Slashdot Mirror


Spaceballs Could Invade Mars

Byteme writes: "CNN reports giant tethered inflatable balls that are being developed by NASA as a potential alternative to the unsuccessful roving robots. The balls apparently will inflate and deflate to catch favorable wind directs and to stop on location. Not quite the fast, cheap and out-of-control solution... but it could be fun to watch!" I wonder if there are any MPEGs of the test this article talks about -- it sounds pretty fun to watch.

194 comments

  1. Spaceballs! by flikx · · Score: 4, Funny

    Aw shit, there goes the planet!

    --
    One future, two choices. Oppose them or let them destroy us.
    1. Re:Spaceballs! by obi327 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Megamaid! She's gone from suck to blow!

      --
      The dog got loose on my computer, and now there's XP all over the screen. -Paul www.ploeb.net
    2. Re:Spaceballs! by pkimball · · Score: 1

      this seems to be the thing we need to fix our ENGINEERS arithmetic vagaries.

    3. Re:Spaceballs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thanks for making the blindingly obvious joke that every single Slashdot reader thought of the moment they saw the headline.

    4. Re:Spaceballs! by PaxTech · · Score: 2

      When contacted to determine the achievable velocity of the balls, NASA engineers could only describe their speed as "Ludicrous".

      --
      All movements for social change begin as missions, evolve into businesses, and end up as rackets.
    5. Re:Spaceballs! by vslashg · · Score: 1

      "Careful, you idiot. I said a funny post, not a blatant one."

      "Sorry, sir. Doing my best."

      "Who gave that man an account?"

      "I did, sir. He's my cousin."

      "Who is he?"

      "He's a Karma Whore, sir."

      "I know that. What's his name?"

      "That is his name, sir. Karma Whore... Major Karma Whore."

      "And his cousin?"

      "He's a Karma Whore, too, sir. Gunner's mate, first class Karma Whore flikx."

      "How many Karma Whores have we got on this site, anyhow?"

      " YO! "

      I knew it. I'm surrounded by Karma Whores. Keep posting, Whores!"

    6. Re:Spaceballs! by Rand+Race · · Score: 1
      You really are a Spaceball aren't you?

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    7. Re:Spaceballs! by erpbridge · · Score: 1

      My God! They've gone to PLAID!

    8. Re:Spaceballs! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Somebody HAD to do it. I'm only surprised it wasn't at the top of the page sorted by score then date/time.

    9. Re:Spaceballs! by Svartalf · · Score: 2

      "No, no, no, not that!"

      "Yes... THAT !"

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    10. Re:Spaceballs! by Svartalf · · Score: 2

      I HATE it when I blow a quote...

      "No, no, no, not that...anything but that!"

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  2. May the Schwartz be with you! by Microsift · · Score: 1

    Schwartz Schmartz its all a bunch of mumbo jumbo to me kid.

    --
    My other sig is extremely clever...
  3. european union? by nilstar · · Score: 3, Funny

    Are you sure this 'space ball' idea isn't the work of the european space agency... because those things look like giant soccer balls. Could you imagine the soccer riots that british and german soccer fan astronauts could get into when they finally land on mars! :)

    --
    ===> An eye for an eye makes everyone blind - MG
    1. Re:european union? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      (in an English accent) "Give me all your money! I've got a soccer ball!"

      "Shit, Ian, that's a Spalding! He's serious!"

  4. Just a warmup mission by zulux · · Score: 2, Funny

    They have to start out at Mars; If they jumped directly to Spaceballs on Uranus, it would scare the US Taxpayer into calling their congress-critter.

    --

    Moneyed corporations, non-working 'poor' and criminal prisoners are turning productive citizens into tax-slaves.

  5. Scotty beamed me twi . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ok well that one doesn't work in this case

  6. Spaceballs? Oh, not the movie! by sachachua · · Score: 1
    Sheesh. First thing I thought of was that excellent parody, Spaceballs...


    ... use the schwartz indeed.

  7. Learning from mistakes by VertigoAce · · Score: 1

    It's cool that this idea came out of their failed test of a more traditional rover. Some of the best lessons are learned by seeing what doesn't work. Although it would have been a bit disappointing to have been the guy that designed the rover. His design broke, but at least the wheel worked!

  8. bawls by Trollificus · · Score: 0

    Spaceballs give me warm bawls.

    --

    "People should be allowed to keep midgets as pets."
    - Gov. Jesse Ventura

  9. Umm... by GiorgioG · · Score: 1

    Is it just me - I thought this had already been thought of. Hell, Mission to Mars or The Red Planet (one of those movies) - they do something very similar. Seems like this really shouldn't be a story on /. Oh well...

  10. And in today's headlines... by dmatos · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...Martians across the globe are boarding up their windows, in anticipation of the thousands of so-called "soccer hooligans" on their way to see the semi-final match.

    Residents are advised to stay off the streets, and if meeting one of these British soccer fans, not to claim loyalty to any particular team.

    Well, at least it's innovative. Gotta admit that.

    --

    It may look like I'm doing nothing, but I'm actively waiting for my problems to go away.
    --Scott Adams
  11. I wonder if there are any MPEGs of the test by anotherone · · Score: 4, Funny
    I wonder if there are any MPEGs of the test this article talks about -- it sounds pretty fun to watch.
    Well, Morpheous lists 129 video matches for "spaceballs", so I guess so. Get downloading!
    --
    Username taken, please choose another one.
  12. anyone else having "Prisoner" flashbacks? by jpellino · · Score: 3, Funny

    giant intelligent inflated ball... "rover"... aiiiiiiieeeeee!!!!!

    --
    "Win treats sysadmins better than users. Mac treats users better than sysadmins. Linux treats everyone like sysadmins."
    1. Re:anyone else having "Prisoner" flashbacks? by British · · Score: 3, Funny

      The idea for the "rover" ball in the Prisoner was inspired by a weather baloon. It was originaly supposed to be a robot, but it failed.

      Scary to think that The Prisoner technology(cmon, a bouncing ball?) has now come to life.

    2. Re:anyone else having "Prisoner" flashbacks? by MrCreosote · · Score: 1

      No, but I had a 'Dark Star' flashback.

      --
      MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
    3. Re:anyone else having "Prisoner" flashbacks? by Chelloveck · · Score: 2

      Orange alert!



      We want... information.

      You can't have it!

      By hook or by crook, we will.

      --
      Chelloveck
      I give up on debugging. From now on, SIGSEGV is a feature.
    4. Re:anyone else having "Prisoner" flashbacks? by jibs · · Score: 1

      Definitely! And only us loyal fans know the password to call it off!

      Here's a picture taken by the scientists in the secret labs at NASA...
      http://www.retroweb.com/prisoner/prisx05r.jpg

      :)
      I am not a number, I am a FREE MAN!
      aaahahahahahahahahahahahhaaa!

    5. Re:anyone else having "Prisoner" flashbacks? by Masem · · Score: 2
      From what I've read, the producers had built an amphibious robot to be Rover for the Prisoner; it performed excellently in all the land tests. So they took it to the water... where it promptly sank and ruined it.


      Rumor has it that as the robot sank, they looked up in desparation, saw a weather balloon, and inspiration hit.

      --
      "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
      "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
  13. Megamaid by obi327 · · Score: 1

    "Megamaid! She's gone from suck to blow!"

    --
    The dog got loose on my computer, and now there's XP all over the screen. -Paul www.ploeb.net
  14. wow by kaxman · · Score: 1

    Can you imagine what the camera view from inside that beachball would look like?

    Not to mention the fact that someone is going to get pissed at NASA for copying the shape of the "ball" and will slap some kind of MOMCA (material objects millenium copyright act) shit on them.

    Doh!

    --
    Everyone on slashdot has a journal.
  15. Makes for some bad PR though... by moniker_21 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I like the idea of a sperical object not having to worry about getting hung up on rocks and all, but what are they going to announce?

    "We have successfully landed our balls on Mars!"

    and in a notoriously bad quote

    "Remote vehicle landing specialist John Doe says he feels so lucky to have his job in that he gets to play with NASA's balls everyday."

    Sorry, but that just sounds wrong.

    --
    I posted to /. and all I got was this stupid sig
    1. Re:Makes for some bad PR though... by snilloc · · Score: 1
      "Remote vehicle landing specialist John Doe says he feels so lucky to have his job in that he gets to play with NASA's balls everyday."

      <duck voice>
      Just roll them around...
      </duck voice>

    2. Re:Makes for some bad PR though... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHAHA....that mp3 was the best thing I ever downloaded off Napster :)

  16. I can see it now by CptnKirk · · Score: 4, Funny

    NASA builds this huge ball that can roll over anything. Packs it with cameras and sensors. Launches the thing from way behind the three point line, and gets it to Mars. Only then do they realize the ball is opaque!

    1. Re:I can see it now by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 1

      No, it's shaped like a puffed up soccer ball, and they put the cameras in the corners between the sections.

  17. For the uninitiated . . . by m_chan · · Score: 1

    Once upon a time warp. . . .

    In a galaxy very, very, very, very, far away, there lived a ruthless race of beings known as . . . Spaceballs.

    The evil leaders of Planet Spaceball, having foolishly squandered their precious atmosphere, have devised a secret plan to take every breath of air away from their peace-loving neighbor, Planet Druidia.


    and, just because this is too much fun . . .

    Spaceballs?

    Oh shit, there goes the planet.

  18. spaceballs are fast... by BOFslime · · Score: 1

    "Not quite the fast, cheap and out-of-control solution..."

    What are you talking about, spaceball's are fast!
    And not even a robot could contol traveling at ludicrous speed!



    "I see your schwartz is as big as mine!"

    1. Re:spaceballs are fast... by Byteme · · Score: 1

      True, they are fast... but I was speaking of Rodney Brooks' solution.

  19. space ballz by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    one thing programming + life has taught me: the simpler the plan is, the less likely it is to fail.

    if its complicated, break it down, damn it! make it simple.

    example: relationships with females --- complicated and confusing. the result: crashes more often than the latest version of netscape. (6 or 4.7x, take your pick)

    example 2: playing with yourself when you are bored. never fails, more rocksolid than the latest stable release of freebsd.

    if it's simple, it'll probably work.

  20. Balloon??? by DESADE · · Score: 1

    Wouldn't a balloon be better for this? Rather than inflate a big ball around the equipment, just attacth a balloon and inflate it when you need to move to another location.

    1. Re:Balloon??? by Skapare · · Score: 2

      That was my first thought. It would be more mobile that way.

      --
      now we need to go OSS in diesel cars
    2. Re:Balloon??? by Glytch · · Score: 2

      Nice idea in theory, but Mars' atmosphere is much thinner than Earth's. One would need a damn big balloon to lift a payload of any practical size. Researchers working on airplanes for use on Mars have similiar problems.

    3. Re:Balloon??? by Caid+Raspa · · Score: 2

      The ball has some advantages when compared to a balloon:

      The payload can be much larger, as there is no need to actually make it fly.

      Control of the balloon is probably much harder.

  21. Marking up the terrain on Mars. by BierGuzzl · · Score: 2
    Well, Martian lovers everywhere will now have new evidence to point to when it comes to "life on Mars" ... Roads wide enough to accomodate a small house, are subtly but surely impressed all over the planet's surface.

    Or, if there really was anything to learn from the arrangement of the planet's surface, we'd be compromising the integrity of the research by plowing it all over (however gently we may do it with this massive lightweight ball)

    1. Re:Marking up the terrain on Mars. by Kronus · · Score: 1

      No need to call out MarsFirst. Any trails these things might leave would last as long in a Martian dust storm as your footprints would on an Earth desert.

  22. Balls transversing the landscape by SilentChris · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I always thought it would be kind of sad if one of the celestial bodies we explored actually HAD intelligent life, and we kept on sending satelites over it and robotic probes over the surface.

    A few Pathfinders are one thing, but can you imagine if an alien ship came above New York City, dropped house-sized balls and had them "blow around in the wind"? Say there is a living creature on one of these planets that is small enough to be crushed by one of these things, but measurably intelligent? The balls seem like overkill.

    1. Re:Balls transversing the landscape by vulg4r_m0nk · · Score: 1


      But if there happens to be a giant dog ...

    2. Re:Balls transversing the landscape by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Say there is a living creature on one of these planets that is small enough to be crushed by one of these things, but measurably intelligent? The balls seem like overkill.

      Of course! But we won't know for sure that there's small, intelligent life on Mars until we peel their tiny, dead bodies off our balls.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    3. Re:Balls transversing the landscape by yomegaman · · Score: 1

      ...named Clifford?

      --
      ...wearing a skin-tight topless leather jumpsuit, with cutaway buttocks and transparent crotch panel.
  23. NASA needs to distribute its exploration by crimoid · · Score: 1


    I keep waiting for NASA to come up with a technology that is cheap, automated and can be deployed in vast numbers.

    To oversimplify the issue: drop a few dozen/hundred/whatever floaty, bouncy balls all over Mars and kick back and let the data roll in. Sure some of the balls will be lost, but as long as a few do their job the mission will succeed.

    Sure there are weight issues getting all these things over there, but if the probes were simple enough their and ther numbers large enough I'd imagine that they'd be more successful than other probes have been.

    1. Re:NASA needs to distribute its exploration by Caid+Raspa · · Score: 4, Interesting
      drop a few dozen/hundred/whatever floaty, bouncy balls all over Mars and kick back and let the data roll in.

      That is something I would like to see. Rapid exploration of large parts of the Martian surface, and not only a few small pathces here and there every two years. Currently we are stuck with the latter.

      Cheap and vast numbers are equivalent. I think the costs of any new space equipment is mainly research and development. After it is done, you can make dozens of units with a price that is small when compared to the initial costs.

      Launch costs are still the biggest problem of space operations, and this has nothing to do with that.

  24. Kinda old news, but oh well by Dutchie · · Score: 1
    I read about this a few months ago on JPL's website.



    Check out Big Wheels too, that also seems like a neat little rover.

    --
    • Imagination is more important than knowledge.

      • -- Albert Einstein
    1. Re:Kinda old news, but oh well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      the big wheels rover was the inspiration for the tumbleweed rover

      doi....

  25. Red Dwarf by Jarvo · · Score: 3, Funny

    This reminds me of the polymorph from Red Dwarf (BBC TV) series.

    At one point, the shape-changer flips through different object shapes until it settles on a basketball and goes bouncing down a corridor.

    Now all we need are robots that can mimic shrinking boxer shorts and we're set!

  26. How ironic by 6EQUJ5 · · Score: 3, Funny


    NASA has no balls, and now they come up with this...

    --

  27. More information from NASA by Skyfire · · Score: 5, Informative

    Alright, here is a link with a little more info and a couple more pictures:
    http://mars.jpl.nasa.gov/missions/behind/tumblewee d1.html

    And here is a place with a video of a test(Realplayer):
    http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/videos/technology/tumblewe ed_rovers.html

    --
    Do not go gentle into that good night. Rage, rage against the dying of the light.
    1. Re:More information from NASA by MagicM · · Score: 1

      Wow! It's a round object that gets inflated, which causes it to not only roll around, but also bounce! I'm so glad they put up a video, or else I would never have believed it.

      What will they think of next...

  28. What for? by nihilogos · · Score: 1, Troll

    Mars doesn't have any atmosphere to speak of.

    --
    :wq
    1. Re:What for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, you were just speaking of Mars' atmosphere by making that comment, therefore rendering it false.

    2. Re:What for? by core10k · · Score: 1

      Very good! Now you know why people believe in God.

    3. Re:What for? by Scott+Robinson · · Score: 1
      Mars doesn't have any atmosphere to speak of.

      Minus those seasonal storms? Or that whole state sized hurricane/tornado?

      Oh, I remember laughing at Red Planet with the tents on Mars! That whole atmospheric pressure thing...

      Scott.

  29. How does it, um work? by MasterOfDisaster · · Score: 1
    what kind of payload do these things take? are we talking 2 or 3 pounds? 50 pounds? cause, i could see earth based use for things like this if they could cary some cargo
    also..they seem to roll...where is the camera pointing? and what exactly is to keep the equipment from getting shock damage? it sounds like this thing would get shook up pretty good...

    NASA's faster! cheaper! mindset has gotten us some nice stuff, this could be more of it.

    --
    The opinions in this post are ficticious. Any similarity to actual opinions, real or imagined, is purely coincidental.
  30. Re:Sorry, broken link by core10k · · Score: 1

    Thw path is grey! Now shut up.

  31. Anybody else think of.... by Atrax · · Score: 1
    --
    Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
    1. Re:Anybody else think of.... by bogasity · · Score: 1

      This was the first thing I thought of also. The video looks almost exactly like Rover - I almost expected Patrick McGoohan to start running down the beach. If the Prisoner movie ever gets made, the producers can hit up JPL for the technology.

  32. Concentrating on the wrong thing ... by Enonu · · Score: 2

    Ok, I'm Mr. Joe schmoe here who is relatively unimpressed with NASA. It seems like we've hit a dead end or perhaps rather slowed down to a snails pace when it comes to space and planetary exploration. Why aren't we concentrating on simply getting a large payload up into space? Perhaps if payload wasn't such a large factor, we wouldn't have to depend on inventions like "Spaceballs." Isn't it something like $10000 a pound for space shuttle cargo? Utterly rediculous IMHO.

    1. Re:Concentrating on the wrong thing ... by Glytch · · Score: 2

      Maybe it would be more practical in the long run to just work on a way to produce what we need in space, instead of hauling everything up.

      Time to go mining Cruithne, perhaps. :)

    2. Re:Concentrating on the wrong thing ... by Caid+Raspa · · Score: 2
      Why aren't we concentrating on simply getting a large payload up into space? Isn't it something like $10000 a pound for space shuttle cargo? Utterly rediculous IMHO.

      The 'better, faster, cheaper' has concentrated too much on the 'cheaper', or 'what programs will be (ex?)terminated', mainly as all these budget cuts have forced them to. 'Faster', or 'get before the next budget cut) is also stressed a lot, but I think they have not concentrated on 'better', expect in the 'pretty pictures' field. However, I have not seen a radical restructuring that would be a consequence of a new choice on priorities. I feel NASA has lost the initiative and is mainly reacting to outside political pressure.

      Considering that the Shuttle is almost 20 years old, USA should have something better. The research on better launchers is extremely expensive, and it will not produce nice pictures that are important to the average politician (and voter). Given all the NASA budget cuts we keep on hearing we will not likely see any significant improvement in American launchers for a long time. I think NASA is also more interested in doing something with the present launchers. If NASA uses all it's money on launcher development, they might notice their budget has been cut to zero when they have the cheaper launchers.

      I have heard that the Russians are seriously considering reviving the Buran program. (For the uninformed, Buran is the Russian Space Shuttle that has been tested succesfully in the Soviet times. It has been even in orbit. Now, it is mothballed somewhere in Siberia. One model is in a park in Moscow) Buran has some improvements when compared to the Shuttle, most important ones being: reusable launcher strap-on boosters and full remote control (a crew can be on board, but it can also fly unmanned). It has also plenty of smaller improvements, which make it easier to maintain.

      Currently, Buran payload is only slightly larger than what Shuttle can manage, but the Russians claim that with minor modifications, they could almost double the payload. If they revive Buran, it has a payload price less than half of what Shuttle has.

      If Buran is revived, I hope some people in Washington will notice that a few years ago USA had a 15-year advantage in the launcher race, but has lost it already. The Europeans have Ariane V (which is still getting improved), Russians will probably have Buran soon, and USA is still stuck with the old Shuttle. Now we all three are even, but in a few decades USA will be holding the 2nd or 3rd position.

  33. mars probes by Script0r · · Score: 1

    We should send This Thing over.

  34. Check this out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    http://sports.espn.go.com/ncf/recruiting/recruit?r ecruit_id=2034


    The San Jose State collegiate football team has a player named Ethan Allen! Isn't that a riot?! I bet his team mates make all kinds of jokes like:

    • "Dude, you really paint the red zone!"
    • "I'm really thinking about Enamel, but I've heard that Latex offers many advanteges. What are they?"
    And many others!! I hope you had a good laugh like me. That name is almost as bad as Asswipe or Malda.
    1. Re:Check this out! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You talk like a man that has never seen Milton Bradley play baseball.

  35. Mel's Now Stellar Career by Webz · · Score: 1

    Wow, those Martians are gonna have a laugh riot!

    "The Schwartz!"

  36. Use the Schwartz! by Plasmoid · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Oh no, not spaceballs. There goes the neighbourhood!

    --
    You don't exist. Go away. --SysVinit Halt
  37. Hmmm... by Atrax · · Score: 3, Funny

    The rolling Mars robot could reach speeds of 35 km/h (22 mph) and come to a halt by releasing gas.



    And I though only conversations could be brought to a halt by a release of gas....

    --
    Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
  38. Just a rip off of the zorb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This looks uncannilly similiar to pictures of the Zorb

  39. Mars to Earth... by ErikTheRed · · Score: 2

    Are your balls are belong to us...

    (Sorry, but somebody had to say it)...

    --

    Help save the critically endangered Blue Iguana
    1. Re:Mars to Earth... by serial+frame · · Score: 1
      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!

      Oh, wait...Hold on. *zip*

      --

      -
      And the Angel said unto me, "These are the cries of the carrots! The cries of the carrots!"
  40. Re:How dare you by Ibby · · Score: 2, Insightful

    First man? Yeah, Yuri Gagarin is a fine American name... :P

    Now, go read a history book and find out why your White House is white... :P

    --
    Karma: Good. I'm hoping in the same way as pizza is 'good'...
  41. Where oh where is Mel Brooks? by Miriku+chan · · Score: 1

    I can totally see those things cruising through the cosmos with the "WE'RE THE SPACEBALLS!" song from the movie blasting

    cut to a winnabego orbiting round mars watching the approach on radar. . .

    i need to go to bed


    --
    shaolin punk, activist post-industrial
  42. ad from hell by core10k · · Score: 1

    Am I the only one that thinks that the Open Source Database Summit has the worst ad, ever? That guy is fucking nasty looking. And what's this bullshit about next-gen techniques (or whatever the fuck it said), as if open source would ever lead fuck all.

  43. Huh? by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

    Hmmm... so NASA wants to develop balls that will inflate, move freely around in the wind, and deflate.

    Does anyone see anything wrong with that sentence?

  44. a really thin atmosphere by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    Considering the Density of the martian atmosphere, those things are going to have to be very big, and very light.

    If I recall correctly, the atmosphere of mars is one percent of that of earth. Which basically means that for the wind to have as much effect on you as a one mile an hour breeze, it has to be going one hundred miles an hour.

    An example of this is the effect on dust in the atmosphere. The normal winds are simply not adequate to raise dust in any way. So the question then is, where do the famous martian dust storms come from? The answer seems to be meteor impacts, which would throw up enough junk into the atmosphere that it could take a while to clear out and settle down.

    And so the red surface of the face of Mars makes more sense, when you imagine the impact of iron dust from the core thrown up and attracting all the free O2 in the atmosphere.

    - - -
    Radio Free Nation
    is a general news site based on Slash Code
    "If You have a Story, We have a Soap Box"
    - - -

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  45. Not impossible by Goonie · · Score: 2
    On Earth, the Helios solar-powered plane reached nearly 100,000 feet. A manned balloon has reached 121,000 feet, and unmanned balloons have undoubtedly gone considerably higher without the weight of life support gear for a crew. Atmospheric pressures at these altitudes are comparable to the pressure at Mars datum altitude. You've also got to remember that payloads way only about 1/3 as much on Mars, considerably reducing the lift required.

    So, yes, it's a considerable challenge to fly a balloon, let alone a plane, in the Martian atmosphere, but it's not impossible.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:Not impossible by BradleyUffner · · Score: 2

      Have you seen the size of this Helios thing? It would have to fit into something that could survive the trip into space and entering the Martian atmosphere. Not to mention that Helios looks extreamly fragile. I'm sure the upper winds here on earth and mighty rough, but Mars is a planet that has year round hurricanes the size of which we would never see here on earth.

  46. just what we need! by xcjohn · · Score: 1

    "Just what we need! A Druish princess!"

    --
    ~~~ They call me Little John, but don't let the name fool you...in real life I'm very big.
  47. A conversation heard recently at NASA... by tswinzig · · Score: 2

    Dark Helmet: Who is he?

    Colonel Sandurz: He's an asshole, sir.

    Dark Helmet: I know that! What's his name?

    Colonel Sandurz: That is his name, sir. Asshole, Major Asshole!

    Dark Helmet: And his cousin?

    Colonel Sandurz: He's an asshole, too, sir. Gunner's first mate, Phillip Asshole.

    Dark Helmet: How many assholes we got on this ship, anyhow?

    Most of Crew: (raising hands) YO!

    (beat)

    Dark Helmet: I knew it! I'm surrounded by assholes!

    (helmet goes down)

    Dark Helmet: Keep firing, assholes!

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  48. Is it just me, by bendude · · Score: 1

    or does the thought of NASA trying to drop giant balls onto the Martian suface hillarious to everyone?

    The scientists think such a probe could use its own natural bounce to cushion a landing on Mars or other bodies in the solar system with favorable atmosphere and gravity conditions

    Just try and prevent any "mis-calculations" that may result in one of those Super-bouncy balls, guys.

    --


    Get the Hell off my planet, you slimy mobster Bush!
  49. Pictures of it! by FFFish · · Score: 2

    I believe I've found [some pictures] of the NASA prototype!

    --

    --
    Don't like it? Respond with words, not karma.
    1. Re:Pictures of it! by Atrax · · Score: 1

      403 forbidden...

      --
      Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
  50. Just to let you know by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Planetary Society [www.planetary.org] was trying to help in achieving this way back in the 90s. The balloon was supposed to go to Mars. Then something happened, I think the probe crashed or something and the balloon never made it there.

    (And this question is offtopic) How do we know that all images from Mars are available... I mean, all it takes is to make the ground station where the data is received to garble it when it hits "forbidden coordinates"

  51. Re:I hate to be a nitpicker... by CeramicNuts · · Score: 1

    soccer is short for Association Football. so you're not a nitpicker this time. ;)

  52. Spacesuits for Goalposts? by Atrax · · Score: 2, Insightful

    far cry from small astronauts on the moon, spacesuits for goalposts, mortal fear of russians. Who can blame them? Mission controllers in the hutch, hmm? Possibly, don't quote me on that. But, you know, haven't we failed the youth? Haven't given them a postive direction. Self respect. Self belief. I can do it. I can do it. I can do it, I can do it, I can really move, from my head right down to my blue suede moonboots. Isn't it? Rubettes, 1973? Marvellous.





    If you're not british, you probably won't get it


    --
    Screw you all! I'm off to the pub
  53. How 'bout doing it here first? by cybermage · · Score: 2

    As this story about Fossett demonstrates, we cannot even fly lighter-than-air craft around this planet with any sort of reliability and precision. What makes us think we can do it remotely around another planet? I guess if we don't care where it lands after take off, then ok.

    1. Re:How 'bout doing it here first? by hawkfan · · Score: 1

      Fossett has ignored a major problem with his trip. As wealthy as he is, he doesn't have the resources that are required for this trip.

      Think NASCAR balloons.

  54. Dark Star by MrCreosote · · Score: 1

    the 'beach ball' monster

    --
    MrCreosote Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump!Meow!Thump! "You're right! There isn't enough room to swing a cat in here!"
  55. Typo in the original article by flacco · · Score: 1
    There's a type in the original article. This:

    JPL researchers came up with the idea after another experimental rover failed during testing.

    ...should actually read:

    JPL researchers came up with the idea after another experiment with the NASA SpaceBong 4000.

    --
    pr0n - keeping monitor glass spotless since 1981.
  56. I wonder... by quintessent · · Score: 2

    ...if they'll find life on Mars.

  57. Dennis Miller quotient... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...as Dr. Frink would say. Only one in a million will get that joke!

  58. BALLS! by jsse · · Score: 1

    Balls! NASA shows us their balls! That's it! Can't they think of our children?! What'd they think when they see that?! We have enough trouble with all the kidnapping, rape, torture, and child p0rns caused by Yahoo!, now NASA show our children their BALLS!

    What would become of our children! Oh my God, oh my God.....

  59. Quick, get me the video of Spaceballs: The Movie! by sconeu · · Score: 2


    But will they travel at LUDICROUS SPEED?

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  60. Will they comb Mars too? by antdude · · Score: 2

    What's next? Comb?

    "Comb the desert!"
    "We ain't found sh*t!"

    From Spaceballs movie. I hope I got the lines right...

    --
    Ant(Dude) @ Quality Foraged Links (AQFL.net) & The Ant Farm (antfarm.ma.cx / antfarm.home.dhs.org).
  61. Unforseen technical difficulties by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 2

    If one ball hangs lower than the other, how will that affect reentry?

  62. More information in "Space Blimps" article earlier by DaphneDiane · · Score: 1

    Sorry about this, but there is an earlier article that talks about nearly the same thing.
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=01/06/15/154923 5&mode=nested

    (Aside, I noticed search in Slashdot seems to be running very slow since the switch to banjo.)

  63. Prisoner by TheKAVH · · Score: 1

    Seems like someone at NASA stayed up watchin Prisoner re-runs.

  64. nanotubes by Gnea · · Score: 1

    tension cords would work, but with nanotubes just around the corner, it might be feasible to use those. with a soft shell with a stronger inner-shell to absorb and distribute outside pressure, and at the core would be the technical side, it could be used to control mass distribution, allowing it to be steered in a general direction (depending on the wind speed, etc). It wouldn't be a precise turn like the rovers, but it would be better than going aimless. :) of course, someone could up with a better idea for all i know ;)

  65. I know its a big detail in the article but... by Nathdot · · Score: 1

    could you all not say "balls" so much please.

  66. No. by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The pressure of wind is proportional to the square of the windspeed relative to whatever its hitting. Martian winds are faster than on Earth. This thing doesn't have to be light either. Changes in the weight would affect acceleration, but have little impact on the top speed.

    1. Re:No. by Captain+Bonzo · · Score: 1
      The pressure of wind is proportional to the square of the windspeed
      relative to whatever its hitting. Martian winds are faster than on Earth

      Don't forget that as the density of the atmosphere on Mars is rather
      lower than on Earth, this will counteract much of the effect of the faster
      winds.

      Faster winds --> more kinetic energy imparted.

      But...

      Less air hitting the ball --> less kinetic energy imparted.

      I assume the NASA people can do the sums correctly (as long as they
      decide in advance if they are working in metric or imperial measures).

    2. Re:No. by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 1

      Yes, but the faster winds will allow for a better top speed, even if the acceleration is crappy.

    3. Re:No. by Captain+Bonzo · · Score: 1
      Yes, but the faster winds will allow for a better top speed, even if the acceleration is crappy.

      Fair point. I misinterpreted your earlier comment, sorry.

  67. Stupidest idea theyve ever had by bug1 · · Score: 1

    I cant believe they would go through with something like this.

    There is a force... called gravity !

    This idea that the thing they call a "ball", will roll DOWNHILL due to gravity.

    Common, you think wind is going to blow these up ontopof mountain ranges (hehe), or down into valleys.

    The shape of a ball doesnt exactly lend itself to catching the wind either.

    It will probably endup rolling down to a spot sheltered from the wind and stay their forever.

    1. Re:Stupidest idea theyve ever had by drnomad · · Score: 1

      The article states clearly that these balls run uphill too. Hey, it now does actually become interesting right?

    2. Re:Stupidest idea theyve ever had by bug1 · · Score: 1

      So when does this superball climb everest ?

      Wind doesnt always blow uphill

      Be realistic, they dont have a hope in hell of sitting this thing ontop of hill and it not eventually rolling down.

      Maybe it could climb a small altitude in strong wind, but they have no hope of exerting any real control of this thing by deflating and inflating it.

      They have lost the plot.

  68. So now what are we going to see? by krmt · · Score: 2

    How much you want to bet there'll be a few "NASA Ate My Balls" pages thrown up over this?

    --

    "I may not have morals, but I have standards."

  69. Oh no they can't... by plaa · · Score: 2

    Mars is going to take care of any Spaceballs landing there... Unless, of course, they take along a CD of that awful creaking music.

    --

    I doubt, therefore I may be.
  70. Just like "Red Planet" by Parsley+Sage · · Score: 1
    In the movie, the intrepid crew abandon their mother ship and crash onto the surface of Mars in something looking like a bathysphere. To survive the hard landing the bathysphere has an inflated geodesic buffer.


    Is this a similar idea ?

  71. Why Mars? by E-Rock-23 · · Score: 1

    Why are we so worried about Mars when we have a moon here we could be colonizing. That might help a wee bit in both Mars missions and general space observations. Kind of a jumping off point. We more or less have the technology (if 1969 put us there for a visit). NASA should take the tagline from another four letter company and "Just Do It"

    --
    Blog Prophyts - Right On, Man
    1. Re:Why Mars? by Caid+Raspa · · Score: 2
      I am also a member of the 'Moon 1st' crowd. We have most of the tehcnology and money, and some recent missions (Clementine, Lunar Prospector) have given us plenty of new information. ESA's new mission SMART-1 will be the next step (launch in October 2002), mapping most of the Moon in several wavelengths from IR to X-rays, with a resolution of down to 50 meters in the optical. It will give us a map on the distribution of the Lunar resources.

      In a few years we will be able to select the optimum place for the first Lunar base. After that, we should send a few robotic landers to study the places in more detail. And after that, we should get a base over there. I think it would take less than one decade to get the base there. Perhaps we should start lobbying the politicians, as otherwise they will do nothing.

    2. Re:Why Mars? by Kronus · · Score: 1

      While a lunar colony would be cool, there's no way it will be financially feasible any time in the remotely near future. Even if there is water and oxygen trapped in the rocks somewhere, it would take tons of equipment to extract and process it. And while this is going on the colonists would need full life support. That includes food, air, water, and shelter. It currently costs about $10,000 a pound just to get something into orbit. I'm not sure how much it would cost to get something to the moon, but it wouldn't surprise me if it was 10 times that much. We're easily talking in the trillions of dollars here. And for what benefits? Surely none that would convince the tax payers who are fitting the bill.

  72. The Prisoner On Mars by Enygma42 · · Score: 1

    Big balls bouncing along, is this not copyright infringement? Where's my lawyer?

    --
    "hehe, website" - Homer Simpson
  73. "Unsuccessful roving robots?" by sph · · Score: 1

    So, which one of the roving robots sent to Mars was unsuccessful? For a little reminder, here's complete list of them to help pick the unsuccessful ones: Mars Pathfinder. Yes, that's the only one, and as far as I can remember it didn't crash, burn, or otherwise vaporize.

    Am I the only one who's tired of this endless NASA bashing? Sure, their success rate at doing something completely new and revolutionary isn't 100%, but whose is? Still, only the occasional failures gain big media attention, while the numerous and constant successes have no wide interest, because they do not involve expensive equipment being destroyed, explosions or aliens.

    1. Re:"Unsuccessful roving robots?" by Malic · · Score: 1

      Too true! I had the opportunity to watch the live JPL mission center broadcast for the Pathfinder mission on NASA TV in Florida. Simply put, it was obviously one of the most successful interplanetary projects ever. A lot of good ideas (and a bit of very good luck) is what put it there for the cost of two Hollywood blockbuster summer films.

      The public keeps forgetting - this is science. Success or failure - you still can learn something.

      --
      I swear by MacOS X. Although I use to swear *at* MacOS 9...
  74. Finally some good headlines by HongPong · · Score: 2

    See, that sort of headline is the kind of thing that could raise slashdot to a new level. No more of this "IBM Wants Linux" drivel. Clever, makes a geek culture reference AND is accurate. I say, CT, put a few more seconds of thought into your headlines. Kudos!

  75. ALTAIR by six809 · · Score: 1

    Sounds a bit like the ALTAIR - a research project at Aberystwyth University (Wales).

  76. Re:Umm... life imitating art? by capsteve · · Score: 1

    okay, so i'm not the only one tripping... yeah this concept of multiple inflatable bladders tightly surrounding it's precious cargo was used in a movie(s). so which came first, the movie or the jpl concept? i suspect that jpl had the tumbleweed concept first(take a look at the drawing in cnn article, in profile the instrumentation is tiny;sublime) then the movie folks got a hold of it(holds 4 or 5 people in special harness chairs, equipment, the landing party survives the impact landing;ludicrous).

    --
    three can keep a secret, if two are dead - benjamin franklin
  77. Hey! That's 30+ years old technology:) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Besides the Prisoner's deja vu, they already used these spaceballs on the moon :)

  78. Ahem by Captain+WrapAround · · Score: 1

    "Not quite the fast, cheap and out-of-control solution... "

    No, that would be fat, gassy, and out of control.

    Head for the hills, little green men.

  79. "Space Balls" in action. by Odinson · · Score: 2

    It looks like they have worked out some kind of AI Unit to manipulate the ball.
    It looks pretty promising.

  80. ROBUST by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

    using only the thin, but robust, winds of Mars.

    Ok this has got to stop, if I hear the word "robust" one more freaking time im going to have a non-synergetic event of proactive office buzz lingo breakdown. Can these drones not scribe inventive and original prose? Why does everything I read sound like its been poured through a corp-speak PR sieve?

    Sheesh.

  81. Evil company by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.ibmandtheholocaust.com/

  82. Real prototype by harriv · · Score: 1

    Automation lab of Helsinki University of Techonology has already made football sized prototype of rolling robot. It's kind of fun to put it in the middle of the crow and drive it remote controlled ;)

    Here's the URL:
    http://www.automation.hut.fi/research/robotics/b al l/ballrob.htm

  83. Re:How dare you by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

    ...ok - now i have to know why the White House is white. The story sounds very unflattering to Americans... Im sure Ill love it.

    Has it anything to do with the Brits razing it in 1814???

  84. And now, a special report... by jd · · Score: 2
    "I'm here, at the scene of the supposed balloon manufacturing plant, in the Village of Portmerrion. Number 6, how do you feel about Rover going to Mars?"


    "You're one of Number 2's spies, aren't you? Well, I'm not going to tell you. Be seeing you!"

    --
    It's a small world and it smells funny; I'd buy another if it wasn't for the money; Take back what I paid (SoM)
  85. oh $hit, there goes the planet... by 3am · · Score: 1

    what are those things coming out of her nose? ...blah, blah, blah

    obligatory awful quote. sorry.

    --

    A: None. The Universe spins the bulb, and the Zen master merely stays out of the way.
  86. The video reminds me of a day at the beach by Hee+Hee+Hee · · Score: 1
    This video reminds me of a day I spent at the beach as a kid, chasing my beach ball as it blew away across the sand. There was no way I was going to catch it as it approached a highway. I cried my eyes out when it got smashed by a truck.

    Also, I love stories of inspiration like this one. A tire came off and rolled for 3/4 of a mile, and they said "hey! Check that out!" Isn't that how it goes? Your "baby" just disintegrates before your eyes, but as you watch it happen - between sobs - you are smacked in the head with a touch of "genius".

    --
    - Bill
  87. Be seeing you... by barries · · Score: 1

    And when we ship prisoners off planet to small colonies and guard them with these giant roving balls....

    Pennyfarthing bicycles on Mars anyone?

  88. Re:Umm... life imitating art? by erpbridge · · Score: 1

    Actually, if I remember right, Pathfinder (1996?) was surrounded by airbags when it first touched down on Mars.

  89. Hey, I've got an idea! by Uttles · · Score: 1

    Why don't we just build a giant statue-of-liberty-look-a-like spaceship with a vacuum and just suck up everything from the planet, then we'd know if it ever had life!

    --

    ~ now you know
  90. Separated at birth? by finial · · Score: 1

    http://www.jpl.nasa.gov/videos/technology/tumblewe ed_rovers.html

    http://www.retroweb.com/prisoner.html

    What do you want?
    Information!
    You won't get it!
    By hook or by crook, we will!

  91. Research through littering by gelfling · · Score: 2

    Gee that's great.

  92. NASA's Balls by InigoMontoya(tm) · · Score: 1
    Press Release:
    NASA today announced that it will be sending balls to Mars. These balls will be named after the project director and designer, Dr. Ralph Schwetty.

    NASA has expressed interest in putting its Schwetty balls on another planet, saying "here is a planet we haven't had our balls bouncing on yet." NASA's Schwetty Balls will roam free, bouncing about, rolling, and blowing freely in the wind.

    The Coalition of Intelligent Beings on Mars also released a statement, saying: "We are excited to hear that NASA's Schwetty Balls will be coming to our planet. We are looking forward to getting up close and personal with these Balls, and may even taste one or two of NASA's Schwetty Balls to see what they're like."

    Okay, I think this joke is dead now.

    -1 Not Quitting While He's Ahead

    InigoMontoya(tm)

    --
    This signature is self-referential.
  93. Re:How dare you by Fjord · · Score: 2

    If you have to know, the White House is white in order to protect the locally-quarried sandstone used for the exterior against deterioriation. The poster you are replying to is probably confused by
    a popular urban legend, though.

    --
    -no broken link
  94. Interesting name for the invention by loconet · · Score: 1

    "Tumbleweed"

    They tumbled into this idea by tumbling into some of that first

    yes yes ..... that's what you need to smoke to invent stuff like this.

    --
    [alk]
  95. Re:How dare you by Ibby · · Score: 1

    Urban legend? Not at all, but there's some misinformation about this topic.
    It happened during the war of 1812, not in 1814. When the French and English were fighting north of the border, some Americans figured it would be good to expand their horizons by taking over some more land. This infuriated the French, who were having a bad enough time with the English. A group of French militia from Montreal accompanied by some of the local natives sneaked on down to Washington, and set fire to the White House. It was pink before this. Funny thing, I've never read an American history book or school history text with this story in it. But it's well documented in Canadian, French and English history books. Pick one up and check it out.

    --
    Karma: Good. I'm hoping in the same way as pizza is 'good'...
  96. What?!?!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They found land on mars?!?!

  97. Re:How dare you by Fjord · · Score: 2

    Did you read the link? It doesn't question if the white house was burned down. In fact, it states that it was burned down when Washington was taken in 1814. But it clearly states that it was white before this happened. It even has a quote from a letter in 1811 refering to it as "the White House".

    --
    -no broken link
  98. Hillarious by Telek · · Score: 2

    I'm sorry, but could you imagine being a Martian and watching this thing fall from the sky, bounce, then roll around, deflate, inflate, roll around, etc, etc?? It'd be hillarious!

    But a good idea! =)

    --

    If God gave us curiosity
  99. Houston: we have a problem... by MatthewLovelace · · Score: 1

    Fuck! Even in the future nothing works!!

    --

    ******
    "What makes you think I care about your opinions?"

  100. Spaceballs? by DarkHelmet · · Score: 1

    Oh shit, there goes the planet.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  101. Martian Pinatas! by MyMarty · · Score: 1

    Let's just hope that any martians up there aren't from mexico, don't have blindfolds and are all out of colourful sticks... otherwise NASA's going to be playing host to one hell of a party up there...

  102. Re:How dare you by Ibby · · Score: 1

    Yup. I read it. Did you pick up a history book published outside the US? You might get a different story...
    Considering the French actually burned it, I don't take a lot of stock in small unknown articles I read on the net...

    --
    Karma: Good. I'm hoping in the same way as pizza is 'good'...
  103. Re:How dare you by Fjord · · Score: 2

    Dude, I think you need to pick up a history book. Yes, the war of 1812 was started by the Americans invading what we now call Canada (yes, I'm Canadian). Both the French and the British fought the US in that war because they had land stakes in that area. The war went to December 24, 1814. In 1814, the British took Washington. Undoubtedly there were French militia with them since they were fight with the British in the war.

    Even if we suppose that there is a global conspiracy to cover up a different burning of the White House not in 1814 but during the war of 1812 prior to that which happened during the British occupation of Washington in 1814, it still doesn't explain why there is a letter from 1811 refering to it at the White House (did this burning of the pink house happen both during the war of 1812 and before 1811?). If you don't trust snopes, then the encyclopoedia britannica, which is a British publication, states that the term "White House" was commonly used in 1810.

    Quite frankly, your version of history does not make sence (starting with the sentance "It happened during the war of 1812, not in 1814") because it isn't reality. You were duped by an urban legend. It happens.

    --
    -no broken link
  104. Re:How dare you by Ibby · · Score: 1

    "Dude". Indeed. :P

    --
    Karma: Good. I'm hoping in the same way as pizza is 'good'...
  105. Re:I hate to be a nitpicker... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, the biggest loosers are americans who call a game, where you hardly touches the ball with your feet, football.

    Morons.