Slashdot Mirror


Linux-Based Phone, Snatched From Inferno

elemur writes: "For your linux loving friends with everything, why not get a TuxScreen? This phone is based on the Compaq Linux distribution, normally used on the iPaq. When is the last time you needed to upgrade the packages or distribution on your phone?" A phone with a 640x480 touchscreen and a lot more smarts than "redial" would be an upgrade to most people anyhow -- being able to play games even more.

69 comments

  1. Linux on Fridge by FortKnox · · Score: 1

    Come on...
    This is a dumb marketing ploy. Attempt to get the linux community to buy our phones!
    I don't need the stability of linux on my phone. I have yet to have my phone blue-screen or crash. Its the age old "I got linux on my fridge" cliche...

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Linux on Fridge by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 1

      That's a cliche already..? :-)

      Still, if there was a Doom port on this, I could see it being a good outlet for frustrations/anger after annoying phone calls from telemarketers and the like.. although could you imagine playing Doom on a numeric keypad? :-)

    2. Re:Linux on Fridge by BlackSol · · Score: 1

      Actually my cell phone does crash.

      Its a samsung 3500. If you try to record a voice memo with less than 1/4 battery it locks up - have to pop the battery (hard boot :)

      Ocassionaly it will lock when browsing the phone book or the internet but not consitantly.

      Not that I think I need linux on my cell phone though ....

      --
      $sig=$1 if($brain =~ /idea\s+(.*)/i);
    3. Re:Linux on Fridge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Would you prefer prboom or lxdoom? Both run on the HHLinux iPAQ, there is no reason they wouldn't run on the TuxScreen. Or, if you prefer, there's xmame and xgb (C64) and stella (Atari 2600) and xgb (gameboy) and snes9x and MP3 players and avi/mpg/open divx video and...

      Cpt_Kirks

  2. snatched from inferno? by F2F · · Score: 1

    could someone explain? do you mean 'inferno' as the plan9-based OS from bell-labs?

    1. Re:snatched from inferno? by grahams · · Score: 1

      Yes, these phones, originally developed by Lucent for Phillips ran Inferno.

    2. Re:snatched from inferno? by porttikivi · · Score: 1

      Yes. The phone is built running Inferno. This hack replaces that with Linux. I wonder is there is any rational reason to do so, though. Inferno is much better solution for an embedded OS. Notice how the nifty Inferno interface let's you easily replace the whole bootstrap code via the serial port.

      --
      Anssi Porttikivi / app@iki.fi
    3. Re:snatched from inferno? by iainl · · Score: 1

      I don't know, perhaps they stole it from the discreet, the makers of the video effects program inferno?

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
  3. Just another net appliance... by purduephotog · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And those have sold so well.

    No remote control so I can dial from my couch? Where's the advantage?

  4. Oh boy! by ucblockhead · · Score: 0
    When is the last time you needed to upgrade the packages or distribution on your phone?


    Never.


    I think I'll stick with the plain-old hardwired electronics, thank you very much.

    --
    The cake is a pie
  5. No camera?! by micromoog · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Wait a minute . . . it's a phone with a color screen, but no camera for "videophone" capability? Is this a joke?

    • It's a PDA that's, uh, not portable
    • It's a phone that costs way too much
    • It's a complete overuse of technology
    Gimme a freakin' break, and some freakin' technology that's useful!
    1. Re:No camera?! by alhaz · · Score: 2

      The concept, when it was designed by a now defunct joint venture between philips & lucent, was for it to be an "internet appliance". They only sold a few hundred phones at $600/ea.

      It's a strongarm computer that sits on my coffee table, and a complete overuse of technology. But it's fun.

      --
      This is just like television, only you can see much further.
  6. Linux and Telephony by pgrote · · Score: 5, Informative

    Although some may snicker at the kicthen aspect of the phone, this really does provide a nice platform for Linux telephony.

    Strides are being made in the telephony arena using linux. Bayonne is making great progress:

    http://www.gnu.org/software/bayonne/news.html

    One of the interesting things that people forget is that while VOIP is cool, you can't forget about the phone/automated system interaction for transacation based systems. Lots of market there.

    1. Re:Linux and Telephony by fmaxwell · · Score: 5, Insightful

      this really does provide a nice platform for Linux telephony

      "Linux telephony"? Am I in a Dilbert cartoon about buzzword hell or what? It's a network appliance with a voice modem and a telephone handset. Big friggin' deal. I can just envision conversations like the one below:


      Son: Hi Mom. I'm calling you on a Linux-based telephone.

      Mom: A what?

      Son: A Linux-based telephone. It's a phone with Linux in it. I just started penguin-dial, clicked on your name, and it dialed the phone for me.

      Mom: Oh, like my speed dial buttons...

      Son: No, this has your name on the screen.

      Mom: But I write the names on the labels next to the speed dial buttons.

      Son: This is different. It's like a laptop computer and it was only $99.

      Mom: But we bought you a laptop computer before you went to college. What happened to that? If a $99 one was all you needed, why did your father and I spend $1500?

      Son: I still have the laptop. This one is really slow and has a small screen. Plus, it does not run on batteries so you have to keep it plugged in. So this can't replace the laptop.

      Mom: So if you already have a better computer and your phone worked fine, why did you need that new $100 thing you are using?

      Son: Because it runs Linux.

      Mom: You keep saying that. What's Linux?

      Son: It's like Windows only way better. It's free.

      Mom: So you spent $100 for a computer phone to run a free computer program that gives you speed dial?

      Son: You don't understand. It does much more than that.

      Mom: Like what?

      Son: It has a web browser and word processor and calculator and all kinds of other stuff.

      Mom: But that laptop has all of that, doesn't it.

      Son: Yeah, but it uses Windows and Windows sucks.

      Mom: Then why did you have us get you a computer with Windows?

      Son: Because all of the programs that I need to run for school are on Windows. But it sucks. It's not stable and crashes a lot.

      Mom: So this new "thing" doesn't crash?

      Son: It does, but that's because it has a beta version of Linux on it. Once I have a non-beta version of Linux, it should be more stable than my laptop.

      Mom: So now you will use this new thing and the laptop we spent all of that money on will gather dust?

      Son: No Mom. You just don't understand. Anyway, that's not what I called about. Could you and Dad send me another $100? I need it for books and clothes and stuff.

  7. Hackable? by Lxy · · Score: 1

    The ONLY use I could see for such a device is if you can add a network card and make a nice little X term. Otherwise it only scores point in the "oooohhh" category. Sure, it's fun to have a touch screen phone but unless it can play MP3s and DivX ;-) movies what's the point? And as someone else pointed out, there's no camera, so video conferencing is out of the question.

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
    1. Re:Hackable? by Garion911 · · Score: 1

      It has PCMCIA slots.. Need network access, add it... I'm considering adding a PCMCIA soundcard and using it for MP3's in a room that doesn't have a phone or computer yet.. Right next to my bar, so I can snag drink recipes too....

      --
      Slashdot is like Playboy: I read it for the articles
    2. Re:Hackable? by alhaz · · Score: 2

      It has PCMCIA slots.. Need network access, add it... I'm considering adding a PCMCIA soundcard and using it for MP3's in a room that doesn't have a phone or computer yet.. Right next to my bar, so I can snag drink recipes too....

      Unfortunately linux doesn't support pcmcia sound cards.

      The pcmcia slots in the is2630 are quite badly hacked in. They only support 3.3v cards and cannot send a reset signal to a card. Many 3.3v capable pcmcia cards work, and so far every CF card that's been tried in a pcmcia carrier works.

      I've got a 10/100 nic and a 64 meg cf card in one of mine.

      --
      This is just like television, only you can see much further.
  8. Definity G3 by totallygeek · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    All I want to know is when will I be able to run Linux on my Intuity AUDIX system and Definity G3Si systems? I am sick of Unixware 1 and ATT UNIX. And, something I have never understood is why you have to use a windows program (Definity Site Administrator) to maintain a UNIX system.


    By the way, for anyone out there that wants to be notified when I have it done, I am writing a Site Administrator for Linux. Email me at sellis@totallygeek.com if you want to know more.

    1. Re:Definity G3 by FunkyLinux · · Score: 1

      It might me a bit off-topic, but it is Telephony. Maybe you can upgrade to OpenUNIX 8? Then you can run almost all the Linux binaries you want via the LKP. They will run even faster than on the 'real' Linux kernel too.

      --
      [unclesam@usa /]$ rm -rf /bin/laden
    2. Re:Definity G3 by anothy · · Score: 1

      first off, the current version of the definity software runs on Unixware 2, not Unixware 1. it's a minor improvement, i ran it while it was towards the end of beta. the developer types were looking towards UW 7 already, but who knows what's up with that with the current state of Lucent and here derivatives.
      also, i've run both UW1 and UW2 based Audix systems, and neither one relied on a windows program. i didn't even know such a thing existed. i did all my administration via xterms or on console, using the pre-bundled tool set. nothing special going on.
      and that kinda makes me very uninterested in your Linux work. i mean, if all i'm using now is xterm, why would i want any special program, regardless of platform?

      --

      i speak for myself and those who like what i say.
    3. Re:Definity G3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You don't need to use DSA to administer a Definity OR Intuity.

      Ever tried Telnet?

      -Duh-

    4. Re:Definity G3 by totallygeek · · Score: 1
      xterms or on console, using the pre-bundled tool set. nothing special going on.


      Really?!?!? I would be very interested in this -- I guess I need to speak to my Avaya rep again. They make me connect to AUDIX via 4410 emulation (I have tried to develop something with the Minicom source). I don't have network cards in either the AUDIX or G3, I guess I need some upgrades -- man, that stuff is expensive though. For a CLAN card (network card) to be added to my G3, it will cost over $38,000!

    5. Re:Definity G3 by djrogers · · Score: 2

      Talk to your Avaya SE, he may have a nice NDA for you to sign, but you may like what you'll hear...

      --
      Think outside the... Hey, where'd the friggin' box go?
    6. Re:Definity G3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about your Definity talking to a Telephony switch simulator, with drag and droppable workflows for your calls --- workflows that have access to all the information you hold about that customer based in their DDI, and routing to right person, who gets their information put on screen for them the moment they hit the answer phone button on their screen.
      Try getting a call from your Company President, the software figuring out who it is, and saying Hi Mr President, (We play "Happy birthday Mr President" by Marylin Monroe ) while it transferes you to his secretary, where ever she may be. How about doing anything the fuck you want with your calls, emails and Web Chats routing and writing all the rules in VB ?

      Ask your Avaya rep about Quintus , and get that network card, the reason its so expensive is because its really a mini Cajun Swith for doing Voice over IP.

  9. Fun hack? by kableh · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I work for a company doing a lot of wireless VoIP stuff, and can imagine all sorts of cool stuff you could do with this. Just load up OpenH323 and you have a functioning VoIP phone for anywhere. A guy who works with me has written an open source H323 app for WinCE on the iPAQ, and I bet it would be simple to port to a device like this!

    1. Re:Fun hack? by slickwillie · · Score: 2

      Open source on WinCE? Has your friend read the license agreement? Is that allowed? I'll bet he gets a visit from the M$FT legal team, especially now that you've posted it here. Don't you know they monitor this sight closely for license violations, new ideas to steal, and anti-Microsoft thought-crime?

  10. Nokia 7100 by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 1

    is the phone I considered buying a few months ago. It cost here R$ 799,00 (aprox. US$ 300). I had the money to buy it without caring for the money, but after a second tough I gave up and kept my old 5120, you know why ???

    I have a palm IIIC with a modem that allows me to connect to internet and read mail, I have a desktop at home and at the office for more sofisticated use of the Net, so would I buy a phone with crapy 9.2kbps, black and white small screen when most of the time I'm on the big blue room I DON'T need to be connected ?

    7100 is big end clumsy for a cell phone, is not a decent PDA, and almost worthless as a web browser. I rather have an excelent PDA, with a reasably good web connection and an awesome desktop.

    all-in-one devices usually doesn't perform any of it's individual tasks as good as a dedicated device and in some cases they cost more than buying 3 or 4 separate pieces of hardware, so give me a break.

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
    1. Re:Nokia 7100 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you mean the Nokia Communicator 9200? The colour one with the 620x200 colour screen, and good PDA functionality?

      The 9000 was a black and white version, IIRC.

  11. hello anyone there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1

    hello!!! there are 2 usb ports on the thing.. so what is the problem with adding a usb supported device... come on guys be creative.. I think it is a nice prospect

    1. Re:hello anyone there? by jelliebellie · · Score: 1

      I didn't see any mention of USB ports. PCMCIA and serial, yes, but no USB.
      Plus the PCMCIA slots only support 3.3v cards.

  12. mp3 could be useful!! by CrudPuppy · · Score: 1

    think about it, the caller is unknown and is asked
    to press "1" if he is a sales person and "2" if
    he is not.

    when he presses "1" you have the phone randonly
    choose from a list of insulting songs to play for
    our nice telemarketer ;)

    wonder how long before I'd get sued for infringing
    on his right to not listen to south park tunes...

    --
    A year spent in artificial intelligence is enough to make one believe in God.
  13. The US ... mobile backwater... by MosesJones · · Score: 2, Informative


    Go to Japan, come to Europe. This really isn't news. The nokia communicator http://www.nokia.com/phones/9210/index.html or for you guys next year http://www.nokia.com/phones/9290/index.html does all of that, runs on the rock solid EPOC operating system and is very nice as it runs full Java and a proper rather than cWAP browser (although it does that as well).

    Java's CLDC and CDC profiles address these sort of issues in a device independent mechanism which is critical given the differences in OSes, memory configurations and facilities.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:The US ... mobile backwater... by Xenna · · Score: 1

      I have a 9210 communicator and it's the only PDA worth having for me, but I wouldn't want to use the term rock solid in the same sentence.

      Have you ever actually used one?
      Are you in marketing?

      (it does actualy crash fairly often and there are problems syncing with PC's)

      Regards,
      Xenna

  14. Software for phones by ^Z · · Score: 1

    If phones had decent and available SDKs, as Palms do, we would have some useful user-written software for them, as we do for Palms. Alas, cell phone designs change much faster (or it seems so). Also, producers use same hardware for several models, enabling and disabling features in software. So, having an SDK or just decent specs may lead to conversion of cheap model to its more expensive and able brother just by upgrading software. (Remember the USR Sportster to Courier thing?)

    Let's hope that using embedded java will lead us to some standard for phone software. Anyway, by the time when all phones will have java onboard, most of them will be PDAs anyway.

    --

    Computers make very fast, very accurate mistakes

  15. I have an idea! by wiredog · · Score: 2

    How about a simpple device, handheld, controlled with an easy to use numeric keypad, used only for voice communication? Has anyone else ever thought of this?

  16. wow thats useless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lets see a telephone connected to a cheap terminal ala Iopener. So what will this telephone do for me?

  17. Screw this... by MatthewLovelace · · Score: 0

    Stop wasting brains on useless toys and give use cheap SCSI!!

    --

    ******
    "What makes you think I care about your opinions?"

  18. Doesn't even work yet! by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1

    From the article "We hope to get Linux running on the devices soon". Its nothing more than a design concept for now. I'll stick with my $10 wal mart phone for now.

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:Doesn't even work yet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Check this link: Screenshots That sure looks like linux to me!

  19. Cool toy, but needs to be re-directed. by Lumpy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    microwindows is cool, I use it in embedded places.
    but this phone screams for PicoGUI instead. It's much smaller, and is better suited for a multi-display device instead of a mini-X windows. I tried both in a home automation project, and picogui won because of size and speed and the lack of ability to have overlapping windows.

    I for one am getting 3 of these phones just for the hardware hacking potential.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    1. Re:Cool toy, but needs to be re-directed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I really didn't need to read your .sig today.

    2. Re:Cool toy, but needs to be re-directed. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :-) then filter it out :-)
      I for one, agree with him. Women are screwed in the head,(most of them) and the few that are not nuts are married already.

      Oh and every woman I have met that is under the age of 25 is completely looney...

  20. Bugger MP3 by MatthewLovelace · · Score: 0

    I want to use Ogg Vorbis.

    Boycott MP3. Boycott MTV. Boycott Christianity.

    Fuck... let's go nuts and boycott everything.

    >^..^

    --

    ******
    "What makes you think I care about your opinions?"

  21. explanation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Since a lot of posts here seem to show a misunderstanding about what this phone is all about, let me explain:
    This is actually a phone that was developed and produced about three years ago. It was really ahead of its time when it was made, but never reached the market before the project was cut.
    Tim got his hands on a big pile of them, and is reselling these dirt-cheap as Linux developer boxes because they've got a 206MHz StrongARM, 640x480 color LCD screen, have 2 PCMCIA slots, are expandable up to 72MB (come with 16MB), have telephony circuitry (caller ID, etc), so they make a great development box. They come with an
    IR keyboard too. (I saw some comments about having to use the keypad to play games which
    isn't true)
    You can find out some more details about them by going here.

    1. Re:explanation by johnjones · · Score: 2

      this looks really nice I was looking for a StrongARM evaluation board and this fits the bill for a student project

      I am very greatful to Tim Riker who seems like at really nice guy (tm)

      its projects like this that make it all worth while..

      regards

      john jones

      p.s. mod this AC up

  22. X10 Interface? X-10 Confusion? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

    does this device have an X10 interface? according to the hardware doesnt say specifically, but when you look at the logo on their index.html has a little subscript '10' next to the "X" in Tu X

    Anyone care to comment? Still a very interesting little device...

    1. Re:X10 Interface? X-10 Confusion? by plumby · · Score: 1

      Well, according to the apps bit of the site.

      X10 Control Interface

      Many X10 customers are ever looking for new interfaces to expose their X10 control capabilities. The TuxScreen phone provides a touch screen interface to control X10 networks graphically. The application's User interface would likely be HTML based images or tags which when selected through the touch screen take action. X10 control commands would be routed out of the serial port of the TuxScreen device and could either be directly connected to an X10 controller or to a dedicated Linux box which reroutes X10 commands to the X10 controller. The latter configuration would allow for communications to be multiplexed for more uses than just X10 and a non-dedicated channel. This application would essentially extend the user interfaces available to control a home by one or many depending on how many TuxScreen units were distributed throughout a home.


      So I'd guess yes.

    2. Re:X10 Interface? X-10 Confusion? by arglesnaf · · Score: 1

      It does have an X10 interface.
      See this link...

    3. Re:X10 Interface? X-10 Confusion? by alhaz · · Score: 2

      No, it doesn't. But it has a serial port on the back. You can plug an X10 interface into that quite easily.

      --
      This is just like television, only you can see much further.
    4. Re:X10 Interface? X-10 Confusion? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      does this device have an X10 interface?

      I don't know, but I'm pretty sure it does have an X11 interface ;-)
      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  23. I have one, here are my thoughts by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    It is "not ready for prime time". However, the rate of
    development is good.

    If you don't put Linux on, you get the factory features, but
    the development is a dead end.

    Personally, I made mine into a 640x480 X terminal that I
    can use to browse from the living room.

  24. Linux is working by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    I have Linux, X and a network card in mine, and it is
    possible to use wireless networking, and a 1GB IBM
    MicroDrive.

    What is not working: DSP functions, so the phone is still
    useless in Linux mode...

  25. What it really is... by nowt · · Score: 1

    is a computer with a Lucent DSP chip to provide telophony support.

    I bought 2 of these units and think they are pretty damn great. Right now, they can boot linux and run xwindows + pcmcia support. Unfortunately, the dsp chip itself needs a driver to really use this device as it could be used.. glorified call management device that could forward 'voicemails' as e-mails or posted to a website (which could also be run from said device). I can't wait to get it to the point where I enter my kitchen, click on an icon to review calls,v-mails, etc. Then use 'normally' as a linux computer and run kmail or konqueror to quickly check e-mail or look something up.

    --
    A strange game. The only winning move is not to play. How about a nice game of chess? - Joshua (Wargames)
  26. Think of the possibilities... by AlgUSF · · Score: 1

    With a DSL connection (and some software), you could basically answer your phone from any computer connected to the internet.

    --


    I want my rights back. I was actually using them when our government stole them after 9/11.
  27. PCMCIA sound cards... by mypalmike · · Score: 1

    Do you know of any currently manufactured? For under $100? That have Linux drivers?

    --
    There are 0x40000000 types of people: those who understand 32-bit IEEE 754 floating point, and those who don't.
    1. Re:PCMCIA sound cards... by O · · Score: 0

      Heh, it might be more efficient to get a PCMCIA USB card and USB speakers with audio out. That should all be under $100.

      --

      1, 1, 2, 3, 5, 8, 13, 21 -- Mathematics is the Language of Nature.
  28. Dissapointment! by john_e · · Score: 1

    I can't describe how dissapointed I was when I saw the picture of the phone. When I read the posting I thougt it was a cell-phone, that would have been much cooler!
    Anyway.. who uses ordinary phones these days?

  29. You folks seem to not get it by andersen · · Score: 1
    This is a product that was dumped by Philips. They made the phones, spent a ton of money, and eventually decided to not even sell them. They dumped them, and Tim Riker managed to pick them up for a fraction of their value. The touchscreen on these things alone is worth $150 and yet Tim is selling these things for just $99.


    The other thing people seem to not understand is the we (the people currently hacking on the tuxscreen) already have Linux running on them, thanks to Russ Dill's work on the kernel, and Tim's work on the blob bootloader. I bought 2 of them and I'm having a lot of fun hacking on them. I plan to use it as an email terminal (using a pcmcia network card) and for VOIP as well. You really can't go wrong here. Tim could turn around and sell the lot of them to an electronics salvage house with about 15 minutes of effort, but instead he want to make them available for people like me to hack on. These phone are very cool.

    --
    -Erik -- --This message was written using 73% post-consumer electrons--
    1. Re:You folks seem to not get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think I get it and it looked interesting. I am more of a software guy than a hardware guy. I could not tell if I would be able to make use of this device. The important part seems to be some kind of programming dongle that I don't know if I would be able to get. Other than that question, it looks like a great deal to start some strongarm development.

  30. Mod this up! +5 Fuckin Hilarious! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ...and with linux ported to my console stereo system from 1970, I can use 8-track tapes in a RAID-5 array.

    rotfl!

  31. inferno to linux is a downgrade :) by DrSkwid · · Score: 1

    kinda
    'cept for app support
    the usual annoying problem
    if you kept it inferno no doubt you can keep all the telephony gubbins going and add more apps that you need.

    Inferno'll do tk & limbo out of the box
    If you need to customize it use the tools that fit, not batter it with the linux hammer.

    Still, nice cheap boxes.

    M

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:inferno to linux is a downgrade :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      are you looney?

      if u uze inferno on it ,it be dead. it will only doo what u saw it do when u open the box.

      inferno sucks rocks... anyone that has had to deal with it knows that... and I am really sick of these lamers that are too lazy to spell and type correctly....

    2. Re:inferno to linux is a downgrade :) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      inferno sucks rocks... anyone that has had to deal with it knows that...

      hehe sure, keep smoking them instead of sucking and you might get somewhere

  32. Thank you Slashdotters by TimRiker · · Score: 2, Informative

    Thought I'd post here briefly to clear up some of the comments.

    As andersen mentioned these are a discontinued product which I got a hold of for below the manufacturing cost.

    They are a true hackers appliance. Probably don't serve any useful purpose yet. Once we have VoIP and a digital answering machine working then I'll call them useful.

    At any rate the components should run you around $300 (usd) so if you want a project to hack on, this has been a fun one for those involved.

    There is no x-10 interface. As the paragraph quoted below mentions this could be connected to the existing serial port if you like.

    Linux will run on the device. Inferno is on them now. Play with both. Subscribe to Inferno source for $500 and hack on it if you like.

    It looks like MicroWindows and perhaps others as well running on uClibc will fit in the 4M of onboard flash and get about the same functionality that the existing Inferno offers. I prefer a complete open source solution, but will not force those views on others.

    Thanx for the interest! Still around 1000 units left at the time of this writing (for the may that keep asking).

    --
    Tim Riker - http://rikers.org/
  33. Visor Phone anyone? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So, is smarter phone is most people would want, why is nobody buying the Visor+Phone combination? Even now, that they are giving it away (the GSM one, not the CDMA one, of course...) it is just not selling. Good luck to Sprint and its Palm+phone combo (for $499).

  34. TuxScreens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine a Beowolf Cluster of these!!!