Slashdot Mirror


Making LCD Displays Snappier

newSlashUser points out a very interesting article at ExtremeTech about a new means of more quickly controlling LCD panel response, so the old complaint that LCD panels make poor displays for gaming and high-motion video may be whittled down a bit. As a bonus, the change is all in the controller, so it doesn't require any change in the way the panels are manufactured.

146 comments

  1. Wel, what do you know? by cyborg_monkey · · Score: -1

    That is all.

    1. Re:Wel, what do you know? by timmah · · Score: -1

      You might have first post, but I have the Visio 2002 iso! WERD!

      RIBBLAH RIBBLAH RIBBLAH TIMMAH!

  2. fp by ArchieBunker · · Score: -1

    fp bitches

    --
    Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    1. Re:fp by cyborg_monkey · · Score: -1

      Nice try, ass humper.

      In the future, remember that cyborg_monkey is the king of first posts. Don't even bother if I am in the house.

    2. Re:fp by spork_testicle · · Score: -1

      The house you are in: a shit encrusted festering slumped pile of debris inhabited by crack whoring unwashed borek dick arab camel fuckers.

      --

      Having to be a testicle, I am happily the testicle of a spork.

    3. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      a first poster called cyborg monkey
      wished he had the penis of a donkey

      unfortunately, all against his wish
      he actually had the penis of a goldfish

    4. Re:fp by cyborg_monkey · · Score: -1

      It is obvious that your time away has not help you with making sense.

      although I know who you really are, and that you were not really away.

      p.s. this is posted via IE6 on WinXP. w00t!

    5. Re:fp by spork_testicle · · Score: -1
      WTF are you babbling about. You are like a brook that was behind the house I used to live in: babble all day, babble all night. Only stopped babbling when the fucker was iced over. I think I am gonna have to ice you.

      XP eh? Doesnt that licensins shit suck? Can you get me some numbers so I can try it out?

      --

      Having to be a testicle, I am happily the testicle of a spork.

    6. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      license shit only sucks if you're too dumb to know how to crack it.

    7. Re:fp by spork_testicle · · Score: -1
      You maroon. I was talking about the licensis shit. *Bot* the license shit.

      idiot.

      --

      Having to be a testicle, I am happily the testicle of a spork.

  3. Why not make Linux less expensive first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Let's have a close look at the costs involved when running a Linux system.

    An important factor in Linux' cost is its maintenance. Linux requires a *lot* of maintenance, work doable only by the relatively few high-paid Linux administrators that put themselves - of course willingly - at a great place in the market. Linux seems to be needing maintenance continuously, to keep it from breaking down.

    Add to this the cost of loss of data. Linux' native file system, EXT2FS, is known to lose data like a firehose spouts water when the file system isn't unmounted properly. Other unix file systems are much more tolerant towards unexpected crashes. An example is the FreeBSD file system, which with soft updates enabled, performance-wise blows EXT2FS out of the water, and doesn't have the negative drawback of extreme data loss in case of a system breakdown.

    The upcoming 'solution' to this, EXT3FS, is nothing more than an ugly hack to put journaling into the file system. All the drawbacks of the ancient EXT2FS file system remain in EXT3FS, for the sake of 'forward- and backward compatibility'. This is interesting, considering that the DOS heritage in the Windows 9x/ME series was considered a very bad thing by the Linux community, even though it provided what could be called one of the best examples of compatibility, ever. When it's about Linux, compatibility constraints don't seem to be that much of a problem for Linux advocates.

    Back to Linux' cost. Factor in also the fact that crashes happen much more often on Linux than on other unices. On other unices, crashes usually are caused by external sources like power outages. Crashes in Linux are a regular thing, and nobody seems to know what causes them, internally. Linux advocates try to hide this fact by denying crashes ever happen. Instead, they have frequent "hardware problems".

    The steep learning curve compared to about any other operating system out there is a major factor in Linux' cost. The system is a mix of features from all kinds of unices, but not one of them is implemented right. A Linux user has to live with badly coded tools which have low performance, mangle data seemingly at random and are not in line with their specification. On top of that a lot of them spit out the most childish and unprofessional messages, indicating that they were created by 14-year olds with too much time, no talent and a bad attitude.

    I could go on and on and on, but the conclusion is clear. Linux is not an option for any one who seeks a professional OS with high performance, scalability, stability, adherence to standards, etc.

    1. Re:Why not make Linux less expensive first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      With Linux you can mount any type of filesystem you want. You like the BSD file system? By all means use it. Software for BSD filesystem that hasn't been written yet for Linux compatiblity? You have acess to the source so quit complaining.

    2. Re:Why not make Linux less expensive first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      YHBT...

      Sincerely, Mike Bouma

    3. Re:Why not make Linux less expensive first? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      quit smokin the crack rock.

  4. My biggest complaint about LCD screens by minus23 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    is the fixed resolution they come with. Many applications I use for 3D require at a minimum 1280X1024, but work best at 1600X1200. So I wouldn't say that slow draw is the only problem, as this site states.

    1. Re:My biggest complaint about LCD screens by n0-0p · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not to be nitpicky, but the article stated that this is one of the major obstacles to bringing the LCD into the consumer television market. In that case it's fixed resolution anyway, so that's not a real drawback. I agree with you, though, that that fixed resolution is an obstacle for PC's.

    2. Re:My biggest complaint about LCD screens by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

      You CAN change resolutions, its just that they (like most monitors) have a MAXIMUM resolution, on laptops for example, they start to make the desktop larger than the physical MAXIMUM resolution.

      --
      ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    3. Re:My biggest complaint about LCD screens by jawad · · Score: 1

      My oh-so-beautiful T22's LCD is at a wonderful 1400x1050, 14.1". The biggest problem is getting nice wallpaper for it, but it's damn crisp. Beautiful screen. So not all LCDs are limited to a horrid 1024x768 or so.

    4. Re:My biggest complaint about LCD screens by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'll second that, the T22 (IBM Thinkpad for the acronym-challenged) has an awesome screen.

  5. Cool beans! by MsWillow · · Score: 1

    This would really be fun :) Imagine playing Quake, or Flight Sim, and not worrying about missing things because the display was too slow?

    I want one *drool* :)

    --

    Lemon curry?
    1. Re:Cool beans! by nsrbrake · · Score: 1

      Sounds good, except they said the controller can do this because it buffers... So there would still be some lag between what it going on and what you see. Not much, just about as much as if you were using a regular LCD with the poor pixel color change rate, I assume.

      Someone please correct me if I got that one wrong.

      --

      Bah!
    2. Re:Cool beans! by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      The buffer lag should be less than the transition lag. The silicon buffers should have a quicker response than the LCD components, but this is just an educated guess.

      Also feel free to correct if wrong.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    3. Re:Cool beans! by toast0 · · Score: 1

      i thought the article said it was keeping the last frame in a buffer, so it can compare it with the frame coming down the wire, and use the appropriate voltages for the transition...

      which wouldn't increase delay at all

    4. Re:Cool beans! by nsrbrake · · Score: 1

      "Mitsubishi works this magic by buffering each frame in the controller's memory. The shade of each sub-pixel is compared to that of the current frame, and these pairs are then applied to as lookup table stored in ROM that provides the correct voltage required for that change."

      I can see this improving visual quality, but the gaming improvement should be negligable all things concidered.

      --

      Bah!
    5. Re:Cool beans! by Trinn · · Score: 1

      Actually, that's exactly what it meant. It however neglected to say it exactly. It said that the frames were buffered, and the current compared to the new. This would require the current to be stored somewhere, not the new, therefore the last frame, not the next frame, is buffered...the pipeline looks like this.

      pixel-->compare to current pixel at location (from buffer)-->look up value-->pass value to FFD controller-->put pixel into buffer, overwriting the last frame at that location-->get next pixel-->repeat.

      Just my $0.02.

  6. Active LCD Screen by ZenJabba1 · · Score: 2, Informative

    Having just upgraded all my CRT monitors to LCD, The difference in refresh was only noticable after the first week or so. But the clarity of the LCD screen makes all the difference. I look forward to this coming forward and letting me spend more money :)

    One Key question is how does microsoft's ClearType work with this, as is uses Aliasing across pixels, does it effect the the refresh rate as well?

    --
    `find / -name "*your_base*" -exec chown us:us {} \;`
    1. Re:Active LCD Screen by Edgewize · · Score: 2, Informative

      Microsoft's ClearType technology is really very simple, and contrary to what they say, it doesn't use direct sub-pixel addressing. At least not in the way they make you think it does.

      It simply relies on the fact that each LCD pixel has three separate cells (for red, green, blue). It adjusts the colors of any pixels that border glyphs, lowering or removing color components depending on which area of the pixel should be darkened. There are some color adjustments to neighboring pixels as well, to avoid obvious color distortion.

      But as long as a LCD display is made of sub-elements for RGB, and that display can take raw RGB data, ClearType will work.

    2. Re:Active LCD Screen by torgosan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      OT and screw the karma:

      The market-droids have gotten to you. You didn't upgrade, you replaced. Big difference.

      Semantics, sure, but this mind-set plays into the spew of the market-droids just a bit too much for comfort.

      --
      "If you put the federal government in charge of the Sahara Desert, in 5 years there'd be a shortage of sand". -Milton F.
    3. Re:Active LCD Screen by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

      One thing I do find working with LCDs for long periods of time is its not as tiring on my eyes as CRTs. Many factors, refresh rates and the static generated from the CRTs drying my eyes up.

      --
      ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    4. Re:Active LCD Screen by Rat's_ass_donor · · Score: 1

      Because, uh, there are no advantages to an LCD? Right?

      I think the cynicism monster may have gotten to you...

    5. Re:Active LCD Screen by jrockway · · Score: 1

      You can actually use it on CRT displays too, and it just looks like normal AA. Here's how it works. (XFree can do this too, set a resource to do it instead of normal AA)

      --
      My other car is first.
    6. Re:Active LCD Screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, seems the reading comprehension monster got to _you_. He wasn't talking about the advanatges/disadvantages of LCD monitors but the original poster's choice of words. Free hint: read a bit more closely next time.

    7. Re:Active LCD Screen by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well call me obtuse, but don't you think questioning use of the word "upgrade", and the fact of whether or not the transition from a CRT to LCD could be considered an improvement, are related?

      Perhaps English is not your first language. If that is the case, I withdraw my comment.

  7. Assertion Failed: Yuo != Fagot by spork_testicle · · Score: -1
    Whassup doodette!

    How the fuck are you spastic monogoloid hell?

    --

    Having to be a testicle, I am happily the testicle of a spork.

    1. Re:Assertion Failed: Yuo != Fagot by cyborg_monkey · · Score: -1

      Werd, my homey.

      I am enjoying a little Corona and surfing the web like a luzer on a beautiful Saturday afternoon.

    2. Re:Assertion Failed: Yuo != Fagot by spork_testicle · · Score: -1

      didja mow yet? I have a screaming 7 week old on my lap.

      --

      Having to be a testicle, I am happily the testicle of a spork.

    3. Re:Assertion Failed: Yuo != Fagot by cyborg_monkey · · Score: -1

      nope, I installed some software today and playing some pool.

      Mowing the grass tomorrow.

    4. Re:Assertion Failed: Yuo != Fagot by spork_testicle · · Score: -1
      I mowed last night for a change. My yard looks like a fucking golf course. I r0x0r!

      Working on the house today. I painted three sides before after I put up the new hardi plank siding. Now I have to finish the back of the house and garage. Good thing I have an airless paint gun and know what the fuck I am doing, unlike some others I could name.

      --

      Having to be a testicle, I am happily the testicle of a spork.

  8. LCDs for gaming? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    What the hell? If you can afford an LCD screen you sure as hell won't use it for gaming, are you?

    Why is it that everything has to be measured in "how the hardware runs Quake 3"?

    Scientific computing is the real hardware test!

    1. Re:LCDs for gaming? by foldedspace · · Score: 1

      What scientific work require LCDs on the desktop? At work we have 8088s, 486s and PPC601s for our scientific applications. Most of them are on VGA 14" monitors to 17" SVGA monitors. No, we can't afford LCDs or P4s or G4s. Putting a P4 - 2 GHz next to a 1980 GC /mass spec looks a bit silly. The data that comes out these machines is pretty easy for a 486 to handle. There are SGI and Sun workstations in the building. That's where most of the big money goes.

  9. mod parent down, troll by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    troll can't even get her facts right

  10. Exterminate All Islam. Exterminate Muslims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Our dead cry out in tortured horror:
    1. Kill all Muslims.
    2. Kill all Mohammedans.
    3. Kill all Arabs.
    4. Kill all Towel Heads.
    5. Kill all Camel Jockeys.
    6. Kill all Dune Coons.
    7. Kill all Islam.
    8. Nuke their countries to hell.
    9. Nuke them again.
    10. Death to Islam.

    I piss on Mecca. I menstruate on the Koran. I shit on Mohammed.

    1. Re:Exterminate All Islam. Exterminate Muslims. by Telal · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      And this has something to do with LCDs? Get a clue.

    2. Re:Exterminate All Islam. Exterminate Muslims. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Of course! It's all about Licking Camel Dung.

  11. Todesfuge by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Schwarze Milch der Frühe wir trinken sie abends
    wir trinken sie mittags und morgens wir trinken sie nachts
    wir trinken und trinken
    wir schaufeln ein Grab in den Lüften da liegt man nicht eng
    Ein Mann wohnt im Haus der spielt mit den Schlangen der schreibt
    der schreibt wenn es dunkelt nach Deutschland
    dein goldenes Haar Margarete

    er schreibt es und tritt vor das Haus und es blitzen die Sterne
    er pfeift seine Rüden herbei
    er pfeift seine Juden hervor läßt schaufeln ein Grab in der Erde
    er befiehlt uns spielt auf nun zum Tanz

    Schwarze Milch der Frühe wir trinken dich nachts
    wir trinken dich morgens und mittags wir trinken dich abends
    wir trinken und trinken
    Ein Mann wohnt im Haus der spielt mit den Schlangen der schreibt
    der schreibt wenn es dunkelt nach Deutschland dein goldenes Haar Margarete
    Dein aschenes Haar Sulamith

    wir schaufeln ein Grab in den Lüften da liegt man nicht eng

    Er ruft stecht tiefer ins Erdreich ihr einen ihr andern singet und spielt
    er greift nach dem Eisen im Gurt er schwingts seine Augen sind blau
    stecht tiefer die Spaten ihr einen ihr anderen spielt weiter zum Tanz auf

    Schwarze Milch der Frühe wir trinken dich nachts
    wir trinken dich mittags und morgens wir trinken dich abends
    wir trinken und trinkenein Mann wohnt im Haus dein goldenes Haar Margarete
    dein aschenes Haar Sulamith er spielt mit den Schlangen

    Er ruft spielt süßer den Tod der Tod ist ein Meister aus Deutschland
    er ruft streicht dunkler die Geigen dann steigt ihr als Rauch in die Luft
    dann habt ihr ein Grab in den Wolken da liegt man nicht eng

    Schwarze Milch der Frühe wir trinken dich nachts
    wir trinken dich mittags der Tod ist ein Meister aus Deutschland
    wir trinken dich abends und morgens wir trinken und trinken
    der Tod ist ein Meister aus Deutschland sein Auge ist blau
    er trifft dich mit bleierner Kugel er trifft dich genau
    ein Mann wohnt im Haus dein goldenes Haar Margarete
    er hetzt seine Rüden auf uns er schenkt uns ein Grab in der Luft
    er spielt mit den Schlangen und träumet der Tod ist ein Meister aus
    Deutschland

    dein goldenes Haar Margarete
    dein aschenes Haar Sulamith

  12. It's about time... by dmarcov · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The number of areas where CRTs were superior to LCD displays continues to dwindle. It used to be they were only smaller/lighter. But in exchange for that, you paid 4x as much, and if you typed faster than 40wpm all you'd see is a grey smudge for 15 seconds (I remember the monochrome, passive matrix screen on my Powerbook 145b). Now the prices are becoming dollar-for-dollar competitive with CRTs, they are still smaller/lighter, and now they might actually be able to handle Quake 3 Arena and look as good as my 20" monitor (and yeah -- they are pretty close to that now, especially with a still image, but...). I think the days of the CRT really are numbered this time around.

    1. Re:It's about time... by vlad_petric · · Score: 1


      There is only one real problem with LCDs: their colors are generally not as vivid (saturated) as the ones produced by a CRT screen. Most of them lack proper color calibration

      --

      The Raven

    2. Re:It's about time... by donglekey · · Score: 2

      Find me a 20" LCD that does 1600x1200 and looks as good as an aperature grille for $200. It doesn't exist, so LCD's are not that close. CRT's are dropping in price very nicely to so competing with CRT's is a moving target. My monitor cost $60 to ship, and is a practically a space heater, but it was a great deal.

    3. Re:It's about time... by mojo-raisin · · Score: 1

      Yeah - it's pretty retarded. You can find 15" laptop displays that have 1600x1200 pixels, but the dumb industry refuses to release these as standalone monitors.

      They could produce an 1800x1400 17" monitor at that resolution!

  13. Formula 1 in the U.S.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    A rare treat for you all!

    The state-of-the-art racing technology has come all the way to you and no article on Slashdot? These beauties run more on computers and software than pure horsepower these days so I'd think that the event warrants a Slashdot article or two.

    1. Re:Formula 1 in the U.S.A. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I just wish "those beauties" would get on the track instead playing the hangar queen...

  14. LCD's for Gamers by sessamoid · · Score: 1

    This might finally make LCD panels usable for action gamers. Those of us addicted to quake/CS/UT have put off upgrading to the spiffiness of LCD's for a while because they've been utterly useless for gaming. I really would like the sharpness of an LCD on my desktop, and now I may have a good reason to get one!

    --
    "No, no, no. Don't tug on that. You never know what it might be attached to."
    1. Re:LCD's for Gamers by Teferi · · Score: 2

      I'd say that price is still a more important factor; I play UT on my laptop (15" UXGA panel) all the time, and I don't have any blurring problems.

      --
      -- Veni, vidi, dormivi
  15. WTC Truth! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Learn the truth about the Zionist conspiracy to destroy America! 4000 Jews were warned to stay away from WTC Sept. 11. See proof here!

  16. Sounds fishy by dingo · · Score: 2, Insightful

    the whole article struck me as a little bit "telemarket shopping"ish i think i will reserve judgement untill i see one in action
    mind you, a monitor on the wall would be nice :)

    --
    The Borg assimilated my race & all I got was this lousy T-shirt
    1. Re:Sounds fishy by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 1

      Why put a monitor ON the wall, why not instead make the wall THE montior ala Total Recall :D

      --
      ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  17. Software ``feed-forward'', feedback, overmod by po8 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you can get your LCD controller to run at 60-80Hz, you should be able to implement this technique in software: compute change-corrected frames, where the ``feed-forward'' bits disappear faster than the human persistence rate. There's plenty of CPU for this, and the psychovisuals help: any reasonable transient errors in the LCD response are likely to be masked by the fact that the changing pixels are likely changing due to motion...

    I had always just sort of assumed that controllers already did this, since it's so obvious. Even better would be to have the controller actually measure the pixel modulation (which it it should be able to do using the same mechanism it uses to change it) and use feedback, which would likely provide even faster response.

    Sadly, at the end of the day, the 40Hz limit on skewing reasonably priced panels over the full range will continue to be a problem. With feedback and feedforward techniques, can one use higher pixel modulation voltages to improve this as well? I don't know, but I would guess one could...

    1. Re:Software ``feed-forward'', feedback, overmod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm. I wonder if the folks at ggi-project.org might be able to try something with this, just to see how it looks on current hardware if you bump the pixel to either white or black (depending on source & destination colour) before changing it...

    2. Re:Software ``feed-forward'', feedback, overmod by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It wouldn't be too hard to implement the "feed-forward" bit information onto an onboard chip inside of the monitor itself, than it could run on any platform and be transparent to the enduser.

    3. Re:Software ``feed-forward'', feedback, overmod by rokicki · · Score: 1

      This does seem obvious; it's certainly used in many other electronics. Simply determine the frequency response of the line and load and build a filter (could even be a simple digital filter in this case) to `overdrive' attenuated frequencies. Sure you need a tiny bit of storage [essentially driving about 1M digital filters all in parallel] but it does seem straightforward.

      I hope this wasn't patented, or we'll be in a situation like with the Trinitron (where Sony had a monopoly on that technology for a long time and thus could charge a lot . . .)

      -tom

  18. LCDs lifespan limited by OLEDs anyway by bryan1945 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Organic LEDs are on the way in probably about 5 years or so, and I am willing to wait for them. Cheaper to produce, no backlight, and flexible. Production screens for cell phones and camcorders are being produced, so it's only an engineering step to up-size them. They are also more durable and scaleable than LCDs.

    It's nice that LCDs are getting better, but even better stuff is just down the pike.

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    1. Re:LCDs lifespan limited by OLEDs anyway by n0-0p · · Score: 1

      Scaling the size isn't really the issue. Given current OLED technolology and average use you wouldn't get even a year of service out of a monitor or television display before the OLED layer started to break down and signifcantly damage picture quality. With cell phones and camcorders the display isn't active anywhere near as much as on a TV or monitor so they are being tested in these applications first. Once they get the lifespan issues resolved, though, OLED's will no doubt be a viable alternative to other display technology.

    2. Re:LCDs lifespan limited by OLEDs anyway by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      This is a good point, but I think I read in IEEE's Spectrum that they thought that they had a some insights into how to lick the breakdown problem. Something about adding a certain chemical which stabalized the whole thing. Of course, it's still in testing, so they don't know if it will work.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    3. Re:LCDs lifespan limited by OLEDs anyway by yaeger · · Score: 1

      In my car i have a pioneer DEH-P9300(http://www.onlinecarstereo.com/caraudio/ product.asp?sku=11656) head unit. This has an organic EL display and it really is a cut above any other display tech ive seen before. It has a visualiser, and the refresh rate of the screen is pretty impressive. Much better, then say a similar visualiser on my thinkpads TFT screen.

      I cant wait till i can have a big one of these on my desktop. That said, I just bought an 15' lcd for my desktop, and my eyes love me for it. I spend pretty much 9 hours a day stareing at the Visual C++ interface, and the clarity is a true relief.

    4. Re:LCDs lifespan limited by OLEDs anyway by ncc74656 · · Score: 1
      I just bought an 15' lcd for my desktop
      15 feet? That must've cost a fortune...is Bill Gates your neighbor or something?
      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
  19. WTF by JediTrainer · · Score: 2

    From the article: One key result to note, however, is that switching from any gray shade to black is the fastest of all. This is because switching to black simply requires that the voltage to the cell be set to maximum, and the cell responds quickly.

    What the hell? Don't they mean the voltage is turned off to get black? Or maybe they're confusing it with white? I don't understand why you need power to produce black...

    ...unless they give it so much voltage that the thing responds quickly and pops - producing a gaping black hole in the cell's place.

    --

    You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    1. Re:WTF by bryan1945 · · Score: 2

      I believe that this is because LCDs are backlighted, and applying a voltage causes the pixels to align and block the light, thereby giving black.

      --
      Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
    2. Re:WTF by toast0 · · Score: 2, Informative

      that is correct...

      as an example, most digital watches use LCD technology and when you take out the battery, everything turns white (or greenish, or whatever color it is :), but when you have the battery in, some areas are black

      the voltage 'turns on' the liquid crystal, and blocks out the light

    3. Re:WTF by tcc · · Score: 4, Informative

      Two polarizing filters encase the liquid crystals in the LCD. One filter is etched with horizontal lines; the other with vertical. Light enters the liquid-crystal compartment parallel to the first filter's lines and follows the path of the liquid crystals. If the liquid crystals become energized, the crystals and light rays do not twist to become parallel with the second filter. Light rays reach the second filter perpendicular to its lines and cannot pass through to the viewer's screen image. If the crystals are not energized, they twist themselves and the light rays to allow light to pass through and illuminate the LCD.

      taken from

      http://www.smartcomputing.com/editorial/article. as p?article=articles%2Farchive%2Fg0903%2F36g03%2F36g 03%2Easp

      --
      --- Metamoderating abusive downgraders since my 300th post.
    4. Re:WTF by statusbar · · Score: 4, Insightful

      As others have pointed out, the LCD stops the transmission of light when voltage is applied, hence giving you black.

      But one other nit-pick: "I don't understand why you need power to produce black" - No you don't need power. You need Voltage. The LCD cell acts like a capacitor and does not pass DC electricity though it. So no current, and hence no power used.
      Leakage would probably be in the micro-amp range.

      --jeff

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    5. Re:WTF by pyrrhos · · Score: 1

      Correct, but this only true in the static case, i.e. when the voltage for black has reached the desired value. But, strictly speaking, you will need some power to set the capacitor on the desired voltage. Various things, like the resistance of the wires and the energy needed to move the crystals around (align them or whatever) between the capacitor plates will make you spend some power. The power plug of the LCD is not only for the back light :-)

    6. Re:WTF by Hulboy · · Score: 1

      And yet, when I take the battery out of my laptop, the screen goes black...

      ?

    7. Re:WTF by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually current is needed for charging capacitors.

      Q=C*V where Q = I*t

    8. Re:WTF by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Because the light is off. A watch reflects light, a laptop makes its own with a cold cathode light.

    9. Re:WTF by statusbar · · Score: 2

      In the case of a LCD cell, the required charge on the cell is very very tiny. Therefore the impulse current required is miniscule.

      Once I was playing around with a bare dot matrix LCD panel - looks just like a piece of glass. I could make the cells go black by holding it on one side where the almost transparent rows of wires were and waving it in front of a computer monitor or even near someone else. The static charge was enough to make the cells dark - And stayed that way for over half an hour.

      Fun stuff

      --jeff

      --
      ipv6 is my vpn
    10. Re:WTF by Trogre · · Score: 1

      In it's normal state, an LCD cell is transparent, letting (close to) 100% of the light from the backlight or reflector to pass through, producing white.
      Placing a voltage across an LCD cell makes it opaque, thus blocking out the backlight, making it appear black.
      In this state the LCD is producing power to BLOCK the backlight. Therefore the most efficient use of power is when the LCD is off, ie a white screen :)

      Look at your calculator screen sometime.
      A neat trick on an LCD calculator is to rotate one of the polarizing filters about the horizontal axis, so the calculator screen is now white-on-black :)

      --
      "Nine times out of ten, starting a fire is not the best way to solve the problem." - my wife
  20. MOD THIS UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    This may be Offtopic, but -1 is definitely not justified on this one. It's one of the most impressive poems of the 20th century. Is Slashdot populated by barbarians??

    1. Re:MOD THIS UP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Black milk the early one we they drink we in the evening drink it at noon and in the morning we drink them we drink at night and do not drink we dig a grave in air are situated there one a man live not closely in the house play with the queues write write if it darken to Germany your golden hair Margarete it writes it and steps before the house and it flashes the asterisks it whistles its Rueden here it whistles its Jews out lets dig a grave in the earth it instructs us plays on now to the tanz Black milk the early one we drink you we at night drink you we in the morning and at noon drink you we drink in the evening and drink a man lives in the house plays with the queues writes writes if it darkens to Germany your golden hair Margarete your aschenes hair Sulamith we do not dig a grave in air are situated there one closely He calls stings more deeply in the soil it one it others sings and plays he reaches for the iron in the belt he schwingts its eyes is blue stings more deeply the spades it one it others continues to play to the tanz up Black milk the early one we drink you we at night drink you at noon and in the morning we drink you we drink in the evening and drink in man live in the house your golden hair Margarete your aschenes hair Sulamith it plays with the queues He does not call plays more sweetly death death is a master from Germany it calls deletes more darkly plays the violin then rises it than smoke into air then has it a grave in the clouds is situated there one closely Black milk the early one we drink you we at night drink you at noon death is a master from Germany we drink you we drink in the evening and in the morning and drink death is a master from Germany its eye is blue it meets you with bleierner ball it meets you exactly one man lives in the house your golden hair Margarete it rushes its Rueden on us it gives us a grave in air it plays with the queues and dreams death is a master from Germany

  21. Party time!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    A case of beer

    Some acid

    Three gerbils

    Duct tape

    Two young goats

    A twelve-year old virgin

    Nipple clamps

    Four enema bags

    Styrofoam penuts

    A lot of lube

    And a cardboard cutout of George W. Bush

    Oooh boy am I gonna have fun tonight!!

  22. Patents? by Alsee · · Score: 1

    First, why the hell did this new item draw a flood of offtopic firstpost/trolls/flames/WTC-jewish-conspiracies?

    Maybe I'm the smartest person on the planet. Or maybe this "new technology" is bloody obvious and should have been implemented ages ago. In my oppinion the technique is blantant once you see the response time graph. Large changes respond faster, so you overdrive the pixel and stop when you get to the desired brightness.

    This obviously warrants many broad patents. Oddly, the word patent never appears in the article.

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  23. What? by iotaborg · · Score: 1

    What do you mean, fixed resolution? Are you saying that you cannot change resolutions at all on LCD screens (which I seem to be able to)?

    1. Re:What? by steveg · · Score: 1

      There's a "real" resolution and a "logical" resolution.

      You can set any resolution you like, up to the maximum, which is the physical or "real" resolution. Any other resolution is an interpolated resolution.

      --
      Ignorance killed the cat. Curiosity was framed.
    2. Re:What? by ncc74656 · · Score: 3, Informative
      What do you mean, fixed resolution? Are you saying that you cannot change resolutions at all on LCD screens (which I seem to be able to)?
      You can change resolution, but it looks like crap since the image has to be scaled (and pixels interpolated) to fill in. The worst displays used to be 800x600 panels run at 640x480; the available controllers usually just doubled some rows/columns to produce a chunky, uneven image. Newer displays interpolate the pixels so it doesn't look as nasty, but the image still has a blurred appearance at anything other than its intended resolution (typically 1024x768).
      --
      20 January 2017: the End of an Error.
    3. Re:What? by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      Technically speaking, doesn't a CRT basically do the same thing?

      I mean sure, the "pixels" are a lot smaller, and it's done with analog hardware, but it's still the same thing, ain't it? So just wait for lcd res to go waaay up!

      Can you still tell the display to just use a smaller, centerred portion of the display?

    4. Re:What? by Nullsmack · · Score: 1

      not really, you see in a crt, the main display is a phosphorous covered part that you see, as well as an electron beam. (plus there's the differen't color "spots" that produce the color that you see) When you change the resolution on a CRT, it just changes where the electron beam scans, among other variables. You can start to get pretty fuzzy if you push your monitor too hard though. Most of the monitors that I've seen say that they support 1600x1200 are fuzzy at that res, same for older ones that max out at 1024x768..

      As for lcd's, just imagine a matrix of LED's, They are fixed pixels, basically just lights. LCD screens aren't LEDs.. they are just like "normal" LCD's, but with a backlight, but follow me here.

      if your display runs at 800x600, then you go to 640x480, then something that took 1:1 pixel on 800x600 would take something like 2:1 or 2:2 pixels on 640x480. I can't really explain this easily without 'showing' you, but I think you can get the idea.

      BTW, yes you can tell it to use a smaller central portion, rather than scaling or interpolating, but then you don't use the entire display.

      I hope I could be of some help?

    5. Re:What? by rabidcow · · Score: 1

      (plus there's the differen't color "spots" that produce the color that you see)

      Right, I'm comparing these spots to the pixels on a LCD. There's a finite number of them, in a fixed location, with a fixed size. The difference is that they're smaller, more numerous, and never correspond to exactly one pixel.

      I do understand how cheap bitmap scaling works, but it was kind of you to explain.

      BTW, yes you can tell it to use a smaller central portion, rather than scaling or interpolating, but then you don't use the entire display.

      Ah, well the comments here made it sound like that was no longer being given as an option. thx

  24. Oh my God!! It's happened again!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    *** PLEASE READ THIS *** URGENT ***

    Those damned terrorists just took out the Empire State Building and Sears towers! The Empire State Building is still standing but the Sears went down 35 minutes after it was hit. There are also reports of a gas attack on Boston. Another plane was shot down on its way to the capital.

    Yahoo has the terrible details here [yahoo.com].

    *** UPDATE ***

    It seems the Empire State building has finally collapsed! Fire and medical officials are afraid to go in after authorities received threats of anthrax bombs in the plane! Over 25,000 dead in Boston!!

    *** WE ARE AT WAR PEOPLE!! ***

    I can't write anymore sorry

  25. So wat yuur saying...? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Kurt Cobain is DEAD??!! OMFG!!! how did he dye??

    -cyborg_monkey's littel brodder

    PS: tank yu for letting me hav "internet", bud wen are yu going to let me out of my kage?

  26. never looked at your LCD with a magnifying glass? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A 1600x1200 screen does 800x600 by using 2x2 block pixels, or 1024x768 by using 1x1,1x2,2x1,2x2 pixels (ugly).

  27. Captain Obvious, or Admiral Oblivious? by Thedalek · · Score: 1

    I may be missing something, but wasn't the article talking about greyscale only? Looks like it's going to be even longer before we see the same thing in all 32k color shades.

    --
    Happiness is relative, Based upon the way we live.
    1. Re:Captain Obvious, or Admiral Oblivious? by toast0 · · Score: 3, Informative

      teh way lcd screens work is (through magic) they seperate the white backlight into vertical bands of red, green, and blue (not necessarily in that order).... so you have three sub pixels per pixel, each one is individually controlled.

      (that is what microsoft's cleartype(tm) leverages... since, the order of the subpixels are known, you can render to individual subpixels by using color values... and stuff)

      (grc.com has a better explination of cleartype)

  28. Amazing displays by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://www.panoramtech.com/

    The ultimate monitor :D pretty close to it :D

    --
    ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
  29. Look to Apple by Simba · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Apple's LCD displays are probably the best that exist, beating out SGI by a large margin. I've never had a moment's problem playing Quake or Unreal Tournament on my TiBook or G4, using either the Studio or Cinema display.

    Perhaps the solution isn't more hacks, but better hardware. Sure, it comes at a price, but I'd rather drop an extra couple hundred for something that actually works.

    --
    Hippies smell.
    1. Re:Look to Apple by Paul+Komarek · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Aren't pretty much all consumer LCD screens produced by the same company, and remarked by Apple, NEC, etc?

      -Paul Komarek

    2. Re:Look to Apple by ZaneMcAuley · · Score: -1, Redundant

      No on yer nelly matey, are the best ive seen by far.

      --
      ----- Whats wrong with this picture? http://www.revoh.org:1234/whatswrong
    3. Re:Look to Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      And you're just another slashdot moron. You've got a TFT and NOT an LCD display!
      Come on!, you don't have to tell us all that you're clueless. I wish that ./ users with modpoints could spend them better so browsing at a higher threshold could sort out all the noise!!!

      (Yes I know I'm being a dork to bitch about this, but sometimes I just have to scream)

    4. Re:Look to Apple by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      No

    5. Re:Look to Apple by Simba · · Score: 2, Informative

      No, I have a thin film transistor (TFT) active-matrix Liquid Crystal Display (LCD). Regardless of what method they use, they are indeed LCD displays.

      Now, perhaps a little education is in order as you seem to be the slashdot moron here.

      There are two types of Liquid Crystal Displays (LCD). Active Matrix and Passive Matrix.

      First, I'd like to point out that the article did not specify between Active or Passive Matrix LCD screens, and as such my comment on the high quality apple Active Matrix LCD's is perfectly valid.

      Now, Active Matrix LCD screens are also known as TFT screens, which stands for Thin Film Transistor. In this type, each pixel is controlled by one to four transistors. The TFT system offers the best resolution and image quality of any LCD, and as such is more costly to produce and buy. Thusly you will note my comment about spending a few extra bucks for something that does not suck.

      Passive Matrix LCD Screens come in three major flavors. DSTN (Dual Scan STN), CSTN (Color Super Twist Nematic), and TSTN (Triple Super Twist Nematic). There are numerous differences between them, for exmaple DSTN divides the screen into halves and scans seach simultaneously, thusly giving twice the refresh rate and a sharper appearance. Many Sony Vaio laptops use this type, and have the characteristic line through the middle of the screen.

      In future, I would suggest you do your homework before telling someone who knows what they are talking about that TFT is not LCD.

      --
      Hippies smell.
    6. Re:Look to Apple by ravemax · · Score: 1

      Most Apple LDC-Panels are produced by LG Electronics - thats the reason why the Apple Cinema Display and LGs 22" are more or less the same...

  30. Chekidout, c_m: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Lookit a picture I stumbled on accidentally: Ouch!

    Pretty funny in a way, though I feel for the guy.

  31. Improve the dark-color range! by rice_burners_suck · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think LCDs could be improved a little bit in the dark color range. Unlike a CRT, which is a black surface on which color is added, LCDs are a white surface on which color is subtracted by blocking the light.

    IMO, the image on LCDs already looks a lot better than that of CRTs, and doesn't fatigue me as much. In fact, no matter what refresh rate I was using with my CRT, I could always see the flicker for some reason. My eyes actually hurt after looking at the monitor for a few hours. This problem got worse proportionally with larger displays, so graphical work was always very tiring. The LCD fixed that. Yes, there is a refresh rate, but it works differently than that of a CRT, so I cannot see the LCD refresh.

    I think the advantages of LCDs outweigh the disadvantage of slower animation. Most work I do is either textual (writing or coding) or graphical. There is rarely any fast action going on. (I occasionally play Quake II, the only game I ever bought, but with a CRT. I just don't play for very long. Why should I? There's so much to life that if I'm not working, I prefer to do things unrelated to computers.)

    As for television (and this is a weak argument as I rarely watch TV), I think LCDs already accomodate that format quite well. The colors look great. Yeah, fast action isn't as good, but oh well. :-)

    Like I said before, the only thing I would improve about the LCD is its reproduction of really dark colors--that is, better blocking of the light.

  32. NO SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Osama Bin Laden - IMMARSAT - 00873 682505331

    1. Re:NO SHIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Prank call any1

      "We are doing a vibrator recall..."
      or
      "You kicked my dog"

      "You are now live on internet radio"

  33. DOH! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny


    Why didn't I think of that first?

    I mean, if you're merging your car onto the freeway, you floor it until it you catch up with traffic, then let off to maintain constant speed.

    You wouldn't even think of going 0 to 60 by applying only the amount of throttle that sustains 60 mph; it would take ages.

    1. Re:DOH! by mabinogi · · Score: 2, Funny

      > You wouldn't even think of going 0 to 60 by applying only the amount of throttle that sustains 60 mph; it would take ages.

      No....but the person in front always seems to think that's the best way to go......arrgh..

      --
      Advanced users are users too!
  34. Seen it, it does work... by philipsblows · · Score: 5, Interesting

    My time spent with Philips Flat Displays in Philips Components allowed me time to see this and many other LCD-ish technologies. If you look here at the papers about Motion Compensation, that is the stuff I saw, and in fact, our group was working on the drive electronics to make it work. David Parker, one of the authors on a couple of those papers, is a very cool guy, as were all of the guys at PRL in Redhill, England.

    Unfortunately, the LCD panel business slipped into commodity mode too quickly, where 15-inch panels and the displays containing them had to be super-cheap, and that was where Philips wanted to be, so we tabled the project. The simulations, though, showed a drastic difference is clarity and response time, resulting in sharp images suitable for television or video gaming.

    As an aside, someone asked about applying voltage to get black. This works best with active matrix displays, while passives use the normally-black approach (apply voltage to get white). If you remember your old laptop displays from back then, dark vertical lines in dialog boxes and the like created vertical lines that ran the height of the screen thanks to voltage leaking to all of the dots in a column, which is not a big problem for actives.

    There is a lot of cool stuff in the future of displays. LCD tech of today sorta sucks/ Look for some very cool stuff in multidomain displays and OLED/PolyLED displays.

  35. Parent post FALSE. NO ATTACK by Alsee · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Parent post claims another NYC attack and mentions anthrax. I live just outside NYC and I can state that this story is FALSE.

    Sorry for this off-topic post, but I felt a post claiming ANTHRAX to warrant specific disproof.

    SYSOP - I reccommend to blackhole the IP of the anonymous coward. False bioattack posts are pretty serious.

    --
    - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    1. Re:Parent post FALSE. NO ATTACK by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      yer new here aint ya? we dont got no sysops. this aint no usenet. we got them there MODERATERS. they just moderate these kind of whacky posts down. then no one's gonna read em exceptin all the other whackies that post em.

    2. Re:Parent post FALSE. NO ATTACK by Alsee · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      [sarcasm] Gee, thanx for the info Anonymous Coward. I had no clue. [/Sarcasm]

      Ths NYC attack post was already moderated down to -1. I felt that insufficient. The people runing the server DO have the power to ban the IP address of the poster and to remove the post entirely.

      Posting of a bioattack during a state of war is comparable to shouting 'fire' in a crowded movie theater. I am aware of Slashdot policy against removing content. This is probably a case they never considered. Editing the post to add a disclaimer before and after it might be a reasonable compromise.

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  36. What, exactly, do you feel for that guy? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Although, technically, he should be more of a gal by now...

  37. What war? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    War has not been declared.

    1. Re:What war? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      War was declared within minutes of the attack. Where have you been? We just haven't figured out who it has been declared on, yet.

      Here's a tip though. If you live in Afgahnistan, you might want to relocate.

    2. Re:What war? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1
      War has not been declared.

      It sure has. Your comment violated the postercomment compression filter. Comment aborted

  38. The ATTACK is TRUE!!! Blackhole the disclaimer!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I live in NYC and am now feeling the first symptoms of anthrax. I'm an MD and an epidemiologist, so I know what I'm talking about. The above disclaimer is, obviously, planted by a terrrorist in order to generate confusion.

  39. LTPS by shibut · · Score: 2, Interesting

    LTPS (low temperature polycrystalline silicon)is a new technology that improves the quality of small LCDs (e.g., for handhelds). Supposedly Sony, Toshiba (watch out for the fonts), and Sanyo are early adopters and should start mass production in 2002. Palm-3D-games anyone?

  40. No need to suppress EM safe monitors any longer. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 0, Troll
    The Cell and PCS phone structure is a far superior system when it comes to bathing the populace in EM radiation.

    The effects achieved by exposing people to close range low frequency CRT radiation, while slightly different, are more than made up for by the effects of the much higher frequency delivery system portable phones facilitate. Shorter exposure durations are required for the desired effects, and individuals who were left out of the 'computer revolution' are now included, not just through the popularity of hand set use, but also as a result of the proliferation of the microwave broadcast towers used throughout urbane areas.

    Ask yourself what is achieved by this, (research is required), and who benefits. Hint: It has nothing to do with cancer.


    -Fantastic Lad

  41. Re:No need to suppress EM safe monitors any longer by sucko · · Score: -1
    Ask yourself what is achieved by this, (research is required), and who benefits. Hint: It has nothing to do with cancer


    Everything was fine until this last sentence when the poster went from "informed" to "crazy".
  42. Hemisphere issues on LCD screens? by p3bf · · Score: 1

    Does anyone have any insight into whether some of the issues surrounding different hemispheres affect LCDs the same way as CRTs? Or do they retain 100% functionality when the same unit is used in either hemisphere? Do they have their own unique issues when used in another hemisphere?

    I came across this tidbit (scroll waaay down to B3.5.2 TV Info) which I shall excerpt:

    In the Southern Hemisphere, the locally-vertical component of the field is in the opposite direction to where it would be an equivalent distance north of the equator.

    This affects the colour convergence of video monitors. It's not a *huge* difference, and it took computer companies until the late 1980s' to wake up to the difference and ship different monitor versions to New Zealand, South America, and Australia. Northern hemisphere monitors *work* but the colours won't be as crisp as you'd expect.

    --
    Slashdot: Everything in Moderation, including Moderation itself.
    1. Re:Hemisphere issues on LCD screens? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm... no, LCD monitors don't have magnetic-field dependence. That's pretty obvious...

      For skeptics, I actually have a southern-hemisphere monitor that has a wierd greenish tinger when used in the northern hemisphere, so this sort of thing really does matter...

    2. Re:Hemisphere issues on LCD screens? by kiwipeso · · Score: -1

      LCD's have no problems, just get one from wherever.

      --
      - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  43. -1 Paranoid Pseudo-science on the MQR standard by MarkusQ · · Score: 2
    The Cell and PCS phone structure is a far superior system when it comes to bathing the populace in EM radiation.

    The effects achieved by exposing people to close range low frequency CRT radiation, while slightly different, are more than made up for by the effects of the much higher frequency delivery system portable phones facilitate. Shorter exposure durations are required for the desired effects, and individuals who were left out of the 'computer revolution' are now included, not just through the popularity of hand set use, but also as a result of the proliferation of the microwave broadcast towers used throughout urbane areas.

    Ask yourself what is achieved by this, (research is required), and who benefits. Hint: It has nothing to do with cancer.

    Just curious, did you cut and paste this text from the ads for those tin-foil hats that block out the alien mind control beams?

    In answer to your "ask who benefits" I only see three possible beneficiaries of this sort of babble: people who run call-in talk shows, lawyers who want to stir up doubt till it's thick enough to sue someone with deep pockets, and paranoids who are going to be afraid of something and might as well be afraid of this.

    In short, bah humbug.

    -- MarkusQ

    1. Re:-1 Paranoid Pseudo-science on the MQR standard by kiwipeso · · Score: -1

      It's not babble, CellPhones do radiate microwaves.
      While these are not as much as a microwave oven, I would not recommend using them for more than 5 minutes per call.

      --
      - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  44. No such thing as a free lunch by renoX · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I just wanted to add that this technique while very nice is not entirely free.

    The "voltage spike" used to lower the response time means that there is an increase in power consumption (sp?).

    So laptop users may not want this feature enabled while they are traveling..

    Of course it depends it the increase of power consumption is large or not..

    1. Re:No such thing as a free lunch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since the "voltage spike" is between the max and the min value and a black screen is consuming the most "power" at any one time, I don't think that altering voltage levels would suck any more or less power than operating the device normally.

    2. Re:No such thing as a free lunch by plastik55 · · Score: 1
      Not really. The field-effect transistors on a TFT screen have gates which behave like capacitors. You pump charge into the gate of the transistor to set the pixel on or off.


      All this does is charge the capacitor faster by using a bigger current for a shorter time period.The same amount of current is used, so it has the same power cunsumption.

      --

      I have a positive modifier on Troll. When I mod someone Troll their karma should go UP!

  45. Wallpaper for 1400x1050 displays by yerricde · · Score: 1

    My oh-so-beautiful T22's LCD is at a wonderful 1400x1050, 14.1". The biggest problem is getting nice wallpaper for it

    1. Get wallpaper for any size display up to 1280x1024.
    2. Rescale it in GIMP, GIMP for Windows platform, or any other paint program so that width == 700 and height changes proportionally. Because you're creating a half-size bitmap, the wallpaper will lose a little detail, but that just makes your icons stand out more.
    3. If you started with 1280x1024 wallpaper, you now have a 700x560 picture. Crop off the top 35 pixels.
    4. Convert to 256 colors using optimal palette and the best dither settings. (A 256-color wallpaper takes less space in RAM.)
    5. Save it in c:\windows or wherever your OS keeps its wallpaper.
    6. In Windows, right-click the desktop and choose Properties; it should put you on the wallpaper tab. In any other desktop environment, find the analogous control panel. Choose your new wallpaper, tell the system to scale it to the full screen, and click OK.
    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
  46. 1600 x 1200 LCD screens by kiwipeso · · Score: -1

    Why not get an Apple Cinema Display?
    They are 1600 x 1024 and are fully digital.
    The refresh rates are good and you will get 2 A4 pages side by side on this display.
    Also looks really cool with widescreen DVD's.

    --
    - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  47. Death joint by kiwipeso · · Score: -1

    Black milk the early one we they drink we in the evening drink it at
    noon and in the morning we drink them we drink at night and do not
    drink we dig a grave in air are situated there one a man live not
    closely in the house play with the queues write write if it darken to
    Germany your golden hair Margarete

    it writes it and steps before the house and it flashes the asterisks
    it whistles its Rueden here it whistles its Jews out lets dig a grave
    in the earth it instructs us plays on now to the tanz

    Black milk the early one we drink you we at night drink you we in the
    morning and at noon drink you we drink in the evening and drink a man
    lives in the house plays with the queues writes writes if it darkens
    to Germany your golden hair Margarete your aschenes hair Sulamith

    we do not dig a grave in air are situated there one closely

    He calls stings more deeply in the soil it one it others sings and
    plays he reaches for the iron in the belt he schwingts its eyes is
    blue stings more deeply the spades it one it others continues to play
    to the tanz up

    Black milk the early one we drink you we at night drink you at noon
    and in the morning we drink you we drink in the evening and drink in
    man live in the house your golden hair Margarete your aschenes hair
    Sulamith it plays with the queues

    He does not call plays more sweetly death death is a master from
    Germany it calls deletes more darkly plays the violin then rises it
    than smoke into air then has it a grave in the clouds is situated
    there one closely

    Black milk the early one we drink you we at night drink you at noon
    death is a master from Germany we drink you we drink in the evening
    and in the morning and drink death is a master from Germany its eye is
    blue it meets you with bleierner ball it meets you exactly one man
    lives in the house your golden hair Margarete it rushes its Rueden on
    us it gives us a grave in air it plays with the queues and dreams
    death is a master from Germany

    your golden hair Margarete your aschenes hair Sulamith

    --
    - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  48. Don't you mean.. by eightball · · Score: 1

    ala Farenheit 451?

  49. Have seen this� by kiwipeso · · Score: -1

    the coastlands shopping center at kapiti has a few big LCD monitors around the walls.

    --
    - Kaos games and encryption systems developer
  50. Snappier? by Pope · · Score: 1

    Put them in the fridge?

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  51. 1600x1200 displays by fperez · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know why 1400x1050 and 1600x1200 displays, which are now commonplace in mid and high end laptops, can't be found anywhere as stand-alone monitors? You can pay through the nose for the best in lcd displays and still be stuck with a 1280x1024 monitor (with good angle, bright image, dadada...) Why???

    1. Re:1600x1200 displays by benh57 · · Score: 2, Informative
      Sure they are. The 22" Apple Cinema Display - 1600x1024.

      Get It here. [Apple Store]

      Price: $2499. To run this on a PC you will also need a 3dlabs card with the ADC connector. I think those are over $1k as well.

    2. Re:1600x1200 displays by Bilestoad · · Score: 1

      Or you could use a DVIator adapter, or get one that has the DVI connector (the old version). These work really well with GeForce cards like the Hercules Prophet II Ultra or Gainward GeForce 3.

  52. Good point. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I never paid any attention to >18" displays, since they are out of my price range, but I see that even something like the 20.1" NEC LCD2010x has only a 1280x1024 panel.

    I'm sorry to add nothing other than agreement, but, well... you're right.

  53. apples and oranges by mj6798 · · Score: 2

    The SGI displays you are comparing the Apple displays to are several year old designs; of course, Apple's displays are better, as are many other LCD monitors on the market. In fact, the 17" PC LCD I'm sitting at has a better contrast ratio than any of the Apple LCDs and costs around $630. The Apple LCD monitors are beautiful designs, but you still pay a premium for the brand, style, convenience, and the non-standard connectors.

  54. Palm-3D-games anyone? by RzUpAnmsCwrds · · Score: 1

    Palm-3D-games anyone

    No, but Quake is available for PocketPCs.

  55. Very definately happening, but high-end only by Wackston · · Score: 1

    I work in this area... actually, just about all the big panel makers (including LG/Philips!) are looking at this. The research is most definately still going on, though its now moved on to the "Development" stage. All I can say is people I know in Philips are funding quite a bit of R&D in around "front of display" image processing (addressing essentially all the points people have mentioned here).

    The improvement is pretty drastic in older panels but unfortunately the newer panels reduce the gains a *lot* (they're faster anyway). Combine this with big cost hits (you currently need a custom chip with a frame buffer between scaler and timing control or a new timing controller) and this simply won't appear in manstream priced panels.

    It will go mainstream, but when it does it will be integrated earlier in the pipeline where you *already* have a frame buffer anyway - in the graphics controller or for LCD/TV capable monitors in an integrated scaler/timing controller.

    Andrew

  56. I love it when. . . by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
    You can generally measure the degree of somebody's programming by the violence of their knee-jerk response when you point the fact out to them.

    I NEVER Troll.

    Honestly; I am willing to bet that if you have done any research at all into the subject, (which I strongly doubt), that it consists of listening to the advertising and 'studies' funded by the telecommunications industry and its affiliates in the hopes that they will brush away any concerns you may have nagging in the back of your mind. Cuz, Cell phones are just too 'cool' for there to be any danger. Denial is a sweet drug indeed.

    Please. Use what's left of your mind for a second to consider the following: The human brain, body and nervous system are electrochemical in nature. This is why EEG machines work. It is why stun guns work. To think that bathing the body in electromagnetic radiation has NO effect whatsoever is entirely naive.

    So what are the effects?

    Do the damned research. The multi-billion dollar telecommunications industry certainly isn't going to tell you. (The industry which has fingers in media and everywhere else!) All the information is out there, and it is not quack science. The research has been performed by many private labs. --And labs run by foriegn governments. Look at the Polish studies from the sixties to present. Look at the Swedish studies. (Though theirs have been tamed; they only admit to significantly higher levels of miscarriages in female CRT users.) Heck, look at the American studies during the same time period. Look up, "Alan Frey", a fellow funded by the U.S. military no less, to work on EM weapons and espionage devices from the sixties to present. Some of his work is on public record, and it is extremely revealing. There are dozens upon dozens of examples, but you will not see any of them on the "Learning" Channel. (The Indoctrination Station).

    --There are also plenty of labs funded by telecommunications and military interests who will say different. The U.S. Air Force openly funds a lab which has specifically gone to the effort of discounting ALL claims made by private science groups which have come forth with troublesome findings regarding EM radiation. Massive P.R. bullshit. And why the heck does the military care? And who is funding the military? --Like killing flies with cannon.

    Honestly.

    This stuff is out there in verifiable form for those who aren't scared to dig. Go through the U.S. Air Force websites. Go through Google. Just do the damn research for crying out loud! --Do it before making any more asinine comments and generally displaying the embarrassing levels to which you have been programmed by those agencies who are clearly a lot smarter than you think you are.

    Or don't.

    You can always go back to your Playstation or tune into the soothing voice of CNN. Your level of awareness is entirely up to you.


    -Fantastic Lad Oh, please! Mod me down again! Prove to me the fear you have of open discussion regarding 'taboo' subjects. Damned children.

  57. lcD Display? by bertboerland · · Score: 1


    as in liquid crystal Display Display?

    This might not seem important, but if you (read: /.) want to be taken seriously by the (printing) press, you might want to have your acronyms straight...

    --
    -- for undocumented cisco commands, take a peek @ dotu
  58. Other sources of artifacts by Animats · · Score: 2
    I'm surprised this wasn't done long ago. Most controlled devices that have some equivalent of inertia, no feedback, repeatable performance, and a speed problem are driven by a suitably ramped signal. Stepper motors, for example.

    One of the big problems with "TV" on flat panels comes not from the flat panel response time, but the conversion from 24 FPS film to 30Hz video, often followed by some kind of compression. All the fooling around to accomodate interlaced displays adds artifacts. Movies transmitted by television or stored on DVD ought to be sent at 24FPS 1080p HDTV, then shown on a flat panel at 24FPS. That's rarely the case today, but we're getting there.

    What's needed are some good, simple 21" flat panel HDTV sets that cost about $450. Then HDTV will take off. But we're probably five years away from that price point.

  59. TFT's are now awesome by sillysurfer · · Score: 1

    Just got my hands on a new Sony M61 DVI TFT, sitting alongside my Vision Master Pro410 CRT. Lets just say that under all circumstances (games as well) the sony TFT is a million times better - its clearer, perfect colour matching (DVI works a treat) and perfect geometry. For the money (£500) this Sony is smashing. All those people who think TFT sucks, just keep thinking that way, I'm going to buy shares in an opticians ASAP!

  60. So get a 1600x1200 LCD by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So get a Dell Inspiron 8x00 or a high-end IBM Thinkpad. That's what I did. A 1600x1200 LCD screen is great! And its not super-expensive, through Dell at least. (Fonts are small but I don't care.)

  61. Here are some 1600x1200 notebook models by LinuxParanoid · · Score: 2

    About 3-6 months ago I went looking for notebooks with 1600x1200 screens (and built-in CD-RW drives) and after noticing that Dell had em, I checked to find out who else did. HP, Compaq, Gateway, and Sony didn't, but IBM (and Dell) did.

    Check out the Dell Inspiron 8100 (also sold with Linux on it through Emporer Linux.) And IBM has a somewhat more expensive ThinkPad A Series A22p.

    While the font size is small, it is configurable and I appreciate the greater screen real estate.

    --LP

  62. Sedish CRT Studies . by morbid · · Score: 0

    All they showed was that women sitting on a chair for long periods were more likely to mis-carry. It was the seating position rather than the EM radiation that was most likely the culprit.

    --
    I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
  63. More paranoia by MarkusQ · · Score: 2
    There's no reason to "dig". All of the information you need to calculate the magnitude of the effect is publicly available. How much energy does a cell phone put out? How much of this could (using worst case assumption) be absorbed by the brain (or testicles, or whatever you fear losing to the fearful technology demons)? What could this amount of energy do, and how does it compare to the background?

    It isn't dificult if you have a half-way decent math background, just very tedious. And, as it turns out, pointless. Unless the cell phone companies are conspiring to change the laws of physics (which I strongly doubt), the fears over cell phone useage are nothing more than ludite humbug.

    -- MarkusQ

    P.S. I however agree with one point you made:

    You can generally measure the degree of somebody's programming by the violence of their knee-jerk response when you point the fact out to them.