Slashdot Mirror


IgNobel Awards

how_would_i_know writes: "I've always suspected there was a coconut conspiracy... now there's proof. :-)" We might as well follow-up on our earlier story with a list of the IgNobel Winners. Stalin World! A study of glee! And of course, a true breakthrough, the solution to the shower curtain mystery.

95 comments

  1. The Shower Question? by Desus · · Score: 1

    Funny, in 4th grade I remember having a science project that set out to solve the problem of "clinging shower curtains". The winner used velcro if memory serves correctly.

    Good to see the great mystery in life are always being pondered. Now lets try and figure out Dick Clarks true age. ;)

  2. Patented the WHAT?! by FreezerJam · · Score: 5, Funny

    Ok, I bet he only patented the ROUND wheel.

    I'll patent the wheel composed of a high number
    of flat sides arranged as a regular polygon.

    That'll get him....

    1. Re:Patented the WHAT?! by Tony-A · · Score: 1

      Then there is the square wheel.
      Bumpy on the flat, but fairly smooth on a corderoy road with the right size logs.

    2. Re:Patented the WHAT?! by jtra · · Score: 1
      ...patented the ROUND wheel.

      Oh, there must be a prior art.

      --
      -- Wanna textmode user interface for ruby? http://freshmeat.net/projects/jttui/
    3. Re:Patented the WHAT?! by StrawberryFrog · · Score: 1
      I'll patent the wheel composed of a high number of flat sides arranged as a regular polygon.

      You do realise that it would wear round very quickly.

      --

      My Karma: ran over your Dogma
      StrawberryFrog

  3. Alternate address for results... by FreezerJam · · Score: 5, Informative

    ...and try this address for winners...



    http://www.improb.com/ig/ig-2001-winners.html


  4. Oh, so that's what it's calld.... by gimmie_prozac · · Score: 3, Funny

    All this time I've been thinking I was a freak, it turns out I'm just suffer from Rhinotillexomania. Gross activities seem so much more benign once you stick a scientific name on them. Now I just need to do something about all the crud stuck to the underside of my desk.

    1. Re:Oh, so that's what it's calld.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and I thought I was the only one who did that... ugh....

    2. Re:Oh, so that's what it's calld.... by RogrWilco · · Score: 1

      And where can we get tickets to Stalin World?

      Welcome to the unfunnest place on earth!

  5. 2.5 percent of injuries... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just goes to show you that no matter what you say to people, they're going to walk around without crash helmets! If it were Canada, there would already be legislation, perimeter fences around the coconut trees, and big wind blocks to prevent the coconuts from being blown off the trees.

    This is a preventable accident, and measures should be taken to halt these needless coconut injuries!

  6. Black Holes by nzhavok · · Score: 1

    The Ig Nobel with the most cosmic impact was in Astrophysics, awarded to Michigan televangelist Jack Van Impe for discovering that black holes meet all the technical requirements for being the location of hell.

    Great so judjing by the article Bill Gates now has a mnopoly to black holes too.

    --

    He who defends everything, defends nothing. -- Fredrick The Great
  7. Oh dear god! by SpookyFish · · Score: 1


    We must move immediately to protect our children from the perils of falling coconuts! I hereby propose a law requiring saftey fencing at least ten feet larger in diameter of any tree bearing coconuts or similar fruits. Any owner of such a tree will blah, blah, blah...
    </sarcasm>

    Ok, if he can patent the wheel, I'm going to patent the use of "<sarcasm/>" notation to prevent the /. average of 3 ACs who post responses that clearly indicate no capability to pick up on it whatsoever.

    1. Re:Oh dear god! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please. You people know nothing about the sacrifices involved with coconuts.

      Take a look at some real heroes, recently reported here on slashdot.

      Anonymous cowards are still tickled pink that Slashdot readers, alone among web surfers, need help in figuring out where links go.

  8. Funniest statement in the article by dngrmouse · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Group glee doesn't happen alone."

    Gosh, how insightful! Never in a million years would I have known that group glee cannot happen when you're alone!

  9. Anyone else thinks... by Balinares · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ... That the guy who managed to prove Patent Offices will approve a freaking patent on the wheel deserves a real prize? I mean, what a better proof could you find that (while patents are inherently a good thing) the way they're being handled of late is, well, kinda bad...

    Bleah, maybe the guy who managed that just wanted to be funny, but I find it rather chilling myself... :p

    --

    -- B.
    This sig does in fact not have the property it claims not to have.
    1. Re:Anyone else thinks... by mmontour · · Score: 4, Informative

      I mean, what a better proof could you find that (while patents are inherently a good thing) the way they're being handled of late is, well, kinda bad..

      Does US5443036: Method of exercising a cat qualify? (IIRC, this won an IgNobel in a previous year)

      Abstract:

      A method for inducing cats to exercise consists of directing a beam of invisible light produced by a hand-held laser apparatus onto the floor or wall or other opaque surface in the vicinity of the cat, then moving the laser so as to cause the bright pattern of light to move in an irregular way fascinating to cats, and to any other animal with a chase instinct.

    2. Re:Anyone else thinks... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      A method for inducing cats to exercise consists of directing a beam of invisible light produced by a hand-held laser apparatus onto the floor or wall

      In that case I would like to file this patent...

      A method for inducing cats to exercise consists of directing a beam of visible light produced by a hand-held laser apparatus onto the floor or wall

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
    3. Re:Anyone else thinks... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does US5443036: Method of exercising a cat [delphion.com] qualify? (IIRC, this won an IgNobel in a previous year)

      So something weird is happening to me. There is no doubt that the above patent can make you giggle, but, by the same token, it is astonishing how well it works. The very first time I infringed on patent 5443036, I was absolutely astounded at how well the "laser pointer trick" worked, and, indeed, I thought to myself how unobvious it was that something as dorky as this really would completely entertain just about any cat. (Note that my infringing behaviour began after I heard about the patent; Cdr, Hattie, and Lil should all be held blameless for my law-breaking.) Really, I think there are tons of sillier patents than this one from the point of view of obviousness. The big problem here is that the grounds for the patent appear to be the same as the grounds for granting a patent for (say) a chemical process or a business process, and I'm not really sure how this fits.

  10. Science History by Nindalf · · Score: 5, Funny

    Stalin, while relaxing in a tropical amusement park, picking his nose, was struck by a coconut, prompting a brilliant idea! He immediately dragged his car (he couldn't get any wheel's, because they were patented) to his workshop and made a set of airproof underpants. He considered using charcoal filter's to absorb fart's, but because it would have to be changed, he instead leveraged his recent singularity research to create a small, contained black hole.

    To test them, knowing that adult's might be too polite to be honest or too dignified to participate, he gathered together a group of children. The test's were held in a shower to handle any accidents that might result from forced farting. It worked brilliantly. The children tried them in turn's, and not an unpleasant whiff escaped.

    For a final test, Stalin tried them on himself and stepped into the shower and strained with all his strength. Unfortunately, his mighty blast destabilized the black hole, causing him and the shower curtain to be sucked into it. At first thinking it all part of the fun, the children were overjoyed at the spectacle.

    He was awarded an Ig Nobel Prize posthumously, though this is likely no consolation as he is presumed to live in an eternal hell of contained fart's.

    (I swear it sounded like a good idea when I started writing...)

    1. Re:Science History by mustermark · · Score: 1

      ... adult's might be too polite to be honest or too dignified to participate, ...

      The test's were held in a shower to handle any accidents that might result from forced farting. It worked brilliantly. The children tried them in turn's, and not an unpleasant whiff escaped.


      Aww, look at this post. You have completely butchered the use of the apostrophe. You forgot the poor englishman who runs the Apostrophe Protection Society. He got the literature award and would be horrified by your post. Is that a coincidence? Hmmm...

      Where's GrammarNazi when you need him?

      BTW, I actually attended the Ig Nobel Prize ceremony, and it was hilarious. I would highly recommend anyone in the Cambridge/Boston area attend next year if at all possible.

    2. Re:Science History by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You dork, it's just as much of a coincidence as all the other things he mentioned that won Ig Nobel's (ha ha).

    3. Re:Science History by sporktoast · · Score: 1

      He was awarded an Ig Nobel Prize posthumously
      Sounds like he would have rated a Darwin as well.
      --
      In a related story, the IRS has recently ruled that the cost of Windows upgrades can NOT be deducted as a gambling loss.
    4. Re:Science History by killmenow · · Score: 1

      BTW, I actually attended the Ig Nobel Prize ceremony, and it was hilarious. I would highly recommend anyone in the Cambridge/Boston area attend next year if at all possible.
      Not being in the area, I watched the live webcast. There were definitely some excellent parts. I think the webcast left a lot to be desired, but what can I expect for free? I'm sure actually being there is 10 times better.
  11. Damn! by Nindalf · · Score: 2

    I left out the part about how, because due to time dilation, he will not be truly dead for several million years at least, the usual inheritance tax was not levied on his estate.

  12. Simple answer by Davace · · Score: 1

    There's a simple answer to the shower problem that doesn't need computer modeled renderings to comprehend. Showers use hot water. The water that is close to the shower head is hotter than the water just before it hits the shower floor (go ahead, try it, I'll wait!) So that means the hot water gives the air some of its heat. Now you have some hot air in one half of the bathroom. That air will rise and go over the shower curtain. That will push the cold air down, and into your shower from below, pushing the curtain in at you! I can't believe scientists didn't think of this.

    1. Re:Simple answer by grammar+nazi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      That's a nice simple answer, Davace. You are a real genius. Now tell me, Davace, why does the shower curtain still 'suck' even when you take a cold shower? The researcher mentions that fact in the first paragraph of his article.

      ....dogh!!

      --

      Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
  13. I am forced to quote a teacher I had once... by SpiritualRemains · · Score: 1

    "We're dealing with mental midgets here" - Clarence Tabar

    Spiritual Remains

  14. Shower Curtain Prior Art by Autonomous+Crowhard · · Score: 4, Funny
    Oh hell... At least it was prior thought. I figured this out ages ago (1981-ish). and I even came up with a better solution: redirect the shower head slightly towards the curtain. The water pressure overcomes the other forces.

    OK, where the hell is my grant???

    1. Re:Shower Curtain Prior Art by Error27 · · Score: 2

      Well, first of all as far as I could see he didn't patent it but was merely studying it...

      But also, if we used your suggestion then we would get water all over the floor. The whole point of the shower curtain is to keep water from getting on the floor. Moisture hurts the furniture and perhaps the floor. And wettness increases the your risk of falling when you get out.

      What I do is use a blow drier to negate the inward forces. With my method there is far less risk of getting the floor wet but the noise may bother some people.

    2. Re:Shower Curtain Prior Art by grammar+nazi · · Score: 4, Funny
      What I do is Duct Tape the shower curtain sealed all around the floor, walls, and yes... even the ceiling.

      In addition to keeping the shower curtain where it belongs, this also forces me to take quick showers, because of CO2 poisoning if I'm in there for more than 7 minutes.

      I've thus, killed 2 birds with one stone (or roll of duct tape). Extra benefits are mastery of the 6 1/2 minute shower and being able to shave afterwards while still dizzy.

      --

      Keeping /. free of grammatical errors for ~5 years.
    3. Re:Shower Curtain Prior Art by Isle · · Score: 0

      It's CO thats poisonous it's CO2.
      CO2 is very common, and in an environment with high concentrations, you would feel a normal chooking sensation. The dangerous part of CO-poisoning, is that you wont notice you are being choked to death, before you hit the floor.

    4. Re:Shower Curtain Prior Art by DGolden · · Score: 1

      I know you're joking - but just in case anyone seriously tries that after reading it:

      It's a lot easier just to stick weights to the bottom of your shower curtain. Here (Ireland) the more expensive shower curtains have folded over hems at the bottom with small weights sewn in. Problem solved - weights are heavy enough to pull curtain flat. You just need to have a firmly attached curtain rail, since the curtain is obviously significantly heavier with weights in.

      --
      Choice of masters is not freedom.
    5. Re:Shower Curtain Prior Art by killmenow · · Score: 1
      What I do is use a blow drier to negate the inward forces.
      Why not just install those plexiglass sliding doors in your shower? That's what mine has and they never suck inward...at least not visibly.

    6. Re:Shower Curtain Prior Art by Autonomous+Crowhard · · Score: 1
      Uh... You're supposed to put the base of the curtain inside the tub.

      If you're in a standup shower, direct it so that the curtain gets hit when it blows it.

  15. Re:Simple answer [Ich bin schmutzig!] by Kira-Baka · · Score: 1

    Or you could just be like me and not bathe at all

  16. Gas-Masking Ass Shields by runslothrun · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    All this time I've had two questions about our modern world: 1. Where are the flying cars? 2. Where are the gas-masking ass shields? Finally, one has been answered. If only these were available 15 years ago. I shudder to think back to that night...the night that officially ended all roleplaying acitivites in my life. After years of nasal abuse at the hands (asses?) of the other role-players in the group, I finally had had enough. I remember going on a twenty minute tirade about what I referred to as "common, everyday, ass-hygienics and socially acceptable levels of ass-orchestration". I left the game and have never gone back. Even thinking about it now, my mind is assualted by olfactory memories of past-gas. Now, however, I know that there is hope for others, like me, who would like to play a game with a group of friends or just jaunt down to the local hobby store for a look around without being assaulted by free-floating-vaporous-ass-emissions. I think I'll make some flyers up about these drawers and strategically place them in various books at my local game shop. Maybe, in some small way, I can make a difference. The horror, the horror...

  17. but what about the... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    i still say nothing beats a nice large anvil when hitting people

    1. Re:but what about the... by DJerman · · Score: 2
      [I] still say nothing beats a nice large anvil when hitting people

      Yes, generally things that beat a nice large anvil are, in fact, hitting a nice large anvil.

      --
  18. The prize for literature should have been shared! by MadDog+Bob-2 · · Score: 1

    The shameful misuse of the apostrophe is being fought by others as well.

    Bob must be ... um ... more irate!

  19. Turn off scripting before you read the results by sulli · · Score: 2

    otherwise it redirects to a 404 page.

    --

    sulli
    RTFJ.
  20. Truly comic touch by Ronnie+Coote · · Score: 3, Funny

    The truly comic touch to this comes from IP Australian (the federal government agency which granted the patent in the first place) says...

    "Don't reinvent the wheel. Searching worldwide patent information can help you avoid wasting time and money duplicating work done elsewhere"

    (from here)

    --
    Candygram for Mongo!
    1. Re:Truly comic touch by markmoss · · Score: 2

      That's the explanation. There are no previous patents for wheels.

      You would think they would give some thought to non-patented prior art too. Next thing you know, they'll let someone patent communications satellites... 8-)

  21. Dr Jack Impe and Rexella by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

    I'm just glad the man who put the Crazy in Crazy religious right and his wife Rexella (King of all monsters) finally won recognition for all their hard work

  22. bleh, rejected by Trracer · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    2001-10-05 12:35:56 Ig Nobel prize 2001 (articles,humor) (rejected)
    Now give me credit, damnit!

    --
    English is not my first language, so cut me some slack -: Om du kan lasa det har sa kan du Svenska :-
  23. A physics question (really) by hey! · · Score: 2

    Peter Barss of McGill University earned the Ig Nobel Prize in Medicine for pointing out that the real thing can pack a metric tonne of force when it drops from a 35-metre palm tree.

    He had an astronomer relative calculate the force after seeing victims arrive at the hospital where he worked in Papua New Guinea.


    How exactly do you calculate something like this? I'm one of those geeks who remember just enough physics to be confused. It seems to me that the force is dependent on the mass of the coconut and its acelleration, which is determined by the rigidity of what is being hit (e.g. a steel plate vs. a foam mat).

    It also seems to me that as devestating as a coconut impact might be, it would not be as reliably deadly as carefully placing over two thousand pounds on somebody's head.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
    1. Re:A physics question (really) by jnik · · Score: 2
      Pretty simple, actually. Figure the mass of a coconut, height of the tree, and you can solve for the velocity of the coconut at impact, say five feet off the ground. I think for this one you'd ignore air resistance, but that's possible. You then know the impulse. Elasticity of the human heada is I'm sure well-known by know, so you can find out how the force would be spread out over time to produce the needed impulse. Heck, you might even be able to do this one on the back of an envelope.

      Certainly a coconut is less reliable, but I don't recall anyone suggesting they use this research for assassination.

    2. Re:A physics question (really) by Pludodog · · Score: 1

      The real question is, how many swallows does it take to carry one?

    3. Re:A physics question (really) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      actually, I'd suspect the force is mostly meaningless in this case. The momentum of the coconut is what you feel first. The force would be a factor of how fast the coconut transfers the momentum to you. Obviously, some part of the body can safely absorb several tonnes of force over very short periods of time. And keep in mind that the body may be solid, but its not a fixed solid. I.E. people probably fall down when hit. It would be interesting to see how elastic these colisions are and do some calculations...

    4. Re:A physics question (really) by lucius · · Score: 1

      An African or European swallow?

  24. Free Ignobel Lectures by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    If you live in the area, you can get there this afternoon.

    The IG INFORMAL LECTURES will beheld at MIT room 26-100 on Saturday, October 6, 1 pm.

    A half-afternoon of improbably funny, informative, brief (10-15 minutes each), high-spirited public lectures:

    • David Jones (Nature magazine's "Daedalus") will delight and confound everyone and everything.
    • The 2001 Ig Nobel Prize winners in the fields of Biology, Medicine, Public Health, Economics, and Peace will attempt to explain why they've done what they've done.
    This free event is organized in cooperation with the MIT Press Bookstore.
    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:Free Ignobel Lectures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I would have loved seeing the 2000 psychology winners.

      "Unskilled and Unaware of It: How Difficulties in Recognizing One's Own Incompetence Lead to Inflated Self-Assessments."

      They basically want to prove that incompetent don't recognize their incompetence (which may not be such a new idea for any compentent psychologist)

      They use humor tests, and participant have to recognize which jokes are funny (or more precisely, which jokes the phsychologists have rated 'funny')

      Considering the fact that the most funny joke was: If a kid asks where rain comes from, I think a cute thing to tell him is 'God is crying.' And if he asks why God is crying, another cute thing to tell him is 'probably because of something you did.', you have a nice GEB-like self-referencial article...

  25. A follow-up to a follow-up. Niiice. by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 2



    Enough with the "shower curtain" stories, Michael. You yourself originally posted the same story back in July. Out of the hundreds of submissions for stories given to Slashdot, you picked this one? Come on..

    Cheers,

    --
    Bowie J. Poag

    1. Re:A follow-up to a follow-up. Niiice. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Idiot. The story is not about the shower curtain. Go play in the traffic.

  26. Even better by Pope · · Score: 1

    I've seen shower curtains with magnets in the bottom! So if you have a regular tub/stall, they act as weights. If you have an old steel tub, they stick to the walls. Genius!

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
    1. Re:Even better by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      Not steel. Cast iron.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
  27. The scary thing... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My roommate and I have a long history of debating all sorts of esoteric subjects. He's an ex-Born Again, and I'm an atheist, so of course the subject of Hell came up. =-> He and I were actually arguing about whether Hell was endothermic or exothermic. (yes, we're bored, overeducated college kids) Then we moved on to its location, and we ended up coming to the same conclusion - if Hell exists and is bound by the same physics as the rest of the universe, it's a Black Hole. (the big tipoff was the whole heat without light bit... radiation! Or, alternately, heat from extreme pressure)

  28. Is Hell exothermic or endothermic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    This one is great. Some of you might have seen it before:

    >The following is an actual question given on a University of Washington
    >Chemistry mid-term. The answer by one student was so "profound" that the
    >professor shared it with his colleagues. Bonus Question: Is Hell
    >exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)? Most of the
    >students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle's Law (gas cools off
    >when it expands and heats up when it is compressed) or some variant. One
    >student, however, wrote the following: First, we need to know how the
    >mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate that souls
    >are moving into Hell and the rate they are leaving. I think that we can
    >safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave. Therefore,
    >no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, lets look
    >at the different religions that exist in the world today. Some of these
    >religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will
    >go to Hell. Since there are more than one of these religions and since
    >people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all
    >souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect
    >the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the
    >rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle's Law states that in
    >order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the
    >volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added. This
    >gives two possibilities: 1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the
    >rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell
    >will increase until all Hell breaks loose. 2. If Hell is expanding at a
    >rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and
    >pressure will drop until Hell freezes over. So which is it? If we accept
    >the postulate given to me by Teresa during my Freshman year, "that it will
    >be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you," and take into account the
    >fact that I still have not succeeded in having sexual relations with her,
    >then, #2 cannot be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and
    >will not freeze. The student received the only "A."

    1. Re:Is Hell exothermic or endothermic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This story seems to be an urban legend. There are many different worded versions floating around the net. Not all contain the 'cold day in Hell'-Part, they have different names etc.

  29. ADA by krugdm · · Score: 1

    So now I wonder if I can qualify for benefits under the American Disabilities Act if I claim that I'm suffering from Rhinotillexomania?

  30. The Australian sense of humor by ral · · Score: 2, Funny

    From the Australian government patent site Searching patent information page:

    "Don't reinvent the wheel. Searching worldwide patent information can help you avoid wasting time and money duplicating work done elsewhere."

  31. Re:Wow! Fart filtering undies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dUtCh OvEn!!!

  32. Re:Simple answer, but wrong by Lish · · Score: 1

    Except that they did, and your answer is incorrect. For proof, try taking a very cold shower. Same effect occurs. It's a meteorologically-related phenomenon, not just "hot air rises".

    --
    "This message is composed of 100% recycled electrons."
  33. To heck with patenting the wheel... by markmoss · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'll patent fire!

    Claim 1: A process for the production of heat by the chemical combination of oxygen with solid, liquid, or gaseous substances.

    Claim 2: The reduction in volume or weight of waste material by chemical combination with oxygen.

    1. Re:To heck with patenting the wheel... by Alsee · · Score: 1

      I'll patent fire!

      Damn! I was about to post that.

      I was going to make Claim 1 (heat), I didn't think of Claim 2 (reduction of waste material), but I can still patent this claim:

      Claim 3: A process for the production of visible radiation via the oxidation of a suitable substrate. The vital feature being that said substrate enters the process in a favorable energy state and exits in a depleted energy state.
      Additionally this process has the advantagous properties of being continous and self sustaining as long as both reactants (oxygen and substrate) are present.

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  34. Stalin World Article by pedro · · Score: 2

    Is available here. The guy who built the place has one *seriously* twisted sense of humor.... my hat goes off to him!

    --
    Brak: What's THAT?
    Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
    1. Re:Stalin World Article by Harlockjds · · Score: 1

      I agree that is one seriously sick since of humor. If I had the money to do it I would do the same thing.

  35. really? by twitter · · Score: 1
    Gosh, how insightful! Never in a million years would I have known that group glee cannot happen when you're alone!

    So, who were you with, Saturday October 06, @12:23AM?

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  36. GOD FUCKING DAMNIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0



    will someone PLEASE suck my god damn motherfucking cock?

    -- Yours Truly, Captain "Cocksucker" Picard

  37. cold showers and the chimney effect by wayne · · Score: 1
    People seem to be dismissing the chimney effect of a shower by showing that the curtain still pulls in when you use cold water instead of hot water. While the temperature of the water certainly can play a part, there is another thing about the water that is important:

    Water is wet. Really. You can go check if you want.

    Now the funny thing about all this wet stuff all over the inside of the shower is that water vapor (H2O) is lighter than air (N2, O2, etc.). Yes, H2O (molecular weight of 2*1+16=18) is about 36% lighter than N2, O2 (molecular weight of 2*14=28, 2*16=32 etc.) This fact is well known by pilots, who have to deal with less lift when flying over large bodies of water and such. I, for one, dismiss the "tornado" theory based on the fact that the shower curtain still pulls in when the shower is hitting my head.

    --
    SPF support for most open source mail servers can be found at libspf2.
    1. Re:cold showers and the chimney effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I, for one, dismiss the "tornado" theory based on the fact that the shower curtain still pulls in when the shower is hitting my head.

      If the shower is hitting your head, I'd think you'd want to move out of the way. Only the water, the air and perhaps your hands should be anywhere near your head. Perhaps you've already been hit by too many showers to realize that.

  38. Patent #2001100012 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's that patent again? the web site I searched only accepts 9 digit numbers 2001100012 has one extra. Maybe someone can post the patent here for reference...

  39. You've never seen a kid watch Barney then by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

    Watching TV is being alone.

  40. You know funny about that shower curtain mystery.. by Telek · · Score: 2

    I've been wondering about it ever since it was posted... I've done some tests in my shower, and I'm not so sure that what he says is true. Or at least it's not entirely responsible.

    I tried the cold shower thing, and the curtain only moved inwards slightly. Not nearly as much as with a hot shower.

    And after the water was turned off, the curtains were STILL pulled inwards. As soon as I opened the side a little (to let the air mix) they immediately stopped pulling inwards (hence it would appear to be a temperature difference, not a mysterious mini cyclone effect)

    Anyone else tried it?

    --

    If God gave us curiosity
  41. NS access to time machine? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Quantifying the hazards of falling coconuts and patenting the wheel are just two of the achievements recognized by the 20001 Ig Nobel Prizes. These are awarded each year for achievements that "cannot or should not be reproduced".

  42. Shower curtain project by thejake316 · · Score: 1

    I believe that lead the Scorpions to update their song to "Rock You Like My Mother-in-Law's Virtual Shower Simulator"

    --
    AC's cheerfully ignored
  43. Re:Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Can you imagine a World Trade Center of these?

    No, but I can imagine a Boeing 767 of them.

  44. "Cannot, or should not, be reproduced" by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2
    I though the IgNobels were supposed to be about outright silly research. Maybe it's just me, but what's so silly about the coconut thing? I never thought about it much because I live in Baltimore, where we don't have a lot of coconut palms, but yeah, if the damned trees run to 35 meters in height, then that's roughly a coconut dropping off a ten-story building. I'd be damned surprized if that didn't injure anybody who happened to be standing below. If he's right that it's 2.5% of the trauma cases he sees, that's not entirely trivial (just for comparison, does anybody know what percentage of trauma admissions are for injuries from lightning?)

    Oh, and if you visit New Guinea and there's a storm -- don't take shelter beneath a palm tree.

    --

    This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

  45. SQUARE wheels by Bastian · · Score: 4, Funny
    And a new road surface.

    No, really. A square wheel will ride over a surface made of a series of half-circles (think: one long string of speedbumps) as if it were a round wheel going across a flat surface.

  46. Have a helping of math. by Bastian · · Score: 2

    Let's assume the coconut weighs 1kg.

    And our unfortunate victim's head is 1.5m off the ground (thus making the distance the coconut falls 33.5m.

    After having falling 33.5m, the coconut will be moving at sqrt(2*9.8*33.5), or 25.6 m/s.

    If the person's head stops the coconut instantly, the deceleration will be infinite, meaning infinite force. Let's hope this is the case, because our hapless victim will likely die too quickly to feel the pain.

    Sadly, the world does not work this way, so let's assume it takes 1/2 cm for the coconut to fully decelerate after hitting his/her head. (It's a soft head.)

    Using the equation used above, v^2 = v0^2 + 2a(x - x0), we know that the acceleration will be 656.6m/s/s.

    With a 1 kg coconut, that means 656.6 newtons of force into your head. And that's assuming you have a truly soft head.

  47. Everyone should read Bob The Angry Flower by Bahumat · · Score: 1

    It's nice for us living in Edmonton; See Magazine (a weekly entertainment/alternate newspaper) carries it. (Again.)

    --
    "To pass through the jungle; silence, courtesy, ferocity, as the occasion demands." -- Kamau, "Proper Passage"
  48. Square wheels are not as good as round wheels. by more · · Score: 1

    If you accelerate a square wheel over a surface made of series of half-circles with a constant torque, the acceleration will have a wave pattern in it. Thus, it is more practical to have round wheels and enjoy from constant acceleration.

    --

    -- Imperial units must die --