Slashdot Mirror


Sharp Readies SL-5000D

Anders writes "infoSync has a story and pictures of Sharps new Linux-device SL-5000D, which runs on Embedix Linux 2.4 with Jeode's PersonalJava, using Qt/Embedded and the Qt Palmtop Environment, and will be capable of running applications coded either in Linux or in Java."

22 of 142 comments (clear)

  1. Coded in Linux? by InsomniacsDream · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I was under the impression that Linux was an OS, not a programming language ;-)

  2. NOT-released-to-the-world by Knunov · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check your dept.

    From the article:

    "Sharp's efforts to put a Linux handheld on the market has been known for quite a while, and now they're readying actual devices - but they're only for developers yet."

    You can register to become a developer on their website, but it's still a PitA.

    And there was no mention of how much these things will cost. Anyone know?

    Knunov

    --
    Why do users with IDs under 100,000 or over 700,000 usually have the most worthwhile comments?
    1. Re:NOT-released-to-the-world by waerloga01 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I just looked on their website (and registered as a developer) and the price is $399US for the developers edition (Tuesday, Nov 6, 06:45 EST)
      Please point me to where you found the $200US price!

    2. Re:NOT-released-to-the-world by alexjohns · · Score: 3, Informative

      The development version is $399. The regular version is supposed to be in the $500+ range. Sorry, Linux or no Linux, that's too much for a PDA. I can buy a used laptop for that price. I'll stick with my Handspring Visor. PalmOS is still not an MS OS, so either way I'm supporting variety in the marketplace.
      Go to www.linuxdevices.com - they've got pictures. Try this: http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT2134869242. html

  3. PersonalJava is old... by MosesJones · · Score: 4, Informative


    PersonalJava is old hat and is a variant of the old 1.1 version of the language. The new J2ME platform has various profiles aimed at amoung other things PDAs and Mobiles, which is where the market will be at.

    From a Java perspective this isn't very interesting and isn't very cool. Hopefully they will be able to upgrade the libraries to support J2ME when the PDA profile is released. Then it will be an interesting device.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:PersonalJava is old... by rbeattie · · Score: 4, Informative
      Not totally true.

      It says on the Sharp developer news page that it uses PersonalJava version 1.2 and from that spec you can see that:

      • PJAE 1.2 uses JDK 1.1.8 as its base.
      • PJAE 1.2 adds security as specified in Java 2 SDK, Standard Edition, v 1.2.2 (referred to as "JDKTM 1.2.2" in this specification). Therefore, this specification contains some APIs based on JDK 1.2.2 APIs. These are identified in the appropriate sections.
      Below in the spec it says the createImage apis use Java 1.2 too.

      I found this stuff while trying to figure out if you were right:

      Even still, it uses Java 1.18 for most of it's functionality, but this isn't totally useless! I was doing some decent development a few years ago using that spec...

      -Russ

      --
      Me
  4. Ooh. by Ravagin · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Well, the screen is those photos is clearly the usual photoshopped image, but the device still looks extremely sexy. Keyboard, CF slot... mm.

    Mind you, my Palm is still all I need (IIIxe forever! whoo! etc!), but I can respect the extreme coolness of this device. Looks vaguely like one of the tricorders on Enterprise....

    --

    Karma: T-rexcellent.

  5. Looks Great! by Judg3 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I especially love it's "Thumb Board" keyboard. You don't see it unless you need it, real nice. More PDA maker's should think of this idea. I may get one simply because it would be a lot more useful then my IPAQ. Having an actual keyboard to type on is nice, even if its not full size you can still type on it faster then a virtual keyboard. Good job Sharp!

    --
    Looking for hardware (Currently need: Large Etch-a-Sketch) Have one? See my journal!
  6. Any standard in the linux pda field? by lekter1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm a happy Palm user, but I'd like to switch to a Linux-based PDA once a standard emerges. Now there are too many platforms (QT-embedded, plain X, the one from AgendaVR3, the one from Yopy, ...).

    For me it seems risky to buy one nowadays. I'm going to wait 6-8 months more.

    What do you think about the standards? Which one do you think is going to be the "winner"?

    --

    greetings,
    lekter
    http://www.hispacluster.org
  7. This is the machine I have been waiting for. by Anton+Anatopopov · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I have held off buying a PDA because I wanted to make sure I could run Linux on it with the manufacturer's blessing (rather than their tolerance, indifference or outright hostility).

    Microsoft will be watching the success of this one like a hawk, since their ill-fated WinCE experiment proved windows lack of scalability in the embedded market.

    This could be the first of a lon long line of Linux powered handhelds. Roll on world domination !! :-)

  8. nice hardware, but the software... by mj6798 · · Score: 5, Informative
    The hardware is nice, although starting to show its age (faster ARMs are around the corner). I think the choice of Qt/Embedded for the GUI is a big mistake, however.

    Linux PDAs won't take over the consumer market from Palm, but they are good platforms for vertical and custom software (medical, scientific, legal, etc.). But people who write that kind of software already have languages, environments, and toolkits for their domains, and those languages and toolkits are usually not Java, C++, or Qt. X11 would allow applications created in different environments to co-exist, but Qt/Embedded forces everybody to use Qt.

    I hope Sharp will put X11 on the device. They can keep their Qt applications by switching to Qt/X11 for their applications. If they don't base the UI on X11, I think they are going to miss their target market.

    (In case you want to bring up the "performance" argument for using an "embedded toolkit", a 200MHz ARM is the equivalent of a desktop machine from a few years ago, machines that ran X11 with no problems. X11 was actually developed on and for machines less powerful than today's low-end Palms.)

  9. Make it slick and easy and cool... by motherhead · · Score: 3, Interesting

    and watch as people start talking about Linux that would never have before.

    Use that Microsoft tactic of sneaking the OS into peoples homes and hearts. Lets face it, most people still think Linux is an Ugly, cobbled together OS that is difficult to install and use. (if they really know what it is at all). I think it would be fun when they start seeing Handheld applications that are as stable as any Palm app but far more powerful and able.

    Microsoft has made no new freinds with XP. Even sheep know when they are being lined up for slaughter and the backlash against it's "directed marketing" is starting to get mainstream press.

    this would be a perfect time to show off slick Linux apps to the masses. make them love the little bastard and watch that spread the gospel to the desktops (perhaps). At least introduce modern Linux to them.

    I, like a lot of us will probably just get an iPac and plop Linux on that. But your your dad spend $500 on a shiney new gadget and hack the OS? would his friends?

  10. I'm not very happy with qt-embeded by C0vardeAn0nim0 · · Score: 5, Informative

    I have it installed in my iPaq for more than a month now. It has several bugs...

    One of them in the multimedia player: after playing anything (mp3, mpeg, etc.) it hangs, and you have to fire a terminal to kill the player if you want the audio device free.

    In the calendar you can't enter a repeating event with a fixed end date. it will be included in the database but wont show on the display,

    At least once a week I have to reset the unit because Qt hangs

    and last bu not least, the power saving doesnt work. it doesnt shut off the back light or the LCD after some inactive time.

    Gotta check if these things were corrected...

    --
    What ? Me, worry ?
  11. Cost. by ludey · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I couldn't imagine it costing less than $500. That's probably going to be the main problem as a Palm competitor. This is a gorgeous piece, and I plan to get one myself, but how many people are willing to shell this kind of money out to say they're running linux on their PDA?

    --
    --------------
    David O.
  12. Notice Opera? by nervlord1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Maybe its just me, but the number of Linux based handhelds seems to be pushing towarsd linux, i think it has something to do with the cost ;) but whats the cost of something like QT embedded? expensive stuff for your handheld? or really cheap? BTW did anyone else pick up opera in the screenshot? if theyve got opera, its save to assume this thing can browse the web. *patiently waiting to sell his karma to purcahse one :P*

    --
    Microsoft IIS is to webserving as KFC is to healthy eating
  13. Maybe... by Colin+Bayer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Java is an operating system, too...

    In either case, edit posts, /. :P

    --
    Want Linux games? HERE.
  14. where is | on that keyboard? by monas · · Score: 3, Funny

    Keyboard without "|" - keyboard without future!

    In wrong place - it's even worse :-//

    1. Re:where is | on that keyboard? by Jay+Carlson · · Score: 4, Funny
      Keyboard without "|" - keyboard without future!

      In wrong place - it's even worse :-//

      Don't you mean: :-|

  15. Played with it at Systems 2001 by Alan+Cox · · Score: 5, Informative

    It feels nice. Its a thinner and lighter than the ipaq with CF jacket which is a good thing. The display quality was nice. They input methods were interesting (eg full unicode popups) but I found I hated all of them. CF and a memory card slot are built in to the base thin unit. There is no PCMCIA provision at all.

    It had no full screen handwriting mode like familiar on the iPAQ. The pop out thumbpad is cute but almost unusable - even for me an ex sinclair computer user and PC110 owner.

    The apps were good, but appear to be proprietary, The guy present wasnt sure how many binary only driver modules it used and I've not seen much sign of hardware docs.

    It seemed very much "nice PDA that happened to have Linux hiding at the bottom" than "Linux on a PDA".

  16. FlashRom? by SubtleNuance · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Does anyone know if this device has flashable ROM? I own a CasioE100, I bought it the moment it became available (it was the feature leader BY FAR at its time, and the Casio Exx series still holds strong (including the hardware on my E100)).

    The reason i ask is this, without a flashable ROM, will i be left behind AGAIN(!). You see, ive got this E100 that all the CE developers have 'moved on from' - if they burn JavaPersonalEdition into the Sharp unit, and i am incapable of removing it for a J2ME upgrade later? Will I be able to completely remove Opera5 for Opera5+x? I would hate to get stuck w/ QT Embedded VXX(?) and get screwed when everyone moves up to QTE VXX+Y.

    Really, I am not just a little miffed about the 'applicance' like state of the PDA world - the PDA universe needs someone who will ship a PDA in a more generic sense, with WinCE as an 'option' and drivers for all the hardware for WinCE, QT Palmtop, QNX and Linux.

    Instead of stearing PDAs like the handheld version of Apple hardware, Id like to see a little more of a "open IBM clone" style hardware... but i digress.

    So, what is the chance that I might be able to consider this device, IE: only if I can re-flash it to be the 'latest' and 'greatest' software available in future... i cant stand to think ill end up with anther $600CDN PDA that I cannot shove software into because it was sold as a glorified calculator...with a permanent OS/APP/ROM image.

  17. Re:Wot to do with it by hey! · · Score: 4, Funny

    Sounds like an eminently hckable device

    In my bleary eyed, pre-caffeine morning haze, I read the above as 'Sounds like an eminently lickable device'.

    Stop doing that.

    --
    Post may contain irony: discontinue use if experiencing mood swings, nausea or elevated blood pressure.
  18. Re Do with it.. whatever you can by d.valued · · Score: 3, Informative

    1. Yes, it is eminently hackable.. but on Sharp's site, they say that it won't be possible to make it into a microserver. (However, a CF II slot means that you CAN connect a pricey 802.11b card to it... ultra-small, ultra-portable Web surfing and hacking). 2. Unless you've a wallet large enough to deserve a combination lock, it's not gonna be that good an MP3 player at first. Granted, they're working on Microdrive support, but the RAM is only 32 MB and the only other media slot is SD (or SmartMedia..? I've never messed with SD before.). 3. If you register with their site, you can pre-order a Developer's Version for $400. Delivery by end of month. (ps: Those site refs are very incomplete; just click the hyperlinks.)

    --
    I used to be someone else. Now I'm someone better.
    Real life is underrated.