Slashdot Mirror


Using Radiators to Cool CPUs

dan writes "Overclockers Australia have a review up of the CPU Radiator Zen, a new approach to cooling your toasty CPU's. Rather than taking the traditional approach of a heatsink with lots of fins and a noisy 7,000rpm fan it uses radiator/heat pipe technology. The implementation of the unit is a bit flawed, but it is interesting to see where the technology is heading.. and if it can be done right I personally think this is where it will end up."

90 of 245 comments (clear)

  1. Silent? by chrysalis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How silent is this? It's cool for overclocking, but if it's silent, it could also be very cool for music makers.

    --
    {{.sig}}
    1. Re:Silent? by Chakat · · Score: 2, Informative
      It looks like its still farily loud. It's got two fans on it, so it's going to make a good amount of noise. Unfortunately, it's not the fanless system I was hoping for when I checked it out.

      Plus, it looks like its not good for OCers. The device is very poorly designed, and busted caused damage to both the CPU and Mobo.

      --

      If god had intended you to be naked, you would have been born that way.

  2. Noisy Fans? by FortKnox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    a noisy 7,000rpm fan

    Maybe I'm just an old-school style computer guy, but is fan noise really that big of a deal? My computer is in an infants room and it doesn't wake up the baby (counterstrike pumped through 4 speakers does, but that's beside the point). Honestly, who has a huge issue with fan noise?

    And why always complain about CPU fan noise? Doesn't the fans in the power supply make more noise, anyway?

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:Noisy Fans? by melquiades · · Score: 2

      I'm just an old-school style computer guy, but is fan noise really that big of a deal?

      I don't think it has anything to do with being "old-school style" -- apparently you're just not a musician! Those of us who do musical work with our machines half the time and have hyper-sensitive ears the rest of the time find fans quite irritating.

      Doesn't the fans in the power supply make more noise, anyway?

      Not in my laptop! :) It's soooo close to silent, but darn, if I could just squeeze it down a few more decibels....

    2. Re:Noisy Fans? by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      Try working with a fanless desktop computer -- e.g., an iMac -- for a while and then go back to your regular desktop. See what a difference it makes. Fan noise never used to bother me until I got an iMac at home; now sitting down at my desk at work bothers the hell out of me for the first hour or so, because I'm always aware of the noise from the CPU. And I'm convinced that even if one isn't aware of it, the constant background noise harms productivity.

      Not that it harms productivity as much as posting to /. when one should be coding, of course ... ;)

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    3. Re:Noisy Fans? by bstrahm · · Score: 2

      The answer is obviously YES...

      When I left my last company I had a dual Xeon system (3-4 fans if I recall) and a bunch of network switches, other boxen, etc. each with their own fans...

      When I powered down when I left, I was SHOCKED at how quiet my cube got... I just keep a laptop in my cube now and use X/SSH/etc. to get at the "real" work machines that are elsewhere... I love the quiet.

    4. Re:Noisy Fans? by Peter+Dyck · · Score: 2, Interesting
      is fan noise really that big of a deal?

      Fans make noise. Period.

      I'm one of those individuals who are simply driven mad by excessive computer noise which means that anything over 50 dB is intolerable. In fact, some time ago I sold my 600 MHz Duron PC because I couldn't stand the noise the CPU fan alone made. A CPU fanless Sun Blade 100 with a low rpm hard drive was heaven after the previous noise polluter (the power supply still makes noise, though). I'm quite content with the trade-off I had to make between computer speed and noise.

      I still blame the CPU manufacturers for ignoring the heat problem (=noise problem) at the altar of unnecessary performance, though.

    5. Re:Noisy Fans? by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      one problem with your reasoning is that babies like soft white noise. at a resurant, babies sleep because the background noise is soothing and hypnotic. ever wonder why all those crib toys come with an option of waves or wind?

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    6. Re:Noisy Fans? by sammy+baby · · Score: 2
      Call me madcap, but I always thought that a heatsink *is* a radiator.


      Well, yeah, it is, in the technical sense. In the article, though, they're using the term "radiator" to describe what you probably have in your house if you're not on central air: a long pipe through which they're moving a refrigerant. Essentially, this is a liquid-cooled system, minus all the crap that's usually involved in putting together a liquid-cooled system (external resevoirs and radiators, along with a couple feet of flexible tubing).



      It's a shame the thing apparently has the worst mounting system in the world, because otherwise, it looks from the test results like the design worked pretty well.

    7. Re:Noisy Fans? by Manaz · · Score: 2

      And why always complain about CPU fan noise? Doesn't the fans in the power supply make more noise, anyway?

      It sounds like you haven't actually HEARD the sound of a 60mm 7,000rpm Delta Black Label fan.

      Imagine a hair dryer. On it's fastest setting. Sitting inside your PC.

      That's the sound one of those fans makes. It takes a LOT of effort for a 60mm fan to move 38cfm in a free-air environment - then add to the fact that you're trying to push that airflow through a heatsink, which creates even MORE noise, and your fan gets louder again. It's not unusual to hear of HSF units with Delta Black Label fans rated at 48dBA. And that doesn't take into account the fact that the noise is very high pitched as well. It makes your PC sound like a jet plane readying itself for takeoff. It can *really* get on your nerves. Trust me.

      Power supply fans tend to be pretty damned quiet in comparison. Especially when Panaflo fans (or similar) are used - they're known for being quiet.

  3. Has this... by rmadmin · · Score: 2, Informative

    already been done? I do believe that one of the Cray models had a 'liquid cooled CPU', or something to that effect. I never saw the specifics on how it was done, if it was just the CPU, or if it was the whole machine being cooled that way.

    I also remember someone else (Penguincomputing?) having the '1st commercial liquid cooled PC', which was a 1.6 Ghz(2x800Mhz) Dual Athlon.

    Either way, its really cool to see this same technology replicated for private use.

    1. Re:Has this... by sphealey · · Score: 2
      already been done? I do believe that one of the Cray models had a 'liquid cooled CPU', or something to that effect. I never saw the specifics on how it was done, if it was just the CPU, or if it was the whole machine being cooled that way.
      That's one of the most famous design hacks in computer hardware history (although that statement itself is a bit unfair, given the percentage of high performance hacks directly attributable to S. Cray): the entire processing section was submerged in liquid Freon, several hundred liters worth. There was a glass section so you could look in as with an aquarium, too.

      sPh

  4. Submerging circuit board in an inert liquid by melquiades · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I remember seeing years ago on public television somebody demonstrating this amazing liquid which, I believe, was called "chlorinert". It looked and behaved more or less like water, but it was completely nonconductive. The guy demostrated by plugging in a lamp, submerging it in the liquid, and screwing in a bulb while it was submerged. It was pretty amazing.

    They mentioned its possible application to CPU cooling in supercomputers -- the idea was that you would actually submerge whole circuit boards in the liquid, while pumping it through a conventional refrigeration unit. Heat sinks be damned!

    Apparently it never caught on, though -- I can't find anything about it online. Even mighty google just says, "Did you mean 'chlorine'?" I think it was incredibly expensive; perhaps that's the reason.

    1. Re:Submerging circuit board in an inert liquid by Sir_Real · · Score: 2, Informative

      It was called Flourinert actually, and the reason it isn't used is that at high temps it turns into musturd gas... ;)

    2. Re:Submerging circuit board in an inert liquid by Raptor+CK · · Score: 5, Informative

      You mean Fluorinert?

      I remember seeing an overclocking/cooling experiment with this somewhere. Cool stuff, until it turns to mustard gas.

      --
      Raptor
      "Procrastination is great. It gives me a lot more time to do things that I'm never going to do."
    3. Re:Submerging circuit board in an inert liquid by xcjohn · · Score: 2, Informative

      you may be thinking of flourinert. This is actually used. I remember seeing a setup down at the San Diego Supercomputer Center that cooled itself by litterally passing flourinert over certain parts. iirc they called it, simply, a waterfall... and was on one of the Cray's

      --
      ~~~ They call me Little John, but don't let the name fool you...in real life I'm very big.
    4. Re:Submerging circuit board in an inert liquid by rschwa · · Score: 2, Informative

      aha! here's the link:
      Wacky flourinert fun!

    5. Re:Submerging circuit board in an inert liquid by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      I think the NSA uses that modle...or at least did use it. I saw an NSA dude talking about computer systems infront of that thing on a PBS show like nova or somthing.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
    6. Re:Submerging circuit board in an inert liquid by RainbowSix · · Score: 2

      It isn't uncommon to see somebody with their computer submerged in Mineral Oil, which is nonconductive, and the bath in turn refrigerated.

      For example, http://www.drffreeze.com/News.htm

      but it hasn't been updated in quite awhile

      --
      --------
      It's OK to be social, just don't tell anyone about it.
  5. Future visit to computer shop by Chairboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    Me: "My computer has been making a strange sound."

    Computer Mechanic crawls under my computer, then slides out a few minutes later and wipes oil off his hands with an old shop towel. "Looks like your radiator fan has lost a bearing. I can replace it, but I also have to put on a new belt. The old one is almost wore down. Also, you need an oil change. These new Septium-6 processors can really eat up an oil filter quick, and the color of this stuff is pretty dark now.

    Me: "Boy, I remember when computers were so simple, I could just pop off the case and swap out components on my own."

    Computer technician: "Ok gramps, whatever you say. You just sit yourself down out in the lobby and I'll have Betsy ring you up once I'm done. Shouldn't take more then a couple hours. Oh, and the tread on your network connector looks a little thin, can I suggest a new pair?"

  6. Not the first time. by TagrenHawk · · Score: 2


    This is not a new idea. This has been done before.

  7. Hell, *I* know... by legLess · · Score: 3

    I know where it'll end up: just like Reason in Snow Crash. Boxes will be nuclear powered and you'll have to have the heat exchanger immersed in water the whole time or it'll melt down.

    In all seriousness, I do think this is the way things'll go. Remember all those air-cooled Volkswagen buses? Remember how people bolted radiators onto the side of them so they wouldn't explode in hot climates? Air-cooling will only carry you so far, especially with dinky little fans. For serious cooling you need serious metal-to-metal heat exchange.

    --
    This isn't as much "normalization" as it is "don't take so many drugs when you're designing tables."
  8. Great by British · · Score: 2

    Great, at this rate, we'll have tricked out computers a la The Fast and the Furious

    1. Re:Great by Leven+Valera · · Score: 2

      Great, at this rate, we'll have tricked out computers a la The Fast and the Furious

      "Well damn, you might have pulled 2 MFlop on me, but you have to remember I've got half the MHz of your Dell in this Hewlett Packard."

      "So why'd you put an P4 sticker on it?"

      --
      Woot w00t w007.
  9. is overclocking really necessary these days? by El+Puerco+Loco · · Score: 3, Insightful

    it was cool when you could jack a celeron300a up to 450mhz and have it run faster than a pentium 450 at less than half the price, but with most processors today you're looking at maybe a 5 or 10 percent gain and maybe a 20 or 30 dollars in savings. the savings is nil when you have to buy a fancy cooling solution to keep running

    1. Re:is overclocking really necessary these days? by denzo · · Score: 2
      It comes into play now when you buy a new super fast computer and 6 months later its starting to look a little slugish compared to the newest models... you then overclock it and it will be as good as new again. Until you have to buy a new mobo/cpu to get the newest tech that is.
      A couple of problems with this. First, computers are hardly getting sluggish after a few months. Before the Athlon/PIII era, new processors actually were significantly faster than their prior versions/ratings, especially with Windows and software bloating almost faster than the hardware. We now see a general levelling off of software bloat, with certain games as an exception, while hardware is only getting better at small percentages. My 900MHz Athlon, which I got almost a year ago, performs admirably well in all my applications, and can even play the latest games just fine.

      Secondly, as the previous poster mentioned, you can't overclock newer processors as much. The older Celeron varieties were underclocked in order to make a big dent in the economy PC market, and overclocked by as much as 100% or more for many people. Pretty much all processors released now are close to their yield. Intel and AMD are ramping out processors as fast as they can make them, there's no time to underclock the processors, especially when it won't result in any market gains.

      With current processors, we can't just simply overclock it by any significant amount when they start to appear "sluggish" compared to newer ones. And just buy a new processor, it'll cost less than a watercooler kit. :P

    2. Re:is overclocking really necessary these days? by FunkyChild · · Score: 2

      Celeron300A -> 450Mhz = 150% speed increase.

      My 1000Mhz Athlon -> 1450Mhz = 145% speed increase.

      I would never say that overclocking is necessary, but it's still giving the same sort of performance boosts today as it did a few years ago. When I got my 1Ghz chip, 1.4Ghz Athlons weren't even available yet. And when they did come out, they were far more expensive than what I paid. My 'fancy cooling solution' is a Globalwin FOP-32. It doesn't sound like a hairdryer and it's quite efficient and cost me about US$15. So the cost benefits are definitely still there too.

  10. Cool. Or rather, it will be when they perfect it. by Anton+Anatopopov · · Score: 2
    Wow, this is sort of based on the same principle as refrigerators and airconditioning units. It looks like it will be extremely effective at cooling down an overclocked CPU.

    As someone who has never overclocked my CPU, I have nothing but admiration for those brave souls who risk destroying their hardware, and being prosecuted under the DMCA all for the sake of a few extra MHz. It is this pioneering spirit which shows why time and again hackers (not crackers) are at the cutting edge of computer technology.

    I pity the poor tech support person at CompUSA when someone brings one of these suckers in for repair though. Looks like it will need a plumber as well as an electronics wizard, and we all know how expensive that can be :-)

  11. Heat pipes have been in use for a long time by Sara+Chan · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I've got a 1998 Twinhead laptop that uses heat pipe technology for cooling. The laptop also has a fan, which almost never goes on, due to the heat pipe. (It was for the quiet fanless running that I bought a Twinhead.)

    Twinhead advertising claims that their heat pipe technology is patented. I've no further details and couldn't find anything relevant on their web site.


    Buy Windows XP. Give Bill Gates even more of your money.

  12. I still like the homemade jobs by Count · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Not that they are all practical but man they look so cool.

    http://www.overclockers.com/tips672/

    http://www.overclockers.com/tips699/

  13. Where "it" will end up by Jeffrey+Baker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    No this is hopefully NOT where it (CPU cooling technology) will end up. Ideally, it will end up with CPUs that consume less power and give off less heat, can withstand higher core temperatures, and can more efficiently transfer heat outside the core. Slapping a vapor refrigerator onto the CPU is the opposite of elegance.

    1. Re:Where "it" will end up by markmoss · · Score: 2

      It's not a "vapor refrigerator" but a heat pipe. It's non-powered, except for the fans that blow air through the radiator part of it. You could eliminate the fans by making the radiator larger.

      Cost/performance ratio doesn't sound so good though. ($85 for cooling 10 degrees C better than an ordinary heatsink/fan, and not quite as good as the best performing (and enormous, I suppose) HSF's. Heat pipes are NASA technology, and there are few cost-effective applications on Earth. But if you really want a _quiet_ Pentium 3 or 4 system, your choices right now seem to be either immersing the motherboard in liquid, or a heatpipe to carry the heat out to a big fan-less radiator. Or else run non-bloated software on a CPU that doesn't need extreme heatsinking...

    2. Re:Where "it" will end up by the_2nd_coming · · Score: 2

      I think that oneday, by accident, a chemist will create a room temprature super conductor. this is where computing will go next, since quantom computing is about 50 to 100 years away.

      --



      I am the Alpha and the Omega-3
  14. Basically it was the next thing coming. by BuBu_ · · Score: 2, Informative

    Well guys if you sat down and read the article all the way through and saw what was going on you could basically understand that this isn't that much of an innovation, just tweaking an already proven practice. People have been using water cooling for years, and basically this just takes water coolings model and just makes it self-contained (at least how I understood it) the only flaw that they are going to run into is keeping the coolant cool at all times which will be hard since in water cooling setups there is a return pipe to the cooler/recycled water..

    Over all I give em two thumbs up for at least tweaking a proven practice, but then again they need some more work to really get the idea going.

    -bubu

  15. Other reviews by alewando · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Other sites have also reviewed the Radiator Zen SCR325-2F:

    The reviews are all favorable, but it's not clear whether this is simply because the reviewers are blinded by the "hey, it's neat!" factor, or whether the Radiator Zen SCR325-2F actually has a legitimate technical advantage. But hey, it is neat, so I can't blame them.
    1. Re:Other reviews by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Very cool, if it weren't for the fact that they destroyed a motherboard and a processor in the process of installing it I'd be more interested in getting one :).

  16. Re:Heat Capacity by stilwebm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Several reasons why water is not commonly found in computers. One, water an electricity do no mix well. Two, it is very expensive to make the many parts required to keep water in the cooling system, keep it flowing, and still allow it to exchange the heat with air. By very expensive, I don't mean hundreds of dollars per CPU, but considering that a heatsink and fan combo are very inexpensive to manufacture...

  17. Re:laptops already have this, no? by x-ntric_one · · Score: 2, Informative

    I know that there is a company called Thermacore does it for Dell laptops. I have been able to play around with their heat pipes and they are amazing. I believe Thermacore does product for any laptop product higher than a C600. So to answer the question.. YES! Are there anymore company's like this besides these 2?

  18. They gave it a positive review? by 512k · · Score: 2, Informative

    and it physically broke their CPU and their mobo..if it were me, I wouldn't have anything positive to say about it.

    --
    ------ Work is so much easier when you don't
  19. Also reviewed... by Daniel+Rutter · · Score: 5, Informative
    ...by, ahem, me, as part of my monster cooler comparison.

    The Zen review is on page four.

  20. Over Clocker Cooling Comedy? by Alien54 · · Score: 2
    What comes to mind was that article about the blokes who stuffed their computer into freezer. I can't find the link right now.

    But I can imagine that this would be the logical conclusion of this development trend.

    With the engineering and all, it might be just easier to dump everything into a vat of freon in a deep freeze some place.

    or just make a refrigerated rack system.

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  21. so it would work! by xcjohn · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I had used this same basic idea in a project about 2 years ago in a computer project. I've still got the 3d models for it too. My partner for the project and myself were told to design a computer for a specific market and come up with design, info, and a marketing pitch. Let's see if i can find the model.... ha! found it! http://lenin.nu/~jwhite/graphics/gallery/comp. basically we had coolant being pumped through a specialized heatsync, through a set up copper coils with fans next to each coil drawing the heat away and pumped back through the heatsync. I always wanted to see it actually implemented.

    --
    ~~~ They call me Little John, but don't let the name fool you...in real life I'm very big.
  22. Re:Heat Capacity by sphealey · · Score: 2
    already been done? I do believe that one of the Cray models had a 'liquid cooled CPU', or something to that effect. I never saw the specifics on how it was done, if it was just the CPU, or if it was the whole machine being cooled that way.
    For suitable values of "commonly", I guess. Mainframes (which probably process the majority of the world's bits, even today) have been water cooled since the 1960's.

    sPh

  23. Re:Heat Capacity by pbur · · Score: 2, Insightful

    IIRC, *pure* water doesn't conduct electricity. It's all the crap found in freshwater that make it conduct.

  24. Health Issues by squaretorus · · Score: 5, Informative

    There is a documented link between low level noise and hearing and stress levels in those spending long times exposed to them.

    The hum of a fan, whatever it is cooling, is often at a level that you might strain to hear clearly. It is these levels that can cause hearing strain. This is similar to eye strain when you need glasses and can give you monster headaches.

    Many articles in New Scientist, among others, have covered this - normally relating to office environments.

    Symptoms can be migranes, and a persistant ringing / humming sound when you are in a silent room / trying to sleep. Its worth checking out if you feel any of these because the long term stress levels can be harmful.

    I don't know if its a problem for babies - but I know the effects are magnified many fold if you are exposed for long periods, i.e. all night. So I wouldn't leave the machine on 24/7 even if the baby doesn't seem bothered by it 'just in case'.

    1. Re:Health Issues by morcheeba · · Score: 2

      After playing around with fans and such in my rig, I finally gave in and bought a set of bose noise cancelling headphones. They work well; the only problem is that you've got a well-sealed headphone on your head (leading to warm sweaty ears!), and they are somewhat spendy ($300). When I put them on, I can still hear the computer, but it's at a reasonable level. When I take off the headphones, I am consistently amazed at how loud the computer is! My comfortable music level I usually less than the computer!

      (Just FYI, it's a dual athlon, 3 hard drive computer in a room with a lot of hard surfaces in an otherwise quiet house) Also, sony has two noise cancelling headphones, but the open-ear design one seemed ineffective, the closed-ear version seemed to add to much 'hiss' of its own.

    2. Re:Health Issues by Pedrito · · Score: 2

      That's why I sleep with the T.V. on. It definitely overpowers the noise of my computer fan.

    3. Re:Health Issues by micromoog · · Score: 2
      The hum of a fan, whatever it is cooling, is often at a level that you might strain to hear clearly. It is these levels that can cause hearing strain. This is similar to eye strain when you need glasses and can give you monster headaches.

      This is jibberish. Comparing this to eyestrain is like claiming that the tiny nightlight at the far end of my well-lit office is causing me to go blind.

  25. This would be great... by daemonc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...if it hadn't DESTROYED their CPU and their motherboard.

    --
    All that we see or seem is but a dream within a dream.
  26. Mr Coffee motherboard by BrentRJones · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now for sale: The Mr Coffeee motherboard. (Patent Pending.) Yes it works well, but only on processors over 400 MHz. Makes up to 6 cups per hour.

    Retailer and investor inquires welcome.

    --
    Help end the use of Sigs. Tomorrow
  27. Next time read the article- you'll look better. by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    They're using heat pipe technology to move the stuff about- that doesn't mean water. Furthermore, radiators do NOT mean water is involved- alcohol or ethylene glycol work rather well in radiator applications (which is why I keep wondering what these people are thinking when they run liquid cooling systems with water.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    1. Re:Next time read the article- you'll look better. by cloudmaster · · Score: 2

      Water has a higher specific heat capacity than ethylene glycol, and therefore is better for transferring heat. The antifreeze in your car's radiator system is there to 1) stop the water from freezing, expanding, and breaking your engine/hoses/radiator and 2) to keep the aluminum parts from corroding.

      Don't believe me? Drain your car's radiator, then fill it up with pure antifreeze. Your car will now run much hotter than it did before, I promise.

      Alcohol, on the other hand, would be fine, I guess - as long as you keep it away from fire and stuff.

    2. Re:Next time read the article- you'll look better. by bluGill · · Score: 2

      Drain your car's radiator, then fill it up with pure

      Doesn't matter. Either pure water or pure anti-freeze will give worse cooling than a proper mixture of anti-freeze and water. the mixture resutls in higher boiling points than either alone, and lower freezing points than either alone. Note that for each of the above you need a different mixture. 50/50 tends to be optimal for most people. In Minnesota we lean closer to 70/30, and in the desert (I think) they lean a little the other way. It turns out that 70/30 is close to the lowest freezing point you can achive with anti-freeze/water mistures. However the boiling point and heat capacity is changed.

    3. Re:Next time read the article- you'll look better. by Svartalf · · Score: 2

      I know that. However, it's NOT conductive (Like with all cases of water except high-purity distilled...) and while it's not as effective as water, it's still more effective than convective cooling (because air has a lousy specific heat capacity even compared to ethylene glycol)- it'd work fine. I'd not take chances with a leak and water...

      Alcohol wouldn't be exposed to fire and stuff inside your computer (unless you've got worse problems... :-)

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
    4. Re:Next time read the article- you'll look better. by Svartalf · · Score: 2

      The reason why I suggested ethylene glycol alone in a liquid cooling system is that it's non-conductive with a more than passable heat capacity. Mixing in water brings back the risk of conductivity (any impurities of an ionic nature and it's conductive...)- while it'd work better than water alone or antifreeze alone, it's not what you're striving for with antifreeze alone.

      --
      I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  28. not really a new idea by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2

    The idea of using radiant cooling isn't really a new concept in computing... people have been using radiators with liquid cooling implimentations for quite a while.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  29. That is a vapor phase refrigeration system by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    i.e. a refrigerator- that's extreme and a commercial company does the same thing (Kryotech). That is not the same thing as a phase change heat pipe and radiator (The device referred to in the article)- it's moving the heat, but it can't get the chip below ambient.

    The vapor phase system CAN.

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  30. This is the link you're thinking of by Yarn · · Score: 2

    Project Eunuch from the Temple ov thee Lemur.

    It is a joke.

    --
    -Yarn - Rio Karma: Excellent
  31. You said it yourself... by 2nd+Post! · · Score: 2

    Your babe tolerates certain levels and sleeps through others.

    For her (him?) it's Counterstrike. For others it's the fan on the CPU. For other's it's the whirring of the CDRW drive.

    Me, I use a PowerBook because I *love* silence. I listen to my music *quiet*, so when the CPU or PS fan is louder than my music, I have issues.

    My *new* PC is an 800MHz Celeron with a low speed fan and a 140W PS in order to supress noise. Tradeoffs of power and heat for noise and performance.

  32. Re:Heat Capacity by gorilla · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Actually mainframes went away from water cooling, starting with Amdahl in 1979. Nowadays even IBM's highend mainframes are air cooled.

  33. I wonder... by Atilla · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you would put a thermal generator on a CPU, would you be able to produce enough juice to run a fan? I mean, modern CPU's produce an enormous amount of heat calories...

    --
    --- sig moved for great justice.
    1. Re:I wonder... by denzo · · Score: 2
      I mean, modern CPU's produce an enormous amount of heat calories...
      So that's why I've been getting fat sitting in front of the computer all day!

  34. it's all conditioning by Erris · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I have heard of an infant that is calmed by a vacuum cleaner. The child used to cry when it's mother left it to shower. The child stopped crying when it heard the blow drier and knew mom was not far. The mom noticed and put a vacuum cleaner in the room with the child and it worked. The child often falls to sleep with the vacuum cleaner on. No the child is not deaf now.

    --
    DMCA, Hollings, Palladium. What might have sounded like paranoia is now common sense.
  35. I doubt this thing actually does anything... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I mean, you have a radiator which exposes the same surface area as a typical heat sync, but makes less effective contact with the heat source.

    The fluid is probably not doing anything significant at all, the two fans gushing past the aluminum tubes is probably doing all the work.

    I don't even think this thing is actively cooling. There doesn't seem to be any pump... they're relying on the thermal gradient to cause the vapourizing fluid to move to the cool side of the radiator and condense. It doesn't work that way. You need to have some way of forcing the fluid to move in one direction, you need to cause the liquid to vapourize by forcing it through a small opening, pulling heat from the CPU.

    If you can somehow get around that technical wizardry, then you have to find fluids which vapourize at the temperature of the CPU, but condense at the temperature on the other side of the radiator... whatever wimpy thermal gradient that might be... the pressure of the system also remains constant because the whole system is operating passively of course.

    In other words... if you have a CPU at 50 degrees C, and your cooling fluid vapourizes at 40 celcius, then the other side of your heat sync MUST remain lower than 40 celcius, otherwise you just have a bunch of tubes full of pressurized vapour. There is no reason for the cooling side to actually cool especially if the same area is exposed to the CPU as is exposed to the fans.

    On the other hand, if your fluid vapourizes at 60C, it doesn't actually DO anything until the CPU reaches that temperature.

    This is not to say that passive refrigerators do not exist, I just don't think they've built one. They've built a chunk of aluminum full of fluid with two fans blowing through it.

    They should have run another benchmark: Drain the radiator.

    Kryotech has this done right.

    1. Re:I doubt this thing actually does anything... by Dr.+Evil · · Score: 2
      Heat pipes generally consist of a pipe, a working fluid, and a wick. They work by vaporizing a liquid at the evaporator
      (cooling the chip with the latent heat of vaporization) The vapor flows along the heat pipe until it reaches the condenser.
      The vapor condenses back to a liquid, releasing the latent heat. This heat is removed by fans or natural convection. The
      condensed lqiuid is then pulled back to the evaporator using some combination of gravitational forces and surface
      tension forces


      So you're saying that this graceful, passive operation can move enough heat to cool a CPU, but is efficient enough to fit in a 2x2x3" cube and can outperform a chunk of aluminum with a fan?

      Oddly, it seems to perform as well as a chunk of aluminum with a fan.... but wait... it happens to be a chunk of aluminum, with two fans.

      Technically you didn't say whether you agreed or disagreed with my opinion, so there is little I can respond with.

      What I was saying was that you can't cram something like this into such a small space and expect to achieve a magical balance where the fans are cooling the vapour in the coils so that it condenses back on the gently warm CPU.

      If the system gets too hot, there will be no condensation, and if the 2"x2" heat source isn't near the boiling point of the fluid, I don't think you can pull enough heat away from it.

      It is quite possible to cool a CPU like this, but I don't think the cooler would look anything like what these guys show. These guys don't even seem to indicate that the 'radiator' needs to be in any particular orientation.

  36. Compaq Xeons use this method sometimes by Drakino · · Score: 2

    The Xeons used in Compaq's 8 processor Proliants use a small plate bolted to the processor with two copper pipes. They go up into a radiator assembly, and the server pulls air through them with a very efficient and nice design. I've always liked the design by Compaq on some of their Proliant servers, and how they stay away from putting fans directly on a heatsync. I'll take a hot swappable fan any day.

  37. Heat pipes != water and other basics by enkidu · · Score: 2, Informative
    First of all the radiator in you car and the type of heat pipes used in this CPU cooler are similar in principle but radically different in construction and efficiency. The radiator in your car is an open system relying on water+antifreeze. The heat pipe used in many industrial applications (including laptop cooling, my Dell CPx has one that I can see through a grill) is a SEALED pipe with a wick and liquid (usually alchohol) inside. The liquid vaporizes at the operating temperature at any place where there is heating going on and condenses where there is cooling going on. The cool thing about heat pipes is that the heat transfer happens REALLY REALLY fast. For home computing applications (<1 meter) it should be instantaneous. This allows you to move the heat away from where it can do damage to any place you want (within the limits of cost and space of course.). This is also why thin laptops don't fry their CPU's instantly: using heat pipes they can spread the heat sink around and away from the CPU.

    Check out a NASA tech brief, Thermacore a company that makes them and MIC another company that makes them for more information.

    --

    There is no trap so deadly as the trap you set for yourself
    -Raymond Chandler, The Long Goodbye
    1. Re:Heat pipes != water and other basics by billanderson71 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Heat pipes have been used to cool laptops since the mid to late 90's. The heat pipe transfers the heat from the cpu to the shield around the bottom of the laptop (which is one reason that our laptop often does a good job of warming your lap). The advantage is that cooling fans can be eliminated, which prolongs battery life.

      Most of the heat pipes used in electronics cooling have a copper envelope, copper wick, and use water as the working fluid (operating under a partial vacuum). The advantage is not that they are really fast (the velocity of the water vapor is on the order of meters/second) but that they are very nearly isothermal. (The temperature drop in the heat pipe is essentially negligible, with small temperature drops occurring due to the heat conduction through the copper walls and wicks). This allows you to transfer heat over relatively long distances before removing the heat.

      A second advantage is that heat pipes can be used to reduce the heat flux. The heat flux (watt/cm^2) out of the chip is fairly high. On the other hand, air cooling is relativley inefficient, so a low heat flux is preferred. By using a larger condenser than evaporator, the heat flux can be adjusted to match the capacity of the cooling media. This will become more important in the future, as the heat flux from the chips continues to rise. Some experimental designs water designs have cooled several hundred W/cm^2, which is higher than chips should reach in the near future (high temperature heat pipes - have removed in excess of 50,000 W/cm^2)

      The best introductory book is Heat Pipes, by Chiu, but it is out of print. Dunn and Reay have a reasonable book on heat pipes, but it is quite expensive (~ $100).

  38. Re:another way to do this by CausticPuppy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Good idea in theory but that won't move heat quickly enough for powerful cpu's. Also, your case would get very warm and act like an oven around your hard drives and other components. You'd have to drastically increase airflow through the case in order to keep the rest of the system cool, which would defeat the noiseless aspect of the copper wire cooling method. With cpu heatsinks, the heated air is usually vented right out without circulating to the other components.
    Without a real heatsink that has a large air-exposed surface area a relatively short distance from the chip, you'll wind up with an impressive heat gradient across the wire.
    An Athlon chip will get up to roughly 600-700 degrees (F) within just a few seconds of power-on if no heatsink is attached. The copper cloth wire might bring it down a bit but you're still talking about having something exposed inside your case that's hot enough to melt wire insulation and probably catch dust on fire (after your system crashes of course).

    --
    -CausticPuppy "Of all the people I know, you're certainly one of them." -Somebody I don't know
  39. What you don't know.... WAS : Hell, *I* know... by firewort · · Score: 3, Informative


    You never owned an air-cooled VW, did you?

    Those radiators are oil coolers. Air cools the cylinders, which are finned like motorcycle cylinders. Oil does the rest of the job, besides lubricating, it soaks up much of the heat. Running the oil through a small radiator makes a large difference in some climates, but is usually unnecessary. Shoot, in Israel (commonly accepted as a pretty hot climate) they run without 'em just fine.

    The reasons to add the radiator for oil-cooling are:
    exposing the oil to a finned, air cooled radiator cools the oil off faster, leading to a cooler engine, and

    having greater oil capacity means that the oil is more resistant to heating up, and adding the oil cooler adds more oil capacity.

    And remember, the air-cooling on the VW is the same as it is on air-cooled porsches, a fan on the back of the generator (alternator) driven by a belt off the crankshaft. Pretty darn efficient.

    --

  40. Re:Heat Capacity by bluGill · · Score: 2

    True. However pure water picks up impuritieds. Take some 18 megaohm water (the purest we can achive) pour it into a clean glass, and just from the air it will have picked up a lot of impurities. (I've been told how much, but can't recall. puts the water way out of spec though)

  41. Liquid cooled mainframes are obsolete by Animats · · Score: 3, Informative
    IBM mainframes used to be water-cooled. Cray mainframes used to be Freon-cooled. One Cray machine of the early 1990s actually ran immersed in Fluorinert. All those machines were plumbing nightmares. IBM considered it a big step forward when the water-cooled mainframes were replaced by air-cooled mainframes. Far fewer maintenance headaches. You don't want to go to liquid cooling on the desktop unless there's no alternative.

    Solid-state Peltier-effect coolers are much more promising. They actually refrigerate, they have no moving parts, and they don't make noise.

    1. Re:Liquid cooled mainframes are obsolete by Manaz · · Score: 2

      Solid-state Peltier-effect coolers are much more promising. They actually refrigerate, they have no moving parts, and they don't make noise.

      Except that they don't work if they're not themselves cooled. So you're still stuck with using alternative heat removal techniques anyway. Which generally comes down to water cooling (messy and expensive), or very good air cooling (we're back to being noisy again). And if your ancilliary cooling fails, your peltier becomes a *really* good insulator. Meaning you end up with a fried CPU.

      Due to the laws of physics, you also have to remove more heat from the hot side of a peltier than it removes from your CPU.

      And the clamping pressure requires by a peltier to function at it's most efficient is significantly greater than the recommended maximum clamping pressure on the top of either AMD or Intel processors.

      Then there are also problems with condensation. Which is bad when mixed with computer components.

      Peltiers aren't sounding so crash hot all of a sudden, are they... :(

  42. Re:Cool. Or rather, it will be when they perfect i by radish · · Score: 2
    being prosecuted under the DMCA

    why? I really don't follow...

    --

    ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

  43. Now, now...no need to be ugly with them... by Svartalf · · Score: 2

    There's always a better way to clue-by-four people- what you just did isn't it...

    --
    I am not merely a "consumer" or a "taxpayer". I am a Citizen of the State of Texas
  44. conductivity of water by Alien54 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    One, water an electricity do no mix well

    Minor nit pick

    The conductivity of water is based purely on the impurites in it. If you had truely pure distilled water, it would not conduct.

    I used to work on a transmitter that had water cooled voltage regulator tubes. They regulated many tens of thousands of volts with big wattage. You measured the purity of the water by the measuring the electric conductivity in fractions of micro-mhos

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  45. This got bad reviews, but look here! by Daath · · Score: 2

    If you read the article (broken ad software - phpAdsNew by the way :) - they said it wasn't the best, but it was probably getting there...

    How about utilizing the Peltier Effect - a.k.a. thermo electric cooling? =) Here is a little info here!
    Granted, they use a lot of power - I've seen from around 50W to 200W...

    Water cooling! I remember reading somewhere about Leufken - Gotta find a link... Just a sec... ;)
    Here it is! - Leufken Technologies - They got both watercooling and thermoelectric cooling, regular fans and heatsinks :)

    I myself is using a twin cooler (CoolTium) for my Athlon 900 - but it is SOOOOOOOOOO noisy!

    --
    Any technology distinguishable from magic, is insufficiently advanced.
    1. Re:This got bad reviews, but look here! by carm$y$ · · Score: 2, Informative

      How about utilizing the Peltier Effect - a.k.a. thermo electric cooling?

      You still have to get rid of the heat somehow - and thus the peltiers come with bulky radiators plus noisy fans themselves.
      As a bonus, you also have to handle somehow the condensation problem - the peltiers being able to refrigerate (or at least to go down to pretty low temperatures, close to zero Celsius).

      So, it's a promising technology, but it's not ready yet.

      --
      -- No sig today
  46. Re:try this: by Atilla · · Score: 3, Funny

    Good idea. Why not hook up a whole bunch of Athlon/P4 PC's to the same tank...

    This will provide a good source of goldfish snacks for a Q3 fragfest.. Feed the critters with some cheddar flakes for a few days prior.

    --
    --- sig moved for great justice.
  47. Probably end up with more noise by barzok · · Score: 2

    All that transmission gear (belts, clutches, driveshafts, "splitters" and so on) would make more noise than a group of individual motors. Plus, moving parts = wear & tear = maintenance.

    Not to mention the headache when your single point of mechanical failure goes out.

  48. Why is this such a big deal? by Bad+Mojo · · Score: 2

    We allready use air-cooling for our CPUs. A radiator is the next logical step in cooling. It's a simple matter of efficiently moving heat arround. Something that car manufacturers have been doing for ages with good success.

    --
    Bad Mojo
    "If you can't win by reason, go for volume." -- Calvin
  49. A problem with one of the graphs. by flatcat · · Score: 2, Informative


    Anyone else notice that the graphic on page 2 that shows the processor under load is messed up? The coloration for the MC462+delta and zen radiator are swapped. This graph shows the Zen as the worst of the coolers.

  50. Alpha prototypes had this too. by Jeff+Bell · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There was work done by Hamurgen and Fitch at DEC where they experimented with using heat pipe technology to cool chips way back in 1992.

    They needed a liquid with a high heat of vaporization, and a boiling point in the 30-50C range. They tried mixtures of water and alcohol, but settled on just water, pumped down to 1/3 ATM.

    They went looking through the "steam tables" and found that nobody had ever looked at the sub-atmospheric range of pressures, and had to derive all of the thermodynamic properties themselves.

    It was pretty quiet, but made a funny little 'tick' noise right when it started boiling.

    More details at http://www.research.compaq.com/wrl/techreports/abs tracts/92.1.html
    and http://www.research.compaq.com/wrl/techreports/abs tracts/90.9.html

    -Jeff Bell

  51. Awesome... by Pedrito · · Score: 2

    Just what I've been waiting for: A CPU cooling device that physically breaks my CPU. Sounds like instead of a review of the product, they should have just had a 1 paragraph summary in large bold letters warning people from buying this defective product. Giving it a review almost gives it legitimacy.

  52. Old news? by jmatlock · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Uhm... my Dell Inspiron has a water tube cooled CPU, it links to a radiator/heatsink near the back of the machine... and I got it almost a year ago... this isn't really anything new and spectacular. Intel developed it to work with the M series of Pentium III's... it's even listed on their site under technology.

    --
    ... and all I wanted for xmas was a magic 8 ball, but i got this lousy ./ t-shirt instead.
  53. Thermal generator runs against thermodynamics by SysKoll · · Score: 4, Informative
    Atilla,

    The average Intel CPU dissipate a waste heat much greater than the few watts absorbed by your average fan. So the idea seems reasonable.

    Alas! The laws of thermodynamics often fly in the face of reasonable ideas. See, if you want to passively cool off the CPU, all you have to do is let it radiate its heat. But what you seem to wish for here is some kind of device that actively cools off that CPU, by taking some of that waste heat as its energy source. That's called a thermic engine. And here, thermodynamics get you: You can generate power from a heat source only if you have a cold "sink". All thermic engines work by getting heat from a heat source and moving it to a heat sink. E.g., for a car, the heat sink is the radiator.

    Here, your contraption would use the CPU as a heat source and would require some sink, such as, oh, a radiator. Maybe with a fan. Which is exactly what we are trying to avoid.

    So it's a nice catch-22. But think about it: if it worked, we would have big ships moving smoothly on all oceans, powered by the extracted heat of sea water and leaving a trail of ice cubes in their wake...

    -- SysKoll
    --

    --
    Mad science! Robots! Underwear! Cute girls! Full comic online! http://www.girlgeniusonline.com/

    1. Re:Thermal generator runs against thermodynamics by muffel · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Actually, thermodynamics wouldn't forbid this, as the cpu is not running at ambient temperature (in which case we wouldn't need cooling anyway).

      E.g. with a cpu running at ~50C, and a liquid with a boiling point of, say, 40C, you could build a little steam engine, letting the steam condense at room tmperature for the 'refill'. Voilà.

      --

      bla
  54. Re:Cool. Or rather, it will be when they perfect i by Manaz · · Score: 2

    ...and being prosecuted under the DMCA all for the sake of a few extra MHz.

    Um, please DO tell me you're kidding.

    What I, or anyone else, chooses to do with my processor after I buy it is MY business. We're not talking about art, or artistic license here, but a consumer electronics product.

    The only time it becomes illegal is if, through the process of overclocking, I damage the CPU, and then try to claim warranty - that's fraud. Otherwise, if I want to run my 1GHz Athlon @ 1.5GHz, there's no-one who has the right to stop me.

  55. I -have- a watercooled work PC by xtal · · Score: 2

    Sorry, no pictures online yet, other people have plenty however. I got my kit from cool-computers.com, but there's lots of other ones out there. You don't use alcohol in a liquid cooled system because not only is it flammable, the vapours are extremely explosive. If you had a minor vapour leak, the slightest spark inside your computer - like, oh, say, a motor, a bad capacitor, your power supply, whatever - would cause an explosion. Alcohol at near purity running at ~40C is also extremely flammable. That's INSANE.

    Please, nobody attempt to use alcohol to liquid cool a PC. It's dangerous. If you want to experiment with other liquids with higher specific heats, try an oil instead, but understand the risks. No, I'm not responsible if you blow up your machine. Distilled water is a wonderful insulator, too. No worries there. $1 buck for 4 liters at the local Walmart. Hardly exotic.

    I'm running a athlon 1.2G mildly overclocked (1.3g) with the entire apparatus inside a mid tower case. I got sick of my work machine locking up because of overheating (the lab I work in has poor ventilation and gets extremely hot). Liquid cooling works extremely well, but it's far from plug and play and definately not something for beginners. :)

    --
    ..don't panic