Slashdot Mirror


2nd Space Tourist To Visit ISS In April 2002

Anonymous Coward writes "Another continent is represented in space: It has just been announced that Thawte founder Mark Shuttleworth is in the final stages of securing a seat on the next Soyuz launch in April. Press Release says he plans to do a lot of Science up there, with a whole bundle of other stuff. SpaceDaily seems to have broken it first of the commercial news, haven't seen it anywhere else yet. Go, Africa, Go! (Oh, and he reads Slashdot religiously ... Good Luck Mark!)" Looks like it's getting cheaper, too. I think it's time for a Slashdot staff meeting in space...

184 comments

  1. geeks in space should be broadcast there by linzeal · · Score: 1
    http://www.thesync.com/geeks/

    I so want to slashdot a server in space

    1. Re:geeks in space should be broadcast there by teasea · · Score: 0

      You mean it's not broadcast from space? Ahh! False advertising! There is no God!!!

  2. Geeks in space??? by MikeLRoy · · Score: 1

    Yeah rob, i guess you guys would have to resurrect the show just for that ;-) Anyways, congrats to mark... at least he's doing more then the last tourist, and not just breathing valuable air.

    --
    -Michael Roy Some people are like Slinkies. Not really useful, but you can't help smiling when you see one tumble down
  3. Why is this news? by Safety+Cap · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Isn't the eventual goal to have "average Joes" go to space?
    Yes, I'm envious, but until the cost comes down to maybe the price of a luxury cruise, then I could care less.

    --
    Yeah, right.
    1. Re:Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Isn't the eventual goal to have "average Joes" go to space?

      Actually I think that this is a better way to fund space technology than selling the results of weighlessness experiments to companies.

    2. Re:Why is this news? by anotherone · · Score: 1

      Yah know, since most spam-bots would probably not be logged in, they wouldn't see this post. Sorry to burst your bubble...

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    3. Re:Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How about sending naked chicks and making a pr0n film in space -- weighless sex!

    4. Re:Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mmm, imagine what breasts would do when weightless...

    5. Re:Why is this news? by freeweed · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Why? Well, seeing as this is only the second civilian/paying customer/whatever to go into space in the history of human space exploration, I'd say it's pretty important.



      Isn't the eventual goal to have "average Joes" go to space?


      Yes, and considering NO average Joes will go until a LOT of rich folks do (think cars, airplanes, etc, etc, etc)... I'd say it is NOT going to happen overnight.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    6. Re:Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aw.. but I wanted to go in to space.

    7. Re:Why is this news? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Try checking your history better. He is something between second and fifteenth depending upon how you feel like counting customers. He is the second paying visitor to the ISS. The others went on a mix of Shuttle and Mir flights. The uncertainty results from questions like "Do politicians count as paying customers?" Four have been flown. All four were major supporters of NASA. and "Do service technicians for paying research customers count?" and "What if the so-called service technician has no operational duties beside enjoying the flight?" There have been both genuine service technicians who ran in flight experiments and pseudo-technicians who just enjoyed the ride.

    8. Re:Why is this news? by jbailey999 · · Score: 2

      This is how the supply and demand curve starts, though. These initial folks are doing a few important things:

      1) Proving that the service is worth providing, and that people want it.

      2) Forcing the ISS folks to start making the station safer for "average folk".

      3) Providing funding.

      I think the next step is that space agencies will start to see these ``tourists'' as sources of revenue. So then you start to see the ads show up in the Robb Report.

      After that, commercial enterprises will be able to demonstrate a market and secure the funding they need to do it themselves, and cheaper, and then leave the poor scientists alone.

      Effectively, the count down to watching an earth-rise from the moon has begun. =)

    9. Re:Why is this news? by armb · · Score: 2

      > "Do politicians count as paying customers?" Four have been flown. All four were major supporters of NASA.

      How much of their own money were they supporting it with? (I think spending taxpayers' money on space is a good thing (within limits), and having politicians as representatives of the taxpayers getting rides to see it being spent isn't necessarily a bad thing, but I don't think they are in the same class as "paying customers" paying with their own money).

      --
      rant
  4. Wait for this to be verified, then... by twilight30 · · Score: 3, Interesting
    see if he'll agree to a Slashdot interview.

    But wait first.

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
    1. Re:Wait for this to be verified, then... by reg · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you can't wait, then here's a recent online chat with him, from a South African TV show.

      Regards,
      -Jeremy

    2. Re:Wait for this to be verified, then... by codetalker · · Score: 1

      Here here. I think this guy has to be interviewed. Reads Slashdot religously you say? BRING IT ON! :) MOD THIS UP!

      --
      All a coder really wants, are fast cars, fast women and fast algorithms.
    3. Re:Wait for this to be verified, then... by Lenbok · · Score: 1
      see if he'll agree to a Slashdot interview.

      But wait first.

      That's what I thought, except I reckon it should be after (or for extra geekiness, during) the space visit.

  5. Go Africa Go? by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Is anyone else confused by this phrase in the post? What is it supposed to mean? Is the poster just issuing general support of the contenent of africa? If so, why?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:Go Africa Go? by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thawte is based in South Africa (or was, before VeriSign bought Thawte), but it still seems like a wierd thing to post.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    2. Re:Go Africa Go? by nihilogos · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thawte is a south african company. Mark is thus a representative of the continent of Africa, and probably the first person from said continent to go into space.

      --
      :wq
    3. Re:Go Africa Go? by brshuttleworth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So lets see: after the US does anything, 500 posts say "America is amazing". One cool thing happens in Africa, someone says "Go, Africa, Go!", and people say "how wierd is that".

      Hmmm. I think its pretty reasonable for someone to be patriotic, don't you?

      --
      -- South African and not-an-expatriot [rare]
    4. Re:Go Africa Go? by heliocentric · · Score: 2

      I think its pretty reasonable for someone to be patriotic, don't you?

      patriot - one who loves his or her country and supports its authority and interests.

      Last time I checked, Africa was not a country, it was more of a continent on which several contries have set up shop.

      --
      Wheeeee
    5. Re:Go Africa Go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's 'wierd' as in the posters message is 'unclear'.

    6. Re:Go Africa Go? by pompomtom · · Score: 1

      Last time I checked, America was not a couple of continents upon which several countries have set up shop.

      --

      Buckets,

      pompomtom

      "There's an exception to every rule. Except for some rules"
    7. Re:Go Africa Go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go take your inadequate defense of to another story. There is a quite a bit of jingoism here on /., but really, how was anyone who doesn't: A) A current or ex thawte employee, B) South African C) A fan of obscure trivia about crypto and computer companies supposed to know Thawte is from South Africa! If I said Go Ames, Iowa, Go! at the end of my post, you might wonder why I posted that. Well, I had a Subway sub for lunch today, and before they got bought by TriGlobCon, they used to be headquartered in Ames, Iowa. It was a good sandwhich and inspired me to post this.

      Go, Ames, Iowa, Go!

    8. Re:Go Africa Go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      patriot: somebody who receives a parking ticket and rejoices that the system works.

    9. Re:Go Africa Go? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Go Milton Keynes, GO!

    10. Re:Go Africa Go? by n3r0.m4dski11z · · Score: 0

      To quote Oscar Wilde: "Patriotism is the virtue of the vicious."

      wow intelligence from /. but true to form modded at -1... do not get discouraged!

      --
      -
    11. Re:Go Africa Go? by gpinzone · · Score: 0

      Go Go Gadget! Wait...what were we talking about again?

  6. looking forward to the day..... by lordDarcy · · Score: 1

    that someone rich funds research on the effects of space travel on the poor an out of shape!!!!
    someone like well.... ME

    sincerely
    lordDarcy

  7. Slashdot meeting in space? by Exmet+Paff+Daxx · · Score: 3, Funny

    What would the Slashdot team do in Space that they couldn't do here on earth?

    Learn to spell?

    --
    If guns kill people, then CmdrTaco's keyboard misspells words.
    1. Re:Slashdot meeting in space? by corr · · Score: 0

      hhaha djsm c ha hrmmmff hahaha bwa ha ha

      NO BITCH

      You're not funny.

      --

      We wave the flag of freedom as we conquer and invade.
    2. Re:Slashdot meeting in space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      Weigh less, perhaps?

    3. Re:Slashdot meeting in space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      How long before the first post from space?

    4. Re:Slashdot meeting in space? by GroovBird · · Score: 1

      Get chicks?

      Dave

    5. Re:Slashdot meeting in space? by EinarTh · · Score: 1

      Science bah! I wan't to have sex in zero-g.
      Not that I'd say no to sex in any other kind of gravity, but still...grrrrr....

      --
      -- Computers are not intelligent. They just think they are.
    6. Re:Slashdot meeting in space? by inburito · · Score: 2

      It's been tried.. not very easy.. Might be okay if you like lots of straps, though.

    7. Re:Slashdot meeting in space? by seann · · Score: 1

      It's been tried.. not very easy.. Might be okay if you like lots of straps, though.

      :D

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    8. Re:Slashdot meeting in space? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > What would the Slashdot team do in Space that >they couldn't do here on earth?

      Take a giant piss and see how much of a dent we could put in a car from up there...

  8. Uhh by Cave+Dweller · · Score: 2, Funny

    Must...resist...temptation...
    Shuttle...worth...ugh.

  9. laughing my cock off :) by twilight30 · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    But fank you *mmph* [talking with mouth full? :)

    --
    ========================================
    Death will come, and will have your eyes
    -- Pavese
  10. An awful lot of money? by RobPiano · · Score: 0

    Seems like an awful lot of money to spent unless he has planned research? Or is this just one really sweet vacation? Just seems as though south africa could use the hosptials and schools more than the rocket trip.

    Still pretty sweet,
    Rob

    1. Re:An awful lot of money? by October_30th · · Score: 0, Insightful
      Well, it's HIS money and he can use it any way he wants.

      If I had surplus money I sure as hell wouldn't use it to do what the government is already supposed to do with all the tax money they're collecting.

      --
      The owls are not what they seem
    2. Re:An awful lot of money? by vladkrupin · · Score: 1

      :) A lot of money for him... As for me... I am saving my $100 for the ride in the near future. Well, maybe not $100, let's say $150, just to be on the safe side - that really depends on how much of this you believe.

      --

      Jobs? Which jobs?
  11. Through Haggling, Space by patiwat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Shuttleworth had to go through a lot of haggling to get into space. For one, he had to cut back on his original plan of staying two weeks to only ten days. There were also difficulties in resolving what would happen if Soyuz failed to dock with the ISS - would he get a free repeat flight or not? In addition, Shuttleworth insists on being the first African in space - however, South Africa isn't part of the ISS consortium.

    The difficulties appear to have been resolved though, and through the magnificent power of over $20 million, a just about anyone can get into space.

    But please, don't by claim that now we have "geeks in space" - the original Gemini, Mercury, and Apollo astronauts were the original ueber-geeks, and their hacks saved many missions from failure.

    1. Re:Through Haggling, Space by Siener · · Score: 4, Informative

      The difficulties appear to have been resolved though, and through the magnificent power of over $20 million, a just about anyone can get into space.

      True, almost. To avoid the problems that Dennis Tito had with NASA (he's a safety risk because of lack of training etc.), Mark went through a much more rigorous and thorough training program. It has been reported that he could in fact be considered as a fully trained cosmonaut.

      Also, this will not be a purely recreational trip. He's hoping to make the trip pay for itself by conducting some experiments in space that could later have some commercial value.

      There also seems to be some confusion here at /. about the "Go, Africa go" bit in the post. Mark Shuttleworth is a South African. So am I, so : "Go, Mark go"

    2. Re:Through Haggling, Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      He's hoping to make the trip pay for itself by conducting some experiments in space that could later have some commercial value.

      What? Signing server certificates in a zero-G environment?

    3. Re:Through Haggling, Space by MrScience · · Score: 1

      Tito would have been traned much more if NASA hadn't turned him away at the training-center gate. Literally. Then NASA had the balls to whine that he wasn't trained. Yeesh.

      --

      You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

  12. i propose to do some "science" by trance9 · · Score: 4, Funny


    I volunteer to go up into space and conduct a scientific experiment to determine whether a 2 week vacation in space increases or decreases the productivity of an opensource programmer upon return to earth.

  13. The favoritism runs rampant by dfeldman · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Space, like so many other industries and programs throughout the years, has seen tremendous advances in technology, accomplishments, and workforce skill. It is often speculated that eventually many people will live for years, or forever, on other planets or in human-friendly space stations. This helps ease overcrowding of Earth, and helps people experience new living environments.

    However, it seems as though most nations' space programs don't feel the same way about that egalitarian vision. They don't think space is the final frontier for everyday citizens; they don't want space travel to become commoditized. NASA, and now the Russian space agency, want to use space as a perk to sell to very wealthy businessmen. They want money, influence with politicians, or both. Regardless, these agencies are using taxpayer money to pamper the rich, and it is high time to stop this abuse.

    Mind you, I am not against rich people. My brother has a net worth of over three million dollars. I am simply against letting the government use its considerable power to reward those who have already been rewarded by the capitalist system. Why reward people twice for the same deed? I don't win an award or see the government kissing my behind every time I collect a paycheck. Why should really rich guys be any different?

    Astronauts are hired because of their physical strength and courage, their technical abilities, and their personalities. They should not be selected on the basis of their bank account balances. We should work toward letting astronauts do their jobs, without interference from wealthy joy-riders who feel like they have to ride into space before they die, just because they can.

    df

    1. Re:The favoritism runs rampant by Omnifarious · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indulging a few rich people their fancy is the ticket for travel to space to become affordable. We don't try to get people into space much now because no profit can be made doing it. If a profit can be made doing it, there will be strong financial incentive to do it more and more cheaply, and eventually it probably won't cost too much more than a transcontinental airline flight.

      That's the logic that's driven the semiconductor revolution to incredible advances in speed and minaturization. Mark up your advanced products, and sell them to rich people who want them, use the money to design the next batch to be better and cheaper.

    2. Re:The favoritism runs rampant by LMCBoy · · Score: 2

      I mostly agree. I don't object to rich guys shelling out the dough for orbital joyrides (because, as others have pointed out, this should eventually drive costs down, and maybe someday I'll be a not-rich guy on an orbital joyride).

      However, I think that if NASA is the one doing it, such commercialization would be a Bad Thing. Instead, it should be handled by private "space tourism" companies.

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    3. Re:The favoritism runs rampant by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Oh, sure..... wealth = virtue


      When was the last time you left your parent's house?

    4. Re:The favoritism runs rampant by Yet+Another+Smith · · Score: 2

      I am simply against letting the government use its considerable power to reward those who have already been rewarded by the capitalist system.

      I am also against governments rewarding anyone who has not done something to earn that reward. However, you have not made the case that this guy is being rewarded in any real way. Every indication is that these guys are paying a fair sum for the extra costs of sending them up with a mission that's going up anyway. The extra costs associated with their presence is offset not by government favoritism, but by the money that these guys actually pay. That's not immoral in the slightest, unless you feel that anyone who pays for something that most cannot afford is immoral, in which case, I guarantee that your millionaire brother should have his Lexus confiscated forthwith, and probably your Jetta, too.

      Now, if you don't believe that these guys have paid enough money to cover the expenses they incur, that's a different story, but has nothing to do with the capitalist system. Capitalism is all about charging enough to cover your own expenses, so if governments don't do it, then they should be showered with derision.

      As for government not kissing your butt for getting a paycheck, well, actually they do. You can go to a national park any time you want. Poor people rarely do, but the middle class partake often. Do you like space? Have you ever been to the Air and Space museum? I have. Its cool. Its government funded. Do you think that the government would have funded it if only the unemployed were interested? Hell no.

      they don't want space travel to become commoditized.

      The simple fact of only allowing people who spend big bucks be early adopters of space tourism technology is hardly evidence that they are attempting to exclude the poor from space. Early cars were only affordable to the rich. They were impractical toys. But now if you post a flyer at any college campus you can find somebody getting rid of their car for under a thousand bucks.

      This helps ease overcrowding of Earth, and helps people experience new living environments.

      Unfortunately, space will never be a viable solution to overcrowding. Certainly not within the next few centuries. The number of people removed from the population will be a drop removed from the ocean compared to the population of the earth. The only folks for whom it might relieve overcrowding would be those who actually left. The ones remaining would not be any better off.

      BTW, Moding this guy's post as flaimbait veers toward the ri-damn-diculous. It might be poorly argued, it might be a crazy liberal or crazy libertarian screed. But while there are undoubtedly jackasses out there who'll flaim it (and this response) this is more reasoned and less flaimworthy than your average Katz article. Lighten up.

      --
      if ($it != $onething) {$it = $another;}
    5. Re:The favoritism runs rampant by Yet+Another+Smith · · Score: 2

      Hmm, good point. I'm curious to take this reasoning a step further. Is it possible that NASA might actually one day stifle space use, by perpetuating a government monopoly and effectively driving out private firms that might one day provide cheaper space flight for the unwashed?

      Where would the computer industry be if the government had decided to regulate computer use through a single agency? If there had been a "NCA" that was in charge of providing computing power to those who needed it, would that have prevented the private computer industry from forming? I mean, since all the computer engineering know-how would have been under government control, then any private venture that was trying to build computers would have inferior products at high prices when they started up, while the government agency would be covering its development costs with taxpayer money.

      What I'm getting at, is if we shouldn't have the government in the rich-guys-in-space business, should we have them in the rich-corporations-putting-satelites-in-space business? Would a ban on ESA and NASA launches of private satelites spur private space development? Certainly if the NASA and ESA stopped, it wouldn't reduce the demand for orbital insertions. Everybody and his brother wants to put things in orbit. Get Arien and NASA out of the loop, and private corporations would step into the void.

      Right now, the private companies that are developing things like SSTO (Single Stage to Orbit) and similar technologies are not getting much capital funding because, why develop a cow when the government gives you milk for free?

      I've heard a great deal of talk about NASA supporting itself with private space launches, but should we be thinking the other way around?

      I'm just thinking out loud here.

      Of course, a counter-example is the air-passenger service industry. This actually formed from government contracted air-mail carriers adding rich, high-paying passengers to their mail flights. If we'd said, "No you can't do that, because its a waste of taxpayer funds" where would the airline industry be today? I'd certainly have to drive 1000 miles to see my family at christmas, which would suck.

      --
      if ($it != $onething) {$it = $another;}
    6. Re:The favoritism runs rampant by Maeryk · · Score: 2

      I've heard a great deal of talk about NASA supporting itself with private space launches, but should we be thinking the other way around?

      NASA could be self supporting next week, if the US.GOV would stop glomming all the developments that NASA comes up with and not paying them back for it.

      The list of things invented for the SPace Program that have become public domain is immense.. there used to be an entire magazine dedicated to it called "spinoff". However, NASA, and their affiliated agencies, make no money off these inventions once they are released from "top secret" status.

      Just think.. one penny from the sale of anything that has Teflon on it would do quite a bit of good for NASA. How bout all those anti-fog window treatments? NASA developed the specific technology that makes them work. The list goes on and on..

      Lets stop NASA from being a boondoggle by allowing it to make some money, and maybe we can stop shooting worn out space-planes up to the ISS, and maybe we can afford to build it right the first time.. without having to rely on Russian and ROC to handle components that come in late, grossly overbudget, and flawed.

      Lets start putting 1/3 of the money into NASA that we put into the development of a new gun for to kill people with.

      Alas, it will never happen, because so many people think A) the whole thing is fake, or B) we have no reason to be in Space, or C) there is no point to studying space, because no good can come of it.

      (ALL WRONG, imho)

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
    7. Re:The favoritism runs rampant by Yet+Another+Smith · · Score: 1

      Well, Teflon was actually patented by DuPont, and was never public domain.

      OF course the problem with the Russians is not the technology, but the funding. And who's ROC? The only ROC I can think of off the top of my head is the Republic of China, AKA Taiwan. Is Taiwan or the PRC associated with the ISS?

      --
      if ($it != $onething) {$it = $another;}
  14. Let's polish up my resume... by MavEtJu · · Score: 1

    Just in case they're looking for a tour-guide there.

    --
    bash$ :(){ :|:&};:
  15. It's time? by Octothorp · · Score: 1

    It's time to make 'Geeks in space' a reality? ;-)

    --

    --
    Steve VanDeBogart
  16. Geeks In Space... In space! by matusa · · Score: 1

    Heh, if we got you guys into space, I think it would motivate you to finally do another geeks in space... you could called it "Revenge of the Pun" or something.

    or not.

  17. Dont let Katz go by MisterBlister · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you do shuttle up the slashdot folk, don't let Katz go. The last thing I need to hear is him whining about the corporatization of space, or how the 'jock' astronauts bully the poor geek space tourists, or how difficult is is to find a TV station airing buffy the vampire slayer up there.

    1. Re:Dont let Katz go by Moonshadow · · Score: 4, Funny
      Actually, I was going to suggest that he be the only one to go.

      Just with a one-way ticket.

    2. Re:Dont let Katz go by freeweed · · Score: 2
      Don't forget, he could also write ~7K or so about how all of the cool software up there was windows based, so he couldn't use it on the machines he plays windows-only games on.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    3. Re:Dont let Katz go by Zocalo · · Score: 2

      I thought the ISS was using Linux on a collection of three IBM Thinkpads. Or is my memory faulty? This page would suggest not however, and IIRC the ESA uses Linux as well.

      --
      UNIX? They're not even circumcised! Savages!
    4. Re:Dont let Katz go by checkyoulater · · Score: 1

      Hey, didn't you see ID4?

      It's all Apple Notebooks up there!

      --
      Is that a real poncho? I mean, is that a Mexican poncho or is that a Sears poncho?
    5. Re:Dont let Katz go by gpinzone · · Score: 0

      Don't forget, he could also write ~7K or so about how all of the cool software up there was windows based, so he couldn't use it on the machines he plays windows-only games on.

      He can always borrow that Divix playing Commodore 64 from the Afghanis to keep him entertained.

  18. I'm just not in the know... by On+Lawn · · Score: 2


    First I find that everyone just knows "I had a candle light dinner with Ashley Judd on Film" Wil Wheton is a reader. Now some Anonymous Coward knows a millionaire in the news for being the next space tourist religiously reads slashdot.

    I must be on the B list. No, make that the R list.

    1. Re:I'm just not in the know... by corr · · Score: 0

      Ashley Judd is fucking hot. Seriously, I think imma go jack off to her right now.

      --

      We wave the flag of freedom as we conquer and invade.
    2. Re:I'm just not in the know... by brshuttleworth · · Score: 3, Informative
      Or, alternatively, you haven't read some interviews with him :) from a web-chat he had after a Carte Blanche interview:
      Mark Shuttleworth: Of course! The Net is still on course to become the fundamental platform for all communications... from your cellphone to your fridge, they will all talk TCP/IP. But the net makes competition brutal, so expect to work hard for those profits. The mistake was in thinking that something that removed all barriers to entry could also be a source of infinite profitability! I don't think we'll see any new Yahoo! or E-Bay emerge, but we'll see great new ideas like slashdot.org that find a place for themselves, driven by people who love what they are doing and do it better than anybody else as a result, using the net to reach their listeners at the lowest possible cost.
      --
      -- South African and not-an-expatriot [rare]
  19. WARNING: Joke that only slashdot fags find funny! by rygarsdad · · Score: 0

    I PRAY that you read this before you read the message.

  20. Re:This isn't about making space profitable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Yes

    And the PR is great. This guy is quite obviously doing something a huge number of people want to do, and he's doing something useful whilst he's there. Which is of course irrelevant, but true. Now the point is that he's not an idiot; he's likely to have a slant on what he sees there which is both different to the average selected astronaut, and useful. Clearly he's good at making money.

    I don't see the problem, unless it's that certain Slashdotters just can't keep their elitism down. Personally, I'd like to congratulate this guy, and eventually do just what he's doing now.

  21. Re:This isn't about making space profitable. by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1

    [BLOCKQUOTE]And the PR is great. This guy is quite obviously doing something a huge number of people want to do, and he's doing something useful whilst he's there. Which is of course irrelevant, but true. Now the point is that he's not an idiot; he's likely to have a slant on what he sees there which is both different to the average selected astronaut, and useful. Clearly he's good at making money. [/BLOCKQUOTE][P] Who cares what slant he has on what he sees? This is about wasting billions in US capital investment so the Russians can make a few million using the ISS as a hotel instead of a research facility. Sure, if I were this guy, I'd be doing the same thing. And if I could get the USAF to sell me a F-14 under the table for $50 bucks, I'd do that too. But it is graft either way. The people going up to the ISS should be selected based on who will perform the best science there. Anything else is misappropriation of taxpayer money. Of course, the Russians don't care, because it's really American taxpayer money. The Clinton administration used ISS for years as a cheap foreign aid package. I guess the Russians still view it that way.[/P]

  22. control by heliocentric · · Score: 2

    I volunteer to go up into space and conduct a scientific experiment to determine whether a 2 week vacation in space increases or decreases the productivity of an opensource programmer upon return to earth.

    To make that more towards the realm of science, you'd need a control person or group. Depending on what you're testing, lack of human interaction, some sort of weightlessness impacting code openness, typing speed, who knows... you'd want your control group to experience something similar only without that which you are testing. So, if you're going of the weighlessness impacts coding, you'd need to lock some people up in a small place, limit their diet to things rehydrated, limit their interaction with outsiders.... oh wait, that sounds like most coders lives I know... drat.

    --
    Wheeeee
    1. Re:control by linzeal · · Score: 2, Funny

      We should send up a few M$ employees to store in the airlock.

    2. Re:control by Tackhead · · Score: 1
      > We should send up a few M$ employees to store in the airlock.

      I think you misspelled "outside of". Though it could be fun to have 'em inside and just pressurize and depressurize the airlock a few times a day. Costs a lot of money to lift a pound of M$ employee to orbit, probably shouldn't waste it all in one go.

    3. Re:control by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Costs a lot of money to lift a pound of M$ employee to orbit

      Just hack Bill's bank account and send the whole company up there.

  23. Let me get this straight... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Nerds have no business being in spac...oh wait, never mind.

  24. Re:Moral bankruptcy of comic books by corr · · Score: 0

    lobo is DOPE!!!!

    --

    We wave the flag of freedom as we conquer and invade.
  25. Re:This isn't about making space profitable. by Supa+Mentat · · Score: 5, Insightful

    First a disclaimer, I am an American, not a Russian, these are just the facts as I have come to know them. First off, Russia spent a shitload of money on ISS, not as much as us but it was a significant contributor, I think second overall as far as money spent goes. Secondly, if it hadn't been for the knowhow that the Russians acquired with Mir ISS wouldn't have gotten off of the ground, their biggest contribution by far was the technical knowledge and experiance they brought to the table. Back to money though. What money Russia did spend it really didn't have, the Russian government is in economic straits and space gains them nothing in the short term. So they figured out a way to recoup some of their losses, Tito. He never even touched the American side of the station so Americans (including me) have no right to bitch about it. The Russians have gotten plenty of science done in space, more than us actually because for the longest time we didn't have a station and they had Mir. In conclusion, don't sell the Russians short. Their contributions to the ISS have been substantial and if they need a way to subsidize their part of the station and they can do it than I say more power to them. Neither Americans nor Russians are being kept out of the station because of these extra visitors, so don't worry about it.

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
  26. Re:This isn't about making space profitable. by Supa+Mentat · · Score: 1

    Dude, see my above post, this isn't using any of our money in a substantial way. Believe me if it was I'd be _really_ pissed off.

    --
    "A witty saying proves nothing." - Voltaire
  27. Hang On ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It`s a great idea to send Mark Shuttleworth into space. While he`s there he can gaze down upon the continent of Africa and ponder why it is that a white South African can waste millions turning himself into a artificial satellite while millions more black South Africans slowly die because they don`t have the money to buy anti AIDS drugs. Nice to know he`s got his priorities right.

    1. Re:Hang On ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think it`s something to do with having a conscience. What part of that don`t you understand ?

    2. Re:Hang On ... by Maeryk · · Score: 2

      It`s a great idea to send Mark Shuttleworth into space. While he`s there he can gaze down upon the continent of Africa and ponder why it is that a white South African can waste millions turning himself into a artificial satellite while millions more black South Africans slowly die because they don`t have the money to buy anti AIDS drugs. Nice to know he`s got his priorities right.

      SO, when are you giving me a shell acct on your box? Its obvious you have something I dont have, therefore it is my RIGHT to have access to something you own, simply cause I dont got it and you do.

      Maeryk

      --
      Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
  28. hehehe! geeks in space! by mr_gerbik · · Score: 4, Funny

    hehehe! geeks in space! hohoho! hahaha! lets say it again and maybe it will be funny this time!

    if the slashdot team ever had a meeting in space, i would surely try my best to depressurize their capsule and watch everyone explode.

  29. Shuttleworth by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oh, he's surely worth a shuttle. Eh-eh-eh.

  30. Re:This isn't about making space profitable. by reg · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think you need to look a lot more carefully at Mark Shuttleworth. While his motives aren't altruistic (if I was an unemployed, ex .com'er, and had $575mil in my pocket, I'd also be going into space), he nearly didn't get to go because he insisted on being allowed to conduct scientific experiments, and held a competition in South Africa to find the best experients. NASA's primary complaint is that they didn't want him doing experiements... It was OK if he just sat there and enjoyed the view.

    I'd hardly call his trip wasting the precious US investment (which would have been a lot less if the Russians had built it, because they don't squander money like NASA).

    Regards,
    -Jeremy

  31. Rich People and Space by NatePWIII · · Score: 1, Flamebait

    If all these rich people have all this money and power, why don't they work together and build themselves a "privatized" space station and space program, so they can stop abusing the government funded ones that cost us taxpayers billions of dollars to put up. Lets get real if Bill Gates and some of his richer buddies got together on an idea like this they could probably have an even more impressive "space hotel" than the ISS, I wouldn't doubt it, and their own shuttle to go with it (seating for 30).
    I say let the rich people build their own space program if what they want are "vacations and joy rides".
    Come to think of it why doesn't Microsoft with all its money not dabble more in the communication industry, particularily satellites and other space ventures, if they really want to be innovative I think this is where its at...

    --

    Nathaniel P. Wilkerson
    www.haidacarver.com
    1. Re:Rich People and Space by TGK · · Score: 2

      Because the objective of buisness is to maximize profit while minimizing risk. Space is risky, and while it may pay off, it's unlikely to.

      Potential Profit x Prob of Profit > Potential Loss x Prob of Loss

      That must evaluate to true for a company to realisticly consider doing something (it gets even uglier with present values etc thrown in, so think of it like that).

      The result is that capitalism encourages firms to drink cautiously from the river of innovation rather than jumping in. It takes socilized capitalism (much like Japan) to encourage the sink or swim approach.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    2. Re:Rich People and Space by ewirt · · Score: 1

      Come to think of it why doesn't Microsoft with all its money not dabble more in the communication industry, particularily satellites and other space ventures, if they really want to be innovative I think this is where its at...

      Bill Gates and his "rich buddies" *are* dabbling in the communication industry -- specifically satellites.

      I know this has been covered by Slashdot several times in the past, but I guess it can't hurt to bring it up again:
      Teledesic is the company that Gates, McCaw, Motorola and several others started to build a global satellite system, similar to what Iridium tried to do. The Teledesic FAQ has a little information about Gates's investment. The FAQ doesn't mention how much money he invested, but I seem to remember reading that it was something like 12 billion of his personal dollars...

    3. Re:Rich People and Space by YanIsa · · Score: 1

      Space is risky, and while it may pay off, it's unlikely to.

      Space is unlikely to pay off??

      That must be the stupidest thing I've read here (and keep in mind, this is Slashdot). One nickel asteroid from the belt would pay for all the expenses many times.

      Of course, not if we do it the NASA way - step by step, and don't dare to take another step until everything possible has been done on the first.

      For a realistic view of a possible space future check out How To Save Civilization and Make A Little Money by Larry Niven. The full text is available in "N-Space" - the link is just a piece of Niven's mind on the topic.

      I mean, come on, USA went to the moon in a glorified bath tub and now, 30+ years later with ten times the tech all we can do is one lousy space station?

      If only Bill Gates had a desire for space besides the desire for money - we'd be booking our seats on Microsoft Mars Express right now.

      Yan

      * Origin: (2:380/110)

      --
      I think this line's only filler
    4. Re:Rich People and Space by Tazzy531 · · Score: 1
      so they can stop abusing the government funded ones that cost us taxpayers billions of dollars to put up
      I don't understand what you are getting at with this. First of all, both of the "tourist" that have been in the news recently have paid their own way. I don't know of any that have been on a space trip on a free ride. Now, take the example of the previous tourist. He paid the Russian space agency $20 Million. This $20 million not only paid for his ride but also to fund other projects that the space agency could do.

      Secondly, if all these individual companies decided to form their own space agency NASA would probably have to shut down. A good percentage of the money that NASA gets is to launch private satellites for companies or even go up there to fix a satellite. If another company was offering to do it for cheaper, greater competition. Hey, NASA has a monopoly on this and the only way they'll survive is to maintain a monopoly. Lastly, (I think someone else already responded to this) but Bill Gates (or MS..don't remember) has invested in a network of communications satellite that will span the continental US. I haven't heard any more news on this though...
      --


      _______________________________
      "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    5. Re:Rich People and Space by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
      Billionaire Andrew Beal of Beal aerospace tried this. NASA squished him flat with their subsidised programs, which they then arranged to fail. NASA doesn't want private space programs, or even their own programs taking money away from their pork barrel programs; or more accurately perhaps, the politicians that pay NASA don't want that.

      But don't take my word for it; listen to what Beal said:

      Beal Aerospace closes

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    6. Re:Rich People and Space by TGK · · Score: 2

      Damn. And I thought people were idiots for not reading the artical. Not you're not reading the comments you reply to?

      I was talking about private ventures in space. I never said that it was unlikely to pay off, I said that the risks involved made it such that the payoff times the probibility of success were not sufficiently greater than the potential loss times the probibilty of failure. That's not all a corporation cares about. If there's an earthside venture which has better odds than the space side ones that's where the money will go.

      Oh, and this has nothing to do with NASA. NASA (in case you forgot) is a government operated cost center (as opposed to a profit center). NASA seeks only to keep its costs below its budget. Either by lowering costs (bad) or increasing budget (good).

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
    7. Re:Rich People and Space by YanIsa · · Score: 1

      Hello,

      ok, let's both raise the tone a bit so we'll understand each other :)

      I understand the economic factors involved in a business decision but still believe that a corporation with, say, 10 billion USD could fund a succesful space-tourism venture.

      I angrily replied to you because you didn't seem to understand that the possible benefits of space are virtually LIMITLESS and therefore worth a lot of risk. This is not a vacant lot we're talking about that can make 1 mil as a parking space or at the max 5 mil as a business center - this is INFINITE SPACE we're talking about.

      Why isn't it space tourism and industry happening? Because the general public has gotten an idea that "space is for scientists", largely a fault of NASA (lately) and US Administration. One of the first heads of NASA, Von Braun, was actually actively involved in promoting further space exploration and quit in disgust after two years of unsuccessful persuasion of US Govt officials who thought that everything's been seen and done by going to the Moon.

      Since then, NASA has pursued a "science only" view of space. Kinda like the Internet was in the beginning, but it was not until the general public wanted to come and play, too, that the medium truly blossomed. (insert obligatory AC goatse.cx reply here)

      I blame the current space stand-still on a NASA decision to explore space safely. Exploration is _never_ safe. The USA, as you know, was reasonably hostile to the first European settlers and it took centuries for the world to get the benefits that it brought. Lives will be lost - let's accept it and get on with it.

      Oh, and before you tell me to put my money where my mouth is, if I am offered a trip to space that involves a, say, 10% chance of getting killed, I'd go in a flash - especially if they could promise me that I'd die on the return journey. :)

      Yan

      * Origin: (2:380/110)

      --
      I think this line's only filler
    8. Re:Rich People and Space by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If only more people in places of real authority thought like you.

    9. Re:Rich People and Space by TGK · · Score: 2

      Yes and no. I agree that NASA has contributed substantialy to the "space is for scientists" conception, largely to the detriment of the industry as a whole. Nonetheless, I think space tourism is a bit further out of site than you think. Consider the idea of a "space hotel"...

      First off, no one goes on vacation to a hotel for the view. You need stuff to do there, so we expand the concept to a space resort. No big deal, just larger facilities, which as you pointed out, doesn't eactly effect rent costs.

      That being said there's a plethora of considerations for a space resort. Most importat to them is staff. How many people does it take to run a hotel? You'll need those people at your space resort. Many of those people will have to be permanant staff, that means a HUGE space station. We're talking 11 kilometers across (ring shaped of course) to allow rotation and thus artificial gravity (wouldn't want those bones to deteriorate would we?).

      Then there's the matter of providing food. It's not economicly feasable to ship food up there for any sort of serious commercial venture. So blue green alge it is. Now you've got to find ways to make this into something palletable, which isn't that hard (it's really good with Vodka, try some time).

      Shielding is a problem too. Most plans include large bands of water storage tanks which ring the damn thing. That's where you grow the algee of course.

      Overall my point is that a space based hotel whatever is more expensive precisely because it's not for science. A small facility operated on occasion can be left alone for a lot of the time and it doesn't matter. Supplies needed for habbitation can be transported to the station and consumed. It does not need to be a closed system.

      A commercial hotel scheme must be a closed system. Space is energy rich and stuff poor. You need to make sure that no matter leaves the station. You also need to make sure the station is self sufficient. Part of making this profitable is having it ready to go whenever and keeping it running all the time. To do that you need the infrastrucuture to build an 11 kilometer ring spacestation.

      That's a hell of a project, no matter who you are.

      --
      Killfile(TGK)
      No trees were killed in the creation of this post. However, many electrons were inconvenienced.
  32. Mark In Space by geltoob · · Score: 3, Funny

    Since the Mark is going by way of Soyuz, what is a trip on the Shuttleworth?

  33. Appropriate name by Basalisk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    "Shuttleworth"

    Almost as good as a dog trainer I know called Jack Russel

  34. Re:This isn't about making space profitable. by J05H · · Score: 1

    and with a solution like yours, human spaceflight will never shown to be profitable. ISS is a pig, research-wise, especially in light of it being a 3-person capacity indefinitely. There isn't enough manpower onboard to effectively do much research, just enough to keep systems running. If the Russians are making money, on both their investement and ours, more power to them. The more people that fly, the better. The more profit that is made, even by a pseudo-govt-owned company like Energia, the better for the future of private spaceflight. Private space is the future, ISS has the possibility to be the stepping stone to private stations that do much more, or NASA can keep being boneheaded about private use, and human spaceflight (like, you and me) will fail to happen.

    --
    gigantino.tv - Heavy but weighs nothing.
  35. Re:hehehe! geeks in space! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Then we should organize a collection to set them up the bomb.

  36. Looks like a good guy, too... by Voidhobo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    At least according to Slashdot's values...

    In a recent chat-room interview in ZA:

    Scurra: Hiya. How does Russian software development differ from the software development that you've done. I mean, do they program in Cyrillic? Are the Russians keen on something like Linux?

    Mark Shuttleworth: I think Linux is pretty popular here, which is great. Most programming languages don't change, but obviously they use Unicode and DBCS to present the Cyrillic characters in the UI. They have fantastic programmers here (Dmitry Sklyralov (sp?) is Russian ;-)
  37. No by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    North, south, and central America are collectively called "The Americas" not "America" The only thing called "America" without a north/south/central modifier is the United States Of America.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:No by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Unless you live in South America, which is also America by the locals.

      Of course, locals never know what they're talking about, right?

  38. How Will He Get Around the ISS ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I suggest he uses a Segway - it should be hilarious watching him bounce around the station at 17 miles an hour.

  39. AMES IOWA!!! by autopr0n · · Score: 1

    Well, autopr0n is based in Ames Iowa right now. So,

    Go, Ames, Iowa, Go!

    :)

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:AMES IOWA!!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop trolling for your commercial pr0n site.

  40. Re:Moral bankruptcy of comic books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, I would never let my two beautiful daughets read something like Lobo. They are only permitted to read hentai about tentacle rape, and other pornography. They've been learning quite well.

  41. Re:This isn't about making space profitable. by Siener · · Score: 2, Informative


    No money is being wasted here. Mark will go up as a fully trained astronaut. This does not cost any more or less than sending up any other trained person. Please note that Mark went through full cosmonaut training together with normal prospective cosmonauts. The only difference is of course that he paid for his own training..



    From the press release :

    [He] will be a fully certified member of the Soyuz crew, responsible for some Soyuz systems during the flight



    He is by no means just a space tourist like Dennis Tito was.

  42. I have a question... by Tarkwyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    What's Mark's Shuttle worth?

    --
    Tarkwyn.
    1. Re:I have a question... by Nitroshock · · Score: 1

      $1.76, same as the price of tea in china.

    2. Re:I have a question... by Beechmere · · Score: 1

      Dunno what the shuttle's worth, but it probably similar in value to a Greek Urn.

  43. As if... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As if NASA needs any help to waste tax payers money.

    They built the most powerfull rocket in the world (Saturn V), and then use it as a lawn ornament at the Kennedy space centre.

    Instead they use the the Space Shuttle to launch cargo at 100 times the cost, just so that they don't have to admit that it's a big and expensive screw up.

    The Mars lander crashes because of a screw up with metric and imperial units ... need I say more

  44. Re:hehehe! geeks in space! by Omnifarious · · Score: 0, Troll

    if the slashdot team ever had a meeting in space, i would surely try my best to depressurize their capsule and watch everyone explode.

    If that's actually how you feel, stop coming here, reading and posting. AFAIK, nobody sticks a gun to your head and makes you go to Slashdot.

  45. Re:This isn't about making space profitable. by eugene_roux · · Score: 1
    Not being an American, I would actually consider America to be one of the "countries in less important spots on the earth's surface".

    Come to think About it, they're probably not making money off "American tax money" either, but rather off Russian tax money.

    Oh God, we're not Americans, we're not worthy... Sheesh! Bloody arrogant Git!

    --
    Part Time Philosopher, Oft Times Romantic, Full Time Unix Geek
  46. America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The only thing called "America" without a north/south/central modifier is the United States Of America."
    May be when you say America like:
    Capitan America
    America On-Line

    But America is a continent. Africa is a continent too.
    If America uses north/south/central modifier is because the TV want's.

    Because most of Yankies think that they are the most special people in the world. And they have forget that his grandfathers where from Africa, Europa and Asia. (Yes this things are continents)
    But this news are about Africa not America.

    1. Re:America by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, no, "America" is not a coninent.

      There are continents called "South America" and "North America", but there is no continent called "America".

      You might wanna check your facts next time, eh?

  47. Re:slashdot homos blast into orbit, buttfuck in sp by ayjay29 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Do you do vodo?
    No, but I do know judo.

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  48. Typing ROT13 from memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Imagine how well hot grits would work in space. Naked, petrified and weightless!

    Gurer vf n zna fgnaqvat oruvaq zr jvgu n tha gb zl urnq. Ur vf znxvat zr glcr anfgl pbzzragf nobhg fynfuqbg.

    1. Re:Typing ROT13 from memory by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      *chuckle* Now that's funny. :-)

  49. And the name to go by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Heh-heh he has a suitable name, doesn't he?

    Mark Shuttleworth... that should Mark him Worthy of a Shuttle trip... :-)

  50. Incorrect Story by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think the story subitted is incorrect. This will be the third space tourist. The first space tourist was way back in October 29 1998 The second was on 30 April 2001 So this should definately be the thrid right?

    1. Re:Incorrect Story by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2

      John Glenn didn't pay his way; he doesn't count. Otherwise, you could argue Gagarin was the first space tourist.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    2. Re:Incorrect Story by nathanm · · Score: 2

      Actually there were 2 congressmen that were space tourists before Glenn:

      Senator Jake Garn on STS-51D

      Bill Nelson on STS-61C

      This is from some previous /. comments: 1 2 3

  51. He is funding research too.. by axxter · · Score: 2, Informative

    Shutleworth is funding three research projects around his trips. One of the projects will involve University of Cape Town, Physiologists. The universities monday paper has the story

  52. Research by HavingToLoginSucks · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm really curious about what type of scientific research he intends to pursue while up there. Does anyone know what his scientific interests are? Anyone have any idea what experiments he intends to perform? Anyone gotta link or literature ref (CS research may be online, but the rest of science is laggin a little)? A curious chemist

    1. Re:Research by brshuttleworth · · Score: 1

      From the africaninspace.com site, it looks like he wants to do Stem Cell research, your standard Physiology stuff (heart rate, etc.) and some Protein Crystallisation for HIV and allergy drugs.

      --
      -- South African and not-an-expatriot [rare]
  53. It's the "How long will we be solvent" game! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    "I think it's time for a Slashdot staff meeting in space..." Oh, you're paying for that with the sale of your VA stock? (giggle)

  54. Interview with Mark Shuttleworth by Siener · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Here is an interesting interview with Mark Shuttleworth.

    A few quotes :

    "I realise that I'm not going on a joyride, this is not just a question of getting into space. We are kick-starting an African space programme. It is not good enough to simply take Russian experiments; we must give South African scientists an opportunity."

    "Of course there is a personal reward, but at the same time the trip will do a tremendous amount for South Africa in the international arena. Also the money I'm spending on this project is not disappropriate to the money I have already spent on other people and that I gave away."

  55. What Nonsense by frog51 · · Score: 2, Informative

    America is commonly used to mean USA, but that is mostly due to the fact that the USA is very self-centric. AFAIK USA is the United States Of America, hence the acronym
    To the rest of the world America includes Canada, Mexico, Peru, Argentina, Chile etc etc etc etc., because most other countries don't see the USA as all important, more as a large country with a predilection towards violence and aggressive politics.

    1. Re:What Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Don't forget our predilection towards noisy cars and big-breasted blondes. When I hear the Star Spangled Banner, tears come to my mind as I think of noisy cars, porn stars, porn stars on noisy cars, noisy cars filled with porn stars, ad nauseum. Though I must admit that Britain produces some mighty fine porn stars of the non-blonde variety.

    2. Re:What Nonsense by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "America" is unfortunately also often used for USA here in Europe. The reason is however that it is just easier to pronounce, not the notion that USA == Continent America. I hear more people from the USA say "The States" than "America" anyway.

    3. Re:What Nonsense by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

      Speaking as a Canadian, that is certainly not true of Canada. "America" means USA. "North America" is a continent containing, among other contries, both Canada and the US.

      I'm sure that Mexicans feel the same way, although I can't speak for them.

  56. Re:This isn't about making space profitable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's ISS not ASS (American Space Station). The I stands for International and that does NOT mean American (even through some americans seem to think so.)

  57. South-african geek!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hey I met this guy, he was giving a speech at my comapney. The guy is a real Linux geek :)
    Seems South-africa is finally so the world, that we have some decent geeks. -Phazer
    Nou dit is mos wat a boer seun moet doen!!

  58. Dumbass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Have you ever heard of this thing called 'context'?

    besides none of the moderators read at zero. they'll never see what you wrote, you anonymous fuck.

  59. American porn is rubbish by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Cos US blokes have mostly had their genitalia mutilated shortly after birth. Some religous thing expounded by the founder of Kellogg's Cornflakes apparently. I'm sure the women are lovely if you like looking at silicon, which I guess most geeks do...

    1. Re:American porn is rubbish by Craig+Davison · · Score: 1

      Have you seen the prostitutes in Berlin? Way more fucked up fake 'n bake plastic blonde than any American porn stars.

  60. Slashdot staff meeting in space .... by shaunak · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Please, oh please let them meet as hitch hikers aboard a vogon ship.
    Oh, and I hope they are read vogon poetry, by the vogons.
    Take that CmdrTaco, Timothy, Katz.

    --
    -Shaunak.
  61. NAME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did no one else get the gag in this guys name???

  62. Making NASA look bad by SpinyNorman · · Score: 2

    Well first the Russians embarass NASA by proving they can make a profit from a $20M passenger while the shuttle costs $500M per trip (10x over budget), and now they're going to embarass them by doing science up their while all we hear about NASA is how smart they were to build table out of junk and duct tape.

    Maybe NASA should step aside in the interests of space research, and sell their ISS spot to Russia who it appears can not only pay for it commercially, but also get science done (pretty damn cool that a competition winner is going to get his/her experiment on the ISS!).

  63. Re:This isn't about making space profitable. by Luyseyal · · Score: 2

    Well... don't forget about the loud Russian module. You can't get much science done, or at least very well, if you can't hear yourself think.
    I'm not saying either program is fundamentally better, merely that they each have their strengths and weaknesses. And yes, the Russian space program is all about flying coach, without which, I'll never get to see the blue earth below me.

    Cheers,
    -l

    --
    Help cure AIDS, cancer, and more. Donate your unused computer time to worldcommunitygrid.org. Join Team Slashdot!
  64. 'Nonsense' right back a'cha by Dirk+Pitt · · Score: 4, Insightful
    C'mon. I get so tired of these 'America is so self-centric and aggressive' posts that automatically get modded up.

    Firstly, the USA is commonly referred to as 'America' because it is, to the best of my knowledge, the only country on these two continents that includes the word 'America' in its title. People would quickly grow tired of calling us "United States of Americans" or "YouEssAyans" instead of just "Amercians". This is the only descriptor I've run across, in my fairly wide travels anyway, for people from these United States. All of the Australians, Brits, Chinese, and Japanese I know refer to the American continents as "The Americas", and would never assume that 'America' includes countries north and south.

    Secondly, oh yes, our 'predilection towards violence' and aggression is so unique in the world. The countries of Africa, Asia and Europe are just flower carrying peace lovers compared to America. Every country has their violent little toys, and likes to use them. Just because America can afford the most and the best right now doesn't make them any worse or better than any country of the often parental 1st world on down.

    1. Re:'Nonsense' right back a'cha by a_an_the · · Score: 1

      How about "Staties"?

  65. Re:This isn't about making space profitable. by tekrat · · Score: 1

    This is not real space tourism. This is about Russians making a quick buck off of American tax money. We (and some other countries in less important spots on the earth's surface) spent billions in captial to build the ISS, and the Russians are wasting the investment by sending up tourists instead of scientists to perform experiments and astronauts to run the station. Sure the Russians make a few million, but only because the billions were spent by someone else. If this were really about making space profitable, I'd be all for it. But its not profit, it's graft.

    So, by your same argument, when the US sent astronauts to MIR before we had an ISS, that was graft, because the Americans were getting a free ride on Russian Taxpayer money, eh?

    --
    If telephones are outlawed, then only outlaws will have telephones.
  66. Quiz Show by nick255 · · Score: 1

    More interestingly the BBC are reporting that one company has secured places to be used as prizes in a TV game show!

  67. Space station could pay for it's self... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    at $20 million a trip, we could pay for the space station if we send up 1000 rich people.

  68. When will everyone be there by ackthpt · · Score: 4, Funny
    Yes, and considering NO average Joes will go until a LOT of rich folks do (think cars, airplanes, etc, etc, etc)... I'd say it is NOT going to happen overnight.

    And when it does happen, we can look forward to:

    The first Domino's Pizza delivery in space, "Hey, the toppings are stuck to the top of the box!"

    _Real_ scien-terrific 'spiriments, "Oh, man, he puked and it came straight out!"

    Mothers equiped with instant cameras will line everyone up for a group picture over the Grand Canyon.

    New anti-gravity sports leagues will be developed.

    and inevitably, the below-average Joe's will arrive to make space totally egalitarian...

    Rednecks in space -- "Dang! I haid th' gol-dang yard all fixed up with space junk and them nassa varmints are tryin't swipe it again. Maw! Git muh laser arn! Ahm agonna blast 'em."

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  69. Civilians in space by soundlord · · Score: 4, Insightful

    one important thing to note is that if Christa McAuliffe, a civilian teacher, hadn't died aboard Challenger in 1986, the idea of civilians in space probably wouldn't be as big a deal as it is now. More civilians would have likely boarded shuttles during the following years, and gradually the civilian population would have become more comfortable with the idea of having civilians in space. When this happened, the average person would feel that space was within his or her grasp, and the space program would have experienced more interest and increased financial support.

    the Russians, perhaps without meaning to, are again getting average people comfortable with the idea of civilians in space, which might not be such a bad thing - they don't have the stigma of the Challenger tragedy to deal with, and their efforts might foster increased interest in space programs here in the States.

  70. Re:This isn't about making space profitable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    At the time that NASA sent the shuttle to Mir, the Mir program was pretty much being totally funded out of NASA fees related to the Mir-Shuttle dockings. NASA paid for the last two lab modules sent to Mir. Without NASA funding, Mir would have crashed to earth 10 years ago - not last year.

  71. Re:This isn't about making space profitable. by muffen · · Score: 1

    I agree with you on some points. However, the problem that I see is the pollution caused by launching rockets.

    I can accept this guy going up, because (hopefully) he will do some experiments that will be useful for people. However, people like the last guy that went up (I'm too lazy to look up his name) really bothers me! He simply polluted the planet ALOT for his own pleasure.

    I hope that space tourism never grows big! The pollution would be soo big... it's not worth it!

  72. Shuttle Worthy by Sideways+The+Dog · · Score: 1

    I think now he should change his name to "ShuttleWorthy"... at least on Slashdot.

    --
    "Love is never saying you're too proud." -Tonic
  73. as far as I know.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    he is a South African Linux user ;-) -- so can I go too??
    He almost did not get in but the local paper has been carrying the story for a while now.
    I think he threw more money at them;-) ( the Russians)

  74. Re:This isn't about making space profitable. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well said. Without the Russians the ISS would have stayed, like its NASA ancestors, as a multi-billion dollar pile of paper. While NASA was producing one paper study after another the Russians were learning the hard way how to make a space station work and what needed to be improved for the next one.

    After all the complaints about the delays on the early Russian modules (excusable due to the chaotic present condition of their nation), it'll be interesting to see what happens if/when the US rate of building is slowed down under new NASA administration. Will everyone else be saying that the Americans should have been kept out of the ISS? ;-)

  75. Lord British by uk_greg · · Score: 1

    I undestand that Richard Garriott AKA Lord British wants to fly in space as well. I wonder how close he is to realizing that goal?

  76. shuttleworth? by owenferguson · · Score: 1

    If he's wortha a whole shuttle, why is he settling for a trip on a Soyez?