Slashdot Mirror


KaZaa Suspends Downloads

chill writes: "'Download Temporarily Suspended -- Download of the KaZaA Media Desktop software is temporarily and voluntarily suspended pending Dutch court decision on January 31. We apologise for the inconvenience. Please check back at www.kazaa.com for more information.' --- Both the Linux and Windows client downloads are offline. I wonder what the judge thinks this will do to the tens, if not hundreds of thousands who already have the software?"

111 of 586 comments (clear)

  1. Re:Larry Ellison by nusuth · · Score: 2, Offtopic
    Ofcourse a database can only be "less breakable" not unbreakable and I'm willing to excuse the term. But 3 buffer overflows, discovered in a short amount of time does not sound very "less breakable" to me either. Neither "100 times faster" sounds like 1.5-3 times faster according to Oracle's own adds (IIRC they were comparing with an IBM database.) I don't think we have to be so forgiving about his BS. It is not much different than MS, really, each new version of windows DO add something, and IS faster on some tasks when they claim releases are "unlocking the full potential of PC." It is a matter of degree, but yours seem to be a bit too forgiving.

    Oh, that, and the parent thread. Reading it may illimunate what may possibly happen if government can track all your actions and act without any wisdom and respect for different ideas.

    --

    Gentlemen, you can't fight in here, this is the War Room!

  2. even funnier by Richthofen80 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    is that i'm sure the kazaa client is available for download from Morpheus, or one of the hundreds of other file sharing programs. Effectively, once one copy exists, software gains a sort of immortality... which the courts can't effectively dismantle.

    --
    Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    1. Re:even funnier by zatz · · Score: 3

      kazaa and morpheus are the same network, so if you can download something from morpheus, you dont exactly need the kazaa client :)

      the downloadable installer actually gets most of the kazaa program from the fasttrack network, oddly enough....

      --

      Java: the COBOL of the new millenium.
    2. Re:even funnier by dozing · · Score: 2, Funny

      Or you can just open up your Kazaa client and download Kazaa and install it on your... Oh wait... I suppose if I don't have Kazaa I can't open it... So I open Morpheus and download Kazaa and install it... Oh, I suppose if I already have Morpheus there's no real purpose in installing Kazaa since the use the same network... What was I saying?

      --
      Dozings.com -- Its kinda funny... If you're as crazy as me.
  3. What a difference a day makes. by Mike+the+Mac+Geek · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Great. In one 24 hour period we have had stories on Universal's general screwing of it's customers, the network's reluctance to let us record shows in any shape or fashion, and now Kazaa shutting down pending litigation.

    What a happy joyous world I live in. How in the FUCK did we get to this point?

    --
    -------------------------------------------------- ---- The man, the myth, the something or other.
    1. Re:What a difference a day makes. by anotherone · · Score: 2, Redundant

      KaZaa hasn't shut down, they've just taken the program download off of their website. I've got KaZaa open right now, it's working fine.

      --
      Username taken, please choose another one.
    2. Re:What a difference a day makes. by mlk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You stole music, then distubeded it over a P2P network which the lovly, all knowing goverment could not control.

      --
      Wow, I should not post when knackered.
    3. Re:What a difference a day makes. by DavidTC · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Don't forget Borland backing down.

      --
      If corporations are people, aren't stockholders guilty of slavery?
    4. Re:What a difference a day makes. by Rogerborg · · Score: 4, Interesting
      • In one 24 hour period we have had stories on Universal's general screwing of it's customers, the network's reluctance to let us record shows in any shape or fashion, and now Kazaa shutting down pending litigation. What a happy joyous world I live in. How in the FUCK did we get to this point

      What point? That there's more content freely available right now than there's ever been in the history of humankind? It's way harsh on Dmitri and Jon Johansson, but as far as the rest of us are concerned, what's the biggie?

      Don't get me wrong, I think it's loathesome that content distributors can tell us to our faces that we're all guilty (of whatever new offence they want to buy with "campaign contributions"), but in practical terms, they're fighting a losing battle, and I can show you precedent. The ex-Soviet Union.

      Like most truism, this one is actually true: The more they tighten their grip, the more star systems, er, customers, will slip through their fingers.

      When they tell us that we're all criminals whatever we do, when they make it harder to play by their rules than to get content via P2P or on a street corner, when they try to dictate demand by controlling supply, they'll create a black market that will supply the genuine demand of you and I and Joe Public. It happened in Russia, with far tighter controls at every level of society than even the RIAA and MPAA combined can buy in the USA. The War on Piracy will be about as successful as the War on Drugs, because they are both a War on The People.

      I mean, really, this is bad luck for Kazaa, but Kazaa screwed up by trying to control supply using authorisation servers. They joined the losing side there and then. If Kazaa goes under, another service will pick up the pieces, and the amount of content available will just grow and grow. The losers will be anyone who refuses to supply the demand, the winners will be you, me, Joe, and the lawyers.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
  4. Bug or design? by yerricde · · Score: 2

    Could've been a libc mismatch with my Debian-unstable system, but [KaZaA for Linux] wouldn't accept user input after starting up and logging in.

    That might be the whole point: if I remember correctly, you start a client daemon (with &), and then you use other apps to send commands to that daemon and interact with the network. (Normally, a GUI wrapper would handle that for you.)

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Bug or design? by Linux+Freak · · Score: 2

      Well, I wouldn't exactly call it "working fine". I use it too, but it segfaults a lot at startup, doesn't redraw the screen properly many times (I have only ever used it with 'screen'; perhaps on a raw console it behaves better). Now this. If only they had opened up their code, a) we could fix the glarinb bugs, b) we could add cool features, and c) we could tell the courts to piss off.

      Now, if kazaa is shut down completely, we will forever be stuck with this version. (Hopefully the "gift" project on sourceforge will mature soon.)

  5. The legal system, etc. by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Insightful
    The Brad Waldell article Lawsuits in the Internet Age sums it up nicely; as he says:

    ''Never in human history has technology allowed the big to crush the small with so little effort, and never have the laws and infrastructure of the world been so set up to expedite this process. [...] In reality, the legal system is a nasty, ugly thing that unless you have a great deal of time, resources and money, you're up the creek.''

    He also explores the various myths of how the system works. For example -

    Myth #1: What matters is who is right. Sorry, wrong -- it matters who is willing to spend the most money proving they are "right."

    - and on it goes.

    I wish these guys well with their fight

    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    1. Re:The legal system, etc. by mjpk · · Score: 2, Insightful

      So the question is, as always, what should be done? Would we be better off, if there were no legal system? Should there be someone superior who would make things right for the little globo-citizen?? Propably no. The _system_ is the correct one in general terms, in democracies. It's the application that has number of bugs.

    2. Re:The legal system, etc. by dimator · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Well put yourself in "the big"'s position: suddenly, all the content (movies, music, etc) that you've made your billions with can be exchanged with next to zero effort by countless millions of people. Wouldn't you be doing something to defend your business? And don't give me that "The cat is out of the bag, they should evolve to use the internet." Let me repeat: BILLIONS of dollars. Why would they want to adapt when what they've been doing has gotten them so much cash?

      The only power they have is the legal system, and they are forced to utilize it.

      Note: I'm not passing judgement on who's right or wrong. I'm just pointing out that "the big" have their side to the whole "digital rights" story too. It would be stupid to expect them to give up and walk away.

      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    3. Re:The legal system, etc. by DahGhostfacedFiddlah · · Score: 2, Insightful

      And don't give me that "The cat is out of the bag, they should evolve to use the internet."

      But that's what the parent post is all about - they got big off of a system that would not work if it were brought in brand-new today, and now that they're big, they can crush opposition. Of course they don't want to adapt when what they've been doing has gotten them so much cash. The point is that the law allows obsolete business practices to litigate their way through a few more years of survival - hurting a lot of entrepreneurs and innovators in the process.

    4. Re:The legal system, etc. by Robotech_Master · · Score: 2

      There was an article in the New York Times about that this very day. (registration, yadda, blah blah, if someone wants to post the 'registration-free' link, please do; I don't remember how to construct them) Quite interesting.

      BTW, I didn't even know there was a KaZaa client for Linux. Where can I find it? :)

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    5. Re:The legal system, etc. by cancrman · · Score: 2

      That all comes back to the old saying (I'm sure I'm butchering it):

      Any one who wants to be a politician, shouldn't.

      --
      The sole purpose of the Internet is to get porn and bomb making plans into the hands of children.
    6. Re:The legal system, etc. by dimator · · Score: 2
      --
      python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
    7. Re:The legal system, etc. by issachar · · Score: 2

      that doesn't work. it used to, but it doesn't anymore. neither does using "http://partners...

      instead, you can use the amazing slashcode0 account.

      Username Slashcode0
      Password Slashcode0

      That's a zero in both cases.

      Have fun.

      .

      --
      . --- If you're looking for free e-mail you won't find it here! http://www.noemailhere.com
    8. Re:The legal system, etc. by Nicolas+MONNET · · Score: 2

      ...and therefore I should be able to download it all for free for my own entertainment pleasure.

      No. The conclusion is: and therefore it does'nt matter to humanity if it dies a deserved death.

    9. Re:The legal system, etc. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Troll

      it is amazing how human nature often allows people to discard rational logic to justify their actions. unfortunately, this issue isn't as moral unambiguous as people would like to believe. you (along with thousands of others) are saying that "the law allows obsolete business practices" regarding this issue. it's amazing that the _protection and preservation one's rightful property_ transformed overnight from an inalienable human right acknowledged by almost every society (though not by every political system) throughout time, into an "obsolete business practice." in reality, these immutable liberties haven't changed. what has changed is that technology stripped theivery of its legal reprecussions and made it amazingly easy.

      i especially like the quote, "hurting a lot of ... innovators in the process." file-sharing systems are indeed innovative. selling drugs on the street was innovative once too. planting a bomb in your shoe was an innovative form of terrorism. i think you get the point. the only good that can come of these innovations, is that steps can be taken to protect individuals from these threats to their natural liberties of life and livelyhood.

      a change in the system doesn't justify the violation of these most basic human rights. we're nothing more than looters using technology to our advantage, grabbing everything we can because we know there will be no reprecussions later on. we can't blind ourselves with these false arguments, or criticize the system for putting an end to our exploits.

      if the record companies/movie studios successfully utilize the law in order to preserve their rightful property, i applaud them.

    10. Re:The legal system, etc. by Rogerborg · · Score: 3, Insightful
      • Wouldn't you be doing something to defend your business [...] The only power they have is the legal system, and they are forced to utilize it

      Hang on a minute while I just choke quietly in the corner. The only power? So, a big business can buy the laws they want through political bribes (aka campaign contributions), can have courts stop just about any activity they like (prima facia, before any guilt has been proven), and then can keep anybody they like in court until the little guy runs out of money and has to settle or starve, and that's the only power they have?

      What more do they need? Well, it would be nice if they could get laws passed that effectively allow them to instruct their government to provide paramilitary enforcers to imprison individuals either at home or abroad, but that's beyond the realms of fantasy, surely?

      Oh, wait, remind me, why did I buy that "Free Dmitri" T-shirt? How's Jon Johansson doing these days?

      Only the legal system. God help us all.

      --
      If you were blocking sigs, you wouldn't have to read this.
    11. Re:The legal system, etc. by Sloppy · · Score: 2

      The only power they have is the legal system, and they are forced to utilize it.

      I don't have a problem with that. I just wish they would go after the copyright infringers, instead of the tookmakers. The whole idea of vicarious/contributory infringement is bullshit, because there's no way a tool can ever be made that knows the difference between infringing and non-infringing use. Going after toolmakers is an abuse of the system.

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  6. Morpheus is still going by asv108 · · Score: 2, Informative

    For windows users, you can still use Morpheus for all your mp3 and pr0n downloads. I wouldn't be suprised if Morpheus is next considering Kazaa and Morpheus are based on the same technology from fastrack. Both morpheus and kazaa are similar to napster in the sense that they have centralized authentication, but they differ in the fact that there is not a centralized index. There is a good writeup on morpheus and kazaa available here.

  7. Artist websites by Inthewire · · Score: 2

    Yeah. I pay for music. See, I don't like record companies, so I just buy music online from bands I like. If that's not an option, well, I break down and buy the cd, but since I hate most music put out by the big guys, it all works out. MP3.com had some good stuff, particularly Americana (which is my personal choice)

    --


    Writers imply. Readers infer.
  8. Who cares? by Chemical · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Chemical's reasons for not caring:

    1) Even if the stupid Kaaza client is no longer available, Morpheus still is, and is a lot more popular a client anyways. That's like trying to shut down the WWW by banning Netscape.

    2) Morpehus/Kaaza suck anyways. Even though the idea behind it is pretty genius, in practice their software sucks. Besides crashing constantly, being spyware, bloatware, and every other type of negative ware there is, and just plain being a crappy client, there is no friggin music on their network. I try searching for something somewhat well known but not quite mainstream, say "The Descendents", and I get 0 results back. And any results I do get download at 1.1 k/sec, despite claiming the user has a bandwith of "300" whatever that means. Worst of all you can only get mp3s of up to 128kpbs. I'll stick with WinMX or eDonkey2000 for now. There are plenty of alternatives to Kaaza/Morpheus that don't suck ass.

    1. Re:Who cares? by VA+Porware · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually you can get mp3s higher than 128kbps. In regedit, go to HKEY_CURRENT_USER, Software, Morpheus or Kazaa, change LimitBitrate to 0 and reboot!

    2. Re:Who cares? by roguerez · · Score: 2

      I wonder why there is a limit in the first place?

    3. Re:Who cares? by roguerez · · Score: 2

      If they actually thought that 128 Kb ought to be enough and that more Kb's don't make a difference, I consider it a design flaw.

  9. Morpheus still up.. by hughk · · Score: 2
    As noted wlsewhere, both KaZaa and Morpheus share the FastTrack network. They are P2P clients but have the disadvantage that they are centrally authenticated (to force the advertising down the punters' throats).

    KaZaa users are still connecting as of 06:00 GMT today. The main problem is if the courts go after the authentication servers. This isn't happening yet.

    --
    See my journal, I write things there
    1. Re:Morpheus still up.. by Robotech_Master · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's worth noting, again, that giFT, the open-source FastTrack clone, is now undergoing network testing. Slashdot over to there, get their client, try it and see if you can't help them out. giFT, if it takes off, shouldn't have any of the advertising, authenticating, or other such problems of the commercial FT clients, right?

      --
      Editor Emeritus and Senior Writer, TeleRead.org
    2. Re:Morpheus still up.. by daw · · Score: 5, Insightful

      > The main problem is if the courts go after the authentication servers. This isn't happening yet.

      Actually, I have read (in the leaked RIAA memo on fasttrack) that if the authentication servers are unreachable, the software will connect to the network without authenticting. It comes with a long list of peers to try connecting to, which whenever it connects. If this is true, and kazaa etc. vanish with their servers, the software should keep working.

      On the other hand, I have read (in the New York Times article on video trading yesterday) that FastTrack have the ability to shut down the software remotely. And this would seem to be borne out by the time they forced everyone to upgrade to version 1.33. (Though maybe this was accomplished in the authentication process.)

    3. Re:Morpheus still up.. by ScumBiker · · Score: 2

      An Americans take on punter; dumb-ass, dope, idiot, moron, senator. Any Brits out there? I'm probably wrong.

      Now to the on-topic bit. Fasttrack updated everyone during the authentication process. Although I can't wait for a Morpheus client for Linux, especially if it also ties into the gnutella stuff.

      --
      --- Think of it as evolution in action ---
  10. Re:How does this solve anything? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What is the point of suspending the download from their homepage?

    Because a judge took a look at the binary executable and found that the byte values and/or their disposition in the executable is offensive.

  11. What it will do by ErfC · · Score: 5, Funny
    I wonder what the judge thinks this will do to the tens, if not hundreds of thousands who already have the software?

    It will get a story posted on /., prompting millions of users to simultaneously fire up their existing KaZaA software to see if the network is still up, thus melting the servers and shutting down the network...

    --

    -Erf C.
    Cthulu always calls collect...

  12. Re:What to do: by VA+Porware · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Eventually they will simply have to go after individual users if they want to stop illegal sharing. I know that if word got around on perhaps a college campus that students were being kicked out of the dorms that it would cause the casual pirates to think twice.

    The fear of this happening is spreading. I recently had a few people come to me to ask about encrypting their hard drive contents. This will help for now, but I'm expecting the US to pass an equivalent law to the UK RIP Act, which requires people to turn over passwords if the government asks for them.

    This country used to be about freedom for the people. What have we let happen?

  13. Reminds me of a wonderful book. by AMuse · · Score: 5, Funny

    In the book "Microserfs", by Douglas Coupland, the writer muses (This was, by the way, in about 1993):

    "Someday life will be nothing more than jail and shopping."

    'Nuff said.

  14. Re:Only a matter of time by cscx · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Remember:

    KaZaA does not condone activities and actions that breach the copyright of artists and copyright owners - as a KaZaA user you are bound by the KaZaA Terms of Use and laws governing copyright in each country.

    Slow down cowboy? Maybe I just type too fast...

  15. Doesn't matter too much by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Sure, lots of people use Fasttrack, and the network is fairly decent (in that it sort of works sometimes), unlike Gnutella, Open Napster, and Direct Connect. But now that Fasttrack implemented a cryptographic challenge (such that no open source client can enter the network easily without cracking the code) they have shot themselves in the foot since it's easier to shut down with only one company licensing the technology. I wouldn't download Kazaa anyways, since it's loaded with sypware, 3rd party programs, and the like. Morpheus is another Fasttrack program, and it is pretty decent, although it does have ads that popup through Internet Explorer (!) and they even often have sound or shockwave, or take up the whole screen! Your best bet is to use Freenet once version 0.5 is released (really soon now) with Frost. All those who know the old, non-working Freenet will be impressed by 0.5, as it works incredibly well now.

    One other thing worth mentioning: Kazaa wants you to use it so that it can make money off your processing cycles, memory, and network connection. That's right; Kazaa plans to introduce technology to allow businesses to use the Kazaa network to burden the load of distributing large quantities of data.

    1. Re:Doesn't matter too much by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      [not a fanboy!]
      Ok ok... spyware. The spyware is detectable by all anti-virus software. Ad-aware will take care of the other spyware as well. The 3rd party programs can be not installed... if you know how to read and use your mouse.

      FastTrack, IMHO, has more promise than other P2P ideals. I love gnutella in many ways, but being able to get a full movie in 30 minutes kills the rest.

      ALSO-If Kazaa does use my unused cycles, memory and connection to make money... who cares? I'm downloading a small, ok large fortune of media from that network. Do you know how many people downloaded XP [for example] from these networks? That saved people thousands of dollars.

      What is your point?

    2. Re:Doesn't matter too much by mr3038 · · Score: 2
      One other thing worth mentioning: Kazaa wants you to use it so that it can make money off your processing cycles, memory, and network connection. That's right; Kazaa plans to introduce technology to allow businesses to use the Kazaa network to burden the load of distributing large quantities of data.

      Well, I for one would be more than happy to give some bandwidth, cpu power and memory for exchange if I could legally download music and stuff. If, however, the plan is to count on dumb users not to read eula and spend those resources without payment this sounds ridiculous.

      --
      _________________________
      Spelling and grammar mistakes left as an exercise for the reader.
  16. Forget Kazaa by xxSOUL_EATERxx · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Have we forgotten that the system is supposed to be PEER-TO-PEER, not PEER-TO-SPYWARE-EMBEDDED-GET-RICH-QUICK-SCHEME-TO- PEER?

    True file sharing technology should not sneak Gator onto your hard drive or try to sell you CDs you don't want

    The future of P2P belongs to technologies like GNUtella, which can be used to set up truly decentralized file-sharing networks that CANNOT be struck down by tyrants disguised in business suits

    Yes, GNUtella is harder to use, klunkier, and tends to access smaller listings of files, but given time and work, these problems will be alleviated as greed-driven fake P2P systems like Napster and Kazaa are crushed by the moneyed interests controlling the legal system.

    Anyway, True Freedom belongs to those willing to work for it. Strong, free geeks will always find a way to overcome the forces of oppression. Forget Kazaa. P2P4Profit is a deservedly dead end.

    1. Re:Forget Kazaa by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      I think at first I was kinda mad at your comment.

      But the last line got me. P2P4Profit is wrong. That is what clearly violates 'fair-use'.

      They can't make money selling your bootlegs.

      I still like Kazaa though... sorry.

  17. What a relief by Dan+Crash · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, that takes care of THAT! Piracy is finally solved. Move along now! Nothing to see here!

    --
    He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
  18. kazza? good riddance. by juju2112 · · Score: 2

    There are other decent file-sharing networks people can get on besides FastTrack, like OpenNap or Gnutella. Good riddance to Kazaa, I say.

    I just wish someone would write a file-sharing client for windows that doesn't suck so badly. Almost all of them have ads, spyware, and crummy interfaces.

    1. Re:kazza? good riddance. by LegendLength · · Score: 2, Funny

      The idea is to get people to share files not run away in fear.

  19. resolution by spongman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    now, more than ever, it's important to open up your outgoing bandwidth when you're not actively using your machine and share the love. i recommend downloading a gnutella client too and share your files over both networks. the only thing that can keep this technology alive is selfless participation...

  20. KaZaa MaNtraa by guttentag · · Score: 2, Funny
    The "communitieZ" topics at the bottom of their home page reads like a strangely appropriate twist on Apple's "Rip. Mix. Burn." ad campaign:

    Discuss. Chat. Defend.
  21. Wow by J'raxis · · Score: 2, Funny

    Well, it worked so well for DeCSS, didnt it? Didnt it?

  22. This is like... by suss · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Suspending downloads of Internet Explorer and expecting the web to automatically disappear?

    Way to go BUMA/STEMRA! (Dutch record company mob), a fine example of clear thinking...

  23. Re:What to do: by Com2Kid · · Score: 3, Funny

    Solution?

    Biometrics.

    "Oh, what password officer? I just put my eyeball upto the retina scanner, my thumb on my fingerprint scanner and belch into my microphone and then hum Beethoven's fifth backwards. Then I say the list of woman I have cheated on my wife with."

    Even if they tied you down to a chair and made you look in the retina scanner, pressed your hand on the scanner, and made you drink alot of carbinated soda, you could hopefuly plead self incrimination for the voice recognition part of the authentication. :)

  24. Get your Kazar right here by XenoBOFH · · Score: 5, Informative

    It is still possible to download KaZaA, a quick search found a copy here

  25. KaZaA still up -- I think by ciurana · · Score: 2, Troll

    Greetings!

    I just logged on to KaZaA, did a search on 'Spears' and lots of images, MP3s, videos, etc. are available for download. Could someone please explain?

    Thanks,

    E
    --
    http://eugeneciurana.com | http://ciurana.eu
  26. Re:What to do: by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


    > Eventually they will simply have to go after individual users if they want to stop illegal sharing. I know that if word got around on perhaps a college campus that students were being kicked out of the dorms that it would cause the casual pirates to think twice.

    That strategy hasn't been notably effective as a way of stopping people from using illegal drugs.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  27. Amen ! by Murphy(c) · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    We should do this more often, and call it the "International Internet Is Fast Again Day".

    Affectionatly known as IIIFAD.

    Murphy(c)

  28. C|Net Reporting on this... by instinctdesign · · Score: 5, Informative

    C|Net is reporting on this, check out the article which includes a few more details that haven't been mentioned here.

    --
    forma3
  29. Serves ya right, you cheap bastards. by tempest303 · · Score: 3, Flamebait

    All I can say to that is a big simpsons Nelson-style "HA-HA!"

    Yeah, the content companies suck ass, no doubt, but that doesn't mean that NOT PAYING FOR THE SHIT YOU DOWNLOAD is going to make things any better. If you hate stupid restrictions, stop buying records from the opporessive major labels. Frequent places like Emusic.com, where the downloads are all real MP3s, no bullshit copy prevention. The albums are sold for a reasonable price, and the artists GET PAID.

    And finally, would everyone stop acting like they're somehow oppressed because they actually have to PAY for their media? Cry me a river. Don't put up with copy prevention bullshit, but don't go back and *REINFORCE ITS APPARENT NEED* by "trading" stuff on Kazaa...

    1. Re:Serves ya right, you cheap bastards. by rick-o · · Score: 3, Insightful

      > NOT PAYING FOR THE SHIT YOU DOWNLOAD

      OK. I'd like to pay to download songs. Where do I sign up?

      Here's the answer: nowhere. Your options are: either drive down to your nearest record store and pay for pressing, shipping, handling, packaging, advertising, sales assistance, cashiering, and post-sale security checks; or you can download it for free. What am I supposed to do if I like one particular song and would like a legal, electronic copy of it?

      The issue isn't about opression, or stealing being some kind of right. It's about a market that's unsatisfied.

    2. Re:Serves ya right, you cheap bastards. by BenHmm · · Score: 2

      there's no way a highschool kid can afford to buy all the music he/she wants to listen to on a part time job flipping burgers


      Yeah, and you know what? I can't afford that motorbike I want to ride on my salary, but it doesn't make it right to steal one.
      You can't afford it, then you can't have it. That's life, kid. Deal with it. Buy a radio. Grow up.


    3. Re:Serves ya right, you cheap bastards. by shepd · · Score: 2

      >Here in the UK we pay around £12-£16 ($18-$24) for a single CD and double CDs can cost more.

      Last time I ventured into America (a year ago) this was the price one paid in American $$$ for some of the latest releases, and most of the re-releases.

      Double CDs in Canada, unless you look far and wide, will cost $35-$45 CDN ($25-$35 US). Imports cost about 50% more.

      I still don't understand why an album sells for more than (or the same as) the movie Waterworld (for example). Waterworld cost $175 million, was a money loser right from the box office in America (so they have a lot of catching up to do in home sales), yet still retails for $9.98 US. The soundtrack for that same movie, which cost far, far, far less to produce, and has had far less promotion also costs $9.98.

      Maybe I don't get it. Maybe it actually costs $175 million to record a record these days and I'm deluding myself. I guess you have to buy a radio station every time you record a track nowadays to get a studio quality cut?

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    4. Re:Serves ya right, you cheap bastards. by tempest303 · · Score: 2

      Your options are: either drive down to your nearest record store and pay for pressing, shipping, handling, packaging, advertising, sales assistance, cashiering, and post-sale security checks; or you can download it for free. What am I supposed to do if I like one particular song and would like a legal, electronic copy of it?

      The issue isn't about opression, or stealing being some kind of right. It's about a market that's unsatisfied.


      Come to think of it, I'd really like nude pics of a petrified Natalie Portman with hot grits poured down her pants, but I can't have that either. So I deal with it, life moves on. Not a perfect analogy, but it illustrates what I'm trying to get across, which is, to quote the Rolling Stones: "You can't always get what you want." If one don't like the purchasing options, yeah, that sucks, but that doesn't give one the right to just take for free whatever the heart desires.

      The fact that downloadable music (well, legally downloadable anyway) is a largely untapped market may be true, but it's irrelevant to the fact that people aren't giving anything back for the stuff they copy. You're blurring the issue. The fact remains, while the available options suck, not paying for stuff is still wrong. And cliched as it sounds, two wrongs still don't make a right.

      Don't get me wrong, I'm a hardcore music freak - I'm painfully aware of how corrupt the industry is, and how much they jack both consumers and artists. But until something can be worked out, what else am I supposed to do? I can't stick it to the labels without sticking it to the artists. So I have to either bite the bullet and pay for the over-priced disc, or choose not to buy the stuff. Taking without paying is not an option.

      As for solutions? While Emusic's 128kbit MP3s (as oppposed to much nicer ~160kbps .OGGs or something) and relatively limited selection aren't exactly what I'm looking for either, it's a damn fine start. There's no bullshit encryption, and the prices are fair. You can even buy single tracks, etc. All these things are *exactly* what the "untapped" market you refer to are clamoring for. It's just not developed enough yet... Here's to hoping that a place built on fairness and rights for the consumer and the artist actually succeed.

    5. Re:Serves ya right, you cheap bastards. by tempest303 · · Score: 2

      Not everyone downloads copyrighted content

      This is quite true! Unfortunately, that's what the vast majority of the material "traded" on Kazaa, et al., is: copyrighted content. So my argument isn't necessarily flawed, but yes, I agree it's a shame that the *legitmate* uses of peer networking and filesharing can't be better explored, because people are too cheap to go out and buy the music of the artists they claim they love... :/

    6. Re:Serves ya right, you cheap bastards. by BenHmm · · Score: 2

      sigh all you like. It's still illegal. Breaking the law does not change it: only reasoned rational argument can.

      Just saying "fuck you I can take it anyway" and quoting the bits.v.atoms debate is not going to make any difference. It's theft, purely theft, and a lack of respect for that law - regardless of campaigning against it - mirrors itself automatically to the laws you do respect, from the legal enforcement of the gpl to the legal boundaries stopping me from taking your car. You steal my music/code, I take your car. No difference at all from a legal standpoint.

      You can't change a law by breaking it, bo matter how stupid it is. and I tend to agree it's stupid.

  30. Upload a mirror today! by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 2, Informative

    I uploaded a mirror here: Windows, Linux. If everyone uploads a copy of the program this thing will never go away!

  31. So... whatever happened to the time when... by ebbomega · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Copywrite laws existed to protect the artist and not the corporations that bought the artists out.

    Music is intellectual property, not physical property. When are people going to figure this out?

    I remember the days when music copywrite was simply so that someone couldn't blatantly rip off some artist and then claim it as their own work. For instance, if The Verve decided to blaringly take a riff from a Rolling Stones tune without permission, the Rolling Stones should be given all the money that The Verve makes on said song, or at least a portion thereof.

    Now all of a sudden intellectual property means The Ability To Listen To said song.

    Since when do Music corporations have a right to limit how far the music is reached? Doesn't this compromise the artist's intent in itself? Honestly, what this is doing is once again putting more power in the hands of those with the money and reinforcing Murphy's Golden Rule (whoever has the etc.).

    Morons. All of them. Especially since they don't realize the awesome power (wow, this sounds like a speech from Masters of the Universe or something) of Filesharing, and that the existence of mp3s/Divx/mpgs/exes/whatevers is going to negate any attempt to control flow of music/information. napster got shut down. Everybody said it was over. Out sprung a dozen clones. Now Kazaa gets shut down. If Morpheous, Audiogalaxy et al follow suit, I personally guarantee this number reaching out in the fifties. And eventually genre-driven ones and all that kind of stuff.... It'll be glorious.

    Wow. That was cheesy. I'm gonna stop before it gets worse.

    --
    Karma: Non-Heinous
    1. Re:So... whatever happened to the time when... by Ieshan · · Score: 2

      That ended, when Puff Daddy Blatantly Ripped off the Police (I'll be *MISSING* You?), Shaggy Blatantly Ripped off Steve Miller Band (Listen to ANGEL and then The Joker, my lord!), and countless other rappers decided that other *good* classic rock songs didn't actually deserve their copywrites.

      So... I'd say... sometime in the mid-90s.

      Maybe mid-80s, if you count Vanilla Ice (Under Pressue and Ice Ice Baby, yeeesh).

    2. Re:So... whatever happened to the time when... by gorilla · · Score: 2
      Copywrite laws existed to protect the artist and not the corporations that bought the artists out.

      Then they're failing, and should be replaced with something else.

  32. Apportioning blame by Boiling_point_ · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Q. Why is it that it's the Napsters, KaZaAs and Morpheii of this world that seem to get squashed by courts, rather than, say, Gnutella?

    A. Courts squash what they can define.

    Just like America turned (rightly or wrongly) a non-nation-state terrorism incident into an old-fashioned "my country vs. yours" war, courts/governments will try and shut down companies with business models that (they argue) are based on piracy and individuals that write "harmful code".

    <pessimism>
    The day someone anonymously builds a true peer2peer network that scales well and people choose it ahead of something with advertising in it, the genie really will be out of the bottle. Sadly, that's when governments will decide that "anti-supply" laws we're talking about now are useless, and the "anti-demand" laws will get tougher - in essence, they'll start going after 'users' rather than 'dealers'.
    </pessimism>

    --
    "If you create user accounts, by default, they will have an account type of Administrator with no password." KB Q293834
  33. Gee... by NoWhere+Man · · Score: 4, Informative

    Looks like I might just have to download it from 1 of another billion locations like this one:

    http://www.mpex.net/software/download/kazaa.html

    --

    "Imagination is the only weapon in the war against reality." -Jules de Gautier
  34. Still downloading... by MisterManiac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find it odd that, even though KaZaA has suspended downloads, their download counter (at the top of the page at http://www.kazaa.com/en/defend.htm, for example) is still going up. This might be automatic (it's going up very smoothly and uniformly), but even so it's amusing. In addition to Morpheus, there's also Grokster, which likewise licenses the FastTrack technology. Is file sharing really dead? I don't think so. I mean, the way courts generally work, organizations like the RIAA and MPAA would have to sue every file sharing program making company separately. In addition to the legal fees, the industries are lagging behind by a year or at least several months... Programs are around for a while before any suit gets filed, and then the suits take time. True, it's hardly optimal that file sharing programs rise and fall every so often, but a bit of a shakeup is good now and then. Besides, they're growing faster than people can try to get them shut down. Direct Connect is quite good for some things. Gnutella, although it sucks, cannot be eradicated. And if something like Freenet ever gets somewhat usable and efficient, they won't really have anyone left to sue. Maybe then they'll concentrate on making movies and music and software good enough that we want to buy it, instead of producing crap on a stick, trying to limit what we can do with it, and suing everyone in sight. Marketing can only do so much to sell a bad product (although M$ has done an entirely too good job of it...).

  35. Re:What to do: by Anonymous+DWord · · Score: 3, Funny

    Or you could just cut off your thumbs and flush them down the toilet when you see the Gest^H^H^H^Hpolice coming. Poof! No password!

    --
    "If he thinks he can hide and run from the United States and our allies, he's sorely mistaken." Bush on bin Laden
  36. Let's clear this up. by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    i'm sure the kazaa client is available for download from Morpheus

    If you've got Morpheus, you don't need KaZaa. KaZaa is the main company, and Morpheus [music city] is just another client on the network.

    While their goals may be different-the software is effectively the same. If you use KaZaa, you notice that some users are @musiccity, while others are @kazaa.

    I've actually had people tell me that Music City is better than Kazaa.. but because there was more stuff on Music City.

  37. Misleading Topic by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 4, Informative
    The topic "KaZaa Suspends Downloads" is very misleading and is making people think that the ability to download content people have shared on the network is being halted.

    This is not the case. They have taken the CLIENT software download off the website. The actual service seems unchanged.

  38. Take your racism somewhere else. by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    when Puff Daddy Blatantly Ripped off the Police (I'll be *MISSING* You?)

    Hrmm.. we all saw Sting on MTV singing WITH Puffy right? Puffy has loads of cash, he paid everyone enough to sample those songs.

    Shaggy Blatantly Ripped off Steve Miller Band (Listen to ANGEL and then The Joker, my lord!),

    Steve Miller Band? Come on! Shaggy has had way more 'hits' than them... they are basically one hit wonders. Whoever ownes the rights to SMB songs needed the cash, trust me. But, just because two songs sound similar doesn't make them the same. Plenty of songs are ripped from each other... you just didn't bother to listen close enough because it's not rap vs. classic rock.

    and countless other rappers decided that other *good* classic rock songs didn't actually deserve their copywrites.

    It's copyrights and since you are obviously a racist, you should know that the only Rap song that didn't pay to use the beat [etc] is Ice Ice Baby.

    But while we are on the subject, most Rap songs don't take beats or lyrics from classic rock songs. They take many of their beats from Funk songs. They also take their beats from other rap songs.

    No one ever points out that Country songs take from Classic Rock songs. Just noticed that.

    People get paid... this isn't a rip off, it's business. I like Classic Rock first, but I'm also a Rap fan. Sometimes I don't like the 'new' songs, but at times I find myself applauding the 'new' song for the work they've done.

    Look at "Changes" by Tupac. It's a good song if you listen to the lyrics. If you don't like it, I'm sure there are other reasons.

    1. Re:Take your racism somewhere else. by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      Steve Miller Band? Come on! Shaggy has had way more 'hits' than them... they are basically one hit wonders.

      The fucking-asshole-RIAA has this to say about your delusion: Tell me, where is 'shaggy' on this list compared to Steve Miller Band? For the record, Im not a Steve Miller fan. I just feel that 'rap and hip hop' is to the art of music as as television commercials are to the art of theatre. The sole reason for its existence is to sell a product (which the performers are in-and-of-themselves) such as Shaggy, Backside Boys, 2Pac or Brittany Spears. This is not art, its a catchy jingle for the performer-as-artist-product.

      you should know that the only Rap song that didn't pay to use the beat [etc] is Ice Ice Baby.

      If i recall correctly there was a lawsuit sometime-ago that made sampling legal via compulsory licensing... where ice-ice-baby fits in this is im not sure.

      People get paid... this isn't a rip off, it's business.

      What? How does 'business' end up being a justification for an act... as if it is self-evident and natural? Give me a break pal.

      Take your racism somewhere else. && It's copyrights and since you are obviously a racist

      Wow, a little defensive arent we?

      It's a good song if you listen to the lyrics. If you don't like it, I'm sure there are other reasons

      Not to sound to harsh, im sure there must be some merit and talent somewhere in the rap/hip-hop world... just that 99% of it is blatant pap...here are always exceptions to the rule...

    2. Re:Take your racism somewhere else. by Genom · · Score: 2

      It's copyrights and since you are obviously a racist, you should know that the only Rap song that didn't pay to use the beat [etc] is Ice Ice Baby.

      So...if you don't like rap, you're a racist?

      But while we are on the subject, most Rap songs don't take beats or lyrics from classic rock songs. They take many of their beats from Funk songs. They also take their beats from other rap songs.

      Here's part of the reason I don't like rap music. At the risk of being labelled a "racist" in your eyes, it all seems to sound the same to me. I understand that some people like it, and it's their perogative. I don't begrudge them for liking it. I just don't care for the sound of it myself.

      No one ever points out that Country songs take from Classic Rock songs. Just noticed that.

      Well, I don't like Country, either - does that mean I'm also racist? Or does it mean that I "even out"? My isagreement with Country is that I have a hard time with "twang" - it just gets on my nerves. (Yes, my musical tastes are rather closed-minded, I guess. Classical, Metal, Rock, Classic Rock, and Jazz)

      Look at "Changes" by Tupac. It's a good song if you listen to the lyrics. If you don't like it, I'm sure there are other reasons.

      Yep - like not liking rap music in general. =)

      Seriously - just because someone makes an overgeneralization towards rap music, it doesn't mean they're racist. They may just not like the sound. They may have obnoxious neighbors that feel it necessary to play rap music at extremely high volumes at 2am during the week. (Hell, that's enough to make you hate any genre of music, if youre someone who has to work during the day, and thus has to be able to sleep at night)

    3. Re:Take your racism somewhere else. by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      1) Steve Miller Band: Your RIAA list proves nothing. Look at the top part of the list. Music sales != good music.

      2) So classic rock, and only classic rock is the true music? Most artists are about selling their product... music. Listen to the music next time. Sure, lots of hip-hop is commercial, but much more isn't. Tupac for example has some of the most profound things to say about society, that I've ever heard. I guess it's a matter of listening and not judging until you hear it.

      3) Vanilla Ice was sued because he ripped off the beat. He claimed that it was different because he, or someone, added on beat every X seconds or whatever. Other artists that sample give full credit, and the record company gives 'points' on the album sales to compensate the 'rip'.

      4) If you haven't noticed there is a huge business behind all that music you hear. Plenty of times rappers come up [to stardom] with only lyrics. When they hit the RIAA-fan some white guy in a suit thinks that it would be cool to use the twangs from Stairway to Heaven.

      5) Yes, I'm defensive. When I hear this 'rip-off' argument it's being produced by some racist piece of shit. I'm not Black, and that isn't why I jumped.

      6) "I'm sure there must be some merit..." Exactly... you don't know because you haven't listened to it.

      One thing I can say with confidence though, rock and roll [in general] is a blatant rip-off of other's work anyways. How many times have I listened to covers? By respectable artists, like Jimi Hendrix or even the Beatles? I mean, this is the whole song that is ripped off. The genre was ripped off. 'Nuff said.

      All in all, I'm still a good classic rock fan. Just keep that Steve Miller bullshit away from me.

    4. Re:Take your racism somewhere else. by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      No no... I really didn't mean to imply that anyone who hates hip-hop/rap is racist.

      Who cares what you like? I don't.

      My point is, the same old song and dance [Aerosmith] that we hear about it being ripped off is perpetuated by people who are racists. [usually]

      Yes, there is sampling, yes there is full 'beat-stealing'. But 99% of the time people are getting paid for it. Do you think a big time commercial guy like Master P [whom I don't like] is going to risk his multi-million dollar empire by copying a few drum hits? No... the original artists get points on the album and get paid depending on album sales.

      Seriously - just because someone makes an overgeneralization towards rap music, it doesn't mean they're racist.

      No, it makes them prejudice :-)

      I still stick to my statement: "All white people are prejudice" [joke, like GNU]

      For the record, i'm white.

    5. Re:Take your racism somewhere else. by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      Maybe...

      hey is this Ralph The Jew Hater?

      I think you missed my point. Hit parent and read my replies to people with usernames.... you'll figure it out.

    6. Re:Take your racism somewhere else. by SubtleNuance · · Score: 2

      1) Steve Miller Band: Your RIAA list proves nothing. Look at the top part of the list. Music sales != good music.

      So you agree with me? I was disagreeing with you that Shaggy has had way more 'hits' than them... they are basically one hit wonders definition of artistic value... thats how *you* defined it until i presented the RIAA list, at which time you changed your mind about what 'success' is. Holy shit man, you cant argue by agreeing with me.

      2) So classic rock, and only classic rock is the true music?

      No, who said it was?

      Most artists are about selling their product...No, publishers are about selling a product. Being an "artist" means you are compelled to create by your very existence. An "Artist" doesnt care to sell millions of units, sure, he likes to eat (as do us all), but he wont stop being an artist if it ceased being 'profitable'. If he did, he wouldnt have been an "artist" in the first place.

      Tupac for example has some of the most profound things to say about society, that I've ever heard. I guess it's a matter of listening and not judging until you hear it.

      Agreed. Ive never listened to Tupac. I have no opinion of the lyrics (or music). This is why i said "there are exceptions..".

      3) Vanilla Ice was sued because he ripped off the beat. He claimed that it was different because he, or someone, added on beat every X seconds or whatever. Other artists that sample give full credit, and the record company gives 'points' on the album sales to compensate the 'rip'.

      I believe that the legal issue had not been made of rap-sampling until this(??) test case. After this(??) test case a rap-sampler was required to pay royalties to the original copy-right owner.. again.. Compulsory license of music, for the purpose of rap-sampling was created.

      4) If you haven't noticed there is a huge business behind all that music you hear.

      you dont know what kind of music I listen to... Ill just tell you that your wrong. I dont pay for music that has been time-shifted (i copy it all from friends and dload mp3s). I also listen to allot of self-published artists.

      Plenty of times rappers come up [to stardom] with only lyrics. When they hit the RIAA-fan some white guy in a suit thinks that it would be cool to use the twangs from Stairway to Heaven.

      What kind of racist crap is that? Hey man, WTF is this "white guy with suits" bullshit. That is pretty fucking racist, IMHO. Or, are you trolling.. hmmm.

      5) Yes, I'm defensive. When I hear this 'rip-off' argument it's being produced by some racist piece of shit.

      Suggesting the music is 'ripped off' doesnt make the guy a racist. If the guy is racist it doesnt make the music *not* riped off. There is no relationship. Also, the 'ripping off' argument in music is worthless, mostly done by self-congratulatory music-wonks trying to pull a turf-pissing match with a commoner. Art can be the inspiration for other works, only when you involve capitalist-copy-right && $ does this become an issue.. the whole idea is bunk.

      All in all, I'm still a good classic rock fan. Just keep that Steve Miller bullshit away from me.

      ...again, your jerking your knee, when i explicitly said "im not a fan".

      Like shooting fish in a barrel.

    7. Re:Take your racism somewhere else. by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      Oh... here I go.

      Shaggy has had at least two hits, one more than Steve Miller Band.

      No, I'm sorry, but most artists are about selling their product. Sometimes there are self-less artists out there, but you don't hear them on the radio... no matter what genre you like. This even goes for painters etc. Even John Lennon, imagine it, was into making some cash.

      You stated that Tupac was one of the no-ability, rip-off artists. Yes you did. Doesn't matter because you shouldn't have an opinion on something you know nothing about. I HATE GOAT SEX?

      It's simple. When you use something, or sample, the copyright holder gets a point on the album. Maybe two. This goes back to Sugar Hill days. If I used your beat, you get a 'point'. I ususally get 30-40 points. The record label gets the rest [out of 100] and uses it to pay for the costs, cars, etc.

      Sure, you listen to those guys who are out there doing all for the 'art'. I'm sure. I won't even touch that one.

      I'm racist because the record industry is owned and operated by white guys? How can you fight this? Look back. Rock and Roll, white's fought this black devil music, then one guy liked it. Next thing you know it's all whites, and to this day white guys in suits rip off black artists. Motown?

      Suggesting the music is ripped off is racist, most of the time. Never do I hear about whites doing the same thing. It is because the person is RACIST! That's right. When you can easily point out all the times blacks do it, and you don't bother to look at when whites do it, that makes you a racist. The person may not think that they are racist, but that doesn't not make them a racist. If I liked guys, but I don't think I'm gay... guess what, I'm still gay.

      STFU about Steve Miller, I know you are NOT [NOT] a fan.

  39. Re:Extremely Intresting To See by RadioheadKid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Actually there is a central server for both Kazaa and Morpheus, but what separates it from Napster is that there isn't any file index on the server, only user authentification. Will the courts be able to get at that server? It's a harder case to argue, that's for sure...

    --
    "Karma can only be portioned out by the cosmos." -Homer Simpson
  40. This is the wrong way to do it. by arikb · · Score: 2, Informative

    KaZaA are supposedly acting in accordance with the court decision by stopping download of their software - BUT - this will not stop the network from existing.

    In order to really stop the network from existing, the KaZaA guys nead to really break it - for instance, force a download of a newer version of KaZaA media desktop and disable it on a particluar date.

    Thinking about it, maybe the versions we all have contains a remote control code which disables them, thus disabling the entire network.

    It is enough that the network is inactive for a few days or fragmented enough to make it stop. There are some mechanisms built into KaZaA to prevent that from happening, but it is not impossible.

    -- Arik

    1. Re:This is the wrong way to do it. by josh+crawley · · Score: 2, Informative

      Still, this is yet another version of Obscurity. So what if they release a broken client/server. I've already got source to kazaa-like places (I used it to connect my linux box to them). Personally, I archive everything I get my grubby fingers on. As an example, I found a place I could download VirtualDub 1.3d, the avi editor that could convert ASF's. Yet another example is that I still use WinAMP 2.23 , and yes it's still shareware. I don't trust the AoL version until I comb the code. It'll have to be ASM, but I want to look for network tattletale code. Well, all of my data (in collecting rarelike downloads), I have about 4 archive cd's.

      Josh Crawley
      contact if you need something ,ahem, rare.
      jwcrawle aght iupui daught edu (just say it out loud)

  41. When cool stuff gets posted by PC World, etc. by DraconPern · · Score: 2, Interesting

    How? Easy, just tell the writers at all those magazines that target the population at large to write an article about a 'useful' ;) tool or service (eg. DVD Genie in the January 15th PCWorld newsletter). The general public downloads the program, use it, and the worst part is flaunt it. "Look ma, I can play these DVD's that are cheaper from other countries." Soon after, everyone and their grandma knows about it. D'oh, attention from the authorities and soon followed by a lawsuit from a company.

  42. Re:What to do: by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

    ummm... I thought that they could demand passwords in the USA already?

    It's called a subpoena, and if that doesn't work it's called contempt of court.

    Even if you did nothing wrong you are going to sit in jail until you prove it.

  43. Re:UK RIP act by sconeu · · Score: 2

    dd if=/dev/random of=somefile.crypt count=437k

    repeat as needed.

    They'll go crazy trying to figure out what you've got encrypted there!

    --
    General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  44. Hey, people just being reasonable :) by saikou · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's easy. If the track you want is not available from Emusic what are you going to do?
    I want new Vangelis. EMusic has a whopping TWO albums of "Best songs" from 1984. Sweet. Oh wait... I already have those, bought for less than $5 each. Now I am supposed to pay 9.99 per month for right to download those two albums. I don't think it's a good deal.

    As for other new services where you can pay for download -- you either can't burn downloaded copies or you have to pay a full price (that exceeds the cost of a "regular" CD album) with a limit of songs. Until it gets to the level of Tivo where for 9.95 a month I can record and play and do whatever I want with the tv shows without limits it won't be a good deal and big guys will be giving out interviews screaming that "those bastards don't want to use our legal system!". Hope they'll get smart one day :)

  45. Hollywood makes billions of dollars by Convergence · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Which is chump change. Telephone and communications companies make more in a year than hollywood has made SINCE THE INVENTION OF THE VCR.

    Furthermore, they, as a group, have a monopoly on the creation of new fictional entertainment... Does this give you ideas?

    If hollywood could (say) get even a small part of the communications (aka, the delivery) pie, they'd make more money a year than they do now.

    Does this give you ideas for other sources of revenue? Make everything literally free (to download) on the internet. With, maybe, a royalty on home-user (IE, non-business) bandwidth, with statistical sampling to determine how much of that royalty should go to which entertainment industries for mass-market entertainment. Maybe add in hard drives or cd blanks. Basically, make something similar to the Audio-CDR mechanism.

    After all, if they increased home telephone/communication bills by even 10% for such a royalty. 100 million people spending $100/month (cable, telephone, internet), with a 10% royalty toward entertainment production starts moving into the billions of dollars/year range.

    Not only that, but suddenly there is MUCH less fighting over copyrights, hollywood doesn't have to worry about extra duplication, caues every duplication is more profit for them. It lets people do whatever they want on and with their computers.

    Yeah, its annoying, and if you only backup your hard drive onto CD's, you're subsidizing brittney spears. But on the other hand, it *will* give hollywood billions and billions of dollars, and stop digital control technology.

    And, in such a world, napster/gnutella/morpheus for movies would be the best thing ever for movies. 10x the bandwidth, means 10x the money coming in! Furthermore, they could make even more money from premium servers where you pay, but you get high-quality, uncorrupted, fast downloads.

    The idea is to not fight humanity, but try to go along with them.

    I heard about this idea, oh, about 3 years ago.

    So, what do you think.

    1. Re:Hollywood makes billions of dollars by StevenMaurer · · Score: 2
      Yeah, its annoying, and if you only backup your hard drive onto CD's, you're subsidizing brittney spears. But on the other hand, it *will* give hollywood billions and billions of dollars, and stop digital control technology.

      Here's the problem with that. How would anyone know which artists to subsidize? As it happens right now, sales go directly to the artist who is currently actually selling music (whether or not the establishment *likes* the music), not just to whoever some "music commission" decided had artistic merit.

      Further, if you don't like the power media companies have over artists now, imagine what it would be like in a world where they get no direct credit for anything they create. The "music commission" would no doubt end up being filled with industry lobbists who would try to funnel as much cash as they could to the media conglomerates, starving the people who actually stimulated demand in the first place.

      This idea is a non-starter. I'll take the current system over it, warts and all.

    2. Re:Hollywood makes billions of dollars by Artifex · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Does this give you ideas for other sources of revenue? Make everything literally free (to download) on the internet. With, maybe, a royalty on home-user (IE, non-business) bandwidth, with statistical sampling to determine how much of that royalty should go to which entertainment industries for mass-market entertainment. Maybe add in hard drives or cd blanks. Basically, make something similar to the Audio-CDR mechanism.

      What a scary thought. This would make artists even more subject to patronage than they are under the current system. Remember, at least now you can come up with your own money and release what you want independently, and it may find a market. If business can effectively control the means of delivery, you won't be able to do that without cutting deals... and those deals will be excruciating for the little guy.

      Of course I am being a bit extreme here; independent producers could find alternate methods of delivery. But still... look back to the roots of artistic patronage, when museums and "salons" were solely showcases for the baubles of the rich. Great things came out of counter-movements to that paradigm - but lots of good and important artists and ideas starved while it was still dominant. Or look more recently at MTV (since the whole recording industry is too byzantine to summarize here). When it first came out, it had a monopoly on playing music videos, and could directly control what millions of teens saw - and so not only commanded billions from advertisers, but also from record companies... not to mention asserting "creative control" in other ways as well. (Who do you think made the "a" in "alternative" a capital letter? The same people who now sell you pre-rumpled plaid shirts and jeans for more than "dress" clothes. ) Even now, the "discoveries" or "underground" bands that get airtime go through rigorous vetting and are brought in primarily for novelty and market share.

      We must remain vigilant when new technologies get introduced, that there are no hidden strings attached. By the way, the best way to see that alternative and free technologies get chosen by the masses over what industry will offer them is to make it available to them in ways they can use - that means making your super-cool new codecs and software available for MS-Windows and Mac, not just for *nix and BSD, because otherwise, for most of them, it's still no choice at all.

      --
      Get off my launchpad!
  46. IMHO, wasn't it something else? by Convergence · · Score: 3, Offtopic

    Isn't the real reason for the war the fact that they didn't turn over the terrorists?

    IE, we're not invading them because they have terrorists inside their borders (in which case, we'd have to invade half of the world), but because they didn't turn over *the* group of terrorists that killed 3000 of our people.

    1. Re:IMHO, wasn't it something else? by gorilla · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Nations don't normally hand over accused criminals unless the nation requesting extradition provides reasonable evidence that those accused may have committed the crime and usally that the requesting nation will treat them in a fashion which is compatable with what the originating nation would expect, no torture, or other cruel inhuman or degrading treatments. In otherwords, if Ebolia demands extradition of George W. Bush for the crime of eating pork, then the US is not going to hand over George W. Bush. Even if eating pork was a crime in the US, Ebolia is still going to have show that GWB is a reasonable suspect. It's also very rare for a nation to extradite unless there is a treaty with the requesting nation.

      The US refused to show the Taliban the evidence they claim they have against bin Laden. Afganistan also has not extradition treaty with the US. The Taliban was therefore justified under international law to not extradite bin Laden.

  47. Good by TheCrunch · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Personally, I'd like to see Kazaa, Grokster & Morpheus taken down. Don't get me wrong, I'm an avid Grokker, but every time a popular P2P service gets taken down, a newer and better one rises to the top.

    When people wanted more than Napster, Scour appeared. When they both stopped, Kazaa etc.. hit the scene.

    It's only a matter of time before Kazaa etc.. are stopped completely and I look forward to the "next big thing". Although annoying, this leads to progress and I hope it'll end up with a P2P network that you *can't* kill and that's better than Gnutella.

    --
    My life is one big siesta in which I'm dreaming I wished my life was one big siesta.
  48. Re:you cant fool me by spongman · · Score: 2

    yeah, either that or I'm currently sharing over 100Gb of files. take your pick.

  49. Re:you cant fool me by spongman · · Score: 2

    over 3 networks (morpheus, gnutella, audiogalaxy), and on a T1... man, what a leech i am. (Hi Hilary.)

  50. Napshare by evilviper · · Score: 4, Informative

    It's amazing how closely this lawsuit coincides with the release of Napshare v1.0. Napshare v1.0 being the best Gnutella client out there.

    Based loosely on GTK-Gnutella, it has the best features I've seen in any type of downloader. You feed it a string to search for, the minimum file size, a string that the files SHOULD NOT contain, and the minimum server speed if you like. (someone I know *cough**cough*) personally downloaded Jurassic Park 3 and Pulp Fiction in the past 2 days since they got Napshare... and that's 700MB/piece over a SLOW cable-modem (30KBps/7KBps).

    Did I mention it's been running for two days constantly, under heavy load, without any memory leaks, and not a single crash.

    --
    Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    1. Re:Napshare by evilviper · · Score: 2
      I have morpheus running 24/7 for weeks in a row on a 486 under win95 without crashing/memory leaks.

      I don't even believe that Win 95 would not crash on it's own in that time so I'll ignore this comment. But I will say that Napshare is still running...

      Gnutella on the other hand sucks my bandwidth, CPU etc. and is slow.

      Gnutella is as slow as you make it. It's completely configurable. If you only have 1 host, you'll use up only a tiny ammount of bandwidth, and can still participate.

      CPU? It all depends on the client. There are dozens of implimentations out there and universally globbing them together just shows ignorance on your part.

      Slow? Slow how? If it's anything in addition to the above, you need to point out exactly how it's SLOW for you.

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
  51. GPL = Intellectual Theft??? by KlomDark · · Score: 2

    WTF? Your dumb little rant on the GPL is retarded. The GPL only states that you have to distribute the code if you distribute your binaries. If you do an in-house code change, and never distribute that change, you DO NOT have to distribute your source code.

    You are insane, or a Microsoft shill.

  52. The best part about Kazza... by Agent+Green · · Score: 2

    ...was the fact that a huge file could be downloaded from several people that had the same file. In essence, enough people with 1.5mb down 300kb up cable modems could effectively share a file with a guy on a DS3 and have it be efficient.

    I don't know of any other file sharing clients that allow this kind of transfer capability, so if anyone knows of one, it might be a good idea to get the hype started!

    --
    // Agent Green (Ian / IU7 / KB1JQO)
    // IEEE 802.3: All 10base Are Belong To Us
  53. Re:Just get Morpheus by orangesquid · · Score: 2

    Actually, the Linux client never crashes assuming that you wait at least three seconds or so switching between the download and search windows. Seems there are some issues in the client with select() and ncurses usage.

    But I'd go with LimeWire as far as Gnutella is concerned, even if there are ads. It's a damn good piece of software...

    --
    --TheOrangeSquid Is it any wonder things seem so awry? We swim in a sea of confusion and don't have to think to survive
  54. I noticed this a couple of days ago by rograndom · · Score: 2

    I went to download the Windows client a couple of days ago and the download page on Kazaa.com said something to the effect of "Downloads are temporarly unavailable". But meanwhile the little download counter on the top of the page was still chugging along past 3mil downloads or so.

  55. ill bite by SubtleNuance · · Score: 5, Insightful

    it's amazing that the _protection and preservation one's rightful property_ transformed overnight from an inalienable human right acknowledged by almost every society (though not by every political system) throughout time, into an "obsolete business practice."

    Intellectual Property is a fiction, it is not property (as in tangible asset) at all. The act of creation ceases when the work is born, only in the 'intellectual property world" does a producer feel the right to control a work once he has borne it. Does a plumber call you and ask for a fee every time you flush your toilet? No, neither should a musician, actor, author or inventor ask for fees to exercise the purpose of their past creation. Meaning, that by its regular availability, the thing *has been created* and no further compensation is necessary.

    If I copy a book, I am creating a book. The original author was not present or required to make my copy - why should he be compensated? If a creator feels he needs to reach some artificial economics of scale to make his time worthwhile, thats his issue -- i refuse to have *MY* liberties eroded to enforce a concept of capitalist business practice. The creator has no business telling me what I may or may not do with my own time and equipment.

    Intellectual Property, (Copyright, Trademarks and Patents) have no place in an intellectually free society. Intellectual Property is a tool of economics and not a 'rightful property by inalienable human right' -- to suggest such is absolutely ridiculous. It is neither a 'right' nor a natural, self-evident thing. It is a concept, a construct, an agreement... and those who would use it as a economic hammer are no longer entitled to it.

    I no longer purchase any item that would re-enforce this system. I copy all my music CDs*, I download movies and use the library for all books and magazines. I also advocate the rest of us do as well.

    Ideas dont exist in a vacuum, and to suggest that a creation of the mind has a sole creat or with inalienable right to then control it is offensive to the rest of us.

    * Canadians, because our government collects a fee for the RIAA types with every CDR sold, are legally allowed to make copies of Music CDs OTHERS have bought at record stores. Stop buying and burn those discs!

    1. Re:ill bite by SubtleNuance · · Score: 5, Insightful

      what you're saying is that once something has been created once, that because we are capable of copying it, that the creator can not reasonably expect to be rewarded for his work.

      Yes, that is what i am saying. If I write a song. only the activity of writing it should be compensated - not the use of it after it has been performed/written. The * act * of creation should be compensated. Simple. If i was a carpenter, would I collect a fee for every comfy-night you spend in bed??? NO!

      It is exactly the same, patents and copy-written material are not magic. If they exist then the work required to create them has ceased. It is in the past -- what makes these things so special that their control, and the 'right' of the builder causes such a pile of ill-logic and nonsense as copyright and patent law?

      You sir are a LEECH.

      And you excrete dogma without a mite of critical thought. You are a PUPPET.

      It's precisely this sort of attitude that Copyright is designed to thwart.

      No, copyrights were granted to people to protect them from printing press owners. Copyright was granted to a person so he could sell his works. Capitalists have, by making themselves legal-persons (amongst other plutocratic-borne legislation in the USA), granted themselves copyrights... the concept was built to protect a person from publishers. Not publishers from people. Dont try and pretend this is not the case, it is indisputable and intellectually dishonest to suggest otherwise. This discussion is not a debate -- as in public debate as an exercise -- are you honestly presenting this as your opinion?

      removing the incentives and rewards of creating will lead to a decline in creation.

      Untrue. Intellectual Property was created all through time -- it is society itself... without copyright and patents the mechanisms through which people would have incentive would change. Was Matisse given a copyright? Mozart?

      RIAA is trying to protect itself, and it's monopoly on the distribution of music, they're not attempting to foster the creation of music.

      Agreed.

      but that doesen't justify deliberately flaunting the law, nor taking away from the creators the rightful earnings.

      Actually it does. Civil disobedience is an act of a free society. If 50%+1 of the population decides to ignore a law it should be changed - the consequences are ours to reap. If it proved true that creation ceased when copyright ended (it wouldnt) then the people would pay the consequence -- or make a new offer to potential producers. Not being a 'producer' in this dynamic doesnt mean we are with out rights. If the persons (like yourself) willing to accept this construct + the creators ("artists" (or RIAA))
      But that is how (im sure you would agree) a democratic and free society should work. Im not suggesting the USA is this place, but that is another issue, and a much bigger problem.

      When you say "I copy all my music CDs", you're committing piracy plain and simple.

      No, by law, in Canada I am fully entitled to do this. My government has changed the construct of copyright to encourage the act. It is not "piracy".

      http://www.cdrfaq.org/faq03.html#S3-33-2
      http://neil.eton.ca/copylevy.shtml#copy_for_friend s

      If you don't PAY for it, and you don't get it via available LEGAL means, you're still not entitled to STEAL it.

      Life is not about money. Watching a movie or listening to music has zero effect on the producer (no incremental cost) - what part of this basic problem with the capitalist-economics of copyright are you not understanding?

  56. Freeing yourself of Spyware by nohear_t · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It does not matter what kind of spyware crap gets installed on your system, getting rid of it is much easier. A nice way to tell them up yours with Gator and the rest. Lavasoft ad-ware will remove these beasts (and others) from your computer. It even has a reference library that is updated by people who hate spyware as much as we do. Install, scan, select, and remove. Send Gator and its spyware alike where it belongs, in the garbage. Download ad-ware from here: http://www.lavasoft.de

  57. Re:FYI - OT by EllisDees · · Score: 2

    You're both right. Shaggy ripped off both Steve Miller and Merrilee Rush in the same song. Also, Queen originally sang the sone "Under Pressure" and Vanilla Ice definitely didn't have permission to use it.

    --
    -- Give me ambiguity or give me something else!
  58. Re:Don't complain, do something. by Spankophile · · Score: 2

    I think we need an online service, that lets you write letters to politicians.

    I.e. You get an online interface, a simple text box in which you can write your complaint, and a list of politicians from which you can select (or even multi-select/mail-merge).

    The service charges for postage/consumables via paypal, and someone then looks after printing your letter, and mailing it to the appropriate person.

    That makes bitching convenient, which is what lazy /.ers want. It also makes their bitching more effective, which is something /. doesn't offer.

  59. Re:What to do: by frost22 · · Score: 2

    stealing music
    You cannot steal music
    SO expecting to be able to perform illegal acts such as stealing copyrighted material and ...
    To steal copyrighted material you have to go somewhere and take it away from it owner. Nobody advocates that here.
    Get your propaganda right. The only illegal act discussed here is copyright violation. Theft is not an issue.

    And, as Richard Stallmann correctly notes, copyright violation means sharing with your neighbour, which is a deeply human and positive act.

    So, please, get lost and die.

    f.
    --
    ...and here I stand, with all my lore, poor fool, no wiser than before.
  60. Another fall of server-based file sharing... by Brendan+Byrd · · Score: 2

    No offense, and I don't agree with the legal decision, but if you're running a server-based file sharing system, you're just asking to get shut down.

    It doesn't matter what kind of lawsuit it is, but the big guys with big lawyers can laid down any kind of lawsuit to get you shut down, and you'll have to pay out the ass in your own lawyers to get it turned back on.

    At least with a server-less option, the worse you could do is remove the client, and the protocol would still exist in the underground.

  61. Terror sponsors came from Saudi, Egypt, Pakistan by meehawl · · Score: 2, Informative

    Afghanistan is just the fall guy, and a convenient site for a new oil pipeline. How many Afghanis were on the planes in 9/11?

    It's a good thing that the Bush Gang have frozen many "suspect" international bank accounts... but they specifically excluded those with ties directly to Bush or his dodgy family oil company, Harken. That banks in Bahrain, Kuwait, and Saudi Arabia are not being investigated, where most of the Al Qaeda funding must have come from, is ludicrous and abdurd and patently dishonest.

    --

    Da Blog
  62. Re:Don't complain, do something. by Mike+the+Mac+Geek · · Score: 2

    I send about a letter a month. Snail mail, as well as fax and email. I keep doing it, even as I see my rights slowly eroded away. I need to buy my own congressman.

    --
    -------------------------------------------------- ---- The man, the myth, the something or other.