Slashdot Mirror


The Harvard Network Accessible Dartboard

These guys hacked a dartboard to serve scores over a wireless network. There is an OpenGL client that grabs the scores, runs the games, stores the results in a database, and suggests moves based on player's past performance. On top of all this, the client looks exactly like the dartboard, so it can be projected over the real thing.

109 comments

  1. Looks fun, but by rsklnkv · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    I think the real fun lies in hack of Caps.

    --
    _____ "If liberty means anything at all, it means the right to tell people what they do not want to hear." -- Orwell
  2. Re:why is it taking so long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    We were waiting for you - what took you?

  3. Re:why is it taking so long by Tofuhead · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    We were waiting for each other? Surely this is love.

    --
    It is still the dark of night.
  4. of course! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    because we wouldn't want to insult our Lord by claiming that he had a tiny white man's penis.

    Preach on, brother!

  5. stats by terradyn · · Score: 2, Funny

    lol, they keep stats on ppl!? Not only can ppl know how badly I suck at CS; they can also know how bad at darts I am, with a picture to boot!

    1. Re:stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They can also know that you spell like a mongoloid idiot

    2. Re:stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      AOL 7.0, it's so easy that anyone can use it!

  6. Very interesting, but... by jonr · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Wouldn't just been easier to hack a digital dartboard? You know, the one in pubs? Of course that wouldn't give the feel of a classic metal dart/wool dartboard.
    J.

    1. Re:Very interesting, but... by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2, Informative

      It _is_ a digital dartboard, as you can see by looking at the pictures:
      1) The board has obvious cavaties: http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~sander/dip/proj board.jpg
      2) I've never noticed anything like this on a regular dartboard: http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~sander/dip/boar d.jpg

      Read the article, look at all the purdy pictures and _then_ post :-)

      Not that I bother doing that of course ... hehe

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    2. Re:Very interesting, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice job, you just told a Sub 1200 user to piss off.

      The real question is, are you and him the same?

    3. Re:Very interesting, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actualy there are electronic bristle-boards...

      the proseries 400 [www.dartpunt.nl/boards/proserie.html]
      It's in dutch.

      /Okl

  7. I want one of those! by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Not because I can play darts - I probably couldn't even hit the board - but because it's cool. I wonder if you could do something similar for a pool table. It would probably be quite a bit harder, as you'd need to be able to recognize each ball rather quickly. Maybe you could even build a program to recognize each ball and suggest the best shot and project it onto the table? Something new to do for these guys :-)

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    1. Re:I want one of those! by benjymous · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's something I've thought of in the past, and I can't see why it couldn't be done.

      You'd need

      1) A camera mounted above the table, so it gets a fairly flat view of the table, and can see all 6 pockets

      2) A Projector also mounted above the table, which can project over the whole area of the table (ceiling height would probably make this difficult)

      3) A pc in between that runs some kind of image recognition system to spot the balls (I'd think recognising circles of distinct colours would be easy if you're playing english style pool with red and yellow balls. Spots and stripes may be harder to recognise). It could then hook this into a pool simulation engine to work out which is the best ball to aim for, and then plot lines of the ball paths, which would be projected onto the table.

      Al made one of these for Sam in an episode of Quantum Leap :o)

      --
      Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
    2. Re:I want one of those! by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      "Al made one of these for Sam in an episode of Quantum Leap :o)"

      Which, of course, only Sam could see, because it was a holographic projection into Sam's mind, right?

      Quantum Leap was cool. I especially enjoyed the episodes where he ended up in a woman.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    3. Re:I want one of those! by benjymous · · Score: 1

      though it seems that most problems happen to men, since the "Sam as a woman" episodes came quite infrequently when you'd think statistically he'd jump into a woman 50% of the time.

      Going back on topic, the whole projector thing would only be any use if you wanted to give both players a hand (unless the game is programmed to be able to turn off the hints for the better player). We'd really need some way of making the projection visable to only one player.

      --
      Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
    4. Re:I want one of those! by Space_Nerd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Im just ranting here, but here is what i think:

      1- Put a camera that focuses on the table and tune it so it just distinguishes circles, not colors.
      2- If you put all the balls in a standard formation in which all the balls are ALWAYS in the same place (for example, number 1 with stripes is always on the tip of the triangle facing the player), so after a shot has been made it shouldnt be too hard for a computer to track all the circles movements so it knows which circle is which ball.

      My guess for calculating the circles movement is to calculate each circle's center for each frame, and if your're using a fast enough camera you should be to calculate the balls movement...

      Disclaimer: I'm not a good pool player neither have i any experience with image recognition systems.

      Me not know english? that's unpossible

      --
      Everybody has a purpose in life, maybe mine is to lurk in slashdot.
    5. Re:I want one of those! by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2

      Maybe you could work out somekind of "handicap" for the program. The bigger the handicap the better hints you'd get. All new players start out with a handicap of, say, 100, and as you play, the computer works out how "good" you are, and manipulates the standard of the hints it gives you. Of course this requires you to register with the computer, but hey - what's the harm in that?

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    6. Re:I want one of those! by blibbleblobble · · Score: 2, Informative

      Did I not see a colour detector as part of the LegoMindstorms set, or does that require one digital camera for each pool pocket?

      If you're using red/yellow balls, plus white cueball and black 8-ball, you should be able to detect all of those using 2 light-sensors, a red filter, and a yellow filter.

      Of course, you can just play pool at games.yahoo.com if you really need the bounce-angles calculated and displayed on the table

    7. Re:I want one of those! by rm-r · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This could easily be done on a monochromed and thresholded (thresheld?) image to give white balls on a black background and then using Hough transforms to give the ball positions. The area detected could then be sampled from the original image to obtain the ball colour. This is cool! If only I had a pool table so I could do this ;-(

      --

      J-aims
      --
      Yo, whatever happened to peas? Join T( H)GS
    8. Re:I want one of those! by rm-r · · Score: 1

      And here's a link about Hough transforms ...

      --

      J-aims
      --
      Yo, whatever happened to peas? Join T( H)GS
    9. Re:I want one of those! by nat5an · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, given that you know the positions of the balls at the beginning of the game (assuming that you specify what game you're playing), it's pretty easy to track them if you know where they start. This can even be done fairly well with people, who are much more complex in their movement patterns than billard balls.

      In fact, you could do LOTS of useful things with a system like this. Combine it with two other cameras that get side views of the table, and the computer can get the angle and location of your cue and predict what will happen if you hit the cue ball at this angle with varying levels of force.

      The only thing you'd have a problem with is predicting what would be affected by varying levels of chalk on the tip of the cue, but if you played consistently, the system could be trained to predict very well.

      Hey, this would be a good topic for my thesis, and a lot more fun than some other topics :-D

      --
      Head down, go to sleep to the rhythm of the war drums...
    10. Re:I want one of those! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why not just predict how well each player is going to do, and spit out the winner without even playing the game.

    11. Re:I want one of those! by JohnPM · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nice idea, but tracking the ball movements is not going to be feasible unless you have a very fancy high-speed high-bandwidth camera and a lot of computing power to process images many times a second. The problem is mostly with the break, I should think. The balls are moving essentially at random all over the place in just a fraction of a second. The ball tracker would also have to understand the basic physics of the game, because otherwise even two balls colliding head on would present a big problem. The moving ball may appear to pass through a stationary ball for example.

      But all is not lost. I don't see why you can't just track the balls on colour. In pool, each ball has a unique colour and at least some of it is always visible - even on the "stripes" balls (aka bigs or halves). Since you're not tracking movement, you can do all the image processing between shots, taking several seconds if necessary.

      Finally, may I suggest, instead of an expensive projector, you could rig up a laser pointer reflected off some kind of servoed mirror. If your computer could manipulate the mirror accurately and quickly enough it could draw out the line along which you should hit. You may well be able to buy these mirror components as they are already used in laser displays for rock bands, museums, etc.

      --
      Karma police, I've given all I can, it's not enough, I've given all I can, but we're still on the payroll.
    12. Re:I want one of those! by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2

      You a mirrored setup as in most lasershows? Kinda like this: http://www.laser-light-show.com/syst.htm

      "Total system cost is only $8995 complete (Low power 5mw).
      Medium power 50mw system $9995 complete.
      High power 100mw system $10,995 complete.
      Includes Pent III desktop computer. Laptop available at additional cost"

      Not entirely sure that this is a bargain ... hehe :-)

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    13. Re:I want one of those! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The pool thing has already been done with a heads-up display:

      http://vismod.www.media.mit.edu/people/jebara/stoc hasticks.html

    14. Re:I want one of those! by Merlin42 · · Score: 1

      We'd really need some way of making the projection visable to only one player.

      Think HMD ...

      Kevin

    15. Re:I want one of those! by Destoo · · Score: 1

      As a woman? It was cool.

      But the best leap was when he was a monkey to be sent in space.

      Oh.. and to stay on topic..
      Imaging a beowulf cluster of dartboards...
      No. Really. Would be nice for tournaments.

      --
      Nouvelles de jeux et technologies en français. TC
    16. Re:I want one of those! by JohnPM · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nah those are with huge lasers for open-air displays. All you would need is a good laser pointer. The page you want is here where they have a bunch of cheap components like mirrors and "General scanning 124 Galvo" for a couple hundred.

      Also they have a "hackers special" which includes the laser and stuff for $2700, which is almost getting down to the price-range. It looks like the galvo (motors) + mirror subsystem goes for around $1000 though - still pricey.

      --
      Karma police, I've given all I can, it's not enough, I've given all I can, but we're still on the payroll.
    17. Re:I want one of those! by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2

      Cool. But that doesn't help out the spectators, if they were to get any benefits of it. Unless you want to spend a ton of money for head-up-displays and wearable computers for all spectators.

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    18. Re:I want one of those! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      Gee, I wonder how hard it is to convert video output meant for a heads up display to something everyone can see on a regular monitor. Trivial probably. Now projecting onto the pool table - That would be cool : )

  8. Announcements by Maiko · · Score: 3, Funny

    I know from UK Darts TV coverage that the announcer says the scores after each set of darts thrown. Does the machine spout "Whon Hunderud hand eIIIIIIghty!" every so often?

    --
    I am the breaker of Chairs!
    1. Re:Announcements by Maiko · · Score: 1

      Update - They do, but only for "Bullseye", good throws and a bad round. No 180 calls though

      --
      I am the breaker of Chairs!
    2. Re:Announcements by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not true -- it will say "triple 20!"

    3. Re:Announcements by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 1

      Update update - they definitely DO say "One Hunndreed aaaaand Eiiiiiighty".
      As an aside, the mighty darts commentator Sid Waddell is well known for his 'unique' commentary on darts. Example: "There's only one word for that: Magic Darts"

      --
      They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
  9. Re:et alors ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd prefer if Yana were wearing a bikini :-)

  10. Re:why is it taking so long by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oops, didn't hit anonymous! Oh well, _I_ thought it was pretty funny. ^_^

  11. Geez! by Tazzy531 · · Score: 3, Funny

    Geez..they go to harvard and they have enough free time to build a "wireless dartboard" ... meanwhile I'm still up a 7am working on my Programming Languages and Translator class project...UGH!

    --


    _______________________________
    "I'm not Conceited...I'm just a realist..."
    1. Re:Geez! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      hahahahaaaaaaaaaa!!!!

      oooh, what a riot.
      thank you for starting my day off right!

  12. Just what we need... by BadDoggie · · Score: 1
    Drunk geeks with sharp instruments. Great.

    Anyone smelling a hoax? It looks good and even possible, but the dartboard shown looks like a standard horsehair board and not one of those electronic pegboard types, so how does a hit register? A normal dartboard is a damned good insulator with a wireframe over it. Sections don't move, so switches can't be pressed.

    woof.

    1. Re:Just what we need... by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

      Copy/paste from another post I made earlier. Maybe you too should drink a couple of cups of coffee:

      "It _is_ a digital dartboard, as you can see by looking at the pictures:
      1) The board has obvious cavaties: http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~sander/dip/proj board.jpg
      2) I've never noticed anything like this on a regular dartboard: http://www.people.fas.harvard.edu/~sander/dip/boar d.jpg"

      --
      We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    2. Re:Just what we need... by benjymous · · Score: 2, Informative

      Nope, this is real. if you read the article they say "Our first goal was to understand how our Sportcraft dartboard translates a single dart hit to an electronic signal..."

      and a quick search of sportcraft on google finds www.sportcraft.com

      Which has electronic darts boards exactly like the one they've hacked.

      --
      Help me! I'm turning into a grapefruit!
    3. Re:Just what we need... by Rolo+Tomasi · · Score: 1

      Dart board? We don't have one anymore. There was a horrible accident. Drinking and darts don't mix.
      --Mancomb Seepgood

      --
      Did you know you can fertilize your lawn with used motor oil?
    4. Re:Just what we need... by Johan+Veenstra · · Score: 1

      Drinking and Darts don't mix? That's got to be the silliest remark about darts and alcohol I've ever heared. Playing darts without drinks, is next to impossible.

      Johan V.

    5. Re:Just what we need... by Knobby · · Score: 2

      You could use a horse hair dart board using a pair of cameras and a little triangulation algorithm. The result would be a little bulkier, but probably more fun (soft darts suck!)..

    6. Re:Just what we need... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The board they throw at is a digital with holes.
      The image of the board used in the WEB display is an horse hair.

      Having competed in darts tournaments. Alcohol and darts go hand in hand in bars. The difference between serious players, and non serious players is weather they started drink during the game or waited until after.

    7. Re:Just what we need... by tonedevil · · Score: 0

      The difference between serious players, and non serious players is weather they started drink during the game or waited until after.

      Just wondered which one's which?

  13. Watch out for... by mikeage · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...network accessible _darts_. Now those had better be secured-- I don't want anyone cracking into my sharp pointy object collection

    --
    -- Is "Sig" copyrighted by www.sig.com?
  14. I did read the article... by jonr · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    ...but obvisously before getting my morning caffine fix...

  15. I forgive thine sins. by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 1

    Say five "hail cofee" and two "ave computer".

    ;-)

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  16. Bonus scores? by Frank+of+Earth · · Score: 3, Funny

    How many points is it when you get the dart to hit the parallel cable. [looks like shielding doesn't cover everything completely]

    Very cool guys.

  17. Cool hack but not so good players by CProgrammer98 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is so cool, although the guys are obviously not that great at darts strategy - look at the stas for the doubles. Double 20 is at the top as expected but double 16 is way down the bottom. Watch the pros play, they will always try and leave themselves double 20 or double 16 to finish. The logic should be obvious to most slashdotters - you can keep splitting the double 16 all the way down to double one if you miss the double and hot the single. Double 1 is the next highest double in the stats so maybe they are doing tjis, but just not very good at getting the doubles!!!

    --
    And the people shall be oppressed, every one by another, and every one by his neighbour Isaiah 3:5
  18. Then maybe they should create a 'tutorial mode' by darylp · · Score: 1

    Where the computer works out the most optimal target to hit next and highlights it for them on the projection.

    That would be sweet!

    1. Re:Then maybe they should create a 'tutorial mode' by mcarbone · · Score: 2

      It actually does do this. If you look at this image, you'll see a box that says "Aim for Triple 20" in the bottom right corner. When playing 301, the computer calculates the best next move using a simple dynamic programming algorithm and displays it there (assuming perfect players -- we are working on a version that considers a player's probability distribution).

      --

      The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what we share with someone else when we're uncool. -Crowe
    2. Re:Then maybe they should create a 'tutorial mode' by Usquebaugh · · Score: 2

      I'd like to see what they think is the shortest way to finish 501, nine darts is the answer. saw John Lowe do this once :-) Two darts from 101 etc.

      I also wonder if the tutor is smart enough to realise that John is crap and should always aim at triple 19s. Clive is playing and it just lights the whole board up as a guide:-) etc

      Lastly, whatever happened to KISS, there is more hardware here than they took to the moon :-)

  19. Two things we can notice here: by ksp · · Score: 3, Interesting

    1)
    "Pedro V. Sander" desperately needs to get a life according to the stats!

    2)
    You can be no good at darts as long as you play alone, it is easy to cheat since the PC never notices when you miss the board altogether.

    BTW: Pedro, I am not suggesting that there is a link between 1) and 2).

    --
    What is the sound of one hand clapping?
    cat /dev/null > /dev/audio
  20. We can even track the slashdot effect. by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I read the article the first time, the counter (at the very bottom) said 865 visitors, now (~50 minutes later) it says 4589. That's obviously not enough to slashdot the server, so let's show them what we can really do - slashdot the server. Or just slashdot the fastcounter.bcentral.com server (they're the ones hosting the counter) :-)

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
    1. Re:We can even track the slashdot effect. by MrSeb · · Score: 1

      A bit sad, really... just now I was hitting 'refresh' every second, and every time it reloaded the counter had gone up around 15-20 times...

  21. I am so Proud by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So this is what the leaders of tomorrow do in their spare time? I am so proud!

  22. Imaginitive! by squaretorus · · Score: 2

    We built a parallel port onto a dartboard. We connected the dartboard to an old laptop, which we call the dartboard server

    I'd have thought they could have come up with a better name than 'the dartboard server'. How about 'Jocky', 'Eric', or 'Tricia'

    1. Re:Imaginitive! by The+Grassy+Knoll · · Score: 1

      Should be named after "Sid Waddell (the darts commentator)", surely!
      "The players are under so much duress, it's like duressic park out there" - thanks, Sid!

      --
      They will never know the simple pleasure of a monkey knife fight
  23. Security concerns, anti-cheat mechanisms by Xerion · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Seems like every great game will eventually be ruined by cheaters, see Starcraft, CounterStrike, ARC... I wonder if this wireless dartboard can detect cheaters (e.g stand in front of the board and stab it point blank, in order to up your stats). Hope the AI is smart enough to /ban such users. And maybe literally "kick" them by ways of a 10 ton hydrolic metal boot nailed behind the player's spot.

    1. Re:Security concerns, anti-cheat mechanisms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, if you do cheat...People might see a snapshot of your face as you are stabbing the dartboard.

      Oh, the shame

    2. Re:Security concerns, anti-cheat mechanisms by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Did you read it? They have a "dart cam" that shows who is throwing, and you can pretty obviously tell if they're right in front of the board. That and for crying out it's darts! Why was this modded up as interesting? This electronic darts will never be as farspread as Starcraft or CS, and what's more even if it was it still has a real human element. People aren't playing isolated from each other, there will be people seeing the players in real life. *They* can tell if they're cheating...

  24. Are you sure they are from Harvard? by pherret · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    We built....
    We connected...
    We wrote...
    We wrote...
    We connected..
    We highlight...
    We also...

    How may "we's" can "we" use?

  25. Harvard grades by Aurorya · · Score: 1

    Actually, when applying to most grad schools, your undergrad GPA is multiplied by a certain factor depending on both the difficulty of the college AND the amount of grade inflation. It turns out great Harvard grades don't count for that much to most graduate programs.

    1. Re:Harvard grades by Aurorya · · Score: 0

      I meant Harvard undergraduate grades don't count for that much.

    2. Re:Harvard grades by essiescreet · · Score: 1

      They're in grad school, dumbass...

  26. Re:how I vote for /. polls by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    boy... this moderator didn't get the joke.

  27. How Ingenious! by Quarters · · Score: 2

    >> the client looks exactly like the dartboard

    I heard that version 1.0 was done as a dodecahedron. When that didn't work too well they tried the classic "Circle with some pie-slices" approach and found success.

  28. Try out an Etch-A-Sketch by asmithmd1 · · Score: 1

    Check out an Etch-A-Sketch that you can draw on by submitting moves to a form. The server is an 8 bit Rabbit 2000

  29. Someone I know finally made it onto slashdot by DoorFrame · · Score: 4, Funny

    Ok, so I've known a number of people in my life, but this is the first time any of them have ever did anything which warranted their appearance on the infamous slashdot. So, with my knowledge of a grand total of TWO of the players, I want to ask you, what do you think this guy is up to?

    Ok, sure, it's a cool hack... blah blah blah, but you're all missing the most important point of discussion, does or does not Marco Carbone look like Jon Favreau (of Swingers fame):

    Picture of Marco Carbone: here.
    Picture of Jon Favreau: here.

    There's almost certainly some sort of conspiracy afoot.

    PS. I attempted to find a picture of Marco Carbone as a dog, but alas the wayback machine failed me.

  30. Also some game theory on the matter... by mcarbone · · Score: 4, Interesting

    We also applied some game theory to the game 301 and to a game we invented called 30-Block, which you can read about here. We can solve 301 fairly easily, but 30-Block turns out to be quite intractable.

    The more interesting part of this paper discusses probability models we use to predict where players will hit based on where they aim. It's interesting: if you are a perfect player, you have the highest expected value when aiming for Triple-20 (obviously), but the worse you get, the best place to aim in the boards spirals inward until it gets to double bulls-eye (which minimizes how often you miss the board).

    --

    The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what we share with someone else when we're uncool. -Crowe
  31. deamon by davidhan · · Score: 2, Funny
    We wrote a dart deamon to poll for dart hits. The deamon accepts multiple simultaneous TCP connections and sends the dart hits to all connected clients.


    And these guys go to Harvard?
    1. Re:deamon by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 1

      Eighty percent of Harvard students graduate "with honors." Eighty percent. Please remember that when you're looking at resumes from Harvard alums. Grade inflation is so rampant that C's are very rare. Meanwhile, I graduated - without honors, and with lumps -from an affordable public university with an attrition rate of over 40% (OK, it's still a top-tier school, but it *is* a state school.) And still Harvard gets the hot rep - and we still end up working for the Harvard boys. It's just not fair, I tell ya.

  32. Uh oh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wait till those online casino guys hear about this. I can see my popup ads doubling or tripling, with "PLAY AND BET ON DARTS ONLINE!!!!"

    Damn. Of course, the easiest way to beat electronic darts is to simply press on the triple-20 repeatedly. No darts required!

  33. "Monkey Quotes" stock server by Ukab+the+Great · · Score: 2

    A while back, the wall street journal did an experiment they had group consisted of seasoned investment managers square off against chimpanzees who would select stocks by throwing a dart at a dartboard. 50% of the time, the chimpanzees picked better stocks.

    The Harvard guys should get themselves a few good chimps and use their networked dartboard to serve up a website that well-informed chimp-picked stock tips. They can then sell ad space to financial

    Hey, there have been crazy dot.com business schemes.

  34. Dart-proof cover by tangent3 · · Score: 1

    The laptop and wires are protected by a dart-proof cover... but what about the webcam itself?

    1. Re:Dart-proof cover by adamjaskie · · Score: 0

      Heh, mebbe we can protect it with the transparent aluminum oxide tile!!!!

      --
      /usr/games/fortune
  35. Harvard can't be tops in CS: #@ +30 ; News @# by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    if they have a building named after the Great
    Satan Bill Gates.

  36. Blindfold? by Hektor_Troy · · Score: 2

    "Think HMD .."

    Is that some kind of blindfold?

    --
    We do not live in the 21st century. We live in the 20 second century.
  37. Re:Someone I know finally made it onto slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marco Carbone, I want your sexy ass.

  38. I like the stats by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The most common value they hit? Zero!

    maybe because Zero is all around, where as any other spot is well defined.

    I still think I hit more 20s than zeros. Heck, I think I hit more T-15s than zeros.

    I've taken my electronic dartboard apart. Never thought about this though. I'm with the people that say doing something similar with billiards would be better.

  39. Re:Someone I know finally made it onto slashdot by mcarbone · · Score: 2

    Who doesn't?

    --

    The only true currency in this bankrupt world is what we share with someone else when we're uncool. -Crowe
  40. Cool, but ... by paro12 · · Score: 1

    This is by far one of the niftier hacks i've seen lately, but its a shame that it is an electronic dartboard. I mean, if they had figured out how to do this with a standard dart board (which would probably be hard as crap) I would seriously go out and purchase one today (and yes i know they're not trying to sell it, i'm just saying). Having played on electronic dart boards before, i can tell you that half of my shots never stick in the board. This could be because i suck and have an unorthodox throwing style, but more over its just because its damn hard to get the darts into the tiny little holes. Can anyone think of a way to do this using a real dart board. just some food for thought.

  41. The way the board picks up dart hits by BlakeCaldwell · · Score: 1

    This project is impressive -- i saw that they're not EE's, so they had a hard time figuring out how the contact sheets are picking up dart throws. They came up with a good work-around, but i'll explain how the thing was supposed to work -- (i'm doing a similar implementation to this for my senior EE project).

    WIRING:

    Contact sheet 1:
    Basically, the grid is broken down into two halves. one of the contact sheets connects full wedges (ie, 20, 19, etc) across the single/double/triple boundaries together with another wedge on the other half. Therefore, there's 10 wires (20/2 = 10)

    Contact sheet 2:
    contact sheet two connects all the point values on each half...so, for half #1, one wire connects all singles, one wire connects all doubles, etc... one wire connects all singles on half #2, etc...there's 7 wires total, because one of them is used for bull's eye

    Implementation (time division multiplexing):
    send a logic pulse down each of the 10 wires in contact sheet #1 really fast, in a loop. Read as input on the rings...so, if you read that there was a single scored on the first half, just check where you sent the last pulse down -- deduct which was hit.

    i dunno, i guess this is boring, but in case anybody was interested :)

    - blake

  42. goggles by Mighty-Troll · · Score: 0

    Going back on topic, the whole projector thing would only be any use if you wanted to give both players a hand (unless the game is programmed to be able to turn off the hints for the better player). We'd really need some way of making the projection visable to only one player.

    Should be possible. Though it would require wearable computers and IO glasses. You can get yourself an wireless IP and have a central server broadcast the image to your goggles, or to everyones. This is the basic theory anyway - don't get me started on any specs.

    --
    I live under the bridge, in a pile of feces.
  43. Re:Someone I know finally made it onto slashdot by nachoworld · · Score: 1

    when can i get in on the action?

    --

    ---
    I'm just an ordinary man with nothing to lose.
  44. How about a game console? by mrseigen · · Score: 1

    We could have a 'net-accessible Atari 2600 which you control much the same way. It would take fighting over the controller to the next dimension.

  45. It already (kind of) exists. by ewirt · · Score: 1

    I believe this was a slashdot story a long time ago, but there was a "Snooker Playing Machine" built by the University of Bristol (UK) back in '98.

    The only information I could find about it now is at: http://www.bmc.riken.go.jp/sensor/Ho/chicago/Robot ics/Snooker/snooker.html

    The site includes some pictures and a couple very limited technical details.

  46. Other games by darklink · · Score: 1

    Well the usefulness of this technology escapes me at the moment. It is kinda interstings , but what next a web active foosball? I have a hard enuf time keeping up with that little ball as is. Maybe air hockey? Well in the spirit of spirits , networkable drinking games. Try one at your next lan party. I am running thin on those so far. But i do know you can hook up a lan while totaly enebriated.

    I know that alot of breakthrows in computing and hard ware have happend do to people just fooling around. This could if used right turn into something workable in another feild , maybe your next SAT prompter will be a camera and use of specal pens so it can track cheaters.

    But i kinda want one in my home sounds kinda fun.