Slashdot Mirror


TRON 20th Anniversary Edition DVD Reviewed

gevmage (Craig Steffen) writes with the review below of the new DVD boxed set of Tron, which he says is a "must-have for any science fiction fan." So whether Tron brings back fond memories, or only serves to show you what movies before your birth, read on for his take on the set. If you're not familiar with Tron at this late stage, beware of a few spoilers within.

Review: TRON 20th Anniversary Collector's Edition, 2 Disc DVD set

January 15, 2002, issued a special edition DVD set of TRON. For those of you who have never seen the film, I mention some plot details revealed in the third of the film.

First, the film itself. It's a fantasy about a computer programmer who gets pulled inside the mainframe at the company where he used to work while trying to hack into the system to retrieve evidence that one of the execs stole programs from him. While inside the computer world (on the other side of the video game screen) he's forced to play the games that he's programmed, while trying to keep the computer world safe for democracy. It's an interesting plot premise, and who wouldn't want to go inside his computer and interact with programs as people?

The film is paced reasonably well, the script carries through but is kind of klunky in some places. The computer world scenes are visually stunning, and the DVD is an excellent transfer. If you have the means, I highly recommend watching it on a progressive-scan player. The original film was released in 6-track magnetic 70mm, and the sound track carries through very well. In addition to the back-lit animation for the "program" characters in the computer world, the film has 20 minutes plus of pure CG generated footage, unheard of at that time.

If you like the film at all, the special edition is definitely worth the extra money. Disney's standard DVDs are single-layer letter-box; this is two double-layer disks. The first disk has the film, on a THX certified "Enhanced for Widescreen TVs" presentation. The commentary track on the film is interesting and informative.

The second disc has all the extra material, and there's a huge amount of it. There's a 1 1/2 hour "making of" feature; also many hundreds of storyboards and photographs from the set for comparison. There are shorts talking about specific aspects of the production, and the usual previews, deleted scenes, publicity material, and lots of interviews with production and cast members.

An excellent presentation of an excellent film; a must-have for any science fiction fan.

Film Ratings:
Plot Originality: 8.5
Pacing: 7
Characterizations: 6.5
Dialog and Plot Coherence: 6
Visual Impression: 8.5
Geekness "Cool!" Factor: 8
Overall: 8

DVD Specific Ratings (Special Edition):
Film Transfer: 8.5
Sound Transfer: 7.5
Commentary Track: 7.5
Making Of Feature: 8
Other Additional Material: 8
Overall: 8

(All ratings are from 0 to 10 inclusive, 10 being better, with the ratings 2 through 8 encompassing 99% of all films.)

141 of 402 comments (clear)

  1. And if you don't like the DVD.. by PopeAlien · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you don't like the DVD, you can recreate your own deadly 'Discs of Tron' game in real life!

  2. One of the only movies... by FortKnox · · Score: 3, Insightful

    So whether Tron brings back fond memories, or only serves to show you what movies before your birth,

    Back before you were born, computer movies were about real computer components with real terms; obviously, they had contracted computer technicians/scientists to ensure they were truely discussing computers so that the computer intelligent would not be offended... Unlike movies like "Hackers" or "The Net" where they didn't even ask a computer person anything, they just made stuff up...

    --
    Good quote, too many chars. Seriously, the slashdot 120 char limit sucks!
    1. Re:One of the only movies... by poot_rootbeer · · Score: 4, Funny


      Yes, "WarGames" and its ilk were technically accurate to a much greater degree than more recent movies like "Mission: Impossible"...

      Uh-oh, the Sarcasm Alert has hit DEFCON 5!

    2. Re:One of the only movies... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      "Hackers" was actually technically accurate in what could and could not be done with computers and technology. "The Net" was the movie where they made stuff up. So were "Swordfish" and "Sneakers".

      "Hackers" is usually criticized because it is a "teen exploitation film". Teenagers are oppressed by adults and authority figures and in the end they save the world from disaster and are finally appreciated. The graphical visual elements of the computing scenes are superfluous, but the capabilities of those systems do not go into the "supernatural" realm like they do in "Sneakers" or "The Net".

      Cryptnotic

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    3. Re:One of the only movies... by GigsVT · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Sneakers was a little bit of a stretch, but pretty accurate, if you suspend disbelief long enough to assume a device could be created that would do the instant decryption thing. I think Sneakers embraces more of the hacker spirit, in that they were creative, smart, and did a lot of homework before hacking their way into something.

      As far as most technologically correct, I'd have to say Antitrust is the most accurate. The first movie I know of to use valid IP addresses in it, and even smart enough to put them in 10.X.X.X, which is much like the well known 555 exchange for phones, for all intents and purposes. As far as whether his half-brained plans would have gotten them as far as they did, that is a different issue.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    4. Re:One of the only movies... by greenfly · · Score: 2

      Hackers was accurate? So all those hackers could chat so graphically and browse 3d graphic high-end mainframes over their 14.4 (assumed, since they freaked out over a 28.8 modem on the notebook) modems?

      I like Hackers, heck I have the DVD, but I like watching it *because* it's so inaccurate.

    5. Re:One of the only movies... by gamgee5273 · · Score: 3

      HEY! WarGames was the bomb, baby! I modeled my whole life off of that movie!

    6. Re:One of the only movies... by hrieke · · Score: 2

      DEFCON 1 is the lowest rating for DEFCON, 5 is status normal.

      --
      III.IIVIVIXIIVIVIIIVVIIIIXVIIIXIIIIIIIIVIIIIVVIIIV IIVIIIIIIVIII...
    7. Re:One of the only movies... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      The graphical junk is "fluff" added because it's a movie. The capabilities are real though. Remotely downloading a file, planting malicious code in a supertanker control program, etc.

      Also, for the year when the movie was made, it had an amazing soundtrack.

      Cryptnotic

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    8. Re:One of the only movies... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      Not in Hackers. There weren't any Mac's, and the only Apple computer was an old Apple //e that the lamer newbie guy had.

      Cryptnotic

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    9. Re:One of the only movies... by Cryptnotic · · Score: 2

      That was the point I was trying to make. Hardly anyone agrees with me though. Someone even modded me -1, Flamebait.

      Cryptnotic

      --
      My other first post is car post.
    10. Re:One of the only movies... by ackthpt · · Score: 2, Informative
      Back before you were born, computer movies were about real computer components with real terms;

      I dunno, I can remember a lot of movies depicting computers completely wrong back in the 70's. Tron at least used some correct terminology, but I still thought it was tommyrot when I saw it. IMHO the arcade game was better than the movie.

      Think about making a movie like that today, where you have to get past the Firewall, or dodging packets, or taking a fast ride on the AGP, or heck, going to meet the Kernel! :)

      There's a 1 1/2 hour "making of" feature

      Think of this as "History", since you could probably do a lot better now with the PC you are sitting at.

      --

      A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    11. Re:One of the only movies... by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      You are simply hanging out with the wrong hackers.

      '-pp

      A few manage not to look like Baron Harkonnen.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
    12. Re:One of the only movies... by tringstad · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Sneakers was a little bit of a stretch, but pretty accurate, if you suspend disbelief long enough to assume a device could be created that would do the instant decryption thing.

      Actually, one of the cooler things about Sneakers, is that (right now) there is no way to prove that such a device can't be built, assuming it's purpose is to be used against private/public key encryption, or anything that doesn't use a OTP.

      Or am I wrong? I haven't seen the movie in a long time, and admit I may be missing a point somewhere.

      -Tommy

      --
      "I got a half gallon of Jack, and 2 dozen Ant Traps. I'm about to get wild." -me
  3. Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by vrmlguy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is TRON, for gawd's sake. It's a slam-dunk 10 on the geekiness scale.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    1. Re:Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by cowboy+junkie · · Score: 3, Funny

      It reminds me of the Simpsons Halloween episode where Homer was trapped in the 3rd dimension:

      "What's it like in there?"

      Homer: "Did you ever see that movie Tron?"
      Every character responds in turn: "No."

      Of course, by making this Tron reference through a Simpsons reference, I have gone past 10 on the geekiness scale....

    2. Re:Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by agilen · · Score: 2, Funny

      I've seen that episode.....whenever its on, I laugh hysterically, and nobody else has seen tron.

      Its like how Moses in South Park is the MCP...nobody ever seems to understand what Moses is supposed to be, I just think its hilarious.

    3. Re:Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by Happy+Monkey · · Score: 2

      With bonus points for having early appearances of Londo (accounting program) and Sheridan (Tron) from Babylon 5.

      --
      __
      Do ya feel happy-go-lucky, punk?
    4. Re:Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by zephc · · Score: 2

      yeah tron was on the other night and they have the MCP and so I said jokingly to my roomie "Dude, it's THE Moses!"

      --
      "I would say that 99 per cent of what my father has written about his own life is false." - L. Ron Hubbard Jr.
    5. Re:Geekiness factor only gets an 8? by WinPimp2K · · Score: 2, Funny

      Heck no.
      Everybody knows the geekiness scale goes all the way to "F" (except for you trapped in a merely mortal decimal world)

      --

      You either believe in rational thought or you don't
  4. Impressions from a kid by crumbz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I saw TRON at the theater when it cam out. I was 9 or 10 at the time. We got a Sincalir ZX-81 with 16k RAM about the same time. That movie got me into computers like nobody's business. Imagining the CPU and RAM and electrons flowing through them. WOW! It is a little bit dated now, but when you are 9 years old you absorb the images and ideas like a sponge.

    1. Re:Impressions from a kid by s3hel · · Score: 5, Funny

      Back in my day, 16K of RAM held a lot more. We got 2-3 people loaded in to that much ram! We were less bloated back then. Somethime we would have to take turns if there were more than 3 of us.

  5. Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Petersko · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I realise this is slightly off-topic, but is anybody else disgusted with Disney's habit of putting out letterboxed versions, rather than Widescreen"Enhanced for 16x9 Television" editions?

    I wanted to buy Hercules the other day - only letterboxed editions available. I have a 16x9 HD-Ready television, and it's either watch a terribly distorted picture, or watch it in 30% of the viewable area of the display.

    Thankfully, their "Collectors Editions" (when available) have the enhanced versions, but some are simply not available.

    Technology marches on, Disney! I won't buy them

    1. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Sc00ter · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Correct me if I'm wrong but letterboxed movies are the aspect ratio that the movie was ment to be.. That's why if you have a standard 3:4 TV and a few letterboxed movies made at different times by different studios the black bars could be larger or smaller.


      Enhanced for 16:9 versions are "modified" to fit correctly for a 16:9 TV, must like how they used to pan and scan for 3:4 TVs. It's not as bad as when they did this for 3:4 screens, but it's still not what the original intented aspect ratio.

    2. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Aexia · · Score: 2

      I may be off, but the first edition of TRON was released several years ago, long before 16x9 TVs were even available.

    3. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Rob+Parkhill · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actually, there is a BIG difference between "letterboxed" movies, and "anamorphic", or enhanced-for-widescreen-TV movies.

      I can't possibly explain the difference as well as these guys can, so I won't even try. Go there and read this, it's a great explination. It's true that both present a wide-screen picture, but you lose a lot of information in a letterboxed format.

      --
      "Tomorrow's forecast: a few sprinkles of genius with a chance of doom!" - Stewie Griffin
    4. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Junta · · Score: 2

      Movie theater screens are 16:9 ratio, they didn't just draw a new ratio out of thin air, they wanted the TV to more closely match the movie standard.

      Now if they take a version that was pan and scanned to 4:3 and then modify it again to 16:9 without the original, then it is messed up.

      Letterboxing in general means to present 16:9 aspect ration in an assumed 4:3 screen geometry. When the actual screen is 16:9, then you get horrible horizontal strecthing. Switching TV to show 4:3 corrects ratio, but it means you have big black areas above, beneath, and on either side, when you could get proper aspect by simply filling the screen.

      --
      XML is like violence. If it doesn't solve the problem, use more.
    5. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
      Sorry, not all movies are 16:9.. Newer movies are yes, but if you start looking at older movies they are much wider then they are tall..

    6. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      Erm what do you mean by "modified"?

      Most theatrical releases are either 1.85:1 or 2.35:1. IIRC a widescreen TV's aspect ratio is 1.77:1 (I could be a little off), so there are still black bars at the top and bottom -- they're just significantly smaller.

      Widescreen enhanced means that the image has higher vertical resolution because there's less black bar in the way. It doesn't imply that the movie was cropped or that the aspect ratio was adjusted in any way. Some 1.85:1 movies are opened up a little to fill the screen entirely, but that's usually because the movie itself was open matte, and they're just reducing the size of the matte (thus the aspect is slightly off from the theatrical presentation, but it's insignifantly small and you're not losing information and likely not screwing up the intended framing).

      Anyway, Disney -- from what I've heard -- isn't screwing the consumer out of 16:9 transfers anymore. They've found better way to screw consumers.

    7. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by gea · · Score: 3, Informative

      OK, you're wrong.

      All DVDs encode the material at a resolution of 720x480. A flag in an MPEG header indicates whether the bitmap represents a 4:3 image or a 16:9 image; either way the pixels aren't square.

      On a DVD box, "Enhanced for 16x9 televisions" means the bitmap represents a 16:9 image. When played on a 4:3 TV, vertical scaling is performed in the DVD player, producing a letterboxed image.

      For whatever reason, some DVD creators letterbox the film first, then encode the letterboxed image. So some of the 720x480 bitmap is wasted on the image of the black bars, resulting in lower picture quality.

      So if the Tron DVD is "enhanced for 16x9" then Disney did it right.

    8. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by ceswiedler · · Score: 2

      Wrong, too. The aspect ratio of the movie screen depends on the film format. 35mm is 16x9, but 70mm and 135mm are much wider. Most movies today are indeed shot in 35mm, but not all, particularly epic movies (Last of the Mohicans comes to mind).

    9. Re:Letterbox Being the Disney Standard by jedidiah · · Score: 2

      That's probably just panoramic.

      It would be far better to make no assumptions about the display equipment when mastering the disk and simply allow the DVD player to put in the necessary bars for normal or panoramic letterboxing.

      --
      A Pirate and a Puritan look the same on a balance sheet.
  6. I want to see the whole movie. by Captoo · · Score: 3, Funny

    For those of you who have never seen the film, I mention some plot details revealed in the third of the film.

    Why are they only releasing a third of the film on DVD? :)

    1. Re:I want to see the whole movie. by sulli · · Score: 2, Funny

      You have to go to Region 2 for the second third, and Region 4 for the third.

      --

      sulli
      RTFJ.
  7. The CG was great for it's time by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2

    I was happy as a clam that only 6 years later, I was doing similar CG on my Amiga (minus the 'light trails' from the flying discs)

    1. Re:The CG was great for it's time by Dino · · Score: 2

      Yup, The Amiga was fully capable of Tron-eqsue graphics. Way back, before I was an Imagine Jockey, I re-created the flying two-legged ship thingys in DPaint III of all places. I would "render" each facet of the ship's body using DPaint's 'Move' command. It was tiring work! I was so happy to discover real 3D rendering! "You mean I don't have to render each polygon separetely! What will they think of next!!"

      I also remember the 8-player tron-motorcycle game that was released for the Amiga as freeware. Man, those were some fun times.

      --
      That's not what I meant.
    2. Re:The CG was great for it's time by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2

      OK... getting off topic here, but in reply:

      Didn't Jim Sachs do most of his excellent animations in DPaint only? If you remember some of his work, you'll appreciate the patience he must have had in doing them.

      Then of course, Eric Schwartz did wonders with MovieSetter (I think)

    3. Re:The CG was great for it's time by ChadN · · Score: 2

      I remember Leo Schwab (ewhac on /.) describing how Kim Sachs used to work; If Jim wanted to change the color of something, he would manually repaint each pixel. Then, if he wanted to change it back, he would repaint each pixel again. He wouldn't just do a simple palette change.

      Now that may sound foolish, but if you saw Jim's work you'd see that he was very adept at blending and texturing with colors, and using dithering techniques, and so by changing the color of a few pixels, he would then repaint the surrounding pixels so that it looked just right. A simple palette change would not have had the same effect, because each pixel color was predicated on its neighbor. In short, it took a LOT of patience and mouse clicks (in fact, he used to talk about how many mice he wore out from clicking)

      --
      "It's overkill, of course. But you can never have too much overkill." - Anonymous Slashdot Coward
    4. Re:The CG was great for it's time by sharkey · · Score: 2

      the flying two-legged ship thingys
      are called Recognizers.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  8. Look out -- grid bugs! by quistas · · Score: 3, Interesting
    This has always been my favorite part of tron -- the 5s grid bug creation CG, which is commented on and then never mentioned again in the entire movie.


    I'm convinced it was done earlier as a proof-of-concept or something, but they thought it was so cool they had to work it in.


    Can someone who has the new edition comment on that -- were the grid bugs supposed to be important and then cut down, or are they just a funny aside tossed in?


    -- q

    1. Re:Look out -- grid bugs! by wikthemighty · · Score: 2, Informative

      This scene was worked in because they developed the arcade game at the same time, which had a grid bug sequence in it...

      --
      "There are people who do not love their fellow human being, and I _hate_ people like that!" - Tom Lehrer
    2. Re:Look out -- grid bugs! by mblase · · Score: 3, Interesting

      More details, from that same URL:

      As every good Tron fan knows, the grid bugs were almost entirely edited out of the movie (what was left was about two seconds of an animation of a grid bug creating itself). Grid bugs appear in the game because of pressures to develop the arcade game in time for the release of the movie (all part of Disney's sales strategy for the movie's launch -- posters and trailers ended with a tagline along the lines of: "See the movie. Play the game.") So, game programmers had to use whatever script elements they could from the movie before the film itself was actually completed. Light cycles, tanks, recognizers, and the MCP, of course, all made the final cut -- the grid bugs did not.

  9. Tron! by Carmody · · Score: 2

    Raise your hand if you can close your eyes and make yourself "hear" the sound of the cycles warming up from the video-game... if you can make yourself "see" the guy ALMOST losing his balance from Disks Of Tron... if you can perfectly picture the exact shade bright blue that permeated the movie....

    Tron!

    --
    God is real unless declared integer
    1. Re:Tron! by CyberDong · · Score: 2, Informative

      Thankfully, there's a MAME download for those who can't imagine it...

  10. Sequelitis by Cinnibar+CP · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah, and the review neglects to mention the overpowering hints on the DVD regarding "Tron 2.0".

    The sequel is coming.

    1. Re:Sequelitis by LoveMuscle · · Score: 2, Funny

      Tron 2.0 ie. Troff .. -love

  11. ... did anyone see the movie 'Tron'? by merz · · Score: 3, Funny

    Hibbert: No.
    Lisa: No.
    Marge: No.
    Wiggum: No.
    Bart: No.
    Patty: No.
    Wiggum: No.
    Ned: No.
    Selma: No.
    Frink: No.
    Lovejoy: No.
    Wiggum: Yes. I mean... um, I mean, no. No, heh.

  12. What have I done? by Aaron_Pike · · Score: 5, Funny

    I just saw Tron for the first time and... *sob* WHAT HAVE I DONE? All those programs I've deleted over the years... Oh, the humanity...

  13. Better reviews by cowboy+junkie · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you'd like a review with some actual depth, check out DVDFile's, which goes into much greater detail as to the picture & sound quality as well as what the extras are all about. This thread at Home Theater Forum also has more useful feedback about the disc.

    IMHO, it's a pretty nice disc. The picture quality is good, the sound is sweet and the extras really show you in great detail how it was all done.

  14. Re: Real Life Tron scene by somethingwicked · · Score: 2
    Better yet, get some Jai Alai equipment and re-enact the Jai Alai like scene from the movie.

    No challenge you say?


    Consider that you would still have to bounce the ball off the ceiling. AND that 99.999% of us have never touched and a piece of Jai Alai equipment and even coming close to someone should earn you a point like in horseshoes.

    I guess you could use those cheap plastic "scoops" to get a one-on-one game going

    Takes me back to when my friend had a "Thundertree" rigged up with tire swings and platforms that was inspired by Beyond Thunderdome...anyways, I'm rambling

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

  15. Interacting with Personified Programs Stinks by guttentag · · Score: 4, Funny
    and who wouldn't want to go inside his computer and interact with programs as people?
    Me: Where am I?
    Program: It looks like you're trying to go to MSN.
    Me: How do I get out of here?
    Program: It looks like you're trying to buy some data. Would you like to use your Passport account?
    Me: Do you ever shut up?
    Program: It looks like you're trying to access help on help. Please have your Windows activation code ready.
    1. Re:Interacting with Personified Programs Stinks by Winged+Cat · · Score: 2

      Oh, I don't know. That one might make a good test subject to find out just how many ways there are to delete a program. Hit with disc, falling from an erased platform, hit (or near miss) by tank projectile, stomped by recognizer, run into lightcycle wall at high speed...and let's not forget the wall of pain. ^_-

  16. Re:If this was AICN I'd be first by SomeoneGotMyNick · · Score: 2

    I know I would....

    I have an Accounts Receivable balancing application I'd like to slap upside the head....

  17. Tron and MS by Derkec · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Recently I heard an interview with one of the main guys at Disney who has been with Tron. He described it as being similar to the early "Bill Gates story." Bear with me. The MCP is the classic big iron central computer of the time. It was controlling and monolithic, like say.. IBM. It locks up programs and does mean things to users. In comes a rogue force which strikes back at the monolith. By going inside (like MS getting IBM's contract) it finds the weakness of the monolith and destroys it. This brings happiness to the programs and the users. While I don't think they really intended it to be the "Bill Gates story" (how could they at the time) the themes that made MS successful early on resonate soundly. Tron is a entertaining when you watch it with that perspective.

    1. Re:Tron and MS by sharkey · · Score: 2

      And now, the parallels are still there, is you cast:

      Bill Gates/Microsoft as Dillinger/MCP/SARK
      Linus Torvalds as Alan/TRON
      Tove as Lora/YORI
      Eric S Raymond as Popcorn Guy/RAM
      Alan Cox as Flynn/CLU
      and... RMS as Walter/Dumont

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  18. Tron games. by billn · · Score: 2

    If you're a big fan of the movie, check out 'Armagetron' over on Freshmeat. Windows and X clients available, BE SURE to get the movie packs for images and sounds. The game is already well done, show some support and it can improve. (LAN play is fine, net play gets a little hairy.)

    --
    - billn
    1. Re:Tron games. by ashitaka · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I like GLTron better. Closer to the movie in visuals. GPL'd.

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    2. Re:Tron games. by JWW · · Score: 2

      I concur, GLTron is awesome. Espically the latest versions with the split screen multi-player.

  19. Time to get out more... by Spamhead · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...and who wouldn't want to go inside his computer and interact with programs as people?

    Uh, me for one. Time to get outside more, dude.

    --
    Everybody Wang-Chung tonight!
  20. No Tron for me... by PeterClark · · Score: 5, Funny
    I thought Disney was the bad guy? Undoubtably, someone is going to get on my case for expecting some standards here at /., but really, this is DISNEY, bringer of evil acronyms, like SSSCA, and part of evil four-letter acronyms, like MPAA. But look! Shiny lights!


    Bah. A pox on your house.


    :Peter

    1. Re:No Tron for me... by ConceptJunkie · · Score: 2

      Yeah. well dont be surprised if Disney pulls Tron in a few months and refuses to sell it for several years, just 'cause they're jerks. They do it all the time with their kids' movies for no reason other than to create artificial demand and screw the customers. Or maybe they'll buy another Congress and force a pay-per-view system into every DVD player. Who knows?

      --
      You are in a maze of twisty little passages, all alike.
    2. Re:No Tron for me... by tempest303 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Completely agreed.

      While I'd love to own this movie, especially on DVD, I refuse to give another cent to Disney. After what I read about what Eisner had to say at the Senate hearing, I will NEVER purchase another Disney product, and I encourage others to do the same.

      Check out this quote from the above link:

      "Eisner confessed that the only reason he could think of for Michael Dell not to build in ubiquitous copyright-policing functions in his products was that Dell wants to sell his products to infringers."

      In the face of such blatent corporate doublethink, how can anyone who's at all concerned about Fair Use justify the future purchase of even a single Disney product?

    3. Re:No Tron for me... by Bilestoad · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yes! Disney, RIAA and MPAA are all iredeemably wicked.

      They are symbols of corporate abuse of power and show complete contempt for us as consumers. They regularly use their lobbyists in Washington to try to influence lawmakers to further restrict our rights to what we pay for. They wish "fair use" would just go away.

      But they do make shiny things that CmdrTaco likes to buy.

    4. Re:No Tron for me... by TheLoneCabbage · · Score: 3, Informative

      Do you realized how hard it is to boycott Disney?

      They just dont sell old movies, and over packed theme parks.

      I lived for 2 years in Orlando, Fl... seat of the Disney/Eisner Kingdom...

      Let me tell you something... Disney owns EVERYTHING. They have a 10billion dollar a year general aquisition fund, for buy NON-Disney like companies...

      Though you may not like them the Cristian Coalition also tried to boycott Disney... they failed miserably..

      BTW: Disney is not all bad. They were one of the first major coroporations to offer benifits to same sex couples. (since this message will be archived for the next Gazillion years on Google, I should probably mention I'm not gay) And they do a heck of allot of charity. Just because they don't GET tech doesn't make them evil, just a little (or a lot) slow.

    5. Re:No Tron for me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Actually, I had a random thought about this whole copy protection thing the other day.

      Why is it we assume fair use for music (the ability to mix tracks, the right to get the information in a non-encrypted format) but not for video. I'd really like to be able to take my favorite scenes to The Matrix, The Fugitive, Tron, et. al, and mix em up for a treadmill DVD.

      I mean, if we have the right to do this with audio, why not video? I think we need to push for enshrining (ie., yes, legislation) guaranteeing certain "fair use" rights regardless of the type of product.

      This gets confusing and interesting when thinking about books and libraries, software and source code...

      :-)

    6. Re:No Tron for me... by fleener · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No Tron for me because I bought the DVD when it was first released. It's quite a racket to release a barebones edition, have all the diehard fans buy it up, then wait a few years and release a bigger version to sell to the same audience again.

      No thanks.

    7. Re:No Tron for me... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Why do you assume /. must cater to a specific agenda? They pst stories about thing for nerds. TRON qualifies. Wether or not you want to buy it, is up to you. I don't think anybody wants /. to tell us our opinions.
      so, who did you vote for in the last election?
      If you don't vote, you are being a huge hipocrite when you complain about problems like this. Thats far more important then anything on /. .
      if you do vote, thanks.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    8. Re:No Tron for me... by elmegil · · Score: 2

      Buy the soundtrack by Wendy Carlos then. She's not Disney, and the music is pretty darn cool.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    9. Re:No Tron for me... by Skuld-Chan · · Score: 2

      Yeah, but I have the laser rotted (seriously) laser disk of tron - and I bought this before I found out how evil disney is - does this mean I can still watch the thx certified movies I have without feeling too guilty?

    10. Re:No Tron for me... by Ricdude · · Score: 2

      She? I thought it was still going by "Walter" back then (before the new age years)

      --
      How's my programming? Call 1-800-DEV-NULL
    11. Re:No Tron for me... by elmegil · · Score: 2
      She prefers to be referred to as Wendy regardless of the specific time of original release. I respect her wishes by referring to her as such and not worrying about when the change was made.

      You'll note that reissues are all listed by Wendy, including the reissue of S-O-B which definitely was recorded prior to the change.

      Sorry if you're incapable of treating another human with respect, but most of us don't have much trouble with doing so.

      --
      7 November 2006: The day Americans realized corruption and incompetence weren't addressing 11 September 2001
    12. Re:No Tron for me... by Storm+Damage · · Score: 3, Funny

      Disney may offer benefits to gay folks, but they have more than their share of employee abuses. For instance, this fall, thousands of Disney employees in the Orlando area had their workweek cut significantly short, and had their pay reduced to match. Middle management and the labor force have routinely been screwed over the years since Eisner took over, while the share price has gone through the roof, and Eisner has pulled hundreds of millions a year in bonuses and option compensation.

      Disney is one of the most piggish and corrupt corporations around these days, and like you said, they are EXTREMELY hard to boycott. To do so effectively, one would have to avoid all of its business outlets (including possibly all advertisers on its media outlets)

      For instance, In addition to the Disney-labeled media outlets, Disney owns over 19 TV networks including ESPN, A&E, the History Channel, Lifetime, E! and Fox Family; 6 magazines like US Weekly and Discover; 6 movie studios including Touchstone Pictures, Hollywood Pictures, Miramax, Dimension and Buena Vista International; 50 Radio stations; 9 resorts; 5 book publishers, including Hyperion, Talk Miramax, and ABC Daytime Press; 2 sports teams (Anaheim Mighty Ducks and Anaheim Angels); and lots of other businesses, including 4 large theatrical productions, a Broadway theatre, 741 Disney Stores and the Disney catalogue, tons of licensing deals of characters for clothes, toys, teaching aides and videos/films for schools...as well as stakes in NFL.com and Movies.com and the 4900-acre town of Celebration, Florida.

      Oh, that's just it's media holdings. Who knows what else they've got investments in.

      Even if you successfully avoid exposure to Disney-sponsored entertainment (a herculean task), it's nearly impossible to get widespread success with this, and you'll still be buying products from companies that advertise through Disney.

      Basically, it goes like this:

      Disney: I OWN J00

      You: WHAT YOU SAY!

      Disney: T4KE 1T!

    13. Re:No Tron for me... by Shadow99_1 · · Score: 2

      good point, I forgot about that one... But I was trying to point out some of their more hiden & lesser known ventures first...

      --
      we are all invisible unless we choose otherwise
  21. Re:If this was AICN I'd be first by Flounder · · Score: 2
    What?? Are you saying you wouldn't want to interact with programs as people??

    User, you've got some 'splaining to do!

    Of course, those are just from my earlier spaghetti code years, not now. No way.

    --

    No boom today. Boom tomorrow. There's always a boom tomorrow. - Cmdr. Susan Ivanova

  22. I hope Tron 2.0 doesn't suck. by Aexia · · Score: 2

    It'd be interesting to see what the computer program inside are like now. Would they have multiple personalities because of all the people involved? Would open source programs be transparent?

    Is the MCP still around, only he's calling himself Windows?

    1. Re:I hope Tron 2.0 doesn't suck. by sharkey · · Score: 2

      and the MCP is an MCP (Microsoft Certified Professional) now

      Ahh. Minesweeper Deathmatch.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  23. Problem with the first disc by Lord+Javac · · Score: 5, Informative

    I was really excited about this edition and bought it shortly after its release. Unfortunately, there is a flaw in the disc which makes it unplayable on a PS2. In the eighth scene, during a conversation in the holding cell, there as a graphic error that causes a PS2 to totally flip out. Fortunately for everyone with a real DVD player, this is a small enough glitch to go unnoticed on all but the PS2. I did try returning the disc, but the replacement had the exact same flaw and when I took it back again, they guy at the store said there had been complaints at other stores.

    The movie is great, if you can get it to play, and the special features are nice. My favorite part of the disc is the menus. I will try purchasing this edition again when either Sony updates their DVD drivers to address issues like this or Disney re-issues the disc with a new master (to remove the flaw).

    --

    End of Line
    1. Re:Problem with the first disc by Dimensio · · Score: 2

      Did you try this with both the original PS2 DVD drivers and the "updated" ones that came with the official Sony remote, or did you not have both available?

    2. Re:Problem with the first disc by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 2
      Unfortunately, there is a flaw in the disc which makes it unplayable on a PS2.

      The top-level menu is widescreen (16x9) formatted, but plays in 4x3 on my DVD player, so you only see part of the picture. Of course, the highlight graphics when you select items are in 4x3, so they don't line up with the images behind them. Shows up on my Samsung 7something, but plays fine on the cheapo Apex player we got my parents for Xmas.

      The second disc is fine, though...

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
    3. Re:Problem with the first disc by ElrondHubbard · · Score: 3, Informative

      Really? I have an original Apex AD600A player, and the goldurned thing won't recognize the anamorphic flag on this movie - I end up with tall-skinny-Boxleitneritis. If I want to watch it in the correct aspect ratio, I have to use my computer because there's no way to override it on the Apex. It's probably time to replace the thing anyway. It was a good deal when it was new, but it really is cheap - it overheats, it won't handle seamless branching correctly, and various other problems as well.

      Certain DVDs incorporate widescreen menus - _Tron_ is one, _Gladiator_ is another. It uses the pan-and-scan flag to tell the player to zoom in on the menu image when playing on a 4:3 display. These menus usually don't have actual selectable menu items on the sides which would get cut off, just extra background image. It sounds like your Samsung isn't getting the pan-and-scan flag right. (This flag was supposed to enable anamorphic DVDs to act like cropped discs so that both crowds could be pleased by the same disc, but a lot of players don't seem to get this right.)

      My favourite part of the extras on this disc is when someone describes generating animation frames by hand. He actually had to write down the camera coordinates on paper - six spatial and angle coordinates each for hundreds of consecutive frames - to be manually input into the system that rendered the images, because apparently there was no mutually compatible storage medium (floppy discs, etc) between the system they used and the rendering system! Compare that to, say, _Monsters Inc._ - talk about stone knives and bearskins...

      --
      "The deep-fried Mars bar is a symptom of a wider crisis." -- Nutritionist Ann Ralph, on the Scottish diet
  24. Tron2k - Tron Killer App by Flamesplash · · Score: 3, Informative

    Keep an eye out for the new tron movie.

    http://us.imdb.com/Title?0208650

    I don't see how this can't be a total flop, given historical sequals/remakes of classics, but we can hope.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
    1. Re:Tron2k - Tron Killer App by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, when Steven wrote the first Tron, he was a young(ish) man writing about himself and his own fascination with computer graphics and their potentiol in the real world and in movie making. The characters were all about his age, young(ish) adults, but (as the other posts attest to) the movie was readily acessable to kids as well as adults (He made the movie FOR adults).

      Now Steve is an old man and is helping to write the new one which stars young kids. I'm very afraid that it'll be nothing more than a typical kids disney film with virtually zero adult interest. and ironicly probably even less kid interest than the old one.

      --
      Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    2. Re:Tron2k - Tron Killer App by sharkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Rumor has it that Jeff Bridges will reprise his role as Flynn. The character is supposedly retreated fully into cyberspace.

      www.tronkillerapp.com is the official website for the movie. Just a single Flash applet.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  25. dododo dododoDO DOOODOOO DOOOO DOOOO by somethingwicked · · Score: 2
    Not only was the movie cool, but for 3 years it was the only movie my family had on VHS...


    We were living in England and something about the formats was different over there...luckily a friends dad had a GIANT tape collection but it was all on BETA!!! So my dad went over and dubbed Tron but never got a round to anything else...

    That music haunts me sometimes though...

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

  26. I want this, but I won't buy it. by Bonker · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Man, I loved TRON so much when I was a kid. Besides seeing the movie and renting the VHS cassette over and over again, I pumped dozens of dollars into TRON and DISCS of TRON game machines.

    When I first heard that TRON was going to get a SE DVD I was ecstatic. Then I remembered who produced TRON. I remembered the fight in congress to introduce the SSSCA, which has been largely fueled by that same company.

    So, thank you, Disney, for giving me a wonderful experience in my youth. Thanks, but no thanks, for the TRON SE DVD. I won't spend my money to help a company that wants to surgically remove my rights to do what I want to with my computer or any media I buy.

    If you have any feeling at all about the SSSCA don't spend your money on the TRON SE DVD.

    --
    The next Slashdot story will be ready soon, but subscribers can beat the rush and slashdot the links early!
    1. Re:I want this, but I won't buy it. by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      I actually broke down and bought the DVD at Costco. My wife and kids never seen it, so I had to buy it.

      Then I ripped it, and encoded it with Divx5 and the AC3 audio stream, just a couple CDs, very nice. Humm, lucky I don't have broadband, I might put it on gnutella. (-;
      -
      quote removed by RIAA copyright control via .net architecture

    2. Re:I want this, but I won't buy it. by ElrondHubbard · · Score: 2

      Buy a used copy - Disney won't see a cent of your money. Of course, you could construe this as an indirect subsidy or endorsement, if you'd a mind to... Just a suggestion.

      --
      "The deep-fried Mars bar is a symptom of a wider crisis." -- Nutritionist Ann Ralph, on the Scottish diet
  27. Re:TRON SE by Sc00ter · · Score: 2
    There was a release of Tron on DVD when DVDs first started coming out, but they later pulled it pending the release of the new edition.


    It's still available here.

  28. Please buy by r_j_prahad · · Score: 5, Funny

    Everybody must buy this DVD, even if it won't play in your region. Michael Eisner and Jack Valenti need all the money they can get to combat evil movie pirates.

    Just trying to burn off karma.

  29. Re:I'm sorry by The+Original+Bobski · · Score: 2

    but that movie was never any good. "Ooo a movie about computers!" Puh-lease. That doesn't make up for a weak plot and bad acting. If this movie was released now-days with up-to-date effects, it would bomb badly

    You obviously never experienced it in all it's glorious theatrical release.

    The Geek factor alone, at the time, made it worth sitting through three times in a row. It was a world previously experienced only by SIGGRAPH attendees, and only then in 10 minute shorts.

    This movie was that world delivered to the masses, Drooling Geeks, included. And we loved it!

    --
    satire, n: 1) witty language used to convey insults or scorn; 2) a form of humor lost on most slashdot moderators.
  30. Re:TRON SE by Tebriel · · Score: 2

    Doh! Of course, I'm now very upset that I missed out on it.

    --
    The Blaster Master Fighting for Truth, Justice, and Evil Pie since 1979
  31. And is the video anamorphic? by Dimensio · · Score: 3, Informative

    I'll avoid the natural comments about Disney and the MPAA and SSSCA and all that crap and address the review.

    This is kind of a minor nitpick for a rant, but someone has to bring it up.

    One of the common elements in DVD reviews that I read is whether or not the video is anamorphic. For some viewers -- especially those with TVs that can take advantage of the enhanced resolution -- that is an issue. Whenever a widescreen DVD is reviewed it should be noted whether or not the video is anamorphic, I've refused to purchase discs because of that issue.

    BTW, the video, from what I've read, is anamorphic -- though Disney in the past was notorious about only releasing "letterbox" movies in 4:3, not 16:9.

    1. Re:And is the video anamorphic? by denzo · · Score: 2

      Short answer here: Yes, it's 2.20:1 anamorphic. And it's THX certified to boot.

  32. Re: Real Life Tron scene by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    I've partaken in both of these things. Somehow I managed not to kill myself? Then why do I need little plastic plugs in all of the outlets for kids these days?

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  33. Soundtrack is out too by NetRanger · · Score: 2, Informative
    Admit it -- you like the music. The soundtrack is now on CD for the first time too, to coincide with the 20th Anniversary release. The composer has some really interesting notes on how it was nearly lost forever until it was baked. Yes, baked, as in an oven.

    It makes for a fascinating story, especially considering the future of classic works -- will they be lost forever when the media disintegrates?

    --
    -- We live in a world where lemonade is artificial and soap has real lemon.
  34. Re: Real Life Tron scene by JWW · · Score: 4, Informative

    The really neat thing about the Jai Alai scene is that Flynn's competitor Pete Jurasick the same guy who would go on to play Londo Mollari in Babylon 5. It really hard to recognize him without Londo's trademark hair.

  35. Electical outlet plugs by somethingwicked · · Score: 3, Funny
    Then why do I need little plastic plugs in all of the outlets for kids these days?

    OBVIOUSLY, to avoid having little 2 year old "lit-up" Tron re-enactors.

    Turn off the lights and the kids glow as they fly across the room


    ZZhhCK. "Mommy!"

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

  36. TRON memories by vrmlguy · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I saw TORN in the theaters when it came out in '82, and I still recall how for weeks afterward my geeky friends and I would say "Greetings, program!" when we saw each other on the street.

    I bought the 20th anniversary edition the day it cam out, and watched it that night with my 17 year-old son and a buddy of mine. I've got a 36" screen (non-projection) TV, and normally like to watch with some lights on in the room, but I made an exception for this viewing, and it was well worth it. The TRON universe, for those out of the loop, is *black*, with the only light being provided by the inhabitants. It was visually stunning in a dark theater 20 years ago, and it was equally so in my dark living room.

    As for the CGI, I was a regular attendee at SIGGRAPH in the early '80s, and I think I recall seeing some previews of the movie's special effects. Of course, as is pointed out in the "making of ..." feature, this was before it was called "CGI". I was doing a far amount of computer modeling back then (which is why I was at all those SIGGRAPH's), so several other parts of the "making of ..." feature resonated with me. At one point they talk about running a program to calculate a trajectory, getting a printout, and then reading it over the phone to someone on the other side of the country who was entering the numbers into a computer at their end. Speaking as someone who once or twice did something similar, that doesn't just make you appreciate the Internet, it makes you appreciate modems!

    BTW, there is one complaint that I have with the "making of ..." feature. There aren't any chapters! The show is divided into three sections, but there's no way to skip directly to any of them.

    The review doesn't mention it, but the 2nd DVD also has a couple of deleted scenes. While just about everyone interviewed says that, in retrospect, they wish the scenes had stayed in, I have to say that I agree with the decision that was made at the time. The "love scene" doesn't add anything to the plot, and in fact undercuts the later scene where Flynn kisses Yori.

    Finally, there's one other surprise on the DVD. These days, most DVD's start with a "Coming Attractions" bit that you have to skip over. This one starts with something that looks and sounds at first glance like the standard Disney previews, except that it says "Coming soon from the scret lab". What follows strongly hints that TRON 2.0 is in productions. I can hardly wait!

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
    1. Re:TRON memories by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2

      I saw TORN in the theaters when it came out in '82, and I still recall how for weeks afterward my geeky friends and I would say "Greetings, program!" when we saw each other on the street.

      My wife and I still greet each other that way sometimes.

      Our poor children...

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
    2. Re:TRON memories by Sabalon · · Score: 2

      Wasn't TORN the comeback (no pun intended) film for Ginger Lynn Allen?

  37. A classic geek movie by Jack+Admiral · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I liked this movie when it first came out because of the (then) high-tech graphics. The problem was, being only 12 at the time, and having just bought my first computer (a 16K TRS-80 color computer), I couldn't yet understand some of the concepts being presented in the movie. (What the hell was an I/O port?) Imagine what other, non-geek type people must have felt about the movie.

    Now, after having used computers for 20 years, earning a living through computers, and after being exposed to the current 3D games and movie SFX, I realize just how dated the graphics seem now but which probably cost a lot to render back then.

    The pacing of the movie is a little slow and will bore people especially if they don't have an affinity for computers. I like computers but I just couldn't wait to see the next scene. They could have sped it up a bit instead of dwelling on one particular area in order to present, fully, the computer world.

    I like the girl in the movie though and I can now understand the concepts fully. I love this movie very much because it brings me back to those days of yesteryear when computing was so much simpler. and there still was so much to discover and to explore. This ranks up there with War Games (with Matthew Broderick).

    There was an old BASIC command that I used to type just to get the feeling that I was bringing TRON to life. The command was TRON (TRacer ON). TROFF did the opposite which was to turn the TRacer OFF. This basically just listed the number of the program line that was being executed at that moment.

    I'll recommend to my rich brother to buy the DVD so I can watch it too.

    1. Re:A classic geek movie by magic · · Score: 2
      One of the saddest moments in my life was when I accidentally hit F4 follwed by F5 in BASIC, which causes it to execute


      SAVE "TRON


      Which, though bizarre (because of the lack of a close quote), was legal in BASIC and caused it to overwrite my first 3D game (Tron, of course) with an empty file. Fortunately, I didn't decide to throw in the towel on 3D, but I did can the Tron project because it was too emotionally painful to rewrite after the loss.


      -m

  38. Walter/Wendy Carlos' later career is such a pity.. by emil · · Score: 2

    Of course, as a youth I really enjoyed Switched on Bach (I even have the double CD set of Switched on Brandenburgs in my car right now). It's amazing that she was a personal friend of the Moog family.

    However, when I consider her later work (Digital Moonscapes, Beauty in the Beast, and even the Tron soundtrack), I see unrealized potential. I think that the recent "Switched on Bach 2000" is really sad from this perspective. My favorite piece that she actually composed herself was "Country Lane" from her Clockwork Orange soundtrack (I love the Dies Irea theme; I wish that she'd had more time to work on this score).

    I don't know much about her decision to get a sex change, but sometimes I wonder what sort of an effect that had upon her musical output.

    Still, AFAIK, Switched on Bach was the hottest-selling classical music album of all time...

  39. Poll idea by lightspawn · · Score: 2

    Fun as it is to watch President Sheridan as a young geek who 'invented' Space Paranoids...

    The poll I'd like to see: Considering the MPAA continued attacks on freedom, and the region coding/Macrovision issues, would you like slashdot to cover American DVD releases or not?

    1. Re:Poll idea by lightspawn · · Score: 2

      Corrected we stand. It was several years since I've seen it.

      At least they 'invented' games, not 'discovered' them.

  40. Who knows? by mblase · · Score: 2

    I guess the "grid bugs" were just mentioned to explain why they couldn't afford to jump out of their simulation/ship when they got attacked a few minutes later. But yeah, it would've been nice to see them mentioned more than once.

    I have a bigger problem with "Bit", personally. It hangs around Flynn's program at the start of the film. Then it hangs around Flynn. At no point does it offer useful advice to either one. And then it's gone, poof. Why was it even there? Probably just to make the movie look cooler or more "computer-like". *shrug*

    1. Re:Who knows? by bakes · · Score: 2

      Bit was OK, but the problem I had with it was that it had three states. It had the 'yes' and 'no', but it also had a kind of 'neutral' state as well. Maybe it hung around Flynn because it was actually from an early prototype trinary computer and was lost?

      --
      Ho! Haha! Guard! Turn! Parry! Dodge! Spin! Ha! Thrust!
  41. Tron 2.0 Scoop! by indole · · Score: 5, Interesting
    From the Coming Attractions page:

    "At the start of the Tron 20th anniversary menu screen, a cryptic promo is seen. After several moments of watching 80's computer graphics and designs (looking as if they're straight out of the original Tron movie) flash over a rolling timeline, the promo ends on the year 2003 and a web address flashes on the screen: www.tronkillerapp.com.

    When you go visit that website you're given the impression that you have entered a restricted site by accident. A multiple answer question prompts you for your "Level 6" security clearance. Regardless of the answer you select, you are then taken to a screen where you appear to receive a communique from somebody trapped in the system:

    Please...I need your help
    System wide failure imminent
    Must destroy system corruption Will continue contact shortly
    Do not believe their lies

    We've checked the WHOIS registration for www.tronkillerapp.com and it's owned by Buena Vista. If that doesn't convince you this is some kind of viral marketing idea for Tron 2.0, nothing will."

    --
    (2,3-Benzopyrrole)
    1. Re:Tron 2.0 Scoop! by omega9 · · Score: 2

      Well, someone is paying heavy attention to access to that site. Hitting that site causes tronkillerapp.com and hitbox.com to attempt to lay *seven* different cookies, high considering there are no adverts on that page.

      Once you answer the question, it attempts to lay *nine* more cookies, and still no adverts. Aurgueable, of course, that the whole site is an advert, but 16 cookies means somebody is extremely interested.

      --
      I'm against picketing, but I don't know how to show it.
  42. Wow! I'm a science fiction fan but I... by SIGFPE · · Score: 2

    ...hated this film. It's almost as bad as Last Starfighter - but at least that had real CG.

    --
    -- SIGFPE
  43. Re:I'm sorry by gmezero · · Score: 2, Informative

    Actually, Tron did bomb in the theaters when it first came out... and I'll tell you why. It came out the same time as E.T.

    I personally went and saw Tron by myself while my parents took my little sister to see E.T. (which I never bothered to see in the theaters), and I never regretted it.

  44. It's Disney's fault. by Jakobud · · Score: 2, Informative

    Yes, there are problems with Tron in the PS2. I work for SCEA and talked to our hardware guys about this problem. They contacted Disney to find out what the problem was and found out that even though Disney had PS2's to test their DVD's on, they forgot to test them...so basically Tron is jacked up on the PS2. Stupid Disney.

    Jakobud

  45. Re:The CG was great for it's time - Jim Sachs by ashitaka · · Score: 2, Informative

    A very talented artist. I was always amazed at what could be produced at 320x200x32. Note, that's 32 colours, not 32k!

    A portfolio of his work is here.

    The women in your life will love these gifts [blatent plug link]

    Nah, they'll like these better. :-)

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  46. You're kidding right? by somethingwicked · · Score: 2
    Bit was there for two reasons:

    First, it was the logical personification of a computer concept: a "bit" that can only say yes or no. How can you NOT put that in a movie based in a computer world?

    Second, comedic value. You can argue if you like if it was funny, but no doubt it tried to be. I can still hear the little guy "NONONONONO" as Flynn crashes his way around

    --

    ---"What did I say that sounded like 'Tell me about your day?'"---

  47. Spoilers? by erasmus_ · · Score: 2

    I read the whole (short) review, but where exactly are there spoilers in here, especially from the 3rd act of the movie? The review devotes only a few short sentences to the plot itself, and in most generic of terms. Almost everyone knows the basic premise of this movie, so this does not give anything away. Usually I appreciate the warning about spoilers, but here it's hardly necessary, as no details about the outcome are revealed, or any successes/failures of any of the characters.

    --
    Please subscribe to see the more insightful version of th
    1. Re:Spoilers? by Dr.+Manhattan · · Score: 2
      The review devotes only a few short sentences to the plot itself, and in most generic of terms.

      Hell, the commentary audio track on the DVD barely mentions the plot! It's the producers and directors chatting about how they did this or that effect, the problems they had with the film, or the management, or the locations, etc.

      This is probably because the plot is barely there to begin with... the movie is a showpiece, driven by the technology (backlit animation and computer graphics), not because the story needed to be told.

      --
      PHEM - party like it's 1997-2003!
  48. The Gospel According to Tron by Tin+Weasil · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Flynn=Jesus Christ

    According to the New Testament, Jesus was God... then he became Human so that through his sacrifice, all mankind would be saved.

    According to Tron, Flynn was a User... then he became a Program, and by his sacrifice, all the user-created Programs were "saved".

    Was this parallel on deliberate, or simply coincidental?

    1. Re:The Gospel According to Tron by btempleton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's even deeper than that, but it's a mishmash of some other religions too. For example, it is panthiestic, and there are many users, both good and bad, who are equal in the higher world.

      TRON is sort of a John the Baptist predicting the coming of Flynn, but he has his own user, and provides a key tool in the defeat of the evil one.

      Also particularly telling is the scene where Flynn "dies" after performing a miracle and then comes back to life.

      But the theme of the gods, who created the world, incarnating and acting in it, performing miracles etc., is certainly a deliberate religious theme. Not that the writers were trying to push a religion, I think, it's just a classic story.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    2. Re:The Gospel According to Tron by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      > TRON is sort of a John the Baptist predicting the coming of Flynn, but he has his own user,
      > and provides a key tool in the defeat of the evil one.

      But then Bob wanted his keytool back.

      Chris Mattern
      "Glitch, BS'n'P!"

    3. Re:The Gospel According to Tron by btempleton · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The users are independent. Each program seems to have its own personal user, and appears to us as looking like that user. In addition, we have evil users of equal power to Flynn.

      And of course we have MCP. MCP has no user. Sark is the character with an evil user. MCP has power in the real world as well as the system. There's nothing like this in the Christ story, but there are such beings in other mythologies.

      In the Christ story, Jesus is the incarnation of the soul of god on our plane. Flynn however is just an ordinary mortal on our plane, if a smart one.

      --
      Has it been over a year since you last donated to the Electronic Frontier Foundation
    4. Re:The Gospel According to Tron by grammar+fascist · · Score: 2

      But the theme of the gods, who created the world, incarnating and acting in it, performing miracles etc., is certainly a deliberate religious theme.

      IIRC, Sark actually calls belief in the Users a religion.

      I need to watch it again.

      --
      I got my Linux laptop at System76.
  49. Oh, GREAT.... by Midnight+Ryder · · Score: 2

    If you don't like the DVD, you can recreate your own deadly 'Discs of Tron' game in real life!

    Oh, great. See what you just made me do? I'm now having to waste my time playing Deadly Disks of Tron on MAME rather than work on writing the next game...

    --

    Davis Ray Sickmon, Jr - looking for something to read? Check out my three free novels at MidnightRyder.org

  50. Deleted Scenes by freakinPsycho · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Damnit, the one thing that bothers me about DVDs including deleted scenes is that you are seeing them completely out of context.

    DVDs need the option of viewing the deleted scenes as part of the movie. I've seen it done (once, I think) and it was a lot of fun.

    Take your favorite movie DVD and picture the option of viewing the extra scenes as part of the movie so it's seamless.

    Maybe I just ask for too much...

    --
    "All the things I really like to do are either immoral, illegal, or fattening."
    - Alexandar Woolcot
  51. 99% by ceswiedler · · Score: 2

    "ratings 2-8 encompass 99% of films."

    So in Plot Originality, Visual Impression, and Film Transfer, the DVD is better than 995 out of 1000 other DVDs (at least, I suppose his scale must be logarithmic or exponential?)

    Sounds a little high.

    1. Re:99% by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      Exactly my thought. I doubt the reviewer has seen more than 20 films in his whole life. When he can talk about the Spartacus references in Tron, I'll be more impressed.

  52. That's right folks... by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2, Insightful
    ... Do your part for Disney's political contributions for SSSCA and for the MPAA by running right out and buying this.

    Sometimes I think the geek worldview would depress me if it weren't so f*cking pathetic I had to laugh...

    --
    That is all.
  53. TRON didn't get any Oscars by gevmage · · Score: 2, Informative

    One of Steven Lisberger's (writer/director of TRON) constant beefs is that TRON didnt' even get nominated for any Academy awards.

    So no, I don't think that's true.

    Sorry.

    --
    Craig Steffen
    http://www.craigsteffen.net
  54. Tron 2.0 (Sequel information and possible spoiler) by rtos · · Score: 2
    Anytime someone mentions Tron, everyone is quick to mention the upcoming sequel. Coming Attractions has some spoilers on Tron 2.0 that I will ruthlessly blockquote below:
    ---BEGIN SPOILER---
    Jeff Bridges character does play a Colonel Kurtz-like character now permanently in cyberspace. The script also features a cyberspace ghetto where all of the obsolete software and videogame characters go when no one uses them anymore. This project had been cold for quite some time until recently, when Disney execs were surprised to learn of the strength of advanced sales for the 20th anniversary DVD going on sale next month (and which may be the best DVD ever produced by Disney). As a result, the sequel has apparently gained momentum as of late. Glimpses of pre-production material for Tron 2.0 will appear on the DVD."
    ---END SPOILER---
    For those wondering, Kurtz is from Apocalypse Now (1979) where:
    "Burnt out Captain Willard is sent into the jungle with orders to find and kill Colonel Kurtz who has set up his own army within the jungle. As he descends into the jungle he is slowly over taken by the jungles mesmerizing powers and the battles and insanity which surround him. His crew begins to succumbs to drugs and are slowly killed off one by one. As Willard continues his journey he begins to become more and more like the man he was sent to kill."

    There is also some good info here as well, but it's mostly a rehash of other sites. Surprisingly UpcomingMovies.com doesn't appear to have any info on this.

    --
    -- null
  55. Re:Anamorphic == "Enhanced for Widescreen TVs" by Dimensio · · Score: 2

    I did a word search to see if you'd used any terms mentioning the 16:9 ratio of the presentation, and I either mistyped or forgot to search for "widescreen". My apologies.

    I am aware of "anamorphic" lenses -- a clear sign of them is when lens flares are oval rather than circular -- but it's become so common to refer to 16:9 presentation on DVD movies as "anamorphic" that it's just another definition of the word to me.

  56. No kidding by Perianwyr+Stormcrow · · Score: 2

    There is nothing wrong with giving credit where credit is due as far as the classic nature of Tron goes- but I have no interest in supporting the Empire any more than I'm forced to.

    --

    What we call folk wisdom is often no more than a kind of expedient stupidity.-Edward Abbey

  57. Re: Tron, a bad movie? by King_TJ · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I felt a little bit of that when I saw it for the first time. I was very interested in computers back then (even if all I had was a Timex Sinclair 1000 and 16K RAM expansion pack). I found it just a little too much that we're supposed to believe that inside a computer is all of this "life", and that you could somehow be beamed into that world to explore it as a person.

    I saw it again, not that long ago, on satellite though - and I found it sort of enjoyable. I think it's old enough now that it's easier to smile at it, call it a "classic", and appreciate the advances we've made in computer graphics since then - while still realizing all the work that went into producing it.

    Sometimes you just have to "let go" of reality enough to enjoy a movie or a book, and not let believability get in the way. I think this is something it took me a long time to come to terms with, as generally - I prefer movies to tell stories that are fathomable and believable, even if "far fetched".

  58. MCC password by evenprime · · Score: 2, Funny
    Finally after 20 years I've found the other people who like TRON as much as I do.

    I loved that flick, but was amazed at the amount of detail some people can recall. One year at defcon a jeopardy question was "what was the password for the master control computer in TRON"....I was amazed that someone in the crowd actually knew it was "reindeer flotilla"

    --

    "Weapons should be hardy rather than decorative" - Miyamoto Musashi
    I think that goes for OS's too
  59. Re: Real Life Tron scene by cpt+kangarooski · · Score: 2

    A 'Thundertree' huh? Sounds good, I guess, but when I was growing up, I just went over to the municipal thunderdome.

    --
    -- This and all my posts are in the public domain. I am a lawyer. I am not your lawyer, and this is not legal advice.
  60. Re:Most DVD start with a coming attactions bit? by vrmlguy · · Score: 2

    Well, I've got a four-year-old, so my buying habits are a bit biased. That said, everything that we own from Disney starts off with a "Coming Attractions", as do, I think, many of the other animated features we have for her. I want to say that some others do to, but I'd have to go home to check.

    --
    Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  61. Re:Association for legitimate integers by denzo · · Score: 2

    It's 2.20:1 because the whole movie (both "real world" and "computer world" scenes) were shot in 65mm, the quality of which you can really notice on the real world scenes.

  62. Re: Real Life Tron scene by dswensen · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I had "Thundertree" once. I was in the toilet nearly the whole day.

  63. The Wizard of... Tron by Dirtside · · Score: 2

    Has anyone else noticed how similar Tron was to The Wizard of Oz?

    - The main character is transported into a strange, magical world.
    - Many of the people in the other world look like people in the real world.
    - The characters journey along a golden path (yellow brick road in Oz, the gold power beam the Solar Sailer moves along in Tron).
    - The villains have flying beasts to do their dirty work (flying monkeys vs. Recognizers).
    - There's a big, powerful wizard figure at the end of the road, but he's ultimately just a little old man hiding behind smoke and mirrors.
    - The wizard has the power to send the hero(ine) back to the real world.

    Freaky eh?

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  64. Re:Most definately a MUST-PASS. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2
    I agree with your principles, but ultimately they're doomed. Because it is very very unlikely that a critical mass of people will get on this bandwagon. Especially geeks - geeks are such anti-joiners, that as soon as they hear that 2 people had done something, they will immediately go to work to explain why they won't be the third.

    The real solution is to get one's political hands dirty, to do civil disobedience (and be willing to go the course) or to participate in lobbying efforts. Not buying DVD's isn't going to do much.

  65. Re:I admit the Geekness should have been higher by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

    And the other aspects - plot, for example - much lower. 4, maybe. 3, even. It was a *bad* script. *Bad.* The storyline got soggy towards the end, and the dialogue was cringe-worthy.

    As a visual piece though, and in terms of art direction, it was ground-breaking, of course.

  66. Too Good by Max+von+H. · · Score: 2

    I remember seeing Tron in a theater, when it originally came out. I was a little kid then, and it *really* impressed me to the point I *knew* I wanted to do stuff with computers later. I think it had a bigger influence on me than WarGames or any other movies of the kind.

    Yeah, Tron turned me into a geek when computers were still a curiosity where I lived back then... People gave me eerie looks, really. After all, I suppose I'd be equally (well, not quite) puzzled if an 8-year old kid came to me and started talking about pretty much unknown technology...

    It'll be a pleasure watching it again! Sure beats Starfighter...

    /max

    --
    -- It's always darker before it goes pitch black.
  67. Re:Rating system Meaning by Apotsy · · Score: 2
    Hey dude, thanks for the review.

    By the way, you're probably one of only a handful people on Slashdot who is aware of 5-perf 70mm 6-track. I was just a kid when Tron was release, and it was actually the first time I became aware of 70mm. In later years, I would refuse to go see big summer movies unless I could find a place that was showing them in 70mm. Fortunately, that was very common where I lived in those days, and I believe I was often able to go for months if not a whole year at a time without ever seeing a movie in 35mm.

    Boy do I miss those days. I recently saw the 70mm re-release of "2001", and it was the first 5-perf 70mm print I'd seen in years. The way things are going, I may never get to see another one... :-(