Slashdot Mirror


Yahoo Knows Best, Resets Users' Marketing Prefs

Anonymous Coward writes ""Yahoo is pulling a good one on everyone. As a matter of some changes on their system, they have kindly reset everyone's marketing preferences. So,when you signed into Yahoo for a Yahoo ID, you were given a chance to set what sort of notices you wanted yahoo advertisers to send to you, well, they just set EVERYTHING to Yes for you. The poster was kind enough to include instructions on how to turn these settings back. In related news, we've signed you all up for a /. newsletter! (I am so just kidding.) To change this...

Go to your Account Information screen (for each and every ID you have) and about mid screen you will see "Edit Your Marketing Preferences" link. Click on it and set them back to the way you want them, otherwise get ready for *LOTS* of advertising spam type emails from Yahoo's advertisers. Note also at the bottom, that you will be marked YES for 'By US Mail' and 'By Phone' as well."

In additional Yahoo News, smagruder writes: "Starting today, I noticed that Yahoo! stopped forwarding my mail and when I go to setup/change the POP Access/Forwarding settings, they display a page for me to give them money to get my mail forwarding back. The issue: In their recent widely distributed press release, Yahoo! said that this all would start on April 24, NOT March 28!"

Update: 03/29 20:24 GMT by J : Yes, of course Yahoo is a TrustE customer. For a small fee, TrustE certifies: "You can edit your Yahoo! Account Information, including your marketing preferences, at any time." Isn't that great? I can edit my marketing preferences that I had no reason to know existed! Thanks, TrustE!

Update: 04/07 11:54 GMT by J : Nine days later, Yahoo notified me that these preferences existed:

From: Yahoo! <yahoo_privacy@reply.yahoo.com>
To: [me]
Subject: Message from Yahoo! about changes to our Privacy Policy and your Marketing Preferences

[...]

In order to keep you up to date about our many new products
and services and how they might be of use to you, we have
created a new Marketing Preferences page

http://subscribe.yahoo.com/showaccount

within the Account Information area. It is designed to make
it easier for you to manage the marketing communications
you receive from Yahoo! and ensure you get the latest
relevant information to meet your needs. We have reset your
marketing preferences and, unless you decide to change
these preferences, you may begin receiving marketing messages
from Yahoo! about ways to enhance your Yahoo! experience,
including special offers and new features. Your new marketing
preferences will not take effect until 60 days after the date
of this mailing so you have plenty of time to decide what you
want to receive and what you don't. To change your
preferences, go to the Marketing Preferences page.

155 of 473 comments (clear)

  1. Illegal? by alwayslurking · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Anyone care to comment on the US legality of signing people up to snail mail, telemarketing lists after they've explicitly opted out? Seems very dubious to me.

    1. Re:Illegal? by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Laws on telemarketing lists most likely do not apply here. In a strictly legal sense, Yahoo could be considered an opt-in list since you explicitly and voluntarily signed up for the service. Because of that, they can do with your account on their servers as they wish. On the other hand, laws governing opt-out lists work because you never voluntarily signed up on a telemarketer's calling list.

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    2. Re:Illegal? by czardonic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Didn't you hear? We need more commerce to strengthen our economy. The least you could do is pay attention to the urgent commercial updates that are painstakenly assembled for you by patriotic marketing operations. What, with all the human effort and natural resources devoted to these campaigns, the least you could do is read them. Would it absolutely kill you to buy something you don't need or want once in a while?

      --
      Takahashi Rumiko made beats! DON, taku, DON, taku. . .
    3. Re:Illegal? by SquadBoy · · Score: 2, Informative

      Yes the laws about telemarkting *do* apply. When I signed up for an email account I told them not to call me or give my info to others in short I did in fact opt out. They have now put me on a telemarkting list after I told them to take me off and in fact to never put me there in the first place. It very much does apply.

      --

      Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
    4. Re:Illegal? by Fastolfe · · Score: 2

      I agree to an extent in that they're free to do whatever they want with the information you've given them, provided they don't break their own written policies or other contractual agreements that you might have made while signing up.

      If their privacy policy states that they won't give your information out if you ask them not to, then you definitely have grounds for action if they've gone ahead and done so.

      But if it doesn't, and there's nothing on the site that might imply that that is the case, then asking you what your preference is as far as marketing your personal information doesn't legally bind them to honoring that preference. It carries as much weight as a poll does.

      (Though I am not a lawyer.)

    5. Re:Illegal? by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 3, Funny

      Surely they can't retroactively change that agreement.

      Of course they can change the agreement. try to imagine dealing with Darth Vader in The Empire Strikes Back ("I have changed the conditions of our deal, pray that I do not change them again!") That's what all that fine print at the bottom of the contract is :) But seriously, you don't really believe any company adheres to its "privacy policy" do you? :)

      --
      In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    6. Re:Illegal? by coolgeek · · Score: 2

      Maybe this is Vixie's golden opportunity. RBL Yahoo? WOW! that'll cause an uproar.

      --

      cat /dev/null >sig
    7. Re:Illegal? by stienman · · Score: 3, Insightful

      No, the laws about telemarketing do NOT apply. You are signing up for an email service. Have you read their service agreement lately? If you never signed up for mail then normal telemarketing laws/regulations would apply, but since you signed up for their service you agreed to whatever they got you to agree to - including being able to change their service agreement and privacy policy without notice and at will.

      Oh - I forgot - you don't spend time reading those, do you?

      -Adam

    8. Re:Illegal? by dustman · · Score: 2, Funny
      Of course they can change the agreement. try to imagine dealing with Darth Vader in The Empire Strikes Back ("I have changed the conditions of our deal, pray that I do not change them again!") That's what all that fine print at the bottom of the contract is :) But seriously, you don't really believe any company adheres to its "privacy policy" do you? :)

      In fact, every company does adhere to its "privacy policy"! It's just that if you do read all the fine print, the privacy policy is "you have none. bitch."
    9. Re:Illegal? by parliboy · · Score: 2

      Two of the options are to have people contact me via telephone and snail mail. If I opted out of phone contacts, and they've opted me back in, is that a naughty?

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    10. Re:Illegal? by letxa2000 · · Score: 2
      This is Geek Central. You are not allowed to misquote Star Wars. ;-)

      Then your bad... Because he altered the "bargain", not the "deal". :)

  2. The Bright Side by pizen · · Score: 2

    The bright side of this is they also reset my info so that I would get all these offers sent to my Yahoo email account. All I use Yahoo for is Fantasy Baseball so they can spam that email account to their hearts' content.

    1. Re:The Bright Side by argStyopa · · Score: 2

      Ironically, I also use my Yahoo account for junkmail which is mostly filled with spam from -you guessed it- Yahoo.

      So how much of their purported 'traffic' is them sending email to themselves? Are their corporate reports audited by Arthur Anderson by any chance? Doesn't this mean that they'll choke on themselves, like some sort of reverse Ouroboros thingy?

      --
      -Styopa
  3. POP hasn't worked for about a week by cbull · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think they implemented the restriction on POP3 access a week or so ago. I emailed their support people and got a canned response. I replied to that, as directed, for more assistance. I got the same canned reply. Then I saw that they were going to start charging.

    I use this as my "junk" account, anyway, so it doesn't bother me too much. But it's annoying that they can (and will) change my preferences for me. What else are they changing (or monitoring) without my consent?

    1. Re:POP hasn't worked for about a week by Rich0 · · Score: 2, Informative
      I seem to be able to get POP3 access just fine still. Are you sure you didn't turn off access to Yahoo Delivers (an advertising service) when you set all your other marketing preferences to no?

      Yahoo only provides POP access if you agree to accept some spam as part of Yahoo Delivers. The yes/no setting for this is just under all the marketing preferences, and I'm guessing that turning it off will instantly block your POP3 connections.

  4. Civil Case? by Publicus · · Score: 2

    IANAL, but I wonder if there is an opportunity for a Class Action case here? Does Yahoo! have the right to do this?

    I must say, Yahoo! seems to have gone way downhill in the past year or two. I just don't even go there anymore.

    --

    My Karma was at 49, then they switched to words. All that work for nothing!

    1. Re:Civil Case? by cjpez · · Score: 3, Funny

      Yeah, why don't you go set that up? I'm sure that a judge will be just ecstatic to hear about how a bunch of people using a free service are upset at what the people providing the free service want to do with it. I'll sign up just as soon as I can . . .

    2. Re:Civil Case? by Monkelectric · · Score: 2

      Hey Im paying for yahoo's mail service.

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    3. Re:Civil Case? by cjpez · · Score: 2

      But is that just for a bigger Inbox? I'm guessing that you're still getting the basic service for free.

    4. Re:Civil Case? by Monkelectric · · Score: 2

      Actually Im paying for them to host a mail domain ... its actually a pretty good deal, you point your dns record at them, and they run a smtp server that delivers mail to your *yahoo mail* account. It costs them nothing, I pay them something, its a good deal for both of us :) Or was ... I think because I already had my domain registered it was only 20$ a year for 5 accounts.

      I tell ya what I would pay a for, the ability to remove the stupid yahoo advertisements from the bottom of my emails (you can pay another 20$ a year to do this via pop3 but it dosen't effect your webmail).

      --

      Religion is a gateway psychosis. -- Dave Foley

    5. Re:Civil Case? by cjpez · · Score: 2

      Ah, well in that case, you're still not actually paying for the Yahoo mail itself, which is what's being affected by this.

    6. Re:Civil Case? by cjpez · · Score: 2

      No, Yahoo's giving you a free email service, and you're paying to have them host a DNS MX record for you . . . If you weren't paying them that money, you'd still have the Yahoo account; you just couldn't get to it using "whoever@mydomain.blah" Unless I've misunderstood, in which case you might just want to give up on me. :)

    7. Re:Civil Case? by cjpez · · Score: 2
      Right, many of you are paying for Yahoo services, but unless I'm mistaken, none of you are actually paying for the base email service. I hold again that if you're upset that Yahoo is using your "most valuable personal and financial information," then you've just made the serious mistake of trusting them with the information in the first place.

      As to the second point, it's entirely relevant. I haven't taken the time to read through the little internet agreement thing that you sign when getting your free email, but I'm guessing that if you did, they'd have some provisions that they would be able to change preferences like that.

      If they've got your info and you don't want them to, then it's your own fault.

  5. Re:Shit happens by mnordstr · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... and of course an ISP that doesn't block port 25... =)

  6. It wasn't explicit by drew_kime · · Score: 4, Informative

    Did yahoo send out an email telling everyone this had occured?

    You got an email saying that their privacy policy had been changed and to click a link to go review your personal settings. I just happened to notice the marketing ones. So they can plausibly argue (in court) if they have to that they did tell users to go review the settings.

    Or is this a marketing ploy of some sort?

    Well of course it is.

    --
    Nope, no sig
    1. Re:It wasn't explicit by UnifiedTechs · · Score: 2

      You got an email saying that their privacy policy had been changed and to click a link to go review your personal settings.

      Not everyone got such an E-mail, I belong to a large Yahoo group and one of our members posted to let us know, but Yahoo never sent us anything.

    2. Re:It wasn't explicit by i0lanthe · · Score: 2

      You got an email saying that their privacy policy had been changed
      Hm... I don't think I got one. Lucky thing I was reading /. today.

      --
      "The Crystal Wind is the Storm, and the Storm is Data, and the Data is Life"
  7. Re:Question... by rehannan · · Score: 2

    I didn't get anything... I just turned everything else off and made sure they had fake contact info.

  8. The right to spam? by 68030 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If yahoo is offering all of it's features as a
    free and publically accessable system, don't they
    have the right to do whatever they want with
    the default settings? Granted they due operate
    on the sole basis of being used, but I wouldn't
    get up in arms if something that I used for
    free just up and changed one day in some way
    that I didn't agree with. If it really has
    such a huge negative reaction from enough people
    then yahoo make other changes. However somehow
    i doubt that the hundreds of thousands of yahoo
    users are all in that slashdot mindset.

    there are alot of droids out there.

    1. Re:The right to spam? by A55M0NKEY · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are free to delete my account, change services, or do whatever they want to with the account which I admit is theirs because it is on their servers ( though if I am paying they should play by different rules ) But if I entrust them with my email address that is hosted on my ISP's mail servers which I pay for, and specifically opt out of their marketing lists, and they breach the terms under which I entrusted my email address to them by sending me spam, then they ought to be sued.

      --

      Eat at Joe's.

    2. Re:The right to spam? by inkswamp · · Score: 2, Interesting

      If yahoo is offering all of it's features as a
      free and publically accessable system, don't they have the right to do whatever they want with the default settings?


      Sure they do, but why does that preclude just being decent about this kind of thing instead of just doing what they want and inconveniencing people? Why couldn't they have emailed all users and warned them and given them a link to turn off all the spam? Someone at Yahoo has committed the same breach of public trust that Amazon.com is guilty of which is precisely why I won't do business with Amazon.com ever--because they have given me no reason to trust them. Likewise, I wouldn't buy anything from Yahoo (should they ever try any sales ventures) as I don't trust them either. Bear in mind, this isn't the first time they've futzed around with their users in this manner.

      So, yes, nobody is denying them their right to do as they please with their free services, but at the same time, they should recognize that the trust of the public and their own users (paying or otherwise) is a valuable resource and a good thing to have. These kinds of moves, done without notice, erode that kind of trust and sully the name-recognition/branding that they clearly take for granted. Most online companies would kill for the kind of branding that Yahoo has managed.

      --Rick

      --
      --Rick "If it isn't broken, take it apart and find out why."
    3. Re:The right to spam? by guttentag · · Score: 3, Interesting
      I pay $15 a month for Yahoo to host my Web site (it's Yahoo, for crying out loud. They're not evil, right?), which means that they have my phone number, home address, and credit card number on file.

      When I logged in a minute ago to reset the marketing preferences, I found that not only had they signed me up for email spam, but they displayed my home address and phone number and had me signed up for snail mail spam and telemarketing.

      So no, they're not collecting due compensation for free services, they're taking advantage of the my status as a paying customer. I'm going to find a new ISP, and I'm going to switch all my small business Web site clients as well, because they deserve better. To hell with Yahoo.

  9. POP Access disabled... by CaptCosmic · · Score: 5, Informative

    I found that my POP access was disabled after resetting the marketing preferences.

    To reenable it, you need to go back and turn the Yahoo Delivers! option back on. POP Access/Forwarding require you to agree to this. Once that is done, you should be able to go back into your mail settings and check your settings.

    Once I did this, it gave the options for POP/Forwarding access.

    --
    -> Capt Cosmic <-
  10. Re:Question... by Mr.+Sketch · · Score: 2

    Well, I can't speak for 'everyone', but I got an e-mail notifing me of a privacy policy change today, but nothing saying that all my preferences were set to yes. If it weren't for slashdot, I wouldn't have known about the change until I started getting TONS of spam, and even then I probably wouldn't have known exactly where to go to fix it.

    Thanks whoever submitted this story!

  11. This could shoot them in the ass.... by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    These marketing data, as set by the user, could have been a very valuable commodity to sell to other companies. Those companies would have a very good idea of what to market to these users as a result. This makes this kind of information quite valuable. However, in resetting all of the user's preferences to be interested in everything, and given that most users will probably not give a rat's ass and change it, then these data become worthless to 3rd parties because it does not provide them with any new information. So effectively, Yahoo killed off an asset that could have been worth the money to rent and/or sell to others.

    --
    In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
    1. Re:This could shoot them in the ass.... by cjpez · · Score: 2

      I certainly wouldn't do anything with data out of Yahoo. I certainly didn't give them real information when I signed up, nor has any one of my friends I've talked to. Anyone basing anything off of stats from a free webmail provider has got to be insane.

    2. Re:This could shoot them in the ass.... by bluGill · · Score: 2

      I suppose that advertisers would find it interesting that I'm a female born in 1901. I wonder what city I gave them? probably new york.

      On hind site though, I wish I had given them my cell phone number. $500 for every incident of unsolicited calls would be really nice to get, considering todays ecconomy.

  12. In other news... by e4 · · Score: 5, Funny


    ...Yahoo announced that it will change its marketing slogan from "Do you, uh, Yahoo?" to "You WILL Yahoo."

    1. Re:In other news... by Hiro+Antagonist · · Score: 4, Funny

      More like "Stick it in your Yahoo!", "Take it in the Yahoo!", or "Let's all crowd into your Yahoo!"...

      --

      --
      I Hit the Karma Cap, and All I Got Was This Lousy .sig.
  13. Disgusting... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm absolutely disgusted with Yahoo's behavior here...

    It's one thing to activate "Yes" on all those email spam options, but I provided Yahoo with my address and phone number when I made a credit card purchase through Yahoo Travel. I'm pretty sure I was told that these would be kept confidential and were mainly for the purpose of credit card verification. At any rate, I trusted them with these details.

    But it turns out they put "Yes" on my phone number and physical mailing address, as well.

    I'm really disgusted with Yahoo on this. They've gone too far.

    1. Re:Disgusting... by cjpez · · Score: 2

      Well, that was the problem, really. As a general rule of thumb, DON'T give out your address or credit card info on the web. Or if you do, certainly don't tie it in to some user account somewhere, so they can pull something like this. If somewhere makes you create a profile just to buy something, refuse. There's a pretty good chance you don't actually need whatever it was you were buying, or in the case of travel you can always get tickets elsewhere.

    2. Re:Disgusting... by b0rken · · Score: 2, Insightful
      That's perfectly okay because, like most clickthrough licenses you and I agree to, "The Agreement says something different when you are not reading it".

      Of course, it says it in legalese, but the biolerplate that the Company reserves the right to modify or update the provisions of this agreement mean, in essence, that when you're not reading the agreement, they're free to do whatever they wish with your personal information, at least to the extent that the law would let you give them use of your personal information (since you have agreed to agree to the changed license)

      And then there are the privacy agreements you must read at http://www.example.com/privacy.asp that claim you agree to them by reading any page on http://www.example.com. So you can't even see the agreement before (they claim) you have agreed to it.

      If anybody truly took both the clickthrough license and their own privacy seriously, I don't think it would be possible for them to browse the web.

      --
      Hate stupid software on freshmeat? Laugh at
    3. Re:Disgusting... by rehannan · · Score: 2

      If you buy something from a Yahoo store (and there are *lots*), Yahoo keeps your contact information. I never game mail.yahoo.com my mailing address, but they had it becuase I ordered a PSU from a Yahoo! store a month or so ago.

    4. Re:Disgusting... by cjpez · · Score: 2

      That's why you don't give out your address to Yahoo stores. :P

    5. Re:Disgusting... by ahaning · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This reminds me that when I purchased something from 2600.com, it's acutally just a Yahoo! store. So, they've got my credit card number and address/phone/etc. Hopefully 2600 will go about setting up their own store sometime soon, or at least find a better host.

      Also, in case people don't draw the connection, signing up for a Geocities site also signs you up for Yahoo!, so you, too, will want to change these settings.

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
  14. Just checked my account. by Picass0 · · Score: 2

    I prefs for marketing have stayed the same. In addition to having a spam/product registration e-mail account at yahoo, I also belong to some clubs and groups. When I looked at my prefs, they had not changed.

    I have noticed that the mail-forwarding has ended. All of my pr0n stays on yahoo.

    1. Re:Just checked my account. by cymen · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I thought I was ok too until I went here:

      http://subscribe.yahoo.com/showaccount

      See the posts above to find the link that already selects "no" for everything and all you have to do is click "ok".

  15. Sure, it's bad on principle... by Sims+Youth · · Score: 3, Insightful
    ...but what's the big deal in reality? Who fills in real information when they sign up, anyway?

    All I know is that whoever lives at 123 Fake St. in my town is going to be very offended at the manner in which mail is addressed to them.

    1. Re:Sure, it's bad on principle... by spezz · · Score: 3, Funny
      Dude, I have a ton of your mail.

  16. WoW! Exciting New Features! Hooray! by slashdaughter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Can we build a new internet and start over? This one is starting to smell funny...

    I've been trying to get my parents online for a couple of years now. Not an easy task when I live thousands of miles away and can't provide much in the way of instruction. So far its been a nightmare. Machines pre-installed with the full trojan-horse marketing one expects from a windows machine. Their doors to the web, AOL, MSN... all of it making their experience feel like getting 500 new cable channels that are all just different versions of the Home Shopping Channel. Email with a GUI that looks like Mickey Mouse has hacked your pop mail account. Lots of shiny clunky flashy advertising for people that really don't buy shit anyway...

    The desperation with which corporations and their advertising machines come after us makes me very uneasy about the stability and future of our economy. The pyramid scheme can't hold... I can't afford/don't need any more crap.

    --
    "The U.S. Constitution - not perfect, but its better than what we have now"
  17. Thanks to Slashdot and this community by pmancini · · Score: 2

    This is why communties like this are important. I would have had no clue this was happening. Thanks. I was able to make the changes. I also changed all my contact information in my yahoo account to let them know how I felt about them!

    Bastards.

  18. good for this AC by macsox · · Score: 3, Interesting

    i always wonder if, when an article is submitted by an AC, the person works for the company that is behaving badly. if so, kudos to them for doing what's right.

  19. well whaddya know by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 2

    I went to this url:

    http://edit.my.yahoo.com/config/eval_profile

    And sure enough everything was set to "yes".

    But what I want to know is, why on earth would you give Yahoo! your real address and telephone number?? My account is all lies.

    Then again, I only use Yahoo to track my portfolio.. I hardly use any of the services.

    1. Re:well whaddya know by gbell · · Score: 4, Informative

      If you buy something from a vendor that uses Yahoo (its not always obvious), Yahoo goes ahead and saves your addresses and phones "so you don't have to type it in again." Gee, thanks. The time saved can be spent recycling all the paper junk mail I'll be getting.

      I found both my home and work addresses AND phone numbers! I quickly deleted them, but as security conscious as I am, I had no idea Yahoo was saving that stuff away for future marketing "opportunities".

      Please everyone go check!

    2. Re:well whaddya know by payslee · · Score: 2

      I found that they had my current address also, and I was really surprised, since I have never given them that information.

      For all those saying "Who would give yahoo their real address?" Well, was a time, say 1996 when I signed up for my account, when yahoo was way cool and we were all a bit more wide-eyed and naive. I gave them my real address.

      Which does not explain why they have my current one, five years, two apartments, and one state later. I've bought airline tickets and books online, and used my yahoo mail for the confirmation notice.

      Somebody's been telling secrets...

      --
      Doing my part to piss off the religious right.
  20. Ok, I just tested this by legLess · · Score: 5, Informative

    I went in and signed up for a new account (spambot12321), and I was never presented with a choice for these items. They asked if I'd like other things ("Send me special offers from selected Yahoo! partners through Yahoo! Delivers."), but the items listed in http://subscribe.yahoo.com/showaccount never showed up.

    So I don't know about other people who say they've already set these to "no," but at least for new accounts you're signed up for all of it whether you want to be or not. Bastards.

    --
    This isn't as much "normalization" as it is "don't take so many drugs when you're designing tables."
  21. Thank You for your Post by shawnmelliott · · Score: 4, Funny

    NOTICE: Since you've posted to /. we have kindly modified your preferences

    [Y] Spam
    [Y] Pr0n
    [Y] support HP merger
    [Y] something..something...cowboyneal

    Have a nice day

  22. This is implied by their privacy policy by Fastolfe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    From http://privacy.yahoo.com/:
    New categories of marketing communications may be added to the Marketing Preferences page from time to time. Users who visit this page can opt out of receiving future marketing communications from these new categories or they can unsubscribe by following instructions contained in the messages they receive.
    This might imply that you must explicitly "opt out" of new marketing categories. If all of these options are relatively "new", then it's consistent with their privacy policy. It doesn't excuse the fact, however.
  23. Re:Confirmed? by mbessey · · Score: 2

    Okay, I just checked this, and Yahoo signed me up for all of the spam in the world, without notifying me. It is possible that a notice was posted somewhere on their web site, but I certainly didn't receive any email about it.

    -Mark

  24. How to delete Yahoo account by Fastball · · Score: 3, Informative
    https://edit.yahoo.com/config/delete_user

    Your account will remain in their database for 90 days, then poof gone, but the account is deactivated. For what that's worth. Peace of mind?

  25. If you are pissed off.... by bluebomber · · Score: 2
  26. not just privacy, but contract by hawk · · Score: 2
    I am a lawyer, but this is not legal advice. If you need legal advice, contact an attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.


    They clearly state what they're offering in return for what they're taking. They provide you with a certain type of email with certain types of marketing, while you provide them information and bet battered with annoying blinking ads.


    They're plain and simply not free to change this or to use information you provided for other purposes.


    hawk

    1. Re:not just privacy, but contract by ichimunki · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I am a lawyer, but this is not legal advice.

      Even so, lawyers have been known to have differing opinions about and interpretations of law. That's why as a final tie-breaker in tough cases we sometimes refer people to a group of nine highly respected lawyers.

      They're plain and simply not free to change this or to use information you provided for other purposes. Prove it. If all this does is result in you getting email from them then they have only contacted their own customers, which is not illegal. In fact, their terms of service clearly state "Yahoo provides its service to you, subject to the following Terms of Service ('TOS'), which may be updated by us from time to time without notice to you." Which is pretty much carte blanche to do what they want.

      Furthermore their privacy policy states: Yahoo! does not rent, sell, or share personal information about you with other people or nonaffiliated companies except to provide products or services you've requested, when we have your permission, or under the following circumstances: We provide the information to trusted partners who work on behalf of or with Yahoo! under confidentiality agreements. These companies may use your personal information to help Yahoo! communicate with you about offers from Yahoo! and our marketing partners. However, these companies do not have any independent right to share this information. ... Which is pretty much whenever they feel like it.

      Finally, they clearly are in the business of providing services in exchange for your acceptance of targeted advertising. This is not SPAM (which is not typically targeted in any way). This is simply targeted advertising delivered via email.

      --
      I do not have a signature
    2. Re:not just privacy, but contract by Fastolfe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's been a while since I created my Yahoo! account, but by the time you receive this screen with marketing preferences, you've already given them your contact information, a decision you've made solely on the information in their terms of service and privacy policy.

      THEN they ask you what your preference is regarding using your contact information for marketing purposes. You've already given implicit consent for them to use it by signing up in the first place (according to their privacy policy).

      Now, I still consider it very shady and unethical for them to turn around and say, "I know you said no, but we don't really care," but:

      a. I don't *think* there's any legal issue here; and
      b. This is all assuming that these 'marketing categories' existed when you signed up in the first place. Their privacy policy seems to imply that they can add 'marketing categories' to their site later and assume an 'opt-in' policy for everyone that doesn't explicitly re-visit and opt-out.

      So while I'm just as annoyed at Yahoo! as everyone else is, and find that this practice (assuming it was even deliberate) to be very shady, it's definitely arguable as to whether or not legal retaliation is warranted or possible.

      (In my opinion.)

    3. Re:not just privacy, but contract by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2

      Finally, they clearly are in the business of providing services in exchange for your acceptance of targeted advertising. This is not SPAM (which is not typically targeted in any way). This is simply targeted advertising delivered via email.

      bzzt. Wrong. SPAM is Unsolicited Commercial Email. I don't give a damn if it's targeted or not, if I didn't request it it's SPAM and will be treated as such.

  27. Re:No they dont. Illegal. by cjpez · · Score: 2

    Um, I use two Yahoo addresses outside of my mail address: one that gets used whenever websites want me to register to get in, and one for a few Yahoo lists I'm on. Neither of those accounts know about my real email address. There's a field when you're signing up that asks you for another email address, but it's entirely not required.

  28. Not a g00d idea for f4k3 by oo7tushar · · Score: 2

    Putting fake information in is not a good idea. According to the agreement (which you agreed to by signing up) they can revoke your account for false information...of course, they'd have to find out but they've got their fingers in many pies...

    1. Re:Not a g00d idea for f4k3 by TheGreenLantern · · Score: 2

      I wonder how long until they figure out my name isn't really Hal Jordan?

      --

      It hurts when I pee.
    2. Re:Not a g00d idea for f4k3 by cjpez · · Score: 2
      I was going to be all jerky and write a sarcastic remark about how I'd just be shattered to have my "feel free to deposit spam here" address yanked away from me, but then I got to thinking about people who aren't fortunate enough to have college accounts or friends with large datapipes running into their homes. And in any case, I wouldn't trust Yahoo with real information anyway.

      So what options are there for people who need free email (well, "need" is a pretty strong word - let's say that unless it's free, they'll just live without it)? What's a good site to go to that doesn't have those kinds of clauses in their agreement-thinger?

    3. Re:Not a g00d idea for f4k3 by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      > I wonder how long until they figure out my name isn't really Hal Jordan?

      Well, of course it isn't; he's dead. You're Kyle Raynor, right?

      Chris Mattern

    4. Re:Not a g00d idea for f4k3 by Chris+Mattern · · Score: 2

      Well, at least I didn't accuse him of being Guy Gardner...

      Chris Mattern

  29. Kidding by SavingPrivateNawak · · Score: 2, Funny

    In related news, we've signed you all up for a /. newsletter! (I am so just kidding.)

    We SO just have to wait and see...

  30. For some more info by edhall · · Score: 5, Informative

    CNET had an article on this yesterday. In brief, Yahoo! split their Marketing Preferences into a bunch of categories, and defaulted the new categories to opted-in. They are mailing out notices (a process that will take a few weeks) telling people about the new preferences. They then have 60 days to opt-out.

    -Ed
    1. Re:For some more info by VP · · Score: 2

      Also, Yahoo provides a link on the preferences page with an explanation: http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/privacy/privacy-23.h tml

      (or click here for the lazier among us)

    2. Re:For some more info by gilroy · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Blockquoth the poster:


      In brief, Yahoo! split their
      Marketing Preferences into a bunch of categories, and
      defaulted the new categories to opted-in.

      All well and good. But the default should be to opt out. If you really want the email you'd set it up. But as a default the system should be as un-intrusive as possible.


      OK, I know. I'm living in a fantasy world. But that's how it should be. Since they chose to do it their way, I don't see how they have any defense to charges that they are abusing user trust and misusing user data.

  31. Just pure evil. Phone & snail mail spam TOO? by tweakt · · Score: 2

    Other Delivery Indicate other ways you want to receive the special offers and marketing communications you have selected.

    via U.S. mail [X] Yes No
    via phone [X] Yes No
  32. Re:Confirmed? by Wonko42 · · Score: 2
    I also have a Yahoo ID, and I also did not recieve any notification of a change in policy. But I went to my account info page (login to yours here) and, lo and behold, what the Cow said was true. All my marketing preferences had been set to Yes, even though I remember explicitly setting them to No when I signed up for the account.

    Before you start whining and moaning about accountability, maybe you should take the five seconds necessary to do some research yourself. The entire point of the article was that Yahoo is slamming its users' preferences without notice, which is why you didn't recieve a notice, genius.

  33. Ugggh... spam is ugly by shepd · · Score: 2

    Well, if they want to spam snail mail addresses and phones, give them some addresses to spam to!

    Enter these in your home/work preferences, and only turn off the email spams:

    Yahoo! Canada
    106 Front Street East
    Toronto, Ontario
    M5A 1E1

    Phone: 416.341.8605
    Fax: 416.341.8800

    ------------------

    Yahoo! Inc.
    701 First Avenue
    Sunnyvale, California 94089
    Tel. (408) 349-3300
    Fax. (408) 349-3301
    Tel. 408-349-2000

    I'm sure yahoo would LOVE to hear from their advertisers any day!

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  34. Does anybody still use Yahoo? by Animats · · Score: 2

    Yahoo gets more and more obnoxious. I dropped "Yahoo Store" years ago, when they started wanting a cut of my sales in addition to a monthly fee.

    1. Re:Does anybody still use Yahoo? by maggard · · Score: 2
      Yes, unfortunately, anyone who shops at [competitor], for example, are set to expose not only their credit card information, but their billing and shipping addresses, phone numbers, and other such personal information, on just getting a DVD or two.
      It should be noted (but isn't) that this is DragonMagic smearing a business competitor, not a disinterested party passing along a helpful hint.

      --
      I don't read ACs: If a post isn't worth so much as a nom de plume to its author then I wont bother either.
  35. ** Just do what I did!! by MImeKillEr · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I simply went in and added their mailing address and phone number as my primary contact. Now, their marketing department will be sending their own contact info to their partners.. Maybe if we all did this, they'll get flooded with all their own goddamned SPAM!

    --
    Cruising the internet on my TI-99/4A @ a whopping 300 baud!
    1. Re:** Just do what I did!! by sporty · · Score: 2

      Smart developers would probably prevent certain numbers and names from getting into spam lists they create, no? :)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:** Just do what I did!! by cpeterso · · Score: 2
      For my spam email addresses, I usually use one of the following:

      • glaser@real.com
      • rglaser@real.com
      • robg@real.com

        Rob, your "Real" Player has inflicted so much pain on this world..
    3. Re:** Just do what I did!! by cybermage · · Score: 2

      Lenny Bruce had a better idea until the Post Office changed their rules. In his famous book, "Steal This Book," he suggested that you attach postage paid reply materials to something heavy, like a brick, and send it back.

      Apparently, so many people did this, that the Post Office said that the postage paid reply cards and envelopes couldn't be attached to anything. That, however, doesn't stop you from trying to make the envelop as heavy as possible. I'd avoid using white powder though ;)

    4. Re:** Just do what I did!! by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 4, Insightful

      I usually type in root@127.0.0.1 as the email address... let 'em clog up their own mail server.

      --
      Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
    5. Re:** Just do what I did!! by benwb · · Score: 4, Informative

      There are entire blocks of email addresses that were created for this. Basically any example domain (example.com, example.net, etc...) is defined as being nonexistent to be used in tcp/ip documentation as examples. something@example.com goes nowhere, doesn't consume anyone's bandwidth, and pretty much no one filters for it.

    6. Re:** Just do what I did!! by Shiny+Metal+S. · · Score: 5, Informative
      I usually type in root@127.0.0.1 as the email address... let 'em clog up their own mail server.

      root@127.0.0.1 is not a valid address. Sending email to such address usually gives some error like unrouteable mail domain "127.0.0.1" because there's no MX record in DNS for 1.0.0.127.in-addr.arpa (but I'm not sure if it would work even if there was such record, I'm too lazy to test it). Use root@[127.0.0.1] if you want email to literal ip address bypassing the standard MX resolving (see RFC 822). But the mail server can be configured to reject them, and e.g. my server will give you this error: root@[127.0.0.1] domain literals not allowed.

      So the root@localhost is probably the the best choice (but it still sometimes may not work as you expect, if the "localhost" is not set as local domain of SMTP server). But remember that even when you make them spam local root mailbox, it's usually their own account, not the one of their ISP.

      When I have to ever register with working email I make alias like spam-from-yahoo.com@my.domain so I always know who sends spam and I can always deactivate such alias. But I have yet to see anyone selling my spam-from-their.domain@my.domain address to anyone.

      If you can't easily edit /etc/aliases on your mail server (and if you're not your own postmaster, it's usually true) check out spamgourmet self-destructing disposable email addresses:

      After you save and confirm the email address where you'd like to receive messages, you can give out self-destructing disposable email addresses whenever you want as follows:
      someword.x.user@spamgourmet.com
      where someword is a word you haven't used before, x is the number of email messages you want to receive at the address (up to 20), and user is your username. For example, if your username is 'spamcowboy', and you give this address to somebody (or, more probably, some thing):
      spamelope.2.spamcowboy@spamgourmet.com
      the address will be created here the first time it is used, and you'll receive at most two messages (forwarded to the email address you specify above) on the address. The rest will be indelicately consumed. That's it. You won't ever have to come back here.

      I don't use it because I have my own mail server and I can do whatever I want (or whatever I can) with my mail address, but spamgourmet seems to be great if you just have one mailbox somewhere like most of the people.

      --

      ~shiny
      WILL HACK FOR $$$

    7. Re:** Just do what I did!! by Yottabyte84 · · Score: 2
      [yotta@windy yotta]$ ping -c 3 porn.org
      PING porn.org (127.0.0.1) from 127.0.0.1 : 56(84) bytes of data.
      64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=0 ttl=255 time=56 usec
      64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=1 ttl=255 time=56 usec
      64 bytes from localhost (127.0.0.1): icmp_seq=2 ttl=255 time=70 usec

      --- porn.org ping statistics ---
      3 packets transmitted, 3 packets received, 0% packet loss
      round-trip min/avg/max/mdev = 0.056/0.060/0.070/0.011 ms



      There are others.

  36. New York State by wytcld · · Score: 2

    In New York State you can register you phone number(s) on a Do Not Call list. Any telemarketer (with exceptions for politics and those with whom you have a "prior business relationship") who calls a number registered with the state is liable for fines up to $2000. So Yahoo might be able to get away with calling you, but not some other business you have no relationship with who they've given your number to.
    ___

    --
    "with their freedom lost all virtue lose" - Milton
  37. Re:confirmation of reset prefs? by TheGreenLantern · · Score: 2

    Confirmed again. Set all to Yes on two seperate Yahoo accounts.

    --

    It hurts when I pee.
  38. Yahoo insists on storing CC # for POP after 04/24 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    So, I just went pay the $19.99 to continue to use the POP services at Yahoo. It is worth it to me for that amount. I find out though that I *must* create a Yahoo Wallet to do so. To use the Wallet service I must give Yahoo my credit card info FOR THEM TO STORE. This is "for your convenience". Then I look at the Wallet TOS and see this: "Yahoo! will not be responsible for any purchases or errors made under your account or Yahoo! Wallet". So you're going to force me to let you store my number but will not take any responsibility for it. Forget that! Its one thing to make purchases online, another to let somebody store my cc #. I've used Yahoo mail and the POP service for a long time since it allows me to keep one email address regardless of ISP. It looks like that is coming to an end!

  39. You got your facts a little mixed up by joeflies · · Score: 2, Informative

    One of the terms of service for turning POP access on was that you subscribe to Yahoo Delivers. Thus turning it off, they are enacting an EXISTING rule, not adding a new one

  40. pop3/forwarding DOES stop on April 28th by shellac · · Score: 2, Informative

    The reason your POP3 stopped now is likely because you unsubscribed from the "yahoo delivers!" option when you went to the account information. Yahoo delivers has always been a prerequisite to using pop3 or forwarding. Once you sign back on to it, you'll be able to start the pop3 again.

    The yahoo delivers thing is not that annoying, as I have only gotten mail from it like once a month, and a lot of it has been genuinely interesting. The other stuff mentioned in this story you should definitely unsubscribe from though.

  41. Send it all to their door. by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 2

    Just set your address and phone number to their address and phone number and let them receive all your bulk mailings and telemarketing calls.

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
  42. Rocketmail customers? by shellac · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yahoo has been providing forwarding for @rocketmail.com addresses ever since they bought them out. Does anyone know if they are planning to charge for this also?

  43. From their site by scott1853 · · Score: 2

    "Yahoo! is notifying users of these changes to marketing preferences via email. Your new marketing preferences will not take effect until 60 days after the date the email is sent to you so you have plenty of time to decide what you want to receive and what you don't. To change your preferences, go to the Marketing Preferences page."

    Of course who reads e-mail that comes from a yahoo account. They probably sent it and it got caught in a filter.

    Something else interesting is that since I've just gone to Yahoo's site, now when I hit F3 to repeat my last search in IE, the Yahoo homepage pops up in a little sidebar window. Coincidence?

  44. Let's take "opt-in by default" to a new level by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2

    Suppose all of us Yahoo users were to draft a hardcopy letter that goes something like this...

    Dear Yahoo,
    By copy if this letter, I am opting out of all marketing lists; my contact information is not to be used by Yahoo for marketing purposes, nor is it to be sold, shared, leased, lent, or revealed to any third parties. This letter supersedes any website settings and is in response to all past, present, and future requests for marketing permission. Any future requests for permission will be ignored, since this letter will serve as your notification until revoked by me in writing.

    Should you make use of my contact information anyway, I will invoice you $5000 per message as a "reading fee". Abuse of my contact information constitues your agreement to pay the "reading fee", in addition to collection costs, court fees, and reasonable attorney's fees. I understand that $5000 per message is quite expensive -- do not use the service unless you intend to pay the fee.


    I would love to see a service that offered to auto-send this kind of letter to all the "opt-in-by-default" morons. Even better if it could help facilitate the collection process.

    1. Re:Let's take "opt-in by default" to a new level by dcavanaugh · · Score: 2

      "You may only use the service if you agree to their Terms." Precisely. I have defined a service "dealing with direct marketing crap". It costs $5000 per message. You may only use the service if you agree to my terms. They have a service, they have terms. I have a service, I have terms. What's the problem?

  45. Re:It is (was) a free service by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 4, Informative

    I guess this is thier last chance to screw you before they have to stop using the "its a free service" excuse.

    Free service? Not POP/SMTP access or forwarding of Yahoo! Mail... I've been quietly abandoning my (previously useful) Yahoo accounts. I suppose they remain useful, but not at $20/year. Call me Scottish, but for only twice that, I can register another domain and have thousands more e-mail addresses.


    At 09:42 PM 3/20/2002 -0800, Yahoo wrote:

    Hello,

    Important service announcement regarding your POP3 or Mail Forwarding service. Please read on.

    Effective April 24, 2002, Yahoo! Mail will no longer provide free POP3 Access or Auto Mail Forwarding to Yahoo! Delivers subscribers.

    If you would like to continue using Mail Forwarding or POP3 Access, please subscribe to our improved package that allows you to:

    • Use Outlook, Eudora, or another POP3 client to access and manage your Yahoo! Mail.
    • Automatically forward your Yahoo! Mail to another email account -- even another Yahoo! address!
    • Send larger attachments, now up to 5MB instead of the free 1.5MB limit.
    • Send email without the Yahoo! promotional text at the bottom.*
    Sign up today and SAVE 33%

    Subscribe before April 24th and get the first year of service for just $19.99. That's 33% off the regular service fee of $29.99.

    Remember, if you do not subscribe by April 24, 2002, you will no longer be able to access your Yahoo! Mail messages by POP or at another email address.

    Sincerely,
    The Yahoo! Mail Team

    For further information, please read our frequently asked questions. Please note that your Yahoo! Delivers settings will not be affected.

    *Applies only to email sent through the Yahoo! SMTP servers.

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  46. Yahoo contact info by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    In case anyone can't find it..

    701 First Avenue
    Sunnyvale, CA 94089
    408-349-2000

  47. What THEY say by doru · · Score: 4, Informative
    The Yahoo Privacy Center Help page specifies that :

    [...] we have reset marketing preferences for some of our users. If you are one of those users, unless you decide to change these preferences, you may begin receiving marketing messages from Yahoo! about ways to enhance your Yahoo! experience, including special offers and new features.

    Yahoo! is notifying users of these changes to marketing preferences via email. Your new marketing preferences will not take effect until 60 days after the date the email is sent to you so you have plenty of time to decide what you want to receive and what you don't. To change your preferences, go to the Marketing Preferences page.

    Well, it doesn't look that outrageous. Still, there's no hint as to why they did it.

    1. Re:What THEY say by Croaker · · Score: 2

      Except that this is bullshit.

      I recieved spam the other day from them hawking some travel special. I never recieved anything in the past, and I had opted out of any and all e-mail offers that had in the past.

      I've not had any "60-day" notice of them changing my preferences. Unless they consider their spam as being "notification" that they have changed their policy.

      I've wiped all user data from their system. They want to play games? They can do it with someone else.

  48. Re:Question... by Snowfox · · Score: 2
    Did yahoo send out an email telling everyone this had occured? Or is this a marketing ploy of some sort?

    From what we can tell here, they sent the notification only to people who previously had checked "yes" for service change notification preferences.

    So the only people who got a note about the update were the ones who didn't care enough to turn these off in the first place.

    Like many, I'm more than a little peeved by this. If this is "okay," then every website you've ever given contact info to can do the same, claiming "Of course we didn't tell you we were starting to sell your name again. You told us not to send unsolicited mail!"

  49. The Fine Print by StefanJ · · Score: 2

    "By using Yahoo and viewing advertisements, you agree to have a behavior-modifying microchip implanted in you hippocampus, and will allow the corporate logos of our advertisers encoded in your junk DNA."

  50. Re:How do you know they are reset automatically? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    From msnbc - http://www.msnbc.com/news/730862.asp?0dm=C18KT

    Yahoo users will now automatically have their marketing preferences set to accept updates from a smattering of Yahoo's business. Previously, people were offered one option to either accept or reject product notices when first registering on the site. The new preferences page includes offerings ranging from job listings to new media products and inclusion in Yahoo's user surveys, among other things.
    Yahoo users will have 60 days upon receiving notice to opt-out of these promotions.

  51. Of course this only matters... by Robber+Baron · · Score: 2

    ...if you were dumb enough to give them your primary e-mail address. I always give outfits like this a hotmail one and they can spam the shit out of it for all I care. In the case of my Yahoo account, the e-mail they have is one I haven't used for two years now, so spam away boys!

    --

    You're using her as bait, Master!

  52. Don't Change The Prefs to "NO" by istartedi · · Score: 2

    Just change the e-mail address to marketing@yahoo.com. Change the snail-mail to something in North Korea, Iraq, Somalia. Or perhaps something more subtle. Distant towns in Alaska that can only be reached by dogsled when things are frozen? I bet they could use the burning material. Use your imagination. Be creative.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    1. Re:Don't Change The Prefs to "NO" by rehannan · · Score: 2
      Distant towns in Alaska that can only be reached by dogsled when things are frozen?


      Hey, keep your spam down there buddy... :)

    2. Re:Don't Change The Prefs to "NO" by kindbud · · Score: 2

      Here's an address I set in my Yahoo account info:

      701 First Avenue
      Sunnyvale, CA 94089

      I don't recommend anybody else set the same address. No siree... that would not be nice. Don't do it.

      --
      Edith Keeler Must Die
    3. Re:Don't Change The Prefs to "NO" by djmurdoch · · Score: 3, Informative

      I already tried to set my alternate email address to abuse@yahoo, marketing@yahoo, and sales@yahoo - won't take any of them.

      There are plenty of sites that offer free email addresses and would be happy to forward to one of those.

  53. Feedback link to tell Yahoo what you think. by klieber · · Score: 2

    Here is a page that explains why yahoo has made these changes:


    http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/privacy/privacy-23 .h tml


    At the bottom of the page, you can click on the "no" button to go to a contact form where you can tell Yahoo exactly why their behaviour isn't acceptable.

    I wasn't so upset over them resetting my email preferences, but I was *pissed* that they also reset my phone preferences. That's going one step too far in my opinion.

    --
    Gentoo Linux http://gentoo.org/
  54. It was nice of them... by dkone · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To leave a user input for the email that all the "partner" announcements are to be sent. I left all my choices to yes and changed the email account to abuse@yahoo.com

    HAHA, stick that in your spam hole and smoke it.

  55. Are we just rats? by austus · · Score: 2, Informative

    I apologize if this post seems like a rant. It is. I'm infuriated yet again by this trend of corporate corruption which is more of an explanation than an excuse. I'm really pissed at Yahoo. But I'm even more pissed at AT&T at the moment, but I'll get to that in a moment. At least with yahoo, I can do exactly what I did which was delete or change any possible information that could possibly give them something to sell to someone. Then I changed my password to some really freaking obscure password that I'll never remember in a million years. I tried to cancel their account, but to no avail, I can't seem to find out how to cancel my account. I tried. But their little rat maze doesn't seem to be set up for people to cancel their accounts. I'm not surprised.

    Now on to AT&T. I have a question. Has anyone else had the experience of calling AT&T directory information to find a number only to be told by some automated voice, "Press pound to hear the number." At which point, you press pound happily expecting to hear the number. Instead of hearing the number, you instead hear the voice of the receptionist of the place you desired to call manually. Keep in mind I always write down the number so that I can manually call the number instead of paying the , "I'm a lazy moron." tax. Most non-thinking people would dismiss it as a freak occurence. I don't. I verified my facts. I got charged the moron tax against my will. I'm confident many others have been charged this tax against their will as well. Now I desire to verify it. How many of you have been charged the moron tax against your will? If it's thousands of people who have been subjected to the "moron" tax against their will, then I'd say AT&T has got quite the scam going and is a shining example of what may soon be widely known as the "Rat Tactic". I'm giving them the benefit of the doubt for the moment.

    I must say that I am never surprised at the corruption I find in Corporate America.
    (One of my personal least favorite scams is the customer service automated systems that never seem to have the option I need unless of course I want to sign up for their service my ISP my cellphone service provider.) You say that's not a scam, but I say that it is especially when I'm trying to complain about something that could result in a loss of millions of dollars by customers collectively, not individually. It feels like a scam that ranks right up there with the guy who took a few pennies out of millions of bank accounts. By the way, is that an urban legend? Even if it is, the principle is sound. And I'd say it's the principle that corporations rely upon the most to jilt the masses out of billions fo dollars. It might be aptly called the "Rip off the masses by small amounts so nobody will notice and you can grow rich in your big house while you watch society decline into a group of mindless drone rats that never complain that wake up every day just to work for you, consume your products, fsck , eat, drink, poop, pay taxes, fart, and breathe while never really having one meaningful thought during the day. (all while using your products)" tactic. Personally, I affectionately call it the "Rat Tactic" for possibly arbitrary reasons.

    We, the complainers, the ones willing to speak up are unfortunately a very small minority. "They" count on that and count on their automated systems to oppose our attempts for satisfaction (while vigorously using the rat tactic). Is there any other reason it takes two seconds to get to a customer service rep when you want to order service. But if you want to complain, that's another story altogether. If you want to complain, "they" conveniently use technology to thwart your efforts. The most common mechanism is the setting up automated mazes for us to traverse so that by the time we get ahold of a real person, we're so infuriated that the low level customer service rep immediately calls his/her supervisor for assistance. He, of course, solves MY problem by crediting me the seventy five cents I'm due while happily keeping the money of the thousands of "sheep" rats unwilling to complain.

    Well today I was too infuriated to traverse the maze for very long and now I'm venting on slashdot. I hope it sends a resoundingly clear message to Corporate Earth which is this: "We know what is going on and we are growing in numbers and discontent."

    At least I hope that's the message that they get, but my message is more likely going to be ignored by the greedy guy in the big house who looks down upon us as rats that need our wheels, our mazes, and plenty of shiny things. Well I've got news for "them", I'm not a rat that likes wheels or mazes. I kind of enjoy using my brain. I don't worship their god of money. I'm sorry, but exercise wheels and mazes just don't do it for me. Though to be honest, I do like a few shiny things. But the truth is I'm not a rat at all. I am a human. And I'm not too distracted with my wheel, mazes, and shiny things that I won't make the time to bitch.

    So everybody join me in bitching about something that's bothering you. They can't kill us all. Perhaps we can successfully discourage some of the rampant greed and corruption by curbing peoples' purchasing habits. And maybe, just maybe, we won't become a species that is somewhere between rats running on exercise wheels, the Ferengi, and the Borg.

    Thanks for listening :) I feel better now.

  56. Tell your co-workers ppl! by Kphrak · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I work with a lot of older people who don't read Slashdot, but have Yahoo. I made sure to tell them about this new disgrace. For all those at work, please do the same; it's a courteous thing to do, and your workplace will be a helluva lot happier.


    --

    There's no sig like this sig anywhere near this sig, so this must be the sig.
  57. Yahoo Groups goin' down too by kindbud · · Score: 2

    Yahoo Groups is home to a lot of special interests that I follow, mostly astronomy-related. The participants are getting particularly annoyed at the ads, since they foist them off on the email-participants as well as the on-website participants, who have been slogging through ads to read the damn list for some time now.

    I don't mind advertising, it's a necessary evil for a lot of websites. But when it gets to the point that it drives people away, you're doing something wrong. The people on these astronomy lists are not rabid anti-spam geeks, they are not the type to setup automated Spamcop-reporting procmail recipes on their inbox. They have a lot of disposable income, since astro-imaging is not exactly a cheap hobby to get into (expenses are comparable to owning a large boat or an airplane, in many cases). Those are the people being driven away by excessive advertising.

    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
    1. Re:Yahoo Groups goin' down too by smagruder · · Score: 2

      I'm a group owner myself, but intrusive (pop-up, interstitial, embedded-in-text) advertisements aren't the only big issue with YGroups these days.

      YGroups has also been letting major bugs with the service go unfixed for months ! The biggest bug is many posted messages mysteriously not making it into the group archive. This is yet another nuisance that is making my group members very upset. And I don't blame them. That's why I'm seriously considering moving my groups away from Yahoo!.

      --
      Steve Magruder, Metro Foodist
  58. Added to my block list by cluge · · Score: 2

    Do you think if enough people added Yahoo to their block lists they would get a clue?

    Clue by 4's are in rare supply at yahoo today.

    --
    "Science is about ego as much as it is about discovery and truth " - I said it, so sue me.
  59. Been doing that for a while by drew_kime · · Score: 5, Funny

    You'd be amazed the number of free-registration-required sites you'll be able to get into using billg@microsoft.com and the zipcode in Redmond as a password.

    --
    Nope, no sig
    1. Re:Been doing that for a while by Alsee · · Score: 2

      Ok, so what is the zipcode in Redmond?

      -

      --
      - - You can't take something off the Internet! That's like trying to take pee out of a swimming pool.
  60. An Easy Way To Show Your Opinion by acrostic · · Score: 2, Informative

    Assist them in slashdotting themselves. Leave the 'by mail' and 'by phone' option on and set your address to:

    Yahoo! Inc.
    701 First Avenue
    Sunnyvale, California 94089
    Phone (408) 349-3300
    Fax (408) 349-3301

    Inspired by MImeKillEr.

    For a whole 1 minute of your time, we can collectively inspire Yahoo to slashdot itself.
    I also reccomend leaving all the marketing preferences set to Yes, but redirecting the delivery address to your secondary, which can be any of your dearest and most loving advertisers.

    I think that the idea has occurred to others, since the yahoo corporate info page containing their address appears to be quite sluggish. :}

    -ted

  61. The reason pop3/forwarding stopped by Gambit+Thirty-Two · · Score: 2

    When you turn off the marketting preferences, it turns off forwarding/pop3. it doesnt go into effect perm until April 24th. But you NEED to have the "yahoo delivers" stuff under your mail options set to "send me crap"

    i noticed this too.

  62. Yahoo offers are GREAT!! Opt-in!! by kindbud · · Score: 5, Funny
    I didn't uncheck any boxes. I want all those Yahoo offers to be sent to me in the postal mail. They are just too good to pass up! And I want all my Yahoo offers to be sent and stored on my Yahoo account. Soem of them are valid for YEARS after they are sent. You never know when you'll need one, so I'll keep them all on my free-of-charge Yahoo mailbox, forever.

    But I just noticed that my street address and phone number are way out of date in my Yahoo account. I just updated it. Here's my new street address, to which all my paper mail will be sent:

    Mr. Stop Spamming Me
    701 First Avenue
    Sunnyvale, CA 94089
    408-530-5062
    Of course, no one but me should be using that street address. I wouldn't want to get flooded with a bunch of paper spam at "my" street address, so don't any of you go changing your street address to send me any of your offers. No sir, that would not be very nice. Don't do that.
    --
    Edith Keeler Must Die
  63. Check Your Account Info! by -tji · · Score: 2

    I have been a long time Yahoo user. I use the "My Yahoo" page daily, my @yahoo.com e-mail address is my primary web mail account, and I have purchased several things through the Yahoo shops.

    The amount of spam on yahoo mail has jumped dramatically in the last few months. I have noticed that the spam has more and more personal information (first name, last name, etc.). Their ads have also become much more intrusive and obnoxious.

    So, today I went through and removed every bit of personal information from my yahoo accounts & preferences. I was surprised to see just how much was in there.. It takes some digging, make sure you follow all of their sub-categories. I deleted information wherever possible. Some places did not allow blank entries (addresses, phone numbers) so, I replaced them with bogus entries.

    And, yes.. I know they need to make money to pay for their services. But they need to be careful to avoid pissing off too many customers, or their usage goes down & they have to add more ads & sell their data to more spammers to stay afloat.

  64. I LOVE /. by ljaguar · · Score: 2, Funny

    I love it when /. headline sounds like something from the onion.

  65. POP is now a Paid Feature by Lysander+Luddite · · Score: 2

    Is you want to use POP you must pay for the privilige. This was either on C|Net or a yahoo announcement. Since I never used the POP feature it was no big deal

    IIRC the fee is $20/year.

    HTH

  66. Here are some others too by Randy+Rathbun · · Score: 2

    Just sign up anyone listed in these documents.

    That should nip this in the bud in 60 days or so.

  67. I just went back and changed things... by meckardt · · Score: 2

    Yeah, yeah, I know this post is too late for anyone to read, but I thought I'd say it anyway. After reading this article, I not only went to reset my opt-outs, I changed all my personal information to something more appropriate... like a fake address and phone number.

    Face it, Yahoo! is on a slippery slope, and going down fast. Every time they pull one of these shenanigans, they loose customers. I was already cutting loose from their e-mail due to the no-free-pop decision. I use their my.yahoo as my default browser home page, but about one more such "marketing decision", and I'll be moving over to MSN or some Lycos.

  68. Technical fault at Yahoo by jesterzog · · Score: 2

    I think there's a technical fault going on with at least some international Yahoo sites at the moment.

    I've just been to check my marketing preferences, and there were no options listed. The page was there, a check-all link was on the page, and there was a save button, but there weren't any options listed.

    Furthermore I went to check the terms of service. I was told that I'd have to agree to a new terms of service for Australia and New Zealand "described below", but apart from that statement there was a blank page with an Accept/Deny button at the bottom. All I can conclude is that there's been a technical error or they've withdrawn their terms of service. (I'm betting on the former for obvious reasons.)

  69. Re:How do you know they are reset automatically? by miguelitof · · Score: 2
    Since the lazy sacks of shit who run this site are too lazy to check the facts on what they report,
    You didn't do a very good job of checking facts, either. Check out either:
    http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/privacy/privacy-23.h tml
    http://www.msnbc.com/news/730862.asp?0dm=C18KT
    --
    --- Biffster.org
    "Bite my shiny metal ass."
  70. OT: Automating Webmail? by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Free service? Not POP/SMTP access or forwarding of Yahoo! Mail... I've been quietly abandoning my (previously useful) Yahoo accounts.

    Off-topic, but does anyone know of any scripts which will automate the retrieval of webmail messages and queue them in your regular mail spool?

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  71. maybe not quite as bad as you think... by jchristopher · · Score: 2
    A link at the top of the 'preference editing form' takes you to this page: http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/privacy/privacy-23.h tml, which states that the changes made to your account will not take effect for 60 days, giving you time to sswitch everything back to "no".

    Still sleazy, but maybe not as bad as you think - they won't be spamming you right away, and you DO have the opportunity to decline between now and then.

  72. Re:confirmation of reset prefs? by homer_ca · · Score: 2

    Confirmed here too. For god's sake go into your profile and clean all your private info out like address and phone number. They could cancel your account if you give them fake info, but when was the last time that happened to anyone. Definitely don't give them any more info than they require. Last I checked a street address and phone number are not required, just a ZIP code and birth date.

  73. just use spamgourmet by antichef · · Score: 2, Informative

    spamgourmet offers unlimited free disposable email addresses that you can have forward to any real address. You don't have to create them on the website, just give one to somebody and it gets created the first time *they* use it. I never trusted Yahoo, anyway...

  74. That's what the YBL is for. by Dredd13 · · Score: 2
    It's a standard dnsbl blacklist that only contains Yahoo's netblocks. So it doesn't matter what domain they come from (yahoo.com, geocities.com, etc.).

    Just add "ybl.megacity.org" to your standard DNSBL configurations in your MTA of choice and away you go.

    This public service brought to you by...me.

    D

  75. Appropriate Forwarding Address by zangdesign · · Score: 2

    I just set my email address on Yahoo to investor_relations@yahoo-inc.com. That (hopefully) will take care of that problem.

    On another note, how does one go about getting rid of a Yahoo account? I'm gonna miss my TV listings, but I wasn't really watching it that much anyway. And the movie listings were pretty handy as well. Anyone know of a replacement site where I can get that info? (Our local theatre is a small chain and isn't really into the web that much.

    --
    To celebrate the occasion of my 1000th post, I will post no more forever on Slashdot. Goodbye.
  76. How to get your email. by Some+guy+named+Chris · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you're like many, and haven't enabled pop3 access until now, you are probably discovering that they aren't making it obvious how to enable pop3 forwarding for you. Makes it kind of hard to get your email off their system before it becomes fee based, doesn't it?

    What they aren't telling you is that until April 24th, the flag they are using to control whether you have pop3 access is still changable by you!

    Here's what you do:

    1. Log into your Yahoo! account and go here. This should be the Marketing Preferences page.
    2. Enable the last option ONLY, the one that says "Special offers from selected Yahoo! partners brought to you by Yahoo! Delivers."
    3. Optionally, instead of items 1 and 2, you can just click this link.
    4. Now, you can log into the pop server pop.mail.yahoo.com with your yahoo ID and password and get all your mail off!
    5. Enjoy a pat on the back for beating the system

    Hope that helps some of you.

  77. Re:Yahoo offers are GREAT!! Opt-in!! by Dredd13 · · Score: 2
    Actually that phone number used to be mine when I worked there as the domain contact. I don't know where that number goes now, though.

    And you should address the mail to Srinija Srinivasan, since she's the one quoted in the article as being all behind this new move.

    A better number would be 349-3300 (the main number, press zero for an operator).

    D

  78. Put yahoo.com in your spam filters by djmurdoch · · Score: 2

    I already had yahoo.com messages flagged as spam. I thought with the move to a pay system they'd drive out the spammers, but instead they've decided to become spammers themselves. No problem, they can stay in the filters.

  79. Re:Third Party Spammers sold our info? by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2
    How the hell would I notice? I get up to 100 spams a day, and some Slashdot readers (and staffers) get even more than that.

    :P

  80. *SIGH* by Chris+Johnson · · Score: 2

    Is it me or did they top off the pref-unsetting experience by rewarding me with a pop-under? :P

  81. Yahoo Reports Yahoo's Screwup by sohp · · Score: 2, Funny

    Amusingly enough, the CNet story got onto the syndicate feeds and ended up on the front page of My Yahoo.

  82. It is your job to guard your privacy by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

    Note also at the bottom, that you will be marked YES for 'By US Mail' and 'By Phone' as well.

    This should be pretty damn obvious, but you shouldn't give them your real US mail address and phone number anyway when you sign up. I almost never give those out, and guess what? I get maybe one telemarketing call a month (neener neener neener!) And when I do get them, I tell them to go f--k themselves, which usually deters them from calling back. Perhaps that's actually what they're doing? :D

    Basically, what it comes down to is that if you want your privacy protected, you have to really take steps to guard it yourself. You can't just give your information out to anybody that asks for it and expect them to respect your privacy.

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  83. Re:** Just do what I did!! -- And risk losing acct by donutz · · Score: 3, Informative

    If you give them inaccurate information to the registration questions, you risk having your account deactivated. From the Yahoo Terms of Service:

    In consideration of your use of the Service, you agree to: (a) provide true, accurate, current and complete information about yourself as prompted by the Service's registration form (such information being the "Registration Data") and (b) maintain and promptly update the Registration Data to keep it true, accurate, current and complete. If you provide any information that is untrue, inaccurate, not current or incomplete, or Yahoo has reasonable grounds to suspect that such information is untrue, inaccurate, not current or incomplete, Yahoo has the right to suspend or terminate your account and refuse any and all current or future use of the Service (or any portion thereof).

  84. Yahoo! being acquired?? by donutello · · Score: 2

    I found it very interesting that the new privacy policy so explicitly specifies what will happen if they are acquired. Something has to be in the works.

    Given their recent behavior, it sounds rather like they are trying to fit into the AOL culture.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
  85. Get used to it by NewtonsLaw · · Score: 3, Insightful
    I fear that those of us who are strongly anti-spam are becoming the minority and that those who have already accepted it as "just a fact of [online] life" are a rapidly growing majority.

    Yesterday I wrote an article on how Google, for all its good Netizenship, has sold out to the spaming industry.

    If you enter the search query "bulk email" you'll see that Google is quite happy to play its role in the promotion of spamware and spamming services -- by way of the list of paid-advertisements down the right-hand side of the page promoting such products and services.

    Surprisingly, I had a raft of feedback from readers who seem to think that there's nothing wrong with Google carrying paid advertising for the promotion of spamware and spamming services.

    I know that over the past seven years I've started and run (and sold) a number of very successful ad-funded online publications and I've never felt that I had to stoop so low as to accept advertising dollars from spammers.

    Perhaps I'm just one of a dying breed of entrepreneurs who are prepared to put his money where his mouth is in the battle against spam.

    I see this latest move by Yahoo to simply be part of a slow but inevitable move towards the day when we're all forced to swallow our daily diet of spam along with the few little morsels that are actually real email.

  86. Ironically enough... by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

    I'm tempted to keep the settings as they are. A while ago I set my mailing address to:

    1600 Pennsylvania Ave.
    Washington, DC 20500-0001

    At any rate I'm noticing the site is running a tad sluggishly. Have we slashdotted Yahoo?

  87. Not just Yahoo by kireK · · Score: 2, Interesting

    HotMail did the same... even set "Share my registration information" to yes. This info includes county, region, state, ZIP, gender and a few other goodies.

  88. Re:Thank You -- Warning About Changing Back by Fishstick · · Score: 2

    nope. this is common to just about every preference or email management page has buttons bot top and bottom. this is actually a nice feature since you don't havt to scroll all the way down to the bottom of a page to hit 'submit' (or vice versa). 'course, just hitting the enter key usually submits the form anyway.

    --

    There is much cruelty in the universe, John.
    Yeah, we seem to have the tour map.

  89. Re:Oregon by BadDoggie · · Score: 2
    Great. So you have to PAY to be left alone. Do you not see the problem with this? The word is "extortion". Think "Italian 'protection' schemes in New York City".

    woof.

  90. Easy way around all of this crap by Space+cowboy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ... is to lie. Apparently I'm a female construction worker, and only 3 years old too -
    precocious, huh :-)

    The important thing is the age - if you're less than 13 they don't bombard you with any crap at all...

    Simon.

    --
    Physicists get Hadrons!
  91. Delete your accounts, people! by rakslice · · Score: 2

    Another TrustE certification I noticed on the linked page... You may delete your account at any time. =)

    I just did. Bye bye Yahoo IM, Groups, Maps, etc. accounts. Too bad for them. Maybe if enough people leave over this, they'll change some policies. But if they don't, I'll just keep going about my business elsewhere.

  92. I just unsubscribed all my memberships, but... by PhilHibbs · · Score: 2

    when I tried to email the list administrators, with an individual email to each but cc:d to abuse@yahoo.com, all but one of the emails were refused thus:

    We are unable to process the message from <xxxxx@xxxxx.co.uk>
    to <xxxxx-owner@yahoogroups.com>.

    You may not cross-post a message to moderators of multiple groups
    simultaneously. Your message to the moderator of the xxxxx
    group was not delivered.

    For further assistance, please email support@yahoogroups.com
    or visit http://help.yahoo.com/help/us/groups/

    So I tried removing the cc:, and that didn't work either. It seems that once you've emailed the owner of a group, Yahoo looks out for emails to other group owners, and blocks them. So I had to post to the lists instead, with an explanation and apology for posting to the group. Does that suck, or what?

  93. Re:It is (was) a free service by BigBlockMopar · · Score: 2

    You can have your domain, yeah. Setting up and maintaining software to run email server is free?

    Sure. I've already got a high-speed static IP for $34.95/mo, and the server running, so it's only a couple of lines in the /etc/files.

    I don't know about you, but fiddling with the settings of my linux box quickly goes from "fun" to "I'd pay someone good money if I didn't have to bother with this". Usually sometime around 3am.

    I know the feeling. :) I quickly got over it, though. My webserver and firewall do their own things independently of anything else. I don't touch 'em except to do patches. The electricity usage is still less than $xx/mo for hosting, and the benefit (in the winter, anyway) is that the electricity they consume still contributes to heating the house... even if heating electrically is more expensive than heating by oil. Typically, I have to heat for 8 months of the year, one way or another - mid-September through mid-May.

    In my case, anyway, it makes perfect economic sense. And, another benefit is that I can use Samba to drag and drop large stuff to my webserver so that friends can download it conveniently. (Main machine still runs Windows, unfortunately.)

    Well, yahoo is a rather nice email service as far as webmail goes. Much better than hotmail, certainly. Looking at all the .com corpses, I don't blame them trying to make profit.

    Yup. But $20/year seems a little steep for POP3 access, especially given the above.

    Personally I use another service, which is even more expensive than yahoo. But they have fascist spam filtering and IMAP among other things.

    Who? Fascist spam filtering sounds interesting...

    --
    Fire and Meat. Yummy.
  94. Where localhost goes if you're not careful by billstewart · · Score: 2
    So what happens if you type in "localhost" rather than a fully qualified domain name? Probably the machine you're on has "127.0.0.1 localhost" in its equivalent of a hosts file, but another alternative is that it tries to resolve localhost.subdomain.mydomain.com, then localhost.mydomain.com, then localhost.com . The last one *does* resolve, to a machine that *isn't* 127.0.0.1 :-) Be careful, a Grue might eat you! I don't know what happens to email to root@localhost.com, but it probably also gets eaten by grues.

    If for some reason, your browser or some other helpful software decides to resolve that to www.localhost.com , you'll get a helpful page explaining that your DNS configuration is probably not correct and pointing you to some common problems.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  95. I lost my Hotmail account that way :-) by billstewart · · Score: 2

    My hotmail account had some default birth year on it, like the 1997 that I got the account. When they put in the new law about protecting information for children under 13, they blocked my account until my parents gave permission for them to reactivate it, complete with documentation that those "parents" were over 13. Not wanting to give them real documentation, I decided that I could use another disposable account somewhere else instead.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks