Slashdot Mirror


Living on Internet Time... Like Thomas Edison Did

securitas writes: "If you think that dotcommers are the first people to live on Internet time, then take a trip to the 19th century (NYT Story, here's a Yahoo link). Thomas Edison had 10,000 researchers and scientists working at his Menlo Park labs, who slept on their desks, and had the same problems pleasing the investment community as today's tech companies. The result? Over 1000 patents and many inventions that we take for granted today."

290 comments

  1. What do we have today? by AntiPasto · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Headaches, and the careers of 1000's that we take for granted.

  2. Bad slashbot. by saintlupus · · Score: 2, Funny

    The result? Over 1000 patents and many inventions that we take for granted today.

    Bad slashbot. Patents are always evil. You are not correctly disseminating RMSthought or ESRspeak.

    Time for re-ned-ucation!

    --saint

    1. Re:Bad slashbot. by baronben · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Its not the idea of a patent which is bad, registering with the government for the express purpose of protecting your idea for a limited amount of time is great, it helps foster innovation and otherwise makes life a little easer to live.


      However, you'll notice that Edison only patented his idea of passing electricity though a special filament in order to make light. He did not patent the idea of making light. He patented the idea for a phonograph which could reproduce sounds encoded on a wax cilender. He did not patent the idea of recording and playing back music.

    2. Re:Bad slashbot. by shawnce · · Score: 1
      However, you'll notice that Edison only patented his idea of passing electricity though a special filament in order to make light. He did not patent the idea of making light. He patented the idea for a phonograph which could reproduce sounds encoded on a wax cilender. He did not patent the idea of recording and playing back music.


      True... it is not so much that people try to patent the obvious or what you could call ethereal but that the patent office lets people do this every now and then.

      Most of the time they do this right... I guess they just haven't fully figured out how to deal with "software" patents.
    3. Re:Bad slashbot. by simm_s · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Right on!
      In today's world, laws that were designed to protect people are twisted and gnarled to be used against people. I once read that as a small self-employed inventor you will need two or more patents to protect your invention. If you have only one, larger companies will be able to exploit your ideas. When you decide to sue the large company, good luck!

      Large companies, on the other hand, utilize patents to control markets and lock out competitors. The whole system needs to be reviewed.

    4. Re:Bad slashbot. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2
      Bad slashbot. Patents are always evil.

      Patents aren't bad. Software patents are bad.

      The government grants three primary forms of protection for IP: trade secrets, copyrights and patents. Until software arrived, very few products enjoyed protection under more than one of these concepts.

      Software is often subject to restrictions from all three protections simultaneously. Copyrights (of course), trade secrets (closed source), and now patents. Top it off with the need to enter into a "contract" to install the software that further restricts your rights.

      Each individual IP protection category was carefully developed over time to balance the rights of the producers and consumers. When software makers OR together all of their rights and AND together their customers' rights, this throws the whole system out of balance.

      To return software to a more reasonable situation, at least one of the protections for it should be disallowed. Since patents are the worst fit for software, software patents should be severely curtailed or eliminated.

    5. Re:Bad slashbot. by nathanm · · Score: 2
      The government grants three primary forms of protection for IP: trade secrets, copyrights and patents.
      Close, but not quite. Trade secrets are not granted by the government. The one you missed is the trademark.

      The copyright (at least before 1976), patent, and trademark require you to register with the government to be granted. Trade secrets are just that, secrets. About the only protection they offer is that in court proceedings, if you can convince the judge a piece of your evidence is a trade secret, it won't be entered into the court records.
    6. Re:Bad slashbot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      The result? Over 1000 patents and many inventions that we take for granted today.

      Bad slashbot. Patents are always evil. You are not correctly disseminating RMSthought or ESRspeak.

      You mean software patents shithead!

    7. Re:Bad slashbot. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2
      OK, trade secrets aren't granted by the government, but they are recognized by it. You can make your employees sign contracts that forbid them from revealing trade secrets, and those contracts are enforceable.

      I left out trademarks because they are pretty much orthogonal to the software patent problem.

    8. Re:Bad slashbot. by nathanm · · Score: 2
      You can make your employees sign contracts that forbid them from revealing trade secrets, and those contracts are enforceable.
      You could forbid your employees from wearing pants by contract and it would be enforceable (as long as they sign it). The minute they wear pants you could sue for breach of contract.

      I left out trademarks because they are pretty much orthogonal to the software patent problem.
      Correct. The best tool I've found to understand the relationships between the different types of "intellectual property" is this IP map by law professor Tom Bell.
    9. Re:Bad slashbot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Edison held patents which gave his company complete control of the motion picture business.

      It was only after this monopoly was broken up that the modern studio system arose.

    10. Re:Bad slashbot. by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2
      The best tool I've found to understand the relationships between the different types of "intellectual property" is this IP map

      That is an interesting diagram. Using that as a reference, what I originally meant to say is that they want to simultaneously apply all of the protections from the bottom half of that diagram to a single product. Plus an EULA as a bonus.

    11. Re:Bad slashbot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "..He patented the idea for a phonograph which could reproduce sounds encoded on a wax cilender. He did not patent the idea of recording and playing back music."

      Obviously avoiding any trouble from the RIAA...

    12. Re:Bad slashbot. by cyberlotnet · · Score: 1

      Ok, the patent office must be full of idiots like you..

      Your stated contract is invalid and as stupid as the patents coming out of the office these days..

      You can not have a valid contract that forces a person to do something harmfull, or illegal.. A contract stating a person can't wear pants would be such..

      You could state then have to wear slacks.. But so say they can't where pants all together wouldnt hold up in court..

      Just like these software patents shouldnt hold up in court

    13. Re:Bad slashbot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Who is to say that working without pants is harmful or illegal? I think you should preface what you say with "IANAL" because you obviously have no clue what you are talking about.

    14. Re:Bad slashbot. by JatTDB · · Score: 1

      Next job I go to, I'm going to *insist* on a no-pants clause in my contract. Thank you for this wonderful idea.

      Chillin' in the server room in my boxers...awww yeah.

      --
      "That's Tron. He fights for the Users."
    15. Re:Bad slashbot. by mikerich · · Score: 1
      Of course what the article neglects to point out is that Edison did not invent the incandescent light bulb. Indeed at the time of his patent he had not even created a workable filament.


      In reality the light bulb was created by Joseph Swan who had already demonstrated an incandescent bulb 10 years before Edison and patented his device more than a year before Edison's patent.


      Swan was well ahead technologically. He had first tried using carbonised paper for a filament, but the best available vacuum pump could't extract enough oxygen from the bulb. Later when the pumps improved, Swan found that adsorbed oxygen on the filament continued to cause them to burn out. Additionally, exisiting materials were too irregular, with hot-spots and weaknesses. Swan turned to synthetics. He produced some of the first synthetic cellulose fibres, carbonised them and made a working filament. (I seem to recall that some of the fibres were made into lace by his wife).


      The synthetic carbon filament remained the best available until the invention of the tungsten filament in the US around 1910.


      Edison lost patent cases for the light bulb in both the UK and the US. In the UK, Edison was forced to co-name Swan in the Edison-Swan United Electric Light Company which made bulbs on Swan's design. In the US Edison's patents were ruled invalid as it was deemed he had based his work on that of William Sawyer.


      Edison was a genius, but let's attribute his inventions correctly.

    16. Re:Bad slashbot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      An AC wrote:
      Who is to say that working without pants is harmful or illegal


      One word: winter.
    17. Re:Bad slashbot. by cyberlotnet · · Score: 1

      You have to read my message in full context Anonymous moron..

      If I where to show up in my underwear I could be put in jail..

      If its 0 below outside I could be hurt

  3. Sure he got a lot done. by beamdriver · · Score: 4, Funny
    See how much work your techies can get do when they can't surf for pr0n all day.

    Imagine of they had the Internet back in Edison's day.

    "Hey, did you invent that light bulb yet"

    "Sorry boss, I spent all day downloading 'Naughty Knickers 6'"

    1. Re:Sure he got a lot done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Edison probably did something unheard of today. He showed up for work every day, got involved, watched and understood what was going on, didn't sneak off unannounced to go to the Hooter Bar, and waste more time, setting a bad example for the workers back at the company. Oh yes, he wasn't some "manager" that an out-of-state boss/owner hired to run the store, and forgets _permanently_ to drop by once in a great while to see if the "manager" is there, or to marvel at the drunks, etc. that the "manager" has hired. Gee, does this sound like some place you know about? I hope not. For all the "out-of-state bosses, etc" that might be reading this, you can bet that only half of your employees are actually working and contributing to the success of your business. You need to show up some day, and clean house, starting at the top floor! Yes, Edison's lab was a good example of productivity from times long ago, and No, not every business today can measure up to their standards. Looks like it'll always be that way.

    2. Re:Sure he got a lot done. by Drath · · Score: 1

      "Patriots Gone Wild: Guy Fawlks Day"

    3. Re:Sure he got a lot done. by deglr6328 · · Score: 2

      Yes, I hear that the engineers down in the kinetoscope development room, have obtained a copy for "testing" purposes. Word has it that Mme. Irwin shows her ankles!!

      --
      - "Hear that?! The percolations are imminent! Cease your ingress!"
    4. Re:Sure he got a lot done. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Note: Edison and Edisons lab did not invent the incandescant lightbulb. It was Joseph Swan. The courts found that Edison had just copied Swans work.
      Repeat a big enough lie often enough and people will believe it.

  4. "The result?" by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The Great Depression.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
    1. Re:"The result?" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hehe, it must take quite a lot of drugs to make that jump.... I'm impressed, even for you, this is stupid.

    2. Re:"The result?" by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 3, Interesting

      amen.

      kicked off the first truly big stock market bubble - electricity companies. bugs bunny numbers and valuations, just like the internet bubble.

      followed shortly by the automobile and radio bubble.

      the crash, boom, alakazam... Great Depression time....

      well... at least this time, we dont have a horribly pro-big business president. doh.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
  5. Its called business by gad_zuki! · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Sure this is a geek friendly story, but "internet time" which was called "hard work" at one point isn't limited to high tech. Have you ever tried to start your own company in any field? I have and yes, you do work for pennies and you do work twice or three times the hours your pals work all for a gamble that you can carve a niche out for yourself in your local economy.

  6. Front page display of the story by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Italics are busted again.

    --
    "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    1. Re:Front page display of the story by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 1

      It was ontopic at the time --- the editor forgot to close the tag when he posted the story. That has to do with the story, meaning it is ON TOPIC. I don't give a flying fsck how much of a stretch my claim is. It's technically correct, so STFU and mod me back up to 1.

      Oh, and by the way, I'm in a bad mood.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
  7. Tesla by phrontist · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I still say tesla was covered up by edison and it still going on today. Oh well I'm just paranoid.
    Phrontist=Geek

    --
    T( H)GSB Apr 21-27
    1. Re:Tesla by doooras · · Score: 3

      Tesla was ok, I guess... I mean "Signs" was pretty cool, but they kinda disappeared after that, it seems...

    2. Re:Tesla by Anonymous+Cowrad · · Score: 1

      That was a cover, by the way. I think it was originally done by the 5 Man Electrical Band

      That must suck ass, to have the one signifigant achievement in your life be a rip off of someone else's signifigant achievement.

      --

      --
      pants ahoy
    3. Re:Tesla by Flavio · · Score: 1

      The band is back together. They have a new live album called RePlugged.

      My favorite Tesla album is Five Man Acoustical Jam.

      Back on topic, the engineer Tesla filed hundreds of patents (I've read differing reports about the exact number, but it usually lies between 600 and 1000). Many of them were classified and have stayed so ever since.

      I believe Tesla was technically superior to Edison. Edison was only interested in conventional ideas which could eventually bring revenue. Tesla was interested in the innovation, no matter the expense.

    4. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      *cough* Micro-um... nevermind...

    5. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tesla devolved into a nut in his later years.

      In that sense, he 'fell away from his early work' similar to the way Bill Gates doesn't hack code anymore.

    6. Re:Tesla by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      It'd be nice to read an objective account of Telsa. My initial searches of Tesla revealed a lot of people are far more concerned with 'conspiracy theories' than actual facts of what happened.

      From what I can tell, Tesla did a TON of work involving electricity and fields etc, but Edison seems far more well rounded.

      Can anybody help me out? Where can I find more objective information?

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    7. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      Well tesla destroyed himself trying to deleiver wireless power distribution.

      While we tend to pay attention to the supprising innovations, most innovation actually comes from developing conventional ideas over times such as how edison did.

    8. Re:Tesla by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      take your pick of books.

    9. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Tesla's autobiography is up on E2.

    10. Re:Tesla by Reltuk · · Score: 0

      There's quite a few books...my favorite being Tesla: Master of Lightning. Anyway, neither was "well-rounded" by todays terms. Tesla was obsessive-compulsive and couldn't stand to be dirty, had problems with doing everyday things like turning off water faucets, etc. Edison was the complete opposite, and would only shower and eat at the forceful hand of his wife :-).

      --Reltuk

    11. Re:Tesla by (outer-limits) · · Score: 1

      Edison was nothing more than a basic hacker. He did not invent the electric light, other scientists had already thought of the idea, he just persevered trying thousands of materials till he found one that lasted long enough to be practical. It is just that he happens to be American, and America needed to create it's mythology, (ref. Davy Crockett, Buffalo Bill, Walt Disney, etc), that he ever became such a folk hero. Other geniuses were the real inventors. For example, quantum theory was being invented back in the time of the biplane.

      --

      Microsoft - Where would you like to go today, Maybe Jail?

    12. Re:Tesla by spiro_killglance · · Score: 2

      The last part of Chapter 5 reads:

      1) The inter-connection of existing telegraph exchanges or offices all over the world;

      2) The establishment of a secret and non-interferable government telegraph service;

      3) The inter-connection of all present telephone exchanges or offices around the Globe;

      4) The universal distribution of general news by telegraph or telephone, in conjunction with the Press;

      5) The establishment of such a "World System" of intelligence transmission for exclusive private use;

      6) The inter-connection and operation of all stock tickers of the world;

      7) The establishment of a World system -- of musical distribution, etc.;

      8) The universal registration of time by cheap clocks indicating the hour with astronomical precision and requiring no attention whatever;

      9) The world transmission of typed or hand-written characters, letters, checks, etc.;

      10) The establishment of a universal marine service enabling the navigators of all ships to steer perfectly without compass, to determine the exact location, hour and speak; to prevent collisions and disasters, etc.;

      11) The inauguration of a system of world printing on land and sea;

      12) The world reproduction of photographic pictures and all kinds of drawings or records..."

      Wow, Tesla imagined the Internet and GPS and
      radio clocks and the world stock market. OK was wrong in thinking he's magnifing transmitter would do the trick, but still thats an incredible
      feat of prediction.

    13. Re:Tesla by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, no, no. You're all fucked up!

      Tesla sang "signs" and a bunch of other shitty songs nobody remembers.
      "Master of Lightning"? You're thinking of
      "Master of Puppets" and "Ride the Lightning" by Metallica.
      Jeezus.

    14. Re:Tesla by VWswing · · Score: 2, Informative

      Read the book "Man of lightning" It shows a lot
      of truths about tesla..

      For example, Tesla holds the patent for wirelss
      transmission, not marconi.

      Without tesla we'd have power statiosn every few
      miles because.. well. DC doesn't go too damned far..

      --
      "And how can this be? For he is the ..."
  8. edison=teh suq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Edison screwed over Tesla

    1. Re:edison=teh suq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Edison was a true geek. He was always notable for his unwashed hair, and his habit of staying up all night working on stuff. He started out as a boy operating a small newspaper, including printing press, on a railroad car. He came up through the ranks of the 'hackers' known as Telegraph Operators.

      Tesla was noted for wearing formal dress to work, including spats.

    2. Re:edison=teh suq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Different cultures. Edison could dress like a slob because he could get away with it... I'm sure it bothered people.

  9. I tried this once! by colonelteddy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Trying to keep up with Edison, who survived on little sleep and recharged with catnaps on top of his desk,

    Reading this in one of the physics labs at uni. I decided this method might be the way to increase my grades and come up with that pesky solution, I mean, if it worked for such an obviously great inventor and man as Edison, surely it oculd do something for me!

    So of course, I curled up on one of the benches in the labs, for a quick nap. let me suggest: DONT DO THIS! they dont like having students sleeping on their equipment.


    .... of course, the very blurry hologram of my big toe is rather amusing

    --
    c - a blessed +5 grain of salt
  10. The next light bulb from some php slackers? by jbridges · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Big difference between a research lab refining the lightbulb, and a zillion overfunding dot-bombs selling dog food at a $50 loss per customer.

    Staying up all night trying to fix yet another eCommerce site before the VC funding dries up is 100% perspiration and 0% inspiration.

  11. list of patents by flynt · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here is the complete list of inventions and patents of thomas a. edison. truly a remarkable man.

    1. Re:list of patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except for the fact that the majority of his patents were stolen from either his workers or Tesla, and the fact that he couldn't innovate, only refine, methods, and the fact that he used monopolistic practices (albeit unsucessfully) to defend his direct current empire against the onslaught of alternating current generators (which we never use today, anyway), then Edison was an okay guy!

    2. Re:list of patents by rho · · Score: 2
      truly a remarkable man.

      At first I thought this was the Alan Thicke troll...

      --
      Potato chips are a by-yourself food.
    3. Re:list of patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      One of Edison's greatest inventions was the Research and Development lab. He was one of the first to hire on a lot of smart people for general purpose research, who could then be directed toward projects to develop useful things.

      As such, he 'stole from his workers' much the same as any worker at, say, INTEL was 'stolen from' who claims that his work should belong to himself.

      Tesla is the 'alternative hero' kind of guy. I'd call him the 'Amiga of invention.' Somebody for the nutcases who want to be in the vocal minority for the sake of being the vocal minority will gravitate to. Like the design of the Amiga, Tesla had his merits. Like the Amiga, he has loudmouths out there who will rant that he has been shit on by the mainstream.

      Whatever. Keep ranting about Tesla. It gives potential employers a way of weeding you out as a weirdo.

    4. Re:list of patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Does that list include the electrocution of stray animals as well?

      Think I'm joking?

      Edison did just that, in order to "prove" that Tesla/Westinghouse's newfangled Alternating Current was "dangerous". With this we can see that perhaps Edison's true invention was FUD, plain and simple.

    5. Re:list of patents by CharlezManning · · Score: 1

      1000 patents out of 10,000 R&D staff is nothing to crow about. I'd expect something closer to 20,000 patents.

    6. Re:list of patents by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1

      But...it is dangerous, isn't it? Is it still FUD?

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    7. Re:list of patents by 198348726583297634 · · Score: 2, Funny

      I believe the proper phrase is:

      truly an american icon

    8. Re:list of patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Does that list include the electrocution of stray animals as well? Think I'm joking? Edison did just that, in order to "prove" that Tesla/Westinghouse's newfangled Alternating Current was "dangerous". With this we can see that perhaps Edison's true invention was FUD, plain and simple.

      Yea this is true. Sort of the dirty tricks you would expect from Microsoft. The funny part is that the electric chair actually uses DC. The good old Edison way!

      Edison strung up some power lines in New York. Course his used DC not AC. Damn thing would start to glow when they powered up the street!

    9. Re:list of patents by rodgerd · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Not in the way Edison was trying to claim.

      Telsa thought AC was the way to go for long distance power transmission; he'd fallen out with Edison after Edison had already ripped him off, and took the idea to Westinghouse.

      Edison, meanwhile, had invested a lot in using DC for long distance transmission, even though it's quite inferior. Since he couldn't compete on the merits of the technology he was pushing, he ran a campaign to try and scare people away from AC by pointing to its use in the electric chair, and by slaughtering animals with AC driven apparatus.

      Of course, at the kind of volatages and currents used for transmission, DC is just as dangerous as AC (grab the poisitive 550V DC terminal on a Wellington trolley bus while grounded if you don't believe me), but Edison wasn't about to allow the pesky facts to get in the way.

    10. Re:list of patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Considering that IBM (industry leader in number of granted patents/yr) was granted 3000 patents last year across a staff of 300,000+, I'd say that Edison had a lot to crow about.

    11. Re:list of patents by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The funny part is that the electric chair actually uses DC. The good old Edison way!

      Classic Westinghouse FUD!

    12. Re:list of patents by bluGill · · Score: 2

      Accually DC is better than AC for long distance power transmissions. Corenia (sp) discharge is a problem at high voltage, eventially you cannot pump any more voltage into a wire. However, the maximum voltage reached counts, and AC varies the voltage, and is only carring the maximun for a moment, while DC can carry the maximun voltage forever.

      AC also has phase problems if you create a loop. Not a problem on a small scale, but that a generator in NY and a generator in CA cannot be connected with AC because there is no way to synchronize the peaks everywhere on the wire.

      I've just given a small overview. If you want to understand this, a good education followed by a job in power transmission is the way to go.

    13. Re:list of patents by gewalker · · Score: 1

      Correct as far as you go, however, for educational purposes you should hae continued to mention why AC won the war (eventually, DC was still in use in NYC as late as 1950).

      AC permits the use of transformers to step/down voltage. To keep trasnmission loss small, voltage must be high. To keep from killing consumers in droves, voltage must be low.

      Back to NYC, why did DC finally die? Television, which requires a step up transformer to generate the high voltages needed for the CRT.

      Even Edison's marketing might could be this advantage of AC power.

    14. Re:list of patents by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Esp. when compared to Artur Fischer, who has 1042 inventions to his credit and 5700 patents worldwide.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

    15. Re:list of patents by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      the complete list of inventions and patents of thomas a. edison.

      For very small values of complete, you mean. At the top of the page you cited:

      This page lists the principal inventions and discoveries of Thomas Edison
      There are hundreds more not on that list.
    16. Re:list of patents by CharlezManning · · Score: 1

      Of IBM's 300,000 employees how many are R&D? Probably only a few thousand (lets say 10,000). That's 0.3 patents per person year.

      How long did Edison's R&D group take to generate their 1000 patents. I don't know, but lets say it was 5 years. That's only 200/year for 10000 people or about 0.02 patents per person year.

      Remember too that Edison's folks were chasing patents. Most people only create patents as a side effect of their normal work.

  12. overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Edison is perhaps one of the most overrated figures in American History. Like Darwin, his political clout helped him to become the known inventor of things which had been developed elsewhere at the same time.

    1. Re:overrated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lots of things were invented nearly simultaneously in the 19th and early 20th century. There were people all over the globe tinkering and experimenting.

      Edison's greatest invention was the Research and Development lab, which he used very successfully.

    2. Re:overrated by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      If he had half the political clout you claim he had we'd all have DC power outlets in our homes instead of the AC Westinghouse pushed.

      Today's useless fact: When the electric chair was first developed and used, Edison pushed (successfully) to have the chair run on AC. His motive: He wanted to have AC associated with something deadly so that consumers would ask for DC instead.

    3. Re:overrated by ArchieBunker · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Edison also staged public shows where he electrocuted various animals with AC to show how deadly it was. Tesla later challenged him to a contest to see who could withstand the highest voltage, Edison backed out. Lucky for Tesla that higher frequencies travel on the outside of an object instead of passing through it, also known as the 'skin effect'

      --
      Only the State obtains its revenue by coercion. - Murray Rothbard
    4. Re:overrated by SocietyoftheFist · · Score: 1

      Calculus was developed around the same time by two seperate individuals, one being Sir Issac Newton who was a very bitter man and sought to discredit the other researcher, and it worked well. Can you name him? The victors always write the history books.

    5. Re:overrated by harks · · Score: 1

      Yes, Liebnitz.... I am taking calculus now and they mention Liebnitz quite a bit

    6. Re:overrated by jmv · · Score: 2

      If he had half the political clout you claim he had we'd all have DC power outlets in our homes instead of the AC Westinghouse pushed.

      Not even Microsoft would have succeded in pushing DC instead of AC. There are limits to what marketing can do. MS might succeed in pushing Windows vs. Linux, but not MS-DOS vs. Linux.

    7. Re:overrated by 3waygeek · · Score: 1

      Since Sir Issac apparently died a virgin, no wonder he was bitter.

    8. Re:overrated by dufke · · Score: 1

      , also known as the 'skin effect'

      At a few tens to maybe a few hundreds of herz...?

      I know about the skin effect... but I've only heard of it in relation to coaxial cables, being driven at hundreds or thousands of megaherz.

      --
      __
      Comment submitted. There will be a delay before you understand what you posted.
    9. Re:overrated by ebh · · Score: 2

      You're right, it's a big deal at those frequencies. As most audiophiles (of the educated variety, not the Tice Clock variety) will tell you, the skin effect is negligible below about 10KHz. At house-current frequencies, it's nonexistent.

    10. Re:overrated by God!+Awful · · Score: 1


      Calculus was developed around the same time by two seperate individuals, one being Sir Issac Newton who was a very bitter man and sought to discredit the other researcher, and it worked well. Can you name him? The victors always write the history books.

      That's interesting, because when I studied calculus, the textbooks spun it a different way. To be sure, they mentioned Liebnitz quite a bit, but the story they spin is that Newton invented Calculus first, but he didn't publish because he was too modest. Later, after Liebnitz published his results, Newton's friends convinced him to come forward.

      -a

    11. Re:overrated by krautmann · · Score: 1

      His name was Leibnitz, not Liebnitz. See http://www.maths.tcd.ie/pub/HistMath/People/Leibni z/RouseBall/RB_Leibnitz.html for his biography.

    12. Re:overrated by mindstrm · · Score: 2

      No... Tesla would have done this at tens of thousands of cycles/second.

      The point was about AC as a technology in general.. not the standard 220v/60Hz we are used to now.

      Edison was, in short, scared shitless that AC was so superior for power transmission.

      He also tried to have laws passed limiting the voltage that transmission lines could legally carry, and make it the same for ac and dc.
      The obvious benefit of this is that high-voltage DC is bloody dangerous, and high voltage AC is relatively safe.

  13. This just in: People work long hours BESIDES YOU by UsonianAutomatic · · Score: 2
    "If you think that dotcommers are the first people to live on Internet time,"
    I don't know which is more irksome, the use of the phrase "Internet time", or the implication that I'm supposed to be amazed that in all of human history, I was not the first person to pull an all-nighter because I worked at a dot com.

    But I'll bet Thomas Edison's crew didn't have Nerf guns.
  14. In 50 years.. by insta · · Score: 2, Funny

    We'll be regarding the "one click" patent as the greatest innovation of mandkind!
    Just you wait.

  15. be creative and innovative by sensui · · Score: 1

    So I guess the trick is, to be creative and innovative, you need to live in the dreams all the time.

  16. Where's the connection? by alewando · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Companies have had to please stakeholders since at least the seventeenth century. Where do you think the Jamestown Colony got its funding from?

    So he had a bunch of researchers amassed in a big thinktank operation. This is similar to the decentralized Internet exactly how?

    Unlike the Internet, Edison spawned entire useful industries. Unless you call revolutionizing the distribution of pornography a spectacular human achievement, there's nothing approaching what Edison accomplished here. Comparing the two is just silly.

    Just about the only similarity I can see is in the realm of disputed patents, namely Edison's quadruplex telegraph, which A&PTC and Western Union bitterly squabbled about. But then again, disputed patents are nothing new either.

    1. Re:Where's the connection? by Nightpaw · · Score: 4, Funny

      Unless you call revolutionizing the distribution of pornography a spectacular human achievement, there's nothing approaching what Edison accomplished here.

      Who are you?

  17. Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Here's a task for you to try:
    Go check your encyclopedia to find the answers to the following questions: (answers are given in parentheses)

    1) Who invented the radio? (Marconi)

    2) Who discovered X-rays? (Roentgen)

    3) Who invented the vacuum tube amplifier? (de Forest)

    In fact, while you're at it, check to see who discovered the fluorescent bulb, neon lights, speedometer, the automobile ignition system, and the basics behind radar, electron microscope, and the microwave oven.

    Chances are that you will see little mention of a guy named Nikola Tesla, the most famous scientist in the world at the turn of the century.

    In fact, few people today have ever heard of the guy. Good old Tommy Edison made sure of that.

    (copied from a website)..
    So why is Edison so great? Because he used foul tactics to crush better inventors?

    1. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nope.

      You're not going to sully this discussion with more of those conspiracy-theory 'Tesla rumors.'

      Tesla was also a great inventor. He went nuts and became sort of an embarassing crackpot in his later years, though.

      And he competed in some ways against Edison, and lost.

      There's no 'dark conspiracy' there. Get over it.

      I know you won't. Go read your Alestair Crowley, kay?

    2. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by ctxspy · · Score: 0

      Have you read about Tesla?

      Or do you just like to regurgitate what you heard in high school because, at the time, you thought your teachers were the most amazing and smart people in the world.

      I'll tell you two things. 1) Text books are written by authors working for companies. These companies do not want to break the status quo, hence they do not disparage Edison, and make marginal mention of Nikola Tesla.
      2) Your teachers were probably nitwits that got great grades from your local community college.

      Think about the recursive implications of what I'm saying to you before you respond and flame me.

      -Tomaj

    3. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      "In fact, few people today have ever heard of the guy. Good old Tommy Edison made sure of that."

      I've heard of Tesla plenty of times. I continually had to deal with his invention in C&C: Red Alert. :)

    4. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by s4ltyd0g · · Score: 1

      Heh Isn't Edison's light bulb still burning somewhere? Do you think there will still be a copy of MSDOS 1.0 running somewhere in 50 years time?

    5. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep.

      It's all a conspiracy, man.

      Hand that doobie over here. Quit bogarting it.

    6. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by ctxspy · · Score: 0

      Ohhhhhhhhhhhh.....I get it now

    7. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yep.

      Now you're starting to see.

      Books about Tesla are always in the bargin bin at the Barnes & Noble. They're published by dubious publishing houses, the same sort who publish UFO books. They have that same reek of 'it's all a conspiracy' that the average dope-sodden loser on a sofa has about the world in general.

    8. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I sense bitterness here. Did some alpha male with a big fat doobie in his mouth steal the chick you wanted?

      Anyway, Tesla attracts loonies, no doubt about that. All the same it would be historical revisionism to claim that Edison was above undermining Tesla. The AC/DC conflict was acrimonious.

    9. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Are you nuts? Why would I want to ball some weed-smoking skank chick? Do I look like a loser?

      The AC/DC conflict stands as real history. And an instance where Edison was wrong.

      I like to wonder what a world without any significant source of 50/60 hertz 'hum' interference would be like, however. I think in some ways it'd be nicer.

    10. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Kierthos · · Score: 1

      1) Who invented the radio? (Marconi)

      Except that the Supreme Court ruled that Marconi invented nothing that wasn't already covered by the patents of Tesla, Lodge and Stone.

      Kierthos

      --
      Mr. Hu is not a ninja.
    11. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by sean23007 · · Score: 5, Informative

      When Tesla came to America, he came with an interesting and groundbreaking idea, the concept of using alternating current to distribute electricity over large distances. However, he also lacked money, so he sought a job working for none other than Thomas Edison. His job involved rebuilding the generators when they broke, and the only restriction on this rebuilding process was that he continue to use the direct current concepts that Edison had invented and was trying to push through to fruition. Edison honestly believed that DC was the future, and that it just needed a little more innovation. You see, DC cannot travel long distances at high voltages or with a lot of amps. AC, on the other hand, can, and Tesla recognized this. This recognition led to a rift between Edison and Tesla, with the latter being abrasive, arrogant, and obnoxious, and the former retaliating by stifling AC and Tesla even more. It was a reasonable reaction to Tesla's behavior.

      But don't say that Edison "won," or that Tesla "lost." You may have noticed that electricity travels long distances (across the country, from the plant to your home) by AC, and short distances (from component to component inside your computer) by DC. They are both used because they are both useful.

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    12. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Google says http://www.centennialbulb.org/ Longest burning bulb in the
      world. When it was moved it was done with full honors and sirens. It was
      once hit by a basketball and the firemen RAN from the building. I know
      someone who used to work there. It is a 220V bulb running at 110V. That
      probably explains a lot.

      ac

    13. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Have you ever realized that just because you believe something different from the mainstream that you are neither better than the majority, nor correct.

      Then again you're probably bitter because you got poor grades at the same community college.

    14. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

      You see, DC cannot travel long distances at high voltages or with a lot of amps. AC, on the other hand, can

      Bull.

      An electromechanical transformer cannot transform DC, which means it cannot raise the voltage to levels needed for low-loss long distance transfer.

      But power semiconductors can transform to DC at very high voltages, hence the recent trend to transport power using 'HVDC' lines, to eliminate inductive losses, which become significant at long distances.

    15. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by bugg · · Score: 2
      As humans we're really good at inventing/discovering stuff, ignoring it, inventing it again (and possibly yet again) and then eventually catching on. Why? Greed perhaps.

      Examples:
      All of the Edison examples that you just presented.
      Marconi-Tesla
      Columbus-Native Americans
      On that note, Columbus led a crew a couple thousand miles west. Chris thought that'd be enough to hit Asia. The Greeks had startlingly accurate figures for the circumference of the globe some 1600 years prior.

      We're all plagirists. Deal with it. The innovator is the guy who can *convince* everyone else that he was first.

      --
      -bugg
    16. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Mandelbrute · · Score: 3, Insightful
      He went nuts and became sort of an embarassing crackpot in his later years, though.
      OK - broadcast power, someone had to try it to see how ineffienct it was. Have you ever wondered why all those pencil sketches of broadcast power machines stayed in pencil? On the cutting edge people try all kind of weird ideas that sort of work but are not practical. It appears that a lot of the crackpot stuff was character assaination from other parties. You could get accused of dabbling in black magic at that time simply by being jewish, by being a member of a lodge, or coming from a country with a "z" in it that a lot of odd folk tales come from.
    17. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by MessiahXI · · Score: 1

      how wide spread is this trend? Are you saying that Edison was ultimately right to back DC?

    18. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Bender_ · · Score: 2

      1) Who invented the radio? (Marconi) -> Hertz, Maxwell

      and the basics behind radar -> Christian Huelsmeyer(?), 1904 working prototype

      electron microscope -> ernst ruska, nobel price 1986.

      microwave oven -> The guys who invented the klystron ?

    19. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by bonzoesc · · Score: 3, Insightful

      If you can get a Tanya to their power plants, you shouldn't have anything to worry about.

    20. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by cuteduo · · Score: 0

      >>I like to wonder what a world without any significant source of 50/60 hertz 'hum'
      >>interference would be like, however. I think in some ways it'd be nicer.

      And without power lines. Gotta love the idea of "free" power though with the transmission of
      wireless energy would we have higher rates of cancer now than we do with people living around
      HV AC transmission lines?

    21. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by bluGill · · Score: 2

      Yeah, much as it pains me to admit a brute force idiot like Eddison was right over a thinker like Tesla, DC is better for long distance transmission than AC.

      To Teslas credit though, technology of his day did not allow easy working with DC. In fact even today DC at high voltages cannot be worked with easially. (for instnace you cannot make a DC circuit breaker because when the breaker trips the power just turns air to plasma which is enough of a conductor that the triped breaker still send current. - this is solveable but the prefered way is just have the breaker on AC and then transform DC) Tesla also came up with the induction engine which requires AC. Today it is still cheaper and easier to change voltages with AC, and convert to DC where needed, than to transform DC into AC. So for the last mile I would have to say that AC is better. When going many miles (in the hundreds) DC is better. At the last foot level it is easy to transform to whatever you need at the end.

    22. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      3) Who invented the vacuum tube amplifier? (de Forest)

      Many historians and engineers would insist that Howard Armstrong is the proper and deserving inventor of the vacuum tube amplifier (originally known as the "audion" or "regenerative oscillator"). Why? Well, DeForest's claim is based on an accidental (and quite incidental) discovery that a particular electronic circuit howled when tuned a certain way. It was Armstrong that understood the underlying theory and was able to fine-tune this "howl" into something that could be harnessed to amplify practical signals (such as voice over radio). Furthermore, DeForest never bothered to submit for a patent until he had discovered that Armstrong had fine-tuned the very primitive observation into a usable technology. DeForest would never have gotten, or even attempted to get, a patent based on his discoveries alone.

      DeForest is only credited with the invention because of a U.S. Supreme Court decision based on technically flawed assumptions (Chief Justice Cardozo desperately needed a "Special Master" to tutor him on the technical details). It's all described in fascinating detail in the 1991 PBS Documentary Empire of the Air.

      Another one of Armstrong's inventions that was rightfully his was wide-band Frequency Modulation, the basis of today's FM radio. Armstrong spent the last years of his life fighting companies like RCA and Motorola who blatantly violated his patent rights. Corporate legal tactics, including stalling him for years in endless and expensive "discovery," eventually led him to suicide. His widow eventually triumphed in court after his death and was awarded millions in damages.

    23. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by BushLad · · Score: 1

      so wait, your point is that Thomas Edison wasn't the only inventor ever? Well this is certainly news to the Slashdot community - job well done!

    24. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Da_Biz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You see, DC cannot travel long distances at high voltages or with a lot of amps. AC, on the other hand, can, and Tesla recognized this.

      I hear people say this all the time. I work as a consultant to Bonneville Power Administration (US DOE), which is the holder of many long-distance power intertie lines. The high voltage DC "tie-line" that connects BPA (Oregon) to Los Angeles (California ISO) regularly sends hundreds of megawatts an hour to California, with far lower loss than the AC tie-lines. I know, because I work on the software that helps schedule transmission :-)

      I'm not entirely sure why this is, but perhaps someone in the energy business can fill in why...

      Working on E-Tag 1.7? E-mail pblee@bpa.gov!

    25. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fucking Tanyas... it's the sole reason I stopped playing C&C, some guy sent a single Tanya who destroyed my entire base while chased by a dozen tanks and a platoon of grunts. Fucking Tanya...

    26. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And why do you need 3 (three) nukes to sink a single fliggin ship?

    27. Re:Edison = Microsoft of his time? by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      One simple word: pillbox. Chews Tanyas up to shreds and keeps looking for more.

  18. That's what they will be saying about Gates by mmusn · · Score: 5, Insightful
    100 years from now, people will be looking back at Bill Gates and say the same thing: look, he ran a gigantic research and development lab, creating many of the inventions we take for granted today, and being responsible for the creation of thousands of patents. Never mind that almost all the technology Microsoft puts out was invented elsewhere.

    Of course, Gates is not Edison, but think about how today's events are going to look in the future. That may give you a bit of a better idea of what to think of the past.

    1. Re:That's what they will be saying about Gates by istartedi · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Of course we can only speculate, but I think people will look back at Gates the way they look back at Henry Ford. Gates never claimed to invent the GUIs or OSs. He simply produced an OS that was popular and you could have your applications in any color you liked, as long as they were Windows applications. Likewise, Ford never claimed to invent the automobile. Daimler and Benz had the first practical car, but it was Ford that put them in the hands of millions of Americans and sparked the real revolution. Much like Gates' OS, Ford's cars were "good enough" and offered little choice in style. That was the right tactic for the first few years of the auto, and it was the right tactic for the first few years of computing.

      Of course Daimler and Benz did just fine and became a premium brand--like Apple. There were certainly automobiles prior to Daimler-Benz. These would be analogous to the prototypes turned out by Xerox PARC or the DoD. They failed to reach the market either because the inventors were hogtied by short-sighted backers (Xerox) or because the projects were not suitable for the mass market (ENIAC).

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    2. Re:That's what they will be saying about Gates by CharlezManning · · Score: 1
      Ford's cars were "good enough" and offered little choice in style.

      Ford was also a ruthless shithead in the way he dealt with competition and employees.

    3. Re:That's what they will be saying about Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Visit monolinux and, through embracing the most powerful and efficient operating system in the world, put an end to Bill Gates' evil reign.

    4. Re:That's what they will be saying about Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      :s/monolinux/FreeBSD/

    5. Re:That's what they will be saying about Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS treats it's employees well!

    6. Re:That's what they will be saying about Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      s/FreeBSD/Plan 9/

    7. Re:That's what they will be saying about Gates by istartedi · · Score: 3, Informative

      MS treats it's employees well!

      So did Ford! The plants were famous for their five dollar day (just google that phrase and you can get a lot more links) which was considerably more than the typical daily wage at the time. Ford believed that if the workers made enough to buy the product, it would ultimately be good for the company too.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    8. Re:That's what they will be saying about Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      he ran a gigantic research and development lab, creating many of the inventions we take for granted today


      Except that there are individual researchers working at companies like IBM that hold more patents to their name than the much vaunted Microsoft Research department.

    9. Re:That's what they will be saying about Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Considering the over-emphisis of techinical education in this joint, it might be interesting to the readers that the the system of economic and social relations in the US from 1930 to 1970 is commonly called "Fordism" by historians.

      Ford's 5 Dollar Day, in some corners, gets credit for saving the country from socialism.

    10. Re:That's what they will be saying about Gates by george399 · · Score: 1
      I don't know about Gates... I'd like to think the history books will remember the "Insanely Great" Steve Jobs and his Total Reality Distortion Field!

      crackpot! ha!

      Since they've already forgotten about Woz...

      --
      Patience is a virtue, but I don't have the time - TH
    11. Re:That's what they will be saying about Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      saving the country from socialism.

      saving...?

  19. Did they invent uppers? by linzeal · · Score: 1

    Methamphetamine or methcathinone, or did they do it just with caffiene? I read somewhere that a non-insignificant amount of programmers use speed up to a certain age, expierences ?

    1. Re:Did they invent uppers? by doooras · · Score: 2

      I heard most code jockeys at Microsoft are bred to be addicted to ketricel white.

    2. Re:Did they invent uppers? by Vegeta99 · · Score: 1

      Both were invented by Nazi Germany. SO was Methadone.

      Heroin was also invented in Germany, but before WWII.

    3. Re:Did they invent uppers? by dbremner · · Score: 1

      According to Richard Zack's Underground History, Edison drank a lot of cocaine laced wine.

      --

      Life is a psychology experiment gone awry.
    4. Re:Did they invent uppers? by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

      i would say chemical use in general can correlate directly to the customers interest in software/systems changes. in a support group, programming work is steady and dull. in a development environment, the work is sporadic and at the whim of the project sponsor. when they want a project completed, it has to be as cheep and quick as possible. when they need nothing, you're corporate over head.

  20. One thing Edison DIDN'T invent... by dimator · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...was the electric hammer!

    --
    python -c "x='python -c %sx=%s; print x%%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))%s'; print x%(chr(34),repr(x),chr(34))"
  21. What about...? by mudder · · Score: 2, Funny

    They didn't mention two of Edison's most famous inventions, the automatic hammer, and the 6-legged chair.

  22. Not all things are the same. by fireboy1919 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Consider a story also about the corporate workplace, "Working with Einstiens."
    Heres a quote from a news segment I've seen:
    Reporter: "Mr. Edison, how do you feel about Einstiens theory of relativity?"
    Edison: "Well, I don't quite understand it."

    Edison inspired his staff by working EXTREMELY hard all of the time. Also, because of this, he was certianly qualified to be the boss: he was the one who made it happen, and he didn't play golf to do it. Can the same be said of the local IT industry? Is the management a group of people who got there because their career path in life was to work harder than their peers? Or did they choose a path that they thought would net them the most money with the least amount of work?

    My guess is on the latter for most management.

    I like Edison's management technique a lot better:
    "What a man's mind can create, a man's character can control."

    His character gave him the respect and admiration of his assistants, who helped him with the mundane task of trying out thousands of different materials to find just the right one for the light bulb, among other things. Do you think we find the same in the IT industry? Will I do something "stupid" for someone else because I have faith in them? I think not. I'd only do it for a high rate of pay.

    There is a place akin to this one: MIT media lab, as well as a lot of other Universities throughout the world, where the professors work like dogs for a lot less pay than they would get if they would sell some of their inventions on their own. But don't be so haughty as to compare this lab to IT.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:Not all things are the same. by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      I live in Memphis. There's dick for a "local IT industry"

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    2. Re:Not all things are the same. by AHumbleOpinion · · Score: 1

      There is a place akin to this one: MIT media lab, as well as a lot of other Universities throughout the world, where the professors work like dogs for a lot less pay than they would get if they would sell some of their inventions on their own. But don't be so haughty as to compare this lab to IT.

      Also don't be so haughty to think that university researchers are making a noble financial sacrifice. They are trading money for picking their own projects, IT gets paid more because they don't get to work on whatever they feel like. They are trading job security for ownership of their ideas, they are not putting their money at risk. That said, there is nothing wrong with choosing the university environment, been there, done that. What is going on at the MIT media lab is not comparable to Edison's Menlo Park.

      Apologies for the AC post, I accidently had cookies disabled.

    3. Re:Not all things are the same. by marko123 · · Score: 1

      Professors don't work like dogs. They get their PHD students to do that for them!

      --
      http://pcblues.com - Digits and Wood
    4. Re:Not all things are the same. by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 1

      um, prof's generally don't own thier IP..

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
  23. Gates is the Edison of Today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Edison was a jerk.

    He hired tons of "the best and brightest" and then allowed the press to claim their hard work as his own genius.

    He tried his best to squash anyone who wanted to do it differently than him. See Nickolai Tesla, for example.

    He pushed inferior technologies because of their proprietariness and money making possiblities. If it were up to him, we'd all have DC from every outlet in our homes, with Edison power plants every two city blocks (because DC doesn't transfer over long distances). He staged demonstrations in large metropolitan areas where he would electrocute elephants and horses to show the dangers of AC.

    He was an IP-grubbing exploiter.

    He wanted to unitarilly squash anyone who dared compete with him. See Westinghouse

    Luckily, he eventually lost most of these battles. Let's hope Gates fares so well.

    1. Re:Gates is the Edison of Today by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, Larry Ellision has more in common with Bill Gates than Edison does.

      Scot McNeely has nothing in common with Bill Gates. He's a hockey-playing jock wearing a suit. He doesn't know shit about technology or computers. He's just a good administrator in a suit jacket.

      And Steve Jobs has the most in common with the smarmy coke dealer whose daddy is rich.

    2. Re:Gates is the Edison of Today by Inthewire · · Score: 1

      R-i-g-h-t

      Ever heard of a little company called General Electric? That's right - T. Ed. is dead, but his company lives.

      --


      Writers imply. Readers infer.
    3. Re:Gates is the Edison of Today by ctxspy · · Score: 0

      But they're not using DC power on the power grid. So there.

  24. Decisions... by moral+kiosk · · Score: 1

    From the library, the tour moved to the stock room, where Edison bragged that he had anything he needed to make any conceivable invention.

    Do I make the obvious six-legged chair joke, or the obvious Interoceter joke? Hmm... I'd say Edison was more of an Exeter than a Homer...

    --
    It's so much more attractive / inside the moral kiosk.
  25. Bill Gates is doing nothing new by AsOldAsFortran · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Another lesson from the end of the 19th century is the story of the new media of photography for the common man. Handheld cameras, fast emusions, paper roll film and photographic labs were all new then.

    A collaborator of Edison, George Eastman of Eastman Kodak, behaved like our own Bill Gates. Eastman tried to corner the patents on the new technology of mass production photographic equipment - lots of good stories about him stiff arming competitors and trying to become a monopolist.

    Gives you an opportunity to see what happens to technology monopolists after a hundred years. Got Fuji?

  26. Let's Westinghouse 'em! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    What I wouldn't give to be as nasty as to
    hook a horse to an AC circuit and electrocute
    it over the course of 40 minutes to defame
    my arch-nemesis Westinghouse. It's just too
    bad we have these animal rights laws and so
    many countries have dispatched with the death
    penalty. Oh the evil I could get away with what
    with all the identity theft and lack of privacy
    and copyright stupidity. I'd line up all you
    geeks and make an example out of you for trying
    to break into MY market. Damn your cursed
    "social progress"!!!

    1. Re:Let's Westinghouse 'em! by biobogonics · · Score: 1

      What I wouldn't give to be as nasty as to
      hook a horse to an AC circuit and electrocute
      it over the course of 40 minutes to defame
      my arch-nemesis Westinghouse.


      This actually is the story behind the electric chair. Edison wanted to demonstrate that Westinghouse's AC current was dangerous, as opposed to his "safe" DC, so he encouraged the use of AC at Sing Sing for the electric chair, figuring that public revulsion would spread to AC current as well.

      If you look at the story behind the light bulb, it shows the use of brute force to solve a problem. Edison's assistant tried hundreds of things before coming up with carbonized thread, instead of understanding something about the situation and guessing what might work well. Putting the filament in a vacuum was also not part of their first attempts.

  27. Did I miss something? by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Troll

    Did I skip over a paragraph or something in the article that said Edison was the only guy to ever invent stuff?

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Did I miss something? by VP · · Score: 1

      His point is that all these things were actually invented by Tesla, while Edison is the reason you didn't know that.

  28. Re:My experiences with Windows XP Professional by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    Err wouldn't the password thing have happened with ANY OS? Sounds more like you should be mad at Dell than at Microsoft.

    I bet Edison's response to this would be along the lines of "If you're not solving the right problem, you're not solving anything."

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  29. A few things Edison didn't invent. by gooberguy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The transistor. Without it, we'd be stuck with vacuum tubes. The transistor revolutionized the world by creating the information age. We can credit Edison for the wasteful incandescent buld and a wax phonograph, but how many people use those now? Flourescent lights were invented not long after the incandescent bulb, and not by Edison.

    The radio. The radio finally allowed communication across long distances without a wire. It revolutionized warfare and entertainment.

    The Turing machine. While not a physical machine, it was Alan Turing's amazing machine that changed the world. The first definition of a computer, soon followed by crude mechanical and vacuum tube devices (which were built by Turing & his team)

    To summarize, Edison was not such a great inventor. There were dozens of others who have affected our lives in much more powerful ways. Marconi, Tesla, Turing. Edison actually silenced these inventors using his fame and political clout.

    Just my 2 cents.

    D/\ Gooberguy

    --


    Karma: Meh (Mostly from meh.)
    1. Re:A few things Edison didn't invent. by 0xB · · Score: 2, Informative

      The lightbulb. Everyone thinks Edison did, but Joseph Swan actually invented the lightbulb before Edison

      --
      0xB
    2. Re:A few things Edison didn't invent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The transistor. Without it, we'd be stuck with vacuum tubes.

      Yeah, and guess what: without electricity, none of these would be very useful. Edison essentially invented electrical power distribution for the consumer.

    3. Re:A few things Edison didn't invent. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's just great, but too bad he invented the DC system we DON'T use. Tesla invented the superior polyphase AC system we use today.

    4. Re:A few things Edison didn't invent. by pc486 · · Score: 1

      Edison might not have been a great inventor to you but he probably has had more impact on more people than Marconi, Tesla, and Turning. He was the one who brought in records, so you have to give him credit to mass produced music. He brought in movies by advancing the technology. Every time you watch a movie you are witnessing two of Edison's inventions in a newer form. I bet you couldn't even get to the theater if it wasn't for the headlights on your car. Thanks to Edison we can go watch a 7pm movie at a theater 10 miles away.

      Sure, technology has advanced quite a bit and much of Edison's orginal technology is no longer with us. Same goes with the other inventions of the time. We don't use Marconi's orginal radio and we sure as heck don't use Turning machines anymore. I am not saying that any of these inventors are small and insignificant but to say that Edison's inventions are outdated, worthless, and insignificant is like saying that the original wheel stinks because is nothing like our rubber-based wheels of today.

    5. Re:A few things Edison didn't invent. by Requiem · · Score: 1

      we sure as heck don't use Turning machines anymore.

      Turing machines are not actual physical machines. They are abstract and theoretical, and while their definition is very simple, they can compute anything that is computable, thus making them extremely powerful.

      Turing machines are often used as the model of computation in undergrad complexity courses, having replaced Church's unwieldy lambda calculus.

    6. Re:A few things Edison didn't invent. by shippo · · Score: 1

      Moving pictures were first developed by Louis Aimé Augustine Le Prince whilst living in Leeds, England, firslty in 1886 with a multiple lens camera and then later using just a single lens. The earlier surviving images are a series of taken on Leeds Bridge in 1888. Le Prince received patents in both the USA and the UK.

      At the same time Etienne Marey was also working on moving pictures. Marey considered himself a scientist and not an inventor.

      Marey's design was adapted by William Dixon, an English employee of Edison, into the Kinetoscope, more commonly known as a "What The Butler Saw" machine. This was soon overtaken by the Lumierre brothers work with film projection

      Strangley Le Prince disappeared whilst visiting his brother in France, just prior to making a visit to the USA. Was he killed by Edison or the Lumieres?

  30. Here's an example... by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Troll

    Here's an excerpt of a supposedly true story about Tesla, now you know why I'm looking for objective data:

    "After his death in 1943, his TeslaScope interplanetary communication device was turned on at the home of a friend in Canada, and the assembled group heard the Commander of an Alien vessel, explain the true hidden facts behind Tesla's fantastic 87 year life. Tesla apparently didn't discover until fairly late in his life, that he himself was an Alien, who had been left on Earth as a baby to help the people of the Earth evolve through the use of his inventive genius. From early childhood it was clear that he was quite different and odd compared to more "normal" Earth humans. The Commander mentioned that they had attended Tesla's funeral, and they had simply blurred all the photographs so that there would be no record of their attendance."

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:Here's an example... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a shame, isn't it. Tesla was a smart man, a true genius, but he slowly went insane. By the end of his life he'd pretty much discredited himself, in effect letting Edison, who truly was a rival, win.

    2. Re:Here's an example... by jacoplane · · Score: 1

      What the frell? do you have some more info to point to? I'd be quite interested to hear some more, even though it's no longer april 1st. It'd be nice if someone could do the googling for us, i'm to sleepy right now ;)

    3. Re:Here's an example... by Ctrl-Z · · Score: 1


      Here: Try this. Or maybe this is more to your liking.

      --
      www.timcoleman.com is a total waste of your time. Never go there.
    4. Re:Here's an example... by nomadic · · Score: 4, Informative

      Tesla was a brilliant inventor, who did come up with several interesting innovations, and didn't really get the recognition he deserved.

      He was also, however, quite mad, and near the end of his life started working on some really far-out death-ray kinds of things. Unfortunately, too many people online have latched onto his latter "inventions" as being something other than dementia.

      A good source about the life of Tesla is Clifford Pickover's book, Strange Brains and Genius : The Secret Lives of Eccentric Scientists and Madmen.

      What I'm really curious about is why this fringe cult has grown up around Tesla. I mean, there have been plenty of unappreciated inventors before (look at Philo Farnsworth), and crackpot scientists, but for some reason the fringe people have a thing about Tesla in particular.

    5. Re:Here's an example... by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      Telsa attracts people because he's both unappreciated and became a crackpot. There's a huge amount of stuff he did right, and he was often mocked for ideas that came good; your common or garden crackpot usually can't point to a single success.

      So from that point of view, he's far more compelling. They may laugh at his death rays, but they laughed at using alternating current for long distance power transmission, too!

    6. Re:Here's an example... by pegacat · · Score: 1

      The reason everyone likes Tesla is that he made big sparky things. BIIIIG sparky things. That went *ZOT* *CRACKLE* *FOOM*.

      And lets face it, every good geek has a secret desire to build a giganti-bloody-normous tesla coil in their back yard.

      --
      Wer mit Ungeheuern kämpft, mag zusehn, dass er nicht dabei zum Ungeheuer wird.
  31. Edison didn't even invent the lightbulb. by 0xB · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Joseph Swan, from the great city of Sunderland, did.

    The light bulb

    Edison improved it.

    --
    0xB
    1. Re:Edison didn't even invent the lightbulb. by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      THATS THE FUCKING BEAUTY OF IT! Muwhaha, the way it is, if you do the paperwork, you get the credit! It's a lovely system for those of us that can hire office administrators .... ;)

      It really is like this tho. Bill Gates was the opportunist, not the inventor. I mean, c'mon, Beethoven used to steal like 3 bars verbatim from other composers works. This story is the first /. story in a TON OF TIME to actually put some things in perspective, instead of holding the maginifying glass up to a social pattern most people don't even appreciate. The people rewarded are the ones who put the last piece in place. Hey, Newton said it best, I think? What was it, something about "standing on the shoulders of giants."

      Haha, good thing we're strengthening the laws to protect the 'inventors', 'authors' and and 'composers'. ;)

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    2. Re:Edison didn't even invent the lightbulb. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      God invented the light bulb. these man just had the pleasure of discovering it, just as everyone who has lived since has done. as a child, you discover the light bulb, you assimilate lightbulbconcept into mind.

  32. Re:This just in: People work long hours BESIDES YO by soap.xml · · Score: 1

    or foosball tables, pool tables, beer in the fridge, quake and aoe2 sessions... :)

    ah.. those were the days...

  33. Internet Time is a Misnomer by NeuroManson · · Score: 4, Insightful

    There is a differnce between what we used to call "Workaholism" and "Internet Time"... Workaholism is a refusal to stop working (or prompting to work) for a measured period of time to force either change or innovation through personal or redirected physical, mechanical and technological means...

    Internet time, however, is a different beast... For lack of a better word, it is a mental dependance on instantaneous gratification, eg: if it doesn't happen the nanosecond you think of or want it, bitch gripe and moan until someone does it for you (if you don't do it yourself)... Your music, videos, or websites must load now now now, and if your distributed computing doesn't come to par, it's not your fault, it's the guy running the (pick the OS you gripe about the most) OS of the week...

    Your attention spans are measured in seconds, not minutes, hours, days, weeks, months, or even years... If the work isn't done by then, then an incredible offense has been performed, the likes of which are worthy of jihad du jour, flamewars, or what have you... Take this from someone who was diagnosed with ADHD over 20 years ago, most of those today make me look like an attentive, slow, and otherwise average representative member of society *gag*...

    For a best case example, compare this to Linux users who wait months for the newest kernel to fix their bugs, as opposed to those who wait weeks for Microsoft to come up with their patches/service packs... Microsoft is expected to rebuild a OS (from scratch) far faster than Linux, and is condemnned the moment it exceeds hours past another exploit being exposed, while Linux users wait patiently for months for the equivelent being released...

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
    1. Re:Internet Time is a Misnomer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Your ideas intrigue me and I would like to subscribe to your newsletter.

    2. Re:Internet Time is a Misnomer by ryanvm · · Score: 2, Funny

      You're high right now - right?

    3. Re:Internet Time is a Misnomer by thelexx · · Score: 2

      There is a differnce between what we used to call "Workaholism" and "Internet Time"... Workaholism is a refusal to stop working (or prompting to work) for a measured period of time to force either change or innovation through personal or redirected physical, mechanical and technological means...

      Not according to the dictionary. Workaholism is a compulsive desire to work, regardless of outcomes. What you are describing is called dedication.

      For a best case example, compare this to Linux users who wait months for the newest kernel to fix their bugs, as opposed to those who wait weeks for Microsoft to come up with their patches/service packs... Microsoft is expected to rebuild a OS (from scratch) far faster than Linux, and is condemnned the moment it exceeds hours past another exploit being exposed, while Linux users wait patiently for months for the equivelent being released...

      Holy crap. This is the most amazingly absurd couple of lines I've stumbled across in a _long_ time. Well done!

      LEXX

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
    4. Re:Internet Time is a Misnomer by josh+crawley · · Score: 2

      Th rest of this post seems decently correct, as I have no quarrel with it. However, the last paragraph sounds like a troll in disguise... Let's have a look:

      "For a best case example, compare this to Linux users who wait months for the newest kernel to fix their bugs, as opposed to those who wait weeks for Microsoft to come up with their patches/service packs... Microsoft is expected to rebuild a OS (from scratch) far faster than Linux, and is condemnned the moment it exceeds hours past another exploit being exposed, while Linux users wait patiently for months for the equivelent being released..."

      First, Linux users wait months for kernel bugfixes? Yeah, right. Ever heard of diff patches? If there's a bug within free software (eg: not propeirty hardware or software), It's fixed within days. Depending on urgency, less than 24 hours. No other community can claim that due to the sheer volume of users/developers/debuggers.
      Having OPEN SOURCE helps quite a lot, too

      Next, is this statement. See if you can identify the troll like part in this:

      "Microsoft is expected to rebuild a OS (from scratch)."

      That's like "Regrowing New hair", right?

      Or how about this:

      "and is condemnned the moment it exceeds hours past another exploit being exposed, while Linux users wait patiently for months for the equivelent being released...
      "

      Well how about NEVER fixing identified bugs? All the NT series OS'es suffers from the CSRSS backspace bug. The big gripe here is is that NT 4.0 has been "laid to rest", essentially junked. Many corporations use NT 4.0 , as it is a good product, when installed and administered correctly. But since this bug will NEVER be fixed, NT 4.0 is forever broken. Here's the website explaining the bug: http://homepages.tesco.net/~J.deBoynePollard/FGA/c srss-backspace-bug.html

      Now about that Linux comment about lack of exploit patches: Like HELL. Whenever there's a root exploit or other comprimising problems, THERE IS A PATCH WITHIN DAYS. Usually, you just turn off the daemon till the patch comes through, or follow what a user found to stop the bug. It's exactly the opposite what this idiot said. Microsoft drags its heels in even admitting there is a bug. Then you hav eto wait for a service patch to fix it (hoping it doesn't break something else).

      It's sad that a/few moderator(s) actually didn't see through your junk argument. It's people who use thier brains who break this crap.

      Josh Crawley

    5. Re:Internet Time is a Misnomer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm still waiting for any linux kernel to do proper interrupt load balancing on SMP P4 XEON motherboards. Its been many months now. Days my ass.

    6. Re:Internet Time is a Misnomer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Please limit your complaining to bugs that went undiscovered for 10 years and only require a one line fix.

    7. Re:Internet Time is a Misnomer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      For a best case example, compare this to Linux users who wait months for the newest kernel to fix their bugs, as opposed to those who wait weeks for Microsoft to come up with their patches/service packs... Microsoft is expected to rebuild a OS (from scratch) far faster than Linux, and is condemnned the moment it exceeds hours past another exploit being exposed, while Linux users wait patiently for months for the equivelent being released...


      Have you ever used Linux? I highly doubt it, since everything you say in this post about Linux is not true. I don't know about Windows, and I won't say, because, unlike you, I don't talk about things I know nothing about.

    8. Re:Internet Time is a Misnomer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? There are bugs in Windows that have been there for over six years now, and MS still doesn't bother to lift a finger to fix 'em. MS software is about as stagnant as software CAN possibly be.

  34. Tesla invented radio as well by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 4, Interesting

    His patent predates Marconi's.

    He didnt make the commercial system before marconi because tesla was trying to use the investor's money to secretly develop another invention.

    1. Re:Tesla invented radio as well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because tesla was trying to use the investor's money to secretly develop another invention.


      Probably trying to communicate with aliens.

      He was a loony in a lot of ways. Out of touch with reality. Thats the reason he's seldom remembered, though he made many breakthrough discoveries.

  35. internet time.. by Suppafly · · Score: 2

    I thought internet time referred to breaking time into an easy to understand system based on clicks or something.. A quick search on google will back up my assumption.. whats this have anything to do with Thomas Edison?

  36. how did tesla "lose"? by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 2

    Are you getting dc or ac power from the wall?

    Whose electric motors provide basicly all electricity created by man?

    Whose electric motors are used for almost every electromechanical device?

    There is no field where edison and tesla competed, in which edison made a better invention. In most istances Tesla completely overshadowed edison.

    Tesla lost in financial and public relations matters, he often lost government contracts, but as far as inventing goes - he blew edison away.

  37. DC *is* used for electric power grids. by CharlezManning · · Score: 1
    Edison power plants every two city blocks (because DC doesn't transfer over long distances)

    DC actually travels very well over long distances and is frequently used at high voltages over long distances between independent power grids. The best things about DC is that it does not suffer VAR losses or phase problems. The problem with DC is converting it down from high voltages used for long distance to the lower voltages suitable for domestic usage. This is easy with AC - just use a transformer. Until recently (20 years ago or so) there was no way to do this efficiently with DC. With modern switchmode electronics, it would be quite simple and cheap to replace the 11kV->220V (or whatever) transformers with a DC equivalent.

    1. Re:DC *is* used for electric power grids. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You are correct. DC uses the whole cross-section of the wire better -- AC only travels near the skin. The 800 KV line that sends Columbia River juice to California is DC. Before Seattle became overpopulated with guys with blow dryers, there was a plan for a similar link from BPA to Chicago, over 1 million volts of DC, all the way and back, but it never happened. They would have had to cross the lines every 50 miles or so, or the magnetic field from that big loop of DC would have caused spectacular auroras all across Idaho, Wyoming and the Dakotas.

    2. Re:DC *is* used for electric power grids. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      DC also creates self-sustaining arcs. AC arcs go out every half cycle.

      I've watched a DC light bulb blow and arc between the ends of the internal wires. The arc then chewed its way up to the base of the bulb, through the base of the bulb, through the bulbholder and up the cable dangling from the celing and into the mounting rose.

      This was all before someone had presence of mind to switch the bloody thing off.

      If noone had been around it proably would have arced all the way back to the fuseboard if it hadn't set the building on fire first.

      DC is nasty in distribution systems. Ask any engineer how much you have to derate fuses, switches and circuit breakers by if they're on DC circuits instead of AC.

      200VDC.

  38. oh you are not paranoid by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 4, Informative

    Do you remember the slashdot story about an year ago about how the Smithsonian put edison's bust over tesla's inventions.

    The edison companies were big sponsors.

    So yeah it still goes on.

    What is more paranoid to think about are some of the Tesla files that are still in fbi custody.

    Are they keeping them secret because of incompetence, or is there something truly interesting in there?

  39. University environment / Low pay by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is a place akin to this one: MIT media lab, as well as a lot of other Universities throughout the world, where the professors work like dogs for a lot less pay than they would get if they would sell some of their inventions on their own. But don't be so haughty as to compare this lab to IT.

    Also don't be so haughty to think that university researchers are making a noble financial sacrifice. They are trading money for picking their own projects, IT gets paid more because they don't get to work on whatever they feel like. They are trading job security for ownership of their ideas, they are not putting their money at risk. That said, there is nothing wrong with choosing the university environment, been there, done that. What is going on at the MIT media lab is not comparable to Edison's Menlo Park.

  40. Edison Had Some Problems by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    He lost most of his fortune trying to build the steel industry in New Jersey. He was working on a way to try to extract iron from the lousy ores found in NJ, and with his typical persistence, he just about ran himself out of money failing. Fortunately for him, the Mesabi iron range in Minnesota was discovered before he was completely broke.

    He did invent the movie camera, but not the projector. It looked like someone else did that, but the guy's house was mysteriously burglarized, his prototype disappeared, and Edison wound up with both the glory and the money. Very suspicious.

    He invented the phonograph. He thought it would be very popular as a means to record famous last words. And he insisted on being the A&R man for his record company even though he was notoriously deaf. This led to the non-recording of the early greats of ragtime and jazz, to a withering of his market share, and to cylinder records that were too hard to stamp out, so they had to line up a matrix of recording machines in front of the artist to maximize the number of originals. Then he came up with flat records to match the competition, but he made them five times thicker than the competition's (just like Betamax videos were only half as long), and Edison's (verticals) wouldn't play on any other company's (lateral) machines, either (Apple of the ragtime age?). And he put on a tour to 'prove' that no one could tell the difference between his acoustic horn phonographs of 1915 and the real thing (just like the Memorex ads, supposedly no one could tell). The public bought the competition's records in droves.

    He worked on electric cars about forever, but never came up with a good one, and he also came up empty big-time on synthetic rubber. There is, however, a baseball park named after him somewhere now.

  41. At least.... by Capt_Troy · · Score: 2

    they invented stuff...

    The dotcommers only invented creative ways to do nothing with lots of money!

  42. Ecclesiastes 1:9 by gambit3 · · Score: 1

    "There is nothing new under the sun."

    Just further proof...

  43. great bio on Edison by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    A really good recent biography of
    Thomas Edison is:

    Thomas A. Edison
    A Streak of Luck

    by Rober Conot

  44. Tesla rules! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Edison was a greedy jackass.

    Tesla was the real deal. The bomb diggity.

    Edison = Micrsoft
    Tesla = GNU/Linux

    1. Re:Tesla rules! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Does that include Tesla's later years, when he went sorta nuts and started ranting about UFOs and stuff?

    2. Re:Tesla rules! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So what he means is:

      Edison = Bill Gates
      Tesla = Richard M. Stallman

  45. not only that... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    The point here being that over 10,000 people had to give up their life and spend it at work, including sleeping overnight on/under their desks. Their reward? Edison got over 1,000 patents.

    Let me repeat that for the slower people out there. EDISON got more than 1,000 patents off the sweat and sacrifice of living standards (social life, family life, reasonable rest and personal life) of those 10,000 employees.

    Just like today.

    I promise you Scott McNealy isn't staying after work all night and crashing for a couple hours curled in a ball under his desk like a large number of his employees are. Same with Bill Gates and Carla Fiorina.

    1. Re:not only that... by Pope · · Score: 1

      That's the reward of being TEH BOSS.
      It's your name/money/company on the line, so you spend your time on other things, having paid the dues earlier. What, you don't think Gates and McNealy had a zillion sleepless nights when they started out?
      I highly doubt many here on /. are going to be jazzed up about spending 18 hours at the desk fuelled by coke, pizza and Quake breaks when they're 40.

      --
      It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  46. Unpaid overtime's for suckers unless self-employed by nabucco · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The ITAA, the anti-engineer lobbying group which is bankrolled by Microsoft, IBM and others, did away a few years ago with FLSA laws for "computer operators" which require overtime pay.

    From government statistics, we know that Americans have surpassed even the Japanese in the hours worked per week and per year - Americans work more hours than people in any country in the world. This is very good for those who own the companies - the 1% of the US population that owns 42.2% of the stock. How about everyone else though?

    Well, as the average working week gets longer and longer over the past thirty years, the average US inflation-adjusted hourly wage has dropped. Anyone who has a pulse can see what's been happening in the IT field lately - layoffs (with those over-burdened people still around picking up the "slack"), frozen wages, falling wages, ever expanding workloads requiring ever more hours worked.

    If you work for yourself, and thus all work you do will profit you, then yes, hard work *does* pay off. If you're a wage slave working for someone else, all the unpaid overtime you work, all the hours on call you work are just making your boss look good, and the people who really own your company more wealthy. By really own I mean the people who really own your company, not the 1000 shares of underwater options you get that vest over 4-5 years and which are 0.000001% of the total shares, minus the strike price.

    Sorry, I hear enough of this stick-and-carrot stuff at work, I hear people say it here and I have to say, BS! I wish I had listened to the guys at the Programmer's Guild during the bubble when they were pointing out how rising H1-B caps and the destruction of FLSA laws. If one looks at the industry polls which show engineers getting farther and farther away from the 40 hour workweek, it becomes apparent how many suckers there are in this industry. When somebody *aside from yourself* is getting your labor time for free, than you are the sucker.

  47. Re:MODERATORS, ARE YOU ON CRACK? by bryan1945 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    This would actually make me come back!

    --
    Vote monkeys into Congress. They are cheaper and more trustworthy.
  48. The Green Mile... by percey · · Score: 3, Insightful

    My opinion of Thomas Edison was forever altered when I read about one of his inventions, the electric chair It was an invention to show how dangerous AC current was by associating in the public's mind the horrible execution of people with Westinghouse's AC power, rather than the more benign DC that Edison was hawking. As for the spirit of invention in the old days, it was quite a marvel that he was able to do so many things, but thankfully in this internet revolution, with all its new inventions, there's no comparison to an electric chair. No modern death by spam, (although, slow death by cellphone may be an option) or the like. However, you must appreciate that he was one man that changed the world in a way that it would take the entire internet to do.

    1. Re:The Green Mile... by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      (* My opinion of Thomas Edison was forever altered when I read about one of his inventions, the electric chair.... *)

      The first person who really invented the electric chair was probably a poor lab peon who accidently sat on an open wire.

      It is a very trivial invention:

      regular_chair + live_wire + butt

  49. Good Troll, ...now bark by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did you folks mod this post using your feet?

    I read a book that claimed Bill Gates got his success through some satanic goat blood ritual,...so I guess everything written MUST be true.

    Trrrrol.

  50. Million-Nerd March by Tablizer · · Score: 1

    (* However, you'll notice that Edison only patented his idea of passing electricity though a special filament in order to make light. He did not patent the idea of making light. *)

    I wonder why he didn't patent the one-click on-switch?

    BTW, what is needed is a Million-Nerd-March on the patent office. (Or, at least several hundred.)

    1. Re:Million-Nerd March by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      A several-dozen nerd march.

      Raymond can show up this time as R2D2. I think even with the price of VA stock he can get a kitchen trash can at WalMart for ten bucks or so.

    2. Re:Million-Nerd March by Tablizer · · Score: 1

      (* Raymond can show up this time as R2D2. I think even with the price of VA stock he can get a kitchen trash can at WalMart for ten bucks or so.
      *)

      Raymond who? The reference rings no bells.

  51. Patent this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My ass licking technique needs to be patented. As HBO pointed out, "Do you like jelly or jam?"

    I also want to patent my shit-sucking-ass. Think toilet but backwards. Very fulfilling (ha ha).

    Sometimes I cut myself and call it SlashNut (ouch!)

    I like beavers!

    Penis Monkey!

    Did I mention that I'm drunk?

    Sweeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeet !

    Peace out!

  52. new-style museums are great by bshanks · · Score: 1

    the writer of the article liked old "don't touch it" museums better than interactive ones. i would just like to say, for the record, that i think interactive ones are more educational. furthermore, the boston museum of science is particularly awesome.

  53. GEEK Hatred! by erroneus · · Score: 2

    Oh my GOD I've never witnessed such geek hatred in my life! Well, except for the Bill Gates thing... but sheesh! The man's DEAD! (Wait, did someone create an everlasting-life machine that he put his name on?)

    Okay, I'll admit that I'm getting something of an education about Edison and all the things he didn't do successfully on his own, but sheesh... the hatred! The bitterness! The utter contempt!

    Some of you people should put yourselves in check... or in one of those funny couches, or maybe even one of those jackets without the holes for the hands to come out of...

    "Just because he was successful, you guys all hate him! You're just jealous and always trying to bring him down!"

    1. Re:GEEK Hatred! by swordgeek · · Score: 2

      You've got to understand (or not, if you'd rather not) that there are few things that bug many /.ers more than hype over truth.[1] If you were around and reading 16 months ago, you would have seen violent, cruel flame wars about the start of the new millennium. (not to mention the spelling flames)

      Then of course, you have the underdog factor. The comparison between Edison and Gates isn't too far off, actually. (After all, Bill has done some real work in his life too!) Both managed to get ahead by stealing the thunder of other, possibly better inventors.

      Finally, let's not forget the geographical factor. When an American gets credit for something that was done by a non-American, the ex-US subset of /. gets wildly up in arms! That's the price to be paid by being a modern empire. Ironically, in the days when Swan, Tesla, and Edison all lived, Edison would have been the underdog by virtue of geography.

      [1] Unless it involves Linux. Oops. Forget I said that. :-)

      --

      "People who do stupid things with hazardous materials often die." -- Jim Davidson on alt.folklore.urban
  54. Edison: great man, but...... by Farang · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is another side, no part of which takes anything away from Edison's accomplishments. He paid kids a quarter for puppies and kittens he could electrocute in his demonstarations of how dangerous AC power is, and even electrocuted an adult male elephant. He filmed the spectacle. He was little more than a gangster when it came to promoting his businesses, using every dirty trick in the book to intimidate the competition and gain a monopoly on movies and their distribution. No one knows how frequently he took credit for the work of others, but my guess is he was very good at it. He often slept curled up like a dog on old newspapers in a closet beneath the stairs--just another manifestation of a unique, driven personality. A fascinating man, but in my book, by no means totally admirable. A lot of his inventions, in fact all of them, I suspect, would have been made by others in time. We would not be reading by candlelight today if Edison had been run over by a beer wagon. If he was such a total genius, why did he seriously propose DC power? IMHO Bell Labs, not Edison, played a greater role in the development of technology, and Edison is sixty percent hype and forty percent solid contributions. Certainly old Thos. A. was nowhere near the intellectual equal of Maxwell, whose theoretical work was vastly more important and seminal. Still--credit where credit is due!

    1. Re:Edison: great man, but...... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude.. that's cool. I want to see some smoking elephant knads. Where can I find the divx?

    2. Re:Edison: great man, but...... by Chester+K · · Score: 1

      He often slept curled up like a dog on old newspapers in a closet beneath the stairs

      Edison is protected.

      --

      NO CARRIER
  55. Re:This just in: People work long hours BESIDES YO by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    But the porn was better then, you could not get the crappy faked pics from {insert fav p2p}, so you HAD to go out add actually GET A SHAG.
    Somethink I think would be a good thing for 99% of the /. population, but not for the rest of the world, trust me when I say, the freebsd-is-dead-troll genae would not be missed.

  56. TROLL?! Read what I said!! by NanoGator · · Score: 1, Troll

    Oh come ON! Is the point of what I said that obscure? In the parent post I was trying to find info about Tesla, and above is an excerpt from a web page that I found!! It's because of information like that that I wanted to find objective information.

    I did NOT post that to wind anybody up or to ruin Tesla's name, I posted it to show people the type of info I was *not* hunting for.

    Troll. *hrumph* "MS rules and Linux sux". -- there, now you can mod me down as a troll.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
    1. Re:TROLL?! Read what I said!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not a troll if it's the truth. Flamebait, maybe, but not a troll.

  57. 10,000 researchers and scientists - no way. by Animats · · Score: 5, Informative
    Edison never had "10,000 researchers and scientists working at his Menlo Park labs". He started with about 15 employees there in 1876, and ramped up to a peak of about 80 employees at Menlo Park by 1881. There was a lamp factory at Menlo Park, with another 40 or so employees in 1880-1881, as the electric light moved into production, but the Menlo Park operation never got big. In 1881, Edison moved operations to 65 5th Avenue, New York City, and closed down Menlo Park.

    Edison's actual lab in Menlo Park was about 20 people in one big room. The whole place, with much of the original equipment, was rebuilt at Greenfield Village in Dearborn, MI, and can be seen there.

    General Electric, which was formed by the merger of the Edison businesses and Thomas-Houston of Cleveland, became a very big company, of course. But that wasn't Edison's lab, although he was on the board of directors of GE for a while. Nor did GE ever do R&D in Menlo Park. GE R&D was (and is) in Schenectady, New York.

    There's a substantial literature on Edison's life and lab. There are even movies; after all, he invented those, too.

  58. T.E. self-educated at public libraries by SgtChaireBourne · · Score: 1
    Edison was removed from school at an early age and was mostly self taught by reading at the public library. It would be interesting to see an economic guesstimate on the value of his inventions and the immediate derivatives of his inventions.

    Granted, very few people turn out to be as productive as Edison, but given how widely used his inventions and derivatives of his inventions are and their role in the world's economies, the return on investment for stoked public libraries that result in even one Edison every other generation is still probably triple digit or higher.

    Since the web and the Internet seem to be taking up a lot of the self learners these days in regards to technology, this is a very strong argument to keep access/infrastructure open and to provide low barriers for entry such as Internet terminals at all public libraries.

    --
    Beta is broken and the link to classic doesn't work. Stop wasting our time or there won't be anybody left here.
  59. Great post- wish it wasn't anonymous... by smirkleton · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...likening Edison to Gates is quite on-the-mark.

    As inventors / innovators, they have a great deal in common. They lack the sublime genius of their superior contemporaries (Tesla in Edison's day, Doug Engelbart in Bill Gates' day...). But what they lack in true vision they more than compensate for in cunning and ambition.

    100 years from now, our great grandchildren will probably be informed by the education system that Bill Gates invented personal computing singlehandledly, in addition to the GUI and a bunch of other crap. The gazillions of dollars in the Gates trust will constantly be invested in extending the historical footprint of William Gates III, even while parts are also appropriated to noble philanthropic causes.

    Some of you Linux-loving libertarian squints are telling yourselfs, "Ah! But you're wrong! Because the Internet will have a perfect record of today's history! The media in Tesla's day wasn't digital- it wasn't permanent. That's how he got so marginalized over time."

    And all I can say is that whatever the digital network ends up turning into - even if its the bloody Matrix itself - or its a global cashless society where you can't buy or sell without having a barcode tattoo- it is going to be owned and operated by Microsoft.

    Sucks. But history's gonna repeat itself. Until it ends.

    1. Re:Great post- wish it wasn't anonymous... by jedrek · · Score: 2

      > Sucks. But history's gonna repeat itself. Until it ends.

      As history repreats itself, Microsoft will fall under it's own weight long before history ends.

    2. Re:Great post- wish it wasn't anonymous... by smirkleton · · Score: 1

      what- like edison's GE did?

      (oh wait, it didn't. its one of the biggest corporations in the world.)

    3. Re:Great post- wish it wasn't anonymous... by jafac · · Score: 2

      I wanna be a digital archaeologist.
      I want to spend my days looking through old CD ROMs and tape backups, digging through ancient browser caches, matching history's version of what things were like back then, with what things really WERE like back then.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
  60. An Elephant, actually. by Hugonz · · Score: 1

    Edison went as far in FUD as to film the electrocution of an elephant.

  61. Thomas Edison and the origins of Hollywood by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 4, Interesting
    In the book Walt Disney, Hollywood's Dark Prince, the origins of Hollywood are discussed as Edison sought to drive out of business the Jewish filmmakers who were making peep shows with his film technology, using brutal mob tactics and violence to raid and threaten the penny arcades out of business. He wanted only his kind of films - dry, boring documentaries - to be made with his new film pipeline. The Jewish filmmaking community responded by physically removing themselves from his presence, and relocating to a sunny desert location in Southern California, where they planted the seeds for a vast empire of filmmaking, out of reach of Edison and his moral imperialism. See also an audio program by Dave Emory entitled Mickey Mauschwitz - The Reactionary Politics of Walt Disney, which excerpts the out of print book at length.

  62. Nikola Tesla by PhantomHarlock · · Score: 4, Interesting
    was a man way ahead of his time. As mentioned by other slashdotters, he seemed to have only lost a battle with Edison due to Edison's political clout and his desire to make a huge fortune at the expense of the entire human race.

    Tesla's experiments into wireless energy transmission would have spelled the end of the energy industry as we know it, as well as the end of conventional radio and television transmission as a limited resource doled out by the FCC, as we have seen all of this become. His Autobiography is very interesting albiet very quirky. It is also interesting to note that over half of his patents and papers remain classified by the U.S. government to this day. Try getting them through the FOIA act, I dare you. It would actually be an interesting experiment. You can read about alleged uses and abuses of Tesla's wireless technology in the book about Project HAARP, entitled Angels Don't Play This haarp: Advances in Tesla Technology which puts forth evidence that Project HAARP's goals aren't as benign as they would like you to think, and that the weather modification aspect of the techology has been tried extensively for less than good purposes. Food for thought and grounds for further research. (http://www.haarp.net/ HAARP book home page.)

  63. My Favorite Tesla Story by Triv · · Score: 2

    goes something like this:

    Tesla apparently figured out how to turn the entire planet into a giant battery so that, in order to get power, you'd simply stick a copper pole in the ground. He went to J.P. Morgan and asked for some cash to implement his idea. Morgan listened and then asked Tesla how exactly he was supposed to charge people for it.

    :)

    It's a shame he was so nuts (he lived in a hotel room filled with pigeons, hated spherical objects and was terrified of body hair) some of his ideas would've been wonderful to try, even if they didn't work. I mean, the guy invented the radio (marconi got the credit but Tesla got the patent) :)

    1. Re:My Favorite Tesla Story by kubrick · · Score: 2

      Tesla apparently figured out how to turn the entire planet into a giant battery so that, in order to get power, you'd simply stick a copper pole in the ground. He went to J.P. Morgan and asked for some cash to implement his idea. Morgan listened and then asked Tesla how exactly he was supposed to charge people for it.

      Branding, of course!

      Hell, if Coca-Cola can sell bottled tap water at obscene prices, Morgan would have had no trouble selling people free power :)

      --
      deus does not exist but if he does
  64. Edison did NOT invent the electric light bulb by nagora · · Score: 2
    Joseph Swan invented it and Edison, realising that he had been beat, went into partnership with him, setting up the Edison & Swan United Electric Light Company. Swan had the bulb; Edison had the money. Edison's main contribution to the technology was to realise that an oxygen-free atmosphere greatly extended the bulb's life, but the filament of carbon was Swan's.

    None of this is secret, so why do so many people still credit Edison with the invention and who do they think the "Swan" was in the Edision Swan Co?

    Davy (of the Davy safty lamp fame) had invented a bulb even earlier but it worked by producing an arc rather than an incandescent filament.

    TWW

    --
    "Encyclopedia" is to "Wikipedia" what "Library" is to "Some people at a bus stop"
  65. Tesla - on Edison - said it best ........ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "If Edison had a needle to find in a haystack, he would proceed at once with the diligence of the bee to examine straw after straw until he found the object of his search."

    " I was a sorry witness of such doings, knowing that a little theory and calculation would have saved him ninety per cent of his labor."

    Nikola Tesla, NY Times 10/19/1931.

    Is genius really 99% sweat?

  66. Marconi didn't invent the radio by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Marconi invented the wireless telegraph. What we call "the radio" with voice travelling over it wasn't really realized until later. It was largely realized by the work of (Edwin) Howard Armstrong.

    Oh, and the vacuum tube amplifier? de Forest invented it, but he didn't understand how it worked and so couldn't put it to good use. Who figured that stuff out? (Edwin) Howard Armstrong.

    Armstrong made what we call the radio possible by figuring out how to well use de Forest's Audion (3 element tube) as a radio wave detector and amplifier by inventing regenerative (postive) feedback. And he invented how to use it as an audio amplifier. Then he invented heterodyning which allowed you to shift signals up and down to other frequencies, making tuning actually work and making it possible to operate at higher frequencies.

    Then he invented FM.

    I've boned up on Tesla (I own a biography on him, a poor one), he was a smart (and crazy) guy. But he didn't invent radio, he discovered some things about radio waves as about the same time as Maxwell and Hertz.

    He didn't come near inventinging microwaves (or radar which operates at microwave frequencies). It wasn't possible to operate properly at those frequencies without the later work of Armstrong and then the later work on the Klystron.

    As far as I know, the microwave oven was created by a guy who was doing radar work. He noticed his candy bars were getting melted in his pocket. Creepy.

    See link.

    http://www.ideafinder.com/history/inventions/sto ry 068.htm

  67. Edison's lab was highly improductive by kalifa · · Score: 2

    However fascinating may Edison's Lab be, the truth is that no significant invention came out of it, in decades of work. All the major discoveries made by Thomas Edison were made before the existence of this lab (which was built, logically, after he had already made a fortune).

    The most significant discovery coming from Edison 's Lab is the lab in itself, that is, the concept of the modern research laboratory, which appeared for the first time in the US, not long after Louis Pasteur's labs in Paris.

  68. Edison Vs. Tesla by Asmodean · · Score: 3, Informative

    Tesla was first an inventor and second a showman, he absolutely sucked at business. Edison on the other hand would RUN to the nearby patent office when he had a new invention.

    Telsa invented these, among other things:

    The whole AC system that we use today including:
    Rotating magnetic field and the motors/generators that use it. Polyphase. The Transformers to convert to high/low frequency for transmission.

    Flourescent lights
    Arc lights
    Radio (Supreme court said he had it first)
    Radar
    The first remote controlled vehicle (small boats he made for the army)
    X-ray (go read his bio's before arguing)
    The Tesla coil (you probably have one in your monitor/tv)
    First truly accurate oscillator
    The Tesla turbine
    Electricity collector from the difference in voltage from the sky/ground. (kinda like the recent 'tether' experiment on the shuttle. but from the ground)

    Toward his later years he was working on wireless transmission of electricity. also the 'death ray' he was working on was nothing more than a anti-airplane beam that would melt their engines through inductance.

    All his life it was his dream to harness the power of niagra falls, which he did. Westinghouse put him in charge of setting it up, but tesla only hung around for a short time. He wanted to get back to inventing stuff.

    --
    It's a good thing the world sucks or we'd all fall off.
  69. Edison is evil! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't forget that Edison started a patent war against many inventors and there is proof that he stole some inventions. Even the lamb was developed years before by a German.

  70. Richard Feynman by Marcus+Brody · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I remeber an anecdote about Richard Feynan. He decided that there just werent enough hours in the day (which is true). So he shifted to a 30 hour day, still sleeping 6 or whatever hours in each of his "days". He continued for some time, gradually coming in and out of phase with the work patterns of his colleagues.

    And look how brilliant a man he was. Not that his wierd working days was a contributing factor to his greatness, but it was most probably a result of it.

  71. History repeating by FrostedWheat · · Score: 1

    Thomas Edison had 10,000 researchers and scientists working at his Menlo Park labs, who slept on their desks, and had the same problems pleasing the investment community as today's tech companies. The result? Over 1000 patents and many inventions that we take for granted today.

    Symantic have a similar method .. only I think they have 10,000 monkeys at 10,000 typewriters.

  72. re-mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    fucking idiot moderators

  73. Yet IBM is already largely forgotten by ynotds · · Score: 1

    I can't see Bill or Microsoft coming to mind much in 2102, well at least not unless serious life extension techniques are developed in time to benefit(?) the Internet generation.

    Their problem from a future history perspective is that they really haven't done anything much of ongoing public interest. Sure I'm first to applaud their early work on Basic thru GW and their role with CD-ROM, but the most significant thing since those early days has been in the area of business practices which most won't want to remember. Hardly the stuff of Edisonesque legend.

    There was a time, maybe even two times, when IBM meant computer, but even their incredible patent production process is nowadays only of note to those who peer behind the scenes.

    If I had to bet on anybody being remembered for this generation's Internet time, it would be Tim Berners-Lee because of the role he has stepped into at W3C, with a place bet on Steve Jobs.

    --
    -- Our systemic servants do not good masters make.
  74. And Edison didn't even invent the light bulb by anaplasmosis · · Score: 1

    Thomas Swann did. And won the court case. And edison had to pay him large sums of money.

  75. Thomas Edison was a liar by chrysalis · · Score: 1, Troll

    Discoveries patented by that fucking Thomas Edison were in fact made by John Tesla (who was a _real_ hacker at that time) .


    --
    {{.sig}}
  76. What I want to know is..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Was this guy shooting for "funny" or "flamebait"?

    1. Re:What I want to know is..... by NeuroManson · · Score: 2

      Neither, the operative term is "Irony"... Maybe Slashdot should have a moderation category for that?

      --
      Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  77. General Electric by pommiekiwifruit · · Score: 1

    My favourite zipcode:

    2 River Road

    12345-6789

    I wonder what's at number one?

  78. Farnsworth?! by Pope · · Score: 1

    Hey I remember reading about ol' Philo!
    Possibly the inspiration for a certain Futurama character we all know and love?

    --
    It doesn't mean much now, it's built for the future.
  79. You know nothing of management of the media lab by alexhmit01 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Management is hard, middle management is easy. The fact that you report to a middle manager that is a 9-5er doesn't mean they all are. Once you find senior managers that are successful, they work like dogs. Most are out at a reasonable hour because they are in by 7. Want to reach the CEO of a major corporation without being intercepted by his secretary? Call before 8 AM, after 6 PM, or Saturday morning (before their golf game, most are at their desks).

    Outside of being born rich, there is no shortcut. Those that go into management as the easy route become middle managers where they stay for the rest of their lives. Even the cookie cutters work hard, they dog for 60-75 hour weeks for 3 years to get into a top MBA program. If they rock a top MBA program, they graduate and are 6-8 years away from financial success, but they bust ass to get there.

    Sure, these guys may appear like spoiled children, but ask their families how often they are at the office. The fact that slashdot says it doesn't make it true. I've worked at startups where management has their act together, we all bust ass for a common vision. When management doesn't put in the hours or effort, I was out early. Now that I have my own business, I try to lead by example and bust ass all the time. And if you think that lunch meetings or weekend meetings are taking a vacation, you're a fool. I think about my company from the time I wake up till I go to bed.

    The MIT media lab is a joke, great on spin, low on anything. No one puts in a full day of work, the PhD students sometimes work. The undergrads that work their suck down free money. It's an overfunded lab, they by toys to play with and make silly demos. They are mostly smoke-and-mirrors, with the job of spinning things for MIT's PR game.

    Alex

    1. Re:You know nothing of management of the media lab by fireboy1919 · · Score: 2

      Hmm...you could be right about the media lab. And you could be right about some middle management. But I know a lot of business majors, and I know that the reason they're doing it is because they want an easy job where they can make lots of money.

      I just gave the media lab as an example because that's what it was like at the lab I worked for while in school, and I know thats what its like at CMU.

      As far as being "a joke," that's just not true. They come up with stuff that obviously takes a long time to develop. If you don't believe me, you haven't been reading technical journals enough. It is precisely these technical journals that ensure that the lab continues to make a profit. Otherwise, they wouldn't be overfunded.

      --
      Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
  80. I couldn't disagree more. by FallLine · · Score: 2
    Of course we can only speculate, but I think people will look back at Gates the way they look back at Henry Ford. Gates never claimed to invent the GUIs or OSs. He simply produced an OS that was popular and you could have your applications in any color you liked, as long as they were Windows applications. Likewise, Ford never claimed to invent the automobile. Daimler and Benz had the first practical car, but it was Ford that put them in the hands of millions of Americans and sparked the real revolution. Much like Gates' OS, Ford's cars were "good enough" and offered little choice in style. That was the right tactic for the first few years of the auto, and it was the right tactic for the first few years of computing.
    Ford's cars were more than just "good enough", this implies that he was somehow lucky to land that. What he did required great engineering and manufacturing abilities, not to mention vision and persistance, to bring to fruition. To say that his cars were merely good enough is to blindly dismiss his accomplishments. He may not have made the first car, or even the second, but his were the first cars that actually ran reliably and his cars were the first to be produced at an economical price. That is no small task.

    Gates, on the other hand, can make no such claims. While I agree with you to some extent that Xerox PARC was like the Daimler-Benz of its day, that is to say too much in the lab but lacking most of the engineering and development time to take it out, you are ignoring the likes of Apple and other groups that did and could have done just as well. Without getting into a holy war, I believe it is quite reasonable to assert that Gates' Windows and MS-DOS won the industry because of the nature of the PC industry (e.g., compatibility) and because of the backing of IBM and such. Gates could have easily have been replaced by IBM and we would be looking at an entirely different company. (That said, I will give Gates some credit for having the intelligence and tenacity to grab other markets,...but that's a seperate argument).
    1. Re:I couldn't disagree more. by istartedi · · Score: 2

      WTF? Go back and re-read what I wrote.

      Ford's cars were more than just "good enough", this implies that he was somehow lucky to land that

      No it doesn't. Otherwise, I wouldn't have described this as a tactic.

      To say that his cars were merely good enough is to blindly dismiss his accomplishments

      No it isn't. You are right to attribute genius to Ford's ability to bring economical cars to market, but the fact remains that other cars were much better--if you could afford them.

      Once again, go back and read what I wrote. I didn't ignore Apple at all. I likened Apple to Daimler-Benz, not Xerox to Daimler-Benz.

      I can agree with you that Gates is nowhere near the genius that Ford was. It's arguable that someone else could have done what Gates did. It is less arguable that someone could have done what Ford did; mass-produced cars would have come eventually, but perhaps not in so distinguished a fashion as Ford's.

      To end on a more pleasant note, here's a nice piece of Ford lore that was related to me by my father: The dimensions, material and construction of wooden crates used to ship engines were specified with precision by Ford. Why? Because when the engine was un-crated, the crate was disassembled and re-used as floor boards for the model-T.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
  81. Yep by FallLine · · Score: 2

    Without saying "me too", in so many words...

    I absolutely agree with what you are saying, it's irks me to see slashdot's repeated dismissal of all things corporate and praise for all things academic. While I don't necessarily agree that upper management at publically held firms are always or generally right, slashdot is seriously deluding themselves if they think it's that easy.

  82. hehehe critical difference by Srin+Tuar · · Score: 2
    1. His patents are readadle, todays are designed not to reveal infromation.
    2. They were groundbreaking in thier day.
    3. Most of all they are EXPIRED.

    None of this makes him a good person, Edison was still an evil, helpless-animal murdering, bastard.

    But ideas are clean of their promulagators, inherently.

  83. +5 Interesting? by TheAwfulTruth · · Score: 3, Informative

    Large scale energy trasmission by HF RF is ABSOLUTLE BULLSHIT! People freak out over 0.2 watt uW transmission from their cell phones and yet bathing in gigawatt RF transmitting our daily power is in any way a workable idea? We'd need RF transmission towers radiating millions of times more energy that a typical 50,000 watt FM station! Tesla was a brilliant mad man. He invented someinteresting stuff, but his plans for putting it to use were absolutely insane.

    Thank god AC power won out over Edisons DC wishes however. Though maybe there's a lesson here for you conspiricy theorists out there. DC power transmission would also have been insane. And as usual saner and more practical heads prevailed. So now we have easily transmitted low loss AC power transmission and by WIRES not RF!

    --
    Contrary to popular belief, coding is not all free blow-jobs and beer. Those things cost MONEY!
    1. Re:+5 Interesting? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      perhaps it is only the insane who are truly sane

  84. Edison biography by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone who wants more on Edison should try Neil Baldwin's excellent biography of him. It's called Edison: inventing the century. I'm too lazy to put in an amazon link - i'm sure you can all find it by yourselves.

  85. Mad over method? by drjzzz · · Score: 1

    It's probably Edison's method that is so galling. It's as if Pasteur, instead of saying that "chance favors the prepared mind", had said that "chance favors the bigger research lab" (in french, of course). More monkeys on more typewriters is not an admirable way to produce anything. Edison, unlike scientists mentioned in other posts, does not seem to have cared much about the underlying physical phenomena.

    --
    to err is human, to forgive is divine, to forget is... umm...
  86. A note on patents. by mindstrm · · Score: 2

    Two Words. Nikola Tesla.

    Shortly after WW2, several major electronics companies filed patents on "Digital Logic Gates".

    The patents were denied, the USPTO cited several of Tesla's patents for the same system implemented in his devices.

    The end result? Digital logic stayed public domain.

  87. Fuck a bunch of Thomas Edison by dav · · Score: 1

    Tesla was a "loony" but he was hella better of an inventor and scientist than Thomas "FUD" Edison.

    And personally I don't think that his surety that his equipment was picking up signals from aliens was so loony. Given the time period, and the zeitgeist caused by the great leaps of science and industry at the time, he wasn't the only one who found extra terrestrials easy to believe in.

    What was loony was his obsession with the numbers that are multiples of three (if he walked around a block once, he had to do it two more times or it would drive him bonkers) and his neurotic fear of germs.

  88. InterNet invented in 1844? by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Some people say the telegraph was the InterNet release 0.0. That was the first time the world had communication at the speed of light. Sammuel Morse even invented a clever compression protocol- the Morse Code. The first killer app was the newspaper. News a couple weeks old wasn't interesting, but same day news from across the ocean was.

  89. Re:You know nothing of management or the media lab by alexhmit01 · · Score: 2

    Take MAS.100, commonly called Pizza for Credit (if its still offered), which was a 6 unit (2 credit) course where you would eat Pizza and listen to people in the Media Lab explain what they do. One year it was dropped from a 3 hour class to a 2 hour class because the money for pizza wasn't there, yet the course was still a "3 hour classtime" class. You'd be floored at what gets funded there.

    Have a friend who works in the Media Lab take you on a tour (not the official one) and see what really goes on. Go in before 9 (I've been there on middle of the night reuse runs when I was an undergrad... don't ask, but I have some 15 year old Decstations to show for it), it's empty. Show up after 5, find a professor that is working.

    The Media Lab gets a lot of money from some corporations who can't cooperate on some of the research so they all chip in to the Media Lab. 20%-25% of the Media Lab produces stuff, the rest just plays with expensive toys to stroke their own ego... Don't worry, within a few years the new researchers will learn how to play with toys, then crank out another stupid demo right before the corporate donors come on a tour. It's a really sad organization.

    CMU is a very different school from The Institute.

    BTW: The fact that your friends are business majors and want a cushy job doesn't mean that they will graduate and get a cushy job. I mean, I wanted to graduate and get a cush job that pays a lot, I also want a million dollars, and a pony. You don't get things just for wanting them, you inherit them, marry into them, or earn them.

  90. as far as i remember there are two theories on what he was working on

    1. his idea to deliver electricity to every household without the need for wires by sending oscilating current in the ground.

    2. some people say that he wanted to create some kind of a military invention

    btw trying to communicate with aliens does not neccessarily make you insane. Are the people at SETI insane?

  91. Not really. by plunix · · Score: 1

    The Great Depression was caused by the booms and busts of the economy, and by inflation, which themselves are caused by the Federal Reserve System. One of the direct causes of the Great Depression was deliberated created inflation in the 1920's in order to lower the value of the U.S. dollar relative to the English pound. This was done because the English economy was falling and the U.S. dollar was the de facto international currency. The result was a massive outflow of gold from the United States, speculation in the stock market, and unemployment, factors which led to the crash of 1929 and the depression.