Slashdot Mirror
PlayOnline Network To Use Dreamcast Technology
Iron Chef Japan writes: "Squaresoft announced that they have teamed up with ACCESS to develop middleware for their upcoming PlayOnline network, set to debut in Japan soon. The PlayOnline network is the service that Square has setup for such games as Final Fantasy XI, and will be used for future games. Well the software that ACCESS is sharing with Square, is all built on the same technology that the Sega Dreamcast used (called NetFront). Full details here."
all mine!
The Dreamcast is DEAD, people. Wake up! All the best franchises have moved onto the X-Box, which is more or less a Dreamcast 2 (Electric Boogaloo?) anyway!
Consoles built on PC Hardware will always fail, due to FUD spurted out by other console makers who think their obscure, arcane, poorly-documented hardware will automatically be easier to program than tried and tested off-the-shelf components.
Solution? Kill a Nip today. Remember 1942!
"Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
Post?
Maybe the BSOD's in FFXI won't be as prevalent as the ones in PSO.
- colin
Can someone please help me to suck my own cock? I'm having trouble bending far enough down to wrap my lips around my dick head. If there is another method, I sure would love to hear about it. BTW, I would like to avoid using the backward underneath method, due to my concern about my taint, seeing as how it's infested with pubic lice. Thx.
nice, but theres no mention of how much the riaa plans on charging us for the sound and the mpaa for the video. then theres the soon-to-be-everywhere extra bandwidth fees...wow this game could stimulate the economy right back into inflation!!
In the name of logged in trolls who are being surprisingly coherent today! In order to fill out these two minutes, I'd just like to state that the Dreamcast was an EXCELLENT piece of hardware, years in advance of it's time. The major innovation? Online connectivity out of the box.
On-line gaming, as evidenced on the PC, is the next stage of the console revolution. Any console which refuses to support it OUT OF THE BOX will fail. Gamers don't want to buy additional peripherals.
So why did the Dreamcast fail? Simple. Marketing. Sega chose to throw their money into online game development and superior software. Sony threw all their money into advertising. Spreading FUD about the Dreamcast. In the end, people are stupid, and went for the blocky, poorly textured, movies-instead-of-gameplay embarassment of the Playstation, instead of the smooth, photo-realistic, gameplay enhanced qualities of the Dreamcast.
It is no co-incidence that the Dreamcast was responsible for one of the best console games ever - Phantasy Star Online. Groundbreaking in its short tenure, this game provided global online play. But of course, the gaming community, not willing to accept innovation, would have rather chose the myriad of cloned 'Rhythm Games' on the Playstation.
So, gamers have another choice. The PS2 WILL win, due to superior marketing. That leaves the X-Box, somewhat derivative, but capable of breathtaking gameplay. And the Gamecube, with arguably the best 'franchises' in the home console market.
However, the Gamecube's online plans are feeble to say the least. Does the consumer choose Broadband or Dial-up, and can gamers on one choice play with gamers on the other?
And don't even get me started on the Playstation 2's 'online' plans. A hard disk and Broadband connection, pushing the price of a combined PS2/Online setup BEYOND that of the X-Box.
The choice, dear consumer, is yours...
"Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
Now, the question is, since all these adaptors exist in Japan, how long until we see this stuff in the USA? This is where I think Microsoft will get a step ahead, since their marketshare here is pretty decent.
Well, i'll be glad to be playing Phantasy Star 2 and FFXI on my Gamecube thats for sure, the question is when. And Gran Turismo 4 on my PS2 will rock as well. Long as they find a decent service that my Cable modem can connect to..
Hell, the only thing we've gotten BEFORE them was the damned X-Box...what kind of deal is that!?!
Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
I find the racism on this site disgusting. Please refrain from using stereotypical phrases in the future.
We always get the crappy stuff first (Read: XBox) and the Japanese get the mega sweet stuff (Read: Gamecube and PS2) .. Sigh.
One more crippling bombshell hit the lready beleaguered *BSD community when IDC confirmed that *BSD market share has dropped yet again, now down to less than a fraction of 1 percent of all servers. Coming on the heels of the latest Netcraft survey which plainly states that *BSD has lost more market share, this news serves to reinforce what we've known all along. *BSD is collapsing in complete disarray, as further exemplified by failing dead last in the recent Sys Admin comprehensive networking test.
You don't need to be a Kreskin to predict *BSD's future. The hand writing is on the wall: *BSD faces a bleak future. In fact there won't be any future at all for *BSD because *BSD is dying. Things are looking very bad for *BSD. As many of us are already aware, *BSD continues to lose market share. Red ink flows like a river of blood. FreeBSD is the most endangered of them all, having lost 93% of its core developers.
Let's keep to the facts and look at the numbers.
OpenBSD leader Theo states that there are 7000 users of OpenBSD. How many users of NetBSD are there? Let's see. The number of OpenBSD versus NetBSD posts on Usenet is roughly in ratio of 5 to 1. Therefore there are about 7000/5 = 1400 NetBSD users. BSD/OS posts on Usenet are about half of the volume of NetBSD posts. Therefore there are about 700 users of BSD/OS. A recent article put FreeBSD at about 80 percent of the *BSD market. Therefore there are (7000+1400+700)*4 = 36400 FreeBSD users. This is consistent with the number of FreeBSD Usenet posts.
Due to the troubles of Walnut Creek, abysmal sales and so on, FreeBSD went out of business and was taken over by BSDI who sell another troubled OS. Now BSDI is also dead, its corpse turned over to yet another charnel house.
All major surveys show that *BSD has steadily declined in market share. *BSD is very sick and its long term survival prospects are very dim. If *BSD is to survive at all it will be among OS dilettante dabblers. *BSD continues to decay. Nothing short of a miracle could save it at this point in time. For all practical purposes, *BSD is dead.
*BSD is dying
Get linUx u l0ser. it is teh b0mb.
From there website -
Talk about having one hell of a vision and forsight in the mid-1980's!
It seems (at least according to their website) that they make most of their money from wireless phones by providing different services and wireless applications.
From their site:
This seems like a pretty interesting company. This is the first I've heard of them. I hope you guys find the background info useful, because the article that is linked is *very* light on information.
:-)
NetFront is just a web browser for appliances. English info here
Access also makes the cHTML browser behind NTT-Docomo's popular i-mode phones.
Well... seeing as over an addict to EverQuest who was so consumed with his online identity that he lost site of reality and finally committed suicide. Or so is being claimed by the plaintiff!
:(
This may be bad news for the company right about now.
Vital Idea
They're just porting some software they've used for the DC originally. Big deal - many companies port applications from one platform to another. It's probably just a communication library - and not a very large one, at that.
Sorry to go offtopic, but...
It's sad that someone kills themself, but if you read deeper into this, you'll find that the man (he was in his early twenties) had been diagnosed w/other emotional problems/disorders...Everquest was not the direct result of his death but only one of many factors. There is negligence on behalf of the mother since she was attempting to get him into some kind of group home, but she was too late.
The mother is supposedly only suing to get warnings about the game's addictiveness, but whether there's some kind of monetary goal is unclear.
1. Drink
2. Puke
It will be interesting to see how the pricing scheme ends up considering that there will already be a substantial charge to obtain the HD/modem combo in the first place. Some are saying that they will take the X-Box approach and have a service charge which allows access to only a limited number of games and then expand the costs to more "elite" titles. Sega had the right idea by letting users use their network for free with the exception of Phantasy Star Online v2, where they were able to give their v1 addicts a free taste before charging $15 for 3 months of play on the new version. It will also be interesting to see if the games will internetwork across systems (i.e. PSO on the Gamecube). Should be an interesting time, but it's too bad that Sony waited so long. Not only is time against them, but so is the fact that a non-bundled video game accessory has never sold enough to make every game take advantage of it. If people choose not to buy the HD/modem combo, we may only see one generation of online games on PS2.
I just found out the infamous Libby Hoeller vids were a hoax! The girl in the movies was a paid actress! You idiots were wanking to ordinary pr0n all along! Pls kill yourselves Thx
The biggest hurdle I see from FFXI is going to be all the subscribers trying to play all at once when the game is first released. Battle.net got swamped by players when Diablo 2 was released because they went through a million copies in about two weeks. With the popularity of the FF titles (FFX sold about 4 million copies world wide, about a million of those in the US) I can see PlayOnline getting hammered unless there's some alternate direct network play available. That of course may not be possible with the style of the game but I suppose time will tell. Square's facing a playing population four times the size of Everquest's. That is an awesome amount of networking power to muster up.
That sort of leads to something I've been kicking around lately, I've noticed few if any games having modem to modem multiplayer options anymore. I know the venerable modem is a little long in the tooth but I like playing over one. The lag is virtually non-existant and the bandwidth of the connection is enough to play most types of games. I'm hoping in vain that maybe when modem and broadband adapters are more prevelent in the current generation of consoles that maybe a couple games have the option of a direct modem to modem connection. If you take a sample of ten people with GCs, one or two might have cable modems another one or two might have DSL but the others are going to still have a regular modem dialup. These are the people that would play a two player (or more) modem to modem game. You could have two players per console and have two consoles connected over the phone for up to four people to bash one another in Killer Instinct 8:Killerest Instinct of All or Ultra Smash Brothers Melee. I used to have a lot of fun playing Warcraft 2 and Diablo against my friends on a modem game. The internet is fine when I'm busting the skull of some dude from the east cost in CS but against my friend who lives a few miles away the extra overhead is just problematic, from my point of view at least.
I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
When I think about you, I touch myself!
It's still one hell of a show though, right?
"Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
Copyright is WRONG, unless it's ours.
I love Alterslash, especially the 'Signal / Noise' graphs. A whole different way of looking at the site.
I'm sure Jon Katz advocated sites like that a few years back, providing an alternative view on common websites, etc.
At this rate we'll have to start spelling this site's name as "$lashdot"!
"Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
One more crippling bombshell hit the already beleaguered Catholic community when Commander Taco confirmed that ...
Elizabeth Bowes-Lyon is dying, anyone?
--What follows, then? That one had better put on gloves before reading the New Testament. The presence of so much filth makes it very advisable. One would as little choose "early Christians" for companions as Polish Jews: not that one need seek out an objection to them . . . Neither has a pleasant smell.--I have searched the New Testament in vain for a single sympathetic touch; nothing is there that is free, kindly, open-hearted or upright. In it humanity does not even make the first step upward--the instinct for cleanliness is lacking. . . . Only evil instincts are there, and there is not even the courage of these evil instincts. It is all cowardice; it is all a shutting of the eyes, a self-deception. Every other book becomes clean, once one has read the New Testament: for example, immediately after reading Paul I took up with delight that most charming and wanton of scoffers, Petronius, of whom one may say what Domenico Boccaccio wrote of Ceasar Borgia to the Duke of Parma: "e tutto Iesto"--immortally healthy, immortally cheerful and sound. . . .These petty bigots make a capital miscalculation. They attack, but everything they attack is thereby distinguished. Whoever is attacked by an "early Christian" is surely not befouled . . . On the contrary, it is an honour to have an "early Christian" as an opponent. One cannot read the New Testament without acquired admiration for whatever it abuses--not to speak of the "wisdom of this world," which an impudent wind bag tries to dispose of "by the foolishness of preaching." . . . Even the scribes and pharisees are benefitted by such opposition: they must certainly have been worth something to have been hated in such an indecent manner. Hypocrisy--as if this were a charge that the "early Christians" dared to make!--After all, they were the privileged, and that was enough: the hatred of the Chandala needed no other excuse. The "early Christian"--and also, I fear, the "last Christian," whom I may perhaps live to see--is a rebel against all privilege by profound instinct--he lives and makes war for ever for "equal rights." . . .Strictly speaking, he has no alternative. When a man proposes to represent, in his own person, the "chosen of God"--or to be a "temple of God," or a "judge of the angels"--then every other criterion, whether based upon honesty, upon intellect, upon manliness and pride, or upon beauty and freedom of the heart, becomes simply "worldly"--evil in itself. . . Moral: every word that comes from the lips of an "early Christian" is a lie, and his every act is instinctively dishonest--all his values, all his aims are noxious, but whoever he hates, whatever he hates, has real value . . . The Christian, and particularly the Christian priest, is thus a criterion of values.
--Must I add that, in the whole New Testament, there appears but a solitary figure worthy of honour? Pilate, the Roman viceroy. To regard a Jewish imbroglio seriously--that was quite beyond him. One Jew more or less-- what did it matter? . . . The noble scorn of a Roman, before whom the word "truth" was shamelessly mishandled, enriched the New Testament with the only saying that has any value--and that is at once its criticism and its destruction: "What is truth?". . .
"You're just scared like a little white pussy. I'll fuck you till you love me, you faggot!"
I seriously hope that whatever decides to use this technology doesnt have the same problems that have plagued Phantasy Star Online.
The PSO world is almost a barren waste land now, thanks to all the hackers, cheaters and Player Killers. When PSO first came out, it was an amazing experience. You could logon, and be playing a game in seconds. All games were 'open', as there wasnt much need to play in passworded games.
This soon changed. Once the hackers got going, it totally ruined it. Virtually ALL games are password locked now, and so any newcomers are pretty much doomed. The only reason I get to play good games, is because I have joined a PSO Yahoo Group - and its great fun.
But I shouldnt have to join such a group, just so I can play the game properly. Trouble is, we have recently had some problems with someone getting into our games, and PK'ing us all, and saving over our characters.
So thanks, whoever you are - just pray you dont meet me in real life.
I put my books on Amazon, Smashwords, Demonoid, ISOHunt and Pirate Bay. Search for 'Michael Cargill'
Michael Sims: enemy of freedom, or foe of liberty?
SpoNgE FinGeRs
ItS TrOlL TuEsDaY!
Happy TroLLiNG!
.................................................
Any game that relies on a trusted Client is doomed to this kind of behavior. Clients can be spoofed, hacked, tampered with, etc. etc.
The problem with PSO on the Dreamcast is that cheating devices were so prevalent. Although code was added into PSO ver. 2 to detect cheat devices, the ONLY initial side effect was that rare weapons couldn't be found for the user. Seeing as the cheat devices could make ANY weapon, that was hardly a drawback at all.
I for one shall be eagerly awaiting PSO on the X Box. Why? Because Microsoft are the only company with the power to clamp down on cheat device manufacturers. (DMCA, anybody?) Although I also hope that the Gamecube version is equally popular, with the ability for X-Boxers and Gamecubers to ally and form friendly rivalries.
What matters isn't the console. It's the game. Something Sony needs to remember when pushing the PS2 brand as a 'lifestyle accessory'.
"Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
Port My Sponge Fingerz Bitch
.................................................
Got the link.
Otherwise I can't understand why everyone get so excited about consoles and playing games? I stopped playing games a long time ago when I installed a real operating system, Linux, on my computer.
The owls are not what they seem
So, if you're cheating, they stop you from healing? Even though you're wearing a hacked 4 slot Guardian Armor with 99% protection against everything, and are walking around with hit-point totals that can only be measured using exponents.
VERY effective, Sega. Admittedly, the server-side hack detecting got increasingly fascistic, not letting cheaters log on. But once again, the cheaters found their way around the block.
"Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
OMFG slashdudes think of the ramifukations! there will be teh cheeting leik in pantasy star online which was all fun until we hacked that mutha open!
Hal!
now phinal phantasy 11/onrine will also be hacked because of inferiour windows ce dreamcast tech. suxors on theese balls, SQUARE!!!
Spo nge Finger s
.................................................
But i mirrored it
Fonge Spingers!
.................................................
The technology that both to work is a protocol that allows packets to be sent and be guaranteed to get to the other side, or be notified that they didn't/ This little known magical protocol is naped TCP/IP, and ahs worked wonders for any net based aplication
slashdot!=valid HTML
Basically its the same old story all over again...
:)
Great, amazing technology gets incorporated into low-marketshare platform, creating amazing product. Innovation goes virtually unnoticed. Small marketshare platform dies, squeezed out by its semi-monopolistic comptetitors who, though they use (perhaps) inferior tech, have the benefit of a well-known brandname, more apps, established user base, et etc.
That was the death of the dreamcast. Now we enter Chapter Two:
Tech used in low-marketshare-yet-advanced platform gets bought up (or copied) by its larger, and now former, competitors. "Innovations" are much heralded. Amazing "new" features are aplauded by all, and large, monopolistic companies get kudos and make more money.
Basically, history repeats itself. Microsoft is notorious exactly for this sort of behaviour. Sony's rep isn't too good, either. But I am the first to admit that the PS2 kicks ass. Anyone have a nice, free one for me?
Glad to see Square is taking the initiative here instead of waiting for Sony/MS/Nintendo to do it. Sony might pull something off in terms of networked gameplay, MS obviously could, but Nintendo's been sitting around scratching their heads at the concept of it for some time now.
:p
;)
The coolest thing (And thus, the one that will not happen) would be for online console games to be platform independant. That is, I have CmdrTaco's Edit-o-Rama Rumble '03 for the Playstation 2.. You have it for the X-box. We can both play on the same server.
Even makes sense. Why, your customers would have more people to play with. That's the problem, it makes sense. I've this vision that console games will be incompatible.
Anyway, while Square and their online FF is somewhat on topic.. Square, if you're reading.. FOR THE LOVE OF GOD! LOOK AT EXISTING ONLINE GAMES BEFORE DESIGNING!
Realize that players are the enemy and will cheat at any cost. Realize that it's rather simple to block all but the most dedicated of cheaters - it just takes knowledge freely availible from any freshman in a computer-related major.
Oh, and make sure if you need additional funds to cover bandwidth/etc., you charge from the start. People get pissy when their free anything suddenly requires a subscription fee.
And the European release is still to come.
The best thing about this argument is how you followed it up; by showing us that the hurdle has already been met and overcome. Not just by Blizzard, but also by Sony (Everquest) and countless other MMORPGs.
Square's stepping up to the plate to join the field of online rpgs -- not to pioneer it. They've seen the mistakes that Sega made, the mistakes that Blizzard made, and have learned from them. Best of all they've got *Sony* to work with on this (as FFXI is for the PS2 platform)..
And for Sony, this kind of endeavour should be old hat. :) I'm hopeful.
Its time to get started on ponlined!
Shockwave Flash movies are the greatest thing to happen to non-sequitur humor since Japan.
Good thing too. DC is old, failed technology. Just about good enough for mobile phones...possibly. Surely its better to go for PS2/GCube tech instead?
My questions is...
Will that Linux ethernet adaptor that Sony is marketing with the hardrive be compatible with whatever implementation they choose? Or should i buy it just for the coolness of saying i own it.
FYI:
:) ). Its basically a portable browser written in C. Everything is handled in a 'round robin' single thread - so if the networking hangs, the UI hangs. Other than that, its a nice piece of software (for a few thousand bucks...).
I've worked alot with the access browser (even did a port
At this point, though, I really wonder how a company can compete with so many open source browsers out there, but so far no one has 'packaged' mozilla/gecko into something the typical embedded guy would understand.
I'm afraid that just by posting in this discussion will get me modded but here goes nothing (no pun intended). Since the Dreamcast is dead and the vultures have started to pick it apart, when will the other consoles adopt its finer qualities? I love my Dreamcast (that I bought to run linux among other things) and I wish that the console had a bit longer life before it was declared dead. I guess I should have known that Sega would have given it a half-hearted effort from my experience with the genesis and its tech superiority for a good year. I guess I should stop droning aimlessly, but does anyone know where I can get some sort of software that allows me to burn VMU games to cd and then load from the cd to the vmu?
Heroscape, it's like legos combined with anachronistic wargames.
so i thought i'd post my page for what its worth... and here it is.
Comments are owned by the Poster.
Unless Katz wants to publish a book containing them without permission, in order to push his manipulative "Geeks are victims of EVERYTHING" journalistic agenda.
Did that Hellmouth book ever get printed after all?
"Why did they cancel my favorite Sci-Fi show? I downloaded ALL the episodes!"
I'm not saying "Down with M$!" to be "1337" or anything, but sincerely, "Down with M$!".
And the rest of them.