Slashdot Mirror


Staggeringly Amazing Church of Lego

rcharbon writes: "This link brings you to yet another of the web's compulsive personalities. Almost 18 months in the making, the lego church is astonishing. Christened as a monument to dead cats, no less." I know we post Lego things often, but this is an amazing project from Groundbreaking ceremony to completion. I was especially impressed with the mosaic works. The artist also has a number of other Lego works to check out while you're at it.

200 comments

  1. lego church? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    all those bricks.. should have used them in my next mindstorms projects.

  2. Delusional by ZeroLogic · · Score: 1, Funny

    This is one of those people that I'm very happy to have seen on the web, but are too scary to meet in real life.

    Brings up thoughts of Misery.

    1. Re:Delusional by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 4, Funny

      What would be really scary is if all the parisoners were identical -- white robes, no hair, maybe with a tub of KoolAid in the corner... (I had no idea Lego made so many different people)

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    2. Re:Delusional by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Jean Tisdale lives!! For the uninitiated, check out The Onion

  3. hmm by timdorr · · Score: 5, Funny

    where's the lego tv crew and the lego phone number overlay?

    --
    Tim Dorr
    Owner/Manger
    A Small Orange
  4. Oh no by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    were at FP and it's already slashdotted

  5. Slashdotted! by cybercuzco · · Score: 1, Redundant

    So this is like the second or third post, and the link is already slashdotted. Sigh. Mirrors anyone?

    --

    1. Re:Slashdotted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of course it's slashdotted. It's a Lego Church.

    2. Re:Slashdotted! by thesolo · · Score: 5, Informative

      I mirrored a few, here you go (be gentle!):

      1) Overhead of the Church
      2) The Altar
      3) Lego Priest giving a sermon
      4) Lego Organ Pipes
      5) Her cat, Precious, inside the church (you'd think laying on legos would be uncomfortable!)

      Should I be amazed or afraid?! :P

    3. Re:Slashdotted! by morbid · · Score: 0

      Of course, in real life you'd never fill a church up with that many people, because nobody in their right mind believes in that shit any more :-)

      --
      I'm out of my tree just now but please feel free to leave a banana.
    4. Re:Slashdotted! by WhaDaYaKnow · · Score: 2, Funny

      Wow, I didn't know people looked that happy in church!

      It seems though that some racial profiling was done when selecting the people for this church. ;)

    5. Re:Slashdotted! by foghorn666 · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      All those white folks, they've gotta be Mormons.

    6. Re:Slashdotted! by ArizonaBay · · Score: 4, Funny

      All those white folks, they've gotta be Mormons.

      You all watch too much Simpsons. In the real world, white people aren't yellow. :)

    7. Re:Slashdotted! by zeugma-amp · · Score: 1

      All lego are yellow, not white.

      --
      This is an ex-parrot!
    8. Re:Slashdotted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      You all watch too much Simpsons. In the real world, white people aren't yellow.

      That's funny.

    9. Re:Slashdotted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And to those of you who keep wondering what good P2P is...well...here's yet another example. Mirroring is a kludge...and Rob and Co. are almost broke from the cost of keeping thier servers running.

      Slashdotting the websites we support doesn't seem to make a whole lot of sense...especially for people whose providers charge for over-quota traffic.

    10. Re:Slashdotted! by trubador · · Score: 1

      You could get that many folks in the church, but they'd be seated towards the back. No one would be in the front rows.

    11. Re:Slashdotted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless it's a wedding.

    12. Re:Slashdotted! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      .
      Funny! when I was a kid, I used to color some of my logo heads with a brown Marks-A-Lot permanent marker so I didn't have such a homogeneous legoland. and so I could say that one of them was me!

      .

    13. Re:Slashdotted! by Zathrus · · Score: 1

      Having just gotten married... do you have any idea how much it would cost to have a wedding with nearly 1400 guests?

      (Ok, the smart ass answer is "about the same for 10 guests"... the reception is the killer)

    14. Re:Slashdotted! by ChrisKoehler · · Score: 0

      Or Presbyterian maybe.......Catholic, Methodist, Southern Baptist, etc....

      There are many many denomonations, otherwise I guess I would be Mormon according to you (Presbyterian actually.

  6. Correct Link by samael · · Score: 3, Informative

    Do you not check those links?

    You should be going here: http://www.amyhughes.org/lego/church/

  7. Kaboom by Shaper+of+Myths · · Score: 5, Funny

    I guess their server was built from lego too...

    1. Re:Kaboom by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 1

      What, you mean like this?

      --
      -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    2. Re:Kaboom by OblongPlatypus · · Score: 1

      Was of course supposed to be: This.

      --
      -- If no truths are spoken then no lies can hide --
    3. Re:Kaboom by zaffir · · Score: 1

      I thought you meant this.

      --
      "Upon attaching the waterblock to my penis, I began to notice that I know nothing about computers." -- JRockway
    4. Re:Kaboom by ProfMoriarty · · Score: 1
      Seeing that it's still down ... I would conjecture that they did not use "real" Lego bricks, but a inferior substitute that has looser molding tolerances ...

      Mega-Bloks ... almost, but not totally unlike Lego bricks ...

      --
      Karma? Karma? I don't need no stinkin' karma.
  8. Ooohhhhh! by Kenja · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Curch made of Legos. Not Curch Of Legos.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
  9. Yikes. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next on "let's bring the Slashdot Effect down on the kind, poor and hapless," the readers of Slashdot bring down the servers of three orphanages, a school for the blind, two hunger project centers, and a sweet little old lady's home-based DSl-linked web server that she uses to organize day trips for the terminally ill.

    1. Re:Yikes. by 56ker · · Score: 1, Redundant

      or how about harnessing the value of the slashdot effect for good? Get a site promoting - just slashdot it! :)

    2. Re:Yikes. by 56ker · · Score: 2

      Sorry that should've read :

      or how about harnessing the value of the slashdot effect for good? Get a site promoting (insert evil cause here)? - just slashdot it! :)

    3. Re:Yikes. by bobdehnhardt · · Score: 5, Funny
      CERN Advisory: D/.DOS Attack

      Overview
      The CERN/CC has received reports of a new web DOS attack, called the Distributed Slashdot Denial Of Service attack. Rather than depending on exploits readily found in certain HTTP servers, this attack utilizes social engineering to bring down sites that appeal to the technically savvy. Within minutes of the target site's URL being posted on a publicly accessible web site, the target site is bombarded with connection requests. This can result in the complete blocking of even the most robust web farms.

      Workaround
      1. Don't put up a sight that is anywhere close to something considered "Cool", "Kewl", K3wl", "News for Nerds" or "Stuff that matters".
      2. Avoid techno-geek hot topics, including Legos, Mindstorm, Manga, Anime, and Beer
      3. Never, ever post anything complementary about Linux, or disparaging about Microsoft
      4. Never mention the name CowboyNeal

    4. Re:Yikes. by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      Don't put up a sight that is anywhere close to something considered "Cool", "Kewl", K3wl", "News for Nerds" or "Stuff that matters".

      And how would you end up on /. by posting something like that? This story itself isn't even "News for Nerds", and it certainly doesn't matter. (or so the Troll reasoning goes). Everyone knows it's just Slashvertisements these days anyways.

      *grin*

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    5. Re:Yikes. by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 2, Insightful
      This story itself isn't even "News for Nerds"

      Clearly you are not a nerd.

    6. Re:Yikes. by ZaMoose · · Score: 2

      *sigh* I guess my attempts at sarcasm and heading people off at Troll Pass are woefully misguided.

      'Twas sarcasm.

      --
      I wish I had a kryptonite cross, because then you could keep Dracula and Superman away.
    7. Re:Yikes. by Solonor · · Score: 1

      Too funny. Can I post this on my web site as a definition of "to be slashdotted"?

      --
      Solonor Rasreth
      Solonor's Groovy Grove of Mystical Wonders
      http://www.solonor.com
    8. Re:Yikes. by djweso · · Score: 1

      Well then I guess I shouldn't post about the pictures on my site of the life-size, Anime-style, Robotized-with-Mindstorms CowboyNeal and Tux Lego Statues which portray CowboyNeal drinking beer and Tux hurling [vomiting] on a passed out Bill Gates [whom seems to not to be able to handle his liquor]. The beer mug is of course running embeded linux, which uses 802.11b and Bluetooth to connect with the Mindstorm powered Beer Tap, to get a refill, and of course the whole thing is a Case Mod that holds and AMD AthalonXP liquid [read: beer. Well its gotta go somewhere when the statue drink it.] cooled and overclocked to 3GHz [can you imagine a beowolf cluster of these?!?]. Cowboy neal is wearing a ThinkGeek.com "RTFM" shirt and Tux is wearing a "BSOD" shirt.

      I wonder what lego vomit would look like....

      weso

      --
      "I like my sugar with coffee and cream." - Beastie Boys
  10. Just watch out... by Tadrith · · Score: 4, Funny

    ...for the child molesting Lego priests! *ducks*

    1. Re:Just watch out... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh man that's great.....who the hell modded it down?

    2. Re:Just watch out... by 56ker · · Score: 2

      just thinking how much time must have gone into this project... I wonder what God thinks of it all.

    3. Re:Just watch out... by Loligo · · Score: 0

      >I wonder what God thinks of it all.

      If there was a god, I'd imagine he/she/it would have better things to do with his time than worry about what someone with too much free time did with his toys.

      I love Lego as much as the next geek, but let's not forget: they ARE toys, and no matter how impressive the result of this guy's obsession is, it's hardly of major theological importance.

      -l

    4. Re:Just watch out... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      Sounds like a feature for LEGO^H^H^H^H Block Structure Porn

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    5. Re:Just watch out... by 56ker · · Score: 2

      Yes I know - I meant it tongue in cheek really. Next time I'll put a :p on so ppl know.

    6. Re:Just watch out... by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      >I love Lego as much as the next geek, but let's
      > not forget: they ARE toys, and no matter how
      >impressive the result of this guy's obsession is,
      >it's hardly of major theological importance.

      what if he built a lego tower all the way to heaven? or what if he built a lego ark big enough to hold two of every animal? or what if he sent a lego half way across the ocean in the belly of a fish? or what if he turned lego's into blood? or what if there were burning legos that talked? or what if... ok that is enough of the ridiculous bible stores.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    7. Re:Just watch out... by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      I would imagin that after the first few milennia that a Major Diety might get a bit bored and find at least a little bit of humor in such silly endevors. I mean just imagine knowing that You were the one who created an entire universe the ended up creating some guy who made a church centered around You out of lego bricks!

      Woh, that'd be one serious trip! LOL!

    8. Re:Just watch out... by sean23007 · · Score: 2
      Wasn't that one of the newspaper articles from SimCity?
      Obsessed man builds church in your honor... completely out of LEGO bricks!
      Click to see full story...

      ..."It wasn't easy, but I devoted myself, and I just thought, what would Mayor [insert name here] do? That didn't really give me any answers, but the Ancient Golden Llama of Infinite Wisdom told me: 'If you build it, he will come.' So I built it. I'm still waiting for Mayor What's-his-name to show though."
      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    9. Re:Just watch out... by Com2Kid · · Score: 1

      Beats me, the version of SimCity that I own doesn't have a newspaper. ^_^

      (the original PC SimCity, no idea, lots of versions out there even of 'the original')

    10. Re:Just watch out... by Moofie · · Score: 2

      I think that anytime some person (like this WOMAN) spends time doing anything to glorify God, God appreciates it. He's not as jaded as you.

      Just my opinion. I'll ask Him when I see Him.

      --
      Why yes, I AM a rocket scientist!
    11. Re:Just watch out... by Zarquon · · Score: 2
      or what if there were burning legos that talked?

      Don't give the mindstorm people more ideas... hmm.. TTS chip, speaker, butane tank / valve, large coil for spark..

      --
      "'Tis great confidence in a friend to tell him your faults, greater to tell him his." --Poor Richard's Almanac
    12. Re:Just watch out... by smashr · · Score: 0

      okay, im sorry, but thats just wrong. i mean to drag your fantasies into a story about legos is NOT right!

    13. Re:Re:Just watch out... by Punkerbat · · Score: 0

      Rock on, man! I agree with you whole heartedly. I'll ask Him too. :)

      --
      Carbonated Sugar Water! Makes kids jump around!
    14. Re:Just watch out... by Loligo · · Score: 1

      >(like this WOMAN)

      Fair enough, the site was slashdotted straight to Peoria and back and I didn't look at the URLs all that closely. You got me. Hope it feels good.

      >Just my opinion. I'll ask Him when I see Him.

      Good for you.

      Meanwhile, I'll continue to live my life as a decent person because it's the right thing to do, not to score brownie points with some mythological bearded old man in the sky that goes "tsk tsk" and threatens to send me to eternal torture and suffering... But he loves me.

      Whatever. Hint: There is no tooth fairy.

      -l

  11. the /. effect by mcspock · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I hate to suggest it, but perhaps links to sites that can't sustain a /. load shouldn't be posted? Besides the fact that nobody can check this site out after 2 minutes, it's undoubtedly difficult for the webmaster of said site (especially if they have bandwidth limitations, etc).

    --
    -- Patience is a virtue, but impatience is an art.
    1. Re:the /. effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Totally agree. When you know that posting a link is going to knock that site off-line and do it anyway, that's un-cool as it gets.

    2. Re:the /. effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Honestly, the /. editors should have enough common sense and decency to check things out before posting. Sure, Malda has this site and is fairly successful, but I don't think posting a link on slashdot that leads to some young girl's web hosting account (probably with something like 5megs and 100megs/month bandwidth) is responsible judgement on their part, unless they're willing to pay the fees for the bandwidth (which, they're not).

      Ironic how so many posts are made "for the common man", yet, they blatantly ignore these principles whenever they feel like.

    3. Re:the /. effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The /. effect is no different than your every day web-based DDoS attack. Wonder if how much liability /. would have for their postings if it comes to that..

    4. Re:the /. effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow moderators, good job modding this to offtopic; unfortunately, there is no way for anybody to discuss the actual topic since the website in this article went down after a couple minutes.

    5. Re:the /. effect by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      P2P!

    6. Re:the /. effect by Tony-A · · Score: 2

      And ruin their moment of glory?

    7. Re:the /. effect by Casca · · Score: 1

      And how exactly do you propose determining if a site can tolerate the traffic? Maybe a mandatory form that has to be filled out by the operator of the websites ISP that states what their bandwidth availability is, combined with a geek rating of the story?

      --
      Casca
    8. Re:the /. effect by RedWizzard · · Score: 2

      Amy Hughes doesn't seem too upset about it: a message from her regarding the slashdotting. Now she's looking for a new host though. Anyone here able to help her out?

  12. One day... by Drakker · · Score: 1

    I will live in a house completly made out of lego blocks, fully automated and linked to my computer for additionnal control. I'll even have a lego dog running around. Yeah!

    1. Re:One day... by the_consumer · · Score: 1

      You know, I have been thinking about this for a while. People make houses out of straw bales, so why not Legos? Obviously, real Legos are far too small to bother with, it would take forever, but why not make giant Legos, around 3' x 3' x 5', with evacuated cavaties inside them for insulation? Certain Legos would have ports running through them for pipes and conduit.

      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    2. Re:One day... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Houses made out of bricks ... what a concept

    3. Re:One day... by Drakker · · Score: 1

      Well, in hot countries near the equator where you have no cold winter, you could build a house entirely out of those block without the need for insulation. It would make it VERY easy to pass those extra Cat-5 cables through the house too. :)

      And when youre bored, you can modify your house with little problems. You just need a clean, non-rainy day. :)

      It's not a tent, but close enough to be carriable too.

    4. Re:One day... by the_consumer · · Score: 1
      Well, in hot countries near the equator where you have no cold winter, you could build a house entirely out of those block without the need for insulation.
      Yeah, If you enjoy being hot or spending a lot on electricity for an AC. In any case, the blocks are all you need, since the ratio of the thickness of the plastic they're made out of to the overall volume of the blocks is much lower than with regular legos, you have room in the block to create a vacuated cavity inside it, which would act as an insulator. And rearranging the house on a whim is definitely a big benefit. You could build temporary guest rooms and such. You wouldn't have to paint, either. I'm not sure about the structural integrity of the blocks, though, not being an engineer...
      --
      "If you're thinking what I'm thinking, you're right." -
    5. Re:One day... by Drakker · · Score: 1

      About the structural integrity, I'd say you'd just need to build carefully. Though, it would be possible to make blocks that can support more weight for the supporting walls/pillars in the house.
      The only real problem with this would be the roof. It must not allow water to pass through.

  13. MIRROR THIS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AND HURRY!

  14. Patriotic: #@ +1 ; Informative @# by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    John Ashcroft will be pleased because only
    Christians, Jews, and Muslims know that the
    source of liberty is God.

    Thanks for this uplifting news article.

  15. How Much? by jaybird144 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm just a bit curious as to how much it COSTS to build a castle out of LEGOs... I remember when I used to play with LEGOs, (like 4 years ago...I'm not that old ^_^) I had a hard time scraping enough money together to build a decent castle (for the little LEGO people, that is...) The site is /.ed, so I can't see if it says there - does anyone have figures as to how much the Church of LEGO cost? -Jaybird144

    1. Re:How Much? by infinite9 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      It depends on what it's made of (I can't see the site either). In general, you can get lego bricks from bulk ordering sites for 1-25 cents. Of course, they go way up from there, but most aren't too expensive. I once ran a lego brick auction site. 35,000 bricks. I invested $2000 up front. I made back $4000 gross and had 6000 parts left over. To this day, I have a massive herd of lego horses. :-)

      --
      Disconnect your television. Do your own research. Draw your own conclusions. They're probably lying. Don't be a sheep.
    2. Re:How Much? by ay2b · · Score: 1

      When bought in sets, Lego pieces cost an average of about 15 cents per piece (that's weighting the pieces by commonality). More specialized pieces cost more. 2x2 bricks cost about 7 cents each. 2x4 bricks cost 14 cents each.

      When bought in bulk and buying just bricks, you can get them for a little less than if you buy full sets (with lots of specialized pieces). Check out Lego Shop-At-Home for exact prices.

      (I haven't been able to get to the featured site, so I have no idea how many bricks are used in the church.)

      If I ever updated my Lego site, I wonder if I could get a slashdot feature, too...

      --
      "Those who would sacrifice essential liberty for temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety."
    3. Re:How Much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Wow, then you did better than the average Herbalife Independant Distributor! Legos, a product where the market Isn't Saturated!!!

    4. Re:How Much? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Anywhere from $100s to $1000s depending on what you are trying to achieve. And no, it's not cheap to build something worthy nor does The Lego Company make it easy in any way to acquire the needed elements.

      A rough estimate of a modest structure with some special elements would run a minimum of $400, but at that price a smallish castle could be fairly complete. Not spectacular, just a good basic castle.

  16. Not NEARLY as interesting as... by thelizman · · Score: 5, Funny
    1. Re:Not NEARLY as interesting as... by KL1NK · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      combine the two and you get a catholic church

  17. Mod up the above... by sterno · · Score: 1

    not necessarily on topic, but a good point

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  18. If it doesn't work by JMZero · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just press your refresh button as fast as you can. And don't give up. Just keep on pressing it. Faster!

    Make sure nobody enjoys it if you can't.

    --
    Let's not stir that bag of worms...
  19. Text from the main page & one picture by thesolo · · Score: 5, Informative

    Since it is already slashdotted, here is the main page. I managed to grab one overhead of the church, you can see it here

    "This project is dedicated to my cat, Precious, who passed away January 8, 2002, the same day construction was completed. May this church, of such amusement to My Little Chirper, express some of the joy she brought me.

    "I thank my God upon every remembrance of you" Philippians 1:3

    About this project

    I got back into LEGO building after a twenty-year "dark ages" as a means of dealing with grief after my first cat, Murray, passed away in June, 2000. I also adopted Precious, my third cat, at that time. She loved to be amidst my building from the start. She didn't disturb partially assembled LEGO objects, or even piles of bricks, so I only had to concern myself with cleaning up loose pieces when I was done working, and I could leave her to play around my assembled work without too much fear of damage.

    My first project was to be a large house, about 4 feet by 2 feet in size. I drew floor plans, and then built much of the front wall as a test of concept. Then I set about creating a pattern for the floor that was to become the living room. I quickly came up with a double row of crosses that reminded me of the center aisle of a church, and building a church suddenly seemed like a more interesting project.

    And so the Abston Church of Christ was conceived as my first LEGO project in twenty years. As the picture above shows, Precious continued to enjoy my building, and as you'll see in the Cats in Church pictures, she and her sister, Anya, made this project quite a lot of fun. Read about it in the construction log.

    As chance would have it, I only had a few hours of work to complete after Precious passed away, so in her honor I wrapped it up that same day. I didn't have a chance to do some small revisions or to build a piano for the church because I wanted to leave it as it was on that day.

    I hope you enjoy this church, because that's how I get to share the memory of My Little Chirper with you. I like to think of this as Precious's Church. "

    Honestly, this is an amazing project, but the site gives me the creeps for some reason.

    1. Re:Text from the main page & one picture by yintercept · · Score: 2, Funny

      This project is dedicated to my cat, Precious, who passed away January 8, 2002, the same day construction was completed.

      Wow, so its not just a lego church, it is a haunted lego church...now that's cool.

    2. Re:Text from the main page & one picture by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So funny though

    3. Re:Text from the main page & one picture by squaretorus · · Score: 3, Funny

      This guy kills a cat every two years! MAN!!
      I think he probably forgets to feed the poor things while he arranges his bricks!

    4. Re:Text from the main page & one picture by Mostly+Monkey · · Score: 2, Funny

      I wonder if the cat choked on a lego?

      --
      Chika Chik-ah... do-e ow ow.
  20. I hate it when by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the editors tell me how amazing something is, knowing all the while that chances are I will never see it

  21. For those who can't get it by xcomputer_man · · Score: 1

    Here's a picture:


    http://129.7.201.70/xcomputerman/legochurch.jpg

    1. Re:For those who can't get it by Neil+Blender · · Score: 1

      Hmmm, I'll put this on my server at home.

      <epiphany>My bandwidth sucks.</epiphany>

    2. Re:For those who can't get it by xcomputer_man · · Score: 1

      Actually the failure of one of the server's processors coincided with my post. It took me about an hour to revive the server, but it's back up now. And no, this isn't my computer at home, this is a server machine running on a 100mbit link.

    3. Re:For those who can't get it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Weren't there any pictures of the *outside* of the church? I've seen a bunch of pictures of the inside -- but, what about shots of the outside?

  22. Slashdot Effect.. by MyNameIsRaGe · · Score: 0

    Also known as a Distributed Denial of Service attack.. And they say 'hackers' are the problem.. Ha!

    --

    ~RaGe
    www.outrigged.com
  23. Genesis 1:32 by OccSub · · Score: 5, Funny

    And on the eighth day, God created plastic, and he saw that it was good, and he made little teeny-tiny blocks out of it to give geeks something very cool to play with.

    1. Re:Genesis 1:32 by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 5, Funny

      ...and bare of foot, man did step upon teeny-tiny blocks of plastic, and he did blaspheme.

    2. Re:Genesis 1:32 by Kasmiur · · Score: 3, Funny

      And on the 9th Day
      The garden of eden website was slashdotted.
      God saw this and realized it was bad.
      He cast the leader of the slashdot and said, "Forver you will drink yellow substance and be denied sleep. You will also fear the sun and lack social skills"

      the great and many slashdotters cheered and ran into thier underground cavern. God realized he made a mistake.

      --
      -THIS SPACE FOR RENT!
    3. Re:Genesis 1:32 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      piss, beer, or mountain dew?

  24. Re:DDoS by slug359 · · Score: 1

    sorry but for every story now comments like this are
    getting put up.

    moderators?

  25. Easily spotted... by tswinzig · · Score: 5, Funny

    They are the ones with the legs on backwards, for obvious reasons.

    --

    "And like that ... he's gone."
  26. Precious :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
    The artist's cat, Precious died on January 9th :(

    This AC thinks starvation was the cause *rimshot*

    1. Re:Precious :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, what's the allusion here ?

    2. Re:Precious :( by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There isn't one. I'm just saying that the cat starved to death because she either 1. neglected to feed it or 2. it was trapped inside the church and starved.

    3. Re:Precious :( by ipfwadm · · Score: 1

      I'm just saying that the cat starved to death because she either 1. neglected to feed it or 2. it was trapped inside the church and starved.

      "Give a man a fish, and you'll feed him for a day. Give a man religion, and he'll starve to death while praying for a fish."

  27. Re:the /. effect - Criteria for link non-posting by ashitaka · · Score: 1

    1) Created by FrontPage
    2) Cheezy colour scheme
    3) Obviously "personal project" type page
    4) "Server IIS running on Windows NT x.x"

    Others?

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  28. /. effect solution? by KaizerWill · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Im not sure if this idea has been suggested before, but i haven't heard it. How much of a stretch would it be for /. to cache and mirror most of the links, at least for a few days while the traffic dies down?
    They could be archived several links deep, untill the story cycles off the front page, or the olderstuff tab. This would be a great convinience for the users, and i cant see that it would cause much of a problem for the servers.
    Perhaps we could pool suggestions on solving the /. effet and bring it up over at slashcode.com?
    Anyways, thats just my $.02 ....

    1. Re:/. effect solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      http://slashdot.org/faq/

    2. Re:/. effect solution? by rherbert · · Score: 5, Interesting

      How about building the cache on top of Squid? Write a program so links would reference, say, http://slashdot.org/cache/www.amyhughes.org/lego/. This program then requests the URL through Squid, which takes care of making sure that the site receives the appropriate number of hits. (Squid checks to make sure the data hasn't changed, and if it hasn't, the data isn't downloaded - this results in the site registering a hit, but not having to transfer any data other than the header response.) If a site seems like it might get slashdotted (and I can usually guess when a URL will be slashdotted), the editor clicks a button and POOF - the URL in the story is automatically changed and the cache program lists it as a valid site to cache (so that people can't use it to bypass pr0n filters at work). This can't be THAT difficult, can it? Squid does all the work for you, and who needs permission from the site to use Squid? Are there any implications (described in the FAQ or otherwise) that I haven't addressed (besides non-relative links in the HTML needing to be rewritten)?

    3. Re:/. effect solution? by -=OmegaMan=- · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      This should be pretty easy to implement, especially with all the subscription revenue rolling in. ;)

      --

      This sig is xenon coated, and will glow red when in the presence of aliens

    4. Re:/. effect solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The only issue is how to you restrict it so that people don't just use it as a general cache/anonymizer.

    5. Re:/. effect solution? by Kwil · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      He answered that..
      The ability to cache a certain URL is given to the editor. They look at the site, decide if it can handle a slashdotting, and if not, enable the Squid-suit.

      --

      That Jesus Christ guy is getting some terrible lag... it took him 3 days to respawn! -NJ CoolBreeze

    6. Re:/. effect solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In the last Q&A CmdrTaco and Hemos held, this question brought up, and the simple answer is, they cant, because of copyright issues.

    7. Re:/. effect solution? by rherbert · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      So why can Google do it? Why force /. users to haphazardly mirror (potentially copyrighted) things rather than doing it in an orderly and controlled fashion? The sites that would be concerned about copyright issues would probably be able to handle the load - CNN, NY Times, etc... so you just don't enable caching for them. (And if someone complains about copyright violations... Disable it for that site!)

    8. Re:/. effect solution? by swillden · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      In the last Q&A CmdrTaco and Hemos held, this question brought up, and the simple answer is, they cant, because of copyright issues

      Would a caching proxy really constitute a copyright infringement? Does the one in my house, or the one at the office? What about the ones that many ISPs set up to cut down on their upstream bandwidth costs? How about the browser cache on every computer? For that matter, what about the Google cache?

      My theory is that /. doesn't want to increase their own bandwidth consumption when they can let others handle part of the load they generate.

      --
      Note to ACs: I usually delete AC replies without reading them. If you want to talk to me, log in.
    9. Re:/. effect solution? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      They look at the site, decide if it can handle a slashdotting
      How are they supposed to do that?

      ...AND! I'd like a boolean response from a web script on whether any url I feed can take a slashdotting! ;)

    10. Re:/. effect solution? by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      Amazon.com, Riaa.org, Blizzard.com - These can handle a slashdotting.

      geocities.com/someguy123/manganatalieportmanlego s. html, 123.34.56.256/shinything.html, ServerrunningonaC64.net - these cannot.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    11. Re:/. effect solution? by kasparov · · Score: 1

      Not to get picky or anything, but nobody is going to be slashdotting 123.34.56.256... it's not a valid IP address. Now if it was 123.34.56.254 they might have some serious issues with a slashdotting.

      --
      There's no place I can be, since I found Serenity.
    12. Re:/. effect solution? by patrick42 · · Score: 2, Insightful

      so then how does google get away with it? they have cached versions of pages. and what about http://web.archive.org/ ? It seems like slashdot could easily do something similar.

    13. Re:/. effect solution? by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      I did that on purpose just to be sure i didnt put a valid address :P

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    14. Re:/. effect solution? by John+Harrison · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Google cache is a good example. Has anyone sued Google? The Scientologists?

      Still, I think that /. would want to run ads or have subscriptions pay for each page view. I certainly think that it is one thing for someone to simple cache a page. It is another to cache it and show your own ads.

      I don't think that Taco & Co. are worried enough about this problem to do anything about it. If they were they would have done something long ago. The copyright problem seems like an excuse. It would be a simple thing for them to contact small site owners and ask for permission to take a snapshot of a portion of a site and leave it up for a few days. They could even show the sites own ads in addtion to any ads that non /. subscribers see. Heck, if /. actually made $$ they could pay small sites a bit for the right to cache their content for a while.

      Interestingly at least two stories today were from small sites that got hammered within seconds of hitting the front page. In fact, all the Lego (tm) stories that I can remember recently got /.ed so fast that I had to wait until a day or two later to view them.

      I don't seem how anyone is harmed by temporary caching if done with some thought, do you?

    15. Re:/. effect solution? by rherbert · · Score: 1
      I'd be just as afraid of being sued for negligence as copyright violations. At least one site gets slashdotted every day, right? So they KNOW that it happens, yet they continue to post links to sites that might not be able to handle it.

      amyhughes.com is TOTALLY down right now. The NAMESERVER isn't even working. And the /. admin KNEW that might happen. And what if poor Amy Hughes exceeds her allocated bandwith and has to pay out the wazoo for it? She may not have ads on her site, and now she has a large bill to pay.

      I'm not trying to flame anybody (and IANAL), but.... it sounds like negligence to me. Maybe they figure that the people who can't handle the load don't have the resources to sue them, either. I guess that's a valid point. But it's still not very nice.

  29. Dead cats by ross.w · · Score: 3, Funny

    Does this make the 102nd use for a dead cat?

    --
    If my call is important, why am I talking to a recording?
  30. Re:More Misery From Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Did the email cause Steven King to have a heart attack and die?

  31. To go along with it beautifully... by DrEldarion · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out The Brick Testament

    Complements it quite nicely.

    -- Dr. Eldarion --

    1. Re:To go along with it beautifully... by Richthofen80 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The most disturbing part of this is the lego illustrations on instructions of slavery. The slave lego people are all black, and some are sporting afros.

      I don't remember afros in the bible, but i could be wrong.

      --
      Reason, free market capitalism, and individualism
    2. Re:To go along with it beautifully... by Reziac · · Score: 2

      Oh yes, with that special tinge of parody -- I loved the parts involving flames :)

      BTW, a new Lego-themed DOOM map was released this week. Snag it from http://www.duellist.net/ (No! no!! not all at once! :)

      --
      ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    3. Re:To go along with it beautifully... by markmoss · · Score: 3, Informative

      Slave = black only in the special circumstances of American history. Biblical slavery was not race based -- mostly the slaves were war captives, although sometimes a criminal would be auctioned off to raise money to compensate his victims, or a bankrupt debtor might be sold to pay the creditors. So a slave might be a foreigner, distinguishable by accent but often not by appearance, or might even be a former neighbor.

      The problem was, if a slave looked like free people, he could escape fairly easily. So in the American south, bondservants (white people who paid for their passage by agreeing to a limited period of slavery) would all too often simply walk away and take up land of their own out on the frontier, but africans couldn't travel even a few miles without showing papers. In other countries without a frontier, non-racial slavery worked better, but there were still problems in the long run. If slaves were used on a job, free men were reluctant to take wages for the same work -- in the antebellum south, there were poor whites that would be happy to take a job "overseeing" the slaves, but would rather eat clay and grass than pick cotton themselves. So in the long term, most societies evolve to either be mostly slave or mostly non-slave. E.g. in Medieval and Renaissance France, a poor man wandering the countryside was obviously a runaway serf. In England serfdom died away, then African slaves were imported for a while, but by the late 1700's slaves were so rare that it was easy to ban slavery entirely. However, in the Arab nations in the same period, only very important persons and desert nomads were free -- and when the Turkish empire extended from Bulgaria to Africa, legally _everyone_ was the Sultan's slave.

  32. The Japanese really know how to honour dead cats.. by cheekymonkey_68 · · Score: 1

    the lego church is astonishing Christened as a monument to dead cats, no less

    This may not be made of lego but its one hell of a shrine to dead cats

  33. /.'ed and robot.txt'd by darkstar2a · · Score: 1
    Since it was an old story I check the Internet Archive, unfortunately the archive was not listed due to robot.txt.

    Anyone else have a mirror? What I want to know is when will Lego go public! Keep buying, keep building. :)

    Garth

  34. Metal Church would've been cooler by ScoLgo · · Score: 1

    This is pretty cool. But would've been a lot cooler if it was a Lego concert hall with these guys playing.

    --
    "Michael, I did nothing. I did absolutely nothing - and it was everything that I thought it could be."
  35. Trolling moderators by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    the lego church is astonishing Christened as a monument to dead cats, no less

    The comment Does this make the 102nd use for a dead cat?
    Question: How was his comment offtopic ?

    Answer: Crack smoking trolling moderators

  36. Phase 2? by e1en0r · · Score: 5, Funny

    How long until the Lego church folk start to attack the Harry Potter lego for evil wizardry? Or until little Lego missionaries try to convert the pirates and the spacemen to their side?

  37. Phshaw by r_j_prahad · · Score: 1

    That ain't nothing. My ex-brother-in-law done built hisself a entire house down by the river under the old bridge using some cardboard boxes and some newspapers he found in the dumpster.

  38. FYI Site is hosted on Apache/Linux by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Via our friends at netcraft

    The site www.amyhughes.org is running Apache/1.3.6 (Unix) mod_perl/1.21 mod_ssl/2.2.8 OpenSSL/0.9.2b on Linux.

    Perhaps its running on a lowend computer in her house with possibly a less than ideal connection to the net.

    I wonder what the high end of /. generated slashdot effect (number of users who hit the link) is these days......

  39. Of course the site had to be down... by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    There really wasn't any need to start subscriptions here on /. now was there, Taco, when you could simply have charged hapless siteadmins in exchange for rejecting submissions linking to their machines...

    Gah, do I have to do all the thinking round here?

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
  40. 4 Images Mirrored by Str8Dog · · Score: 1

    Check here. Please be kind... 8(

    --


    Str8Dog
    using System.Darkside; public
  41. church stats by e1en0r · · Score: 4, Informative

    from her site: It contains approximately 75,000 pieces, including almost 4000 windows, seats 1372 minifigs and is about 7 feet long by 5 1/2 feet wide.

  42. Laying on Legos by BlueFrog · · Score: 1

    Actually, it's amazingly comfortable once you get settled. All the little bumps and points sort of massage you if you distribute your weight. (Still hate stepping on bricks, though.) I used to do it when I was a kid, and would nearly fall asleep. I guess it's kinda like laying on a bed of nails.

  43. Yep, this guy's stable by Da+Penguin · · Score: 5, Funny
    > I got back into LEGO building after a twenty-year "dark ages" as a means of dealing with grief after my first cat, Murray, passed away in June, 2000

    Some people deal with their emotions, some go into denial, and some build lego cathedrals.

    I guess we should be more sensitive though, those must have been some cats and must have meant a lot to her.

    Really good work, though; astounding detail on the pews, lights, crucifix, lighting...
    I just hope she didn't actually entomb the cat there.

    PS: I now realise that it is not a guy, I just thought that such obsession is usually a guy thing.

    1. Re:Yep, this guy's stable by JimPooley · · Score: 1, Troll

      Yes, but it's about cats. cat obsession is the last refuge of the crazy woman...

      --

      "Information wants to be paid"
  44. Re:if it is made out of legos.. by pmsr · · Score: 0, Troll

    And to the schools with all the child molesting teachers. And to the families by the way with all the child molesting parents. Ad nauseum.

    /Pedro

  45. Umm, wheres the key to crack this code? by g_bit · · Score: 1

    I don't visit websites who's forums are in the Chinese language and make an ass out of myself, so why don't you do yourself a favor and and learn the language first?

    mmmkay?

    1. Re:Umm, wheres the key to crack this code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Stop feeding the trolls, asshole.

    2. Re:Umm, wheres the key to crack this code? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps for the same reason you can't be bothered to learn the difference between "who's" and "whose"?

      Idiot.

  46. Re:the /. effect - Criteria for link non-posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    5) if they use blink tags

    6) if they use l337 green on black colour schemes

    7) Any site hosted on geocities type sites

    8) Server running on old/weird hardware, i.e. potato powered server, ZX81 web server etc

  47. Ob. Grammar correction by mattman · · Score: 2, Informative

    For the (hopefully) last time:

    Lego is the plural of Lego. Lego is the company. If you must add an 's', use "Lego bricks." The bastardization "Legos" grates on any true fans nerves. Please don't use it.

    --
    Ideas in this comment are smarter than they appear.
    1. Re:Ob. Grammar correction by wadetemp · · Score: 5, Informative

      As you've stated, the LEGO(R) trademark is an adjective not a noun. A LEGO(R) legal page has more information about this, under "Proper Use of the LEGO Trademark on a Web Site."

    2. Re:Ob. Grammar correction by Darby · · Score: 1

      Lego is the plural of Lego. Lego is the company. If you must add an 's', use "Lego bricks." The bastardization "Legos" grates on any true fans nerves. Please don't use it.

      This well may be grammatically correct, but it sounds dumb to me. What you're saying doesn't sound dumb, but, "I'm playing with Lego" sounds dumb when there are more than one of them. The vast majority of English speakers agree, hence the repeated use of it this way. I'm generally all for correct grammar, but there are times when the correct way is just wrong. This is such a case.

      For the (hopefully) last time:

      Nope, it won't be, for the reasons given above.
      Please try not to let it get to you.

    3. Re:Ob. Grammar correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just remember kiddies - before you go to bed,
      pick up your legos, brush your tooths and
      comb your hairs - then if you can't sleep,
      count sheeps.

      YES "LEGO" DAMMIT!

    4. Re:Ob. Grammar correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Childs, don't put Legos in your mouths, there may be virii on them.

      *shudder*

    5. Re:Ob. Grammar correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Lego is short for Lek Godt, wich can be translated into: Play Well.

      As a scandinavian I've watched the lego documentary a week ago.

    6. Re:Ob. Grammar correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They are Legos. Says who? Says generations of people who have used them. Bitch, moan, and whine all you want about "properly call them 'lego bricks'", no one gives a rat's ass, and rightly so.

    7. Re:Ob. Grammar correction by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Purely out of interest- if you refer to muliple sheep, do you say sheeps?

  48. A slightly -less- serious religious lego project by MaxwellStreet · · Score: 4, Interesting

    How about this fellow? Equally scary, yet interesting . . .

    The Brick Testament

    Very funny, if a bit irreverent . . .

  49. Thanks for the tip! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "t only a few weeks of age, a kitten's bones have not yet hardened and become osseous. They are extremely soft and springy. In fact, if you take a week-old kitten and throw it to the floor, it will actually bounce! We do not recommend that you try this at home. The kitten may bounce under the furniture and be difficult to retrieve, as well as covered in unsightly household dust."
    Wow I better do this outside on the concrete then

  50. Re:A slightly -less- serious religious lego projec by Brian+Kendig · · Score: 3, Funny

    If you want irreverent, look closely at the figures in the background of the first image in the Flood story.

    http://www.thereverend.com/brick_testament/the_flo od/gn06_11.html

    (there's not supposed to be a space in 'flo od', I don't know why Slashdot is putting one there, but the link works)

    The guy in the striped shirt is a mime, but his face is too blurry to see that it's painted white. And yes, that's Jar Jar back there, and a guy in a tree stump, and an unfortunate sheep...

  51. Re:A slightly -less- serious religious lego projec by MaxwellStreet · · Score: 1

    Hehe... see? Now I'm gonna have to go over the site carefully, lookin for stuff like this.

    There goes an hour or two.

    Hilarious.

  52. A modest proposal by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    Great idea. Even better, slashdot (which needs the money) could charge the sites for this service. The conversation might go like this:

    Hapless Victim: Hello?
    Cmdr Taco: Hey, I about to post a link to your site which will cause it to get blitzed, causing your ISP to charge you big bucks for bandwidth usage. Howz about you pay me to cache it instead...

    Ya get the idea...

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  53. Re:More Misery From Bill Gates by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ROFL. I wonder if Unicode has a smim?

  54. oh man, by jcsehak · · Score: 0, Flamebait


    This project is dedicated to my cat, Precious, who passed away January 8, 2002

    Forget about building a church out of Legos-- just naming your cat "Precious" is enough to qualify as a kook.

    --

    c-hack.com |
    1. Re:oh man, by markov_chain · · Score: 1

      Wait a second. Her first cat passed away in 2000, and the second one just two years later? Maybe this person thinks the cats are also constructed of Lego bricks, so they don't need feeding, and can be locked up in Lego structures for extraordinary amounts of time :)

      --
      Tsunami -- You can't bring a good wave down!
  55. Thank you! I propose the SlashCache (tm) by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 2, Funny

    Sometimes, amongst the thousands of posts about how We hate Copy Protection, Lawyers Stink, I oppose the DMCCYAYYCCY Law Which Prevent me from Downloading Phr33 StUph, there is actually an article about News For Nerds with some cool pictures. I suggest that out of common courtesy, or compassion perhaps, Slashdot will kindly mirror sites with such pictures on the SlashCache, and have the Slashdot article refer to the mirror.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  56. Another mirrored image by piranha(jpl) · · Score: 2, Informative
    Here's another image I've mirrored for the few people that will see this post. It's looking down the main isle, to the front.

    I'm not karma-whoring, honest. If I am moderated up, well, I'm on a 33.6 and I could very well be Slashdotted worse than the original host of this web site. =)

  57. Re:A slightly -less- serious religious lego projec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This "Reverand" guy is way out of line, any black people see the bible bit about slavery, or any women see the bible bit about women? Sick. Or maybe I should put the blame where it belongs, the Reverand didn't say it. The ever right all knowing most popular book on the planet said it, the Reverand just copied it. Figures, I have yet to see a physically relevant and/or original thing either spoken or written come from a religous person. Maybe "modern" religion truly is for the weak of mind and spirit who cannot handle life on there own.

  58. Re:A slightly -less- serious religious lego projec by Dimensio · · Score: 2

    I thought that it was a religious-themed site to promote Christianity through Legos, then I read "Treatment of slaves" and "Women in the Church"

    Funny stuff.

  59. Re:Ob. Grammar correction is correct by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    An (assumed) American telling us how to speak English! Ha ha!

    It's 'some lego', not 'legos' because it's not 'a lego', it's 'a lego brick'.

    I'm making cookies using (some) 'flour', not 'flours'. Jeez.

    I could also argue '1 sheep', '2 sheep' etc. but its probably banging my head against a brick wall.

  60. Re:A slightly -less- serious religious lego projec by L.+J.+Beauregard · · Score: 1

    Even better are the Instructions for Marriage.

    --
    Ooh, moderator points! Five more idjits go to Minus One Hell!
    Delendae sunt RIAA, MPAA et Windoze
  61. I've been slashdotted by amyhughes · · Score: 5, Informative

    The site actually has a pretty fat pipe, but traffic started to spike a couple days before slashdot even got the story. It looks from emailed comments and the web log like it's being discussed in email, "online journals" and other forums. Traffic has been doubling every day. Would it have survived a slashdotting a week ago? I dunno. I'll get a fatter pipe before I announce the next project :-) In any case, when the server comes back up there'll be no church pictures for a while. Amy

    1. Re:I've been slashdotted by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 1

      You should zip up the files and put them on some pub FTP somewhere to allow people to mirror the site. I really want to see the pics... but, the site's been down for 3 days now.

      :(

    2. Re:I've been slashdotted by CaptCosmic · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should grab a free website on Yahoo or something and post it there. I'm sure they would love to deal with the slashdot effect.

      --
      -> Capt Cosmic <-
    3. Re:I've been slashdotted by amyhughes · · Score: 3, Informative
    4. Re:I've been slashdotted by amyhughes · · Score: 1

      Update:

      Turns out slashdot didn't take the server down afterall. Some time ago my host had to pay for bandwidth hackers used (according to him), so he instructed *his* host to shut his server down should there ever be a spike in traffic. That's what happened to little old amyhughes.org, and all other customers on that server, when slashdot "attacked".

      When someone who knew what they were doing looked at the situation, they removed me from the name server and brought the server back up. It took them about 7 hours to get someone who knew what they were doing involved, so that's how long all the other customers' service was interrupted.

      In any case, I'm back online with another host.

      Amy

  62. If only... by tjensor · · Score: 1

    ..Gaudi had had Lego. Maybe he would have got finished with Barcelona.

    --
    <fnord>OBEY</fnord>
  63. Re:Slashdotted! Thank God! by errxn · · Score: 1

    I was kinda afraid to look in the first place.

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
  64. Re:Ob. Grammar correction is correct by Darby · · Score: 1

    An (assumed) American telling us how to speak English! Ha ha!

    Correct assumption. I have been speaking English for as long as you assuming that we're the same age so your point is?

    It's 'some lego', not 'legos' because it's not 'a lego', it's 'a lego brick'.

    My point is that "some lego" sounds stupid.
    The proper way to say it would be "Some Lego brand building bricks". This is ungainly hence you simplify this.
    The vast majority of people simplify this further to legos. Does the Lego company make anything besides legos? No. Hence there is no ambiguity.

    I'm making cookies using (some) 'flour', not 'flours'. Jeez.

    Of course. A mass of ground wheat is called flour. Where's the problem?

  65. Her comments on being /.ed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    She knows.

    http://news.lugnet.com/announce/?n=1589

  66. Re:A slightly -less- serious religious lego projec by hanwen · · Score: 1

    Or an even less serious one: Lego Porn!

    --

    Han-Wen Nienhuys -- LilyPond

  67. Re:Ob. Grammar correction is correct by BrightBlade · · Score: 1

    Another point of view might be this:

    When someone says they are going to photocopy something, they might say "I'm going to Zerox this". Or they might ask for a "Klennex" instead of a facial tissue.

    Lego wants to protect their name. The problem is that people go to the store to buy "legos" and get Mega(crap)blocks. After all they are building bricks so they must be "legos". Or at least that is their train of thought.

    Help Protect Lego's brand name, call them "Lego Bricks".

    -J

  68. Re:Correct Link (*NEW* now as hyperlink) by darkcookie · · Score: 1

    For those who don't want to cut'n'paste:

    http://www.amyhughes.org/lego/church/

  69. Re:Ob. Grammar correction is correct by riven1128 · · Score: 1

    *does the fish slapping dance and then smacks BrightBlade with a wet trout made of many lego*

  70. Re:The Japanese really know how to honour dead cat by Isle · · Score: 1

    These cats are not even dead, they put airholes in the glass-tubes!

    Damn, and I though MY apartment was cramed.

  71. Re:The Japanese really know how to honour dead cat by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yeah but you've got to admit its a pretty funny site, not as good as furniture sex but not bad

  72. An idea... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    First off, the church is tre's cool and tre's spooky.

    Second, everytime a site gets slashdotted, slashdot should send out a "I got /.ed and all I got was this lousy T-Shirt!" t-shirt to the owner(s).

    1. Re:An idea... by kireK · · Score: 1

      Best idea I've heard in a long while. :-)

  73. Hahahha by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    The entire domain is *totally* /.ed heheheh

    :P

    1. Re:Hahahha by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hey, you stupid BITCH moderator. How is a post that refers DIRECTLY to a link in the ORIGINAL post considered offtopic? Stupid fuck.

      I hope your mom gets cancer.

  74. Re:Correct Link (*NEW* now as hyperlink) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    nope still dead.

  75. The site is still down apperently by Kasmiur · · Score: 1

    Sigh. The poor lady.

    --
    -THIS SPACE FOR RENT!
  76. Jesus Christ! by GuNgA-DiN · · Score: 1

    We Slashdotted the hell out of her site! Yesterday it said that connections were being refused. Today it says: 'no address for host www.amyhughes.org'. Whatever we did must have killed her server. And, unfortunately, she set up her "robots.txt" file to ban all robots. Now, we may never get to see this goddamn Lego church!

  77. Re:A slightly -less- serious religious lego projec by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you look at the main website, you'll see that the whole thing is just parody....So, with that in mind, lighten the hell up.

  78. Re:The site is still down... by space_kadet · · Score: 4, Informative

    The church site (amyhughes.org) is down for the count. I over-stayed my welcome
    at my previous host, and now I'm looking for a fatter pipe. My needs are
    variable, and pretty extreme on the upper end (but nothing like BS, BL, etc)...

    My normal traffic has been about a half gig per month, but I think it's going
    to be in the 2-4 gig range for the forseeable future, with peaks of 2-4 gig per
    *day*, about once per year for a duration of a few weeks. Summary: 4 gig/day
    peek for a few weeks per year, 4 gig per month normal traffic.

    My storage requirements are more modest - perhaps 50 meg.

    I need all email addressed to @amyhughes.org domain routed to me, regardless of
    address. I currently have access to procmail for mail sorting and don't want to
    lose that capability.

    I'd like to be able to control URL re-direction based on referer, and I know
    how to do this in Apache, so I'd like an Apache host. I'll consider other,
    working alternatives, but my requirements are...

    1) prevent other sites from inlining my images
    2) block links from some sites, using regular expressions or something similar
    that is just as flexible

    A Linux box running Apache meets all these requirements, provided the host
    gives me access to procmail, directory-level htaccess and the apache rewrite
    module.

    Any ideas?

    Thanks,
    Amy

  79. Well, there's incentive for ya... by Denial+of+Cervix · · Score: 1

    ...Create something incredibly cool and lose your site. Thanks to thesolo for mirroring a couple of pix - this thing is AMAZING. Two weeks ago I sold my collection of 60,000+ LEGO bricks (re-entering my "dark ages"), but I never managed to do anything that cool with them. I did get around to a 100 square foot train layout with pneumatically powered switches, compressor, and regulator (all LEGO) but this puts my stuff to shame.

    For those who have been out of LEGO for a while (15+ years), there is some pretty amazing stuff out there now. Mindstorms is quite cool, some of the larger Technic sets are amazing, and LEGO seems to be catering toward its growing Train fans by releasing neat sets like the Sante Fe Super Chief. On the other hand, unfortunately, they are also licensing Harry Potter and Star Wars. Feh.

    Some other links to Slas^H^H^H^Hview are:
    Lego Castles
    The Pacific Northwest LEGO Train Club
    the Brickshelf Gallery
    The LEGO Users Group Network

    Hopefully the traffic'll die down soon so I can see the rest of Amy's site. Nice work, Ms. Hughes, and may your cat rest in peace.

    DoC

  80. I am not an Idiot. by g_bit · · Score: 1

    Perhaps I already know the difference between "who's" and "whose" but I didn't remember it when I typed this reply. Does not remembering something make me an idiot? No. I'm sure that you've forgotten things in the past, are you an idiot?

    Thinking that you know everything makes you an idiot because everyone knows that nobody can know everything.

    I do not appreciate being called an idiot because I do not pretend to know everything. You, on the other hand, must think that you know everything to be calling me an idiot. Therefore, it is you who is idiotic, not I.

    You are also (obviously) a Coward.

  81. Re:french tost by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ahahahaha i found that post and this via metamod.

    nothing like making a statement with your moderation tag...

    (i said it was a fair mod)

    It's like when somebody makes a serious argument and gets modded "funny"...