Slashdot Mirror


Words That Speak a Thousand Pictures

venolius writes: "The New York Times (free registration required) has an article on TextArc (created by W.Bradford Paley), a site that "aids in the discovery of patterns and and concepts in arbitrary text" (from the detailed overview at TextArc). The site serves an applet that performs the task (texts on which analysis is available include Alice in Wonderland, Hamlet, and thousands of others -made available by Project Gutenberg-). The NYTimes article reports that Paley found that "Dracula", which relies on a strong storyline had a few keywords clustered hotly at the center, and that the metaphoric "Frankenstein" generated a circle of 50 words of modest intensity that faded towards the edges. "Portrait of the Artist as a Young Man" with evenly distributed key words produces tight and round lines and "Alice in Wonderland" produces loopier lines. Check it out! (the applet was tested on better hardware, but I did well enough with 98/IE6/550MHz/64MB)"

102 comments

  1. Please... by morhoj · · Score: 1

    Don't ever do that to my browser again...

    1. Re:Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hrm. Works fine for me... moz 0.9.9, JRE 1.3.1, linux.

    2. Re:Please... by teddlesruss · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      i agree, it sux that something opens a max window over your desktop without asking permission, chews up cpu without asking permission, and then fscks up as soon as you click on it and has to be killed by hand.


      shame textarc, shame!


      you can be sure whom i'll never consider for anything whatsoever, ever again...

      --
      -- ted russ http://www.arach.net.au/~ted/mydynes/ http://www.arach.net.au/~ted/myblogs/
    3. Re:Please... by HiQ · · Score: 2, Funny

      And they have also hidden some subliminal //drink Coca-cola// messages in the texts, so there you go. You have been had!

    4. Re:Please... by phaze3000 · · Score: 2
      Works fine for me (Konqueror, Blackdown JRE 1.31).

      Maybe you're using a crappy browser?

      --
      Blaming GW Bush for the Iraq war is like blaming Ronald McDonald for the poor quality of food.
    5. Re:Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      chews up cpu

      Heh ... I love you geeks. You spends thousands of dollars and months of your lives overclocking and tweaking to get your CPU running as fast as possible. Then complain when something forces it out of the idle loop.

    6. Re:Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MSIE 6 handled it extremely well.

      Try again, troll.

    7. Re:Please... by Alien54 · · Score: 2
      yeh, it only works on those systems where you don't have things locked down, and even then it seems broken.

      probably not properly load tested or something.

      well we just took care of that.

      --
      "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
    8. Re:Please... by Beliskner · · Score: 5, Funny
      it sux that something opens a max window over your desktop without asking permission, chews up cpu without asking permission, and then fscks up as soon as you click on it and has to be killed by hand.
      Better to do a complicated slow query on Google using many keywords, hogging all those read-locks, attacking multiple Google linux machines simultaneously as inverted file dictionary lookups are performed, forcing them to swap in pages to look up *your* damn query (15ms DoS attack), and then a machine having to perform a sort algorithm on all those results. As if this wasn't enough, you hog the CPU of the machine that parses this into HTML so that your browser can see it, and then a whole fork() has to be done for you OR you steal a thread out of the Apache thread pool to serve you, clogging the routers because of queued packets because of your cheap ISP, your slow xDSL connection making Google's Apache *wait* for your ACKs, taking memory to hold such a massive TCP sliding window. Selfish selfish you, doing a DoS attack on Google whenever you perform a search.

      Point: Somehow if it uses *your* CPU it's different, but when Google's machines do all the work it's somehow OK. Next you'll be complaining about websites doing a DoS by forcing your browser to use CPU by rendering HTML and your TCP stack having to store a sliding window whenever you view a webpage. This selfish attitude is why all filesharing software must be redesigned to NOT allow anyone to kick uploaders. If you want to kick uploaders then shut down the filesharing App, but then you lose download karma.

      My personal opinion: Due to heavy-client structure of the majority of machines, this applet uses the correct CPU (yours). Reduced ad revenues means that Internet companies can no longer afford massive server farms unless they require Cydoor installed on all client machines, alternatively they can decrease their equipment costs by delegating processing to client's (suerfers' browser's) CPUs. *nix systems, especially if apps are in a Java sandbox are heavily protected against most attacks, including process DoS attacks via kill -4, kill -9 and a scheduler+VM designed to stand up under heavy loads. Poor Microshaft Win9x people have to do Ctrl-Alt-Del which halts all processes while they look at the sceduler's contents, and it takes 30 seconds of a sucesful DoS for the offending process to be recognised as "unresponsive and kill -9'able" otherwise it is merely "kill -4'able". If you don't want them to use your CPU, then don't visit their website, disable JVM, disable HTML parsing in the browser (this takes CPU), read the raw HTML yourself, disable TCP stack, write packets by hand to minimise CPU usage or even bypass the CPU completely by setting the modem's line inputs yourself with a logic probe, then probe for response using oscilloscope and logic probe. Do PPP-IP-TCP by hand. That won't use your CPU.

      Pop quiz hotshot, this is an Informative flamebait, what mod do you do, what mod do you do?

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    9. Re:Please... by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1

      I think his complaint was that it did it unexpectedly.

    10. Re:Please... by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2
      Somehow if it uses *your* CPU it's different, but when Google's machines do all the work it's somehow OK.

      I'm fairly certain that Google is inviting people to use their machines. If the original poster was doing something like SETI@home, and got mad because his CPU was bogged down, then yes, that is silly. But as that is not the case, and the behavior of that site was not in line with most (considerate) websites, it is reasonable that the poster would be annoyed.

      I mean, it's like if someone tried to borrow $100 from you, and you got annoyed, and they said "oh, so when banks lend out money it's supposed to be okay, but if I want to borrow money from you, suddenly *that* isn't ok." Darn right it isn't!

      If you say that the person should just not visit the site... well, I guess we can defend any crappy website that throws ettiquite to the wind with that line of thought (not that this site was that bad).

      mark
      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    11. Re:Please... by jo42 · · Score: 1

      Phew-uck! A perfect example of why Java needs to die...

    12. Re:Please... by Beliskner · · Score: 1
      I'm fairly certain that Google is inviting people to use their machines. If the original poster was doing something like SETI@home, and got mad because his CPU was bogged down, then yes, that is silly. But as that is not the case, and the behavior of that site was not in line with most (considerate) websites, it is reasonable that the poster would be annoyed.
      True. A lack of courtesy is something that I see all the time while driving in London, Downtown Chicago and Toronto, heck in Toronto people people are courteously discourteous - they cuss you in multiple languages, "Where did you learn how to drive? Mon Dieu! Bapre bap" that's English, French and Hindi respectively. Possible reactions:

      1. Start flamewar on /. - equivalent to road rage
      2. Ignore it, go home and bitch about it to your spouse/friends - normal reaction

      What are they supposed to say anyway? "This java applet is going to use your CPU, please brace yourself". Quite a redundant dialogue box. I remember people on /. getting real unhappy at all these modal dialogue boxes in apps. I'm no expert, but "This app is now initialising to prepare for executing main(), please be advised your CPU is being used" modal dialogue is something we will all cuss, plus if it's in Swing it'll probably take 100 times more CPU than any sensible app anyway.

      10 seconds into execution it could maybe show a quick status message that it's doing something complicated, after all many JVMs seem to use 100% CPU usage for "Hello World" anyway, so I doubt anyone will notice the difference. I suggest you simply file a bug report with the app authors and/or the JVM authors

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    13. Re:Please... by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 2

      Actually, I was more annoyed at it being full screen (I think it is reasonable to expect a warning of "this will take over your screen", which may have been the fault of the person who posted the story or whatever for linking right to it).

      And then I was more arguing the principle of the matter in terms of doing unexpected things, which many other sites do. The post I was replying to suggested that if you are making their computer do things, don't complain if they do things to your computer. And I was pointing out how it's different.

      I wasn't trying to say that this site here was actually so terrible, because it wasn't that bad.

      mark

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
    14. Re:Please... by toriver · · Score: 2

      I thought people with browsers with sucky Java VMs would do the smart thing and disable Java?

      Ran fine in JRE 1.4 on my Opera 6.01 at least, though I kinda failed to see the point of it.

    15. Re:Please... by First+Post+Counter · · Score: 1

      Congradulations, morhoj! Your first post has been officialy recognized as the true First Post

      Current Statistics:

      Logged in FPs: 4
      AC FPs: 0

      First Posters:

      1 - morhoj
      1 - Spanko
      1 - teambpsi
      1 - Tensor

    16. Re:Please... by Beliskner · · Score: 1

      And they say it's very difficult to screw up Java what with garbage collection and whatnot ;-) Warning: Applet window should always be clearly visible.

      --
      A caveman dreams of being us, the incalculable power and riches. We dream of being Q, then what?
    17. Re:Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Pop quiz hotshot, this is an Informative flamebait, what mod do you do, what mod do you do?


      "I want a $10,000 a night hooker!"


      Oh, wait, wrong movie. Lemme try again:


      "I know Kung Fu!"


      Damn. Can I get back to you?

    18. Re:Please... by WBPaley · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hi people,

      Thanks for all the discussion!
      Here are some notes from the perpetrator (Brad)...

      >by morhoj on Tuesday April 16, @07:29AM (#3349188)
      >Don't ever do that to my browser again...

      Valuable feedback; perhaps more gracefully put by

      >by Paradise Pete on Tuesday April 16, @09:34AM (#3349613)
      >I think his complaint was that it did it unexpectedly.

      I have put in a warning about the screen takeover; Others say there are ample warnings about the research & speed issues, so I left that alone. I agree that /.should link to Alice.html and
      Hamlet.html and Thousands.html, where the warnings are, rather than directly to the page that opens the applets. Can this be changed now, so others don't have morhoj's problem?

      ---

      >by reo_kingu on Tuesday April 16, @07:33AM (#3349201)
      >is this really new? I think maybe some of my teachers having
      >been using this thing to grade papers.

      Don't know if it's new, but I haven't seen it before.

      >by big.ears on Tuesday April 16, @10:41AM (#3350110)
      >...factor analysis on text. It maps every word in a text into about a
      >100-dimensional space, based on how often they co-occur in similar
      >contexts. If you feed those factors into a clustering algorithm or and
      >multi-dimensional scaler in order to present it graphically, you probably
      >get something very close to this trick.

      Flattering, but I was trying to come up with something easier to write and explain. This trick uses arithmetic (each word is drawn at its average position) not math. Net pull of a bunch of rubberbands is easier to explain _and_ conceptualize for a lot of my audience.

      ---

      >by proxybyproxy on Tuesday April 16, @07:56AM (#3349250)
      >Once again Project Gutenberg shows its beautiful face. ...

      Hear, here! Inspiring and generous work.

      ---

      >Just ran Slashdot through it (Score:2, Funny)
      >by Anonymous Coward on Tuesday April 16, @08:43AM (#3349375)

      ;)

      ---

      >by TheCrunch on Tuesday April 16, @09:28AM (#3349577)
      >(User #179188 Info | http://www.slippersandpipe.co.uk/) But a word
      >of warning to anyone else running Win98 on a P133 with 64MB RAM.
      >This thing nuts your machine. I can't get it off my desktop. I'm gonna
      >have to reboot again.. arg.

      Sorry... That warning's now on the intro pages to each applet

      ---

      >The Emperor Is Naked! (Score:1, Informative)
      >by robbway on Tuesday April 16, @09:47AM (#3349706)
      >I have to say it: I see no value in this. The mathematical algorithms do
      >more to shape the images than the words themselves. My opinion is
      >that this is rather unartistic, uninspiring, and doesn't reveal anything
      >about language at all.

      A damning observation, if it were true. I also have little respect for artsy code that doesn't express the variability in the data. In fact, the only "algorithm" here is the averaging, so any variation _must_ come from the language. They initially look similar, but so do leaves to people who don't get into the country a lot. For some people developing a feel for how different texts reveal themselves here might be worth the time. But I expect that will take more than a few minutes.

      As to unartistic--I'll weigh your opinion with Larry at the Whitney, Bruce at Columbia, Matt at the Times, Sara at Banff, and a few dozen others as I decide whether it's art. (I made it as an ndex/concordance).

      I agree that it doesn't say anything about language, but leaves don't say anything about biology. _You_ gotta provide the intelligence.

      Actually, it was built to tap into the human brain's pre-attentive processing abilities. (Oh no, do I need to provide a warning now that it'll take over your brain as well as your desktop? ;) You can actually read many more words than you are consciously aware of as your eye scans text. I hoped that as your eye jumps from word to word
      in a TextArc it wasn't jumping randomly, but to the next most "important" word, where "importance" is some function of brightness (frequency), position (distribution), and recency of concept activation,
      or level of interest (in your own head). It seems to work especially well in the 32" x 20" printed versions. Different people read different things.

      ---

      >Wishing I could see an example... (Score:1)
      >by BobTheJanitor on Tuesday April 16, @10:33AM (#3350032)

      Some screen shots are on the site, lower right button. (Guess I should make it more prominent.) http://textarc.org/Stills.html

      ---

      >Dark grey text on black background? (Score:1)
      >by an_mo on Tuesday April 16, @11:20AM (#3350462)
      >If textarc.org [textarc.org] continues to publish their stuff
      >with dark grey text on a black bacground they're not
      >reacing for the masses.

      Oops. Fixed, I think. (Do you?)

    19. Re:Please... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude... Its not java thats the prob- just that site- what badly written dross. Beleive me- you could do worse with C# or VBASIC scripting- ilke Ph*ck the registry too... Lovely...

  2. You know.. by reo_kingu · · Score: 1

    is this really new? I think maybe some of my teachers having been using this thing to grade papers.

    1. Re:You know.. by big.ears · · Score: 3, Interesting

      You are probably thinking of LSA: (Latent Semantic Analysis), which was 'Invented' by former Bell labs researcher (and current U of Colorado psych. prof) Tom Landauer. He uses it to grade his papers, and others probably do as well. It uses the same principle that some search engines (e.g., excite) are based on, and essentially amounts to factor analysis on text. It maps every word in a text into about a 100-dimensional space, based on how often they co-occur in similar contexts. If you feed those factors into a clustering algorithm or and multi-dimensional scaler in order to present it graphically, you probably get something very close to this trick.

  3. You would expect... by GnomeKing · · Score: 1

    that slashdot posting a link would indicate that it doesnt do horrible things(tm) to your system / browsing experience....

    guess not...

    1. Re:You would expect... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    2. Re:You would expect... by adrew · · Score: 1

      Worked pretty smoothly in Netscape 6.2 on my G3/450 with 384MB

      However, when I loaded the Bible, it chewed up just about all of the available memory. The machine started choking a little and swapping to the hard disk, something I haven't heard it do in a *long* time.

      See this.

  4. Darn... by flipflapflopflup · · Score: 1

    I wanted to generate one on this comment and see how it handled recursion...

  5. in my school.. by GnomeKing · · Score: 1

    there was never anything as sophisticated as that used for grading papers...

    I heard a rumour that grades were assigned by how close the teacher got to the target while holding the paper in her hand in a game of "pin the tail on the donkey"

  6. Let's try it on certain newsgroups postings by billmaly · · Score: 3, Funny

    alt.sex.stories.* And see what the results are!! :) What "patterns" might develop? The mind reels!!

  7. Analise this by fabiolrs · · Score: 2, Funny

    "All your base are belong to us"

    "Somebody set up us the bomb"
    Is there any pattern there?

    --
    Fabio - Sumare/Sao Paulo/Brazil/South America/Earth/Solar System/Milky Way/Universe
    http://www.morroida.com.br
  8. Other tools for exploring the Semantic Web... by tessellation · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...the one we already have, that is:

    map connections between two words, concepts, or famous names

    see a word's rhymes, synonyms, definitions

    and I leave the rest to you.

    1. Re:Other tools for exploring the Semantic Web... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 2

      I always liked jwz's DadaDodo

      While it doens't paint pretty pictures, it shows some interesting results when pointed at a month of e-mail composed mostly by me. Given much more than a month or from too many people word use tends to normalize and the results seem very random.

    2. Re:Other tools for exploring the Semantic Web... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This has always been one of my favorite tools on the web. Not only is it pretty, it's also very, very useful.

    3. Re:Other tools for exploring the Semantic Web... by johann6 · · Score: 1

      Its broken.. I put in orange and it replied "no rhymes found"

      --
      "Life moves pretty fast. You don't stop and look around once in a while, you could miss it." Ferris Bueller
    4. Re:Other tools for exploring the Semantic Web... by croanon · · Score: 1

      People, check out lexfn.com! It works very well!!!!! I did choose connection radio box, my first word was "gates", and the second was "monopoly". The result was: gates->microsoft->service->competition-&g t;monopoly If you give the first word as "monopoly" and the second word as "gates", it finds the following: monopoly->competitors->microsoft->gates HAHAHAHAHAHA!!!!!!! I love it!

      --
      Dear Bill, do you have a .net tatoo on your ass for marketing?
    5. Re:Other tools for exploring the Semantic Web... by JustJake · · Score: 1

      Anyone familiar with any open source text analysis utilities, such as those that map links between concepts or do semantic clustering? I'm looking for something I can run on Linux against my own data collections.

    6. Re:Other tools for exploring the Semantic Web... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Try a Google search on "C4.5"

  9. Free reg. by k98sven · · Score: 2, Informative

    As usual, one can change the www.nytimes to
    archive.nytimes to acces the article without registration.

    1. Re:Free reg. by oever · · Score: 1

      does not work for me

      --
      DNA is the ultimate spaghetti code.
    2. Re:Free reg. by Fantastic+Lad · · Score: 1
      Doesn't fly for me either. Too bad! You got my hopes up!


      -Fantastic Lad

  10. Re:WTF? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hahaha! Looks pretty cool in MSIE 6.0 under Windows2000. Maybe you should upgrade to a better operating system and browser? Mine doesn't lock up like yours does on such a simple web site. Do you want thewayout?

  11. Dept. of Redundancy Department by rwa2 · · Score: 2

    and and it even filters out extraneous conjunctions!

    Brought to you by the Associated Federation of Organizations.

  12. Gutenberg by proxybyproxy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Once again Project Gutenberg shows its beautiful face. If you haven't heard about it before, then read a Wired feature here. Michael Hart started the project years ago and he wants to digitize anything which is out of copyright. The uses are infinite (think of the blind who can fead texts to tactile printers, for example), which this story also shows.

    Anyway, Hart is a big supporter of sensible copyrights (read the feature) and if you can spare the time, help him by digitizing your favourite book.

    --

    Hurra for Knark!
  13. /. interview with Michael Hart by proxybyproxy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just remebered this:

    Nupedia and Project Gutenberg Directors Answer - a /. interview with Michael Hart

    --

    Hurra for Knark!
  14. This is pretty interesting by kvn299 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Although I only viewed one book, it came up with some interesting results. I'd be curious to know how similar an authors books are to one another... can this distinguish an author's style, or merely individual works.

    I also imagine that a college professor might be interested to run this against term papers!

    1. Re:This is pretty interesting by KH · · Score: 1

      I'd be curious to know how similar an authors books are to one another... can this distinguish an author's style, or merely individual works.


      This was exactly what I was thinking. I'm studying an authorship problem of a Sanskrit text, and would like to try this on the work and other works allegedly from the same author.

      By the way, the applet rendered properly on my iBook with OmniWeb. Didn't need Windows or Pentium III or 256MB RAM.

  15. Just so you know by sielwolf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The Jargon File is out there and, oddly enough it too looks pretty similar to the others described. I don't know that is speaking highly of the JF or poorly abou the rest of the work out there.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
  16. Netscape 4.79 on SGI IRIX by green+pizza · · Score: 2

    Works great on my SGI... (250 MHz R10K Octane, 256 MB, Netscape 4.79, Java 1.3.1, IRIX64 6.5.15m).

    Got the latest versions from here:
    http://www.sgi.com/products/evaluation/

    Zipping thru some CS Lewis right now. Very, very cool!

    [snazzy sig here]

    1. Re:Netscape 4.79 on SGI IRIX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sound surprised that something actually worked on your POS computer!

  17. /me by wbg · · Score: 1

    throws my library of books about web-usability at those biggots...
    nice try. but staring at white noise on my TV is more fun.
    or listening to "cat /boot/vmliunz > /dev/audio"

  18. Market trends. by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is very nice looking.
    Would make a really cool screen saver if it where in c and not java. Any volentears?
    But now I must put on my "think like corp. hat"
    Some publisher goes out and maps all the great books and compairs them with current best sellers. Coralate the patterns and then decide that Fromat X creates the best sellers that people buy. Now they refuse to print any book that does not fit their demo graphic of what they concider to be the next best seller.

    Its only a matter of time befor these kinds of things are used like a DNA test to see weather a book has good "genes" or bad "genes".

    I know it sounds like a conspearicy but I have seen corp.s do stranger things in attempting to repeat past successes. Just look at the movies. We are about to release Star Wars -2 in the name of working on a tried and true formula that started with the release of Jaws II. Did anyone else catch the Special on PBS (frountline i think) that talked about how Jaws was the birth of the end of original movies as we knew it?

  19. Just ran Slashdot through it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    There was a dual explosive center around the words "FreeBSD" and "Linux", a tangled network emanating from the phrase "Alan Thicke" and complex sparkling array of connections between the words "Gates", "Microsoft", "monopoly", and "blue screen". There was also a massive weird lumping around the word "Stallman" but it crashed my browser.

  20. Word linkages by Blue23 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is exceedingly facinating. I've worked with word associations for computer authoring, mostly Markov chains of various lengths and phrase-structure stuff. While this takes works for human authors and works out from that, there are some very interesting concepts in here which may be useful in the other direction.

    And on top, a wonderful way of displaying it, to catch the eye so the brain has time to engage. 8)

    =Blue(23)

    --
    LITTLE GIRL: But which cookie will you eat FIRST? C. MONSTER: Me think you have misconception of cookie-eating process.
  21. TextArc by JJ · · Score: 2

    This is certainly a very interesting tool for summarization and analysis. Viewing it thru an NLP perspective, it converts a text into a purely visual representation. It would be interesting to examine writing from different communication channel dominant authors and check for the pattern differences. It would also be helpful for checking consistency of translations.

    --
    So long and thanks for all the fish . . . !!!
  22. Rosetta Stone by JJ · · Score: 3, Interesting

    TextArc would certainly be a useful tool for analysis of undeciphered languages and texts. Ventris certainly could have used this for Linear B. The only big limitations would be requiring a suitable sized text and having a consistent meaning to that text. As in, the Rosetta stone probably was not a long enough text to analyse this way.

    --
    So long and thanks for all the fish . . . !!!
  23. Could this be useful for source code watermarking? by iotk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone besides me think that this kind of technique could provide stronger protection in cases of source code piracy such as GPL violations, theft of codebase, etc.,? By generating visual patterns based on the occurrence of keywords (or even compiled bytecodes) a signature of a codebase could be generated that is still recognizable even after comments have been stripped out or subtle changes introduced. This could be immensely valuable in GPL infringement cases.

  24. Very Interesting by TheCrunch · · Score: 1

    But a word of warning to anyone else running Win98 on a P133 with 64MB RAM. This thing nuts your machine. I can't get it off my desktop. I'm gonna have to reboot again.. arg.

    --
    My life is one big siesta in which I'm dreaming I wished my life was one big siesta.
    1. Re:Very Interesting by croanon · · Score: 1

      Go upgrade your OS to something good (Preferably non-bill-product), and upgrade your hw and try it. It is really fascinating. :) Kudos to TextArc team!

      --
      Dear Bill, do you have a .net tatoo on your ass for marketing?
  25. The Emperor Is Naked! by robbway · · Score: 1, Informative

    I have to say it: I see no value in this. The mathematical algorithms do more to shape the images than the words themselves. My opinion is that this is rather unartistic, uninspiring, and doesn't reveal anything about language at all.

    1. Re:The Emperor Is Naked! by croanon · · Score: 1

      Maybe because you read mathematical equations more than books. :) I read lots of books, I have 2 undergrads, 3 masters, etc. And I find it very inspiring. :) And it is nice that it is written with Java, so that MS, SGI, LINUX, MAC users are able to see this. :)

      --
      Dear Bill, do you have a .net tatoo on your ass for marketing?
  26. Random New York Times Registration Generator by lw54 · · Score: 2

    Here's a link to the Random New York Times Registration Generator. I found this on a previous slashdot comment but do not recall who posted it. Enjoy!!!

    1. Re:Random New York Times Registration Generator by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Fantastic.. thanks. Hey, I registered.. doesn't say I have to use the correct info right? Maybe more of these pay-with-your-bio-info sites will stop bugging us. Imagine if EVERY link you click on the web required you to fill out a registration form before you could do anything. Even if it was free it is annoying, time consuming, and intrusive.

  27. Amazing... by dcigary · · Score: 3, Funny

    One of the coolest, and most useless things I've ever seen.

    I like it!

    --
    ...my Karma ran over your Dogma...
  28. Right On! by ryandlugosz · · Score: 1

    I'm tired of listening to people on /. complain about their browsers (et. al.) not working properly. That's what you're signing up for when you installed Linux as your desktop OS in the first place! You've got to do a little more work than everyone else does to get the same results.

    I love Linux & have used it as my server OS of choice for 5 years now. But to this day, I can't deal with it on the desktop. This applet worked just fine for me on Win2k with JDK1.4 and Opera 6.1 as my browser.

    By the way, the applet is really cool - I love this concept!

  29. Wishing I could see an example... by BobTheJanitor · · Score: 1

    Could someone host a screenshot? I'd love to see this work, but the java on my browser craps out on me, so I only see an empty grey box.

    1. Re:Wishing I could see an example... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, me too. I read the desired specs to use it, 600MHz, 256MB RAM, etc, and decided to pass on the active version. You can however get a glimpse of it by noticing a box on the righthand side. stills.

      HTH

  30. This reminds me.. by Sheyala · · Score: 1

    This reminds me of the Virtual Theasaurus. Seems like it's doing about the same thing, but it a much simpler way.

  31. Unpossible! by elphkotm · · Score: 2, Funny

    Java is too slow to do such intense computationalizations! They should use something fast, like VBScript!

    --

    <Amanda`> I just went out to the parking lot in my bathrobe to exchange warez CDs.
    1. Re:Unpossible! by croanon · · Score: 1

      Whaaaat? VBScript? Hahahahahaha! Read the posts, people using Windows, Mac, Linux, SGI boxes are able to see it working. Thanks to Java. :)

      --
      Dear Bill, do you have a .net tatoo on your ass for marketing?
    2. Re:Unpossible! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      r u dumb?

  32. Re:WTF? by wheany · · Score: 1

    Well, that's what you get by using "the matchstick browser"

  33. Another Software Patent, I See by tom's+a-cold · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Notice the "patent pending" notice on the site.

    While this is a delightful little entertainment, and quite fun to play with (though a bit of a hog while it's running, not to mention my difficulty in getting it to run in Mozilla on Win32), semantic networks have been around forever. Let's hope the patent application is meant to keep things like this in the public domain, rather than fencing in yet another area of the commons.

    --
    Get your teeth into a small slice: the cake of liberty
  34. Re:What's better? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (c) Sex with a stallion. (I just LOVE that full feeling in my rear passage. Don't you?)

  35. Blind and copyright books by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Ummm... did you know that (in the US) blind people are allowed to recieve copyrighten books for free if they are certifiably blind. There is actually an undertaking to convert novels into a form usable by the blind. Ahh just found a link.

  36. Dark grey text on black background? by an_mo · · Score: 1

    If textarc.org continues to publish their stuff with dark grey text on a black bacground they're not reacing for the masses.

    I have to higlight the text in order to be able to read it.

    1. Re:Dark grey text on black background? by Cederic · · Score: 2


      erm. it's intentional that words fade away the longer it is since they were last used.

      least, that's how i interpreted it.

      The actual story (which appears along the bottom) is nicely highlighted as it goes along. If you can't read it, check your monitor contrast settings.

      personally i think it was interesting, and would (as someone else mentioned) make a classy screen-saver. But I can't actually see a decent use for it.

      ~Cederic

  37. W.Bradford Paley Bio by NiftyNews · · Score: 2

    Current tally from W.Bradford Paley's Bio:
    Semi-interesting javascripts - 1
    Dates with real women in the last 6 months - 0

  38. Java... 'nuff said by lamour · · Score: 2, Insightful
    the behavior of that site was not in line with most (considerate) websites, it is reasonable that the poster would be annoyed.

    How???? He had to go to the site and then go to the prefs in his browser to turn on Java and then click on the link that said it was going to analyze the entire text of some long book and make pretty pictures out of it...in Java. (and if he didn't have to turn on Java, then he's probably due for some more disappointment in the future) What alternative does the site have to make their research available to others? Should they have just put up this note?

    We are doing some cool research, and we've
    developed this really cool tool that we'd
    love to let you play with, but we're worried
    that some individuals may have unreasonable
    expectations of how powerful their machines
    are and we don't want to burst their bubbles,
    so instead, we'll just keep it to ourselves.

    that's just silly. I mean, the system recommendation contains the following:

    • 600 Mhz Pentium III or faster
    • 256 Mb of RAM
    • A fast internet connection
    • No other memory-intensive programs running
    • Netscape 6.2 (the most recent) browser (RECOMMENDED for fastest Java)


    Sounds like a good enough warning to me that if you're using a 486 with 32MB of RAM over a dialup, that, perhaps, you don't want to try running it.

    IMHO,
    Michael
    1. Re:Java... 'nuff said by Dephex+Twin · · Score: 1
      that's just silly. I mean, the system recommendation contains the following:

      Sorry about that, I was talking more in general, and I didn't mean that this particular site necessarily fell into the "annoying" category.

      I was thinking of other sites that just assume things, like that you want to go full screen or something like that.

      mark

      --

      If you want to make an apple pie from scratch, you must first create the universe. -- Carl Sagan
  39. Heh by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    (the applet was tested on better hardware, but I did well enough with 98/IE6/550MHz/64MB)"


    No wonder you think Windows is a slow crashy peice of poop.

  40. Works well on 98/IE5/550MHz/64MB too! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Linux sucks!

  41. The Bible by Amoeba+Protozoa · · Score: 2

    Just for fun, I loaded the Old and New Testaments into the thing just to see if there could be any interesting and or humorous relations in the text. One thing that I thought was mighty interesting was the fact that "God" was smack dab in the center of everything.

    Clicking on "God" linked to damn near everything. My screen lit up yellow like the sun. Well, I guess that's one book that knows its topic!

    Unforunately, the text is so large that it really didn't render very beautifully. It was really jumbled. It might be time to crank up to super-res...

    -AP

  42. TextArc analysis of Slashdot postings: by TrevorB · · Score: 2

    beowulf
    /--------\
    |first post|
    \--------/
    grits

  43. i love it by thopo · · Score: 1


    i do not know what this is exactly good for, but i do know that it is fscking beautiful!
    caroll the old mathematician would have loved it too i believe.

    --
    keep it simple.
  44. Just fine on Konqueror by HishamMuhammad · · Score: 1

    And that's not even Konqi 3...

    Konqueror 2.2.2, Java 1.3.1, Linux.

  45. A quantifiable measure added to English... by big_daddy_t · · Score: 1

    One of my major complaints with English (North American bias here...I should say Literature) in high school was that we learned about creative prose or patterns in word choice from teachers. Basically, they told us who used what word choice and we repeated these thoughts on exams. I really like that this tool adds something more concrete to such statements...I'm waiting for some recent Tom Wolfe novels to appear in the Gutenburg database so I can confirm my suspicion that he overuses 'solar plexus'.

  46. it doesn't work with Mozilla! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    The article was for IE users - it requires Java that does not work with Mozilla as Sun and AOL do not support each other.

    I thought Slashdot should moderate such article.

    Now, I guess /. will moderate myself :(

  47. that was pointless by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it ran perfectly (if it was supposed to make my comp burst into flames (joking) ) but seriously. i wasn't that surprised that it worked fine (1333 mgz cpu, 512 meg memory under linux:~)