Slashdot Mirror


UK Lab Responsible for VNC To Close

NexUK writes "Guardian Online has an article about the imminent closure of the UK based AT&T lab , the place that brought us VNC, the popular desktop remote control system. The article talks about a nice "Toys" budget where the employees could buy gadgets without prior authorization." AT&T Strikes again, I'm surprised they haven't bought PARC and closed it down too.

166 comments

  1. TightVNC is Good Version by elucidus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    TightVNC adds variable JPG compression and is optimized for slow connections.

    --
    This sig is self referential.
    1. Re:TightVNC is Good Version by Xofer+D · · Score: 0, Redundant
      TightVNC [tightvnc.com] adds variable JPG compression and is optimized for slow connections.
      It was also broken when I tried it a couple months ago. It doesn't update the display properly, it fails to draw the display sometimes, and it just plain doesn't work. I tried it, then went back to plain old VNC.
      --
      The Signal/Noise ratio can be improved in two ways. Remaining silent is the OTHER way.
    2. Re:TightVNC is Good Version by jelle · · Score: 2, Informative

      tridiavnc and its companion developers site , have integrated tight and jpg encoding in their version, plus added an acceptable windows installer.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    3. Re:TightVNC is Good Version by 56ker · · Score: 2

      I wonder if they'd gone the way of PCAnywhere and charged for their software they'd still be going! Having said that I still hope they release the source code so further versions can be made.

    4. Re:TightVNC is Good Version by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      VNC is open source. It's released under the GPL, idiot.

  2. So what happens to VNC? by shaldannon · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think that's my biggest question. Luckily I've got a couple UNIX tarballs around, but that's just archival. Is development going to continue?

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
    1. Re:So what happens to VNC? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Hopefully it will find a new home on Sourceforge.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    2. Re:So what happens to VNC? by cmowire · · Score: 2

      I'm hoping that the TridiaVNC folk are not the people who take it over.. They rubbed me the wrong way when I viewed their site.

      Of course, this /is/ the advantage of open-source software. Unlike in the case of Blender, SOMEBODY can go on and develop new stuff with VNC, no prob.

    3. Re:So what happens to VNC? by billcopc · · Score: 1

      Hardly. Sourceforge has source control like any other half-decent rig. Amateurs will butcher it only if someone foolishly lets them in the door. There will still be a project administrator (or many), so there will always be some sort of quality assurance.

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    4. Re:So what happens to VNC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you are reading this, you most likely have no social skills.

      hey! how'd you know that??!!! Dude!

    5. Re:So what happens to VNC? by sql*kitten · · Score: 2
      Is development going to continue?

      From the link:

      April 23rd 2002: Although AT&T Laboratories in Cambridge will close shortly, VNC will continue to be freely available and supported at this web address

      And the original VNC team has something cooking ...


      Maybe they plan to set up a company, sell support or commercial licences?

  3. Irony? by swordboy · · Score: 5, Funny

    When management shuts them down, will they do it in person or will they just pull up a remote terminal and shut them off that way?

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Irony? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're assuming management know what a computer is and how to turn it on...

  4. Plans to Continue by s.a.m · · Score: 1

    Are there any groups out there who are going to take up the vnc project and expand it any? Or is it basically a dead project that will remain as is due the fact it's been out for a while?

    1. Re:Plans to Continue by seann · · Score: 1

      www.tightvnc.com
      You just have to look.

      --
      I'm a big retard who forgot to log out of Slashdot on Mike's computer! LOOK AT ME.
    2. Re:Plans to Continue by Lumpy · · Score: 1

      Look at the top post for this story...
      I havent used plain VNC for over a year... TightVNC is better/faster/tighter than plain jane VNC.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    3. Re:Plans to Continue by ajv · · Score: 2

      Yes - see tightvnc.com and my work on RFB 4.x

      http://www.evilsecurity.com/vnc/

      --
      Andrew van der Stock
    4. Re:Plans to Continue by cryptor3 · · Score: 1
      TightVNC is better/faster/tighter than plain jane VNC.
      I'm fortunate enough to be on a very fast network, with a 1 GHz computer acting as VNC server, and I've noticed that turning on additional TightVNC compression algorithms, like jpeg, actually make VNC run slower. So in a situation like mine, TightVNC doesn't trump VNC by very much.
  5. VNC is GPL though. by SuperBug · · Score: 1

    So it should be relatively easy to get the source and start a new project, right?

    --
    --SuperBug
  6. Re:fp? by n9hmg · · Score: 1, Redundant

    It can't die. It may not be as well-supported, but there are several other projects working on the "platform" (notably TightVnc. I hope it isn't in some kind of freakish licensing where they go out of business in a fire sale, get bought by NA (remotely possible) or Symantec(pcanywhere) and locked away forever.

  7. Guess it could be worse... by balamw · · Score: 1
    They could have been spun off to Lucent.

    Where's the next PARC, Bell Labs, IBM ?

    I know all of these still exist in name at least, but they sure seem to be mere shadows of what they used to be...

    And, no, I don't think it's MSFT

    Balam

    1. Re:Guess it could be worse... by brad.hill · · Score: 2

      Well, IBM is still producing record numbers of patents every year and doing lots of good research. I've been to a few OOPSLAs, and it seems like the research output from IBM's Watson Labs on object-oriented stuff is nearly equal to the rest of the world's academic facilities combined.

    2. Re:Guess it could be worse... by Halvard · · Score: 1

      Lucent no longer is Bell Labs. Avaya was spun off from Lucent and contains that portion. The AT&T Research Lab in England is the old Olivetti Research Lab.

    3. Re:Guess it could be worse... by perky · · Score: 1

      Hursley is still going strong over in Winchester, waving the flag for IBM.

      --
      "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
    4. Re:Guess it could be worse... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From prior Bell Labs ...

      And another unrelated Bell Labs with different mission;
      at times major news agencies have mistakenly used their logo :-)

  8. Tragic? Maybe. by cloudscout · · Score: 2, Troll

    Nothing terribly revolutionary has come out of the UK Research group recently... at least nothing publicly announced. The bulk of useful VNC development in recent years has been done by 3rd parties working with the open VNC sources.

    While it's possible they could have come up with another killer product given their obvious talents, the dissolution of the group probably isn't that tragic for our industry.

    Other's have already listed URLs pointing to 3rd party VNC products (both freeware and otherwise) so I won't repeat them here but it's definitely worth your while to seek some of them out and support their work.

  9. This stinks by Psiren · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I used to drive past this place every day on my way to work. I often used to wonder what a magical place it must have been to work in. I always hoped I'd get the chance to work there myself someday. Bang goes that idea. Strangely enough I can see the new Microsoft Research Centre from my flat. I guess that would be a cool place to work too, if it weren't for the owners. Cambridge has long been known for its hotbed of innovation. I'm sad to see us lose a bit of that.

    1. Re:This stinks by Rowenio · · Score: 1

      Yes, but they did pay most of the university's computer lab (next door), which is a most wonderful building, even if the doors do slam.

    2. Re:This stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's also an amazing indication of how small the world is - the article mentions Herman Hauser as one of the original folk 'involved' with the lab when it was under olivetti's 'wing'.

      If you look at the more recent press about the Microsoft research lab in Cambridge you'll see Hausers name again !

    3. Re:This stinks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You'll find Herman's name associated with almost any tech that came out of Cambridge, including Acorn, ARM, Olivetti, etc.

  10. Holy shit. . . . by Com2Kid · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I am still out of breath, my word, this is. . . . horrible. What the hell is AT&T thinking? Just the other day I was thinking to myself how nice it is that there is such a company still around that is willing to support pure research and development, but now. . . . holy shit.

    VNC will live on, but what new ideas might have come this lab? What technology, what science, will now never be invented, or at the very least horribly delayed? This is awful, how could any company get pissy over intellectual property rights when there is so much more at stake? For crying out loud, shutting down not only one of the premier research labs in the world, but a (I think?) profitable one at that!

    1. Re:Holy shit. . . . by sagneta · · Score: 5, Interesting


      What they think is that they are going out of business in the not-to-distant future.

      The Gartner group claims that within 5 years AT&T will be purchased by another corporation and will cease to exist as a serpate corporate entity. The time frame might be optimistic, 5 years seems a bit soon, but the conclustion is indisputable. AT&T just began a 5-1 stock reverse split. First time in its history and the first for a DOW component. That's something that soon-to-be-delisted dot-coms do. Not DOW components.

      How the mightly hast fallen.

      I'm not sure if those outside the United States realize that MA-Bell is on her deathbed. In fact, amoungst the possible purchasers of the AT&T franchise are any number of the baby-bells such as Verizon or PacBell.

      Thus the closing of the lab is just a
      sign of AT&T's time. Telco in general is cratering within the United States. The internet is crushing the old to make way for the new.

      I have to tell you that, honestly, AT&T had it coming for some time. I am sorry that many good people are getting squashed but the corporation as a while has done much to harm customers and prevent the movement towards the Internet in recent years.

      In any event, so goes AT&T and so goes the lab.

      Sorry guys.

    2. Re:Holy shit. . . . by pmsr · · Score: 1

      "The internet is crushing the old to make way for the new."

      What is the new? AOL/Time Warner? Well, talk about jumping from the pan into the fire.

      /Pedro

    3. Re:Holy shit. . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Tax, is what AT&T is thinking.

      That's why they bought the place 3 years ago, and now the minimum term for a tax write-off is up, they carry through and dump it.

      Beancounters 1, Engineers 0.

    4. Re:Holy shit. . . . by Nexx · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The Gartner group claims that within 5 years AT&T will be purchased by another corporation and will cease to exist as a serpate corporate entity. The time frame might be optimistic, 5 years seems a bit soon, but the conclustion is indisputable. AT&T just began a 5-1 stock reverse split. First time in its history and the first for a DOW component. That's something that soon-to-be-delisted dot-coms do. Not DOW components

      Exactly. AT&T said that they're doing the reverse 5-1 split to buoy their share price to above $10, so that institutional investors will be more interested in their stocks. However, most companies would've created a plan for buoying their share price to above $10/share instead of hatching this hare-brained idea.

      It's sad to see a company like AT&T go, because of its history with the research labs, but you're right, they're hurting for money, and that's the real reason behind the closing of these labs (Bell Labs is now owned, in most part, by Lucent).

    5. Re:Holy shit. . . . by Combuchan · · Score: 3, Informative

      AT&T just began a 5-1 stock reverse split. First time in its history and the first for a DOW component. That's something that soon-to-be-delisted dot-coms do. Not DOW components.

      You forget that stock value is just one barometer of measuring a company's strength. AT&T's stock is among the most widely held in America, with 3.545 BILLION shares outstanding as of 01 April 2002.

      According to this, AT&T employs 117,800 people, has massive properties (dialup, broadband, long distance ...) No dotgone ever had this magnitude. Plus the Gartner Group is wrong in their assessment of AT&T's future; they've been going under some restructuring in the past couple years and restructuring a company of AT&T's girth doesn't happen overnight.

      Lastly, you get delisted from the NASDAQ or NYSE if your stock hovers below $1.00 for a while. AT&T currently trades at $13.75.

      --
      "[T]he single essential element on which all discoveries will be dependent is human freedom." -- Barry Goldwater
    6. Re:Holy shit. . . . by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      The truth is that Intel wanted to buy the lab and was on the brink of closing a deal. Although nobody in AT&T will talk openly about it, the word on the street is that negotiations foundered because the lawyers on both sides couldn't agree about intellectual property issues

      Slashdot readers should love this paragraph.

    7. Re:Holy shit. . . . by palme999 · · Score: 1

      Telco in general is cratering within the United States. The internet is crushing the old to make way for the new.

      An example of this in my hometown (not necessarily being crushed by the Internet) but surely a sign of things to come, is that the local Cable company has begun offering digital voip for some time now, at significant cost savings, utilizing your existing phone wiring and simply replacing the box that hangs on the side of your house.

    8. Re:Holy shit. . . . by Elwood+P+Dowd · · Score: 2

      Well... after the reverse split, it'd only be 709 MILLION shares outstanding. Is # of shares outstanding actually considered a useful measurement? I would assume that the interesting number would be $ value of outstanding shares.

      He's not saying that AT&T is soon to be delisted. He's saying that the 5-1 reverse split is uncommon among corps of it's size and stature. You misread the grandparent completely. Or you trolled me really well.

      --

      There are no trails. There are no trees out here.
    9. Re:Holy shit. . . . by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

      AT&T is the local cable company in many areas.. so, yes they have their foot in that too...

      --
      I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
    10. Re:Holy shit. . . . by eht · · Score: 1

      it used to be that way, i'mstill waiting for the company i used to work for to get delisted on2.com it's been under a dollar for over a year

    11. Re:Holy shit. . . . by jlund · · Score: 1

      Of course PacBell could never buy AT&T as they (Pacbell) are owned by SBC.

    12. Re:Holy shit. . . . by OSgod · · Score: 1

      Sounds like a good buy for a company with lot's of cash.

      Who's in the market for a large share of the cable and telecom infrastructure and has a few billion hanging around in cash? What's this -- front page of most recent Money magazine -- MS is sitting on 40+billion in cash and looking for investments...

    13. Re:Holy shit. . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      > Thus the closing of the lab is just a
      > sign of AT&T's time. [...] The internet
      > is crushing the old to make way for the new.

      Companies who start to get outdated and are run by smart people look for a new, related core business.

      AT&T Labs can help with exactly that. They created very modern technologies like a really fast, open-source CORBA ORB (forget about OrBbit).

  11. What? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    >> AT&T Strikes again, I'm surprised they haven't bought PARC and closed it down too.

    Or at least buy Microsoft Research Labs and close it down.

  12. Yes, how dare they! by UVABlows · · Score: 0, Funny

    AT&T Strikes again, I'm surprised they haven't bought PARC and closed it down too.

    Brilliant witticism! What jerks the guys at AT&T are for closing down something it wouldn't have been profitable to maintain. If only one of the slashdot editors had been there, maybe they could have helped save it. Let's have a gander, shall we:

    AT&T Exec: Hmmm, looks like the lawyers drilled us, we can't afford to keep open that lab, we'll have to shut it down.
    AT&T Employee/Slashdot Editor: No way MAN!! That place is COOL. You can't just like, shut it down, man.
    AT&T Exec: You're fired.

    6 months go by and the SE has not found another job....

    Slashdot Editor's wife at work:
    Wife: Hey MyBoss, looking good today, with a job and all.
    Boss: Motel 6 at the corner of Cherry and Shamrock, room 35, 7pm.
    Wife: You betcha!

    SE's kid:
    Kid: Mommy, how come you have a lot of meetings at the hotel with your boss?
    Mom/Wife: Because your father is a limp-dicked loser and mommy needs some real play.
    Kid: Daddy's a loser! Yay!

    Later:
    SE/Dad: Hey kid, wanna do something fun with me?
    Kid: No way, you're a limpdick! I like mommy's new friend more, he gives REAL play mommy said. We're leaving tomorrow. No one likes you, not even your stuffed penguin.

    Well folks, there you have it. Put on some shoes, clean the ejaculatory emissions off the keyboard and get a real job in the real world.

    --

    <high-level position here>
    <name of stupid small company here>

  13. This totally blows... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1

    Another example of corporate idiocy! What these guys could have accomplished left to their own devices will now never be known. VNC is great, I use it for hours a day, and I don't know what I would do without it! AT&T should get their head out of their a$$ and fund this lab _more_, not ditch it altogether.

    1. Re:This totally blows... by krlynch · · Score: 3, Insightful

      But how much did you PAY AT&T for VNC? They don't run this lab for your benefit alone ... they run it to make money. If in their cost-benefit analysis the lab is a liability to the corporation, then they have not only the right, but the fiduciary responsibility to shut it down. Just because a lab comes out with neat stuff doesn't mean there is a good reason for the owner to keep it open.

      If you are so convinced that it is worth pouring money into, it shouldn't be that hard to find a group of investors willing to give you the cash to buy and run the place as you see fit. That's the way commerce works! The fact that no one is interested in buying the place indicates, to me at least, that it might not be such a valuable property as many comments seem to think it is....

    2. Re:This totally blows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      research labs are typically places where future products are developed. they dont bring in cash ASAP but usually have products for the parent company in 3-5 years.

    3. Re:This totally blows... by teamhasnoi · · Score: 1
      As much as I use VNC, I would be happy to pay ($50?) to use it and to encourage further development.

      As far as investors giving me money, I don't think that will happen. You see, I ran this research lab that wasn't quite pulling it's weight, and well, you know the rest.....

    4. Re:This totally blows... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      We have X11, and XFree86 is a free implementation. X is more advanced than VNC, anyway...

    5. Re:This totally blows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      X is more sophisticated, but VNC was created originally for mobility, so that desktops could follow you around automatically from machine to machine when triggered by the lab's various location systems. X wasn't stateless enough or cross-platform enough for that.

    6. Re:This totally blows... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh wow really? now way!
      How much did you pay AT&T for it?

      Oh yeah that's right - ZERO DOLLARS..

      They're losing money. AT&T is not a charity. Want charity? Get the red cross to write software for you.

  14. The problem by NitsujTPU · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I bet that a lot of these labs aren't "profitable." The average user, now, has little use for such devices. Most of my friends kind of wow over the x-window system, and that I can use my own computer remotely, or ssh for that matter.

    So what happens? Well, 20 years from now, everyone will have keyboards over rf to their tv's with their computer interfaces on them. Today it's useful to me, so I have to rig it myself. None of them will want it for 20 years, because they don't have a "reason."

    1. Re:The problem by Zurk · · Score: 1

      the thing though is that these labs had the financial firepower to do research tightly focused at the commercial market. now the only people doing research are the people in universities who dont have the budget to do the nifty whiz bang gadgets..they do pure research only. which means a lot of university developed research will not be developed into whiz bang gadgets and hence improve the market place or the company stocks. it just means the public wont be able to buy really kewl new technology and companies wont make huge profits selling this technology. the effects are usually felt in 3-5 years or so when AT&T will find itself without any new products to develop since the research base has gone.
      its a tragic loss. i hope someone can keep up the VNC GPLed tree at least.

    2. Re:The problem by 0x0d0a · · Score: 1

      Is Coda pure research? Seems pretty useful to me...

    3. Re:The problem by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      coda is not a nifty whiz bang gadget. it doesnt take tremendous manufacturing costs to produce software while it does to produce whiz bang gadgets.

  15. No surprises here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Take a look at what Telco stocks have been doing over the last year or so. They're looking under couch cushions in the employee lounge for spare change!

  16. what about omniORB?!?!?!?!?!? by SirSlud · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Anyone know what'll happen to omniORB, the good C++ CORBA ORB produced outta bell labs?!

    --
    "Old man yells at systemd"
    1. Re:what about omniORB?!?!?!?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CORBA's yesterday's news. XML RPC and SOAP. Learn them, live them, love them.

    2. Re:what about omniORB?!?!?!?!?!? by balneary · · Score: 3, Informative

      This is from the omniORB mailing list:

      AT&T Laboratories Cambridge will close on 24 April. Some time before
      that, the majority of the www.uk.research.att.com web site, including
      the omniORB bits, will move to a new home at the LCE, part of
      Cambridge University. Links to omniORB's web pages will continue to
      work. The FTP site and the mailing lists will move too.

    3. Re:what about omniORB?!?!?!?!?!? by SirSlud · · Score: 2

      Ah, I unsubscribed recently. Good to know its going to live on. Thanks for the low-down!

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    4. Re:what about omniORB?!?!?!?!?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      CORBA's yesterday's news. XML RPC and SOAP. Learn them, live them, love them.

      And dump them tomorrow.

    5. Re:what about omniORB?!?!?!?!?!? by benb · · Score: 1

      ...says the buzz

  17. Re:SCREW AT&T! by Rock+'N'+Troll · · Score: 0

    Linux is still a very bad oper-ass-ive system.

  18. VNC development should continue by compugeek007 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I bet the ATT lab FTP servers are going to be slammed for quite some time as source is being leeched by every sysadmin in the world.

    I myself use VNC extensively for my network. Combined with SSH2 it makes a decent little VPN (plus it works in a browser window!)


    OT, has anyone here gotten VNC to run in the Windows CE / PocketPC OS? I like the idea of controlling servers from my wireless PDA at home.

    --
    Jesse Wolfe Sr. Manager Systems Integration
    1. Re:VNC development should continue by matth · · Score: 2

      Yeah I have it working on an HP-PC. (Pocket PC) Windows CE. It's not nearly full screen and on a 14.4 modem it's slow.. but I bet on a ethernet card on a cable modem it wouldn't be half bad. Speaking of which.. know of any ethernet cards that work with the Windows CE o/s?

    2. Re:VNC development should continue by Snotboble_ · · Score: 1

      Yep, it works just fine and you can pick it up here - http://www.uk.research.att.com/vnc/cevncviewer.htm l - before Wednesday, that is! :-(

      --
      Q: How does a Unix guru have sex? A: unzip;strip;touch;finger;mount;fsck;more;yes;umount;sleep
    3. Re:VNC development should continue by afidel · · Score: 1

      Even better, get the PC-Card sleeve for the iPaq and put an 802.11b card in it, wireless palm based computer with the power to sync to your desktop and run things like VNC, pocket office, ssh, etc.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    4. Re:VNC development should continue by hemp · · Score: 1

      http://www.cewindows.net/wce/20/ethernet.htm
      has a nice list of compatible ethernet cards.

      --
      Skip ------ See the latest from http://www.anArchyFortWorth.com
  19. oh, i see by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Chrisd writes: "AT&T Strikes again, I'm surprised they haven't bought PARC and closed it down too"

    Well Chrisd, /. is now taking subscription fees. How much of that money is going towards general research for the benifit of all mankind? what? none of it? Typical...

  20. Thanks for using the GPL for VNC by fetta · · Score: 1

    Thanks to the folks who decided to use the GPL for VNC.

    They deserve a lot of credit for ensuring that their software would continue to be freely available to the world.

    --
    ** The opinions expressed here are my own, and do not reflect those of my employers - past, present, or future**
  21. Does this have to do with... by wo1verin3 · · Score: 1, Troll

    ... the fact that it's illegal to use VNC with WindowsXP now? :)

    source: WindowsXP License Agreement

    1. Re:Does this have to do with... by saarbruck · · Score: 1

      well, that, or perhaps Microsoft threatened to bump them up to a higher tier of the corporate pricing structure unless they divest themselves of GPL projects...

      --
      I am the very model of a modern major general!
  22. This is what breeds true innovation... by lw54 · · Score: 4, Informative
    In Hopper's lab there was a rule that anyone could buy anything on his own authority so long as it cost less than £1,000. If you wanted something more expensive, you had to get another signature, but that was usually a breeze.

    It was known colloquially as the 'toys budget' and it was, no doubt, sometimes used for frivolous purchases. But in the main it was not. And it meant that the lab's researchers always had the latest gizmos - and the freedom to take them apart and see how they worked.

    My first thoughts were how on earth could management implement and afford a policy like this. But in the end, I thought true innovation requires liberal policies such as these.

    The dotCOM era was full of excess, perhaps too much so, but this is proof that there are still companies out there striving to be the best.

    1. Re:This is what breeds true innovation... by afidel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well when a Purchase Order costs ~$250 total to cut I can see why they would do this. Where I work most people have a Visa card that they can put small purchases, up to $5,000 on. This way the admin cost is greatly reduced and the employee can be more productive by getting what he needs when he needs it, not after 3 managers and a vp sign off plus it goes through finance.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    2. Re:This is what breeds true innovation... by swb · · Score: 2

      Wow, $1500 per thing? And no annual cap?

      My guess about management's tolerance would be that it was seen as an expense budget and not a capital budget, although who knows what the accounting rules are in AT&T or the UK.

      If you just said $150k expense budget for toys and nobody asks for shit like $5k desks, new chairs, carpeting/paint maybe it would work out.

    3. Re:This is what breeds true innovation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Generally, it managed itself quite well - the engineers had access to pretty much whatever they needed, as soon as they needed it, and so could get on with their work without the distraction of red tape. However, since there was such a relaxed view on spending, people didn't feel they needed to take too gratuitous advantage of it, and so people generally only bought what they really needed. As the article says, one of Andy Hopper's great talents was the ability to shield his engineers from the people providing the funding :)
      It was a great place - it's a real shame it can't continue.

    4. Re:This is what breeds true innovation... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Heh, I have to post anon for this one, lest my chain-o-command get sacked for allowing me to exist.

      In Hopper's lab there was a rule that anyone could buy anything on his own authority so long as it cost less than £1,000.

      I'm 3 years out of school and working for a major research lab. I have a Visa card that will do $2000/transaction, $5000/month unaudited. Usually I keep purchases around $500-$700/month, but it's nice to have the leeway. Let me tell you, this "toy" budget is absolutely invaluable. In recent past I have picked up a couple of HP products, the 100 model (4*6) scanner and printer that have been extremely useful to the business that wouldn't have been purchased otherwise. I snagged a Kangaru 128MB USB flash drive that works with Win, Mac, and Linux. (no fscking drivers needed!) Seeing as none of our Ultralight machines have disk drives anymore, (and we're too paranoid for wireless) this has proved incredibly useful. I've bought large IDE hard disks liberally, and vast quantities of cheap ram from crucial.com. (Compaq and IBM ream corporations for memory, so I saved the company at least 15k last year buying from crucial.com)

      "Toy" budgets are totally acceptable, IMNSHO, and in the end, when used by reasonably responsible employees, save the corp some major $$$.

      I don't think it's a liberal policy, or even an excess. I think it's the way research organizations need to do business to survive.

  23. Lame header by wakaramon · · Score: 4, Troll

    "UK Lab Responsible for VNC To Close" is lame.
    A better header would be "AT&T Kills Lab that Created VNC".

    The "UK Lab" is responsible for VNC, not for its closure. AT&T is responsible for closing the lab.

    1. Re:Lame header by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Indeed. That head is horribly passive. Want real headlines? Read a reputable newsource ... where real editors with real journalism backgrounds write the headlines. Headline writing is part art, part science and it definitely requires some dedication.

    2. Re:Lame header by nexUK · · Score: 1

      Your comment is bloody pedantic. "AT&T Kills Lab that Created VNC" is hardly the Queens English either!

    3. Re:Lame header by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is off-topic of course, but aren't headlines written by the submitting reader? And isn't all this nitpicking?

    4. Re:Lame header by nexUK · · Score: 1

      exactly, I was the guy who submitted, and it was info that I thought that slashdot readers would want to read. I didnt expect someone to nitpick over the headline.. I wont bother next time....

  24. Re:Tragic? Maybe. by gorilla · · Score: 2

    A lot of this sort of stuff you don't really know what was useful until 5,10 or more years later. Unix was originated around 1970, but it's usefulness didn't become widely aparent until 1978 or so. Engelbart's mouse was invented in 1963/1964, but wasn't patented until 1970, and didn't become widespread until after the PARC stuff in the late 1970s.

  25. What a shame... by MonkeyBot · · Score: 3, Insightful

    AT&T research facilities are wonderful, magical places that shouldn't be allowed to shut down or see their demise. These things should be heavily subsidized by the government. Bell Labs (now Lucent) is going down the shitter, and AT&T is closing the research labs that they still own. AT&T's research facilities (Bell in particular) are the people that brought us things like Unix, the laser, and the transister, not to mention countless other things. It's a real shame that they are closing down these facilities--like the article says, research facilities are delicate organisms, and they can't be reassembled after you've broken them up.

  26. Debian uses it. by evil_one · · Score: 1

    If it's good enough for The Debian project's package maintainers, it's good enough for me. TightVNC is the offical VNC of the Debian project.

    --
    Desperation is a stinky cologne
    1. Re:Debian uses it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well that's a stupid reason. How about this one: Windows is good enough for the world's richest man, Bill Gates, it's good enough for me.

  27. Re:Apple promotes Darwinism, un-Christian like val by Rewtie · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Update Piggly Wiggly is real! It's a grocery chain with 600 outlets in 16 states and there's even a Web site at PigglyWiggly.com.

    Does this suprise you?

    --
    Ever Onward, Forward Bound
  28. There's been more to them than VNC... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    We do not just owe them the VNS stuff, but also things like omnyORB, one of the free CORBA implementations available. And moreover, have you ever looked at such fine projects as PEN or CLAN over at their site? Less of practical use for the meek of us, but really interesting and insightful. A shame they will get shut down...

  29. VNC ./'ed already by TheWanderingHermit · · Score: 1

    I've never used VNC, but was planning to use it in a current project-- thought I'd download it and start experimenting with it next week sometime. When I saw this, I went to the site and downloaded all the files I'd need. When I first got there, the downloads were quick, but just in the time it took me to download 4-8 files, the response time slowed quite a bit.

    1. Re:VNC ./'ed already by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow thanks for the play by play of you being a dumbass. without such quality comments like yours on /. i don't think people would come here.

  30. Re:Tragic? Maybe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting
    > Nothing terribly revolutionary has come out of the UK Research group recently...

    Things that have come out of AT&T Labs Cambridge recently:

    The Active Bat system, which can locate in 3D better than any other deployed system. They are using Bat transmitters as mice in the air, on 50 inch plasma screens. Now that's a cool interface.

    A broadband phone, rolled out across the entire staff, which lets then see train timetables, share a doodling screen during phone calls, have active directories so that they can call the nearest phone to someone (c.f. Bat above)

    At least visit their website before you start trolling. You might even learn something.

  31. Toys Budgets Anyone? by squaretorus · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does anyone else have a toy budget - surely the /. crew do?

    We have a CD budget at work - idea being that we all listen to CDs all the time and if anyone takes on in it gets assimilated into the office collection so we ended up buying replacements all the time.

    By having a 'CD a week' thing anyone can order up a new CD on the Amazon account whenever they like. Beats being able to take money out of petty cash for milk!

    Costs what - 50 x £20 a year and keeps us happier than a bunch of pigs in poop!

  32. Ungrateful Users by MarkedMan · · Score: 3, Funny

    One reason that companies are reluctant to provide ongoing public services is that when they discontinue them, instead of getting kudos for all they contributed, they get negative reaction for pulling support.

    1. Re:Ungrateful Users by Quickening · · Score: 1

      snort. And we're supposed to be grateful for them shutting down?!

      VNC was a community effort. It ran on so many different platforms because of outside support.

      --
      tcboo
    2. Re:Ungrateful Users by benedict · · Score: 1, Flamebait

      Prove it.

      --
      Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
  33. I have a mirror of VNC up by Squeezer · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Linux and Windows Source and binaries plus docs

    http://free.house.cx/~adam/vnc

    --
    Does the name Pavlov ring a bell?
  34. VNC never was revolutionary by lseltzer · · Score: 1

    Remote control software is a really, really old idea. There are at least a dozen commercial products for Windows that do the same thing and many of them are well over 10 years old. VNC is a nice program, and since it's GPL it will live on, but it was never revolutionary at anything. In fact, it's hard to see why AT&T spent any effort on it.

    1. Re:VNC never was revolutionary by cloudscout · · Score: 2

      VNC wasn't supposed to be remote control software in the beginning. It was supposed to be the foundation of a thin-client computing environment.

    2. Re:VNC never was revolutionary by HughsOnFirst · · Score: 2

      Whether it was more remote control software or a remote frame buffer or whatever isn't the interesting part.

      What is interesting is that VNC could export a windows NT display to a palm pilot, or Amiga to Nokia 9000 or whatever.

      I actually used the NT display on a palm pilot setup quite a bit

    3. Re:VNC never was revolutionary by 4of12 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      VNC wasn't supposed to be remote control software in the beginning. It was supposed to be the foundation of a thin-client computing environment.

      I swear, some of the best innovations are not carefully planned in advance, but spring forth from where you least expect them.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  35. Re:This guy is an idiot. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    intel wanted to buy it you idiot. didnt you even read the friggin article ?

  36. Buying out and closing down PARC by wjr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I don't think there'a ny need for AT&T to buy out and close down PARC - Xerox seems to be doing a good enough job of that. They've been trying to sell it to venture capitalists for a while, with a notable lack of success. I don't think that PARC will last another 12 months, which is very sad.

    Xerox also has (had?) a research lab in Cambridge, colloquially known as EuroPARC. I visited there a few times and saw some quite neat stuff.

    1. Re:Buying out and closing down PARC by quentinsf · · Score: 1

      Xerox also has (had?) a research lab in Cambridge, colloquially known as EuroPARC.

      Had. It's closing a few days later.

  37. Olivetti was the creator. and its not dead anyway. by nurb432 · · Score: 4, Informative

    ATT only bought them and changed the source to reflect ownership. they *created* nothing.. barely even a bug fix since the buyout..

    Thats why groupls like tightVNC ( gpl ) or TridiaVNC ( commercial ) came about.. and will continue it far into the future..

    Its not going anywhere.. do some homework people.

    Still sad, though anyone could see it coming...

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  38. Thank you AT&T by Lumpy · · Score: 2

    thanks for letting them create and Release VNC as a GPL'd item.

    it was a great ride... and thanks for the freebies.

    --
    Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  39. Will the next "Bell Labs" be named SourceForge? by ScrewTivo · · Score: 1

    If anyone stops and looks around to see where innovation is happening they will surely see the Open Source community cranking! I bet if you look real close you'll see all the top names spying on the Open Source comm. and trying to "out patent" them:)

  40. -1 misinformative by benedict · · Score: 2

    They did that before AT&T bought them.

    --
    Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
  41. Bummer no Broadband Phone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The broadband phone:

    http://www.uk.research.att.com/bphone/

    This was one of my favorite projects, something our company would buy today,,,I had asked them about a month ago if they had any expected release date, no was the answer guess the closing of the lab had something to do with it.

    Hopefully AT&T will license the rights to some company to produce them.

  42. Anyone remember Interchange? by EdlinUser · · Score: 1

    An AOL type network (Great GUI, lots of content and downloads).
    AT&T bought it just before it was released and killed it a
    few months later. I was a beta tester; I had such high
    hopes for Interchange.

  43. Right, SF will always be around by Cardinal · · Score: 2

    Hopefully it will find a new home on Sourceforge.

    Sure, because we all know SourceForge will continue running and providing free services to OSS projects after VA Linux^H^H^H^H^HSoftware runs out of money in a year or two.

  44. http://www.tightvnc.com by eean · · Score: 1

    Its already happening at http://www.tightvnc.com

  45. i expected worse.. by Ommadawn · · Score: 1

    When AT&T bought out the labs, I was cringing, waiting for VNC to drop out of sight. Thanks, AT&T, for keeping it around as long as you did!!

    --
    Restrictions are prohibited. Be well, get better.
  46. Research institutions. by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

    There will always be a place for independent or academic research institutions that aren't subjected to the vicissitudes of corporate politics and moneygrubbing (insofar as it was intellectual property anxieties that killed a sale of the lab to Intel, I think it's fair to say that moneygrubbing and the corporate fuck-you instinct was at work here). The Santa Fe Institutes, MIT * Labs, Berkeley Labs, and the like couldn't be replaced by corporate entities. While it makes sense, then, that there's cooperation between those entities and the private sector, I think it needs to be emphasized how important it is that the ethic of sharing of scientific knowledge and open research be maintained.

  47. Other projects underway at the lab by DaveWood · · Score: 2

    I was curious what the lab was working on and found a variety of multimedia materials on their anonymous FTP site here:

    ftp://ftp.uk.research.att.com/pub/videos/qsif-200/

    What I've seen so far is interesting though not earth-shattering. Take a look.

    -David

  48. Icky heads R Us by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Oooh, you didn't even bother to write your own. "Re: Lame header" doesn't even have a verb. People in Ass Houses ....

  49. Current VNC D/L Sites by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    I, being the paranoid vnc junkie that I am, just cruised over to the ATT - VNC website, to get copies for each OS, and found the downloads are gone beyond the forms.

    Hopefully someone out there has them all for download at their website. Anyone know any sites?

    Being GPL, I imagine that there are several. I need to feel assured that the source is untouched as well.

    Thanks be to any who finds this info.

    And screw "The Man" for making another horribly morbid decision.

  50. Budget? by VonSnaggle · · Score: 1

    I wonder if every lab has that kind of budget to buy odds and ends just to take apart and see how they work? I think there should be more labs like this in more places around the world.

    --
    if common sense was common, wouldn't everyone have it?
  51. XORL.org by quentinsf · · Score: 1

    Anyone wanting to offer lucrative contracts to AT&T people after the closedown can find more information at www.xorl.org :-)

  52. Re:VNC has been ported to WinCE/PocketPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    http://www.cs.utah.edu/~midgley/wince/vnc.html

    I LMAO when I saw this. It worked fine for me on a iPaq running Pocket PC 2002.

  53. "Gartner group claims" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Do these guys have ANY CREDIBILITY left at all after the dot com implosion? I don't think so.

  54. Bazaar by PigleT · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Find your favourite distribution's source archive, and grab 'em from there. (Debian would be my first port of call, seeing as I *know* they've packaged VNC before now.)

    I'm thinking, in this day & age of open-source, it's slightly weird that projects can be "removed" from public distribution - cf ?Blender?, the Net::DNS CPAN module, and/or that nice movie editor thing - when so many distributions have used the sources in the past, it can very rapidly become quite hard to find something once it *is* removed; reason being, freshmeat refers people only to the project's listed homepage, it doesn't copy stuff locally.

    Seems to me that within the "bazaar" that is open-source development, there's quite a lot of "one package, one home site" going on.

    --
    ~Tim
    --
    .|` Clouds cross the black moonlight,
    Rushing on down to the circle of the turn
    1. Re:Bazaar by quentinsf · · Score: 1

      The downloads aren't being removed, BTW. They're just being slashdotted.

  55. Other Platforms? by Tokerat · · Score: 1

    Any mirrors for Mac users? I'm sure I'd liek to have the source as long as they're going away...

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  56. surprise! ethics costs something! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    apple costs too much! sun costs too much! microsoft is relatively cheap, for now, but it lacks ethics! save a few bucks, employ a few children... voila, profit! wake up, pleazzzze!

    1. Re:surprise! ethics costs something! by OSgod · · Score: 1

      Are you naive to assume that Apple and Sun are more ethical than MS? Next you'll be telling me that IBM is your friend... that Larry Ellison isn't an egomaniac willing to do whatever it takes to make a sale and that the business of business is to support employees (it's not -- it's to make a buck for the shareholders and if the employees get supported in the effort that's ok too).

  57. Re:You, sir, are a dumb-ass. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    Not only did YOU not read the article, but you hide your precious karma behind a AC post.

    Whilst 'reading' the article, did you happen to note this? And I quote: "...the word on the street is that negotiations foundered because the lawyers on both sides couldn't agree about intellectual property issues.

    This eleventh-hour failure is a disaster because it shatters something magical. ..."

    Sure, Intel wanted to buy AT&T, but...They didn't!!! The question remains then, why doesn't AT&T keep it?

    If your answer is, "uhh, 'cause they wasn't makein no money." I respond with, "So what?"

    The point to my post, (obviously lost to you) is that the lab has had a fine track record, so why not hold on to it, if only for the fact that they will come up with something else revolutionary.

  58. Re:I did it by nitehawk214 · · Score: 1

    I am responsible for closing VNC every time I am done with my remote console session.

    --
    I'm a good cook. I'm a fantastic eater. - Steven Brust
  59. A Quandary. by Smur · · Score: 1

    Small businesses fuel the (U.S) economy to a greater extent than large. Small businesses do best with laissez-faire management and motivated workers. As they grow, managers replace founders and innovators. Inertia sets in. By the time the company is "big" and/or (dog forbid) publicly traded "innovation" is a slogan and business plan as well as a practice. Then, some managerial genius notices that the time-to-market cycle of brilliant, innovative technology doesn't line up the the metronome-on-speed quarterly-financial-reporting cycle that American investors know in their heart of hearts is cocked up, but can't seem to leave behind (yes, you, little Maisie-in-the-home-getting-a-dividend-check) and presto - the genius manager gets promoted for shuttering that nasty, inefficient lab. This is not capitalism, or market forces - it is a the triumph of myopic beancounters over producers, and it does suck. This I know - I am an accountant, and I have seen the beast with my own eyes. The only comfort I find is that those who "do" can "do" faster than the Trogs in Suits can screw up. The lab is dead - long live the lab.

  60. so what happens to active badges? by perky · · Score: 2
    Blimey! This lab is just out the back of my house and I walk past it every day en route to the engineering department. In fact the director, Andy Hopper taught a few lectures last year on distributed computing during which he spoke extensively about the Active Badge system they have there. The setup is pretty sweet: they have a bunch of IR tranceivers in every room in the lab, and also in the LCE in the engineering department. Each of the lab rats wears a small badge with an IR transmitter in it which emits a pulse containing a badge ID every so often. The receivers catch these and relay the information to a central server. This server runs a daemon which provides information on where everyone is to any program that requests it. More info on active badges here and its successor, the active bat system here. Location of staff members using the system here


    Incidentally hopper is a pretty interesting character too. Having worked on the Cambridge ring which was for a while superior to ethernet, he then became involved with the Acorn computers that every Brit of my generation knew and loved at school. He established the then olivetti lab in the mid 80's and is involved with 2 of the three big startups in Cambridge, ARM and Virata. Oh, he also flies planes, is worth a packet and lectures in scruffy jeans.

    --
    "The new wave is not value-added; it's garbage-subtracted" - Esther Dyson, Dec 1994
  61. VNC future by ajv · · Score: 2

    The VNC development community is healthy, despite nearly no activity from the authors at the Cambridge Labs for some time.

    I'm working on RFB 4.x which is attempting to fix the authentication and security issues, whilst adding clipboard, drag and drop, multiple desktops, file transfers, encryption, channels, etc

    http://www.evilsecurity.com/vnc/

    TightVNC is the preferred VNC now - don't think that with one lab closure the world is coming to and end.

    http://www.tightvnc.com

    There's even a commercial version of VNC out there, TridiaVNC as well as literally tens of clients and servers for all sorts of platforms.

    VNC is far from dead.

    --
    Andrew van der Stock
  62. Other "Gartner group claims" by danro · · Score: 1

    Yeah, isn't thet the guys that claimed that MS IIS5 was insecure?
    Clueless bastards! My IIS has always been rock soli... bzzzrt...
    *
    *
    *
    Buffer Overflow...
    This page has been hacked by the Chinese!

    --

    "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
  63. Re:Prove It by MarkedMan · · Score: 1

    The absolute classic case for this was outside the computer arena. For many years (decades?) Nabisco donated cookies to the Red Cross. After a blood donation, the donor got led over to a refreshment area, where Lorna Doones and Oreo's were served to the dizzy. Sometime in the eighties, Ol' Nabisco was going through some very hard times, with plant closings and layoffs. Some exec looked at the books and said they had to cut the Red Cross cookies. Maybe this was a smart decision, probably not, but in any case, after giving away many millions of dollars worth of product to a charitable organization, they decided to do what every other cookie manufacturer had been doing all along: nothing. Did anyone say, "heck, we will miss the Lorna Doones, but it sure was nice of Nabisco to supply us all those years, I'm sorry they are in financial trouble, I wish them well and hope some other cookie manufacturer will take over the load"? Of course not. They were crucified in the press. There were calls to boycott Nabisco for "putting the screws to the Red Cross". I learned a lesson then: if I am ever in a position to do anything charitable on the corporate level, make sure it is a one-off, because once people expect something, they will turn on you if you take it away.

  64. What the heck??? by SuperJ · · Score: 2
    Maan...I was going to observe the boycott this week too, but now this stupid post by Chris is going to force me to talk.


    Why is everybody like "AT&T killed the lab!" oh no! Look, AT&T bought the lab, and when they didn't have enough money to keep it running, they closed it. It's produced some wonderful stuff, but this is the way capitalism works. And Chris, *come* *on*. "uhh, I'm surprised AT&T hasn't bought out PARC and closed it down..." What kind of a comment is that? AT&T has had a good history of funding R&D, and now they're in some financial trouble. Cut them a break.


    And the post towards the bottom of the page that says AT&T is tanking and the Internet age is getting rid of the Telco, that's ridiculous. AT&T is a big Internet player. Yeah they're a long distance company, but they also provide a lot of Internet connectivity. AT&T is in some financial trouble, but they're by no means out of it. They've taken some hits from the dot com crash and the 9/11 slump, but they'll be back.


    This whole idea on Slashdot that AT&T was a big bad evil company and still is, is hilarious. They brought you Unix for crying out loud!

    --

    Sheepdot: Open Source good, Closed Source baaaaaaad!

  65. Excuse me ? by cmuncey · · Score: 2

    Funny, but Bell Labs thinks it still belongs to Lucent . . . Bell Labs' own site has a rather prominent Lucent logo on it, and the Avaya Labs site states that "It's a brand new research lab, but it can boast of a rich, 75-year-old heritage from Bell Labs". It's a spin off . . .

  66. Noooo! by neema · · Score: 2

    I was looking ahead to the Broadband Phone too! They even had a wireless version running. Sigh.

  67. VNC Future by const_k · · Score: 1
    1. Closing AT&T Labs UK would not change much in the VNC status. The "official" VNC was unsupported for years, and currently it lacks important features available in the derived products. Today, there is no much sense to use the official VNC distribution at all. For example, TightVNC is much more advanced in many aspects.
    2. The development on the VNC code base was never stopped. Many people issued various ports and additions, and currently there is at least two major projects maintaining VNC-derived code bases: TightVNC and TridiaVNC. TightVNC is free, TridiaVNC includes both free and commercial versions.
    3. Being the maintainer of TightVNC, I can say that the code base is in the state of active development, the latest version was released on March 24, 2002, and the next version is to be released in May. And I have no plans to stop the development.
    4. The TightVNC project is open to contributors, so I don't see a reason to create another branch from the "official" VNC sources.
  68. Re: who ever complies with EULAs? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Who ever reads them, and if 100million people copy windows for free, i dont think they give a rats ass on the EULA

  69. A note from a VNC developer by chromatix · · Score: 3, Insightful
    VNC development will continue, and here's how and why:

    1) AT&T Labs has not released a significant version of VNC for a little while now, yet VNC development continues on many fronts. These efforts will therefore not cease just because the AT&T Lab goes away. Examples of non-AT&T projects involving VNC:

    ChromiVNC (MacOS 7.5/9.x server) - maintained by myself, Jonathan Morton.

    VNCThing (MacOS Carbon viewer) - maintained by Dair Grant.

    OSXVNC (MacOS X server)

    TightVNC (ultra-efficient Win32 and UNIX servers and viewers) - maintained by Constantin Kaplinsky.

    TridiaVNC (semi-commercial Win32 and UNIX servers and viewers) - maintained by Tridia Corporation.

    A large number of independent viewers, as well as a few servers, for minority and hand-held platforms are also available.

    Each of the above is independent of the AT&T Labs, although most use at least some of the AT&T code.

    2) Most people who use VNC seriously, use the independent versions because they are noticeably further advanced than the AT&T versions. In fact, generally progress on the AT&T versions has been limited to occasional bugfixes for some years.

    3) Support for most versions of VNC (but not normally TridiaVNC, for which commercial support from Tridia is available) is primarily conducted on a central mailing list, currently operated from an AT&T server. The posting rate from AT&T representatives or developers is very low. As a group, VNC developers are currently discussing where to move the support list to ensure it's continued operation.

    This is all made possible by the GPL.

    --
    --- The key to knowledge is not to rely on people to teach you it ---
  70. Re:Olivetti was the creator. and its not dead anyw by malex · · Score: 1

    TridiaVNC is GPL too, as you can read at TridiaVNC Developer Zone.

  71. What about the weather? by tunders · · Score: 1

    A large number of people use the weather station on their roof - I use a little app written by a friend that displays the outside temperature next to my CPU monitor on my taskbar. They have fairly comprehensive archives for the last few years, so it would be a shame if this service stopped as well.

  72. The future of VNC by The+VNC+Team · · Score: 2, Informative
    Sad but true, the AT&T lab in Cambridge is closing.

    Now for the good news - VNC lives on!

    First, the current version of VNC will continue to be available at the original web address, which will soon be re-hosted at Cambridge University where AT&T continues to sponsor research.

    Second, the creators of VNC are planning a venture to independently support and develop VNC as an ongoing open source project. You haven't heard much from us recently because we've been busy with other projects such as the Broadband Phone, but now that we have the opportunity :) we're back on the case.

    Watch the VNC website, the mailing list, or slashdot for an announcement "real soon"

    The VNC Team

  73. Sentient Computing by Uri · · Score: 2

    I remember them demonstrating some of their technology at a careers fair at Cambridge University. It was pretty spectacular. For example, take a look at some of the applications of their Sentient Computing Project.

  74. VNC goodies by shaldannon · · Score: 2

    If they start selling VNC t-shirts and caps, I might buy one :}

    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
  75. No broad compatibiliy by PatSmarty · · Score: 1

    The best thing about VNC is the multitude of supported OS's, in my opinion. Mac, Palm, WinCE... you name it. When I'm on the go slow connection support is nice, but if I can't use it, well...

  76. Re:Apple promotes Darwinism, un-Christian like val by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brilliantly insane, perhaps. Unfortunately, this Dr. Paley is dead serious. In case you've never had the misfortune to be involved with a fundie church, I'm here to tell you that this sort of thing is pretty typical of the "everyone that isn't with us is against us" paranoia many of this type espouse on a daily basis.

    Which accounts for the success of Landover Baptist: it's damned difficult to tell them apart from the real fundies. Though they are admittedly more over-the-top, they're (frightenly enough) not too far from those they parody.

    (My first exposure to Landover: Jar Jar Sexdolls?)

    Gautama, doing the bad-Karma avoidance shuffle...