Slashdot Mirror


Installing Linux On A Wal-Mart OS-less machine

Azar writes "An article at Newsforge details the experience of installing Linux on Wal-Mart's OS-less PC. It states: 'A few months ago, super-sized discount store Wal-Mart made the headlines in the Linux world by becoming the first major U.S. retailer to offer PCs without Windows preloaded...While this was widely hailed in the Open Source community as a victory over the "Microsoft tax," which usually afflicts buyers of Linux PCs, one major question remained unanswered: How well do these machines support Linux?' Here is your answer." Newsforge is owned by OSDN, which also owns Slashdot, is all part of the sinister Andover keiretsu.

103 of 390 comments (clear)

  1. Summary for the lazy by NewbieSpaz · · Score: 4, Informative

    As long as you have experience putting linux on a PC, this should be no problem, as long as you don't need a modem; it's a winmodem.

    --
    ------
    Random, useless fact: I type in startx entirely with my left hand.
    1. Re:Summary for the lazy by flipflapflopflup · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I disagree:

      > As long as you have experience putting linux on a PC

      the author picked "newbie" options every time, and everything worked straight away (bar the modem). So it would be fair to say "You don't need experience of putting Linux on a PC"

      >as long as you don't need a modem; it's a winmodem

      If you look at the comments further down, several people got the modem to work (albiet having to recomile their kernels). So it *is* possible to get the modem to work under Linux. Admittedly, maybe beyong a beginner.

    2. Re:Summary for the lazy by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      This used to be true... My Compaq E500 has a "winmodem" that works perfectly in linux. there have been great strieds in reverse engineering these abortions of hardware called winmodems, and open source is winning...

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  2. Why oh why did they use a software modem? by GnomeKing · · Score: 4, Insightful

    did walmart use a modem designed for windows on a machine that did not have windows pre-installed?

    Sure, that particular modem can be supported under linux (and other operating systems?), but the clear point of these machines was that they did not have windows pre-loaded

    so why use components that are designed for windows and often wont work with other operating systems?

    1. Re:Why oh why did they use a software modem? by hajmola · · Score: 2, Interesting

      because they're cheaper.

    2. Re:Why oh why did they use a software modem? by levik · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Somehow, I doubt that the decision to drop windows from the bundle was motivated by the highter purpose of giving users a choice. The idea was to cut corners where possible. Since when looking at the spec sheet, the absence of an OS isn't what strikes you right away, they probably thought this was one of the corners they could cut more or less unnoticed.

      Now given that it was never their intent to promote the use of alternative OS, I think their decision to use a (cheaper) winmodem, makes all the sense in the world. Its disappointing to the /.ers because we just go and assume that anyone who unbundles windows from a system is a Good Guy (tm). But really, sometimes people are just greedy.

      --
      Ñ'
    3. Re:Why oh why did they use a software modem? by kruczkowski · · Score: 2

      Mabye becouse winmodems are cheap?

      I know what you are saying, and I agree, but some marketing idiot said the PC needed a modem and look into a cataloug and found the cheapist thing they could get.

      --
      hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
    4. Re:Why oh why did they use a software modem? by jordan_a · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Not by much, I buy wholesale and a hardware 56Kbs modem is only $10 more expensive then the equivalant software modem.

    5. Re:Why oh why did they use a software modem? by Turing+Machine · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I buy wholesale and a hardware 56Kbs modem is only $10 more expensive then the equivalant software modem.

      Even if your definition of "wholesale quantity" is the same as Walmart's (probably not, eh? :-) that still adds up to a nice chunk of change when you're looking at selling a million or so machines.

      Still, this is something people should complain about.

    6. Re:Why oh why did they use a software modem? by EvilBuu · · Score: 2, Insightful

      No, not that the modems are cheaper. They sell Windows-hardware-boxen without Windows because the boxen are cheaper that way. You can put on your warezed (or legitimate) copy of Windows for zero cost. I doubt very much you will ever get anyone from Walmart endorsing Linux or giving you Linux install help. This is about cheap crap not open-source. And Walmart is very good at pushing cheap crap.

      --

      Green-voting, republican-registered, socialist-libertarian.
    7. Re:Why oh why did they use a software modem? by banuaba · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Because most people who buy these machines are going to use pirated copies of Windows on them. I mean, it's great that you can buy machine where you get free reign on what OS you run, but when we're talking about regular people, the point remains that nobody runs linux. These people are going to borrow their sister's copy of windows XP or ME or whatever and throw that bad boy onto this box.

      --


      Brant

      Argle. Bargle.
    8. Re:Why oh why did they use a software modem? by rosewood · · Score: 2

      Or student copies or copies that MS gives them for free @ conferences or full retail versions they can buy cheaper online then OEM versions or they transfer their win98 full retail lic over or a few other legit ways to get windows on a box cheap

      Its not always about the piracy, g

    9. Re:Why oh why did they use a software modem? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 2
      Not by much, I buy wholesale and a hardware 56Kbs modem is only $10 more expensive then the equivalant software modem.

      But the way computer manufacturer's accounting works, you multiply the hardware cost by a factor of 3 or 4 to get the suggested retail price (at least last time I was involved with it, way back when hardware had a profit margin). This works out to a $30 or more difference to the end user.

      I know that the fixed factor is bogus, but that's the way accountants think. Even if you convince someone that you don't need to assign the same overhead and profit numbers to the extra $10, somebody later on is going to come back and ask why this product's base materials cost is out of line with the rest of your products.

    10. Re:Why oh why did they use a software modem? by arivanov · · Score: 4, Insightful

      yep you are asbolutely correct.

      I would only add that MSFT also cut a few corners on the spot. The new draft of the agreement with the DOJ has a clause that prohibits OEMs from OSless machines. It may not be MSFT but it must have OS. Which in reality means MSFT

      So Walmart just got demonstrated by MSFT how do you cut corners on its own turf. And was sufficiently stupid not to fill an amicus curae. Sigh... some people that claim to be experienced businessmen never stop to amuse me...

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    11. Re:Why oh why did they use a software modem? by EvilBuu · · Score: 2, Funny

      The funniest part is if I had used "boxes" instead I'd have twice as many people yelling at me about how "boxen" is the correct term. Language changes, deal with it.

      --

      Green-voting, republican-registered, socialist-libertarian.
    12. Re:Why oh why did they use a software modem? by jrp2 · · Score: 2

      I know what you are saying, and I agree, but some marketing idiot said the PC needed a modem and look into a cataloug and found the cheapist thing they could get.

      And if they were any good they would realize they could save $7 off the BOM cost and not include any modem at all. Sell a separate modem if it is needed (many don't need a modem anymore). Modems are a support headache anyway.

      --
      The only athletic sport I ever mastered was backgammon - Douglas William Jerrold
    13. Re:Why oh why did they use a software modem? by mandolin · · Score: 2
      It may not be MSFT but it must have OS. Which in reality means MSFT

      That's a fair comment; but honestly I wonder, if wal-mart already has the balls to ship 'no OS' I wonder how much harder it would be to put an unsupported linux distribution on the hard drive.

      I could see them going with debian (disclaimer: I use mandrake), just so there was less "confusion" about support. Heck they could put something more useless than NT's posix layer on the hard disk as long as they did *something*. I didn't think disk replicating machines were that hard to find.

    14. Re:Why oh why did they use a software modem? by Abreu · · Score: 2

      10 dollars is a HUGE ammount of money given the quantities these guys must handle.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    15. Re:Why oh why did they use a software modem? by arivanov · · Score: 2

      It imposes requirements on OEM contracts and resellers. Which means that Walmart cannot sell any machines with MSFT OS and products. And this is an ordered "remedy" so there can be no complains that MSFT is bending arms and behaving monopolistically here.

      And this is something Walmart cannot afford. They cannot become the reseller just for geeks. It is not a viable large scale business.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
    16. Re:Why oh why did they use a software modem? by arivanov · · Score: 2

      After finding out that we are required to ship the original MSFT OS (not the same, the original with the original license numbers) with any PC we dispose of to charities and such we are considering the same approach.

      See the article on the register for more:

      http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/4/25085.htm l

      I am no f*** reseller of MSFT to keep track of products we do not use and do not pay license for. Wipe and put an "unsupported" linux on it. Solves all questions on the spot.

      --
      Baker's Law: Misery no longer loves company. Nowadays it insists on it
      http://www.sigsegv.cx/
  3. Interesting by enneff · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Kudos to the author of this article, as it was genuinely interesting and informative.

    These machines are obviously an affordable, functional, and useful personal computing package for the 'alternative' (or perhaps just plain thrifty) user. Perhaps Red Hat or another distribution vendor should strike up a deal with Wal-Mart to bundle copies of Linux with the machines? It's been done before with not a huge amount of success, but Wal-Mart is a pretty powerful distribution mechanism, and the product already exists minus one inexpensive and 'easy-to-include' component.

    How long do you think it will take for other hardware vendors to follow a similiar path? Is there enough demand for it? Does Microsoft offer too great an incentive (target market, for example) for vendors to switch away from their platform?

    1. Re:Interesting by Alan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Well yes and no. See, if they bundle windows they are being sucked into the evil monopolistic empire that is the hell hole of microsoft. If they bundle linux they are champions of free source and deserving of big hugs and wet kisses.

      See how it works? :)

    2. Re:Interesting by Qrlx · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Based on Wal-Mart's love of Chinese factories to mass produce all that plastic crap they sell, they should be bundling *Red Flag Linux* with these boxes.

      It's funny/sad/lame to me that eveyone here hates MS for being predatory and abusing their monopoly power, but nobody is taking Wal-Mart to task. Remember, Wal-Mart got to be Wal-Mart by rolling their mega-stores into town and putting Mom and Pop out of business. They are hostile to their wage-slave workers' attempts to unioninze. Many of their products are made in sweatshop factories in China. (Consider that your queue, Libertarians.)

      If you think that Wal-Mart gives a shit about the intellectual agenda behind Linux then you are either ignorant or stupid.

      Wal-Mart just might be the force big enough to combat MS on the "MS Tax" OEM issue (since Dell etc. have all rolled over), but that does NOT mean that they are Pro-Linux. It means they can get the box put together cheaply in China and appear to sell it for less. I bet they eke out a higher margin selling Win XP Retail Box version to those who forgot they need an OS than if they preinstalled the OEM version from MS.

      Wal-Mart: Watch for falling ethics!

    3. Re:Interesting by swordboy · · Score: 2

      These machines are obviously an affordable

      Not as affordable as one might think. Here's a link to the PCs in question. They don't look much better than a bundled Dell or Gateway entry with Windows and all that other stuff. Not that I am for Windows or anything. I just think it would be better for everyone if they didn't scrap the OS for the sake of raising margins.

      --

      Life is the leading cause of death in America.
  4. Don't stop with just Linux by 4thAce · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Has anyone tried putting FreeBSD on one of these? I wouldn't expect the modem to fare any better, but it would be interesting to find out whether the rest of the package came up successfully.

    --
    Inventor of the LOLbalrog meme.
  5. But. by ath0mic · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How many people, who buy computers at Walmart, are willing to installing Linux/read these instructions.

  6. Re:oh my gosh are y'all stupid? by Chazmati · · Score: 2

    You must be trolling.

    With Microsoft Windows nearly unavoidable on a PC purchase, it's more like worrying about a "car" tax and going to a car dealer. The big deal here is that a major retailer is offering computers without Microsoft pre-installed.

    You're a major stud for building your own PC. This isn't about that.

  7. Re:oh my gosh are y'all stupid? by blane.bramble · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you are so worried about the MSFT tax don't buy prebuilt computers, duh.

    That's like worrying about paying a "ford" tax and going to your ford dealer.

    Not at all - this is a "Microsoft Tax" - the computer is not made by Microsoft. If when you bought your Ford you had to take out insurance from a particular insurance company (whether or not you already had insurance), then that would be a better comparison, and people would complain.

    You ought to be able to buy a computer without a software vendor insisting you buy their product as well.

  8. "Check out our selection of Linux books" by techstar25 · · Score: 5, Interesting

    At Wal-Marts website at the bottom of the page that features the Windows-less machines is the following note with respective links:
    See all computers without operating systems. Also, check out our selection of Linux books.
    Yes folks, they are PROMOTING Linux for these machines. So it might be possible that they could bundle a distro with the pc in the future.

    1. Re:"Check out our selection of Linux books" by Kibo · · Score: 2

      They are promoting high margin books, not free, as in beer, linux. Funny part is, the direct cost to the consumer for windows used to be $15, I would assume that it hasn't changed by much. I wonder how much a linux for dummies book goes for, and a package of redhat off the shelf? They've just convinced people they are saving money by spending more :). And they're being cheered for it. No wonder Walmart is number 1.

      --
      --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
    2. Re:"Check out our selection of Linux books" by Kibo · · Score: 2

      Heh. TCO. Time is money, and throwing win2k on a box is not a big deal. Win2k has a easy learning curve, supports most hardware, and is pretty stable. Not that I'm on microsofts press team or anything.

      But seriously, do you think your estimate of what linux costs is accurate for people other than yourself. A classic example of this is the problems lilo had with udma66 hd's, thankfully that maxblast software prepares for such eventualities. Sure someone might comment, "Duh, get yourself a real bootloader, ass." And for someone like myself, they might even have a point. But for someone like my grampa, who at 76 has taken to installing his own hardware on his first pc, the TCO is too much to even bother. And for people with his skill level 15 bucks for a copy of windows bundled with a pc, is a heck of a lot of value.

      Linux isn't bad, but it sure as hell isn't for everyone.

      --
      --Jimmy has fancy plans; and pants to match.
  9. Modem works? by Quixote · · Score: 5, Informative

    Some of the followups to that article mention that a working version of the modem driver can be obtained from http://www.heby.de/ltmodem.

    Given this, it would be nice if someone could put together a complete linux distro (complete with the OpenOffice suite, etc.) ready-to-run on this box. Heck, maybe we could even convince Wal-Mart to give it away with every box!

    1. Re:Modem works? by InodoroPereyra · · Score: 2, Informative

      Some of the followups to that article mention that a working version of the modem driver can be obtained from http://www.heby.de/ltmodem

      Yes, but there is a later post by the author of the article, insisting that it is not supported: "Well, I opened the ltmodem source kit and started doing some investigating. It appears that this chipset is unsupported by the ltmodem driver. The scanPCI program does not find a supported card and lspci shows an ID that indicates it is this chipset:
      http://www.idir.net/~gromitkc/agere/ager e_SV92P.ht ml
      I pulled the card and inspected the chips. It uses the SV92P chip.
      It is unsupported.
      "

      This is a real issue, and it seems to be still open, so I ask: has anyone
      really GOTTEN THIS MODEM TO WORK with the lt driver ?. If not, walmart will be pissing people off unnecessarily. There are plenty of cheap but supported winmodems.

      Given this, it would be nice if someone could put together a complete linux distro (complete with the OpenOffice suite, etc.) ready-to-run on this box. Heck, maybe we could even convince Wal-Mart to give it away with every box!

      As many people pointed out in the linuxtoday followup, Wal-Mart wants you to do-it-yourself because:
      1. They want to make a clear point: it is for geeks
      2. They do not want to have to invest in support

      But that raises another question: why do the distro sellers not sell preinstalled machines ?. They could ship the machine with the CDs, and
      offer you support for some extra bucks. It's a win-win, they sell the soft + the hard + optional support. I cannot understand WHY they do not do it (except for lycoris, but they sell you dual boot plus I don't trust them).
      I would love to go to mandrake.com or suse.com ot redhat.com or whatever, click, configure my deskop, and buy. Of course, I would expect competitive price and no M$ Tax.
  10. Wow by jhines0042 · · Score: 2

    So it appears that the Wal-Mart machine as tested makes a very reasonable Linux box. But I suggest you lose the Lucent modem card and replace it with a real hardware modem. I have more respect for Wal-Mart now. I used to scoff at shopping there, but if they can produce this kind of barebones system, at a very low cost, that can handle Windows and Linux with equal ease then the state of the computer as a home appliance is improving greatly. As for me, I buy my computers from a friend who owns a computer store so I probably won't be getting one myself.

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
  11. Re:build your own by Quarters · · Score: 4, Informative
    Inside the unit, there is a 40 GB Samsung drive, 128 MB of memory (8 MB of which is shared as video), and 52x LG CDROM Drive. The motherboard is a Microstar MicroATX motherboard model MS-6378. It has 2 DIMM slots (1 used), 3 PCI slots (one of which is occupied by a modem card), and 1 unused CNR slot. Sound and ethernet are handled on the motherboard, which also sports an Award BIOS dated 2/25/2002.


    Ah, the power of reading the article...
  12. Re:build your own by squaretorus · · Score: 2, Interesting

    build your own is fine if you care that much about specs. Personally, I don't.
    I want a machine thats easy to use, easy to set up, and easy to dick about with.
    MS falls down on step 3 - the dicking about with. I can set up and use an XP box in about half a minute - but once I've switched off the voice recog I've almost exhausted the possibiliuties so far as dicking about are concerned.
    So a nameless motherboard running Linux sounds a whole heap more attractive than a posho self build with windows

  13. Re:oh my gosh are y'all stupid? by ch-chuck · · Score: 3, Funny

    That's like worrying about paying a "ford" tax and going to your ford dealer.

    Oh, ok. So all prebuilt PC vendors are Msft dealers/franchise - roger, gotcha.

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
  14. Re:oh my gosh are y'all stupid? by kruczkowski · · Score: 2

    Not really, goto mwave.com and get the motherboard bunddle and throw in a HD, video and case and your set.

    --
    hmm... for fun I enjoy launching DDoS attacks against 127.87.42.5
  15. Re:build your own by PD · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I've got an Intel Celery 1100 board with everything integrated. The only thing I did was to disable the onboard video controller and add an Nvidia MX 400 card. It's hardly a crappy board. A better word for it would be inexpensive, and reliable. Probably the same applies to the Microstar board. Not everyone is interested in overclocking and tinkering with chip voltages.

  16. I find the modem pretty low... by weave · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I think it's horrible they sell a naked PC that has hardware that requires Windows to be used. Some sort of notice that this PC has hardware that won't work unless you use Microsoft Windows, which isn't installed on this PC and you'll need to buy a copy that costs about half what the PC itself costs...

    It would have also been nice to throw in a piece of paper with instructions about your choices for an operating system to load, including a note that to install Windows, you must buy a full-price retail copy of it.

    I'm all for getting rid of the Microsoft tax, but this just smacks of promoting piracy, frustrating users, and adding fuel to microsoft's arguments about how bad an idea naked PCs are.

    On the other hand, if it never had an OEM Windows PC on it, you don't have to worry about violating the law for removing it...

    1. Re:I find the modem pretty low... by Uruk · · Score: 4, Informative

      I think it's horrible they sell a naked PC that has hardware that requires Windows to be used.

      Check the other comments - the modem in this machine can be used by Linux and other operating systems.

      Also, as for it being a naked PC, it's not like they're not warning you - find the link in the article to Walmart's site and you'll see that they trumpet it underneath every ad - "THIS PC DOES NOT INCLUDE A COPY OF WINDOWS" in bold. At the top, it recommends users read their PC guide or something before buying, and states that the computers do not include a required operating system.

      I think things like this are a VICTORY for consumers. Sure, this product isn't the right thing for some people, but for others, it is the perfect thing. Sure, there are people out there who could mistakenly buy this but I'm glad the option is available for people like me who want a cheap addition to the home LAN.

      --
      -- Truth goes out the door when rumor comes innuendo. -- Groucho Marx
    2. Re:I find the modem pretty low... by weave · · Score: 2
      The notice on the web page is just a start. It's not the naked PC I object to. I think that is the greatest thing. It's bundling a farking (tm) winmodem with the damn thing, replacing a microsoft tax with a lucent tax basically.

      It's kind of like... "We know you're going to load Windows on this anyway, and if you're so cheap as to want a $400 PC we know damn well you won't buy Windows legit, but that's OK, we'll make money off of it and all the alternative OS supporters will love us too..."

      Let's face it, Microsoft has every right to sell proprietary software and make a fortune at it. They cross the line when forcing us to buy it. But on the flip side, none of us should be supportive of the idea of stealing it either.

      I just don't think this particular computer promotes what many of us want to see. What I want is to go to website or store, and choose what computer I want with what OS I want bundled with it. You can preinstall Linux on a PC for basically nothing and if someone wants to wipe it install OS/2 or Be or FreeBSD, there's nothing wrong with that either...

      30 minutes on a work processor to type up a notice to throw inside the box that says "This computer does not come with an operating system. Here are your choices..." Extra credit for throwing in a linux distro CD set that would add about 20 cents to the wholesale price of the PC... They could sell it for $400 instead of $399 :)

    3. Re:I find the modem pretty low... by Erasmus+Darwin · · Score: 2
      "I'm all for getting rid of the Microsoft tax, but this just smacks of promoting piracy, frustrating users, and adding fuel to microsoft's arguments about how bad an idea naked PCs are."

      While I see your point, let's not forget that there's a legitimate, purely Windows-centric solution to the problem that doesn't involve forking over extra money: existing, non-OEM Windows licenses. If a user has already purchased a retail copy of Windows, they can install it on the new machine provided that they completely remove it from their old one.

      Admittedly, I don't know how many non-OEM copies of Windows are floating around, as it seems most people purchasing a computer would go for an OEM bundle. Still, they're at least theoretically out there.

    4. Re:I find the modem pretty low... by GrenDel+Fuego · · Score: 2

      The number of people dialing up to AOL, MSN, and other dial up providers is still pretty high. It would seem to me that they are probably the same people that would be buying a $300 computer at walmart.

      Besides, a modem isn't a bad backup when your DSL/Cable modem goes out, or you're waiting for it to me installed.

    5. Re:I find the modem pretty low... by neo · · Score: 2

      I think it's horrible they sell a naked PC that has hardware that requires Windows to be used.

      I think you're assuming that they knew. This is Wal-Mart guys... do you honestly think anyone even tried to turn the machines on? Technical knowledge is not their strong suit. They sell items as cheaply as possible. My guess is that the manufacturer they bought it from just told them "it has a modem".

    6. Re:I find the modem pretty low... by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 2

      The number of people dialing up to AOL, MSN, and other dial up providers is still pretty high. It would seem to me that they are probably the same people that would be buying a $300 computer at walmart.

      You're probably right, but for those dialing up to AOL and MSN it's pretty dumb. The $5 a month extra for life has an expected value of $5*12=$60/year, factoring in a 5% interest rate=$1200 expected value, more than four times the cost of the machine.

  17. Sam Walton, meet Beowulf by kyoko21 · · Score: 2, Funny

    A couple of years ago, beowulf clusters was made from a bunch of 'relatively' cheap ALPHAs. I wonder if there will be a new breed of beowulf clusters, made from a bunch a REALLY cheap Sam Walton branded PCs? :-)

    Can you imagine a rack full of PCs with the sticker "Sam's Choice" on them all? LOL

    Just thought that I'd give you all a chuckle.... :-)

  18. Re:oh my gosh are y'all stupid? by BreakWindows · · Score: 2

    Not really, goto mwave.com and get the motherboard bunddle and throw in a HD, video and case and your set.

    So just buy the motherboard and cpu...then buy a hard drive, video, case, ethernet and all the parts you need and assemble them. You're right, that's much easier than assembling your own from parts.

    As the other post basically said, this isn't about having a MS-less computer on your desk, it's about having one on the shelves of a major retailer. If one does it, maybe other companies will follow suit, and allow consumers a choice (even if that choice is Win2k vs WinXP vs WinME).

  19. very cool article by ACK!! · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I was very glad to hear that most distros installed on the machine with no trouble I was thinking about getting one these things myself.

    I hear some people painting the winmodem experience as typical but I have used the ltmodem packages on four different machines with great results. Below in some of the comments it is explaining that this particular one is a chipset that is not really supported. Still, the ltmodem modules work great for the winmodem in my Dell 4000 right now.

    What I like is that he did not just install one distro and let it go at that. He installed multiple distros which gives a reviewer a much nicer base of experience to speak from.

    Read carefully his experiences with the install. It just goes to show linux installs are getting much easier and autodetection is very good.

    There are still gotchas (his was the modem) but anyone not using Windows pre-loaded from the manufacturer to work with that machine will come up with at least one install gotcha. My gotcha was the free Umax scanner that came with my laptop. Xsane still has no driver for it because of Umax's bull-headedness. The funny thing is that Dell started selling the Epson 1250 after that and I hear they work great with Linux. Argh!

    ________________________________________________ __

    --
    ACK /ak/ interj. 2. [from the comic strip "Bloom County"] An exclamation of surprised disgust, esp. i
  20. Re:Only if the Best-Buy exists by RazzleFrog · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I see Wal-Marts everywhere

    That is probably because Walmart, number one on the fortune 500 with $220 Billion (with a B) in annual revenue (compared to Microsoft which is 72nd with $25 Billion), has sucessfully used predatory pricing to drive out of business all of the small mom-n-pop businesses and most of their larger competitors.

    Before we all jump on the WalMart bandwagon just because we think they are taking a swipe at Microsoft, we must remember that this is the company that used its power to force record labels to produce two copies of every album (one nice for Walmart and one naughty for everyone else).

  21. Re:oh my gosh are y'all stupid? by kwik_mart · · Score: 3, Insightful

    not everyone has the time or the inclination to go out and find, buy, and assemble all of the parts into one machine. Some people might just not be into the hardware scene enough to want to do that. I'd buy I clone because I'd just have more fun fixing it when it sucks and breaks. The problem here is that for a long time you could only buy a computer *with* an operating system, and the only OS the store would give you to choose was Windows. It sounds like something called coercive tied selling to me (salesperson implying that you must buy one product in order to buy the other). Maybe before building your own was the best way to avoid that problem. Maybe people are just saying that they're glad it's not like that now, and they can just go out and buy a computer like anyone else would.

  22. Not exactly OT - Consider the Date. by SubtleNuance · · Score: 4, Informative

    I would suggest you all consider NOT shopping at Walmart -- for anything at all -- read this please

    It is very sad that this story is also posted on May Day, which is (as another /. headline states) Labour Day everywhere else in the world but Canada, USA and SouthAfrica. Did you know May Day became Labour Day because of the American Labour Movement? Read a little history here

    1. Re:Not exactly OT - Consider the Date. by hyperizer · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Not to mention they:
      • drive away locallly owned businesses
      • are notorious for having unsafe stores and parking lots
      • are America's largest retailer of music, yet only carry censored versions of CDs, thus influencing the music industry
      • pour money into the Republican party (which may or may not be a problem for you)
  23. Re:build your own by Masem · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I recently had "built" my own system (I had previously done card swaps, HD installs, etc, but where the mobo was already in place). Unfortunately, I believe, I started this with a 1.2gHz tbird. Not a bad chip, but this was a chip line that ran hot and right before the introduction of the next line that ran much cooler. With everything in place I had no problem getting a system going -- but I was alarmed by rather high chip temperature, at least as I percieved it: during warm days in late spring, CPU temps in 50-55 deg C with load (with a modern gfx cpu also running at load), approx 22 deg C above the southbridge temp. sensor. I *knew* that this chip could go to 95 deg C before the die was damaged, but this also carried the cavaet that the CPU temp probe may be as much as 30 deg C too low due to placement. I realize that when I read others' reports of the same chip (and mobo combo as well) that my temps are certainly within ballpark if not lower, but I was still concerned particularly with warmer weather still on it's way.

    So over the next 2 weeks I spent a good amount of cash in getting additional cooling equipment: additional rear case fans, a slot fan, etc. I was able to shave a few degrees off the max temp under the warmest days. Of course, these weren't installed at one shot, and each time I changed the internal configuration, I worried that something might fail.

    But finally I got it to the point of being a good little box, and hasn't had a problem since. However, I am still worried on it's temperature situation and monitor it often enough to make sure nothing weird is going on.

    But after that experience with newer CPUs, I'd much rather avoid all the hassle of building the system from scratch, and next time I'm looking, purchase a system that has been prebuilt to handle the cooling effectively and such that I don't have to worry about that at all. Obviously, the above boxes wouldn't be for gamers, but as the reviewer indicates, would work well for a linux install as well as average-joe users if they wanted to install WinXP/2K on it. I'd consider getting one of these particularly since I would not expect custom shops to be able to beat that price easily without cutting more corners.

    --
    "Pinky, you've left the lens cap of your mind on again." - P&TB
    "I can see my house from here!" - ST:
  24. Re:build your own by GutBomb · · Score: 2

    amsung is not known for hard drives, however there is nothing inherently wrong with samsung hard drives. I have one in my wife's machine, and lots of laptops use samsung drives with no problems. as for microstar, they are very reliable boards for the price. If i was forced to use an integrated board I would choose microstar. although the shared memory is kinda bad. Microstar beats the hell outta amptron. Overall i think the wal mart low end system is GREAT for the price. 1 GHz value CPU, 40GB hard drive, 128 MB RAM for only $349? sounds great to me.

  25. Re:MS? Wal-Mart definitely hurts more people. by Technician · · Score: 2

    -without the knowledge of the employee or their families-

    Nice troll. I heard the same radio program. The big complaint was when an employee died, the family did not recieve the bennefit. There was no mention the employee or the family bothered to pay the premium. Both could have taken out a policy if they wanted to be the benificiary. It was a case of sue for the money whether you have a right to it or not! Too bad the broadcast distorted the picture so the family looked like the victim they were not.
    Now if they billed the family for the premium and then kept the benifit, then you would have a real issue!

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  26. That was sort of a let down.. by Uttles · · Score: 2, Insightful

    All he tested was a Duron at 1GHz. I would like to see the results from doing the same tests with the higher end models. The way he made it sound, you could get a much better PC for about $600 and most of the components would probably be PCI and not wired to the motherboard. When you get the lowest of low end, like a Duron, it frequently comes with one of those do-it-all motherboards that has substandard (in my opinion) components, such as the modem and ethernet interface.

    It was a thorough review of the low end machine, I admit, but I'd really like to see how the higher end machines performed. $880, or whatever he said the max price was, isn't that much for a 2Ghz machine with 512MB ram, and I think that would still be a "price concious" buy for a linux user.

    --

    ~ now you know
  27. Install fests!! by LinuxHam · · Score: 4, Interesting

    or what if Walmart hosted install days?

    Advertise for customers to order the PCs up to a week or two in advance to allow for delivery. Then have them return to the store on the selected Saturday & Sunday to pick up their new PC and have Linux installed on site for free by local geeks. They could sell books and distros near the install area. I'd do it at the local Walmart, no problem.

    And I bet RH would supply tons of free CD kits. Hell, use one of the machines to burn CDs for the customers! That'll freak 'em out for sure.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  28. Re:build your own by Salamander · · Score: 2
    a Samsung 40 gig.. Samsung is far from a reputable HD company

    On what notion of "reputable" do you base that? Among professional storage folks, Samsung drives have a perfectly decent if not stellar reputation. Sure, their drives are no performance kings, but they're as reliable as anything else and are generally above average wrt environmental factors such as heat and noise. IBM is supposedly a "reputable" vendor, but look at their GXP series. Other vendors have put out clunkers from time to time as well. Who do you think is better, and what evidence do you have to back that up?

    they didn't mention RPM's.. which ill assume is 5400rpm.

    RPMs don't matter; performance matters, and this isn't supposed to be a rule-the-road kind of machine anyway. For mom and pop surfing the web and so on, there's no way the fact that it's a 5400RPM drive is going to matter even one little bit.

    Only 128mb of RAM? and its shared with onboard video ?

    If there's one place that they might have been a little bit too skimpy, it's here. It's a budget machine, sure, but RAM's dirt-cheap right now. An upgrade to 256MB would give a lot of bang for the buck, more than doubling the memory available to the OS and applications.

    a MicroATX motherboard? wow, forget upgrading.

    It's not as bad as you think. MicroATX is an increasingly popular form factor, with quite a few good boards available from well-regarded vendors. Motherboard swaps are pretty rare compared to other types of upgrades anyway, and spec-compliant cards fit just fine. Lastly, it's not uncommon for budget-oriented machines to have limited expandability; some of the most common vendors of full-ATX systems are less upgradable than this.

    In short, you're wrong that the board being MicroATX has a significant effect on upgradability, and even if you were right it's a common and acceptable tradeoff for this class of machine.

    Microstar, another not too reputable manufacturer

    Nonsense. Microstar products are mediocre, but no worse. There are a lot of worse vendors, even among the big names. While it would be insane for an enthusiast to buy a Microstar board, it's a reasonable choice for a budget PC.

    In short, you're a snob. Your criticisms of the components seem to be influenced more by advertising and name recognition than on a realistic consideration of the components' and vendors' actual track records, and you resolutely refuse to accept that the requirements of building a budget mass-market PC are very different than those affecting an enthusiast such as yourself. This is a perfectly reasonable machine for its target market, even if the lack of an endorsement from Britney Spears seems to bother you.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
  29. Why not pre-install Linux? by dunstan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    How much would it cost W'mart to sell these machines with a pre-loaded Linux image? Surely if they cut a gold image it would only cost a few cents to ghost them onto the hard drives before they went into the machines? Or they could produce a "recovery CD", which restores a Linux image which works on that hardware?

    How much better for the customer to go home with a system which they can plug in and start playing nethack straight away without having to obtain and install a Linux distro.

    And it would annoy the crap out of M$.

    Dunstan

    --
    The last scintilla of doubt just rode out of town
    1. Re:Why not pre-install Linux? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > How much would it cost W'mart to sell these machines with a pre-loaded Linux image? Surely if they cut a gold image it would only cost a few cents to ghost them onto the hard drives before they went into the machines? Or they could produce a "recovery CD", which restores a Linux image which works on that hardware?

      It would cost them support, which they currently don't have - you install the OS, you support it. If they preinstall the OS, customers could reasonably expect Walmart to support them, and Walmart doesn't really want to be in the full-service OEM business, they want to be bare box shifters. They'd have to explicitly state that OS support comes from the OS vendor, not them.

      Walmart doesn't give a damn about annoying/not annoying Microsoft, Walmart cares deeply about lowering their costs / maximizing their profits as much as humanly possible. So, unnecessary support costs are Not Going To Happen.

    2. Re:Why not pre-install Linux? by dunstan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Since when does a machine with Windows pre-loaded come with any support? If the machine is shipped with a recovery CD (you boot the machine from it, and it is back in the same state as when it came from the shop) then that's as much support as you get with pre-installed Windows. They could also contract a third party (e.g. RedHat?) to provide support via a premium rate phone service.

      This would be a perfect embodiment of what RMS wrote 15 (or more) years ago - that if software is free then businesses can make money out of selling support and handholding.

      How does this help Walmart make bigger profits? Because they will ship *far* more machines if they are "working systems" where prople can do real work (and play real games) rather than bare machines which need someone to install an OS before they can do anything. Remember, the whole Windows OEM scam started with the premise that "people shouldn't have to install an OS before they can start using their computer".

      Dunstan

      --
      The last scintilla of doubt just rode out of town
    3. Re:Why not pre-install Linux? by JordanH · · Score: 2
      It might be even neater for them to have 5 or 6 Linux distros on ghosted CDs all customized for these configurations, ready to install in the store.

      That might impress people about Linux. Oh, new computer user? Here, have this Lycoris. Linux purist? Would you like Gentoo or Slackware? Server? Have this RedHat or SuSe. All installed free of charge while you go shop the store.

      Maybe have Lycoris or similar on all the machines already, to make it really easy for people who don't know enough to express a preference. Maybe try to sell those people the distro itself, so they can have the 30 days of handholding.

    4. Re:Why not pre-install Linux? by 56ker · · Score: 2

      It would put up the price though. The people who buy these machines usually have the techonology to burn their own Linux CDs anyway.

    5. Re:Why not pre-install Linux? by frankie · · Score: 2

      How much would it cost W'mart to sell these machines with a pre-loaded Linux image?

      I bet it would cost them even less (and be more likely to happen) if a reputable Linux distro volunteered to compile the custom build, do QA testing, and create the master HD image for them. Anyone? Anyone? Bueller?

  30. Re:build your own by Drachemorder · · Score: 2
    Let's see. I'm a redneck, I live in Mississippi, and I built my own computers and installed Linux on them.

    Not all rednecks are stupid. :-)

  31. Attention Wal-Mart Shoppers by ebooher · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Look, you are viewing this backward I think. Maybe I'm the one viewing it backward. The point is this, however.

    Wal-Mart does not care about the people who are usually shopping at Wal-Mart when they are selling them these computers. This, in my humble opinion, was never about the typical Wal-Mart shopper.

    Someone in Wal-Mart management was only just savvy enough to recognize that there was a computer community in full force that did not want to have Windows on their computer. It goes back to the basics of supply and demand.

    There is a community of people demanding that computers be available without Microsoft anything.

    There is now a supplier of computers without Microsoft anything.

    Now, with news sites like Slashdot running stories on it. More people are going to be saying to themselves. "I could hit walmart.com, pick up a new clone and drop linux on it." Some of them might even be saying "I could drop my existing copy of Windows on it."

    Even if the machine isn't a major name brand, Wal-Mart has more people than ever looking their way now because of this. With the whole Microsoft trial, and the all the anti-Microsoft sentiment right now, this is probably just the thing for Wal-Mart to do.

    Even if they can't pull in the "build it yourself" crowd. Joe Sixpack has heard from all his buddies who are in the crowd how bad the "Microsoft Tax" really is. Even if they end up installing Windows anyway, these machines still get a quick look.

    The only thing I can say is that it appears to be a win/win situation for Wal-Mart.

    --
    "Genius may shine aloof and alone, like a star, but goodness is social, and it takes two men and God to make a Brother."
    1. Re:Attention Wal-Mart Shoppers by JCCyC · · Score: 3, Funny

      The only thing I can say is that it appears to be a win/win situation for Wal-Mart.

      And a lin/lin situation for us.

      (Sorry, I couldn't resist. The Devil made me do it)

  32. Re:something else to consider by Drachemorder · · Score: 3, Insightful
    It's been mentioned before, and is probably true, that people buying these machines are using "pirated" copies of Windows, not Linux, FreeBSD, etc.

    That is perhaps true. However, there are also people whose cheap computers have just died, and they need a new one, and they already have a "legal" copy of Windows that was installed on the dead computer (assuming that it's not an OEM version tied to the original hardware). That's a completely legitimate use that not even MS can really argue with.

    And then you have people who are buying a second computer (for the kids perhaps) and are going to install one copy of Windows on both of them. Microsoft might call that piracy, but most reasonable people wouldn't.

    With that in mind, the number of people who are actually pirating Windows --- in the sense of actually going and downloading XP from Morpheus or some such just to avoid paying for it --- to put on a new computer is probably not quite so large as you theorize. It's probably still mostly going to get Microsoft POed, though, because they're going to perceive it as encouraging piracy.

    Microsoft might be the 2,000 pound gorilla ... but Wal-Mart is a pretty big ape itself. They could stand up to MS if they really want to.

  33. Re:OEM Licenses by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 2

    would a company still qualify for the MS OEM reduction, if they sold an OS-less pc, but included a cd of a linux distro, without actually installing it?

    A mom and pop vendor, or even someone like Gateway and Dell would probably not be able to get away with this, but because Walmart is the world's largest corporation, it can force Microsoft to accept this action. If Microsoft did not like it, then Walmart could threaten to discontinue selling all Microsoft products altogether, which is definitly something Microsoft would not want. I don't know how big Walmart's computer sales are compared to its overall revenue, but I can't imagine that not selling PCs (along with any other Microsoft software and products) would force it out of business. On the other hand, Microsoft would lose a MAJOR distribution channel for its products (not just OS's, but Office, mice, games, etc.) if it pissed Walmart off.

    --
    In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
  34. Re:Only if the Best-Buy exists by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 2

    >> we must remember that this is the company that used its power to force record labels to produce two copies of every album (one nice for Walmart and one naughty for everyone else).

    I hate censorship as much as the next guy...(however I am now a father and can appreciate not wanting your kids subjected to all of that crap) ... But why would I base a computer buying decision on if the store offered "alternative clean" CD's? I can see they understand that their clients (shoppers) are more family oriented and may want to purchase "today's music" without "today's decedent message..." (In my days it was fu*k like a beast --- now days it's fu*k a beast.)

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  35. Why not ask them to? by awptic · · Score: 2

    Why doesn't Wal-Mart just preinstall linux themselves on these? It would expose Linux to people who otherwise probably wouldn't try it, and hey.. maybe they'll even like it and keep it!

    1. Re:Why not ask them to? by ichimunki · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Because Wal-Mart is not selling these to push Linux. They are selling these because some people who already own computers (and have install CDs for Windows of some variety) would like to save a few bucks on newer hardware without having to rebuy their OS. That much is obvious from their choice of modems.

      --
      I do not have a signature
  36. Re:oh my gosh are y'all stupid? by rosewood · · Score: 2

    if you read the user comments they link to a few sites that sell OS-Less Laptops

    Also, www.shackstore.com will sell you a laptop sans OS

    and also Ive been told if you specifically ask for no os and order over the phone, Dell will sell it to you w/o an OS -- but IIRC there is no price discount.

  37. Re:build your own by Salamander · · Score: 2

    Wrong. Building a PC from scratch requires quite a bit of knowledge - not deep knowledge, but broad. Jumpers and DIP switches and voltage settings and connectors that are easy to insert backwards. Non-obvious concepts like master vs. slave vs. cable select. How to install a heatsink/fan without cracking the CPU core, and so that it actually provides the necessary cooling. How not to zap your system into oblivion with static. Get one thing wrong and your system won't even get into the BIOS...now, or perhaps forever if you really managed to screw up.

    Linux installs on vanilla hardware have gotten pretty damn easy, even for novices. Building a custom machine, and then installing Linux and XFree86 with the right drivers (because the basic install might not recognize what you have or know how to set it up properly) is still very hard for most people. It's a hill - not a mountain - they're just not interested in climbing, nor should we expect them to. They have better things to do with their time; they're willing to pay someone else to put together even a mediocre computer system rather than have to deal with it themselves, and that's a valid choice. I also have better things to do with my time than learn how to fiddle with my car's engine, so I pay someone else to do that. Civilization itself is based on that same willingness to pay someone else for their specialized skills, and it's hardly a bad thing. Just think, if everyone did learn how to do this stuff themselves, you'd no longer have even that one lame reason to feel so special.

    --
    Slashdot - News for Herds. Stuff that Splatters.
  38. Re:Write to them NICELY!!! by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Write to Wal-mart customer services and point out how silly it is to include a WinModem with an OS-less PC. Ask if they will be supplying proper modems with their PCs in future.

    Please write to them in friendly, non-condesending words how helpful it is to offer non-winmodem PC's, of make modem an option. Being a jerk is unlikely to have your letter read past the "Dear Bloated Sack of Protoplasm" salutation. It's a big step for Wal-Mart, love 'em or hate 'em, and if it's a success than others will likely follow suit. If Wal-Mart sees it as a failure and the type of customer they've attracted as obnoxious jerks, the decision to drop it and declare it a bad business decision will be that much easier.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
  39. Worked well with Win2kpro by Larry_Dillon · · Score: 2

    I installed 2k Pro for non-profit on one of their 1.4 athlon's. It came with good driver cd's for M$ products. A bit loud, but working fine.

    --
    Competition Good, Monopoly Bad.
  40. BTC bare PC for $250 at Fry's by bcrowell · · Score: 2
    I'm posting this on my $250 PC I bought recently at a Fry's in Southern California. I'm pretty happy with it. It comes with trimmed-down Linux, which I replaced with Mandrake.

    It has a winmodem, which I couldn't get to work. Don't know whether BTC has their own propretary driver module or if there is really an open-source driver available. Anyway, I just ended up buying an external modem for $30 on e-bay, and that works fine.

    A few minor problems: I had to turn on sw_cursor in my XF86Config, because the video card's hardware acceleration feature for drawing the mouse cursor wasn't working correctly. (This was an intermittent bug that would show up every day or two.) Ethernet also didn't work correctly at first. Had to download the mii and 8139too modules and add the relevant insmod lines to rc.modules.

  41. About the modem by AchilleTalon · · Score: 3, Informative
    I haven't try with the actual Walmart PC, however, I own a Lucent modem and I made it working fine without recompiling the kernel.

    The source code compiles fine and a script complete the installation. There is even pre-packaged drivers for many distros including: RedHat and Debian. So, yes it is not straight forward, but is not as painful as recompiling the kernel.

    --
    Achille Talon
    Hop!
  42. Wal Mart != evil (IMHO) by chainsaw1 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Wal Mart's can be hard to find in cities, so many people may not know what a godsend they are to rural america. WalMart stores are typically located on cheap land--which is mostly rural America and out suburbs of the some large towns they can be found in. It's very similar to how Southwest on flies into and out of cities/airports with cheap airport fees and terminal space.

    And I encourage you to look at WalMart's prices and compare with others. They _are_ pretty damn low. Even in the small rural towns where Wal Mart has already put small mom & pop stores out of business and cornered the market. This is about the only downside of WalMart's--the little guys can't compete with them.

    They provide many items which may not be sold in the immediate area also (shopping selection in rural America tends to be very limited). They have a good distrobution system where the ship the things that aren't selling real well in one location to another where they are during the night via truck. For instance, during the Missouri floods they would bring in sand, shovles, flashlights from other stores and ship things like riding lawnmowers and plastic play pools out.

    This sounds more like a hit piece against corporations/Fortune 10 than truth. The article is seething with angst and loathing from the denotations of the adjecives and adverbs used.

    Also remember, Sams is also connected to the Waltons and contributes heftily to the profits also. Anyone who has bought one bag of chicken wings for $10 to feed themselves for a month knows the joy of Sams :)

    --
    - Sig
    1. Re:Wal Mart != evil (IMHO) by Bastian · · Score: 2

      This is about the only downside of WalMart's--the little guys can't compete with them.

      That and the products made in Saipan so they can be produced in third-world sweatshops and still bear a "Made in the USA" label.

  43. Walmart is very price sensitive by jhines · · Score: 2

    They need to offer a sweet deal on a cd set to sell along with it. Allow Walmart to hit a price point, like under USD $20.

  44. read this book by EddydaSquige · · Score: 3, Interesting
    read this book by Bill Quinn. It describes how truely evil Wal-Mart is. I've seen small town that have had their retail economies stripmined by Wal-Mart, and seen towns have to hire ful-time legal staffs whose job is solely to keep Wal-Mart out. In Grey's Harbor WA, after the town voted down Wal-Marts bid to buy property to build, they discovered that most of the other bids where placed buy Wal-Mart though dummy corporations.

    I'd rather live in a world dominated by Bill Gates than one dominated by Sam Walton.

    1. Re:read this book by grub · · Score: 3, Informative


      I'd rather live in a world dominated by Bill Gates than one dominated by Sam Walton.

      Woo, that would be creepy as Old Sam died in 1992.
      I'd be horrified to see his lumbering corpse giving orders over his zombie global domination network.. "Brains.. BRAINS!"

      --
      Trolling is a art,
  45. Re:In case of Slashdotting by qurob · · Score: 2, Insightful

    [i]If I had wanted to keep Windows on the machine, I would have had to manually install drivers for both the ethernet and sound card, because Windows did neither on installation.[/i]

    Yeah, recompiling the kernel is SO much easier than checking "Use a driver from specified location"

  46. Re:something else to consider by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 2


    However, there are also people whose cheap computers have just died, and they need a new one, and they already have a "legal" copy of Windows that was installed on the dead computer (assuming that it's not an OEM version tied to the original hardware).

    That's a pretty big assumption. You'd have to go back quite a few years to find an Windows preinstall that wasn't tied to the hardware. You have got to pay the Microsoft Tax, as many times as possible, says Microsoft.

  47. Re:Windows as well by OwnedByTwoCats · · Score: 2

    Ping! The light bulb goes on. Did Microsoft actually say that you "purchased" a copy of Windows? Not that you "licensed" a copy...?

    What does that do to the "this software is licensed, not sold..." term in the EULA?

  48. Re:Pirated Windows by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

    Most people buy new PCs as replacements for, not supplements to, their old one

    You really think most people just throw away their aging computers? (not asking in a snobby voice, just pondering.) I would have thought differently, really. As the kids start growing up, I would think the oldest kid would always get the newest hand-me-down, and so on down the line. It's just the geeky few who actually network the house and firewall it off. The rest of them just share a 2nd phone line.

    I seriously think AOL will consider releasing a Linux distro targetted at recently-replaced machines.. great to give to Grandma and your average ten year old. That whole idea relies on families keeping older PCs around that have been replaced.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  49. Re:Only if the Best-Buy exists by elefantstn · · Score: 2
    Walmart...has sucessfully used predatory pricing to drive out of business all of the small mom-n-pop businesses and most of their larger competitors.


    You say "predatory pricing," I say "efficiency and selection." Let's be clear: the reason Walmart is successful is because lots of people like to shop there. I personally don't, unless I'm looking for something like an inexpensive appliance, but lots of people really do.
    --
    If it ain't broke, you need more software.
  50. Show me a driver for a type 048c Lucent modem by RC+Pavlicek · · Score: 5, Informative

    I'm the author of the piece at NewsForge.

    Let's get this straight: the modem does not work.

    The people who say they have a working Lucent modem do not have this Lucent modem. This Lucent modem (type 048c) is not supported by any driver I can find. One of the people who insisted that the modem works had a type 0440, which is supported by the Lucent driver.

    If someone has a patch that makes the 048c modem work, I'll be glad to try it. But the ltmodem driver does not have it, according to the documentation.

  51. Modem DOES NOT work by RC+Pavlicek · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Yes, you can get a driver at that location.

    But, according to the documentation, that driver DOES NOT support the specific chipset used in this particular Lucent modem.

    The Lucent driver does not support ALL Lucent modems.

  52. Re:OEM Licenses by Kamel+Jockey · · Score: 2

    Maybe they should try it then

    I believe that the fact Walmart is even selling OS-less PCs is proof that they are trying it already. They most likely didn't ask MS if they could do this, they just saw a market and are trying to make money by filling it. IMO, the best part about Walmart's buying power is that they can dictate to MS (and any other supplier) exactly how much Walmart will pay them for a copy of Windows, Office, etc., instead of the other way around.

    --
    In case of fire, do not use elevator. Use water!
  53. Re:Write to them NICELY!!! by aquarian · · Score: 2

    "Proper" modems are expensive, winmodems are cheap. Many winmodems do work with Linux- drivers have been written for them. There's no reason not to use one of these. However, it must be one of these...

  54. Re:Cursor dirt by bcrowell · · Score: 2
    Mandrake's config file already had the following in the graphics device section:

    # Option "sw_cursor"

    I just had to uncomment it.

    What's SiS? Is that a chipset? I don't even know what video chipset this machine has -- Mandrake just autodetected it.

  55. How does this benefit newbies? by Skim123 · · Score: 2

    Linux users who are not going to use Windows face a Windows tax when buying a computer from a distribtor like Gateway, granted. However, what incentive would a new user have NOT to pay the Windows "tax"? You may say that the user wishes to save however many dollars extra is costs to have Windows preinstalled, but realize that that money's going to go straight to buying RedHat (or whatever).

    Yes,yes, I know these are downloadable for free, but what *newbie* is going to download the image files and burn them to a CD? Unless the newbie wants to try out Linux, I'd wager that the costs for either option are roughly the same. (RedHat 7.2 costing $59.95 - I don't know what the tax is on a Windows OEM version, but I'd bet it's comparable.)

    I guess I just don't see how this cheaper model (stripped of the "Windows tax") really saves newbies much money, if any at all...

    --

    I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

    1. Re:How does this benefit newbies? by Ziviyr · · Score: 2

      I guess I just don't see how this cheaper model (stripped of the "Windows tax") really saves newbies much money, if any at all...

      How about this then?

      If they're forced to buy Windows and they want Linux, Windows does not provide Linux, so they will buy Linux and will have paid unnecessarily for Windows.

      Not paying for Windows would have saved them money.

      --

      Someone set us up the bomb, so shine we are!
    2. Re:How does this benefit newbies? by Skim123 · · Score: 2

      I agree with you there, if a newbie WANTS to install Linux, then yes, this saves him money. But if he's saying, "I'll use Linux just because it will save me money," then, unless he gets an image off the Web, he's really not saving anything at all. That was the point I was trying to make...

      --

      I could not justify my existence if I were a turkey farmer. Would I terminate myself? Undoubtably, yes.

  56. WinModem by StaffInfection · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Keyword that should have been included in this article is WINMODEM. Drivers have not been distributed with the latest distros of linux, but there is a .org of developers that have Linmodem drivers under construction. Presently beta versions though. Good article though. Walmart should have sold the HW with full HW modems but that would have tacked on another $50.

    Jaxs

  57. What? by timster · · Score: 2

    Okay, first off, corporations are imperfect by definition, so yes, Wal-Mart has done some bad things. I know that personally. But your examples are inane.

    Let's say you own a small bookstore. As a retailer, what you do is buy things on one hand and sell them on the other. You put books on your shelves and you hope people buy them.

    Do you have an obligation to stock any particular book? If you're a gaming bookstore, are you going to have teachers banging on your door, demanding that you stock more books about science and math? If you do run a science-oriented bookstore, are you going to have Christians banging on your door, demanding that you stock Christian Bibles?

    Maybe you will, but you'll send them on their way, or call the police if they get too annoying. And you'll be in the right.

    Any retailer has to make decisions about what they will and will not stock. More importantly, any retailer has the unalienable RIGHT to decide what to stock. The size of the retailer has nothing to do with it, because abuse of monopoly power is about things you do to your *competition*. If Wal-Mart would only stock albums from publishers who would not sell to K-Mart (aka Microsoft in reverse), that would be an abuse of a monopoly.

    Wal-Mart controls what they put on their shelves. Not you, and not the government. And certainly not the bands or the publishers. Misunderstanding this makes you look like someone who doesn't understand the system. Wal-Mart isn't coercing bands; that's ridiculous. That's like saying you're coercing Hershey's to stop using almonds whenever you buy a candy bar that doesn't have almonds.

    Whenever you use an argument like this, think about what you're suggesting. For example, are we suggesting that the government should prevent Microsoft from forcing OEM's to load Windows only? I think so. Do you want to suggest that the government should allow the music publishers to control what Wal-Mart is required to stock on the shelves it owns? I think not.

    --
    I have seen the future, and it is inconvenient.
    1. Re:What? by vrmlguy · · Score: 2

      Well, Wal-Mart and K-Mart both just happened to decide that neither of them are going to sell your CD. They claim that it's because it's a piece of sh*t, but I think that they are colluding to exclude tone-deaf musicians from the marketplace.

      --
      Nothing for 6-digit uids?
  58. Re:Walmart by lordsutch · · Score: 2
    When Walmart moves into a town they offer very low prices sometimes even lower than cost. After the smaller competitors are forced out of business they return to their regular prices. They may call it Grand Opening prices or whatever. This is illegal in many jurisdictions and unethetical in other areas.
    Do you have any evidence of this whatsoever? Wal-Mart sets prices on a regional or nationwide basis; if I walk into the Wal-Mart in Oxford, Miss., everything in stock will be the same price as it is at the Wal-Mart in Tupelo or Batesville or the umpteen stores around Memphis. The only difference is that the Oxford store, a pre-supercenter, doesn't have as good a selection as the others. (At least, this is the case for most products; I don't know about groceries, but that's a very different market than general merchandise.)
    --
    My Blog. Sela Ward can sell me long distanc
  59. Re:Wal-Mart is Good by Bob+Uhl · · Score: 2

    Why the hell was my post modded down? How can it be over-rated when it's not even rated? The moderators need to quit with the crack...

  60. Re:Redhat et al, should do something. by el_chicano · · Score: 2
    The true slavery of MS is trying to find your stupid Windows 98 disk!
    Which is why many Windows users copy the CAB files to their hard drive. In effect you end up with a few hundred megs of wasted hard disk space but you now longer have to waste time looking for the stupid CDROM...
    --
    A man who wants nothing is invincible