Slashdot Mirror


HP, Compaq Deal Approved

EyesWideOpen writes "The merger between Hewlett-Packard Co. and Compaq Computer Corp. (originally reported in this Slashdot story) is now official according to eWeek as well as SiliconValley.com. From the eWeek article:'Hewlett-Packard Co. today announced that it will complete its $19 billion buyout of Compaq Computer Corp. and that the merged companies will formally launch as the new HP on May 7.'For you investors out there, HP will begin trading under the new symbol HPQ on Monday." A message to the Interesting People list gives some insight into the shareholder voting procedure.

87 of 251 comments (clear)

  1. New stock symbol by quark2universe · · Score: 5, Funny

    HPQ, what does that stand for, Hewlett-Paqard?

    --

    Believe in things of which no person has ever learned
    1. Re:New stock symbol by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful

      When Compaq bought out DEC, they made a big deal out of their name, saying that the "Q" in Compaq
      stood for Quality. Yes, the DEC folks snickered at that, and still are.

      Evidently, Carly and Curly decided to do a tip of the hat to Compaq and change the symbol, probably to deliberately piss off the old guard at HWP so as to incite them to riot^H^H^H^H leave. Just one
      more example of [t]he[i]r arrogance.

      But, one thing hasn't changed - the 'Q' comes last! Maybe as an afterthought...

      Anyone who's bought a Compaq PC knows it, right?

      I'm an old DECcie, and have respect for my opposite numbers at HWP, and certainly feel badly for them that they've been saddled with the CPQ albatross. Let's hope that HPQ's PC division really shows its true colors (as it has by losing several million dollars a month for the last year or two), and maybe we can shuck it and Carly and Curly, and tell Master Gill Bates and the rest of the Wintel Weenies to fuck off, and then we can make some real money building real systems with real operating systems without bowing to Redmond six times a day.

    2. Re:New stock symbol by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Informative
      The stock symbol "HP" belongs to some mining company. This has been a source of confusion for a generation or so.

      Bruce

    3. Re:New stock symbol by thogard · · Score: 2

      HP won't be making anything off inkjets after next year or so. When the inkjet companies started looking at going into the Point Of Sale (POS) market, they quickly found that that merchants were not going to pay more when the system they have been using for 20 years works fine. So in an effort to break into that market they had to build printers that could cost a bit more but had cheap consumables. The result is some $500 POS inkjet printers that have ink cost less than the old dot matrix ribbons. This technology isn't in the home market because they won't be sellnig all thouse $50 ink cartages but there are a few companies out ot Tiawan that don't have any market share so they have nothing to lose and over the next year their home printer products will be rolling out.

  2. Naahh by brokenspoke · · Score: 4, Funny

    Not it's not tis: Hardly Passable Quality

    --
    -- I am Jack's sig line.
    1. Re:Naahh by swb · · Score: 3, Interesting

      We've bought a couple of batches of HP desktops here and they've been no worse or better than any other desktops (Compaqs, Dells).

      We've bought nothing but HP x86 servers here and have yet to disappointed by quality or workmanship standards. Even the documentation feels like it has links to the olden days when you actually got *good* documentation.

      The few Dell servers I've seen seem pretty cheap. They have been low-end boxes, but there's a flimsyness about them that makes them feel like desktop boxes with server nameplates.

  3. HP-aq?! by nbvb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    OK, now for the Big Questions (tm) regarding this merger...

    The desktop business isn't interesting. Neither are the handhelds, or the printer business.

    What _IS_ interesting is the Big Iron stuff...

    What happens to the PA-RISC stuff? All the HP-UX boxes? Superdome?

    How about the AlphaServers? The GS160's? The Wildfire clusters?

    OpenVMS?

    Himalaya NonStop? Where does _that_ stuff go?

    HP's got a history of taking stuff down the cul-de-sac and strangling it in favor of their own products (look up Apollo if you're curious)...

    So what happens to all the great technologies that Compaq's bought over the years??

    I hope they keep it alive. There's nothing (and I mean NOTHING) that clusters like OVMS. Transaction processing runs like a top on the Himalaya. SuperDome's got some neat functions too.

    This is where the interesting stuff to this merger is going to be. Who cares about the desktop business? :-)

    1. Re:HP-aq?! by Hanul · · Score: 3, Informative

      The desktop business is interesting, and the printer business is where the BIG money comes in, especially printer ink supply.

      PA-RISC is going to put to rest. 8900 will be the last PA-RISC CPU (currently it's 8700), then Itanium will take over completely. Same will happen to Alpha.

      There are some contracts to fulfill regarding VMS, but that does not mean there will be an emphasis on this OS. True64Unix will be phased out in favor of HP-UX, which MAY be replaced by Linux sometime in the future.

      The Compaq brands that will go on are the Intel stuff (ProLiants, notebooks) and handhelds. How the PCs are branded is unclear.

    2. Re:HP-aq?! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      What happens to the PA-RISC stuff? All the HP-UX boxes? Superdome?

      HP announced the end of PA-RISC before the merger announcements. It seemed at the time (though I do not recall any official announcement) that the intent was to port HP-UX to Itanium. Folks might note: HP-UX is the oldest commercial Unix on the market. They licensed Unix from Bell Labs back in the days when they still were called Bell Labs. HP has also announced the end of the 3000 line: good bye MPE/iX. Perhaps an equally interesting question is: where does OSF/1, aka Digital Unix, aka Tru64 go?

      How about the AlphaServers? The GS160's? The Wildfire clusters? OpenVMS?

      Compaq's well known plan was to port VMS to Itanium. With VMS shipping on 1G Alpha GS320s at this time there seems to be plenty of life in the high end servers running Alpha VMS, along with a "roadmap" to move to high end commodity hardware eventually.

      Himalaya NonStop? Where does _that_ stuff go?

      This is an intersting one. Compaq had announced the plan to port Himalaya from MIPS to Alpha, but I don't think that was ever accomplished. One might only guess that they'd target Itanium for an eventual port. That market moves very slowly and carefully though.

    3. Re:HP-aq?! by Hanul · · Score: 2, Informative

      >It seemed at the time (though I do not recall any official announcement) that the intent was to port HP-UX to Itanium You can buy Itanium-based systems pre-loaded with HP-UX 11.20 (on Itanium aka Merced) and 11.22 (on Itanium2 aka McKinley) from HP. Just visit the online shop.

    4. Re:HP-aq?! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Funny
      I think the intel IA-64, a direct descendant of PA-RISC, will take over at the high end.

      Regarding the other operating systems, I'm fortunate that I only have to worry about the Free Software ones. I do know that HP-UX will be around for a long time.

      Bruce

    5. Re:HP-aq?! by analog_line · · Score: 2

      As far as Alpha goes, there are a lot of pretty influential people within Compaq that are real big fans of Alpha and Tru64. Matter of fact, if you've ever been in the bowels of Compaqs datacenters, you'll see (or at least you would about a year ago) large patches of Digital blue. The fact that Tru64 and the Alpha are still around is mostly due to the tireless efforts of these kinds of people within Compaq (as well as those who were using Digital Unix before the Digital merger) but I've got the feeling that they're going to run up against the wall, if they haven't already. While I wish them well in keeping the Alpha and Tru64 around, I have the sinking feeling I should rather wish them well in the job search. Enron dying was bad enough for Houston. The jobs that HPaq is going to shed as a result of all this are going to really put it down for the count.

      And I wish HP-UX would die as a result of this, but there isn't a chance in hell of that happening, realistically. Gods, I hate HP-UX.

    6. Re:HP-aq?! by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 2, Interesting
      OVMS was slated to die a slow death as Compaq had decided NOT to port the operating system to Itanium

      This is not what our people heard from their briefing last year. We have been promised that OpenVMS would be on Itanium in a few years, this is nothing to do with the merger. The issue here isn't that Compaq would love us to move to other platforms but like many others we can't kick the cluster habit.

      Compaq has a number of agreements that it inherited from Digital and many of those are with the Feds (hard to wriggle out of) for OpenVMS systems over the next 15 or more years.

    7. Re:HP-aq?! by 4of12 · · Score: 3, Insightful

      ...then Itanium will take over completely. Same will happen to Alpha.

      If I were one of the HP engineers working on PA-RISC, it would be a bitter blow to concede defeat to Itanium while PA-RISC currently trounces it. (I know, I know, some HP people worked on Merced, too. But PA-RISC seems like a better product right now and for the foreseeable future.)

      Likewise, anyone at Compaq (DEC) that puts together Alpha servers has got to know that they beat Itanium to pieces. Might as well throw in the towel before the EV8 sees the light of day.

      I guess there's consistency between the two companies on their willingness to concede defeat to Intel in their 64 bit RISC lines.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
    8. Re:HP-aq?! by Jah-Wren+Ryel · · Score: 2, Informative

      All the Alpha engineeers were transfered to Intel last Summer to work on future Itanics. At least the ones that didn't quit out of digust (very few, according to usenet scuttlebut).

      --
      When information is power, privacy is freedom.
    9. Re:HP-aq?! by ZoneGray · · Score: 2

      The desktop business isn't interesting. Neither are the handhelds, or the printer business.

      What _IS_ interesting is the Big Iron stuff...


      Considering that Dell's market cap is now triple that of Sun's, I'm not so sure that's the case.

      It's worth noting, though, that of all the people now at HPQ from the combined companies, there's apparently not a single one who knows how to design an attracive laptop.

    10. Re:HP-aq?! by chill · · Score: 2

      From what some engineers at HP told me, the Itanium is pretty much a drop-in replacement for the PA-RISC processor. I brought this up at an HPOV class I was attending and was told that the Itanium is pretty much binary compatible with the PA-RISC.

      HP is a *big* seller of Unix in certain (non-ISP) markets. They are bigger than Sun in the Enterprise markets. They dwarf Compaq's Tru64, so I expect that product to be silently killed off

      --
      Learning HOW to think is more important than learning WHAT to think.
    11. Re:HP-aq?! by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
      I will be ordering an iPAQ.

      Given that both companies had handheld lines, there is a question of which ones will continue to be developed. The Jornada 700 series ran Linux well too (without official support from HP, although their labs were involved in porting) and the iPAQ does (again, without official support although Jim Gettys and his lab were porting). I would prefer to have a Linux palmtop that comes with Linux and doesn't need to get it loaded on after the purchase. That way, we'd get decent peripheral and application support. HP's only effort in that direction so far was directed toward the teenage market, and died when they saw how well the Palm m100 was doing. It would be nice to see more now.

      Bruce

    12. Re:HP-aq?! by laserjet · · Score: 2

      Having used HPUX 11.20 on a Merced HP server, i was fairly impressed. It is pretty darn fast, although I didn't have a very recent PARISC HPUX machine to compare it to directly.

      so even though I don't agree with dumping PARISC for itaniums, the transistion should be about as painless as possible.

      the cool thing is you can get an itanium server, and run HPUX, linux, or 'doze on it all the same. That has to do something for the bottom line, and make it cheaper to produce.

      PA-RISC was a damn fine platform, though. I will miss it for sure. Luckily, it's legacy will be around for years to come until all the older HP servers are obsoleted... which will be a while as they do their job just fine.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    13. Re:HP-aq?! by laserjet · · Score: 2

      what do you hate so much about HPUX? I like it quite a bit compared to other unixes. And please don't tell me that linux is better... if you say that, then you obviously have no idea what application HPUX is meant for.

      I am not trolling, but I find HPUX nice and easy to work with, and the hardware is well done.

      I suspect if you hate HPUX, it is because it is different to you, but you really should get to know it.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    14. Re:HP-aq?! by laserjet · · Score: 2

      You are not correct. HP announced long ago that PA-RISC is going bye-bye in favor of Itanium. It will be supported for some time to come, yes, but no new PA-RISC architectures will be produced beyond the 8900 series.

      This does not mean HPUX is going away, though. It runs fine on the Itanium, which you can purchase right now.

      --
      Moon Macrosystems. Sun's biggest competitor.
    15. Re:HP-aq?! by tfb · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I think they've finally blown all their feet off. The big machines are certainly the interesting bit, but their products are now even more of a tangled mess than they were before.

      The combined company has (among others):
      • Alpha and alpha-based machines. Alpha is officially dead. Tru64 presumably will die with it. Anyway people won't buy too many of these boxes. OpenVMS also runs here, but this also must be of only legacy interest by now.
      • PA-RISC and the HP-UX machines based on it. PA-RISC is also rumoured to be dead, although it's taking a while to go away.
      • Big x86 boxes from both companies, running Windows.
      • Itanium, which is meant to replace all of these. Except, that, oh dear, it doesn't really exist yet: it's horribly, horribly late (4 years plus), and no-one really knows if it will succeed, especially after everyone else has eaten the big-64bit-commerical-machine market.
      • (Oh, and they also have nicely overlapping desktop and laptop ranges too at the low-end.)

      So what are they going to try and sell you? They have *three* processor families, all officially to be replaced by something that doesn't work yet, two Unices, VMS, Windows, and maybe Linux. On top of this they need to unify the groups of people making these things, including finishing the digestion of DEC.

      This is just horrible. If you go to Sun, you know they're going to sell you a big SPARC box running Solaris. If you go to IBM you know they wrote the book on big machines and reliability. If you go to HPaq, it's probably going to be because you want a printer or a commodity PC, because the rest of their range is just completely confused.
  4. fu fiorina by unk1911 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    thanks fiorina. now that you've screwed up lucent, let's screw hp. my poor friend may be out of a job as a result of this merger?

    1. Re:fu fiorina by Master+Bait · · Score: 3, Insightful
      I've been an outside contractor doing things for HP for about 7 years or so. The old HP Way of cooperation amongst the people working there (Silicon Valley area, both Cupertino and Palo Alto) has been replaced by fear and back stabbing competition. There have been constant departmental 'reorganizations' accross the board ever since Fiorina came on.

      It has become a mess. The layoffs that are coming will seriously dampen wider economic recovery in the Tech sector, at least in No. California. But I understand that Carly and Curly get around $70 million in bonuses because of the merger. I wonder why they have such an incentive to grow their company's assets?

      --
      "Only in their dreams can men truly be free 'twas always thus, and always thus will be."
      --Tom Schulman
    2. Re:fu fiorina by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I've been an HP-UX admin for about 3 years (out of 10 years of being a unix sysadmin), and at this point I'm pushing my clients to go with Sun or IBM. HP support used to be the best in the business, but it's been rapidly going down the tubes for quite a while now. Ever since the merger was announced, it's been impossible to get someone who knows their ass from a hole in the ground on the phone. I guess all the good people beat it while the beating was good, and now they're staffed with whetever lemons they could catch with a butterfly net at the local bar. The FE's who service our account tell me morale is in the toilet, and their resumes are spread as far and wide as the fall leaves. All too frequently, they just blow off service calls without even bothering to call. I guess they know they're short timers.

      One good thing, if you need spare parts, hardware support will send you virtually anything just for the asking, whether it's covered by contract or not. I guess they just don't give a shit anymore. And who can blame them?

  5. Great news for Dell... by AVee · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...one competitor less.

  6. Can anybody clarify this? by blankmange · · Score: 2
    I don't know that I have read any reason as to why these two are merging to begin with; although there is this story that may clarify it for us all.

    Does this also mean that Walter Hewlett will finally shut up and go away?

    --
    ...we are from the government - we are here to help...
    1. Re:Can anybody clarify this? by mekkab · · Score: 2, Troll

      Yup. The board chose not to "invite" back the lone trouble maker. This is the first time there is neither a Hewlett nor a Packard on the board.

      I mean, what are you going to do to the whiny, cray-baby loser who just cost your company (and share holders) MILLIONS in advertising alone?! (not to mention of the proxy votes being sent, re sent, and sent yet again).

      Share holders shoulder that cost. So if you own stock, give yr thanks to Walt. A raspberry over the phone at 3am would be lovely!

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
    2. Re:Can anybody clarify this? by watanabe · · Score: 5, Interesting
      The comments that Walter Hewlett is a whiny cry-baby who is costing shareholder's money are just total crap.

      Read a bit about HP in, say, Good-to-Great, or other management books, and you'll understand that Carly Fiorina, current CEO of HP is a massive departure from the companies long term values, and it's showing in things like this purchase. I predict long term loss to shareholders from this merger -- it just doesn't make sense for HP. And the long-timers at HP knew it!

      I'm disappointed in the shenanigans the poster to the Interesting People list described, and frankly, Ms. Fiorina, if you ever read this, I'm disappointed in you. Please stop telling people the HP way is one that makes office politics irrelevant! You just look like a jerk.

    3. Re:Can anybody clarify this? by mekkab · · Score: 2

      I'm not arguing FOR Carly Fiorina...

      but mergers just don't happen becuase one woman has a vision... THE BOARD makes it happen becuase they deem the move will increase share-holder value.
      NOTE: I understand that sometimes the board doesn't know its ass from its elbows, and many board meetings are spent with the members sitting on their elbows ;)

      SO FIRST this merger had to pass by Walter (which I believe he okayed!!). Then he turns around 180 and drops everything to stop it after it was already voted on.

      If there was a time to voice opposition and remind people of the HP way. it was way before the board approved. This whole fight has cost a LOT of money. Almost every day there were 3-4 pages in the Wall Street Journal full of Pro and Against advertisements, all shouldered by the share holders.

      Now why is this important? Becuase Walter is on the board, and the boards mission is to increase share-holder value (As opposed to the CEO and managers whos mission is to keep their jobs!), and if Walter was acting in the best interest of the share holder this fight should have gone down long ago for much less money!

      Be disappointed in Carly, but also be disappointed in Walter.

      --
      In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  7. Who wants to bet by jhines0042 · · Score: 2

    The independent vote-tabulation firm, Delaware-based IVS Associates, reported 838,401,376 shares of stock were voted in favor of the merger, 793,094,105 shares were voted against, and 13,950,651 shares abstained.

    Who wants to bet that a lot of the folks who voted against the merger sell their stock?

    --
    42 - So long and thanks for all the fish.
  8. La De Frickin' Da by n-baxley · · Score: 2

    Who really cares if two aging giants get stomped on together or seperatly? Honestly, this whole court case has been a battle between a rich boy who is living off his father's brilliance, and two CEOs who are desperatly looking for something to lift their reputations out of the duldrums. How will this affect consumers, be they corporate or home? Not one bit other than to have 1 fewer meaningless "label" to choose from.

  9. AOL-Time Warner by gambit3 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Kids(I'm looking at you, HP), kids(I'm looking at you, Compaq), didn't we learn anything from the AOL/Time Warner Fiasco?

    I guess not.

    Let's see how they're doing in a year's time.

    1. Re:AOL-Time Warner by glitch_ · · Score: 3, Insightful

      They will probably be doing a lot better than AOL/Time Warner/CNN/Netscape/Time because the Compaq/Hewlet Packard merger is a more vertical merger (both companies in similiar marketplaces and business space), while AOL/Time Warner was a more horizantal merger where AOL and Time Warner were in completely different marketplaces.
      This merger has a chance of actually becoming a successful business.

    2. Re:AOL-Time Warner by new500 · · Score: 3, Funny

      . . .

      Nice link, that Time.com article. Especially the bit about AOL-TW stock effectively valuing the AOL compnent at ZERO :) Just repeating some thoughts below, which seem on topic here and worth reposting :

      To me it was always a story of AOL cashing out its funny money stock at the height of the internet boom. Many manias have come and passed, leaving a scorched trail of people who bought in too close to the last hurrah. My guess (since largely vindicated) was that Time - Warner was one such sucker.

      Nevertheless, TW was desperately seeking growth, as a mature massive media business. It's much harder to grow incrementally the larger you get and still hit that year on year percentage target for your shareholders. TW's growth prospects were heavily tied to, e.g., newsprint subscriptions, and the internet boom looked then to be able to run and run.

      As many corporations who have been out of fashion have found (think banks during the '70s, when all the "smart" money was in the conglomerate boom) out of fashion can quickly mean out of access to capital too, and print and press is desperately cyclical, and very capital intensive - worse even, tied to the sharp acceleration and decelleration of advertising which behaves exaggeratedly in synch with that most nebulous of economic indicators - sentiment.

      Things change, and may get better for AOL - TW, but boy does it look tough for them for the forseeable.

      Here's some selected quotes from recent Financial Times articles :

      But broadband is different. Anyone buying a high-speed internet access over a cable system, for instance, will already be paying for the cable company's own ISP. Why pay for AOL as well

      The logic of the synergies, and the merger itself, have failed. . . . shareholders consistently fail to restrain management from empire-building. . . a fine example of hope triumphing over reason . . .AOL used its overvalued paper to buy some real assets . . .Those loyal to Time Warner shares have underperformed the media sector by more than 60 per cent.

      It's a sad indictment of much of mainstream press that which was - to me at least (and allowing I spend a good deal of my time studying speculative bubbles) - plain dang obvious, is only talked about now - after we've all been hit by the train. But then it's easy to go with the flow, ain't it?

      P.S. Maybe someone still holding the stock should buy Gerald Levin (CEO at time of merger) a t-shirt with a slogan such as "I bought into the biggest merger ever, and all I got was this lousy CD-ROM". Okay, that's enough lame jokes from me . . .

    3. Re:AOL-Time Warner by glitch_ · · Score: 2

      I appreciate the correction. But I can't really see how AOL/TimeWarner was a vertical integration because AOL is only a medium for some content. AOL is a medium for online content, but it doesn't seem like it could be a medium for print, TV, Radio or any other type.

      Please correct me if I'm wrong.

  10. Re:scary by totallygeek · · Score: 2
    already horrible computer job market in houston.


    Maybe some people will consider smaller towns around Houston. I live in Victoria (couple hours drive South of Houston), and it is great here, but all the good computer people always move away to Houston, Austin, San Antonio or Corpus (all two hours away). Move on down here, there is plenty of work to be done!

  11. HP is probably the largest Linux company now by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This probably makes HP the largest Linux company by shipped product. Did you know that HP offers 24/7 support for Debian?

    The merger has not been a comfortable thing from day one, and the press coverage has been very disquieting. It's clear what people like me in the company should do now - our best to make it work, regardless of anything that happened on the way. I said a long time ago that this could be excellent for Linux, and I still think so. It's going to be fun.

    Thanks

    Bruce

    1. Re:HP is probably the largest Linux company now by Alioth · · Score: 2

      That maybe so, but it's one more megacorporation, one less competitor and ultimately, worse for the end-user as the big manufacturers clump together inevitably reducing competition.

      Why they call it a merger I don't know - it was a takeover: HP eliminating a competitor simply by buying them out. There are no marriages in business; only rapes!

      I may be biased - living in Houston, we are expecting our unemployment rate to go up as a direct result of this takeover.

    2. Re:HP is probably the largest Linux company now by Tadghe · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Bruce,

      I respect you immensely. I've been hearing the 'This is great for Linux' line from Carly, you and a few other OSS people since the merger was announced, but I have *not* seen anyone explain *why* this is good for Linux or OSS in general. Why is the merger a good Idea for the OSS crowd?
      I really would like to know. Right now I'm having to decide on what do I tell my clients when asked about buying HP/Compaq equipment, especially with regards to their Linux commitment. Will the DL380's with Linux compat LightsOut boards we have today still be supported 18 mos down the road by this new company?
      Should I tell them to check out the new Dell IU's or IBM's new line?

      Please for those of us who really need to know, why is the merger a "Good Thing(tm)" for Linux?

      --
      Bugs Bunny was right.
  12. Further details of the merger: by bravehamster · · Score: 4, Funny

    Compaq's fine consumer printing division will replace HP's struggling print division.

    Compaq will dissolve their business and enterprise division, and refer all service requests to HP consumer tech support.

    The new HP will announce a redesigned consumer level computer, named the Paviliario. Exciting new features to include 3 seperate proprietary motherboard connections, an LS-120 drive, and Windows ME. The Presarion business line is expected to be launched within the next few weeks.

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
  13. A bad idea all-round. by darkov2 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    $19 billion for Compaq? I'll give you $10 bucks for it.

    I have to say I still resent Compaq for buying Digital. They killed off all the good research and turned it into another homogenised, bland corporate. Digital used be be a great company with great products in their time. HP has made some great products in their time. I wonder how long before they become bland and homogenised, selling lowest-common denominator boxes, avoiding anything that looks like risk, imagination or anything else that used to propel the computer industry forward. Now the only ideas they have is a takeover deal (and another and another). Great! That'll keep the industry going for the decades!

    I'm just glad that no-one will touch Apple with a 10-foot pole. Everyone expects them to go broke every other week. No-one in corporate land really understands what keeps Apple afloat becuase it can't be boiled down to a finacing deal. And they probably realise that the customer loyalty and brand respect they enjoy will very probably evaporate if someone tried to buy it.

  14. Re:I don't see the point by AJWM · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Then they go and do this, it's Sure! to lay people off.

    Mergers pretty much always result in layoffs, since you end up with a lot of duplicate departments (HR, marketing, sales, some of the technical groups, etc.). Sure, the resulting company is bigger so you (maybe) need more people in each of those departments, but not as many as the sum of the two pre-merger companies.

    Compaq went for the deal because it was effectively a bailout for their stockholders. H-P went for the deal because...hmm, that one's tougher, which is why the vote was so close.

    Nominally it was to gain Compaq's foothold in the PC market, where H-P has been losing share. Why anyone would want to pay good money for such a position in a market that is slowing and rapidly commoditizing itself is another question.

    --
    -- Alastair
  15. From a casual view perspective by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I think this deal is *terrible*. Case in point: Both HP and Compaq make:

    (1) Laptops (bad ones at that)
    (2) Desktops (worse than their laptops)
    (3) Servers (no opinion)
    (4) Printers (used to kick butt, now I'm not so sure)

    So, with the merger going through, what divisions/departments get slashed?

    In my *uninformed, casual opinion* there is too much overlap of products and services, never a good sign. There will be chainsaw-like cuts throughout all departments and the end result will *not* be a good thing.

    I'd love to be wrong of course, but considering the rapid decline in the quality of the products bearing the Compaq and HP name in recent years, I really don't see this merger improving this.

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
    1. Re:From a casual view perspective by stephend · · Score: 2

      It's kind of like the Dilbert cartoon:

      Box 1. Guys, we're going to merge with our biggest rival. And the good news is that they like engineers!

      Box 2. In fact they already have a department that does exactly what we do.

      Box 3. Except they're younger and less well paid.

    2. Re:From a casual view perspective by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      Yep - I tend to agree. The products that overlap are so similar, I can't even see them getting much value out of new design ideas they obtained the rights for....

      Personally, I think both HP and Compaq built perfectly good servers. That said, they're all pretty much alike. I mean, let's face it. In the world of servers, all you really want is something that's fairly reliable (usually done by adding extra cooling fans and redundancy for things like power supplies), holds lots of RAM, and uses one of 2 or 3 major brands of SCSI 10K or 15K RPM hard drive. It's not rocket science to get this forumla right.... Even physical looks pretty much cease to matter with everything going to rack-mount cases. (Just don't paint the thing day-glo orange or something!)

      HP LaserJet printers are still pretty respectable, but that has more to do with compatibility than anything else. If the other leading manufacturers would concentrate a little more on good device drivers for all platforms, the differences would diminish quickly. (There's still the reliability issue though. We had an IBM Lexmark laser printer that was awful. Not only did toners cost more than any other brand, but it broke quite regularly. Bad design, all around - despite good print quality when it worked.)

  16. Re:The largest major supporter of Linux??? by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
    I think it does make them the largest Linux company by shipped units.

    Bruce

  17. But who will use who's computers? by mekkab · · Score: 2

    Much like AOL forcing Time Warner to use their e-mail system (which subsequently hosed up, cause e-mail to get lost, delayed, or appended with pix of britney spears) I'm sure there will be the typical integration woes.

    or maybe they'll all just use Dells...

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  18. Lame reasons, mostly by shaldannon · · Score: 2
    What it boils down to is "if you can't beat them, join them." HP and Compaq got tired of having their crappy knock-off proprietary PCs competing for shelf space at Worst Buy, Office Crepot, and so on, so they decided to join forces and monopolize the crappy PC market. I suspect that acquisition of Packard-Smell would be next if it hadn't already debased itself below Compaq. Maybe they'll try to get Gateway's PC business next.

    **SIGH**

    The thing that kills me about all this is
    1. As AOL-Time-Warner-Turner-etc have proven, mega-mergers are not a good thing for your business. The best way to run a business is to eliminate inefficiencies. Mega-mergers tend to magnify these problems
    2. When Compaq acquired DEC, DEC stock went south, in a hurry. Last time I took a finance class, the professor emphasized that a good merger usually resulted in the purchased company's stock going **UP**. What this tells me (nothing new, of course) is that Compaq is a company to avoid.
    3. Fiorina (or however you spell her name) seems to have missed where HP's core business is. It isn't in selling second-rate PCs to office store chains for resale. HP would have done itself **and** Compaq a favor by dropping that business line altogether if things were looking grim. In fact, HP has a much stronger bread-and-butter business selling mundane things like printers, calculators, and oscilliscopes.
    As for Mr. Hewlett...who knows. He certainly lost the lawsuit, but had also said he was considering his options. HP also didn't give him a chance to get his seat back, so when his term is up, he's out. I guess I'll sit back and watch things play out, but I for one think this merger was a foolish idea.
    --


    What is your Slash Rating?
  19. What about the Pocket PCs? by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2

    Compaq has the very popular iPaq line of PPCs, HP has the less popular Jornada line.

    Will they continue to make both, or will one get dropped in favor of the other?

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  20. Product line announcements on Tuesday by RocketScientist · · Score: 2

    The telling part of this merger, and a lot of answers on "why" will be answered on Tuesday when they announce which product lines they are keeping, and which ones are going away. Some choices are obvious, keeping HP's printers, for example. Others....

    Which to keep: NetServer or Proliant?
    Which to keep: Jornada or iPaq?
    Which to keep: HP Desktops or Compaq desktops

    They're both in the consumer and workstation PC markets. Which of those stay, and which go?

    All I've got to say is that if anything happens to the Proliant quality, there's gonna be a lot of IBM x440's bought on this end. Anybody got any guesses on which way the axe will fall?

    1. Re:Product line announcements on Tuesday by rcw-home · · Score: 2
      Which to keep: NetServer or Proliant?

      I was asked to research this at work a few weeks ago - here's a few links:

      News.com, December 11, 2001: "Businesses should limit these commitments to product lines that Gartner has already identified as strategically sound [...]: Compaq Proliant servers"

      News.com, March 8, 2002: "At a minimum, HP will adopt the Proliant line, according to every source interviewed"

      Steven Vaughan-Nichols, September 5, 2001: "the Proliant (always a troublesome line, in my experience), will gradually be phased away in favor of Netserver. I'll be surprised if there's a new 2002 line of Proliants." (...I tend to believe the opposite of whatever this man predicts.)

    2. Re:Product line announcements on Tuesday by Mr.Intel · · Score: 2

      Which to keep: NetServer or Proliant?

      From my personal experience, this is a no brainer. Proliant kicks the trash out of anything HP has had for years. I once managed a data center with 100 Proliants. In two years we had three drives (out of 400) and one power supply go bad.

      Which to keep: Jornada or iPaq?

      iPaq because of branding/name recognition. Jornada just doesn't have the market penetration of Jornada.

      Which to keep: HP Desktops or Compaq desktops

      Tough one there, but I would say merge the two and keep the best features from each. Throw out the crap and try using something a little less proprietary.

      --
      ASCII tastes bad dude.
      Binary it is then.
  21. The HP Way by zentec · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...is long gone. It's a shame too.

    In my previous jobs, HP test gear was a way of life. If you had a budget to buy new gear, no one was ever fired for buying HP. Now, that division is in shambles, the gear actually has flaws or is DOA, getting calibrations is a disaster and they've pretty much kissed-off a solid business for consumer electronics.

    I do not know how much of this was the fault of Fiorina, but all I can say is that it's my opinion that in a few years, HP will be remembered for what they once were, not consumer electronics and computers.

    It's a shame, but not unexpected. The visions of American corporations are tightly focused on the next two quarters, not on the long-run. They're willing to sacrifice long-term performance for short-term bumps in the financials and stock pricing. This is the crux of the games played in accounting, and it's a disaster that has yet to fully run its course.

    1. Re:The HP Way by barawn · · Score: 3, Interesting

      What kind of test equipment do you mean? Their test equipment and lab supplies spinoff, Agilent, is doing pretty well: many lab supplies you'd be crazy to buy anything except Agilent, and I'm (starting) to grow fond of the Infinium oscilloscopes, though Tektronix is still my preferred (I do NOT like seeing an oscilloscope bluescreen!). If you're buying lab power supplies, you're best off buying Agilent, as they're the most well known.

      Then again, it could be because I'm still IN a lab that's Agilent/HP dominated, so I might be biased without even knowing it. HP itself I don't think is that bad: printer-wise, they're still in the top running, IMHO.

      I'd be sad to see HP flounder simply because the high-end stuff faltered. Maybe they can spin off their printer division as well, so the stupid parts can die in peace. :)

    2. Re:The HP Way by barawn · · Score: 2

      Is Agilent doing that bad? I'm really curious, because as far as I can tell, they're doing fine. I definitely agree about the robustness of the equipment, though - for the most part we've had no problem with any of the lab equipment we have, and it's almost completely all HP/Agilent stuff.

      I mean, honestly, I wouldn't even know who ELSE to go with for equipment like that - in the labs I've worked in, they've all been HP/Agilent equipment.

  22. Thank you Mr. Sensitive by Mordaximus · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "from the massive-layoffs-coming-soon dept"
    From all of the employees of Compaq and HP who read Slashdot, Thanks for the reminder.

  23. Re:Wow by wilhelm · · Score: 2, Informative

    The plural of Unix is Unices. I've also seen it as Unixen, but I like the first better.

  24. A word from the home town of Deutsche Bank by anonymous+cupboard · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I work with computers in the financial industry in Frankfurt and the twin towers of DB's HQ are visible from where I work.

    Let me just explain something here. German banks offer depository accounts for shareholders to hold their shares. However, they have a nasty habit of making sure that the shareholder signs over their voting rights to the bank. This tends to give the banks a disproportionate vote. The German Association of Small Shareholders is fighting this, but it hasn't really happened yet.

    As the banks tend to have some interesting share positions themselves, this leads to major conflicts of interest. In the case of Deutsche Bank, they certainly have a large interest in IBM (not just as users, as shareholders).

    Last point, when was any large merger good for anyone except the banks and the lawyers doing the M&A work? It seems like they may have a win-win situation, with organising the financing and possibly seeing IBM benefit from the transaction.

    1. Re:A word from the home town of Deutsche Bank by hughk · · Score: 2
      The SEC has already looked at this and have said whilst they were unhappy about some aspects, there was nothing they could do.

      According to the article quoted Fiorina definitely did some questionable stuff though which makes me doubt her ability to be a team player. However DB, just looked carefully which way the wind was blowing and followed it. As you say they don't lose.

      --
      See my journal, I write things there
  25. Here is how it SHOULD break down. by OS24Ever · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Here's what I see happening from the tidbits I've garnered from many a customers discussion with their HP or Compaq Rep.

    1) Anything without an intel chip in it, the days are numbered. HP invested way too much in the Itanium / EPIC instruction set and they are going to can PA-RISC in favor of Itanium in their future Unix Machines.

    2) Compaq already said Alpha going bye bye in favor of Itanium.

    3) HP dumped their 3000 line...Can't see any non-intel compaq line sticking around much longer

    4) HP will dump their entire business line of Intel products, the Netserver, the Desktop PCs, and the Notebooks. This does not include the Best Buy crap, just the stop corps use, or should I say DON'T Use. Compaq's product line will become HP's product line for corporate intel servers.

    5) Toss up in the consumer market. HP & Compaq have been 1/2 in the retail division with the Presario/Pavillion, don't know/don't care what happens to them. In my personal experience of living vicariously through other people HPs Pavillions break more than the Presarios did.

    6) HP Should maintain it's printer division while Compaq fades away.

    7) The new company will claim all sorts of wlid thing like they've been supporting Linux the longest, they have the most Unix experience, etc trying to woo the Open Source community when in fact the people that are running the new HP never touched Linux, they just bought and destroyed other companies that did (Digital) and desperately have been trying to get some news bites about linux because other companies like VA Linux, Pengiun Computing, and IBM really support linux by giving things back to the community instead of just hoping it sells more of their servers/desktops.

    8) IBM and Dell will continue to chip away the lead of this new merger, just prolonging the inevitable die off of even more hardware companies. If past experience of mergers with Compaq involved mean anything it'll be 18 months of a mess before anything positive comes out, and Dell and IBM will continually be beating on that. Dell from a price perspective, and IBM from a technology perspective.

    --

    As a rock-in-roll Physicist once said, No matter where you go, there you are.

  26. This is great news by Colin+Smith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    These massive mergers invariably slash the worth of all the companies involved as they go through their departments indiscriminately hacking away. The only purpose is big bonuses for the execs.

    The bright side of this is that smaller companies who can actually produce quality products the people want and at reasonable prices will eat through the market share of the combined HP/Compaq like sharks at a feeding frenzy as customers desert the sinking carcass. And with all the layoffs from HP/Compaq that will be coming, there will be lots of talent around for the smaller guys to pick up.

    --
    Deleted
  27. Re:A Newbie Question... by danro · · Score: 2

    If Compaq purchased Digital, and HP is merging with Compaq, is HP-Compaq-Digital a Beowulf cluster of corporations?

    No, to much overhead.
    It will probably be more like a crash prone Windows 95 box ;-)

    No, seriously, chances are this will not work out very well.
    Or at least take years to get right.
    Time will tell.

    --

    "First lesson," Jon said. "Stick them with the pointy end."
  28. Re:How HP Rigged the Election... by shemnon · · Score: 2, Informative

    The shareholder meeting and Walter Hewlett's suit should have been held in Florida, because it wound up being a big stink about nothing on a tight schedule.

    Deutsche Bank had only 17 Million votes, and the margin of victory was 45 Million votes. If Deutsche bank swung the margin would have been 11 Million, still a squeaker but it would be the exact same result! (Unless the by-laws would have required a 50% approval rathern than a majoroty of votes cast, then it would have failed).

    Yest Carly was pulling an Al Gore with the votes (except for the part where she wins), but the result would have been the same: Hewlett Compaqard.

    (838,401,376 votes for 793,094,105 against for those who care, about 14 Million didn't vote)

    --
    --Shemnon
  29. Maybe now they can make shit that works by corebreech · · Score: 2

    I'm still trying to return this damn dvd100i. The thing is worthless, can't even play music CD's let alone burn anything.

    I have *very* fond memories of my HP-9100A and HP-41C calculators, but frankly, everything I've bought from HP after that has been shit.

    I'm getting sick of the smell.

  30. Exactly: rapidly commoditizing by sterno · · Score: 2

    That is one valuable thing is that if they can combine forces with Compaq, they can put themselves in a better position in the commodotized market of PC's. The problem with a commoditized market is that margins are razor thing so you have to be able to produce in vast quantities to make any money. There is still good money there, but only for the biggest players. Seperately they might not have the power to survive in the market, but together they stand a better chance.

    Sure the growth rate in PC's is slowing, but it's still growing at least and there will always be demand for upgrading of old systems, etc. It stands to be a cash cow for many years to come but only if you are a big player or a niche player (game machines, etc).

    Also, in this deal, think about hand helds which is definitely a fast growing market. The two leading manufacturers (I think they are leading, but correct me if I'm wrong) of WinCE devices are becoming one. That's certainly putting them in a better position in that market.

    --
    This sig has been temporarily disconnected or is no longer in service
  31. Because HP used to be great by A+nonymous+Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I have always worked at small companies in out of the way places doing interesting work, and not worrying too much about who paid the best. HP is the only big company I ever interviewed at, and would have been interested in working at, because they were not the typical Silly Valley company. They used to stand for long term patience and steadiness. Quirks in their equipment to be sure, but quality was there too. Carly is destroying that.

    The 15,000 layoffs coming are a good example, as was spinning off Agilent. The point about not laying people off is not socialism or workers' rights, but rather the management mentality. If you know you can fire like crazy, you are more likely to hire like crazy. If you are reluctant to fire, you will also have a more long term outlook on hiring and expansion. If a project needs cutbacks, you will have the attitude of needing to find a new project for the current staff, rather than cutting back in a hurry and losing all that expertise, then later hiring like crazy and trying to integrate new staff.

    That long term outlook is gone from HP now, with the Carly (and Curly) gang in charge. There are no doubt lots of the old guard still around, but they aren't in charge, and HP is on the road to being just another huge corporation, nothing special.

    That's what Walter Hewlett tried to get across.

    1. Re:Because HP used to be great by 4of12 · · Score: 3, Funny

      That long term outlook is gone from HP now, with the Carly (and Curly) gang in charge.

      I'm not sure, but I get the feeling that the demands on company management and the incentives they receive are not well balanced.

      I can see where shareholders want to see EPS increases from quarter to quarter, come hell or high water.

      Executive perks in terms of stock options tend to be for the short term.

      But I can cut costs in the short term by firing the research department, getting rid of quality control and subcontracting maintenance and support to a call center in a blighted urban area.

      As long as I get to bail before the cows come to roost in a couple of years, I'm a golden executive at the shareholder's meeting.

      Now if they only made sure the stock options given to executives could not be redeemed for at least 5 to 7 years. Their decisions really impact the long term - make their rewards reflect their true impact.

      --
      "Provided by the management for your protection."
  32. Digital Equipment Corp., err, Compaq, err, HP by forged · · Score: 2
    Now I wonder what will happen to all these obsolete domain names.

    Can I get dec.com, please.

  33. Re:Who cares if HP is now the biggest Linux compan by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 2
    OK, I can't claim to know much about HP's old lines. But the 3000 and 9000 are very similar - you can actually convert one to the other. The difference is that the 3000 runs MPE, an old mainframe OS, and the 9000 runs HP-UX. HP recently announced a 5-year de-support schedule for MPE, with other vendors coming in to continue support if the customer wishes it.

    I have a hard time understanding the MPE world. The CTO of a big MPE consulting firm sat me down at HP World last year and told me why Unix would never make it in business. Not Linux, Unix. So, I decided I would only worry about the Free Software operating systems at HP.

    In the case of HP-UX, on the IA-64 it will be binary-compatible with Linux. If you write to that interface, you have an application that runs on two operating systems, one of which gives you the option to self-support indefinitely (or buy consulting) and not worry about when someone decides to de-support it. HP had no choice but to embrace Linux, the company has to go where its customers are going.

    Bruce

  34. Truth behind merger by jsse · · Score: 3, Funny
  35. Re:Ridiculous by Derkec · · Score: 2

    I think this merger is best described as a head-on train wreck in slow motion. At least they're coming together.

  36. Modern Capitalism by Peaker · · Score: 2

    How soon will it be before Microsoft, and HPQ-sun-aol remain?

    As soon as the big guys realize monopolies and cartels are more profitable than competition. Who ever said capitalism worked? :)

  37. Re:Ridiculous by AntiNorm · · Score: 2

    Over the past year, we've seen so much god-awful M&A activity - think Vivendi-U or, even worse, AOLTW - none of which adds any value to the resulting company.

    And if you think of it from the consumer's perspective, the resulting companies are usually worse. Which begs the question -- why merge in the first place? I don't think I've ever really figured this one out; the only things mergers are good at as far as the average tech consumer is concerned are expanding monopolies *ahem*AOLTW and reducing product quality. They may be good in the short term for the companies involved, but they're inevitably bad for the consumer, and this in turn results in a long-term loss for all companies involved.

    --

    I pledge allegiance to the flag...
    of the Corporate States of America...
  38. Re:A Newbie Question... by Derkec · · Score: 2
    I'm sorry, to say this, and I can already feel the karma slipping away...


    You're right that it's a cluster, but not a Beowulf cluster. Instead it's just a cluster-f... ah nevermind.

  39. What happens to Houston's Compaq Center? by berteag00 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I think a change of titles is appropriate...

    May I suggest the "HP Pavillion"?

    1. Re:What happens to Houston's Compaq Center? by ArhcAngel · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually it will soon be called Oasis of Love when Lakewood church leases it.

      --
      "A person is smart. People are dumb, panicky dangerous animals and you know it." - K
    2. Re:What happens to Houston's Compaq Center? by quark2universe · · Score: 2

      Well let's examine this.

      Enron Field
      Compaq Center

      If you work for Reliant Energy, be afraid. Be very afraid.

      --

      Believe in things of which no person has ever learned
  40. Industry mergers carried to logical conclusion. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

    Hewlett Compackard Dell.

  41. The sound of an air conditioner by Graymalkin · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I guess it is sort of fitting that two companies that have recently continued to fail to capitalize on their investments would merge. Compaq bought Digital and failed to really do anything worth while with them. The Alpha was a badass of microprocessor engineering. Had something been made of it the entire industry might have been turned on their head. The 21164 whipped other processors of the time like little bitches. By 2000 only about 500k Alpha systems had been sold. That is bad marketing and poor capitalization. HP for some retarded reason thought the internet bubble boom was going to last for some long period of time and dropped their slow growth steady divisions and spun them off into a separate company. That is another failure to retain their market capitalization. They may sell a lot of computers and not go out of business no one is going to remember them for anything other than for a stupid merger.

    Jeff Clarke: Somebody set up us the bomb.
    Peter Blackmore: We get signal.
    Mike Capellas: What !
    Blackmore: Main screen turn on.
    Captain: It's You !!
    Carly Fiorina: How are you gentlemen !!
    Fiorina: All your Presario are belong to us.
    Fiorina: You are on the way to destruction.
    Capellas: What you say !!
    Fiorina: You have no chance to survive make your time.
    Fiorina: HA HA HA HA ....

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
  42. The new company... by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2

    The new company will becalled "Hewlett Paqard"

    --
    Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
  43. It's a matter of corporate culture by Bruce+Perens · · Score: 5, Informative
    The reason it's important is a matter of corporate culture. IBM does not have a person like me, and never will, because the corporate culture would not allow it. They can't "get it" to the extent that HP does. Nor would IBM employ the Debian project leader (Bdale Garbee).

    I don't think you need to question HP's Linux committment. We have to go where our customers are going, and we get very firm "Linux" signals from them.

    You now have Jim Gettys, me, Bdale Garbee, David Mosberger, and Jeremy Allison in the same company, along with another 100 people I really should mention. There's a bigger array of Linux expertise than VA ever assembled, and most of them are working on GPL projects, and are also driving the company significantly. That's got to be good for Free Software.

    Bruce

    1. Re:It's a matter of corporate culture by Telastyn · · Score: 2

      My appologies for being the cynic:

      I don't think people question HP's Linux committment, I think people question what sort of management would do something that (from the outside, and being uninformed) appears to be ripe with headaches, inefficiencies, and cost for very little (relative) gain.

      I hope that's merely perception and not truth, though there's little history or proof to show otherwise.

  44. Something Extraordinary by bigjohnandsparky · · Score: 2, Funny

    It can now be revealed what Carly Fiorina meant when she said on the eve of the merger vote that "we may have to do something extraordinary" to get Deutsche Bank to vote the HP way. Shortly before the meeting, Fiorina opened her portfolio and showed DB Chair Hilmar Kopper all her assets. Then she gave him vigorous oral arguments and afterwards personally debriefed the entire DB board. No one knows what she told the board but shrieks of, "Das ist gut, Carly, das ist sehr gut!" reverberated throughout the meeting place during a 40 minute delay before the vote. A HP spokesman said that the DB board put up stiff resistance at first, but afterwards they were putty in her hands.

  45. Hewlett Compakard by Bill+Kendrick · · Score: 2

    They should rename themselves to Helwett Compakard or something similar. ;)

  46. Hewlett Packard is dead. by acceleriter · · Score: 2

    Long live Compaquard Bell. /me observes a moment of silence for Digital Equipment Corporation and the old HP, both of which made quality products before being pimped out.

    --

    CEE5210S The signal SIGHUP was received.

  47. Re:I don't see the point by Edmund+Blackadder · · Score: 2

    The market is slowing down. And it is also rapidly comoditizing itself. which means sales are decreasing and margins are getting thinner. Not sure if its true but thats what the author meant.