Slashdot Mirror


Farscape & Stargate SG-1 New Seasons Tonight

marekk writes "Frelling A! The fourth season of Farscape, arguably the best Sci-Fi currently on television premieres tonight on the SciFi Channel. You can catch the premiere episode, titled "Crichton Kicks" at 9PM CST. Afterwards, you can watch the premiere of Stargate SG-1's sixth season, "Redemption"." I've been watching the SG1 season 1 box set and am impressed. Its a solid show, and I'm looking forward to season it without the benefit of syndication lag, even if there are problems. As for Farscape... well, Duh!

124 of 221 comments (clear)

  1. Farscap start by gerardrj · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Should be interesting.
    Most of the crew is gone, Talon and Kreis are dead, Moya was sucked in to a workhole and John was left floating in space all alone with no fuel.

    What a way to start a new season.

    --
    Article X: The powers not delegated... by the Constitution...are reserved...to the people
    1. Re:Farscap start by KC7GR · · Score: 3, Funny

      >...Moya was sucked in to a workhole...

      Hey! Wait one frelling minute!! A 'workhole?' That's what I get sucked into at 08:00 every day when I walk in the door at my employer! Moya had nothing to do with it (lucky her!) unless Boeing's got a sooper-sekrit hangar for Leviathans somewhere on the campus...

      --

      Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

      Blue Feather Technologies

    2. Re:Farscap start by 3Cats · · Score: 1

      "..sucked in to a workhole.."

      snarfed! Assuming that "Work" is a blackhole ="workhole"

      3C

    3. Re:Farscap start by BoBathan · · Score: 1

      "Moya was sucked in to a workhole"

      Damn workholes, that's where I'll be spending my night, tonight.

      --Travis

      --
      EOF
    4. Re:Farscap start by Desperado · · Score: 2

      Well, I wouldn't be so sure that Crais and Talon are dead any more than I'd assume Scorpius died in the explosion.

      Aeryn came back and only one of the two John Chrichtons was killed. Heck we may yet see more of P'au Zhaan.

      It will be an interesting season for sure.

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
    5. Re:Farscap start by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Well, I wouldn't be so sure that Crais and Talon are dead any more than I'd assume Scorpius died in the explosion.

      The difference, of course, is that they found fragments of Talyn's hull after their escape. That's kind of like finding body parts after an accident. It makes the possibility of resurrection somewhat less likely.

      Besides, I think Talyn was getting to be a burden on the writers. They kept having to come up with reasons why he couldn't just fly in and blast the hell out of everything to save the day.

      That said, I think the writers could stand to take a page from Joss Whedon's playbook. Take a cool supporting character, give her lots of screen-time to connect with the audience, and then kill her off mercilessly. Gotta keep the viewers on their toes....

    6. Re:Farscap start by ClosedSource · · Score: 1

      Well, if it's like most Farscape season-openers, the episode will start about a week after John ran out of fuel. In the course of the dialog we'll hear maybe one sentence about how he escaped. These gaps drive me crazy.

    7. Re:Farscap start by Lord+Omlette · · Score: 2

      Yup... he (John) has to be thinking to himself: "This can't possibly get any worse..."

      --
      [o]_O
    8. Re:Farscap start by Desperado · · Score: 2

      Besides, I think Talyn was getting to be a burden on the writers. They kept having to come up with reasons why he couldn't just fly in and blast the hell out of everything to save the day.

      Well, for one thing Talyn was out of control. I sure wouldn't want to have him fly in and blast any where near me.

      Crais is a great character and I'd like to see him return in the new season. Lose Jool if someone needs to go.

      --
      If you're not living on the edge, you're taking up too much space.
    9. Re:Farscap start by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 1
      Heck we may yet see more of P'au Zhaan.

      That would be great! However Virginia Hey says she wouldn't come back to the show unless they made her more human looking... the make up was making her sick, plus she had to shave her head and eyebrows off...

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    10. Re:Farscap start by Klox · · Score: 1

      It's Crais and Talyn. Go to www.scifi.com/farscape or www.farscape.com (I prefer SciFi's page).

    11. Re:Farscap start by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 1
      Kreis, Crais, Talon, Talyn. Does anyone know what the character's names are??!

      Bialar Crais, Aeryn Sun, Chiana, Ka D'Argo, Pa'u Zotoh Zhaan, John Crichton, Joolushko Tunay Fento Hovalis, Rygel XVI, Scorpius, Stark, Pilot, Moya and Talyn.

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    12. Re:Farscap start by foobar104 · · Score: 3, Funny

      Lose Jool if someone needs to go.

      No way, man. Have you seen that chick's bellybutton? One of the best special effects on television. ;-)

    13. Re:Farscap start by PythonOrRuby · · Score: 1

      You obviously didn't notice the Delvian with (blond)hair in the promotionals.

    14. Re:Farscap start by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 1
      You obviously didn't notice the Delvian with (blond)hair in the promotionals.

      Yeah, I did, and they had Delvians with hair last season. But I'm on the Virginia Hey mailing list, and this is what she said about it. She just moved to LA and will be in some major movie soon.

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    15. Re:Farscap start by LazyBoy · · Score: 1
      plus she had to shave her head and eyebrows off...
      Ouch! The eyebrows aren't so bad, but it'd take a lot to make me shave my head off every week.
      --

      If Chaos Theory has taught us anything, it's that we must kill all the butterflies.

    16. Re:Farscap start by PythonOrRuby · · Score: 1

      Must have been one of the few I missed.

      Working late on Friday nights really sucks.

    17. Re:Farscap start by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 1
      Ouch! The eyebrows aren't so bad, but it'd take a lot to make me shave my head off every week.

      he he he!

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    18. Re:Farscap start by DavidRavenMoon · · Score: 1
      Must have been one of the few I missed.

      I know, I missed a few too, like the whole Crichton clone thing.

      Actually the clip that they show in the promotionals was the one from last season. There was a man and a woman Delvian, that both had hair.

      --
      -- if it was so, it might be; and if it were so, it would be; but as it isn't, it ain't. That's logic - Lewis Carrol
    19. Re:Farscap start by PythonOrRuby · · Score: 1
      I know, I missed a few too, like the whole Crichton clone thing.

      That's unfortunate. "Eat Me" was one of the best hours of horror I've ever seen.

  2. wooo! by MrLint · · Score: 1

    I have been gnawing at the big to sg1 to get to sci fi as im not paying to watch it on showtime and the syndication in my area has been haphazard. I do how they find a way to make everyone happy with locations and make a 7th season.

  3. No Argument Necessary by ewoods · · Score: 1

    No Argument Necessary - Farscape Is The Best!

    1. Re:No Argument Necessary by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Im not sure Id say that. I do like Farscape, but there are a lot of times that it is weird just for the sake of being weird. The episode that made me roll my eyes the most was the one where they ended up on a planet occupied by mostly lawyers.

      Ugh.

      *Really misses Doctor Who*

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  4. that's backwards by rbabb · · Score: 4, Informative

    I think SG-1 air's first at 9PM, and then Farscape airs at 10MP.. Well at least here in ATL.

  5. no more fox by r1ddl3 · · Score: 5, Funny

    with the demise of Tick, X-files, Futurama and now Stargate moving, fox has finally completed the transition to nothing but crap and soft core porn. Congrats Fox

    1. Re:no more fox by BigBir3d · · Score: 1

      funny, i watch stargate on showtime, not fox. besides, fox still has the simpsons and NFL games. the rest is just filler now.

    2. Re:no more fox by KFury · · Score: 2

      And Simpsons.

    3. Re:no more fox by ar1550 · · Score: 1

      Before the move to SciFi, original episodes of SG1 aired on Showtime. FOX stations aired syndicated reruns of SG1 a season behind the Showtime schedule. They still might, I'm not sure if SciFi obtained the show's syndication rights or not.

      --
      I once shot a man in Reno 'cause they cancelled Firefly.
    4. Re:no more fox by Ian_Bailey · · Score: 1

      "Funny... The transition on Fox to soft-core porn was so gradual I hardly noticed it!" -Marge Simpson (well, paraphased anyways)

    5. Re:no more fox by Thenomain · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You'd think so, but, amazement of all amazements, Fox ordered up a new sci-fi series from Joss Whedon (Buffy/Angel/Ripper) called "Firefly". Sure, it looks like it might be Buffy In Space, but as Joss put it (and I wish like hell I could find the quote, so this is a paraphrase), it will be humans doing evil things to humans; no aliens need apply.

      YMMV, but I'm looking forward to at least giving it a try, hoping that he has enough clout to keep the fingers of money-hungry network execs from making it the kind of pablum you'd expect from Fox. (Mind you, I won't scream if the show has a little soft-core porn.)

      And if it flies, Joss would have his shows on four major TV networks. (Fox, BBC, WB, UPN.) Go rah.

      --
      This now concludes our broadcast day.
  6. The game by hoowee · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looks like the Farscape game is shaping up nicely as well...

    --

    Comic Book Guy: "There is no Groening in my store."
  7. Stargate SG-1 by realdpk · · Score: 2

    I'd love to get all of the episodes on CD or DVD somehow - unfortunately only the first season seems to be available, and for a hefty price. I'd rather wait until they're all available before starting a collection since there's no guarantee they'd all be released.

    1. Re:Stargate SG-1 by Deffexor · · Score: 2

      Actually, I managed to pick up the whole first season of SG1 for $50. Also, I know Season 2 has been released in Region 2. Supposedly MGM plans to release Season 2 in North America this fall. I'm not sure why they waited so long.

      I know the first season of Farscape is out, but apparently the going rate is $15 - $20 per disc (with each disc holding only 2 episodes.) Considering that the first season was 22 episodes, I'm not particularly inclined to pay $165 - $220. Such a shame. :(

    2. Re:Stargate SG-1 by realdpk · · Score: 1

      Yeah, it's tempting to hit Kazaa and the like to get 'em. I just wish there was a way I could get them (all) "legit" from the producers, even as a rental.

    3. Re:Stargate SG-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      Supposedly MGM plans to release Season 2 in North America this fall.

      Season 2 is scheduled to be released on September 3.

    4. Re:Stargate SG-1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      You can buy all of them including the first 8 eps of season 5 from http://www.blackstar.co.uk. Now all you need to do is have or find a region free DVD player.
      As for me, I have them all downloaded from various sources and burned to SVCD format and they look just as good as DVD.

    5. Re:Stargate SG-1 by MrLint · · Score: 1

      It has been my understanding that the USboxes sets have been so long in coming due to syndication issues (greed?). I picked up season 1 as soon as i could. However i am worried about the other SG seasons being broken up peicemeal and sold at high prices like the farscape ones.

    6. Re:Stargate SG-1 by Brian+See · · Score: 2

      Talk about disapointing. A cool sci fi show with a good plot, good scripts and nudity! So close ...

      Jeremiah. It's on after Stargate on Showtime, at 10:45 PM eastern.

      Don't let the fact that it stars Luke Perry and Malcolm Jamal-Warner scare you off. It's produced (and mostly written) by J. Michael Straczynski, the same guy who did Babylon 5.

      Series premise is that a plague wipes out all adults, but spares the children. It's now 15 years after the "Big Death", and the kids have rebuilt, sort of. Lots of post-apocalyptic scenerey and plots, but the general theme and tone of the series is pretty hopeful.

      Plus, there's ample swearing/violence -- and nudity. Not as much as the softcore porn on cable, but probably as much as the Sopranos.

    7. Re:Stargate SG-1 by Wanker · · Score: 2
      Season 2 [tvshowsondvd.com] is scheduled to be released on September 3.
      Good site! I had never seen the http://www.tvshowsondvd.com site before.
    8. Re:Stargate SG-1 by ar1550 · · Score: 1

      alt.binaries.stargate-sg1 I don't have the link, but the DVDs have been released up through about a third of the way through season five. Or maybe I'm hallucinating this cylinder of CDrs filled with SG-1 DVD rips from the newsgroup.

      --
      I once shot a man in Reno 'cause they cancelled Firefly.
    9. Re:Stargate SG-1 by PyRoNeRd · · Score: 1

      Here in the Netherlands they just brought out the first of the series 5 DVD. I'm surprised that they are still at series 1 in the states.

      So I guess those DVD rips are from the European DVD's.

      PS: Don't bother with series 5 as it's pretty awful. I downloaded the whole bunch of series 5 rips with edonkey2000 and now I regret burning them on CD-Rs as I won't watch them again because they are so bad.

  8. BBC Farscape Episode Guide by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    There's lots of info on Farscape at the BBC Online Farscape Cult page.

  9. Re:I can't wait till the next season of 24 starts! by LordNimon · · Score: 1

    The last 10 minutes of the season finale ruined the whole show for me. I have a hard time believing that a future First Lady could be so stupid, and I don't like the fact that Jack's wife is dead. If they don't resolve these two "issues" in the next episode, I think I'm just going to tune out completely.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  10. Thank you Tivo by ZeroLogic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I didn't even know a new season was starting tonight, nor do i have time to go home to record it. That's when I remembered that my Tivo should be smart enough (fingers crossed) to record it on it's own.

    1. Re:Thank you Tivo by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      Unless you had a Wishlist for Stargate or created a Season Pass for it on the Sci-Fi channel, it won't be recorded. SPs don't migrate from one channel to the next.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    2. Re:Thank you Tivo by KFury · · Score: 2

      "SPs don't migrate from one channel to the next."

      I've actually found (and correct me if I'm wrong) that if a show is offered on multiple channels at the time the season pass is created, it's created only for the specific channel you specify, but, if it only appears on one channel at the time you make the season pass, the season pass is 'global' (because it doesn't need to be exclusionary at the time), and will capture shows on other channels whould they come up in the future.

      Well, we'll see. I'm in the same boat, and won't be home until too late.

    3. Re:Thank you Tivo by LordNimon · · Score: 1
      if it only appears on one channel at the time you make the season pass, the season pass is 'global'

      I don't think that's correct. SPs are definitely tied to a single channel, no matter how or when they were made.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    4. Re:Thank you Tivo by scottmartinnet · · Score: 1

      Nope, SPs are definitely not tied to a single channel. I'm looking at Upcoming Episodes for Stargate SG-1 right now, and it covers episodes on three channels (Sci-fi, FOX, and WB).

    5. Re:Thank you Tivo by porges · · Score: 1

      "Upcoming Episodes" does indeed list the show on all channels; nevertheless, the Season Pass only applies to one particular channel. Yes, it's horribly misleading.

    6. Re:Thank you Tivo by LordNimon · · Score: 1

      That doesn't mean anything. "View Upcoming Epsidoes" shows episodes on all channels, but the SP itself will only record from one channel. Take a second look, and you'll see what I mean.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
    7. Re:Thank you Tivo by scottmartinnet · · Score: 1

      No, I mean I'm looking at the Season Pass information, showing which episodes will be recorded. There are check marks next to episodes on multiple channels.

    8. Re:Thank you Tivo by LordNimon · · Score: 1
      Then those checkmarks were not all created by a single Season Pass. Either you have multiple season passes, a Wishlist, or you checked the epsiodes on the other channels manually. I am 100% positive about this, because it is one of my biggest gripes about the TiVo software.

      Check out the TiVo online forums and you'll see what I mean. You can search the archives or just ask about it. Everyone will tell you what I'm telling you: Season Passes are locked to a particular channel.

      --
      And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
      To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  11. Farscape on DVD - Read before you buy! by bmooney28 · · Score: 4, Informative

    If you are considering Farscape on DVD, be sure to get the European versions if at all possible.. They come in 6 packs for only 50% more than US 2-packs... (aprox $30 for 6 pack vs $20 for 2 pack)... In the long run, it would actually be worthwhile to buy a region free DVD player if you plan to collect the whole set and live in the US... Hint: look for APEX 600A on ebay... and do a google search for "loophole menu"....

    Note: The APEX 600A will also disable CSS copy protection allowing you to copy ANY DVD onto VHS!

    In the long run

    1. Re:Farscape on DVD - Read before you buy! by Dante333 · · Score: 1

      As someone who had been doing this for quite some time, I recommend Amazon.co.uk, or Blackstar.co.uk. One thing to keep in mind, is you may also need to convert a PAL to NTSC signal for your TV.

    2. Re:Farscape on DVD - Read before you buy! by Hallow · · Score: 2

      I have a 600A. The regionlessness and macrovision decoding are great. The problem is, it has major problems with seamless branching. I doubt the Farscape DVD's use that feature, but many movies do, and at the rates these sub-$200 dvd players (I got mine for about $125 about 2 years ago) are going for on ebay, I seriously doubt it's worth it, as you can get a brand new region/macro free for about the same price with no problems with seamless branching (or dual layer issues, like the pause and skip the Apex-600A's do, or the overheating issues, audio/video sync issues, etc.).

    3. Re:Farscape on DVD - Read before you buy! by bigbigbison · · Score: 1

      but do the European versions have the commentary tracks? I looked at a couple uk DVD vendors and they don't mention it. If not it might be more worthwhile to take some time and hunt down the North American one's used.

      --
      http://www.popularculturegaming.com -- my blog about the culture of videogame players
    4. Re:Farscape on DVD - Read before you buy! by billnapier · · Score: 2

      Actually, that would be the Macrovision protection that the APEX 600A is stipping off the output signal and allowing you to record it to a VCR. CSS refers to the encryption used on DVD's to control what players can play them.

      Most /.readers refer to CSS as a mere annoyance rather than an effective copy protection scheme.

    5. Re:Farscape on DVD - Read before you buy! by Microlith · · Score: 1

      But the US versions have some exclusive extras, namely some commentary from the shows actors, and a number of smaller things.

      They're published in the US by A.D. Vision, the same people that bring us tons of the anime that Taco and I know and love (Gasaraki, Steel Angel Kurumi), and are NOT members of the MPAA.

      So buy up!

  12. The Correct Times by ar1550 · · Score: 1

    Stargate SG-1 is premiering before Farscape. SG-1 will be shown at 8:00 and 10:00 CST, while Farscape will be shown at 9:00 and 11:00 CST. The original 1994 Stargate movie started at 5:30 PM CST.

    --
    I once shot a man in Reno 'cause they cancelled Firefly.
  13. Re:I can't wait till the next season of 24 starts! by TellarHK · · Score: 1

    24 was definitely the best damn thing on TV last season. I tried to miss none of it.

    The last 10 minutes didn't ruin it for me, but MAN did it hurt to see Jack's wife die. I mean, that sucked a lot. An awful lot.

    As to Palmer's bitch wife? She got what she deserved. She wasn't stupid, she was manipulative. And I could believe it, from the way her character was portrayed. And she's not going to be a future first lady. Once the Secret Service is called in to keep her away from Palmer? Phbt. She's gone. Palmer might be the first single man to get the Presidency. He sure deserved it anyhow. :)

    I dunno about a second season of 24... I fear it won't be as good. It's got a lot to keep up to.

    Oh, and whoever posted stuff screwed up the schedule. SG-1 comes on at 9PM Eastern, and Farscape comes on at 10PM Eastern. That -is- 9PM Central, but SG-1 comes on -first-, not after. So remember folks, don't rely on Slashdot for your TV schedule news.

    Doublecheck me, too. Just in case. ;)

  14. Re:Too bad I can't watch it.... by foobar104 · · Score: 2

    Or equally as good, when will the cable companies come up with a decent pricing format?

    Guh. We've been over this ground before, but I don't feel like finding a link to the old thread now. When you buy cable TV service from the cable company, you're buying the bandwidth and the wires and all of that transport-layer stuff. You're not actually buying the program content itself. That's paid for by advertising. (Except for premium channels, of course.)

    The fact that you only watch 5 of the 50 channels doesn't really make any difference to the cable company. It costs them the same to provide you with the wires and whatnot. So it doesn't really make sense for them to charge you by the channel.

  15. Season continuity from Fox to SciFi: Anyone know? by KFury · · Score: 2

    Not having Showtime, I've been following SG-1 on Fox (with all their time-jumping and out-of-order episodes) and the last ep I saw was the cliffhanger when Chronos's (err, our) mothership, and Apophis's ship just came out of 'hyperspace' from running away from the star that Carter made go nova, propelling them entirely outside the galaxy (note that anyone who doesn't already watch SG-1 probably never will after reading that sentence, really, the show's not so contrived).

    My question is, now that we're jumping from syndicationto first-run, how many seasons, if any, will I be skipping, and how will I be able to catch up, since apparently Fox is giving up the show (Are they?) and the DVDs are only out for season 1 so far. Anyone know?

    Thanks,

  16. Season 4 is out by frovingslosh · · Score: 1

    I'm not sure about which region, but I've seen from a newsgroup that season 4 has been released (was long before season 5 had completely aired). The DVD does contain some nice stuff, including a director's commentary for the episode on a second audio track. Lots of nice insight to the creative process there. Waiting for all seasons to be released is an option, but that may be a while, and you'll be without the insight of stuff like this extra material while you wait.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
    1. Re:Season 4 is out by Raphtor · · Score: 1

      Season 4 is out in region 2. If you have a dvd player that is 'region free' you are all set. I did this with Angel season 1 as it was only region 2. You pay more with shipping and everything though...

  17. Re:I can't wait till the next season of 24 starts! by LordNimon · · Score: 1
    As to Palmer's bitch wife? She got what she deserved.

    True, but it will cost Palmer the Presidency, which is just stupid. Just like killing off Jack's wife is also stupid.

    Of course, there are plenty of plot holes. Like why was Mrs. Bauer allowed to roam CTU unescorted? And why wasn't the surveillance video of Jamie's "suicide" examined earlier? And why are CTU employees allowed to make unmonitored cell phone calls inside the building? Cell phones shouldn't even be working inside that building! These are obvious security holes.

    --
    And the men who hold high places must be the ones who start
    To mold a new reality... closer to the heart
  18. Re:I can't wait till the next season of 24 starts! by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

    There have been several single presidents you dolt.
    http://www.fujisan.demon.co.uk/USPresidents /plist3 b.htm

    --

    Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
  19. Re:Season continuity from Fox to SciFi: Anyone kno by kevdog · · Score: 2, Informative

    You'll just be skipping season 5. The second part to the episode you mention is called Enemies, and is quite good.

    One thing you might want to do is watch the season 5 opener, as you'll understand a lot more about what's going on in season 5 (but still not quite. You'd probaly need to watch 3 or 4 season 5 episodes to know exactly what is going on and the progression of the Earth and others vs. Goa'uld plot). Episodes can be found in some newsgroups if you want to download them.

    Check out this link if you want to know spoilers for season 5:
    http://www.gateworld.net/s5/index.shtml

    Overall, I'm really looking foward to season 6 on sci-fi.

  20. Clearing up some misconceptions... by D'Arque+Bishop · · Score: 5, Informative
    Just to clear up some confusion here...

    Stargate SG-1 was originally a SHOWTIME show. The episodes that run on Fox (aka, syndication) are actually a season behind the Showtime run. When SG-1 ended its fifth season on Showtime, it immediately jumped to Sci-Fi for its sixth season. The Fox run (which is still on season 4) still has another season to go.

    Last I checked, Fox was NOT dropping their run of SG-1. It's Showtime that's no longer running it. So, those of you without cable or satellite can rejoice; you still have at least another season.

    1. Re:Clearing up some misconceptions... by Syberghost · · Score: 2

      One last misconception to clear up:

      There is *NO* Fox run. It's syndicated. In some places that means it's on the Fox affiliate. In others, the WB or UPN affiliate. In others, one not affiliated with any network.

      Hell, in some places it's probably on the NBC affiliate.

      I thought you people got this concept during Deep Space Nine?

  21. Re:Season continuity from Fox to SciFi: Anyone kno by Ryan+Kirkpatrick · · Score: 2, Informative

    As close as I can tell, there is only one season between the last (new) epsiode broadcast on Fox (which was the season finale for season four) and the epsiode being broadcasted tonight on SciFi (the preimer for season six). Season Five was only on ShowTime, though there are rumors that SciFi is going to run all of the old Stargate SG-1 episodes in the afternoon like they do with Babylon 5 in the future.

    I only saw the first 12 or so episodes of season five on ShowTime before I moved (and lost access to pay channels). The linked slashdot article basically sums up the fifth season. I hope they turn it around now that ShowTime is no longer in control.

    --
    -------------------------------
    "For to me to live is Christ, and to die is gain." - Phil. 1:21 (KJV)
  22. Re:Season continuity from Fox to SciFi: Anyone kno by realdpk · · Score: 2

    Fox wasn't carrying the show, if I understand right - it was your local Fox affiliate. Here, in Seattle, it's been UPN.

    According to TiVo, I've been watching most of the 2001 episodes lately, which should mean I'm nearly caught up to Season 6.

    (Regarding DVDs, I made a post about this as well, but to add to the concept, it'd be great if we could at least *rent* the DVDs of the shows, even if they don't let us purchase them yet.. I know I'm still seeing episodes I've never seen before and I'd love to be fully caughtup. The ep you mention, I haven't seen yet. :( )

  23. Re:I can't wait till the next season of 24 starts! by foobar104 · · Score: 2

    Of course, there are plenty of plot holes. Like why....

    I'm pretty sure that all of these things fall into the category of stuff that makes the show possible. If the show were totally realistic, you never could have gotten a suspenseful, engaging story out of it.

    Besides, the stuff you mentioned just isn't that big a deal, unless you go looking for things to complain about. While everything you said is valid, none of it jumped off the screen and prevented me from enjoying the show.

  24. Farscape in Canada?!? by Nyktos · · Score: 1

    I've been in Australia for the last 3 months (where Farscape is filmed, I believe) and now that I'm back in Canada (where SG-1 is filmed... a few eps filmed up at SFU, I might add) I'm aching to watch some Farscape. A while back, the only canadian channel to have it was YTV (Youth TV), but they cancelled it when they realized that it wasn't really a youth program merely because of the Henson puppets. SPACE (our cool ass sci-fi channel) only has ep 2 for this summer :(. So does anyone know of anystation that we can get with basic/extended cable up here in Canada (the left-coast) that carries Farscape?

    Do I have to resort to downloading the episodes again?

    1. Re:Farscape in Canada?!? by mclearn · · Score: 2

      I thought that SPACE carried up to season 4.

    2. Re:Farscape in Canada?!? by Graemee · · Score: 1

      It's on three channels, currently showing the middle of season two. SPACE, the NEWVR and the NEWPR, both channels in Ont. They are all on DBS Starchoice. the NEWVR PR have it Friday 9:00 AST with Space showing it Sat & repeat on Sun @ 3:00PM, yes it's a sucky timeslot.

      Space is several episodes ahead of the others. With them just showing Crackers Don't Matter. Rocks. YTV only showed the first season, again and again and again and again.

      But the good news we get 2mins of extra scenes due to 2 mins less commercial time then the US.

  25. I Dunno...I kinda like SG1 by Raphtor · · Score: 1

    I got so sick of waiting for new Farscapes - a year is WAY too long!!! So, I downloaded all 5 seasons of Stargate and watched them and all in all, I'll take Stargate over Farscape. Farscape just turned into too much of a soap...it did start out good in the first season though. And Lexx - give me a break! I watched it for a while but it started to get just plain stupid. Truth is the SCIFI channel stinks and at least on my cable service is poor quality video and crappy sound - stereo only.

  26. Re:Too bad I can't watch it.... by geekoid · · Score: 2

    thats not entirely true.
    They do pay for there channels, and if they find too few people watch a certian chanell(becasue noone will pay for it) they can quit carrying it.
    so You might be able to have a min. mo. payment of like 10 bucks, just to have service, then .50 cents pers channel you suscribe to.

    Cable an sat. companies do charge too much for there service. They should be allowed to have cometition on the cables. There monopoly has been around long enough to re-coup the cost of laying cable, and they could split maintainence costs amongs all there competitors that use the same cables.

    You will never see fair pricing from a for profit orginization, without competition.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  27. Re:I can't wait till the next season of 24 starts! by SquadBoy · · Score: 1

    No I was including the ones who got married after being elected also.

    --

    Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
  28. must be me... by geekoid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...but I just can't watch SG-1. I find it dull, its writing unimaginitive, and the stories old and done. After watching season 1, I was actually surprised that it caught on. It must just hit the right nerve.

    Farscape, OTOH, is one of the top 3 sci-fi TV shows ever.
    number one is ST(original). Mostly because they where doing things that where ahead of the time, saying stuff that needed to be said, and had a lot of interesting concepts.
    number 2 and 3 kind of switch between Bab5 and farscape.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:must be me... by stubear · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Many season 1 shows aren't all that great, even (especially?) sci-fi shows. Look at shows like the X-Files, ST:TNG (really all the ST spin-offs) or Earth: Final Conflict. Shows evolve as characters are developed, bad plot decisions from the first seasons are written off and fan input is worked into the new episodes. Stargate: SG-1 took a season or two before many of the kinks were worked out and a few story plotlines could be established. Now if I could only remember when it comes on I'd be set.

    2. Re:must be me... by IronChef · · Score: 2


      I think most of today's SF like that "SG StarGate" show is overrated. I really liked older shows, they had much better writing.

      Like Viper! That dude fought crime with that cool car! He was driving all over the place, jumping over stuff and shooting rockets, like that old arcade game NARC! Man, that's what *I* call crime fighting!

      Or what about that other show about the guy in a wheelchair who kicked ass when he put on his super-suit? That guy was the bomb, and a great role model for all wheelchair-bound people. If I was in a wheelchair I'd DEFINITELY invent a suit that let me jump around and fight crime and go to the bathroom by myself!

      And who can forget Misfits of Science? There was a superhero who could get REALLY SMALL! Have you EVER seen anything like that?! Those CRAZY scientific guys! He was SO SMALL!

      Team Knight Rider featured like FIVE TALKING CARS. It was probably the best show of the last 10 years but strangely you never really hear people talking about it. That big truck sounded all tuff when he talked! What a blast! And wasn't one of the cars a chick? I mean, who can THINK of that stuff? Genius.

    3. Re:must be me... by Dh2000 · · Score: 1

      The guy in the wheelchair was the Mantis.
      Excellent show, though sadly cut short. The men in black and all that.

    4. Re:must be me... by dswensen · · Score: 1

      Actually I think it was not "the Mantis" but M.A.N.T.I.S. Gotta love a superhero who's an acronym.

    5. Re:must be me... by Ark · · Score: 1

      Actually, I thought E:FC's first season was the best. The show jumped the shark when they let Boone die.

  29. "Frelling A!"? by RatBastard · · Score: 2, Funny

    No offence, and I do not intend this as a troll, but WTF? As a survivir of the great BattleStar Galactica "frack off", I can tell you first-hand that swearing in "Sci-Fi"-onese will destroy your chances of ever getting a date.

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:"Frelling A!"? by seanb · · Score: 1

      Wrong. I know quite a few women that use the words "Frell", "Drenn", and "Frellnik". My girlfriend is among them.

      Speaking of, I'm going to leave work and go see my sexy redhead right now.

    2. Re:"Frelling A!"? by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Actually, I think you can get away with 'shazbat'. :)

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  30. Re:Doesn't disable CSS... by orkysoft · · Score: 1

    CSS isn't a copy-protection method. It's a method to control which devices can play the content, and it used to be an anti-rip protection.

    With an expensive DVD writer and expensive recordable DVDs, you could still copy existing DVDs verbatim (at least, I don't see why not).

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  31. Stargate SG-1 Season 1 DVD by fiziko · · Score: 2

    Those of you who haven't explored the Sci-Fi news slashbox may be interested in my review of the first season of Stargate SG-1 on DVD that CmdrTaco mentioned. (Season two is due on September 3, if you care.)

    </blatant plug>
    --
    - W. Blaine Dowler
    http://www.bureau42.com
  32. Re:let's be honest - these shows suck and... by NanoGator · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "if you think otherwise, you're a loser. no flame intended - just good ole self-evidence."

    I hate when people say stuff like this. A show doesn't have to be universally accepted as 'good' for somebody to enjoy it.

    I'm a Deep Space Nine fan. I even like the bad eps of DS9 because I have found something I really appreciate about it: it's overall visual quality. The sets are very nice and the effects are top notch.

    Do I expect everybody to like DS9? Nope. I found something in particular I really like about it. There are a lot of people that say it sucks. So what? It just means that those people don't appreciate the same stuff that I do.

    Call me a loser over it, however, and all you're doing to do is convince me that you judge people for petty reasons. "You suck because you like shows that I don't."

    You can't measure somebody by the shows they watch. All you're doing is giving other people a means to judge you, negatively.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  33. Re:ok... by Raphtor · · Score: 1

    IRC!!! DOwload a whole season in a 1 or 2

  34. Sounds like Buffy by DustMagnet · · Score: 1

    I've quit watching Buffy because it gets boring watching characters die and cry all the time. I really hope Farscape doesn't over do the die/cry thing too.

    --
    'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
  35. You're Both Right by DustMagnet · · Score: 1
    SG-1 new episode first airs at 9pm, then Farscape comes one, then the SG-1 episode is repeated.

    You can watch or record it before or after Farscape. I guess that's the best way for SCIFI to make sure Farscape's viewer rub off on SG-1.

    --
    'SBEMAIL!' is better than a goat!!
  36. Sci-fi channel UK by superpeach · · Score: 1

    Does anyone know if the sci-fi channel on sky in the UK has anything to do with this magical channel which is offering new seasons of Stargate and Farscape? A quick (well, long, thanks to the stupid crashing digibox ;) ) look over the next week of whats on my sci-fi channel and theres no stargate, and only old farscape.

    1. Re:Sci-fi channel UK by Quaryon · · Score: 1

      It used to, but not any more. Their web page was, until very recently, at uk.scifi.com but the domain lease appears to have lapsed - you can still find it at http://212.250.105.231/

      They're due to start Farscape season 3 on the 16th June, so that makes them still a season behind, but at least they show it at a more sensible time of day than BBC 2. I've actually given up and bought the DVDs - mvc.co.uk have been doing a pretty good deal on them...

      Q.

    2. Re:Sci-fi channel UK by Quaryon · · Score: 1

      Ah, the correct DNS appears to be http://www.uk.scifi.com/ - you need the www obviously :)

      Interestingly the FAQ question on ownership has no answer any more - it used to have some stuff about how they used to be the same as the US channel but aren't any more..

      Q.

  37. Other good UK DVD seller by The+Rizz · · Score: 1
    I've also had good luck getting UK DVD's for a good price (+shipping to USA) from Dividica.

    --The Rizz

    "The trouble with finding your place in the eye of the storm is, you're basically surrounded." --D.C. Simpson

  38. I agree - SG1 is better by The+Rizz · · Score: 1
    I have to say, SG-1 is definitely the better of the two shows, for just the reason you've mentioned:
    Farscape got to be too soap-opera most of the time.

    Granted, SG-1 can get kinda soapy from tiem to time as well, but at least those episodes are in the minority, and are almost never anything except subplot.

    --The Rizz

    "It is so stupid of modern civilisation to have given up believing in the devil when he is the only explanation of it." --Ronald Knox

  39. Try SG-1 seasons 2+ by The+Rizz · · Score: 1
    After watching season 1, I was actually surprised that it caught on. It must just hit the right nerve.

    If all you watched was season 1, I can see why you thought that. There are only about 3 or 4 episodes in the first season I'd ever go back and watch - the rest of them were absolute crap.

    Once you get into the second season, however, things start to get MUCH, MUCH better! Go watch season 2 before you write the show off.

    --The Rizz

    "Progress is impossible without change, and those who cannot change their minds cannot change anything." --G.B. Shaw

  40. No spoilers here. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Great! Now I don't have to bother actually watching the third season You managed to sum up almost everything that happens and kill any surprises that might have popped up.

    +1 Informative? -2 Unwarned Spoiler!

    makes me wish I had moderator points to keep this tragedy from happening to anyone else who is unlucky enough to not get the show and has to wach it much later.

    1. Re:No spoilers here. by Bitsy+Boffin · · Score: 2

      So much more happens in the 3rd series that, well, suffice to say it'll blow your socks off when you do get to see it.

      --
      NZ Electronics Enthusiasts: Check out my Trade Me Listings
  41. Re:I hate Farscape(but you prolly lapped up ATOTC) by The_THOMAS · · Score: 1

    Lexx had some fair episodes. Like the chess match one. That was creative. But I agree with hallow. Overall it's sophmoric crap with satire so dull it would smack you on top of the head and then limp away into the corner.

    Farscape is QUITE GOOD. Certainly a far better production using less budget but the same type muppets as the Lucas drivel.

    Rejoice that it continues. Dread that it will, like all good things, stop being so good. Let's hope that day is far off.

    --
    Ya Sure! You Betcha!, The_THOMAS
  42. Waiting for the right place by On+Lawn · · Score: 4, Interesting


    To put a real serious rant here....

    I've been a SG-1 fan from the beginning. The cultures are thought out, the government reactions to the cultures have a certain "truth is stranger than fiction" ring to them. The Air Force was on the one hand treating the gate like a hole to be plugged up, and on the other hand wanting to exploit what it could find on the other side.

    But my favorite aspects are...

    1) No captains chairs. No bridges, no ship to ship bantering. Don't get me wrong, I liked Star Trek the first for this, and TNG did it right but SG-1's lack of it was refreshing.

    2) Earth is the star in every episode, terribly outnumbered, flawed, and childishly ideolistic, and the series is ready to show that.

    3) Episodal. I think anyone who wants "story arc" really wants to watch a soap opera. Really they do, except they don't get the geeky "holier than thou" satisfaction of telling people they like daytime television.

    Now, whats wrong with this picture? I've recently watched some taped season 5 episodes, and guess what. Here's what must have happened, a bunch of out of work writers that filled such shows as Babylon 5 and Star Trek DS9 with charectar drama (read paralysis by analysis), story arc (read soap opera), and captains chairs with lots of ship to ship banter have rewritten the SG-1 universe. It has to be.

    One episode the major science words were "Miosis" and "Mitosis" used in a way that made me think they never got past JR High biology. Another had the Gould in a captains chair saying "I'm the great God Osiris, I have nothing to fear". Yet another had a symbiot telling Capt Carter that his former host loved her, I mean really loved her, like really really loved her.

    So I say, "Oh well". What ever these writers are the keep getting jobs can do what they want with SG-1, its basically ruined now. At least we had such episodes in season 5 as "the Tomb" and four other seasons of fun episodes.

    General Hammond looks bored now, nothing for him to do now that SG-1 has taken off on their own (and everyone seems to have forgotten all the other SG teams up to like 24.) Retire General Hammond, and I'll share some beach sand with you remembering the days of good science fiction that took research and thought to write.

    1. Re:Waiting for the right place by Weezul · · Score: 1

      There are problems with Stargate, but you managed to miss em'.

      1) The Carter-Mar'touf (sp?) thing was good character development. They even killed the guy. The Carter Jack thing was really really truely amazingly dumb. The large breasted (7 of 9) Tok'ra was also pretty stupid.

      2) Invasion of the episodic technobabble: One of the cool things about Stargate is that they find cleaver solutions to hard problems, by doing some amazingly simple thing with advanced alien technology they happen to find. Blowing up the McNeil to kill a bunch of replicators was a good example. A stable of human technology in Stargate is "ships rentering from orbit tend to burn up," not exactly knock your socks off technology. Another good example, was the time they failed to save the plannet with the sun going nova, but their failed method was scientifically sound and their failure was ambiguious, so the Asguard save the plannet without telling anyone. Anyway, this has definitly gone down hill recently. Its been bad, very very bad. Carter should be seen, not heard, or we will all be reminded of the lameness of technobabble.

      3) Not using Daniel enough. He was historically the most importent charater on the show. The Daniel-Jack dialog was among the best dialog available in a sci-fi show. He was also the favorit character from the fans perspective. Plot wize, his concience and the fact that he was an archeologist (and not a technobabbler) was really the main thing the show had going for it. Daniels assention would have been a perfect ending to the series. Unfortuantly, they seem to be making another seasson for some odd reason.

      Ultimatly, Stargates story arc is no big deal one way or another. It was always a pretty simple show. They do seem to make an episode one season with the knoweldge that they will make an episode relating to it next season, but I don't think episodes generally depend on other episodes very much.

      --
      The Christian religion has been and still is the principal enemy of moral progress in the world. -- Bertrand Russell
    2. Re:Waiting for the right place by On+Lawn · · Score: 2

      Yep, I'll buy that. Very good points.

      1) The Carter-Mortout thing was alright when was just fine as something you could sense like it was in the first few seasons. It didn't need to get so adolescent. The Carter-Jack and Vanessa Angel thing, I think, was a product of the shows producer (you know who that is). Anyway, your very right, the make-shift romances (except for the Daniel-Shoree one where she was off stage the whole time) was dumb.

      2) I don't mind technobabble as long as it makes sence. I remember watching many episodes where people with a much better grasp of technology (like the planet killer woman) would explain what was going on in "Golden Book" simplicity. I thought it was funny and good social commentary how Carter always needed to interpret the simple language into techno-babble. Then the camera would pan to Jack wearing an expression that said sarcasticaly "Oh yes, now I understand."

      3) I'll add that not using Shoree during his ascention was missing out (actually I saw the episode after it so maybe I missed it). Daniel quit the show, I hear, because he didn't like where it was going. Daniel was cool though, and was with General Hammond for being just as good if not better than the Movie actor.

      There's always been good continuity, like you said. A good example was when Carter's ex-symbiot saving her from the white worms and giving a clue to the rest of the crew how to stop them. But it was down right soap opera story-arc for the last 3/4 of the fifth season.

    3. Re:Waiting for the right place by On+Lawn · · Score: 1

      If that was as bad as it got, it wouldn't be *that* bad. Even so, you are talking out of the wrong end,

      Or is this the show that had the gadgets that made people super human but only worked for three days or something. Some how these gadgets managed to cause the fall of a whole society.

      Nooo, as Vanessa Angel reasoned in the episode (and she is never wrong) the gadgets staved off the attackers for a brief period, but as the society developed an immunity to the gadgets they no longer protected them. Of course, you missed the obvious caloric increases, and sonic booms, lack of bone mass to hold up their muscle streangth for a plot point that is actually explained.

      Isn't this the show that had a planet locked in it's orientation to the sun...What kind of weather would a planet that didn't spin have?

      Probably the one that was mentioned on the episode. Are you just grepping through slashdot comments or did you watch any of these episodes your talking about. Btw, planets with permenant day/night sides were also treated by Star Trek TNG, Bab5, Voyager and many others.

      The sane thing was to setup the base off world. Shut down the Earth gates except for scheduled checkin. That would have been thought out. Now you say you lose all those attacks on Earth. Yes but you gain a new world to investigate in depth. Something that could have run through out the series.

      1) The thing was encased in a mountain, with protocols developed for every contingency (even time travel).

      2) An off world base? Come on, be reasonable. We don't even have a base on the moon.

      3) What assurity would there be against attacks against earth? The enemy learned in season 2 how to burn through the Iris. Keeping it closed or shut down wasn't going to do anything. That was explained often in the series.

      I'd like to hear what you think is a good science fiction show, and why. Just as a bet that some people only know how to critisize and don't know how to enjoy.

  43. Great for both-I think by WTTM · · Score: 1

    Well, let me start off of how big of a fan of StarGate I was. Back in '96 I had one of the 3 stargate sites, and worked with the guy who later became the webmaster of the SG1-site. So being a hardcore fan I read that Dean Devlin (producer, and writer of the movie) wanted to make it a trilogy after the books. But MGM wanted money, and thought a series would be a better idea. Fair enough, I gave it a chance- It got worse in my opinion. From the beggining really, changing the name of Shau'ri to Sharay (sp due to lack of accent) Who the hell knows why they needed nudity in the pilot too. And changing of the "Death Glider" name from Udjeet glider made me mad. But reasonably enough, the stories were quite good. After a season or two, I begin leaving the house more and more, and less SG-1-I come back and the plots just seem so ridiculous and complicated that it just needs to be put out of its misery. I mean, from what I understand its story works, but its needlessly complicated and getting worse; Now if sci-fi can help 'em out maybe get things really back on track it'll be good, But I'm also a hard core movie fan, so the show started off bad with me. In any case, Farscape is the most original show I've ever seen, the comedy, plots and characters are great. They have excuses, that star trek never answered as well. Finally, I like it so much because its so original, I've not once been able to guess whats going to happen next, maybe soap-opera-y but its working right now.

  44. Re:let's be honest - these shows suck and... by Danny+Rathjens · · Score: 1

    You can't measure somebody by the shows they watch.

    Ok, then you can be friends with the people that enjoy the fights on "Jerry Springer" and "WWF".
    I'll choose the people that like "The West Wing" and "Farspace".

  45. Next Generation by tps12 · · Score: 1

    Ha. Some Physics "Genius." You couldn't beam yourself out of a paper singularity bag.

    --

    Karma: Good (despite my invention of the Karma: sig)
  46. Re:let's be honest - these shows suck and... by NanoGator · · Score: 1

    Ok, then you can be friends with the people that enjoy the fights on "Jerry Springer" and "WWF".

    Lol it's kind of funny you said that because me and my GF watch Jerry alot, and she's really into WWF.

    Okay, I guess the prolly humor's lost on ya. It's just funny cos Im at her house right now.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  47. Re:Frelling A! by sllim · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I find it ironic that someone like yourself would use a word like 'frelling' in your subject.

  48. Missing Fifth Season of Stargate by NeuroPulse · · Score: 1

    If you watch the sixth season of Stargate on Sci-Fi and you don't have Showtime, you will have missed the fifth season, since it has not reached syndication yet. Season four is currently being shown in syndication.

  49. Duck-Fu by Graymalkin · · Score: 2

    Until last year I didn't have the Sci-Fi channel so I'd never been able to watch Farscape. Even after I got the SFC I'd usually find something else on TV or just not watch it at all. Then it hit me, the Farscape marathon from last week. It is very rare that I end up so interested in a TV show. Now I can see why there is all the hubbub about the series, it is pretty damn awesome. I've found it to be the perfect mix of space opera and true sci-fi. There are sci-fi elements that make it intriguing and pique geek interest and then there are dramatic elements that easily transcend genres but make the show much better by fleshing it out and humanizing the story. Some parts of the story arc still confuse me but I've just started to watch the show. I wish Enterprise's writers would write some better drama which would really intrigue the audience. Another reason for not watching Farscape is I had it confused for a while with Lexx which actually hurt me on the inside.

    I've been watching SG-1 since it first aired on Showtime (at which point it actually had some nudity). The first two seasons went by pretty slow and it took a while for the series to really hit its stride. I think since season three started it really has. Like others have said, there's no captain's chair or any of the other sci-fi staples we've come to expect. There's aliens but they aren't masterful overloads of MIB, they're real badasses with laser guns trying to kill the characters. I liked the movie so I figured I would give the series a shot and found that I did indeed enjoy it. The things over the years I haven't liked is the increasing amount of Carter-delivered technobabble and the decline of witty banter. O'Neil and Jackson had some of the best banter that was well performed and didn't seem entirely out of place. Both actors delivered it well and the scene didn't pause for the punchline which I absolutely despise. It is a sitcom tactic to pause for a punchline. Now the banter seems entirely one sided with O'Neil delivering lines to no one in particular or saying some sarcastic remark at entirely the wrong time. The technojargonbabble is just crap. Carter is a decent character but I really dislike when she get used to deliver some technospeak that has no real point other than to give O'Neil an oppertunity to come back with a faux witty remark. I'm glad it was picked up by SFC though, it makes a good addition to their lineup. It will be nice to be able to watch the latest season rather than Fox's saturday behind the times filler syndication.

    --
    I'm a loner Dottie, a Rebel.
    1. Re:Duck-Fu by grazzy · · Score: 1

      uhu, duh. no channel even near sweden airs farscape, yet ive seen every episode, and im watching first ep of this season tonight.

      god bless broadband & tv-out.

  50. Re:Season continuity from Fox to SciFi: Anyone kno by Richard_at_work · · Score: 1

    Over here (uk) we are getting one stargate a day at 6pm. Its satisfying me for the moment :)

  51. All trolls out there ! Let's write a sci-fi series by Krapangor · · Score: 1

    If you are honest you have to admit that most Sci-Fi series plainly suck.
    Either they 100% fucked in scientific respects, like Start Trek or even worse Stargate (I wonder why the Däniken crap is still popular). Or their storyline sucks like hell, being extremely childish (Farscape) or retarded (Lexx).
    So, I purpose hereby that we, teh Trolls of Slashdot, write a high quality, not sucking Sci-Fi series. Most of us have high writing skills or a high-level science education, or sometimes evens both. It should be a very simple task to create an decent series.
    It is our most holy task to fight against immature content and retardedness.
    So I say: Lets get it on !

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
  52. Re:I hate Farscape(but you prolly lapped up ATOTC) by Jethro · · Score: 2


    * WARNING - Farscape Spoiler Below *




    I actually liked Lexx. Never watched it till about 6 months ago, and then I managed to find nearly all the episodes and catch up.

    Yes, its a very childish show, and at times brings back memories of very bad 70s German Soft-porn. But they did stuff on that show that no other show would dare to do.

    The one distinct advantage Lexx had over Farscape was that the main characters were always the same. Stanley, Xev and Kai. Sure, Xev changed to Zev, you got Lykka for a while, and Prince for a while, but the Crew of The Lexx were always the main three characters.

    Whereas Farscape added Chiana, Jool and New Chick from tonight, and lost Zhaan. And man is Jool annoying!

    I'm still trying to get a few of the S4 Lexx episodes I've never seen. I do think that S3 of Lexx was a masterpiece.

    --


    In the land of the blind, the one-eyed man is kinky.
  53. Re:Season continuity from Fox to SciFi: Anyone kno by Gossy · · Score: 1

    Yeah, we've been getting that for ages on Sky One. I'm actually sick of it now - after repeating them all up to season 5 just in time for season 5 to start, when it was over they went back to the start of season one AGAIN.

    Then, just when I thought they'd put something new on when they reached the end of season 5 once more...

    You guessed it, back to the start we go.

    Last I saw they must have just about got to the end of season 5 for what, the third time? Hopefully that'll be the end of it until season 6 appears.

    Talk about milking it for all it's worth. They've ruined the Simpsons in my opinion by doing the same thing, but on a bigger scale. I think they're showing 4 a day on some days, 2 on others. Madness. What about repeating Family Guy? Futurama? Hell, I'd like them to do their neverending repeats on Farscape simply because I've missed so many through it being on at awkward times on BBC2..

  54. Trust me, you won't miss a thing about series 5. by PyRoNeRd · · Score: 1

    You won't miss a thing about season 5 because the whole series has gone downhill after 4. The series has become a cheap ripoff of the X-Files.

    It became so bad that Michael Shanks called it quits because he thought his role had become a joke and they now have some alien from a planet of boring people replace him.

  55. Get a life. TV? How gauche. by crovira · · Score: 2

    You WANNA watch ads and their vehicles?

    --
    MSBPodcast.com The opinions expressed here are my own. If you don't like 'em... Think up your own stuff.
  56. Farscape - Best sci-fi swears yet by Wubby · · Score: 1

    Frell - "The 'F' word"
    Drenn - Crap
    Hezmana - Hell
    Mivoks - Male genitals
    trelk - slut
    trat - $hit (the physical stuff)

    I've actually caught myself using frell in casual conversation. (I'm already married, so I don't care about getting dates)

    --
    Sig
    Appended to the end of comments you post. 120 chars
  57. Continuity by coyote-san · · Score: 2

    Ironically, even though the shows generally avoid story arcs (and it's usually a disaster when they do), the series has some of the best continuity on television. Unlike some other shows I could mention, you don't watch episodes in frustration as the characters forget an easy solution covered in an earlier episode.

    But the series as a whole is on an arc to support the possible spinoff series Stargate: Atlantis.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
  58. Re:Umm. . .no. by Krapangor · · Score: 1
    By means by definition that you're all a bunch of retards who have nothing better to do then crapflood a message board instead of posting intelligent commentary. And now you think that you can write a science fiction series??

    A comment from someone who posts AC just to preserve his precious "karma".
    Did you ever realize that this "karma" is an imaginary value added by Taco to get better control of his message board ?
    Did you ever realize that this "karma" has no real value at all and that it doesn't matter if you are at 50 or -4536 points ?
    And therefore is no reason to preserve this "karma" ?
    And that it's the most retarded thing at all to post anonymously just the keep this "karma" save ?

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
  59. Characters by Krieger · · Score: 2

    I enjoy the fact that Farscape is relatively true to life. It constantly evolves, the same character's continue to be important, but new characters enter and old ones leave. I mean really do you still have all the same friends you had in high school? In college? Time changes everything and while they may still have importance to you, you don't always see them, or even think about them as much.

    The ever changing landscape of characters is extremely interesting. Some are annoying, some are cool, and all of them add new elements and depth to the plot.

    Overall I find it superior to the shows that are only episodic and always have the same characters with no chance that they'll die or evolve. Data from ST:TNG is a perfect example. I can't think of how many different shows they had him learn emotions or different elements of being human only to have him revert back to emotionless android the next time.

    Farscape's risk taking with new characters and plot is to be commended. It resembles life better, though I will admit that their occasional flights of fancy and wierdness both delight and scare (the cartoon episode).

    Overall it's a wonderful show that makes for some damn good entertainment.