Slashdot Mirror


Robocup 2002 Now Underway

ChenLing writes "Forget small robots on wheels playing soccer...193 teams from 30 countries have built androids to play soccer at 'RoboCup'. Although as the article says, it will be a while before we can pit androids vs humans on the same field....." Our previous story has background links and information about the contest.

182 comments

  1. Sounds like fun... by LordYUK · · Score: 1

    ... until the robots try to escape!

    --
    This is my sig. Its pathetic.
    1. Re:Sounds like fun... by grytpype · · Score: 2

      It could happen! Check this out!

      --

      - Have a picture

    2. Re:Sounds like fun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    3. Re:Sounds like fun... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Was that called for?

  2. Ouch by d_lesage · · Score: 2, Funny

    Although as the article says, it will be a while before we can pit androids vs humans on the same field

    Wouldn't want to get tackled by one of those.

    I guess there wouldn't be as much faking on the field then...

    --

    Ich werde nie wieder denken
    1. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Injury is the whole point of choosing soccer as the venue for robot sports development. The robots must not harm the humans -- the technology must be developed to a level of sophistication that prevents injury to non-robotic players.

    2. Re:Ouch by EFGearman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hey, I'd just hate to be slide tackled by one. Forget anything else. That would hurt.

      EFGearman

      --
      Atomic batteries to power! Turbines to speed!
    3. Re:Ouch by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      According to Gilligan's island, playing in an atypical, "chaotic", or otherwise unexpected fasion is how humans can beat a bunch of robots. So outrageous behaviour IMHO would actually increase on the part of the human team. Of course, you could still see less faking because the robots would be less prone to it . . .

    4. Re:Ouch by Alkaiser · · Score: 2

      Other instances where playing against a robot opponent will make you consider chaning your day job:

      1) You're the last man between him and the keeper, and you've got to make the tackle. You just know the bastard programmer's going to have him step on your balls.

      2) Wall in front of a robot free kick. You think that he's calculating where to hit a 200mph ball so it ricochets off you and in.

      3) Goalie during a penalty shot.

      4) In the box for a robot corner kick. Hmm...lots of metal trying to get to a ball you're trying to get to...with metal elbows...

      5) The road team playing in the robot team's home stadium...and all the drunk robot hooligans are in force.

      I think I'll keep my organic and non-organic players separate. The robots would have a far easier time winning than Big Blue ever did.

      --
      Netjak.com independent reviews of domestic & import video ga
  3. whats next by JeanBaptiste · · Score: 1, Redundant

    robot hooligans?

    1. Re:whats next by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      next wuld be to simulate pregnancy and sex.

      In fact sex is already implemented - I think M$ Windowz have a real satisfaction by forcing me to f*ck in the vagin of her registers.

      Microsoft viruses reminds me also how some plants and mashrooms spring themselves :)

  4. Bleh by ALoverOfPeace · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Who wants to watch robots play soccer?

    1. Re:Bleh by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      who wants 20 min of talking and only 5 min of real robot fighting the BBC has a robot wars type show several years ago that was way better they also had to go thru obstacle course and to allot more than just fight. The robots in robot wars on comedy central would get torn to shreds to the old school ones on robot wars on the BBC

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    2. Re: Bleh by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1

      Yes, in the English spirit of giving so much more you got 45 minutes of talking and a whole 10 minutes of fighting. :-)

      Honestly, Comedy Central's Battlebots is a lot better than Robotica, which has the obstacle course format you were speaking of. That show is just plain f-ing boring.

      And the third choice here is part pro wrestling (they have an ex-wrestler for an announcer) and it is the LAMEST...SHOW...EVER!!!

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    3. Re: Bleh by generic-man · · Score: 1

      And the third choice here is part pro wrestling (they have an ex-wrestler for an announcer) and it is the LAMEST...SHOW...EVER!!!

      That third choice is, of course, the American version of Robot Wars. The early episodes were filmed in the UK using Mick "Mankind" Foley, who is just terrible as an announcer.

      On the other hand, the UK version has one of the actors from "Red Dwarf" hosting. Geeks love his silly English accent and bad puns, but it's not for everyone.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    4. Re:Bleh by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      Yeah! let's have them play American Football, and Hockey. Soccer,(aka football in Europe) is so dull! How about boxing and pro rasslin'? The Bot's gonna lay the smack down on your rudy-poo candy ass, If ya smell what the bot is cooking!

      --
      How ya like dat?
    5. Re:Bleh by generic-man · · Score: 1

      Robot boxing has been around since the 1960s.

      --
      For more information, click here.
    6. Re:Bleh by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      Yes indeed! The Rockem Sockem robots. Someone should make those again. They were fun.

      --
      How ya like dat?
    7. Re: Bleh by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1
      That third choice is, of course, the American version of Robot Wars. The early episodes were filmed in the UK using Mick "Mankind" Foley, who is just terrible as an announcer.

      This I didn't know. I just do not like the "house robots" or the fact that they go out of their way to totally destroy an incapacitated robot to the cheers of the crowd. It just seems lame in a Roman arena sort of way.

      On the other hand, the UK version has one of the actors from "Red Dwarf" hosting.From the article, it looks like the guy played "Lister" on Red Dwarf. Did I misread it?

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
  5. "HUMANITY NOT THAT EASY TO FAKE" by mike3411 · · Score: 1

    Clearly not true. Haven't the writers seen talk-show hosts?

    --
    Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:"HUMANITY NOT THAT EASY TO FAKE" by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1

      Or lawyers? Politicians maybe?

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    2. Re:"HUMANITY NOT THAT EASY TO FAKE" by Theom · · Score: 0

      How about marketing?

      --

      mp3: l33t term for empty.
  6. 50 years? by jglow · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The RoboCup people have made it their goal to create a team of robots tht will beat the world cup winner by 2050. Pretty amazing stuff.

    --


    There's no "I" in Linux.. err..
    1. Re:50 years? by uonuoha · · Score: 1

      This might happen sooner than 2050 if they use the honda robot and implement the AI from the robot that tried to escape.

    2. Re:50 years? by Raffi+Spock · · Score: 1

      Yes, great idea, until it runs away from fans straight out into the parking lot.

      --
      Quid latine dictum sit, altum viditur.
      Anything said in Latin, sounds profound.
  7. US Team by red5 · · Score: 1

    eulogy-for-the-U.S.-team dept.

    Yah, like the US count be germany at this :)

    --
    I know I'm going to hell, I'm just trying to get good seats.
  8. Robocop 2002? by Nermal · · Score: 2, Funny

    Ok, did anybody else read that as 'robocop 2002' and cringe?

    1. Re:Robocop 2002? by Zelet · · Score: 1

      I really liked Robocop 1... the other 2 blow.
      I bet with special effects and the right actors/story, Robocop 2002 the movie would kick ass. (Robocop kicks the shit out of international terrorists for 2 hours)

      --
      ...And when they came for me, there was no one left to speak out for me." - Martin Niemoeller (1892-1984)
    2. Re:Robocop 2002? by Aexia · · Score: 2

      I thought it was a futuristic jockstrap.

  9. I wonder.... by The+Ape+With+No+Name · · Score: 2

    I wonder if there is a Zlatko Zahobot or a Keanebot that stomps off the field calling the coach a "Gearhead now and a gearhead when he was a player." Do you give the players punchcards instead of booking them the old fashioned way? What about hooliganbots that trash serverrooms after England gets whipped by the Faroe Islands?

    --
    Comparing it to Windows will be a moot point, since El Dorado is going to have a 40% larger code base than XP.
    1. Re:I wonder.... by ashitaka · · Score: 3, Funny

      Better:

      While(entire_world_watches)

      --
      If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
    2. Re:I wonder.... by jfinke · · Score: 1

      More like a brazilian... Hit me in the shins with a ball and I will go down crying clutching my head....

    3. Re:I wonder.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You mean...
      robot2.check_refs_paying attention() == true,
      not "= true" as that is an assignment.

    4. Re:I wonder.... by Tablizer · · Score: 2

      (* You mean...robot2.check_refs_paying attention() == true, not "= true" as that is an assignment. *)

      I hate languages that do that. I keep making a similar mistake. Whoever makes a new language, assume that the programmer uses multiple languages, and not make any one common habit from another compile/parse. "Leaking assignments" are annoying also IMO.

      But, that is my opinion. I don't want to start Yet Another Language War. It is personal and subjective.

      But back to the topic, I wish they'd spend effort on making robots fetch sodas and take out the garbage instead of chasing around a little ball like a bunch of silly humans.......unless they can crash into each other and spark. Humans don't do that enough in the game. In humans, the "sparks" appear to be an internal virtual phenomenon only. The audience does not see them.

  10. I always did like Cyberball by mthyen · · Score: 1

    Robots playing football with an exploding ball. What a great game!

    1. Re:I always did like Cyberball by totallygeek · · Score: 2
      Cyberball kicked ass! I wore out many a joystick on my Amiga over that game.

  11. When they can play against humans.... by HowlinMad · · Score: 1

    Will they get thier own team for World Cup play?

  12. Robocup 2002 by L.+VeGas · · Score: 2

    Was I the only one that thought this was the latest Ronco invention?

    1. Re:Robocup 2002 by ringolevio · · Score: 1

      I figured it was Nike invention being worn at the World Cup.

  13. I'm on a team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm on the University of Virginia team, and we're in the simulation league. We don't have physical robots. The result is we don't have to spend the effort on mechanical concerns and image recognition, and we get to devote more effort to the AI aspect of the competition. In the simulation league, the robots DO get tired, they do miss shots, and they have imperfect information. The idea is to remove all physical considerations from play and have them win on intellect alone. The robots being used in competition are no where near the level required to beat a world cup team, but I imagine that once they get close, these "humanizing" factors will be added to keep the match fair. At the current rate of development, I expect this to be well before 2050.

    1. Re:I'm on a team... by vrmlknight · · Score: 1

      That's pretty bad programming on your part if they miss you should devote more to the angle calculation algorithms. What the hell do they get tired from???? Why the hell do they have imperfect information all they need is better sensors oh wait this is all simulated so its crappy programming on your part if your going to simulate something simulate it to the best of your abilities putting voluntary problems in to a program sounds like Microsoft tactics

      --
      This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
    2. Re:I'm on a team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I hope you are just trolling. The whole point is to create human-like AI. That includes making mistakes. I'm working on a research project doing gamebots for unreal tournament. We don't want a bot that can kick the life out of any human player, we want one that simulates the human learning experience and performance variables.

    3. Re:I'm on a team... by mobets · · Score: 1

      Just a guess, but maybe he doesn't have any control over the quality of the data given to his program.

      --

      It was me, I did it, I moved your cheese
    4. Re:I'm on a team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we're in the simulation league. We don't have physical robots.

      And I'm in the simulation league of the World Cup. We play by imagining the game in our heads. I win every time :o)

    5. Re:I'm on a team... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea is to remove all physical considerations from play and have them win on intellect alone.

  14. inspiring by Sir+Elton+John · · Score: 0

    First they beat us at chess. Then they take our jobs. Now they challenge our authority in football. What next?

    I think it is only a matter of time before the machines take over. Strangely enough, I'm not worried. I've seen the cruelty of this world, the irrational hatred and fear that almost defines humanity. I've seen the pain that one human can put another through in the name of love.

    There is something colder than the heart of a machine. And that is the heart of a man.

    --
    "I'm a rocket man / Rocket man burning out his fuse up here alone." - Sir Elton John
    1. Re:inspiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A bit heavy on the melodrama, don't ya' think?

    2. Re:inspiring by llamalicious · · Score: 1

      Dude, that was way too deep.
      Now I'm depressed, and going to have to enter into a monestary and live out my life under a vow of silence.

    3. Re:inspiring by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      John... don't be such a pill.

      look at it this way -- your one true love is slobbering somebody else's knob right at the moment. Hey, at least one of the two of you guys is in a good mood, that's better than nothing.

  15. Not androids by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think the bipeds are competing, just exhibition.

  16. Wow. by bluemilker · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I didn't realize robotics had gotten anywhere near this point. I think a lot of people underestimate exactly how hard it is to get a robot to do something like, for example, find a ball. Now these robots are walking (a significant challenge, from my experience... :) kicking a ball, and interacting with each other? Pretty incredible.

    I wonder how sophisticated these humanoids can get. Can they pick themselves up if they stumble? Can they figure out whether another robot is on their team? Can they pass? The article seems to imply that at this point, they're not that much more than glorified mechanical penalty kickers.

    1. Re:Wow. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The article very vague on the specifics of these "robots". I wonder if they operate under fully automatic control as true robots do, or if they are really just remotely controlled toys (like battlebots).

    2. Re:Wow. by bluemilker · · Score: 1

      I think the article specified that the robots must be programmed, not controlled.

    3. Re:Wow. by natefaerber · · Score: 1

      Most don't walk. They have wheels that are optimized for lateral movement and such. They do have an Aibo division that is quite interesting in regards to walking and shooting.

      --
      -- My HARDWARE, My CHOICE.
    4. Re:Wow. by tid242 · · Score: 1
      so i saw a scientific american frontiers show on PBS quite a while ago, never cared much for the robocup stuff until i'd seen that, and now, man is it ever awesome to read about... ultimatedly i think this is a great way to make technology "fun," there's too much seperation of the mega-sports leagues vaguely reminescent of ancient gladitorial social-control and the arts & sciences...

      but anyway:
      Can they pick themselves up if they stumble? Can they figure out whether another robot is on their team? Can they pass?

      as of last year the 4-legged autonomous robots (there are different leagues: 2 & 4 legged autonomous, and 'wheeled boxes' of which the team is controlled by one computer and viewed by an omnipotent eye (above the playing field)) could pass to one another, recognize team vs. non-team (by color i believe, though unsure), and even 'squeaked' to one another to announce control of the ball if out of the line of sight of team-mates (ie behind them). at the time the SciAm show was aired the 2-legged league was mostly focusing on walking, but then again a couple of years ago the 4-legged league had robots that couldn't get up if knocked over, and oftentimes got 'confused' and would endlessly wander into a corner...

      while world-cup is amazingly awesome (mostly in it's humanizingly unifiying potential) i think robocup could ultimately become a unifier of 'fun technlogy' with a world-wide audience. of course i could be dead wrong (which i usually am...).

      my $2*10^(-2)

      -tid242

      --

      With a few exceptions, secrecy is deeply incompatible with democracy and with science. --Carl Sagan

    5. Re:Wow. by schon · · Score: 2

      The article very vague on the specifics of these "robots". I wonder if they operate under fully automatic control as true robots do, or if they are really just remotely controlled toys (like battlebots)

      UofA has a team competing..

      The robots are "real" robots - no human control at all; they're about the size of a coffee can - 12" high by 9" around; they move via wheels. They're semi-autonomous - they're controlled by separate computers, which transmit instructions to the robots via RF (this makes the robots much cheaper and more durable.) The computers watch the game from overhead.

      UofA has (IMHO) a better chance this year, as they modified the bots to be able to "kick" the ball - last time, they were just trying to push the ball into the net, and got soundly thrashed.

    6. Re:Wow. by gmarceau · · Score: 3, Informative

      I was on the McGill Aibo robot team in '99, 2000 and 2001. Every year we coded like mad apples all through the competition, days and night relaying each other. Thus, this is the first year I can post about it

      Usualy the code is divided six ways : vision, mapping, odometry, decision making, real-time sensing and real-time motion commands.

      The first three set us the real robots from the simulation. No mater are much simulation leaged proud themselves about dealing with noise - gaussian noise is nothing like what Mother Nature throws at you through real sensors : shadows, glare, obstruction, tripping, pixellation, ccd noise even the crowd. All those can throw your system off on a wim.

      The decision making is as easy as your base three module is solid. Its architecture gets a bit tricky though. At McGill we eventually came up with a small bytecoded language to ease the job, and ran an interpreter an the dogs. Cool stuff.

      The first year competing with the Aibo, walking was the bottleneck. Whoever could walk to the ball won. The year after, the walking had gotten better, and localisation became key. Every could walk to the ball, but only the better robots had tracked their position well enough to know which direction to kick it to when arriving. In 2001, speed and reliability of the whole made the cut.

      And to answer your question : yes, the Aibo stubble over all the time. It makes a good shows when compared to the larger robots which are extra careful not to run into each other. Nobody wants to break anybodyelse's research baby.

      Moreover, since the Aibos are equiped with gyroscopes, getting yourself up is only a mater of : if (gyro.vertical() > 45degs) { bring the legs in, bring the legs out }

      The dogies have miniature ccd camera and couldn't really tell team appart. The large wheels robots, which have full sized frame grabber, can. Acting on the information is harder. Even if you see your teamate, you have to be able to mesure speed in order to complete a pass - and that adds a source of real-world noise to your system. Few teams manage to get it right, but it gets better every year.

      They are certainly more than automated kickers. Better, it does wonderful thing for robot research and is alot of fun to participate in.

      --
      This post was compiled with `% gec -O`. email me if you need the sources
  17. Forget soccer... by southpolesammy · · Score: 2

    Let's get this technology implemented for Doom.

    Then again...

    --
    Rule #1 -- Politics always trumps technology.
  18. Won't find in a parking lot... by Vengie · · Score: 1

    Unlike the british experiment, I doubt we'll find these robots in a parking lot. (*evil grin*)


    However, this does raise a question; When these robots get to the point of being able to really _play_ soccer, what happens when they slam into each other? They have to be able to get back up, re-orient themselves, etc. Raises the question of Asimov's three laws....could they decide to actually harm another robot on purpose to impair its playing ability? (Red card on B-001-05-NZ18 !)

    --
    When in doubt, parenthesize. At the very least it will let some poor schmuck bounce on the % key in vi. (Larry Wall)
    1. Re:Won't find in a parking lot... by thefirelane · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Not just another robot, consider this:

      The robots could never win because they could never be programed to "play dirty". Think about it, when a human does something underhanded to hurt another player you think "That guy is a dick" but it is understandable because he is human and so are you.

      If a robot did this, there would be serious reprecussions to both the robot, and the designer. No one would accept a robot that behaved this way, therefore the humans will alway have a considerable advantage.

      In the same vein, this is why it is especially tough to build automated drivers for automobiles. With a human bus driver, an accident seems like an inevitable fact of life. To make a robotic driver with human intelligence requires it to also have human faults. It might, late at night, mistake the road as going off in the wrong direction and crash the car. The problem is, for a robot to do this is unacceptable.

      This is why really building a robot is so difficult: because of people's relation to them.

      People want robots to have the intelligence of people, while requiring the reliability of machines.

      Is this possible? Probably, but it is most likely very difficult. Probably even more difficult than simply creating a AI "as good" as a persons.


      ---Lane

  19. Androids vs Humans by Wrexen · · Score: 1

    Although as the article says, it will be a while before we can pit androids vs humans on the same field....."

    Unless, of course, those androids happen to be buzzsaw wielding, flame throwing, high voltage instruments of death himself (and we mix up the rules a bit)

    Let's face it, you'd watch it :)

    1. Re:Androids vs Humans by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Unless, of course, those androids happen to be buzzsaw wielding, flame throwing, high voltage instruments of death himself [battlebots.com]

      Yeah, and that thing was actually a robot, instead of just an RC-car with a sawblade.

      The robots in this competition are REAL - no human controllers.

  20. remember the good times by rocket97 · · Score: 0

    Past the road to your house
    That you never called home
    Where they turned out your lights
    Though they say you'll never know

    I remember running through the wet grass
    And failing a step behind
    Both of us never tiring
    Desperately wanting

    When they pumped out your guts
    And filled you full of those pills
    You were never quite right
    Deserving all the chills
    They say the worst is over
    Kicked it over and ran
    Then they ask what went wrong
    When they turn you on again
    They turn you on again.

    [Chorus:]
    Kick them right in the face
    Make them wish they weren't born
    And if they bring up your name
    Well they'll say you won the war.
    Baby burst in the world
    Never given a chance
    Then they ask what went wrong
    When you never had it right

    Oh the letters have dropped off
    Though they say you got them all
    I finally figured out some things you'll never know.
    Take back your life and let me inside
    We'll find the door if you care to anymore.

    I remember running through the wet grass
    and falling a step behind
    Both of us never tiring
    Desperately Wanting.

    --
    "The two most abundant elements in the universe are hydrogen and stupidity." -Harlan Ellison
  21. Well duh! by soulctcher · · Score: 1

    Of course it takes that long to clear the dinner table. Look how short they are!

  22. Pro-US censorship at slashdot ? by Krapangor · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Speaking of football, I have to mention that I'm very surprised that Slashdot didn't have any information about the historic loss of the US football team against Germany.
    As far as I understand football is considered to be a "weird" or "nerd" sport in the US, so this would be "News for Nerd. Stuff that matters."
    Or are you just rejecting stories which shed a bad light at the US ?

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
    1. Re:Pro-US censorship at slashdot ? by ringolevio · · Score: 0, Flamebait

      football is considered to be a "weird" or "nerd" sport in the US

      It's not weird, just stupid and boring.

    2. Re:Pro-US censorship at slashdot ? by Universal+Nerd · · Score: 1

      Ooooh alright, I'll bite... :)

      Or, as with most sports events, they are NOT news for nerds, I don't remember Slashdot praising the Patriots for the superbowl or the Red Wings for the Stanley Cup (Go Wings!) or the Lakers. Come to think of it, CmdrTaco et. al. didn't even mention any of the gold metals that the US has received in the last few olympics (summer and winter)...

      Maybe it's just me, but if I want sports news I'd check in to CNNSI.com or a good sports magazine on line.

      --
      Ash nazg durbatuluk, ash nazg gimbatul Ash nazg thrakatuluk agh burzum-ishi krimpatul
    3. Re:Pro-US censorship at slashdot ? by bje2 · · Score: 2

      why is the loss historic? i think it was historic that the US made it to the round of 8, sure...but Germany was pretty heavily favored in the game...it would have been a huge upset if the US won...but they were expected to lose...

      had they won, it would have been "historic"...not quite the level of US Hockey over Russia in 1980...but still "historic"...

      --

      "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    4. Re:Pro-US censorship at slashdot ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Yes, Ah-merry-cans preefur moor vahlahnt gamez, lahk RUuuGBEEe. But denn you gutta defand yerselss 'gainst dem guvamient wit dem biggy guns dat youw gowat. An' down' faggit dat fierst ammendamient!! Gowd bless Ah-merry-ca!


      Es lebe Deutschland! Nieder mit Amerika!
      Es lebe die Sozialismus! Nieder mit dem Kapitalismus!
      Es lebe die DDR! Nieder mit der BRD!

  23. I wonder.... by Lord_Slepnir · · Score: 5, Funny
    ....and will be programmed never to commit fouls...

    Or, if the programers were smart, to only commit them when the ref was looking away

    if (theirscore - ourscore > 3)
    {
    robot1.fall_down_and_cry_like_an_argentinian();
    while(robot2.check_refs_paying attention() = true)continue;
    robot2.break_other_teams_forwards_shin();
    }

  24. Human emotions by Corby911 · · Score: 1

    "Today, however, the simplest act remains a tremendous challenge for any robot."

    Well, all they need to create artifical boredrom is a robot with a scoop, and a herring sandwich....

    --
    Monday is a horrible way to spend 1/7 of your life.
  25. Imagine by metatruk · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Imagine a beowulf cluster of these!

    1. Re:Imagine by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1

      That would take some balls!

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
  26. Real Soccer? by KnightNavro · · Score: 3, Funny

    Is programing at the point where it can truly emulate soccer? Will they shoot the losing goalie? Will the Italian league fire the Korean when he scores against the Italian national team? Most importantly, will they riot?

  27. Robocop kicks ass! by Kenshin · · Score: 1, Troll

    I hope Robocop goes and beats up those lousy terrorists!

    ...oh, wait. RoboCUP?

    That's just boring, then...

    --

    Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    1. Re:Robocop kicks ass! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Robocup: what robots leak into when checking for performance-enhancing substances

  28. Good Progress for Robotics by Skepsi · · Score: 1

    Even though it is very simple soccer, it is still amazing to think that they can have teams actually play against each other. Taking sports or anything that we do everyday and create machines that can do it can have many positive impacts in the future. Who knows maybe they'll find a more efficient way for robots to run, which in return might result into better prostetics for humans. The more interesting aspect is the AI however. I wouldn't mind taking a look at those algorithms. IMHO.

  29. Re:robotic soccer by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1

    Actually, soccer is the fastest growing sport in the US. Admittedly, that means precisely squat because it has no real following compared to more traditional American sports, but at least it is growing.

    --
    Murphy was an optimist.
  30. well now.. by synshyne · · Score: 1

    I'm not a big sports fanatic or anything but shouldnt some things be left to humans. Sure we create these nifty robots that bend to our every command and do as they are programed for. But how lazy does that make us...we're now making robots to play our sports, teachers will eventually be dubbed out for computer interaction (i.e. DDR in Gym class, what will come next? I shudder to think...

    I got my ramen noodles, and my torengos and my beer...everything else I dont nessacarily need!

    --
    -Alicia
    1. Re:well now.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "we're now making robots to play our sports"

      In the long run it might be cheaper than hiring professional athletes.

  31. i beat them all. by pmanheier · · Score: 1

    i realize there's a lot of work behind this sort of thing....and that soccer really isn't the point....

    ...but really...i would whip all of them.

    and bash soccer all you want. bash ALL sports. they've all gone too far.

  32. Robobowl III by hivolt · · Score: 1

    Carnegie Mellon University's hypothetical Robotics Channel covers yet another exciting robot sporting event.

  33. Robocup special on PBS.. by bje2 · · Score: 4, Informative

    recently i watched a PBS (i think) special on the Robocup...must've been from 2001, if the 2002 one is going on right now...it was hosted by Alan Alda...anyway, it was really interesting...

    some of the things the teams could do were amazing...while most teams basically used "brute force" to push the ball into the net, there were some advanced teams that could actually recognize teammates and pass the ball to them...that was pretty impressive...the had kind of a pinball type flipper kinda thing that would poke out near their feet...

    another cool thing was that some of the robots (i think it was the same team that could do the advanced passing) could actually "trap" the ball...they had a spinning bar on their front, so as the ball came to them, the bar would spin, and they could keep control of it, by basically continually spinnning the ball towards themselves...kinda like a tread mill...

    another progressive idea (and i'm sure the slashdot/open source community will appreciate this) was that after the competition is over, all of the teams are required to share their source code, so everyone starts on the same plane for the next year of research... it's really a cool speical if you can catch it while you're flipping the channels sometime....

    --

    "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
    1. Re:Robocup special on PBS.. by Mignon · · Score: 2
      after the competition is over, all of the teams are required to share their source code

      That's kind of like how real players exchange jerseys after games. Sweat and all.

  34. Forget small robots on wheels? Don't think so. by pornaholic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    The motivation behind these human-shaped robots is not at all the same as the motivation of the wheeled robot soccer tournaments. The whole point behind the small robots on wheels is to learn and improve on teamplay and improvisional skills from a software level, not in mimicry of physical ability. These approaches to robot design aren't competitive, they are parallel in the pursuit of higher functionality.

    1. Re:Forget small robots on wheels? Don't think so. by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2

      Hmm. Apply the tactics learned by the wheeled robots to the legged robots. Let the legged ones 'concentrate' on walking/running and other movements. Then upload how to play later. Just like in the Matrix! Interesting. Could save $$$ and faster results too...

  35. Re:Notice how the truly stupid throw that word aro by vrmlknight · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Actually they call it football because you use your FEET which sounds more like a game played with your feet.
    1) A game where you kick a ball and use almost nothing but your feet
    2) A gamer where you hold a ball and run and try not to get tackled my large sweaty men

    --
    This must be Thursday, I never could get the hang of Thursdays.
  36. How About a What's New File? by GeekLife.com · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'd like to see a comparison of this year's robots vs. last year's. What new features are being tried out, how much closer are we to the dream of beating the best humans, and what strategies are being rethought?

    Everyone always talks about how fast technology like this advances, but when I watch the little Aibo's fight it out, it always looks the same to me. Can anyone provide insight?

    1. Re:How About a What's New File? by LenE · · Score: 2

      That would depend on each team that is participating, and what league you want to know about. The "Humanoid" league is new this year, so everything there is new.

      The software agent, small, medium, and quadraped (AIBO) are returning leagues. Unfortunately, the results page doesn't have any in-depth information about what teams have done to improve, or what gives certain teams an edge.

      I know that the Cornell Big Red (small league) team derrives much of it's success (two-time champion, placed third last year) from being multi-discipline based team. For the entire year, separate CS, ME, and EE teams work on improving every aspect of their robots and the AI that they run on.

      This year, their robots are faster, more agile and have better ball control. Since they design and construct their own team, they can optimize all aspects of their team's performance. Other teams are primarily CS based, some even buying their robots off-the-shelf (in addition to the AIBO-toy league which is hardware constrained). Many of these teams can only focus on improving the AI to match what they have.

      One thing that I haven't seen on the RoboCup site though is a listing for their first eleven-on-eleven match. Most physical games are five-on-five, except for the humanoid league, which is still nascent.

      The eleven-on-eleven match is an exhibition match between Cornell's 2001 robots and another team that placed second last year's tournament. I'm not sure who the other team is, but I know that they are really good as well.

      -- Len
  37. Three laws by rgoer · · Score: 5, Funny

    1. A robot may not score on his team's own goal, or, through inaction, allow his team's goal to be scored upon.

    2. A robot must obey the orders given it by coaches except where such orders would conflict the First Law.

    3. A robot must protect its own field position as long as such protection does not conflict with the First or Second Law.

  38. Simulate human behavior by exhilaration · · Score: 1
    It would be interesting to give each robot a personality, have them play a game, and use the results to predict human behavior.

    The next step would be to refine each personality, perhaps trying to emulate a real soccer player, and continue to use the robots to predict the outcome of a game or to find a particular weakness in a player.

    It would at least be popular with gamblers. :)

    1. Re:Simulate human behavior by pornaholic · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure it would be very interesting. We'd end up with 2 sides that won't communicate beyond killing a few of each other whenever possible. At least if we were really trying to mimic personality. Just look at the state of global affairs right now - we're just too self-destructive to be interesting.

  39. First Robot Soccer Hooligan! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2

    I nominate yesterday's robot! A stadium full of these and I think I'll stay home and watch the game on Pay-per-View.

  40. Forget small robots? by ckuijjer · · Score: 1

    Forget small robots on wheels playing soccer ...

    Please let not forget about those small robots, the design and contest goals are quite different for the small/medium league versus the humanoid league. If I'm not mistaken one of the contests in the humanoid league is standing on 2 feet for an amount of time (ok.. it's the first year for the humanoid league but come on this doesn't look really spectacular), so this league is mostly about designing humanoid robots and writing software for moving them around without falling.

    The small and medium size leagues are a lot more about designing distributed systems of autonomous agents and letting them sort out good strategies for play. I think the non humanoid leagues will be much nicer to look at for some years to come and forgetting about them will make a game of robotsoccer even harder to watch (watching one of those games still consists of waiting for a long time looking at robots that decided they better like it standing still.)

  41. Human's will always win! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    We'll just put a robots.txt file in our goal! :-)

  42. Yeah, what was that about? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Will the Italian league fire the Korean when he scores against the Italian national team?

    That would be like the Colorado Avalanche firing Joe Sakic for being on the Canadian Olympic hockey team.

  43. Who wants to see RC cars... by devross · · Score: 1

    ...fighting it out. 'Battle Bots' are just big-ass RC cars with weapons too weak to do any real damage. Also, who wants to mod up a post referencing a show on Comedy Central? Huh..

    --


    If these walls could talk they'd probly still ignore me. --MF DOOM
    1. Re:Who wants to see RC cars... by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1

      with weapons too weak to do any real damage

      Come back and post again after you have actually watched the show, ok? Not every design is a shredder, but there are many designs that are quite effective. Or do you want to see flamethrowers and tacnukes? :-)

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    2. Re:Who wants to see RC cars... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > Come back and post again after you have actually watched the show, ok? Not every design is a shredder, but there are many designs that are quite effective. Or do you want to see flamethrowers and tacnukes? :-)

      Dude, this is Slashdot. OF COURSE WE DO!

    3. Re:Who wants to see RC cars... by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2

      In Robot wars series 5 the robots have evolved quite a bit - the most effective weapons being powerful pincers (aka. Razor, which can cream 95% of the robots out there... it normally only loses if it gets driven into a pit or something) and flippers (Chaos II, which likes to finish rounds by throwing the robots [which weigh about half a ton] clean out of the ring, and WheelyBigCheese, which recently threw a robot from the middle of the ring, through the air and out of the ring, where it nearly demolished the protective barriers).

      The weedy Axes and stuff are generally only used by newbies - they're pretty useless.

      Mind you, I wouldn't like to meet any of those things in a dark alley...

      Robot Wars has flamethrowers btw. - both the house robots and the ring itself have them. They're not terribly effective against a titanium shell.

      Tacnukes would vapourise the judges, so it'd probably be declared a draw...

    4. Re:Who wants to see RC cars... by macdaddy357 · · Score: 1

      What the show really needs is that bud light mini fridge. That would rule!

      --
      How ya like dat?
  44. Wake me up... by Steve+Franklin · · Score: 1

    ...when they build one that looks like Madonna and has a tongue.

    _
    I am not a troll. I am a vertically challenged bridge inspector!

    --
    Hic iacet Arthurus, rex quondam rexque futurus.
  45. You meant pro-German bias? They played badly. by Augusto · · Score: 2

    To be quite honest, the Germans are the ones that looked bad after this game.

    Already the press is saying how the US pretty much dominated most of the game, and even ex-German players are criticizing the poor performance of the German team.

    Historically, Germany is a "soccer" super-power and has won the World Cup more than one time.

    The US is a "novice" when it comes to this sport, and in the last World Cup we finished dead last out of all the countries.

    Support for soccer in Germany is great, even the president of that country was photographed watching the game.

    So to be quite honest, I'm proud of a 1-0 loss against Germany (let's not talk about the obvious goal & penalty not counted by the referee).

    Germans expected to beat the US like they did Saudi Arabia. All they came up with was a "1-0" win. At this rate, the current German team has very little chances of beating Brazil, Spain or even Senegal/Turkey.

    --

    - sigs are for wimps.
    1. Re:You meant pro-German bias? They played badly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, I heard a certain leader of a certain European country left a certain conference early so he could watch a certain game of football...

    2. Re:You meant pro-German bias? They played badly. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since you're not talking about the obvious goal & penalty, I won't talk about the occurrence when the US played Mexico.

      BTW, today's was arguably not a penalty, as the ball wasn't handled intentionally.

  46. first soccer, then baseball by wmol · · Score: 0

    how are all those overpaid professional athletes going to ever get that kind of salary out of Unemployment? Doesn't anyone realize what this will do to their lifestyles?

    I can see it now, the cover of cheerios, robbie the robot, star pitcher for the NY Yankees - robbie's signature move is the 350 mph curveball.

  47. Re:Notice how the truly stupid throw that word aro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A gamer where you hold a ball and run and try not to get tackled my large sweaty men

    Run? Running is done with your feet. Dumbass. The original assertion (football vs. soccer) stands.

  48. Could they- by IWantMoreSpamPlease · · Score: 2, Funny

    Use Gaak, the escaped robot from the UK, to perform soccer tricks the other bots haven't discovered yet?

    --
    So rise up, all ye lost ones, as one, we'll claw the clouds.
  49. stupid, stupid. by denttford · · Score: 1, Funny

    Why couldnt they teach them something important, like those nice robots from Krikkit...

    --

    Leben Sie jetzt die Fragen.
  50. Our own insecurities by osgeek · · Score: 2

    The part of the article I found amusing was the end where they assure us that even if robots one day can beat us at soccer that we should still be proud, because building the robots was a human endeavor.

    Almost every article relating to some type of AI has to get those little insecurity-based digs in. It reminds me of all those Star Trek episodes where human beings are held up as the treasures of the universe.

    It's very telling and sad, really. We can't just celebrate achievement for its own sake, we have to tie it to our family, our school, our nation, or (at very least) our species.

    Unfortunately, I don't think that we'll lose that immaturity any time soon.

  51. Origins of the word. Re:It's not soccer, by Eye+of+the+Frog · · Score: 1

    According to Garry Archer, who's played for both English and American Football/Soccer clubs, soccer is an English word merged from "rugby" (or rugger) and association football. Take a look at the full explaination: http://www-2.cs.cmu.edu/~pstone/why.html

    Or look it up on the net your damn selves......

    --
    "Sexy Man" is not a moderation option. -- arose
    1. Re:Origins of the word. Re:It's not soccer, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      No, soccer comes from Ingsoc + Certification. It is a way of demonstrating one's allegiance to The Party.

      Freedom-loving Americans don't play evil communist games! This is why loyal Americans despise the evil distractions of Airstrip One! Real Americans play RUGBY!


      !Ouy rof etal oot si ti !Lortnoc ruo rednu ydaerla era uoy ti daer evah you fi !Stsinummoc dna atsinatas yb neddih egassem lanimilbus a si txet siht

  52. Jack off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful
    Hearts of Men

    Elton John

    You are a slack jawed faggot.

    Go suck your daddy's cock again, puff boy.

    1. Re:Jack off by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >You are a slack jawed faggot.
      >Go suck your daddy's cock again, puff boy.

      this got modded as insightful - who by? dubya?

  53. Soccer as a jingoist exposition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Soccer fans don't go for the sport, they go to express that infinite European desire to proclain their own localities superiority. Barbaric and tasteless diversion for the lowest common denominator.

    1. Re:Soccer as a jingoist exposition by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You stupid motherfucker, it's not only Europe that is about soccer, or rather football, it's the whole world, except the US of course.

  54. Re:fp by alexmogil · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    I want chicken. I want liver. Meow Mix Meow Mix Please Deliver.

    --
    A winner is you!
  55. Re:fp by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Copycat.

  56. UC Berkeley DeCal by mikerackhabit · · Score: 1

    For any of you out there who might be UC Berkeley students there will be a decal offered next semester in which we will build a team to play in the Simulation league. It'll be focused on developing the AI needed to do something like play soccer and should be a lot of fun. Watch the decal page for more info.

  57. dorks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a bunch of. btw, why do geeks use their full names, ie michael instead of mike? johnathan instead of john, etc. etc. etc.

  58. Pre-emptive -5 Offensive... by meringuoid · · Score: 1

    That infinite European desire to punch the crap out of froggies, krauts, dagos, eyeties, polacks, micks, sheepshaggers, scots, and all those Eastern European countries we haven't really got derogatory names for because in a thousand years we've somehow never found a reason to hate them... Yes, that. And that infinite English inability to forget about the war...

    --
    Real Daleks don't climb stairs - they level the building.
  59. Re:Notice how the truly stupid throw that word aro by ashitaka · · Score: 2

    Read this then go look in the mirror and realize how much of a fool you just made of yourself.

    Just because you post AC doesn't mean you're not a moron.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  60. Wonder if it will be the same as human soccer... by Dilbert_ · · Score: 2

    Didn't Gary Linneker once say something like :'Soccer is a game of eleven against eleven, and in the end, the Germans win'?

    --
    superblog.org: all your favourite blogs on o
  61. the point... by tid242 · · Score: 1
    But how lazy does that make us...we're now making robots to play our sports, teachers will eventually be dubbed out for computer interaction

    you're missing the point, we're not trying to create robots so that worldcup players can take a break, they're building robots that can solve problems, and since it's an international effort they chose a dynamic medium (unlike chess et al.) that has global interest/understanding. making a robo-football (americano) would have about as much interest in the rest of the world as a robo-sumo would here in the states...

    and as far as replacing teachers w/ computers, espcially jr. or sr. high teachers: how many students are already having their teachers be replaced by google? honestly there's more information online ready for consumption at your own pace (oft much faster than in a classroom setting) than any teacher could ever supply anyone with. true human interaction, blah blah blah, but face it, for people interested in learning technology will be a panacea.

    sorry this is a bit off-topic, but isn't that the way discussions usually go?

    -tid242

    --

    With a few exceptions, secrecy is deeply incompatible with democracy and with science. --Carl Sagan

    1. Re:the point... by synshyne · · Score: 1

      I guess when you put it that way in a sense it is reasonable to do as such and create these bots to extend what we can make them do, and how far we can enhance our experiments on technology...

      but its still just one view point of many on this topic i guess..such as mine...no harm done...

      if you think about it..we have bots to play chess against us why? to challenge us to make us think harder to be an programed bot that has books of moves in its system? If we are using bots in our sports, how will that make us better?
      and putting computers in school...sure its great for us to learn more about technology especially in this day and age...hell 3 yr olds know how to use the internet, that now is nothing surprising to us...infact as soon as all teachers are out of the picture come to think of it (shedding new light into own view point, beginning to change) students can learn how to read and write with visual and sound basic programs that can be loaded at home...no more school! yay!

      thinking way ahead of time and probably making no sense here; going back to old mind frame: then again everyone would be hermits, no? Sit at home on their computers all day and read and type to eachother but not physically go outside because on tv they have battlebots or someother revolutionized form of android sports they can watch...what other interaction (human to human) or job will we have if we build robots and computers to make our lives easier and easier....and our learning process faster because we dont have to wait on someone to teach us....and by default, using common social conformity..its easy to assume that could happen, you put an idea into stupid peoples heads and they will look around to see if everyone else is doing it; tell them they wont need to do much and can find their whole life on computers or using robots then they will rely on computers and robots..........
      sure its a wonderful step forward into technology future..but isnt it a step back too? (in some odd, demented way in my head)...i have no idea i'm rambling...just forget i typed anything...

      robots good? robots bad? technology good? technology bad? ahhhhh!!! my head!!!! make it stop!!!!

      --
      -Alicia
  62. Ahh, but the real question is... by Ami_Chan · · Score: 1


    Will they program female World Cup robots to take off their shirts if they win?

  63. good time to sell these by tandr · · Score: 1

    I bet Russ^H^H^H^Hsome of the commands considering to buy some of the best performers...

  64. I think you are overestimating what is being done by sielwolf · · Score: 5, Informative

    Ok, I'm not there but as far as I know android team v. android team is not being done this year, contrary to what the article is insinuating.

    According to the Official 2002 Robocup Humanoid League Draft Rule there are three catagories of Current and Future events with several sub-sections. Here is the run down.

    * Standing Still on One Leg
    * Humanoid walk - out from one end, around a pylon and back,
    * Shoot - where the bot is able to shoot on the goal and get it in.
    * Penalty Shootout
    * 1v1, 2v2, 3v3 Soccer
    * Freestyle - Five minutes of judged performance art.

    According to the organizers they are just hoping to get some teams to try the first few! And as you can see the competitive playing of soccer is waaaaaaaaaaaaaaayy down the list and probably aren't even being attempted this 'Cup. Sure, those nice posed shots of those Sony bots look nice, but those aren't competition pictures. Sure, the information on the Official Robocup site is sparse, but don't you think that they would have some big announcement if it did?

    This article from MSNBC is confusing one league (the humanoids) with another (the non-humanoid) in an attempt to create hype. Personally I think Robocup deserves it, but not by misconstruing what's going on.

    The best thing about the Robocup site is that you can actually watch the replays of the simulation games with Flash. Pretty sweet.

    --
    What is music when you despise all sound?
  65. Pussy robots by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Or do you want to see flamethrowers and tacnukes?

    Yes. I will not watch that show until someone in the audience is at least hospitalized. That's when you know they're pushing the envelope.

    Better yet, parts of a broken robot blown over (better: through) those wimpy partitions and killing a fan.

  66. Charging/Rushing Penalties by Cryptosporidium · · Score: 1

    I think they have charging penalities. I am not quite sure of the details, but if a robot detects another robot is approaching it, it must make maneuvers to get out of the way (such as move in a different direction). Likewise, if a robot detects it is moving itself toward another robot, it must change course. If two robots are charging each other, and only one attempts to prevent the collision, a foul/penalty is called on the other robot.

    All this is in the rulebook, which probably has a stricter definition of how the whole situation works.

  67. Shin-Pads by Joel+Ironstone · · Score: 1

    Imagine getting kicked in the junk by one of these beasts, or heading-butting them while going for a header. Scary.

  68. robot r&R by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    it's nice to see these robots taking time from the stress-filled world of building cars to relax a little bit and play some football.

    go 10101101

  69. Of course you are referring to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    a previous /. article?

  70. drooling at the thought... by beaverfever · · Score: 1

    What I really want to see is robot hockey!

  71. Aw, why can't they play football instead? by wackybrit · · Score: 3, Funny

    Who wants to watch soccer? Why can't the robots play proper football instead?

    Oh, I forgot, they haven't got motors strong enough to carry all that wussy 'protection' gear, and robots are too smart to waste waiting 5 minutes between every play.

    1. Re:Aw, why can't they play football instead? by VEGx · · Score: 1

      How can you call that stupid game "football" after all?!?!?!? Since it's mainly played by hand!!!! what does it have to do with FEET?????

  72. Soft evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The coolest thing, by far, to ever be done with the Robocup was to evolve teams to play the game using genetic programming.

    http://www.cs.umd.edu/users/seanl/gp/soccerbots/

  73. First Round Action by KnightNavro · · Score: 2, Funny
    "In first round action today, the Brazil Nuts and Bolts defeated the Germany Robomench by a score of 10-1."

    Don't think this is a high scoring slaughter. They're using binary.

  74. Re:robotic soccer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that means precisely squat because it has no real following compared to more traditional American sports

    This is a fallacy. There are no american sports.
    Everything is either ripped off from some other countries, (such as "Rugby for sissies" - what the americans call "football" - or basketball), or a game (like baseball - it's not a sport, it's a game.)

  75. Re:Notice how the truly stupid throw that word aro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You know that football is a real sport played by real athletes.

    Uhh, no. "American" football is a sissies' version of Rugby. If they were "real" athletes, they'd play without all that stupid-looking equipment.

  76. That's our team! by LenE · · Score: 3, Informative

    The Cornell Big Red team is the one that introduced the spinning bar (dribbler), omnidirectional travel, and passing. You have to see these robots in action to appreciate how well this works.

    Our current robots can trap the ball and move from one end of the field to the other, backwards in under a second. The ball looks like it is stuck to the robot! On top of just pulling the ball in, they also have a transverse dribbler so that the robot can also move side to side without loosing the ball at the end of the roller.

    Most teams are pure CS majors, but Cornell uses a team of Mech. E., EE, and CS students. By doing this, the team can concentrate on developing more innovative robots with new features to better play the game.

    Oh, and brute-force is forbidden by the rules. A ref. is supposed to assess penalties against robots that hit into the opposing team's players.

    -- Len

    1. Re:That's our team! by Altus · · Score: 1

      And I suppose that ref is as acurate as the refs in the real thing right? :)

      hell, if that is the case you could probalby just make a tank and youd get away without even a yellow card :)

      --

      "In America, first you get the sugar, then you get the power, then you get the women..." -H. Simpson

    2. Re:That's our team! by LenE · · Score: 2

      The refs are a bit forgiving.

      Last year, one team took advantage of a loophole in the rules that was supposed to limit trapping the ball out of camera range. Since an overhead camera in the middle of the field supplies a video feed to each team, a robot could remove the ball from view by pushing it into a corner and sitting on it. The rules state that a robot could attempt to retrieve the ball from the corner for a maximum of 20 seconds, after which, a ref would knock the ball free.

      One team programmed their AI to pin the ball in the corner for exactly 19 seconds, and then pull it out and shoot at the opposing goal.

      Since the camera wouldn't couldn't see the ball when it is put into the corner (with a robot blocking it from view), most of the AI would either go dead, or scramble the team it had control of, so as to reveal the ball. As such, most other teams were caught with their pants down when the ball was not put into play by the ref, but by the player hoarding it in the first place.

      This was legal by the rules, but hardly in the spirit of the game.

      Because of tactics like this and the buldozer technique employed by less skilled teams, I expect to see a SellingTheFoul() function show up in many of control programs this year.

      -- Len

    3. Re:That's our team! by bje2 · · Score: 1

      Yeah, i know that "brute-force" play is forbidden (as in you get a penatly for pushing another player out of bounds)...what i was talking about in the original post was actually the difference between less advanced robots that try to just walk/shove the ball into the goal (brute-force) as opposed to those robots that actually take shots at the goal, which are obviously more skilled...

      --

      "Facts are meaningless. You could use facts to prove anything that's even remotely true." - Homer Simpson
  77. I wanna blow stuff up [digitally]. by pornaholic · · Score: 1

    I know there was an article about a guy and his family learning to program Java online with a robot programming game. Does anyone remember which website he was talking about? Even better, what's your favorite (preferrably free) robot programming game?
    Please refrain from listing a google search, I want to hear what YOU think.

  78. What the hell? by RatBastard · · Score: 1

    And just what kind of other high-tech protective gear will you have to wear with your robocup 2002? Bionic shinguard X-3? Superconducting supporter J-12? Titanium shoulder pads?

    When will the madness end?

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
  79. mistake in the script by VEGx · · Score: 1

    replace this: robot1.fall_down_and_cry_like_an_argentinian(); with robot1.fall_down_and_cry_like_RIVALDO(); now we are talking of MASTER "cry babies"!!!

  80. just like soccer by Apostata · · Score: 3, Funny


    I'm to assume I'll have to wait years for German robots to stop winning?

    --

    This wasn't just plain terrible, this was fancy terrible. This was terrible with raisins in it. - Dorothy Parker
    1. Re:just like soccer by jeti · · Score: 2

      I know members of the german team that plays in
      Fukuoka this year (4 legged league). They aren't
      too optimistic because in the first round, they
      play against the former world champion. UNSW
      is reported to be really good.

  81. You're still missing it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If we are using bots in our sports, how will that make us better?

    It will teach us to make better AI for robots. NO ONE HAS THE INTENTION OF REPLACING HUMAN PLAYERS IN HUMAN SPORTS. This is basically just a research thing. Like a lot of other competitions, they get a bunch of teams together to build a robot to do something. Other competitions have the robots navigate mazes or stack boxes; Robocup has them play soccer. So they chose something that isn't simple labor and requires a bit more thinking and hence more complex and advanced AI. Big deal.

  82. Uniformative Article by sharkey · · Score: 2

    So what does a Robocup look like, exactly? And why do the robots need to wear a cup? Do they have Roboballs?

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  83. Robocop by n08ody · · Score: 0

    For a second I thought they were planning another sequel to this crappy film.

  84. Good Luck, Cornell by Skout · · Score: 1

    I had just gotten done with a trip to studying kungfu in Dengfeng, China(Site of the Shaolin Temple) when we (20 kungfu students/geeks) happen to see the Cornell University RoboCup team in the Narita Airport. I have to say we were pretty impressed. I asked one of the team members if they gave out cards (yellow/red etc etc) or fouls and he said yes robots can be carded. They had kewl shirts and a very cute manager. Good luck.

    --
    skout perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5,(41*2),sqrt(7056),(unpack(c,H)-2),oct(1 15),10);'
  85. Watch out for terrorist attacks ... by freaker_TuC · · Score: 1


    ... they could replace the ball with a EMP loaded device. It would "shock" the hell out of the players.

    --
    --- I am known for the ones who want to find me on the net. Is that a privacy risk or a privilege? One might wonder..
  86. I'll not be interesting, with... by Wolfier · · Score: 2

    ...today's battery technologies.

    Would you watch a 90 minutes game only with 60 battery recharge breaks?

  87. Re:Notice how the truly stupid throw that word aro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I don't think Jerome Bettis needs pads to go up against one of your eurotrash pussy rugby players.

    I would like to see one of your pussy eurotrash rugby players "go over the middle" against Ray Lewis (both of them without pads), however. I can always use a goog laugh.

    You really need to come up with something better than that. You are embarrassing yourself.

  88. Re:Notice how the truly stupid throw that word aro by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    How exactly does that disprove the fact that feet are normally used in running?

    Thanks for proving my subject line. The truly stupid (moronic in your case) do throw those words around!

  89. Thanks, but not really by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My post wasn't really all that insightful, unless you think the assertion that "snow is cold" insightful. It should be self-evident to anyone who watches sport of any kind.

  90. scores by jeti · · Score: 2

    Here you can find the scores of last years competitions.
    As you can see, UNSW totally flattened everyone.

  91. Re:A fine example by juha0 · · Score: 1
    robot2.break_other_teams_forwards_shin();

    here

  92. Video of this event and others. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here you go, posting anonymously cuz I dont buy into karma. pretty neat videos, CHECK OUT THE GOALIE! ha!

  93. Re:robotic soccer by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 1

    Funny that you chose to reply to this as an AC. Football |= rugby. And I'm not a baseball fan, but it is just as much a sport as football, rugby, soccer, basketball, or whatever. And since basketball was invented on the East Coast of the USA (IIRC), it was obviously not "ripped off from some other countries".

    --
    Murphy was an optimist.