Slashdot Mirror


The Chronoliths

Brooks Peck writes: "The Chronoliths, by the underappreciated* Robert Charles Wilson, is a finalist for the 2001 Hugo Award and Campbell Award. The tale begins in 2021 with the abrupt arrival of the first Chronolith, a 200-foot-high monument of unknown composition that memorializes a military victory. It's dated twenty years in the future. More Chronoliths follow, blinking into existence with explosive force--usually in the centers of cities. Each is grander than the last, and each lauds another victory by a leader who does not currently exist." The Chronoliths author Robert Charles Wilson pages 301 publisher Tor Books rating 8.5 reviewer Brooks Peck ISBN 0812545249 summary Big honking monoliths beam in from the future.

Witness to it all is our narrator, Scott Warden. There's nothing special about this guy. He's no clever scientist, no tough soldier. He's just a computer programmer who happens to be close to the location of the first arrival. After that he's pulled into the Chronolith investigation by a series of seeming coincidences. But where the manipulation of time is involved, coincidence becomes a slippery concept--something his co-investigators are well aware of.

I consider this quiet, unassuming novel to be on the cutting edge of science fiction for this reason: it creates a literary metaphor for our current view (and fears) of the near future. Just as giant, mutant bugs stood for our fear of the bomb in the '50s, the Chronoliths represent our fear of what's just around the corner today. But today we can no longer easily predict what the future holds. Science changes things too quickly--so quickly that we can only say with confidence that we cannot say what the future will be like.

Science fiction writers have devised a variety of means to cope with this threat to their livelihood. Vernor Vinge pulls off a plausible (and excellent) space opera in A Fire Upon the Deep by having the universe limit how far science can progress depending on its location in the galaxy. Other writers retreat to the very near future. The rise in popularity of alternate history stories could be another byproduct of this dilemma.

But in The Chronoliths Wilson doesn't resort to any tricks. The novel is all about the unknowableness of the future, as represented by the Chronoliths themselves: impenetrable, unstoppable, and, most importantly, of our own making.

*Perhaps one reason Wilson isn't as well known as he should be is that his novels are not as strong as his short fiction. The Chronoliths, interestingly, is his first novel written in first-person, the point of view he chose for many of his best short stories including "The Perseids" and "The Inner Inner City."

You can purchase The Chronoliths from bn.com. Slashdot welcomes readers' book reviews -- to see your own review here, read the book review guidelines, then visit the submission page.

242 comments

  1. Link is broken by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    The link from the main page was broken

  2. Er... This doesn't sound right... by dmarien · · Score: 4, Insightful

    "t's dated twenty years in the future..."

    Okay, i'm with you so far...

    "and each lauds another victory by a leader who does not currently exist."

    So, teenagers are winning the wars fought in the future? I knew the dexterity I had built up with a gamepad would come in handy some day... My giant robot remote controlled robot can beat yours anyday!

    --
    dmarien
    1. Re:Er... This doesn't sound right... by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      > "and each lauds another victory by a leader who does not currently exist."

      > So, teenagers are winning the wars fought in the future?
      Not having read the book, I don't know. But I'd take a guess that the leaders don't exist at the point in the fictional-future that the monument appears. At least, that's how I read it.

      > I knew the dexterity I had built up with a gamepad would come in handy some day
      If, on the other hand, your interpretation is the correct one, you don't exist and therefore should be vaninshing in a puff of logic about....now :)

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    2. Re:Er... This doesn't sound right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haven't you ever seen Project AKO??

    3. Re:Er... This doesn't sound right... by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1

      I, like most here, haven't read the book. My guess though would be that they don't exist as leaders yet, though they probably exist as people. I've probably never heard of whoever will be leading the free world (?) in 20 years so he doesn't exist as far as I'm concerned. Then again, maybe I should read the book. Looks interesting.

    4. Re:Er... This doesn't sound right... by actiondan · · Score: 1

      So, teenagers are winning the wars fought in the future?

      Maybe he means that the person involved exists today but is not currently a leader.

      e.g. I am 23 right now but in 19 years I become a great leader and change my name to 'Zardan the indesctructible'. A year after that I win a great victory and the memorial says "Zardan the Indestructible won a great victory" The leader who wins the victory (me) is in his 40's and the name is not that of someone who exists as a leader today.

      It's confusing wording but perhaps that is what he means.

    5. Re:Er... This doesn't sound right... by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      Read that as 'doesn't currently exist as a leader'. The person, in fact, is assumed to be somewhere, and because of the strange looping effect of knowing the future, is drawn forward into leadership by his own future successes. In fact, multiple potential leaders appear, all assuming that they will be the one that the Chronoliths refer to.

      Really, it's a pretty good book, but frankly, not one of my Robert Charles Wilson favorites. I'll take Mysterium or Memory Wire, or A Bridge of Years anyday. His older stuff is better than his newer stuff, IMHO.

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
    6. Re:Er... This doesn't sound right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that to say that the "Chrono" in the name Chronolith refers to the fact that they were modeled after future leaders who built these sculptures in the past using time travel (as i inferred from the review), or that they were created by some mysterious force?

    7. Re:Er... This doesn't sound right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Alexander started his march across the world at 20, and had conquered most of it by 32. Edward I was successfully waging war at 20 or 21, though he was not yet king. There are hundreds of other examples.

      It's not outside the realm of possibilities.

    8. Re:Er... This doesn't sound right... by Ducky · · Score: 1

      From what I gathered from the statement was:

      - The story takes place 20 years into the future
      - These leaders are even further into the future

      -Ducky

    9. Re:Er... This doesn't sound right... by rscrawford · · Score: 1

      Bit of a spoiler below...

      The paradox of the "non-existent leader" isn't one, for precisely the reason others in this thread have pointed out. The great military leader whose works are memorialized by the Chronliths has not yet emerged as a military leader. Gads, I wish I could remember his name! Well, part of the book at least does focus on many people in the world trying to figure out who the leader is, and where he might be currently residing, building up his army for his first major victory in Southeast Asia.

      The Chronoliths is a good book, but not the strongest by this author. Better than Bios. I highly recommend Mysterium by the same author, if you can find it.

      --
      -- The reason it's called the right wing? Irony.
  3. Re:Er...�This�doesn't�sound�right... by forsetti · · Score: 0, Informative

    Actually,¦I¦think¦he¦means¦the¦big¦statues¦are¦bei ng¦sent¦from¦further¦in¦the¦future,¦say¦2080,¦by¦p eople¦who¦are¦sending¦them¦into¦THEIR¦past,¦2021,¦ to¦commemorate¦leaders¦from¦2080¦(Confusing¦enough ?).

    --
    10b||~10b -- aah, what a question!
  4. not bad but nothing special by j-beda · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I picked this up the other day (along with "Dead Girls" (or available here) by Nancy Lee which was pretty good and I am not just saying that because I know the author) just for the fun of it.

    It has an interesting style and brings up questions about the nature of destiny and time, but I found it a bit unsatisfying. There were a number of fairly standard plot devices, although given a bit of a twist by the idea that the characters knew that they were somehow destined to come together.

    All in all I would rate it about 6/10.

    1. Re:not bad but nothing special by carlivar · · Score: 1
      You forgot though that you should not buy anything from amazon.

      Carl

      --
      Vote Libertarian
  5. Review is confusing by pgpckt · · Score: 2, Insightful


    What exactly is this book about? I find this book review lacking in the detail and length of normal book reviews. I would have expected a better review of the book, perhaps chapter by chapter highlights.

    From the review, it sounds like big statues to future events randomly appear. But I don't know what that means to the characters. How do people react to this? Do people try to prevent the wars before they start? Does it matter who the victor is? Does anyone ever figure out why these statues are appearing? Assuming they are being sent by humanity from the future, what is the motivation of those that send the statues? Are they warnings?

    I am having a hard time understanding the genre of the book and its plot from the review. If anyone else has read it, post your experiences.

    On an unrelated note, anyone else notice the karma system has changed? Apparently, my karma is now "excellent." Man, I want a point system back!

    --
    Lawrence Lessig is my personal hero.
    1. Re:Review is confusing by Chairboy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Chapter by chapter highlights? Are you certain you are not looking for the Cliff Notes version of the book instead?

      I suppose it's fairly common to confuse the concept of a review vs. Cliff Notes....

    2. Re:Review is confusing by dmarien · · Score: 4, Funny

      The reviewer allready answered this. Look in the table that precedes the review...

      "summary: Big honking monoliths beam in from the future."

      Don't know how much more concise it can get... :)

      --
      dmarien
    3. Re:Review is confusing by Darkfred · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Umm you seem to be thinking this is a high school book report. What you have here is actually a book REVIEW and is meant to do nothing but whet your appetite for reading the book, as well as give a few opinions about how it stacks up relative to other books.
      Also the only kind of book reports that give chapter subjects and highlights are for purchasing technical or text books.

      But since you are obviously some sort of alien who only reads slashdot this may have been the only kind of book review you've seen.

      Regards,

      --
      ----- 70% of all statistics are completely made up.
    4. Re:Review is confusing by jmoriarty · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I most respectfully disagree about this review. It gave me exactly what I needed to know to decide if the book might be something I would want to invest my time in.

      Of course, I also loathe movie trailers that give away most of the plot. From any summary medium like a review or a trailer, I want to know what the subject matter is about, not the details of what the subject matter is.

      Ow... I think I accidentally got Zen there for a moment and gave myself a headache...

    5. Re:Review is confusing by gerf · · Score: 1

      It's hard to even tell it's a book he's talking about. it could be some game or some back room pot smoking gibberish that could include things like "maybe each atom is like a little solar system. with the nucleus being the sun and the electrons the planets" "whoa dude, trippy"

      let me put it in your language (as best i can fudge, i'm not a programmer myself...

      "programmer" =! "good book reviewer"

      hmmm, not sure how to say, could be, but not necessarily... damn 1 cred class of c++ two years ago, i can't remember that shite!

      ---is it drinking alone if you're talking to someone on IM?

    6. Re:Review is confusing by Peyna · · Score: 2

      "summary: Big honking monoliths beam in from the future."

      Sounds like 2001 to me. Except those monoliths somehow sparked great changes in humanity.

      --
      What?
    7. Re:Review is confusing by pgpckt · · Score: 1


      Why repling to myself is bad form, I thought I should clear up that I wasn't asking for a cliff notes version, nor a spolier summary. I did however think it would be nice to clear up what is going on in this book (since from the review it is unfamilar to anything I have read). By chapter summaries, I meant I was hoping for a little more detail of what is going on in this book, what motivates the characters, and why these statues are appearing. This review didn't do that. There is not enough material for me. I do agree with those that commented they didn't want the book spolied. Neither do I, but I do need more to go on for a book that deviates from any plot lines that I am familar with.

      I hope this clears that up a bit :)

      --
      Lawrence Lessig is my personal hero.
    8. Re:Review is confusing by DrVxD · · Score: 2, Insightful

      > Sounds like 2001 to me. Except those monoliths somehow sparked great changes in humanity
      And didn't come from the future. But you're right, they both have monoliths.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    9. Re:Review is confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Aliens, the future, it's all the same =P

    10. Re:Review is confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Naw, replying to yourself is fine. I, too, found the review somewhat lacking... but I figure that he didn't want to spoil the book for us. I'd really rather too little than too much information in such cases.

    11. Re:Review is confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      =! != !=
      huh? sorry... think I might be confusing myself with that one ;-)

    12. Re:Review is confusing by Nomad7674 · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Not sure this is a better review, but here is my take on it:

      An unknown terrorist leader from the future begins beaming back monuments to himself through time (think of the Washington Monument appearing suddenly in the middle of colonial virginia), which tell of a terrible war where this terrible leader won everything. These monuments appear with more and more frequency as time moves on, and the world begins to panic as they imagine a new Ghengis Khan, Hitler, or Hannibal. Like people claiming to be the Messiah today, people begin taking on the name of the leader and claiming to be HIM in their own areas of the world. Chaos threatens to engulf the world, as our heros try to find a way to prevent an outcome which has apparently already happened.

      Basically, I found the book interesting, but not exciting or compelling. The narrative was diverse and the ideas unusual, but in the end many threads were left unexplored and the book sort of peters out rather than ending with a bang. If you like speculative fiction, this will fill a pleasant afternoon but is not a "must-have."

      At least that is my two cents.

    13. Re:Review is confusing by Prior+Restraint · · Score: 2

      On an unrelated note, anyone else notice the karma system has changed?

      I wondered about this last night. I just want to know why no one told us.

    14. Re:Review is confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "summary: Big honking monoliths beam in from the future."

      Don't know how much more concise it can get... :)


      What? They're beeming back future versions of the Linux kernel???

    15. Re:Review is confusing by Jonathan · · Score: 3, Funny

      But you're right, they both have monoliths

      Wouldn't that be multiliths if there is more than one?

    16. Re:Review is confusing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      but I do need more to go on for a book that deviates from any plot lines that I am familar with.

      Personally, I think any book with a plot line I am not familiar with would be an automatic choice.

    17. Re:Review is confusing by gerf · · Score: 1

      lol, i always get them mixed up... heh, thanks :P

  6. F.Y.I by dmarien · · Score: 1

    "unknowableness" is a.k.a. uncertainty.

    --
    dmarien
    1. Re:F.Y.I by cbellamy · · Score: 1

      I'm not sure they're the same thing - Uncertainty can be reduced by using better measurement methods. Unknowableness can't be reduced, or it wouldn't be unknowableness.

    2. Re:F.Y.I by dmarien · · Score: 1

      Dude -- i'm uncertain about a lot of things that'll happen in the future... Will the earth implode, or be taken over by little green men? Will I get fired this afternoon if/when my boss finds out he's paying me to troll slashdot? I just don't know...

      A ruler isn't going to increase certainty of these events which I can't forsee.

      --
      dmarien
    3. Re:F.Y.I by deceptakahn · · Score: 1

      uncertain != unknowable Something is "unknowable" if it is not possible to know it. (think epistemology) Something is "uncertain" if it may or may not happen.

      --
      deceptakahn
    4. Re:F.Y.I by Dstrct0 · · Score: 1

      "Ineffable". i.e. "The ineffable will of Bob".

      I forget which Douglas Adams book that's from... Any Douglas Adams fans around here today to remind me? I'm thinking it mighta been Mostly Harmless, but I'm not sure...

      --
      Build boards not bombs
    5. Re:F.Y.I by DrVxD · · Score: 3, Funny

      > "unknowableness" is a.k.a. uncertainty.
      Heisenberg unknowableness principle doesn't have the same ring to it though, does it?

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    6. Re:F.Y.I by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      Dude, ducks float. Therefor she must be a witch.

    7. Re:F.Y.I by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      > Uncertainty can be reduced by using better measurement methods
      Not according to Heisenberg.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    8. Re:F.Y.I by kmellis · · Score: 1
      "Heisenberg unknowableness principle doesn't have the same ring to it though, does it?"
      No, but it would perhaps be a bit more accurate. Many people believe, incorrectly, the HUP to be a problem of measurement, rather than a problem of epistemology.
    9. Re:F.Y.I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it may not truly be unknowableness. Heisenberg stated taht you can not measure without affecting, thus you can know only a value at a snapshot in time after the effects of the measurement are taken into effect.... Perhaps this is only true now, with measuring techniques currently known, it would be impossible to measure without affecting the true value. Will there ever be a way to measure without changing? THAT is uncertain. (not unknowable, because we may actually know one day weather we can measure without affecting by actually finding a way to prove that the measurement obtained with a certain device had no effect) so since it is uncertain if we will ever be able to measure without effect, then its really not unknowableness that Heisenberg is talking about. Its only unknowableness if today's conditions remain true forever, which is uncertain..... God... that one give me a headache

    10. Re:F.Y.I by kmellis · · Score: 2
      "Heisenberg stated taht you can not measure without affecting..."
      No, that's my point. The math of the HUP is not concerned about distortions caused by measurement; rather, it says that the knowability of position and momentum are inversely proportional. This is a matter of principle, not measurement. The pop-science characterization of HUP as "you can't observe something without affecting it" is analogous to the "everything is relative, therefore there is no 'truth'" characterization of relativity. Both are popular misconceptions of genuinely revolutionary scientific ideas that have had far more social and cultural influence than the real science they mimic. Darwinism also comes to mind.
    11. Re:F.Y.I by Soulslayer · · Score: 1

      She turned me into a newt!

      Well, I got better.

      --


      Once more unto the breach dear friends...
    12. Re:F.Y.I by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yes, it is.

    13. Re:F.Y.I by cbellamy · · Score: 1

      So you can't reduce the uncertainty of a measurement by using a micrometer instead of a yardstick?

  7. "just a computer programmer" by DrVxD · · Score: 5, Funny

    > He's just a computer programmer
    Whaddya mean, JUST a computer programmer. Didn't you know that the geeks will inherit the earth?

    --
    Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    1. Re:"just a computer programmer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I've never met a meek geek in my life.

    2. Re:"just a computer programmer" by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      > I've never met a meek geek in my life.
      What does meekness have to do anything? After the overture to 2112, Geddy Lee quite clearly says "And the geek shall inherit the earth". (It's amazing what you can do with digital audio...)

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    3. Re:"just a computer programmer" by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      Being a computer programmer does not automatically make somebody a geek.

      Some would say that unless a person can write code, read schematic diagrams, and maybe even solder, 'geek' status is questionable.

      'Hardware' isn't plugging together stuff with a phillips screwdriver in your hand. And 'writing code' isn't just shoving together something that will compile and run in C. Assembly language might even be added as a fourth requirement.

      Not that any of these things prevent wannas from ordering 'geek gear' from 'ThinkGeek' or other poseur salons.

    4. Re:"just a computer programmer" by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      I fulfil all of your requirements. (Although I consider aeembly a tool for the feeble minded that can't deal with raw hex or binary - depending on the platform). And it was JUST A JOKE. At least three people have found it funny enough to mod it +1 (and somebody with no sense of humour has modded it down -1 "overrated". Which, IIRC, means they're safe from M2)

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    5. Re:"just a computer programmer" by BigZaphod · · Score: 2

      No no.. That's "Meek" not "Geek." Unless of course the bible had a misprint...

    6. Re:"just a computer programmer" by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      > Unless of course the bible had a misprint...
      The bible IS a misprint :D

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    7. Re:"just a computer programmer" by sciolist · · Score: 1

      Didn't you know that the geeks will inherit the earth?

      yeah, but the pieces are unusually small; commonly only 3'x6'x6'...

    8. Re:"just a computer programmer" by colmore · · Score: 2

      right... that's what we're quoting, Geddy Lee...

      and what about the voice of Geddy Lee
      how did it get so high?
      I wonder if he speaks like an ordinary guy
      I know him and he does
      And you're my fact-checking cuz...

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
    9. Re:"just a computer programmer" by Rand+Race · · Score: 1
      I believe he was reffering to all purveyors of information services...

      --
      Insanity is the last line of defence for the master diplomat. But you have to lay the groundwork early.
    10. Re:"just a computer programmer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blessed are the cheese-makers.

    11. Re:"just a computer programmer" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      umm, didnt you know tech is a commodity sector now and well be replaced by: robots, Indian or Chinese programmers (who will be slave like indentured servants with little or no pay (i.e. POWER).

      Corrupt politians and tyrannical psychopaths will continue to rule the world :/

  8. Future Dating? by Ryan_Terry · · Score: 4, Interesting

    **Disclaimer** I really know nothing about carbon dating, just babbling here...

    Now unless the "Born On" date was stamped to the bottom how exactly does one Future Date something? Does it actually gain more carbon that it would have now, so that by the time we see it the carbon is right?

    --
    MessEdUp
    .sig
    #/var/www/v
    1. Re:Future Dating? by TMLink · · Score: 1

      I think they mean that there's a date engraved on the monuments that is 20 years in the future. Course, I havn't read this yet, so it's just a guess. But seeing as nobody else on here has, I don't mind posting this. :-)

      --
      Every time a guy gets a threesome, somewhere in heaven an angel gets his wings. --Cary Tennis
    2. Re:Future Dating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Chronoliths are human-made monuments. IN fact, the "Born On" date is actually stamped on them.

      "This chronolith commemorating the military victory on August 17, 2031, etc."

    3. Re:Future Dating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      **Disclaimer*** I'm not roman but
      ...you could just carve MXLI on it.

    4. Re:Future Dating? by ajs · · Score: 5, Informative

      Carbon dating only tells you how long it's been since an organic life form died. Thus it does not work on a) things that have never lived or b) things that are currently alive. If it worked in reverse, you would be able to tell me when I was going to die (sort of the topic of a R.A.H. short story, "Timeline").

      To be even more general, carbon dating assumes many things about the state of the atmosphere, sun, and organic life. It would work on another world, but the parameters are different.

      This is why after a certain horizon (measured in tens of thousands of years, AFAIK), you have to switch to something like Uranium-decay. Even still after you start going past a significant percentage of the Earth's history (say 500M-1B years) it starts getting hard to back up any specifics.

      Any geologitsts want to chime in here?

    5. Re:Future Dating? by Peyna · · Score: 4, Informative

      You also get things like a few nuclear weapon explosions messing it up too.

      --
      What?
    6. Re:Future Dating? by LMCBoy · · Score: 1

      ***Disclaimer*** I'm not a pedant, but

      wouldn't that be MMXLI ?

      --
      Liberal (adj.): Free from bigotry; open to progress; tolerant of others.
    7. Re:Future Dating? by yeoua · · Score: 1

      Actually, if it was in the future, and came to the past, it would have lost more of the carbon isotope than the rest of the world. Since the carbon decays and that is what is measured, it would have decayed into the future, where it was sent to the past. So it would still be possible to carbon date it, if it had carbon in the first place, and if carbon dating could get it to that specific of a year.

      But like someone else said, its probably date stamped.

    8. Re:Future Dating? by ajs · · Score: 2

      On a slightly off-topif vein, this reminds me of one of my favorite travesties of logic: a christian group once tried to "disprove" the usefulness of carbon dating. They had a technitian (against his protests) carbon date a live plant). Of course, the result was completely wacky, but you could interpret it as meaning that the plant was several thousand years old.

      From this, the conclusion was drawn that carbon dating doesn't work. Heh.

      Kind of like pointing a gun at your foot, turning off the safety, pulling the trigger and then claiming that guns can never be safe.... The sad part is that even today many anti-science types still recite the mantra that carbon dating is "known not to work".

    9. Re:Future Dating? by ajs · · Score: 2

      How can that have any effect?! Certainly a few tens of thousands of years from now, we'll see changes, but the geologic record that exists today is totally unchanged. Until the topsoil, plants, sea beds, etc of today become the rocks of tomorrow, uranium dating will still give us a pretty good idea of the age of a mineral sample won't it?

    10. Re:Future Dating? by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      Proof positive that time travel is impossible - the grammar is WAY too complex.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    11. Re:Future Dating? by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      So what you're saying is that certain religious groups have certain ideas which are so ill-founded as to be laughable, yet they will take every opportunity to use those ideas to embarass themselves in public? Fortunatly for them, stupidy is not the obstacle to survival that it once was :-)

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    12. Re:Future Dating? by Peyna · · Score: 2

      Do you not know how radiocarbon dating works? When all those nuclear tests were done it f'd up the amount of Carbon-14 in the atmosphere. Thus, in the future, it will be difficult to date objects from 1950+.

      --
      What?
    13. Re:Future Dating? by Xeriar · · Score: 2, Interesting
      We use Potassium-Argon dating along with Uranium dating, and another method (altogether called 'isochronic dating') to determine the age of the Earth.

      Sortof.

      These methods can only really determine when a given rock last solidified, becuase the daughter products can otherwise escape. Thus the oldest rock we've found for the Earth is 3.3 billion years or so, whereas the Moon dates to 4.55.

      Carbon-14 dating is tied to the atmospheric levels at a given point in time, which is correlated to tree-ring data (going back ~8,000 years) and another method which I forget. Because nukes produce C-14, it will appear to be a spike in the atmospheric data for future archeologists to puzzle out.

    14. Re:Future Dating? by fizbin · · Score: 2

      > Proof positive that time travel is impossible - the grammar is WAY too complex.

      No, time travelers just don't speak English.

      We all kljeka fiuw coeit blot.

    15. Re:Future Dating? by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1

      ok, I've got a serious question. If carbon dating a live plant dates it at several thousand years old, what happens to it's structure upon death that suddently pulls the figures into an accurate reading? If the readings are scewed while its alive, why isn't its state frozen at death and progress from there? This isn't intended as flamebait or anything, I'm just curious.

    16. Re:Future Dating? by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      > No, time travelers just don't speak English.
      Or any language that we currently know about. Grammar is pretty important in the expression of temporal ideas, and if you're going to travel in time I'd take a guess (and it's nothing more than that - my time machine is in the shop right now) that you're going to need to express temporal ideas.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    17. Re:Future Dating? by mikerich · · Score: 2, Funny
      And of course there is the opposite effect caused by all the C12 we're pumping into the environment thanks to our use of fossil fuels.

      I feel sorry for the radiocarbon dating people.

      Best wishes,
      Mike.

    18. Re:Future Dating? by Peyna · · Score: 2

      IIRC Tree-ring data is used to 'calibrate' carbon-14 dating, because they usually don't exactly match up too well. Carbon-14 dating is relatively decent for younger things that were at one time alive. Of course, I can't quite figure out how coal, which is supposed to be millions of years since dead, stills has detectable levels of C-14 in it. I think that dating techniques are far from any kind of closed book, and need much more refinement than we currently have. We might be on the right track, but they need much more work.

      --
      What?
    19. Re:Future Dating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually it would be pretty easy. You see if you know something "blips" into existance than you could assume that it is "new" and when you carbon date the object it will be missing a certain amount of carbon that it should have in reality not have yet lost. The only problem with this theory is the fact that carbon dating is accurate (at best) to plus or minues 42 years...

    20. Re:Future Dating? by dasunt · · Score: 2

      Entertaining part of Timeline, if you noticed, is that it has Mr Lazarus Long.

    21. Re:Future Dating? by Mr.+Bad+Example · · Score: 1
      [...] you're going to need to express temporal ideas.

      I think you mean "willan on-need".

    22. Re:Future Dating? by monkeydo · · Score: 2

      Why would they have to "puzzle it out"? I assume that someone is recording atmospheric C-14 levels currently so there is no reason why future scientists would have to use tree rings. If you assume future scientists will still be using C-14 data, why not assume they will have (current level of knowledge) + X instead of (current level of knowledge) - X?

      Do you think at some point all of humanity will forget that we did nuclear tests? This is like the people worrying about putting up monoliths around the nuclear waste dump. In 500 years will English be a dead language? There are people around today translating 5000 year old writtings and 500 years from now linguists will have a much larger "rossetta stone" (think Library of Congress).

      --
      Si vis pacem, para bellum
      The only thing more annoying than a Libertarian is an (un|mis)informed Libertarian
    23. Re:Future Dating? by Xeriar · · Score: 1
      Carbon 14 could use refinement, and is getting refined, but the ones used to date rocks/the Earth are pretty solid IMO.

      I believe the coal deposits found with C-14 are those above/around uranium deposits, and they turn some c-13 into c-14 via neutron capture. This is all IIRC, so take with salt.

    24. Re:Future Dating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If carbon dating a live plant dates it at several thousand years old, what happens to it's structure upon death that suddently pulls the figures into an accurate reading?

      I can't remember the exact details, but basically a living organism is still absorbing and removing stuff (including the various carbon isotopes used for carbon dating). Only after it dies does the system go into a predictable state, where the existing carbon isotopes decay and no new carbon is introduced.

    25. Re:Future Dating? by silicon_synapse · · Score: 1

      I can't remember the exact details, but basically a living organism is still absorbing and removing stuff (including the various carbon isotopes used for carbon dating). Only after it dies does the system go into a predictable state, where the existing carbon isotopes decay and no new carbon is introduced.

      But with all the fluctuation during its life, wouldn't you have to know the values at time of death to reach any reasonable conclusion at a later date?

    26. Re:Future Dating? by inimicus · · Score: 1

      Caveat: There are a lot of constraints on carbon dating, but none of them relate (at least not directly) to whether something was alive or not...

      --
      Internet Explorer was unable to link to the Web page you requested. The page might use standard HTML or CSS.
    27. Re:Future Dating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      500 years from now linguists will have a much larger "rossetta stone" (think Library of Congress).

      Paper doesn't last 500 years, thanks to acids currently in use. Older books may have less acid, but nothing paper is going to survive as long as cuneiform tablets did. We'll eventually move everything into digital form where no one will be able to read it within 50 years or so. Especially with the current DRM crap.

    28. Re:Future Dating? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Entertaining part of Timeline, if you noticed, is that it has Mr Lazarus Long.

      After the travsety that was Number of the Beast didn't ALL Heinlein stories (and everything else!) acquire Lazarus Long?

    29. Re:Future Dating? by abreauj · · Score: 1
      These methods can only really determine when a given rock last solidified, becuase the daughter products can otherwise escape. Thus the oldest rock we've found for the Earth is 3.3 billion years or so, whereas the Moon dates to 4.55.

      As I recall, the oldest rocks we've found on Earth solidified 3.8 billion years ago, and the earliest fossilized evidence of life is dated at 3.5 billions years ago.

      The Precambrian Era, the time before multicellular life appeared, is split into three periods, which geologists measure in units of megayears (1 mya == 1 million years ago). The Precambrian Era is comprised of the Hadean period (4500 to 3800 mya, the time before the Earth solidified), the Archaean period (3800 to 2500 mya, the time before the continents stabilized), and the Proterozoic period (2500 mya to 540 mya, the time before multicellular life appeared).

  9. link at amazon by bjt062659 · · Score: 1

    I highly recommend this book. The link to it at Amazon is here

  10. Good scifi by bravehamster · · Score: 5, Insightful
    But today we can no longer easily predict what the future holds. Science changes things too quickly--so quickly that we can only say with confidence that we cannot say what the future will be like.
    Science fiction writers have devised a variety of means to cope with this threat to their livelihood.

    Science fiction has _never_ been about "this is what the future will be like!". Well, some of the crappy stuff is. The best science fiction is all about what-if. Good science fiction places characters in strange circumstances that may or may not bear any relation to a plausible future for humanity. The fun is in seeing how humans (or aliens for that matter) would deal with these circumstances. What-if there was an alien loose on your ship with acid for blood and lightning quick reflexes? What-if a colony of nanobots became self-aware? What-if we found the sun was inhabited with creatures who were slowing down the fusion processes at the center? The plausibility of these scenarios _actually happening_ is slim to none. But that has nothing to do with whether or not this is good science fiction. For me personally, if the story is based on hard science, then thats when I stop caring about the plausibility of the story.

    Any science fiction writer who sees himself as a prophet for the future needs to find a new line of work, like say, I don't know, start a cult for instance.

    --
    ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    1. Re:Good scifi by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 1

      You are absolutely correct. The best Sci-Fi is all about the what-if's. I have read essays by Bradbury, Asimov, and a few others all supporting this philosophy.

      --
      If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
    2. Re:Good scifi by DrVxD · · Score: 5, Funny

      > The plausibility of these scenarios _actually happening_ is slim to none

      So, earth creature, we have succeeded in lulling you into a false sense of security. You will kneel before the might Kr'a,nuth when he comes to take your pathetic little planet. All your chronoliths are belong to us.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    3. Re:Good scifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where ever there's a link to the cult, there should be a link to www.xenu.com

      "The organization clearly is schizophrenic and paranoid, and this bizarre
      combination seems to be a reflection of its founder, L.Ron Hubbard."
      --Judge Breckenridge, Los Angeles Superior Court

    4. Re:Good scifi by charlesc · · Score: 2, Insightful

      That's why people still care about "The Martian Chronicles", even so far as to make it required reading in some schools. The sense of wonder and the unknown and opportunity that the characters feel really jumps out and makes the reader feel the same wonder, even though we know none of that stuff is really going to happen in the time frame laid out by the book (or maybe ever).

      All the aliens and doodads and gizmos and bending universes and lasers and exploding planets in the world don't make up for a shitty story and paper doll characters.

      --
      "So many ways to skin a cat, and still everyone uses a great big knife."
    5. Re:Good scifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can think of numerous science fiction novels that are succesful because they are plausible. A good science fiction novel takes everything we see today, and adds a novel concept that seems plausible, but not expected. The point of the original reviewer was that unless this concept seriously effects the entire scope of human development, it is difficult to create a future that will interest people.

      The biggest problem with this today is that most science fiction writers don't want to invent their own rules of reality, they wish to take what is currently known, and provide a what-if scenario based on that. Our knowledge of physics is much greater than it was even 20 years ago, and generally speaking, it is a lot easier to associate physics with the physical world than it was then. This means that any forward looking novel that breaks or bends any of these rules is expected to play out their effect on everything else. So any vision of the future that focuses on any science not known today will be quite difficult to pull off well.

      Of course, there is good science fiction that doesn't feature the future (Lucifer's Hammer), or doesn't feature our society (Nightfall). But even the ones that don't have humans in them generally try to create a society that we can still identify with. It is terribly rare that someone creates an entirely new reality that is succesful, simply due to the size of such a task.

      Science fiction is all about what-ifs, I agree. But good science fiction is about how the what-if relates to us right now.

    6. Re:Good scifi by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 1
      What-if a colony of nanobots became self-aware?

      Why, Wesley would save the ship, of course!

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    7. Re:Good scifi by bravehamster · · Score: 1
      Hmm, was there a star trek episode like that? I was actually referring to the Greg Bear classic "Blood Music". Recommended reading, as is any Bear novel.

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    8. Re:Good scifi by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      No, however there was a The Next Generation episode about nanites becoming aware, and speeeeking through the ship's compuuuuters. It was bad, bad, bad, like most TNG episodes that didn't feature the Borg or Spock.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    9. Re:Good scifi by Tosta+Dojen · · Score: 1

      I was going to ask if you were referring to Vacuum Diagrams by Stephen Baxter. It had that and the sun-killing creatures too.

      --

      I have a strong belief in the Second Amendment.

    10. Re:Good scifi by dancies · · Score: 1

      I've got to totally disagree with the premise that "The best science fiction is all about what-if". It's my understanding and experience that "the best" (of course, "the best" is always somewhat subjective) science fiction examines real-world situations in another context removed from the emotion of that situation. Indeed, looking at this page we find that many of the most renowned science fiction writers reference some sort of real-world context in their definitions of science fiction.

    11. Re:Good scifi by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Blood music was an incredible book, but it had nothing to do with nanotechnology. It was about self aware biological pathogens.

      Bear has written some excellent books on nanotechnology though...

    12. Re:Good scifi by bravehamster · · Score: 2
      Damn you're right. *smacks self with clue stick* It's been years since I read it, and the plots been convoluted in my head since then. I need to pick that one up again.

      --
      ---- El diablo esta en mis pantalones! Mire, mire!
    13. Re:Good scifi by UranusReallyHertz · · Score: 1

      That part of Vacuum Diagrams was taken form Ring. Good book.

      --
      Smoking is an expensive, slow, and unreliable method of suicide.
    14. Re:Good scifi by BlueFashoo · · Score: 1

      Any science fiction writer who sees himself as a prophet for the future needs to find a new line of work, like say, I don't know, start a cult for instance.

      Starting cults has a long and honorable tradition. Please don't tarnish it's reputation by suggesting that any loony sci-fi writer should start one.

      --
      Nice Marmot
  11. cronolith? by Sogol · · Score: 5, Funny

    Cronolith: (noun) any entry in /etc/crontab whose width exceeds 80 characters

    1. Re:cronolith? by Darkfred · · Score: 1

      Crontab always seems to be the goto feature for dumb geek jokes. It does have a silly name, but then so does linus.

      Regards,

      --
      ----- 70% of all statistics are completely made up.
  12. I found this book... by eaeolian · · Score: 3, Insightful

    ...unsatisfying. While the premise is very interesting - always a good start in SF - the execution is somewhat lacking, as the plot elements are very guessable in a lot of places. I also thought the way the social unrest was depicted was overly-simplified, and the ending left something to be desired.

    On the plus side, the characters do come to life, and the story sweeps you along pretty well, and has a couple of interesting sub-plot twists. Overall, not a bad read, but it's not something I'll stand on the rooftops and shout about, either.

    1. Re:I found this book... by taniwha · · Score: 1

      I agree - the book was a good read but the ending kinda sucked - I felt it was a cop-out - sure a twist, but kind of understated and not the grand explanation that the rest of the book seemed to be leading up to

  13. Good book, read it recently. by dpilot · · Score: 5, Informative

    Specifically, I read it on June 18, on airplanes and in airports taking a trip with my daughter.

    Good book, though IMHO "The Harvest" is still my Robert Charles Wilson favorite. (Kind of like "Childhood's End" but different.)

    To clear up a few basics, the Chronoliths appear, smashing cities where they do. They have writing on them, commemorating a battle victory 20 years in the future. No carbon dating needed, they read the information. If you suddenly had a big monument materialize obliterating your city, would you be prone to distrust the writing on it?

    Of a more interesting nature is a hero who is a hero by working his craft, not his fists. This aspect is reminiscent of Neal Stephenson's works or "Crosstime Engineer". (Author forgotten, but I think he was Polish) In most fiction no matter what the profession of the hero, the hero-work seems to get done with fists and guns. Nice to see a change.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Good book, read it recently. by Amezick · · Score: 3, Informative

      Leo Frankowski is the name of the author. Really nifty little series.. (Crosstime Engineer) Gets abit corny into the 6th book but is a fun read.
      --Angus

    2. Re:Good book, read it recently. by DrVxD · · Score: 1

      > If you suddenly had a big monument materialize obliterating your city, would you be prone to distrust the writing on it?
      If it said "we come in peace", probably.

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
    3. Re:Good book, read it recently. by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Didn't even know it was a series, apparently I caught the first one. Darn, now I'll have to look for more.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    4. Re:Good book, read it recently. by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Hey, give us a spoiler summary. Someone! I'm never going to read this book, but my curiosity is getting the better of me and I want to know what happens.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    5. Re:Good book, read it recently. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can think of one where the hero got it done with an apple laptop and a "virus".

    6. Re:Good book, read it recently. by Sebbo · · Score: 2
      Of a more interesting nature is a hero who is a hero by working his craft, not his fists. This aspect is reminiscent of Neal Stephenson's works
      Yeah, wasn't it neat how Snow Crash and Diamond Age didn't have lots of violence, car chases, and explosions?

      Oh wait--they did. Dang.
  14. Woo hoo! by LittleGuy · · Score: 5, Funny

    The tale begins in 2021 with the abrupt arrival of the first Chronolith, a 200-foot-high monument of unknown composition that memorializes a military victory.

    So, the Red Sox finally win a World Series?

    --
    Mod Karma -1: I sed bad wurds. If I cep my mouf shut, I wud be at riyses.
    1. Re:Woo hoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Whoa, slow down there. This is science fiction, not high fantasy.

    2. Re:Woo hoo! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      At least he didn't say the Cubs...

    3. Re:Woo hoo! by Ravensfire · · Score: 1

      Well, if it had said the Cubs won, everyone would have known it to be a fake!

      --
      "But we decide which is right, and which is an illusion"
  15. OT re: unrelated not about karma by drew_kime · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    On an unrelated note, anyone else notice the karma system has changed? Apparently, my karma is now "excellent." Man, I want a point system back!

    So when I hit the cap, shouldn't my karma be "most excellent"?

    --
    Nope, no sig
    1. Re:OT re: unrelated not about karma by EvilBudMan · · Score: 1

      How does the naming system relate to the numbers? I'm most confused.

    2. Re:OT re: unrelated not about karma by Vinnie_333 · · Score: 1

      Grade me! Rate me! Please! ;)

      --

      "We shall party like the Greeks of old! You know the ones I mean." - HedonismBot
    3. Re:OT re: unrelated not about karma by colmore · · Score: 2


      party on Garth
      party on Wayne

      --
      In Capitalist America, bank robs you!
  16. Still disappointed with the ending by SpamJunkie · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I read Chronoliths and my favorite part was the beginning. The ending was my least favorite part, which probably means I didn't "get it". While enjoyed the concept of the book it didn't live up to my expectations.

    The entire book leads up to the arrival of the unkown conqueror Kuin. The pace increases with each new Chronolith. However when the date foretold on the first Chronolith arrives the book dries up and decides that it wasn't so interested in dealing with Kuin at all. I was disappointed.

    As far as the Hugos go my favorite this year is American Gods. I thought I'd hate the book, judging from its title and the fact that I'm not American at all. I nearly didn't read it, but in the end decided I couldn't make a fair judge of the other Hugo nominees without reading it. I am very glad I did. The American in the title refers to being of all of America, not just the USA.

    Neil Gaiman's Coraline just came out as well, and my copy's already in the mail.

    1. Re:Still disappointed with the ending by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where can you find a list of this years hugo nominees?

      No google didn't help.

    2. Re:Still disappointed with the ending by ocbwilg · · Score: 2

      As far as the Hugos go my favorite this year is American Gods. I thought I'd hate the book, judging from its title and the fact that I'm not American at all. I nearly didn't read it, but in the end decided I couldn't make a fair judge of the other Hugo nominees without reading it. I am very glad I did. The American in the title refers to being of all of America, not just the USA.
      Neil Gaiman's Coraline just came out as well, and my copy's already in the mail.


      I didn't think that I would like American Gods very much, but I picked it up on the recommendation of Uncle Willy and found out that I enjoyed it quite a bit. In fact, I just reread it again a couple weeks ago beore I started passing it around to my friends. It's not particularly dense reading (I finished it in one lazy Saturday) but is still quite entertaining.

  17. Underappreciated by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why, when I read the word underappreciated to I automatically translate this to mean "shite"?

  18. Other reviews by Alien54 · · Score: 5, Informative
    --
    "It is a greater offense to steal men's labor, than their clothes"
  19. Robert ANTON Wilson by arrogance · · Score: 1

    Never read anything by this Robert CHARLES Wilson guy, but Robert ANTON Wilson wrote some pretty cool, messed up books. Try the Illuminati trilogy....

    1. Re:Robert ANTON Wilson by Nightpaw · · Score: 2

      That's nice, but not what we're talking about here.

  20. Robert Wilson conspiracy? by phaxkolumbo · · Score: 1

    Has anybody noted that there are shitloads of Robert Wilsons who specialize in Sci-Fi/Paranoia/Conspiracy -subjects?

    Robert Anton Wilson being a prime example.

    Check it out in Amazon sometime, when you're really bored...

  21. Why? by arcmay · · Score: 4, Insightful
    This "review" is essentially only two paragraphs long. While I know most people don't want to see spoilers, I'd rather see something a bit more meaty. Beyond mentioning that it is in the first person, there is absolutely no discussion of the style or flow of the book. Is there action? How is the character development? Most Amazon reader reviews go into more depth.

    That being said, I have read this book and it is quite good. Also, I found it refreshingly short: Average readers will finish it in just a few sittings. Wilson manages to tell a complete and satisfying SF story in a few hundred pages, which is occurring less and less often.

    Anyway, if your curiosity is piqued, check out a more complete review here: http://www.sfsite.com/10b/cl114.htm

  22. I liked it by larry+bagina · · Score: 5, Informative

    The strength of Robert Charles Wilson's latest book is not in the time travel per se, but rather the response of a group of fully-developed, sympathetic characters to the phenomena they are encountering.

    To my delight (and unlike so much literary fiction these days), Wilson's protagonists DO SOMETHING. It may not always be the right course of action, but there is an understandable human motivation when it is the wrong course of action.

    Scotty, the protagonist, is strong yet flawed, and his fascination with The Chronoliths is kept in proper perspective. Sue Chopra, the brilliant physicist, is handled gingerly by an accomplished author.

    The time travel theme -- the appearance of "artifacts" from the future -- is not new but is integral to the story. And this latter point is crucial to good science fiction. The science (regardless of what you think of time travel dynamics) is consistent and interesting and becomes a de facto character in the tale.

    The only area where the novel could've been strengthened was the development of Scotty's relationship with his father, and indeed, development of the father's character in general.

    Nevertheless, this is an entertaining and thought-provoking book with a broad scope, engaging characters and a very interesting ending.

    It is also an optimistic allegory to the hope and renewel that always follows tragedy, like the euphoria following World War II.

    It is well worth the read. Wilson is going to be a major force in speculative fiction in years to come.

    --
    Do you even lift?

    These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    1. Re:I liked it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You just pulled this review off of the amazon.com page for this book you fucking karma whore.

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/ASIN/081254524 9/ 104-9438685-4428738

      Go down the page

  23. Other Book Genres by gcshaw2nd · · Score: 1

    I'm curious what other book genres typical "geeks" enjoy reading. I used to read a great deal of scifi but I moved away from it during college, not having much time for extraneous books. Now I find myself attracted to pseudo-history books like Dumas' The Three Musketeers and Scott's Ivanhoe. In some ways, these books are related to scifi playing what-if games. What genres do you guys like to read besides scifi (and manuals)?

    1. Re:Other Book Genres by Angry+Toad · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Personally (not that anyone will care, but just add to the thread):

      - History: currently reading Barbara Tuchman's The Proud Tower - A Portrait of The World Before the War, a somewhat episodic but interesting review of the late 19th century. There are some fascinating correspondances with the current climate (the chapter on the anarchists is particularly interesting - I was a bit vague on them before, but there is a real resonance with the current terrorist threat).

      Another big favourite recently was A World Lit Only By Fire - The Medieval Mind and the Renaissance by William Manchester. Many medieval history books can be pretty dry, but this one is a cracking good read.

      For fiction I used to be a big fan of John Irving - I think The Hotel New Hampshire remains my favourite book of his, though I'm less enchanted with his recent stuff.

    2. Re:Other Book Genres by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For the pinacle of pseudo-history bordering on fantasy, have a look at Jill Paton Walsh's 'Knowledge of Angels', and of course Umberto Eco's 'Name of the Rose'. Both incorporate strong philosophical elements.

      I still read SF as one book in 3, but I'm currently working through George Elliot and Thomas Hardy. Just started a Wilkie Collins which is good, and probably more accessible than GE/TH. But Jane Austin is still my favourite author.

      I would say that Peter F Hamilton was my favourite SF author, if it weren't for his sex scenes - too many, too graphic, and utterly unconvincing.

    3. Re:Other Book Genres by Tricepticon · · Score: 1

      For more in the realm of pseudo-history I have to recommend a few I found engaging.

      -Pillars of the Earth, by Ken Follett - a deceptively simple novel about the building of a cathedral that ties in to England's historic past.

      -The Lions of Al-Rassan, by Guy Gavriel Kay - a retelling of El Cid in a semi-fantasy world, remarkable for its analysis of religious conflict in a thinly veiled stand in for Spain.

      And if you like the whole "what-if" genre, there are a couple of very good studies of famous events (mostly military, i.e. battles) if the conditions had been just a little different. They're called What If and What If 2, both edited by Robert Cowley.

      Go read a few! It's good for you.

    4. Re:Other Book Genres by ProlificSage · · Score: 1
      I'll read almost anything, but I'm partial to sci-fi/fantasy. However, I found it quite enjoyable to read some of Ken Follett's books, which take place in the past. Pillars of the Earth was set in 1000 A.D. It gives you some perspective on how good we have it now, compared to then.

      Ann Rice's Vampire Chronicles books were also a fun read, as they are an escape from reality.

      Any other reading I do tends to be science fact rather than sci-fi. I am currently reading books on quantum mechanics, history, and differential equations.

      --
      Real software engineers regret the existence of COBOL, FORTRAN and BASIC.
    5. Re:Other Book Genres by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Philosophy, in particular zen and buddhism.

      And Hentai mags.

  24. Enigmatic this is not by ianscot · · Score: 1
    Okay, so the idea of these monuments, their potential meanings about the near future and so on, might be interestingly enigmatic. A little derivative, but hey, it was a good idea so why not steal it? (If you didn't immediately think of 2001, you may be alone.)

    This doesn't sound anything like subtle, though. Gee, these huge (city stomping) monuments have specific dates on them, and they all commemorate military victories (yawn) by some sort of conqueror named "Kuin." Talk about your ploddingly obvious directions to go...

    --
    "Fundamentalism" isn't about divine morality. It's about human authority.
  25. oysters by coyote-san · · Score: 4, Interesting

    You also have to pay close attention to the biological processes involved. One of the favorite "proofs" that evolution is all wrong and therefore the literal interpretation of the Christian book of Genesis *must* be accurate is the fact that some breed of oyster (or at least some type of clam) preferentially uses one isotope of carbon over another. It's enough so that you can pull an oyster from the ocean, eat most of the meat, and date the rest as thousands of years old.

    I don't remember the mechanism involved, but it's something that makes sense to the scientists involved and they can account for it. But anyone who's only had the standard K-12 exposure to science would be utterly confused by the results.

    --
    For every complex problem there is an answer that is clear, simple, and wrong. -- H L Mencken
    1. Re:oysters by merlyn · · Score: 3, Funny
      It's enough so that you can pull an oyster from the ocean, eat most of the meat, and date the rest as thousands of years old.
      Hey, I've been to that oyster bar. That explains it!
  26. Currently not a fan by Zabu · · Score: 1

    I am not really a fan of sf, but I think it is because I have not been reading the right ones.

    Would anyone recommend this book for me? or should I read a better sf book so I can enjoy the genre?

    Anyone?

    --
    It's all good.
    1. Re:Currently not a fan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Read "The Anubis Gates" by Tim Powers.

    2. Re:Currently not a fan by jazz_hunter · · Score: 2, Informative

      Try the Hyperion series by Dan Simmons, the story gets better with each volume...

      --
      WANTED: Good sig, funny, concise yet somewhat esoteric.
    3. Re:Currently not a fan by Zabu · · Score: 1

      thanks

      Damn 20 second wait

      --
      It's all good.
    4. Re:Currently not a fan by yotto · · Score: 1

      I will gladly reccomend anything by Isaac Asimov. Anything. Well, don't pick up the fifth book of one of his several series, but definately go for book 1. Specific reccomendations: Foundation (This is good, as not only is it the first book of a series, but it's also a set of longish short stories, so it's easy to pick up and drop. Though I suspect you won't drop it that much) The Caves of Steel (Especially if you like detective stories. A lot of people think you can't write SF detective novels, but Mr Asimov proves you can. This is also the first in a multibook series, contained in the universe with his Foundation books, though they are separated by thousands of years) Any of his short story collections.

    5. Re:Currently not a fan by Grab · · Score: 2

      Depends on what you like reading, really.

      Just got hold of "Grass" by Sheri Tapper. Imaginative, good plot, good characters, well-written. Highly recommended.

      Heinlein fills in the trashy end of the sci-fi spectrum, kind of the Alastair Maclean or Harold Robbins paperback novel of sci-fi.

      If you like conventional fiction that rambles a bit plot-wise but has superb imagery and ideas, you should try "Snow Crash" by Neal Stephenson. Phil Dick and William Gibson both have styles like this as well. All three of these are highly-rated for the visions of the future and the quality of writing.

      Asimov's books have great ideas (particularly the robot short stories and novels), but I don't rate the writing much. Usually fun to read though.

      Ditto Arthur C Clarke and Kim Stanley Robinson - both very inventive, but I don't rate their writing styles, I'm afraid. Others may disagree, but I think their plots and characters aren't that well shaped, cos they're too interested in the science and "big picture" society, and the actual ppl are kind of an afterthought.

      Stephen Donaldson's Gap series is good but it's bloody hard going, and his writing style kind of sucks (he's fond of using obscure words just to brainfuck you, and he keeps using the same ones over and over so his vocab obviously isn't *that* extensive, he's just looked up some stuff in a dictionary). But the plotline and characters are just awesomely done.

    6. Re:Currently not a fan by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      I highly recommend the Greg Bear series: "Eon" and "Eternity". Even better is the series: "The Forge Of God" and "The Anvil Of Stars".

      I also highly recomment Niven/Pournell's "The Mote in God's Eye".

      Another vote for Vinge's "A Fire Upon The Deep", and LeGuin's "The Disposessed".

      "Stranger in a Strange Land" is a classic as well (thought not without its flaws).

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    7. Re:Currently not a fan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I recommend the Deathworld trilogy by Harry Harrison (I think). Basicly, it's scifi/adventure, and the 3 books take place on 3 VERY hostile planets.

      If you like time traver, "The Time Patrol" by Poul Anderson is pretty good. Not much hard science, but nice adventure episodes, and the action mostly takes place in the past.

      If you want something that's "mainstream" among slashdotters, go with Asimov, Clarke, Orson Scott Card, William Gibson, etc.

      I'd also recommend the Dune series by Frank Herbert, but not solely because it's scifi. I think the story could've beed told without the scifi element, and it's there just to create a futuristic atmosphere. But the book itself deals with many, many other topics, like religion, economy, ecology, martial arts, phychology, etc. It's just an awesome story. The books are: Dune, Dune Messiah, Children of Dune, GodEmperor of Dune, Heretics of Dune, and Chapterhouse: Dune.

    8. Re:Currently not a fan by trotski · · Score: 1

      Some really good Sci Fi? Try Asimov's The End of Eternity. Another pretty good one is Orson Scott Card's Ender's Game. Finally, although this is a bit more hard core and may not be a good introduction, try Frank Herbert's Dune.

      --

      "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
    9. Re:Currently not a fan by HeghmoH · · Score: 1

      I just have to disagree here. :) I love Hyperion, but to me the series is all downhill. The first book is really excellent, the second not half bad, the third not good and the fourth painful. But oh well, at least read Hyperion itself!

      --
      Mod down posts with a "Free Mac Mini/iPod" sig, they're spam!
    10. Re:Currently not a fan by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Definitely check out the Dune series of book (original not the new ones). They are definitely some of my favorites.

  27. Add to dictionary by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Brooks, buddy, come on. "Unknowableness"?

    Where oh where is my super hero, Teh Grammar Patroll??? I am going to write a graphic novel called "Teh Grammar Patroll Returns", about an aging, cynical technical writer who brings hell fire vengance down on slashdot.

    It will be made into a movie called, "Slashdot vs. Teh Grammar Patroll". Teh Grammar Patroll will win, of course.

  28. Old News! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    These guys ran this story ages ago:

    http://forum.questinq.com (-source)

  29. Try a sample by sh00z · · Score: 5, Interesting

    There's an excerpt (from the grossly-overpriced ebook version) here.

    1. Re:Try a sample by 3am · · Score: 1

      can you tell me how it ends? i read the thing and didn't like it at all, but i hate not knowing how it ended.

      --

      A: None. The Universe spins the bulb, and the Zen master merely stays out of the way.
    2. Re:Try a sample by sh00z · · Score: 1
    3. Re:Try a sample by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The butler did it...

  30. The Author by sehryan · · Score: 2

    Robert Charles Wilson is very good author. His more recent works have less than thrilled me though. Chronolith is a good book, but not nearly as compelling as some of his older ones ("The Harvest", "Gypsies", "A Bridge of Years"). Those are some of his best books. I would definitely recommend checking out the Harvest if you ever have the chance.

    --
    The world moves for love. It kneels before it in awe.
  31. Ender's Game by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Come now, certainly at least a few of you slashdotters out there have read Ender's game. Everyone knows that children make the most skillful and deadly military leaders. It is just one of those known facts.

    --
    With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
    1. Re:Ender's Game by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Know it? My band wrote a song based on it back in 2000. Met "Uncle Orson" at a book signing a couple years back too. Great series.

    2. Re:Ender's Game by flonker · · Score: 1

      children make the most skillful and deadly military leaders.

      Or Joan of Arc...
  32. cover art by lopati · · Score: 1

    not to disparage wilson (the divide and harvest are faves) but often (sadly :) choice of sci-fi is governed by cover-art. thankfully, the chronoliths has one of the best, stephan martiniere!

  33. Catagories by ThereIsNoSporkNeo · · Score: 1

    Being a computer programmer makes one a geek.

    Being able to write code, read schematic diagrams, and solder religates one to the status of UBER-geek.

    Of course, there are several tiers in between these thresholds, but they are not relevant to the current discussion.

    ThereIsNoSporkNeo, SuedoUBERGeek

    --
    With my dying breath, I curse Zoidberg!
  34. With apologies to the Simpsons by jcsehak · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    On an unrelated note, anyone else notice the karma system has changed? Apparently, my karma is now "excellent." Man, I want a point system back!

    My Karma is NOT "Excellent" damnit! I want a number score!


    Pgpckt: [panting] Grade me...look at me...evaluate and rank me! Oh, I'm good, good, good, and oh so smart! Grade me!
    [CmdrTaco scribbles "Karma = 50" on a piece of paper]
    [Pgpckt walks off, muttering crazily and sighing]

    --

    c-hack.com |
  35. Chronoliths won the Campbell by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Chronoliths tied with Jack Williamson's Terraforming Earth for this year's John W. Campbell Memorial Award for the best science fiction novel of 2001, by the way.

  36. Recommendations by Precipitous · · Score: 1

    My recommendations reflect my reading biases. I like sci-fi that:
    Expands our concept of what is possible.
    Uses non-contempory settings, or alien worlds to allow the author to explore societies and individuals without the encumbrance of researching a real culture or history. (Speculative fiction)

    That said, gadget heavy sci-fi, and sci-fi that relies on mystery and thriller techniques for it's tension, annoys me.

    I'll recommend:

    Anything by Arthur C Clark(Unathorised fan site). Childhood's End, while several decades old, still reads like a shocking new novel.

    Almost anything by Ursula LeGuin(Link skips entry page). The Dispossessed Is a classic. She is far towards the speculative fiction end of the genre.

    Philip K Dick is responsible for the short stories behind some of the more interesting sci-fi movies. Blade Runner, Total Recall, Minority Report, to name a few. The short stories behind them, of course, have much more substance. I've just read Ubik which left me dizzy for a week

    --
    My motto: "A cat is no trade for integrity."
  37. Even the abstract has cardboard characters by gelfling · · Score: 2

    Geesh where have I seen the alienated techno geek and the smart sexy vaguely foreign brainiac chick hook up before?

    Oh yeah, in a million other books.

    I hope the book is better than the reviews and synopses.

    1. Re:Even the abstract has cardboard characters by Jett · · Score: 1

      well in this book the braniac chick is a lesbian and the alienated techno geek starts off as an ex-pat partying it up in an asian resort town, living on the beach, hanging out with a drug dealer, and generally being a carefree fun loving kind of guy (which gets him in trouble, but go read the book if you want to know about that).

    2. Re:Even the abstract has cardboard characters by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well, gosh that makes it completely different...

      The lesbian and the guy who wishes he was in Neuromancer, how original.

  38. I didn't read the book or the review... by errxn · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...but I have to say that "The Chronoliths" would be a cool name for a heavy metal band.

    (Sorry for the OT post, but I couldn't resist)

    --
    In Soviet Russia, Chuck Norris will still kick your ass.
  39. I've read it by Jett · · Score: 2, Informative

    I'm a pretty picky reader, but I this book was recommended to me, so I decided to give it a try. I was very suprised by how much I got into it. It is a little predictable occasionally, and there are a few spots where it feels a little sparse, but overall it's a very solid book. It is both well written and entertaining, and the author does a good job of explaining the ideas he is exploring without detracting from the plot.
    I got the feeling that the author strongly identified with his characters and did his best to imbue them with realistic traits and emotions, which is something sci-fi isn't really known for.

  40. Simple solution. by blair1q · · Score: 4, Funny

    Why would two of them appear?

    All you need to do after the first one is make your own, saying "Stop spamming our time period!" They're bound to see it and realize their mistake.

    That'll stop them.

    --Blair

    1. Re:Simple solution. by Click+0+Nett · · Score: 3, Funny
      All you need to do after the first one is make your own, saying "Stop spamming our time period!" They're bound to see it and realize their mistake.

      Naw, that'll just validate your time zone to them, and before you know it, BAM, you've got ads for 'hot alien escorts' and the like:)

      --

      Like eagles on pogo-sticks! -- Glottis

  41. HA! by isotope23 · · Score: 1

    That's what THEY want you to believe....

    We are in fact talking about the Discordians,
    and the number 23. (Are you wearing your tinfoil
    conversation decryption device?)

    --
    Service guarantees Citizenship! Questions Guarantee GITMO.... Amerika Uber Alles!
  42. Who are you, Dave Barry? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what a dork....

  43. Etymology and You by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    "Chronolith: "time stone" "

  44. I am surprised.... by DeusExLibris · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ...that no one has yet noted the parallel between the social unrest (and corresponding government reaction) in the book and the "war on terrorism(tm)" being prosecuted by the United States.

    Clearly, the Chronoliths are a weapon of terror (a rather clever one, I might add). And while terror is not the central theme of the book, it clearly is a considerable factor in the economic, social and political upheaval that is the backdrop for the main story line.

    I will let each reader decide for him/herself whether there is any conclusion to be drawn or not.

  45. I am an SF Convention panelist... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...including at some WorldCons, and I can tell you that the best works of linear art (text, film, graphic novels, plays, audio) cannot be summarized in less than their own lengths. In this case, Wilson's "The Chronoliths" works as a novel because the characters themselves are trying to figure out what may happen in the future based upon what is happening in their present, and how the feedback loop between their present and their future is far more bizarre than they ever believed possible. But I shouldn't give anything else away. As one of the characters realizes: "It's not a secret if you tell someone else". I'm betting this one takes the Hugo Award for best SF novel of 2001 (a pretty significant interplay of ideas across time, anyway, to those of us who thought 2001 would have trips to Jupiter and big smart slabs). I strongly recommend this book.

  46. Does anybody remember. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The sci-fi flik from the 60's about rocks that would move by growing very tall and following over. No, I don't think they were from the future.

  47. Read this book, but skim it by Precipitous · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The Author's strength is ability structure his books around unique social themes, and populate his books with a number of interesting ideas. The reviewer pointed out that the main character is a programmer - but his job is actually to 'evolve code', producing algorithms that he doesn't always understand. Unlike many sci-fi stories, where the earth unites around a common enemy - we have a hundred sub sects worshipping these cronoliths or trying to destroy them. That the book is full of such speculations on where our society is headed and how it responds keeps it interesting.

    That said, the editor could have taken a chain saw, shredded half the book at random, and it would have been a better read. The authors mediocre style and character development don't warrant the long development sections. This yields a how-to-read it suggestion: If a section starts to bore you: just skip a few paragraphs or pages at a time. You won't miss anything.

    As an aside, has anyone noticed the new assumption behind many current works of fiction? In the 90's, we had consipiracy theories. Before that, there were all the Apocolyptic novels. In the past 2 years, many of the near future sci-fi books that I've read take the fall or decline of the United States as a foregone conclusion. Cronoliths is no exception to this new pessimism.

    --
    My motto: "A cat is no trade for integrity."
  48. According to the novel, published in 2001... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...and now available in paperback, the chronoliths are made of exotic matter. They seem to be moulded, but by what process is still unclear by the end of the novel. As moulded, they show text impressed on the material with dates in English. Buy the book, read it and then post. Most of us who bought the hardcover (now a New York Times Notable Book and a Hugo Award nominee, but we didn't know that when we bought it last year) read it in one or two sittings. You will probably be able to post by tomorrow, and I'd love to see what you thought.

  49. Just???? by AppyPappy · · Score: 2
    He's just a computer programmer

    Just? What am I? A troll that lives under a bridge?

    --

    If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

  50. American Gods! by Dante · · Score: 1

    Damn I felt the same way, I was sure I was going to just _HATE_ it, topic, themes, seemed too campy, too patriotic.

    And lo a behold! I was wrong! It was a great book fresh incite into mythos and fun to boot. I need to get Coraline, ASAP.

    --
    "think of it as evolution in action"
  51. and suddenly... by cr@ckwhore · · Score: 2

    Suddenly today, my karma changed to 'excellent'. Could this be from the future?

    maybe this post will reduce my karma to 'not so excellent'. Only time will tell.

    --
    Skiers and Riders -- http://www.snowjournal.com
  52. I think you misread something... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...since the novel never shows events in 2021 or the Kuin years themselves, but only before and after (when the novel was putatively written), and the question of who will become Kuin is, I think, clarified as well as can be in a novel about ambiguous, ramifying self-modifying temporal feedback loops between their present and their future.

  53. Well, then, it's good thing that RCW is a better.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...writer than you are, because the result of reading the book (which you clearly have not) is not "ploddingly obvious" at all. Try reading a book before sharing your wisdom again with us in future, O Clueless One.

  54. No, that was "Back to the Future II" by dpilot · · Score: 2

    1995: Florida Wins World Series

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:No, that was "Back to the Future II" by Cybrex · · Score: 1

      Great Scott!

      -Cybrex

      --
      Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
  55. I HAVE TED WILLIAMS IN MY FREEZER by grytpype · · Score: 2

    Sorry, I don't normally troll, but I've been at work for about thirty hours straight.

    --

    - Have a picture

  56. Good book by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is a very good book, and you guys are all just a bunch of dorks.

  57. Wilson by dpilot · · Score: 1

    IMHO Mysterium was somewhere on par with Chronoliths, but The Harvest (Have you read it?) was much better. Haven't seen Memory Wire or A Bridge of Years. Mysterium started with a really neat premise and followed up on it, but then seemed to me to drift along after that. Perhaps I would have enjoyed it more if I knew was gnosticism was, I'll admit.

    --
    The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    1. Re:Wilson by SpryGuy · · Score: 1

      gnosticism: The doctrines of certain pre-Christian pagan, Jewish, and early Christian sects that valued the revealed knowledge of God and of the origin and end of the human race as a means to attain redemption for the spiritual element in humans and that distinguished the Demiurge from the unknowable Divine Being.

      --

      - Spryguy
      There are three kinds of people in this world: those that can count and those that can't
    2. Re:Wilson by ScuzzMonkey · · Score: 2

      I have read "The Harvest", and it was pretty good, but just didn't really capture me the way some of his other stuff has. Too derivative of "Childhood's End", maybe? I'm not sure. "Memory Wire" is optional (kind of a departure from his usual style--cyberpunkish, sorta) but I think "A Bridge of Years" is pretty much a must read for RCW fans.

      I agree with you about "Mysterium"... it did kind of slack off a bit toward the end. Another really great alternate worlds novel in somewhat the same vein is Kube-Mcdowell's "Alternities" which has got to be one of his less well known books, but IMHO is one of the best.

      --
      No relation to Happy Monkey
  58. Finalist? It won the Campbell by MarkLR · · Score: 1

    The Campbell awards took place on July 5th. It tied with Terraforming Earth by Williamson for the 2001 Campbell award. See Locus.

  59. Don't blame me... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I voted for Kodos!

  60. I love Internet by Troed · · Score: 1
    I read this little review, went to an online bookstore in Sweden (Bokus) - ordered the book (in English, most translations are crap) and it'll be here early next week.

    I browsed with Mosaic in 93 (94?) when there was only a handful of webpages up - only universities and when no one really believed we'd be doing shopping like this in 10 years ..

  61. It's like picking a favorite ice cream... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    ...everyones tastes will be their own. SF itself has a number of subcategories, and I'll try to pick winners in each:

    (a) alternate history: the events of the past occurred differently than in our own world. Usual examples include "Hitler won" scenarios, such as Philip K. Dick's "The Man in the High Castle", Richard Harris' "Gorky Park"-influenced police procedural "Fatherland", and Civil War alternatives such as Harry Turtledove's "The Guns of the South" and Ward Moore's "Bring the Jubilee". These should not be confused with alternate historical fantasies, of which Tim Powers (a neighbour and friend of Philip K. Dick) is the Undisputed Grand Master, in such fun novels as "The Anubis Gates" and "Last Call". Those are recommended too, only they're not SF.

    (b) Unrepentant Old Time Space Opera: Like Vernor Vinge's superb Hugo Winning novels "A Fire Upon The Deep" and "A Deepness In The Sky", or Greg Benford's Galactic Center novels, the first two of which are "In the Ocean Of Night" and "Across The Sea Of Suns". If you can find it, Glen Cook's "The Dragon Never Sleeps" is worth paying $75 to get from a book collector as it is, in my view, the best space opera ever written.

    (c) Unclassifiably brilliant: Like Gene Wolfe's "The Fifth Head of Cerberus" or his Book of the New Sun, published as "The Shadow of the Torturer", "The Claw of the Concilliator", "The Sword of the Lictor" and "The Citadel of the Autarch" as well as the coda novel "The Urth of The New Sun", or even Ray Bradbury's poetic "The Martian Chronicles", which is amazing, regardless of what Mars turned out to be like.

    That's enough for starters, anyway, and doesn't include Le Guin, Tiptree or Russ, much less Zelazny's "Lord of Light" or Delany's.... Ok, I'll stop now.

  62. An excellent C14 dating summary by Neph · · Score: 1
    Can be found here (Thanks Google!).

    Basically it measures the amount of time since the subject stopped absorbing new C14 from the atmosphere, which in most cases means when it died. (So the post which claims attempting carbon dating on a living organism yielded a "very old" result doesn't make sense.)

    So it's been proven to work (see link) but there are lots of assumptions involved and it's very easy to apply it to inappropriate situations. For the "chronoliths" example, it wouldn't work because a) they presumably were never alive (or absorbing atmospheric C14) and b) Even if they had been, there wouldn't be a magic "backwards jump" due to time travel.

  63. They wouldn't be war memorials... by Cybrex · · Score: 2

    More likely, M$ would buy the chronolith technology, engrave the TCP/IP specification on one, send it back in time, and patent it in the future using the `lith as an example of prior art. Poof- they own the internet.

    The possibilities of governments and corporations trying to chronologically trump each other with this technology could be both frightening and humorous.

    -Cybrex

    "Put CP/M on the PC, not MS-DOS!"
    -Chronolith that appeared in Boca Raton, FL, 1980

    --
    Boundless Expansion, Self-Transformation, Dynamic Optimism, Intelligent Technology, Spontaneous Order- BEST DO IT SO!
    1. Re:They wouldn't be war memorials... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Put CP/M on the PC, not MS-DOS!"
      -Chronolith that appeared in Boca Raton, FL, 1980

      Message received! In the current version of the Universe IBM gave the user a choice of UCSD System, CP/M86, MS-DOS and PC-DOS (essentially same as MS-DOS). Chris Morgan, Editor in Chief, hails the new IBM PC as the "Rosetta Stone of Operating Systems (see Byte Magazine, January 1982, Vol. 7 Num. 1, pages 6 to 10).

      Please continue with your great suggestions on how to use time travel to make the world a better place. Thanks

    2. Re:They wouldn't be war memorials... by Eustace+Tilley · · Score: 1

      There's a Cheapass Game (tm) named US Patent Number 1. Players race to be the first to register a time machine at the US Patent Office -- on the day it opens. http://www.cheapass.com, look for "Board Games."

  64. It is. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    A lot better.

  65. This is a trademark violation! by nanolith · · Score: 1

    The name Chronolith clearly infringes on my nick. As does Monolith, lithium, and any other /.*lith.*/

    I do believe that Mr. Wilson will be getting a call from my lawyer.

  66. Inevitability of history... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...Every empire falls eventually, even if successor states pick up the pieces with varying degrees of success: China, the Akkadians, the Hittites, Babylon, India, Egypt, Crete, Rome, Byzantium, the Caliphate, Spain, the Ottoman Empire, the Holy Roman Empire, Austro-Hungary, the British Empire, the Third Reich (sound of spitting) or DEC.

    One day, the United States will decline and fall, and I hope something else will be around to replace it. That's not necessarily a bad thing: modern Turkey came out of the Ottoman Empire, Israel and a future Palestinian state out of the British protectorate of Palestine, the United States, Canada, Australia and New Zealand from former British colonies.

  67. I knew this sounded familiar.. by mstyne · · Score: 2

    My cousin reviewed this book a couple months ago.. although if I recall correctly he said there was no sex in it... which in this case was a good thing, I guess. Anyway, you can check out review for a slightly more insane take on this book if you just can't get enough.

    --
    mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
  68. Eh? by ionpro · · Score: 1
    Of a more interesting nature is a hero who is a hero by working his craft, not his fists. This aspect is reminiscent of Neal Stephenson's works...

    Warning: If you haven't read Snow Crash, by Stephenson, then this will spoil it for you. Go read it right now, or else.
    Uh... it occurs to me that Hiro Protagonist used his swords and a hypercool rail gun both in Snow Crash, as well as other weapons I've probably forgotten. A lot of the action was YT spraying people with liquid nuckles, etc. And Uncle Enzo's shaped glass-busting charge seemed like a very physical thing to me. True, Hiro did end up winning over Raven in the Metaverse, but that was virtually a given considering their relative skill sets, and it was still swords and bikes and other neat, "Hiro" type things.

    And don't forget the rat thing up Rife's ass at the end. That was friggin' awesome.


    1. Re:Eh? by dpilot · · Score: 1

      Yeah, Hiro did have Reason, but the sword was in the Metaverse, not reality, and he did hack his way through at least some of the problems. Uncle Enzo is allowed to use more physical things, because that's where his power was rooted - he wasn't a hacker.

      But this one was a bit more fisticufish than some other Stephenson. I was thinking more of Cryptonomicon or Diamond Age. A little of the hero doing fisticuffs there too, but still reasonable.

      --
      The living have better things to do than to continue hating the dead.
    2. Re:Eh? by keytoe · · Score: 2


      but the sword was in the Metaverse, not reality

      Actually, he uses the sword in reality as well - I can't remember the scene exactly, but as one example he was in a large tent in the northwest looking for somebody (related to the raft). Ended up slashing a bit if I recall...

  69. Polish? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The author of "Crosstime Engineer" is Leo Frankowski. Remember, google is your friend.

  70. A little old? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the first time I've gone out and purchased a book based on a review on /. It got a lot of good comments so I figured what the heck. Now, maybe it's just me but I went to the store expecting to find this in the new releases section. It was actually buried on the shelf in paperback. Are /. reviewers in the habit of reviewing books that came out a year ago or am I just missing something? Not meant to be a troll or anything, I'm just curious.

  71. Re:suck it by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This|information|wants|to|be|wider|and|wider|and|w ider|and|wider|and|wider|so|we|can|suck|delicious| and|nutritious|cock|while|discussing|linux|and|why |bill|gates|is|evil|with|the|rest|of|the|kneejerk| slashbots|who|reload|the|front|page|every|twenty|m inutes|to|get|fr0s+|p1s+|or|share|their|minimum-|w age|opinions|working|help|desk|at|cocks|-|o|-|rama |because|open|source|is|dying

  72. Red Sox have won the World Series five times. by brunnock · · Score: 1

    Heck, even the Boston Braves won it in 1914.

  73. Yes. by ionpro · · Score: 1

    He was looking for the former president of the republic of Kodak; the one that Raven and his friends took from the "government" there with the nuke. He found him, talked to him a bit, and then was harassed by a few people from New South Africa; he cut off a head of one guy and slashed some more, then escaped by cutting through the tent using the millimeter wave radar his gargoyle getup had.

  74. Ok Siskel. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Didn't you rate Waterworld 9.5/10?