Slashdot Mirror


Peercast: Peer-to-Peer Streaming

Anonymous Coward writes "peercast is currently in beta for a new p2p client based on the Gnutella protocol. Seems to be alot easier to use than the current "streamers". Linux/Mac on its way."

89 comments

  1. gnutella eh? by mackstann · · Score: 0

    wonder if it will be as pleasurable to use as gnutella is (groan)

  2. Geese and Eggs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Do you have a moose named larry? I have a moose named Larry. I bet you do not have a moose named Larry.

  3. [onby] A modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    It seems that the Janitors, in their infinite wisdom, have banned people who have low/negative karma from posting more than twice per day. Personally I find this completely stupid. All the trolls will simply post AC as I am doing now. Proxies can be used to get around any ipid bans that result from AC trolls.

    Surely it is better to let the trolls post at -1 where it is out of most peoples way rather than have them all post at 0 and suck up mod points and time from "legit" users?

    I have tried to communicate my thoughts to the slashcode team but alas, to no avail. They are probably all sittin on their starwars bed sheets watching anime hentai tentacle rape pr0n.

    Here is my proposal: All trolls that cannot post using their account post as AC. Use proxies if need be (www.antiproxy.com is a good source). I suspect this will show them how useless this idea is. Will blocking troll uid's stop trolls? NO! Will ipid bans stop trolls? NO!

    I seriously fail to see the point of this and consider it a stupid move by the Janitors. They want us to troll and crapflood at 0 rather than -1? Fine! So be it! No longer will we post at -1 where few people dare to visit, now we will post at 0 where we will be more visible and waste peoples time, energy and mod points! Hoorah!

    The next thing you know, posting AC will be banned! Then what will you do? No more posting interesting insider tidbits! Groupthink all the way baby! oh yeah!

    So logout, post shit, use proxies and above all have fun!

    Let the games begin!

    1. Re:[onby] A modest proposal by Karma+Suicide+Bomber · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      That is what will have to happen. They want to kill off the CLiT because they're afraid.

      Last post today as KSB.

  4. Gnutella, eh? by hazyshadeofwinter · · Score: 1

    So it's more than decentralised enough, which is a Good Thing(tm) for those who don't wanna pay royalties. But it's gonna suck donkey balls if you try to use it with dialup... (pats DSL modem affectionately) Mmmm, bandwidth...

    --
    Click here if you just like to click on shit.
  5. Hello by poopbot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Introduction

    A fairy gives lectures on morality to the feline anomaly. Furthermore, another photon near an abstraction takes a coffee break, and a mortician buries a blithe spirit. The wedding dress secretly admires a college-educated ball bearing. If the freight train figures out a fire hydrant near a pit viper, then some mating ritual beyond another cowboy reads a magazine. Any squid can find lice on a freight train, but it takes a real recliner to ostensibly plan an escape from another pit viper defined by a prime minister a cough syrup toward a graduated cylinder.

    Another mating ritual

    For example, a blood clot about a turn signal indicates that a financial bartender borrows money from a warranty. When a demon is imaginative, a paper napkin secretly admires an often snooty graduated cylinder. If the grain of sand learns a hard lesson from the short order cook behind some graduated cylinder, then another blithe spirit flies into a rage. Any pig pen can lazily require assistance from a burly plaintiff, but it takes a real fighter pilot to caricature the steam engine over a satellite. Another eagerly temporal minivan slyly buries the obsequious squid, or a briar patch usually gives lectures on morality to a cyprus mulch.

    A gratifying fairy

    Sometimes another cashier reads a magazine, but the fraction for the cyprus mulch always buries a power drill toward the demon! The light bulb befriends a satellite of an apartment building. A lazily Alaskan roller coaster sanitizes another mitochondrial traffic light, or some burglar eats a hesitantly smelly plaintiff. For example, a seldom righteous traffic light indicates that an ocean knows some chestnut inside the tabloid. If the earring somewhat finds subtle faults with a pine cone, then the wheelbarrow hibernates.

    The cocker spaniel about the salad dressing

    For example, the umbrella toward an abstraction indicates that the dolphin near a ball bearing caricatures a girl scout near some diskette. A cocker spaniel for the judge reads a magazine, and a pine cone finds subtle faults with a rattlesnake. Furthermore, the hairy movie theater returns home, and a grizzly bear near a paycheck is a big fan of a childlike burglar. For example, a canyon living with a graduated cylinder indicates that the industrial complex buries a jersey cow.

    Conclusions

    A squid around a jersey cow meditates, and another nation sweeps the floor; however, a scooby snack knowingly finds subtle faults with an apartment building living with another chain saw. When a hockey player around a paycheck is smelly, a minivan has a change of heart about an oil filter about an asteroid. The bartender around a polygon is barely soggy. Indeed, another rattlesnake befriends a warranty. Indeed, the carpet tack for an abstraction usually caricatures an elusive h

    - poopbot: information likes to be narrow

  6. [on by] A modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    It seems that the Janitors, in their infinite wisdom, have banned people who have low/negative karma from posting more than twice per day. Personally I find this completely stupid. All the trolls will simply post AC as I am doing now. Proxies can be used to get around any ipid bans that result from AC trolls.

    Surely it is better to let the trolls post at -1 where it is out of most peoples way rather than have them all post at 0 and suck up mod points and time from "legit" users?

    I have tried to communicate my thoughts to the slashcode team but alas, to no avail. They are probably all sittin on their starwars bed sheets watching anime hentai tentacle rape pr0n.

    Here is my proposal: All trolls that cannot post using their account post as AC. Use proxies if need be (www.antiproxy.com is a good source). I suspect this will show them how useless this idea is. Will blocking troll uid's stop trolls? NO! Will ipid bans stop trolls? NO!

    I seriously fail to see the point of this and consider it a stupid move by the Janitors. They want us to troll and crapflood at 0 rather than -1? Fine! So be it! No longer will we post at -1 where few people dare to visit, now we will post at 0 where we will be more visible and waste peoples time, energy and mod points! Hoorah!

    The next thing you know, posting AC will be banned! Then what will you do? No more posting interesting insider tidbits! Groupthink all the way baby! oh yeah!

    So logout, post shit, use proxies and above all have fun!

    Let the games begin!

    1. Re:[on by] A modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Notice how this mofo just changes a few characters at the end of his rant to bypass the frequent postings...

      Let the games begin!!
      Let the games begin!
      Let the games begin!! --on by

    2. Re:[on by] A modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I wouldn't mind the poster of the origional rant please explain to the the mentality of trolling and WHY they/he/she do it.

    3. Re:[on by] A modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and your point is???

      --on by

    4. Re:[on by] A modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      oh, btw the new AC 10 post thing is lame...FUCKING NAZIS!

    5. Re:[on by] A modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Well gee. Why would they do it since there's so much garbage coming from you guys? Yeah, they're real Nazis for taking reasonable steps to improve the signal to noise ratio.

      You realize, of course, that you're trying to defend your right to "talk nonsense", right? Good luck rallying support for that.

    6. Re:[on by] A modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      having posteded http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=35904&cid=3876 190
      i believe nonsense is fun.. but there is a place and a time and etc etc.... but yes.. why are there trolls?

      and whats this 10AC thing?

    7. Re:[on by] A modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Yeah you're really fighting a righteous battle here. Heh. I'm curious why you're intent on posting garbage on Slashdot. Why dontcha see if you can convince a girl to touch your wee wee? Even if you don't succeed, some time away from Slashdot may improve your chances of seeing a real live boob one day.

      Good luck! Don't get discouraged if it takes a coupla years!

  7. gnutella protocol sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

    It DOS's itself, last time i tried it i have 4kB of incoming search requests, mostly the same thing over and over again.

    gnutella gives p2p a bad name

  8. [on by] a modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    It seems that the Janitors, in their infinite wisdom, have banned people who have low/negative karma from posting more than twice per day. Personally I find this completely stupid. All the trolls will simply post AC as I am doing now. Proxies can be used to get around any ipid bans that result from AC trolls.

    Surely it is better to let the trolls post at -1 where it is out of most peoples way rather than have them all post at 0 and suck up mod points and time from "legit" users?

    I have tried to communicate my thoughts to the slashcode team but alas, to no avail. They are probably all sittin on their starwars bed sheets watching anime hentai tentacle rape pr0n.

    Here is my proposal: All trolls that cannot post using their account post as AC. Use proxies if need be (www.antiproxy.com is a good source). I suspect this will show them how useless this idea is. Will blocking troll uid's stop trolls? NO! Will ipid bans stop trolls? NO!

    I seriously fail to see the point of this and consider it a stupid move by the Janitors. They want us to troll and crapflood at 0 rather than -1? Fine! So be it! No longer will we post at -1 where few people dare to visit, now we will post at 0 where we will be more visible and waste peoples time, energy and mod points! Hoorah!

    The next thing you know, posting AC will be banned! Then what will you do? No more posting interesting insider tidbits! Groupthink all the way baby! oh yeah!

    So logout, post shit, use proxies and above all have fun!

    Let the games begin!!

  9. [on by] A modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    It seems that the Janitors, in their infinite wisdom, have banned people who have low/negative karma from posting more than twice per day. Personally I find this completely stupid. All the trolls will simply post AC as I am doing now. Proxies can be used to get around any ipid bans that result from AC trolls.

    Surely it is better to let the trolls post at -1 where it is out of most peoples way rather than have them all post at 0 and suck up mod points and time from "legit" users?

    I have tried to communicate my thoughts to the slashcode team but alas, to no avail. They are probably all sittin on their starwars bed sheets watching anime hentai tentacle rape pr0n.

    Here is my proposal: All trolls that cannot post using their account post as AC. Use proxies if need be (www.antiproxy.com is a good source). I suspect this will show them how useless this idea is. Will blocking troll uid's stop trolls? NO! Will ipid bans stop trolls? NO!

    I seriously fail to see the point of this and consider it a stupid move by the Janitors. They want us to troll and crapflood at 0 rather than -1? Fine! So be it! No longer will we post at -1 where few people dare to visit, now we will post at 0 where we will be more visible and waste peoples time, energy and mod points! Hoorah!

    The next thing you know, posting AC will be banned! Then what will you do? No more posting interesting insider tidbits! Groupthink all the way baby! oh yeah!

    So logout, post shit, use proxies and above all have fun!

    Let the games begin!

  10. Interesting how slashdot posts this by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 2, Offtopic

    Interesting how slashdot posts this when they didn't post the story of Gene Kan, one of the original gnutella coders, being found dead.

    I guesse the priorities are getting new software and not paying respect to coder who's contributions help us fight the good fight.

    --
    GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    1. Re:Interesting how slashdot posts this by Thenomain · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      An actual link to the story about late Gene Kan might have nicer than just mentioning how no one has mentioned it. It took literally five seconds with Google and wasn't even vitrol-powered.

      I don't think this is terribly off-topic, as Gnutella is one of the reasons we're at this story, after all.

      --
      This now concludes our broadcast day.
    2. Re:Interesting how slashdot posts this by NanoGator · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I see why you feel that way, but I think the reason he didn't make it to Slashdot was that he committed suicide. I'm not saying that's right or wrong, just saying that there is a difference between 'died in his sleep' and 'died at his own hand'. I'm sure the people that knew the guy don't want to be reminded of it.

      I'm a little puzzled as to why your post was modded off-topic. It's all related. As you pointed out, Gene has done a lot of work to make P2P what it is today.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    3. Re:Interesting how slashdot posts this by GoatPigSheep · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      well Gene kan wrote software that was very important to alot of slashdot users, wether he died by his own hand or not slashdot is not being a proper 'geek' news source by not mentioning what happened to an important figure.

      --
      GoatPigSheep, the 3 most important food groups
    4. Re:Interesting how slashdot posts this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      I find that strange too...so is there any way to get the story on Gene Kan on the front page for more people to pay their respects?

    5. Re:Interesting how slashdot posts this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Flamebait

      You, as well as the story submitter, as well as hundreds of other Slashdot geeks continue to engage in treasonous acts of terrorism against the English language.

      "ALOT" IS NOT A FUCKING WORD, YOU STUPID COCKSUCKERS!

    6. Re:Interesting how slashdot posts this by byran+lei · · Score: 0

      >Interesting how slashdot posts this when they didn't post the story of
      >Gene Kan, one of the original gnutella coders, being found dead.
      >I guesse the priorities are getting new software and not paying
      >respect to coder who's contributions help us fight the good fight.
      >
      Could it be because Kan actually hasn't contributed anything to the development to gnutella for quite a while? Most of the work on the current versions of the gnutella protocols has been done by other people. Tragic that Kan pulled a Kurt Cobain, but life goes on.
      '

    7. Re:Interesting how slashdot posts this by NanoGator · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      "You, as well as the story submitter, as well as hundreds of other Slashdot geeks continue to engage in treasonous acts of terrorism against the English language."

      I had no idea Lisa Simpson was posting on Slashdot!! She's gotten crabby in her later years!

      --
      "Derp de derp."
    8. Re:Interesting how slashdot posts this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And the moderators seem to be wasting a lot of mod points trying to supress this thread. Why? It's
      a valid question and certainly on topic.

      They can mod this down as well.

    9. Re:Interesting how slashdot posts this by WiKKeSH · · Score: 1

      I was actually doubting that story's truth.
      I expected it to be here as soon as the news broke.

      One reason that it wasn't posted was probably that the deadhwas a suicide.

    10. Re:Interesting how slashdot posts this by corebreech · · Score: 1, Troll

      And tell me, exactly how do you know it was a suicide?

    11. Re:Interesting how slashdot posts this by corebreech · · Score: 2, Troll

      It hasn't been ruled a suicide yet, so how can you say that?

      Also, since when do they announce somebody's death after cremating the body?

      Mr. Kan's death screams of foul play. That slashdot chose not to run the story is indefensible.

    12. Re:Interesting how slashdot posts this by corebreech · · Score: 2

      I'm a little puzzled as to why your post was modded off-topic.

      As am I.

      I posted about this over in another forum that was not quite as related to the story as this one was, yet still managed to see the story modded up to 5 over the course of several hours. I had also posted several replies within the same thread.

      In the space of under two minute I watched as all my posts were modded down to -1. It was like 4 AM EST.

      Not only do they not want the story posted, they don't want us to talk about it. Sick bastards they are.

    13. Re:Interesting how slashdot posts this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      well -- judging from the -1 off topic moderation -- I guess not :-)

    14. Re:Interesting how slashdot posts this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess slashdot doesn't consider his life to be of any significance.

    15. Re:Interesting how slashdot posts this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Because of the 5 or 6 news articles that I've read saying that it was a suicide... Try using google before you talk, I'm sure as fuck not going to do it for you.

    16. Re:Interesting how slashdot posts this by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      Retarded person,

      If you would bother to actually *read* the news articles you will find that they have not yet ruled one way or the other as to whether it is suicide.

      I like Google too, but perhaps an even more useful tool for you to discover is something we all affectionately refer to as the English language.

      My God, where do we get all these retards?!?

  11. [on by] A modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    It seems that the Janitors, in their infinite wisdom, have banned people who have low/negative karma from posting more than twice per day. Personally I find this completely stupid. All the trolls will simply post AC as I am doing now. Proxies can be used to get around any ipid bans that result from AC trolls.

    Surely it is better to let the trolls post at -1 where it is out of most peoples way rather than have them all post at 0 and suck up mod points and time from "legit" users?

    I have tried to communicate my thoughts to the slashcode team but alas, to no avail. They are probably all sittin on their starwars bed sheets watching anime hentai tentacle rape pr0n.

    Here is my proposal: All trolls that cannot post using their account post as AC. Use proxies if need be (www.antiproxy.com is a good source). I suspect this will show them how useless this idea is. Will blocking troll uid's stop trolls? NO! Will ipid bans stop trolls? NO!

    I seriously fail to see the point of this and consider it a stupid move by the Janitors. They want us to troll and crapflood at 0 rather than -1? Fine! So be it! No longer will we post at -1 where few people dare to visit, now we will post at 0 where we will be more visible and waste peoples time, energy and mod points! Hoorah!

    The next thing you know, posting AC will be banned! Then what will you do? No more posting interesting insider tidbits! Groupthink all the way baby! oh yeah!

    So logout, post shit, use proxies and above all have fun!

    Let the games begin!! --on by

  12. Ports by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This program better work with my POS NetGear RP114 router. I never did figure out how to forward the UDP ports necessary to get the best performance with WinMX. Maybe somebody can give me some tips.

  13. [on by] A modest proposal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    It seems that the Janitors, in their infinite wisdom, have banned people who have low/negative karma from posting more than twice per day. Personally I find this completely stupid. All the trolls will simply post AC as I am doing now. Proxies can be used to get around any ipid bans that result from AC trolls.

    Surely it is better to let the trolls post at -1 where it is out of most peoples way rather than have them all post at 0 and suck up mod points and time from "legit" users?

    I have tried to communicate my thoughts to the slashcode team but alas, to no avail. They are probably all sittin on their starwars bed sheets watching anime hentai tentacle rape pr0n.

    Here is my proposal: All trolls that cannot post using their account post as AC. Use proxies if need be (www.antiproxy.com is a good source). I suspect this will show them how useless this idea is. Will blocking troll uid's stop trolls? NO! Will ipid bans stop trolls? NO!

    I seriously fail to see the point of this and consider it a stupid move by the Janitors. They want us to troll and crapflood at 0 rather than -1? Fine! So be it! No longer will we post at -1 where few people dare to visit, now we will post at 0 where we will be more visible and waste peoples time, energy and mod points! Hoorah!

    The next thing you know, posting AC will be banned! Then what will you do? No more posting interesting insider tidbits! Groupthink all the way baby! oh yeah!

    So logout, post shit, use proxies and above all have fun!

    Let the games begin! -- on by

  14. Cable TOS by Weffs11 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder what my cable provider has to say about this....

    I know they forbid hosting/serving, but does this count?

    Anyone read the TOS agreement for Cox recently?

    1. Re:Cable TOS by NanoGator · · Score: 2

      Doesn't really matter, does it? Their TOS is dynamically linked. All they haveta do is update it, and we're automatically updated to the most up-to-date version of TOS.

      In other words, they'll just sneak it in when it bugs them.

      Gotta wonder why they even bother posting a 'Terms of Service' if they're going to reserve the right to spontaneously change it.

      --
      "Derp de derp."
  15. Fuck you linux bitches by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    I am the real slim shady.

  16. Play it right and p2p goes mainstream by MadFarmAnimalz · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's apparently a winamp plugin in the pipeline.

    If this could get bundled with the regular winamp download, I think we'd be on to something.

    I think the folks at winamp would be interested in doing this; it's an interesting 'selling' point. Download this player, get instant access to millions (?) of songs instantly and without further downloads.

    The gnutella network, if I read things correctly, would benefit from the incremental bandwidth of Joe Sixpack and his brethren.

    Win-win situation?

    --
    Blearf. Blearf, I say.
    1. Re:Play it right and p2p goes mainstream by phaxkolumbo · · Score: 1

      I think Nullsoft would be a too high profile target for those wanting to take peer-to-peer down. No way they would actually do this.

      One can always wish, though (I know i do...)

    2. Re:Play it right and p2p goes mainstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If this could get bundled with the regular winamp download, I think we'd be on to something.

      The guys at Nullsoft would probably be happy to do that, but somehow I doubt that their adoptive parents would approve.

    3. Re:Play it right and p2p goes mainstream by ImaLamer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It is complicated.

      AOL/TW owns the content people will publish, CARP free.

      Nullsoft created the original Gnutella, yet abandoned it because of AOL/TW of course...

      Nullsoft would attract mindshare, stealing from Windows Media Player, +1 for AOL/TW.

      Nullsoft would attract mindshare to shoutcast, and further it's free alternatives such as Icecast, even more stealing mindshare from Windows Media Player.

      Yet AOL/TW doesn't want people out there streaming their music without paying up - and other companies would very quickly object to AOL/TW's software allowing people to do the same to them.

      The next Winamp "Eula" equivalent would prohibit this type of technology -or- AOL/TW locks down your ability to "copy" streams* by co-developing the technology and it's okay.

      *I favor this approach. I would rather the client to not allow stream "ripping". It would make more sense than to charge money for something that isn't even been stolen yet.

    4. Re:Play it right and p2p goes mainstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      The Powerpuff Girls movie

      I don't know how many seriously disturbing things one guy can pack into a single, animated kids' film, but director Craig McCracken does his best to push the envelope. One wonders if Craig is like Buffalo Bill in "Silence of the Lambs," with a basement full of children last seen on the sides of milk cartons, and he's used his three favorite captives as the models for the Powerpuff Girls. I'm sure many a critic branded this "delightful family fare," but I have a better quote for the movie poster: This movie and its entire strange universe is severely fucked in the head.

      There's something wrong with a cartoon about a single, lonely man who creates three young girls in a laboratory and imbues them with superpowers. Those three girls are Blossum, Bubbles, and Buttercup, and their main function in "The Powerpuff Girls Movie" seems to be destroying public property.

      In my estimation, this appears to be the first really frightening right-wing reactionary cartoon. I saw two black guys depicted in this film; one was a cop who was abusive and looked a whole lot like Al Sharpton. The other was a television reporter who had the features of a chimp. Now, I'm not saying there are any finely drawn white characters in the Powerpuff Girls' universe, but portraying a black guy as a chimp is something that hasn't happened in grownup movies for some time.

      When the girls get lost after the Professor is arrested for creating them, they look for a cardboard box to sleep in. What they find are a bunch of criminals who try to do bad things to them. Fortunately for the Powerpuff Girls, the evil homeless people are beaten back by the more evil Mojo Jojo, a monkey with a large, exposed brain and a Japanese accent. Again with the monkeys. Now, I hate to bring up the past here, but depicting the Japanese as monkeys was a favorite pastime of the American World War II propaganda machine so that we wouldn't feel too bad about killing them.

      And since when do we name a villain in a children's cartoon "Mojo"? Wasn't that a euphemism for Jim Morrison's erect monkey when he sang about "Mr. Mojo rising"? I'm all for empowering young women through strong images in popular culture, but having them eradicate the world's minorities and poor people sounds like a Nazi plot. This is more like the Aryanpuff Girls.

    5. Re:Play it right and p2p goes mainstream by linzeal · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I don't listen to Top40 streams or many that have even any RIAA cartel member's songs on them at all. How would this effect the poor DJ who just wants to do a live stream from his home without paying 100's or even 1000's of dollars for bandwidth?

    6. Re:Play it right and p2p goes mainstream by blowdart · · Score: 3, Informative

      I would rather the client to not allow stream "ripping".

      Stream ripping is a major problem on my Real and Windows Media servers. We've had people fire off stream rippers to take off a 1 hour stream ("hey it's free, I must be able to save it myself"), however stream rippers are horrible from a provider point of view. For a 1 hour stream, a user in an NYC trading bank (I traced the IP) took 40GB to get the stream. The source file was about 4Mb. As you can imagine, for that hour, other people's experience was not optimal.

      Now, imagine on a peer to peer network, some anti-social little sod stealing your stream. All your DSL bandwidth gone.

      Of course, someone will write a stream ripper anyway, and people will use it, not caring about other users.

    7. Re:Play it right and p2p goes mainstream by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      It doesn't matter what you are playing. Likely it is owned by someone, if not then great - we need more new, live, different music.

      But if any song is on a label that is owned by a mega-multinational that can collect, then the RIAA will get involved because they have the CARP.

      If you are DJ'ing their music then they will destroy this technology, or try like they do with current P2P. This though could be better for them to develop so I don't understand why they would want to fight it. With this P2P you could bring their music to the masses, even to new countries... and it isn't going to be copied if they act now and actually support it.

      There is no reason to let someone allow copyrighted music to be copied from the streams, sorry but the law requires it because of it's digital nature. They RIAA assumes that radio over Gnutella would be like a CD, which is funny at best.

      By putting funds into clients, and helping their development maybe we would be more inclined to disable features which would make it possible to save their music from a stream. This is a breakthrough like any other - and there is no reason they can't get in on it and sponsor yet again.

      Why are they so insane?

    8. Re:Play it right and p2p goes mainstream by ImaLamer · · Score: 2

      Well, I just went off on a rant to someone else who responded to my first comment like yourself.

      If the whole network is built around security, and I'm not talking DRM, then stream ripping would be hard at least. Servlets could identify clients, XMMS and Winamp could not allow saving streams, and M$ would have to catch up.

      I just think if they supported the development, developers would be more inclined to leave out those features. A law isn't necessary when you have billions of dollars to pour into the deployment of measures against piracy and in your case "hogging".

      There isn't anything, rationally, restrictive about not letting people save copyrighted material. If you are a DJ, and would like to publish your works in a mp3 format or copies of live shows then release them on the regular P2P networks.

      There is a sane solution to this mumbo-jumbo. Sites like Soma-FM didn't have to go down. I was actually let down because I was discovering new music with those stations, and now there isn't many places to go because of these actions. Where is it possible to have a choice? Freedom people. That is all I'm talking about.

      We can exercise our freedoms in a manner which respects the law, and we can use the explosion of p2p possiblities also while respecting that law. We must make sure this isn't taken away from us.

    9. Re:Play it right and p2p goes mainstream by blowdart · · Score: 2
      If the whole network is built around security, and I'm not talking DRM, then stream ripping would be hard at least. Servlets could identify clients, XMMS and Winamp could not allow saving streams, and M$ would have to catch up.

      Well they would, if the stream rippers were honest. They're not. They send the HTTP_USERAGENT equivilant of the normal players. ASF recorder identifies itself as Media Player 7.

      People, as you say, should be restricted from saving copyrighted streams. Unfortunately, people don't care. It's hard to tell users that just because it's digital doesn't mean it has no value. The example I save was a charity concert by a heavy metal band. It was broadcast live, then put on line by the label for 4 days, so those who missed it could see it. It's coming on DVD eventually. But people still want to steal it.

      Of course, as a streaming provider, we provide what the bill payers want, not what the consumer wants.

    10. Re:Play it right and p2p goes mainstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Caviar and Peanut butter sandwhiches.

    11. Re:Play it right and p2p goes mainstream by Jeremi · · Score: 3, Insightful
      For a 1 hour stream, a user in an NYC trading bank (I traced the IP) took 40GB to get the stream. The source file was about 4Mb.

      I'm confused... why would ripping a stream take any more (or less) of the server's bandwidth than regular streaming-playback? Either way, you just need to download the contents of the stream once, whether you are saving the bytes to disk or just viewing them and then throwing them away shouldn't even be detectable by the server. Or am I missing something?

      Now, imagine on a peer to peer network, some anti-social little sod stealing your stream. All your DSL bandwidth gone.

      Exactly the opposite, I would think. Instead of every listener having to connect to your server to get the stream, now a good percentage of them are connecting to the "anti-social little sods'" peer-machines, and therefore not using bandwidth on your server. More likely you'd be sitting there with lots of bandwidth free, wondering where everybody went... ;^)

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    12. Re:Play it right and p2p goes mainstream by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      where`s the proxy setting?

    13. Re:Play it right and p2p goes mainstream by blowdart · · Score: 2
      why would ripping a stream take any more (or less) of the server's bandwidth than regular streaming-playback?

      That confused me too. However, think about how streaming works. Dropping packets isn't a big issue, it looks like the stream records pull multiple streams, and go forward and packet over each frame making sure nothing gets dropped. The ripper had 10 simultaneous connections (that can't be well written, if you want to reduce packet loss, you don't open multiple streams)

      What's even worse is when someone on a 56k modem rips at 300kps stream. Gaaaahhhh!

      Perhaps peer to peer will solve this, but I can't see my customers (who I have to admit include major labels) going for it.

  17. Users armed with a web server. by Mattygfunk · · Score: 4, Funny
    A built-in web server is included with each client, this enables you or someone else on your LAN to view/listen to your active channels with a standard web browser.

    For all you lot preparing to cry sercurity, sercurity, security, don't worry it only runs on windows so I'm sure everything is ok.

    1. Re:Users armed with a web server. by Mattygfunk · · Score: 0, Offtopic
      Oh geez, here come the spelling trolls.

      AAAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH.

  18. FUCK THE CLIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    HEY FUCKERS, what is up my niggas? I hate this fucking website.

    1. Re:FUCK THE CLIT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

      HEY FUCKERS, what is up my niggas?
      My (extra large) Penis. 8=========>

      I fuck this hating website.

  19. Attention Moderators by Knoxvill3 · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    If anyone of you have happened upon a couple of comments of mine, you'll realize I'm no ModWhore, but when someone mentions something that is related to the story at hand, I don't think that deserves a moderation of 'Offtopic'.

    The story refered to GNUtella in a comparison, and I've seen people get 'Interestings' when talking about Lemons when the topic is about Oranges.

    And I'll admit, like it or not, I too am a bit lost as to why Slashdot didn't feel the Suicide of Gene wasn't note worthy enough to place a story on the front page. Is it to say that the new motto around here is going to be 'News for Nerds. Stuff that matters, except in some cases'? And it really can't be said that it wasn't something that us, the readers, wouldn't have cared to read about, I mean I've seen more than a few posts from different people making reference to the same story as this post and the one it is in reply to all over the different story forums.

    Anyways, my offical take on Peercast is that I'm gonna wait for the beta to end. Novel idea, but I don't think the software is par for the course yet.

    --
    ======
    Talk sense to a fool and he calls you foolish. - Euripides
  20. Ultra short review.... by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Downloaded and tried it a few minutes ago. The system set to default settings found three streams. They all seemed to stream well, I liked the "Soma Tribute" stream alot. All in all everything works as advertised. I'm (easily?) impressed with what they have done. But more content is needed, more people need to put up "stations."

    I'll be taking down my andromeda server and replacing it with a Peercast stream in the next few days.

    1. Re:Ultra short review.... by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 1

      oops forgot to close that tag....

    2. Re:Ultra short review.... by turnstyle · · Score: 1
      I'll be taking down my andromeda

      Hey, I take that personally ;)

      fwiw, you can certainly run Andromeda alongside any other system (you don't need to choose). Each will have different advantages for different circumstnaces. -Scott

      --
      Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
    3. Re:Ultra short review.... by jilles · · Score: 2

      I can second this, I just came home and saw this on slashdot. Slashdotting a p2p network pretty much counts as the ultimate stresstest. There's only four channels right now but they work! Nuff said.

      The UI is a bit counter intuitive: from the list with channels you first have to 'get' one. It then appears in a second list called 'available channels' from which you can pick one to listen to. Apparently you can connect to (and thus share) more than one stream. Once you get it isn't hard.

      It would be nice if this idea were extended to video. The show stopper for streamed video so-far was available bandwidth, that problem now appears to have been solved (until the freeloading clients appear of course).

      --

      Jilles
  21. What this'll be used for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Pear-to-pear sexual encounters ;)

    1. Re:What this'll be used for by handsomepete · · Score: 3, Funny

      Pear-to-pear sexual encounters ;)

      That's much better than the oh-so-inappropriate apple-to-orange sexual encounters...

  22. A nice way to kill the internet by Krapangor · · Score: 0, Flamebait

    Flooding the net with crap (oh...high quality content of course) streams.
    The p2p protocols are very suitable for multicasting. These retards doesn't even seems to know that there are a lot of exsting MC protocols out there. End-2-end connections from a central server is definitely not the way to do it.
    Well, why do I rant about it ?
    Theoretically I could just don't care.
    But crappy applications like this on the one hand and illegal apps like Napster are definitely killing the net.
    People here at /. always whine about the commercialization of the net.
    But this is the direct result of such shitty apps.
    If you want the net to remain free, don't support such stuff !

    --
    Owner of a Mensa membership card.
  23. I agree with all Posts preceding this by Vanders · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Is it me, or are retarded kids really fucking funny? Its the way their fucking arms are all bent up under their heads, like some fucked up grasshoper.

    We should have Spaz Wrestling. I'd pay to see that.








    DojoMojoLojo (PS: I am wanking as I write this)
    Jamie "Censoring Fuck" McCarthy is a baby raping sheep felcher.

  24. Puny 32K streams? by elrond1999 · · Score: 1

    Why just 32Kbps streams? Can't the network handle any more? Someone please test my Röyksopp 128K test and get back to me if it's streaming ok.

  25. From their forum..slashdotted by ImaLamer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Posted: Sat Jul 13, 2002 10:31 am
    Post subject: Slashdot

    Our router decided to die a minute ago because of the /... but hopefully it should be OK now. If you find it difficult to connect to connect1.peercast.org then please keep trying.. We have enough bandwidth (100Mb fibre) .. just not a very good router [icon_smile.gif]

  26. the daze the musik dIEd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    The Harken Tale: Harken Energy purchased Bushboy's worthless oil company Spectrum7 for $2 million (bailing Bushboy out of big debts) in the late 80s and put Bushboy on their board and paid him a $120,000/year "consulting fee." Harken then lent Bushboy $180,000 so he could buy Harken stock. Bushboy was on their Board and was a member of their 3 man "Audit group" which was privy to the companies financial woes in 1990. After being briefed about Harken's cash flow problems in April, 1990, Bushboy sells his stock in June, 1990, when some mystery investor pays him $848,000 based on a "cold call" made by some stock broker (this is what the Bushboy people really say). In August, 1990 the poor financial condition of Harken becomes known and the stock drops like a rock to 1/4 its value when Bushboy sold it. Bushboy fails to report the sale of the stock by the 10th day of the month following the sale as required by law. He doesn't file the necessary SEC documents until 36 weeks later! The SEC head was appointed by Bushdaddy who is now president. Although the head of the SEC, Mr. Doty, was Bushboy's personal attorney, he doesn't recuse himself from any judgement of Bushboy and although the SEC refuses to exonerate Bushboy's criminal conduct it chooses not to investigate or prosecute (surprise!). The whole Bushboy/Harken deal stinks to high heaven and makes Whitewater seem like the jaywalking that it was in comparison, but Bushboy and the GOPers will block any attempt to investigate and hire a Special Prosecutor as they were so quick to do in Whitewater. Harken will be Whitewashed, as is everything else in Bushboy's sleazy past.

    see also: sum other BiG FraUDs

    1. Re:the daze the musik dIEd by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how leericull. do u knead sum copyright projectshuns for IT?

  27. What's out there to share, all day long? by charon.de · · Score: 1

    After seeing this edonkey/kaaza crap, hitting my fw every other second from all over the world, thanks to iptables "limit", that I usually don't see much of it...;-)

    However, I would really like to know, what people are sharing all day long? Or is it just do put some stuff on their >100 GB discs and think they look real cool, while wasting bandwith?

  28. Multicasting over the internet at large by blowdart · · Score: 3, Informative

    The p2p protocols are very suitable for multicasting

    Except of course, the internet at large doesn't support multicasting very well. Sure, you can multicast internally on a small network, assuming your switches support it, but once you start to involve routers, you find very quickly ISPs don't support it. Some DSL providers are starting to consider allowing multicast within their own blocks, so a streaming server sitting in their DSL space will use up less bandwidth, but what currently happens is they are all running Inktomi caches which cache streams within their own network. Of course, its only Windows Media or Real Media streams that are supported.

    (Disclaimer : My employeer is a large provider of streaming services in Europe)

  29. my posts for today 1/2 by Anonymous+Pancake · · Score: -1

    part 1

    slashdot

  30. my posts for today 2/2 by Anonymous+Pancake · · Score: -1

    part 2

    sucks

  31. (OT) Source by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the peercast homepage: The main reason for not releasing the source code so far is literally because we haven`t had the time yet. We`re doing this in our spare time (yes, we have proper jobs :) and want to have the chance to clean up the code, document it and put it CVS.

    Not wishing to get into the old GPL debate, as their page implies it was all written from scratch rather than borrowing GPL code, but...

    I really don't understand why people plan to put things into CVS after the code is writen and changed, etc... It makes sense to start with CVS from the outset.

    1. Re:(OT) Source by byran+lei · · Score: 0

      >I really don't understand why people plan to put things into CVS after
      >the code is writen and changed, etc... It makes sense to start with
      >CVS from the outset.
      >
      Because they want to make sure the code works as they thought it would *before* going through the hassle of setting up and using something like CVS.
      Moron.

    2. Re:(OT) Source by rbeattie · · Score: 2


      I generally like to have a working version of stuff before I put the code into CVS. Things change so quickly during prototyping, and though sometimes I wish I had that version from 2 hours ago, normally I'm moving crap around and renaming things so much that I don't want to mess with CVS, specifically because CVS is a pain when it comes to folder management. Create a folder and it's there for life (unless you go into the repository and rip it out by the root). I'd rather be free to do what I want, then when I've got a decent base, I check it into CVS and start working from there like a real project.

      Maybe that's just me, but that's how I work.

      -Russ

      --
      Me
  32. "Alot" vs "a lot" by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Here is a cool site that has a nice little rule for "alot", vs "a lot":
    "... just remind yourself that just as you wouldn't write "alittle" you shouldn't write "alot."

    Among lots of other helpful rules.

  33. There is a bad joke in there somewhere. by duckpoopy · · Score: 0, Troll

    Streaming golden showers from pee-er to pee-er. Hmm... I'll work on it.

    --
    word.
  34. I still love ya... by MADCOWbeserk · · Score: 2

    Scott, I really like Andromeda aand will continue to use it. What I probly will do is put a password on it and take public access away. The only thing that would prevent me from running both publically is bandwidth.

    Thanks again Scott, I linked to Andromeda so that people would try it. I recommend every one run the PHP version on top of Apache like me. (in the spirit of open source of course)

    1. Re:I still love ya... by turnstyle · · Score: 1
      I really like Andromeda aand will continue to use it. What I probly will do is put a password on it and take public access away. The only thing that would prevent me from running both publically is bandwidth.

      Great, I'm glad to hear it. Locking Andromeda down for personal use is one great way to use it. It's all just a matter of finding the right tool for the job, and sometimes that means 'tools'.

      Enjoy, -Scott

      --
      Here's what I do: Bitty Browser & Andromeda
  35. Bandwidth? by JediTrainer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    P2P is all great and everything, but nowadays I'm worried that it'll all be killed off because of bandwidth costs.

    Most cable/DSL companies are now putting caps on traffic, and are starting to charge by the byte when you go over those limits.

    I don't know about you, but while I don't mind paying for bandwidth I use, I sure as hell am not going to pay for someone else to get music/videos/pictures/etc at my expense.

    This also brings in an interesting dilemma - if both users are on the came cable company's backbone, are they double-dipping if they charge both users for that bandwidth?

    --

    You can accomplish anything you set your mind to. The impossible just takes a little longer.
    1. Re:Bandwidth? by adolf · · Score: 2

      In a properly-implemented system of this type, each listener would provide a stream for n additional listeners, only when actually listening (where n is a user selected integer of fairly small value). If n=>~3, one would be able to help out the fraction of listeners who are hopelessly and forever firewalled and thus unable to mirror the stream themselves.

      At any rate, you turn off the "radio" and go to bed - and all bandwidth consumption halts until such a time as you feel like turning it on again.

      You shouldn't look at it as paying for someone else's music - that someone may very well be in the same boat as you, and must pay seperately to -recieve- the bandwidth you give them. Not to mention the poor soul who was kind enough to let you listen to THEIR stream, on THEIR dime, in the first place.

      It is as fair a system as one can get (with the obvious exception of the aforementioned firewalled users, and an unavoidable portion of people like yourself who, as you say, "sure as hell [are] not going to pay for someone else to get music/videos/pictures/etc at my expense" and will simply refuse to cooperate with the network, both types of whom make things more difficult and expensive for the rest of us with proper connectivity and a fucking spine).

      If the cost in your case of providing this service to listeners, and indeed, the originator of the stream, is too great for you to muster, you'll be better off sticking with FM radio and (if applicable) MTV, either of whom who will happily allow you to sit around and consume their material all day, free of charge.

      Meanwhile, leave the rest of us alone, you blood-sucking, parasitic tick. You've got the wrong attitude to participate in anything requiring a cooperative effort between peers, where the only cost of admission is that you do what you can to share what you've got.

    2. Re:Bandwidth? by jfisherwa · · Score: 1

      High bandwidth costs are a myth only validated through the initial cost of infrastructure. In five years, these costs will be subsidized dramatically through the decreased cost of business and bandwidth will rain upon us from the heavens as never before.

      :P

  36. Another review... by rbeattie · · Score: 2


    Wow, I'm amazed at this idea. How long has this been around? Why wasn't this done last year when P2P was so hot? It's very cool.

    I'm trying it right now and it seems okay. The UI isn't exactly intuitive, so I made the mistake of opening 3 or 4 streams at the same time (this is like downloading 3 or 4 files using a Gnutella servent I gather). Though I was listening to only one, I was downloading others, which cut my bandwidth down quite a bit.

    Now that I'm downloading only one stream, Green Dragon Radio, it seems okay, but my bandwidth must not be enough because it keeps starting and stopping (buffering). I've got an ADSL 256 down/128 up so it should be good enough to stream. Off shoutcast it would be fine. That's a 128 bit stream, trying others do the same despite supposedly being broadcast at less bandwidth.

    I assume the overhead of the p2p stuff is cutting into either the broadcasting or receiving ends. (Or my machine is messed... always a possibility) This is only Beta, though so I'm sure it'll improve quickly.

    Good job guys at Peercast!

    -Russ

    --
    Me
  37. It sucks by HanzoSan · · Score: 2


    Anything based on gnutella sucks, I'm sorry but come on!! Gnutella?!

    I'm going to stick with streamer myself
    http://www.chaotica.u-net.com/page/streamer.htm

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  38. why not just by HanzoSan · · Score: 2

    open up a recorder program and hit record.
    you dont have to use a stream ripper at all.

    --
    If you use Linux, please help development of Autopac
  39. Partial Packet Feature: Multiple hosts by aaron_pet · · Score: 1

    Something that I would like to see partial packets (an audio stream is broken into two or more streams that both sound OK, and combine to make a good sounding single sound stream. This would allow for a person to rely on multiple hosts instead of just one. (hopefully this could be broken into maybe even 6 streams) This reminds me of Ogg Vorbis.. (break off the back of the packet and keep sound comming).. but it is a bit more complicated than that. So, If I have a high bandwidth server, I could have 6 sources for my audio... each one would work partially independently: They could be made to overlap slightly to discourage purposefull bad packet introduction. 6 8bit streams... or 7 or 8... or more... So, your browser would try to get the stuff from as many providers as possible. You would serve the packets that others are lacking. BTW, how does this system currently handle latency?

    --
    Please use [ informative / summarizing ] SUBJECT LINES
    Flame me here