Slashdot Mirror


Suggestions for Home PBX/Key System?

foobar104 asks: "I'm fascinated by the idea of putting in a home PBX or key system. I don't really have a good justification for this; it just sounds like a neat thing to have. There are commercially available small PBX systems available for $500 to $2,000, plus another $500 to $2,000 for voicemail, but putting in one of those doesn't sound like as much fun as building one from scratch using an older PC and some off-the-shelf components. I'm wondering if anyone has suggestions for sources of information, tips, HOWTOs or other knowledge on this subject? I'm sure it's been done before; GNUCOMM and GNU Bayonne are out there, but I'm not having much luck finding tutorial-type info about them."

"The system I want to build doesn't need to be complicated. I'd like to have two outside lines and about five inside lines. I'd like the system to have all the standard cool features, like intercomm and station-to-station calls and such, but I'd also like to do some exotic things. For example, I'd like to implement a call whitelist system, where during certain hours of the day, only calls from numbers on a pre-defined "white list" ring through, and all other calls go to voicemail. I'm guessing that something like that will require programming, and I'm not afraid to get my hands dirty. I just don't know where to start.

It sounds like a fun hobby project-- to me anyway. Can anyone point me in the right direction?"

165 comments

  1. Hmmm by tadheckaman · · Score: 0, Troll

    Why would you want a PBX system in your house? how many people live in your house?

    --
    My potato gun was confiscated by the United Nations. They said I wasn't allowed to have weapons of mash destruction.
    1. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you read what he said, you'd notice he doesn't have any justification except doing it for fun. You'd have noticed if you weren't so busy trying to get an early post.

    2. Re:Hmmm by foobar104 · · Score: 5, Informative

      Why would you want a PBX system in your house? how many people live in your house?

      Two... but that's obviously not the point.

      I'm looking for features. Features like programmable voicemail and room-to-room intercomm are easy, and they're available at reasonable cost from companies like Panasonic. But the more complex stuff, like call filtering by caller ID, call forwarding by caller ID, day-night programming, and so on... those are harder. That's why I'm hoping somebody can help me out with building a scriptable, configurable system using off-the-shelf hardware and software as much as possible, and homegrown software where necessary.

      I really thought I made this clear in my submission. Maybe I was wrong.

    3. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Your questions to him are ">", my questions to you are "#" :

      >Why would you want a PBX system in your house?

      #Why would you post jackass crap like this just to be first post?

      >how many people live in your house?

      #How stupid do you have to be just to post jackass crap like this just to be first post?

    4. Re:Hmmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Moron, why the hell do you care? he wants todo it, that should be enough. Why does he need to justify doing something cool like this to YOU?

    5. Re:Hmmm by King_TJ · · Score: 2

      I think your submission was clear enough.... I think many readers are simply trying to say that they don't feel it's realistic to get what you want with an "off the shelf" software/hardware combo for the PC without spending a lot of money.

      Products like this absolutely do exist, but because they're useful/valuable to businesses, people are selling them at pretty high prices. EG. Brooktrout is a manufacturer of cards that plug into your PC and work with a variety of different software packages that support them. They handle voice mail, voice recognition, and automatic call routing functions, incoming and outgoing faxes, caller ID recognition, etc. Last I checked, though, a Brooktrout board was well over $500, and you still need a software package that works with it. Otherwise, it's just a cool piece of unusable hardware.

      By contrast, you can buy a complete PBX system with phone handsets for under $200 on eBay. If you look for older NEC "NEAX" phone systems, for example - you'll occasionally see them going for minimum bids of only $50 or so. These things have battery backup for power outages, pretty much any feature you could want on a phone (day and night + holiday modes, least-cost routing of outgoing long distance calls, automatic wake-up calls in the morning, priority ringing for specific callers, etc.), and if you pick it up in person - you won't get hit with a huge shipping charge on it.

  2. Asterisk PBX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Check out the Asterisk PBX system by Linux Support Services. http://asteriskpbx.org/
    It is all linux based and the hardware is very nicely priced. I have this running at home and love it!

    1. Re:Asterisk PBX by Multispin · · Score: 2, Informative

      I totally agree! Asterisk is a great system that is well designed to boot. If you want more than one incomming line, I'd strongly consider ISDN. ISDN is a really good voice facility. It has better voice quality and features in addition to often being cheaper than two POTS lines. Besides, ISDN cards are fairly cheap (I got one for our incomming trunks at work for $5 on eBay)

      For the internal lines, a couple Internet PhoneJack cards will do it. Current supported FXS cards (FXS is the type of line the telco gives you) only support 1 port per slot. If you need more, you can either use two machines and hook them together via VoIP or get a channel bank and T1 card.

      The channel bank solution can easily give you 24lines but would run around $700 ($500 for the t1 card and $200ish for a channel bank on eBay).

      H.323 and SIP support are in the codebase, but in beta quality. IAX is Asterisk's naitive VoIP protocol. It's also supported by gnophone.

    2. Re:Asterisk PBX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that you Mark? ;-)

  3. vgetty for smaller stuff by bmetz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Some of the call filtering and voice mail things can be done with vgetty, an extension of mgetty. A $10 genero rockwell will do well with it. It's not a pbx but it's something for cheap.

    --
    What did you eat today? http://www.atetoday.com/
    1. Re:vgetty for smaller stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Vgetty is probably the most unintuative, unforgiving, complicated, inefficiant, poorly documented piece of crap I have ever had the misfortune of working with. Here is my list of gripes:

      Hard coded modem support. Got a new modem that's similar to an old one but has a new feature you really want? Gotta hack the source code! Everybody else uses a conf or ini file to set up different modems, why can't vgetty?

      Most of the developers are German, and while I don't neccesarily have a problem with Krauts since I'm 87% German myself, most of the documentation looks like it's been run thru babelfish 10 times, then proof read by a Korean game developer. Picachoo First Space Explore!

      Most $10 generic modems nowadays are Winmodems, completely devoid of all voice functions and Linux support. Even if it is supported, see my first rant.
      I fought with vgetty for about a week trying to get my old Zoom modem, which BTW, was allegedly 100% supported by vgetty, to act as a simple answering machine. After almost losing my sanity I went and bought a Sony SPP-A1050 cordless phone/answering machine. Works great, it's all digital, and doesn't require a PhD in CS to set up.

    2. Re:vgetty for smaller stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      >since I'm 87% German myself

      *whips out slide rule*

      87.5 maybe (50 + 25 + 12.5), but what combination of 50, 25, 12.5, 6.5, ... 50 / (2 ^ (n-1)) adds up to 87?

      Yeah, I didn't think so, mister story teller.

    3. Re:vgetty for smaller stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      maybe one of his grand parents lost a leg in a WW2?

    4. Re:vgetty for smaller stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you Mr. Spock, for pointing out that I shouldn't round off my decimals in the midst of Linux zealots. I may actually be 87.5% German, but my rant is 100% correct. Prove me wrong, I dare you.

    5. Re:vgetty for smaller stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Vgetty is probably the most unintuative, unforgiving, complicated, inefficiant, poorly documented piece of crap I have ever had the misfortune of working with.

      I guess you never tried to use linux...

  4. Informative by SpatchMonkey · · Score: 3, Informative

    You might find this interesting. Search the page for 'PBX', it brings up some possibly useful links.

  5. Nice system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting


    It's not a DIY project, but these people make an awesome phone system for home/home office use.

    http://www.talkswitch.com/

    You can get a 2-line or 4-line system, and new systems due out will be able to handle VoIP.

    They're physically quite small, work with standard phones, regenerate caller-ID info (this was a killer for me, I couldn't find any other system that did it), programmable via PC.

    I've had mine for over a year, and mostly use it for the auto-attendant to screen calls, ringdown to try me at home, if I don't answer forward them to my cell,and the built-in voicemail. It's awesome!

    - Turbo

    1. Re:Nice system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you're just after the auto-attendant featues, check out the personal assistant product at http://www.voicecom.com/services/voicecom_assistan t.cfm - a whole lot cheaper than buying your own PBX.

    2. Re:Nice system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Thank you, thank you, thank you. I've spent the last couple of days trying to figure out how to set up a system for our small business.

      We're move from consulting to electronics and wireless sales. I had assumed I was going to need to spend at least 3-4k on a KEY system.

      This is the perfect solution for us--and at a fraction of the cost.

      you've made my week.

    3. Re:Nice system by pixitha · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      badass, i am so going to install one of those in my houses.. along with some nice phat gigabit ethernet...for use on my mac g4 of course.

      --
      "an eye for an eye only makes the whole world blind"
    4. Re:Nice system by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hi five! Gigabit on my TiBook rocks.. well, I assume it rocks.. the only other computers I have around here are 100Base-T.. but I assume it rocks, you know.. seeing as everything else about it rocks.. We'll just put that down as a maybe rocks...

  6. Dialogic MSI board and support web site by YogaDude · · Score: 3, Informative

    You can build a PBX with Intel (formerly Dialogic) "MSI" boards. The MSI can take an analog interface from the outside and generate ring and dial tone for your station sets. You can use an SC bus capable voice board for voice mail. Ought to be able to find this stuff on e-bay at a reasonable price. As for how-tos, there is a wealth of material on the dialogic/Intel support site Check out the various documentation, especialy the the "Application Notes." There are also forums you can join for free and folks on the forum are very knowledgeable. The bayonne user community is also very helpful. I've been dying to do this kind of project for years but haven't had the time. Enjoy!

    1. Re:Dialogic MSI board and support web site by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow when did Intel buy Dialogic? I used to do a lot of work with their IVR and T1 boards.

    2. Re:Dialogic MSI board and support web site by RobNich · · Score: 2

      Haven't had time? Ditto. Using Dialogic MSI cards has appealed to me greatly. I program Dialogic T1 and voice resource cards on SCbus. I always wish I had time to make a cool system for home. Knowing me, I would end up with a product I could sell.

      The coolest feature that I still haven't found anywhere is a scripting language to alter the behavior of the system and phones. I would do that.

      --
      Hello little man. I will destroy you!
    3. Re:Dialogic MSI board and support web site by YogaDude · · Score: 2, Interesting

      You ought to look into Bayonne. There's a write-up on it in the latest issue of Linux Journal. Bayonne abstracts the board-specific API to its own asynchronously oriented scripting language (ccscript) that can freely interact with other beautiful tools such as Perl, TCL, and, I think, Python. This ought to reduce development time in a huge way. The beauty of Bayonne is that you can slip other hardware onto the server and your app doesn't care because it's going through the Bayonne abstraction layer and Bayonne can handle other products besides Dialogic. My only reservation is that Bayonne does not appear to have plans for a VoiceXML interpreter. But who's perfect?

    4. Re:Dialogic MSI board and support web site by snakeyes · · Score: 1

      Wouldn't you need a small analog board for the interface to the CO. A D41/ESC for example.

      Also, there are some other things to consider such as number of internal phones in order to ensure that sufficient voice resources are available.

      My memory fails me as to how many resources are available on a D41/ESC but if you are wishing to support more than ~4-8 internal phones, you'll need a resource board.

      So, that's a MSI board, a D board (analog or digital), and possibly a voice-resource board. All in all, this is getting to be a chunk of change.

      (not to mention that the older models are full-length ISA boards, so good luck finding a good case)

      Not that it can't be done, it is just more difficult and expensive than a PnP board that you install for fun.

  7. A few Places by puto · · Score: 4, Informative

    You can always find pbx systems on E-bay relatively cheap. My house has a 15 year old system that I got out of an old office building. has 2 lines running into it, voice mail, and runs fine.

    However, I want to kludge up something as well so here is my research for you.
    http://www.mtnsys.com/ Software
    http://www.openippbx.org/ Nix software
    http://www.virtualpbx.com/ More software.

    Hope this helps.

    Puto

    --
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  8. What does PBX stand for? by Mr2cents · · Score: 1

    I hate it when an abreviation is thrown in my face without explanation. Am I the only one?

    --
    "It's too bad that stupidity isn't painful." - Anton LaVey
    1. Re:What does PBX stand for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Private Branch eXchange

    2. Re:What does PBX stand for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why does it matter what it stands for? If you have ever worked in an office you should know what it is and therefore not need an explanation. Besides Public Branch Exchange doesn't really tell you anything.

    3. Re:What does PBX stand for? by gabba_gabba_hey · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, you could always search google, or for general tech acronym descriptions this site is often helpful. from the techweb site:
      (Private Branch eXchange) An inhouse telephone switching system that interconnects telephone extensions to each other as well as to the outside telephone network (PSTN). A PBX enables a single-line telephone set to gain access to one of a group of pooled (shared) trunks by dialing an 8 or 9 prefix. PBXs also include functions such as least cost routing for outside calls, call forwarding, conference calling and call accounting. Modern PBXs use all-digital methods for switching, but may support both analog and digital telephones and telephone lines. See IP PBX and WPBX.

    4. Re:What does PBX stand for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      wow 2 for private and 2 for public. and the answer is: PRIVATE BRANCH EXCHANGE. it's private because it is for use by businesses in private offices, yet connects to the public telephone network. get it? i didn't think so.

    5. Re:What does PBX stand for? by vofka · · Score: 1

      Public makes more sense - it's not what it does, it's where it connects to (The PUBLIC Switched Telephone Network), and who can access it (The PUBLIC can place a call into the exchange).

      This is one of those cases where an acronym has multiple acceptable and correct variations, live with it!

      --
      Disclaimer: I meant what I thought, not what I wrote! What? You can't read my Mind? Oh dear!
    6. Re:What does PBX stand for? by FattMattP · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Actually it stands for Private Branch eXchange as it acts as a private telephone switchboard.

      --
      Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    7. Re:What does PBX stand for? by TRyanC · · Score: 2, Informative

      PSTN vs. POTS isn't an American vs. British thing. The Public Switched Telephone Network (PSTN) is the public phone network used ing your country (or the world), it consists of many large switches all kinds of different phone connections, including optical fiber, satellite, undersea cable, frame relay, T1, and even POTS (plain old telephone service), which is a simple twisted pair carrying one analog phone conversation and enough voltage to ring a heavy electromechanical bell.

      The PSTN is like the telephone version of the Intranet, and a PBX would be the telephone version of a LAN.

    8. Re:What does PBX stand for? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      i've never worked in an office.

    9. Re:What does PBX stand for? by AndyMcL · · Score: 0

      I have always known it as Private Branch Exchange too.

      I guess that the people who say it is Public Branch Exchange are the same people who think that Duct Tape is Duck Tape. ;-)

    10. Re:What does PBX stand for? by mwillems · · Score: 1, Redundant

      Private Branch Exchange (not public!)

      Michael (ex PBX engineer)

      --

      ---
      BDOS ERR ON A:>
    11. Re:What does PBX stand for? by bat,+blind+as+a · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      http://www.octanecreative.com/ducttape/duckvsduct. html

    12. Re:What does PBX stand for? by doorbot.com · · Score: 1

      Why isn't there an "-1, misinformation" or alternately "-1, wrong" option when scoring messages?

      If you're going to karma whore by defining acronyms, at least get it right. You can look these kinds of things up on everything2.com or dictionary.com. And better yet, you can even link to the definition (since moderators like these kinds of things... it's a "safe" use of moderation points).

    13. Re:What does PBX stand for? by Media+Tracker · · Score: 1

      Check the Acronym Finder, it's got huge database.PBX stands for Private Branch Exchange

    14. Re:What does PBX stand for? by echo465 · · Score: 1

      If you're gonna get snotty with him, you might as well get the acronym right.

  9. Asterisk of course! by EMIce · · Score: 1, Redundant

    Come on! Search google ya dummy!

    http://www.asteriskpbx.com/main/

    Searching for PBX and Linux will get you Aaterisk. Asterisk is open source, works with widely available, relatively inexpensive hardware, runs linux, and is very flexible. Here is a feature list:

    Extension routing logic
    Simple but functional voicemail, including e-mail notification
    Call bridging
    Call transfer
    Call parking
    Intercom (using sound card)
    Directory
    Execute arbitrary commands
    Simple configuration using text files

    1. Re:Asterisk of course! by hex1848 · · Score: 2

      here is a good article explaing the asteriskpbx project:

      http://www.linuxdevices.com/articles/AT8678310302. html

      looks like this will work great for what your looking for.

  10. Openh323.org by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've got faimly membrers in all the major calling areas in my state. My brother and I have pondered setting up a local calling network using Openh323 and cards from http://www.linuxjack.com/.

  11. I'm kinda in the industry by fuerstma · · Score: 3, Interesting

    And...

    I think you probably have two options. The biggest commercial effort in this area was called CyberGenie. I forget who made these units, but they are actually pretty neat. They no longer make them or anything, but they are on eBay for like ~$50... you can have up to 10 handsets I believe. The worst part of them is that the OS of the host machine has to be a Microsoft (ugh) and worse yet, Win98 is far and away the most supported OS. I'm on the CyberGenie mailing list (yeah, I guess I Dont get enough spam) and tons of people try to get these going with Win2000 and it isn't worth the trouble. Go ahead and Google for CyberGenie, it'll give you better information than I can give you.

    Your other option is to go out and buy yourself a Dialogic Card and program one yourself. A Simple 4 line ISA card will cost you about $100 on eBay. We use Dialogic cards at my work (http://www.telecorpproducts.com) for some real time voice processing stuff. Well a previous developer bought the wrong model so I borrowed it and took it home. Some of the Dialogic models have Linux support. I popped it into my Linux box, and then developed a simple C app to capture the caller ID information coming into my phone w/ the fairly easy to use Dialogic API that dumps the CallerID info into a MySQL DB. Then a simple PHP page to query the DB and viola.. from anywhere in the world I can see who's been callin our casa.

    From there it's pretty easy to do voice processing, transfers, etc... At work we take the raw voice coming off the card, do some shifting around, and then pass that information off to a RealAudio SDK/Server to send real time voice over the Internet (specific to call center monitoring)..

    Oh well, best of luck... you can either buy a canned, unsupported package or strike out on your own (and I hope open source the results so I can use it for my home!)

    --
    www.jackasscritics.com
    1. Re:I'm kinda in the industry by Bamfsog · · Score: 1

      I run a CyberGenie under Win2k and it works great. There is some beta software out there for the system. There are lots of problems with Office XP, but other than that its ok.

    2. Re:I'm kinda in the industry by DavidOster · · Score: 1

      I had no trouble with this on a Compaq running Win2K Server, using the CD that came in the box. The manufacturer was Cygnion, and apparently the phones were actually manufactured by Ericson. The voice recognition is licensed from Lernout and Hauspie, as I remember.

  12. Check this out by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Hi,

    You can check thoses Panasonic PBX ( http://www.panasonic.com/consumer_electronics/comm unication_systems/default.asp ). They have a complete variety of systems and best of all, they accept plain old phones on almost all systems ! It's not for sure the last geeky thing but it works really well. I'm sure that you can find a good used system for a cheap price.

  13. I have one, and recommend by mwillems · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I have one too - 8 extensions, 3 lines (2 connected). Panasonic PBX: takes key sets or analog sets

    That is one of the most important variables: can you connect cheap analog sets, or must you use expensive key sets?

    Used to be a phone engineer so it's an interesting hobby but also useful: share 2 lines, connect through, redirect fax calls to the fax, etc - recommend you buy a cheap analog PBX - few hunbdred bucks in Europe.

    MW

    --

    ---
    BDOS ERR ON A:>
    1. Re:I have one, and recommend by warpSpeed · · Score: 2

      I have a panasonic Hybrid PBX with 6 CO lines and 16 extentions. It works real well. It will take analog phones as well as the digital phones. The digital phones range from $40 to $100+ on EBay. I have picked up half a dozen digital phones on Ebay and they work pretty well.

      The best part is the music on hold, it blows people away :-}

    2. Re:I have one, and recommend by RobNich · · Score: 2

      I have a Panasonic 12x32, with 8x16 in cards in the chasis. I have two spare systems full of cards and about 30 extra phones (at work we pulled three working systems).

      I moved out of the house, and my wife broke all but one of the phones (not malicious, she is just rough on phones). It has one outside line connected.

      Considerations for a new system:
      - Caller ID passed to sets?
      - Can you use analog or key sets on the same line card?
      - Integration with PC? Some provide telephony interface for PC software.
      - Voicemail built-in or seperate? Full integration with PBX? Automated Attendant?

      BTW, a Panasonic is a Key System, not a PBX.

      And I won't mention how I submitted this story a week ago today and got it rejected within an hour. Oh. Too late. Fu2.

      --
      Hello little man. I will destroy you!
    3. Re:I have one, and recommend by dzenizo · · Score: 1

      After trying to assemble a PC based unit for less money than a commercial Key System, I decided to buy a Panasonic Hybrid TD308 (up to 6 lines, 24 extensions) for about 600 dls including Call-ID, Doorbell Interface for up to four doors, and Music On-Hold. I still believe the deciding factor could be the phone itself (programmable keys, zone voice interphone capable, hands free, etc). I needed 3 external lines, 10 extensions, 2 doorbell (3 in the future), call-id, and zone calling/1 external speaker (My house is a 4-level unit, so my wife was tired of shouting from floor to floor...) Considering the cost of the PC (150 dls for a second hand unit), 150 dls for each ringer card (four ports per card, three cards required), 100 dls for a two line external lines (two cards required), and about 70 dls for each single doorbell interface (you lose 1 extension for each doorbell), the system I needed came to around 940 dls, vs 600 dls for an "appliance" I can use right away, versus having fun (and spending two or three weeks making things work in Linux) Still you need the phones with display (if you want call-id on the phone), at about 40 dls each, but.... how do you make individual and zone-voice calling operate under Asterix or whatever you use???.

  14. Software is the hard part, nor is reliability easy by isdnip · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "Real" PBX systems have very complex software. Basic call control is easy. Features, especially keyset emulation, take a lot of code. This isn't something to code yourself in your spare time. You might have fun adapting what's out there, but don't confuse "IP telephony" with a real PBX. IP phones are expensive and don't sound as good as circuit phones.

    Standard PBX systems are designed for the famous "five nines" reliability. You don't get that from a regular PC -- for instance, PC hardware can't do hot swap, which any PBX worth its salt can.

    If you're adventurous, you can cobble together "carrier grade" hardware nowadays using off-the-shelf cards in the Compact PCI (which is more accurately "collosal PCI") form factor plus the H.110 bus, which supports 4K time slots of TDM voice. Of course that's overkill for a home system, but some serious phone gear is built that way, using off-the-shelf Sparc or PowerPC CPUs.

  15. Some links by gibber · · Score: 1
    I've toyed with this idea myself several times but have never had the time (or resources) to do anything about it. ;-)

    linuxtelephony.org is likely of interest. It has some good information and, just as importantly, lots of good links.

    Asterisk seems to be a strong, fully featured, GPL'ed PBX project which has some hardware associated with the project that seems to be pretty well priced.

    I can't seem to find my other links but they're probably linked off of linuxtelephony.org.

  16. Home PBX by GreyyGuy · · Score: 2, Informative

    Just a reminder, a home PBX might be cool, but if your phones go through a PBX, you need to make sure you have a regular phone in case the power goes out.

    1. Re:Home PBX by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      or just a REALLY REALLY BIG UPS!! :D,, lol :), i have over $1500 of UPS's in my house, plus the emergency lighting systems and backup generator :),, who cares about power outages!!

      Reece,

    2. Re:Home PBX by mentin · · Score: 1

      Most professional PBX'es offer call through feature. I.e. they can be configured so that when power goes down or host PC crashes, external lines are connected directly to predefined internal lines (assuming you use regular analog phones). So you lack all the features of PBX and extra extensions, but at least you have regular phone. Worth checking if the PBX supports this before buying.

      --
      MSDOS: 20+ years without remote hole in the default install
  17. Toshiba Strata VI by owlmeat · · Score: 1

    Many years ago I bought a complete system at a swap meet for $50. The electronics, the connectors, and a box full of phones. I've since bought another one for work. They don't have many new features, but they are solid as a rock. Systems show up on ebay all the time for less than $100.

    --
    They stab it with their steely knives,

    But they just can't kill the beast.

  18. Features by Spazmania · · Score: 1

    I've been searching for this sort of thing as well. Key features for me are:

    1) Sidetracks telephone numbers not in a whitelist to a message which says something like "Telemarketers are unwelcome; others press 1 to ring through."

    2) Encodes voicemail to MP3 and forwards it to my email box. That way I can use the mouse to slide forward and back through the message, save important messages easily, and listen to it on my OK computer speakers instead of the crappy speakerphone speakers.

    Do any of the mentioned systems support that sort of thing?

    --
    Moderating "-1, Disagree" is simple censorship. Have the guts to post your opinion.
    1. Re:Features by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Encodes voicemail to MP3 and forwards it to my email box.

      That's a fantastic idea. I mean really fantastic. Can't believe I've never thought of that.

      I hope somebody has a good suggestion on this subject.

    2. Re:Features by Pfhreakaz0id · · Score: 2

      funny thing is I worked at a company that sold a PBX that did this. Now bankrupt....

    3. Re:Features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The personal assistant product at http://www.voicecom.com/services/voicecom_assistan t.cfm has the voicemail-to-email feature you mention.

    4. Re:Features by RabidOverYou · · Score: 1

      > Encodes voicemail to MP3 and forwards it to my email box

      Got it at work. The little blinky on my phone never lights up any more. Mighty fine for getting vmail in meetings, on the laptop, if potentially embarrassing.

    5. Re:Features by JakeS · · Score: 1

      Sure, I used vgetty to do this earlier this year. It allows you to run any program after an incoming recording, so I set up a quick bash script to convert the recording to mp3 using the included tools and lame.

      Then it added an entry to a database containing the Date & Time, callerID, and length of the message. A simple php page allowed me to check the messages from home or work.

      Unfortunately, vgetty is very difficult to get working, and the sound quality of my modem was pretty poor. But it's all there, and very possible.

    6. Re:Features by AJWM · · Score: 2

      Way back when I had (still have, somewhere) an all-in-one box called a Canon Navigator. Based on a 286 DOS PC (gives you an idea of the age), it had a built-in fax (doubled as a scanner and printer), touch screen, and some pretty nice telephony software.

      The phone software had features like:
      - digital answering machine, messages recorded to disk (as separate files for each msg)
      - automated dial-out using a pre-recorded message
      - similar automated functions for receiving faxes to files and automated sending of faxes
      - all of the above integrated with an address and phone number database
      - more stuff I can't remember right now.

      Some of the above had convenience interfaces -- for example, you could set it to give yourself (or somebody else) a wake-up call at a certain time.

      The point being, if you're going to use a general purpose computer as a PBX, you might as well take advantage of the fact that it's a general purpose computer. Make all of the above functions available via any other computer on the household LAN.

      --
      -- Alastair
    7. Re:Features by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You could probably get vgetty to do what you want. It should be included with all recent versions of mgetty. Just playing with it one night, I got it to record the caller id info and the voice message and convert it (voice message) to wav. I was using an old Gateway Telepath II 33.6 voice modem I pulled from an old machine at work (date on card is '96). The sound quality was on par with what my $15 cheapo answering machine does.

      The coolest thing about vgetty is the voice shell extension. It allows one to code a pretty complete voice box system using shell scripts. It even passes the caller id name and number to the script allowing a lot of flexibility. When I get a littel more free time, I am going to finish getting it setup and have it post caller id and message info into a database so I can retrieve it via a PHP page if I want to. I'll probably also set it up so I can call in and have it use rsynth of festival to generate voices so it will tell me who called, when they called, and whether or not they left a message.

      It's not a PBX, but it's a cool voicemail/answering machine setup with loads of flexibility.

    8. Re:Features by luminate · · Score: 1

      Check out Altigen's AltiServ.
      http://www.altigen.com/AltiServ_SmallOffice.htm

      "The AltiServ SmallOffice solution is a fully converged PBX telephone system that uses the LAN, the internet and the public telephone network to enable an array of applications that take advantage of the convergence of voice and data communications.

      The AltiServ SmallOffice supports both traditional and IP telephones as well as Voice over IP functionality, Contact Center capabilities, AltiWeb applications, T1-PRI interface, IP networking and interoffice trunking."

      It has tons of features including e-mail integration.

      "This allows AltiGen to support unified messaging giving the user the option of having their voice mail delivered to any POP3 e-mail server. Now you can access your voice mail without changing at all how you retrieve your e-mail now."

      Not sure how much it costs, but it sure looks cool. =)

    9. Re:Features by ApheX · · Score: 1

      Consider looking at something like GoBeam. Although they do most of the work for you, it uses VoIP. It is all controlled via a web interface - you can set it to follow you (so if you dont answer your desk, it rings to your cell, then your pager..etc). You can set up specific groups for people who should be able to get through all the time, people who will get voice mail every time and so on, so you can restrict whom you talk to. Voicemails can be sent to your mailbox or previewed online. The units provide dialtone to whatever location your using it at so you can use digital OR analog phones (and fax machines). We had their service for a year and it was great, excellent at work and worked fine on my lines at home (1.5/128k AT&T Cable and a 1.1/1.1 SDSL line). Pricing is good too.

      --

      -
      aphex
      I Steal Music!
  19. A home PBX by quigleymd · · Score: 1

    As stated before, Intel sells a nice MSI card available in both PCI and ISA form factors. I have developed for the cards under both NT and 2000 and both platforms seem to run stable. There are several SDKs available for the cards, but the one we choose to use was 'Visual Voice' by Pronexus. It was a toolkit available for VisualBasic which worked well, but I dont believe it is being sold anylonger.

    Intel has a SDK made by them for the boards, and the boards come in various flavors. There are boards for use with T1/E1s, ISDN lines, MSI systems and there is also a board that can be used for general TAPI applications such as an IVR (Interactive Voice Response) system. As for Intels SDK, it seems to be able to be used in both VisualBasic and C++.

    More info can be found at http://www.dialogic.com

  20. Check your LJ by z84976 · · Score: 2

    the latest print issue of Linux Journal has an article on Bayonne...

    wha? you don't subscribe? tsk...

    1. Re:Check your LJ by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      the latest print issue of Linux Journal has an article on Bayonne...

      As a matter of fact, that's what inspired me to Ask Slashdot. It never occurred to me that there might be others out there who shared my idea of a home PBX until I saw that article.

      I did find it a little light on practical information, though. It read like a design specification, which is all fine and good, but....

      wha? you don't subscribe? tsk...

      Wha? Linux Journal isn't free? tsk... ;-)

    2. Re:Check your LJ by Yohahn · · Score: 2

      here here on your question. These packages seem to have SQUAT for documentation for the beginner. (for example where does the "idle" state get defined in the files? I just don't know where to start with the thing... sigh)

      I have two quicknet cards (phone jack and a line jack) and just want to do a simple computer answering machine... how the heck can I use bayonne to do that?

      On top of this, I tried openam and it simply garbled the audio.. even just from machine on local net to machine on local net.

      Sigh...

  21. Siemens multi handset cordless systems by tsangc · · Score: 2

    Though you won't get an CTI capabilities, there are a few consumer vendors who are making multi handset cordless systems that have many PBX like features, including multiple lines, station to station calls, directory features etc-We have a 2.4 Ghz Siemens system with two handsets that only cost about $100 Canadian from a surplus liquidator. I think Sony and Panasonic also make such systems.

    Another route is to buy a used Nortel Norstar system from some of the hundreds of key system vendors out there. Unfortunately they can get expensive but the telsets and ATA adapters often end up in junk and surplus shops or the local Goodwill for really cheap.

    Calum

    1. Re:Siemens multi handset cordless systems by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I own a Siemens system now. It's in my attic. I replaced it with a couple of cheap 900 MHz phones after I put in my wireless LAN. I'd rather have 802.11 than 2.4 GHz phones.

      The Siemens system is really far from being a true PBX-type system. It's just a glorified cordless phone with optional answering machine. Oh, and the cordless handsets sound terrible from the other end of the connection.

    2. Re:Siemens multi handset cordless systems by tsangc · · Score: 2
      I own a Siemens system now. It's in my attic. I replaced it with a couple of cheap 900 MHz phones after I put in my wireless LAN. I'd rather have 802.11 than 2.4 GHz phones.

      We've been pretty happy with ours, but the only bug is the short standby time. Since you had one, what kind of talk and standby times were you getting?

      I was plesantly surprised by some of the features in the Siemens system like station to station calling, barge in, and the caller log/directory features. It's by no means a true PBX, but for home use, it's not half bad. Even a small business could get a lot of use out of it.

      Calum

    3. Re:Siemens multi handset cordless systems by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Since you had one, what kind of talk and standby times were you getting?

      Dreadful. If I left the cordless handset out of its cradle for about 36 hours, it would start giving off that high-pitched "low battery" beep. Which is an amazing thing to wake up to in the middle of the night when you've left the handset on your bedside table.

  22. Toshiba DK40 + Stratagy by Genady · · Score: 3, Informative

    The wife (who is a phone tech by day) says you need a Toshiba DK40 + Stratagy voice mail. I've programmed the DK 424 myself (with the add-on computer interface) and have to say it wasn't too bad. Don't let the sales guy tell you you can program it all through the phone though :)

    --


    What if it is just turtles all the way down?
    1. Re:Toshiba DK40 + Stratagy by Kyeo · · Score: 1

      The wife (who is a phone tech by day)

      Does she fight crime by night?

    2. Re:Toshiba DK40 + Stratagy by elzahir · · Score: 1

      Oh dear God... not the Toshiba! That thing is the biggest POS! If you think it's not too bad; you must have a puch card interface for your other machines. Lord.

      Oh, but you can program it all through the phone. I've lost hours of my life doing just that. What was it, Extension #499?

      I just wish the damn thing had understood daylight savings. Or not getting trapped in a loop on Friday at exactly 5:01 pm.

      I wish I was employed, but I seriously don't miss that job in the slightest.

      --
      For a successful technology, reality must take precedence over public relations, for nature cannot be fooled - R Feynman
  23. Try VOCP by Scutter · · Score: 4, Informative

    You might try VOCP. Good open source call routing system. Even has web integration for retrieving your calls over a network.

    --

    "Tell me doctor, with all of your defenses, are there any provisions for an attack by killer bees?"
    1. Re:Try VOCP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To quote the VOCP website, VOCP "is a complete voice messaging solution, featuring unlimited voicemail boxes, email pagers and DTMF command shells". It uses a voice modem to do this stuff but it cannot actually route calls to different phones which, I gather, is one of the main points with the PBX.

  24. Reliability by tsangc · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The one thing that would concern me with making your own PBX out of an old PC and some CTI cards is reliability. What if the system crashes and someone needs to dial 911 or another emergency service?

    Keep at least one analog 500 set wired directly to a trunk/outside line.

    Calum

    1. Re:Reliability by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I can see your point but lets get realistic here... In your lifetime how many times have you actually needed to call 911 for a "real" emergency?
      I am sick and tired of people calling 911 because there are illegally parked cars where there shouldn't be. 911 is for EMERGENCIES where there is immeninet threat to life and/or property.
      I will type this slowly as you people can't read very fast.
      Illegally parked cars or in my part of the world people watering their lawns on days they are not supposed to are IMHO and probably not anyone else that still use their brains for something besides a mount for 2 ears would probably agree. 911 is an emergency system that is being abused from you morons that are calling about some suspicious parked cars and or someone spray painting LINUX RULES on your street signs are not EMERGENCIES that should take up the limited resources of your local law enforcement agency.

      I was driving home from work the other day and got a "news" bulletin that said to report anyone stealing andhydrous ammonia (supposedly to make meth) to your local law enforcement agency by calling 911. My problem with this is what happens if I actually "need" to dial 911 and some idiot has the line tied up for say 60 seconds or longer and my TRUE emergency doesn't go through.... What recourse do I have when someones idea of an emergency amounts to a "cat in a tree" and my emergency amounts to a real life car accident that has injuries that could have been prevented/reduced by way of having law enforcement doing their "job" instead of directing
      traffic from the cat in the tree incident.

      While we are on this subject Yes I know I am off topic and people will probably call 911 naw most /. readers can't call 911 because there isn't an 11 on their phone dial.

    2. Re:Reliability by FuzzyMan45 · · Score: 1

      i think you might have the incorrect number, i mean, i found the "1" but where's the "91". I dont think the numbers go up that high, am i supposed to spell out nintey one? Hmm, im all so confused...

      BTW: i agree with you on the 911 thing, i have called 2 times (REAL emergencies, other times i needed the police, i called their local number) and one time it was busy. can you believe that? busy. good thing the person i called it for wasnt hurt too bad.

    3. Re:Reliability by BeyondHope · · Score: 1

      I have a PBX sytem at home I inherrited from a failed company. Dialogic hardware, running televantage software.

      I can't speak for other PBX systems, but my dialogic patch panel forwards the first two trunks straight to specific systems in case of system crashes.

  25. Re:Software is the hard part, nor is reliability e by petree · · Score: 2

    You might have fun adapting what's out there, but don't confuse "IP telephony" with a real PBX. IP phones are expensive and don't sound as good as circuit phones.

    Standard PBX systems are designed for the famous "five nines" reliability. You don't get that from a regular PC -- for instance, PC hardware can't do hot swap, which any PBX worth its salt can.


    IP Telephony can sound just as good or better than traditional telephony. With the Cisco gear we had (Call Manager and 7560 Phones) you could specify the bandwidth used, and on the high settings and low compression it was crystal clear. So don't just throw around statements saying IP telephony sucks.

    Oh yeah, and another thing, that same Cisco IP telephony system was based on regular rebranded Compaq servers that Cisco had made sure were nice and stable. Oh yeah and they garunteed "five nines".

  26. Reliability -- by sillivalley · · Score: 5, Informative

    Dealing with phone lines is a PITA. Look at the innards of something like a Panasonic PBX ( I've had one in the house for 10+ years), and one of the first things you notice is that a large percentage of the circuitry deals with spike and surge protection for all the lines going in and out of the box.

    I've thought about homebrewing a system, but don't have a 30 hour day just yet. The panasonic box is reliable -- it just sits in the closet and works. Oh, when power fails, it automagically switches the CO (incoming) lines to the first n extensions, so you're not totally screwed.

    Features with unintended consequences department: One cool feature of the panasonic system is the doorbell boxes. Put one on the front door, and you can answer the door from any phone connected to the system. Unfortunately when I first set up the system, the front door also rang the extension with the answering machine on it. We went away for the weekend -- when we returned, we found that the answering machine had been answering the front door! Oops! A "simple matter of programming" fixed that.

    1. Re:Reliability -- by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      We went away for the weekend -- when we returned, we found that the answering machine had been answering the front door! Oops!

      Doesn't sound like an "oops" to me. Sounds like a feature. ;-)

    2. Re:Reliability -- by drfreak · · Score: 1

      We went away for the weekend -- when we returned, we found that the answering machine had been answering the front door!

      Bzzzt!

      "I'm sorry, we're not home right now. But if you check under the flowerpot, the front door key is there. You may take anything but my 3133+ PBX system!"

  27. Thanks for this submission by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I really appreciate the info people are giving.

    I've been wanting to do this in my home for my small business for a while but I've never known how to do it.

    The features I really really want are:
    1. CallerID being stuffed into a MySQL database.
    2. Filtering rules for callerID to serve up special messages for special people.
    3. 44.1 16bit message recording. I know it's overkill but I have never found a home based digital answering machine that is even halfway decent quality. Does anyone know of one? I'm using a Sony right now and it's awful.

    From then on, everything else is just extra good stuff.

    I might keep in touch with you if you don't mind and let you know what I find.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
    1. Re:Thanks for this submission by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Filtering rules for callerID to serve up special messages for special people.

      That's another fantastic idea. Program the phone system to send a specific message to my girlfriend: "Honey, I went to the market. If you want anything, press 1 to connect to my cell phone."

      I should have entitled this article, "Share your most brilliant phone system ideas."

    2. Re:Thanks for this submission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      44.1 16bit message recording. I know it's overkill but I have never found a home based digital answering machine that is even halfway decent quality.

      The phone company digitizes the signal at 8kHz and 8 bits. The sound quality will never top that unless you use another phone in the same house (or you use voice-over-IP or something). Perhaps your problem is with the speaker.

    3. Re:Thanks for this submission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's another fantastic idea. Program the phone system to send a specific message to my girlfriend: "Honey, I went to the market. If you want anything, press 1 to connect to my cell phone."

      Why don't you just call her and ask if she needs anything instead of relying on her to randomly call you before you're at the checkout counter? This PBX idea for *2* people in a house is about as ludicrous as taking an item that's supposed to be easy to get to (PDA cradle) and sticking it into a PC case which could be a dozen feet away in a shelf or under a desk. You really don't need any of this stuff. Go get a Panasonic cordless phone with a couple of cradles and two handsets. Most of the features you talk about are available from the phone company anyway (distinctive ringing, call blocking, etc.)

    4. Re:Thanks for this submission by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      Why don't you just call her and ask if she needs anything instead of relying on her to randomly call you before you're at the checkout counter?

      Because she's a surgical resident and she's uncallable when she's operating. But she always calls home just before the end of her shift.

      Assuming you know how my family operates is going to lead you to false conclusions.

      This PBX idea for *2* people in a house is about as ludicrous as...

      First of all, nobody asked you. I made it clear in my submission that this is just going to be a "for fun" project with no real practical justification.

      Secondly, the services that you talk about that are available from the phone company don't even begin to scratch the surface. Can I have the phone company set up a nighttime call white-list such that between certain hours the phone only rings if the caller ID matches a number on the approved list, and all other callers get routed directly to voicemail? Can I establish a global black-list such that calls from certain numbers never ring through* unless the caller enters a code? Can I establish a hunt-down list, based on caller ID, that rings the house first, then my cell phone, then my office? Can I have that hunt-down list automatically change or deactivate during certain hours of the day?

      I think you're underestimating the ultimate usefulness-- not to mention just plain gee-whiz-ness-- of a home telephone automation system.

      Besides, the phone company wants you to pay through the nose, every month, for the measly selection of services that they do offer. After a year, you've spent several hundred dollars on telephone services. And what do you have to show for it? Nothing at all. I'd rather invest the time and money, then own the equipment.

      But then again, I suppose people like you are inevitable. Every "Ask Slashdot" has to have somebody-- or several somebodies-- who pisses in the submitter's Cheerios.

      *There's nothing I can do about the policemen's benefit fund calling me. They're technically a charity, and are therefore not regulated as telemarketers. But I don't want to donate, and I don't want to take their calls. Black-list them, they get a polite message that I won't be accepting their calls, and that's the end of that problem.

    5. Re:Thanks for this submission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      First of all, nobody asked you.

      What part of "Ask slashdot" don't you understand?

    6. Re:Thanks for this submission by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      What part of "Ask slashdot" don't you understand?

      First of all, I'm getting pretty tired of this "what part of blank do you not understand" thing. It's trite. Find a new expression.

      More importantly, though, why did you take my statement out of context? The poster said he thought my idea was ludicrous. I replied that nobody asked him whether it's ludicrous or not.

      See? Simple.

  28. try siemens gigaset by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I have a siemens gigaset system in my house and I love it. Only the base station plugs into the POTS line, everything else is 2.4G wireless. You can have 2 outside lines and up to 7 cordless handsets. The sysetm has intercom and voice mail. (I have 802.11b and no interference)

    1. Re:try siemens gigaset by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I have 802.11b and no interference

      You're luckier than I was. As I said in another post, my Siemens system is in the attic. It shat all over my wireless LAN when I first installed it. (The LAN, I mean. The phones were there first.) I have since replaced them with inexpensive 900 MHz cordless phones.

      In case anybody gives a damn, I'm using an Apple AirPort base station with some Macs that are equipped with AirPort cards and internal antennas.

    2. Re:try siemens gigaset by bangzilla · · Score: 1

      I have a Linksys 802.11a WAP and three laptops with receivers. I also have a Siemens Gigaset -- no interference that I can detect between them -- and the Siemens base-station and the Linksys WAP sit about 3ft from each other. Lucky perhaps?

      --
      Rich people are eccentric. Poor people are strange. Me, I'd be happy with odd.
  29. Re:Software is the hard part, nor is reliability e by thogard · · Score: 1

    If the call manglers were so nice and stable, why did 5 of them hit my web server within days of code red? List price on a 25 station system at that time was somewhere in the range of US$40,000.

    If you don't want all the fancy stuff, it does look like IOS will suport the voice cards on the smaller modems so a call manager isn't needed any more but it will take quite a long time to set up.

  30. 1 idea by Izanagi · · Score: 5, Funny

    I myself would just see about buying a used system. Try here or here.

    --
    SCO (noun.)- A Slimy Corporate Ogre. Often seeks free money.
    1. Re:1 idea by duckbillplatypus · · Score: 1

      or perhaps a nice system from Qwest

    2. Re:1 idea by Basje · · Score: 1

      You can find information about the auction of KPN-QWest's assets here: troostwijk auctions

      --
      the pun is mightier than the sword
  31. AltiGen Communications.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    AltiGen Communications (http://www.altigen.com) makes a very nice PC based PBX - with support for open H.323 VoIP, Traditional Analog trunks & extensions, and T1/PRI services.. You can find used systems on E-bay for very resonable prices. Their smallest system configuration is 4x8 (4 incoming analog trunks, 8 analog extensions)

    It does require an MS OS (NT or 2000 Server) - probably the only downside.

    I too work in the industry. ;-)

  32. VoiceML & VoIP? by spankalee · · Score: 3, Informative
    This isn't a PBX reccomendation, but you should look into VoiceXML for your frontend/voicemail. You can all sorts of cool things like branching with DTMF, or speech recognition. You can record speech, playback messages depending on input, use speech sysnthesis.

    One thing I'd like to use that for is to leave messages for people who call in by letting them enter a PIN.

    The only problem is the software, the projects on sourceforge don't seem to be that far along yet

    I'd also check out VoIP for intercoms. There is opensource software for that. You could build your own VoIP intercoms/phones with a single board computer with built-in sound, or a usb soundcard, or the Creative Labs VoIP Blaster (there's oss called Fobbit to use that with Linux)

  33. I've been abusing a 3com nbx by thogard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    3com makes an over priced "VoIP" system called the NBX 100. We got one of these for work and when we got a second office, we got another one. Its custom 486 pc like device that has all its devices hooked off a 10mb ethernet network. Its os is vxWorks. This seems to be a nice system for the geeky house if you can find one at a firesale. They have all the cool things like tapi so windows boxes and do stuff, they have pc soft phones. Of course they only support windows and won't desribe the packets that go over the wire (which aren't voip, but raw ethernet packets). I've got tcpdump and I'm slowly figuring out whats going on. The phones seem to be good but expensive and you want to keep them on their own port on a switch or at least away from links you want to be fast. For more details google for "nbx rant"

  34. why? by Drunken_Jackass · · Score: 1

    Really?

    I mean, unless you have a crap-load of people calling you (unlikely) why would you subject yourself to the proprietary systems of a PBX/Key system?

    A $40 Voicemail system is just fine, thank you.

    --
    There are 01 types of people in this world. Those that understand binary, and me.
    1. Re:why? by FredMcGriff · · Score: 1

      A PBX can provide features that simple voicemail cannot. Some examples:
      1. Each handset can have it's own extension, and therefore can call other extensions - very handy for upstairs/downstairs.
      2. DID (direct-incoming-dial). This allows a public phone number to ring a single handset inside the house.
      3. Voicemail (PBX based) can utilize these features to allow for personalized messaging, and with a simple press of the button, all calls can go direct to voicemail (no ringing phones!!!).
      PBX's can be inexpensive when purchased used.

    2. Re:Why? by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I mean really why?

      You know, I went to the trouble of putting it in the second line of my submission: "I don't really have a good justification for this; it just sounds like a neat thing to have."

      If you people can't be bothered to read two sentences into the story, we're going to have to resort to making the titles longer. And nobody wants that.

  35. Hybrid Old Phone systems + Linux for Vmail by hklingon · · Score: 2, Interesting


    Surplus sites and auction sites like Ebay are good for this sort of thing. Myself, I have a Computone Executech II key system with nice lcd speakerphones and programmable button consoles. I got the PBX and 15 phones on ebay for $65+s/h. While it is true you can't plug in a plain old telepohone (POTs), Even these old proprietary phone systems have some "auxilary" jacks on them for regular analog devices (fax machines, etc) you may want to use at an extension. I was able to use google groups to find all the pertinent wiring information before I even bid on it.

    I use this phone system in conunction with vgetty and this. If someone calls in and the VOCP system answers, you can do all the standard voicemail stuff, you can issue a page to my email pager, send a fax(which can be forwarded to email) or I can even dial into the system and get a PPP dial-up connection if I'm on the road and otherwise don't have internet.

  36. What about the Telco side, maybe a dumb a question by joweht · · Score: 1

    There are a lot of cool and useful things that you could do with open box PC based PBX (here in Australia they are referred to as PABX, hav no idea why). I especially dream of all the cool things that you could do by integrating the PBX with an SME's ERM database , maintaining phone logs for every customer, bringing up the customers details based on caller-id.

    My question is just how much do you need the co-operation of the telco to get a system like this to work , i.e I might want 4 lines in but I don't want 4 different numbers, is there an open standard, or am I forced to involve the telco in how I setup my PBX?

  37. Repartee is a great Voice Mail system... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 3, Informative

    I picked one up for next to nothing that has four ports (four simultaneous voicemails) It came with a 286 (!) computer and a 100 meg hard drive that had hours and hours of recording time. DOS based of course (though I've heard that the newer ones use OS/2). As to a phone system...I'd look for small companies going out of business and offer to buy theirs cheap. A friend of mine got a Panasonic 10 line/25 phone digital system that way for 50 bucks (and he had to remove the PBX from the wall and unplug the phones).

  38. Why? by twos · · Score: 1

    I mean really why? I Like anyone would want multiple lines of telemarketers.....

    Humm lets write Slashdot and have the populous write out project plan...

    --
    Phear The Phat Penguin
  39. Justification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "I don't really have a good justification for this; it just sounds like a neat thing to have."

    Well, how about saving money? With your own homegrown PBX you could program it to take advantage of pre-paid calling cards or 10-10- calling plans, which have dirt-cheap rates. With the right program, you'd pick up the phone, get the PBX dialtone, and just dial the number. Your PBX program would then select the most economical service to use for the number you dialed, dial the correct prefix, send your PID if necessary, complete the call and connect your phone. You'd get "dial 1-" simplicity like Qwest or AT&T but without their big city rates!

    1. Re:Justification by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I have a much better plan for saving money. Works like a charm. It goes like this:

      1. Get a cell phone.
      2. There is no step 2.

      I can't remember the last time I heard of somebody getting a cell phone that didn't include free worldwide long distance. The other night I called Sydney from my home here in North America (I won't get any more specific than that). The cost to me: thirty of the 50 bajillion non-peak minutes that my cell phone provider gives me every month.

      And-- this is the best part-- the company picks up the cell phone bill!

      I mean seriously, I can see the day coming soon when long distance charges are abolished. Local phone service has been deregulated, so there's competition for your local phone number now. All it'll take is for one newcomer to offer unlimited free worldwide long distance for the low, low price of $N a month, and that'll be it.

    2. Re:Justification by bsane · · Score: 1

      Its not a bad plan, but at least in northern virginia and DC cell phone coverage is too lame to use as a primary phone. I've had 3 different phones with 3 different providers, and I haven't been anywhere yet where the signal wasn't questionable. It may be at full strength, but when you walk across the room it will cut out or drop. I don't think its just my bad luck because it seems to happen when my friends call me from their cell phones too.

      CA seems to have better coverage, but the quality can be spotty so I'm not sure I'd replace my land line there either.

    3. Re:Justification by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I have a cellphone with included domestic (US) calling, but haven't heard of anyone with included world-wide long distance. Who's service do you have?

    4. Re:Justification by foobar104 · · Score: 2

      I have a cellphone with included domestic (US) calling, but haven't heard of anyone with included world-wide long distance. Who's service do you have?

      AT&T. Since it's a company account, though, I'm not sure which plan I have, exactly. But my girlfriend has an AT&T personal phone, and she also has free worldwide LD, so it's obviously available to everybody.

  40. The Linux Answering Machine HOWTO by sirhan · · Score: 2, Informative

    The Linux Answering Machine HOWTO is not exactly what you're looking for, but surely a good start.

    --

    It is easier to get forgiveness than permission.

  41. Feature Wish List by CySurflex · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Feature Wish List from PC/PBX integration:

    • Being able to call in remotely and:
      1. changing settings of the phone system
      2. listening to voice mail
      3. having your email read to you
      4. control X10-home-automation stuff (call in through your phone and turn the air conditioner on 30 minutes before you get there!)
    • Being able to do all of the above through a remote web browser (including listening to voice mail through the web)
    • bonus: all of the above with speech recognition?
    • having an IM sent to you at work when you get a voice mail at home
    1. Re:Feature Wish List by Krow10 · · Score: 1

      Old thread, but I'll respond anyway.

      I built my own voicemail a few years ago using an old 486, a Dialogic 2-port voice card and their DOS drivers (what? DOS is a decent loader if you want to do your own scheduling.) It had most of the features on your list, excepting the X10 and speech recognition stuff; plus it had custom messages based on caller-id. Oh and the IM was an email, this being 1998.

      The #1 feature missing from your list, and from my box (since I couldn't afford the switch card or the case/power supply to drive it at the time) is a whitelist only ring through. Incoming calling # not on the list? Straight to voicemail (with a pass-code for getting through, if people are calling from non-standard #'s.) No more voice-spam. Now that's a feature I really wish I had. Hmmm, maybe it's time to revisit that old idea. Especially since there are linux systems available fairly cheaply.

      -Craig

      --
      Corollary to Clarke's Third Law: Any technology distinguishable from magic is insufficiently advanced.
  42. Siemens Voice Quality by supergumby · · Score: 1

    I am relieved to find that I am not the only person who thinks the voice quality sucks. I couldn't belive how this expensive 2.4GHz phone was bested by an old Panasonic that wasn't even 900MHz!

  43. 802.11b and 2.4 Ghz Phones by Macgruder · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I read your other post about 802.11b interference. How you get around depends on what options you have on both your phones and your Airport. 11b has 11 channels. Channels 1, 6, and 11 can coexist in the same area with no interference.

    I have two access points covering my apartment, one in on 11, the other is on 6. I've avoided getting 2.4 Ghz phones just because no one publishes information as to how flexible the setup options are.

    Ideally, you'd have your Airport on 11, and configure your phones to the range between 1 and 6, allowing you to get around any interference from your microwave or neighbors.

    Once the phones get within 5 channels of your airport, your 802.11b is going to suffer. Sounds like that's exactly what happened.

    --
    I'm not crazy,I'm actively irresponsible.
  44. Lets not forget about VOVIDA! by fazil · · Score: 2, Informative

    http://vovida.org

    There you'll find a scalable open source softpbx that's scalable to the 5000 phone range. It's got Cisco research dollars pouring into it, and it's currently free. They have a soft client too! This thing has billing modules, h323 compatibility gateways.. Works with Cisco's VERY cool sip phones :)

    It really is aimed at the carrier type people.. but hell..it's pretty easy to get it all running on a P2-450 :)

    Take it easy all :)

    --
    -=-Ze End-=-
    1. Re:Lets not forget about VOVIDA! by lkeyes · · Score: 1

      There is an O'Reilly book out about this that just was published in July. Basically, it looks like the documentation for Vovida's VOCAL system.

      Neat stuff.

  45. Multiple lines of telemarketers by tlambert · · Score: 3, Funny

    Two words: Conference call!

    -- Terry

  46. ok this shit cant be hard. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the reason why sound is such a difficult thing in linux and other royalty free operating systems.

    If it were easy - we'd have a ton of voice solutions that all the 800lbs gorillas would be paying absolutely nothing for to wire up all the states and commonwealths and borroughs of america to share information like all the big important laws of the last couple of decades try to promise.

    wait - nevermind.

    -v

  47. Dialogic is the standard in the industry. by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2


    Dialogic is the standard in the PBX industry. If you use Dialogic boards, you can be assured of compatibility with the most software, and a long useful life for your hardware.

    On the other hand, Intel is good only with microprocessors, m. support chips, and motherboards. It might not be a good thing that Intel bought Dialogic. (Intel closed its consumer electronics division after many, many blunders.)

    System Release 5.1 for RedHat Linux

  48. Proper audio sampling requires 4x the input freq by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    You forget the sampling frequency isn't going to perfectly match the incoming waveform. Therefore, to properly sample the incoming sound you must sample using at least 4x the maximum input fequency. I know, I know, a lot of people claim 2x. However, that isn't correct. If you sample at 2x you can end up hitting the upside and the downside of a wave resulting in loss of data. That's why pro audio is sampled at 96 kHz. There's a more extensive explanation athttp://www.digitalprosound.com/Htm/SoapBox/soap2 _Apogee.htmp>

    So, 8 kHz x 4 = 32 kHz, right? 44.1 kHz is a common standard so it makes sense to use it.

    This wouldn't be an issue if the waveform delivered over the phone lines was a digital signal. It's not, it's an analog wave.

  49. Mod parent up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Funny, +1 would be reasonable.

    Remember humour is appreciated!

  50. Re:What about the Telco side, maybe a dumb a quest by foobar104 · · Score: 2

    I can't speak for how they do things in Oz, but in the US you can get (for example) four lines that are assigned to what they call a rotary group, or a hunt group. That means that the four lines get used in a round-robin fashion as calls come in. The first person to dial your number gets your line 1. The next person to dial the same number rings in on line 2, and so on, until it loops around again. So basically you're getting four lines with just one phone number.

    You can use a PBX with any number of incoming lines (as long as that number is at least one) and with any service from your telco. So the question of whether you buy a rotary group of lines or lines with distinct numbers is entirely up to you.

  51. How about a SIP/VoiceXML Solution by ungerware · · Score: 2, Interesting
    A completely standards-based, scriptable solution:

    Get an analog SIP gateway, like the one sold by mediatrix.

    Then, a VoiceXML Interpreter.

    The calls come in the gateway, and get handled by the interpreter, which runs on standard PC hardware. You can configure the interpreter to run different VoiceXML apps based on the caller ID info. You can specify any kind of voicemail app you want in VoiceXML, complete with touch tone and speech recognition.

    While you're at it, you can write other vxml apps accessible only to certain people, verified with biometric voiceprint authentication. Here's a scenario: You forgot your housekey. Your electronic garage door opener, however, is hooked up to an X-10 device.

    Computer: Hello, would you like to leave a message?
    You: This is Joe Shmoe.
    Computer: Voiceprint identified. How can I help you?
    You: Open the garage.

    BTW, the Nuance interpreter comes free with a 2 port license (handles 2 calls simultaneously). Any more than that, and they start charging. The software includes the speech recognition, voiceprint authentication, and voicexml interpreter.

    Neat, eh?

    --

    -----
    Kvetch is Yiddish for "throw an exception" --Dr. Ron Cytron
  52. Re:Software is the hard part, nor is reliability e by Elaine_r · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I found the Nortel VoIP phones were as good as other PBX system, but it was setup by having a special card sitting in a meridian 1 switch, running on 100MB ethernet hooked up to a Nortel shasta.. great fun. and all the features you could ever want. (IVR, voice mail, etc...) - but not really a setup you would have in a domestic environment, purely because of cost and rack space required.

    The ciscos VoIP kit by comparison never worked any where near as well and were very disapointing - if you have a choice always go for the nortel, or at least test out the ciscos for yourself before you buy (they may have improved and/or have a configuration that works for you..)

  53. Re:What about the Telco side, maybe a dumb a quest by Technician · · Score: 4, Informative

    am I forced to involve the telco in how I setup my PBX
    It entirely depends on what you want to do. Many PBX systems are perfectly happy sitting on a single POTS line. One caller ties up the entire system except extension to extension calls. This is what you commonly find at very small stores where you ring in and then punch up an extension. Busy's are common. The system is referred to as a key system. A user has to select one of the unused outside lines to place a call and has to select one of the ringing lines (or line on hold) to answer a call.

    A Private Branch Exchange is much more than a fancy termination for a POTS phone line. They run on some trunk lines. This does require some work on the Telco end to make it work. On the Key system, if one line is busy, callers would have to try later or try one of the other lines numbers. The Telco can have it so if the primary number is busy, it will roll over to a secondary number.
    On a trunked system, it is entirely diffrent. You can select diffrent numbers of incomming and outgoing trunks. In-comming calls and outgoing calls are placed on the first avaliable trunk. (you may have seen this, Dial 9 to get an outside line, not pick up line 3) Incomming calls as well as outgoing lines are trunked seprately. An example is an order desk using an 800 number. (operators standing by...) Many calls can be received limited by the number of incomming trunk lines and avaliable operators. The call center may have as few as 2 outgoing lines. A telemarketing center may have hundreds of outgoing trunk lines but just a few incomming lines.

    Another class of trunk is called DID, for Direct Inward Dial. You most likely have seen this for paging and not known it. A paging company may buy a block of 1,000 phone numbers and have them placed on 20 trunk lines. When you dial the regular phone number to call a pager, it picks up any free trunk line to the paging switch (sometimes as few as 10 trunk DID lines) and the phone company sends the last 3 digits of the dialed number. This way 1,000 phone numbers will fit on 10 or so lines. The calls are short so few callers will experiance a busy.
    DID lines are used for many PBX's so you direct dial a department or persons desk without dialing an extension. You can get DID for 1-5 digits to cover 2-100,000 phone numbers. A 1 digit DID does not require reserving all 10 numbers, 2 digit 100 numbers, etc. Getting 20 numbers reserved on a 2 digit DID can be done. My work phone is an example of this. To save on copper wire, all of the trunks can be multiplexed on an ISDN line or dedicated fiber optic line.
    Going trunked is overkill for home use. Look for stuff that will work on a POTS line. Some stuff is set up for trunked service and may support DID or ISDN.

    --
    The truth shall set you free!
  54. Convert some old Modems by simonfunk · · Score: 1
    I converted an old modem into a telephone line interface for my computer, then wrote some simple scripts to handle voice mail, real-time special effects for phone calls, you know. Note that since it's a regular modem, you have all the standard modem features like caller-ID (which your script could use to implement your whitelist). Wouldn't be hard to add tone-detection (actually, I already had it working a while back but haven't integrated it into this project) to route audio to other machines. If you have a computer in each room, you can just skip the phones (and hey, add voice-recognition for dialing out). But if you want phones... you might check out the LinuxJACK or related products.

    -Simon

  55. Cheap Voicemail & semi-pbx functions.. by The+Breeze · · Score: 1

    not quite a pbx, but you could use VOCP to do things like page a pager when a certain voicemail box has a message, accept credit card numbers, and run perl scripts to do whatever you want.

    www.vocpsystem.com

    I'm trying to get it to work for my business so that it pages me depending on which mailbox a message is left in. I know that in theory I can link it into a credit card validator and a bunch of other things but I'm not there yet.

  56. something like this? by sysv · · Score: 0

    http://www.ahlers.nl/shop/media/quatro.htm

  57. you just designed past Panasonic by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you can implement this, you'll kick Panasonic off the market. Lots of features in the lit, but nobody can figure out how to program them, so you end up with just another Radio Shack system. Most installs pay for voicemail, but never get it working.

    BizFone has done what you propose, you should look at their website for starters.

    But whatever you do, make it easy for the business user to program, that is, clean up the interface. You'll make a killing. Don't know how many times I've wanted outgoing messages based on calling number.

  58. where to get docos for programming by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Gawd, our vendor wired it in and left. They can't even get the intercom to work. It has voicemail? Would never know it. If it was up to me, I would have sued them.

    So, where can I buy documentation for this dammed $5000 white elephant? I contacted Panasonic 6 different ways, nobody there knows.

  59. Re:What about the Telco side, maybe a dumb a quest by stevenbdjr · · Score: 1
    am I forced to involve the telco in how I setup my PBX

    There is also some consideration to be given as to how the PBX picks up the phone lines coming into it. The typical telephone uses loop-start to pickup and line for an outgoing call. However, several older-style PBX systems uses ground-start. You'll need to have your lines configured by the telco depending on what kind you might need.

  60. BizFone by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had the task of setting up a PBX system for a 8 person office. I went with a BizFone system(www.bizfone.com). The system is really very easy to learn for both administrators and end-users. I was getting quotes around $12000 from other companies. Anyway this system cost us only $4000, and that's because we bought a second unit for expansion. You can get the single unit for $2000 with a couple of phones. In addition you can use regular phones with this system, you don't even need to buy the "Bizfone" phones. Overall, this system made my life easy, my boss happy(the cost was a lot less then he thought), and the end-users happy. I highly recommend.

  61. Small PBX by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I would recommend the Mitel SX-20. Great little pbx used by many motels and available pretty cheap used.

    Mr Dialtone

  62. Re:Proper audio sampling requires 4x the input fre by shepd · · Score: 2

    Phone audio is only 300-3000 hz. With companding, and 4x sampling (which isn't necessary, remember nyquist) 11 khz @ 16 bits is the best you'll ever get from a phone line. That's assuming you're still on an analog exchange.
    If your exchange is digital, 8 khz @ 8-bits is more than enough.

    HTH! I can provide references to these limitations, if you want them! :-)

    --
    If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  63. Don't bother - Get a Panasonic system! by inicom · · Score: 2

    Consider the value of your time!

    It's really a waste of your time if you want to have a reliable, maintainable, system. The price of a small Panasonic keysystem is worth it, and there are plenty of places that support them. You'll end up with a much better solution plus if you're putting this in your house, it'll *increase* the resale value of your house. A roll-your-own solution based on a trash pc will *decrease* the value of your house.

    --
    -a.e.mossberg
  64. pbx by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Lucent Cybergear Gold are good, http://aa.nu/isdn/nacyber.html

  65. Cybergenie system by waferbuster · · Score: 1
    I've been using the Cybergenie system for several years. It uses multiple handsets with individual mailboxes, and hooks seamlessly into Outlook (I know...). An additional feature is that I can call my home phone and have it read emails from my inbox. Like most text to speech converters it has some problems, but overall it works quite well.

    You can pick up the complete system off Ebay for about $120 (search for Cybergenie), and there is an updated driver set (3.0) which allows use with WinXP. The manufacturer went out of business several years ago, so there isn't any warrenty. There is a large user base for support, including a dedicated MSN newsgroup (just do a google search for Cybergenie to get links).

    It works well, and is relatively inexpensive, and links into my email inbox. Good enough for me.

    --
    I'm an individual! Just like everyone else!
  66. Re:Reliability -get a UPS by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Simple if power goes out - make sure you have a UPS - almost all PBX have internal support. If not add and external unit. There cheap starting at about $100.00 or may be less. If your really cheap there are plain on the NET to make your own.

  67. very off topic already, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was that old saying?

    911 - To save a life, stop a crime, report a fire?

    I totally support that anyone who calls 911 when there isn't an emergency (such as you said, illegal parked cars, watering during bans, etc), should be liable for a ~$100 fine... and repeat "accidental" 911 calls should be the same (tho I'm not sure how that could be tracked with any serious accuracy).

    The ONE time I've needed it (knock on wood) in my life it was there and working and the police were down in like 90 seconds... so I've bought multiple tickets to that stupid policeman's ball every year since =)

  68. bbs telecom by mycal · · Score: 3, Interesting

    has 2 inexpensive pbx's, somtimes under $100 on ebay.

    The low end unit has 3 outside lines and 8 inside, the other 4 outside and
    16 inside.

    I use it with a voiceworks voicemail system I got for $300 on ebay.

    It does have caller ID support and RS232 out, so you could do some call filtering there, but it is not as clean as a PC based would be.

    I do really like it, I got it when I built my office and guesthouse and had to have an easy way to share phonelines and intercom. The side result is I only get about 1 telemarketer call every 3 months now, since they never dial through the greeting, and everyone has there own voicemail box. People at my company can also call me at 11PM at my office and not wake the house, totally cool.
    I have 2 outside lines and 1 VOIP line plugged into the outside which works
    well for all.

    The great thing about it is that it uses regular phones and cool keyphones, your choice, and it is analog, so modems and fax machines work well on the inside.

    This is definatly the way to go on a budget. Under $500 you should be good to go.

    mycal

  69. OT: 9-1-1 by Spoobie · · Score: 1

    Nice rant, and in concept I agree with you. However, the sad fact is that many emergency service organizations don't publish their 7/10-digit number anymore. Some of them won't even give it to you if you call 9-1-1 and say "this isn't really an emergency, do you have a non-emergency number where I can call you back?"

    Many of the police/fire/EMS departments that don't give out phone numbers other than 9-1-1 say it is because of potential legal liability. They say that if someone calls the 7/10-digit number and turns out to have a real emergency, then someone gets hurt or dies as a result of the emergency, the department has a high probability of being successfully sued. Their thinking is that at least if the caller calls 9-1-1, the department can use "we took all reasonable steps" as a defense.

    This logic appears flawed in several ways. As you noted, it ties up the limited number of 9-1-1 trunks. What happens if a homeowner's monitored alarm system (ADT, for example) detects a fire and notifies the call center. The call center doesn't have a phone number on file for any of the appropriate municipality's emergency services. What to do? I can just hear the conversation now:

    "Seattle 9-1-1, what is your emergency?"
    "This is the ADT call center, I need to report a fire to the Luchenbach, Texas fire department."
    "Sir, you'll have to call them directly. I don't have a way to transfer you out of state."
    "I can't call them directly, they don't publish their phone numbers."
    "I'm sorry, sir, I can't help you."

    [Disclaimer: I have no idea whether Luchenbach emergency service numbers are published or not. I just used that city for the sake of example.]

    1. Re:OT: 9-1-1 by marius · · Score: 1

      good god, luchenbach? That "city" (it's actually just a country & western dance hall and a general store) needs to burn down. :)

      -marius (no, not a troll. I drove through luchenbach two weeks ago.)

  70. A chunk of change??? by Andy+Dodd · · Score: 2

    How about a whole bank vault??? :)

    I worked in competitive analysis at Lucent (now Avaya) 4-5 years ago. Some of our competitors used Dialogic boards in their systems, and part of my job was cost analysis - In small quantities, even basic Dialogic boards were $1500 or so. You could get MAJOR volume discounts, but to drop the price below $500 you needed to buy a LOT of boards. (You could get thr price to below $300-400 if you bought enough IIRC...)

    Cool hardware, but WAY too much $$$$$ unles prices have gone down.

    --
    retrorocket.o not found, launch anyway?
  71. DIY? Only if you're rich by bandy · · Score: 1

    The Seimens 2.5GHz wireless phone system also has voicemail capabilities in the two-line, 8-extension version. You end up with the pbx features [intercom, shared directory] along with the convenience of wireless operation. Just don't try to talk on the fern when you're nuking up a burrito.

    --
    "You might as well get your son a ticket to hell as give him a five string banjo." -unknown minister
  72. Re:What about the Telco side, maybe a dumb a quest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    (here in Australia they are referred to as PABX, hav no idea why)

    A = Automatic. Unlike the manual ones in other countries :^)

  73. homebrew pbx by zeropanic · · Score: 1

    Hehehe, its funny when I see you computer folks stagger into my industry! (I've worked for both the phone co and business systems dealers, I'm certified on several switches) I agree with most of the people- building a PBX isn't an easy task, but if your really interested, I'm working an analog system right now using a basic stamp as the cpu (basic stamp II will do neat things like output all the progress tones [busy, dialtone, etc]) will post nfo as it becomes available. I would HIGHLY recommend against using a PC for any type of PBX system (cough cough, Intertel's failed Axxent platform) they are just not reliable enough for anything other then a voicemail.. If you want a quick fix, Panasonic is tops for home users, and it seamlessly integrates with systems such as HAI/On Q's home automation products. ESI also makes an all in one cheap digital keyset called the IVX 128 plus (http://www.esi-estech.com) The nice thing about the IVX over the Panasonic is you can snap on a VoIP module- phones are expected to be SIP compliant soon) IVX' has a built in voicemail, built in MoH, true caller ID integration, etc, etc. email me [zeropanic at bellsouth dot net] if you need any extra info, will be glad to provide it. Intertel and Comdial have new entry level platforms as well, but I imagine the intertel will cost you your wife,kids and your soul (over priced) and the Comdial DX-80 is very buggy right now.

  74. Residential PBX Market? by 206WRX · · Score: 1

    Does anyone actually know what the PBX market is for residential apps (single-family and MDU)? I'm trying to hunt down some research. If anyone could point me in the right direction, I'm sure I can provide you with something interesting (I work for Leviton)...Heh...

    Bernard

    1. Re:Residential PBX Market? by zeropanic · · Score: 1

      Check my previous post.. I've been in the industry for awhile, and we've done many residental systems.