Slashdot Mirror


The Golden Age of Cup Manufacturing

jonerik writes "The Washington Post has this article today on the disappearance of traditional 'small' (8 oz.) cups of coffee in favor of a larger concept of 'small' (12 oz.). In the case of Starbucks, for example, a truly small 8 oz. cup of coffee is still available, but it's called a 'short' and isn't listed on the menu. Why not? 'We still have it,' says Starbucks spokeswoman Lara Wyss, 'but we don't advertise it because of the size of the menu board, the physical constraints.' Yeah, sure. Disposable cup manufacturers have taken notice of the popularity/compulsory nature of larger cup sizes. The Sweetheart Cup Co. started manufacturing a successful 24-ounce hot-beverage cup about two years ago, and Kathy Deignan, the company's national vice president of marketing and account sales says 'The eight- and 10-ounce cups are pretty much gone.' Sweetheart also manufactures 7-Eleven's 44-ounce Super Big Gulp cups, and Deignan says the company is considering producing an 80-ounce cold drink cup - that's 5 pints, folks. Christ, how much do these companies think people need to drink, anyway?"

52 of 718 comments (clear)

  1. Quick reply by death00 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I was going to reply, but I have to piss...BRB.

    1. Re:Quick reply by foo+fighter · · Score: 3, Informative

      Speaking of pissing and how much liquid a body can hold...

      Does anyone else here time themselves while urinating?

      I started timing myself after a long movie where I drank a large pop (~30-40oz.), refilled and drank it, and then didn't go to the bathroom until two hours later. It was a very long piss.

      I find my average to be 12-15 seconds. My longest was 43 seconds, again after a long movie with lots of cola involved.

      This isn't a flame, troll, or whatever. I'm just amazed that my body can hold three times the amount it usually takes to make me urinate without my kidneys or bladder popping out my back.

      If 12-15 seconds worth of urine is enough to fill my bladder and make me go to the bathroom, where does my body find room for 2-3 times that amount?

      Are these 40oz. plus cups two- or three-pissers? Meaning you end up going to the bathroom a few times before you can actually finish the thing?

      Just curious.

      --
      obviously no deficiencies vs. no obvious deficiencies
    2. Re:Quick reply by kesuki · · Score: 4, Informative

      Keep in mind your basic physics. Your bladder is more than a sack of waste fluid, it's a muscularly controlled valved sack for storing waste fluids. the 'need' to take a leak is based in part on how tired that muscle is of holding in the pee. so if you've got about 12 ounces of fluid in that sack the need to pee will arise at half the speed as if you had 24 ounces of fluid in there. To get an idea of how much harder it is, just take a bottle, put a baloon on the end of it and compare how difficult it is to hold in 12 ounces vs 24... it takes a greater amount of pressure, and the strain of holding pee in has everything to do with the muscular valve for your bladder, not the volumeteric displacement that it's capable of handling.
      As for where your body finds the room for it, that is also simple physics, when you drank the cola in the first place, you expanded your mass and volume, starting in the stomache and then moving on to the blood stream, and finally ending up in your bladder, and when you relieve it, your mass/volume is restored to where it was before, since the volume being talkeed about is under 2% you'd never notice such a miniscule change or variation unless you habitually measured your weight or diameter 10-20 times a day.
      Also keep in mind that the flow rate of urine is affected by the gravitational and muscular forces on the urine inside the body, so the only accurate mesurement is to measure the actual volume of urine, and ignoring the time elapsed, since that is such a highly volitatle variable.
      A slight disclaimer, I'm not an expert, but it's pretty clear that bladders follow basic physics the same as anything else.

  2. Not just drinks... by Quasar1999 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Has anyone else noticed that there is no longer a 'small' pizza at pizzahut? They start at medium... but the size has become smaller, and now they have extralarge... which is as large as their old 'large' size...

    Well, at least here in Canada... Don't know about the US franchise...

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
    1. Re:Not just drinks... by bobKali · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It's not just that they've renamed small to medium, but at many coffee shops for example they don't even use descriptive English words to describe the volume of their drinks. Instead we get short, tall (I don't care about the height of the cup), grande, super-grande, etc... names that don't mean squat to me reguarding the amount of coffee I'm buying.

      Maybe they could just put the diameter of the pizza or the number of ounces up there and skip the meaningless (ever-changing) names.

      Yea, I'd like a 40 of Espresso.....

    2. Re:Not just drinks... by kiwimate · · Score: 5, Funny

      Be assured it's just as silly here. I can't comment about Pizza Hut, but I know darn well that several fast food outlet pre-programmed droids get mighty confused when you ask for a small size of anything. "We have medium, large, extra large, and colossal -- what size would you like?"

      To which I reply, "I'd like small, but you're not going to play along, are you?".

      Blank stare, followed by "Medium, then, sir?"

      "If that's the smallest you have, then yes."

      Honestly, how stupid do you have to be to then ask me if I'd like to supersize that? Apparently, approximately as stupid as a significant proportion of American high-schoolers, who really make me want to say, "see, now, that's why you're wearing that silly hat".

      Anyway, I digress. And, apart from that, I'm getting off the subject.

      It's marketing, I'm sure, pure and simple. And the most depressing thing is it evidently works. Well it must, or they wouldn't keep doing it, now, would they? Yes, we really are stupid enough that we accept them calling the smallest size on the menu "medium", in blatant contradiction of all that is sensible and logical in the world, and buy drink sizes that ought to have a health warning from the surgeon general about over working your bladder and other sundry bits of internal plumbing.

    3. Re:Not just drinks... by gmhowell · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I noticed this in early 90's when I went to college. No delivery where I grew up, so the only time you saw a pizza was at Pizza Hut. And a large was ginormous. 16".

      So I go away to school. They have delivery, I have no car (stupid rule if ever there was one. Talk about encouraging alcoholism) so order a pizza. Well, dumb me knows that a large is too much, so order a medium. And what arrives, but a small.

      Now Pizza Hut advertises "The Big New Yorker". A full 16" pizza.

      Yeah. Like the ones you used to sell, before decided that a 14" pizza was a large. BTW, thank you ever so much for not dropping the price when you dropped the sizes.

      No, you sir (madam, celestial body, whatever) are not alone in your observation. As a matter of fact, my parents have an official Pizza Hut large pizza pan from the early-mid 80's. One of my father's patients has a couple dozen. For whatever reason, he gave my father a pizza pan. Guess what? It was an old large. The new large pizzas don't fill the pan.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    4. Re:Not just drinks... by blowhole · · Score: 5, Funny

      Never introduce abstract concepts to someone who needs pictures drawn on the register buttons.

      --
      "Ask me about Loom"
    5. Re:Not just drinks... by JCCyC · · Score: 3, Interesting

      This is the company's small contribution to keeping inflation low. Here in Brazil they used yet another technique - toilet paper rolls are 80% as long as what they used to be. Unit price didn't rise => no effect on inflation. Sweet.

    6. Re:Not just drinks... by JavaTenor · · Score: 4, Funny

      Frighteningly apropos: "...These go to eleven."

      And I think Pizza Hut should change their sizes to large, extra-large, and GALACTUS, DEVOURER OF WORLDS.

    7. Re:Not just drinks... by MiTEG · · Score: 4, Informative

      What I think is ridiculous is the fact that on the under the sizes listed at Starbucks, "large" is displayed as "Venti (TM)." Now, "venti" is the Italian word for the number 20, and that particular size happens to be 20 ounces. I don't understand how they be allowed to hold a trademark on a number like that.

      --
      The future isn't what it used to be.
    8. Re:Not just drinks... by kesuki · · Score: 3, Informative

      Seriously, having worked at a fast food, I can understand what the person was thinking when they gave you the confused look. Because small medium large etc... are all usually industry size terms for the cup. cups come in 4, 8, 12, 16, 20, 22, 32, 44 ounce sizes. 4 ounce is trial size, 8 ounce is almost not in use anymore, but at once time was a water-only-size cup. 12 ounce is usually a 'child' sized cup. 16 is a 'small' 20 is a 'regular' 22 is a 'medium' 32 is a large, and 44 is an extra large. (for those not in the know medium and regular ARE different sizes, but it's possible i mixed them up, and besides the menuboards don't tell you if they're using 20 oz or 22 oz cups.) The sizes are standardized for easy comparison with competitors it would get out of hand if one soda place called a 16 ounce a 'extra large' and the other place called it a small... but anyways, if you 'ask' for a small, you'll generally get the smallest size they have, if the person isn't a rookie. people who work at fastfoods for more than 3 months realize that the poulous doesn't WANT to be educated , they just want to get the food in 5 minutes. I actually ran into problems because of that though, because I would read back orders the _correct_ way instead of the way the customer ordered it if they'd spent more than a few minutes taking the order. And thus I'd have to explain why I rang it up differently. Like people who try to order kid's size drinks. when small was the smallest we had.

  3. Supersize is in. by hex1848 · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Every fast food restaurant from Wendy's to McDonalds has been increasing the size of there portions based on demand. Fatty and sugary foods taste better so we are ticked into wanting more to eat. The same thing goes for soft drinks, drink an 80 oz coke everyday and see how long it takes before you are shooting up insulin twice a day.

    1. Re:Supersize is in. by Mt._Honkey · · Score: 3, Informative

      I worked at a movie theater (GKC) back in high school. We had the child size, small, medium, and large (14, 20, 32, and 44oz). The large was nearly big enough to break your foot if you dropped it. Anyway, we offered free refills, and even though the large is a maddening 44oz, we had people come back for 1, 2, even 3 refills. And no, it wasn't a family sharing the drink, one person (and no they weren't carrying a jug that they poured it in). Some people (they're not all fat either) actualy do drink that much in a 2 hour movie.

      Seems to me that that would make your head explode.

      --

      Don't Bogart the fish sticks
  4. Poor Sweatheart Cup Co syadmin... by xtermz · · Score: 5, Funny

    ....Guy took a job at a simple little manufacturing company, hoping for a stress free position, and then out of nowhere... his web servers get slashdotted....

    --


    I lost my concept of community when my community lost all concept of me.
  5. Supersize Asses by stealie72 · · Score: 5, Funny

    Meanwhile, the 8 ounce asscheek has been upgraded to the 24 ounce asscheek.

    There will be trickle down from larger pants to larger chairs to larger coffins.

    --
    I don't have an anger problem, I have an idiot problem
    1. Re:Supersize Asses by Christianfreak · · Score: 4, Funny

      How unpatriotic can you be? Sarcasm at these patriotic Americans! The 80 ounce drinks mean more pants, and more chairs and more coffins! That my friend means more jobs ... communist!

    2. Re:Supersize Asses by NeMon'ess · · Score: 3, Funny

      That would be a blessing and curse for fit people like myself. Pants will become more expensive because the largest sizes will use more material, but the price is set for all sizes. Given enough complaints, perhaps airline seats in coach will finally become wider, good for me, but that means there are fewer seats per plane, so prices go up per seat. At least fuel costs won't go up or down because the weight of the fat fucks in the seats counterballance the reduction of seats. Coffin prices will go up unless a new extra-wide coffin size is made. Cremation prices will go up unless the price is by the pound. So the fattening of America is mostly a curse for me, damn fat fucks. How many Denis Leary fans who are also fat fucks are reading this?

  6. Being a breast man, by vegetablespork · · Score: 5, Funny

    I'm in favor of the steady increase in cup sizes. I suppose this trend can benefit the ladies, too, since guys also wear cups.

    --

    Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

  7. Re:2 observations by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 4, Informative

    5 pints is a lot less blood that I have in my body. you might want to see what other people can accomplish with a few simple search engine queries.

    hint: the human body has about 6 quarts of blood.

    for a quick refresh on pints and quarts hit that link.

    hint: there are 2 pints in a quart.

    so 5 pints is 2.5 quarts, which is less than half of the amount of blood in the human body.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  8. Is this just America? by Valdrax · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In Japan, at least, the largest drink size you can get at a fast food restraunt like McDonalds is smaller than the "courtesy cup" that they give people who order water in America. Several of my friends and myself got strange looks and comments from host families when buying 1 liter drink bottles for ourselves. I remember one guy was asked by his host family if he had a party of something when he threw away the empty bottle at home. In talking with a few of my foreign friends after I returned, I've been led to believe that America is the "Land of the Super-Sized Drinks."

    Can anyone from another country or who's traveled abroad comment on this trend? Is oversized drinks just an American thing?

    --
    If it's for-profit but free, you're not the customer -- you're the product (e.g., the Slashdot Beta's "audience").
    1. Re:Is this just America? by NMerriam · · Score: 3, Funny

      We almost died on a recent trip -- the value meals came with 300ml drinks. That's the size of cup you'd get for a small orange juice in the states. it definitely is an american thing -- none of us could even ration out the liquid to cover the whole meal and we wound up going back for second drinks.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    2. Re:Is this just America? by Azog · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well... I think it depends on the drink as much as the culture or country.

      For example, in my one experience in a Munich beergarden, I found that Coke came only in small glasses.

      Beer, on the other hand, could be ordered in a few sizes, including "large", "very large", and "2 litre, two-hands-required-to-lift the 20-pounds-of-glass-and beer" size.

      That was a good size.

      --
      Torrey Hoffman (Azog)
      "HTML needs a rant tag" - Alan Cox
    3. Re:Is this just America? by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 3, Funny

      They call it a Darwin because drinking it weeds out people that can't handle their alchohol? =)

      --
      If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
    4. Re:Is this just America? by G-funk · · Score: 3, Funny

      Hahaha, I like that one!

      In all seriousness, I'd like to state that the people of Darwin, NT Australia drink more beer per capita than any other place in the entire world, including germany.

      *sniff*

      God I'm proud to be an aussie

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
  9. Re:Dixie cups by ImaLamer · · Score: 5, Insightful

    the famous paper cups in the dispenser that save dishes from piling up in the sink.

    Funny, I just re-use dishes to keep the sink from over-flowing.

  10. the human bladder and other useless facts by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 5, Informative

    Useless facts about the human body

    some juicy bits:

    The average Human bladder can hold 13 ounces of liquid

    You loose enough dead skin cells in your lifetime to fill eight five pound flour bags

    your skin weighs twice as much as your brain

    When you sneeze, all bodily functions stop--even you heart!

    have fun. remember kids, use knowledge responsibly.

    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
    1. Re:the human bladder and other useless facts by dattaway · · Score: 5, Funny

      When you sneeze, all bodily functions stop--even you heart!

      A sneeze is nothing more than a spontaneous brain abortion.

    2. Re:the human bladder and other useless facts by Daetrin · · Score: 3, Funny
      Useless facts about the human body [geocities.com]

      "If you went out into space, you would explode before you suffocated because there's no air pressure"

      Hey, i can make up facts about the body too!

      Did you know that if you unwound your brain it would reach halfway from the earth to the moon?

      Well except for the brain of the person who compiled that list, his would be lucky to make it around the block.

      --
      This Space Intentionally Left Blank
  11. 44 oz? Try the DoubleGulp! by alouts · · Score: 3, Informative
    Sure, 44 oz. is huge. But 7-11 has done better than that for years. Their DoubleGulp measures in at a cool 64 oz. Yes, a half gallon!

    The best thing about it is that it even comes in a paper carton-like "cup" that very closely resembles a half gallon carton of milk, but with a hole in the top for a straw.

    'Course, the second coolest thing is the fact that you get anywhere from 700 to 900 calories from one, depending on what soda you put in it (assuming that, like most teenageers, you are not a big fan of diet sodas). Mmmmm half my daily calories in carbonated liquid form....

  12. Case in point by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 3, Interesting

    My brother is what I'd call a caffeine addict. He's also a cheap SOB like myself, so when it comes to soda, he did some research to find the best price-to-volume ratio. His findings? Buy a 64oz Double Gulp from 7-11 once, save the cup and refill it for 85 cents a pop. Only problem is he's forgets the cup quite often, so empty Double Gulps litter his desk.

    More relevant to the article, 7-11 charges the same price to refill any fountain soda, so there's no cost benefit for showing restraint.

  13. My rant. by FreeLinux · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I feel that the massive cups are linked to another phenomenon that I have noticed. That is, the new need for people to always have a drink in hand.

    Up until recently, when people got thirsty, they went to the kitchen and got a drink. They finished their drink in the kitchen and went about their business. People also drank at the table while eating. But now, people seem to be incapable of going ANYWHERE without a drink constantly in hand.

    It doesn't seem to matter what the drink is or if they are even thirsty, just so long as they always have a drink. Regardless of whether it is a ridiculous 44oz Big Gulp or a 12oz bottle of water, they must have a drink in hand.

    It appears to me that people have developed some form of security blanket complex where they are out of sorts unless they have a drink in their hand. You notice this with the constant sipping. They are obviously not thirsty but every couple of minutes they are compelled to sip a half ounce or so. They seem addicted to the act of drinking, rather like smokers are to the act of smoking.

    What's up with that?

    1. Re:My rant. by geekoid · · Score: 4, Insightful

      whats funny is, when your sirring around with all your friends, wait until there not paying attention to you, then take a sip of your soda. everyone else will follow suit, not relize it. People with out a soda, will gt up and get one.
      I've been running that experiment for years. it just cracks me up.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:My rant. by guttentag · · Score: 5, Funny
      At washingtonpost.com, this was a conscious effort that served a purpose.

      At one typical "yay for us" session where the publisher/CEO was trying to drum up support for an initiative the editorial staff opposed, I was obliged to clap with the majority. It would have been inappropriate not to. I noticed that one of the editors was not clapping, and I asked him how he could get away with that.

      "I don't want to spill my coffee," he said, pointing out several other editorial staff members who were not clapping and holding coffee cups. "Next time, bring a cup."

      So the next time I grabbed an empty coffee cup on my way to the meeting and just stood there holding it when everyone clapped. It was a good lesson in civil disobedience. When I left the company over a year later, and my boss was giving a BS speech about how much I meant to the company, I brought a coffee cup.

  14. Someone was bored by gmhowell · · Score: 3, Funny

    And rehashed an old Dennis Miller routine. It didn't start with coffee cups. First I remembered was resizing of McDonald's cold cups in the mid to late 80's. That was fine then, but now, when I want a small, it means I really want what is called the 'child size'. Ironically, when you get a happy meal, you don't get a 'child size', you get something even smaller.

    The reason they don't put it on the menu board? It costs ten cents more for the 'small', but only has about 1 cent more cost involved. They 'lose money' (in the same way that pirates cause MPAA and RIAA companies to 'lose' money) by selling this size. That's why they push the barrel basket of popcorn at the movie theatre for 'only 25 cents more': because it only costs them 5 cents more, so they make an additional 20 cents.

    "Do you want to supersize that?"

    "No, moron. If I wanted to supersize it, I would have said 'Number 3, supersize', not 'Number 3, medium'" But I usually don't, as it is the owner/manager who will fire the drone if they forget to pimp supersize fries.

    (BTW, call me in to testify against that fat bastard suing the fast food companies. Listen lard-ass, just order a medium! I'm fat, so fuck you, I'll call you lard ass if I want. I'm fat because *I* shovelled garbage down my gullet, not Mayor McCheese.)

    Oh, and to those who say "the market will prevail": bullshit. McDonald's used to have an "All-American meal". Cheesburger (not 1/4 lb), fries (modern medium, traditional large), and a coke (modern medium, traditional large). It's exactly what I wanted. Doesn't exist anymore. Yes, the items are available separately, but have you ever ordered separate items at McDonald's? What a joke. Definately a roll of the dice as to whether those people get anything right. (I do this frequently. I'll get a medium two cheeseburger meal with an extra drink, sometimes extra fries for my wife and I to split. Then throw in a hamburger for junior.)

    Blah. Gimme a gun, a knife, and an open fire. I'll get your supersized meal as soon as a buffalo comes walking by.

    (Not even 30, and I'm becoming a 'bitter old man', ranting about 'the good old days')

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    1. Re:Someone was bored by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Funny

      I do this frequently. I'll get a medium two cheeseburger meal with an extra drink, sometimes extra fries for my wife and I to split.

      (Not even 30, and I'm becoming a 'bitter old man', ranting about 'the good old days')


      It's a good thing, too, because with that diet, you don't really have any time to lose.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
  15. Re:Customer demand by mbogosian · · Score: 3, Interesting

    The manufacturers wouldn't make them if people didn't want them.

    Do you really know what you want? Ever heard the phrase "something I didn't know existed, but now can't live without?"

    What about the old adage about the two shoe salesmen that go to Etheopia. The first calls back to the home office and says, "no one wears shoes here, there's no market," and packs up to go home. The second calls the home office and says, "no one wears shoes here, we can dominate the market, send all available supply."

    The marketers make people want their products (yes, this includes you). Next time you're thinking of buying something on impulse, ask yourself why, and dig deep to find and answer. You may be surprised....

  16. Re:Drinking is good for you. by martyn+s · · Score: 3, Informative

    Drinking too much water can cause hyponatremia (too little sodium in your blood), which can make all your cells in your body swell up, including your brain cells, which would then cause brain damage. This is a fact.

  17. Re:2 observations by Exedore · · Score: 3, Informative

    A few points:

    1. Can the human bladder even hold that much? I don't know. I'm sure it stretches a bit, and there's probably a variance from person to person. But it doesn't matter because it doesn't go straight to your bladder, you goof. You see, you have this thing called a digestive tract. Anything you swallow generally goes there first. Nutrients (not that Coke contains much of these) and liquids are extracted and absorbed into your bloodstream. Blood passes through the kidneys and excess water (among other things) is filtered out. Then it goes to your bladder. So the real question should be Can the human digestive tract hold 5 pints, and the answer is probably Yes.
    2. As other posters have already pointed out, the average human body contains about 5 quarts of blood. If you only have 5 pints a trip to the emergency room is probably in order
    --

    I take drugs seriously.

  18. water intoxication by MORTAR_COMBAT! · · Score: 5, Informative
    You can drink too much water
    Q. I am a runner and would like to know whether it is possible to drink too much water?

    A. Yes, there is a condition known as "water intoxication." It is usually associated with long distance events like running and cycling. And it's not an unusual problem. For example, water intoxication was reported in 18% of marathon runners and in 29% of the finishers in a Hawaiian Ironman Triathlon in studies published recently in the Annals of Internal Medicine and in Medicine & Science in Sports & Exercise respectively.

    What happens is that as the athlete consumes large amounts of water over the course of the event, blood plasma (the liquid part of blood) increases. As this takes place, the salt content of the blood is diluted. At the same time, the athlete is losing salt by sweating. Consequently, the amount of salt available to the body tissues decreases over time to a point where the loss interferes with brain, heart, and muscle function.

    The official name for this condition is hyponatremia. The symptoms generally mirror those of dehydration (apathy, confusion, nausea, and fatigue), although some individuals show no symptoms at all. If untreated, hyponatremia can lead to coma and even death.
    --
    MORTAR COMBAT!
  19. geek unfriendly story by circletimessquare · · Score: 3, Interesting

    this is a very geek unfriendly story. i myself need the drug-like crutch of a gallon of sugary soda to keep my mental juices flowing while i program every day, all day. i have a feeling i am not alone.

    sure, the sugar spike of modern soft drinks is completely unnatural for a human body evolved to deal with the slow rise and fall of digesting complex carbohydrates, but so what? and no, i won't become a diabetic because i run every day too. calories in, calories out. and yes, as i admitted, it's a drug-like crutch, but in the larger scheme of things, i can forgive myself my dependence upon sugar to get me through the day. surely there are greater addictions and crimes out there we can all worry about, no? (yes, i am aware the micromanaging moralizers amongst us have something to say here, but we don't care, k?)

    programming may not be as calorie-intensive a process as say, the iron man competition, but the brain still eats calories. and is there a single programmer out there who doesn't appreciate the idea of getting into a mental zone and getting their most productive efforts out of that zone? do most of us prop up that zone with comfort-producing stimuli? music, furniture, toys, lighting, etc... but sweets and stimulants top the list. just go visit thinkgeek if you don't believe me and see what kind of stuff they hawk over there. if you've ever drank coca cola while at the keyboard, you have to admit the bonus it produces. what greater comfort-producing aid can there be than something that gives the brain what it naturally craves?

    keep the brain sutffed with oxygen and glucose and it will reward you with good code! don't let the guilt-mongers get at you, fellow programmers, enjoy your code red big gulp, and have one every day. (just make sure you exercise too... don't become another stupid fat american. ;-)

    --
    intellectual property law is philosophically incoherent. it is your moral duty to ignore it or sabotage it
    1. Re:geek unfriendly story by foobar104 · · Score: 3, Informative

      You are wrong, my sugary friend. There's no moralizing going on here; I'm overweight myself, so I'll be the last person to look down on you for your diet.

      IANAD either, but my girlfriend is a surgical resident. I'm handing her the keyboard at this point.

      You're wrong. Type I diabetes mellitus has a strong genetic link (80% concordance in twins), but type II diabetes appears to be completely linked to sugar intake. It's correlated to obesity too (75% of patients are obese at time of diagnosis), but that appears to be a secondary correlation. Because type II diabetes is a slow, progressive disease, it's usually not diagnosed until many years after onset. A diet high in sugar leads to both obesity (sometimes) and diabetes. That's where the correlation comes from.

      The mechanism works like this. When your blood sugar level rises, the pancreas is stimulated to make and release insulin. The insulin signals cells in muscles, fat, and the liver to absorb sugar from the blood and transport it into the interior of the cell.

      People with type I diabetes have an auto-immunity to pancreatic insulin-producing b-cells. In other words, your immune system seeks out and destroys the cells that produce insulin, so your body can't regulate its blood sugar level. Type I diabetics require total insulin replacement to live, but that's all. It's a relatively simple disease that way: take your shots, monitor your blood sugar, and you'll be fine.

      The pathology of type II diabetes is more complex. It's often a combination of insufficient insulin production in the pancreas and a resistance at the cell to the activity of insulin. In other words, type II diabetics may not have enough insulin, or their body may not respond to insulin, or a combination of both.

      When you eat, your body pancreas starts releasing insulin, which your muscle, fat, and liver cells absorb. If you eat A LOT of sugar, all at once, your body has to produce A LOT of insulin, all at once. If you eat a lot of sugar frequently, your body becomes "used" to it. It becomes less sensitive to high blood sugar, and starts producing less insulin. At the same time, your cells become "used" to having a lot of insulin around, so they stop absorbing it as much. When that happens, you can no longer regulate your blood sugar.

      You can treat type II diabetics with insulin sometimes, but not always. If their cells aren't receptive to insulin, then giving them more won't help. In those cases, the patient is usually treated with metformin.

      So taking good care of yourself in other ways won't necessarily keep you from developing type II diabetes. If your diet includes too much sugar, especially if you ingest it in a way that drives your blood sugar up dramatically, then you're at serious risk.

      Do you suffer from excessive hunger or thirst? Do you get tired 2-4 hrs after you eat? Do you urinate frequently? Do you ever suffer from blurred vision? Your doctor can test your urine to see if you're peeing out glucose. If you don't eat for several hours and your urine still has glucose in it, that's an indication that you may have some degree of type II diabetes.

      If you do develop type II diabetes, chances are you won't know about it for years and years, because it's so gradual. By then, moderate to serious neuropathy may have set in, as well as a degree of retinopathy. Circulation to your extremities will have been reduced. If you let it go for too long, you could end up losing your sight, or your legs. I did a BKA (below knee amputation) on a 67-year-old type II diabetic on Tuesday. He wasn't obese, either.

  20. Supersizing doesn't matter... by Pollux · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Every fast food restaurant from Wendy's to McDonalds has been increasing the size of there portions based on demand.

    Working for a major pop company, I can tell you right now that premix pop is downright cheap (premix is the syrup that's mixed with water and CO2 to get the pop that comes from the fountain). Since the pop companies don't have to worry about mixing it, packaging it, and labeling it in the bottling plant, they don't have to charge much for it.

    Believe it or not, advertisements for "80oz. Fountain Drinks for $.99!!!" actually lure customers there. And they can do it because they don't lose money. So, when the fast food / convenience stores get cheap pop, they get more customers, they don't lose money, and the customer walks away happy.

    The stores don't care about sugar levels or diabetes, and most customers don't understand that what they think is a "great deal" isn't doing much good for them, while it works great for the company.

    1. Re:Supersizing doesn't matter... by nelsonal · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I recall an old WSJ article about the new meal deals and McDonald's, back when they were new, and one of the points brought up was that the burgers were sold at about break even, but the fries and drinks carried gross margins of almost 80%. Meaning the cost of the drink, including cup, ice, and straw is about $0.20. What annoys me is the increase in size of straws. If you don't get the mega cup, your drink is gone very quickly.

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
  21. Re:44 oz? Try the DoubleGulp! by unicron · · Score: 5, Funny

    You turn and say "Bitch, hold this" like any normal person. Sheesh.

    --
    Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  22. This really is a weight problem concern by GweeDo · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I recently stopped drinking pop all together. Now I only drink water, milk (one glass per day), and juice (2 glasses per day roughly). In the 6 weeks since I started this I haven't really changed anything else about my excerise and eatting habits. I have already dropped 8lbs. I used to drink close to 5 12-16oz pops per day. At the low end that is 60oz (smaller than the 80oz drink they are talking about). So I think you see the weight concerns here. This is truely making America fatter... :(

  23. Re:Bloody hell! by Luminous · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Who's making your coffee? I'm not keen on sweat and creamy, I like the bitter edge that coffee has, but when made correctly, isn't rancid at all.

    I definately agree, don't drink rancid coffee.

    --
    This is not the way to build a lasting empire.
  24. High level languages by Bouncings · · Score: 3, Funny

    With the growth of high level languages like Perl, Python, and TCL you'd think that coffee cups could be getting smaller, not larger. This is the strongest evidence against Moore's Law I've seen in a while.

    --
    -- Ken Kinder ken@_nospam_kenkinder.com http://kenkinder.com/
  25. Re:Except that by Exedore · · Score: 3, Funny

    True. I should have said Can the digestive tract, bloodstream, and bladder combined handle 80 ounces of liquid before your first trip to the bathroom.

    When I was in college, we used to have contests to see who could drink the most beer before having to take a leak (the loser would have to throw an extra fiver into the pot while playing poker or some such punishment). The record was eight beers (96 ounces). That's 80 ounces with a tall-boy to spare.

    --

    I take drugs seriously.

  26. Won't fit in the cup holder by serutan · · Score: 5, Funny

    I hope they never do make that 80-oz cup. If I put one of those in my cup holder, the whole damn computer would tip over.

  27. A first hand report about hyponatremia by MKalus · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is a subject that is pretty interresting to me since I started racing triathlons, I never really thought that things like Gatorade made sense until some people corrected me on this.

    The following is a first hand account of someone who experienced hyponatremia, pretty scary.

    ----------------

    Hi everyone,

    I'm writing this to "the big list", the PA Buzzards, Virginia Happy Trails
    Running Club, the Montgomery County Road Running Club (in Maryland) and a
    few others to say THANK YOU SO VERY MUCH for the Get Well Wishes, Cards,
    Flowers, and overall concern and support. Wow! I have a lot of wonderful
    friends!

    I am writing to so many people for a few reasons - first, I have received
    many inquires about how I am doing after the Vermont 100 miler. Also, many
    people heard about what happened (which I'll explain below) but only got
    parts of the story. So you'll get the story here - as best I know it, from
    me, Michele Burr - the person who got a severe case of hyponatremia at
    VT100. The people who do know about my getting hyponatremia have urged me
    to post something so that people are aware of this very serious problem.
    I must admit, I don't remember much because I had a seizure and went into a
    coma but I have pieced together many things from people who saw me at the
    end of the race and from talking with my husband, who thank God, was there
    at the finish line and with me during my 5 day stay at two hospitals in
    Vermont and then New Hampshire.

    WHAT IS HYPONATREMIA? This is a condition in which there is a very low
    concentration of sodium in your blood. It is also seen in conjunction with
    WEIGHT GAIN (not weight loss) and most often occurs during endurance
    exercise lasting more than 5 to 7 hours. (From:
    http://www.halcyon.com/gasman/water.htm) More specifically, hyponatremia
    develops as sodium and free water are lost and replaced by fluids, such as
    plain tap water, half-normal saline, or dextrose in water. Basically, this
    condition occurs when a person takes in too much water and not enough salt.
    So you are probably wondering...was I taking Suceed! caps? Was I drinking
    electrolyte fluids? Yes to both of these questions but obviously I was not
    taking enough of either one of these things and yes, I was also eating
    potato chips, peanut butter and jelly sandwiches, fig newtons, and potatoes
    -but again, it wasn't enough salt and I was taking in too much water. My
    weight was up 5 pounds at the last weigh-in. To give you an understanding of
    where my sodium level was compared to a normal person....most people have
    about 140-145 mEq/L - this is some sort of measure of the amount of salt in
    your blood. I had 113 mEq/L. This is extremely low. So, why is this a
    problem? Because you need sodium in your blood for your brain to function.

    WHAT ARE THE SYMPTOMS? The answer to this question is the scary part and why
    this is such a medical emergency when it occurs.
    ****Many of the symptoms are NEUROLOGICAL in origin.**** Level of alertness
    can range from agitation to a coma state. Variable degrees of cognitive
    impairment (eg, difficulty with short-term recall; loss of orientation to
    person, place, or time; frank confusion or depression). Other symptoms
    include seizure activity and irrational behavior. In patients with acute
    severe hyponatremia, signs of brainstem herniation, including coma; fixed,
    unilateral, dilated pupil; decorticate or decerebrate posturing; and
    respiratory arrest. Coma and seizures usually occur only with acute
    reduction of the serum sodium concentration to less than 120 mEq/L.
    (Remember my sodium level was at 113 mEq/L.)

    I didn't recognize where I was or who my friends were or who my husband was
    at the end of the race. I walked the last 5 to 10 miles which is very
    unusual for me and people said I didn't know who they were and it appeared
    as though I didn't even know I was in a race. Shortly after I crossed the
    finish line on Saturday night I started to vomit uncontrollably then I had a
    seizure then I went into a coma. I remained in a coma for 3 days. At some
    point before I woke up out of the coma I began the "irrational behavior"
    mentioned above. I pulled out all my IVs and ripped off my EKG patches and
    tried to kick and hit the nursing and neurosurgeon staff. I was very
    combative whenever someone tried to touch me and was eventually given
    antipsychotic medication.

    When I woke up I didn't know where I was, what
    had happened, what month, or year it was. Upon being forced to give a guess
    for the month I told the neurosurgeons, "I think it's Vermont" for the
    month. I couldn't read and I couldn't add numbers. On Tuesday after the
    race I started to feel much, much, better. I could read again and I had
    watched a car commercial to figure out what year it was. I also got a lot
    of the story about what happened from my husband. It was on this day (or
    maybe Monday?) I learned I had been in another hospital earlier. Why was I
    first in a small local hospital (Ascutney in Windsor, VT) and then
    transferred by ambulance to Dartmouth-Hitchcock? That has to do with the
    scariness about how to treat this medical emergency. It you don't do it
    right, it will lead to further and permanent brain damage.

    HOW IS HYPONATREMIA TREATED? From http://www.rice.edu/~jenky/heat.html: It
    says that the condition is frequently mis-diagnosed as dehydration and that
    the consumption of water makes matters worse because it dilutes the blood
    sodium concentration even further than it already is.
    From http://www.emedicine.com/EMERG/topic275.htm :
    "The principal causes of morbidity and death are when chronic hyponatremia
    reaches levels of 110 mEq/L or less and cerebral pontine myelinolysis (an
    unusual demyelination syndrome that occurs when HYPONATREMIA IS CORRECTED
    TOO QUICKLY).

    Much has been written about treatment of hyponatremia and the potential
    adverse outcome of central pontine myelinolysis. This condition is
    demyelination of the pons, which can lead to mutism, dysphasia, spastic
    quadriparesis, pseudobulbar palsy, delirium, coma, and even death.
    Raising the serum sodium concentration more than 25 mEq/L or to a normal or
    above-normal level in the first 48 hours increases the likelihood of central
    pontine myelinolysis.

    The main controversy in the literature surrounds treatment of chronic
    symptomatic hyponatremia because, as mentioned, central pontine myelinolysis
    may result if the condition is corrected too rapidly. Therefore, although
    treatment in these patients is similar to that just described, the rate of
    correction should be slower (0.5 to 1 mEq/L per hour). Aggressive therapy
    should be discontinued when the serum sodium concentration is raised 10% or
    symptoms abate."

    Upon being admitted at the first hospital in Vermont my soium level was 113
    mEq/L but then quickly went to 116 and the next reading was at 126. The
    hospital felt uncomfortable and kept telling my husband it was possible I'd
    get "PONDS" - which is central pontine myelinolysis (permanent brain
    damage). They also told him to think about long term care for me and that
    "things could turn out a number of ways". They also asked him if I remained
    in a vegetative state, would I want my organs donated and did I have a
    living will prepared. At this point, an ambulance took me to New Hampshire
    to Dartmouth-Hitchcock. Needless to say, I think I aged my husband about 10
    years during these 5 days.

    WHAT ARE THE LONG TERM EFFECTS? Well, so far I feel I am about 95% back to
    where I was neurologically before the race. (Physically, I lost 10 pounds.)
    I couldn't remember my password when I got to my office so I couldn't log
    into my computer and I forgot a combination lock number I often used. I
    also forgot a few people's names. I had a little bit of trouble typing and
    signing my name but that seems to be gone now. The last clear things I
    remember from the race are at the mile 18 aid station. I am also a bit
    spacey (it's a bit difficult for me to concentrate) but I can drive. I am a
    research scientist so it's important that I be able to generate and
    interpret statistics. I haven't tried that yet but I'm optimistic. Here are
    a few more links (in case you just can't get enough about hyponatremia):
    http://www.spinalhealth.net/hypona tremia.html
    http://www.fred.net/ultrunr/hyponatre mia.html#Paul

    Finally, the way to avoid this in the future (for me) is to drink less water
    and eat more salt. I will also push for a blood test from my doctor before
    I run another 100 (this was my 5th one) to make sure I am not starting out
    at a deficit - which is what the doctors were suggesting at
    Dartmouth-Hitchcock Hospital. They said that my low sodium diet, combined
    with a high volume of running (sometimes as much as 100 miles/week) and
    sweating in the heat and humidity here in the Washington DC area were the
    problem combined with the low volume of electrolyte fluids (relative to the
    amount of water I was taking in).

    This was scary. I hope some people will be educated by reading this and for
    the many people who emailed and asked me what happened, I hope this answered
    their questions.

    Thank you so very much again everyone for your concern. My friends,
    co-workers, relatives, and the ultrarunning community have been great!
    Michele Burr

    --
    If you want to e-mail me, use my PGP Key.
  28. Another Example Amoral Economics by istartedi · · Score: 3

    This is just another example of economics being applied in an amoral fashion. For quite some time I've been lamenting the demise of the 12-oz can in convenience stores, which has been replaced with 20-oz plastic bottles. All too often I find myself falling prey to the "you've gotta finish it" mentality. No doubt this comes from being told as a kid to "clean your plate because people are starving overseas".

    Of course, I could just pour out the extra soda or plan ahead by purchasing smaller units at the grocery store. However, if I were inclined to do that I wouldn't be at the convenience store to begin with. Planning ahead simply isn't... well... convenient.

    So... what can we do with all that flat soda? I hate the idea of just dumping it, so here's my proposal: Flat soda collection centers.

    It's not as crazy as you think. Since all non-diet sodas are essentially sugar-water with an acid pH, all we have to do is dump them in a vat, rebalance the pH, add yeast, and let them ferment. Then we can distill the product into ethanol and use it to power stuff.

    Of course this will never work. Most people drink the whole 20-oz, or just dump the flat soda. If I were the tinfoil-hat type, I'd say there was a conspiracy to make America fat, but it's really just amoral economics.

    The companies get a better margin on bigger bottles. They can afford to please the gluttons at the expense of the rest of us because the gluttons are their best customers. There are only 2 major soda companies. Any vendor that tries to carry the smaller sizes faces the same margins. They may also face pressure from the soda companies. Pepsico does a lot of its business because it owns restaurants. They should be forced to divest all their restaurant holdings, as this is very much against the public interst. Alternatively, their corporate charter could be revoked thus relieving them of both the benefits and obligations of being a corporation. Of course charter revokation is a futile proposal since the public service nature of corporations is all but dead and burried.

    Both soda companies are guilty of using heavy-handed contracts on independant operators. All corporations (not just soda companies) should be barred from making deals that prevent customers from dealing in competing products. Such a law, were it in force, would solve much of the Microsoft problem too.

    At any rate, the application of "economies of scale" to serving people drinks is just one of many examples of economics being applied without thought. These aren't refineries we're fueling here, THEY'RE HUMAN BEINGS. They require something other than maximum volume at minimum cost.

    Don't worry too much though. Misguided economics works in the other direction too. Free Trade wags are actually seriously proposing the elimination of subsidies and tarrifs on agricultural products worldwide. As everybody who took basic economics knows, agricultural subsidies help ensure greater than "market" output. Market output could lead to food shortages in drought years. Tarrifs encourage local production. Take away the tarrifs, and US agriculture might flee to a lower cost producer. Yes folks... all of this means that Americans, yes AMERICANS. May someday be taking grain from UN workers throwing it out the back of trucks. And the Blue Helmet guys probably won't offer you the option of "super sizing" that sack of wheat.

    --
    For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?