Slashdot Mirror


Slashback: GameBand, Nexia, Lunarocks

Slashback is loaded with updates to recent (and not-recent) Slashdot postings. More opportunity to hot-rod your Dreamcast with an ethernet adapter, continuing seed-patent madness, more stolen moon rock, an update to Chrisd's favorite MP3 player and more, all below.

Not a paperweight. 13Echo writes: "CSI, the manufacturer of the Dreamcast broadband adapter, is extending its reservations option by another week. They wish to meet a goal of 1,000 units before production will start. A rough Babelfish translation can be found here. This device is very beneficial in Dreamcast home-brew software development, and is also supported in the various Linux and BSD distributions on the Dreamcast. It is available for pre-order from this page at NCSX, or other import shops at a price of US $49.00. If any other Slashdotters are interested, now is the last time that we will be able to get one of these things. I've already placed my order with NCSX."

How about sell moon bits to sponsor the trips up there? Anonymous Coward points to this AP report which begins: "Four grains of moon dust brought to Earth by the first manned lunar mission were stolen from a space exhibit in Sweden, a museum official said."

Will the stolen moon rock madness ever end?

The race is on, Apple. SailorBob writes "The NexII got good reviews on slashdot (Review: Nex II CF MP3 Player) a while back and now a newer version named the NexIIe is shipping. Some nice functionality has been added such as drawing power from the usb while copying files and being able to hook to an external AC adapter. They've also told me via e-mail that they're considering adding Ogg Vorbis support, which wouldn't be a problem after the fact since the player can be updated for new formats with a firmware update."

Graphomania has a name, and it is Orson. Binestar writes "Author Orson Scott Card has released his latest book, Shadow Puppets. As usual, the first 3 chapters are available online. He's definitely one of my favorite authors."

Just kidding, folks -- just kidding. Afraid to play video games in Greece? Elonka indicates this BBC story (Court Allows Greek gamers to play on), excerpting: "In reference to the recent law enacted in Greece which bans all computer games, a court in northern Greece today threw out the case against two internet cafe owners who were arrested for allowing clientele to play Counter-Strike and online chess. The court said the law was unconstitutional."

Monsanto should invest in helicopters and lawyers for a whole new revenue stream. dwprice writes "A Saskatchewan farmer loses a patent infringement case when it turns out patented canola is growing in his fields and he didn't pay for it. He claims it blew into his field." When this farmer, Percy Schmeiser, lost the first round, I figured it was a simple lapse of sanity and would be overturned on appeal. No such luck.

Best TV news I've heard in a while. Masem writes "Offical word has been announced that Futurama will be shows on Cartoon Network (most likely as part of the Adult Swim Comedy block) starting in Jan 2003, according to Cartoon Reasearch. No indication of new episodes, but CN will have all 72 episodes that have been made."

210 comments

  1. How about sell moon bits? by RobertTaylor · · Score: 1

    Last bloke who did this called himself 'the big cheese'... not much hope then.

  2. 3 days or so? by edrugtrader · · Score: 2

    how long did that greecian law last? that was a joke from the start.

    --
    MARIJUANA, SHROOMS, X: ONLINE?! - E
    1. Re:3 days or so? by geekoid · · Score: 4, Funny

      it was a typical greecian formula.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    2. Re:3 days or so? by dotslash · · Score: 2

      Ahem, "greecian"? ... That would be "greek".

    3. Re:3 days or so? by _Swank · · Score: 1

      grecian == greek though typically is used to describe a person who lives in greece rather than other things related to greece (though it certainly can be)

    4. Re:3 days or so? by geekoid · · Score: 2

      boy, you COLORED me!

      Man, I guess I should ignore that wild HAIR up my ass to try and do something funny.

      There are hints in this post as to the joke, can you find the FORMULA? ;)

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    5. Re:3 days or so? by cheezfreek · · Score: 0
      how long did that greecian law last?

      A lot longer than that Grecian Formula lasted in my hair. Woke up the next morning and my pillow was all black. You see, it's all about what you're comparing the law to.

    6. Re:3 days or so? by gimpboy · · Score: 1

      http://www.dictionary.com/search?q=grecian


      grecian

      adj : of or relating to or characteristic of Greece or the Greeks; "Greek mythology"; "a grecian robe" ...


      just because it isn't common, doesn't make it incorrect.

      --
      -- john
  3. NexIIe still USB by DuckWing · · Score: 1
    I'm not sure Apple needs to feel threatened by the NexIIe just yet. One of the big problems with this device is it's still using USB which is much slower than iPod's FireWire.

    I like the price of the NexIIe, but I'm not sure the interface is quite as good as Apple's iPod either. but I don't have either in my hand to do a proper comparison either ;-)

    --
    -- DuckWing
    1. Re:NexIIe still USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The threat was first to play OGG Vorbis, not the actual devices

    2. Re:NexIIe still USB by jcsehak · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure Apple needs to feel threatened by the NexIIe just yet

      Um, let's see:

      Nex IIe:
      Player- $115
      5 gigs of storage (ten 512mb cards)- $1800

      iPod:
      Player w/ 5 gigs of storage- $300

      Yeah, I'd say there's a pretty good chance that Apple doesn't need to feel threatened just yet; maybe it might have something to do with the fact that the Nex IIe costs SIX TIMES MORE!

      --

      c-hack.com |
    3. Re:NexIIe still USB by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You sir are an idiot. Who said capacity is always the major factor?

    4. Re:NexIIe still USB by Mr_Silver · · Score: 2
      I'm not sure Apple needs to feel threatened by the NexIIe just yet. One of the big problems with this device is it's still using USB which is much slower than iPod's FireWire.

      USB is everywhere, Firewire isn't. I can take my Nex around to anyones house and be guaranteed 90% of the time to be able to plug it in. No need to purchase a firewire card (however cheap) and carry it everywhere. I can use it at work without having to open up the machine (i'm not allowed to).

      I can transport a 4 meg MP3 to the player in a couple of seconds. Yes firewire has it's advantages, but I like the versitility I have and rechargable batteries solve the other problem almost as well.

      I like the price of the NexIIe, but I'm not sure the interface is quite as good as Apple's iPod either. but I don't have either in my hand to do a proper comparison either ;-)

      It isn't. But it's smaller, lighter and I'd rather run with it than an iPod. Mainly due to the fact I don't like the idea of shaking a hard-drive about for 2 hours non-stop (12 miles).

      --
      Avantslash - View Slashdot cleanly on your mobile phone.
  4. Ack! $50 for a Dreamcast BBA??? by Green+Light · · Score: 3, Funny

    I paid Lik-Sang $120 + high shipping charges about 6 months ago to get one! And now, nobody on eBay is going to give me $150 for the thing!

    --
    "Send an Instant Karma to me" - Yes
    1. Re:Ack! $50 for a Dreamcast BBA??? by GoRK · · Score: 2

      Did you buy it just to sell it on ebay for a few bucks profit?

    2. Re:Ack! $50 for a Dreamcast BBA??? by Squarewav · · Score: 1

      damn 120$ for an ethernet adaptor, for a dreamcast I know thers a coolness factor of setting up linux with an ethernet connection on a dated video game system, but come on, you can setup a cheap x86 box for that, and it will be far faster and more functional

    3. Re:Ack! $50 for a Dreamcast BBA??? by Green+Light · · Score: 1

      Umm, no, that was an attempt at "humor". See, a few months ago, these things were being auctioned off at $150+.

      --
      "Send an Instant Karma to me" - Yes
    4. Re:Ack! $50 for a Dreamcast BBA??? by Green+Light · · Score: 1

      Well, there's more than coolnes factor here. See, there are actual games that I own on the Dreamcast that use the BBA for online play, etc.

      --
      "Send an Instant Karma to me" - Yes
    5. Re:Ack! $50 for a Dreamcast BBA??? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Got mine from sega.com for $49.99 over a year ago when they first released it. HA HA!

    6. Re:Ack! $50 for a Dreamcast BBA??? by GoRK · · Score: 1

      God, yes I know they were! I was just hoping that you weren't one of those people who buy stuff just to ransom it on ebay.

      I lost my iopener to one of those people and my attempt to get a second BBA was probalby thwarted by such people.

  5. Question by URoRRuRRR · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Why does Apple have to support Ogg? because you want to? There are hundreds of other formats out there, many of them have more files than Ogg. Apple could chose SHN or some other lossless format for much better quality.

    --
    "Oh no, 3 horny women and only 2 condoms...Thank god I read slashdot"
    1. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      because you want to?

      Because I won't buy it if they don't?

      Duh.

    2. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Offtopic, but your sig gets me every time.

      I can just see picture it. 3 horny women, only 2 condoms, 1 Slashdot reader.

      End result - 3 women still horny and 1 geek with 2 condoms still in his wallet :)

    3. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, and how many songs would you get with a loseless compression algorithm vs Ogg or MP3? Do the math.

    4. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      I can just see picture it. 3 horny women, only 2 condoms, 1 Slashdot reader.
      End result - 3 women still horny and 1 geek with 2 condoms still in his wallet :)

      2 condoms = 4 surfaces = 1 per participant

      Creeping senility is taking its toll on me, so I can't be certain, but ISTR an article a while back about cool interview questions, one of which was that scenario.

      Or maybe we are all just helpless geeks...

    5. Re:Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      and his money...

  6. Pay for moon dust? by Eric_Cartman_South_P · · Score: 4, Funny
    You have two choices:

    2004 - Hand over $20,000 for a few specs of moon dust.

    2008 - Wait a bit, go on moon trip for $20,000 and bring back a big round ol' rock the size of a new iMac and photos of you having low-grav sex with loved one (or the stanger in seat 3F. Yeah, row 3. You'd be up in first class, of course).

    Hmmm... let me see.

    1. Re:Pay for moon dust? by RobertTaylor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      2008 - Wait a bit, go on moon trip for $20,000...

      I am still waiting for the refund on the 1999 trip that was promised on /.

    2. Re:Pay for moon dust? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I guess you would be in the 40,000 mile club.

    3. Re:Pay for moon dust? by soulsteal · · Score: 3, Funny

      Damnit Lance, for the last time.... the year is 2002 and you're not getting a refund!

  7. Futurama is back... by radiashun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    now they need to pick up Family Guy. That show is fricken hillarious. Honestly, how can they cancel a show that went up for an emmy last year?

    1. Re:Futurama is back... by machine+of+god · · Score: 2, Funny

      I'll give you a hint, it rhymes with dollar. That's right, it's dollars. (does that last 's' make them not rhyme?)

    2. Re:Futurama is back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      $rm -rf "Bill Gates" ;-)
      sh: syntax error near unexpected token `)'

    3. Re:Futurama is back... by kingkade · · Score: 1

      Thank you, that show is un-friggin-believable. They're definitely cancelling it?

      "
      Lois: What a lovely room and it's so clean.

      Stewie: Well the ultraviolet light will be the judge of that. I picked this [using UV as semen-detecting gadget] up from that yummy exoskeleton Maria Schriver."
      goto for some more FG fun.

    4. Re:Futurama is back... by kingkade · · Score: 1

      sorry link got lobodomized:
      go here for family guy stuff...

    5. Re:Futurama is back... by x136 · · Score: 2
      Honestly, how can they cancel a show that went up for an emmy last year?

      Well, Fox is stupid. Really stupid. I think it's just dumb luck that keeps The Simpsons and 24 from being canned.
      --
      SIGFEH
    6. Re:Futurama is back... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So did your spelling.

    7. Re:Futurama is back... by Yankovic · · Score: 2

      No kidding... two words:

      "Un. Declared." That has to have been the funniest show on TV in so long and they didn't even give it a second season.

    8. Re:Futurama is back... by siskbc · · Score: 1

      They can't be all bad if they canned Futurama...I mean that show blows. It's the Simpsons...except homer's a robot...and it's not even remotely funny.

      Family Guy, let's face it, is just a bit too intellectual for network audiences. I bet it'll end up on cable. Blame America for that one...

      --

      -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

  8. I wonder... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    ... so if someone plants patented grass sends in the lawn of a Monsanto/Monstaco exec., will he be prepared to pay royalties?
    I think not.

    1. Re:I wonder... by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      if you know where one lives let us know and we will find out !!! :)

      Shiat like this make that starving African countries' leader seem VERY SMART.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
  9. I'll Trade Expansion For Portability Any Day by great+throwdini · · Score: 5, Funny

    The NexII got good reviews on slashdot (Review: Nex II CF MP3 Player) a while back and now a newer version named the NexIIe is shipping.

    You can keep your Nex II and even your Nex IIe.

    I, and several others are waiting for the obvious successor: the IIc.

    1. Re:I'll Trade Expansion For Portability Any Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I want the Nex IIGS, for better games, with Woz' signature!

    2. Re:I'll Trade Expansion For Portability Any Day by frankmu · · Score: 1

      did the nex III have problems with its ram?

      --
      Supreme executive power derives from a mandate from the masses, not from some farcical aquatic ceremony.
    3. Re:I'll Trade Expansion For Portability Any Day by x136 · · Score: 2

      Don't be fooled, the NexIIc+ will clearly be superior.

      (Unless you need color, then it'll be NexIIgs all the way, baby!)

      --
      SIGFEH
    4. Re:I'll Trade Expansion For Portability Any Day by moosesocks · · Score: 2

      So we can obviously predict that Steve Jobs will become the CEO of Nex for 10 years, drive the company into the ground, move back to Apple, and buy Nex, thus eliminating the competition.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    5. Re: I'll Trade Expansion For Portability Any Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What we really want to know is when is the spelling going to change from "Nex II" to "Nex ][" or "Nex //"

    6. Re: I'll Trade Expansion For Portability Any Day by great+throwdini · · Score: 1

      What we really want to know is when is the spelling going to change from "Nex II" to "Nex ][" or "Nex //"

      Genius. Sheer genius.

    7. Re:I'll Trade Expansion For Portability Any Day by CPIMatt · · Score: 1

      Of course everyone will forget about the NexLisa. ;-)

      -Matt

    8. Re:I'll Trade Expansion For Portability Any Day by Ecyrd · · Score: 2

      I think I'll be waiting for the "Nac". :-)

    9. Re:I'll Trade Expansion For Portability Any Day by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Congratulations!

      You took a joke that was subtle, even witty, and continued it to the point of obviousness.

      Truly you must be an American.

  10. not profit from llegal things by oliverthered · · Score: 4, Funny

    On of the best monsanto quotes of all time....

    "We have always said we will not profit from people doing illegal things"

    They might have always said that, but it was probably just to cover there ass when they were busy dumping waste from there factories. yada yada yada...

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  11. Ooops almost trolled by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  12. Canola by willpost · · Score: 5, Funny

    "loses a patent infringement case when it turns out patented canola is growing in his fields"

    They don't call it rapeseed for nothin.

    1. Re:Canola by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Probably thought up by the same group who wants to change the official name of
      prunes to "dried plums". I kid you not. Some people have way too much time on their hands.

    2. Re:Canola by Hott+of+the+World · · Score: 0, Funny

      1. Plant copyrighted seeds in random farmer fields, then charge them with copyright infringement!

      2. ??????????

      3. Profit!

      --
      | - | - |
    3. Re:Canola by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They don't call it rapeseed for nothin.

      The plant which the farmer was growing is called rape. The seeds are called rapeseed. The oil pressed from the seeds is called rapeseed oil.

    4. Re:Canola by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 1

      Probably thought up by the same group who wants to change the official name of
      prunes to "dried plums". I kid you not. Some people have way too much time on their hands.


      What, like the California Prune Broad? They're the largest group of prune growers in the world, and you know, if anyone has cause to do it, they do. Yeah, it's all about marketing, but what isn't?

    5. Re:Canola by dknj · · Score: 1

      Where did this business plan thing come from?

      -dk

    6. Re:Canola by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      South Park underpants gnome episode. Season 2?

  13. GE corn farmer by Sheetrock · · Score: 2

    I remember seeing something that stated that there was no way that the farmer being sued by Monsanto could have the density of genetically-enhanced corn he did in his field accidentally. Has anyone else seen this argument?

    --

    Try not. Do or do not, there is no try.
    -- Dr. Spock, stardate 2822-3.




    1. Re:GE corn farmer by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 2

      There would be if he was growing with seed from a previous year, and it was the previous year's seed that had been contaminated.

      What would really suck for this guy would be if his neighbour had been the one "stealing" for a few years beforehand, and if the g.m. stuff had gotten into his mixture back then. He'd have no way to show that the other guy's seed had been g.m.ed, and the other guy sure wouldn't have any incentive to tell anyone about it..

    2. Re:GE corn farmer by jcsehak · · Score: 5, Informative

      No, but I do know of a case in which a corporation put a yam farmer out of business for selling yams which they had the genetic patent on. The thing was, the yams had been engineered by the farmers the real way, by cross-pollinating and whatnot, and the strain had been in the family for generations. Don't have the specifics on it though.

      --

      c-hack.com |
    3. Re:GE corn farmer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Contaminated like secretly replaced with Folger's Crystals maybe.

    4. Re:GE corn farmer by ToastyKen · · Score: 1

      Don't they have prior art then? There must be a reason why that argument didn't work..

    5. Re:GE corn farmer by jcsehak · · Score: 2

      Well, how about the fact that all the prior art's either rotted away or been eaten?

      --

      c-hack.com |
    6. Re:GE corn farmer by Grackle · · Score: 1

      Well, a friend of a friend told me that this guy's brother he knows posted something on a Web site about a corporation putting some sort of farmer out of business for selling a vegetable which they had the some kind of patent on. The thing was, the vegetable had been engineered by the farmers cousin the real way, by cross-pollinating and whatnot, and the strain had been in the his cousin's family for generations. Don't have the specifics on it though. Now /that's/ what I call /informative/!

  14. It's you again, Anonymous Coward by jbrandon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Apparently your email address is slyxter[at]hotmail[dot]com (see "Related Links"). Now I can harrass you about all your years of cowardly posts. Huzzah!

  15. Eurpoe by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    It'd be nice to get some more details on the case, if there was even the slightest chance of cross polination than monsantos fucked in europe

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:Eurpoe by DDX_2002 · · Score: 4, Informative
      Well, the tests on the guys crop found it was 95-98% roundup resistant. The experts said, and both courts agreed, there was no bloody way that could be explained by blow over or cross pollination - a lower percentage, maybe, but 95-98%? At that point, it's the *non* GM plants that look like cross-pollination or blow over.

      The court essentially declined to believe somebody stole onto the property in the dead of night to nefariously plant GM canola on the guy's land, which pretty much left deliberate infringement of the patent as the only explanation.

      --
      MHO. YMMV. Any resemblance between this post and real persons, or reality in general, was accidental.
    2. Re:Eurpoe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hmm... A google search for 'monsanto patent Saskatchewan' pulls up lots of good information. Note that the first result looks to be the involved farmer's own website.

      The popular folk lore is that the case and verdicts are ridiculous. From a casual observer who did look into it somewhat extensively a year or so ago, I actually wound up leaning towards Monsanto's side.

      I don't remember why now, though. I think that the claims that 'the wind did it!' rang quite false when looking at the information provided in court.

    3. Re:Eurpoe by mrogers · · Score: 1
      Cross-pollination could easily result in a crop that was 98% Roundup-resistant... if he were using Roundup. Non-resistant plants would be wiped out, and the resistant plants would gradually take over.

      I wonder if you could be sued for spraying your field with herbicide, and then waiting for herbicide-resistant crops to "accidentally" colonize your field? Or maybe you could be sued for owning a piece of desert that's colonized by nitrate-producing GM maize?

  16. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 4, Informative

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  17. Re:NexIIe still USB - doesn't matter w/ CF cards by Splork · · Score: 2

    CompactFlash cards are hardly any faster than a USB interface to begin with so firewire would be pointless. all computers have a USB 1.1 interface. how many have firewire?

    most people don't use these things with a microdrive (half the battery life). A 512mb CF card is currenty 180 bucks.

    Nex IIs not nearly as convenient as something with 10gigs (ipod wins there!) but they are much lighter and cheaper.

  18. Junis! Are you there? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What? Katz fabricated the whole story?!? There is no Junis? That hoaxster Katz must issue a public apology to the slashdot readers.

  19. New Formats + a bonus bridge in Brooklyn for sale by SomeOtherGuy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Note: I really like my Nex II, it is by far the best CF player out there.

    That being said: "Firware upgradable and can support future formats" is getting really old from all digital music players. I can honestly say that I have seen over 20 players (CD, CF, HD) that proudly make this claim in their marketing jargain -- yet guess how many have came through??? It's about like me saying that my cars tires will support the ferrari. Yet, technically it could happen -- but more realistically those tires will spend their lifetime on my 87 nissan sentra.

    --
    (+1 Funny) only if I laugh out loud.
  20. Re:NexIIe still USB - doesn't matter w/ CF cards by Dr.+Ion · · Score: 2

    Are you kidding? CF is much faster than USB 1.1.

    I pop the CF card out of my Nex II and put it in a Lexar Firewire CF writer (whopping $50), and it writes around 3 MBytes/second sustained.

    With a 512MB card, it really matters. If you already have firewire for video editing, it makes sense to use it for CF too. Great for dumping pictures off the CF card from the digital camera as well (4MBytes/sec read).

  21. Dreamcast NIC by tbdean · · Score: 1

    Okay, so $50 is great but can they be used for anything but hacking the sucker?

    I've already got an Audrey and a MSN Companion to hack - I just wanna play games online with my Dreamcast. Can I still do that or is this a waste of $50?

    --
    tbdean
    1. Re:Dreamcast NIC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'd assume you could play games online with it. It looks like just a copy of the original Dreamcast broadband adapter.

    2. Re:Dreamcast NIC by 13Echo · · Score: 2

      Yes you can. The network is still up, and in most cases, you can play the games. But there aren't many people online anymore.

      PSO V2 is still popular, but isn't nearly the way it was a year ago.

  22. Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by JivanMukti · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Frankly, I'm more concerned about Monsanto using these heavy handed tactics to control the worlds food supply, than I am about M$ Palladium. We can live without computers, but with increasing patents covering basic food (corn, canola, tomatos, ...), I can see a time when all food will be covered by some patent. Think M$ is evil with their monopoly? Think what would happen when a few companies own patents on most of the food you eat.

    Cross contamination of GMO with natural crops is a real concern, and farmers of organic crops are starting to sue GMO producers. Some related articles at cropChoice.com

    Monsanto got Fox news in Tampa to pull a story and fire the two jounalists who researched it because it was about health problems from rBGH (Bovine Growth Hormone [a Monsanto product]) in cows milk, and it's been one of the most under reported news stories. Here's a Google search. So they are very willing to use intimidation and the courts to further their control. Hmmm... Sounds all too familiar.

    1. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting
      Some more pessimistic articles

      These are actually hard to find, there are alot of people that want this guy to be innocent and want Mansanto to be evil. Most people who think the guy is guilty don't consider the case a big deal.


      Text of orignal court decision
      Exposing the Organic Myth

    2. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by NineNine · · Score: 2

      There are thousands of other breeds of corn out there. Farmers can choose to grow whatever they want. Hell, they can even use corn found in the wild. The difference is that their crops won't grow as large, as fast, and won't be as disease and pest resistant as the genetically engineered ones.

    3. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      Seems you need to get back to the biology class.

      No, farmers can't grow what they want. They can buy seeds and plant them, but they can't do anything about stuff that plants itself in the field, like weeds and Monsanto's crops. Do you think that crops are cultivated in an environment that's isolated from the rest of the world? Nope. Seeds have been known to cross countries and even *oceans*.

      There's no reason why Monsanto seeds couldn't fly a few hundred km, grow there, fly extend some more, and so on until they end in a completely different place.

      Now, picture this. You're a quite poor farmer who doesn't even necessarly live near Monsanto. One day a few Monsanto seeds plant themselves in your field, and after a few years you've got the Monsanto genes in most of your crops. Then Monsanto's lawyers come, do an analysis... get it now?

    4. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, Hmm. the best way for that poor farmer is to sue Monsanto for contaminating his crops.

    5. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by NineNine · · Score: 2

      Read the links posted up a level. Monsanto went after the guy because he intentionally planted the seeds. 95% of his fields had those plants. It ws no accident.

      Besides, what you're talking about is impossible, since most genetically engineered plants are sterile so that this *won't* happen. You *must* buy new seeds every year.

      Get it now?

    6. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Bump this guy up...the whole point is to ensure they are using MULE seeds that won't reproduce and then you end up a SUBSCRIPTION farmer. ADM and Monsanto have been doing this for years to 3rd world countries...Offering seed at a loss, once the farmers are fully hooked, then raising the price severely. The farmers have little choice, having broken the seed cycle themselves, they are at the mercy (as if they had any) of the corporation.

    7. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, although Monsanto's "terminator" gene has been around for many years (along with equivalent versions developed by Monsanto's competitors), it has never been put into any seeds that they sell.

      Presumably this is because they fear the backlash would become even greater than it is already.

    8. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      Ok, so how the fuck did he steal them? If Monsanto sold them to someone, and that person resold, sounds like this guy paid fair and square.

      And if not, was this hick farmer supposed to have engineered a nanobot that goes in and repairs the damaged or missing gametes?

      Oh. Duh. He snuck into the Monsanto warehouse at 2am in a ninja suit.

      Think a little bit. Pull your head out of your ass, and quit sucking corporation cock... it doesn't taste that good anyway, and you can start respecting yourself.

    9. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by squidinkcalligraphy · · Score: 1

      No, the only difference with this particular GM corn crop is it is resistant to the pesticide RoundUp (hence the name RoundUp-Ready). Guess who manufactures RoundUp? None other than Monsanto. So the only advantage is that they can plant these crops, and completely nuke the field with RoundUp. The fact the crop is GM doesn't worry me as much as the increasing amount of residual chemicals this causes. And guess what other things Monsanto has hidden in its closet? yes kids, they are the good people who supplied the world with DDT and Agent Orange (still causing problems in Vietnam). And guess who is supplying the chemicals (mostly RoundUp) that the US military is bombing Columbia with right now to destroy cocaine crops (never mind the food crops of thousands of farmers that get in the way)? You guessed it ....

      --
      "I think it would be a good idea" Gandhi, on Western Civilisation
    10. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by pedro · · Score: 2

      Besides, what you're talking about is impossible, since most genetically engineered plants are sterile so that this *won't* happen. You *must* buy new seeds every year.
      Huh?
      How could he *intentionally* plant second generation seeds *IF THEY'RE STERILE*?
      Where would he get first generation seeds if he didn't buy them?

      Your lassiesz faire (sp? please?) attitude towards dubious capitalist practices is obviously influenced by your chosen avenue of enterprise.. the marketing of really bad porn, and insinuating yourself as a middleman in that process.
      (dude! your site has really gone down hill! you need less automation! more hands on! (chuckle) at least there are no dialer sites there anymore.)

      But seriously, don't let your free enterprise views cloud your judgement.
      I'm mostly right wing, but invading Iraq sends my hackles straight up, Rush is sounding like a total GWB apologist, Foxnews makes me puke, and the only things I can hang onto are Hentoff, Buckley and PJ O'Rourke.

      There ARE alleged conservatives that are corrupt. Count on it.
      Don't get complacent.
      Consider.
      Liberty and stuff like that MATTERS more than 'Intellectual Property' does.
      THAT'S a Conservative view.
      Don't be an opportunistic weenie.
      Embrace that which allowed you to do your 'thing' in the first place, and fight for it.

      --
      Brak: What's THAT?
      Thundercleese: A light switch.. of TOTAL DEVASTATION!
    11. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      IANAL, Hmm. the best way for that poor farmer is to sue Monsanto for contaminating his crops.

      The judge found that the poor farmer grew the GM crop deliberately. From the decision:

      [118] It may be that some Roundup Ready seed was carried to Mr. Schmeiser's field without his knowledge. Some such seed might have survived the winter to germinate in the spring of 1998. However, I am persuaded by evidence of Dr. Keith Downey, an expert witness appearing for the plaintiffs, that none of the suggested sources could reasonably explain the concentration or extent of Roundup Ready canola of a commercial quality evident from the results of tests on Schmeiser's crop. His view was supported in part by evidence of Dr. Barry Hertz, a mechanical engineer, whose evidence scientifically demonstrated the limited distance that canola seed blown from trucks in the road way could be expected to spread. I am persuaded on the basis of Dr. Downey's evidence that on a balance of probabilities none of the suggested possible sources of contamination of Schmeiser's crop was the basis for the substantial level of Roundup Ready canola growing in field number 2 in 1997.

      [119] Yet the source of the Roundup resistant canola in the defendants' 1997 crop is really not significant for the resolution of the issue of infringement which relates to the 1998 crop. It is clear from Mr. Schmeiser himself that he retained seed grown in 1996 in field number 1 to be his seed for the 1997 crop. In 1997 he was aware that the crop in field number 2 showed a very high level of tolerance to Roundup herbicide and seed from that field was harvested, and retained for seed for 1998.

      [120] I find that in 1998 Mr. Schmeiser planted canola seed saved from his 1997 crop in his field number 2 which seed he knew or ought to have known was Roundup tolerant, and that seed was the primary source for seeding and for the defendants' crops in all nine fields of canola in 1998.

    12. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When did you become a troll?

    13. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by Zastai · · Score: 1

      Your lassiesz faire (sp? please?) attitude

      Since you ask, it's laissez-faire (hyphen probably optional).

      --
      When all other methods of communication fail, try words.
    14. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      It's difficult to not be a troll, when it seems like everyone else on slashdot has become a corporate apologist that likes it when the little guy gets raped by "big business".

    15. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Pull YOUR head out of your ass and read the link. You're talking out of your ass here without knowing anything.

    16. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      While I could care less about the whiny "eco" spin of this story, I still have concern about it.

      If he isn't telling the truth, or what he knows of it, how the hell did he get the seed? You claim its sterile. He can't have bought it the year before, and just harvested his own seed.

      So WHT happened? If he literally stole it, like a burglar, prosecute him for that.

      No one is alleging that, or even noticing that it's an issue. But since that seems unlikely (Monsanto doesn't have video cameras watching this valuable seed, or didn't report it stolen?), he somehow harvested it and planted it on his own. How did he do that, unless there are records of him purchasing it from a previous season?

      No, it's your ass buried in your ass. Up to the waist, I'd think. But hey, why not. Corporations should have the right to collect a crop tax, eh?

    17. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by NineNine · · Score: 1

      Corporations should have the right to collect a crop tax, eh?

      No, but they should have a right to be paid for their products. Without basic property laws enforced, you have anarchy. Zimbawe is letting black people steal land from white people who legally own it. Perhaps you'd like that system better?

    18. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      If they didn't sell it to him, or have it stolen by him, it's not their product.

      Show me some evidence that he stole it. Even a little bit, I'm not some lawyer for fuck's sake. I don't need to know it was him, just that some substantial amount went missing or stolen from where ever they keep this. That would be enough, hell, maybe even for a conviction.

      And if he bought it... well, DUH.

      I don't think you're saying either of those, though. Are you?

      All this says, is that you aren't allowed to resell something that is patented, or buy it from a reseller. The patent holder can come and charge AGAIN, for the same item.

    19. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by NineNine · · Score: 1

      I'm not some lawyer for fuck's sake

      You're not any kind of businessman either. There's more than one type of contract. You seem to think that the only thing that a company can do is to sell a physical item one time to a customer. There are *MANY* different kinds of contracts... leases, co-ops, condos, timeshares, royalties, options, etc., etc. It's not as cut and dried as you make it out to be.

    20. Re:Monsanto: All your food are belong to us. by NoMoreNicksLeft · · Score: 2

      Nothing was said about him being under contract. Was he?

      Or was it one of these "contracts" that asshole executives pull out of their ass, when their flawed business model proves itself to be flawed?

      Sort of like the "contract" that I'm under that says I have to watch commercials on broadcast tv?

      C'mon, show us the goods. Show us something where he violated a contract. As long as he wasn't forced to sign one, he is obligated to uphold it no matter how stupid it is.

      If he didn't sign one, why did you bring up contracts?

      It is cut and dried. I'm only asking for a single piece of good faith evidence. If you find some story, that says he did something like this, that's good enough for me. I'm not a judge, and this isn't a trial... if it were, you could be damn sure he wouldn't get off on a technicality.

      More likely, something weird happened. That explains why he changed his story, he was trying to understand it himself. Being a farmer, and not a PR rep or lawyer, he failed to realize that speculation was a bad thing, at least publically. Otherwise, we're left with options which are either absurd, make his actions criminal without even mentioning patent law, or prove that he shouldn't be liable at all. We have:

      A) He stole the canola seed from Monsanto (wearing a ninja would be optional). This is burglary or larceny or something, not patent infringement.
      B) He stole the canola from a Monsanto customer. Again, burglary.
      C) He somehow managed to independently breed an exact genetic duplicate. Patent infringement only if he sells the product, which in this case wouldn't be the crop itself, but whatever materials (seed?) are required for another farmer to grow such a crop.
      D) He somehow managed to harvest a significant amount of seed from a sterile crop. A crop that no one has ever mentioned him having... leads us back to other options. Even then, this can't be illegal by itself. Harvesting seed would be normal use of a legally purchased, patented product. If I used a patented wheelbarrow, could they come back and recharge me a week later, claiming that my wheelbarrow disappeared, and that I had in fact manufactured a replacement, thereby incurring a second fee?
      E) Space aliens, acting on orders from Jimmy Carter and the Illuminati Council of Sages, teleported his original crop of rutabaga to the 11th planet, and replaced it with Monsanto canola in an intricate diabolical plot. This is only slightly more absurd than the other options.
      F) He bought the seed from someone other than Monsanto. At best, trafficing in stolen property, and then only if he had reason to know it was stolen. If it was indeed stolen, that is.
      G) Some virus or similar vector transmigrated genes from the Monsanto crop 5 miles down the road. Meaning Monsanto is liable for contaminating his crop.
      H) Cowboyneal recieved a Beginner's Genetics kit, complete with test tube, microscope, PCR equipment and a bank of gene sequencers. Damn I hate this poll option ;)

      So which is it?

  23. "considering adding vorbis" by eddy · · Score: 2

    They're always "considering adding support for $whatever". That's just PR-speak for 'we don't care -- yet'. I really want a vorbis-only player for which none of my money goes to the mp3consortium, but I guess that's just as likely to happen as world peace. Barring that, the only way to my money goes over de-facto implemented vorbis. No "but..." or "future upgrade" or anything. Either you do it, or you don't get my money. (yeah, yeah, small loss -- whatever)

    --
    Belief is the currency of delusion.
  24. Just Finished Shadow Puppets by gmhowell · · Score: 2

    Yeah, another Bean story. Nothing particularly magical in this one. Except that the possible fallout that will give rise to the inevitable next book. This forwards the story of Bean's physical growth. Between that and a few spoilerish things (below) the next book promises to be more interesting. This is just gearing up for that book.

    Oh, and you'll probably be as disappointed in the resolution to the final fight scene as I was. It was telegraphed from a million miles away. Can't remember exactly, but it's possible that you can figure it out from the first three chapters (would need to reread to double check).

    There is a little bit of development of the Bean and Petra characters, but it didn't flow. Really felt forced. Part of that is OSC's obstinancy in not saying "Bean is now 12 years old, he's now 17 years old..."

    Perhaps the best part of the book is that it has me tempted to go reread Ender's stories. After I finish a few other books I picked up.

    SPOILERS:

    Bean and Petra get married. Artificial insemination.
    Achilles steals a few embryos.
    Achilles gets killed.
    Bean and Petra don't retrieve embryos. Obviously waiting for the next book.
    India freed from China.

    --
    Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
  25. Re:NexIIe still USB - doesn't matter w/ CF cards by GoRK · · Score: 2

    You're nuts. Good CF cards are an order of magnitude (maybe even close to two orders when reading) faster than USB 1 (1.1). Of course, they aren't when you use it with a USB card reader.

  26. Software patents aren't the only ones that suck... by Auridel · · Score: 1

    "...farmer Percy Schmeiser of Bruno, Sask., was ordered to pay $19,000 in damages for using Roundup Ready canola. He was also ordered to cover Monsanto's court costs of $153,000."

    Cost of sowing somebody else's seeds: $19,000. Cost of being forced to pay: $153,000. Seriously haywire justice system... I think you know the rest.

    "However, they also rejected a bid by Monsanto to see the damages raised to more than $100,000."

    Oh, that's better.

    Is there any good reason to even have patents anymore? They're meant to promote competition, but how much are they actually doing that? It seems that research is becoming increasingly cumulative, with each advance based on the next; software exemplifies this, but it applies elsewhere too. Taking an entirely different route, while occasionally eye-opening, eats up a lot more time and resources. And the more people who enter a given field of research, the harder it is for every newbie to find a completely different approach that doesn't infringe on any patents.

    On the other hand, thousands of people independently working on the same idea (sans patents) are likely to collectively come up with some pretty cool improvements and developments.

    Of course, without patents, trade secrets might become more common. But considering how easy it is becoming to analyze (and how hard it is to obfuscate,) how much of a problem would that be?

  27. What's up with Cartoon Network? by narftrek · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Anybody know what's up with cartoon network? I mean do they really need an adult swim cartoon segment. This is just gonna screw SO many parents over when they can't let the kids watch cartoons 24/7 anymore. I suppose babysitters will be making more tho ;)

    1. Re:What's up with Cartoon Network? by gmplague · · Score: 1

      I don't know, but i do know they need to pick up teenage mutant ninja turtles.

      --
      __________________________________________
      Take comfort in your ignorance.
      Grandmaster Plague
    2. Re:What's up with Cartoon Network? by Flamerule · · Score: 2
      Speaking as someone who loves Adult Swim, and in fact doesn't watch anything on TV other than Adult Swim, except CNN and Farscape (ARGH!)....

      ... The number of kids watching Looney Tunes and Scooby Doo at midnight over the weekend, I think, is minimal. And even if it wasn't, nothing Cartoon Network actually puts out on Adult Swim merits the verbal disclaimer they show at the top of every hour, IMO.

    3. Re:What's up with Cartoon Network? by Archfeld · · Score: 2

      the adult swim segment is the only part I watch...
      and even that has been getting goofy lately.

      --
      errr....umm...*whooosh* *whoosh* Is this thing on ?
    4. Re:What's up with Cartoon Network? by lewp · · Score: 1

      AOL/TW just needs to drop one of the many ridiculously stupid channels they own and create a channel that's just 24/7 Adult Swim-style programming. I'd never turn it off.

      Of course, if people listened to me there'd already be a channel devoted strictly to The Simpsons.

      To compensate for the addition of these new channels I propose the axing of TBS and Turner South.

      I live pretty close to Turner, and would be willing to come down to their studios and fix all the other broken programming they have. All I ask in return is huge quantities of cash so I can live like Jay-Z.

      Pretty fair, if you ask me.

      --
      Game... blouses.
    5. Re:What's up with Cartoon Network? by handsomepete · · Score: 1

      I agree with that completely.

      In a perfect world, Cartoon Network would split into a kids version and an adults version. I would watch whichever one didn't contain Dragonball Z.

    6. Re:What's up with Cartoon Network? by parliboy · · Score: 2
      Said Ed this past Saturday: "Hot Dog Bun, not too young."

      I don't want to explain statutory rape to a 7 year-old, dude.

      --
      "You're never ready, just less unprepared."
    7. Re:What's up with Cartoon Network? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Well, they have started showing GI Joe lateley. That is almost as cool.

      But no public service annoucements at the end! I was devistated.

  28. I liked it, but... by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    I gotta say, what is it about Card that he gets
    more moralistic with every book? Used to be, the
    Ender books were just about little kids fighting
    wars, having their minds broken, and killing other
    little kids. Now there's all this stuff about
    religion and the joy of marriage - why?

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
    1. Re:I liked it, but... by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      You're just pissed off because your chief of security screwed you over.

      (Seriously though, I agree. The hegemon was barely in the story. Bean has some sort of mystical change of heart regarding love. I think the only reason I read it so fast is to see how Achilles bought it. And I wanted more of the story of the girl/woman in India who started the 'great wall'. THAT was interesting.)

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    2. Re:I liked it, but... by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      i really liked enders game, but the books just got weirder and weirder, the 2-4 books were less about ender, more about human nature and whatnot, speaker of the dead, xenocide and children of the mind each got progressively worse and more confusing, still good books and better than a lot of crap i've read, but card made up for it with enders shadow and shadow of the hegemon, i wish shadow of the hegemon ahd been more about peter and less about bean though, still a great book

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    3. Re:I liked it, but... by John+Harrison · · Score: 2
      The hegemon was barely in the story.

      I thought that he was the focal point of about half of the book. The strange thing is that he became a typical teenager who is annoyed by his parents. This struck me as pretty unnatural. Also, Petra's constant clamoring for babies seemed to make her a bit one-dimensional.

      I have high hopes for the next book. Card seems to run out of steam in his series though.

    4. Re:I liked it, but... by Phosphor3k · · Score: 1

      Flay the Piggies!!!!!!

    5. Re:I liked it, but... by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Perhaps I misspoke, or spoke incompletely. The Hegemon wasn't in much of the book. But Peter sure was. And Peter needed a good bitch-slapping. Throughout all the rest of the series, he never needed as much hand-holding as he did in this book. How did he ever get to be Hegemon if he's that dumb?

      OSC just did not apply enough depth to this one. What possible reason could Peter have to not have Achilles executed? "To study him?"

      Bleh.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    6. Re:I liked it, but... by John+Harrison · · Score: 2
      I agree about the Hegemon/Peter thing. Why would Peter want to "have" Achilles when he had Bean, Petra, Suri, and Virlomi? How is Achilles more valuable to him than Bean?

      In fact, it seems that in each of the Bean/Ender books the characters are less brilliant in each book. Think about the crazy/complex situations that Ender and Bean "solved" in Ender's Game and Ender's Shadow. Then think of Ender in CotM. Now look at what Bean has to in Shadow Pupets. The major strategizing that he does is about Achilles. SPOLIER ALERT It turns out that he could have walked in there without having thought about the situation at all and he would have been fine. In the end he did go in without a plan, but he sure fretted about it a bunch beforehand. Maybe I am over-simplifing it, but Suri had made it so clear in the rescue that he knew how to fool Achilles that it was pretty clear to the reader what would happen.

      I felt that the last book was a bit sparse as well. When I read that he had initially intended to write one book covering the events of these two I knew what to expect. Of course he did the same thing with Xenocide and CotM, but they were filled with enough interesting stuff. Maybe in the next Bean book Bean (and his family) will be smart enough to hop on a colony ship and use time dilation to his advantage, letting the science advance enough to cure him while he zips around the galaxy at high speed. If he went far enough into the future he could meet up with Ender again and maybe even use the philotic web to cure his disease. At least he doesn't have a bad case of OCD.

    7. Re:I liked it, but... by gmhowell · · Score: 2

      Interesting possibility for the next book. But I gotta tell you, I'd be happier if something bad happened to him. Okay, not happy, but... It would feel more real. Tragic hero and all that.

      Maybe I'm just too old to be OSC's audience for these books.

      --
      Jesus was all right but his disciples were thick and ordinary. -John Lennon
    8. Re:I liked it, but... by damiam · · Score: 1
      If he went far enough into the future he could meet up with Ender again

      If he met up with Ender again, that would be rather inconsistant with the storyline of SftD, CotM, and Xenocide.

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    9. Re:I liked it, but... by John+Harrison · · Score: 2

      My point wasn't so much that he and Ender could sit and talk about old times. It was that Bean could use the philotic web thing to fix Anton's key.

  29. LunaRocks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Luna does rock. I love that song. Go SP.

  30. Re:NexIIe still USB - doesn't matter w/ CF cards by ivan256 · · Score: 1

    Four firewire ports on a PCI card and a cable cost $18.50 including shipping. I've seen them for less then that at CompUSA. I don't think that lack of firewire ports is holding anybody back from buying firewire devices.

  31. How to put you competitors out fo business... by gnovos · · Score: 2

    Step 1: Buy GM Canola
    Step 2: Plant in crack in competitor's parking lot.
    Step 3: Call Infringment Police

    --
    "Your superior intellect is no match for our puny weapons!"
    1. Re:How to put you competitors out fo business... by Phroggy · · Score: 1

      Step 4: Profit! :-\

      --
      $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
      $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    2. Re:How to put you competitors out fo business... by cheekyboy · · Score: 0

      step 4. Call your own lawyers, to defend your competitor, and make $ that way

      --
      Liberty freedom are no1, not dicks in suits.
  32. Who buys a Nex II? by fermion · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I fail to understand the Nex II player is even an issue. It is US$120 without memory, while the Nomad is US$100 with memory, and pretty much the same specs(except for the microdrive).

    The Nex II can use a microdrive, but with a 1GB microdive, the Nex II is about the same price of a 10 GB IPOD.

    As far as the defense of the wimpy USB connector, it is not suitable for regular transfers of GB of data. It is slow. I can barely stand to use it for my Nomad.

    Perhaps someone can tell me why I should spend more on the Nex II, when it is little more than sub standard interface dongle.

    --
    "She's a scientist and a lesbian. She's not going to let it slide." Orphan Black
    1. Re:Who buys a Nex II? by PhiberOptix · · Score: 1

      The Nomad doesn't use compact flash, but smart media flash cards.
      if you already have a digital camera that uses compact flash cards that makes a lot of difference

    2. Re:Who buys a Nex II? by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      are you nuts? I can get a NexII all day long for $78.00 without memory or $129.95 with a 128Meg CF card.

      Now he NEX-II sucks for loading through it's USB cable but using a real CF card read/writer it rocks.. and I can upload faster to it thna the blessed I-pod people by using my PCMCIA-CF card adapter or an IDE-Cf adapter

      The NEX-II is the cheapest and absolutely best Mp3 player on the market that is not a fragile hard drive based device.. (take your Ipod and while it's playing throw it out a second story window onto concrete... My NEX-II survived, your Ipod will not.)

      Who buys a NexII? anyone looking for an awesome and super cheap Mp3 player that isnt crippled by idiot engineers that try and force DRM and other crap down your throat. also anyone that uses linux or BSD exclusively... it's one of the only choices.

      I have 2 of them... one for me and I just bought one for my 10 year old daughter... and I will be buying 3 more this christmas for gifts for friends and relatives.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
  33. Re:Software patents aren't the only ones that suck by ajakk · · Score: 2

    The problem is that the money won't be spent on actually inventing new products because the company won't be able to make back the money selling the product. Look at prescription drugs. While there is no doubt that a lot of crap happens with patents and prescription drugs, good drugs would never be invented if there wasn't adequate IP protection for them. The cost of developing and testing drugs is far too high. Companies need to be able to recoup their costs from R&D.

    You notice the problem that it is much easier to analyze inventions and copy them than it is to hide the invention. Why would anybody innovate products that require significant R&D then?

    Software is much better looked at as an exception to patent law than the direct example of how things should be done. The extreme rate of development and low cost of research in software (and obviousness of a lot of it) are not congruant to many other fields.

  34. You're right. by ColGraff · · Score: 2

    That guy was such a wuss. Why the heck did Card explain away his betrayal in two lines?

    The wall was cool thought, especially the way that the girl became little more that a brick in the wall once it got reallt started. Yes, I had to make a lame Pink Floyd reference.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  35. Monsanto suing the wrong thing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They are clearly suing the wrong individual here. It is clear that the canola plants are conspiring to intentionally, and willfully, violate the patnet by making devices (read: themselves) which infringe upon the patent. Monsanto ought to sue the plants.

  36. One Nice Thing about Shadow Puppets by ColGraff · · Score: 3, Funny

    I think we can all agree that if any fictional character ever *deserved* to get laid, it was Bean.

    --
    I'm the stranger...posting to /.
  37. I've always wanted to try... by Stapler · · Score: 1

    I've always wanted to try going online with my Dreamcast, but the lack of a keyboard and broadband adapter (Looked for both, of course.) has stopped me. Dreamcast rocks! Too bad mine'll have to share space and time with a PS2 in a couple weeks. I almost feel like I'm betraying that lovely white box, but...

    And that's GREAT news about Futurama. Adult Swim rules.

    --
    Kickin' it self-righteous school.
  38. Re:If it is so hard to tell.. by ObviousGuy · · Score: 2, Funny

    Earth rocks don't have little labels on them saying "Moon Rock", though.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
  39. Re:Your anti-MS stance by porkface · · Score: 1

    You must be new here.

  40. The Moon Landing was a Fake... by kzinti · · Score: 5, Funny

    Will the stolen moon rock madness ever end?

    In a related note, did anyone else see the story about Buzz Aldrin punching that flat-earther in the nose? Oh, sorry, my mistake. He wasn't a flat-earther, he was one of those nuts who say that the Moon landing was faked. Seems this clown approached Buzz in public and asked him to swear on a Bible that he walked on the moon. Buzz put up with him briefly, then popped in the snout.

    The Moon landing was a fake? No, actually it was a feint and a jab! Hey, Buzz, smack him once for me, would you?

    --Jim

    1. Re:The Moon Landing was a Fake... by Ella+the+Cat · · Score: 1

      Your comment was too verbose. You just scream and leap.

    2. Re:The Moon Landing was a Fake... by wompser · · Score: 2

      You know, I heard about this too, and couldn't get the picture out of my mind of a grizzled old Clint Eastwood punching that guy out. I hope it was as great in person as it is in my imagination. If Buzz Aldrin was not a hero before, he definatly is now!

      Three cheers for crusty old guys!

      --
      .....
  41. 2008?? by Goonie · · Score: 2
    More like 2025, even being crazily optimistic. Even assuming we invent the magic technology to make affordable spaceflight possible tomorrow - for instance, bulk quantities of nanotube composites for the space elevator - to build the infrastructure to a point where it'd be available for passengers would take that long, I'd think. My guess is more likely 2040 (by which time I'll be about to retire, probably... woohoo, blow the retirement savings on a moon trip :)).

    However, I'd be very surprised if suborbital flights didn't become available to paying customers at semi-realistic prices (~100,000 USD) before 2008.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  42. Sue Grain Patent Owner by Myriad · · Score: 5, Interesting
    The farmer should sue the grains patent owner for unlawfully seeding his land. Given the success of the patent suit you have proof, by definition, that the foreign grain has invaded his land.

    I figure you could argue criminal trespass and sabotage (to the existing crops). Possibly more.

    Heck, these days the farmer could probably claim the patent owners were Genetic Terrorists bent destroying natural grain fields. Hrmmm. With cases like this that suddenly doesn't sound so far fetched.

    Mind you, IANAL.

    --
    "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    1. Re:Sue Grain Patent Owner by freeweed · · Score: 2

      From what I've read about the specifics of the case, and the court's decisions so far, your idea is akin to trying to sue Ford because all of their trucks are mysteriously trespassing on your driveway.

      --
      Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
    2. Re:Sue Grain Patent Owner by Myriad · · Score: 2
      From what I've read about the specifics of the case, and the court's decisions so far, your idea is akin to trying to sue Ford because all of their trucks are mysteriously trespassing on your driveway.

      Except that Ford cannot sue me because one of their trucks happens to be sitting in my driveway and they don't like it - whether I bought it or not.

      If a truck that isn't mine turns up in my driveway Ford (or the Police) are welcome to take it away - you just damn well better not damage my property on the way out. Nor can you sue me for having a vehicle I shouldn't (assuming I didn't take it or know it was stolen). It's not mine, I don't want it, take the bloody thing away.

      This is not the first time this has happened with GE grain. There have been similar instances in Africa. It's a disturbing concept: I can be sued because your wacky seeds have blown into my fields. It's not my responsibility to ensure you don't go broadcasting your IP on the wind. How can it be my fault if you seeds grow in my fields when you let the seeds blow into them in the first place?

      --
      "They do not preach that their god will rouse them, a little before the Nuts work loose." Kipling, 'The Sons of Martha'
    3. Re:Sue Grain Patent Owner by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As many others have pointed out, that isn't what happened. It makes a good story ("Patented seeds blow onto field, owner sued") but in reality 95% percent of his crop was the Roundup Ready product, planted in neat little rows. He clearly did it on purpose and dreamed up the blowing-pollen excuse afterward.

    4. Re:Sue Grain Patent Owner by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      He clearly did it on purpose and dreamed up the blowing-pollen excuse afterward.

      So?

      Consider this scenario: I, Joe Farmer, am out in my field one day and notice that I have some mysterious canola seeds growing that aren't affected by Roundup. I spray that corner of my field with Roundup and by golly, these plants are still growing.

      Interesting. I save the seeds from these plants and re-plant them next year to see what happens. By golly, the new plants are Roundup resistant too! Ok, now I have more of these seeds so I save them and plant a field of this Roundup resistant canola next year.

      What have I done wrong? I found some plants growing on my land. I didn't plant them, but they are growing there so I took advantage of them. Heck, if I found an apple tree suddenly growing in my back yard should I not pick the apples?

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    5. Re:Sue Grain Patent Owner by M-G · · Score: 2

      I spray that corner of my field with Roundup and by golly, these plants are still growing.

      Except as a farmer, you don't go spraying your growing crops with Roundup unless you've purchased Roundup Ready seed from Monsanto. That's the whole point of this line of crop seed. Roundup would normally kill or damage your crop plants. Roundup doesn't harm the modified plants, so you can control the weeds that compete with the crops throughout their growth cycle.

      Your Joe Farmer scenario is akin to a cattle farmer feeding cyanide to part of his herd just for giggles.

    6. Re:Sue Grain Patent Owner by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      you don't go spraying your growing crops with Roundup unless you've purchased Roundup Ready seed from Monsanto

      Or unless you suspect that some Roundup-resistant seeds might have "volunteered" in a corner of your field and you want to see if that is indeed the case. If it is, then why should the farmer not be entitled to keep the seeds/plants that have just showed up on his property? "I didn't ask for these things, but since they came by themselves I guess I'll use them."

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
    7. Re:Sue Grain Patent Owner by M-G · · Score: 2

      Or unless you suspect that some Roundup-resistant seeds might have "volunteered" in a corner of your field

      Wow...Roundup Ready seeds just happen to volunteer themselves in the same neat rows you planted your regular seeds in?

      If it is, then why should the farmer not be entitled to keep the seeds/plants that have just showed up on his property?

      Except it's been shown that it's not the case. And since this farmer obviously hates the idea of GMO crops so much, why would he then plant his whole field with the resulting seeds?

    8. Re:Sue Grain Patent Owner by knight_23 · · Score: 1

      I grew up on a farm and while we didn't spray our crops to kill them (unless we were paid to do so, but then we would just plow then under not spray,) we did regularly spray the sides of the fields between the access roads and the main road, or where the fire breaks were, or if a crop looked 'bad' and we decided to write it off and plant something else in its place so we could make a buck. Now knowing that we did spray in place if we found something that didn't die from the spray, guess what would be going into a seed crop next year. You guessed it, the spray resistant seed. Now where did it come from? Well maybe 'ol farmer Cooter that lives down the road a bit bought some and some of the seed bounced off the back of his truck and ended up next to my field, but on my property, maybe it was as a result of cross pollination. Who cares, it is on my land, I didn't sign a contract with anyone to not grow it unless I bought it from them. So my thought is that if they don't want me to grow their seed, that through no action of mine ended up on my land, they can pay me to stop using it. Now if they had come by and told me, "hay looks like we have contaminated your field, and the seed there needs to be destroyed." Fine, they pay me for the crop that is destroyed, but you don't wait for years to go by and then complain about it and demand I give you money to compensate you for damaging my seed crop. And that is how this Bubba sees it.

      --
      __ Fast - Cheap - Good Pick any two
    9. Re:Sue Grain Patent Owner by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

      Wow...Roundup Ready seeds just happen to volunteer themselves in the same neat rows you planted your regular seeds in?

      Second year, sure. Volunteer the first year, save and replant the second year.

      why should the farmer not be entitled to keep the seeds/plants that have just showed up on his property?
      Except it's been shown that it's not the case.


      It has? I beg to differ!

      --
      If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  43. You got moon? by wfrp01 · · Score: 2

    Speaking of going to the moon, don't tell Buzz Aldrin that no one's been there!

    --

    --Lawrence Lessig for Congress!
    1. Re:You got moon? by Catbeller · · Score: 2

      Ack! There's video! It was on Good Morning America! Someone get it on Gnutella stat!

  44. Re:New Formats + a bonus bridge in Brooklyn for sa by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's spelled "jargon". As in the Jargon File.

  45. Re:Software patents aren't the only ones that suck by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 2
    The cost of developing and testing drugs is far too high. Companies need to be able to recoup their costs from R&D.

    A couple random shots at drug companies, I remember reading these, I didn't look up any hard numbers on these, so take witha grain of salt, or try looking up yourself and not be as lazy as me:
    • Drug companies tend to spend more on ads than on R & D. That boosts prices.
    • Most doctors hate drug ads. Some patient sees some expensive drug on TV, tells his doctor "I want this drug", won't listen to doctor when he says this isn't for them. The docs hate the interference in the doctor patient relationship.
    • There was a drug that was used on livestock (sheep I think), cost a couple pennies per pill, or some cost well under a dollar. Then they found it had some use as an anti-AIDS drug, they then boosted the price to a around 10 bucks a pill for humans, though still keeping the livestock price cheap. I don't know the cost of researchng teh AIDS properties, but I doubt it was enough to justify a 100x price increase. This was for terminal patients, some had no choice but to pay, others took the sheep drugs.
    • Not a drug company, but a health related company: Bausch and Lomb marketed disposable contacts in a variety of price ranges, from cheap to damn expensive. The thing is they were all exactly the same. They charged people more just to charge them more.


    People everywhere can be scum. When you have opaque tech, or opaque enough to the average person (drug companies, car mechanics, OS vendors) you have a better opportunity to be scum.
  46. But what about the NexIIgs? by yerricde · · Score: 3, Funny

    I'm not sure Apple needs to feel threatened by the NexIIe just yet.

    However, once the NexIIgs comes out... (explanation)

    One of the big problems with this device is it's still using USB which is much slower than iPod's FireWire.

    USB, or USB 1.0? USB 2 is about as fast as FireWire, and USB 1 is still fast enough to move a pocket-player-quality (128 kbps) MP3 song in four seconds, or several whole albums in less than the time it takes to play a game of Klax.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:But what about the NexIIgs? by snilloc · · Score: 1

      But while the NexIIgs will be the bomb-diggity, it will be undersupported and eventually replaced with the NexMacintosh.

    2. Re:But what about the NexIIgs? by spun · · Score: 2

      No, following the analogy, The NexMac will come out next, but it will ONLY support Ogg Vorbis, annoying people who have lots of mp3. The NexIIgs will be released as a kind of a kludge, giving some of the advanced functionality of the NexMac but maintaining backward compatibility. But it will be incompatible with the NexMac, and rather than Ogg, it will use it's own proprietary format as well as mp3.

      My dad had a IIgs for a while. Odd little beasts.

      --
      - None can love freedom heartily, but good men; the rest love not freedom, but license. -- John Milton
  47. Adult Swim by JohnG · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If adult swim would just pick up Invader ZIM, I'd be about the happiest Cartoon Network viewer out there. I love that little green guy!

    1. Re:Adult Swim by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I too, used to like that show, until I realized that every episode is the same and they never come up with any new jokes. I don't waste my time any longer.

  48. Re:Software patents aren't the only ones that suck by blue+trane · · Score: 1

    Why would anybody innovate products that require significant R&D then?

    Because the drugs developed will benefit the researchers themselves?

    Society would be better off with lower cost drugs. If the free market can't produce that, why not try something else (government-funded research for example)?

  49. BGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    There is no known test which can determine whether milk came from a BGH injected cow or not.

    For some reason, wackos seem to find this fact frightening rather than reassuring.

  50. Re:Your anti-MS stance by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Wow, posting the same rant on Slashdot twice -- must be a big day for you.

  51. Re:Software patents aren't the only ones that suck by Auridel · · Score: 1

    You notice the problem that it is much easier to analyze inventions and copy them than it is to hide the invention. Why would anybody innovate products that require significant R&D then?

    In general, differentiation. If nobody develops anything, instead choosing to use what everyone else has already developed, the field will stagnate and all products will gradually become the same. This could lead to a few outcomes, unfortunately:

    1. Pure price competition. Could be beneficial to consumers, but I don't think this would be the *only* thing happening.

    2. Increased advertisement of everything. If your product is the same as your competitor's, advertise! This would be bad; one can only hope that the public consciousness will become more resilient against advertising and defeat this approach. We're already seeing people ignoring banner/popup ads and eliminate TV ads with their Tivos...

    3. Actual product differentiation. In this model, everybody has something different to offer. This is what competition really means -- one approach to one problem may or may not work, but out of a thousand approaches to the same problem, a few probably will work quite well. The solutions that do work will be adopted (copied, stolen, whatever), and then people will *move past them* and start the cycle all over again. I hope.

    You point out that drugs are at one extreme, having high development costs and low manufacturing costs. This applies with just about any information technology, and that's what recipies are: information. I'm not quite sure what to do about that ;)

    Perhaps getting rid of patents wouldn't be the best idea. What about simply reducing the time period? Fourteen years may have been a reasonable time in the early 1800s, but today it's an eternity. Patents that lasted for only a few years (maybe more or less for certain products?) could be a suitable compromise.

  52. Re:Software patents aren't the only ones that suck by Bartab · · Score: 2

    You forgot one point:

    Each successful drug must pay the R&D cost for 10 unsuccessful drugs.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo.
  53. FOR CHRIST'S SAKE, IT'S "MORONS." by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I mean really. If you were having trouble with the whole "its/it's" thing I wouldn't say anything, since nobody understands that anyway. But this is something so basic. "'s" indicates a possesive, "s" is a plural. For example: "Look at that moron's penguin. Those morons are so moronic. I like pie. I think I'll go get me some."

  54. It dosn't cost six times more by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    You can get smaller amounts of memory for the thing, you know. If someone has $200, they obviously can't get the ipod, but can get the NexIIe and a resonable amount of storage.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:It dosn't cost six times more by jcsehak · · Score: 2

      That's my point. If you're gonna spend $200 for a player w/ 256mb, you really might as well scrape together the extra $100 for 20x the storage. And yes, I know that storage isn't everything, but at the size of a deck of cards, with firewire cable, I'd say that the iPod has all its bases covered. Unless of course the Nex is the size of a wristwatch and comes with a spiffy watch band.

      --

      c-hack.com |
  55. God should sue by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Monsanto for infringment of his prior art.

  56. stupid "representatives" by bugi · · Score: 1

    Regarding video games in Greece: We have that problem in US too. Our "representatives" make crazy laws that to any rational mind are wildly unconsitutional. "Let the courts figure it out."

    Regarding the canola seeds, if Montsanto were a US company the guy could sue under NAFTA chapter 11: the ruling is restraint of trade by that definition.

  57. Re:Your anti-MS stance by LoRdTAW · · Score: 1

    I can see your entire post is based on the frustration that you express in your 3rd paragraph. So what you really mean is: "I am a moron and linux is scary so I will just stick to my toy OS with the pretty name. I then release my linux anger in the form of pro MS and intel rants on /." If you only knew how flexible Linux is you would be singing a different tune. Yes I agree that it is complicated but once you learn it you can command it to do 100x more then your precious XP could ever do. X is very flexible and its appearance can really be customized along with thte UI and window manager. And installation has come a long way since some older scary redhat distros I had back in 97 or 98. So before you spew bullshit that is obviously out of frustration of not being able to install/use Linux, go get some help or dont even bother to install it. Use your brain and stop wasting precious oxygen on your posts.

  58. Why geeks should care about Monsanot (mis-)ruling by twnth · · Score: 2, Insightful

    When the Monsanto agent/sale rep/dealer shows up, he's packing a contract that is a half inch thick and written in greek. You start to read it, but it's not easy to understand, pretty soon your eyes just glaze over, and you sign the bottom line. Hiding somewhere in there is a clause that lets Monsanto reps have access to your land (even if its posted no trespassing) so they can check to see if you've kept up your end of the contract. Sound like any EULA you've ever read?
    This farmer hasn't broken any laws. He's not accused of breaking any laws. All of this is because of a contract.
    The Monsanto reps only had to find some traces of the genetic markers in his field. Traces do the farmer no good at all. Roundup is a herbicide that kills broadleaf plants, including non-modified canola. To get any value from the 'illegitimate' plants, the whole field would have to have been of roundup ready canola.(so he could spray the field, and not kill off his own crop).
    In my opinion, this case legitimizes all the things we fear from abusive EULAs.It legitimizes giving up your rights to a contract that you can't be expected to understand. It legitimizes giving up those rights, even after the practical use of the contract expire (I've uninstalled MediaPlayer, but I can't unsign the Licence agreement). It legitimizes contract law over common sense.
    Today its Monsanto. Tomorrow it could be Mircrosoft, or RIAA (ever read the small print on the cd case before you buy it?).

  59. Hopi Prophecy / Moon dust by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Another Hopi prophecy warns that nothing should be brought back from the Moon -- obviously anticipating the Apollo 11 mission that returned with samples of lunar basalt. It this was done, the Hopi warned, the balance of natural and universal laws and forces would be disturbed, resulting in earthquakes, severe changes in weather patterns, and social unrest. All these things are happening today, though of course not necessarily because of Moon rocks.

    http://www.welcomehome.org/rainbow/prophecy/hopi 1. html

  60. New Japanese Broadband Adapters wont work here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The broadband adapters wont work here (the US), according to an email i just received (is this correct?):

    Dear@Mr@Anonymous Coward

    Thank you so much for your E-Mail.

    About you inquiry we would like to guide you as following.

    1.We enciphered the country number(the number identifies
    each country)and embedded that in Dream Cast(DC)
    2.Since differences of voltage, we fear Broadband Adapter(BbA)
    might be a cause of a fire.
    3.We sell BbA only for collect on deliverly, but this way of
    payment is available only in Japan.

    Therfore the function itself of BbA is not adapted to DC
    (overseas edition) as you have, and that is unavailable for you.
    We feel sorry and have to apology, but because more than anything
    else we don't hope to bother you(particularly reason 2.),
    we decline your subscription.

    We will be so glad if you agree above-mentioned reasons
    and we hope this information helps you.
    If there is anything more we can do for you, please don't
    hesitate to let us know.

    Best Regards,
    Dreamcast
    http://www.csi.co.jp/dc
    drea mcast@csi.co.jp

    1. Re:New Japanese Broadband Adapters wont work here by Technician · · Score: 2

      It sounds like they may use 100 volts instead of 120. You may have to pick up a transformer at the airport to use with it. I still have one I got when I was in Japan. It works both ways 120-100 & 100-120. If it uses a wall wart, you may be able to replace it with a 120 volt replacement that outputs the right voltage and current.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    2. Re:New Japanese Broadband Adapters wont work here by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The Dreamcast BBA draws power from the Dreamcast. The expansion port is the same on US, Japan, and European Dreamcasts; you can swap modems and BBAs between all of them.

      The new Dreamcast BBAs will work on US models; the company just doesn't want to support overseas sales.

  61. Chopper Dave by Drath · · Score: 2

    Oh Man, Sealab, Brak Show and Futurama in the same hour. That's gonna be sweet.

    "It's less of a time machine than it is a.. dodge ball cannon."

    1. Re:Chopper Dave by sh00z · · Score: 2
      "It's less of a time machine than it is a.. dodge ball cannon."
      That Stormy. What an idiot. Since I figure I've got a little Karma to burn, it can't hurt to recommend Adult Swim to anybody who hasn't seen it. Sealab 2021 RULES!
  62. Rehehe Speaking of cheese... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    when will the OPEN SOURCE MOVEMENT port LINUX to my XBOX?

  63. Maybe you don't want the imported BBA. by Inoshiro · · Score: 2

    Here's a copy of an email response I finally received after many emailings to the original company who are going to be making the BBAs:

    Thank you so much for your E-Mail.

    About you inquiry we would like to guide you as following.

    1.We enciphered the country number(the number identifies
    each country)and embedded that in Dream Cast(DC)
    2.Since differences of voltage, we fear Broadband Adapter(BbA)
    might be a cause of a fire.
    3.We sell BbA only for collect on deliverly, but this way of
    payment is available only in Japan.

    Therfore the function itself of BbA is not adapted to DC
    (overseas edition) as you have, and that is unavailable for you.
    We feel sorry and have to apology, but because more than anything
    else we don't hope to bother you(particularly reason 2.),
    we decline your subscription.

    We will be so glad if you agree above-mentioned reasons
    and we hope this information helps you.
    If there is anything more we can do for you, please don't
    hesitate to let us know.

    Best Regards,

    ---
    Dreamcast (Hiragana/Kanji/Katakana redacted due to /. lameness filter)
    ---
    CSI (Hiragana/Kanji/Katakana redacted due to /. lameness filter) URL;http://www.csi.co.jp/dc

    -=-=-

    They make a good (if engrish-ridden) point. Different power requirements and different country stamps mean that you may be buying 49$ USD paper weights.

    --
    --
    Internet Explorer (n): Another bug -- that is, a feature that can't be turned off -- in Windows.
    1. Re:Maybe you don't want the imported BBA. by 13Echo · · Score: 2

      I also got the same email, but I do not believe that it is a legitimate concern. There has been no problem with the import broadband devices in the past. They have worked fine on the other NTSC Dreamcast (I know that the American models work).

      Assuming that they are made the same way as the last units that they produced, then there should be no problem. I don't see why they would be any different.

      Besides... Even the import Dreamcasts themselves work fine. We will see what happens though. I diubt that there will be a problem. American and Japanese voltages (frequency, actually 50/60Hz)do differ, slightly, but it isn't enough to really make a difference on modern devices. If I were in Europe, then I might be concerned. But I am not, and I use an NTSC console.

    2. Re:Maybe you don't want the imported BBA. by 13Echo · · Score: 2

      Also. I just read that European Dreamcasts also work fine with the import BBA units.

      Also- it looks like the region number that they are referring to is not part of the BBA, but the Dreamcast itself. It is a standard region lockout. Normally, this only effects software. It doesn't effect peripherals on the Dreamcast (except for light guns, which operate just a bit differently).

      All of the software that was ever created for the Dreamcast (regardless of region) uses the broadband devices in the exact same way, so there should be no differences from these and the original units. This is why you could play the Japanese PSO on a Dreamcast from another region, with any BBA unit from any region.

    3. Re:Maybe you don't want the imported BBA. by Technician · · Score: 2

      It's possible they are set up for the local 100 volt power. US power is between 115 and 125 volts which is about 20% too hot for the design. If they use a wall wart, you may need to replace it with a US version with the same output voltage and current rating. Otherwise you may need to get a transformer to provide 100 volt power. I still have mine I got when I spent a couple years in Japan. It is reversable. It powered American 120 volt stuff while I was there and it now powers the Japanese 100 volt stuff I brought back.

      --
      The truth shall set you free!
    4. Re:Maybe you don't want the imported BBA. by b1t+r0t · · Score: 2
      Except that the BBA doesn't run off of wall power. It gets 5 volts DC from the Dreamcast unit. 5 volts DC is 5 volts DC no matter what AC voltage it is being derived from.

      They really just don't want to ship overseas. Nothing more. NCS is offering a perfectly sensible way to order one, and they're cheaper too.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
  64. Astroturf alert by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Warning: the parent post is probably an astroturf post. It links to a P.R. company astroturf-website.

    Astroturfing is a tactic used by big business' P.R. companies: pretending to be 'grass roots' people in forums, messageboards or other public places. The agent will cast doubt (think: fud) or give positive/negative accounts of the thing(s) (s)he has been hired to work with.

    -- The Astroturf buster --

  65. Re:Why geeks should care about Monsanot (mis-)ruli by innocent_white_lamb · · Score: 1

    All of this is because of a contract.

    Incorrect. He didn't have a contract with Monsanto. If you have a contract with Monsanto then you pay them a "property use fee" of $15 per acre. He didn't sign a contract and didn't pay $15 per acre because he didn't purchase the seeds.

    I don't know what gave Monsanto the right to trespass on his property (without a contractual right to do so) and test his fields.

    --
    If you're a zombie and you know it, bite your friend!
  66. Futurama! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well, if I believe my HD, I have 56 episodes - I believe this to be all that's aired. If this is correct I guess we all have 16 more epidoes coming! (The website says 72 episodes. Do I dare to start drooling, only to be disappointed?)

    Either way, at least we have the comfort of knowing that Fox will surely bring us something clever and stimulating.

    "I'm more of a fan of the genre: 'world's blankiest-blank'"

  67. Do not fear the BBA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    My BBA is Japanese and it works fine (in Europe). I am sure your message was not a troll, but it certainly spread FUD - as did whoever sent you this email.

  68. Re:New Formats + a bonus bridge in Brooklyn for sa by mlong · · Score: 2
    That being said: "Firware upgradable and can support future formats" is getting really old from all digital music players. I can honestly say that I have seen over 20 players (CD, CF, HD) that proudly make this claim in their marketing jargain -- yet guess how many have came through??? It's about like me saying that my cars tires will support the ferrari. Yet, technically it could happen -- but more realistically those tires will spend their lifetime on my 87 nissan sentra.

    Well its a car player, but the PhatNoise Phatbox and Kenwood Audio Keg have done this. They've already added FLAX and Audible support and Ogg Vorbis support is in alpha test (freely downloadable for those who wish to try it out)

    --
    //m
  69. Re:Pay for moon dust and sex? by ReelOddeeo · · Score: 2

    Wait a bit, go on moon trip for $20,000 and bring back a big round ol' rock the size of a new iMac and photos of you having low-grav sex with loved one (or the stanger in seat 3F. Yeah, row 3....)

    Did I hear correctly? Ymean any geek can have sex if they will go to the moon?

    --

    Those who would give up liberty in exchange for security and DRM should switch to Microsoft Palladium!
  70. Re:NexIIe still USB - doesn't matter w/ CF cards by Splork · · Score: 2

    i stand corrected. it sounds like all of the CF readers/writers i've dealt with have been pathetically slow even when not USB.