Slashdot Mirror


Vint Cerf Talks About The "Interplanetary Internet"

Uncle Humph1 writes "There's an interesting article at NewsForge by Robin (Roblimo)Miller about Vint Cerf giving a presentation to NOVALUG about the Interplanetary Internet and having lunch with them afterward. An interesting read. One of the quotables by Vint with regard to security reads 'We're building in security from end to end,' he says, 'because we don't need headlines saying, '15-year-old takes over Mars.'" Here is some more information about the interplanetary Internet.

169 comments

  1. One obvious question by xactoguy · · Score: 1

    Of course this brings up the obvious question... When do we get to start instant messaging all the little green men? :) ( No, I don't mean the RIAA here... )

    --


    And so we go, on with our lives
    We know the truth, but prefer lies
    Lies are simple, simple is bliss
    1. Re:One obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm certain plenty of Microsoft executives use msn messenger. You already can. :D

    2. Re:One obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those would be the little green lesbians... (a'la Hillary Rosen)

    3. Re:One obvious question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's the first time anyone's managed to make me abhorant about lesbians.

    4. Re:One obvious question by cyclist1200 · · Score: 1

      Well, none of them will be "instant". And forget about gaming - the network latency between Earth and Mars is going to be a bitch.

  2. sigh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    so now i can truly say they'll have broadband on mars before i get it.

    1. Re:sigh.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Don't you tell me to smile!

  3. Already done? by Rainier+Wolfecastle · · Score: 5, Funny

    Well, accoring to this one documentary I saw, TCP/IP is already in use on at least one other planet.

    1. Re:Already done? by Error-404NotFound · · Score: 0

      heh, yeah i thought the same thing when i saw the movie... perhaps he used a dynamically transforming virus that conforms to any language or machine code, even an alien one...

      --
      -=Errors always defy logic.=-
    2. Re:Already done? by BTO · · Score: 0
      Ha ha, let's try to point out movie flaws....

      Sheesh. Grow up.

      It's obvious that it was nothing more than a dialup connection to a BBS, and the whole thing was a game of VGA Planets that got out of hand.

      --

      Banach-Tarski Overdrive
    3. Re:Already done? by paulcammish · · Score: 2, Funny
      What?

      Surely it was Appletalk or something, which is why everyone seemed to be using Macs...

      Otherwise everyone would have netstumbled their wifi network and slashdotted them out of the sky :)

    4. Re:Already done? by Tokerat · · Score: 2

      AppleTalk over IP.

      No, wait, that wasn't until OS 9, ID4 was 1996....

      Maybe he just FTPed the thing to them. Yeah that must be it.

      ahhh to tired for funnies

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
    5. Re:Already done? by Dwonis · · Score: 3, Informative
      From net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c:

      Note that 120 sec is defined in the protocol as the maximum possible RTT. I guess we'll have to use something other than TCP to talk to the University of Mars.

  4. Interesting Question by Error-404NotFound · · Score: 0

    Who would control Mars? Even with a fast and stable net security and communication system in place who would claim Mars? The first person there? I say give it to the 15 year olds since i'm almost 15 :)

    --
    -=Errors always defy logic.=-
  5. Hack the Planet! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    'because we don't need headlines saying, '15-year-old takes over Mars

    All your martian base is belong to us

    1. Re:Hack the Planet! by rawsocket · · Score: 1

      I just forwarded this article to a 15 year old, his reply... "grrrr...we'll still hack it!"

  6. Interplanetary Internet means.... by Kenja · · Score: 5, Funny

    Interplanetary Internet means intergalactic porn. The triple breasted whore of eroticon six will have her poor web server slashdoted.

    --

    "Have you ever thought about just turning off the TV, sitting down with your kids, and hitting them?"
    1. Re:Interplanetary Internet means.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      stop you are getting me hot

    2. Re:Interplanetary Internet means.... by CrazyDuke · · Score: 1

      SWM computer nerd from Earth, Sol seeks SF from anywhere else. Humaniod appearence a plus. Please contact CrazyDuke@hardup.net.us.earth.sol

      (Don't mod me off topic for your not getting the humor.)

      --
      Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    3. Re:Interplanetary Internet means.... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      "Double the number of penis's you have, then add 3 inches!!!"

      "Bill Gates is paying everyone 5 galactic creds for every email you forward to another planet!"

      "see the galactic famous trisexuals!!"

      "Hi, I am the spouse of an important king on omacron 6. I need to transfer some money off world....."

      I would put up with spam from an galactic empire. Its a small price to pay to be part of an galactic empire, that consists of more then just the human race. Unless they want to devour us.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    4. Re:Interplanetary Internet means.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But how will we get a fat pipe to uranus?

    5. Re:Interplanetary Internet means.... by Zoolander · · Score: 1

      Yeah, or put probes up our butts. According to UFOlogists, that is one of their major interests. :D

      --
      Meep.
  7. Re:FP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    damn that's some fast moderation

  8. 15?? by RebelTycoon · · Score: 1

    So now its going to be an 17 year old...

    Congrads... Reminds me of anti-counterfieting of currency... This bill should take them at least 18 months to duplicate.... 3 months later you start to see the fakes.

  9. Who's that impostor? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Shouldn't *Al Gore* be the one in charge of the expansion of the Internet since he invented the thing in the first place?

  10. Sheesh! by MxTxL · · Score: 4, Funny

    C:\>ping www.marsrover.co.mars

    Pinging marsrover.co.mars [68.179.57.159] with 32 bytes of data:

    Reply from 68.179.57.159: bytes=32 time=12100ms TTL=4300
    Reply from 68.179.57.159: bytes=32 time=12000ms TTL=4300
    Reply from 68.179.57.159: bytes=32 time=11000ms TTL=4300
    Reply from 68.179.57.159: bytes=32 time=12000ms TTL=4300

    Ping statistics for 68.179.57.159:
    Packets: Sent = 4, Received = 4, Lost = 0 (0% loss),
    Approximate round trip times in milli-seconds:
    Minimum = 11000ms, Maximum = 12100ms, Average = 11700ms


    Won't be playing UT with these guys anytime soon... :)

    1. Re:Sheesh! by Error-404NotFound · · Score: 0

      120 seconds? more like 600 seconds or more... mars is a long way away, if i remember right it took like... i dunno 12 minutes or more to get an image from the rover. just imagine trying to IRC with that.

      --
      -=Errors always defy logic.=-
    2. Re:Sheesh! by b1t+r0t · · Score: 3, Informative

      Of course it depends on the relative orbital positions, but I thought it was on the order of 12-20 minutes round trip time.

      --

      --
      "Open source is good." - Steve Jobs
      "Open source is evil." - Microsoft
    3. Re:Sheesh! by MxTxL · · Score: 2

      I was just BSing for comic effect.... if i had thought about it more i would have added more than two zero's to the real ping i did...

    4. Re:Sheesh! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right about now given where Mars is at it would take in the neighborhood of 21 minutes for light to travel the distace from Earth to Mars.

      Seeing as a ping involves sending packets there AND getting them back the total time would be in the neighborhood of 42 to 43 minutes.

      So from 2,520,000 to 2,580,000 millseconds would be an accurate ping time.

      UT is definitely out of the question. A game of chess might be a better choice.

    5. Re:Sheesh! by Pius+II. · · Score: 4, Interesting

      In net/ipv4/tcp_timer.c:tcp_retransmit_timer in Linux 2.3.99pre6,
      there's a comment lines 590-604 saying:
      /* Increase the timeout each time we retransmit. Note that
      * we do not increase the rtt estimate. rto is initialized
      * from rtt, but increases here. Jacobson (SIGCOMM 88) suggests
      * that doubling rto each time is the least we can get away with.
      * In KA9Q, Karn uses this for the first few times, and then
      * goes to quadratic. netBSD doubles, but only goes up to *64,
      * and clamps at 1 to 64 sec afterwards. Note that 120 sec is
      * defined in the protocol as the maximum possible RTT. I guess
      * we'll have to use something other than TCP to talk to the
      * University of Mars.
      *
      * PAWS allows us longer timeouts and large windows, so once
      * implemented ftp to mars will work nicely. We will have to fix
      * the 120 second clamps though!
      */

      Found on http://www.wcug.wwu.edu/lists/netdev/200005/msg000 34.html

      The guy in the post proposes a 240 second clamp as upper limit, but I guess that wouldn't really help with this special problem... :-)

    6. Re:Sheesh! by moosesocks · · Score: 3, Funny

      The scary part of that is that I've had worse pings than that on terrestrial servers on my 56k.

      --
      -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
    7. Re:Sheesh! by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 1

      Of course, given most IRC sessions, an average 11700 ping will just seem like 'yet another potty break'

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
    8. Re:Sheesh! by saskboy · · Score: 2, Funny

      I was going to make a similar remark about my highspeed loading pages on earth is bad enough, without having to wait about 14 minutes for my request to be responded to.

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    9. Re:Sheesh! by ender81b · · Score: 1

      IIRC it can be as low as 8 and as high as 42 light-minutes away from earth round-trip.

    10. Re:Sheesh! by xihr · · Score: 1

      A little maths problem there. Even at conjunction, you're talking round trip times from Earth to Mars of 500 s.

    11. Re:Sheesh! by Fred+Ferrigno · · Score: 2, Funny

      > Your sig is false.

    12. Re:Sheesh! by saskboy · · Score: 1

      You just made my head explode. That'll teach me to install an Intel chip...

      --
      Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
    13. Re:Sheesh! by PipianJ · · Score: 1

      I posted a reply on Slashdot on an earlier story that mentioned the Interplanetary Internet and came up with my own answers:

      Let's see here... Depending on what point in the orbit, seems to me that the ping time would be anywhere between 6:04 (Mars is 182 light-seconds (54.5 million km) away at its closest point) and 44:38 (It's 1339 light-seconds (410.3 million km) away at its furthest point). So yes, that's minutes:seconds.

      Original Comment
    14. Re:Sheesh! by RoboProg · · Score: 1

      What? Only inter-planetary. I guess we're still a ways away from a *real* net like in Vernor Vinge's "Fire upon the Deep" or the like.

      I guess I/P would be a convenient transparency, but it sounds more like a UUCP bang-path problem

      Replies to twirlip@misty.strat.jove!ganymede.jove!squire.leo

      or some such thing (OK, I want something to look up the route for me, but I want something to indicate the "expense" of the trip, also)

      Upgrade to Blight 2.0!
      (TM 200002, Micro$lop Corporation)

      P.S. - one way signal time to Mars is in the 3 minute neighborhood at opposition, maybe 11 minutes worst case.

      --
      Yow! I'm supposed to have a plan?
    15. Re:Sheesh! by Steve+Cox · · Score: 2

      I saw a presentation from some guy about Interplanetary Internet (might have been called Interplanetary Network at the time), and found that their proposed DNS scheme was a little bigger than marsrover.co.mars.

      Think more along the lines of marsrover.olympusmons.mars.sol.

      The .sol bit made me laugh - what are we going to do when we set this thing up between galaxies eh? (additionally, ping times would be bad)

      Steve.

    16. Re:Sheesh! by barawn · · Score: 2

      Actually, last time I checked, they had divided up DNS because they realized the problems that Earth-based DNS was having - namely, companies using things like "france.ibm.com" instead of "ibm.com.fr" - people want the TLD to stay the same.

      So they split it up into a domain name, and a location identifier - that is, "mars.ibm.com, mars.sol". This is easily extendable to other galaxies, although there's no real need - parent stars will always be uniquely identified, I imagine. But "mars.ibm.com, mars.sol.milkyway" still sounds fine.

  11. How many dups in a day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Geesh, you doorknobs -- a simple search on Slashdot for Vint Cerf turns up a dup for this.
    Don't you dullards think twice before posting an article?

    1. Re:How many dups in a day? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yea but this "new" post got to plug Roblimo as some kind of author.

  12. Re:FP! by Error-404NotFound · · Score: 0

    ummm just thinka bout it, they make a news post, and then look to sort out the dumbasses... what do you thikn they do, post news then go walk away?

    --
    -=Errors always defy logic.=-
  13. Protocol in Independence Day? by UnknownQ · · Score: 1, Redundant

    So this is the protocol they used in Independence Day? And I've always wondered why the aliens were using TCP/IP.

    --
    Wherever you go, there you are!
  14. Love the link. by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 2

    Come on guys, Worldcom?

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
  15. News: RIAA invades Alpha Centuri over filesharing. by legomad · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just wait till the RIAA goes inter-galactic.

  16. The 15 year old we dont need to worry about by thelinuxking · · Score: 2

    We just have to make sure the URL is kept secret from all slashdot readers. The latency between planets is already long enough.

    If slashdot did link to it...it would be like having a server running on a dial-up.

    1. Re:The 15 year old we dont need to worry about by entrager · · Score: 1

      I'd say worse than that, considering the multi-minute time it takes for light to travel from Earth to Mars....

  17. too bad... by haukex · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Mars will instantly be slashdotted.

    *ducks*

  18. A Better Idea by Krueger+Industrial+S · · Score: 1

    Instead of worrying about an "Interplanetary Internet" how about if Vint Cerf spends some time cleaning up ICANN and making it less of a corrupt, scumbag organization.

    1. Re:A Better Idea by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And Worldcomm, too.

      Vin Cerf is a piece of shit. I hope he gets stomach cancer.

  19. Quotable... by American+AC+in+Paris · · Score: 2
    One of the quotables by Vint with regard to security reads 'We're building in security from end to end,' he says, 'because we don't need headlines saying, '15-year-old takes over Mars.

    "...and we're collaborating with Worldcom because we want headlines saying:

    Profits From Interplanetary Internet Exceed Wildest Expectations
    "Hot Stock! Buy Now!" Say Analysts

    --

    Obliteracy: Words with explosions

  20. Ridiculous! by igotmybfg · · Score: 1

    Because 15 year old kids are all about taking over Mars! That's nonsense; I was once a fifteen year old. All I cared about was getting the newest issue of Sports Illustrated Swimsuit Edition (feat. Tyra Banks) or later on, Maxim. And some privacy. :)

  21. *sob* Willis gets fired. by jukal · · Score: 3, Funny

    Now we can just /. all the approaching asteroids.

  22. Shouldn't this be titled... by Black+Art · · Score: 2

    "Mars needs IP" or "IP on Mars"?

    --
    "Trademarks are the heraldry of the new feudalism."
    1. Re:Shouldn't this be titled... by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 2

      it was said that IPv6 provides enough addresses for every square centimeter on Earth to have its own addy.

      now that mars is in the picture - whats the area per IP upto now?

  23. Virtual Xenocide... by Mithrander · · Score: 1

    If there really IS intelligent life on other planets, I suppose it won't last long after being confronted with a broadband connection full of the products of Earth's LACK of intelligent life...

    --
    -- This Sig is currently under construction
    1. Re:Virtual Xenocide... by Tar-Palantir · · Score: 1

      Are you saying we are not ramen? :)

  24. Built-in security by fireboy1919 · · Score: 4, Funny

    You think the lag time to third world countries is bad? Try third world PLANETS.

    Whenever I play quake against guys from Mars, its always the same: they just stand there, and I frag 'em. They must have a latency of several minutes, at least! Other planets are even worse. I once waited all night just to download a 1k faq on Plutonian mining operations, and I can't even COUNT how many connections I've lost completely with servers on Jupiter.

    Who could hack those anyway? Of course, it would take forever. Plus, as we all know (having seen Independence Day), servers in space run MacOS (otherwise how would the guy have easily uploaded a virus with his iMAC), which is a bit difficult to hack anyway.

    I don't think they have anything to worry about. Except Uranus. I hear they're using unpatched IIS servers there.

    --
    Mod me down and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:Built-in security by Dirtside · · Score: 2, Funny
      Except Uranus. I hear they're using unpatched IIS servers there
      I know I'll get modded down for this, but I can't resist...

      ...are you saying there's holes in Uranus?

      --
      "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
  25. a ploy to get to IPv6 by porky_pig_jr · · Score: 1

    Vint apparently is still trying to find some justification for moving to IPv6. Oh yes, with inter-gallactic internet we'll surely run out of the valid address space available in IPv4. I'm finally convinced IPv6 is the answer.

    1. Re:a ploy to get to IPv6 by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      Well... think about nanotechnology. If you had 1000 machines in a cubic inch, IP space would run out quickly even without going to mars.

      IPv6 is definitely needed.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
    2. Re:a ploy to get to IPv6 by LucidityZero · · Score: 1

      On the same topic, then... I didn't read the article, cause I'm lazy. But does any know if they are already building this specifically with support for IPv6?

      --
      Sig.i>
    3. Re:a ploy to get to IPv6 by PurpleFloyd · · Score: 2

      One would think that nanomachines would not need something with the complexity of TCP/IP. More likely they would have very little intelligence onboard, and just enough smarts to recieve simple orders from the master controller.

      --

      That's it. I'm no longer part of Team Sanity.
    4. Re:a ploy to get to IPv6 by ClioCJS · · Score: 1

      That's a good point.

      Of course, nanotechs could be extremely dangerous if they build more of themselves. I would think one would want lots of security for them. Not just "answer simple orders" -- too easy to hack I would think.

      But since I'm talking about something that doesn't exist I obviously have my head up my ass.

      --
      -Clio
      Karma: Bad (mostly from not giving a fuck)
      Blog: http://clintjcl.wordpress.com
  26. I'd rather see... by kaoshin · · Score: 1

    Sonar internet link to sub oceanic inhabitants. fish.net?

  27. Subspace Ethernet by tokki · · Score: 1

    We need subspace Ethernet. That would let us play UT with our Martian neighbors. I wonder if communicating via gravity would be possible. Gravitational waves may travel only at the speed of light, but the effect of gravity is instantaneous. If the Sun were to disappear right now, we wouldn't see it disappear for another 8 minutes, but the Earth's orbit would change immediately.

    1. Re:Subspace Ethernet by shess · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Of course, if we had a device with a knob which allowed us to increase/decrease gravity, I'm thinking the least of our uses would be communicating with Mars...

      We could just move Mars closer to Earth.

    2. Re:Subspace Ethernet by katre · · Score: 1

      Gravitational waves may travel only at the speed of light, but the effect of gravity is instantaneous.

      Where did you get this information? Gravity waves (if they exist) will propogate at the speed of light, like light waves. And if the gravity wave isn't there yet, there's no gravity effect. If you could somehow instantaneously transport the sun to a different solar system, it'd take the Earth 8.5 minutes to find out and start heading for interstellar space.

    3. Re:Subspace Ethernet by shess · · Score: 3, Insightful

      it'd take the Earth 8.5 minutes to find out and start heading for interstellar space.

      If the sun teleported elsewhere, Earth would be in interstellar space instantaneously!

    4. Re:Subspace Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Of the two hypotheses:

      > Gravitational waves...travel only at the speed of light [ed. assuming they exist]

      and

      > The effect of gravity is instantaneous

      Either could be correct, but not both. Think about it. Make an analogy with electromagnetic radiation.

    5. Re:Subspace Ethernet by tokki · · Score: 1
      Here is this: href=http://math.ucr.edu/home/baez/physics/Relativ ity/GR/grav_speed.html

      The speed of gravitational waves and "the speed of propagation" could be two different speeds, although that's just theory. http://216.239.35.100/search?q=cache:uDPNhqhck6kC: research.spinweb.com/_tp/000001fe.htm+gravity+spee d+of+light+%22gravitational+waves%22&hl=en&ie=UTF- 8

      No one has been able to test that gravitational waves travel at the speed of light, it's speed is only inferred through Einstein's general relativity.

      I don't know how one would go about broadcasting and receiving something over the speed of propagation, but it's interesting to think about.

    6. Re:Subspace Ethernet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, it *might* be possible to verify the speed of gravity.... http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/sci/tech/2238452.stm

  28. Question by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Do they have affirmative action on Mars?

  29. This was already on Slashdot... by Snot+Locker · · Score: 1

    This was already discussed here this past May. Thanks for posting it again -- we'll look forward to seeing it appear again in December!

  30. Remeber your physics... by d.valued · · Score: 4, Informative

    One of the main problems with interplanetary internetworking is the speed of light, since we would be using some form of RF for the actual transmissions. (Blinking lights works disturbingly well, as long as a line of sight is maintained, since at the frequencies of visible light, you can transmit data at more than a terabit per second.)

    Don't expect to be able to play Quake across the galactic sea, as you have mulit-minute ping times.

    In addition, Telnet seems right out.

    The most probable form of interplanetary networking, barring successful use of Bell's Theorem (it has to do with quantum physics, and it is an observed behavior that (A) two particles in contact have spins which eventually synchronize and (B) once split apart, no matter how far apart the particles are, the spins are still in perfect sync), is going to be a store-and-forward systm, like email.

    You make requests for pages, a smart terrestrial gateway will spider the links appropiately, hopefully remove the bloody ads and spyware (since one must make the probabilisticly correct assumption we're going to have windows-dependants on the receiving end)... and in about 1.1-1.5t (where t is the period of time it takes for light to get between where you are Earth and back) you get your content.

    This system makes bookmarking pages more important, since it could gather pages based on a pre-defined list (like checking out what's on CNN, BBC, Slashdot, etc. etc..)

    --
    I used to be someone else. Now I'm someone better.
    Real life is underrated.
    1. Re:Remeber your physics... by jpmorgan · · Score: 3, Informative
      Quantum entanglement can't be used to send a signal faster than the speed of light, since there's no way to encode a message without collapsing the superpositions and breaking the entanglement.

      Sorry, try again.

    2. Re:Remeber your physics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. I guess we'll have to rely on giant planetary web caches, then.

    3. Re:Remeber your physics... by Pfhor · · Score: 2

      This is also why caching servers would become very important.

      Stuff like Akamai, but on a planetary scale for most major sources (or just most commonly reffered sources).

      Would suck to be a bored mars colonist trying to surf the Earth web at night thou, all those old pages being un cached and stuff.

    4. Re:Remeber your physics... by Buck2 · · Score: 0, Troll

      I have, by merely posting this message within 20 (Earth) minutes of the time at which you wrote your own message, proven you wrong, in at least an empirical sense.

      It is unfortunate for you, jpmorgan, that our "calculations" (the closest word in your English) do not predict the successful transference of knowledge between our species over the course of the next 7,342 of your Earth years.

      --

      As my father lik@(munch munch)... ....
    5. Re:Remeber your physics... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Actually, that's not the limit. It does mean they wouldn't be "reusable" but there are worse things. You'd have to send a huge supply with whoever was leaving, and if that wasn't enough you'd have to send more after them, which would slow things down.

      Unfortunately, it doesn't matter anyway, because there is a more serious limit. You can't communicate using Bell pairs, because you can't SELECT what outcome your measurement will have. All you will ever have is shared random bits. This is very useful for encryption, sort of the ultimate pad encrypt, but not for sending ones and zeros.

    6. Re:Remeber your physics... by madenosine · · Score: 1

      what if you make it so that you make sure you are spinning all the 1s one way and all the 0s the other way, but don't know which way they will spin? if the spin depended upon a single "inverter" which decided which direction means a 0 and which direction means a 1. then the client could read the data and then the inverter.

      of course the direction of the 1s and 0s would have to be somehow dependent upon the inverter, but there is still uncertainty

      the inverter could be created in the same way as any entanglement situation is created

      within the next century, our current beliefs on superposition will most likely be disproven anyways

    7. Re:Remeber your physics... by darqchild · · Score: 1

      Philotic theory is Fiction! Quantum entanglement just doesn't work outside of certain sci-fi books

      --
      What? Me? Worry?
    8. Re:Remeber your physics... by d.valued · · Score: 4, Informative

      Let's get past Ender's Game for a minute.

      This isn't some sci-fi, pseudo-science. This is quantum physics we're talking about here. Unless you are one of the theorists, chances are you're a parrot. I'll readily admit I don't grasp most of it, since I'm not doing it full-time and most of the QP stuff gives me migraines on a bad day.

      However, what I mentioned casually in the article (with the thirty-second explantation) is Bell's Theorem. Link provided here, here, here.

      Punch up Google, type in "Bell's Theorem", and enjoy stuff that makes your tiny little mind explode.

      --
      I used to be someone else. Now I'm someone better.
      Real life is underrated.
    9. Re:Remeber your physics... by barawn · · Score: 3, Informative

      Unfortunately, your interpretation of Bell's Theorem is quite wrong.

      Bell's Theorem says that quantum mechanics is fundamentally right. Wave functions collapse instantaneously (barring a nonlocal hidden variable theory). That would seem to imply that we can send information faster than the speed of light, but that's not true - there's no information contained within the wavefunction itself. You can't send information. No. No chance. No way. No how. Go ahead. Try. You'll never be able to.

      "Things" travelling faster than the speed of light is not surprising. It is normal. Imagine two planets, say, 1 light year apart from each other. Now imagine you're thousands of light years away from them, perpendicular to the line joining the two planets. Now you shine a biiig flashlight on them, and wave it back and forth between the two planets. Now think about the shadow (or "lack of flashlight") - passing back and forth. Do the math - it's going to be going back and forth at several times the speed of light.

      Is this a problem? Hell no. There's no information in that "shadow". There's no way for planet A to use that shadow to transmit information to planet B (without sending it to you first, which would... well... defeat the point).

      Bell's Theorem basically says that the wavefunction is the quantum analogue of the magnetic vector potential - a quantum "shadow". Yes, it propagates faster than the speed of light. No, this isn't a problem. The EPR experiment, and others similar to it that Bell's Theorem addresses, cannot be used to send FTL messages. If they could, you'd be damned sure we'd already be doing it!

    10. Re:Remeber your physics... by barawn · · Score: 2

      You can't "make" the 1s one way and the "0s" the other way. If you did, then they wouldn't be entangled, would they? You'd be forcing the message upon them.

      If you're talking about forcing the "1s" in one state before you even send them out, then you're encoding the message before you send it out, in which case, the message takes, well, the travel time of the package to the destination.

      You can't do it. It's really too bad that the EPR experiment and Bell's Theorem get so much air time. So many people get so excited about nothing.

  31. Not really the interplanetary internet by Rupert · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is more a mechanism to get a packet to pay its own way across a network. You can see why Worldcom, and its employee, Mr. Cerf, would be interested in this.

    For all he invented the internet, Vint, whether making proposals of this kind or wielding a knife in the draughty halls of ICANN, shows no signs of putting its well-being over that of his employer.

    --

    --
    E_NOSIG
  32. I know which planet the pron sites will go to... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Its gonna be uranus.

  33. A new working business-model? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    1: Write free software.
    2: ?
    3: Make interplanetary internet.
    4: Profit!

  34. Takes the pressure off the koreans. by Captain_Frisk · · Score: 2

    As anyone who has ever played a U.S. Game on battle.net can attest, Koreans are blamed (justification is another story) for "lagging down the game."

    This will take the pressure of the Koreans, first with the Lunarians, and then Martians, who will make the Lunarians look speedy.

    I can't just see it now.

    Diablo Player 1: Man, those fucking martians, always lagging down the game and spamming those "Give me items messages"... why don't they play with their own people. Diablo Player 2: (several minutes later) HELP ME PLEEEZ... NEED SOJ Diablo Player 1: Fucking Martians.

    1. Re:Takes the pressure off the koreans. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If that is true, then why do people still blame Koreans living in America for lagging down the game? It's racism plain and simple people, and it should be a hate crime too.

  35. Re:I know which planet the pron sites will go to.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If that's so, then i'll have to wait until they discovery planet baldspreadpussy.

  36. Security from end to end by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    15-year-old: "I can't crack Mars, but--Muahahaha! All your routers ar3 B3L0NG 2 ME!!!!!!!11"

  37. UUCP is the answer by drinkypoo · · Score: 2

    This is why UUCP can never die. It's perfect for a network like this. You just write up a new transfer protocol with extra-long timeouts and heavy duplication of data to minimize resends and bang! The existing UUCP works between earth and mars.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  38. Duplicate archives by Dirtside · · Score: 2

    It seems that having any kind of WWW-like setup between planets (given the speed of light barrier) would be kind of pointless, or at least inefficient. More likely, large data repositories would be stored in duplicate form on each planet. They'd be updated by bulk dump every so often (depending on how much bandwidth is available), but local requests would be handled locally.

    Now the problem is, who could afford to do this? Only large organizations, companies, and governments, probably. Also, sites that depend on relatively low-latency interaction (like Slashdot) rather than simple reference libraries (like dictionary.com) might not have duplicates. More likely, you'd end up with functionally-identical but content-different sites... for example, we'd still have /. here on Earth, but then there'd be Marsdot, Jupidot, Plutodot, etc. each catering to its own local community.

    --
    "Destroy science and religion. Science would re-emerge exactly the same; but not religion." - Penn Jillette, paraphrased
    1. Re:Duplicate archives by MxTxL · · Score: 2

      Well, if you figure that Google has the capacity to cache just about the whole 'net, it's not inconceivable that they could dump their archives and have them sent up somewhat periodically.

      But then again, even at these distances, while you would have huge latency, you could still have pretty high bandwidth. It probably wouldn't be too hard to maintain a spider that would run around and collect a local cache of the whole net. Any page requests hit the local cache and are relatively fast. The spider would take advantage of forsight to pull pages people are likely to look at (or even ALL pages) and the 42 min orund trip would be eliminated.

    2. Re:Duplicate archives by Steffan · · Score: 1

      To paraphrase an old saying...

      Never underestimate the bandwidth of a space shuttle loaded with DLT tapes

    3. Re:Duplicate archives by Xawen · · Score: 1

      Due to the inevitable lag and bandwidth price, it's less likely to be a huge repository on each planet, and more like a web caching server. Interplanetary bandwidth is expensive, and the telecoms won't want to waste any of it. For example, if no one on earth cares about Jupidot, and it's never requested, there's no need to replicate it. If one day it is requested, there will be a pretty hefty lag before you can see it, but for a while after that it will be part of the updated cache, until it times out.

      What the people here seem to be missing is the fact that an interplanetary net wouldn't be anything like our current net. The instant access and live updates that we have grown accustomed to would remain on the intraplanet nets, but would not be possible on the interplanet nets. There would be no cross galaxy game of quake. We would be relying on batched communications very similar to the way we currently send email to the servers on the south pole.

      As far as who could afford it, it would have be the ISPs that control the interplanet connections. This caching would be an inherent part of the communications system, and they would be the only ones in a position to handle it. Believe it or not, this is the way things are currently being proposed. Unless someone can figure out how to break the speed of light, there's not much choice.

    4. Re:Duplicate archives by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Now the problem is, who could afford to do this?
      How about your ISP. This sounds very similar to the cashes they use, or even Usenet. How many people 5 or so years ago would have thought ISPs would afford the storage of all the porn / mp3 / mpeg etc files that get posted these days.

      It is also just as likely that anyone on the 3rd moon of Jupiter with a web page will have it hosted on Jupiter and have there own mirror site on Earth - provided as a free servis by their ISP as well no doubt. Still plenty of the bulk transfers you meantion.

      We have, after all been here before. It's not that many years ago that sites were mirrored arround the world because of latency problems as a matter of course. It just seems to be the same thing.

  39. Re:News: RIAA invades Alpha Centuri over fileshari by ollywompus · · Score: 1

    agreed... the next thing you know were going to find ourselves involved in intergalactic lawsuits that state

    "the lawsuit is based upon the stated copyright violation of mars orbital satelites 3,4, and 5. said satelites, whos orbital speed and trajectory are an exact duplicate of several earth-orbital satelites are violating the artistic integrity of said earth satelites. under intergalactic law, no two orbital patterns can be duplicated without the express permission of the originating orbital satelite."

    this of course would be followed by several pay-as-you-go networks, where for a small fee each satelite would have the right to use the orbital pattern of previous satelites, assuming that all royalties have been duly paid.

    --Stupidity should be as painful as Windows.

    --
    -- "We're only gonna die from our own arrogance, that's why we might as well take our time..." -Bad Religion
  40. Orson Scott Card by Aldurn · · Score: 1

    It's quite a simple problem, really:

    RFC20063: IP-over-Ansible.

    --
    char sig[120] = "\0"
  41. Note the date of the article by Shamanin · · Score: 1

    You mean there was nothing more news worthy to discuss on that day?

    --
    come on fhqwhgads
  42. Not the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You must mean the date for the link for more information on Interplanetary IP, yeah I thought the same thing.

  43. News 2035 . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    High-ranking members of the RIAA were vaporized today after seeking legal action based on the DMCA against a group of interstellar music executives from the planet Vanubia.

    When the Vanubians were asked how they could justify such harsh action, the president of the Vanubian music industry explained that he would have preferred a gentler course of action but that other companies on his planet had already obtain the legal patents on all non-violent dispute responses.

    In other news, Microsoft has canceled the high-level meetings with the Vanubians that were scheduled to take place this spring to discuss licensing concerns.

  44. The Buggers would be proud by proverbialcow · · Score: 1

    Finally, practical application of this "ansible" thing the military developed.

    --
    The only surefire protection against Microsoft infections is abstinence. - The Onion
    1. Re:The Buggers would be proud by Tar-Palantir · · Score: 1

      You know, if we are referring to Orson Scott Card, the Buggers invented the ansible - not the military. The IF stole it from the Bugger ships, I believe after the Second Invasion.

  45. Another dream come true by Tarrio · · Score: 1

    It looks like we'll soon be able to FTP the University of Mars...

  46. Heard this speech personally by crystalplague · · Score: 2

    Vint Cerf also was the keynote speaker at the International Summit for Young Technology Leaders that I attended in Austin, TX in July. He gave what sounds like pretty much the same speech. He envisioned an interplanetary internet system and the need for satellites and interplanetary research equipment to be equipped with TCP/IP capabilities, perferrably IPv6, which he also spoke of the future importance of. He also offered some insight into his own job vitality and said despite the collapse of WorldCom, his division will probably be spared.

  47. Hopefully. by moosesocks · · Score: 2

    Maybe someday, we can /. a server on another planet. Oh what fun!

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  48. ET by moosesocks · · Score: 3, Funny

    ET Ping Home. ET Ping Home.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  49. Will the Interplanetary Net support . . . by StefanJ · · Score: 3, Funny

    . . . the MIME types suggested in RFC1437?

    http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc1437.html

  50. reread those numbers by Trepidity · · Score: 2

    Not 120 seconds...his example numbers were more like 12 seconds. (1 s = 1000 ms).

  51. FTL Communications by sam_handelman · · Score: 5, Funny

    FTL Travel is probably never going to be a reality - meaning all those green alien women will just have to pine away for Captain K's hot man love.

    However, FTL Communications are probably possible, so we can hope that our overweight, velour wearing descendents might at least talk dirty with some green alien women.

    Of course, based on today's internet, those green alien women would probably be fat, balding green alien men and green alien FBI agents on green alien sting missions against the sexually deviant human race.

    Unfortunately, this proposed FTL method requires you to ship the quantum-coupled-er...thingies from place to place FIRST, which means we'd have to exchange ambassadors with the green aliens FIRST... meaning Captain K is back in the shag house, big time.

    And then, the quantum communications might be a bit, well, odd, as you might recieve cryptic messages like this:

    Reply from 68.179.57.159: qubits = 256 95% confidence -11fs<time<-4fs, measured from point of transmission, 95% confidence -14fs<time<-6fs, measured from point of reception.

    Which is a reply to the following command:

    Pinging hotbabes.co.vulcan [68.179.57.159] with 256 qubits of data.

    Which you had not yet actually run. Anyone want to suggest changes to TCP/IP that would allow you to handle when acks arrived before the message they acknowledge has been sent? Just asking.

    --
    The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    1. Re:FTL Communications by cperciva · · Score: 3, Funny

      Anyone want to suggest changes to TCP/IP that would allow you to handle when acks arrived before the message they acknowledge has been sent? Just asking.

      Sure: If you receive an ACK to a packet you haven't sent, put it into a buffer. Each time you're about to send a packet, check to see if you've already received an ACK for it. If you have, adjust the window as apppropriate and don't send the packet.

    2. Re:FTL Communications by evilviper · · Score: 2
      FTL Travel is probably never going to be a reality

      Do people NEVER learn? You should NEVER speak in infinitives. You will ALWAYS be proven wrong.

      Traveling faster than light is impossible.... Just as impossible as the 4-minute mile, 70MPH travel, faster than sound travel, space travel, etc.

      NOTHING is impossible for people, unless they limit themselves. (You will notice how I speak about people in the third person {:-> )

      want to suggest changes to TCP/IP that would allow you to handle when acks arrived before the message they acknowledge has been sent?


      Quantum Ack... This feature is already in IPv6. Unfortunately, it looks like it would be easier to change the physics of the universe than to get people to leave IPv4.

      Besides, addressing this issue in TCP/IP should come second. First we have to address it when it happens in our overclocked processors.

      http://bbspot.com/News/2000/5/clock_rift.html
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    3. Re:FTL Communications by Dreamweaver · · Score: 5, Funny

      If you have, adjust the window as appropriate and don't send the packet

      Naughty, naughty. Still need to send the packet or you generate a causality loop. You already received the response for the packet you're about to send, you see. If you don't send it, then what was the response to?

      It's bad enough having inexperienced coders leaving memory leaks and infinite loops lying around; now we'll have reality leaks and causal loops to watch out for, too. "Woops, I forgot a semicolon and now French people speak German..."

      --


      "If a man hasn't discovered something he will die for, he isn't fit to live" -- MLK, Jr.
    4. Re:FTL Communications by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2, Funny

      Unfortunately, it looks like it would be easier to change the physics of the universe than to get people to leave IPv4.


      Damnit, I spilled pop all over my screen...

      --
      I live in a giant bucket.
    5. Re:FTL Communications by evilviper · · Score: 2

      Ummmm, you're welcome??? I guess...

      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    6. Re:FTL Communications by barawn · · Score: 2

      Careful. FTL communications are not "probably possible." Definitely not! About the best you could say is "well... um... since we haven't stretched the bounds of the theory, we should try all possibilities before discounting them."

      Did you read the paper that you quoted? It basically said "well... theory says that FTL communication isn't possible using quantum correlations... but the theory could be wrong!" Yes, it's true, the theory could be wrong - and the same could be said for any number of things, but it's not where I'm going to place my money.

      No one - read, no one has managed to send information faster than light. They've managed to collapse EPR states, they've managed to distort a photon's wavepacket such that a significant portion of it arrived faster than light would, but no one has managed to send information yet, because all of these experiments have the side caveat: no, we can't send information this way - but it's still interesting to see what we can do!

    7. Re:FTL Communications by sam_handelman · · Score: 1

      Why didn't you argue you with the guy who thinks we'll probably move faster than light?

      Now, to the important question - my science is bad, but IS IT FUNNY?

      --
      The good and new comes from no quarter where it is looked for, and is always something different from what is expected.
    8. Re:FTL Communications by barawn · · Score: 2

      You already did. What more can I say other than "FTL travel isn't possible", and you already said that. On the other hand, no one had pointed out to you that FTL communication isn't possible, either, regardless of what some guys with a NIAC proposal think. :)

  52. A universe of spam by GuyMannDude · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I can't wait until my inbox is crammed full of "All-natural proven method to add inches to your tentacles!" porno spam.

    GMD

  53. To no good someone is up by BurntHombre · · Score: 1
    "There's an interesting article at NewsForge by Robin (Roblimo) Miller about Vint Cerf giving a presentation to NOVALUG about the Interplanetary Internet and having lunch with them afterward."

    At
    By
    About
    To
    About
    With

    I think this sentence is suffering from a severe bout of prepositional indigestion.

  54. Security is nice, but hopefully they will be doing something so some script kiddie doesn't DDOS a craft into Safe Mode.

  55. Not Really... by Steffan · · Score: 1

    It wouldn't take 600 seconds... From this table, it shows Mars being about 1.524 AU from the Sun. This equates to about 227,940,000 km from the Sun, vs. 149,600,000 km for the Earth. The difference is 78,340,000 km. At 300,000 km per second, light would travel that distance in about 261 seconds. This is about 4.3 minutes, not the ten minutes indicated by the 600 second figure.

  56. The Poor Pigeons! by tarsi210 · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess the birds will need tiny spacesuits and rocket packs to make it back and forth.

    Incoming interstellar hen!

  57. Re:News: RIAA invades Alpha Centuri over fileshari by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 3, Funny

    the tighter they grip - the more interplanetary internet warez sites will slip through their fingers.

  58. Glass Spheres by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

    You think the lag time to third world countries is bad? Try third world PLANETS.

    Don't look now, but we ARE the third world. (Mars, Venus, ...)

    1. Re:Glass Spheres by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Surely that should be Mercury Venus ...

    2. Re:Glass Spheres by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      Surely that should be Mercury Venus ...

      That is exceedingly true. I should be modded down into oblivion.

      Thank you for your correction.

    3. Re:Glass Spheres by maaleron · · Score: 1

      psst... Last time I checked Mercury was the first planet. :-P

    4. Re:Glass Spheres by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 1

      psst... Last time I checked Mercury was the first planet. :-P

      You are (of course) correct. I didn't even close the italics tag properly. I clearly wasn't thinking straight.

  59. Ping is *roundtrip* time, you loser by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    And the 1.524 minus 1.000 AU figure is a lower bound on the distance of Mars.

  60. At a minimum... by Big+Sean+O · · Score: 4, Informative

    At a minimum it's 0.524 AU. The maximum would be 2.524 AU (when the earth and mars are on opposite sides of the sun) which is 5 times greater than your estimate (for a whopping 21.5 minutes). Of course, good luck getting your radio signal through Sol. Perhaps we have to install some repeaters somewhere (which would make for further delays). Anybody have that Pathagorean theorem handy??

    --
    My father is a blogger.
    1. Re:At a minimum... by Dreamweaver · · Score: 2

      Using a repeater sharing orbit with Mercury that's perpindicular to the line between Mars and Earth, transmission time would be ~22.36 minutes each way :)

      --


      "If a man hasn't discovered something he will die for, he isn't fit to live" -- MLK, Jr.
  61. Two small, minor issues by guttentag · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I have two minor issues with this:
    1. There are no people on Mars yet. We haven't figured out how to get them there (in terms of ensuring their health and safety; in terms of how we're going to bring them back; in terms of financing the project). There's no timetable for sending people to Mars, so one can neither say "we'd better prepare for this" nor "we're nowhere near needing to prepare for this."
    2. Less than one percent of the people on this planet have Internet access, yet we're talking about plugging in a place where man probably won't set foot in the next 50 years?
    I'm not saying it's not worth discussing the theoretical implications of an interplanetary Internet, especially since it probably won't be built in the lifetime of pioneers like Vint Cerf, and then we'll be saying "if only we could go back and ask Cerf what he thought about this." However, I think we need to note that for the forseeable future, this is just theory.
    1. Re:Two small, minor issues by krokodil · · Score: 4, Insightful
      1. There are no people on Mars yet. We haven't figured out how to get them there (in terms of ensuring their health and safety; in terms of how we're going to bring them back; in terms of financing the project). There's no timetable for sending people to Mars, so one can neither say "we'd better prepare for this" nor "we're nowhere near needing to prepare for this."

      Before sending people we will send bots. And to download information from bots TCP/IP may be good choice.

    2. Re:Two small, minor issues by barawn · · Score: 2
      Before sending people we will send bots. And to download information from bots TCP/IP may be good choice.

      ... have sent bots, actually.


      The whole idea of this isn't some science fiction idea of humans on Mars. The real reason is that the DSN (Deep Space Network) is overloaded. It's going to have to be replaced soon, and NASA's thinking, well, why not do it with something that's extendable?
  62. One word by Chris+Pimlott · · Score: 2

    You make some good practical points, but you forgot the most important element:

    CACHING

    Better keep those cache expiration intervals high.

  63. What does this do for the stock price? :-) by kevin922 · · Score: 1

    Well I hope Vint can pull something good off for WorldCom, or MCI or whatever they are going to call it these days. My stock sucks! (and my severence package sucked too) :-)

    Kevin

  64. Vint Cerf is a tool by autopr0n · · Score: 1, Troll

    Just wanted to point that out.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  65. It may stop a 15 year old, but it won't stop Trent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    They tried that (designed for security from the ground up) with the Luna InfoNet, but then Trent got physical access and with the help of Johnny Johnny, managed to crash the boards, letting in a swarms of other Players and AIs into the system.

    Of course, at the time it looked like Ralf was already there, hiding, but one can't be too sure about that.

    (see The Long Run by Daniel Keys Moran)

  66. End to End Security by FattMattP · · Score: 2
    "We're building in security from end to end."
    Why can't more programmers think this way?
    --
    Prevent email address forgery. Publish SPF records for y
    1. Re:End to End Security by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Security isn't profitable.

    2. Re:End to End Security by sql*kitten · · Score: 2

      Why can't more programmers think this way?

      Well, Cerf's already had the experience of developing TCP/IP, which emphatically didn't have any useful security built in. Maybe this time he'll do a little better. Or maybe he'll get a clue and simply adopt something like DECnet or SNA which really does have protocol-level security and robustness built in.

  67. Brings a whole new meaning to: by Lefty2446 · · Score: 0

    DDOS

    I can see it now, Someone on IRC states that "All you're base..." And gets pinf flodded into oblivion from whe whole galaxy.

  68. Great - Now Mars will be slashdotted in 5 minutes! by billstewart · · Score: 1

    Great - Now Mars will be slashdotted in 5 minutes! Just because nobody's living there doesn't mean the machines won't get overloaded.....

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  69. Dear Mars by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The Interplanetary Internet is pretty much pie in the sky, right now. There are a couple of guys at JPL who have been working on the more focused project of sending an e-mail to Mars, where it would be answered by a natural language auto-responder. Check out their site at Dear Mars - JPL. The site links to a natural language system that answers questions about Mars, built by MIT.

  70. Hack the planet by hackerc · · Score: 1

    Brings new meaning to an old BAD movie

  71. saw him lecture and was unimpressed by BS405397 · · Score: 1

    I usually just lurk, but this man made such an impression on me at an engineering presentation that I have very strong feelings about what he says. He may have made some revolutionary contributions, but from what I heard he seems to only consider the implications as an afterthought. Basically, his presentation was 'My vision for the future of the internet' with an emphasis on IPv4 (this is just earlier this year, mind you), which was largely fluff. What struck me what he went on for some time about how everything in the future will have an ip (how original), and started talking about how great it will be to be able to find your socks based on the location of their ip. No more missing socks apparently, although this neglected to address quite a few logistics questions. Then he threw out a scenario where a man would get caught by his wife going to a bar when he said he was working late because his socks had an ip and she could tell the it was being tied into the network from the bar instead of work. Okay, so the finer points aside, in his envisioned future where a man's wife can track him to the bar by the ip in his socks isn't it equally likely that she can track him to his other lover's apartment after meeting at that bar? Doesn't logic follow that the government could also track his socks any time they wanted if these alleged socks are so unsecure that his wife can find him at his lover's? These were the things going through MY mind, but good old Vint kept on rattling off more fluff without the smile once dopping off his face or discussing possible privacy issues that might pop up in his 'future.'

  72. SLASHDOT HEADLINE! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Roblimo was published again!

  73. bugger by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and we really don't want to see headlines like:
    "15-year-old takes over Uranus"

  74. From the article.. by dr_dank · · Score: 1

    There are no MCSEs on Mars to reboot computers that crash.
    Maybe this guy is!

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  75. WorldCom? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All this information from such a wonderful company as WorldCom. Maybe they should focus on their company more and less on space.

  76. having been at the meeting in question... by Hitch · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I can see that a lot of people are missing the point of the project.
    this is not "hey, I'm on mars, let me browse the 'net" stuff. this is "okay. we need to drop 50 or so data gathering probes, which need to send their info back to a central broadcast point, which will send its info to a satellite, which will send it back to earth" stuff. The reason they're developing open and standard data protocols for this should be obvious - if you craft it from scratch (as they had been doing previously) it's REALLY expensive. I found "the Interplanetery Internet" to be a bit of a misleading title myself at first. but considering that the internet was itself a research tool first and formost, this is only because of prejudices already in my head.

    --
    You see, without that little doohicky, the universe stops.
    http://propheteer.org
  77. I've a thought by rebelcool · · Score: 2

    Since this is way into the future, storage space may not become an issue, each planet (or moon) system could have a repository mirror of every other page. And throughout the day the system would continue to update its mirror of every page within. This doesn't work of course with dynamic content or email, but for mostly static pages, it might be the fastest way to serve content.

    --

    -

  78. Bob Z and bandwidth by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 2

    Now Bob Zubrin will cite unlimited bandwidth as a reason to go to mars.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  79. Think of the privacy issues by dvChaos666 · · Score: 0

    Now echolon can spy on other planets too, and the russians ! yay !

  80. WorldCom Involved! You can see the headline now... by Boss,+Pointy+Haired · · Score: 1

    WCOM Restates Extent Of Network Coverage

    CLINTON, Miss., August 8, 2183. WorldCom, Inc. today announced that after its ongoing internal review of its network coverage, it has discovered an additional 237 billion light years of improperly reported network reach. Information previously made available to customers and analysts indicated that WorldCom had full fibre optic network coverage between the United States and over 118 other planetary systems outside of our own galaxy. On November 4, 2182, WorldCom announced that network coverage in actual fact only extended across the Atlantic Ocean.

  81. Porn from beyond the stars! by docbrown42 · · Score: 1

    WooHoo! I can't wait!

    Soon, we'll be downloading pictures of women with blue skin, or 3 breasts.

    -Ed

    docbrown.net NEW!
    Graphic Design, Web Design, Role-Playing Games...all the good stuff

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  82. Vin Cerf's dog has a sweater... by alispguru · · Score: 2

    ... that says "IP on Everything".

    --

    To a Lisp hacker, XML is S-expressions in drag.