Slashdot Mirror


HP Labs Creates Densest Memory Chips To Date

Ruger writes "CRN has this article about memory circuits 10 times more dense than today's silicon chips. R. Stanley Williams, director of Quantum Science Research at HP Labs said the high-density memory his team created fits inside a square micron. That's so small that 1,000 of the circuits could fit on the end of a strand of human hair."

154 comments

  1. A single strand of hair by addps4cat · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Once again they use "a single strand of hair" as some sort of SI unit. Something isn't small until you tell someone how many you can fit on a strand of hair.

    - phranck@nycap.rr.com

    --
    Don't eat shrimp candy, just a heads up.
    1. Re:A single strand of hair by sh4de · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The obvious derivative unit for memory density would then be libraries of congress per strand of hair.

      Humour aside, I think it's the marketing department again that thought people wouldn't grok units that look like bits per square micron.

      That sort of unit isn't immediately accessible to most people, but messing with highly inaccurate, almost metaphorical, made-up units ain't gonna make it any better.

      (My two bits per strand of hair)

    2. Re:A single strand of hair by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      and don't forget head of a pin, pins come in a lot fo sizes, and so do hairs, i could fit a lot more whatevers on a strand of my hair (very thick) than on my girlfriends (very thin)

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    3. Re:A single strand of hair by ottffssent · · Score: 2

      I've got thick hair - does that mean my computer will run faster?

    4. Re:A single strand of hair by Quikah · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Oh come on, most people DON'T grok how small a micron is. It makes perfect sense to relate it to something which people can see and touch. It really makes no sense to criticize making something a little more understandable to lay people. It is an AP story, not a research paper.

      --
      Q.
    5. Re:A single strand of hair by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      I'm really surprised by the amount of these strange units. For some reason this is quite common:

      Small things are compared with strands of hair
      Data storage capacity is compared to the library of congress (which I've never seen and have no idea of how big is it)
      Asteroids are compared with Texas

      How long until fast events are compared to the time it takes to blink?

    6. Re:A single strand of hair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I'm not so sure about that. I've sure put alot of stuff on your girlfriend's hair.

    7. Re:A single strand of hair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Whose hair? Some people have thicker hair than others. And what about beard hairs? They tend to be quite thick. Do they count?

    8. Re:A single strand of hair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A strand of hair is 1/84 of an inch.

    9. Re:A single strand of hair by AJWM · · Score: 2

      Quick, somebody add both of those to the units(1) database.

      You have: libraryofcongress/strandofhair
      You want: bits/micron^2

      --
      -- Alastair
    10. Re:A single strand of hair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This reminds of Billions and Billions the Carl Sagan book. I doubt most people who know what a micron is and how it relates to other units of measurement really have any concept of how small a micron is unless they have actually looked at something in comparison and then figured the difference between the two.. even if it's the next unit of measurement up. For those of us who haven't done this comparison a human hair, pin head or any other small object is a good object for to compare since most people have seen hair or a pin head.

    11. Re:A single strand of hair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What are you talking about? TNT: huge card. Dual pipes, massive fill. TNT2: mostly a speed bump. Geforce256: huge card. Hardware T&L, massive throughput. Geoforce2: mostly a speed bump. Geforce3: huge card. Programmability, greatest rendering flexibility ever. XBox: huge. Far more power than the competition. Geforce4: mostly a speed bump. Geforce4MX: marketing speak. ATI R300: huge card. NV30: ???
      NVidia's small gap is the one between the new card and the speed bumped version. They have created a large gap in every new product generation for years, with an enormous marketplace win every time. What happened here is that ATI stole a march by skipping the R8500 speed bump and executing beautifully on their next full generation. No reason to think, though, that NVidia won't deliver another killer leading product on their next iteration.

    12. Re:A single strand of hair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You have a girlfriend? What are you doing here?

    13. Re:A single strand of hair by Angst+Badger · · Score: 2

      Well, of course. "A single strand of hair" represents the extreme low end of the general public's scale of measurements, with the previously mentioned Standard Texas Unit as the high end. Now, the question of how many strands of hair it takes to be the size of Texas remains unresolved...

      --
      Proud member of the Weirdo-American community.
    14. Re:A single strand of hair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Is that a metric hair or an imperial hair?

    15. Re:A single strand of hair by geekoid · · Score: 2

      remember, if you cut Alaska in half, Texas would be the third largest state.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    16. Re:A single strand of hair by spongman · · Score: 2

      EETimes has a much better article with actual measurements and more technical info.

    17. Re:A single strand of hair by krenshala · · Score: 1

      I suppose short amounts of time could be compaired to 'New York Minutes'. A NY Minute is the time between when the light turns green and the taxi driver behind you hits his horn to get you to move. ;)

      --

      krenshala

    18. Re:A single strand of hair by trb · · Score: 2

      Tne irony here is that the unit in question isn't the (3D/volume) strand of human hair (which many of the /. comments are discussing), it's the (2D/area) end of a strand of human hair. So dumbing down the units wasn't quite helpful after all.

    19. Re:A single strand of hair by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

      In use to describe quick events:
      "The answer to which comes to me in the blink of the eye..."

      In use to describe slow events:

      *blink*

      --
      What's this Submit thingy do?
    20. Re:A single strand of hair by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      D'oh. My english needs some improvement.

    21. Re:A single strand of hair by Lord_Breetai · · Score: 1

      You want: bits/micron^2

      No, dude. You want:

      bit/square/micron

      --
      "You are only young once, but you can be immature forever." -www.animemusicvideos.org
    22. Re:A single strand of hair by AJWM · · Score: 2

      > units
      1378 units, 57 prefixes

      You have: gigabits/hectare
      You want: bits/square/micron
      Unknown unit 'square'.
      You want: bits/micron^2
      * 1e-07
      / 10000000

      --
      -- Alastair
    23. Re:A single strand of hair by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      When will we have enough density? There must be a limit.

    24. Re:A single strand of hair by JimR · · Score: 1

      I've got thick hair - does that mean my computer will run faster?

      No. But it means it will be denser.
      --
      #exclude <ms/windows.h>
    25. Re:A single strand of hair by Michael+Wardle · · Score: 2

      Humour aside, I think it's the marketing department again that thought people wouldn't grok units that look like bits per square micron.

      Engineers and scientists wouldn't grok it either; the term micron (meaning one millionth of a meter) was abolished in 1968 in favor of micrometer (BIPM's SI brochure, page 28).

    26. Re:A single strand of hair by gorilla · · Score: 2

      Dumbing down the units results in missing information. If I say micrometers, then the unit of what I'm measuring is obvious. If I say 'the size of a human hair', then it's not.

    27. Re:A single strand of hair by MaxVlast · · Score: 2

      Think of the children!

      --
      There should be a moratorium on the use of the apostrophe.
      Max V.
      NeXTMail/MIME Mail welcome
  2. Hmmm. The article appears to be missing by azav · · Score: 1, Informative

    ADODB.Field
    error '800a0bcd'

    Either BOF or EOF is True, or the current record has been deleted; the operation requested by the application requires a current record. /sections/BreakingNews/breakingnews.asp, line 131

    --
    - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    1. Re:Hmmm. The article appears to be missing by GMontag · · Score: 4, Funny

      Either BOF or EOF is True, or the current record has been deleted; the operation requested by the application requires a current record./sections/BreakingNews/breakingnews.asp, line 131

      Naaa, the hair their memory was installed on is blonde ;-)

    2. Re:Hmmm. The article appears to be missing by hendridm · · Score: 1

      Why did this notification of Slashdotting get modded up?

    3. Re:Hmmm. The article appears to be missing by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because the mind of a moderator is almost as wide as a human hair.

      They have as much of a clue as your sig.

  3. hope their resumes are ready by garyrich · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I thought Carly and the honchos from Compaq were killing all hardware level design work. This may be the last hurrah from HP Labs.

    --
    -- your Web browser is Ronald Reagan
  4. Huh? by Golias · · Score: 5, Funny
    Why do the guys at HP labs want to date memory chips?

    Oh wait... never mind.

    --

    Information wants to be anthropomorphized.

    1. Re:Huh? by Dr+Caleb · · Score: 2
      I just wondered why they wanted to date really stupid ones.

      --
      "History doesn't repeat itself, but it does rhyme." Mark Twain
    2. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The strand of human hair must be blonde.

    3. Re:Huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      Why do the guys at HP labs want to date memory chips?

      No, silly, I said mammary chicks !

      You nerds never listen.

  5. Had to point this out: by Warmth+Is+Life · · Score: 0, Troll

    The word densest does NOT mean "most dense".

    1. Re:Had to point this out: by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      Actually, it does - Dictionary.com takes of -est and -er for the purposes of giving a definition (as everyone should know what -est and -er do to a word). Note that it says it found "dense" as the entry.

  6. fit on the end of a strand of human hair... by jcapell · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    *yawn*

    Isn't this infinitely more interesting?

    Sure, mod me offtopic. But please, post something INTERESTING on slash occasionally, ok?

    A spam filter that works. Problem Solved.

    1. Re:fit on the end of a strand of human hair... by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      It'd be interesting if it wasn't a joke... Whilst Slashdot's journalism is often a joke, that doesn't mean they post them intentionally ;-)

    2. Re:fit on the end of a strand of human hair... by Arcturax · · Score: 1

      Quite amusing, though from the page I gather it is a joke. I hope Scientology took the mention of Hubbard seriously and tried to quickly copyright his hair in case it contained any OT stuff they didn't know about yet. The thought of them wasting time and money on a joke like this amuses me to no end.

      Don't worry about a few down mods for this. There are some people who simply can't mod worth shit and mod people down because they disagree with them or because they were too thick to get a joke.

      When I get points I no longer mod down anymore. If someone posts sick stories, links or ascii art swastikas, I let the editors take care of it. Instead I save my points to mod up worthy posts or thing that are particularly funny. I only wish more people held to that philosophy when modding.

      I will say though that this topic is still interesting, as it means RAM chips the size of late 90's hard disks. Will make me wish Apple would bring back the RAM disk feature in the next release of OS X.

      --

      --Won't that be grand? Computers and the programs will start thinking and the people will stop. - Dr. Walter Gibbs
    3. Re:fit on the end of a strand of human hair... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Years ago we had pictures of a human hair versus the flying hieghts of disk heads. The disks held a whopping 50 Mb.

    4. Re:fit on the end of a strand of human hair... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Years ago I remember seeing pictures of a human hair versus the flying hieght of disks. The disks held a whopping 50 Mb.

  7. Still trying to get my mind around this... by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Funny

    Can someone put this in terms that make sense for a normal person?
    How many Libraries of Congress would fit in a ponytail?

    1. Re:Still trying to get my mind around this... by geekoid · · Score: 2

      .01 goobzwqs worth

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  8. Getting Annoying... by avalys · · Score: 2, Troll

    Has anyone noticed that we are constantly being deluged with a slew of new technologies/products/techniques, but very rarely do we actually hear of a new product being released that is based on one of the aforementioned technologies?

    --
    This space intentionally left blank.
    1. Re:Getting Annoying... by DonkeyJimmy · · Score: 1

      but very rarely do we actually hear of a new product being released that is based on one of the aforementioned technologies

      elsewhere:

      Still, the technology is at least five years from being commercially available, Williams said.

      Are you gonna remember this in 5 years? These technologies are effecting us every day, but they just happen to be the ones we thought were cool 5 years ago, and seem like just another computer component today.

      --
      "Probably the toughest time in anyone's life is when you have to murder a loved one because they're the devil." -Philips
    2. Re:Getting Annoying... by avalys · · Score: 2

      Sorry - I guess what I said didn't express the point I wanted to make.

      What I was trying to say was that whenever we hear a new product being announced, we don't hear 'This new hard drive is based on the super-magna-store technology we developed three years ago'. We just hear 'New Product! Increased capacity/speed/resolution/etc!'

      --
      This space intentionally left blank.
    3. Re:Getting Annoying... by DeadMoose · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Maybe because a press release saying:

      "We've got a hot new product based on bleeding-edge technology!"

      sounds a little better than:

      "We've got a hot new product, based on technology that we proved physically possible three years ago ago, and have only now managed to make commercially feasable!"

  9. screw HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


    They fired Bruce - the bastards.

    1. Re:screw HP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      carly is the most dense thing going at HP..

  10. Why? by sjonke · · Score: 1

    Just how small does your 640 KB of RAM need to be?

    --
    --- What?
  11. Well it makes sense, by stratjakt · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    they already have the densest management.

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
  12. Improvement by phorm · · Score: 1

    So by this I can infer that denser=
    a) Higher capacity, fits more into less space
    b) Increased retention, memory doesn't blank when power is lost
    c) Cheaper, costs less to produce
    d) Size. Could fit the same capacity in a smaller space
    -How about speed? Is this fast RAM or does density increase latency?
    -If it fits into the size of a human hair, could this technology be used to develop really tiny monitoring devices or other PC hardware?

    Mr. Bond, I'm afraid your hair is bugged, how does a buzz-cut sound... - phorm

  13. In Other News... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    OSDN created the densest linux user to date.

  14. Butter! by Dark+Lord+Seth · · Score: 3, Funny

    And the success rate for the manufacturing process was only about 20 percent. The biggest challenge was sticking -- something anyone who has fried an egg can understand.

    "When we peeled the mold off, we had a material, or parts of the circuit, just literally pull away," he said. "That's a problem we have to address and improve in our processing."

    The answer to sticky memory circuits is clearly to use butter, lots of butter. Hey, it works for the eggs and the guy said it was compareable...

  15. Black (memory)hole by jukal · · Score: 3, Funny

    This is alarming! If they continue making progress at current late, it will take only aproximately 42 years until they have created a memory chip so dense, that no bytes can escape, infact the chip sinks through the fabric of space-time. Any data within 42 square kilometers will be suck in through the event horizon. The only escape from being drawn inside is growing a big head, since the Schwarzschild radius is aproximately 30 cm.

    1. Re:Black (memory)hole by Stele · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      All your bits are belong to us!

    2. Re:Black (memory)hole by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think that your calculations must be off. Everyone knows that the Swartzchild radius just HAS to be 42...

  16. It's an imbalance in tech advances... by mmol_6453 · · Score: 2

    ...so now we have to wait for architectures fast enough to effectively use the data.

    Ho, 64-bit archs: You're now only a quick-fix.

    --
    What's this Submit thingy do?
  17. Wow. Imagine.... by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...a Beowulf cluster of these would look like Chewbacca.

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    1. Re:Wow. Imagine.... by RyuuzakiTetsuya · · Score: 1

      Or Cousin It!

      --
      Non impediti ratione cogitationus.
    2. Re:Wow. Imagine.... by birder · · Score: 2

      That's the first Beowulf cluster joke that made me laugh. I'm good for another 1000 now.

    3. Re:Wow. Imagine.... by krenshala · · Score: 2, Funny

      And when they improve the technology, and make it even smaller ... would that make your Beowulf cluster look like an Ewok?

      --

      krenshala

    4. Re:Wow. Imagine.... by Myco · · Score: 2
      Is that enough to make a Beowulf cluster of Beowulf cluster jokes?

      999 to go...

  18. HP labs political manoeuvre by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Carly and co. want to shed all the research and development departments here in HPC. Every single team has been told to show what they are working on will create a profit for the company within one year, or expect to be downsized. All research has stopped, its all development now. Every group is scrambling to get something published within the next few months, everyone is working on papers to get published at symposiums or mainstream press. Of course, everyone has updated their resumes.

    I have to post anonymously because all our jobs are on the line and everyone is living with the fear of getting laid off. Another 10% are going to go soon, every department head has been told to choose their next cuts.

    1. Re:HP labs political manoeuvre by adb · · Score: 1

      I'm shocked, shocked that a CEO would pursue short-term gains that will profit her personally at the expense of the company's long-term well-being.

      Mmm... pump and dump.

    2. Re:HP labs political manoeuvre by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 3, Funny
      If you're posting from work, it's unlikely that anonymous slashdot accounts are enough to hide behind. I would figure that as someone who works at HP you would know this, so either you're offsite or SSHing around the firewall.

      In fact, My employer is monitoring me right now, so let's give them a big round of applause for leveraging their core competencies, value-adding, and remembering that every client begins with "CLI" and there is no "I" in "Quit," and all that.

      Heh. Well. Um... Ah, yes. You firewall guys know I'm kidding right? uh hello?

      --
      taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    3. Re:HP labs political manoeuvre by Shirotae · · Score: 2

      Carly and co. want to shed all the research and development departments here in HPC. Every single team has been told to show what they are working on will create a profit for the company within one year, or expect to be downsized. All research has stopped, its all development now. Every group is scrambling to get something published within the next few months, everyone is working on papers to get published at symposiums or mainstream press. Of course, everyone has updated their resumes.

      This is a very strange comment. The report is about work being done in HP Labs, which I believe would be called HPL not HPC. Was this a typo (preview is your friend) or is HPC some other part of the company that has been doing long term research that more properly belongs in HPL as the corporate research laboratory. If management is just telling people to focus on their own responsibilities, rather than doing other people's jobs, then I don't see what the big fuss is about.

  19. Getting Annoying... by mblase · · Score: 2

    Well, just today, Slashdot posted an article about a forthcoming 320GB hard drive using, gosh darnit, aforementioned technologies. Is that good enough for you?

    Read the article, man. They expect it to take five years for this technology to produce something you can buy at the store. By then you'll have forgotten about this story completely, and your illusion of ideas never producing products will be preserved.

  20. Silicon Valley-Girl by Pyrosophy · · Score: 2, Funny

    HP Labs Creates Densest Memory Chips To Date

    Great, we'll all have valley-girl memory in our computers by 2005...

    CPU --> Store like 0C 0F 12 14 at totally !3789AC3

  21. HP memory by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let me know when its $20 at some discounter web site then I will believe it.

  22. Dns? by Viking+Coder · · Score: 3, Funny

    Ths s fntstc! Th mst dns mmry vr md!

    Mb th hckrs knw smthng we dn't..

    --
    Education is the silver bullet.
  23. A single strand of hair - That's real progress by hillct · · Score: 2

    A strand of hair means definate prof pf progress. Remember when they used to talk about how many of something they could fit on the head of a pin? A strand of hair is real progress, after all, how many strands of human hair can fit on the head of a pin?

    --CTH

    --

    --Got Lists? | Top 95 Star Wars Line
  24. To those about to /. by Chiggy_Von_Richtoffe · · Score: 1

    HP Labs Creates Densest Memory Chips To Date

    By Matthew Fordahl, AP
    San Jose, Calif.
    6:29 PM EST Mon., Sept. 09, 2002
    Using molecules as building blocks, Hewlett-Packard researchers have created memory circuits 10 times more dense than today's silicon
    chips under a process that could be faster and cheaper than current technology.

    The advance announced Monday could lead to more memory within a smaller space than what is now possible.

    "We believe molecular electronics will push advances in future computer technology far beyond the limits of silicon," said R. Stanley
    Williams, director of Quantum Science Research at HP Labs.

    The high-tech industry's growth has been driven by packing more transistors -- or switches -- into smaller slivers of silicon. Within
    the next decade, however, current technology is expected to reach physical limits.

    Researchers are looking for approaches that could continue the pace of innovation, yet without abandoning completely the industry's
    silicon foundation.

    Williams, who presented his findings at a symposium for the 175th anniversary of the Royal Institute of Technology in Sweden, said
    the high-density memory his team created fits inside a square micron. That's so small that 1,000 of the circuits could fit on the end of
    a strand of human hair.

    The memory is rewritable -- held on an organic synthetic molecule -- and can preserve information even after voltage is cut. It behaves
    much like today's flash memory, commonly used in digital cameras, music players and cell phones to store information even after a
    device has been turned off.

    The difference is that the new memory could be much cheaper to make.

    Conventional semiconductor products are created by etching transistors into silicon by shining light onto light-sensitive chemicals.
    Williams' approach is more akin to contact printing used in creating vinyl records -- but at a very small scale.

    The masters were created in about a day. They were then pressed into a polymer layer on a silicon wafer, and then into a single layer
    of electronically switchable molecules on top of the silicon. Such molecules switch on and off just like a standard transistor.

    "It took just a few minutes to make an imprint," Williams said.

    Still, the technology is at least five years from being commercially available, Williams said.

    "Things are moving along faster than we anticipated," he said. "Even given that, we're just now demonstrating feasibility, and it's a
    long way from feasibility to product."

    The demonstration memory holds about 64 bits of data, thousands of times smaller than the 128 megabytes in the much larger chips
    found in today's personal computers.

    And the success rate for the manufacturing process was only about 20 percent. The biggest challenge was sticking -- something anyone
    who has fried an egg can understand.

    "When we peeled the mold off, we had a material, or parts of the circuit, just literally pull away," he said. "That's a problem we have
    to address and improve in our processing."

    Williams' group also built a simple logic circuit that can address specific areas of nanoscale memory.

    "It's a necessary step in order to have a real memory made out of this technology," he said.

    The work is "a very important step forward in a years-long effort," said James C. Ellenbogen, principal scientist in the Nanosystems
    Group at the MITRE Corp., a not-for-profit research company.

    "This is certainly a really impressive step forward for them and the whole research program as well as for the entire electronics
    industry worldwide."

    Copyright © 2002 The Associated Press. All rights reserved. The information contained in the AP News report may not be published,
    broadcast, rewritten or redistributed without the prior written authority of The Associated Press.

    TalkBack

    You can be the first to comment on this story !

    Messages posted on this Web site as discussion threads or talkback (Content) are solely the opinions of their creators and do not
    necessarily reflect the opinions of CMP Media LLC (CMP) or its sites: www.crn.com, www.varbusiness.com and www.channelweb.com. All
    individuals who post material to this Web site are solely responsible for all Content that they upload, post or otherwise transmit via
    the Web Site.

    CMP cannot vouch for the authenticity of the user or company names or e-mail addresses associated with posted messages. Messages
    are posted as is, that is they are neither edited for content nor checked for accuracy or authenticity. Under no circumstances will
    CMP Media LLC or ChannelWeb be liable in any way for any Content, including, but not limited to, for any errors or omissions in any
    Content, or for any loss or damage of any kind incurred as a result of the use of any Content posted or otherwise transmitted via the
    Bulletin Boards.

    CMP reserves the exclusive right to edit or remove messages containing inappropriate language or other material that could be
    construed as libelous, potentially libelous or otherwise offensive. Discussion forums, bulletin boards and chat facilities are provided
    by CMP solely for the convenience of those who make use of the service. CMP does not endorse the products and services or other
    offerings mentioned in messages.

    Copyright 2002 CMP Media LLC. All rights reserved. Do not duplicate or redistribute in any form.
    Oh crap.... DMCA/DCMA (same diff) boy am I in trouble!

  25. so, in the future by geekoid · · Score: 2

    bald people won't have computers?

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    1. Re:so, in the future by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So now the government will be able to implant microchips in our hair?

      I want my HAN! (Hair Area Network)

  26. What do you do with it? by spikeham · · Score: 1


    What do you do with a computer with unlimited speed and an infinite amount of memory?

    1. Re:What do you do with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Run JBuilder 7 since that's the minimum requirements for it.

    2. Re:What do you do with it? by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2

      I believe Doom 3 will take advantage of that, however the video card will still need upgrading.

    3. Re:What do you do with it? by Jeremi · · Score: 2

      Personally, I'd see how long it takes to complete my "infinite loop" benchmark task...

      --


      I don't care if it's 90,000 hectares. That lake was not my doing.
    4. Re:What do you do with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Find extraterrestrial life, cure cancer, and calculate every digit of pi, all before breakfast.

    5. Re:What do you do with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Play Games...Duh
      Paning

    6. Re:What do you do with it? by mcpkaaos · · Score: 1

      What do you do with a computer with unlimited speed and an infinite amount of memory?

      Finally feel secure in your Windows XP reinstall. Again.

      --
      [McP]KAAOS

      --
      It goes from God, to Jerry, to me.
    7. Re:What do you do with it? by Eu4ria · · Score: 1

      Download all the pr0n off the internet ... duh !

    8. Re:What do you do with it? by new+death+barbie · · Score: 1

      Reboot faster.

      --

      It's supposed to be completely automatic, but actually you have to press this button.

    9. Re:What do you do with it? by sirsex · · Score: 1

      Predict exactly how far down my stocks will go

    10. Re:What do you do with it? by Surak · · Score: 2

      Play solitaire. :-P

    11. Re:What do you do with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Solve the halting problem.

    12. Re:What do you do with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Get a finite amount of monkeys to type out the works of some lesser known authors

    13. Re:What do you do with it? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      create this really annoying robot named Marvin.

  27. Yet another dimm-that-will-store-all-my-mp3s by wildcard023 · · Score: 2

    We seem to see these super jumps forward in memory/store/processing power using various combinations of holography, molecular storage, quantum tunneling and warp space...yet I still see the same size memory available on pricewatch for the same prices.

    When will any of these advancements be available for my machine? In a store near me?

    --
    Mike

    --
    -- Mike wildcard@illuminatus.org
  28. So does this mean by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

    So does this mean i can get soon 10gb ram's and put there that stinking wind0ze to perhaps to prevent it from being so damn lagged even with newest hardware available?

    Tho, even i'd had that amount of ram it would be one pain the ass trick to get wind0ze into ram and boot it from there... so anyone done that? ;)

    time is 12:48AM here, perhaps it's time to get my breakfast... and change coffee to juice =)

  29. I am being unintelligable in many languages! by Thud457 · · Score: 0

    fhqwhgads, is that you?

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

    1. Re:I am being unintelligable in many languages! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "fhqwhgad" looks an awful lot like "Farquad"...

      Makes one wonder how much memory it took to render Shrek.

      Just my off-the-wall psychosis speaking, here. Move along...

  30. Those guys at HP doing some hi-tech stuff... by jack1323 · · Score: 1

    Using Molecules as Building Blocks!!!! WHOAH! Jebus! That's never been done before.

    ...and this little factoid,
    "about 64 bits of data, thousands of times smaller than the 128 megabytes"

    More like 2 million times smaller.

    But seriously, now, isn't this aricle a bit to dumb-downed and fluffed up for Slashdot?
    Oh...wait. We don't read the articles anymore.

    1. Re:Those guys at HP doing some hi-tech stuff... by krenshala · · Score: 1

      2 million times smaller *is* 2000 thousand times smaller ... ;)

      --

      krenshala

    2. Re:Those guys at HP doing some hi-tech stuff... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2 million? 64 bits = 8 bytes. 8 bytes times a million is about 8 megabytes. Try 16 million.

  31. Interconnect limitations yield this Tech useless by aSiTiC · · Score: 2, Interesting

    As much as IBM researchers, etc.. would like to believe that silicon will die and be replaced in the near future I doubt it will happen soon. Producing memory with size on the order of a micron is virtually useless. At the moment the limiting factor in the fabrication of integrated circuits are interconnections. Yes! The little pieces of metal that transfer signals around the IC. Currently 90% of delay in an IC is no longer due to the transistor but instead is cause by propagation delay through the transmission line. As it is not possible to fabricate transmission lines that can actually connect to memory as small as is discussed here, I can not see how this memory can be utilized. Does anyone know of interconnect solutions that could be used?

  32. And in (not so) related news by idleprocess · · Score: 1

    A North Carolina man is suing Hans Wieman after he is arrested when authorities discover 450TB of kiddie pr0n in his hair-brush.

    --
    :wq!
  33. Implications of all that density by hugesmile · · Score: 1
    ok, now it's up to Bill Gates to take away what technology has given us. How fast can we consume all those bits?

    Let's see... what are the implications?...

    - Buffer overruns can REALLY clobber something important - not just create security problems. Now a buffer overrun might overwrite your entire collection of illegal MP3's stored in memory.

    - You can now fit millions of pr0n mpegs onto the head of a ...

    - The DNA mapping of the human genome can now be contained onto something the size of a human hair (isn't it already?)

    And I thought Carley was just a little dense. Now she is densest!

  34. Re:So does this mean by krray · · Score: 1

    YES, this is *EXACTLY* what it means. With the fact that this memory is faster than hard drives and unlike your RAM keeps its memory when voltage is removed.

    I can see putting 5 or 10G in a box for the OS and applications. Hard drives will be for your content perhaps.

    Perhaps Windows will still be around by the time this makes it to market. So what? Windows itself may be fast, and may be be _more_ stable by that time. Now take that same system put a Unix on it and compare. Same old game, just faster and better.

    I'll take my BSD, Linux and OS X any day, thank you. 5G boot strap for the OS on my Mac? Oh yeah...

  35. Re:and i.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    bought a fat java book
    With the exception of standards documents (which are not intended to be read by many people anyway), and without wishing to insult you, I must say that fat books suck. The fatter, the worse, with few exceptions. They tend to be written quickly, by non-experts, and tend to be poorly designed. It's no coincidence that the fat books tend to come from the same companies, who specialize in fleecing the book-buying public.
    My favorite Java book is The Java Programming Language by Gosling, et al. [amazon.com] The first edition [amazon.com] was actually short at 373 pages. With the continual enlargement of the Java libraries, it's now getting a little hefty, but the text of the book is still only about 625 pages, plus a long index. It's a highly correct and beautifully designed book. It's an Addison Wesley book; they have good taste in selecting writers and book designers.

  36. m$ is teh suxor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    rofl!

    micro$oft jokes are +5 Funny!

    retard.

    1. Re:m$ is teh suxor! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      sycophant!

  37. so can we stop with the dead tree thing now? by ZillaVilla · · Score: 1

    I really thought we'd all be paper-less by 1990...and I'm still waiting. I can organize my data, but if it hits paper...it's gone.

    --
    ZillaVilla.com for Mozilla profile roaming.
  38. Rambus' statement by nick_davison · · Score: 2
    Rambus has publicly hailed the news, stating, "We hope to work together with HP, creating an industry standards group, to ensure the full potential of this exciting new technology is met."

    In unrelated news, Rambus' lawyers have filed a series of initial patents, intending to amend them later as more details become available. Ivanna Bendemover, Rambus' CEO reassured everyone at the standards group that this has nothing to do with the new technology, stating, "You can trust Rambus to only have the industry's very best interests at heart."

  39. Are you sure about that? by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    I seem to recall people making memory, or at least ROM where bits were stored as single atoms just a few weeks ago (and on slashdot no less). Is this stuff more dense that that?

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
  40. Density is misleading . . . by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Back in the good old U.S.S.R., workers in the factories were encouraged to make heavy/dense electrical engines. The workers simply began adding weights to the motors, not actually increasing their horsepower or anything, and as a result, the U.S.S.R. made some of the heaviest engines in the world. Now, I doubt that's what's happening here (and the use of "dense" may not have anything to do with these types of chips), but I figured you'd appreciate the little story I had, courtesy of my Economics book.

  41. Re:Interconnect limitations yield this Tech useles by taylor · · Score: 1

    One advantage to sub-micron device structures (here, what, 125 nm2 devices, right, given 64 bits per square micron) is they are as near-field as you could want. Still, it is hard to see how you can get better stipline performance without going to superconducting materials. That is a long dicussion, better served by someone who knows more about it.

    What's the net result? Probably superconducting interconnects will be necessary to take advantage of this type of memory. Conductors with highly desirable LC characteristics (read nanotubes) may be another way to accomplish this without going to low temperature.

    Alternatively, asyncronous memory access / processing may be useful, though I know nothing about those ideas.

  42. Heheh... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Give one of these to Ballmer...

    Mwahahahahah -- evil penguin laughter.

  43. Headline... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What was that headline?

    "HP Creates Densest Merger To Date"?

  44. Re:Prepare for War! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Generalize much?

  45. that's pretty cool, but i want holographic memory! by eecue · · Score: 1

    this is the really cool stuff here: http://opticb.uoregon.edu/~mosswww/memory/shm.html .... yeah baby! can't wait till we can fit our entire music collection on one storage cube.

    -eek

    --
    -- sigs suck --
  46. fiRe by parkingTikut · · Score: 1

    I dont know how stable this technology will be... what happens if I'm writing an email and my hair spontaineously catches on fire? blue screen of death? core dump?

  47. Re:So does this mean by Reece400 · · Score: 1

    OMG!! That's it!!! i'm going to buy a 512mb DDR chip next paycheck, and use a DOS Ramdrive program, and boot windows 98 from RAM!! it HAS to work!! Reece, PS. if i manage to ever a afford a 512mb chip, i am trying this!! and no, i am NOT (excessivly) insane!

  48. micron now called micrometer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    One millionth of a meter has been called a micrometer for over 30 years now. Get with it.

  49. So how small are they? by coupland · · Score: 2

    "That's so small that 1,000 of the circuits could fit on the end of a strand of human hair."

    I can never understand why the mainstream media is so fixated with meaningless comparisons when covering science and technology. Is human hair some sort of benchmark in the memory industry? Do we care how many of these would fit on the end of a human hair? It seems like anything tiny is always compared to human hair ("fifty billion nanomachines could fit on the end of a human hair") and the benchmark for big things is the football field ("the solar wing is equal to the length of 200 football fields!"). Can't we dream up something more original?

  50. short-term gains by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Well that's what you get when you let women run the show,
    RIAA, Margert thatcher, and Mrs HP, oh and not for getting bill gates.

  51. Here's a use... by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2
    With the amount of memory something like that could produce, I could finally ramdisk my pr0n collection.

    I'm sick of waiting for those images to load.

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  52. Good PR tool by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    Now, this may *look* like an ordinary head of hair, but...

  53. Harddisk? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "..1,000 of the circuits could fit on the end of a strand of human hair."
    Wow, I wonder how many could fit inside something the size of a harddisk drive? ... hey, wait..

  54. The real question... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is that nose or pubic hair?

  55. Someone is one smart moderator. by Bingo+Foo · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I'd sincerely like to thank the moderator who called this very little joke "overrated" at +4.

    Linearly additive, [-1,5] integer moderation is broken. I would love to see, as part of the "about" or "faq" on the left of /. pages, a statistical abstract of post moderations. At the very least, I'd like to see a histogram of posts' scores. I'll bet there are far more 5's than there are 3's. That's just plain wrong.

    This isn't about karma, its about ordering the relevance/importance/whatnot of posts, and these are separate issues from posters' karma. What's a slashdotter to do? My personal leaning is toward lobbying Taco to implement log(percentile) scoring, maybe just as a user preference. Or skinnable scoring with user-defined functions, whaddaya think Taco?

    IIRC, there were a lot of posters here circa the 2000 elections with all kinds of ideas on equitable voting schemes. Put some of that experience into devising a better moderation scheme and deluge the editors with stories and "ask slashdots" about it.

    --
    taken! (by Davidleeroth) Thanks Bingo Foo!
    1. Re:Someone is one smart moderator. by seanw · · Score: 2

      your concern/outrage/annoyance is totally valid, and I agree with you, but the chances of the /. crew (especially Taco) getting off their collective asses and doing something about it are...well, they just don't exist.

      apathy is the norm here

    2. Re:Someone is one smart moderator. by shren · · Score: 2

      So go find a site that has better moderation. You know they are out there. They don't hide or anything.

      --
      Maybe the state's highest function is to grind out insoluble problems. (Zelazny, Hall of Mirrors)
  56. HP's earlier work, as context by WillWare · · Score: 2
    There are two cool things here. One is the use of a molding technology to replace photolithography. AFAIK this technique was pioneered by George Whitesides.

    The second is the memory element, described only as "an organic synthetic molecule" acting as a non-volatile memory. Non-volatile is good; that means instant-on laptops. As for what it is, they don't say, but their recent work has involved rotaxane and catenane (see Figure 2). Bit flips in those molecules are reversible, another good thing, since you don't want memory that gets tired over time.

    This is all cool fun stuff, and I'm glad for it, but I had really been hoping for a follow-up of HP and UCLA's brilliant work on molecular combinatorial logic in January. If they could add an active gain stage to that stuff, they'd really have something amazing.

    --
    WWJD for a Klondike Bar?
  57. Densest Memory Chips To Date by Fjord · · Score: 2

    This to match HP's densest management decision to date.

    --
    -no broken link
  58. Re:So does this mean by krenshala · · Score: 1

    But what happens when win98 forces you to reboot after installation? ... and Gods help you if you have to (add|remove) any (hard|soft)ware!

    --

    krenshala

  59. Re:So does this mean by Skal+Tura · · Score: 1

    it was ment as half joke, wind0ze is lagged, did you have a crappy piece of hardware, or new and shiny piece ^_^

  60. Yeah, um by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Before:

    while(TRUE)
    {
    char buf[1024];
    if(ReadBytes(buf, 1024) == 0)
    break; ...
    }

    After:

    while(TRUE)
    {
    char buf[10240];
    if(ReadBytes(buf, 10240) == 0)
    break; ...
    }

    big whoop

  61. Who cares? by FreeUser · · Score: 2

    Who really cares if they've made chips a thousand times smaller than current chips, with a thousand times the capicty? With palladium coming its not like you're going to be free to do anything worthwhile with them.

    --
    The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  62. So ... by Atrus5 · · Score: 1

    In the future children get constant free memory upgrades, wig sales will increase dramaticlly, and the only people who are bald will be the "computing impaired"

  63. It's really cheap, but we can't make it by Animats · · Score: 2
    That seems to be the theme song of semiconductor fabrication by printing. We've been hearing about solar cells fabricated by printing for decades, display devices fabricated by printing for years, and now this. So far, nothing seems to have shipped.

    Most previous enthusiasm for this idea was for applications where you want lots of area but modest density, like displays. It's impressive that HP made it work at micron scale. But it's not clear that it's useful.

    It's more interesting that they made a smaller RAM cell. The mask and fab people were ahead of the device people early this year; they could fab a transistor too small to work. (That means the device physics people have to go to work on the problem.) This new gate may be interesting, with or without the "printing" approach.

  64. HPC = HP/Compaq? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think the original poster meant HP Compaq by
    "HPC."

  65. Too much memory is a BAD THING! by floorten · · Score: 1

    Here's a scenario... in the future memory is virtually infinite. Gigs upon gigs for next to no cost in money & space. What will the government use all this storage for? Keeping archives of all your communications for "law enforcement" possibilities.
    Currently the only real thing stopping the governments keeping records of every single one of your emails and phone calls is the fact that storing them is physically impossible. This sort of development scares me as it's just one step further towards a surveillance society.

  66. Math time by Myco · · Score: 2
    Okay, this is a great accomplishment. I am studying at KTH (Sweden's Royal Institute of Technology) where the symposium took place -- actually, I talked to a guy yesterday right after he came out of it.

    Anyway, it's cool but I just want to run some numbers before we get too impressed. They say it'll be 5 years before this is practical, and it's a tenfold gain in density. Now, what's the expected gain in density over the same period in a Moore's Law-type expectation?

    My trusty desktop calculator (a.k.a. Python) tells me that 2^(5/1.5) is 10.0793683992. Pretty damn close. So yay, we're still on track.

    I wish the article gave more details, though. The guy I talked to had a much better description of how this thing works.

  67. Re:So does this mean by Reece400 · · Score: 1

    I install to it's own partion, and everyboot, it copies the contents of that partition to the RAM drive,, it's so insane that it HAS to work! lol :) Reece,