Slashdot Mirror


Discarded AT&T Microwave Bunkers For Sale

InitZero writes "American Tower is selling nearly 2000 old AT&T Long Line microwave locations that are no longer needed thanks to fiber. These towers -- spaced about 50 miles in every direction -- and their associated bunkers were designed to withstand World War III. The average location (find one near you) has two acres of land, 1,800 square feet worth of bunker and a tower of 200 feet. Some locations still have their hardware (60KW generator, microwave feedlines, equipment racks, feed horns, etc.) All this for an average price of just $25,000. If you're a ham radio operator, building a data center or just looking for a place to put your wireless access point, these locations look awesome."

103 of 333 comments (clear)

  1. Slashdotted? by Phroggy · · Score: 2

    No replies yet, and it's slashdotted already?!?

    This sounds pretty cool. Who here has an extra $25,000 lying around?

    --
    $x='S24;r)>63/* h@<5+oZ)32"5cz';$me='phroggy'x$];
    $x=~y+ -xz+\0-Tx+;print$_^chop$me for split'',$x;
    1. Re:Slashdotted? by rmohr02 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      If I had it, I'd buy one. That is, if I knew where they were. I guess the site was preemptively /.ed.

    2. Re:Slashdotted? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      "No replies yet, and it's slashdotted already?!?"

      Wouldn't most people read the article before replying? ::eyeroll::

      Okay, getting back on topic, is it possible to aim these things? I have a noisy neighbor that I'd like to ...uh.. provide free heating to.

    3. Re:Slashdotted? by brad3378 · · Score: 2

      > No replies yet, and it's slashdotted already?!?

      It appears slashdot has also been slashdotted.
      Take note of your 10:04 EST post and the 9:38 posting of the story.

      I'd like to see one of these towers put to better use with some bungi cords :-)

      --

    4. Re:Slashdotted? by sporty · · Score: 2

      What do I look like, a .com millionaire? *snicker*

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    5. Re:Slashdotted? by packeteer · · Score: 2

      i think the idea is to buy several... the good thing about this offer is that you can get a lot of em that are all withing range of each other... so really we need hundreds of thousands of dollars which might not be too much for some of the crazy hams out there...

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    6. Re:Slashdotted? by G-funk · · Score: 2

      This sounds pretty cool. Who here has an extra $25,000 lying around?

      I wish I did.... I think I'd cut the top of the tower down, and build a nice little open plan shelter on the strong platform that holds the bigger dishes. Keep the bunker for amenities and (really) bad-weather sleeping quarters, and have myself a nice elevated living area with a great view!

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    7. Re:Slashdotted? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Ending a sentence in a preposition is not proper."

      Sorry, I'd be proper but I can't type with my pinky raised in the air.

    8. Re:Slashdotted? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "But I suppose because it's a funny-cute smackdown, people are willing to ignore the truth and mod it up. Such are the times we live in"

      Maybe I'm just tired, but did anybody make sense of that?

  2. microwaves kick ass by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    In many parts of the US, it gets very cold in the winter. The cold is even worse if you're working on a tower - they tend to be in high, exposed places due to their nature. This means more wind, lower temperatures, etc. Legend has it that tower crew would sometimes crawl into the microwave horns for a few seconds/minutes to warm up (for the same reasons you use a microwave to heat your dinner). That was all well and good, until one day a tech fell asleep in the warm, cozy horn.

    oops.

  3. No kidding... I remember these well. by djupedal · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was an Inspector on these in Northern Calif. I monitored the construction for a private firm. Concrete pours and steel, etc.

    They are hell-for-stout, no doubt. You could wipe out everything above ground in the US, and still get a dial tone. Most are in remote locations, naturally, and include fuel storage tanks (propane) and blast shielding. Just the ticket for anyone looking for the ultimate private bomb shelter.

    1. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by muffel · · Score: 5, Funny
      You could wipe out everything above ground in the US, and still get a dial tone.
      Yeah, if everything above ground in the US was wiped out, it would really suck to not get a dialtone.
      --

      bla
    2. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by djupedal · · Score: 4, Interesting

      These were built by ITT, under contract to Uncle Sam, who didn't feel like bothering ground troops with terrestrial communications. The usual method of out-sourcing, only on a very large scale.

      The dialtone joke is just that...how can any govt. think it is doing the populace good by keeping the phonelines up when they won't be seeing daylight for a generation or two.

      Ok, I'll answer my own Q...they were spending cold war $$ while providing 'make work' for the communications industry. 'money' is the key word in why these were built, not concern for the American way.

    3. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by Zen+Mastuh · · Score: 2
      If the US was to be hit by a nuclear attack, whoever was left would have to be able to communicate in order to effective recover, regroup, and retailiate.

      If the U.S. was hit by a nuclear attack your conjecture will be out the window. They didn't bother to tell you this in ROTC, but at some point America will just have to go away. Hell, in an all-out nuclear war, the entire species (or most of it) will just have to go away. The few survivors will probably be interested in a lasting peace.

      Fantasize all you want about your "Highest Priority Targets", "Chain of Command", "Rules of Engagement", and other shop expressions, but when the shit goes down our culture and your military culture will only be confusing memories in the minds of the survivors.

      --
      "What is the sound of one belly slapping?"
    4. Re:No kidding... I remember these well. by jefflinwood · · Score: 2

      http://www.nytimes.com/2002/09/12/international/eu rope/12MOSC.html

      Here's some fear mongering for you - in Russia, atomic inspectors must certify all produce sold in Moscow to be free of atomic fallout from chernobyl. I bet they're glad they went with nuclear!

  4. Sadly... by descentr · · Score: 5, Funny

    It appears these bunkers will NOT protect you from the fury of Slashdot.

  5. World War III... really? by Devil's+BSD · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Assuming there was a nuclear holocaust/World War III, how would a 500 ft microwave tower resist being blown down by a nuclear blast? Even if there is the bunker, the transmission effectiveness will be effectively zero without the tower.

    --
    I'm the Devil the Windows users warned you about.
    1. Re:World War III... really? by descentr · · Score: 2

      Err, that's a 200 foot tower, buddy.

    2. Re:World War III... really? by garcia · · Score: 2

      the tower could be re-erected (sounds like pr0n I know) quickly in the event that it was actually hit by the shockwave or direct blast. The important part is that the actual bunker remains intact.

  6. This brings back fond memories. by Gumber · · Score: 2

    I have fond memories of spending a strange summer night in the vicinity of one of these situated on a mountain pass when I was in high school. I'm just glad my fiends didn't climb the tower durring the gathering thundersorm.

    1. Re:This brings back fond memories. by sconeu · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm just glad my fiends didn't climb the tower

      I'm sure Satan is too... He hates to lose fiends in electrical storms!

      --
      General Relativity: Space-time tells matter where to go; Matter tells space-time what shape to be.
  7. Idea! by Com2Kid · · Score: 2

    1800 square feet? Larger then many studio apartments. Heck larger then most studio apartments.

    I say setup a decent 'net connection and become a digital hermit. (e-hermit?)

    1. Re:Idea! by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2
      1800 square feet? Larger then many studio apartments. Heck larger then most studio apartments.
      But chickenshit compared to the redneck ranches typical of the area around those remote tower sites...
    2. Re:Idea! by Kredal · · Score: 2

      Make sure Amazon and Thinkgeek will deliver there first. (:

      --
      Whoever stated that signature sizes should be limited to one hundred and twenty characters can just go ahead and kiss my
    3. Re:Idea! by jonbrewer · · Score: 2

      1800 square feet? Larger then many studio apartments. Heck larger then most studio apartments. 1800 sq. feet is twice my two bedroom apartment in Boston, and six times a Studio...

  8. take that, SIGINT sattelites! by cygnus · · Score: 3, Funny

    AT LAST! a location for my echelon spoofing site. ;)

    --
    Just raise the taxes on crack.
  9. nevermind by victim · · Score: 3, Informative

    Someone please mod the parent into oblivion. I believe that is the active site list, not the surplus site list.

  10. These sites are awesome! by Newer+Guy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've been inside of several of them and they're simply awesome and must have cost a fortune to build and maintain. They have living quarters and water tanks. The equipment mostly ran off of banks of single cell (2 volt) batteries that were kept charged by utility power and generator. They used klystron transmitters I understand. Another cold war relic made obsolete I guess..but I can't help but be nostalgic for just a bit.. Can you?

    1. Re:These sites are awesome! by Nate+B. · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I'm too young in the business to know, but I've been told by some of the elder techs in the company (we maintain a private microwave system) that the AT&T sites were laid out so identically to each other that a tech who knew his way around one could be blindfolded and taken into any site and would be able to work on the equipment. AT&T and the Bell System were big on standards so I don't doubt the accuracy of this claim.

      Even as careful as we are to try to maintain a standard layout, each of the sites I maintain all have their own quirks. But then, we have auxillary equipment that varies from site to site so that screws up the attempt at standardization.

      --

      "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
    2. Re:These sites are awesome! by Mt._Honkey · · Score: 2

      Klystron, like they use at Fermilab to accelerate protons?

      --

      Don't Bogart the fish sticks
  11. More Long Lines information by ISAKMP · · Score: 5, Informative

    Mark Foster has another really nice Long Lines site that includes a table that lists many Long Lines facilites in many states, describes the equipment installed there and has photos of some of the facilities. He also provides the technical specifications for the construction of these sites, as well as photos from tour he took of a still-operating one.

  12. blast pressure by rebelcool · · Score: 5, Informative

    is measured in lb/sq. inch. The reason the blast is so damaging to buildings is because of wall size magnifies the force to a few tons of pressure on the side of the wall. The towers if you notice, are open, thin bars that present little surface area for the blast to contact. What is exposed is well anchored.

    --

    -

  13. Slashdotted Already? by MoodyLoner · · Score: 5, Informative

    Guess I'm not the only one to dream of owning a nuke-resistant bunker.



    Here's the Google cache of the site map to salivate over...



    Good news if you're back east or in the Bay Area, bad news otherwise.



    Say, wonder if Mrs. Moody would mind running a home daycare out of one of these?



    --
    No Longer a Menace to Society.
    Alexandria Morrigan born 2/22/01 l. 20.5in wt. 7 lbs. 5 oz.
    1. Re:Slashdotted Already? by no+soup+for+you · · Score: 5, Informative
      Here's the Google cache [216.239.51.100] of the site map to salivate over...
      google does not cache images. You really could have just linked to this picture of the states' tower locations

      I appreciate the effort, but I think we should all know google's capabilities.
      --
      If you blog it...
    2. Re:Slashdotted Already? by per+unit+analyzer · · Score: 2
      Here's the Google cache of the site map to salivate over...

      American Tower Corp. (ATC) is in the business of buying/building towers so they can lease them to the wireless telecom and broadcast industries. (Many times they end up leasing them back to the folks they bought them from...) The map in the aforementioned link is a map of ALL of ATC's sites, which number somewhere around 14,000... The majority of the towers depicted on that map are NOT the ex-AT&T sites, rather those that ATC built themselves or obtained from other organizations. The non-AT&T towers are ATC's bread-and-butter and subsequently not for sale.

      When American Tower bought the sites from AT&T a few years ago, the number of AT&T sites was only about 2,700 IIRC. Of the 2,700, ATC kept the best sites for their purposes and put 1000-1500 for sale. Since the ex-AT&T sites have been for sale for a couple of years now, they've been pretty well picked over and the best locations are long gone... So in other words: the above map shows almost two orders of magnitude more towers than what's for sale... don't get your hopes up.

      --zawada

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the Beowulf cluster imagines you!
    3. Re:Slashdotted Already? by psych031337 · · Score: 2
      google does not cache images. You really could have just linked to this picture [americantower.com] of the states' tower locations


      Did any of the people modding this post up bother to check the link in question? It is a link to a google-cached site, alrite, but it sure gives me fancy-schmancy graphics (read: i-m-a-g-e)

      --
      +++ath0
  14. Re:EMP Hardening by Phasedshift · · Score: 4, Informative

    According to the page that is linked in the summary http://www.drgibson.com/towers/ It mentions:

    The buildings supporting the towers were hardened against a nuclear blast, and some of them in high-danger areas were underground. The towers themselves were engineered to withstand all but a close (within 5 miles) blast. The microwave horns were covered with a protective shield to keep out not only the elements, but also radioactive fallout. The buildings were shielded with copper to protect the equipment against the Electromagnetic Pulse associated with a nuclear explosion. Foot-thick concrete walls protected the vital electronics and people inside the base installations of these towers. Thick copper grounds went deep into the bedrock beneath each tower. Fallout showers, backup generators, sleeping facilities all existed to keep the network up in times of war.

    So while the equipment itself is likely hardened, the building is shielded.. It doesn't say how much shielding, etc there is however :)

  15. Made for parties by fiori · · Score: 5, Funny

    Just fill the microwave horn with popcorn and fire-up that 60kW generator.

  16. Built to withstand World War 3? by cperciva · · Score: 2

    What's the point behind having bunkers here which can withstand nuclear attacks?

    The obvious answer would be that they wanted to ensure that the communications infrastructure would survive, but that doesn't make sense -- the towers would be destroyed quite easily, and without the towers, all the equipment protected in the bunkers would be useless anyway.

    Am I missing something here?

    1. Re:Built to withstand World War 3? by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      It's probably a lot easier to rebuild the tower after nuclear holocaust than to rebuild the tower and all the delicate equipment hooked up to it.

      If I could read the article, for all I know there could be an entire extra in pieces inside the bunker.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    2. Re:Built to withstand World War 3? by afidel · · Score: 2

      The most fortifies of sites were designed to be 2.5 miles from a 20 megaton nuke strike and survive, these were sites near prime military targets, then there were slightly less hardened ones for withing 5 miles, and then basically non hardened site for anything further. More info here

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  17. Not just microwave by Nate+B. · · Score: 2, Informative

    It seems AT&T had a considerable investment in long distance buried coaxial cable. Apparently there was a pair of these cable laid a few miles away from here as a contractor was going through a few years back digging them back up and recovering them.

    As I recall from the local paper's article the cables were probably 4 to 6 inches in diameter and were then encased in lead. I also recall that they were buried several feet deep, at least deeper than water lines and regular phone cable gets buried around here.

    From my youth I recall an AT&T Long Lines bunker a few miles south of US 36 on US 75 north of Topeka, KS. I believe these cables went through there as they were on an east/west run through northern Kansas. Where the ultimate terminating points were would be a good exercise.

    Many old microwave sites are still standing around these parts. The tower lights and painting are still maintained. It's interesting that it apparently cost more to disassemble them than to leave them stand.

    --

    "Insanity is doing the same thing over again expecting a different result."
  18. Broadband 2 boonies by CrazyDuke · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Am I the only one thinking of the possibility of buying 2 within signal distance of each other, one in a city where broadband is actually affordable, and one out in the boonies or small cities where at best people get 53K dialup and using it to set up a broadband ISP? $50,000 initial investment + permits is pretty steep still, though.

    Hell, or get paid for offering an alternative route for congested hops.

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced influence is indistinguishable from control.
    1. Re:Broadband 2 boonies by adolf · · Score: 5, Informative

      These things aren't in cities, for the most part.

      The one I'm familiar with is near Mount Cory, Ohio, and is situated in the middle of a corn field (or is it soybeans, this year?). It consists of a man-made hill, twenty-or-so feet tall, with a couple of small buildings on top. The tower itself is as other posters have described - not terribly tall (less than 200 feet), with an incredibly wide base. Giant feedhorns flow gracefully from it. I'm told by people who've been into it that the space below ground is much more expansive.

      High-tension transmission lines live nearby to supply power. It has its own substation.

      It would be a very poor choice as a location from which to which to distribute massive amounts of bandwidth.

      For one thing, a wireless ISP set up their NOC in an abandoned local telco building about a quarter-mile down the road from there. They constructed a rather monstrous, more modern-looking tower. I'd estimate height at 600' - it positively dwarfs the AT&T relay station.

      For another thing, it must have made more sense to build new, than buy the little relay station, or lease tower space, or whatever. Else, they wouldn't have done it. And if a couple-hundred feet would've been OK for this ruler-flat Ohio landscape, I doubt they'd have gone as far up as they did.

      And ironically, I had a conversation that went something like this when I had the comwavz installers at my house, not long after service rollout:

      Him: So, the DS-3 should be up Real Soon Now, after AT&T gets their head screwed on straight. For now, all we have is a T1.

      Me: Well, that's fine. What's the holdup on the DS-3?

      Him: I guess they can't figure out how to sell it to us via microwave.

      Me: This is the same AT&T with the relay station right over there [/me points], right?

      Him: Yeah. Strange, huh?

      It's -hard- to get bandwidth out in the sticks, even if you've got a cold war microwave relay within spitting distance. I doubt things would improve much by owning one or two instead of just being near one.

    2. Re:Broadband 2 boonies by jhines · · Score: 2

      There is/was one near Chicago, it was along I-294 north to Milwaulkee. It got remade, and the towers removed, and was used for AT&T something or another, as it still had a AT&T sign on last time I saw it, which was years ago.

  19. Re: EMP Hardening by Black+Parrot · · Score: 2


    > Oh, and imagine a nationwide Beowulf cluster of these.

    Actually, it might be a good way to set up a disaster-resistant beowulf cluster. One node per bunker, interconnect via the towers. Keep those protein-folding analyses running even after the species is extinct...

    Well, at least it would give the alien archaeologists something interesting to puzzle over. And introduce them to the idea of beowulf clusters, so the joke could infect their civilization as well.

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  20. World War III? by thelinuxking · · Score: 2

    World War II involved the dropping of "The Bomb". The destructive force of the atomic bomb completely destroyed entire cities.

    World War III (for those not in the know, it hasn't started yet...) will probably involve much more powerful weapons than even the atomic bomb. Chances are this structure won't be able to withstand the force of this kind of weaponry.

    And if it does still stand after a bomb, chances are no one in your 50 mile area will be alive to hear your ham radio station.

    1. Re:World War III? by be-fan · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Umm, World War III was planned to happen back in the 60's. That's what these things were built to withstand.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    2. Re:World War III? by passion · · Score: 2

      World War III (for those not in the know, it hasn't started yet...)

      A bit off topic, but not entirely... What defines a "world war"? A war to end all wars? Armageddon? Or just a large number of countries banded together to fight another large group of countries banded together?

      One year ago today may very well be seen in distant history texts as the beginning of WW3, just not the one that we were told would happen when we were growing up. This war will be fought over the cultural divide of the haves vs. the have-nots. If/when Bush snipes Saddam, and marches into Baghdad, the Arab nations will be PISSED, and not only withhold oil, but unleash their wrath upon us. This could very well mean chemical, biological, or nuclear attacks.

      Isreal will be one of the major fronts, and fighting (as we've seen already) will not be limited to the fronts, but will happen everywhere, even with legislation in our government.

      That's how I view WW3... and it started a long time ago.

      --
      - passion
    3. Re:World War III? by kasparov · · Score: 3, Funny

      Nope. WWIV was around during the '80s. I dialed up to several BBSs that ran it.

      --
      There's no place I can be, since I found Serenity.
    4. Re:World War III? by afidel · · Score: 2

      It cannot mean nuclear attacks as no arab nation has or is likely to have in the near future nuclear capabilities. We would probably turn large chunks of desert into glass before we allowed an arab state to have nuclear weapons. There is one muslim state with nukes and that is pakistan, but they have their own problems on their hands to the south and want all the support they can get from us.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
    5. Re:World War III? by Darth_brooks · · Score: 2

      A 100 megaton nuke wouldn't do much to detroit. it's already a barren wasteland.

      --
      There are some people that if they don't know, you can't tell 'em.
    6. Re:World War III? by passion · · Score: 2

      you're ruling out all those Russian suitcase nuclear bombs. sure, they may not fly in on a missle, nor have the biggest blast, but they could easily wipe out a population.

      --
      - passion
    7. Re:World War III? by bluGill · · Score: 2

      Not nessicarly. WWI was mainly chemical weapons (mustard gas). After all seeing what those weapons did to people, niether side in WWII was willing to be first to use them (even though both sides had more descructive chemical weapons) first because of they didn't want retaliation.

      I belive that WWII with bigger weapons helped to prevent a neculear war in the 60's. The last act of WWII was neculear weapons, and the descruction was a roll model. Both sides in the 60's knew that the other could take them out if they started a war, and niether was willing to risk it. (Mutually assured destruction works so long as nobody crazy is in charge)

      Current military thinking is to destroy only targets. In the gulf war the military braged about their ability to get one building in a city without bothering others. (though in truth they didn't succede, that was the goal)

      WWIII won't be faught for a few years anymore. WWI was building in Europe for years, people actually danced in celebration of war being declared. I've encountered many europeans who think that WWI was a good thing, the world NEEDED a war then! Right now nobody thinks need a war. (Though perhaps the terrorist thing could be considered that - I optimisticly hope not)

    8. Re:World War III? by operagost · · Score: 2

      So are the the oil-rich, Rolls-Royce driving Arabs the haves or the have-nots?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  21. Too Much of a Good Thing by Stephen+VanDahm · · Score: 2

    To quote Strong Bad, "too much of a good thing is an awesome thing. But too much of an awesome thing is ... umm ... really, really dumb."

    This is almost too much of an awesome thing. But it's awesome nonetheless.

  22. Build a house! by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 2

    Heck, 2 acres is a decent plot of land for a house. Plus you got a generator! How can you lose? Use the tower to put an access point up and you can have wireless all over your land, and charge neighbors for access :-)

    --
    There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
    1. Re:Build a house! by afidel · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I just realized how small a 60kW generator is. Our backup generator has a 500 gallon tank and would only run for about 42 hours on a tank. So it must be able to do at least 120kW (this was for a recent summer power outage, running a datacent, 180 person office and A/C for the datacenter.) This generator is big don't get me wrong (about the size of a small semi) but something half that size is not what I invisioned when I heard 60kW.

      --
      There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  23. Friend bought one by Lewie · · Score: 5, Interesting

    A friend who owns a paging company just bought one of these. I tagged along during the negotiation and purchase. They are indeed, as a previous poster put it, "hell for stout." The scale of the tower, building and microwave cones makes the whole thing seem like a toy. It's just that weird. The towers are huge, this one is a 100 ft free-standing, 30 ft on a side IIRC with 25 foot tall microwave cones at the peak and associated waveguide down into the concrete buildings. This is a smaller installation, but still has huge power service and infrastructure, neat-o VW diesel inline 6 backup generator and enormous battery supply (the size of a truck or so), later added hardline to the top, it was a hell of a deal (more so considering how difficult towers are to get up these days).

    What really boggles my mind is the BILLIONS and BILLIONS of dollars that went into building these things in the 60's. They are truly incredible, inside and out. Someone decided that there WOULD be long distance (and there was).

    --
    This sig washed every five years whether it needs it or not!
    1. Re:Friend bought one by djupedal · · Score: 4, Informative

      I worked on some of these (underground bunker types), as an Inspector (concrete/steel), during the early '70s. I recall at least one had to be abandoned due to several batches of concrete that failed strength testing in the lab. They simply covered it with dirt and moved over several hundred yards to begin again.

      They were heavily compartmented, and built much like a bank vault, where you have a box inside a box inside a box. There was at least one central cavity that was meant to be home for worst case attacks.

      As I recall, this was pre ATT, and they were built for ITT, under a government contract to provide domestic communications if WWW III (as stated) broke out. And yes, there was considerable money invested.

  24. The Dust Puppy Walks at Midnight by doublem · · Score: 2

    Now I and my friends can LARP the userfriendly.org story arc where they moved into a missile silo!

    Yes!

    --
    "Live Free or Die." Don't like it? Then keep out of the USA
  25. Anyone actually seeing the site? by jsimon12 · · Score: 2

    I have been trying since before there were even replies in the comments section and I have yet to see anything more then the splash page sans images (via Google Cache). Anyone have any idea where these towers are? Are there any in Texas? The wife and I are looking for a country house and this would make a hell of a start. ;)

    1. Re:Anyone actually seeing the site? by djupedal · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I worked on ones built in Northern Calif. To my knowledge, they were normally placed in the middle of no where, frequently without improved access roads, etc. The locations were generally picked with a bias towards line of site to the next tower, etc. Scenery and bubbling brooks were never on the shopping list. Just the occasional oak tree and rattle snake. But if you're living below the horizon, I guess the view from the kitchen is always uninspiring.

      I did concrete and steel inspection. One batch of concrete samples failed about a month after the main ceiling was poured (hot day and the cement trucks were waiting in line)...the result was that the contractor was held responsible, with the 90% completed structure being abandoned. They buried it and moved over a bit and built again. If you can find that site, you can get two-for-one. Look north east of Sacramento....about two hours out.

  26. Re:microwaves kick ass. I smell a ham... by saskboy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Why would the power need to be turned up? Signals are signals right? We don't turn the power up on our Cat 5 because we're talk to Slashdot and eBay at the same time...

    --
    Saskboy's blog is good. 9 out of 10 dentists agree.
  27. Re: EMP Hardening by dillon_rinker · · Score: 4, Funny

    I can see the alien's posting now...

    +4 Hrarfug

    Kruig chxofp lnyuvtezna en BEOWULF CLUSTER boj plorndles? %&)

  28. Ham radio clubs lining up... by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

    Seems like a perfect opportunity for amateur radio clubs to line up to purchase new facilities. In addition, these things seem great for building out a high-bandwidth microwave infrastructure to give hams VOIP.

    Great place for an APRS node, ATV repeater, or even just a regular old 2m or 440 repeater.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  29. There's a good thing in this... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 5, Informative

    Back in the olden days of satellite communications, all satellites operated on the "C" band. The bane of C band was "TI". TI stood for terrestrial interference...and these towers were the culprits! As a secondary service (these towers were the primary service), satellites were limited to very low powers (5-10 watts), so C band dishes had to be very large to pick up such feeble signals from space. Now that these are being decommissioned, maybe, just maybe, C band's potential can finally be realized. I can think of many uses of this slice of 2-4 Ghz spectrum...though the Govt. is probably already salivating at the prospect of another spectrum auction.

    1. Re:There's a good thing in this... by evil_one · · Score: 2, Informative

      Not a chance pal.
      With DTH providers like Dish & DirecTV in the states (destined to be one company?) and Starchoice and Bell ExpressVu in Canada, C-Band is only for hobbyists. Having worked as a C-Band tech for years, I say this from experience, not conjecture.
      C-Band satellites have 24 transponders, Ku (what they use for DTH) have more, 30, 32 are not uncommon. Ku satellites can also be much more powerful. Anik F1, the Starchoice bird is capable of 120 watts. Most importantly, using MPEG compression on the DTH services lets one satellite carry what C-Band saw on 20 satellites, requiring C-Band customers to have an actuator arm, and usually a polarizer motor in the 'nose' of the dish.

      Customers are switching to 'little dish' because it's less of a set-up fee, lower maintaince, lower visibility. C-Band customers that cling to their big ugly dish have to maintain it and buy more expensive gear for it. (Here, a C-Band digital receiver runs 4 times the cost of a little-dish receiver)

      --
      Desperation is a stinky cologne
    2. Re:There's a good thing in this... by mangu · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Ku-band satellites have more power and transponders because they are bigger, the limitation is in solar panel size, not in the frequencies used. Also, those transponder power figures are misleading. The newer satellites have big *maximum* power per transponder, but they cannot use all the transponders at full power at the same time, there simply isn't enough capacity at the solar panels.


      Ku is fine for broadcasting TV, in regions where there isn't too much rain. A good rainstorm will knock off Ku where C-band keeps going. One usually needs up to 8dB margin for rain attenuation alone in Ku-band, which means a 120 watt Ku transponder actually has as much useful power as a 20 watts C-band.


      For links with less bandwidth than video, where one can use smaller antennas, C-band is still the best.

    3. Re:There's a good thing in this... by evil_one · · Score: 3, Informative

      First off, you have not come close to touching my point - C-Band is no longer the mainstream for home satellite reception. That is now Ku-Band. Circular Ku for DBS satellites, and Linear Ku for wackos like StarChoice.

      As for the difference in satellites? Telesat has been launching dual C/Ku band satellites for a while now. Its latest bird, Anik F1, has 48 Ku and 36 C-Band transponders. Cool eh? 90% of the C-Band equipment installed in North American homes can only pick up 24 of those C-Band transponders.

      Anik F1's Ku can be reliably picked up with an 18" dish (I know through experience) and C-Band still needs a 6'er.

      As far as rain fade goes, yes. It is an issue with Ku band. the 5 minute breaks I've suffered 3 times in the past year have been horrible. I had to go read slashdot instead.

      None of this changes the fact that C-Band is becoming used less and less for home tv reception. Anik F1 is a prime example - All its C-Band transponders are currently in use are for commercial use, or use by the CBC, for cross-country satellite interviews, or for sending live feeds from one part of the country to another.

      --
      Desperation is a stinky cologne
    4. Re:There's a good thing in this... by mangu · · Score: 2
      I know a little bit about Anik-F1, Telesat outsources spectrum monitoring services to my company and we are just finishing installing an antenna to monitor that satellite.


      I agree that TVRO is mostly Ku these days, but that's due only to the smaller (and cheaper) reception antenna. The downside is that a more powerful transmitter is needed at the satellite to compensate for rain attenuation, and therefore a bigger and more expensive satellite, which takes longer to manufacture.


      Larger solar panels have another disadvantage: the satellite has to be a "three-axis" model, instead of a spinner. Being in a fixed position with relation to the sun means that electric charges accumulate and may eventually spark over, damaging the equipment. Spinning satellites are, by far, more reliable than three-axis.

  30. Re:Awesome and cheap.. by rodgerd · · Score: 2

    Why would you get cancer? They can take a nuclear blast. I doubt the microwave is going to bug anyone in the bunker.

    If you have a hankering for a wee plot o' land and can telecommute, 2 acres and a 200' radio mast would be a bargain for $25k.

  31. Heres the "real" story. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.snopes.com/horrors/techno/cooked.htm

    Enjoy

    1. Re:Heres the "real" story. by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      The snopes article rightly points out that the 'cooked to death' story is bunk. Like the rocket car there is simply no way anything close to that could happen without leaving an indelible media trail.

      There is a considerably more likely story that predates the 'cooked' story by several years, I heard it in the 1980s. I strongly suspect that the cooked story is simply the result of successive embelishment.

      The story I heard was that a bunch of radar technicians out in Alsaka decided to play some sort of game (football?) on the patch of grass where the snow had melted in front of the microwave horn. Afterwards some of the men started to complain about eye problems and it appeared that the radiation had damaged their eyesight by slightly cooking their eyeball.

      This is actually quite believable since it does not take that much to dislodge gunk from the retina, iris etc causing it to float in the aqueous humour and disrupt vision. It can be caused by drinking too much strong coffee - as I discovered during my 2nd year exams.

      It is possibly apocriphal but I heard it in the radiation saftey lecture of a pretty well known radiation research lab as an example of what can happen if you do not treat all radiation sources with respect. I suspect that the cooked to death story is simply the result of successive tellings.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  32. Abandoned bell sites by aaronsb · · Score: 2, Informative

    Somebody posted an XLS document listing all their sites, both active and inactive. I graphed the data out and listed the geographical location of the inactive sites. Go to http://aaron.cyberfreakout.com/inactivebell.htm to view it.

    I would imagine that they're trying to sell the inactive ones...

  33. FOR SALE: Titan-1 Site, Colorado (Must Sell) by rMuD · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Selling a 3 Silo, 65k sq/ft 1 Mile Nuke Rated site, Near Denver... a Tour of a site 5 miles away Missle Silo Tour This site is the same design except that it hasn't been vandalized, has power, and is not flooded (except silo's) Comes with complete Plans Serious Inquiries Only misslesilo@lasers.org Must be sold before end of September, 2002 also 15k sq/ft underground storage at another hardened facility $2.50/ sqft.

  34. Re:EMP Hardening by afidel · · Score: 2

    another site listed it as -80db for signals above 10khz

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  35. Re:Secret Nuclear Bunker by Memetic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's not a micorwave relay site, that's just part of it!

    It was to be the seat of government for a post WWIII UK.

    The Bunker Website here has loads of info.

    Nice fact, all the defenses were designed to keep the general public out in times of strife and the one time it was fully stocked and ready to be buttoned up.... during our miners strike in the 1980's

  36. Hah! by wiredog · · Score: 2
    Wouldn't most people read the article before replying?

    Remember, you're at Slashdot.

  37. Iran, Libya... by wiredog · · Score: 2
    no arab nation has or is likely to have in the near future nuclear capabilities

    Read "The Making of the Atomic Bomb" by Rhodes. The hard part is getting ahold of weapons grade uranium or plutonium. I wouldn't be at all surprised if Iran or Libya had atomic bombs.

    1. Re:Iran, Libya... by arkanes · · Score: 2

      Actually, the even harder part is the delivery.

  38. Was This Public Property? by N8F8 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Since AT&T/Bell used to be a monopoly, did the government help pay for and construct these sites? If so, how does a private company end up selling these?

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
    1. Re:Was This Public Property? by CrosseyedPainless · · Score: 2

      Monopoly != public.

  39. Fiber huh? by msheppard · · Score: 3, Funny

    Maybe some of that fiber should be run to whatever machine is hosting the website.

    M@

    --
    Krispy Cream is people
  40. Re:that's hilarious by mjpaci · · Score: 2

    I've heard similar stories of sailors standing watch on the ship's tower and keeping warm in the RADAR wash.

    --mike

  41. Long Line Information by jwilhelm · · Score: 3, Informative

    AT&T Long Lines Places and Routes contains a list of Maps, Diagrams and Lists relating to the AT&T Long Line Bunkers.

  42. Re:Survive WW3, but not a good slashdotting... by mjpaci · · Score: 2

    My high-school has a tower on that list. WOW. There is also one right around the corner from my parents. Pretty cool. However, this looks like the active list as my high school is at Row # 7350 in the Excel spreadsheet and the story says there are 2000 for sale.

    --Mike

  43. Re:EMP Hardening by sphealey · · Score: 3, Insightful
    You can't shield against EMP with a conductor unless it completely encloses the entire system. A communication tower MUST have cables going to unsheilded equipment. Shielding communication equipment would cause the equipment to malfunction, and I didn't see a giant copper shield around the towers in the pictures.
    Yeah, those guys at Bell Labs and Bell Systems Engineering were real boneheads. I doubt they had any understanding of EMP, despite having designed the only working anit-ballistic missle system and having done extensive work in the effects of the warheads of those missles. Nor did they know the first thing about the effects of magnetic fields and radiation on telephone systems - they just managed to build a worldwide voice network over the course of 100 years. Yep, a bunch of nincompoops wasting their time.

    sPh

  44. That depends by wiredog · · Score: 2

    on where you're delivering it. Iran and Libya (and Israel) already have missiles that can reach most of the mid-east (and in the case of Libya, Europe). They also have aircraft that can carry the weapons. They may not have intercontinental capability, but then they don't particularly need it.

  45. Diesels run for ever.... by jsimon12 · · Score: 2

    Hey I got a diesel VW car and a diesel generator at my country house, both have been running for YEARS with nothing more then a regular oil change. Diesel engines are built for that crap, to basically run forever with minimal maintance (hence they have no spark plugs and don't need tune ups like crappy gas powered gensets).

    1. Re:Diesels run for ever.... by operagost · · Score: 2

      Modern gas engines don't really need tuneups anymore either, except for the spark plugs you mentioned. They have electronic, integrated ignition. No points or spark plug wires. You still need to change air and fuel filters, bet they have those on diesels as well.

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  46. Looks like a bargain to me by torklugnutz · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This sounds even better than a Missile Silo

    First off, it's cheaper.
    Secondly, these are more conveniently located
    Lastly, it looks like there's a lot more of these than missile silos.

    For $25k, it's a cheap way to get a couple of acres with some improvments.

    --
    Often in Error, Never in Doubt.
  47. Re:Yeah right .. reminds me of.. by Oliver+Wendell+Jones · · Score: 2

    True Story - a guy at work has a small piece of steel embedded just above his eyelid, but below his eyebrow. It's been in there a few days and the wound isn't healing up as it should. He was working with a framing hammer and a chunk of nail or hammer head flew back at him (remember kids, always wear safety glasses!). I told him that I had some powerful magnets back in my cubicle (NIB rare earth magnets, the most fun money can buy, check here if you want some).

    He held two of the magnets (product #2, see above site) up near his eyelid and that little piece of steel pulled that loose skin out about an inch! The guy yelped and immediately pulled the magnet away. Of course, a bunch of people heard the yelp and came to see what it was, and he had to repeat the stunt a few times to make everybody happy.

    Tugging a visible chunk of steel is one thing, but I seriously doubt that you could pull the hemoglobin out of your body, or at least any significant portion of it, even if they did say so on ST:TNG.

    --
    A computer once beat me at chess, but it was no match for me at kick boxing -- Emo Phillips
  48. My Bust, Poorly Stated by N8F8 · · Score: 2

    I stated my question poorly. What I meant was that like the railroads, private companies were given a lot of assistance by the government. In many cased entire projects are funded with public money.Many under govenment contract. If this is the case with any of these hardened structures, shouldn't the public get somthing back?

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  49. Somebody screwed up the list... by iforgotmyfirstlogon · · Score: 2

    I took the Excel list of all of the sites and pushed it into a data mapping program based on latitude and longitude. The following results I thought odd:

    - There are 15 in the middle of the Atlantic
    - There are 5 in Mauritania
    - There's even one in northern Mali

    Talk about your far-reaching communications network!

    - Freed

    --
    "Coffee should be black as hell, strong as death, and sweet as love." -Turkish Proverb
  50. nuclear blast design criteria by mlas · · Score: 3, Interesting
    While browsing some of the supplied links, ran across this page, which is a summary of the design criteria the engineers used for these sites. The site vary in "hardness"-- that is, their ability to withstand a nuclear blast-- but the top level sites were designed to withstand:
    • 2 1/2 miles from 20 megaton blast
    • 1000 Miles per hour wind
    • 40 G shock wave
    • high velocity debris
    • Intense radiation, heat and electromagnetic effects

    Given that wind resistance for a given surface area increases exponentially (I think... been a long time since physics class), that 1000mph figure is astounding.

    Also this: "Above ground structure (microwave and troposcatter antennas) require at least two thirds of the structure to be below grade to prevent tilting or rotation". Does that mean these 200ft towers are rooted 400ft deep?
    --
    "Luck is the residue of design" --Branch Rickey
  51. Fed Ex... by MountainLogic · · Score: 2
    Fed Ex. When you absolutely, positively have to deliver over night.

    Or for that matter a shipping container on a ship works just fine and leaves no return address.

  52. Re:Another example of why IIS, ASP and VB suck by jmorris42 · · Score: 2

    Yup, when a *NIX site gets the /. effect it goes away, but differently. The *NIX site goes when the bandwidth is totally soaked and you just can't contact the victim anymore. NT sites fail sooner because they can still deliver up error pages just fine, but the system is overloaded.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  53. IMPORTANT INFORMATION by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 3, Informative

    After expressing interest in two sites, I received this email response:

    From: Ross Elder
    To: 'John Hoffman'
    Subject: RE: Sites of interest
    Date: Thu, 12 Sep 2002 15:44:03 -0400

    Please note that the message posted yesterday on Slash Dot is incorrect.
    American Tower Corporation has only a limited number of Surplus towers for
    sale that can be accessed by clicking "Sites For Sale" on our home page.
    These are the only towers that are for sale. Please also note that these
    Surplus sites are sold on a strictly "as is-where is", all cash basis.

    If the site you are inquiring about is not on the "Sites For Sale" list,
    then it is not for sale.

    If you are interested in a Surplus site, please contact me via email.

    If you are having difficulty accessing our website, please try again later
    as we were experiencing technical difficulties earlier today.

    Thanks,

    Ross Elder
    Senior VP/Development
    American Tower Corporation

    The actual list of available sites can be downloaded at:
    http://www.americantower.com/acweb/ATCSDMAREP02/Pu blic%20Reports/Marketing/AvailableSitesList.xls

    1. Re:IMPORTANT INFORMATION by TheSHAD0W · · Score: 2

      In that case, it's a ground lease. They will assign the lease to you on purchase.

  54. These Microwave towers operated BIG power.... by Newer+Guy · · Score: 2

    These towers ran with main beam ERP's (effective radiated powers) in the tens of thousands of watts. C band satellite transponders run 5-10 (yes that's five to ten) watts. The satellites were about 30,000 miles away as the crow flies compared to one of these towers being maybe 10-20 miles away. Trust me, there's enough RF scatter from one of these towers to make C band satellite reception almost impossible even if you're 180 degrees off the main beam.

  55. ATT selling these? by jpostel · · Score: 2

    Is the original poster sure it is ATT selling these? When I worked for Lucent, (right after it was spun off) someone told me a story about how ATT had sold all their microwave towers several years before because of the fiber network being in place. The person that sold them caught nine kinds of hell (and supposedly lost her job) because ATT was about to outfit them with cell station equipment.

    I think ATT sold them a while ago, but the company that bought them has to decided to sell them on the open market.

    --
    Ummm, Jon, aren't you supposed to be dead...? - Otter(3800)