Slashdot Mirror


Thailand's "Q" Banks on Rubber Bullets

redwolfoz writes "ABC News reports that Thailand's answer to 'Q', the legendary inventor of gadgets for movie spy James Bond, is busy at work at his warehouse on the edge of the country's capital. Workmen inside are trying out the latest inventions of retired Major Songphon Eiamboonyarith, who runs defence contracting firm Precipart Co. The range includes umbrellas that shoot rubber bullets, bullet-proof baseball caps and a hand-held device to fire a man-sized net 10m to stop a villain in his tracks."

107 comments

  1. Why would you want a bullet proof baseball cap? by happyhippy · · Score: 0, Redundant

    The force of the shot would give you brain damage

    1. Re:Why would you want a bullet proof baseball cap? by McCart42 · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Not if it's a grazing shot to begin with. Besides, even if you're right, mild brain damage or a hemmorrage (chance of death) is preferable to a bullet in the skull (you're dead before you know what hit you).

      --
      "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
    2. Re:Why would you want a bullet proof baseball cap? by wmspringer · · Score: 1

      I dunno....seems to me that death could be preferable to brain damage. I guess it depends on HOW MUCH brain damage, though..

    3. Re:Why would you want a bullet proof baseball cap? by Celandro · · Score: 2, Insightful


      You really have no idea what you are talking about do you? Brain damage you have........

      Helmets were first issued to troops to prevent death from grazing shots to the head as they were among the most common, if not THE most common cause of death (I believe this was WWI but dont quote me on that). A truly bullet proof helmet would be a great achievement and quite useful in combat and riot police situations.

    4. Re:Why would you want a bullet proof baseball cap? by archen · · Score: 1

      Actually not grazing shots, but shrapnel from explosions.

    5. Re:Why would you want a bullet proof baseball cap? by jasonditz · · Score: 1

      The true leading cause of death in WWI was being impaled on a kaiser helmet... don't you guys ever watch the history channel?

    6. Re:Why would you want a bullet proof baseball cap? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      so dying of head wounds or an infection or living with brain damage is better than dying painlessly?

    7. Re:Why would you want a bullet proof baseball cap? by Fat+Casper · · Score: 2
      Helmets were first issued to troops to prevent death from grazing shots to the head as they were among the most common, if not THE most common cause of death...

      No. Fragments are what helmets protect against. As artillery is the most casualty producing element in modern warfare (even WWI) it made, and still makes a lot of sense. People shoot for center mass, not the head, so a helmet is a stupid way to protect yourself from bullets. As a way of protecting you from bombs, shells and grenades (blowing up at ranges that don't turn you to soup), a helmet is well worth the money and discomfort. The rest of your body is less jam-packed with vital parts and tends to be less exposed than your head anyway.

      --
      I spent a year in Iraq looking for WMD and all I found was this lousy sig.
    8. Re:Why would you want a bullet proof baseball cap? by Ozymandias_KoK · · Score: 1

      Bulletproof would be a misnomer for anything like a baseball cap. It might prevent penetration, but you still have the equivalent force of being hit in the head with a baseball bat to deal with. There's a reason helmets are made of hard material. :)

  2. PHB's in Cubicle land by SupahVee · · Score: 2

    I wonder if that spiedy-net would work in an office environment. Would make dealing with the boss MUCH easier, I think. That and Herf wars go to a whole new level.

    --
    "See, we plan ahead! That way, we never have to do anything now."
  3. Um... by mike3411 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It doesn't look like any of these inventions are particularly new, the US police force and riot response teams have been using/testing rubber bullet, bean bag bullets, nets, foam, sonic weapons, and other for the past several years. They've started deploying them to more and more officers, apparently it's lead to a number of situations where they were able to incapacitate and arrest someone they usually would have shot. So it sounds like a movement in the right direction, although I think these weapons get used more against rioters, drunks, the mentally ill, etc. I'm pretty sure they still shoot supervillains... or promote them.

    --
    Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    1. Re:Um... by oooga · · Score: 1

      I'm pretty sure they still shoot supervillains... or promote them.

      Or elect them.

      --
      -- Nerds on toast in the new millenium
    2. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Still, you gotta love the concept of fitting armoured plating, machine guns and nets on tuk tuks, "Thailand's popular indigenous three-wheeled motorcycle taxi". You gotta wonder about the logic of armouring a 3-wheeled vehicle that completely exposes its passengers on either side.

      Still, I'd love to see Thailand's James Bond cruising around in one of those suckers instead of an Aston Martin. Live and let Thai, baby!

    3. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah, but we finally got rid of Mr. "I did not get a knob job from that woman"

      Now at least we're FIGHTING the bad people instead of voting them in... (as much... :)

    4. Re:Um... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yet you say this as we all prepare for Oil War II.

      If he's not doing it to his intern, he'll do it to the world.

  4. Net launcher... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny
    ... a hand-held device to fire a man-sized net 10m to stop a villain in his tracks


    I think I can make a potato gun do that. :)
  5. I can see it now... by drik00 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Man in tuxedo walks up to the bar, orders:

    "...Vodka Martini, shaken, not stirred... ...the name is Band...Rubber Band..."

    Yeah, so i'm a dork. Join the club.

    --
    Beer, now there's a temporary solution -- Homer Jay S.
    1. Re:I can see it now... by mickwd · · Score: 2

      Groan...

      Band ? You should be ;)

    2. Re:I can see it now... by 56ker · · Score: 0

      Well at least you didn't make as a joke to a friend of yours who works in a cinema after the last Bond film had just finished:

      The name's Brace, John Brace. (which if anyone wants to know is my real name)

    3. Re:I can see it now... by passion · · Score: 2

      (where do I sign up? Oh, I guess I got my ID years ago at this website called slashdot, and my ID is #84900)

      "...Bondage, James Bondage double-OHH!-sixty-nine"

      --
      - passion
  6. Death over brain damage by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I'd rather be dead than severely brain damaged, but that could just be me.

  7. Re:Not new here...new in Thailand by McCart42 · · Score: 2

    The article wasn't so much about how it's new and cool, but how they're new to Thailand, and very cheap and effective for the task at hand (mostly, training). Rubber bullets don't fly as far and are thus effective for training exercises in Thailand, where space is at a premium. The Howitzer shells they used to use cost over $200, but now they use rubber shells that are under $10.

    I mean, just looking at the "armored tuk tuk"...it's not like anyone's saying this is something amazingly cutting edge. Though it did remind me slightly of the "elite military vehicle" from Stripes...

    --
    "I may be quite wrong." - Socrates
  8. credbibility by meekg · · Score: 3, Informative

    why should a rubber-bullet gun be disguised as an umbrella ??
    A rubber-bullet gun is for deterrence, and should look like a shotgun, or something even more evil.

    An advancing police line armed with umbrellas will most likely not cause a crows to disperse.

    More likely, the umbrella is quite lethal, in the assassination meaning of the word, but since this is a PG rated story, it's been modified A-Team style.

    Everyone's gotta have a hobby.
    Mr. Songphon's happened to be killing.

    o well.

    1. Re:credbibility by Squarewav · · Score: 3, Informative

      the idea is for protection, if you shoot some mugger with your umbrella, hopefully they run away thinking they've just been shot with a real bullet. as for just carrying a shotgun with you, your going to get some bad reactions from police and people on the street

    2. Re:credbibility by blincoln · · Score: 1

      Depending on the idea of being able to "fool" someone into thinking you can hurt them more than you really can is a bad, bad idea.
      If someone who feels in danger of being mugged is unwilling or unable to carry a real weapon, they should go New York style and carry one wallet for their cash and one for their ID, cards, etc., so they can lose as little as possible when they hand the cash wallet over.

      --
      "...always new atoms but always doing the same dance, remembering what the dance was yesterday." -Richard Feynman
  9. Not to much is really 'Bullet-Proof" by Cyno01 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Bullet-proof is rarely what its called, a standard kevlar bullet-proof vest will stop many smaller caliber shots, but you can still get killed, even if the vest isn't pierced, if your hit in the chest with a powerful enough shot, even if the vest stops the round you can still die from hydrostatic shock, the same goes for the kevlar vests with metal inserts, they my stop powerfull rounds, but if u look at the after photos from testing, you can see the plates of metal with large(2 or more centimeter) deep depressions, it may not penetrate, but that much force hitting you in the chest is enough to cause quite a bit of damage

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    1. Re:Not to much is really 'Bullet-Proof" by abimelech · · Score: 1

      If you've seen a video called "Deadly Weapons", used by training by many police departments, they demonstrate the effectiveness of bullet proof vests... on live subjects.

      They used an assault rifle, at point blank range, and the human subject is totally unharmed. Additionally, the subject stood on one foot, and didn't fall over.

      The vests were rather chunky, however. I'd rather have one of them, than some paper thin vest that fits under my shirt.

  10. the gift by Squarewav · · Score: 4, Funny

    "My father was a soldier. He used to give me manuals on explosives and guns."

    Talk about the gift that keeps on giving, "hey what did you get for x-mas??" "My dad gave me that new transformer!" "That's nothing my dad gave me books on how guns and explosives work! I cant wait too try them out!"

  11. How original! by Longinus · · Score: 1

    In the future, can the story submitters actually make up their own headlines instead of using the exact same one as the story being linked to?

    Thanks

    1. Re:How original! by idontneedanickname · · Score: 1

      If the Headline is acurate or can't really be changed so it would still make sence, why should the poster change it?

    2. Re:How original! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, because then you get crappy headlines like "Tiny Boxen."

  12. Is this guy high? by thelinuxking · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Songphon says in three months Precipart will deliver to police in the south the firm's first armoured tuk tuk, Thailand's popular indigenous three-wheeled motorcycle taxi.
    1. I suppose he is going to cover up the sides of the tuk tuk, because it makes no sense to have just an armored canopy and open sides. If he seals it up it won't even be a bicycle anymore, but will be like an armored car, except with only 3 wheels. How original.

    2.In reference to the umbrellas: "They are designed for police use in hostage situations," says Precipart consultant Sanpetch Putarak, a retired wing commander
    The prototype umbrella is pink. How many police officers would normally be walking around with pink umbrellas?

    3. Police are expected to have things like rubber bullets. Is the umbrella used to surprise the one or people who don't know that police are armed?

    4.The armored "tuk tuk" is equipped with a machine gun. Do you really need a web launcher in addition to that?

    However he DOES have one good idea. He plans to make walking sticks which fire rubber bullets. I like this idea. When you run out of bullets, you can just whack people with the stick.

    1. Re:Is this guy high? by delta407 · · Score: 2
      "They are designed for police use in hostage situations," says Precipart consultant Sanpetch Putarak, a retired wing commander
      How many police officers would normally be walking around with pink umbrellas?
      [snip]
      Is the umbrella used to surprise the one or people who don't know that police are armed?
      What if you don't know that middle-aged woman walking down the street is a police officer?
    2. Re:Is this guy high? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Having a smoking section in a restaurant is like having a peeing section in a pool." Think about it.

      Fuck you. Liberal asshole. If you don't like smoking sections, then don't go to places that have them. You vote with your dollars, and I will vote with mine... I rarely go to places that don't have smoking sections.

    3. Re:Is this guy high? by Mike1024 · · Score: 2

      Hey,

      If he seals it up it won't even be a bicycle anymore, but will be like an armored car, except with only 3 wheels. How original.

      Except the estimated price is $2,400.

      The prototype umbrella is pink.

      Featured word: Prototype.

      Is the umbrella used to surprise the one or people who don't know that police are armed?

      It might be more of a gimmick that's fun to make and use than an actual useful-in-the-field product. You know, like a Desert Eagle .50 or something.

      Or it could be for under cover police.

      Just my $0.02,

      Michael

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
    4. Re:Is this guy high? by Dwonis · · Score: 2

      Be quiet. How is that position "liberal", anyway?

  13. Thank goodness that "Q" is back by tyrani · · Score: 2, Funny

    Now maybe we can finally get someone working on the tuxedo from the Jackie Chan movie.

    --
    rejected (19) accepted (0)
    Is there a psychological term related to getting your stories rejected on slashdot?
  14. It would be cooler by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    If he was called Ng and drove a tank.

  15. Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by swb · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Maybe I just haven't thought about it enough, but why not pepper-spray paintball guns for riot control or other situations where you just want to incapacitate? You'd get decent physical range, with an automatic firing version excellent coverage.

    Regular mace or pepper spray requires you to be too close, "tear gas" or whatever they shoot in a gasseous cloud is too broad and not specific enough.

    Paintballs hurt like a sonofabitch, a repeater could deliver a lot of them at a good distance to clothes, faces, hair, etc, adding some longer-term deterrant effect as well (have to change clothes).

    From my experience, though, you'd have to "fix" the firing mechanism, since jams and fuckups with a tear-gas paintball would be a bit more than just an inconvenience. I'd make the paintball payloads more like conventional bullets, cased in a plastic cartridge. This'd solve a lot of feed issues as well as allow for more traditional box magazines. I'd also use conventional gunpowder propellant for higher velocities, larger payloads than CO2 can deliver.

    It might actually be possible to make a paintball cartridge a standard weapon could use.

    Of course the magic part is probably whatever membrane you use for the irritant payload. It has to be strong enough for firing and to really hurt on impact, but it also has to be soft enough to break on softer surfaces as well as not cause soft-tissue injuries other than bruising.

    A weapon like this would really seem to be a natural, especially in situations where you want to deliver a lot of firepower in civilian environments -- think of defending an Embassy with this -- .50s in the windows, guards with M-16s, all putting out 100s of rounds a minute of a chemical irritant instead of lethal bullets, risking a military conflict..

    Anyway, why haven't they done this yet?

    1. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by Elbows · · Score: 1

      Have you ever used a paintball gun?
      The accuracy is atrocious. Even really nice, heavily-accessorized guns don't shoot all that straight.
      Also, the range is pretty limited.
      And finally, they are very unreliable. In particular, balls sometimes break in the chamber or the barrel as you are firing. If you're just shooting paint this results in a mess and your gun jamming. If you're firing tear gas this could get pretty unpleasant.

    2. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by mike3411 · · Score: 1

      Well, among other considerations, I think things like pepper spray need to be pretty much directly applied to the eyes to work - you need to shoot a stream or spray of it at someone's face. Paintballs explode on impact, but not in any kind of covering way - you'd end up with little splotched of pepper spray on you, and unless you were shot in the face (both painful and stupid - who would turn their faces towards firing weapons?) it wouldn't really do much. It might be feasible as a means of delivering more localized tear gas, but I'd guess that they use tear gas for large enough crowds that the kind of coverage offered by current canister systems is preferable.

      --
      Mod me down, and I will become more powerful than you can possibly imagine!
    3. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by Zrech · · Score: 3, Interesting

      First of all, LAPD has them. They had them before they had bean bag guns. I have seen many demo's of this on a few TLC programs and other programs aswell. And it is not tear gas as those first 2 replys thought. The substance is bright yellow/green in color, and just a little more liquid then the pain in normal paintballs. On a few of the demo's I saw of this, a law officer shot another officer in the chesh from about 60 feet, the officer on the recieving end described it as being pepper sprayed but with more long lasting effects as the substance permiated his clothing.

    4. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by CMRichar · · Score: 1
      most likely because of safety issues. A paintball gun is designed to deliver a paintball to it's target at a speed (leaving the barrel) of ~275-300 feet per second. the weight of the thing (which would probably be altered due to the different substance inside the "shell") helps affect the accuracy of the projectile.

      Now, say you "soup up" a paintball gun like you suggest...assume an inital velocity of 500 fps, and that the weight of the projectile will be the same as a regular paintball. With those factors considered, a paintball, which is a hazard being shot at 300fps (lost eyes, broken teeth, bruises, welts, and other assorted nastys), could well almost become a lethal-"non-lethal" crowd control method.

      Now, if you use protocol that says "shoot at the ground", and have the tear gas inside pressurized so it will reach the face(s) of the people it's being used against, you might (possibly) have something......

      --
      "Good night, good work, sleep well, I'll most likely kill you in the morning." - Dread Pirate Roberts
    5. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by GigsVT · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Alternative weapon systems are usually called "less than lethal", as a reminder that they can and do seriously injure people. As it is, there is a backlash against police overuse of pepper spray and things of that sort. Really I don't think police need too many options. A club, or a sap, and a sidearm are all I personally think they should carry. All these toys might look neat, but I think it encourages abuse. Sometimes technology isn't the answer, when the question already had perfectly good low-tech answers.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    6. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by DrewK · · Score: 1

      Don't think pepper spray would work in Thailand. They'd prolly use it for hot sauce.

    7. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by broken_bones · · Score: 1

      A few posters have already pointed out that some police departments have deployed/are developing "stink bomb"/pepper spray projectiles. As for your comment about shooting them out of a normal service weapon, Simunition (produced by SNC Technologies) is a training ammunition similar to a paintball that can be fired from a standard side arm. Currently the ammunition requires the use of an adapter to prevent chambering of live ammunition.

      --

      Never disturb your enemy while he is busy making a mistake.
    8. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If your going to fight(as in army) some one why not just kill them? If you feel you have to shoot them, shoot to kill! All non-leathal stuff dose to crowds is antaganize them even more. All this touchy fealy stuff is so pointless.... I don't want anyone to get killed, but WTF, if they charge an embassy what do they think will happen? If they are just being an inconvenonce, then we shouldn't be shooting them.
      -James

    9. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      they do have them already (ive seen them fired at people next to me at seattle mardi gras). it was funny watching this person try to take cover behind a big concrete potted plant fixture while little pepper spray puffs were popping up all over them.

    10. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by Shirloki · · Score: 2, Informative

      With those factors considered, a paintball, which is a hazard being shot at 300fps (lost eyes, broken teeth, bruises, welts, and other assorted nastys), could well almost become a lethal-"non-lethal" crowd control method.

      Actually, current "non-lethal" weapons, such as rubber bullets do kill pretty often. A pepper spray paintball would not kill nearly as often simply because of the fact that it explodes and absorbs much of its own force by itself. However, the pepper spray would do the deterrent job of beanbags and rubber bullets quite nicely. Obviously, that still doesn't help with severe eye damage, but if you pepper spray somone with regular mace, you're still gonna damage/destroy their eyes anyway.

    11. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by CableModemSniper · · Score: 1

      Rubber bullets? tear gas? What ever happened to just kicking ass

      --
      Why not fork?
    12. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Using the way-way-way back machine I seem to recall one of the early paintball repeaters was an ingram mac-10 clone that used plastic cartridges containing a paintball in one end and a pistol-caliber (.357?) primer cap in the other. The gas from the cap was enough to propel the paintball and cycle the action, so the little bastard was quite a ripper... I imagine this concept could well be adapted to military usage.

    13. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      To kick ass, you really need a plurality of police vs. rioters/protesters. Protesters are a lot smarter about how to game the police lines now (they give workshops), and will try to incite violence so they can bring up charges of excessive forces, or to break past police lines.

      It's much easier to make them go away with enough deterrents than have to deal with a spitting nutball, armed with god knows what (dirty syringes, lye, acid.)

    14. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um, how about because if a police officer took out someones eye there'd be a multi-million dollar lawsuit? Paintballers wear special goggles to protect against this for a reason.

    15. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by swb · · Score: 2

      And finally, they are very unreliable. In particular, balls sometimes break in the chamber or the barrel as you are firing. If you're just shooting paint this results in a mess and your gun jamming. If you're firing tear gas this could get pretty unpleasant.

      I raised that issue in my initial posting. In order for it to be a more effective weapon it would require 6" diameter accuracy at a range of 100 yards and have to deliver a cyclic rate of at least 3 rounds per second.

      That's why I thought loading the irritant projectile in a typical firearm-style cartridge would help a lot. Most of the paintball firing problems I had related to misfeeds, which I attributed to feeding the "naked" projectile and cheap and overly simple feed mechanisms. Protecting the projectile in a rigid casing would prevent crushing on a misfeed, and allow for a spring or other force feed mechanism, and allow the use of something other than CO2 as a propellant.

      The biggest challenge would remain the projectile membrane, as you need to walk the line between tough enough to hit ~500fps without breaking a projectile in the barrel but soft enough to break on impact without bouncing.

      Dunno why paintball accuracy sucks -- smooth bores? Too-soft casings flexing in flight? Inertial problems because of the liquid? Low muzzle velocity? I'd imagine they all contribute, but again it doesn't have to be a 500 yard sniper weapon. Hitting a 6" circle reliably at 100 yards from a long-barrelled weapon would be more than adequate, and I don't think even that it would get used that way. It'd be a burst or automatic weapon used to spray at smaller crowds, or in bursts of 3-5 rounds at individuals.

      A dozen guys with M16-type rifles could deliver a lot of irritant in a small amount of time. And it's not supposed to be just the irritant, it's supposed to hurt too.

    16. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by Huntred · · Score: 1

      I can assure you that some police departments do have these and they have used them. They were in heavy use in College Park, Maryland, USA after the University's basketball team won the national championship. After the initial crowds died down, they would heavily light up stragglers with the paintball guns. I couldn't tell what kind of gun they were using (and the officer back at their staging area that I tried to ask about them was very unresponsive to my questions as a paintgun hobbyist) but it appeared to be pretty stock with only a fat laser pointer - most likely used to intimidate than actually target. Shots were taken from as close 10 meters to maybe 40+. I didn't have a chronny to check how they had been tuned but the balls were definitely slapping flesh.

      Huntred

    17. Re:Why no pepper-spray paintball guns? by Squalish · · Score: 1

      Go look what happened at the Redskins-Eagles game. They had to stop the game because some jackass security officer had sprayed it into a crowd to stop some fight between two drunks. The resulting irritant-filled air cause a chunk of the crowd to leave and the game to halt because the players(30 yards away down on the field) were complaining of irritated eyes. Pepper spray is basically Tear Gas Lite, liquified. It is not only an irritant if it is in one's eyes.

      --
      People in Soviet Russia, however, appear to be afflicted with amusing juxtapositions of the aforementioned situation
  16. ummm......... by Mobster75 · · Score: 0

    ...."Q" is dead.... Desmond Llewellyn (sp?) passed on....

  17. You see that red button? by Wheaty18 · · Score: 1

    Whatever you do, don't push it.

    Why not?

    Because you'll activate and fire the passenger side ejector seat.

    Ejector seat? You must be joking!

    I never joke about my work.

  18. quality reporting by hidden · · Score: 1

    On the same page :

    Major Songphon tests his latest invention - a net-shooter to entangle would-be agressors ... wearing his latest invention, a lightweight bullet-proof vest able to stop a round from a .357-calibre Smith & Wesson.

    I can accept that he's working on two things at once, but they can't BOTH be "his latest"

    1. Re:quality reporting by cybermace5 · · Score: 2

      Don't you see? He invented the net while the reporter was there!

      --
      ...
  19. Rubber Bullet Umbrella by Sean+Trembath · · Score: 0

    I'm trying to think of a situation where an oficer using rubber bullets would need to disguise his weapon.

    The thing about rubber bullets is they are generally used in riot control by police, and usually the officers are not covert about their attempts to stop whatever riot has erupted. Seem moot, IMHO.

  20. Villain Supply is the answer by xsfo · · Score: 4, Funny

    Villain Supply is the answer

    1. Re:Villain Supply is the answer by jasonkohles · · Score: 1

      Accept no substitute. Real Evil Villians shop at Home Despot.

  21. Thailand? by fruity1983 · · Score: 1

    Sounds like Korea needs this guy!

    We have tested the rubber bullets on dogs. It cannot kill the dog, but the dog is stunned and can't run away.

    I'd like to see PeTA protest this guys work, hah.

    --
    I am a viral sig. Please copy me and help me spread. Thank you.
  22. robocops by tobo · · Score: 1

    I quess that generally the idea of riot cop equipment and uniforms is to frighten the rioters. Therefore, the more visible the gun is the more intimidating it is.

    So why not manufacture very visible and frightening weapons for these purposes? And why not dress up riot police like Darth Vaders?

    I don't know whether rioters would be intimidated by or filled with more rage when they see a Darth Vader-lookalike riot cop wielding a five megaton Riot Stun Gun though.

    If somebody looks more like a robot stormtrooper than a real human being he is most likely psychologically an easier target to fight against. Dehumanization is the name of the atrocity game.

    I quess that we are going to see interesting robocop appliances in the future, as this riot-thing is very likely to become huge.

  23. Err... no. by rjh · · Score: 2

    Err... no.

    Sometime ask the Second Chance company for one of their demonstration videos. You can see the founder of the Second Chance corporation put on a Second Chance armorvest and then take multiple 7.62mm armor-piercing rounds to the chest.

    Given that the 7.62mm is just about the most powerful round anyone is likely to encounter, I have to say you're full of crap. Even a 12-gauge shotgun offers less momentum and kinetic energy.

    1. Re:Err... no. by Nate+Eldredge · · Score: 1

      But a 12-gauge shotgun is a lot more likely to put a pellet in your head, or somewhere else that's unprotected.

    2. Re:Err... no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously you'd need a bullet-proof ski mask.

    3. Re:Err... no. by rjh · · Score: 2

      Not really. The rule of thumb is that a pattern spreads one inch per linear yard of travel. (The rule is off, but it's a useful approximation.) At ten yards, the pattern's only about ten inches across. Aim for someone's center of mass and the pattern will stay confined to their torso.

      Most gunfights between armed individuals take place well within ten yards, according to the most recent FBI crime reports.

    4. Re:Err... no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      that dispersal pattern is assuming its a standard barreled shotgun with standard shot in it, a sawed off has a helluva lot more spray to it

  24. Why bullet-proof baseball caps? by MoonFacedAssassin · · Score: 1


    Because when fans start sneaking guns into baseball games, you'll have protection.
    Screw the occasional assault and battery of some 1st base coach.

    --
    I am a meat popsicle.
    1. Re:Why bullet-proof baseball caps? by Jasa · · Score: 1

      Why bullet-proof baseball caps? Even if they don't work that well they are sure to sell on think geek! Maybe with a OpenBSD logo on them. Now that's something that's bullet-proof

      --
      -Jasa -- Linux - The SOURCE will be with you, ALWAYS
  25. Are you high? by stewby18 · · Score: 1
    The prototype umbrella is pink. How many police officers would normally be walking around with pink umbrellas?

    Clearly the color of the prototype is the most important part. I mean, modifying a black umbrella to shoot rubber bullets would be easy, but making a pink umbrella black? That's crazy talk.

    Is the umbrella used to surprise the one or people who don't know that police are armed?

    Once again, cleary apearances are the most difficult thing to change. Which is easier, dressing a policeman in plain clothes (hey, maybe they could call them "plain-clothes policemen", what a novel idea), or disguising a gun to look like an innocent item?

    The armored "tuk tuk" is equipped with a machine gun. Do you really need a web launcher in addition to that?

    Good point. I mean, I sure can't conceive of a situation where police would want to capture someone instead of gunning them down.

  26. Rubber bullets are greatly needed today. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Due to all the unruliness of people especially in the US to law and order. The police will be able to switch over to using these rubber bullets (with real bullets as backup) when they finally get smart and ban the private ownership of all guns in the US. Time to be civilized, yanks.

  27. A really good book on the subject by Goonie · · Score: 2
    Is the U.S. Army's Improvised Explosives manual. Hundreds of tested, proven, bomb mixture recipes you can cook in your own kitchen, simple enough for any idiot.

    Not that I recommend you actually *try* anything in it unless you're faced with an occupying army, but it was fascinating stuff.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
    1. Re:A really good book on the subject by Reece400 · · Score: 1

      My class was taught how to make pipe bombs from items from your local canadian tire store in gr. 10 science last year,,,

      Reece

    2. Re:A really good book on the subject by blank_coil · · Score: 1

      U.S. Army's Improvised Explosives manual

      Where can I get one? Seriously.

      --
      No sig for you.
    3. Re:A really good book on the subject by Goonie · · Score: 1
      I dunno. I think my friend picked it up in a used bookstore. Whether it was supposed to end up there is open to debate...

      I still hasten to add, *don't try this at home, kids*.

      --

      Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
      --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  28. Good luck trying to get this stuff. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Body armor and helmets are only legally available for purchase to law enforcement/military. They're tools for resisting arrest and have been outlawed in Chicago, New Jersey, etc. Citizens need not apply.

    GOD BLESS AMERICA, THE LAND OF THE FREE AND THE HOME OF THE BRAVE

  29. Bad feeling by Faux_Pseudo · · Score: 2

    Am I the only one that gets the feeling that they will be seeing some
    of these items at his next [A-Z]* protest?
    Don't get me wrong. There is something very fun about this in that
    "we will laugh about this when we are done with our court mandated
    volunteerism. But for right now I am in a lot of pain. Did they have
    to use the tear gas /and/ the the nets?" kind of way.

  30. Re:FP ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You lucky bastard!!!!!

  31. LSD filled paintballs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Yes you heard me right. Paintballs with LSD in them. The PEOPLE need to defend themselves from the fascist police.

    We'll introduce these cops to a whole new form of fear. >:-)

  32. Non-lethal means of control is a trick by capedgirardeau · · Score: 4, Insightful


    All this feel good bullshit about non-lethal means of controlling people being nicer and show that the authorities are really nice guys is a trick.

    More non-lethals controls are still controls and actually lead to an increase in the state powers and ability to surpress protests and dissent!!

    The easier it is for them to package it to the masses as a good, nice, humane thing, the easier it will be for them to get away with putting down people and their voices.

    As if we need more that these days.

    --
    Wax on, wax off baby!
    1. Re:Non-lethal means of control is a trick by crusher-1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Agreed. My father was a cop in a major city and taught me the only time you should use any sort of projectile weapon is in situations where life is at risk. In the event that a weapon of this nature is to be used, it is to be used in only one fashion - you either shoot to kill or you don't shoot.

      Furthermore, while attending UCLA their basketball team won the final 4. A significant amount of the student body went into Westwood and became a bit unruly (as college students will). And of course non-students became involved and things got a bit out-of-hand. The L.A.P.D. sent out a riot control unit. At one point a non-student that was somewhat aggitated was surrounded by a groups of police. Then a stun gun - the type that shoots a bean-bag type projectile was fired at this person at close range. This guy fell as if he had been shoot with a generic projectile (aka bullet). He laid there for 10 to 15 minutes before anyone on the P.D. would take action to get the EMS in their. This only happened after the rest of the crowd became aggitated by the fact that someone that was essentially defenseless was injured and no assistance by the authorities was garnered. It was only then that the man was give assistance - and not before the P.D. dragged him behind the riot line by his feet.

      Point is, that supposed "non-lethal" weapons are not completely non-lethal. If the situations are right or the weapon is used in a manner not intended death can easily happen.

      And what good is a bullet proof baseball cap good for anyway. An umbrella that's just a camouflaged zip gun. Q he ain't. Just another mercenary trying to market stuff that the U.S., Stazi, and the K.G.B. have been doing since the 60's.

      In the U.S. this guy would either be working for the C.I.A./N.S.A. or be labeled as a criminal.

      Just MHO. :[

  33. I don't understand. by asdfasdfasdfasdf · · Score: 1

    If he's anything like this Q, he'd just stop time, arrest the criminals, put them on trial for the crimes of humanity, and be done with it.

  34. As Douglas Adams Once Wrote by LPetrazickis · · Score: 1

    Standing silhouetted in the doorway through which they had entered the vault was the man who wasn't pleased to see them. His displeasure was communicated partly by the barking hectoring quality of his voice and partly by the viciousness with which he waved a long silver Kill-O-Zap gun at them. The designer of the gun had clearly not been instructed to beat about the bush. "Make it evil," he'd been told. "Make it totally clear that this gun has a right end and a wrong end. Make it totally clear to anyone standing at the wrong end that things are going badly for them. If that means sticking all sort of spikes and prongs and blackened bits all over it then so be it. This is not a gun for hanging over the fireplace or sticking in the umbrella stand, it is a gun for going out and making people miserable with."

    --
    Is this a sigs-optional kind of place? 'Cause I am totally down with that if you know what I mean.
  35. Rubber Bullet Umbrella? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    What's so special about this? All you need is a zip gun stuck inside the shaft of an umbrella, firing a standard metallic cartridge. Now, if the umbrella were a semi-automatic, I'd be really impressed.

  36. Thanks comrade by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Isnt interesting that when these methods are used in 'evil' countries, our honest media always take
    the side that democratic countries dont condone the wanton use of force but when its in your own back yard, its always acceptable.

    Having been in Quebec city in 2002 with a documentary crew (Im the dork with the big ten foot pole mic who makes a great target), I can only guess what police does in third world or 'evil' countries.
    Seeing cops scoping a 70 year old woman in a wheelchair or a cop shoot tear gas cans directly
    in the chest of a seated protester is as vad as running over someone in a tank.

    Yet Tianamen square is always mentioned
    as brutal. Hell, I remember a few years ago when protesters where blocking some yugloslaivian city's downtown core for OVER a month, our Canadian government was shocked at how violent the response was. They meant water canons.
    I knew that if downtown Toronto or Montreal were closed down for over one day, they'd have used real canons.
    Hell, we filmed about 30 Montreal cops on horseback running throught a peaceful demonstrations of a few thousand to arrest
    5-6 hooded hooligans.

    All this to say that no country has the moral upper hand, brutality, killings, bombings and murder are always justified. All governments will use it; but somehow we always think the others are wrong and we are right when we do it.

  37. Hmm.... by da_anarchist · · Score: 1
    "We have tested the rubber bullets on dogs. It cannot kill the dog, but the dog is stunned and can't run away."

    How long before PETA begins an ad campaign against Thailand for animal cruelty by testing weapons with animals? Will this lead to labels on weapons in the same vein as the cosmetics industry such as "This weapon not tested on animals?"

  38. Armoured tuk-tuks ??? by Zemran · · Score: 2

    Have you ever been around Bangkok in a tuk-tuk? They are incedibly unstable and the extra weight high up would make them so dangerous to the occupant that no one would need to do anything extra to hurt the occupants.

    --
    I love stacking my barbecues in the shed at the end of summer - you can't beat a bit of grill on grill action.
  39. Nitpicking. by Governerd · · Score: 1

    The first known issue of helmets to troops was to prevent death from being hit on the head with swords, maces, and other hand-held objects. Thousands of years later, the idea came back to life in order to protect skulls from rocks and debree thrown up by artillery. Grazing shots to the head are actually not all that common as a cause of death.

  40. Net launcher...30 Feet? by SEWilco · · Score: 1
    Man-sized net with a range of 30 feet? Less than six body lengths? I can do that with my hands, I don't need any more "device" than the weighted net.

    What would be useful is to have a range of over 30 meters, not 10m. If someone is running, you need time(distance) to choose and aim the weapon -- whether they are running away or toward you.

    I can stop someone at 30m with an Argentine bola, but that requires a little elbow room for the swing. Technically, you need a boleadora for humans to avoid breaking legs, as a cattle bola has way too much power.

  41. Rubber bullets, yes... by Haeleth · · Score: 1

    ...but I don't think the LAPD fire their baton rounds from an umbrella. That's where the 'Q' bit comes in to it, see?

  42. Re:credbibility,WHAT A LOAD by flyneye · · Score: 1

    for real protection,if your life is threatened,use a real gun and real bullets,bigger than .38 or 9mm.
    dont take chances on anything less.you can hope in one hand and crap in the other and see which fills up first.dont take chances with your life or those you love.shoot to kill.Remember if that bad guy is threatening your life to begin with,theres no reason for him to change his mind just because you have a weapon too,USE IT.Never shoot to wound.A wounded animal is the most dangerous.
    Theres no way im gonna gum up the barrel of my .45 with rubber bullets(anyone here actually ever clean a gun?) or pepper or some backwoods asian badguy net invention.take care of your weapon and it'll take care of you.

    --
    *Repent!Quit Your Job!Slack Off!The World Ends Tomorrow and You May Die!
  43. Thailand: Widespread use of torture - from policin by Pseudonymus+Bosch · · Score: 2
    --
    __
    Men with no respect for life must never be allowed to control the ultimate instruments of death.
    GW Bu
  44. Actually airburst & shrapnel washl by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    That's why helmets came back into vogue during WWI.

    Soldiers spent the vast majority of their time in trenchs where the only danger (bar poisoness gas) came from air-burst explosions & shrapnel being blown in from near misses.

    Hence the shape of British helmets with the broadlip all the way round, that gives as perfect protection a helmet could in regards to the danger of airburst & shrapnel wash to a soldier in a trench.

    That's why it the US military's obsession with helmets amazes me. It's ridiculous the way their troops in Vietnam, Iraq 'n Afghanistan are virtually always wearing helmets.

    Someone ought to tell them that slouch-hats (like the Brits wore in Burma, & the Aussies wore in North Africa & New Guinea) or Bush hats (like the Aussies wore in Vietnam) are much better protection from the elements (shading the face, keeping rain 'n sleet out of the eyes, etc) for jungle, dessert, bush & mountain warfare.

    1. Re:Actually airburst & shrapnel washl by crazyphilman · · Score: 1

      You must never have worn an American-made helmet.

      I wore one in the Persian Gulf back in '90, when they were making them out of thick kevlar (about a half inch thick). If you maintained the straps well, and took care of the helmet, it was really pretty comfortable. We used to go out to Oceanside to buy new straps and such at one of the surplus stores because the issue straps were always thrashed. So, us Fleet Marines usually had pretty good gear.

      Anyway, the helmet I had was comfortable, it kept the sun out of my face, and offered pretty good coverage for the sides of my head. I liked it; it was a good design.

      Just my .02...

      --
      Farewell! It's been a fine buncha years!
  45. .357 no problem 7.62 Tokerov big problem by DABANSHEE · · Score: 2

    Bulletproof vests that stop .357 Magnum bullets is no big a deal.

    The problem comes with stopping smaller high velocity rifle ammunition.

    A level 3 Kevlar vest won't even stop a 7.62x25mm Mauser/Tokerov pistol round. The standard soviet pistol/sub-machine-gun round from WWII, which is bottlenecked & has a velocity of 1400+fps (the Chech CZ52 loads do 1600fps)

  46. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 1

    Despite the best efforts of a quantum bigfoot drive (yes I know everyone
    told me they suck, now I know they were right) 2.1.109ac1 is now available
    -- Alan Cox announcing Linux 2.1.109ac1

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...