Slashdot Mirror


Resume Tips For Jobs

JerseyTom writes "SAGEWire reports that with the economy speeding up, more and more people are freshening up their resumés. They've printed an article by Tom Limoncelli, co-author of TPoSaNA, that offers specific advice for geeks writing resumes." 'Course, I'm not sure how much I believe the economy speeding up - but still good information.,

143 of 452 comments (clear)

  1. Don't... by squaretorus · · Score: 5, Interesting

    1: Try and sound interesting in your Hobbies / Interests section, you'll just come across as a twat. Be honest. And DON'T mention Stanley Kubrick. Everyone does that!

    2: Go too far ahead in 'Career Objectives'. Think 2 or 3 years, not 10!

    3: Forget to spell check the thing.

    1. Re:Don't... by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 4, Funny

      1: I'm not sure I agree with you. I would think that any prospective employer would be thrilled to know about my stamp collecting, model car building, awards for being a top notch bird caller, and my highly developed talent in the fine art of taxidermy. I think they would see that that makes a highly dynamic and professional person. But your right. My unhealthy infatuation with Stanley Kubrick might be a bit overboard.

      2. Yeah, I've made that mistake. Aparently "In 10 years I hope to be dating your daughter, forcing her to have childern and selling them to white slavery rings" is just too ambitious for a future boss on a resume. I've switched that to 'I hope to finally finish the original Zork in 2 years'.

      3. I'll try to remember.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
    2. Re:Don't... by forged · · Score: 4, Funny

      Don't overdo your resume either, or else you will look like a moron with absolutely no credibility...

    3. Re:Don't... by BlackMesaResearchFac · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Dont... 1: Try and sound interesting in your Hobbies / Interests section, you'll just come across as a twat. Be honest. And DON'T mention Stanley Kubrick. Everyone does that!

      I would agree, unless your hobbies/interests include computer related issues.

      This can be especially useful in interviews. In my experience, they like to hear about the wireless LAN you have at home running off a Linux box you built from scratch, etc.

      This tells them you're not just some 'tard that went to college and got a degree in computers because everyone lied to you and said there would be guys lined up with bags of money after you graduate. You actually have genuine interest...or so they'll think...

      --
      -- Scientist: You aren't going to leave me here, are you? Boagh! Thump...
    4. Re:Don't... by Violet+Null · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I would agree, unless your hobbies/interests include computer related issues.

      On the other hand...

      I have been told by headhunters that you should not put computer-related items in your hobbies, because it makes you look like a stereotypical geek, and turns prospective employers off unless they are also geeks (which is rare).

      Bottom line is, I don't think there's a right answer on this one. Go with what feels best to you.

    5. Re:Don't... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      When I apply at ILM, my resume's gonna say: "Once bull's eye'd a target 2 meters wide without the aid of a computer."

    6. Re:Don't... by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > I have been told by headhunters that you should not put computer-related items in your hobbies, because it makes you look like a stereotypical geek, and turns prospective employers off unless they are also geeks (which is rare).

      That's a feature, not a bug.

      Your headhunter wants to get you hired anywhere, so he can collect his cut of the loot.

      You what to be hired somewhere you'll want to stay, which ain't necessarily the first company with an offer.

    7. Re:Don't... by Xenographic · · Score: 2, Insightful

      1: Try and sound interesting in your Hobbies / Interests section, you'll just come across as a twat. Be honest. And DON'T mention Stanley Kubrick. Everyone does that!
      >>>>>

      This only applies in Europe. American résumés are considerably different (something both Americans & Europeans need to keep in mind when reading web-based tips!) -- we do NOT put anything about our hobbies on our résumés (nor should we include pictures of ourselves, for that matter; there are anti-discrimination laws to think about). Also, some professions prefer to see porfolios of prior work (it's not a bad thing to have, even for coders...) -- basically, you have to know what the employer you're going after expects, then give it to them.

      Actually, there are lots of factors to consider. If you're at a university right now, check with them--they should have a department called "Career Services" or something like that. USE IT! They've helped me a LOT; I wouldn't have half as many job leads right now if not for them...

    8. Re:Don't... by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      So much for what you shouldn't do. My resume tip for Jobs is: "Make sure your resume includes the fact that you were CEO of Apple Computer." HTH. HAND!

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    9. Re:Don't... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "3: Forget to spell check the thing."

      An automated spell check is insufficient. It won't catch you when you say you posses excellent communication skills. (This is as opposed to possess. Look it up if you don't know the difference!)

      One really great (windows) freeware tool I use all the time on any important written document is Readplease 2000. It reads the document out loud, making many hard-to-detect errors easy to find. It is also useful for people who are vision impaired because you don't need your eyes to 'read' the content of a document.

      Some other pet peeves are the confusion of possessive pronouns versus plural pronouns (its|it's|it is|it has) and in general, messed up plurals versus possessive words.

      If you're the type whose final carefully-checked document has grammar errors, then get someone else to check it! It constantly amazes me how often people whose first language is English and have an English-based university education still mix up homonyms.

    10. Re:Don't... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "Perhaps your prospective employer will teach you the difference between a spell checker and a grammar checker."

      Was that was supposed to be an insult? Heh. Gee, you've wounded me deeply.

    11. Re:Don't... by benedict · · Score: 2

      I dunno about number 1. The owner of the company
      I work for shares my interest in jazz. He lit up
      when he realized there'd be someone else in the
      office who knew who Clifford Brown was.

      I think one shouldn't try to be *cutesy* on one's
      resume, but that doesn't mean one can't be
      interesting.

      --
      Ben "You have your mind on computers, it seems."
  2. Very Helpfull Article by youngerpants · · Score: 5, Funny

    Last time I had to update my CV, it took about a week in order to get all my skills in an easy to read, yet eye-catching format.

    I never realised all I had to write was

    404 Error; Page not found.

    Right then, lets send this baby off :)

  3. Resume Tip #1 by suman28 · · Score: 4, Informative

    Don't write a 10 page essay about your previous jobs

  4. Freshening resume by bytesmythe · · Score: 2

    I'm not sure about the economy speeding up, but I freshened up MY resume because I got laid off. I would hazard a guess that many people are doing the same. They've either been laid off, or are still worried about losing their jobs in the near future.

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
    1. Re:Freshening resume by jmccay · · Score: 2

      I freshened up my resume for the same reason. Now I get to send it to companies and watch it disappear into a blackhole becuase of the employers saying stuff like "no phone calls".

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  5. Speeding up? by goldspider · · Score: 5, Funny
    "SAGEWire reports that with the economy speeding up..."

    What economy are they referring to? Certainly not the American economy...

    --
    "Ask not what your country can do for you." --John F. Kennedy
    1. Re:Speeding up? by mdemeny · · Score: 5, Funny
      "SAGEWire reports that with the economy speeding up..."

      What economy are they referring to? Certainly not the American economy...

      I believe that speed he referred to is akin that that 'slight' acceleration you feel just after jumping out of an airplane. We're really heating up now!

    2. Re:Speeding up? by mccalli · · Score: 4, Insightful
      What economy are they referring to?

      Probably referring to 'the economy speeding up', ie. a faster and faster rate at which everything is getting cut back...

      Cheers,
      Ian

    3. Re:Speeding up? by tomzyk · · Score: 2, Funny

      hm... perhaps picking up speed going down?

      --
      Karma: NaN
    4. Re:Speeding up? by ErikZ · · Score: 2

      Raw data my ass. I need a JOB. The economy hasn't changed if people like me and my friends can't get a full time JOB.

      With that paycheck we'd be happy to help the economy out and buy things. For instance, my car won't make it to the end of the year. I need a new one.

      --
      Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
    5. Re:Speeding up? by itsnotme · · Score: 2
      "SAGEWire reports that with the economy speeding up..."

      What economy are they referring to? Certainly not the American economy...

      I believe that speed he referred to is akin that that 'slight' acceleration you feel just after jumping out of an airplane. We're really heating up now!


      So when you hit terminal velocity shortly before you hit the ground, that'd basically be the point where the recession/depression occurs?
    6. Re:Speeding up? by paitre · · Score: 5, Informative

      *snark*
      It -may- be the longest bear market, but it certain is -not- the worst, job wise.
      We're still under 7% unemployment (or is it still under 6?). That -by itself- tells me that while it's hanging on, it certainly isn't nearly as sever as it could have been.

      Additionally, the market is -now- at about the levels it should have been if the tech bubble hadn't existed.
      As an investor, I'd be buying. Things are cheap, and at least for the short term, getting cheaper.

      As for the IT sector getting hit hardest: so what?
      How many other "techies" have you worked with that didn't have a clue, and only had the job because some manager needed a body to put in that seat? The .com I work for (and yes, there -are- many still in business) is -profitable-, and has been for the last year and a half, or so. I have a job for the next couple of years, for sure. That said, I haven't had a problem finding another job (which I start Nov 4).

      If you're having problems finding a new job, after getting laid off, one of these is true:
      1. the area you live in sucks. MOVE.
      2. you aren't nearly as skilled as you think you are.
      3. you aren't nearly as skilled as the -other- applicants are.

      More than likely it's a combination of 1 and 3. or 1 and 2 (although 2 and 3 is a good combo, too).

      And don't let that lack of a degree get you down, 5 years experience makes up for it...even in academia *smirk*

    7. Re:Speeding up? by bjcubsfan · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I revamped my resume because of the exact opposite reason. The economy is not speeding up, so I need to compete better with my fellow nerds.

    8. Re:Speeding up? by grumpygrodyguy · · Score: 2, Insightful

      It -may- be the longest bear market, but it certain is -not- the worst, job wise.
      We're still under 7% unemployment (or is it still under 6?). That -by itself- tells me that while it's hanging on, it certainly isn't nearly as sever as it could have been.


      For those of you who don't know what the unemployment indicator means(like this poster) it represents the current number of unemployment claims being made. Republicans like my father love this number, because they think it means that 7 out of 100 people in the US don't have jobs...and if the other 93 people can work, so can I. Here's a quote from the .gov unemployment website:

      "Benefits can be paid for a maximum of 26 weeks in most States. "

      26 weeks is approximately 6 months. What that means is, if you get laid off you have 6 months to find another job. If you don't manage to find another job in 6 months, you are no longer eligible for unemployment. Now, the "IT depression" has been around for...about 2 years now give or take. So anyone who didn't manage to find work in 6 months(and I know many) is not included in this indicator. Potentially 75% of the people fired since 2000 could still be out of work...and this would not be reflected in the often quoted unemployment figures.

      Additionally, the market is -now- at about the levels it should have been if the tech bubble hadn't existed.
      As an investor, I'd be buying


      Ya, but you're not an investor anymore are you? Why? Because you're living from pay-check to pay-check just like everyone else.

      How many other "techies" have you worked with that didn't have a clue, and only had the job because some manager needed a body to put in that seat?

      Yes during the dot-com era there was a lot of miss-distribution of personelle. Many people were in positions they weren't qualified for...does that mean that anyone in that category doesn't deserve to have a job? You're worse than my parents.

      And don't let that lack of a degree get you down

      I have a BS in Computer Science from a top 20 engineering school.

      --
      The government has a defect: it's potentially democratic. Corporations have no defect: they're pure tyrannies. -Chomsky
    9. Re:Speeding up? by DohDamit · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Umm...the tech bubble burst in 2000. You know, when Mr. Clinton was still in office. Kenneth Lay and Co. were high on the value of Enron in 2000. You know, when Clinton was in office.
      I'm not saying that Clinton had anything to do with either situation. But come on now, at least try to get something right, before you're sarcastic about it.

    10. Re:Speeding up? by demaria · · Score: 2

      4. The other applicants aren't as qualified, but can sell themselves better than you.
      5. Change or expand markets.

      Unemployment is under 6%, I think it's around 5%. And there are plenty of people hiring in the country, although not necessarily in IT. Of course IT was hit hardest. Over the last 4 years, there was an insane and stupid amount of spending, and nobody was seeing a good return on investment. IT should be hurting the most at this point. The economy is fine. Could be better, but fine, especially compared to other times in the US economy. The tech bubble is the chief instigator in this mess, and now things have corrected back to normal and can resume.

    11. Re:Speeding up? by rppp01 · · Score: 2

      The unemployment rate is calculated from all the unemployed people who have registered with the government, either for welfare, unemployment, or other means to show they do not have a job. It does not show those who do not have a job from voluntarily leaving, or whose unemployment status has gone beyond the 6 months of unemployment benefits.

      I think the number of 6 or 7% is too low. Kick that up to around 9 or perhaps 10% and you have the real numbers.

      If you add in students that don't work, it would be higher. I think the government is playing with numbers here. I know too many people who are without a job, as compared to 18 months ago. And this is between Texas and Arizona.

      --
      They stuck me in an institution, said it was the only solution, to...protect me from the enemy, myself
    12. Re:Speeding up? by FatherOfONe · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Just to agree with the other posters...

      Do you have ANY data to back this up? Why is it that they are considering lowering intrest rates again? It isn't because the economy is flat or growing.

      Being conservative is one thing. I consider myself conservative, and I will admit that the economy was slowing down before GWB got in office, but to say that it is picking up makes you sound like an idiot. I guess you could point out that not as many companies are folding this year as last... :-)

      Just because someone is concervative doens't mean they have to take everything Rush says as gospil. Please remember that he still believes that Microsoft didn't do anything wrong. :-)

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    13. Re:Speeding up? by cdrudge · · Score: 4, Funny

      No, the recession is the trip down. The depression is what is left in the ground after the recession in this case has ended.

    14. Re:Speeding up? by DohDamit · · Score: 2

      Right...and you believe that Bush, president for a month and a half, had more of an impact than Clinton, president for eight years. Come on now...

    15. Re:Speeding up? by DohDamit · · Score: 2

      Right...and the presidency is about morality. Oh wait...

    16. Re:Speeding up? by abischof · · Score: 2

      The unemployment rate is calculated from all the unemployed people who have registered with the government, either for welfare, unemployment, or other means to show they do not have a job.

      It's not the case that "the government understates the unemployment rate because they report how many people are collecting unemployment insurance rather than how many people are out of work".

      --

      Alex Bischoff
      HTML/CSS coder for hire

    17. Re:Speeding up? by paitre · · Score: 2

      Agreed.
      I wasn't talking about the indexes, I was talking about specific stocks.
      personally, I won't touch any of the "big name" stocks. For the most part, their fundamentals -do- suck.
      long term investments, at least on my side, tend towards those companies that pay dividends. you can't bank -just- on growth stocks...and you really never could.

      Aside from that, you're right, I should have said cheaper, instead of cheap. :\

    18. Re:Speeding up? by paitre · · Score: 2

      1. Hobbies. Someone else said to -not- put hobbies on your resume. I strongly disagree. If your hobby is doing something -directly- related to the job you're trying to get, put it on there. Especially bring it up in the interview, too.
      2. It's not glamorous, and it's -not- fun, but CompUSA and BestBuy have technicians in their stores. $7-10 bucks an hour is better than nothing, and you'd be suprised how many folks get their start there. (Of the crew at the CompUSA I worked in 5 years ago, 2/3's of us went on to making 35k+ within a year of my start date..most of us clear 70 now). Besides, the discounts there kick ass.

      3. It's actually -easier- to find a job when you already have one. HR and hiring managers can -smell- desperation coming, especially when you don't have a job.

      I do actually feel for you. It -sucks- coming into a job market that isn't hiring, unless you have experience. You're going to have to start hitting any connections you might have. Talk to your ISP...talk to your webhost, hell, if you have a couple hundred or a thousand to spend, try starting up your own webhosting company.

      l8r.

    19. Re:Speeding up? by guttentag · · Score: 3, Informative
      It -may- be the longest bear market, but it certain is -not- the worst, job wise. We're still under 7% unemployment (or is it still under 6?). That -by itself- tells me that while it's hanging on, it certainly isn't nearly as sever as it could have been.
      There was an article in The New York Times just two days ago which claims the unemployment figure is wrong and misleading. Analysts say a significant and growing number of people either don't fit the government's inaccurate definition of unemployed, or the government has no way of counting them in the figure. The article says the real unemployment rate is probably closer to that of the recession-mired early 80s.
    20. Re:Speeding up? by guttentag · · Score: 3, Informative
      Since the article doesn't provide any of the unemployment statistics it talks about, here is the U.S. unemployment rate over the last 20 years, provided by the New Mexico Dept. of Labor:
      Year: 1982 Rate: 9.7%
      Year: 1983 Rate: 9.6%
      Year: 1984 Rate: 7.5%
      Year: 1985 Rate: 7.2%
      Year: 1986 Rate: 7.0%
      Year: 1987 Rate: 6.2%
      Year: 1988 Rate: 7.2%
      Year: 1989 Rate: 5.5%
      Year: 1990 Rate: 5.3%
      Year: 1991 Rate: 5.6%
      Year: 1992 Rate: 6.8%
      Year: 1993 Rate: 7.5%
      Year: 1994 Rate: 6.9%
      Year: 1995 Rate: 6.1%
      Year: 1996 Rate: 5.6%
      Year: 1997 Rate: 5.4%
      Year: 1998 Rate: 4.5%
      Year: 1999 Rate: 4.9%
      Year: 2000 Rate: 4.2%

      Month: JAN 2001 Rate: 4.2%
      Month: FEB 2001 Rate: 4.2%
      Month: MAR 2001 Rate: 4.3%
      Month: APR 2001 Rate: 4.5%
      Month: MAY 2001 Rate: 4.4%
      Month: JUN 2001 Rate: 4.6%
      Month: JUL 2001 Rate: 4.6%
      Month: AUG 2001 Rate: 4.9%
      Month: SEP 2001 Rate: 5.0%
      Month: OCT 2001 Rate: 5.4%
      Month: NOV 2001 Rate: 5.6%
      Month: DEC 2001 Rate: 5.8%

      Month: JAN 2002 Rate: 5.6%
      Month: FEB 2002 Rate: 5.5%
      Month: MAR 2002 Rate: 5.7%
      Month: APR 2002 Rate: 6.0%
      Month: MAY 2002 Rate: 5.8%
      Month: JUN 2002 Rate: 5.9%
      Month: JUL 2002 Rate: 5.9%
      So what the article is saying is unemployment is closer to 10% than 6%. That's a big difference.
    21. Re:Speeding up? by forkboy · · Score: 2

      the area you live in sucks. MOVE.

      It's not that easy, pal. We've been trying to get out of Denver for months now. It costs real money to move, and more apartments or houses for rent won't let you in without a job, even if you have some cash on hand. And many employers won't hire someone from out of state unless they can get there for an interview in person. (Which the employer does not pay for and we can't afford doing for "maybe" getting a job)

      As far as points 2 and 3 go, heh, yeah, you're dead on there. There's ALWAYS someone better than you out there, and when so many people are unemployed, chances are good that someone is applying for the same job.

      --
      This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
    22. Re:Speeding up? by nathanh · · Score: 2
      As an investor, I'd be buying. Things are cheap, and at least for the short term, getting cheaper.

      Which would make you a pretty bloody awful investor.

    23. Re:Speeding up? by xtremex · · Score: 2

      It was a quote from Martin Luther King, Jr..I paraphrased..he said it more eloquently than I did :) Look up quotes from Martin Luther King Jr.

      --
      If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
    24. Re:Speeding up? by demaria · · Score: 2

      "You point to unemployment as a barameter"

      Please point out where I make that claim.

    25. Re:Speeding up? by DohDamit · · Score: 2

      I'd love to believe this. I really would. Unfortunately, this rather simplistic ideal is something that doesn't hold up to facts. Companies overbought the vision of a new generation of snake oil salesmen. Several trillion dollars later, we have a few really harsh lessons to show for it. Truthfully, neither president can be faulted for the mess. If you want to look for a source of this disaster, take a look at your fellow commuters, who bought stock in Exodus, Pets.com, Allair, and their ilk. Everyone was a genius, and no one wanted to be left out. When the lights flitted on(what, we have to make money?) off the entepreneurs went into the shadows. Don't blame Bush, don't blame Clinton. Neither of them made the general public pony up for this losing gamble-the New Economy.

  6. some tips - by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 4, Interesting

    DO NOT put an "Objective" section at the top of your resume, they're all bullshit, never relevant and only limiting, and when you hand someone your resume, your objective is simple - TO GET A JOB FROM THEM.

    You have 2-4 inches to catch someone's eye - if you've got a college degree put it there, and next, put your most relevant work experience.

    customize your resume for the job you're applying for.

    --
    ... hi bingo ...
    1. Re:some tips - by PDHoss · · Score: 3, Funny

      You have 2-4 inches to catch someone's eye...

      Please note: the preceding tip would not be applicable if you are applying for a position (ahem) as "Male Porn Actor."

      PDHoss

      --
      ======================================
      Writers get in shape by pumping irony.
  7. If you have no experience by ch-chuck · · Score: 5, Funny

    you can always add "did volunteer work rating messages submitted to a public web site. Work involved reading posted comments, deciding quality and relevance of posting, and moderating accordingly. Also did oversight work rating moderators performance."

    or

    "managed a wide area information distribution network involving the exchange of compressed aural and adult entertainment products. Work involved maintenance of clandistine anti-detection systems and frequent network reconfigurations for various Internet service providers".

    --
    try { do() || do_not(); } catch (JediException err) { yoda(err); }
    1. Re:If you have no experience by interstellar_donkey · · Score: 2, Insightful

      you can always add "did volunteer work rating messages submitted to a public web site. Work involved reading posted comments, deciding quality and relevance of posting, and moderating accordingly. Also did oversight work rating moderators performance."

      Perhaps you could add "Rated people poorly who made comments that were over my head by moderating them down despite the fact they were insightful, funny, or full of usefull information. Continue to do this because I am an idiot"

      I like that idea.

      --
      The Internet is generally stupid
  8. Perfect Timing by oddjob · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm getting laid off today...

    1. Re:Perfect Timing by Laplace · · Score: 4, Funny

      Poor guy. You probably aren't going to get laid either.

      --
      The middle mind speaks!
  9. Don't lie... by famazza · · Score: 2

    ... unless you're looking for a job as a lawyer or at the sales department.

    Don't forget, you must lie and the employer must believe, right before the end of the interview you tell that you've lied in your resume and all over the interview.

    The job will be yours. For sure.

    --

    -=-=-=-=
    I know life isn't fair, but why can't it ever be un-fair in MY favor!?
  10. Resume Building by thomas57 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm currently building my resume, and as a App Developer it is tempting to lists all the projects I worked on. In my case diversity was the thinking. To counter the overload of projects, I instead listed just the most complex projects, and also listed the other roles that I had played at the company. Uber g33k? Yeah but, I don't have to sound like one all the time.

    1. Re:Resume Building by jmccay · · Score: 2

      You could also build a portfolios of projects with code samples, design details, explanations, etc. Keep it in a binder, and on your resume or cover letter, list that you have a portfolio available for review during an interview of past projects. You can list them in order of complexity or subject.

      --
      At the next eco-hypocrisy-meeting, count the private jets used to get to the meeting. Should be interesting to see that
  11. Things I've Noticed... by bytesmythe · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I have switched jobs a couple of times recently. I've noticed a couple of things that have changed since I first started job hunting.

    First of all, it is no longer sufficient to simply mention that you are a programmer. It isn't even sufficient to mention that you know C++. I've seen requirements that specifically want 2+ years of experience using Visual Studio. This is the most idiotic thing I've ever seen, but that doesn't stop companies from putting that in the job description. And we all know how HR departments are. If you don't have exactly what they're looking for, you don't get called back.

    Another thing is the certification hang-up. I've known people with certifications that don't know sh*t, but that won't stop them from getting a job before me, because I don't have any certifications. Hiring managers (particularly those who are non-technical) are fooled into believing that certifications somehow equate to a higher quality employee. It doesn't matter that this isn't true; it can easily keep you from getting a job.

    Thirdly, the "Jack of All Trades" background is getting harder to place. Employers want someone with large (sometimes unreasonably so) amounts of experience in particular (sometimes obscure) areas. It used to be that having a generic background was a good thing. It meant you could easily adapt to new technologies, and had a wide range of experience to draw on for coming up with novel solutions to problems. Nowadays, employers don't want you to solve anything. They want to purchase a solution-in-a-box and hire a technician (not really a programmer) to implement it. Finally, employers are looking for more on your resume than "I wrote some software". They want to see how you drastically reduced the running time, or saved a bunch of money, or lead a team on to beat a tight deadline, save money, and make the manager look like a champion. Remember: they aren't hiring you to just get a job done. They are hiring you so that they can pad their own resumes with accomplishments that you pulled off. So, make sure that the things on your resume support what your potential manager would want on his resume.

    After all this, I would like to mention that I am starting to feel burned out, and am looking towards getting back into academia. I'd rather do research than spend the rest of my life feeling like a corporate flunky.

    --
    bytesmythe
    Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
    -- Scott Meyer
  12. I solved my resume woes by back_pages · · Score: 5, Insightful
    by deciding to go to grad school. I'm in my early 20s, with no meaningful work experience in the field, competing with droves of laid off, older, more experienced workers. Even if I find an entry-level position, then I have to compete with everybody else who graduated last May. It's vicious.

    I'm not asking for much. I just want a chance to live at least as well as I did with no income at college (meaning: don't starve, basic cable, internet, and shelter), not default on my loans, and most importantly to me gain experience toward building a better career. I'm looking for an opportunity, not compensation.

    Screw the job market. I'm going back to the college life, late nights, late mornings, parties, beautiful women everywhere, lots of beer, and no drug tests. In a few years, I'll have at least a Master's, but that's only if I completely fail to achieve a PhD. Screw the job market. Screw the job market. Stay in school. A teaching assistantship + college lifestyle if far superior and better for your future than developing an ulcer at 23 trying to get an entry level job.

    1. Re:I solved my resume woes by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Go for the MBA. You want to be the person that fires people, outsources jobs, and can get hired elsewhere for more money after you've run your company into bankruptcy.

    2. Re:I solved my resume woes by Pathetic+Coward · · Score: 2

      MBA or law degree. If you have a PhD in science or engineering, you can go into patent law or consulting - where the big bucks are.

  13. Hobbies... by Tim12s · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Slashdot Reader" is probably a bad thing to put on your CV as a "hobby". I'd imagine (...whistle... makes sure boss aint around...) that alot of people spend alot of time on slashdot.

    "Slashdot Poster" is probably a v.bad thing to put on your CV... unless you've got alot of karma.

    Indicating your Slashdot Karma level on your CV (Character Recordsheet) is probably a good thing... but this also implies Slashdot poster... which is a good thing... but it implies that you're a slashdot reader... so you're buggered.

    I'll probably get modded down as flamebait for this. Have at ye fowl moderator.

  14. I disagree by Planesdragon · · Score: 2, Insightful

    DO NOT put an "Objective" section at the top of your resume, they're all bullshit, never relevant and only limiting, and when you hand someone your resume, your objective is simple - TO GET A JOB FROM THEM.

    Put an Objective on there--but make it relevant to your career search. Do you want a long-term job that will last you to retirement? Do your plans only focus on the short-term now? Do you want a part-time job to support you while you go to school?

    I'd recommend a general objective, instead of customization per company. Use the cover letter for that--to display your interest in and knowledge of the company. Your resume should be static, so it feels honest and trustworthy, and they don't think that they're lying.

    (So call Apple or MS or Be or whomever "the greatest" in the cover letter, not the resume...)

    Oh, and keeping it consice sounds good to. One page is a good limit for a physical resume; if there's extraneous stuff (education breakdown, career breakdown, hobbies) that are relevant but not essential, pt them on the back or leave them out.

    1. Re:I disagree by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2

      you are really, really, really mistaken on every point you've made.

      The objective section is totally useless, and takes up the most valuable resume real-estate with bullshit that tells nothing to your potential employer. NOTHING.

      as for customization, if your a geek, and applying for a network heavy job, wouldnt you want to emphasize those skills, as opposed to your SQL skills?

      as for the old "resume only takes up one page rule", that is only true for your FIRST resume - our college one, where you dont have anything worthwhile to put on it.

      if you've been working for any amount of time, you sure as hell better have more than one page work of "experiences" and job-related skills.

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    2. Re:I disagree by daoine · · Score: 2
      I'd recommend a general objective, instead of customization per company. Use the cover letter for that

      I'm not quite sure how relevant this is in today's market -- if you are sending in a resume electronically or submitting via a career fair, cover letters are generally not accepted. Period. In these situations, if you have expectations of the type of job you want, it's important to use part of the resume to tell the recruiter/company exactly what you're looking for.

    3. Re:I disagree by DohDamit · · Score: 2

      I agree some, I disagree some.

      The objective is the first thing the HR department reads. Put HR friendly stuff here.

      Last time I looked for a job(two years ago) I had three resumes: DBA focus, Developer focus, general focus. I would send the one I felt best addressed the position for which I was applying.

      AMEN BROTHER. If you have a one page resume and you've been working for five years, either you've had one job, or you have wasted your time.

      Truth told, the resume won't make a huge difference. Really, there's two questions for any interviewee.

      1. Will you work well with my other employees? I won't hire a troublemaker with an attitude.

      2. Will you be able to do the job right within a reasonable amount of time?

      IF you can help someone arrive at either of these answers BEFORE the interview with content in your resume, then THAT is what you put in there.

    4. Re:I disagree by Tackhead · · Score: 2
      > The objective section is totally useless, and takes up the most valuable resume real-estate with bullshit that tells nothing to your potential employer. NOTHING.
      >
      > as for customization, if your a geek, and applying for a network heavy job, wouldnt you want to emphasize those skills, as opposed to your SQL skills?

      You're both missing the point of the "Objectives:" section.

      In the example you cited, your "Objective" is "To work on networks in a $BUZZ1 company in the $BUZZ2 industry."

      $BUZZ1 should be an adjective taken from the company's mission statement or some other such fluff. $BUZZ2 should be the company's industry.

      If it's a behemoth like Intel or Microsoft, you can do one better, by aiming for the department to which you're applying.

      Suppose you're a router geek and you're replying to a position in the Windows Media Player 12 group. That leads to "To work on network optimization and design and cryptographic authentication with a leading company in the field of rights-enabled streaming media."

      It doesn't matter that WMP12 is 2% of the revenue MSFT gets from Office 2008 - what matters is that your resume comes across the desk of the HR drone whose boss is convinced that streaming media, crippled with DRM, is the wave of the fy00t0re, and that you're interested in his pet project.

      The HR drone will see the buzzwords her boss raves about, pass the resume to the boss, the boss will say "Gee, this guy doesn't just want a job, he wants this job. Bring him in for an interview and see if he actually knows what he's talking about."

      Bonus points if you have prior experience in the field (e.g. Real, LiquidAudio, MP3.com, somelivepr0ndotcomnobodyeverheardof.com) of course. But even if you don't, if you manage to get your foot in the door (telephone interview), you can talk about how you were bored writing accounting applications for some third-rate company and how the problems you had getting live streams of stock quotes through some ODBC app were pretty much the same problems you'd seen when you started throwing streams of MP3z around your home LAN, and that you saturated it when you tried sending DiVX movies around... and how you thought it might be more fun to get paid to solve these sorts of problems than the sorts of problems you used to be getting paid to solve.

      What you do at the interview is up to you. Hey, this thread was about how to get your foot in the door :)

  15. LIE, and LIE liberally! by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 4, Funny

    Want to look good to the idiots in HR? LIE. And I mean LIE. I've seen H1Bs and absolute total slackers (high-school dropouts, even) do it for years, and they get some pretty cushy jobs.

    Do you have more years experience in a language/program than it existed? Yes, you do have 9 years of Java experience and 550,000 lines of code written, 15 years of HTML, 4 years of Windows 2000 Professional, etc.

    Did you never graduate, or even go to college? No problem -- just put on your resume that you graduated with a BS in CS from RIT, Georgia Tech, or whereever.

    Lie liberally -- the companies hardly check anything unless you're going to be CTO or something, and if they do find out you're lying, it's not like you're going to get arrested; simply move on until you find a company that buys it.

    1. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      very true. I screwed myself out of some money by being honest about my lack of college degree. They're not going to pay any attention.

      Lie like a bastard and suck down corporate funds. They'll screw you any chance they get, so you should screw them also.

    2. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by paitre · · Score: 2

      CHRIST!

      This is utter bullshit.
      Fact of the matter is, if you don't have a degree, you -better- be able to show a damned good reason why.

      I've applied for jobs that require an MS in CE, and -gotten- them. I don't have a degree. What I -do- have are provable skills in the required areas.

      And screwing a company just because they'll screw you isn't the right attitude...oh, wait, you're a slacker who'd rather bitch and whine than actually develop the skills that companies actually want...

    3. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by kin_korn_karn · · Score: 2

      I've got the skills, prick. But without claiming to have the paper they think I'm lying. So fuck them. They can think I have the paper, and then I'll take what I need and go on. This is just my day job anyway.

    4. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by GLX · · Score: 2, Insightful

      This is wholly untrue and horrid advice.

      We've advanced offers to *TWO* people for the same Cisco Engineer job and BOTH were rescinded, one for lying about having a degree ("Well, I went for three years, I thought I could list it as a degree") and another about time-frames on resumes versus what time frames his references gave.

      The worst thing you want is for something to look the slightest bit suspicious - in a tight job market that's a straight trip to the trashcan.

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    5. Re:LIE, and LIE liberally! by bluGill · · Score: 2

      I know ALL programing languges, including the ones that have not been invented yet. (Barring the silver bullet that Fred Brooks is still correct about being unlikely) Any good programer can learn a language in at most a few days. It can take months or years to years to learn all the little details of the various libraries, but you will quickly pick up the important ones, and over time learn the rest. A programer with one month of expirence has either passed the learning curve (doesn't know everyting, but knows most of the details) or never will pass the curve.

  16. Re:Resume or CV ? [Slightly OT] by cperciva · · Score: 2

    What exactly is the difference between a Resume and a CV ?

    CV == Curriculum Vitae; generally it includes more emphasis on academics and less on positions held.

    But the two terms are used more or less interchangeably now, so (modulo the usual rules about customizing your resume to the job) you can generally just use the same sheet regardless of which they ask for.

  17. Re:Resume or CV ? [Slightly OT] by tshoppa · · Score: 2
    In the US, at least:
    • A Resume is a short (one or two page) attempt to sell yourself to HR
    • A CV is a detailed description of your experience (notably published papers in academia, but in the software world it would likely list packages you wrote or groups you worked in)
  18. Change the tense (etc) of every line... by floydigus · · Score: 2, Insightful

    ...so that it sounds like an achievement.

    e.g. Was a member of a team that selected a new problem management tool

    becomes

    Selected a new problem management tool

    Do this on every line and use bullet points.

    BYU

    --

    All things in moderation; including moderation

  19. Spell Checker & Presentation by silversurf · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I can't tell you how many resume's we see that have *gross* spelling errors or serious grammar issues. Plus, we get a ton of resume's without cover letters. I know some companies don't require this, but when you read that a job description says "send resume and cover letter to..." then it's a good idea to include it.

    People aren't handing jobs out anymore and there's alot of competition for them now, even for really qualified and experienced people, so that means you have to compete for the job, which also means you have to actually put effort in to getting it.

    We just filled a sys admin job where we interviewed almost 30 candidates. We actually had guys showing up in shorts, torn jeans and t-shirts. I mean come on folks, even though many west coast jobs aren't "tie required" most employers like to see candidates who look presentable.

    Just check your work. If you don't care about the job you're applying for, don't waste everyone's time.

    -s

    1. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 5, Funny

      I can't tell you how many resume's [sic] we see that have *gross* spelling errors or serious grammar issues.

      Plus, we get a ton of resume's [sic] without cover letters.

      People aren't handing jobs out anymore and there's alot [sic] of competition for them now, even for really qualified and experienced people, so that means you have to compete for the job, which also means you have to actually put effort in to [sic] getting it.

      Is this supposed to be humorous, or are you just a manager?

    2. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by L0neW0lf · · Score: 2, Informative

      There are a TON of sites that give cover letter advice. http://www.about.com has plenty. The body of a cover letter should go like this: Dear (get the NAME of someone, don't write HR Manager unless they tell you to), I am writing to inquire about the recent position for a (job title) listed in your advertisement (list where advertised). I am seeking new employment and this position seems a perfect match. I am currently (list college attendance, or "working as a (job position)"). I have xx years experience and am skilled in (plug your skills here). Feel free to contact the technical references listed in my resume'. I look forward to hearing from you. Sincerely, (your name) A cover letter makes you different from those around you who weren't willing to go the extra mile. It's like wearing a tie and slacks to an interview, even if you're not big on dress clothes. When 50 people are interviewing for a job, make sure you do everything possible to make sure you're not one of the 49 who doesn't get it.

      --

      Never look down your nose at others. Someday, someone is bound to see your boogers.
    3. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by DNS-and-BIND · · Score: 2

      That's what system administrators look like. You likely passed up some good people due to an idiot fascination with personal appearance. If they wore a suit for the interview, they'd be lying about themselves. I suppose that would make for a more comfortable hire.

      --
      Shutting down free speech with violence isn't fighting fascism. It IS fascism!
    4. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by philovivero · · Score: 2
      resume's
      Well, he could always be simulating the accent over the e, given he didn't make the same mistake on 'jobs'.
      Wouldn't it then be "re'sume's"?

      I'm never surprised anymore. A complete lack of English-writing skills seems to be more prevalent than ever. The inability to then properly include French words shouldn't surprise.

      I had the unenvious job of having to weed through 30 resumes for some entry-level tech position a few years back. It pained me to see the illiteracy that's rampant in our society.

    5. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by david+duncan+scott · · Score: 2

      Not to mention the inability to then properly split infinitives. :)

      --

      This next song is very sad. Please clap along. -- Robin Zander

    6. Re:Spell Checker & Presentation by Bishop923 · · Score: 2

      We actually had guys showing up in shorts, torn jeans and t-shirts.

      This can actually act in the persons favor.

      I was recently hired as a Web application developer/Graphic Artist/whatever for a small but stable company.(read only 8 employees but profitable for the past 6 years...) I came in wearing a t-shirt and shorts, unshaven and with long hair. I looked more/less presentable but not business-like. The guy who hired me was the resident geek and took me thru the typical interview. Later on they emailed me and asked me to come in for a second interview, mentioning that the company had a business-casual dress code. I got a hair cut, shaved, and came in wearing a collared shirt and khakis. They asked a few more questions and they hired me.

      Point of the Story?

      I showed in the first interview that I knew what was needed for the position, and in the second interview I showed that I cared enough about what the company wanted to clean myself up and look "professional". I suppose its kinda in the same vein as "let people assume that you know less than you really do so you can impress them later". :-)

      (In addition I learned that they care more about what I can offer the company than what I look like. Turned out to be a good deal for both of us. Within a week they gave me a raise because I "made a substantial contribution to the company" when they figured it would be several months before I became useful.)

  20. You belong in academia. by rindeee · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    I don't mean that spitefully, but judging from your take on the work world, it seems obvious. You see, what you point out as reasons for critisism, many would point out as simple facts that exist in a professional environment. I personally (from my perspective specifically) do not find it the least bit odd that companies are placing more value on specific skill sets as they need them rather than a "jack of all trades". Of course the person that you will report to wants to hire someone who is going to make them look good. They are judged based on the quality of the staff that they hire. I also have a beef with certification whiners. My take on the topic is simple. I don't go out and get certifications for the sake of getting them. If someone that I am trying to get work from (as a consultant) is looking for a particular cert, then I spend the few hundred bucks, take the stupid tests and get the piece of paper. It's still nothing more than a piece of paper, but it is also a marketing edge. I have found that most of the people who whine about certs being "useless and trivial...no real indicator of skill" are usually afraid to go take the test becuase they are unsure they could pass it. I'm sorry, but if it's so trivial and meaningless and so easy that someone with know real knowledge can get the thing, then go get the cert if that's what the hiring managers want to see. It has nothing to do with being a corporate flunky, it has to do with marketing your self. Short of starting your own business, you will have to work for someone. That being the case, you submit your self to their rules. It's their field, their game, their ball, their money, their equipment, their risk. You may be a hell of a player, but like it or not, the company doesn't live or die at the hands of some whiney prima donna. So, all that being said, I again must agree with you that academia is a fabulous place for you.

    1. Re:You belong in academia. by bytesmythe · · Score: 2
      You are definitely correct that I do belong in academia. I would like to address a couple of things you mentioned, though.

      I personally (from my perspective specifically) do not find it the least bit odd that companies are placing more value on specific skill sets as they need them rather than a "jack of all trades".

      The thing I find odd is that people with highly particular skill sets can be disposable. Also, they don't necessarily have a "programmer mindset". Too many specialists are useless outside of their pet framework. It would seem like having a rich, varied background would be an asset no matter what. The fact that it isn't seems like an indication of shortsightedness, which is something I strongly dislike.

      Of course the person that you will report to wants to hire someone who is going to make them look good.

      I do tend to be cynical, but I didn't actually mean for my point about this to come across that way. I know it should be obvious that a boss will want to hire people that makes him/her look good, but many people don't always realize this. The thing that I find disturbing is not when the employer gets credit for hiring you and being a good manager, but for the work that YOU did. I firmly believe in giving credit where credit is due.

      I have found that most of the people who whine about certs being "useless and trivial...no real indicator of skill" are usually afraid to go take the test becuase they are unsure they could pass it.

      This is definitely not the issue I have. ;) I can probably pass any test I can study for. I'm very good at taking tests. The issue to me, again, is one of shortsightedness. I think that this lack of foresight is one of the roots of the problems in our current economic situation. This is why I am so against certifications. If they were meaningful (so that they could be used in a non-shortsighted manner), I wouldn't have a problem with them at all.

      I have many other points I'd mention, but they become increasingly irrelevent to the discussion, and more particular to my personality quirks and schizophrenic idealism, so I'll just leave it at this. Thanks for your reply. :)

      --
      bytesmythe
      Hypocrisy is the resin that holds the plywood of society together.
      -- Scott Meyer
    2. Re:You belong in academia. by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2

      I personally (from my perspective specifically) do not find it the least bit odd that companies are placing more value on specific skill sets as they need them rather than a "jack of all trades".

      I think it makes sense if you don't understand the underlying skills of the position you are hiring for. I am a 23 yr old Jack of All Trades: Operating Systems, Networking, Web Dev, Software Dev, etc. Of course I'm no where near being an expert in all these areas, but I get by well in each.

      At my last position, two others were hired on at the same time. The job required regular VB, COM+, and ASP work. I had virtually no experience in these areas outside of the tiniest bit of ASP. In a few weeks, I was working near peak efficiency. After a few months, some of the expierenced developers were coming to me for help. Within six months, I had contributed to every aspect of our rather complex development system, working in areas of importance that few at the company had ever touched. I never saw this happen with the other new hires.

      Knowing a little bit of everything makes it very easy to learn new skills. If you encounter a new language, you can compare it to the syntax, style, and ideology of languages you already know. As a result, you can learn new tech much faster than a more focussed individual.

      Along the same lines, people I encounter who are not Jack of All Trades often do not even like the computer science field all that much. They chose this profession because it pays well. They learn as much as they have to in order to maintain their paycheck. When it comes down to it though, who is better for a company 6+ months down the road?

      I understand why hiring managers look for the kind of experience they do. Some get hundreds of resumes a day. They can afford to throw out 90% of the applicants. Furthermore, if they are not qualified to review candidates, they can't afford not to throw out 90% of the applicants. They may not get the best people, but in all liklihood, they'll get someone who can do their job.

    3. Re:You belong in academia. by Darth_Burrito · · Score: 2

      I have found that most of the people who whine about certs being "useless and trivial...no real indicator of skill" are usually afraid to go take the test becuase they are unsure they could pass it.

      I agree to a certain point. Back in college, I looked into taking the A+ certification ($100) figuring it might help me land an internship. Looking at sample questions, I knew 60-70% of the answers off the top of my head, the rest could easily be looked up. Looking at the test, I got the impression that no matter how experienced you were, you would have to spend a non trivial amount of time studying for the test. While that's true of any test, not all tests cost hundreds of dollars to take and have a thriving industry of educational materials behind them. It felt like a scam then and it feels like one now.

      That said, I'm starting to look at certs again, not because I believe they are wholly valid, but because I want the marketting value they provide. Of course, the problem then is, which ones and how much? I can work as a Software Developer on any language or platform and could easily fill an entry level Networking/Operations position as well.

  21. Resume & job interview tips in german by featherstorm · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This is a shameless advertisment of my bosses free tips on how to get a job in general. If you're looking for a job in Germany, Austria or Switzerland, these tips might be of help to you. Of course you'll have to be able to read german.

    Tipps & Tricks zur erfolgreichen Stellenbewerbung

  22. Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by weston · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I first wrote a real resume (i.e., not just a high school assignment) about 10 years ago. I spent a lot of time worrying about the format and language. Up until recently, every time I updated it, I assiduously read tips given by job-hunting and other professionals. I spoke with friends who were technical writers and document design specialists. Earlier this year I read a few books on it and asked all my professional friends and a few unprofessional friends and finally, and after much ado the conclusion I came to....

    The advice is often useless.

    Well, not totally useless. But very, very subjective. Some people will tell you to put in an objective. Others will tell you it's irrelevant. Some people will tell you hobbies are irrelevant; others will tell you it shows a holistic person who'll have more to give to a job. Some people will tell you being holistic is important; others will tell you that focus on skills relevant to the job is all that matters. Some people will tell you to use action buzzwords; others will tell you those will get you dismissed as a charlatan. You get the idea.

    My guess is they're all correct. Resume design is an art, not a science. Every person looking at your resume is looking for different things from a slightly different perspective. I've come to the conclusion that there's no set of tips you can follow to get you a resume that will get you in the door. You just have to design and refine as professionally as possible, think a little bit about your audience, and hope the message you intended to send gets across.

    And sometimes I think that your own judgement may be as important as someone else's. If you walk into an interview with a resume you are confident in, that's a good precursor to success.

    This is the result of my thinking. Feel free to send/post critiques of the thing. Or job offers, for that matter.

    1. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 2

      My one bit of advice (and this is not meant in any way to offend):
      drop the bit about Missionary work. Unfortunately, there are a lot of people out there who simply do not like mormons. There are a lot of self-righteous people of other Christian denominations who consider it a cult. There are a lot of people who are going to stereotype and infer that a) mormons have lots of kids, so b) this guy is going to cost us a lot of insurance money and c) ask for a lot of time off.

      It doesn't matter if you aren't even married. It doesn't matter that there are laws in this country that prevent an interviewer from asking you about your religion or marital status or from discriminating against you because of those points. You just set it out in broad dayliht, right in front of them. Even if an interviewer isn't the sort that would actively discriminate against someone, that interviewer may have some of those nagging stereotypes in the back of their mind (particularly if they live/grew up in an area without a large Mormon population). BYU doesn't always click with people, but Latter-Day Saints almost always does.

      Your resume is strong enough already without that one point. I'd lose it if I were in your position.

    2. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 2

      A lot of people just don't like Mormons, like a lot of people don't like Jewish people or Muslims or Catholics. A lot of people are stupid.

      I know some people who are Wiccan, and they just don't bring it up around anyone else. One of the tenets of that religion, in fact, is to sort of operate in secrecy. 9 times out of 10, people get this image of either devil worshipping, idiots who think they can throw fireballs, or wannabe goth kids. In the same respect, a lot of people outside of Utah have a lot of negative views regarding Mormans. Primarily because most Mormons are very faithful to the tenets of their religion, a lot of people do tend to view them as somewhat anachronistic or foaming-at-the-mouth (although I've never met a Mormon who was either).

      Maybe it would be enough to tell people that I'm single, 30, and don't vote republican?
      [joke]Well, that just says to employers, "I'm gay!"[/joke]

    3. Re:Most Resume Advice is Totally Subjective? by sylvester · · Score: 2


      Of course there's a catch-all tip. There always is. :-) Make your resume about you, but also representative of you. Be honest. If you put value in being holistic, then write down your unrelated hobbies (I do.) If you put value in buzzwords, put down buzzwords. If you're focussed purely on getting money, then read a book about how to make a good resume and follow it.

      -Rob

  23. Learn from others by alen · · Score: 3, Funny

    At my company we run Exchange 5.5 and all resumes are sent to a public folder. We just went through a lay off. So just in case I needed some tips I copied the entire public folder into my personal folders in MS Outlook. You should be able to do the same thing in Lotus Notes or any other email system where resumes are sent to a central location.

  24. My three advices by garoush · · Score: 4, Funny

    My three advices

    Speaking of advices, here are mines:

    1) Advice to IT people: if you can build me a website that can handle a /. effect than make sure you put that down on your resume.

    2) Advice to SAGEWire IT people: your website site needs some tune up.

    3) Advice to Hemos and /. team: next time you may want to send a friendly reminder to the site that is about to be /. so that they can prepare.

    --

    Karma stuck at 50? Add 2-5 inches.. err.. 2-5x Karmas Count to your pen1es.. err.. Karma all naturally and private
  25. Keep in mind the purpose of a resume by Infonaut · · Score: 4, Insightful
    From the hiring party's point of view, a resume is a way of weeding out applicants. If you've ever hired before, you've likely come across this scenario:

    You have 100 applicants for one position. You have limited time to sort through them all. So when you see a resume that has an error in it, or is three pages long, or doesn't speak specifically to the job you're hiring for, you can it immediately, with out even bothering to read it.

    If a job applicant can't even take the time to tailor the resume to the job I'm offering them, then why should I bother reading it? If the applicant doesn't take the time to spellcheck something as critical as a job application, then they probably will miss other important details on the job. Sure, not everyone is a good speller. But everyone has the ability to correct their spelling.

    If a resume has a generic objective statement, it's going in the circular file. Employers want to know that you've actually taken the time to show them in your resume how your goals and your skills match what the company is looking for. You don't have to lie or exaggerate, you just have to articulate your goals and skills in a way that they can understand, given their own organizational leanings.

    One of the best things you can do is to have someone else read your resume. Have a friend who isn't afraid to be critical read it, checking for errors and overall flow. Writing is as much a skill as programming, and if you are a good writer, it's always helpful to have someone check your work.

    Electronic methods are great for employers, because they allow for huge keyword-based searches. But the object here is to get your resume noticed, so that it gets read, so that you get called in for an interview. While the resume is a filtering tool for the hiring company, for you it's sole aim is to land you that critical first interview. From there, it's all about your opportunity to sell yourself, and the resume is practically meaningless.

    So where possible, send a hard copy of your resume, along with a cover letter tailored exactly to the company you're attempting to get a job with. Research the company, show them that you're actually interested in what they're doing. This shows the hiring party that you don't just see this as another potential job out of 500 that you're applying for.

    If you can't send hardcopy, try to use an electronic cover letter (depending on which online resume service you're using, you may or may not be able to do this). The cover letter is helpful because it is seen *before* the resume. In essence, it is your opportunity to intercede and present yourself as a valuable hire, before they even see your qualifications.

    Finally, getting a job through want-ads, either online or off, is the worst way to get hired. It's all about connections - if you know someone at the company, even distantly, attempt to use that connection to obtain an informational interview first. Make a personal connection with someone in the department you'd like to be hired for, and your odds of bypassing the "needle in a haystack" hiring process are much higher.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
    1. Re:Keep in mind the purpose of a resume by namespan · · Score: 2

      If a job applicant can't even take the time to tailor the resume to the job I'm offering them, then why should I bother reading it?

      Speaking as a person who's been looking since the end of April, I find myself getting very, very tired of customizing even cover letters for a job opportunity. I don't bother with customizing the resume anymore.

      The reasoning is: I can spend 2-4 hours customizing the letter and the resume, and get out two high-quality applications in a day, possibly as much as doubling my chances of getting hired for a specific job -- or I can send out 4-8 times as many resumes, probably quadrupling my chances of getting hired for some job. Given the subjectivity of resume design and cover letter writing, I'm beginning to feel like the superior approach is to play the numbers and send out more applications.

      Don't get me wrong. When I do come across a job I'm really interested in -- like a recent opportunity to webmaster for a senator's office or direct internet communications for a large government aid organization -- I pay attention and customize like crazy. And I'm still not sending out totally form-based cover letters... every one of them gets at least a few minutes of customization, sometimes 30 minutes to and hour.

      But telling people to customize on every job they apply for seems like an exercise in futility.

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
  26. Network more, be unemployed less by xtal · · Score: 3, Informative

    Something a lot of people out there need to do is build up a solid network of friends and contacts, moreso than anything else. A solid recommendation from someone inside an organization will go farther than anything else; there is more than a grain of truth to the fact that the good jobs never make it to a forum like Monster. Especially so in today's economic climate.

    It's worthwhile to keep business cards. It's worthwhile to go out of your way to socialize with people in your industry. Go to trade meetings when you can. Hell, get involved in some open source projects where you can meet some people.

    Learning to sell yourself is the biggest thing. A resume is part of that, but it's only a part. Unfortunately, the /. crowd do not represent the demographic who sell themselves best :).

    --
    ..don't panic
  27. re: Jack of all trades by Tablizer · · Score: 3, Informative

    Thirdly, the "Jack of All Trades" background is getting harder to place. Employers want someone with large (sometimes unreasonably so) amounts of experience in particular (sometimes obscure) areas. It used to be that having a generic background was a good thing.

    I have heard the opposite from a training institute instructer and IT placement specialist (although they may be biased somehow).

    They said that mostly small companies are hiring, not larger ones at this point in time. These small companies *do* want a jack-of-all-IT person because they don't have a big enough staff for specialists that we are used to (DBA, programmer, network specialist, help desk, etc.).

    Thus, I am getting conflicting information.

    I would also like to see a forum/story on making a *backup* career for oneself being that IT tends to be very recession-sensative.

  28. need advice on sorting advice by Tablizer · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I get a lot of conflicting information about tuning IT resumes for this tech depression.

    Is there any statistical analysis of what works and what doesn't? (Probably not because too few people are being hired to produce good data :-)

    Heresay is nearly useless if it is all over the map. How about advice from people who have recently gotten hired, at least. Posting successful resumes (minus address, etc.) would be nice.

    1. Re:need advice on sorting advice by leshert · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Here's mine.

      Hired less than a year ago. Got interviews from about 20% of the cold contacts I made; got offers from 5 out of the 6 interviews.

      Looks like I followed >50% of the recommendations. The best one in the thread so far is to analyze all the competencies you list, and break them up into categories (I use three, from "very strong/good " to "experienced" to "familiar"). That was picked up at every interview but one.

      It helps an interviewer tailor his/her questions. For example, if I say "familiar with C++", an interviewer can feel comfortable asking about public/private/protected, extern "C", etc. If I say "very strong C++", I'd better damned well be able to answer questions about things like vtbl layout, partial specialization, the current state of the standard, etc.

    2. Re:need advice on sorting advice by leshert · · Score: 3, Informative

      Oh, and another thing: my "Education" section is the best way I've found to honestly document that fact that I don't have a sheepskin. Over the years, I've had several people read it, ask about the degree, shrug, and make the offer anyway. Be honest.

  29. Re:Resumes by paitre · · Score: 2
    List projects you've done. This speaks VOLUMES more about what you can do than a list of classes, or positions you've held at companies.
    -AMEN-. My resume is three pages (shut up), but a significant portion of the second page is my currect position, and all the projects I've 1. managed, 2. did solo, 3. did in my down time and then released to the company.

    I have some 30 lines -just- for my current job.

    And never, EVER lie. You will be caught.
    Amen to this one, too. You never know how many of your references will be called, and you also never know how thorough a background check your prospective employer may do, either. -Especially- if you're looking at a University job, or something with the feds.
    One more thing: In addition to not lying, -don't- sell yourself as having skills that you don't really have. You want to get bitten? Get a job based on having Java skills, and then have to write a 10k line application in 3-6 months. Good Luck.

  30. blatant advert - cv tips : by DrSkwid · · Score: 2
    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  31. Make it short and sweet by mjhans · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Ever hired anybody? Ever sifted through a pile of even 10 just resumes a day, especially while you're trying to code something on your own?

    Yes, you have 1" to catch my eye. You don't catch my eye with education (the piles are already sorted by BS, MS, etc) You don't catch my eye with experience; I want to know what you want to do, not what you did (you are, after all, hiring for the future, not the past). If you sound interesting, I'll read what you've done.

    You ESPECIALLY don't catch my eye with a multi-page resume if you've worked any less than 10 years. This means you're a babbling idiot who can't summarize properly. This means you'll write lousy memos, ramble on at meetings, and aimless documentation (all of which I've seen, amazingly enough all with multi-page incoherent resumes). The memo part is key. People won't listen to you if you can't write a good memo.

    Yes I have 10 years experience. Yes my resume is 1 page with a clear objective. Yes when my dot bomb went under I was somehow only out of work for roughly a week (admittedly after taking a month of voluntary vacation), fending off offers from both coasts, where everybody else is suffering.

    Coincidence?

    - Matt

    1. Re:Make it short and sweet by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2, Interesting

      i've got a multi-page resume, with no objective, and was able to get a job in just over 2 weeks.

      6 of one...

      of course, i did crazy things like show up at companies doors with resume in hand with a suit on, to hand the resume personally :-)

      hey - whatever floats ya...

      i've had very good success with my system, and apparently, you have too :-)

      --
      ... hi bingo ...
    2. Re:Make it short and sweet by Anthony+Boyd · · Score: 3, Insightful
      EnderWiggnz writes: DO NOT put an "Objective" section at the top of your resume
      mjhans writes: Yes, you have 1" to catch my eye. You don't catch my eye with education

      While mjhans has quite a little ego on him, I just need to get it on record that he knows what he's talking about, and EnderWiggnz does not. I can't believe that EnderWiggnz's bad advice is modded up. I'm currently hiring, and I'm going through about 50 resumes each day. The resumes with generic objectives (like "get a job that uses my talents") and the resumes with education at the top (WTF?!?) get trashed pretty quick. I want to see an objective that clearly puts you in my market, or else no objective and a recent job right up front that clearly puts you in my market.

    3. Re:Make it short and sweet by Riskable · · Score: 2

      Well, a resume is a difficult thing to bring down to 1 page if...

      You've done lots of short-term contracting positions (i.e. over the course of 5 years you've done 10-15 contracts). I fall into this category. This is especially difficult if every contract was for different types of work in different industries with different systems and different accomplishments.

      Even if I shrink it down to an 8 point font (which I've tried), it's still about 4 pages long. I would prefer if I could just have one page with the usual stuff, and then one page with systems knowledge/technical skills. I could summarize it all up as, "Did all sorts of technical contracting work for 5 years", but I don't think that sounds very impressive or interesting.

      --
      -Riskable
      "Those who choose proprietary software will pay for their decision!"
    4. Re:Make it short and sweet by aaarrrgggh · · Score: 2

      Don't list everything!!! Definately don't use 8 point typeface! 14 point is more like it! (Only slight sarcasm).

      The whole point is that if real human beings are going through your resume, they just won't read it all! If they are ranked by computer on word "hits," well... maybe 4 pages will work... I really don't know much about these systems.

      If you only have one page to give someone an idea if you are worth a one to four hour interview, or at least a follow-up call, you need to be efficient. While I would hardly say this is the parent's problem, don't put something in if it is just filler!

    5. Re:Make it short and sweet by guttentag · · Score: 2
      the piles are already sorted by BS, MS, etc
      <SARCASM>
      You sort your applicants into piles of BullShit artists and MicroSoft users? I'd hate to see what categories fall under "etcetera."
      </SARCASM>
  32. MS Word by paradesign · · Score: 2
    Ya know, Word comes with a template for these sorts of occasions

    but seriously, in my field (industrial design) your resume is meaningless. its all about your portfolio of work. i know kids that didnt even graduste that got top jobs because they had a hot portfolio. whats my point, employers want to see what youve accomplished, not the paper slips youve accumulated.

    --
    I want 2D games back.
  33. As someone who has interviewed 50+ people... by gosand · · Score: 5, Informative
    Over the years I have interviewed at least 50 people for jobs. I have been working in QA for the last 8 years, and usually the companies have had a policy where people from different groups (development, QA, management, etc) interview someone, and then put their heads together to see if they are worth hiring. After all, you usually have to work with all kinds of different people, and although technical skills are a must, if you can't get along with the people you work with, you aren't worth much.

    Avoid spelling mistakes and typos. Come on folks, this is a resume. If you misspell something, then your chances just got cut in half. Once we were interviewing for a documentation person, and she misspelled 3 words on her resume. She had no chance after that.

    A good tip about experience with different things is to rate your experience. I know on mine, I broke up technical experience into three categories: experienced, some knowledge, familiar. That way when you say "familiar with dbase" you can expand on that in the interview to tell them exactly what "familiar" means.

    Know what you say you know. We were hiring someone into our QA group, and we were testing on Unix servers. We had to have someone with Unix experience. One guy had the word "unix" in several places on his resume, but when we got him in the interview, he couldn't even answer my basic questions. (what is your favorite shell in Unix?) He asked me what I meant. He didn't know what shell scripting was, but he thought he could learn it. Then came the blunt questions "how well do you know Unix?" He said "pretty well". Guess what, for proclaiming to know Unix and not knowing a damn thing about it, he got to see the door.

    Don't put the standard, tired, canned crap on your resume (Objective, hobbies, etc). Believe me, they all start to look the same. What you say in your objective really doesn't help at all, it can only really hurt you. If your objective isn't worded for the position you are interviewing for, then HR may not even pass your resume on. And if I want to know your hobbies, I'll ask you about them in the interview. And printing your picture on it is dumb. Being "clever" for the sake of being clever probably won't help.

    Show that you know how to use your experience, put down some quick details about projects that you have worked on (# of people on the project, the type of project, etc) Don't go into too much detail, but don't just say "coded in C". Be specific, but not boring. If you read what you wrote, would some questions about it come to mind? (and not - what the hell does that mean?) Pretend to have been interested in past projects, even if you weren't. Nobody wants to hire someone who is just there to get a paycheck and doesn't care about what they are doing.

    Be honest. Really, that is about it. Don't blow smoke up anyone's butt, don't interview as someone you are not. Be yourself, that is who they should be hiring. If you aren't right for the job, then it is because you aren't right for the job, not that you didn't put on the right game face.

    --

    My beliefs do not require that you agree with them.

  34. Tips from a Chief Architect/Tech Officer by tizzyD · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Having been a CTA and CTO for many companies including IBM and many start-ups, I wanted to share a few ideas for good resumes.
    1. Make it look nice. If it looks like crap, I think your code looks like crap. Marketing is critical here.
    2. Don't include every technology you've ever touched. If you do, I love calling people on their tech knowledge. You've used Intermedia, interesting. Tell me, what's the function of a stemmer and how does it work in Intermedia? Don't be too agressive. You cannot know everything.
    3. If you put multiple tools or editors down, make sure you know them. I used to ask people what they liked about a Visual Cafe over JBuilder, and, more importantly, why. If they used BEA and Websphere, great, tell me why I would use one or the other. If you can't do that, then you don't know the tools.
    4. IMHO Certifications quite frankly are crap. They show you can take tests, not that you understand the tools or languages. Mention them later, not at the top.
    5. A style note: use verbs!!!! Developed, Created, Architected, Designed, Coded, Documented etc. Do not use sentences. I was responsibile for is a banned phrase.
    If you have any other questions or comments, just let me know. Hope it helps.
    --
    ...tizzyd
  35. length by sirinek · · Score: 2

    With all the resume tips being posted, heres another.

    Keep it under 4 pages. I dont care if you have 25 years of experience, keep it 3 or fewer pages. I personally watched my manager THROW AWAY a bunch of 5-6 page resumes he had. Too much information. No one cares what you did in 1983.

    siri

    1. Re:length by sirinek · · Score: 2

      While I agree with your sentiment about things these days being overly condensed, I think its pretty valid that you should just detail your pertinent skills. A lot of these over-sized resumes had a lot of unrelated job experience and stuff that the applicant hadn't used in many many years.

      I read in "Knock 'em Dead", a respected book for job-hunters, that you should only have one page for every 10 years of experience. That seems a bit light to me, but still, I stand by my "less than 4 pages" idea.

      siri

  36. Job Woes by geomon · · Score: 5, Insightful

    The current job situation in the IT industry reminds me of the energy industry nearly two decades ago. At that time, I was graduating with a bachelor's degree in geology and was looking forward to employment in an oil or mineral exploration company.

    Then the price of oil dropped to less than $20 a barrel.

    The immediate fallout was that oil and mineral companies put a hiring freeze on new undergraduates. Several of them were holding on to their graduates and PhDs in the hope that oil prices would recover leaving them with a core exploration group to field when it was needed.

    It wasn't long before energy companies started laying off the people with masters degrees and, soon, the PhDs. In short, there was blood in the streets. The old joke was renewed: "Why did the guy with a bachelors in geology fail to get a job at McDonalds? Because he didn't have his PhD."

    I couldn't stand the idea of going back to school. I was tired of school (starvation) and wanted to start working again. I gathered up all of my networking contacts and pressed them hard for any job available. None of them were offering jobs in geology. So I started looking in other related industries.

    I figured that if I could get inside of Exxon or Shell, then I could post for internal positions when they started arriving. My foray into the petrochemical industry started with a job in a small formaldehyde plant. I was the only operator with a degree. Heck, I was the only one in the plant with more than a high school education. That experience, however, gave me an in-road into another field - industrial hygiene. I went from plant to factory performing routine studies of industrial exposure to workplace hazards.
    After a few short years, I had learned enough about the field that I considered certifying as an industrial hygienist.

    But I found an ad in a local newspaper that was offering a job as a well-site geologist who had industrial safety training. Because I had taught industrial safety as a hygienist, I got the job. It was a lateral move with fewer benefits and was a contract position. But it was in geology, a field I had long given up hope of getting a job.

    I was eventually hired on permanently and have been here for the last 10 years. I now have more work than I can perform myself. I will have to farm the excess out to people who have more education and work experience than myself.

    The point? Don't stop working just because you've graduated and can't get entry-level work in your field. The IT field will eventually shake out the deadwood and under-qualified. If you continue to keep your skills up, the day will come when your skills are not only needed, they are hard to find. This translates into greater job security than if you were to have taken the first job you could find in your field only to be laid off 8 months later.

    Don't give up.

    --
    "Rocky Rococo, at your cervix!"
    1. Re:Job Woes by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 2
      I can't start! I can't find an entry-level job anywhere, much less one that I'm actually qualified for...

      What exactly are you qualified for? I have no idea. Why isn't there a resume on your web page? When I saw your comment, I looked to see what you were about. I couldn't tell other than that you play trombone.

      Make it your job to get a job. Think like a hunter.

  37. What -not- to mention in your resume... by suss · · Score: 2

    There was a guy on IRC just yesterday, presented the channel his resume...

    Interests and activities:

    System level programming, networks, viruses, hacking, mail bombing, mail faking, Denial of service, password cracking, trojans, software reverse engineering.

    I mean, dude!

    The sad thing is, he was serious about it.

  38. rpg by Frymaster · · Score: 5, Funny

    everybody hates job-hunting, so my advice is to make it like a role playing game. you "roll up" a resume and send it off to do battle with various hr creeps. if you "win" (get the job) you gain some experience and skills that you add to your character.

    right now my resume looks like this:

    name: frymaster
    class: paladin (web)
    level: 6
    alignment: /dev/urandom
    str: 12
    int: 16
    wis: 15
    dex: 17
    char: 9
    hp: 45

    bonuses:
    +9 vs. enterprise applications
    +4 vs. venture capitalists

    spells:
    exercise stock options
    exorcise stock options
    dispell windows
    summon libraries
    banish end user
    read documentation
    evangelize

    skills:
    hide in office (+20)
    comment code (+10 elvish)

    languages:
    java, php, elvish

    1. Re:rpg by DrCode · · Score: 2

      This is great! If I don't get a job soon, I may implement this in my game engine (Exult).

  39. Fake unemployment figures by peter303 · · Score: 4, Informative

    The unemployement figures dont count people who stop looking for various reasons. The link suggest over three million may have stopped looked already in the current recession. A more accurate way is to look at Bureau of Labor total payroll figures which seems to be falling.

  40. How true geeks get jobs by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

    An engineering friend of mine is trying a different approach. Rather than learning to smile better, lie better, and shave better, he is using technology itself:

    He is putting a timed spring on the back of his resume. (Actually, it is kind of a flipper, penguin-like even.) When they toss his resume in the trash, it pops back out onto the top of the desk at night. It has multiple reloads so that it can pop back out multiple times.

    If it works, I am going to buy a set.

    1. Re:How true geeks get jobs by DrVxD · · Score: 2

      > I'd just like to know how he attached the spring to the e-mail.

      Content-Type: misc/Spring
      Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
      Content-Disposition: attachment ...

      --
      Not everything that can be measured matters; Not everything that matters can be measured.
  41. That's pretty funny by Infonaut · · Score: 2
    except that this is a Slashdot article, not a job. In terms of overall personal relevance, I'd consider a job to be a *mite* more important. ;-)

    Besides, as I'm sure you know, my point wasn't that people who submit poor resumes are worthless. My point was that hiring managers have only a limited amount of time to go through a lot of resumes. Unfortunately, if you make errors on your resume, it is quite likely that your resume won't be seriously evaluated.

    --
    Read the EFF's Fair Use FAQ
  42. Think like the hiring manager by andy@petdance.com · · Score: 5, Informative
    A topic close to my heart, since I'm in the middle of looking for a programmer.

    First off, nobody should look for a job without reading Nick Corcodilos' excellent Ask The Headhunter.

    Second, think like a hiring manager. Remember that the hiring manager has 50 resumes in a folder that HR has dumped in his lap, or worse, 50 emails that have been forwarded from HR.

    Tell me, as a manager, exactly what you can do for me. This might mean some extra work on your part customizing a copy of your resume, and of course writing a job-specific cover letter. DO IT. Don't skimp here.

    I want to know exactly what the applicant can do to help me out. Make a thumbnail sketch of what you are. The top of my resume looks like this:

    16 years professional software development, most recently specializing in Perl, PHP and ColdFusion, including
    • Project leader and senior software engineer for TITLEWAVE online library collection and e-commerce site (1 year)
    • Developing object-oriented Perl and PHP, including interfacing with Oracle and MySQL (8 years)
    • Creating intranet database applications with Cold Fusion, Access & VBA and SQL (5 years)
    • Creating flagship software products in C/C++ (5 years)
    Five lines sum up my background and experience, and highlight my key skills. Compare this with the standard meaningless "Objective" heading. Besides, "To obtain a position as a developer that will utilize my skills & experience" is just cargo-cult resume writing.

    Other little notes from my resume sins file:

    • Do not discuss money. If the ad asks for a salary range, then specify it, but then leave it alone.
    • Put your name and contact info on every document, probably on every page. Stuff gets mixed up once it comes out on paper.
    • Don't try to hide your small amount of experience by omitting dates. I won't be fooled.
    • Tell me why you are better then the other 90% of the resumes I'm getting.
    • I take filling this position very seriously. I expect you to do the same. Cookie-cutter cover letters get round-filed.

    Ask The Headhunter makes the key point that managers WANT to hire you. They want to find someone that they can hire so that we can all get back to doing real work. Make it easy for me to see that you are the person for the job.

  43. Re:war and econ by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    > I don't think that is true anymore. The Gulf war didn't seem to change the economy.
    >
    > It depresses everybody it seems and they hunker down and don't spend. Plus, higher oil pricess.

    In the short term, yes.

    Which is why I say, once we've got our men and materiel in place, let's get the damn war started already.

    Once the war's over with, and we've seized the oil fields (and/or turned them over to allied nations), oil drops to $20 (or less!), and we've got 40-year-low interest rates. Then the economy can recover.

    I'd much rather see that - low oil prices - used to bail out the airlines rather than another $5B in taxpayer bucks.

  44. Never underestimate a good cover letter by Courageous · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've reviewed a lot of resumes. A lot. One piece of advice; write a cover letter, very brief (a paragraph!) that is costomized _specifically_ for where you are applying. Furthermore, I suggest that you touch up your resume for every job.

    The point of the cover letter: to get the interviewer to read the resume, and to positively bias them towards what they read there.

    The point of the resume: to get the interviewer to want to interview you.

    Don't oversell any one point. It's a waste of energy. The point of your resume is not to get the interviewer to want to hire you. The point of your resume is to get the interviewer to want to interview you.

    For tech jobs, make sure you have a "buzzword" section. Little to no prose is acceptible in this section. We interviewers have short attention spans. It's common for us to use a yellow hiliter and simply hilite your technical skills. It's quite possible that we can make the decision to interview you on your cover letter alone. To wit:

    "
    Dear Sir or Madam,

    I noticed that XYZ widget company is looking for a skilled senior XXX engineer. I've long had an interest in your company, and I'm enthused with the work that you've done, particularly in the area of ZZZ research. I have up-to-date skills in XXX-A, XXX-B, and XXX-C. Let's schedule an interview to see how it would be possible for me to contribute to your team.

    --[Signed, hotshot]"

    Anyway, hope this helps.

    C//

    1. Re:Never underestimate a good cover letter by T1girl · · Score: 2

      LOL

    2. Re:Never underestimate a good cover letter by Courageous · · Score: 2

      This wasn't meant as a literal template. It was meant as an example. Something appropriately sincere will substitute fine, such "as I have an avid ongoing interest in public key infrastructure, which is one of your areas of work." The purpose here is to demonstrate a commonality and alignment of some kind. Use your imagination, just remember that it has to be very brief in a cover letter.

      C//

  45. Re:Resumes by AppyPappy · · Score: 2

    If you are over 30, you should have a two page resume. If you can only fill a one pager after 8 years in the real world, you will probably not get a sniff.

    I work in Personnel and I hate little bitty ass fonts. It doesn't have to be special ed but I should be able to use it.

    Find a unique font that looks cool.

    It's the 21st century. Make it unique. Add a picture.

    Aw screw it. You will be pasting into a memo field on a website anyway. Who cares what it looks like.

    --

    If you aren't part of the solution, there is good money to be made prolonging the problem

  46. Re: Jack of all trades by SquadBoy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No some parts of IT tend to be recession-sensitive. The thing is to pick wisely. I can't speak for the coding side of the house having never been there. But I know that in the last few years of slow down. I as a datacomm, network infrastructure, security kind of guy have seen *no* slow down and in the past year have seen a lot of new interest. (Mostly having to do with the security side of things.) The reason so many folks in "IT" are having problems right now is because a large number of them got some kind of a cert during the bubble years and thought they were good to go. Had no love for the profession had no depth had no real understanding. And where in the I can run a windows/*nix server crowd. Well the herd go thinned. Get a good solid deep background then learn as much as possible about *every* aspect of IT and you too will be recession proof.

    --

    Cypherpunks: Civil Liberty Through Complex Mathematics. Those who live by the sword die by the arrow.
  47. Re:Economy speeding up? WTF??? by Tackhead · · Score: 2
    > And there's another MAJOR story that is not getting much coverage in the establishment media: the longshoremen lockout.

    I agree that this is a huge story. I happen to think it's a big reason why the stock market's off - no imports from the Far East, no toys/clothes on the shelves for Xmas, consumer spending drops, and the last bit of the economy implodes.

    So, how do I get to be a longshoreman? $100K/year for unloading big b0x3n off boats sounds like hard work, but fun, especially if this tech thing doesn't work out.

    (Seriously - is it so hazardous that they have to offer that much per year to get anyone to take the job? Or is it really $50K/year, but 16-hour days with overtime results in the $100K/year figure? Or are they being grossly overpaid due to their union's militancy, and a $40K/year grunt with a Palm Pilot could do their job just as well?)

    The media and my prejudices tell me it's the latter, but that convenient match-up is too convenient -- and I therefore think I'm missing something vitally important here. What piece of the puzzle am I missing?

  48. Re:Resume or CV ? [Slightly OT] by Anne_Nonymous · · Score: 2

    What exactly is the difference between a Resume and a CV ?

    Academics have CV's and are generally paid half what their non-academic counterparts with resumes are.

  49. alright fuckhead... by EnderWiggnz · · Score: 2

    geezus fucking christ you right wing assholes are insane.

    have you ever heard of the fucking "COMMERCE CLAUSE" in the FUCKING CONSTITUTION?!?!?!

    you know the one that says "To regulate commerce with foreign nations, and among the several states, and with the Indian tribes; "

    how the fuck can this be construed as to being outside of their constitutional duties, asswipe?

    and in my next lesson - why supply side doesnt work.

    fuck head.

    --
    ... hi bingo ...
  50. Re:What economy are they referring to by forkboy · · Score: 2

    NO kidding dude.....I live in Denver and the market here is pretty bad for techies too. I started applying to jobs in Oregon thinking that maybe it wouldn't be as glutted....20 resumes later and not even a polite rejection letter, and I went back to school. Fuck the tech sector, I'm getting into something else.

    --
    This message brought to you by the Council of People Who Are Sick of Seeing More People.
  51. Re:Ever wondered *why* you're not getting jobs? by namespan · · Score: 2

    Your practice of not customizing obviously hasn't worked for you these last five months, so why are you offering this bad suggestion to others? Tailoring your application to the position is absolutely *vital*.

    I should have given a little bit more information. I spent more time tailoring from May through July. The most response I got from any organization was an automated "Thank you... we've received... we'll keep you on file" response. I spent DAYS researching some of these companies, looking up Forrester and Gartner Group reports, scouring their websites, even emailing some companies who used the product made by the company I was trying to get a job at. Lots of serious investment, no return.

    Starting in August, I decided to "play the numbers" -- I sent out more resumes and cover letters, spent less time researching and customizing. I got actual responses from human beings and three interviews. That's what makes me think this tactic is more effective.

    Now, the investment I made up front in spending lots of time writing and rewriting cover letters those first few months is a part of what makes me able to dash off a cover letter in under and hour. I've written the "how my skills and background can work for you" part of a letter so many times that I don't need to spend much time thinking about it anymore, unless the position I'm applying for is off the beaten path and unusually interesting.

    Bottom line: the second approach has gotten me more interviews, the job of a resume and cover letter. The carefully tailored approach wasted time. I now do my careful research and preparation before the interview.

    --
    Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
  52. Resume advice! by Jeppe+Salvesen · · Score: 3, Informative

    Know your audience. The type of job you are searching for should form your resume. It should also emphasize your strengths.

    Sadly, when employers hire these days, they can truly pick among the best. Out of fourty people who applied for a temporary position I'm hiring for, seven are so talented and well fit that I'm almost down to tossing a die.

    Anyhow, you should also make a good application. Write briefly about what skills in your resume you think will enable you to do a good job.

    That's all I can tell you. The rest is probably position specific. Tailor yourself to the position as far as possible.

    --

    Stop the brainwash

  53. Steve by Bud · · Score: 2

    Oh my, has Apple's Switch Campaign finally got to Steve Jobs himself? I heard that his pay was lousy, like 1USD/year, but recently he got a 40M USD bonus so that should have taken care of his itch to switch. So he's now top monkey at Microsoft, right? I heard they needed someone to keep Ballmer company.

    "My name is Steve Jobs, and I run a fruit company..."

    *grin* *duck* *run*

  54. I misunderstood. by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 3, Funny
    The article was titled:

    Resume Tips For Jobs

    Here I was, thinking Steve had quit and needed help on his resume!

    I had so many good suggestions, too!

    --
    Murphy was an optimist.
  55. coders vs. network (was: Jack of all trades) by Tablizer · · Score: 2
    You will of course notice that I state in my post that I don't know anything about the coder side of the house. My statement is purley my observation that network/security guys

    Security *is* one of the few areas that seems to be strong these days. It may be because of 9/11 fears, or just more viruses and hacking. (Maybe all the unemployeed IT people are hacking around.)
    Maybe we can all work out a mutual deal where 1/2 hacks into stuff, scare PHB's, and break custom software, then the other half are hired to plug the holes and fix things. The employed half then shares some income with the hacking half. After all, this is what our government does: cause trouble oversees to get work for the military who then contribute to compaigns :-)
    The coding side seems really down right now. About 1/2 of all coding is normally for medium-term stuff. When the economy is slow, medium-term projects often get canceled. That means that coder demand could drop to 1/2 of what it is usually at.

    You don't really need coders to keep things "as is" in a company, except occasional bug fixes. Thus, a company may keep just one programmer on staff where before they had multiple.

    Stalled business just don't need nor want coders. It is just not an immediate need for them beyond a skeleton staff.
  56. Re:H-1B street protest anyone? by xtremex · · Score: 2

    I do it now...I support the anti-H1B visa program (Not completely, but the US has made the immigrant influx at an all time high)
    Go to http://www.projectusa.org for information on this movement.

    --
    If you're not a Liberal in your 20's, then you have no heart.If you're still a Liberal in your 30's you have no brain.
  57. unicode by Michael+Wardle · · Score: 2, Funny

    For those in the audience using anything more advanced than 7 bit ASCII, the correct spelling is résumé.

  58. Re:Ever wondered *why* you're not getting jobs? by namespan · · Score: 2

    But are they interviews for jobs you really want and are particularly well suited to?

    One was nigh unto perfect for me. The other two were merely good fits. I generally don't apply for a job unless I know it's going to be somewhere where I'll contribute and enjoy putting skills to work.

    My last job hunt lasted a month and I wound up with a job I love. I sent out exactly one resume after spending a day and a half on the cover letter. The cover letter detailed why this was the perfect job for me, and I the perfect candidate for the job

    Would you mind posting the text? OK, emailing it? :)

    --
    Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
  59. And the cover letter gets you through the HR gate by geekotourist · · Score: 2
    The CL also is the key that gets your resume through the gate (HR) to the castle (hiring manager). HR often doesn't fully understand the technical reqs of a job: the CL explicitly links your skills to the reqs.

    My CL's, which have helped get me interviews (no job, yet) are a form of T-resume.

    My 1st paragraph is short: "saw your ad in X for a Y at Z corp. Here is how I match your requirements:"

    Then I have a list of skills or projects, each one directly matching a requirement listed in the ad. I choose 5 (or 6 if they are short) from a set of 30 different descriptions I have used over time. Because these are pre-written, I can put together a decent cover letter in 20-30 minutes. The last paragraph is a standard closing paragraph.

    Within 10 seconds of starting to read the CL, the reader knows several things:

    • 1. I read the ad: this isn't a spam resume.
    • 2. My CL (and, I hope they assume, resume) was adapted for them: I care about making it easy for them to see I'm qualified.
    • 3. I'm qualified with regards to skills and background.

    I don't add anything about how I'd be an asset or other general statements- those statements are too obvious and takes up room on the CL (and time in the reader's brain) Better to spend that time on capturing their attention.

  60. Re:Cool.. but by bluGill · · Score: 2

    Hint, they were not showing you around, they were trying to get something from you. What I don't know, but something.

    I got the show around on my interview for one job, and it turned out that what they were looking for was someone to sit down and play with the system he would work with. (This was a QA job, so I got to use the product I was going to do QA on)

    Remember, when they show you around the plant you need to keep your eyes open for opportunities to prove you will fit in.

  61. Re: Jack of all trades by ErikZ · · Score: 2

    Wow, all you have to do is know everything?

    I'm surprised more people don't do this!

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  62. Re:What economy are they referring to by ErikZ · · Score: 2

    Only if you have a "Secret" clearance.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  63. I'm hiring..... by rew · · Score: 2

    Things that "turn me off":

    - a 10-year gap in your "activities". Either educational or in the work section. You'd better have a good explanation, and it better show on the resume: You won't get invited to tell me in person.

    - Highly under-qualified work. College graduate person swapping tapes for example. Either you were very desparate for a job because everybody else was turning you down, or they figured out that that was all you were good for after a week or so, so that's what you ended up doing. It's certainly a hint when other people were declining someone a job....

    - Not listing your mother tongue as a "language you master".

    I'm currently interviewing people for a job: Technical, hardware/software, you have to work in Delft, The Netherlands. EE/CS college degree. Linux(unix) expertise very much a bonus. Company: Harddisk-recovery.com, send CVs to r.e.wolff@harddisk-recovery.com .

    Roger.

  64. Re:Not just 2-4 inches. by leandrod · · Score: 2
    > As for the automated HR systems, they'll reject my resume every time.

    Have you read Player Piano by Kurt Vonnegut, Jr?

    It features, among other gadgets of a fully-automated USNA, what you are calling resumatics. In the history, it has the effect of keeping talented but disadjusted people out of the system. As in your case, in the story the disadjusted are the only sane people, but then, as the story takes the idea ad absurdum, they have no place in the economy at all. Thus they begin a Luddite revolution, together with people who do are accepted but feel unhappy about the whole thing. The revolution ultimately fails because the same people who started it end up using they creativity to fix the same machines they destroyed...

    In real life, this could be part of the suicide mode big corporations tend to switch into once they start to keep insisting on missing the Cluetrain.

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin