Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own Carnival Ride

SoCalChris writes "Check out these guys who are building their own dark ride similar to the ones found at carnivals and theme parks. The ride is complete with PLC's in each of the cars, and one more PLC for the entire ride. The ride also features a blocking system like professionally built rides."

72 of 192 comments (clear)

  1. Carnies? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it come with a free carnie person?

    1. Re:Carnies? by kingofnopants · · Score: 5, Funny

      It's an add-on and cost extra but, i think everyone will agree that at a one time payment of only 49.99 it's worth it.

      --
      Disco Stu was talkin' to you.
    2. Re:Carnies? by NotAnotherReboot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Austin: Only two things scare me, and one is nuclear war.
      Basil: What's the other?
      Austin: Excuse me?
      Basil: What's the other thing that scares you?
      Austin: Carnies.
      Basil: What?
      Austin: Circus folk. Nomads you know. Smell like cabbage. Small hands.

    3. Re:Carnies? by msheppard · · Score: 4, Funny

      He's not just some guy, Marge. He's a Carny and part of a noble tradition.
      Carnies built this country-the carnival part of it anyway -- and though
      they may be rat-like in appearance, they are truly kings among men.
      [5F08]

      M@

      --
      Krispy Cream is people
  2. Already?! by Xtraneous · · Score: 5, Informative

    Arghhh, slashdotted, yet there is a Hope!

    Google's Cach

    --
    .noitacidem deen uoy siht daer nac uoy fI
  3. Spooky by ActiveSX · · Score: 5, Funny

    Their web server's in for one hell of a dark ride.

  4. call me anal by spacefem · · Score: 4, Informative

    I'm really tired of people getting the plural form of every abbreviation wrong. It's PLCs. Not PLC's. The PLC doesn't own anything. You wouldn't say "programmable logic controller's". Uhg.

    1. Re:call me anal by Elbereth · · Score: 5, Funny

      Actually, most people would say "programmable logic controller's".

      You're not suffiently cynical yet.

    2. Re:call me anal by gordon_schumway · · Score: 2, Informative
      When you pluralize an abbreviation, such as PLC, you use an apostrophe.

      I think it's actually correct to use an apostrophe for acronyms with periods, e.g. Ph.D.'s, and not use an apostrophe for acronyms without periods, e.g. TVs.

      --

      Ha! I kill me!

    3. Re:call me anal by LadyJessica · · Score: 5, Informative

      I agree. Can't people follow the simplest English punctuation? :-) Check out Bob The Angry Flower for a tutorial for the apostrophe impared.

      --

      -- Jessica
      The mutant geek grrl from Hell.

    4. Re:call me anal by Dr.+Awktagon · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well, okay, but the more important thing is to actually write out abbreviations the first time, even if the writer thinks the audience knows them.

      The first thing I thought when I saw PLC was "public limited company", for whatever reason.. even though I know what a programmable logic controller is.

      It didn't make sense for me at first why *either* of those things would be in a carnival ride car, but after a few hundred milliseconds of brain activity I decided it must be the programmable logic controller, or maybe some special "carnival lingo" (Hey Joe! We're all out of Pyrotechnic Lumbar Cartridges on car #3).

      At no point during this time did I take any notice of the apostrophe. (Or the fact that there were no periods, throw that into your grammar mix: P.L.C.)

      Now, I want those milliseconds back. Nearly a second of my time, gone forever! Think of the places I could've gone, the things I could've accomplished! Damn you slashdot!!

    5. Re:call me anal by frankie · · Score: 2
      It's PLCs. Not PLC's. The PLC doesn't own anything.

      It doesn't? Are you sure you're talking about the right kind of PLC?

      In 1989, a random of the journalistic persuasion asked hacker Paul Boutin "What do you think will be the biggest problem in computing in the 90s?" Paul's straight-faced response: " There are only 17,000 three-letter acronyms."
    6. Re:call me anal by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2

      There are three PLCs in the cabinet.

      The PLC's cabinet is the one on the right.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
  5. For those who don't know what a Dark Ride is by EraseEraseMe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Visit here

    The Dark Ride and Funhouse historical Society

    --
    "Anybody who tells me I can't use a program because it's not open source, go suck on rms. I'm not interested." (LT 2004)
    1. Re:For those who don't know what a Dark Ride is by OffTheRack · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Uhhh, is it just me ... or is going through the same dork ride more than few times A YEAR more than enough? So much work for so little fun.

    2. Re:For those who don't know what a Dark Ride is by istartedi · · Score: 5, Funny

      I still don't know what a dark ride is, but the signal/noise ratio on that website was scary enough. I tried to hold out as long as I could. When I looked down at the edge of my screen and saw "loading http://www.laffinthedark.com/sounds/sal001f.wav 5 of 17" I knew I could stand the terror no longer.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    3. Re:For those who don't know what a Dark Ride is by cpeterso · · Score: 2


      but you know, Slashdot is laughing at you..

  6. This is insane by Dragon218 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Before any comments are up, this site is already slashdotted. Google's mirror. No pictures, but better than nothing.

    --

    "It's the little touches that make a future solid enough to be destroyed" --William S. Bourroughs
    1. Re:This is insane by pete-classic · · Score: 4, Informative

      Google will give you thumbnails.

      -Peter

  7. Does it come with.... by sheepab · · Score: 5, Funny

    Does it come with an automated system that makes it break down every 15 minutes, so it truely simulates real carnivals?

    1. Re:Does it come with.... by bsartist · · Score: 5, Funny

      Does it come with an automated system that makes it break down every 15 minutes

      Well, if you wanted a true simulation of a real traveling carnival ride, you'd have to do much more than that.

      You'd also have to forgo any and all maintenance, and keep the operator supplied with enough hash (or other intoxicants) for him to be completely oblivious to the terrified screams of customers whose children are being thrown from the ride due to inadequate restraints.

      For a little added bonus, you can have the operator sell the above-mentioned hash (or other intoxicants) to passing children. This will provide an additional source of cash for you - which will, sooner or later, be necessary to pay for legal expenses and bail.

      --
      Lost: Sig, white with black letters. No collar. Reward if found!
  8. Not quite jive, but... by Aiwendel · · Score: 5, Funny

    "Check out these guys who are building their own dark ride similar to the ones found at carnivals and theme parks."


    I happen to speak a little Slashdotese. I think this translates as :

    "Kickass! Let's see how fast we can get their website over its 30gb a month transfer limit!"

  9. Build your own carnival ride by sheepab · · Score: 4, Funny

    Also known as Roller-Coaster Tycoon, now availible for the Mac!

  10. Re:Link or Mirror? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Informative

    Only 5 replies and the darn URLs been /.ed!

    I don't, but my friend Google does:

    http://216.239.35.100/search?q=cache:j8SrIlANLtUC: www.phantasmechanics.com/darkride/+&hl=en&ie=UTF-8

  11. Mirror by ahaning · · Score: 4, Informative

    All I'm missing is the last file, drvplan.jpg, but here you go anyway: http://www.osuweb.net/~ahaning/www.phantasmechanic s.com/darkride/

    *ahaning throws the URL at the rabid users and gets out of the way as quickly as possible... as if feeding starved dogs*

    --
    Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
    1. Re:Mirror by Jouster · · Score: 2

      (Ha! If this doesn't convince them I'm not a karma whore, nothing will!)

      Ahaning, can you grab my latest files and update your mirror? That way we can expose all of page one and much of page two.

      Now if only someone would do this (the second paragraph).

      Alternately, if the author of the site could send me a tarball, I'd gladly host it in that form and decompressed, browseable form.

      Jouster

    2. Re:Mirror by Jouster · · Score: 2

      The reason I saved it with Mozilla is that that is how I viewed it.

      I figured there was a better chance I'd get in before slashdotting took its toll if I clicked the link than if I connected to my Linux box, remembered the syntax (specifically, the -r part), and serially downloaded all the files.

      Plus, I had a better chance of getting all the support files with Mozilla, since I knew it was downloading all of them, whereas I don't know how powerful wget's parsing capabilities are.

      That said, all you really need to do is uncompress one of my zipped up files into your mirror directory. True, it won't be a precise mirror insofar as it won't map all the semantic attributes like directory names, but it will be perfectly viewable, which is all /. cares about.

      :),
      Jouster

  12. Convenient mirror... by Jouster · · Score: 5, Informative

    I grabbed what I could, but the site was in the middle of a meltdown.

    Grab the .ZIP file, or the .BZ file.

    Jouster

    1. Re:Convenient mirror... by Jouster · · Score: 2

      I'm going to grab ahaning's mirror's copy of the first page, since he has all the images, and roll that into mine.

      I think mine is now the only source of page 2. (You didn't know there was a page 2? Look at the bottom of the page.) If someone could grab my distribution and combine it with a google cache and google thumbnails from page three, that'd be heavenly. Just post it as a reply to this thread so there's just one "mirror" thread.

      Jouster

    2. Re:Convenient mirror... by Jouster · · Score: 3, Informative

      Okay, new version, page 1 is complete, page 2 has some pictures missing, and no page 3 (sorry!).

      Grab it in ZIP, BZ, or convenient browseable form.

      Jouster

  13. While I know money is an object by mhesseltine · · Score: 5, Informative

    From the second page of the article:

    On Friday, February 15, the Chinese -made Enco metal lathe arrived. It took about 4 hours to set it all up, as it had to be hoisted and mounted upon its pedistal. The whole rig probably weighs over 1,200 pounds. Don't even think of starting a project like this dark ride unless you invest in one of these machine tools. (You'll also want a milling machine.) This unit, plus tools and digital readout (DRO) runs about $6K. It's a bit noisy and vibrates, but it's a lot cheaper than a domestic unit - and it works.
    If you are going to do something like this, please invest in a decent tool. EMCO machine tools are the sorriest pieces of crap you can find. Look at a used machinery auction and buy a good Clausing-Colchester lathe and a Bridgeport or Lagun milling machine.

    As another alternative; if you're going to drop this much money on buying machine tools, just to build one ride, contact a local job shop and work with them on making the parts.

    --
    Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    1. Re:While I know money is an object by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny

      If you are going to do something like this, please invest in a decent tool. EMCO machine tools are the sorriest pieces of crap you can find.

      Hey don't forget, these are people who like living dangerously.

    2. Re:While I know money is an object by Animats · · Score: 2
      Yeah. The big problem with those Chinese machine tools seems to be quality control, or lack thereof. You see a row of the things on sale, and some will hold tolerances and on some, you can wiggle the spindle with your hand.

      It looks like this project has about three people busy for a year, plus buying a machine shop and parts. Overall cost will be higher than the $12K per car they were quoted.

      You can also buy such rides used. There's a carnival ride broker. Asking prices are $95K to $110K for single-level rides, and you can probably negotiate down.

  14. Why not.... by paganizer · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ..do it a little cheaper?
    big box on pneumatics, big screen tv on the front, 20" CRT's on the sides, and a few days rendering up something on 3Dstudio?
    would be a lot more bizarre, and cost a lot less.

    See my Stuff! web.changestorm.com

    --
    Why, yes, I AM a Pagan Libertarian.
    1. Re:Why not.... by quinto2000 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, but it would also suck.

      --
      Ceci n'est pas un post
    2. Re:Why not.... by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2

      These guys want to do it the old fashioned way.

      Some of the parts and props are authentic or antiques from other Dark Rides.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  15. Neat but... by Audity · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Even the professional rides are quite dangerous, I definately wouldn't want to ride on a homemade one.

  16. Luke, by fidget42 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I am your fath.. Oh, you said dark ride. My bad.

    --
    The dogcow says "Moof!"
  17. Just GREAT!!!! by Chris_Stankowitz · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I finally after many years just began trusting roller coasters ( including the cyclone http://www.astroland.com/cyclone.html, I live in Brooklyn, NY) and after reports like this one http://abclocal.go.com/wabc/news/WABC_071002_coast ers.html and a few others on news mags I have mustered up enough balls to get back on them and now I hear that your average joe shmoe is building caosters? Is this thing safe? Has it been tested? Is there an "Authority" that approves roller caosters at all?

    1. Re:Just GREAT!!!! by Xtraneous · · Score: 2, Informative

      In a word...

      No!
      Kinda scary when you think about it, eh?

      There are some in state laws, but that does not stop the traveling carnivals from doing whatever they want.

      If you live anywhere near cedar point (near=within 4hrs drive) it is big, there is a lot to do, and they have an excellent record where saftey is concerned.

      --
      .noitacidem deen uoy siht daer nac uoy fI
  18. Thief! Re:Mirror by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    You are in violation of copyright law. Cease and desist your wholesale theft of Mr. Ferguson's copyrighted material. Permission was neither granted nor implied to set up an illegal mirror of his work, and both you and your web site host will be held accountable to the fullest extent of the law.

    1. Re:Thief! Re:Mirror by ahaning · · Score: 2, Funny

      :-)

      Nice to see that the Digital Convergence lawyers are back at work.

      --
      Withdrawal before climax is very ineffective and those who try this are usually called "parents."
  19. Idea for spooking people by lewko · · Score: 5, Funny

    If you REALLY want to scare people, have a monitor in the foyer with a sign on it saying "Safety Monitoring System" and a Blue Screen of Death.

    Muhahahahahaha.....

    --
    Do you or your partner snore? - Visit www.snoring.com.au
    1. Re:Idea for spooking people by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 2

      <m$-bash>

      Just setup a real Windows 98 machine. Then you'd get the benefit of seeing people's faces when it crashed for real. :-)

      </m$-bash>

  20. Probably been suggested before... by deth_007 · · Score: 2, Insightful

    And offtopic, well, mostly. But the way I figure it... /. has a ton of web serving capability, why don't they mirror sites before posting stories so that everyone could read them? They could even have a 'originally at http://...' frame on top like google does for it's cached pages. Sure would make reading /. stories a lot easier :)

    1. Re:Probably been suggested before... by fobbman · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Here is the entry in the official Slashdot FAQ that answers your question.

      Yes, it's been suggested before. And yes, it's off-topic. But there are enough newer Slashdot members around right now that are posting this idea (and then modding it up) that it's time to link to the FAQ again.

  21. They're gonna call it... by SniffleBear · · Score: 3, Funny

    The Flaming Sybian (And that's what it actually is!)!

    Will be popular with the ladies.

  22. The use of an apostrophe is indeed. . . by kfg · · Score: 5, Informative

    accetable in pluralizing acronyms, as well as for other "non word" elements.

    It's a contraction. The apstrophe substitutes for the "e" in the suffix "es," which is an older, but still acceptable form.

    The dropping of the apostrophe in pluralizing acronyms is a modern phemonemon that comes about because of the modern practice, unjustifiable by traditional usage, of treating acronyms as if they were actually words.

    They are not. They are abbreviations.

    KFG

    1. Re:The use of an apostrophe is indeed. . . by kfg · · Score: 4, Funny

      "Please, we do not need the grammar lesson from old fogies ;)"

      The evidence suggests otherwise. :)

      KFG

    2. Re:The use of an apostrophe is indeed. . . by ottffssent · · Score: 5, Informative
      The dropping of the apostrophe in pluralizing acronyms is a modern phemonemon that comes about because of the modern practice, unjustifiable by traditional usage, of treating acronyms as if they were actually words.

      They are not. They are abbreviations.


      And the word is controller. Which pluralizes to controllers, not controlleres.

      So, while you may be right in general, that doesn't make PLC's any more acceptable than before.
    3. Re:The use of an apostrophe is indeed. . . by Osty · · Score: 2

      Bob the Angry Flower disagrees with you. Don't make the flower mad. (See "Some popular but incorrect rules", rule #2, "VCR's".)

    4. Re:The use of an apostrophe is indeed. . . by greenhide · · Score: 2
      And the word is controller. Which pluralizes to controllers, not controlleres.

      Nope, nope nope. Pluralization is based on the phonetic quality of the word, not its semantic meaning.

      So, you're actually saying "Pee-Ell-Cees". And, as everyone knows, the pluralization of a letter requires an apostrophe, as in:
      There are no z's in this sentence.
      Which makes much more sense than:
      There are no zs in this sentence.
      All you have to do is consult any style and usage work, and I'm sure that they will state that pluralization of acronyms require an apostrophe.

      The poster earlier was correct. His point was the abbreviation was not a word, not that we should look at the original words that PLC stood for in order to make a determination about pluralization. However, I disagree with him that the apostrophe is intended to represent an 'es' sound. It is simply used to mark the pluralization of the acronym.

      E-mail has "revolutionized", in a sense, the way that language is punctuated. For instance, notice that I placed the comma outside of rather than inside of the quote marks around revolutionized. Until recently, punctuation marks always appeared within quotes. This changed, probably due to problems like this:
      Your password is "toothbrush."
      Copying within the quotes would yield a bad password. So, over time, punctuation moved outside of quotations, and this is the style that is now commonly used within e-mail and other electronic texts. It is still technically incorrect in normal printed work, however, so be careful around your English teacher.

      In the same way, a lowercase s used to pluralize abbreviations is a new invention, necessitated, probably, by the huge proliferation of TLA's. Using a lowercase s is, in a sense, an abbreviation of 's. In a forum such as Slashdot, but PLC's and PLCs are both equally correct, although the geek "Elements of Style" might suggest the abbreviated s version. However, use just an s outside of this context, and you, my friend, are making a grammatical error.

      Note: I don't think that there are grammatical errors in this posting, but even if there are, what I have said above remains correct.
      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
    5. Re:The use of an apostrophe is indeed. . . by greenhide · · Score: 2

      This is a style guide, but notice that it's a style guide specifically geared towards information development. My point was that outside of that field, using an apostrophe is the correct method of pluralizing. While using a lowercase s might be stylistically preferred, using an apostrophe is the traditional form of pluralization, and is thus could be regarded as correct for all fields.

      By style and usage work, I really meant one that you would get at, say, your local library. Something like Strunk and White.

      --
      Karma: Chevy Kavalierma.
  23. I built a ride when I was about 15 by ylikone · · Score: 5, Funny

    My ride consisted of a grocery store shopping cart with a rope tied to it. I drove a large metal stake into the ground at the top of a ravine and tied the other end of the rope to it. Then I would place my younger sister and her friend into the cart and push it down into the ravine. The rope would stop the cart from going all the way down into the rocks and water at the bottom... but I did not think of putting seat belts on my ride so it didn't end up working that well.

    --
    Meh.
  24. Re:Thief! Re:Convenient mirror... by Jouster · · Score: 2

    As I am merely reposting the content that appears on his site without deriving any benefit therefrom, no court in its right mind would prosecute me.

    That said, if the gentleman wishes to contact me, he may do so at my phone number here, (540) 432-6166 x3666. I will happily take down any material that he feels I should not be providing.

    Note that I blithely ignore the fact that you're a troll. Nice tactic, eh?

    Jouster

  25. Disclaimer reads: by dr_dank · · Score: 5, Funny

    Bearded lady sold separately.

    --
    Where does the school board find them and why do they keep sending them to ME?
  26. Favorite Carnival Ride by Tablizer · · Score: 4, Funny


    There was this one carnival attraction in my hometown where you crawl through a bunch of black boxes, cushions, and tubes in total darkness.

    Teenage guys LOVED that one because they could grab girls every which way without ever getting caught.

    Now *that* would be the one to build in your backyard.

  27. Trent Reznor Owns This by puto · · Score: 5, Funny

    As a Native New Orleanian I guess I should mention that the House of Shock where this ride is located is a Trent Reznor project.

    I worked at the ISP that kicked him his bandwidth in the day and his group were a pretty nice bunch of guys. I remember one day when I was BOFHing some tech calls and someone calls to add a couple of pop boxes for a domain and reset a pass. In my best "fuck you asshole, stupid loser that you are" voice I asked for the customers last name. When I replied "Like uh Trent" guy said yeah and I pulled the account up. Felt like such an ass.

    Course the ultimate scare would be to be the only guy in the ride with 4 300 lb female ex cons who just got outta stir and are looking for some strange. As the lights go out and the strains of the song Closer chime in.... oof gonna have nightmares about that one.

    Puto

    --
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised
  28. This is definitely a gray area. Here's evidence: by egarland · · Score: 2, Informative

    Can you use apostrophes in acronyms when pluralizing them? Some people say yes, some people say no. I say yes! Here's why:

    Purdue University has a nice blurb on how to properly use apostrophes. One of the uses is "Forming plurals of letters, numbers, and symbols" to avoid confusion.

    This page says you can us an apostrophe when the acronym ends in S to avoid confusion. Their example was if you said "The DHSSs of Europe are getting together next week" it would look strange so you can use "The DHSS's of Europe are getting together next week"

    This says use an Apostrophe whenever there is punctuation in the acronym. Many other publications say you can't.

    Since acronyms and codes are getting more popular they have to get more complex to be unique. You wouldn't want someone getting confused between multiple Non-Maskable Interrupts and a Navy Manpower Information System. Why not make it NMI's instead of NMIs so it doesn't get confused with a NMIS.

    Many people seem to agree that you shouldn't use apostrophes to pluralize acronyms but I don't. I think the "ends in S" rule is good but what about the "could be confused with another acronym which is this one with an s on the end" rule. How do you know there isn't an acronym out there that is that one with an S on the end? How do you know there won't be one tomorrow?

    You cant!

    The bottom line is that the purpose of language is to communicate effectively. If I can do that using 31337 sp33ch then that's ok. It's like the whole stupid he/she vs they thing. (They has always been acceptable as a singular gender neutral pronoun despite many people's assertions otherwise).

    To sum it up:

    Language rules are here to help us communicate and any rule that restricts our ability to do so effectively is invalid by definition no matter how much some know-it-all wants to convince you otherwise. It's the way it always has been and the way it always will be.

    --
    set softtabstop=4 shiftwidth=4 expandtab nocp worlddomination
  29. I mean, cheap is one thing, but... by BiOFH · · Score: 2, Interesting

    "On Friday, February 15, the Chinese -made Enco metal lathe arrived. It took about 4 hours to set it all up, as it had to be hoisted and mounted upon its pedistal. The whole rig probably weighs over 1,200 pounds. "

    ...which is why, in the meantime, we just sat it upon these two wooden house stools. LMAO

    --
    - I am made of meat.
    1. Re:I mean, cheap is one thing, but... by cr0sh · · Score: 2
      Funny, on first look...

      But actually, if you look at the pictures, you can see the first shows it on the stools, and the pedestal is in the foreground, the second shows it on the pedestal (and is dated a day ahead). The next image showing one of the guys using the lathe, you can see one of the stools is being used to support a box of tools or something.

      Believe me, while it may look like they could use it on the stools, any metalworker with any kind of experience would tell you that would be a bad thing...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
    2. Re:I mean, cheap is one thing, but... by cr0sh · · Score: 2

      I didn't think you were, I knew you were merely pointing out the funny way it looked. Still, I wanted to clarify things a bit for others who might not understand - and sometimes, even metalworkers get wonky with thier tools...

      --
      Reason is the Path to God - Anon
  30. Develop opt-in slashdot caching tag by Lev_Arris · · Score: 2

    This idea has been proposed before as well:

    Just invent a meta tag that specifically allows slashdot to cache the site. Put it into the FAQ under 'How do I allow Slashdot to cache my site?' and note that 'By including this Tag on your pages you specifically allow us to fetch your website and host a copy of it on our own servers in the event that a link to your site is posted to our front page.' (Maybe even make that a license agreement ...)

    That would at least allow caching for the webmasters who specifically want it.

  31. Build your own carnival ride? by djn · · Score: 2, Informative

    Almost as fun as a backyard roller coaster!

    -Dan

    1. Re:Build your own carnival ride? by RedWolves2 · · Score: 2

      We discussed this on slashdot a while ago.

      I even seen it on CNN Headline news.

  32. Slashdotted; Can anybody tell me Which PLC? by karlandtanya · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm sitting here in a room with about twenty (fifty if you count the ones in the cabinet) "PLCs" (actually, they're the grandchildren of the original "PLC"). This is at the company that invented the PLC; I'm testing the new stuff. At any rate, I think it'd be pretty cool if it was one of our products being used. Which PLCs were used?

    --
    "Reality is that which, when you stop believing in it, doesn't go away." - Philip K. Dick
  33. The Scariest Of Em All by The+Dobber · · Score: 2

    I'm ridin the Dot Com roller coaster..........

    Goin down !!

  34. From Google's cache of the now-dead page by mhesseltine · · Score: 2

    The Google cache of the second page lists the machine as ENCO. I was pretty certain that $6k for a lathe with a DRO system seemed pretty cheap.

    --
    Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    1. Re:From Google's cache of the now-dead page by mhesseltine · · Score: 2

      Ahh! Now I get it. My bad.

      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
  35. Just to completely destroy the rules... by dubiousmike · · Score: 2

    Of the English language in the name of humor...

    You are anal's

  36. Re:Phil Anselmo, not Trent Reznor by puto · · Score: 2

    oops you are right! Sorry bout that. And of all things I went to the same high school with anselmo(clifton l ganus) though he was two years older than I.

    My bad.

    Puto

    --
    The Revolution Will Not Be Televised