Slashdot Mirror


Using Microwaves to Drill Through Glass

Linux_ho writes "UPI is reporting that Israeli researchers have developed a drill that can melt a small hole in glass, ceramics, or concrete with no dust or noise. Nature.com reports that it doesn't work very well with good heat conductors or materials with very high melting points, but the researchers envision a wide variety of manufacturing applications, and possibly some medical uses as well."

140 comments

  1. And spy movie uses! by ottffssent · · Score: 5, Funny

    Can it be suction-cupped onto a piece of glass to cut a perfect circle out?

    1. Re:And spy movie uses! by zacheryh · · Score: 1

      No dork, it would burn the plastic suction-cup before the glass... duh ;)

  2. Industry by DRnetman86 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Wow. Imagine the implications in major industry. It would be the ultimate glass cutter.

  3. Military applications by *Pres* · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I suppose it also melts through bunkers and armoured vehicles?

    1. Re:Military applications by sirius_bbr · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I suppose it also melts through bunkers and armoured vehicles?

      I agree on the concrete bunkers, but I don't think it would work on armoured vehicles (assuming the armor is some sort of metal), since the article states it only works on non-conductive materials.

      --
      this sig has intentionally been left blank
    2. Re:Military applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      Yeah, but after experiments with CD's in microwaves, you have to agree that it would look good... whilst being totally ineffective...

    3. Re:Military applications by AlecC · · Score: 4, Informative

      Except that the leatest, greatest armour is ceramic, not steel. But, according to the article, it limited to the 1/4 wave of the microwaves - an inch or so. And it only makes tiny holes. Somehow I doubt that making pinholes in the armour of a tank is going to slow it down much.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    4. Re:Military applications by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 2, Interesting

      The articles too slashdotted to tell, But assuming it does it quick enough all you would need is some ammunition the size of a pinhole ;)

      Maybe you could 'cut' with it, like frying ants with a magnafying(too tired to spellcheck) glass? where the area of heat is small but constant, so it could easily slice open some armor.

      Also, breaking an air tight seal in the future might be needed. A small pinhole is all you neeed to pump gas into a tank and make it a death trap.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    5. Re:Military applications by Keith_Beef · · Score: 1



      do
      make tiny hole
      move along 1/2 diameter of tiny hole
      until BIG HOLE is cut

    6. Re:Military applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      2000 perforations, let enemy flood out.

      Apologies to the Typhoo lads...

    7. Re:Military applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Except that the leatest, greatest armour is ceramic, not steel.

      Offtopic, yes, but do you have any links to explain this? Most of us are careful not to drop our ceramics, so this is an interesting statement.

    8. Re:Military applications by WowTIP · · Score: 4, Funny

      Sir? Could you please stop your tank a moment? We need to cut a BIG HOLE in it. Hello? Hello?

      --

      --

      "I'm surfin the dead zone
      In the twilight, unknown"
    9. Re:Military applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Make a quick google search on "ceramic armor" and you'll see what he means.

      Note that "ceramic" in this case isn't the same material you associate with pottery.

    10. Re:Military applications by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, not really, but considering the worlds nucs are protected by a mechanism housed in glass with sound and vibration alarms this news would seem frightful. But don't worry, the technology has already been around 15 years, it is just now made public.

    11. Re:Military applications by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Well I think for anti-tank use, i don't think it would have to make a very big hole, or even a hole at all. All it needs to do is make a small hole of irregular shape, or even just weaken the armour in the impact location. If the armour loses its integrity in one spot, the area around that spot will fail if it is struck.

      If this device could be made small/cheap enough, think of this in the end of a missle or bomb, softening it's target as it approaches. Or more reusable, this along side the targeting laser for laser guided bombs.

    12. Re:Military applications by lommer · · Score: 1

      This is ridiculous. The drilling method they described is very short range (not to mention too slow for a bullet) and thus would be completely ineffective in allowing a missile/RPG to inflict more damage.

      I thing that the best thing this could be used for is some sort of small smart patch that could be thrown/stuck/launched at a tank. It would then stick to the tank. Then by using some simple robotics it would move across the tank and position itself to slowly drill into the engine block (or the magazine for even more fun!)

  4. Excellent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    I've always wanted holes in my windows.

    1. Re:Excellent by hplasm · · Score: 5, Funny

      Get Windows XP. The holes included are numerous.

      --
      ...and he grinned, like a fox eating shit out of a wire brush.
    2. Re:Excellent by D4M4DH477X0R · · Score: 1, Funny

      WHAT?!?! i thought they were features...

    3. Re:Excellent by gl4ss · · Score: 1, Funny

      no no! they are in fact holes which are features that the spam industry ordered from ms.

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:Excellent by falzer · · Score: 2

      > Get Windows XP. The holes included are numerous.

      Oh, those? They're speed holes.

  5. So... by iomud · · Score: 5, Funny

    What kind of time are we talking about for the average hotpocket? I'm just thinking about the immediate benefits here.

  6. One step closer... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    to the F-ray.

  7. Not quite by jukal · · Score: 4, Insightful
    By heating a target to nearly 2,000 C, the microwaves soften it up enough for a small rod to be pushed through

    So, the article was a bit misleading as the microwaves are not enough to go through.

    1. Re:Not quite by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Using Microwaves to Drill Through Glass
      or
      Using Microwaves to Melt, while a Metal Rod Drills Through Glass

      It's a headline. It's supposed to lie. I mean, all the ones in real news sources do.

    2. Re:Not quite by Linux_ho · · Score: 2
      By heating a target to nearly 2,000 C, the microwaves soften it up enough for a small rod to be pushed through
      So, the article was a bit misleading as the microwaves are not enough to go through.

      That's +5 insightful? The headline didn't say "Using ONLY microwaves to drill through glass". Of COURSE it requires a small rod or some physical means to remove the molten material from the intended hole area. So, for a minute you thought someone had come up with a way to form a Green-Lantern-like drill bit energy field out of microwaves that physically cut into the material and spiralled it away from the target? No, sorry to disappoint you. The process is still very accurately described by the phrase "Using microwaves to drill through glass".
      --
      include $sig;
      1;
    3. Re:Not quite by Hays · · Score: 1

      First, just because the headline exempted the word "only" doesn't mean it was misleading.

      Second, you make it sound as if vaporizization is only in the realm of science fiction. Lasers by themselves are used to cut materials. It's not such a stretch to imagine that (even unorganized) microwaves could do the same.

    4. Re:Not quite by Hays · · Score: 1

      vaporization, I know. I'm tired.

  8. Max Depth? by BoBaBrain · · Score: 5, Interesting

    The article mentions that it can only drill to a depth equal to a quarter of its wavelength. Why is this?

    Surely it could also drill at depths of .75, 1.25, 1.75 etc.

    --
    I am a Karma Library.
    1. Re:Max Depth? by AlecC · · Score: 5, Insightful

      As I read the article, below 1/4 wave, the drill bit behaved more like a hosepipe - microwave frequency oscillations in the conducting drill bit produce an intense microwave field just beyoind the point of the bit - probably using the Near Field bits of Maxwell's equations, which I never did understand. Above 1/4 wavelength, the drill bit functions as a tradition aeriel, radiating the energy sideways from the drill bit. It is not that some sort of effect doesn't exist at the end of the bit, it is that far to much energy escapes sideways to make it worthwhile.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    2. Re:Max Depth? by Ilari · · Score: 5, Informative

      From the article: "The device is limited to a penetration depth of a quarter of the wavelength of the microwaves used -- in this case, about an inch. If the drill bit is any longer, the microwaves are no longer beamed forward but instead radiate in every direction like an antenna."

      If I understand correctly the drill works as a highly directive antenna - beaming microwaves towards the material to be melted. The drill needs to be short to achieve good directivity.

      Different frequenciens have different penetration depths - that is, how deep the electric field or radiation energy can penetrate into the material which is being "drilled". The penetration depth also depends on the conductivity of the material, so different materials can have very different penetration depths for the same frequency.

      I think the depth of "a quarter of its wavelength" is just a very approximate rule given to journalists. It is more of a comparison rule: the penetration depth is comparable to a quarter of the wavelength. (Although I'm not sure why, the penetration depth is proportional to the square root of the wavelength, if I remember correctly.)

      After they have reached the penetration depth, they need to move the antenna/drill forward. So of course they can drill deeper holes than that, but not at a time.

      What kind of an "antenna" are they using? To achieve good directivity, they would need to use "traveling wave antennas" (or whatever they are called in english), I'd imagine. Does anybody know any details of this?

    3. Re:Max Depth? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0


      I knew a girl once. We use to call her the Hose...oh, wait you said HosePipe. I was thinkin HoseMonster.

      Nevermind.

    4. Re:Max Depth? by AlecC · · Score: 5, Interesting

      The antenne *is* the drill bit - and the quarter wave rule is to stop it acting as a real antenna and broadcasting microwaves all round the room. Below 1/4 wavelength, some undecribed mechanism creates intense heating just below the drill bit, which is where you want to drill. They can't move the drill forward without moving the (presumably non-conducting) chuck, or all their micropwave energy will radiate sideways, gently heating that which they do not want to heat and failing to heat that which they want to drill.

      --
      Consciousness is an illusion caused by an excess of self consciousness.
    5. Re:Max Depth? by Muad'Dave · · Score: 2

      wavelength = 0.1016m
      c = 300x10^6 m/s
      freq = c/wavelength

      freq = ~ 2.95 GHz

      Allowing for journalistic approximation, they could be simply aiming a 2.4GHz microwave oven magnetron at rocks.

      --
      Tiller's Rule: Never use a word in written form that you've only heard and never read. You will end up looking foolish.
    6. Re:Max Depth? by Ilari · · Score: 1

      The antenne *is* the drill bit - and the quarter wave rule is to stop it acting as a real antenna and broadcasting microwaves all round the room. Below 1/4 wavelength, some undecribed mechanism creates intense heating just below the drill bit, which is where you want to drill.

      That's what I said: the drill is a highly directional antenna. The undescribed mechanism is the radiation energy absorbed by the material which is being drilled. (Energy equals heat, among some other things.)

      They can't move the drill forward without moving the (presumably non-conducting) chuck, or all their micropwave energy will radiate sideways, gently heating that which they do not want to heat and failing to heat that which they want to drill.

      Yes, you're right about that. I first thought that the mechanism of drilling is as follows: heat the material with microwaves and when the material is sufficiently hot/soft, push the drill/antenna as deep as you can and repeat. The problem is that the "hole" made is just wide enough for the antenna, so they can't push the drill/antenna any further. So they can't make holes any deeper than the given a quarter of wavelength rule.

    7. Re:Max Depth? by Mr.Sharpy · · Score: 1

      What about using more than one antenna to emitt the microwaves in such a way that they either cancel each other out everywhere but at the target, or amplify at the target point. Would that allow you to move the drill bit further away from the material? Would it be possible to move the drilling point just by changing way the microwaves interact?

  9. CPU key fobs by Perdo · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I doubt that steel conducts the heat away too fast. I'd wager that the steel conducts the RF radiation itself. Just like this device has an antenna, steel would be an antenna too. Not exactly impedance matched, but certainly enough to prevent the steel from being heated except across the entire piece.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  10. In other news... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...Burglars and Bankrobbers Corp. raised it forcasts for the financial year 2003 after a R&D breaktrough.

  11. Not a big deal by Sinbit · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I was doing the same thing over 10 years ago for my Master's thesis with a pulsed CO2 laser with ~500W time averaged output. What is the advantage of using a microwave beam over a CO2 laser?

    1. Re:Not a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

      >What is the advantage of using a microwave over a CO2 fire-extinguisher?
      because if you use your microwave, you can keep the extinguisher handy for putting the fire out afterwards..

    2. Re:Not a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

      According to the nature article- cost.

      And that drives everything

    3. Re:Not a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It gets you mentioned on slashdot.

    4. Re:Not a big deal by geordieboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

      It's probably a lot cheaper - the article says
      that this microwave device is not more expensive
      than a mechanical drill. How much does a 500W laser cost?

      --
      The world is everything that is the case
    5. Re:Not a big deal by crywolf · · Score: 4, Informative

      If I'm understanding correctly, the microwave beam has a very limited range. This would make it much harder to accidentally hurt someone with it. You can hurt someone on the other side of a large room, or possibly in the next room over, with an industrial laser.

      --
      CAUTION: Product may be hot after heating
    6. Re:Not a big deal by silverhalide · · Score: 1

      You should sue for patent infringement and cash in, duh!

    7. Re:Not a big deal by JUSTONEMORELATTE · · Score: 4, Funny
      How much does a 500W laser cost?

      I have no idea:

      All Categories
      0 items found for 500w laser

      Try these search alternatives

      • Search: Title and description
      • Search again using fewer or different keywords.
    8. Re:Not a big deal by jmcwork · · Score: 1

      Val Kilmer did it way before that.

    9. Re:Not a big deal by Idarubicin · · Score: 5, Interesting
      What is the advantage of using a microwave beam over a CO2 laser?

      There are a number of advantages. First is price--you can use off-the-shelf microwave oven pieces for most of a microwave drill. Granted, carbon dioxide cutting lasers are also available essentially off the shelf from a limited number of suppliers, but they tend to run in the tens of thousands of dollars.

      Durability. Laser tubes don't tend to be happy about being moved about a lot. They contain optics that are very sensitive to misalignment.

      Size. Microwave sources for this application would be quite a bit smaller than a carbon dioxide laser, especially when you add in all the ancillary equipment in my next point. In addition, combining size and durability makes a much more portable tool.

      Limited complexity. No delicate optics. No vacuum system. No water cooling system. No mixed lasing gas to deal with.

      Safety. Lasers can remain well collimated for significant distances--you can make holes in your coworkers from across the room if you're not careful. A microwave drill as described isn't acutely dangerous beyond an inch or two from the end of the drill bit. (There might be heating effects beyond that distance, but reflex action--Ow! It's hot! I'm moving my hand now!--would likely be sufficient to protect you. You need the same level of common sense that it takes to operate a band saw--don't put your fingers near the business end!)

      So, that's why microwaves would be advantageous. That said, CO2 lasers can perform extremely well, as long as you don't have to move them to the field. Manufacturers already exist for the lasers, and it's a proven technology.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    10. Re:Not a big deal by WolfWithoutAClause · · Score: 2
      The cheapest lasers cost about $1/watt currently (semiconductor lasers); but normally you're talking $10s or $100s of dollars per watt.

      Semiconductor lasers could be made to work, but they're awkward, you'd need a large array of them and you'd need focusing lenses, and a lot of mucking about and aligning.

      --

      -WolfWithoutAClause

      "Gravity is only a theory, not a fact!"
    11. Re:Not a big deal by BigBadBri · · Score: 1

      Looking at commercial CO2 cutting lasers, even a secondhand one will rush you between £40,000 and £110,000 (with control systems).

      Having said that, most of these lasers are > 1KW, so it may be that you could pick up (or build) a straight 500W CO2 laser for around £1000 (no control systems etc.)

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    12. Re:Not a big deal by BigBadBri · · Score: 1

      oops! looked at a few hobby type sites - a 20W CO2 laser can be built for roughly £70. This site: a funky CO2 laser has some nice pix.

      --
      oh brave new world, that has such people in it!
    13. Re:Not a big deal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      reflex works more like "i'm moving my hand and i don't know why.. ow! it's hot!"

    14. Re:Not a big deal by antirename · · Score: 2

      You can build the laser HEAD for roughly $100, if you get a really good deal on the lenses. After that you need to rent a tank of CO2 laser mixed gas (~$150), buy a power supply (or build one, in which case the price depends on what components you have on hand). You also need a pump that can draw a very high vaccuum to pull the gas out of the tube (I got mine free from a petroleum lab; they were getting rid of it because the manometer containes a LOT of mercury). Buying one would be expensive.You're also going to need a good quality HeNe laser (and associated power supply) to align the thing so it'll lase when you're done. Water pumps and a radiator for the cooling system will also be needed. I think you could build a 25W continuous 100W pulsed laser for less than $1000 if you shopped around, had some components on hand, got lucky finding others, and have LOTS of experience with high voltage (the power supply to run one of these things will definately kill you if you screw up). Not a small project, but doable.

  12. Ummm "Pipe" making ! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    What a great way to make holes in complicated glass pieces. I see a brave new future for the science of "pipe" making.

    Stoners of the world unite ! Yay for those ingenious asians

  13. cost benifit. by jericho4.0 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Is a laser really that much more expensive than one of these? I mean, they've been around for 30+ years now, havn't they? I bet this doesn't turn out to be so much more cost-effective in the short run, at least.

    --
    "A language that doesn't affect the way you think about programming, is not worth knowing" - Alan Perlis
  14. Build your own by dubstop · · Score: 4, Funny

    If you want to know how to build something similar yourself, Kent Fukuzura has some easy to follow instructions.

  15. Jewlery stores by hatchet · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess jewlery stores will now use transparent aluminium instead.

    1. Re:Jewlery stores by lommer · · Score: 1

      Right beside the Nature article is a picture of a piece of aluminium that they drilled through using the microwave bit.

  16. Re:Microwave and Me by a_borowski · · Score: 2, Informative

    Don't play with microwaves.

    I've heard stories of people removing the magnetron and transformer arrangement from old microwaves, and firing it up. The reason it's a stupid idea is that it cooks you from the inside out. You don't feel it - no-one has heat sensing nerves on the inside of their bodies. By the time you realize something's wrong too much damage has been done.

    It also leads to blindness. Don't fsck with microwaves unless you know what you're doing.

  17. IP Violation! by Da+Fokka · · Score: 3, Funny

    That device is very similar to my 'Death Ray TM'

    1. Re:IP Violation! by foniksonik · · Score: 2

      That's okay I have it this way "Death Ray(TM)"

      So you are out of luck on that one...

      --
      A fool throws a stone into a well and a thousand sages can not remove it.
  18. Nice invention by Kj0n · · Score: 2, Funny

    This sounds like a nice invention for burglars. Now they no longer have to make noise when trying to break the window.

    Next week on /.: invention of a burglar alarm that can detect microwaves.

    1. Re:Nice invention by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      want to break a window silently

      1) crack spark plug ceramic
      2) lick it
      3) through at window
      4) take what you want
      5) proffit

  19. Apple's Cube by terraformer · · Score: 3, Funny

    This probably would have solved the cracking problem in Apples now defunct cube...

    --
    Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
  20. Re:Microwave and Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    Common mis-understanding about microwaves. Cooking "from the inside out" is misleading. They only penetrate 3-4 cms (Might want to check exact). This is why cooking large items in a microwave is problematic.

    You risk burning the outside of the food while the inside is still under cooked. For things like roasts, etc it is still better to use the slow and steady approach as the temperature has more of a chance to distribute evenly throughout the food, ensuring an even consistency. But I digress.

  21. I thought he was into the goat stuff by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I thought he was

  22. Re:Microwave and Me by GigsVT · · Score: 5, Informative

    Your warning is a good one, but generally you do feel "warm" if you step in front of an active feed horn, before any damage is done.

    You are very correct about the blindness though, looking directly into a hot horn can blind you before you knew what happened. Your eyes resonate right around the microwave range and absorbe them readily.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  23. See what happens deep inside Israeli underground.. by gorehog · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...top secret weapons labratories?

    Physicist #1: Oh man, this Dr. Brown's Cel-Ray bottle would make a killer bong!

    Physicist #2: Ah, they shatter on the drill press, I tried it last week.

    Physicist #3: (eyes red and bleary)Hey, what's wrong with the microwave? I wanna make this popcorn.

    Physicist #1 & #2 (in harmony):Microwave?

  24. Mmmm.... by houseofmore · · Score: 1

    Pizza pops.

  25. In other news... by docbrown42 · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...the price of tinfoil hats has doubled overnight in response to the news. A foil hat manufacturer, when asked, was quoted as saying "Well, we had to double the price. People gotta protect themselves from those orbiting mind-control lasers, alien mind probes, and now they gotta worry about Israeli scientists drilling holes in their heads!"

    --
    Ed Wedig
    Graphic design services
    docbrown.net
  26. How many microwaves did they use? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    I'm assuming the microwaves don't work any more after they use them to drill the whole?

  27. Medical uses? Bah! by Vortran · · Score: 4, Funny

    Think "Return of the Pink Panther in the 21st Century..."

    What else is a silent, dustless, precision glass cutter good for?

    Vortran out

    P.S. - This is a joke. Please do not feel compelled to point out that the thing probably fills up a whole lab and has all the portability of a pile of bricks.

    --
    Knowledge is like ignorance.. too much can be just as bad as not enough.
  28. Totally impractical... by NewbieV · · Score: 3, Funny

    ...until you can mount one of these on a shark's head... that would be frickin' cool!

    And then you could sell it here...

    --


    "For every right, an equal responsibility..."
  29. Re:First Bozzio Levin Stevens post! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what are you doing here then hmmmm?

  30. Re:Microwave and Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    I thought microwave ovens and the like work because the microwaves are the same frequency range as the rotational bands in water (of which we're what, 70%?). Thus, they make the water's spin which makes them hot - boiling the humour in the eyeball doesn't strike me as a fun thing to have done...

  31. That's transparent alumina... by Jack_Frost · · Score: 1

    Alumina is Al203, a very stable oxide of aluminum. Its properties are entirely different from aluminum and making a ceramic clear isn't that novel.

  32. umm.... by Borealis · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I could be wrong here, but wouldn't an ultraviolet laser be far more effective? Glass is not transparent to the UV spectrum so shouldn't it be able to "drill" right through it?

    --
    Unbreakable toys can be used to break other toys.
  33. Reagan's Star Wars by imagineit · · Score: 1

    Weren't they doing this back in the 80's on a much bigger scale as a possible "star wars" weapon?

  34. make the glass windows conductive by DrSkwid · · Score: 3, Interesting

    a conducting film or fine wire mesh in the wires should sort it

    plus you are goign to probably need a big battery to get through my double glazing

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:make the glass windows conductive by |<amikaze · · Score: 3, Interesting

      So, would windows that already have the metal grid inside be resistant to this?

  35. Physicist #4 by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    mmmmm Popcorn

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  36. sounds like a weapon... by Nevrar · · Score: 0

    Hmm. Sounds like it could be used as a weapon...

    Silent killer....

    --
    Nevrar
  37. a hammer would be more effective by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    but like the laser it's other properties make the difference

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  38. sort of old news? by revxul · · Score: 1

    Didn't someone recently make a homemade forge out of a common microwave? Seems these babies have got some uses it took us a decade (or two) to figure out! has it been a decade? bah!

    --
    Truth, Just Us, And Hatred For All Mankind!
    1. Re:sort of old news? by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

      has it been a decade?

      The first commercial microwave ovens came out in 1954. The first domestic ones came out in 1967. They started gaining popularity in the home around 1972.

  39. Re:Microwave and Me by Froze · · Score: 1

    Reminds me of this urban legend.

    --
    -- The morphemes of your disquisition are ascertainable, but they have eschewed an ambit of transpicuous exposition.
  40. Re:Military applications (offtopic) by panurge · · Score: 1

    It's just as well you don't design tanks. With a pinhole through the armor you could deliver anything from blast to nerve gas.

    --
    Panurge has posted for the last time. Thanks for the positive moderations.
  41. Re:Medical uses? Bah! by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

    What else is a silent, dustless, precision glass cutter good for?

    An easily escaped, slow-starting, elaborate death-machine for the next Bond film?

    "Vell, vell, Meester Bont! Vonce dis meecrovawe emitter has reached your krotch, it vill begin to heatink it unt den ve vill be pushink a rod into it. Dis process vill be takink about tventy minutes to begin. Ve vill be leavink you to your fate now."

    --

    --
    "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
  42. Great! by Polo · · Score: 2

    Since no man is truly complete without a portable power drill, I eagerly await a consumer version of this drill. ;)

  43. Re:Medical uses? Bah! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    i hope my dentist doesn't hear about this.

  44. Re:Microwave and Me by GigsVT · · Score: 4, Informative

    I thought microwave ovens and the like work because the microwaves are the same frequency range as the rotational bands in water

    Well, sorta, but there is nothing magical about 2.4Ghz. It's not the "frequency that water resonates at", as I've even seen printed in semi-credible places.

    google cache of message

    This message on the wireless list sums it up pretty well, although it doesn't exist anymore, google cache has it.

    The bottom line is that lower frequencies penetrate better in general, 2.4Ghz is just a pretty good compromise between penetration and reflection/absorbtion.

    Of course things are different when you aren't inside a metal box like a microwave oven. In the oven, all reflected energy is going to eventually absorb into the object in the oven, or reflect back into the magnetotron. In free space, reflected waves are just going to fly off into space.

    In free space, objects that are about the right size to resonate at a frequency don't reflect much of the energy, they absorb most of the energy, but most of it stays near the surface, this is called the skin effect. High voltages are induced on the surface of the object that is resonating, causing resistive heating. This skin effect is also what is responsible for sparks when you have small metal objects in the microwave. Larger objects like spoons and forks are actually less likely to arc than things like metal twist-ties, the twist-ties are closer to resonant, and also have tiny ends which concentrate the voltage. (blunt objects are less likely to arc, arcing happens when the volts/surface area reach a critical value)

    The FCC has done lots of research on exposure to EM fields, and has come up with SAR (specific absorption rate) in humans, for many frequencies. It mostly boils down to this, your entire body most readily absorbs VHF energy around 400 Mhz, your head gets it worst around 900Mhz, and your eyes absorb the most in the microwave ranges. This is compounded by the fact that your corneas don't have much way to dissipate heat, and are pretty sensitive organs.

    Anyway, the original poster is right, don't play around with this stuff unless you understand it. Although, more likely to kill you taking a microwave oven apart is the 1000 volts at several amps that the power supply puts out. Nasty stuff. Much more dangerous than taking apart something like a monitor.

    --
    I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
  45. As with all non-mechanical drills by euxneks · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I wonder how it would work against a semi-perfect mirror? I've always wondered how a laser or something that would rely on waves would work against a reflective surface.. Can anyone give me a clue?

    --
    in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
    1. Re:As with all non-mechanical drills by jpmorgan · · Score: 2

      There is no such thing as a perfect mirror in real life, the silvering will always absorb some energy. A sufficiently powerful laser will destroy the silvering relatively quickly, then go about its business as usual.

    2. Re:As with all non-mechanical drills by euxneks · · Score: 1

      But would some of The laser be reflected back? Does the mirror provide any amount of protection?

      --
      in girum imus nocte et consumimur igni
  46. Security issues by macdaddy · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This makes me wonder about security issues. Imagine if something powerful enough to direct these microwaves at glass from a distance. Lets also say the glass is bullet proof glass. Could that shatter the glass? Perhaps it doesn't destroy the glass but compromises its integrity to the point where teflon-coated bullets can penetrate it. Interesting....

  47. Easier ways. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    With high voltage current you can melt holes in glass... Even a small TV induction coil will do.
    Put the HV wires on either side, if it doesn't start arcing through it then increase the voltage... The problem is that the glass at the hole heats up and the expansion often breaks the rest of the sheet.

  48. Medical uses? by shrikel · · Score: 2
    From the article:

    it doesn't work very well with good heat conductors or materials with very high melting points, but the researchers envision a wide variety of manufacturing applications, and possibly some medical uses as well

    Right. I know human tissue doesn't conduct heat well, but does anybody know its melting point?

    --
    Any sufficiently simple magic can be passed off as mere advanced technology.
  49. Sapphire and Steel... by Explo · · Score: 2

    Sapphire's melting point, for instance, is too high. And steel conducts heat too well for a hot spot to develop.


    Somehow that gave me a mental image of a woman and a man being attacked by Time with more down-to-earth method instead of using parapsychological powers. (I wonder if anyone recognizes the reference ;)

    --
    Everyone who makes generalizations should be shot.
    1. Re:Sapphire and Steel... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But of course..

      "All irregularities will be handled by the forces controlling each dimension.
      Trans-uranic, heavy elements may not be used where there is life.
      Medium atomic weights are available. Gold, Lead, Copper.. Jet, Diamond, Radium, Sapphire, Silver, and Steel.
      Sapphire and Steel have been assigned."

      Nyah-nyah.. you'll have to try better than THAT to confuse me..!
      (and if no-one else here figures out what we're on about then I'm going to look like some sort of loony..)

  50. Microwave hunt is on! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    ... found cheaply in microwave ovens ...

    In future news: You too can save microwaves from future extinction!

  51. Cost... by cachorro · · Score: 1

    Forget the cost of the 500W laser. Have you priced a live shark lately?

  52. My microwave drilled through it's own door! by MrScience · · Score: 2, Funny

    I didn't have anything in it, and accidentally hit the cook button instead of the minute timer button. 20 Minutes later, POOF! The whole thing caught on fire. Turns out that the mixing belt failed, so it was all focused on the door. The engineer said, "Lucky you didn't loose the whole house! I've seen them burn straight through glass light bulbs...."

    Pictures and story here.

    --

    You quitting proves that the karma kap worked. The most annoying of the whores shut up. --CmdrTaco

  53. New art forms by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Think of the possibilities for carving stone without cracking it. This could make it a lot easier for sculptors.

  54. Even VHF will do by Spamalamadingdong · · Score: 2
    Well, sorta, but there is nothing magical about 2.4Ghz. It's not the "frequency that water resonates at", as I've even seen printed in semi-credible places.
    I've read about ham radio operators cooking hamburgers in resonant cavities at 144 MHz.

    The "magical" thing about 2.45 GHz is that it's in the middle of one of the ISM (Industrial, Scientific and Medical) bands designated by the FCC. Since there are no licensed radio services right around there and any un-licensed service has to accept any interference it gets (you can't complain to the FCC that your neighbor's microwave interferes with your 2.45 GHz portable phone), everyone's microwave oven operates at 2.45 GHz.

  55. water cooled heatsink applications by t0qer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think this would rock for building a CPU heat exchanger. With hundreds of small tiny water filled holes it would wisk the heat away nicely.

  56. Ok fine, as long as by serutan · · Score: 2

    the security people at the airport know how to identify the #$@%&* things!!!!

  57. Re:Microwave and Me by lommer · · Score: 1

    Has there been any investigation into the application of microwave feed horns as weapons? Just think about the possibilities if you could blind all of the enemy's forces from long range with a fairly common piece of equipment.

    I suppose it'd probably be a MAJOR violation of the geneva convention to ever use any such weapon, but the geneva convention hasn't stopped Dubya yet...

  58. Star Wars - Microwave sword by ehiris · · Score: 2

    In other news the next Star Wars will reference upgraded combat technology.

  59. What's the point? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It's clear Palestinians don't use their heads, otherwise a peaceful resolution would have been achieved decades ago.

    It would be best to target the genitalia of the palestinian subrace, so they cannot make any more bombs.

  60. Re:Microwave and Me by MoneyT · · Score: 2

    But if they cook from the inside out, why do the middle of the hot pockets always stay frozen?

    --
    T Money
    World Domination with a plastic spoon since 1984
  61. Is glass transparent to microwaves? by dankjones · · Score: 1

    That could be a factor, surely there would be some savings in energy usage if they were.

    Cutting transparent glass with a laser has to be hella ineficient.

    1. Re:Is glass transparent to microwaves? by Idarubicin · · Score: 2
      At room temperature, most materials that we think of as "glass" are relatively poor absorbers of microwaves. However, if there is a concentrated pulse of microwaves delivered to a small region (sufficient to heat that part to ~500 degrees Celsius) then that region of glass will become much more strongly absorbing--once melting has started in a region, it will continue from there.

      I don't know if room temperature absorption might be increased by selecting a different wavelength from that used in microwave ovens. I suspect that there would be incremental improvements only, but I invite experts to comment.

      If you want to cut glass with a laser, use one that operates up in the infrared. Ordinary glass cuts off transmission at wavelengths longer than about 2 microns (2000 nm). Quartz optics can still be used up to ~2500 nm. There are many commercially available lasers that operate in this regime. Industrial carbon dioxide cutting lasers emit at ~10.6 microns--special (expensive, delicate, finicky) optics have to be used to even let the laser beam out of the lasing cavity.

      My big concern for cutting glass with lasers would be the danger posed by specular reflections from the material being handled.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  62. Re:Microwave and Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Because your mom's chunky brown vaginal discharges defy the physics of the known Universe.