Slashdot Mirror


It's Not a Police Box, It's a Tardis

xA40D writes "The BBC is reporting that they've won the battle with the Metropolitan Police over the trademark police box, more commonly known as a Tardis: 'arbitrator Shaun Sherlock remarked that even if the police had built up any reputation, it would have only been in the area of policing and law enforcement and would not have extended into the goods and services which the BBC had applied to use it for.'"

98 of 236 comments (clear)

  1. Of course, you know that's TARDIS by penginkun · · Score: 5, Informative

    All caps, right? Time And Relative Dimensions in Space, yeah? OK. As you were.

    1. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by spakka · · Score: 5, Funny

      And it's TARDISES not TARDII

    2. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Alan+Partridge · · Score: 2, Informative

      Acronyms that you can pronounce?? Acronyms ARE INITIALISMS that you CAN pronounce as if they were real words. I f you can't say it like a word, it's NOT an acronym.

      --
      That was classic intercourse!
    3. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by 1u3hr · · Score: 4, Informative
      Oxford English Dictionary:
      acronym A word formed from the initial letters or parts of other words; loosely an abbreviation composed of initial letters.

      initialism A group of initial letters used as an abbreviation, esp. one in which each letter is pronounced separately.

      So, "loosely", an initialism is an acronym. (Not that I'd ever heard of an initialism before today.) But if one makes the distinction, I don't think that an acronym is an initialism either. Better to say both are abbreviations.

      But anyway, "Tardis" is strictly an acronym, so it should be written thusly. Unfortunately, the BBC chooses otherwise.

    4. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by FurryFeet · · Score: 5, Funny

      But anyway, "Tardis" is strictly an acronym, so it should be written thusly. Unfortunately, the BBC chooses otherwise.

      You, of course, mean the Bbc, right?

    5. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by mary_will_grow · · Score: 4, Funny

      Actually its GNU/TARDIS

      --
      Why stick up for big business?
    6. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Fig,+formerly+A.C. · · Score: 3, Funny

      "la-ser" -Dr. Evil

      --
      Murphy was an optimist.
    7. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 2

      What about RADAR, SONAR,COMSAT, M*A*S*H, DEFCON, POTUS, FLOTUS, RAM, ROM, USAF...

      Then there are those logical operations: AND, OR XOR, NOR, NAND, etc....

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
    8. Re:Of course, you know that's TARDIS by Spock+the+Baptist · · Score: 2

      'AND' is a logical conjunction when used in digital electronics, and computer science, where as 'and' is both a logical, and grammatical conjunction when used in colloquial English.

      --
      "Oh drat these computers, they're so naughty and so complex, I could pinch them." --Marvin the Martian
  2. Goods and Services? by acehole · · Score: 5, Funny

    You mean the BBC are planning to use the policebox for timetravel tips?

    The timelords would not be happy about that.

    --
    Be you Admins? nay, we are but lusers!
  3. No shit, Sherlock. by Trongy · · Score: 4, Funny

    Next stop will be ionian columns.
    (The Master's tardis default appearance)

  4. I wish... by gr0ngb0t · · Score: 5, Funny

    ... that my room was a tardis. not so much for interstellar travel and everything that the good doctor used to do (although that would be cool), but just so I can fit all my shit in there easily.

    dont know how much my cat would like K-9 though...

    1. Re:I wish... by spakka · · Score: 5, Funny
      I can fit all my shit in there easily

      You're thinking of the TURDIS

    2. Re:I wish... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "You're thinking of the TURDIS"

      Hey, it beats the name "Honey Bucket".

  5. Heh by SexyKellyOsbourne · · Score: 5, Funny

    I peed in one of those Tardis boxes when I went to the UK, as I seriously thought it was a public urinal (I was very drunk) :D

    But anyways, it's not like the police were going to win against the BBC's high-priced lawyers -- and now that this lawsuit's over, the police (read: taxpayers) also have to pay the BBC's mega legal fees, too, even if the rest of it is just 850 pounds.

    If I were a UK taxpayer, I'd be quite angry at them for it.

    1. Re:Heh by Kwikymart · · Score: 4, Interesting

      The one thing that bugs me about this is that why does a government organization that does not take part in any trade, own the trademark on something?

      Maybe if they developed profiling software or an efficient billyclub or something (even then, that is more of a patent area), but I really think the police should be the last people getting a trademark. If I lived in the UK, yes, I would be uber-pissed at such idiocy. I hate the attitude of cops in general. Damn cops!

      --

      Buying a Dell computer is equivalent to dropping the soap in a prison shower.
    2. Re:Heh by inputsprocket · · Score: 2, Offtopic

      ...please permit me to go off topic for 1 second...

      I hate the attitude of cops in general. Damn cops!

      I am in agreement - they should spend more in improving their image and attidute. While the attitude of UK bobbies is on the whole better than their US-counterparts, some are bloody down-right rude

      Get this - I got pulled over 2 weeks ago for running a red light in London (it was frikkin orange, but never mind). I was on my way from work to the hospital, where my 2.5 month-old son lay with a 40.3oC temperature, so I was in a bit of a hurry. I really was, and I was all panicky. Anyway, the cop was sympathetic and let me go on my way without issuing a ticket, and putting god-knows how many points on my license.
      Yesterday, I got a letter with a 600 GBP fine and an issue to go in front of a Police tribunal for failing to stop after being flagged down by a policeman for running a red light. WT friggin F??? The b'stard took my license number and issued a failing-to-stop-for-police notice. I'm frikkin fuming - So hah, Metropolitan police. Pay your frikkin huge court bill, because now I have to get a bloody solicitor to defend me in a my-word-against-your-word case, because I didn't ask for the policemans number after he was so 'kind' to let me go.

      Grrrrrr

    3. Re:Heh by snookums · · Score: 3, Insightful

      the police (read: taxpayers) also have to pay the BBC's mega legal fees

      Yes the police are funded by the taxpayer, but Joe Random Public also pays for the BBC (through taxes and TV licenses). That's right, two-fifths of British free-to-air television is public television.

      I think the BBC will do a better job of making money off the trademark than the police ever would, thus more money goes back into a public service. I put this one down as a good outcome for the British public.

      --
      Be careful. People in masks cannot be trusted.
    4. Re:Heh by stygar · · Score: 3, Informative

      Regarding the Metropolitan Police's desire to have a trademark on something: they might've just been following the lead of the RCMP here in Canada. The mounties have trademarks on their traditional image (ie the red-coated, wide-brimmed hat wearing cop on a horse), ostensibly so that they have control over how the image is used, and on what products. The only really objectionable thing they've done with the trademark is sign a contract with Disney (shudder) to act as their agent for those licensing the image (IIRC, this contract has run out and not been renewed).

      Mind you, the RCMP is probably in a unique position on this - I doubt there are many other police forces with as distinctive an image, in any country.

    5. Re:Heh by sql*kitten · · Score: 5, Insightful

      But anyways, it's not like the police were going to win against the BBC's high-priced lawyers -- and now that this lawsuit's over, the police (read: taxpayers) also have to pay the BBC's mega legal fees, too, even if the rest of it is just 850 pounds.

      You're right - one taxpayer-funded entity is suing another taxpayer-funded entity, over something that was developed with the taxpayer's money and therefore rightfully belongs in the public domain. They only people who are coming out of this ahead are the lawyers. What a coincidence that the present Prime Minister, his wife, and most of their friends, colleagues and supporters are all lawyers. Shakespeare had the right idea centuries ago.

    6. Re:Heh by fruey · · Score: 2
      But anyways, it's not like the police were going to win against the BBC's high-priced lawyers -- and now that this lawsuit's over, the police (read: taxpayers) also have to pay the BBC's mega legal fees, too, even if the rest of it is just 850 pounds.

      The BBC is public funded too. Brits pay a "television licence fee" to the tune of $150US per year, maybe even more now. So they don't necessarily have pots of cash either. Indeed, it is thanks to merchandising and program sales to foreign markets that the licence fee is so low. It seems ridiculous that the Police and another quasi-state owned institution should be battling legal battles. Cases like these just make lawyers rich from money in the public coffers, but there's nothing new about that.

      P.S. If you were really drunk when you peed in a Police Box, you were probably over 18. So you were born in 1940-1950? They haven't been in public for a long long time... there were still red phone boxes until about 10 years ago though.

      --
      Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
    7. Re:Heh by jweatherley · · Score: 3, Interesting

      There are still some (non functional) police boxes in Glasgow. There's one at the end of Byres Road which was in a bit of a state the last time I saw it. You could certainly piss in there after visiting all the pubs in Byres Road on a Friday night as the door was kicked in.

      There is also a police box in the middle of Buchannan Street. It has a small window and if you look through it you see an infinite space full of fibre optic lights - maybe that one does work!

      --

      --
      Reverse outsourcing: it's the future
    8. Re:Heh by billcopc · · Score: 2, Informative

      Hey we get the same kind of police fraud here in Canada. I once got pulled over for speeding, which in itself is okay except for the fact that the guy was out of his district (I traveled four close cities to/from work, and he was about a mile beyond the borders - bah). Anyways I fought the ticket in court and got shut out by the judge who had an obvious grudge against 21-year olds who earn more money than he does, so I pay the fine and go on with my life, slightly irate.

      3 months later I get arrested for driving without a license because they decided to charge late fees on my fine but never bothered informing me, so a sneaky (fraudulent?) 40$ late fee ended up costing 300$ (the fine for an invalid license) and another 600$ in hiked insurance premiums because of the big ugly mark on my record for having my license suspended.

      I have recently moved to the sneaky police's district, and I see them everyday, camping out the same traffic trap, arresting at least a hundred drivers at that intersection PER DAY for the same 130$ ticket and 2 points on the license, for changing lanes during rush hour in 2 kph traffic, something that has never killed anyone here, and certainly doesn't deserve the attention of FOUR cars and 6-7 police agents, leaving two cars to cover the remaining 1400 square kilometers of the region (an aggregate of small country towns, perhaps 25000 habitants).

      I swear every time I drive by that intersection, I get this urge to just ram them all into a sheet-metal sandwich. Police (and the rest of government) are supposed to be non-profit. We pay taxes for this shit, and we get raped in return. Police state, meet Anarchy village!

      --
      -Billco, Fnarg.com
    9. Re:Heh by James+Youngman · · Score: 2
      The one thing that bugs me about this is that why does a government organization that does not take part in any trade, own the trademark on something?
      But the BBC does take part in trade. For a start, they market their TV propgrammes across the world (e.g. Teletubbies, as a famous example, but of course many more). They also sell products other than broadcast rights, too. See the BBC Shop.
  6. Sheesh... by darkov · · Score: 5, Insightful

    You'd think the coppers would have something better to do than having trade mark wrangles with the BBC over something they stopped using nearly 50 years ago. Sounds a bit opportunistic - were they trying to raise some cash for the police social club?

    1. Re:Sheesh... by foo12 · · Score: 2, Informative

      Or win back the mark and allow its licensing to third parties, effectively capitalizing on the popularity won for the police box by the Dr. Who series.

      A similar suit was recently settled in favor of the London Underground. Perhaps those more familiar with international resolution of civil torts can comment.

    2. Re:Sheesh... by slipgun · · Score: 2

      You'd think the coppers would have something better to do than having trade mark wrangles with the BBC over something they stopped using nearly 50 years ago.

      You'd also think they'd have something better to do than pull people over for doing 80 down a clear motorway.

      were they trying to raise some cash for the police social club?

      Normally the speeding fines cover that.

      --
      SpamNet - a spam blocker that really works
  7. Erm... Huh? by pla · · Score: 5, Funny

    WTF? Hey, I totally support police finding "alternative" methods of funding (as opposed to milking the taxpayers, or confiscating anything they lay their eyes on thanks to the WO(s)D, ala a witchfinder general), but really...

    With all that we have going on in the world, these folks have nothing better to do than bicker over who owns a damned box? Oh, sorry, the *IMAGE* of the box. My bad. That makes it so much more serious.

    1. Re:Erm... Huh? by The+Only+Druid · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Just a note - you've got to love a reference in this post to _Good Omens_. On a related note (so that this post isn't viewed as a troll or whatever), I think its important that what the courts basically said here is that if you're not using a trademark for a commercial use, its not really yours. In a meaningful way, they may have just made it possible for people to use any non-commercial trademark in a way that doesn't infringe on the original use.

      --
      "Stumble before you crawl"
    2. Re:Erm... Huh? by nounderscores · · Score: 5, Funny

      Cool! Now I can have my intrepid alien protagonist travel the galaxy in a space ship disguised as a box of Microsoft XP disks. The logic being that it can hide the space ship in computer stores and remain undetected because nobody ever picks it up to buy it.

  8. Dr. Who could have stopped this.. by devross · · Score: 4, Funny

    If he were just a bit more clever, there never would have been a dispute. Nobody would have ever known there was a such thing as a "TARDIS" if the Doctor wasn't materializing and dematerializing all over London in broad daylight like that.

    --


    If these walls could talk they'd probly still ignore me. --MF DOOM
  9. Dr Who movies? Big charges. by phorm · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Perhaps this will allow a reincarnation of the earlier Dr. Who TV series in a new form, or perhaps even a new movie. I remember watching these when I was young, very cool stuff despite its age.

    But the Metropolitan Police lost its appeal and has been ordered to pay £850, plus legal costs.

    The case has been rumbling on since 1996, when the Patent Office originally accepted the Tardis as a BBC trade mark.


    Anyone besides me think that the £850 isn't going to amount to much in comparison to the legal charges. Having to pay legal charges for 7 years worth of case-wrangling is probably a big ouch on the police bankbook. The Metropolitan Police will probably have a shortage of donuts in the office for quite awhile.

    Any else anticipate an article that states Metropolitan Police are reducing the tolerance for speeding limit to 1% and then upping the cost of a tickets, they'll have to recover this money somehow. :-)

    1. Re:Dr Who movies? Big charges. by Atrahasis · · Score: 2, Informative
      Perhaps this will allow a reincarnation of the earlier Dr. Who TV series in a new form, or perhaps even a new movie. I remember watching these when I was young, very cool stuff despite its age
      I read somewhere recently that there will be a new series of Dr Who sometime next year - the Doctor has not yet been announced (probably not Paul McGann, so the Beeb wasted the entire 8th Doctor on a film).
    2. Re:Dr Who movies? Big charges. by G-funk · · Score: 2

      The Metropolitan Police will probably have a shortage of donuts in the office for quite awhile.

      If that's the worst that happens after such a cock-up of public money that this money-grabbing scheme was, I think they got off light.

      Any else anticipate an article that states Metropolitan Police are reducing the tolerance for speeding limit to 1% and then upping the cost of a tickets, they'll have to recover this money somehow. :-)

      Who'd notice? England's about the only place in the world worse than Victoria when it comes to revenue raising speed cameras.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    3. Re:Dr Who movies? Big charges. by krugdm · · Score: 5, Funny

      But the Metropolitan Police lost its appeal and has been ordered to pay £850, plus legal costs.

      Hmm. That should be just about enough cash for the BBC to pay for the special effects to film another episode...

    4. Re:Dr Who movies? Big charges. by Atrahasis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Done some digging around, and it would appear the series is scheduled for November 2003.

      Timomthy Spall (Auf Wiedersein Pet, All or Nothing) was rumoured to be cast as the 9th doctor, but that has been quashed by the BBC.

  10. If the BBC had lost... by roalt · · Score: 5, Funny
    If the BBC lost this case, they could always send Dr. Who back in time to trademark the police box before the 1960-ties...

    Another question is... which Dr. Who?

    1. Re:If the BBC had lost... by spectecjr · · Score: 5, Funny

      If the BBC lost this case, they could always send Dr. Who back in time to trademark the police box before the 1960-ties...
      Another question is... which Dr. Who?


      [nerd mode]
      It's The Doctor, not Dr. Who. Dr. Who is the show; The Doctor is the main character.
      [/nerd mode]

      --
      Coming soon - pyrogyra
    2. Re:If the BBC had lost... by Quatermass · · Score: 2, Interesting
      You'd have to go quite far back in time as the Police box came into existence in the 1930s!

      Doctor Who started in 1963.

      :-)

      Strangely enough old Police box models designed for use on railway models are quite collectable to Dr. Who fans.

      I remember being told by a fan that the original hollow black iron models (about 3 inches high) are worth a good few quid whilst the blue ones are only good for a fiver.

      Amazing how anything Who related is worth money.

      I've still got my square CD of Dr. Who music (serial #2) that I bought donkey years ago at a charity auction. Its supppose to be worth a fair bit to music and Who collectors. :-)

      --
      Stuart http://stuarthalliday.com/
    3. Re:If the BBC had lost... by Phexro · · Score: 5, Funny

      [nerd mode]
      It's The Doctor, not Dr. Who. Dr. Who is the show; The Doctor is the main character.
      [/nerd mode]


      [uber who nerd mode]
      "Doctor Who" is the show, not "Dr. Who." Besides, you're both wrong. The credits listed The Doctor as "Dr. Who" until it's seventh season, when they listed it as "Doctor Who." The Doctor was never credited as "The Doctor," though it did flip-flip between "Dr. Who" and "Doctor Who" a few times.
      [/uber who nerd mode]

    4. Re:If the BBC had lost... by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 2, Insightful
      [Ultra uber nerd mode]
      But he's never referred to as 'Doctor Who' in the series itself, just 'The Doctor' [/ultra uber nerd mode]

      Well, except once. But then the Who nerds (what's the real term for them? Whoies? Whoites? Whovians?) got angry, so they never did it again.

    5. Re:If the BBC had lost... by scharkalvin · · Score: 3, Informative

      The car that Pertwee and Baker drove had "who"
      on the license plate. Later they just used "?"

  11. Etymology of Tardis by jukal · · Score: 4, Informative

    tar -c myself && dis locate work->home.

  12. What's the point? by shplorb · · Score: 2, Informative

    They're both government departments - can't they be happy that it belongs to the government no matter what? Ahh the wonders of bureaucracy!

    Damn bitches! err... lawyers.

    1. Re:What's the point? by istartedi · · Score: 4, Funny

      The point is that when the government sues itself, it begins a process that theoretical physio-economists have postulated will result in the following phases: 1. A massive increase in the consumption of money, in this case pounds. 2. Due to the increased consumption, the government expands. 3. After burning through a considerable ammount of money as determined by the famouse Shrodinger-Herzfeld equation, it begins to collapse in on itself. 4. The collapse accelerates, during which a number of curious phenomenon are predicted such as the emission of Higg-bosons, PI denominated Euros, and pfennig-marks. 5. Finally, the government collapses into a Police Box, err... Tardis, from which an infinite supply of pounds eminates which curiously enough neither overinflates the economy nor vaporizes the world into a burst of X-rays. Unfortunately, it causes everybody to lose their teeth at an early age but most of the scientists studying the matter don't see this as a great problem, and they are eager to continue their research.

      --
      For all intensive purposes, "whom" is no longer a word. That begs the question, "who cares"?
    2. Re:What's the point? by vidarh · · Score: 5, Informative
      They're NOT both government departments. The BBC is a Corporation under Royal Charter. It may seem like a subtle difference, but it means that the BBC for the most part is run like any other company with the exception that it's board is appointed by the Crown, and it's main form of revenue is the license fee.

      Particularly under the Royal Charter BBC has an agreement that guarantee them editorial independence, which means that if they use the Tardis in a way that the Metropolitan Police doesn't like they don't have any recourse through government channels - they can choose to try to negotitate with the BBC, or they can sue. Presumably it's a situation like that the Met doesn't like.

    3. Re:What's the point? by sql*kitten · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The BBC is a Corporation under Royal Charter. It may seem like a subtle difference, but it means that the BBC for the most part is run like any other company with the exception that it's board is appointed by the Crown, and it's main form of revenue is the license fee.

      Then can you explain the practical differences, if any, between the license fee and a hypothecated poll tax on televisions?

      Calling it a corporation rather than a department is mere semantics. After all, license payers are not customers in any meaningful way, since you have to pay the fee irregardless of whether you watch the BBC 24 hrs a day, or not at all. Exactly the same as you pay NI whether or not you ever use a hospital.

    4. Re:What's the point? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      The point is that when the government sues itself

      The BBC is not a government organisation. Why do some people have so much trouble getting this? It is a publically owned corperation.

      The UK government has no control over the BBC. Any time that it tried to "suggest" they do something, they have had their fingers burnt.

      For example, the satirical current-affairs comedy "Have I got News For You" once received a request from up high to not mention a particular politition. They spent the next next show completely focusing on the guy. If they were govenment controlled, that would not have been possible.

    5. Re:What's the point? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2
      "If you use or install television receiving equipment to receive or record television programme services you are required by law to have a valid TV Licence."
      English is an ambigious langauge sometimes. The above can be parsed two different ways, both of which are equally valid:
      1. [ If you use or install ] [ television receiving equipment ] [ to recieve or record television programmes ] ...
      2. [ If you use or install ][ television receiving equipment to recieve or record television programme services ] ...
      The first way is the way you interpet it. The second states that equipment whose purpose is to recieve or record television requires a license, regardless of whether you are using that ability or not. I'm not calling you wrong - just pointing out how it is that people end up interpeting it the other way.
      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    6. Re:What's the point? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      You miss the point. The point is that you pay the same flat rate whether you use the TV to receive TV shows once a year, once a month, once a day, or once and hour. Thus there is no feedback mechanism by which the company has to respond to the needs of its customers beyond just making something they want to watch on rare occasions maybe, and in that regard the BBC isn't like a real company at all. A real TV production company would have revenue for a show vary depending on how popular the show is.

      And note how the BBC gets the money for a TV license for watching ANY TV show, not just ones broadcast by the BBC. Watch ITV, and BBC gets the money. Nice racket they've got going there.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    7. Re:What's the point? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      The BBC is not a government organisation. Why do some people have so much trouble getting this?

      Because it is funded mostly through television taxation. The difference between that and an actual government organization is irrelevant. It's a "private" company in the same way that the electric company is "private" or the sewage treatment company is "private", or the construction company that does nothing but road repair is "private". You cannot choose to patronize a competing company instead. (Can you get a TV, watch JUST ITV for example, and not pay the BBC any license fee? No. BBC gets the same fee either way, whether you watch them or some competitor. Not surprisingly, under that climate the competitors are very small in number.)
      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

    8. Re:What's the point? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      But it is still not a government organisation. It's not owned by the government. It can't be controlled by the government. I hardly see why it's "irrelevant", a government run station would be pro-government, the BBC is independant. Big difference.

      Again, I fail to see what the problem in understanding it. Just because it's funded by taxation does not make it government controlled.

      Personally, I think it's a great thing, folks from the US might not understand. TV without commercials. Think about it for a moment.

      Take a show everyone knows, e.g. one of the new Star Trek series. On US TV, you get the intro segment, the opening credits and then an ad-break. This would not be accepted in this country, because the BBC, having no adverts, sets a baseline for the other stations to compete with. If the commercial channels were to change to the US commercial-break format, there would be an outcry. IMO, this is a very good thing.

      Combined to that, the BBC produces some damn fine stuff. Documentaries that don't aim for the lowest common denomenator, you know the "WOW! AMAZING" type of documentary that tries to make it exciting and explosive to keep the public interested. Instead, the quality of the BBC shows shine through, they are informative and entertaining in a completely different way. Compare the likes of "Walking with Dinosaurs" to the other documentary producting channels, especially the US ones. I know what style I'd rather watch. The BBC is a thinking-mans channel. It's not full of crappy brain-dead shows, except for the obligatory prime-time shows.

      Each night there are at least 4 hours of educational shows on a wide range of subjects. These are aimed at school children, students or just anyone interested. They are set up to be recorded and played back, and play in the early hours of the morning. I'd like to see a commercial channel do anything like that...

      And yes, the BBC can critisise & patronise other companies. Some of it's shows are at the forefront of consumer affairs. Once, a car show, Top Gear produced a damning review of a crap car. The director of the car manufacturer was heard to ask that all advertising be cut from the BBC from them, in essence to "punish" them. But as the BBC doesn't have advertising, it gives it the ability to say what the hell it likes. Consumer affairs programs are always limited when the company they are talking about also pays the network for commercial time.

      Using the name "government television" makes it sound like "state TV", whether that is the intended meaning or not. State TV is pretty evil and anti-democratic. Take Italy for example, they have a state TV network. The current leader is a media demi-god and owns all the other channels. When you say government TV, that's what I think of. Not the BBC.

    9. Re:What's the point? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      Again, I fail to see what the problem in understanding it. Just because it's funded by taxation does not make it government controlled.


      A company is *always* driven by he who holds the purse-strings. When that's ultimately the consumer, it's a good thing. When it's not, you get the downside of capitalism - and that usually happens with monopolies - where the consumer has no choice in whether or not to patronize a particular company, so the company is no longer beholden to it's customers. The BBC is a government-mandated monopoly since you cannot use a TV in Britain without paying the BBC, regardless of which channels you choose to watch. If the government stays out of it and doesn't take an active role in control, it's merely because they choose to delegate - for the same reason Tony Blair isn't running the health care system, or patrolling the streets in a checkered hat directing traffic - it's delegated to others. The BBC just has a greater degree of delegation.

      Now, that being said, the BBC isn't so bad precisely because they are still in the long run beholden to the people, just in a roundabout way - they are beholden to the government that funds them, which in turn is beholden to the people that elect it. Your claim that the fact that the BBC is allowed to criticise the government means it's not a government institution would only make sense if you start from the premise that your government is totalitarian.
      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  13. K-9 or K-O by inputsprocket · · Score: 2

    What the hell did K-9 actually do anyway? Yes, he was the doc's trusty friend, but he just buzzed and wheeled around the TARDIS all day doing sod all.

    Shees, I mean the thing never even trundled his way off to the door wagging his antenna when the Doc returned home. Not much of an 'old faithful was he?

    Come to think of it, I think the Doc didn't really like him either - you never saw him stroking the box-o-bolts or say hello to it.

    Maybe he was supposed to have been a guard dog for the TARDIS, since there were'nt any locks on the front door, and that thing oftern found it way into pretty hostile territory. If so, he could have developed a more fierce attitutude. What would he have done if an intruder got in? Pee'd oil on him?

    1. Re:K-9 or K-O by g4dget · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm not a Doctor Who expert, but I just saw the Key to Time series on DVD. In it, K9 does get the Doctor out of a lot of tight spots. Also, the Tardis is locked and can only be opened by the Doctor. And, the Doctor really seems to like K9 and does pet it quite a bit. And, yes, that tail does wag.

    2. Re:K-9 or K-O by Atrahasis · · Score: 2, Informative

      Actually, the the TARDIS has an infinite number of keyholes inside the one (apparent) keyhole on the outside. Only The Doctor knows which is the right one, and only he has a key.

    3. Re:K-9 or K-O by Tony+Hoyle · · Score: 2

      K9 was cool - he'd laser the badguy in the nuts.

  14. Has to be said... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    'arbitrator Shaun Sherlock remarked that even if the police had built up any reputation, it would have only been in the area of policing and law enforcement and would not have extended into the goods and services which the BBC had applied to use it for.'

    In response to which the BBC commented, "No shit, Sherlock."

  15. Clearly... by Jedi+Paramedic · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...the metropolitan police are running out of places to hide the bodies and simply need to figure out the "dimensionally transcendental" nature of the TARDIS in order to have more room.

    In light of this, I wonder why the people with the patent on the tire-pressure-checker have never gone after the BBC for infringing on their design for the sonic screwdriver!

    The real culprit here is the broken Chameleon Circuit. It was under warranty, but alas - the last time he was near an authorized OEM service station, the good Doctor had to leave Gallifrey in haste before someone tried to go and make him Lord President again...

    And remember - the REAL Matrix doesn't involve a kid whose only line is "there is no spoon."

    Dr. Who rocks. Only he could go back to the beginning of time and jettison 1/3 of the TARDIS (which is asserted in many previous episodes to be infinite) to escape from the gravitational pull that would become the Big Bang. Silly Zero Room.

    --

    That's my purse! I don't know you! -- Bobby Hill
    1. Re:Clearly... by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 2

      Furthermore, I've just realized that Galifreyan society letting other civilizations get destroyed draws a parellel to the United States standing by while Europe became overrun by Hitler's Arian nation.


      Hardly. Time Lord politics was meant to be a good natured self-mocking parody of British government.
      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  16. Are you referring to the BBC or the MET police? by msobkow · · Score: 2

    If the BBC, you can buy T-shirts, memorabilia, copies of shows, etc.

    If the police, I've never been in the UK, and from what's been posted it would seem I couldn't expect to see such a blue police box on the streets. Even though it might have been a trademark at some point, it lost that status because it's status as a trademark was not maintained and protected.

    Had they continually protected and maintained the blue police box as a unique feature or trademark, they might have had legal ground. For example, the RCMP (Royal Canadian Mounted Police) dress uniform is a very distinctive trademark and is appropriately protected. The protection isn't so much to make money for the RCMP as it is to protect the historical importance of that image and theoretically to ensure that it isn't abused for profit by a person or business that didn't build that reputation.

    As to "Damn cops", everyone has the right to their own prejudice. I've never had any problems with the police -- give respect and you get it back. Most of them are just regular people who spend an awful lot of time dealing with whackos, drunks, crazies, domestic arguments, and a lot of other situations where they have no assurance it's not going to blow up in their face. Give them attitude and they have to assume you're a problem and will react accordingly. Don't get me wrong -- there are a few gung-ho gung-ho jarheads and corrupt/prejudiced idiots with badges. They just aren't the norm.

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
  17. What's next? by cybercomm · · Score: 2

    A trade mark on Mr. Bean? :)

    --
    Live for the present, learn from the past, and dream of the future!
  18. Use of everyday item as trademark,. by N+Monkey · · Score: 4, Funny

    In a meaningful way, they may have just made it possible for people to use any non-commercial trademark in a way that doesn't infringe on the original use.

    I don't think this is anything particularly new. The Beatles' Apple record company used to use a picture of a real apple on the labels, which I assume they considered to be a trademark.

    I don't think the farmer tried to sue them for it. ;-)

    1. Re:Use of everyday item as trademark,. by plumby · · Score: 2

      But you'd probably complain if a company decided to claim trademark on your face (which I'm assuming is not currently being used for commercial purposes) and keep the proceeds itself.

  19. TARDIS spotted in the wild by Monty+Worm · · Score: 3, Interesting
    "I bear in mind that for most of the period since the police call box was taken out of service, the only sight the public at large would have had of this item of street furniture has been in the TV programme Dr Who, provided by the BBC where it is a Tardis, a fictional time travelling machine with the external appearance of a police box," ruled Mr Sherlock.

    Eh? If it was taken out of service, how did I manage to get a photo taken of me next to one? For the excessively keen, this TARDIS is outside Earls Court Underground Station, in London, England.

    --
    ... and today's pet project has ... been discarded for lack of time.
    1. Re:TARDIS spotted in the wild by sanqui · · Score: 4, Funny

      That's funny, I was in the area just recently, and I swear it's not there now...

      Unless...!

    2. Re:TARDIS spotted in the wild by Monty+Worm · · Score: 2

      Right! That does it, I'm going down there to look.

      --
      ... and today's pet project has ... been discarded for lack of time.
    3. Re:TARDIS spotted in the wild by Hittite+Creosote · · Score: 2

      They WERE taken out of service. The one you saw was put back after the only place people saw them for decades was as the TARDIS.

  20. What did a "police box" do ? by gibodean · · Score: 3, Informative

    It seems I'm the only person here to actually not know what the original purpose of the police box was.

    I mean, before 1960 when they were taken out of service, what were they used for ?

    Did they have a telephone inside which connected you to the police ?

    Or was it somewhere to hide when you were being chased by hooligans ?

    1. Re:What did a "police box" do ? by Foniks · · Score: 4, Informative

      They were used as a temporary holding cell for aprehended criminals and were made from anything from wood to cement. The front panel did house a phone that could be used by the public or the police to call for help/backup. In fact the original TARDIS was going to be an abandoned police box found in the country - but when the props guys rocked up it had been lifted, so they had to make a new one. Which lasted from 1963 till 1975ish when it fell apart on Tom Baker and Elizabeth Sladens head.

    2. Re:What did a "police box" do ? by DunbarTheInept · · Score: 3, Informative
      They had a dual purpose:
      1. In a time when the telephone had been invented but had not become ubiquitous, and mobile radio units were extremely bulky, the telephone on the outside of the box was the beat cop's means of contacting the station. If he needed some help, or needed to report something, he could run to the nearest police box and use the phone there.
      2. The box could be opened and a suspect could be locked inside for a short while. Thus the officer could hold the person there, then make the phone call (using the phone on the box) to have more people come down from the station to escort the detainee back.
      This became obsolete when the constables started using automobiles in addition to walking cops. First, the automobile could carry a radio and the battery to power it, which made the police box telephone obsolete. Second, the automobile was used to transport the suspect back to the station directly, which made the second use of the police box obsolete.

      By the time of the show, they were already obsolete and only a few were left. Thus the first Doctor and his granddaughter (or was it niece? I can't remember), kept the TARDIS in a back alley piled with random junk (where an old unused Police Box would look normal.

      --

      Don't label something "offtopic" unless you know the topic well enough to tell what's on topic.

  21. 850 Pounds? by NeuroManson · · Score: 5, Funny

    Awright, now they have the budget to bring back Dr. Who for another season! More tinfoil and oatmeal skinned aliens than ever before!

    --
    Just because you can mod me down, doesn't mean you're right. Shoes for industry!
  22. History of the British Police Box by fantomas · · Score: 5, Informative

    This looks like a good introduction to the history of the British Police Box...


    "The TARDIS style boxes were the most expensive and the cost for building a box in 1931 was 55pounds 16 shillings and 7pence, with another 3 pounds for number plate, coat hook, lino , stool, a fire extinguisher and bracket, as well as a brush and duster to keep the mini police station tidy!"


    Happy reading. Me, I'm 36 and grew up in England. Never saw a 'real' police box til I was a teenager. Vaguely knew that Dr. Who was travelling round in something that old-fashioned policemen used to use when my dad was a boy (or the Age of the Dinosaurs or similar) but never saw one until I was wandering round London as a teenager and found a few grubby disused and flyposted ones. Luckily these days councils have cottoned on to the fact that they are actually design classics, charming and tourists love them (as well as us who grew up as kids watching the Doctor take on tin foil and vacuum cleaner-part aliens), and they've been restoring a few rather than flattening them all.

  23. To purchase a Police Box by Foniks · · Score: 5, Informative

    Incidently, "This Planet Earth" used to make a full size replica TARDIS that you could purchase online. It came in a wood version and later a fibreglass version - but it has since been discontinued (only recently too). But you can still buy replica Daleks, Cybermen, K9's etc. Very high quality, i.e. as good if not better than the TV originals. In fact the Daleks have been used for Doctor Who promo gigs I believe. Check them out at http://www.thisplanetearth.co.uk It looks like they are thinking of releasing the 1996 movie version of the TARDIS soon..

  24. Pedant mode on by Burb · · Score: 2, Informative

    Current usage in the BBC Dr Who Site and novels is all caps ...

    --

    1. Re:Pedant mode on by krugdm · · Score: 2

      And in the "quiz", the correct answer for "What does TARDIS stand for?", the D stood for Dimensions

  25. Not just in London... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

    There's at least one in Glasgow, possibly two, and I think there's a couple in Edinburgh...

    1. Re:Not just in London... by stevey · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yeah there are at least two restored ones in Edinburgh, and several others which have been refitted as refitted as small coffee shops

    2. Re:Not just in London... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      Is there one just up from The Bridges, perhaps on Nicholson Street?

  26. The BBC is so cheep. by ayjay29 · · Score: 5, Funny

    This is how the BBC got the TARDIS idea:

    Director: We'r doing a space time travel "Star Trek" type thing. We need a flash spaceship, with lots of flashing lights lights and things.

    Props man: This is the BBC, be realistic.

    Director: OK, well we need a cheap model spaceship with thin wires that we can blue-screen with and do some cheesy fly-by shots.

    Props man: This is the BBC, be realistic.

    Director: Well we need something, what have you got?

    Props man: I've got this old phone box from "Dixon of Dock Green", needs a lick of paint but...

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
    1. Re:The BBC is so cheep. by a1englishman · · Score: 2, Informative

      That would've been great if Star Trek hadn't started in 1966, and Doctor Who in 1963. Hmmmm?

    2. Re:The BBC is so cheep. by Observer · · Score: 2
      Veering offtopic, but didn't Douglas Adams put in some time as a script editor (aka uncredited writer) on the series when Tom Baker incarnated the good doctor? ISTR some sort of Amazing Engine in one episode which had the usual perspex, silverpaint and blinkenlichten, and somewhere in the middle, the main control... the steering wheel from a Moris Minor[1]. Now that was being creative on a small budget.

      [1]A small British automobile, manufactured from soon after World War 2 until the very late 1950's or early 1960s. (Austin Powers would know them, and would surrender to Dr Evil rather than being seen dead in one.) Primitive, but reliable[2], some of the station-wagon versions with the wooden window-frames in the rear extension were still going strong into the late 1990's. They probably finally failed their annual safety tests because of damage from woodworm and deathwatch beetle rather than from rust.

      [2]The Morris Minor, not Austin Powers[3].

      [3]Austin was another British automobile manufacturer, it merged with Morris after WW2.

      [4]Apologies and credits to Terry Pratchett, independent inventor and populariser of the footnote-to-footnote joke.

    3. Re:The BBC is so cheep. by grytpype · · Score: 2

      >Apologies and credits to Terry Pratchett, independent inventor and populariser of the footnote-to-footnote joke.

      Actually, I think Douglas Kenney did a footnote-to-footnote (and a footnote to that footnote's footnote) in National Lampoon in the mid-70s, probably before Pratchett.

      --

      - Have a picture

  27. 850 Pounds.... by Morologous · · Score: 2, Funny

    The BBC could practically make three Dr. Who episodes off that settlement amount!

    Let's see... rent a rock quarry for the day, drag out the old Dalek suits, Voila! Dr. Who episode!

    -jason <-- still loves Dr.Who

  28. I assume that you mean "Ionic." by emil · · Score: 2

    As in Doric, Ionic, and Corinthian columns.

    I wonder what the Master was doing in Greece? Hmm.

  29. Genuinely gone. by Monty+Worm · · Score: 2
    Okay, so doubting I went and looked.

    It's definitely gone. Dematerialised or whatever. That photo was taken in January...

    Mind you, that's absolutely a broken chameleon circuit. Who'd expect to see a call-box like that in London? Even a red phone-booth would be a rare sighting.....

    --
    ... and today's pet project has ... been discarded for lack of time.
  30. OT- Dr. Who Sound Effects by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    The BBC bought 3-5 Mellotrons back in the day to use for sound effects for Dr. Who. Mellotrons are one of the first 'Samplers'; they used magnetic tape loop to store about 6-8 seconds of sound *for each key*. Each key had a rotating group of three of these tapes. You could change the sound my moving a knob, which would rotate the carriers and load new tapes. You can hear a Mellotron (sometimes known as a Chamberlain) on the Beatles 'Strawberry Fields Forever' song - its the flute sound playing in the beginning.

    OT as hell, but interesting nontheless.

  31. Let me get this straight... by mikosullivan · · Score: 2
    The BBC chooses the police box as the disguise for the Tardis for the exact specific reason that it is already common and well-known. Then they try to get trademark protection on it.

    That's a lot of nerve.

    --
    Miko O'Sullivan
  32. Pardon me while I geek out by devphil · · Score: 2


    I am a Doctor Who expert (lots of misspent (sorta) hours of my youth, up until I discovered my first compiler), and the TARDIS can be unlocked by pretty much anyone with the key.

    In one of the sillier episodes, we learn (because the screenwriters had just invented this fact) that inserting the key into the lock turns off lots of protecting and stabilizing mechanisms, on the assumption that the door will be opened half a second later. So a companion (not the Doctor) puts the key in, starts to the open the door, but gets distracted and walks away leaving the key in the lock. So the TARDIS starts drifting around on its own.

    --
    You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
    1. Re:Pardon me while I geek out by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      Out of curiosity, do you know which ep that is or some keywords I could use to find that out?

      I think I missed that ep, and ya got me curious!

    2. Re:Pardon me while I geek out by whovian · · Score: 2

      I'd like to pick your brain on something.

      I thought I heard once, in an episode, that the TARDIS can detect the presence of the being attempting to gain access and can deny access. (hmmm, /etc/sysconfig/firewall/TARDIS.conf ... but I digress.) However there are also counter-examples, such as the Gallifreyan guards entering with a master trimonic key (Invasion of Time).

      Have you any thoughts on the matter?

      --
      To-do List: Receive telemarketing call during a tornado warning. Check.
    3. Re:Pardon me while I geek out by devphil · · Score: 2


      Something in the Sarah Jane Smith / Harry Sullivan time. I don't recall the episode title, sorry, although I think it had the word "invasion" in it.

      --
      You cannot apply a technological solution to a sociological problem. (Edwards' Law)
  33. Big Deal! by foistboinder · · Score: 5, Funny
    The Tardis has been Dr Who's preferred mode of travel for transporting him through time zones since 1963.

    So? I do that all the time in my car.

  34. There are some similarities... by ayjay29 · · Score: 3, Funny

    When I was a lad kids used to hide behind the sofa when Dr Who came on TV.

    Nowdays kids hide behind the sofa when the police come to the door.

    --
    Offtopic, Inflammatory, Inappropriate, Illegal, or Offensive comments might be moderated up.
  35. sane legal systems by martinflack · · Score: 2
    But the Metropolitan Police lost its appeal and has been ordered to pay £850, plus legal costs.

    I'm from the UK living in the US and for my American friends straining their eyes at their monitors, I have to point out that yes, there really is no missing M or six zeros after that number.

    We English figured out a long time ago that the fun is in wearing wigs while you make the judgment, not in ordering large amounts of money to be moved around.

  36. Ahead of it's time... by baine · · Score: 2, Funny

    Anyone noticed how ahead of it's time Dr. Who was?

    Examples :

    Stealth Technology : Chameleon Circuits (ok, so they never worked, but you can't fly a B-2 through a rain shower either).

    Non-lethal Weapons : Sonic Screwdriver

    Recent 'Anit-Gravity' research : The TARDIS' ability to move by manipulating time and space

    Sony's Aibo : K-9 (granted, K-9 could kick Aibo's ass)

    And is it just me or is Jeff Goldblum always seem like he's trying to channel Tom Baker?

    Anyone care for a jelly-baby?

    --
    Need a simple, easy to use data tier generator? http://www.gryphinsoftware.com/
  37. Maybe... by KlomDark · · Score: 2

    They should try suing Bill & Ted and George Carlin for the infringing time-travelling phone booth they used in their excellent adventure... They definitely stole the idea...

  38. Re:What's his name ..... by Woko · · Score: 2

    I thought he mostly signed his name as "Dr. John Smith"?

    --
    ---
    Silence is consent.