Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own PowerPC?

amokk asks: "Let's assume for a second that somebody would want to take the time and effort to build a Personal Computer but base it on a PowerPC architecture. Besides saying 'Buy a Mac' (I already have one) or 'Buy an IBM server', is there any way of acquirng the individual parts and slapping them together? Why you would want to do this isn't up for debate. Rather, this is one of those 'wouldn't it be neat if...' type of experiments."

53 of 320 comments (clear)

  1. The other part of the question... by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is "do I want this to be Mac compatible, or Linux/someotherOS compatible".

    The latter answer is the easier one - the former is harder, since you would have to find "official" Apple parts to make sure the OS talked nice to all the pieces.

    Either way, the idea is an interesting one.

    1. Re:The other part of the question... by rmadmin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For the latter I would suggest FreeBSD. Leave it in Runlevel 5, and install the OSX themese for KDE or Gnome (Your choice). But, I have this odd feeling that you are probably wanting the macintosh compatibility.

    2. Re:The other part of the question... by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 3, Informative

      My point is not that you can't dual boot Mac/Linux machines - Yellow Dog Linux running on a separate boot from OS X is a great example.

      My query is if the author wants to build a Linux compatible PPC desktop (relatively easy), or build an OS X compatible laptop (relatively hard, and probably more expensive).

      My apologies for not making that clear.

    3. Re:The other part of the question... by dhovis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You know, I keep wondering if we'll ever see the return of Mac-clones. Because Darwin is open-source, it should be possible to port it to any other PPC-based machine. Quartz and carbon and cocoa all ride on top of Darwin and don't know what is underneath, so once you've ported Darwin, you should be able to install the full MacOS X.

      This would be a better situation for Apple than their old clone prorgam was, because Apple can force the other hardware vendors to port Darwin to their own clones and support it themselves, and pay Apple for the bit that provides the interface. It would also help Apple spread the cost of Darwin development out a bit.

      Probably a pipe dream, but still...

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    4. Re:The other part of the question... by Gizzmonic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple doesn't use a BIOS, they use OpenFirmware which is designed by Sun. Mac OS X does not require any type of "boot ROM" on the motherboard to load, so you wouldn't need an Apple part. There are a multitude of other reasons why you don't see Mac clones-think about it.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    5. Re:The other part of the question... by bivaughn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Linux compatbility is pretty much enough. MacOnLinux can run Jaguar on an RS/6000 now, so linux on a PPC system not designed by apple can work great. There is also work into getting Jaguar to boot on an AmigaOne PPC ATX motherboard, I think os9 already runs...

      -biv

    6. Re:The other part of the question... by spirality · · Score: 5, Informative

      Darwin is not open source.

      Here is a quote from the Darwin Website:

      We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of Darwin 6.0.1, the Open Source core underlying Mac OS X v10.2 "Jaguar". The Darwin kernel features many enhancements from FreeBSD 4.4 and the KAME IPv6/IPsec code, and is one of the first Open Source operating system releases to be built using GCC 3.1. Darwin 6.0.1 features improved support for POSIX threads and adds several reentrant C library functions, as well as numerous new and updated libraries including ncurses, bzip, and SASL. Darwin now uses bash as the default /bin/sh, and adds python and ruby as scripting languages.

      We are updating the Darwin Tools package enabling you to build Darwin components on top of Mac OS X itself. [Sep 23 2002]


      GPL no, open source yes...

      -Craig

    7. Re:The other part of the question... by dhovis · · Score: 5, Informative
      Darwin is an open source operating system without a GUI.

      A FAQ is available.

      I believe that there are a few components of MacOS X that Apple has licenced and cannot release the source to, so Darwin has replacements for those components, but it is supposed to be binary compatible with MacOS X.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    8. Re:The other part of the question... by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 4, Informative

      OpenFirmware is a consortium (granted dominated by sun.) It is a non machine specific framework that provides a standard boot time interface. It may look nothing like a pc's bios, but still could be considered a bios, without some type of bios, your system doesn't boot. While it's true that apple now uses openfirmware, that was not the case prior to the powerpc. And even though it's an open standard, it still must be implemented at a level that is specific to the specific hardware. A simplistic anology would be OpenFirmware:bios Posix:Linux

      --
      Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
    9. Re:The other part of the question... by autocracy · · Score: 3, Funny
      Also, what company would be stupid enough to throw tons of money at building up a brand only to be at Apple's mercy? That takes a lot of faith, and you saw what happened last time someone had faith in Apple not to screw them over...
      I dunno... but I'd certainly say Dell is Microsoft's bitch...
      --
      SIG: HUP
  2. FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Look here, but it's kind of old. Oh and here also!

  3. Shreve Systems by SmackDown · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can buy refurb'ed Mac motherboards from Shreve Systems in Shreveport, LA. They are a really good source to start with.

  4. AmigaOne by semaj · · Score: 5, Informative

    The AmigaOne G3 SE is a fairly generic ATX motherboard with 133MHz DIMM sockets, IBM 750CXe PowerPC chip (600Mhz), 4xPCI, 1xAGP, etc, etc.

    It runs AmigaOS 4 or PPC Linux quite happily. Plonk one of these in a standard case and you've got yourself a DIY PPC solution .. or is that a bit too easy? :-)

    --
    Meep meep
  5. Hmmmmm... by The+Mainframe · · Score: 3, Informative

    The limitation is really over whether or not you want to use the MacOS. If you could use, say, yellow dog linux, then your job is much easier. Buy your processors from Sonnet, your motherboard from any school (they're getting rid of those old 6100/66 machines like crazy... I have 22), grab your ram from the same places... Basically take a bunch of old machines, assemble one that works from their parts, add a new processor. Or you can do what I'm doing and chain a bunch of stock machines together via ethernet. The only problem is they draw 60 amps of current.
    Oh, yeah... see if you can get your hand on a workgroup server.

    --
    --Bennett Prescott
    Former Lord Of Packets
  6. Try this one? by Ogun · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pegasos
    Should be available now AFAIK.

    There is also the Amiga One which right now is mostly vapor (E.g. not purchasable at the moment)

    See, I mentioned both.

    --
    I found a fast warez site: http://warez.it.kth.se
    1. Re:Try this one? by Jhan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except, of course, that the Amiga One was finished and shipping months ago, and no-one has a Pegasos board (excepting prototypes).

      Anyway, both are based on a Mai reference design. Pegasos is clearly (IMHO) the better product since it has socketed processors (A1 has a surface mounted G3 600MHz (?)). Eyetech will allegedly release an updated version of the A1 with socketed processor if the initial version sells well enough.

      PS. Yes, A1/Amiga OS Vs Pegasos/MorphOS is a very inflamed subject in Amigaland. Three sentence summary follows.

      The Pegasos (a new Amiga PPC motherboard) and MorphOS (an Amiga work-alike OS) was started when Amiga was essentially abandoned. Then, some former employees of Gateway and some Amiga enthusiasts bought the trademarks and started working towards a new, official Amiga platform. The two groups couldn't get along, and now we've wound up with two competing platforms, with a combined market measured in 5 digits, if that (sigh).

      --

      I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

  7. This might be a good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  8. PenguinPPC by BShive · · Score: 5, Informative

    Are you looking for something like this?

    From the site:

    A number of years back from folks in the Microelectronics unit of IBM came up with an idea. It was called POP for PowerPC Open Platform. Basically an open source motherboard design. Well here they are. The first POP boards. It's been a long wait and, like you, I hope it was well worth it.

    The boards do appear to be available - anyone tried them?

    1. Re:PenguinPPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Those boards are basically the same as Eyetech's/Hyperion's/Amiga's A1 and Bplan's Pegasos...

  9. another question... by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you could get Darwin running on such a homemade PowerPC (not made from old Mac parts, but built from 'scratch')... could you then take the pre-compiled parts of aqua out of Mac OS X and run this on your homemade powerpc computer?

    Doesn't darwin handle all of the interaction directly with the hardware? If the aqua binaries can run on your homemade powerpc, shouldn't everything work just fine?

    And a related question... what if you got Darwin running on an x86 chip with a PowerPC emulator? Could you, theoretically, get aqua to run on such a system?

    --
    There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
    1. Re:another question... by ellboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is incorrect. The Apple ROMs you're referring to haven't been used in a long time, like more than 5 years. All modern Macs use Open Firmware. This is exactly why people are asking about do-it-yourself Macs so often. It's now possible.

  10. Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by CySurflex · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next Weeek On Ask Slashdot: "Let's assume I want to pump gas into my car through the radiator and mix in diet cherry 7-up. WHY is not up for debate. I just need the schematics and blue prints of how to achieve this, and I need this NOW."

    1. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by Carmody · · Score: 3, Funny

      This would not be too difficult. As long as you don't want the car to RUN on that mixture, it really is just a question of a nozzle in the radiator that goes to the diet cherry 7-up mixing chamber, and then stores it somewhere for disposal later.

      --
      God is real unless declared integer
    2. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by Contact · · Score: 4, Offtopic
      You may joke, but a hot topic in the UK at the moment is the idea of running diesel engined cars on used cooking fat mixed with a little white spirit.

      This does apparently work (although I'm not sure about the long terms effects on the engine, or performance), and over here, where automotive fuels run to about 5 dollars a gallon, the potential savings are huge - apparently some supermarkets have been running out of cooking oil and have had to impose rationing, and I'm sure that restauranteurs are finding themselves unusually popular...

    3. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by CuCullin · · Score: 4, Informative

      The common term is biodiesel or greasel for the mixture. When used with new diesel engines, they actually run cleaner than a natural gas engine. Some have made their own biodiesel for as little as $.50 USD/gallon, for quite a large savings. In NJ, the price of diesel just went up about $0.10 USD... The primary considerations are seals, older rubber seals will break down and fail, spewing all over the place. The solution? Use newer plastic seals, they last much longer anyway. There is a power loss of appr. 5%, but on new engines you don't feel all that much of a difference.

  11. compatible or not... good point! by Sleepy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The author should ask to ammend the question to include (or not) compatability with Mac PPC as a goal.

    Can you buy Motorola motherboards and pop in a CPU? Sure.

    That's it??

    It would be more interesting to consider the "platform" as part of the question. Some would be exclusively interested in compliant hardware that runs MacOS. Others would just want something that runs Linux.

    1. Re:compatible or not... good point! by Sleepy · · Score: 3, Informative

      retailers for the Motorola VME boards? Good luck!

      I would first search the ppcLinux email archives, then consider posting the question to the list. I know it's been a subject of much discussion there. I sold my G3 ages ago so I have not kept up on things in the PPC world.

      If you are starting from scratch -- not using an old Mac -- what's the advantage?

      I mean, sure, PPC might have a "cleaner" design but who gives a rats ass? The advantage of that is LOST when one considers that the compiler and library chain on Linux PPC is nowhere near as mature as on X86. Someone with more knowledge than myself could state why X86 gcc blows away the ppc port of gcc.

      Personally, I liked PPC most because it was low-power and so needed less active cooling. But the new VIA miniboards with the VIA (Cyrix) chip are relatively cool itels also. Cool and quiet is nice for things like embedded MP3.

      For a desktop, I don't see the value in PPC. Now maybe if Motorola and IBM woke up and LEVERAGED Linux as a "write once, complile & run anywhere' platform, but PPC chips are a small part of their business. Unlike Microsoft, Motorola has no "religion"... just look up the "anti- mother-company" threads where Motorola went on a witchhunt for anything "Motorolla Inside"... be it MacOS, or PPC NT. I don't mean now, because PPC NT4 is dead, but at one time it was supported.

    2. Re:compatible or not... good point! by chewedtoothpick · · Score: 4, Informative

      One thing you can try to get parts is going to your local 'authorized mac repair specialist.' The local mac repair shop where I live is usually okay about it. Aparently the only problem with building MACs is the bus structure between all of the cards for NIC etc... You are going to have to make sure all of your hardware is MAC compatible because the bus addressing etc... is supposedly a little different from that of PC's.

      --
      Erutangis ym si siht.
  12. Howto - Build your own Mac by kuwan · · Score: 4, Informative

    This site has instructions on what you need, where to get it, and how to put it all together. Pretty useful if you want to build your own Mac and don't want to pay Apple's prices.

    1. Re:Howto - Build your own Mac by Tycho · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem with building a Gigabit G4 and probably every other AGP G4 is that the chips on the bottom of the motherboard touch the case and use the case as a heat sink. When you use a standard ATX case those chips on the bottom contact nothing and are not properly cooled. This works for a while but you are going to end up with a fried motherboad eventually.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  13. Similar Questions: ARM-powered Desktop? by Hanno · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...are there mainboards and CPUs available to end-users that are not in the sky-high price-range that manufacturers take for developer hardware?

    I'd be interested in building an ARM-based desktop computer, but it seems there is no normal mainboard sold to end-users. Or is it? ("Normal" = standard form factor, standard RAMs, IDE, USB and VGA included, possibly PS/2 and serial too.)

    Same question for the Crusoe, btw. Seems that the only desktop mainboard available is developers only...

    --

    ------------------
    You may like my a cappella music
    1. Re:Similar Questions: ARM-powered Desktop? by chiller2 · · Score: 3, Informative
      A number of companies from the Acorn scene (yes there are still a few) are working on newer ARM based hardware.

      You should check the following links out...

      Castle Technologies (UK) - The Iyonix PC. It runs RISCOS 4 but can use ArmLinux/etc if you want it to. They've also brought out a USB podule for older Acorn systems. Castle site

      Aleph One have a line of StrongARM based evaluation boards, and ARMLinux related info. Lots of info for ARM developers.

      Uffenkamp (DE) sell Acorn/ARM hardware and software and I guess would be easier for you to get to. See their site.

      RiscStation (UK) have their own RISCOS/ARM based systems you can check out. See the RiscStation homepage for more info.

      You can get a good idea of the ARM hardware out there by following the Acorn/ARM news sites. There is a lot more but that should be enough to get you started :) chiller2
      --
      --- Commission free trading & free stock up to $500 - use http://share.robinhood.com/kelvinp6 :)
  14. Procurement of the hardware by mao+che+minh · · Score: 3, Informative
    Why not assemble the unit from compatible parts from older PowerPCs with choice upgrade parts that are "Apple Certified" from online resellers of Apple hardware?

    Here are a few resellers of Apple hardware:
    Milagro and ETI Express

  15. This was a recent Slashdot story by Geek+Dash+Boy · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
  16. Easy to do (If you've got lots of money) by ivan256 · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you really want to build a system from parts there are several places you can go. Motorola sells evaluation platforms that consisto of a motherboard (essentially a backplane) and CPU modules that plug into it. It's calld Sandpoint. You can get third party CPU modules for it from Tundra (who also sells whole kits with their own system board). Marvell/Galileo sells a platform that is well suited to building a PC style machine with PPC hardware, and you can get a variety of processor cards for it ranging from low end G3 style processors up to dual 7450 processors.

    Some of the best PPC machines available right now can't be built from parts simply because they're on a single board. My current to y is the cyclades TS-100 it's only 1"x3"x3", has dual CPUs and can be had for under $200.

  17. Was already on /. (and I have the link, too) by incripshin · · Score: 5, Informative
    There was an article here a while back: Build a Macintosh From Scratch., which links to "a great step-by-step tutorial" There's your answer.

    incripshin

  18. Try older machines by jmertic · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out these guides for repackaging either a Beige G3 or Blue/White G3 in a standard ATX case. All that's needed that is "Apple offical" is the motherboard stuff; memory, video ( uses Mac PCI video cards ), HD, and CD-ROM are off the shelf PC items. They use ZIF CPUs which can be obtained from Apple, Sonnet, NewerTech, and many others.

  19. why??? by brer_rabbit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why you want to do this *IS* up for debate. If you're shooting for a unix (linux/whatever) platform, does it really matter that it's PowerPC? I mean, unix is general enough that unless you've got specific hardware requirements (and processor alone doesn't constitute this -- I'm talking wierd ass PCI cards or other barnyard oddities) it doesn't matter if you're on powerpc, intel, or sparc. The cheapest bang for the buck in this category is, as we all know, intel.

    I've no idea what you'd need to do to get this MacOS compatible. Do they still use dark matter (ROM) in those machines? But if you're not going for Mac compatibility I don't know why you want to roll your own.

    If you've got a warezhouse full of PowerPC assembly programs then that's a different story. Obviously you're going to need a specific processor to run them. Or maybe you're looking to do embedded system development on a PowerPC?

    Inquiring minds want to know. Ok, we don't really *want* to know, we'd really just like to laugh at the idea a bit more. :)

  20. PowerPC briQ's by myov · · Score: 5, Informative
    You could try a briQ, running Yellow Dog Linux

    Specs:
    • 500 MHz G3 or G4 CPUs
    • 100 MHz 64-bit System Bus
    • 2 x 168 Pin DIMM sites (up to 1GB RAM)
    • 2.5" IDE internal drive
    • RS/232 serial
    • 10/100 ethernet
    • 64/66 expansion slot (adapts to PCI)*
    • programmable Vacuum Florescent Display (VFD)
    • weighs-in at just 1.85 lbs
    • 5.74 X 1.625 X 8.9 inches (same dimensions as CD-ROM)
    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    1. Re:PowerPC briQ's by GlassHeart · · Score: 5, Informative
      You could try a briQ

      The G3 version costs $1,485, plus shipping. The G4 version costs $1,985, plus shipping. The person who asked the question wants to use it as a desktop computer, but this only has a 10 GB drive, no video card, and no CD-ROM drive.

      At the price of the G3, you can get an iMac which is superior in just about every way (for desktop applications) except the RAM size.

  21. hard to do by Gizzmonic · · Score: 5, Informative
    i've been trying to do this for awhile. The problem is that no one offers a (non-apple, non-ibm, non-motorola) PowerPC motherboard besides chaintech in the UK (fastest you'll get there is a 600mhz G3, and prices are higher than a comparable Apple machine. they basically exist to fleece amiga people.)

    Motorola and IBM don't sell their CPUs to end users. You can order a G4 or even a G5 (PPC 8500 series) from one of Mot's suppliers like Arrow, but I believe they force you to order in high quantities (40+ at a time).

    During the dot-bomb era, several companies like Eternal Computing and Silicon Fruit promised to offer affordable PowerPC motherboards to retail customers. Nothing ever came of it (insert Apple conspiracy theory here).

    I think there's a market for retail PowerPC motherboards, or there will be once IBM's 970 hits the market. It's fun to mess with exotic hardware like the PPC, and its performance is very impressive considering its limited clock speed. IBM has published a spec for PowerPC logic boards that is available for free on its website (i'm sure someone else has posted the link by now).

    Linux would run on these things in no time (maybe we could even build our own TiVOs with 'em). And Mac OS X would be easy to port, with or without Apple's help.

    I don't think IBM would like this idea very much however, since it might undercut their huge margins on PPC-based servers. On the other hand, if they manufactured and sold the motherboard for cheap, they could bring PPC to a much larger audience.

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  22. a "BUILD YOUR OWN $800 G4" how too + parts links by DABANSHEE · · Score: 5, Informative

    Macopz.com "build a Mac" page

    They have links to all the parts suppliers, the parts add up to $800

  23. Re:Build your own computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    > I just purchased a new computer, by taking some
    > parts out of my old one, giving them to the
    > service desk at my local computer shop, and
    > telling them how to fill in the blanks

    What is this, an AOL forum? I thought this was Slashdot, where people etch their own fricken motherboards, not drop them off at the local shop to get an upgrade.

  24. Re:put another way... by eno2001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the person is probably asking about commodity parts. Anyone can go into a local hole in the wall PC shop and buy an Intel/AMD compatible mobo and plug commodity hardware (video, NIC, sound, IDE HDs, etc...) into it and get a working computer out of it. But, is it possible to get a PowerPC based mobo with PCI/AGP slots, an IDE controller, USB in an ATX (I'm not a hardware guy, so ATX could be the wrong term) form factor and have it work with an OS like Linux? That would be a great way to get away from the WinTel world and avoid paying the steep prices that Apple fetches. However, since any mobos like this are likely to be made in a much smaller volume and harder to find (implying a small customer base), they would probably be fairly expensive anyway. It's a beautiful idea, but it's not a reality at this time.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  25. Re:My brother built several lab machines by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Informative
    He had a dozen or so free copies of Mac OS X (10.1 I believe) but no hardware onto which to place this neat new OS...He told me the only real hard part was finding cases.
    Pardon me for saying so, but I'm pretty skeptical of this comment. Knocking together PPC hardware isn't necessarily going to get you a machine that can run Mac OS X. Just the fact that you say he used SCSI hard drives makes me suspicious. Early versions of Mac OS X were known to choke on Adaptec SCSI cards -- you might have to pull the card, then install the OS (on your internal IDE drive), then put the card back in and install drivers. What's more, Mac OS X still relies on some proprietary Apple chips/firmware. If you're saying your brother went and found old Macintosh motherboards etc., then it sounds a little more likely ... but considering the difficulty a lot of people have running Mac OS X on stock, store-bought G3 towers, let alone older motherboards, I doubt people will want to get any big ideas based on your post.
    --
    Breakfast served all day!
  26. Mac on Linux by mbrubeck · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mac On Linux will let you run MacOS (including OS X) on any PowerPC system that runs Linux -- even if MacOS won't run natively on the hardware. Mac On Linux provides a MacOS-compatible virtual machine (but it doesn't emulate the processor, so it's nearly as fast as running native).

  27. Re:a "BUILD YOUR OWN $800 G4" how too + parts link by pldms · · Score: 5, Informative
    You might also enjoy this thread from the arstechnica forums. The joy, the pain, the smell of frying components...

    The main problem building a Mac PPC using a refurbished motherboard seemed to be the power supply, IIRC. Needs a 28v trickle feed.

    Anyway, worth a read.

    --
    Slashdot looked deep within my soul and assigned
    me a number based on the order in which I joined
  28. You want PPC boards? we got em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Try here for resellers.

    MicroATX mainboard (236 mm x 172 mm)
    133 MHz processor slot
    600 MHz PowerPC G3 750 CXe - to Dual PowerPC G4 MPC 7450
    PC133 RAM (two sockets), up to 2 GB
    AGP slot
    PCI subsystem with three slots, optional Riser Card
    IEEE1394 (Firewire) VIA VT6306 with 100/200/400 MBit data transfer
    10/100 MBit Realtek Phyceiver 8201 Ethernet
    USB I/O system VIA 8231 with four connectors
    AC97 sound subsystem Sigmatel STAC 9766 Codec with mic input, line in/out and headset connector
    IRDA for infra-red remote control
    ATA100 VIA 8231 with two channels for upto four ATA devices
    PS/2 mouse connector
    RS232 (serial) port
    Centronics port
    Floppy
    Gameport for PC-compatible joysticks
    Open firmware

    Two operating systems included : MorphOS and Linux

  29. Anyone remember CHRP? by barfarf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This was called the "common reference hardware platform". Before Apple usurped back the Power Computing, Motorola, and Umax clones, this was supposed to be one potential answer to building a non-mac powerpc box. Motorola came the closest to accomplishing this by implementing standard PC parts (like ps/2 ports) on their computer.

    At one time, back when Microsoft actually supported the PowerPC architecture, Firmworks and IBM actually made a dual-booting macintosh/NT computer in 1996. IBM's motivation was linux, I believe. Check these links out:

    http://www.firmworks.com/www/chrp.htm

    http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/C/CHRP.html

    http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/9908/19.ibm. sh tml

    I personally LOVED the thought of being able to go to a computer show and putting together an NT or a linux or a mac-compatible computer by purchasing individual parts.

    You know, it's really a damn shame this wasn't meant to be.

  30. Acorn by Jhan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You need to check out the Acorn community (or perhaps that's where you're coming from?). Acorn was an English Arm-based home computer of the late 80's that competed (none to sucessfully, outside Britain at least) against Amiga an Atari.

    Even though the Acorn community is now shriveled enough to make Amiga look healthy by comparision, they have been the one and only group pushing Arm-based desktops over the last decades.

    There seems to be at least a couple hardware resellers still in operation. The pricing didn't seem to extortionate to me, either.

    --

    I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

  31. Motorola Reference Motherboards by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Informative

    Motorola makes reference motherboards and pre-built systems based on them. You can run MontaVista Linux on them. There's a dual-1GHz model available.

    I haven't tried it myself. I suspect it's not cheaper than buying a Mac.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  32. Slashdot Recursion by BiOFH · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    - I am made of meat.
  33. Pegasos G3/G4 mobo by rEWDBOi · · Score: 3, Informative
    You shoul check out bplan's Pegasos G3/G4 mobo.. The Homepage isn't exactly clear as to wether it's released yet or yet another Amiga vaporware, but it sure sounds interesting:

    microATX Mainboard 236mm x 172mm ( 9"3 x 6"8 )
    • 133 MHz Processor Slot
    • Optional with 350 MHz G3 PowerPC® / 512k Cache
      up to Dual MPC 7450 G4 PowerPC® / 2 MB Cache at state of the art speedgrades
    • PC133 SDRAM Memory for a total of 2 modules
      maximum 2GB extension by availibility of modules
    • AGP Slot x 2, user selectable graphics card
    • PCI Subsystem with a total of 3 slots to be used for custom expansion, included one slot for Riser Card Option
    • IEEE1394 VIA VT6306 at 100/200/400 MBit Transfer rates with three ports
    • 10/100 MBit Network Realtek 8201 Phyceiver
    • USB I/O System VIA 8231 with a total of 4 ports
    • AC97 Sound Subsystem Sigmatel STAC 9766 Codec with Mic. In, Line In/Out and Headset support
    • optical S/PDIF output
    • IRDA for comunication with PDAs and other IRDA devices
    • ATA100 VIA 8231 with up to 4 devices
    • KBD for PS2 compatible keyboards
    • Mouse for PS2 compatible pointing devices
    • Seriell one channel RS232
    • Parallel standard Centronics
    • Floppy
    • Gameport to be used with PC style joysticks/gamepads
    • 56K Modem
      integrated