Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own PowerPC?

amokk asks: "Let's assume for a second that somebody would want to take the time and effort to build a Personal Computer but base it on a PowerPC architecture. Besides saying 'Buy a Mac' (I already have one) or 'Buy an IBM server', is there any way of acquirng the individual parts and slapping them together? Why you would want to do this isn't up for debate. Rather, this is one of those 'wouldn't it be neat if...' type of experiments."

220 of 320 comments (clear)

  1. The other part of the question... by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is "do I want this to be Mac compatible, or Linux/someotherOS compatible".

    The latter answer is the easier one - the former is harder, since you would have to find "official" Apple parts to make sure the OS talked nice to all the pieces.

    Either way, the idea is an interesting one.

    1. Re:The other part of the question... by rmadmin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For the latter I would suggest FreeBSD. Leave it in Runlevel 5, and install the OSX themese for KDE or Gnome (Your choice). But, I have this odd feeling that you are probably wanting the macintosh compatibility.

    2. Re:The other part of the question... by PythonOrRuby · · Score: 2

      One doesn't rule out the other. Witness Macs that dual-boot OS9/X and Linux.

    3. Re:The other part of the question... by PhysicsScholar · · Score: 1, Informative

      The latter answer is the easier one - the former is harder, since you would have to find "official" Apple parts to make sure the OS talked nice to all the pieces.

      There's nothing "official" about Apple parts. Just like any other computer company, their parts are manufactured and primarily designed by other companies. For example, their PowerPC processors are traditionally made by either Motorola or IBM. It's not as if Apple has a huge research team designing "Apple(TM)" hard disks; they simply buy Western Digital or Seagate drives just like the rest of us.

      --

      Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S., Canada, B3H 3J5
    4. Re:The other part of the question... by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 3, Informative

      My point is not that you can't dual boot Mac/Linux machines - Yellow Dog Linux running on a separate boot from OS X is a great example.

      My query is if the author wants to build a Linux compatible PPC desktop (relatively easy), or build an OS X compatible laptop (relatively hard, and probably more expensive).

      My apologies for not making that clear.

    5. Re:The other part of the question... by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      OK, so where can I (legally) buy a Mac BIOS chip? The bulk of it may be off-the-shelf, but there are Apple copyright parts -- only available from Apple -- which is why you don't see any Mac clones.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    6. Re:The other part of the question... by dhovis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You know, I keep wondering if we'll ever see the return of Mac-clones. Because Darwin is open-source, it should be possible to port it to any other PPC-based machine. Quartz and carbon and cocoa all ride on top of Darwin and don't know what is underneath, so once you've ported Darwin, you should be able to install the full MacOS X.

      This would be a better situation for Apple than their old clone prorgam was, because Apple can force the other hardware vendors to port Darwin to their own clones and support it themselves, and pay Apple for the bit that provides the interface. It would also help Apple spread the cost of Darwin development out a bit.

      Probably a pipe dream, but still...

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    7. Re:The other part of the question... by PhysicsScholar · · Score: 2, Funny

      OK, so where can I (legally) buy a Mac BIOS chip?

      We have an undergraduate course here at my school where several of the laboratories consist of doing just that. One of the professors used to work for Apple, which explains why he has advanced knowledge in this area.

      If you email me, I could forward it to the appropriate scholar here at Imperial and see if he can't manufacture a few extra for you.

      Good luck.

      --

      Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S., Canada, B3H 3J5
    8. Re:The other part of the question... by Gizzmonic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple doesn't use a BIOS, they use OpenFirmware which is designed by Sun. Mac OS X does not require any type of "boot ROM" on the motherboard to load, so you wouldn't need an Apple part. There are a multitude of other reasons why you don't see Mac clones-think about it.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    9. Re:The other part of the question... by intermodal · · Score: 1, Informative

      Darwin is not open source. Darwin is based off an opensource kernel, but itself is not. And from there, there's compatibility with the rest of MacOS to work with.

      --
      In SOVIET RUSSIA... erm...NSA AMERICA, the Internet logs onto YOU!
    10. Re:The other part of the question... by bivaughn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Linux compatbility is pretty much enough. MacOnLinux can run Jaguar on an RS/6000 now, so linux on a PPC system not designed by apple can work great. There is also work into getting Jaguar to boot on an AmigaOne PPC ATX motherboard, I think os9 already runs...

      -biv

    11. Re:The other part of the question... by spirality · · Score: 5, Informative

      Darwin is not open source.

      Here is a quote from the Darwin Website:

      We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of Darwin 6.0.1, the Open Source core underlying Mac OS X v10.2 "Jaguar". The Darwin kernel features many enhancements from FreeBSD 4.4 and the KAME IPv6/IPsec code, and is one of the first Open Source operating system releases to be built using GCC 3.1. Darwin 6.0.1 features improved support for POSIX threads and adds several reentrant C library functions, as well as numerous new and updated libraries including ncurses, bzip, and SASL. Darwin now uses bash as the default /bin/sh, and adds python and ruby as scripting languages.

      We are updating the Darwin Tools package enabling you to build Darwin components on top of Mac OS X itself. [Sep 23 2002]


      GPL no, open source yes...

      -Craig

    12. Re:The other part of the question... by dhovis · · Score: 5, Informative
      Darwin is an open source operating system without a GUI.

      A FAQ is available.

      I believe that there are a few components of MacOS X that Apple has licenced and cannot release the source to, so Darwin has replacements for those components, but it is supposed to be binary compatible with MacOS X.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    13. Re:The other part of the question... by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      What the hell is runlevel 5 in FreeBSD? FreeBSD has single-user mode, and multi-user mode.

    14. Re:The other part of the question... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Apple's never going to start up clones again after getting burned so bad on them last time (and as a result, I'm never going to get an Apple system again.)

      Also, what company would be stupid enough to throw tons of money at building up a brand only to be at Apple's mercy? That takes a lot of faith, and you saw what happened last time someone had faith in Apple not to screw them over...

      This whole thing reminds me of this (older, 680x0 era) book "Build your own Macintosh and Save a Bundle".

    15. Re:The other part of the question... by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 4, Informative

      OpenFirmware is a consortium (granted dominated by sun.) It is a non machine specific framework that provides a standard boot time interface. It may look nothing like a pc's bios, but still could be considered a bios, without some type of bios, your system doesn't boot. While it's true that apple now uses openfirmware, that was not the case prior to the powerpc. And even though it's an open standard, it still must be implemented at a level that is specific to the specific hardware. A simplistic anology would be OpenFirmware:bios Posix:Linux

      --
      Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
    16. Re:The other part of the question... by 1010011010 · · Score: 2


      How fast is Jag in MOL? Can it take advantage of 3d hardware?

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    17. Re:The other part of the question... by fobbman · · Score: 2

      Unless something huge happens that gives Apple a much larger share of the market, I see no reason why someone would put out the millions of dollars to startup a computer company to compete for the small piece of the pie that Apple owns.

    18. Re:The other part of the question... by Dahan · · Score: 2

      BIOS is the Basic Input/Output System, and is a IBM PC-specific thing. OpenFirmware is firmware. BIOS is firmware. And your analogy is completely wrong too.

    19. Re:The other part of the question... by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 1

      More an issue of semantics. If you look in the context of the original post, he was asking about getting the 'thingie' that makes an apple boot, call it a bios, firmware, or a tuna salad, that doesn't change what it is... or what it does.

      --
      Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
    20. Re:The other part of the question... by __past__ · · Score: 2

      On PPC it's even easier: If the web site of the FreeBSD/PPC project isn't outdated, it won't get as far as multi-user mode anyway.

    21. Re:The other part of the question... by namespan · · Score: 2

      My understanding is that the clone market was a losing game for everyone. Apple had their marketshare cannibalized, rather than expanded. UMAX, when they quit, said that they lost money on it. No gain for Apple, no gain for the cloner. Why bother?

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    22. Re:The other part of the question... by autocracy · · Score: 3, Funny
      Also, what company would be stupid enough to throw tons of money at building up a brand only to be at Apple's mercy? That takes a lot of faith, and you saw what happened last time someone had faith in Apple not to screw them over...
      I dunno... but I'd certainly say Dell is Microsoft's bitch...
      --
      SIG: HUP
    23. Re:The other part of the question... by Geekboy(Wizard) · · Score: 1

      True, but OpenBSD works rather well on PPC. Only problems I have are related to special hardware (laptop) or endian-ness problems with people's code.

    24. Re:The other part of the question... by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 2

      When I looked into doing this, I decided NOt to because I would have to have apple ROM chips. They do use ROM, and always have. My grandmother's performa 650, if you took the hard disk out, or deleted the system folder would boot from OS 6.0.1, stored in ROM. the apple archives describe this clearly. I am no as knowledgeable in the area of the G4 chipset, so I am not sure, but all the "build your own"/"repair macs" books mention that you need ROM

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    25. Re:The other part of the question... by Gizzmonic · · Score: 1
      I am no as knowledgeable in the area of the G4 chipset, so I am not sure, but all the "build your own"/"repair macs" books mention that you need ROM

      As of Mac OS X, this is technically not necessary. It's possible to build (and by build I mean ordering exotic parts, heavy duty sautering, etc) a PPC motherboard using the parts described at openppc.org. Once you have a working mobo there, you could then run LinuxPPC. If you wanted to install Darwin (and by extension, Mac OS X) you'd have write your own drivers for unsupported devices, sort of similar to what has been done here.

      Ordering/sautering your own hardware + writing the drivers= a very large barrier to entry. For anyone but the most hardcore, it's not work the effort.

      If there were an affordable PPC motherboard, it would be a cinch to "build your own Mac" as I am sure there would be drivers for Darwin that would allow it to work on such a motherboard. And if there were a guarantee of getting Mac OS X to work on a non-Apple motherboard, I'm sure that some corporation or another would jump at the chance to make PPC boards.

      It's an unfortunate Catch-22, but unless somebody is willing to risk their life savings getting PowerPC boards made, then it's not gonna happen...

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    26. Re:The other part of the question... by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      Apple doesn't care what kind of machine you run Darwin on... and if you can make a machine that runs Darwin and doesn't require licensing anything from Apple, then you are home free, no?

      No, because no one wants to run Darwin. People want machines with OS X preinstalled, and Apple controls that.

    27. Re:The other part of the question... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      Bollocks, matey. The term BIOS was also used on CP/M systems.

    28. Re:The other part of the question... by frankentivo · · Score: 1

      Any PPC? Port Darwin to my TiVo.

    29. Re:The other part of the question... by PythonOrRuby · · Score: 2

      Oh, I understand the cost issue. I was just trying to make the point that if you could build something that would run OS X, you'd likely also get the ability to run Linux "for free".

  2. FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Look here, but it's kind of old. Oh and here also!

  3. Shreve Systems by SmackDown · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can buy refurb'ed Mac motherboards from Shreve Systems in Shreveport, LA. They are a really good source to start with.

    1. Re:Shreve Systems by unicron · · Score: 2, Troll

      That's the place next to Muddy May Suggin's Gator Farm, isn't it?

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    2. Re:Shreve Systems by SmackDown · · Score: 1

      You must be seeing things- the smallest drive they sell is a 160MB drive for $50. That's ultra-expensive by today's standards, but how common are 160MB or 230MB SCSI-1 drives for use with Quadra 950s? These are pretty much antiques at this point. They do sell 10GB drives for $300, which is insane, but with modern day macs, you should be buying your IDE drives from PC vendors anyways.

  4. My brother built several lab machines by PhysicsScholar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He had a dozen or so free copies of Mac OS X (10.1 I believe) but no hardware onto which to place this neat new OS.

    So, he scoured eBay for the appropriate parts (motherboard, chip, RAM, SCSI hard disks) and pieced together all of the new machines from scratch.

    He told me the only real hard part was finding cases. I think he's still two cases short, but ended up simply mounting the components onto a piece of drywall and setting them flat on a lab table!

    --

    Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S., Canada, B3H 3J5
    1. Re:My brother built several lab machines by HiredMan · · Score: 2
      In that case have him check out this mod...

      http://www.ahleman.com/ElectriClerk.html

      It's Harry Tuttle approved!

      =TKK

    2. Re:My brother built several lab machines by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      PhyicsGenuis (the troll) back with a new account! WB!

      No way, PhysicsGenius was way better than this guy. This guy is a predictible poser, not a clever troll.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    3. Re:My brother built several lab machines by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Informative
      He had a dozen or so free copies of Mac OS X (10.1 I believe) but no hardware onto which to place this neat new OS...He told me the only real hard part was finding cases.
      Pardon me for saying so, but I'm pretty skeptical of this comment. Knocking together PPC hardware isn't necessarily going to get you a machine that can run Mac OS X. Just the fact that you say he used SCSI hard drives makes me suspicious. Early versions of Mac OS X were known to choke on Adaptec SCSI cards -- you might have to pull the card, then install the OS (on your internal IDE drive), then put the card back in and install drivers. What's more, Mac OS X still relies on some proprietary Apple chips/firmware. If you're saying your brother went and found old Macintosh motherboards etc., then it sounds a little more likely ... but considering the difficulty a lot of people have running Mac OS X on stock, store-bought G3 towers, let alone older motherboards, I doubt people will want to get any big ideas based on your post.
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    4. Re:My brother built several lab machines by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      a link from another comment:

      http://www.macopz.com/buildamac/

      apparently a guide to what you need to build your mac from 'scratch', that is, from parts.

      but yeh, he probably went and got himself some mac parts. but parts still. and i guess it's a lot easier to build a mac compatible machine from mac parts instead of crusoe cpu's..(noshitsherlock)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    5. Re:My brother built several lab machines by HiredMan · · Score: 2

      Sorry - was that Tuttle or Buttle? ;)

  5. Go to Computer Renaissance and buy a couple UMAX's by 109+97+116+116 · · Score: 1

    I happened to be in a Computer Renaissance store the other day and saw a couple PPC UMAX Pc's for sale there. Quite cheap. $100 apiece (Old too, not new Power PC's of course.)

  6. Build your own computer? by silvaran · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let's assume for a second that somebody would want to take the time and effort to build a Personal Computer

    God forbid. Would you prefer to buy a stock machine with sub-standard parts? Sure, there are several places (Dell) where you can customize the computer before you buy it, but nothing can match the customizability found in building your own computer. I just purchased a new computer, by taking some parts out of my old one, giving them to the service desk at my local computer shop, and telling them how to fill in the blanks. It runs solidly, I know I'm using compatible hardware, furthermore I know exactly what's in it. It beats the heck out of buying a computer with just a "sound card", "hard drive" and "motherboard", and no other descriptive names to tell you exactly what you're getting. Besides which I would imagine many on Slashdot would be perfectly capable of building their own computers.

    But yeah, PowerPC takes it a step farther.

    1. Re:Build your own computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      > I just purchased a new computer, by taking some
      > parts out of my old one, giving them to the
      > service desk at my local computer shop, and
      > telling them how to fill in the blanks

      What is this, an AOL forum? I thought this was Slashdot, where people etch their own fricken motherboards, not drop them off at the local shop to get an upgrade.

    2. Re:Build your own computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny



      etch motherboards? Geez that's so far along in the process...

      My daughter and I are mining our own copper for her Christmas computer. We make our own fans out of paper mache and magnets. Our heatsink is made of aluminum from an an old Billy Bob Carter beer can.

    3. Re:Build your own computer? by luciuskwok · · Score: 1
      God forbid. Would you prefer to buy a stock machine with sub-standard parts?

      I would hardly call the parts that Apple uses on their stock machines sub-standard. Back when PowerComputing was making Mac clones, some of the clones had sub-standard parts (PSUs especially), but Apple's machines were pretty high-quality.

      If you're looking to build the cheapest PC you can, you're probably going to end up using sub-standard parts.

      With Macs the motherboard will have to be an Apple design with their chipset and CPU boards. The sound, networking, and modem are generally on the motherboard. The last PowerMac I bought came with a Seagate Barracuda IV hard drive, so there was nothing substandard there.

      Still, I do like building my own computer. I just put together a new system based on the VIA C3 cpu, in order to make a quiet PC.

  7. AmigaOne by semaj · · Score: 5, Informative

    The AmigaOne G3 SE is a fairly generic ATX motherboard with 133MHz DIMM sockets, IBM 750CXe PowerPC chip (600Mhz), 4xPCI, 1xAGP, etc, etc.

    It runs AmigaOS 4 or PPC Linux quite happily. Plonk one of these in a standard case and you've got yourself a DIY PPC solution .. or is that a bit too easy? :-)

    --
    Meep meep
    1. Re:AmigaOne by CrosseyedPainless · · Score: 2

      It's a bit too expensive. Compuquick's quoting them for $550, just for a motherboard! Yikes.

    2. Re:AmigaOne by Aknaton · · Score: 1

      I think that includes the CPU. If I remember correctly, the CPU is soldered in the socket.

    3. Re:AmigaOne by Pius+II. · · Score: 1

      Of course, actually being able to buy one of these things would be even better. Try the links on their dealer page; most shops don't even give projected availability dates for the boards.

    4. Re:AmigaOne by Amiga+Trombone · · Score: 2, Informative
      There's a Yahoo! group dedicated to the discussion of the Amiga One you may be interested in. From the group:

      This group is for the discussion of the AmigaOne series of PPC motherboards and Classic Amiga bridge cards developed by Eyetech and distributed by authorised Amiga retailers worldwide.

      You might want to post your query over there.
    5. Re:AmigaOne by Sloppy · · Score: 1

      Is it actually available? Can a "regular person" (i.e. someone who doesn't sign NDAs) buy one?

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    6. Re:AmigaOne by anarkhos · · Score: 1

      Amazing! It runs OSs which don't exist yet? WOW!

      --
      >80 column hard wrapped e-mail is not a sign of intelligent
      >life
    7. Re:AmigaOne by SimonKeogh · · Score: 1


      Apparently they should be available before xmas.

    8. Re:AmigaOne by samdu · · Score: 1

      There have been PPC boards for Amigas available for years. However, they all have required a real Amiga until the A1 comes (came?) out.

  8. insane logistics by l33t-gu3lph1t3 · · Score: 1

    Dude, the parts you're looking for just don't COME in the retail channels these days. I've seen modjobs where Mac enclosures have been used to house PCs (Rotten Apple is a good example), and others, such as the G4 heatsink that was scavenged in order to make a lowend P3 heatsink.

    The tough part about building a Mac is Apple itself - they are the ONLY supplier of Macs or Mac parts, and they want it to stay that way. Why do you think Jobs got rid of the cloners?

    --
    ------- "From bored to fanboy in 3.8 asian girls" ----------
  9. Hmmmmm... by The+Mainframe · · Score: 3, Informative

    The limitation is really over whether or not you want to use the MacOS. If you could use, say, yellow dog linux, then your job is much easier. Buy your processors from Sonnet, your motherboard from any school (they're getting rid of those old 6100/66 machines like crazy... I have 22), grab your ram from the same places... Basically take a bunch of old machines, assemble one that works from their parts, add a new processor. Or you can do what I'm doing and chain a bunch of stock machines together via ethernet. The only problem is they draw 60 amps of current.
    Oh, yeah... see if you can get your hand on a workgroup server.

    --
    --Bennett Prescott
    Former Lord Of Packets
  10. Try this one? by Ogun · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pegasos
    Should be available now AFAIK.

    There is also the Amiga One which right now is mostly vapor (E.g. not purchasable at the moment)

    See, I mentioned both.

    --
    I found a fast warez site: http://warez.it.kth.se
    1. Re:Try this one? by Jhan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except, of course, that the Amiga One was finished and shipping months ago, and no-one has a Pegasos board (excepting prototypes).

      Anyway, both are based on a Mai reference design. Pegasos is clearly (IMHO) the better product since it has socketed processors (A1 has a surface mounted G3 600MHz (?)). Eyetech will allegedly release an updated version of the A1 with socketed processor if the initial version sells well enough.

      PS. Yes, A1/Amiga OS Vs Pegasos/MorphOS is a very inflamed subject in Amigaland. Three sentence summary follows.

      The Pegasos (a new Amiga PPC motherboard) and MorphOS (an Amiga work-alike OS) was started when Amiga was essentially abandoned. Then, some former employees of Gateway and some Amiga enthusiasts bought the trademarks and started working towards a new, official Amiga platform. The two groups couldn't get along, and now we've wound up with two competing platforms, with a combined market measured in 5 digits, if that (sigh).

      --

      I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

    2. Re:Try this one? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      > Except, of course, that the Amiga One was finished and shipping months ago, and no-one has a Pegasos board (excepting prototypes).

      Where have you been lately?

      Pegasos has been out in endusers' hands for some time now.

      AmigaOne is just for a few selected betatesters.

    3. Re:Try this one? by idr · · Score: 1

      Right...can you give me a URL to any on-line dealer where I can buy a board? I searched on google for about 20 minutes and all I came up with was a beta program for ~$1,000.

  11. This Mac by briggsb · · Score: 1, Funny

    Don't buy just any mac, buy this one.

  12. This might be a good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  13. PenguinPPC by BShive · · Score: 5, Informative

    Are you looking for something like this?

    From the site:

    A number of years back from folks in the Microelectronics unit of IBM came up with an idea. It was called POP for PowerPC Open Platform. Basically an open source motherboard design. Well here they are. The first POP boards. It's been a long wait and, like you, I hope it was well worth it.

    The boards do appear to be available - anyone tried them?

    1. Re:PenguinPPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Those boards are basically the same as Eyetech's/Hyperion's/Amiga's A1 and Bplan's Pegasos...

  14. another question... by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you could get Darwin running on such a homemade PowerPC (not made from old Mac parts, but built from 'scratch')... could you then take the pre-compiled parts of aqua out of Mac OS X and run this on your homemade powerpc computer?

    Doesn't darwin handle all of the interaction directly with the hardware? If the aqua binaries can run on your homemade powerpc, shouldn't everything work just fine?

    And a related question... what if you got Darwin running on an x86 chip with a PowerPC emulator? Could you, theoretically, get aqua to run on such a system?

    --
    There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
    1. Re:another question... by vespazzari · · Score: 1

      My guess would be that it might be possible to do that with the ppc, but definetly not on the x86 hardware. The binaries would not be able to run on the x86 because darwin is not an interpreter AFAIK the actually instructions in aqua are not x86 so the x86 processor would not be able to understand them.

      --
      "Alcohol, cause of, and solution to, all of life's problems" -Homer Simpson
    2. Re:another question... by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      Err...what an odd question... You could definitely get Darwin to run on a homemade PowerPC, I doubt if you'd even have to do much to make it happy. The question would be about a full-blown version of OS X running on it...which would boil down to driver compatability with the various bits & pieces you're using. Assuming you use Apple approved hardware, you'd have absolutely no trouble installing OS X.

      As for the next part of your question...well, if it's a PowerPC emulator then any code running will think it is on a PowerPC...so of course you could run Darwin, Aqua, OS X, or whatever. You wouldn't really need an emulator though, since Apple has released Darwin for the x86.

      yrs,
      Ephemeriis

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
    3. Re:another question... by manly_15 · · Score: 2
      And a related question... what if you got Darwin running on an x86 chip with a PowerPC emulator? Could you, theoretically, get aqua to run on such a system?
      This could only happen if someone could succesfully create a PowerPC emulator. So far, no one has been able to do so.

      As per running Aqua on such a system, I would assume that Aqua needs to interact with the Apple ROM chips. In the past, part of the OS has been stored in the ROM chip, and it would make sense that OSX would continue to do so.
    4. Re:another question... by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 1

      yeah, but what if you wrote a powerPC emulator to run on Darwin-x86. Could you then run Mac OS X with the emulator even though you didn't have the Mac ROMs?

      Does OS X access the Mac ROMS directly or does it go through Darwin?

      --
      There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
    5. Re:another question... by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 1

      As per running Aqua on such a system, I would assume that Aqua needs to interact with the Apple ROM chips. In the past, part of the OS has been stored in the ROM chip, and it would make sense that OSX would continue to do so.

      I'm wondering about how OS X uses the ROMs for two reasons:

      1) A big part of the design philosophy behind the Mach microkernal that Darwin uses is that only the kernal gets to interact directly with the hardware. So if Aqua interacted directly with the ROMs that would seem to violate this philosophy.

      2) OS X runs on systems whose ROM's were burned years before anyone started work on OS X so it would be weird for OS X to use any executable code in the ROMS.

      --
      There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
    6. Re:another question... by ellboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is incorrect. The Apple ROMs you're referring to haven't been used in a long time, like more than 5 years. All modern Macs use Open Firmware. This is exactly why people are asking about do-it-yourself Macs so often. It's now possible.

    7. Re:another question... by GMontag451 · · Score: 2
      Does OS X access the Mac ROMS directly or does it go through Darwin?

      There is *NO* Mac ROM!!! This has been repeated over and over again on Slashdot, and yet still people don't get it. There hasn't been a Mac ROM since the first iMac came out. They all use Open Firmware to boot.

    8. Re:another question... by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 2

      There is *NO* Mac ROM!!! This has been repeated over and over again on Slashdot, and yet still people don't get it. There hasn't been a Mac ROM since the first iMac came out. They all use Open Firmware to boot.

      ok.. sorry

      Does OS X access the Mac PROMS directly or does it go through Darwin?

      --
      There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
  15. Motherboard by crow · · Score: 1

    Obviously, the real issue is the motherboard. Once you have a working motherboard, you can get whatever power supply, cards, and whatnot you want.

    Different CPUs talk to the system differently. It's not just a matter of having different pinouts; the functionality of they motherboard is fundamentally different depending on the processor. Otherwise, I'm sure you could buy an adaptor to plug your PPC chip into a P4 motherboard--that would be nice, but it's not realistic.

  16. Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by CySurflex · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next Weeek On Ask Slashdot: "Let's assume I want to pump gas into my car through the radiator and mix in diet cherry 7-up. WHY is not up for debate. I just need the schematics and blue prints of how to achieve this, and I need this NOW."

    1. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by Carmody · · Score: 3, Funny

      This would not be too difficult. As long as you don't want the car to RUN on that mixture, it really is just a question of a nozzle in the radiator that goes to the diet cherry 7-up mixing chamber, and then stores it somewhere for disposal later.

      --
      God is real unless declared integer
    2. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by McFly69 · · Score: 2, Funny

      As sick as it sounds I did something similar two years ago. I was running low on gas on the Mass Pike and I knew my car will make it another 2 miles. The nearest stations was at least 6 miles. So what did I do? Got soem of my diet coke and put 1/4 liter into the tank. The engine sounded like shit but made it fine. Pumped it up and my firebird has no problems.

      Please do not mod this, just wanted to add to the other poster and thought others might find it funny.

      --



      NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
    3. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by Tall_Rob · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno, but imagine a Beowulf cluster of 'em. :-)

    4. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by flux · · Score: 1

      Well duh! If you're going to need the schematics next week, why don't you Ask Slashdot today, to make sure the schematics get on time?

    5. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by unicron · · Score: 1, Offtopic

      "I need an avacado, a snorkel, and a screwdriver."

      "But.."

      "Don't argue with me, man, I've made bongs out of less."

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
    6. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by Contact · · Score: 4, Offtopic
      You may joke, but a hot topic in the UK at the moment is the idea of running diesel engined cars on used cooking fat mixed with a little white spirit.

      This does apparently work (although I'm not sure about the long terms effects on the engine, or performance), and over here, where automotive fuels run to about 5 dollars a gallon, the potential savings are huge - apparently some supermarkets have been running out of cooking oil and have had to impose rationing, and I'm sure that restauranteurs are finding themselves unusually popular...

    7. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by An+Onerous+Coward · · Score: 1

      Obligatory Simpson's quote:

      "AAAGH! My retirement grease!" --Groundskeeper Willie

      --

      You want the truthiness? You can't handle the truthiness!

    8. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by CuCullin · · Score: 4, Informative

      The common term is biodiesel or greasel for the mixture. When used with new diesel engines, they actually run cleaner than a natural gas engine. Some have made their own biodiesel for as little as $.50 USD/gallon, for quite a large savings. In NJ, the price of diesel just went up about $0.10 USD... The primary considerations are seals, older rubber seals will break down and fail, spewing all over the place. The solution? Use newer plastic seals, they last much longer anyway. There is a power loss of appr. 5%, but on new engines you don't feel all that much of a difference.

    9. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by Ymerej · · Score: 1

      Hemp oil is supposed to be pretty good for this too.

    10. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by irontiki · · Score: 1

      The guys over at GreaseCar sell kits to convert your diesel to run on "straight, unprocessed vegetable oil."

  17. compatible or not... good point! by Sleepy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The author should ask to ammend the question to include (or not) compatability with Mac PPC as a goal.

    Can you buy Motorola motherboards and pop in a CPU? Sure.

    That's it??

    It would be more interesting to consider the "platform" as part of the question. Some would be exclusively interested in compliant hardware that runs MacOS. Others would just want something that runs Linux.

    1. Re:compatible or not... good point! by jguthrie · · Score: 2

      If I were to ask the question, I wouldn't be interested in Macintosh compatability. Can you give me a quick link to somewhere I can find retailers for those PowerPC motherboards? A few google searches didn't result in anything like some place I could buy one of these.

    2. Re:compatible or not... good point! by Sleepy · · Score: 3, Informative

      retailers for the Motorola VME boards? Good luck!

      I would first search the ppcLinux email archives, then consider posting the question to the list. I know it's been a subject of much discussion there. I sold my G3 ages ago so I have not kept up on things in the PPC world.

      If you are starting from scratch -- not using an old Mac -- what's the advantage?

      I mean, sure, PPC might have a "cleaner" design but who gives a rats ass? The advantage of that is LOST when one considers that the compiler and library chain on Linux PPC is nowhere near as mature as on X86. Someone with more knowledge than myself could state why X86 gcc blows away the ppc port of gcc.

      Personally, I liked PPC most because it was low-power and so needed less active cooling. But the new VIA miniboards with the VIA (Cyrix) chip are relatively cool itels also. Cool and quiet is nice for things like embedded MP3.

      For a desktop, I don't see the value in PPC. Now maybe if Motorola and IBM woke up and LEVERAGED Linux as a "write once, complile & run anywhere' platform, but PPC chips are a small part of their business. Unlike Microsoft, Motorola has no "religion"... just look up the "anti- mother-company" threads where Motorola went on a witchhunt for anything "Motorolla Inside"... be it MacOS, or PPC NT. I don't mean now, because PPC NT4 is dead, but at one time it was supported.

    3. Re:compatible or not... good point! by chewedtoothpick · · Score: 4, Informative

      One thing you can try to get parts is going to your local 'authorized mac repair specialist.' The local mac repair shop where I live is usually okay about it. Aparently the only problem with building MACs is the bus structure between all of the cards for NIC etc... You are going to have to make sure all of your hardware is MAC compatible because the bus addressing etc... is supposedly a little different from that of PC's.

      --
      Erutangis ym si siht.
    4. Re:compatible or not... good point! by $0+31337 · · Score: 1, Informative

      E is for E-Bay, that's good enough for me...

      (Sing to the tune of C is for Cookie, Copyright 1998-2002 Sesame Workshop)

    5. Re:compatible or not... good point! by giminy · · Score: 2

      Hm...not in my experience. I've used 3c905's, intel pro100b's, and adaptec 2940uw's that were for PCs (they had pc microcode on the cards). They all work fine under linuxppc, you just have to make sure the drivers are compiled with the right endianness. The 2940 worked with a microcode flasher (had to update the instructions on the card's bios to have mac instructions, which is tricky because the pc versions have a smaller bios than the mac versions....someone made a stripped version tho), but I had to go and get the latest "unstable" nic drivers from donald becker and replace the drivers in the kernel.

      Apple's motherboards (at least the g3 and up ones) support pci 2.2, so there's technically no difference between the cards they can take and the cards a pc can take. You'll only run into trouble if the drivers expect different microcode on the card..

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  18. Howto - Build your own Mac by kuwan · · Score: 4, Informative

    This site has instructions on what you need, where to get it, and how to put it all together. Pretty useful if you want to build your own Mac and don't want to pay Apple's prices.

    1. Re:Howto - Build your own Mac by Tycho · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem with building a Gigabit G4 and probably every other AGP G4 is that the chips on the bottom of the motherboard touch the case and use the case as a heat sink. When you use a standard ATX case those chips on the bottom contact nothing and are not properly cooled. This works for a while but you are going to end up with a fried motherboad eventually.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  19. This is very appropriate by jimson · · Score: 1

    We have just taken down one of our servers that is an IBM RISC System/6000 F30 PowerPC that we're not sure what to do with. It had AIX on it, but I'll be very interested on other things that could be done with this old iron.

    1. Re:This is very appropriate by DuBois · · Score: 1

      The E30 is an "interim" design known in IBMese as "rspc" and doesn't have the "chrp" designation that would allow it to be used with most of the currently available commercial Linux distros. It won't run AIX 5.2 either. There's probably a *BSD that'll run on it, though.

      --
      The IPCC has purposely engineered a massive scientific fraud.
    2. Re:This is very appropriate by jimson · · Score: 1

      Actually its an F30 if that makes a difference.

    3. Re:This is very appropriate by Omega996 · · Score: 1

      You might be able to get SuSE PPC 7.3 running on it. They list the 7025 F50 as working, and the F30 is also a 7025-series box. It doesn't mention whether it works with more than one processor or not. I'd think the biggest sticking points would be the service processor and any SSA devices you've got.

  20. Similar Questions: ARM-powered Desktop? by Hanno · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...are there mainboards and CPUs available to end-users that are not in the sky-high price-range that manufacturers take for developer hardware?

    I'd be interested in building an ARM-based desktop computer, but it seems there is no normal mainboard sold to end-users. Or is it? ("Normal" = standard form factor, standard RAMs, IDE, USB and VGA included, possibly PS/2 and serial too.)

    Same question for the Crusoe, btw. Seems that the only desktop mainboard available is developers only...

    --

    ------------------
    You may like my a cappella music
    1. Re:Similar Questions: ARM-powered Desktop? by tchuladdiass · · Score: 2

      Don't know about ready-made ones, but you can build your own.

    2. Re:Similar Questions: ARM-powered Desktop? by chiller2 · · Score: 3, Informative
      A number of companies from the Acorn scene (yes there are still a few) are working on newer ARM based hardware.

      You should check the following links out...

      Castle Technologies (UK) - The Iyonix PC. It runs RISCOS 4 but can use ArmLinux/etc if you want it to. They've also brought out a USB podule for older Acorn systems. Castle site

      Aleph One have a line of StrongARM based evaluation boards, and ARMLinux related info. Lots of info for ARM developers.

      Uffenkamp (DE) sell Acorn/ARM hardware and software and I guess would be easier for you to get to. See their site.

      RiscStation (UK) have their own RISCOS/ARM based systems you can check out. See the RiscStation homepage for more info.

      You can get a good idea of the ARM hardware out there by following the Acorn/ARM news sites. There is a lot more but that should be enough to get you started :) chiller2
      --
      --- Commission free trading & free stock up to $500 - use http://share.robinhood.com/kelvinp6 :)
  21. Well, it depends... by Tom+Rini · · Score: 2

    If you want a PowerPC system, and you don't mind paying a good bit for it, Motorola has numerous systems that run in Linux which you can sometimes get Motorola to admit that they sell, and then sell you one. There's a few other vendors which sell systems as well (Force, SBS, IBM). All of these have a PCI slot of some sort so you might be able to get a video card.

  22. It might be nice by pbinmt · · Score: 1

    If 'non-official' companies start to make Mac parts then building a Mac would be cheaper. But, we would also have the same compatability problems that we have with PCs so, what's the point?

  23. Yawn. by EvilStein · · Score: 1

    We've seen this same question (or something almost identical).. uh.. how many times now?

    Let's recap our "where to get Mac parts" list:
    eBay
    Wierdstuff Warehouse
    macresq.com/etc
    friends.

    Oh, and for the IBM stuff? That's easy. They have dumpsters outside, don't they? Get the h00kup from some disgruntled employee that has access to parts. Just give them beer, works everytime..

  24. Amiga One by slpalmer · · Score: 1

    You could get a PPC based Amiga One. I've not used one personaly, but it appears to be a PPC system using mostly commodity parts.

  25. Build Your Own G4 by glubbs · · Score: 1
    Be a doozer (which has nothing to do with anything other than you can click on it)

    I got that link from a story ran on slashdot a while back you can read through that here if you'd like.

  26. Procurement of the hardware by mao+che+minh · · Score: 3, Informative
    Why not assemble the unit from compatible parts from older PowerPCs with choice upgrade parts that are "Apple Certified" from online resellers of Apple hardware?

    Here are a few resellers of Apple hardware:
    Milagro and ETI Express

  27. This was a recent Slashdot story by Geek+Dash+Boy · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
  28. Re:Go to Computer Renaissance and buy a couple UMA by DrinkDr.Pepper · · Score: 1

    Motorola StarMax is another candidate. I have a 604e 200Mhz.

    --
    0xfeedface
  29. Arstechnica thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  30. put another way... by djtack · · Score: 1

    Can you clarify whether you intend to purchase a motherboard, or make one? IMO, the main board is the piece that makes a "CPU" into a "computer".

    If the answer is that you want to buy a PowerMac, IBM RS/6000, etc motherboard, than I would say you haven't "built your own" anything. If you do intend to make your own main board, than nobody here on slashdot can help you.

    1. Re:put another way... by eno2001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think the person is probably asking about commodity parts. Anyone can go into a local hole in the wall PC shop and buy an Intel/AMD compatible mobo and plug commodity hardware (video, NIC, sound, IDE HDs, etc...) into it and get a working computer out of it. But, is it possible to get a PowerPC based mobo with PCI/AGP slots, an IDE controller, USB in an ATX (I'm not a hardware guy, so ATX could be the wrong term) form factor and have it work with an OS like Linux? That would be a great way to get away from the WinTel world and avoid paying the steep prices that Apple fetches. However, since any mobos like this are likely to be made in a much smaller volume and harder to find (implying a small customer base), they would probably be fairly expensive anyway. It's a beautiful idea, but it's not a reality at this time.

      --
      -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
    2. Re:put another way... by Darth+Hubris · · Score: 1

      Build a Macintosh From Scratch

      Yes. Go out to ebay, and find a Mac mobo and CPU. If it's a recent vintage board, it will have PCI slots, an AGP slot, USB support, support for Ultra 66 ATA drives. An ATX powersupply can be used with some modification.

      Basically, once you have the mobo and CPU, everything else is commodity.

      --
      The party's over ... the drink ... and the luck ... ran out
    3. Re:put another way... by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

      Pssst! Don't let the "build your own PC" guys hear that.

      --

      Lars T.

      To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  31. Easy to do (If you've got lots of money) by ivan256 · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you really want to build a system from parts there are several places you can go. Motorola sells evaluation platforms that consisto of a motherboard (essentially a backplane) and CPU modules that plug into it. It's calld Sandpoint. You can get third party CPU modules for it from Tundra (who also sells whole kits with their own system board). Marvell/Galileo sells a platform that is well suited to building a PC style machine with PPC hardware, and you can get a variety of processor cards for it ranging from low end G3 style processors up to dual 7450 processors.

    Some of the best PPC machines available right now can't be built from parts simply because they're on a single board. My current to y is the cyclades TS-100 it's only 1"x3"x3", has dual CPUs and can be had for under $200.

    1. Re:Easy to do (If you've got lots of money) by chobee · · Score: 1

      Just to be pedantic, the chip used in the Cyclades and other places that's called "dual-core" or whatever isn't really SMP on a chip. The two processors are different, one is supposed to be for I/O handling essentially, I believe.

  32. Was already on /. (and I have the link, too) by incripshin · · Score: 5, Informative
    There was an article here a while back: Build a Macintosh From Scratch., which links to "a great step-by-step tutorial" There's your answer.

    incripshin

    1. Re:Was already on /. (and I have the link, too) by incripshin · · Score: 1

      Well, then. I guess he's just insane. :)

  33. 'wouldn't it be cool if' by physman · · Score: 1

    A dual processor motherboard could be developed that could use both an x86 chip (from somebody like Intel or AMD) and the PowerPC processor. Obviously a completly new operating system would need to be developed, or a large amount of porting would be required to get something like Debian, or Redhat working on it but the advantages of boht processors could be shared. physman

    --
    Murphy's Law of Research: Enough research will tend to support your theory.
    1. Re:'wouldn't it be cool if' by Ephemeriis · · Score: 1

      Actually.... Quite some time ago, about the time that Apple was shipping its first PowerPC systems there was an expansion card that you could get that actually had an x86 processor on it. Don't know what ever happened to those...never got to use one myself...

      yrs,
      Ephemeriis

      --
      "Work is the curse of the drinking classes." -Oscar Wilde
  34. List of Suppliers by spankers · · Score: 1

    http://www.xavax.com/ans/ppcmb.html

    Google, google, google....

  35. Of course by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful


    The question actually is not "can you", but indeed "why" or "what for". Corporate america doesn't use pixy dust. With training, instructions, and patience (or just money), you can build almost anything that intel, cisco, or apple makes. You may need a good chunk of an electrical engineering education (or time to read the books on your own). An EE could do it in his/her sleep.

    So "can you" is a simple yes.

    The interesting question is "why?" and "what for?".

  36. A simple question... by LoadStar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To be perfectly honest, what I hope is a valid, non-troll question: why?

    I mean, I can understand buying a Mac for the ease of use and integration of the Mac OS and it's associated applications. However, when you start talking about buying/building a PowerPC machine - I don't see the point.

    Those who say that the PowerPC is falling behind - fast - in processor performance have a very valid point. I'm a Mac fan, and I realize this. It is getting to the point that Intel-compatible processors are equal to or better than PowerPC processors at the same or lower cost. It's only the Mac OS that still gives reason to continuing to use the PowerPC.

    And as such, if you aren't talking a Mac OS machine, you can run Linux or BSD just as easily on a Intel-compatible processor and platform as you could if you built a PPC machine. More easily, actually, because you can get the parts to put the machine together so much easier.

    Note: I'm not talking a POWER server - that's a different beast, and there's reason for that as well. This is strictly talking about building or buying a non-Mac OS compatible PowerPC computer.

  37. Re:PoewPPC Linux is no longer updated what OS are by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

    Debian. See http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/ and http://penguinppc.org/ .

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  38. Try older machines by jmertic · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out these guides for repackaging either a Beige G3 or Blue/White G3 in a standard ATX case. All that's needed that is "Apple offical" is the motherboard stuff; memory, video ( uses Mac PCI video cards ), HD, and CD-ROM are off the shelf PC items. They use ZIF CPUs which can be obtained from Apple, Sonnet, NewerTech, and many others.

  39. Re:PoewPPC Linux is no longer updated what OS are by f2professa · · Score: 1

    uhhh... Yellow Dog Linux or SUSE???

    --
    Someone, please shake me from this wide-awake nightmare.
  40. why??? by brer_rabbit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why you want to do this *IS* up for debate. If you're shooting for a unix (linux/whatever) platform, does it really matter that it's PowerPC? I mean, unix is general enough that unless you've got specific hardware requirements (and processor alone doesn't constitute this -- I'm talking wierd ass PCI cards or other barnyard oddities) it doesn't matter if you're on powerpc, intel, or sparc. The cheapest bang for the buck in this category is, as we all know, intel.

    I've no idea what you'd need to do to get this MacOS compatible. Do they still use dark matter (ROM) in those machines? But if you're not going for Mac compatibility I don't know why you want to roll your own.

    If you've got a warezhouse full of PowerPC assembly programs then that's a different story. Obviously you're going to need a specific processor to run them. Or maybe you're looking to do embedded system development on a PowerPC?

    Inquiring minds want to know. Ok, we don't really *want* to know, we'd really just like to laugh at the idea a bit more. :)

    1. Re:why??? by da_Den_man · · Score: 2
      "The cheapest bang for the buck in this category is, as we all know, intel."

      Actually, the cheapest bang for the buck is AMD.

      --
      You keep going until you die..."Me".
    2. Re:why??? by demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've no idea what you'd need to do to get this MacOS compatible. Do they still use dark matter (ROM) in those machines? But if you're not going for Mac compatibility I don't know why you want to roll your own.

      No, the NewWorld machines (the PowerBook G3 "Lombard" and "Pismo", PowerBook G4, and all "candy-colored" Apples) use OpenFirmware, and use a ROM-in-RAM system, where the MacOS ROM image is an ELF binary with a Forth wrapper. The OF starts the Forth wrapper, which loads the image, jumps into it, then goes on like an OldWorld from there. The MacOS ROM is kinda picky about the hardware it's on from what I gather, so it probably wouldn't like a non-Apple PPC system. OS X might not care. But if you don't care about running MacOS, why wouldn't a commodity PowerPC system be the perfect answer?

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
    3. Re:why??? by brer_rabbit · · Score: 1

      thanks demon for the explanation, I didn't think Apple would still have the old ROM routines directly planted in hardware.

  41. PowerPC briQ's by myov · · Score: 5, Informative
    You could try a briQ, running Yellow Dog Linux

    Specs:
    • 500 MHz G3 or G4 CPUs
    • 100 MHz 64-bit System Bus
    • 2 x 168 Pin DIMM sites (up to 1GB RAM)
    • 2.5" IDE internal drive
    • RS/232 serial
    • 10/100 ethernet
    • 64/66 expansion slot (adapts to PCI)*
    • programmable Vacuum Florescent Display (VFD)
    • weighs-in at just 1.85 lbs
    • 5.74 X 1.625 X 8.9 inches (same dimensions as CD-ROM)
    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    1. Re:PowerPC briQ's by gabe · · Score: 1

      Does anyone out there use these currently? I'm kinda curious how they perform for web serving.

      --
      Gabriel Ricard
    2. Re:PowerPC briQ's by GlassHeart · · Score: 5, Informative
      You could try a briQ

      The G3 version costs $1,485, plus shipping. The G4 version costs $1,985, plus shipping. The person who asked the question wants to use it as a desktop computer, but this only has a 10 GB drive, no video card, and no CD-ROM drive.

      At the price of the G3, you can get an iMac which is superior in just about every way (for desktop applications) except the RAM size.

  42. hard to do by Gizzmonic · · Score: 5, Informative
    i've been trying to do this for awhile. The problem is that no one offers a (non-apple, non-ibm, non-motorola) PowerPC motherboard besides chaintech in the UK (fastest you'll get there is a 600mhz G3, and prices are higher than a comparable Apple machine. they basically exist to fleece amiga people.)

    Motorola and IBM don't sell their CPUs to end users. You can order a G4 or even a G5 (PPC 8500 series) from one of Mot's suppliers like Arrow, but I believe they force you to order in high quantities (40+ at a time).

    During the dot-bomb era, several companies like Eternal Computing and Silicon Fruit promised to offer affordable PowerPC motherboards to retail customers. Nothing ever came of it (insert Apple conspiracy theory here).

    I think there's a market for retail PowerPC motherboards, or there will be once IBM's 970 hits the market. It's fun to mess with exotic hardware like the PPC, and its performance is very impressive considering its limited clock speed. IBM has published a spec for PowerPC logic boards that is available for free on its website (i'm sure someone else has posted the link by now).

    Linux would run on these things in no time (maybe we could even build our own TiVOs with 'em). And Mac OS X would be easy to port, with or without Apple's help.

    I don't think IBM would like this idea very much however, since it might undercut their huge margins on PPC-based servers. On the other hand, if they manufactured and sold the motherboard for cheap, they could bring PPC to a much larger audience.

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  43. Be Box ? by didiken · · Score: 1

    Just get a BeBox and inherits the legacy

    (well if you can find one)

  44. Re:PoewPPC Linux is no longer updated what OS are by alfredo · · Score: 2

    PowerPPC lost out to the competition. YellowDog, Debian, NetBSD, Mandrake, SuSE, and a few others have taken up the slack. I use YellowDog on my iMac and am very happy with it.

    OSX with XWindows installed is about all one needs.

    I have considered building. A PPC machine would be nice.

    --
    photosMy Photostream
  45. 60 amps! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    How many machines is this?? How much more do you spend for air conditioning -- or do you like to cook hot dogs while you're working?

  46. Easy! by orkysoft · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just ask the "what if" machine! :-P

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  47. a "BUILD YOUR OWN $800 G4" how too + parts links by DABANSHEE · · Score: 5, Informative

    Macopz.com "build a Mac" page

    They have links to all the parts suppliers, the parts add up to $800

  48. 'wouldn't it be neat if...' by physman · · Score: 1

    somebody actually designed an emulator that ws both fast and worked on a decent desktop PC that emulated (or simulated) the PPC architecture on x86? this would probaly be a much more cost efficient option and also give most mere mortals a chance to experience PPC and run MacOS, without 'buying a Mac' or 'buying an IBM server' or 'building a PowerPC comuter'?!

    physman

    --
    Murphy's Law of Research: Enough research will tend to support your theory.
    1. Re:'wouldn't it be neat if...' by ralmin · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Yes, it would be wonderful to have an emulator for recent Macs, that was capable of running MacOS X!

      Microcode Solutions are writing an iMac emulator now, both an all-software emulation and a hardware emulation solution (PPC CPU on a PCI card). It currently still vaporware, but they say it is nearing completion.

      --
      Ralmin.

  49. RS6000/F30 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    This is a fine piece of iron. Slow by today's standards, but bulletproof / built-like-a-tank.

    If I had one, I'd immediately proceed to install Linux on it.

    I do have an old RS6000/43P (desktop unit, 120MHz ppc uniprocessor) that I just decommissioned from service as an Informix workgroup database server, and intend to try installing Linux on it if I ever find some spare time to play around with it.

  50. ooooohhh by StormShaman · · Score: 1

    Please, stop; your making me drool. homemade PowerPC...

  51. Be VERY careful with the Marvell board by nyet · · Score: 2

    The cpu slot is VERY finicky.

    1. Re:Be VERY careful with the Marvell board by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      Oh, believe me, I know. Compare my e-mail address with the list of vendors that support their platform. If you think the current boards are finicky, you should have seen the early prototypes. :-)

  52. Carbon for Windows has been released by yerricde · · Score: 1

    The only question is when or if [Apple] are going to release [Mac OS for x86].

    There's already Carbon (the updated Mac Toolbox) for Windows, as part of QuickTime for Windows, and other apps can link to it.

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:Carbon for Windows has been released by WatertonMan · · Score: 1

      Calling this Carbon is a tad misleading. It isn't the same as the Carbon on OSX in terms of functionality. It might be better to call it a limited subset of Mac API calls.

  53. Does OS X need Open Firmware to run on a PPC? by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 2

    Does Aqua interact with Open Firmware directly, or does it go through Darwin?

    If got a fully functioning Darwin system running X-Windows on a PPC, couldn't you just copy the binary files for the Aqua windowing system over?
    (This would violate the OS X EULA -- but is it possible in theory?)

    --
    There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
    1. Re:Does OS X need Open Firmware to run on a PPC? by anarkhos · · Score: 1

      1) Aqua is not code. It's a human interface specification.

      2) Nothing interacts with Open Firmware. OF is turned off once the kernel is loaded.

      3) How the hell would anything running in user-space interact with any hardware directly?!

      4) It is possible provided Apple's binaries don't check for a specific machine type. If it does you'll have to pretend to be that machine type. I'm running OS X on an unsupported clone so currently I doubt it does any such check. However if everybody were to do this I doubt Apple would survive and Mac OS X would die.

      --
      >80 column hard wrapped e-mail is not a sign of intelligent
      >life
    2. Re:Does OS X need Open Firmware to run on a PPC? by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 1

      1) Aqua is not code. It's a human interface specification.

      Aqua is the OS X windowing system. There are Aqua human interface guidlines, but that is not Aqua. Aqua includes the window manager + the compositor + several frmeworks... all of which are in nicely compiled PPC binaries.

      2) Nothing interacts with Open Firmware. OF is turned off once the kernel is loaded.
      3) How the hell would anything running in user-space interact with any hardware directly?!
      4) It is possible provided Apple's binaries don't check for a specific machine type. If it does you'll have to pretend to be that machine type. I'm running OS X on an unsupported clone so currently I doubt it does any such check. However if everybody were to do this I doubt Apple would survive and Mac OS X would die.


      "Apple's binaries" checking for "the machine type" would involve something in "user space" interracting with hardware directly, most probably with open firmware. If any checks for machine type were done through Darwin, these could easily be overridden since Darwin is open source.

      --
      There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
    3. Re:Does OS X need Open Firmware to run on a PPC? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      Aqua is the OS X windowing system.

      Quartz is the OS X windowing system.

  54. Mac on Linux by mbrubeck · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mac On Linux will let you run MacOS (including OS X) on any PowerPC system that runs Linux -- even if MacOS won't run natively on the hardware. Mac On Linux provides a MacOS-compatible virtual machine (but it doesn't emulate the processor, so it's nearly as fast as running native).

  55. (OT) x86 mobo, case, and CPU for under $200 by yerricde · · Score: 1

    I think that [$550 motherboard] includes the CPU.

    Even so, it's still out of my price range (but possibly not yours). Unless you're trying to build a multiple-platform compile and test farm, why buy a $550 CPU and motherboard for the PPC architecture, a $50 case, a hard drive, a keyboard, a mouse, and a CD-ROM drive instead of an x86 based total package for $200?

    --
    Will I retire or break 10K?
    1. Re:(OT) x86 mobo, case, and CPU for under $200 by runderwo · · Score: 1
      why buy a $550 CPU and motherboard for the PPC architecture, a $50 case, a hard drive, a keyboard, a mouse, and a CD-ROM drive
      Maybe it could be because some of us like to support alternatives and see their importance in keeping the marketplace diverse? You know, all that silly "ensuring through our choices today that we will continue to have a choice in the future" and other such rot.

      Of course this sort of thing doesn't matter to the typical consumer, for whom all decisions are made within a purely immediate context. (I only buy what is biggest/best and costs the least, and I want it THIS INSTANT!) Move along now, nothing to see here.

    2. Re:(OT) x86 mobo, case, and CPU for under $200 by amigabill · · Score: 1

      >why buy a $550 CPU and motherboard for the PPC architecture, a $50 case, a hard drive, a
      >keyboard, a mouse, and a CD-ROM drive instead of an x86 based total package for $200

      Well, the original poster expressed interest in the PowerPC. He probably already has a number of x86 machines, and was curious to try something PowerPC flavored. What other reason is needed??

      I myself have 3 PCs at home, with an extra motherboard laying around wishing it had a CPU to match. Plus a couple Amigas still currently in use. And I'll still buy one of these >$200 PowerPC rigs. Do absolutely need it? Of course not. I'm interested in it, and that's the only reason I require to spend my money on it. If you're not interested, then don't. Quite simple, really.

    3. Re:(OT) x86 mobo, case, and CPU for under $200 by statichead · · Score: 1

      $550 sounds like a fair price to avoid the fsckin x86 bios bullshit.

  56. Re:a "BUILD YOUR OWN $800 G4" how too + parts link by pldms · · Score: 5, Informative
    You might also enjoy this thread from the arstechnica forums. The joy, the pain, the smell of frying components...

    The main problem building a Mac PPC using a refurbished motherboard seemed to be the power supply, IIRC. Needs a 28v trickle feed.

    Anyway, worth a read.

    --
    Slashdot looked deep within my soul and assigned
    me a number based on the order in which I joined
  57. Sure, but it will cost you by afidel · · Score: 2

    There is no commodity market for generic PPC boards, but such boards do exist. For instance we use them for early development stages of software for our embedded systems. They are standard ATX boards with a PPC chip and the usual host of connectors plus some more developer centric things like bus taps to allow easy application of data analyzers to the PCI bus etc. The thing is because there are no economies of scale these boards cost as much as a complete low end system from Apple.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  58. You want PPC boards? we got em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Try here for resellers.

    MicroATX mainboard (236 mm x 172 mm)
    133 MHz processor slot
    600 MHz PowerPC G3 750 CXe - to Dual PowerPC G4 MPC 7450
    PC133 RAM (two sockets), up to 2 GB
    AGP slot
    PCI subsystem with three slots, optional Riser Card
    IEEE1394 (Firewire) VIA VT6306 with 100/200/400 MBit data transfer
    10/100 MBit Realtek Phyceiver 8201 Ethernet
    USB I/O system VIA 8231 with four connectors
    AC97 sound subsystem Sigmatel STAC 9766 Codec with mic input, line in/out and headset connector
    IRDA for infra-red remote control
    ATA100 VIA 8231 with two channels for upto four ATA devices
    PS/2 mouse connector
    RS232 (serial) port
    Centronics port
    Floppy
    Gameport for PC-compatible joysticks
    Open firmware

    Two operating systems included : MorphOS and Linux

  59. Anyone remember CHRP? by barfarf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This was called the "common reference hardware platform". Before Apple usurped back the Power Computing, Motorola, and Umax clones, this was supposed to be one potential answer to building a non-mac powerpc box. Motorola came the closest to accomplishing this by implementing standard PC parts (like ps/2 ports) on their computer.

    At one time, back when Microsoft actually supported the PowerPC architecture, Firmworks and IBM actually made a dual-booting macintosh/NT computer in 1996. IBM's motivation was linux, I believe. Check these links out:

    http://www.firmworks.com/www/chrp.htm

    http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/C/CHRP.html

    http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/9908/19.ibm. sh tml

    I personally LOVED the thought of being able to go to a computer show and putting together an NT or a linux or a mac-compatible computer by purchasing individual parts.

    You know, it's really a damn shame this wasn't meant to be.

  60. Real Biodiesel... by dman123 · · Score: 2, Flamebait
    Here is my biased opinion on the subject...

    Unfortunately, it's people like these people in Wales that give industrially produced biofuels (such as biodiesel manufactured to ASTM D6751-02) a bad name. A bunch of wankers that ruin engines with chip particles and undecanted glycerin deserve to have the engines fail... Not to mention that it is technically illegal to evade taxes in this manner.

    For anyone wishing to get the non-hippie version of the biodiesel industry, check out www.biodiesel.org.

    --

    --
    dman123 forever!
    Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
  61. Why no ppc mobo? by kherr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm no EE so maybe I'm way off, but I don't understand why a single mobo maker (e.g., Abit, Asus, Tyan) couldn't make just one PowerPC-based mobo, since all the other parts (IDE, PCI/AGP, et al) are the same. I would think minor changes to the clocking of the board and the right kind of CPU socket is all that's needed. Oh yeah, it would also need Open Firmware for booting.

    Sure the market is tiny compared to the x86 mobo market. But there's also no competition. Linux works great on the PowerPC so it would be easy to support a board like this. Someone take a risk and create the market!

    1. Re:Why no ppc mobo? by kherr · · Score: 1

      Ask Google (the company) about why PowerPC might be attractive. Lots of x86 servers means lots of power draw, which would be significantly lower if they were all PowerPC-based servers.

      I also take issue with the "Tier 3 Linux port", considering great ppc linux distros like Yellowdog, SuSE, etc.

  62. Acorn by Jhan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You need to check out the Acorn community (or perhaps that's where you're coming from?). Acorn was an English Arm-based home computer of the late 80's that competed (none to sucessfully, outside Britain at least) against Amiga an Atari.

    Even though the Acorn community is now shriveled enough to make Amiga look healthy by comparision, they have been the one and only group pushing Arm-based desktops over the last decades.

    There seems to be at least a couple hardware resellers still in operation. The pricing didn't seem to extortionate to me, either.

    --

    I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

    1. Re:Acorn by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      Acorn were the company, not the computer. And they didn't just use the ARM, they invented it (Acorn RISC Machine), and became the first company to produce a consumer RISC platform.

    2. Re:Acorn by chiller2 · · Score: 1

      "Acorn was an English Arm-based home computer of the late 80's that competed (none to sucessfully, outside Britain at least) against Amiga an Atari."

      To say just late 80s is selling Acorn short, plus you gave the wrong name to the machine in question ;p

      Acorn was the name of the company responsible for the ARM based 32bit machines, starting with the Archimedes range (A305 to A440, A540 (which could run RiscIX)) running Arthur and then RiscOS 2 (3 with upgrade), the A3000 (ARM2) 3010 (ARM250) (ooh green function keys!) & 3020 (ARM 250) which were similar in their general look to the Amiga/Atari ST range, the A4000, A5000, A7000, RiscPC (ARM6), RiscPC (StrongARM 110) but alas they died out before they could finish the RiscPC2 (Phoebe).

      Acorn actually started in the late 70s, with their first machine being the Acorn Atom. They then hooked up with the BBC and were commissioned to produce the BBC Microcomputer (models A & B, B+, Master and Master Compact.. 8 bit 6502 cpu, varying ram & expansion) which were incredibly successful right through the 80s and early 90s in UK schools, colleges and universities, indeed there are many educational establishments still actively using them because a) they are so easy to interface devices to and b) they never die. Acorn also released the Electron (relative of the BBC, cut down with no mode 7/teletext, limited sound and expandability).

      The problem with the Beeb (as it was known), and the later Archimedes/RISCOS systems was not a technical one but a marketing one. Like Apple now, Acorn then charged a hefty price for the hardware. At launch the BBC model A and B were released at 299.99 and 399.99 (UK pounds) respectively, the later ARM systems e.g. A3000 aimed at home users for 649.99 (UK pounds). This is what hurt Acorn most IMHO and led to the lack of market penetration outside the UK. Why would Joe public (who wouldn't know better) bother with them when they could get a Sinclair Spectrum (ZX/+2/+3), C64/128, Amstrad, etc or later Amiga 500/Atari 520ST/1040 for half the respective price? As a knock on effect the software houses of the time (Ocean, US Gold, etc) were slow to release conversions of their games for the Beeb & Arc as they didn't think the market was there (thank you Krisalis!)

      Having said all that it's great that the developers weren't all talk when they took over development of ARM based systems/RISCOS where Acorn left off. I wish them every success.

      Now if someone would just write something to convert DesktopTracker mod files to XM/S3M so I could revive the hundreds of songs I wrote on my A3000 I'd be super happy! :)

      chiller2

      --
      --- Commission free trading & free stock up to $500 - use http://share.robinhood.com/kelvinp6 :)
  63. Critical to Fighting Palladium by javacowboy · · Score: 2

    I know I'm probably being really paranoid and alarmist, but this Open PPC architecture may be necessary if Palladium and DRM succeed in keeping Linux off the PC desktop.

    The odds of Palladium locking out Linux from the PC platform are minimal at best, but in order to ensure the survival of OpenSource, it is probably best to make available an alternative computing architecture for Linux and OpenSource software in case Microsoft and the content providers get their way in crippling PCs.

    Open PPC (if I may call it that) may be essential to ensure the long-term survival of OpenSource and protect it and the internet from those who would attempt to restrict it.

    --
    This space left intentionally blank.
  64. Re:Isn't this something Apple forbids? by BiOFH · · Score: 1

    Neither do Toyota or GM but you can certainly buy all the parts of a car if you want. It's not like they could stop you. They could cut off a parts supplier, but that's all.

    Apple "forbids" (does not license) other retailers to sell Mac clones.

    --
    - I am made of meat.
  65. Motorola Reference Motherboards by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Informative

    Motorola makes reference motherboards and pre-built systems based on them. You can run MontaVista Linux on them. There's a dual-1GHz model available.

    I haven't tried it myself. I suspect it's not cheaper than buying a Mac.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  66. Slashdot Recursion by BiOFH · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    - I am made of meat.
  67. SGI Origin 3000 L2 Controller is PPC by masonbrown · · Score: 1

    In the SGI O3K server systems, each brick has an L1 controller, and each rack has an L2 controller. The L2 controller is about the size of a cable modem, sits in the top of the rack, uses an embedded PPC processor, and runs a stripped down Linux. Uses flash for storage. Never opened one up, but thought it was cool.

  68. Question for hardware gurus.. by BigZaphod · · Score: 2

    Is it possible to interface an alternate CPU to a motherboard not originally designed for it? For instance, could a PowerPC be grafted onto a standard x86 motherboard? In my somewhat currently limited knowledge of such things, it seems that address lines are just address lines and it all really comes down to software. So if a new bios firmware could be connected to the new chip, and the right bus lines connected in the right places, the rest would just be software, right?

    I imagine there would be timing issues to deal with. Possibly voltage differences, too. I don't know. Like I said, I don't know much about this layer of things. :-)

    1. Re:Question for hardware gurus.. by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      No, address lines are not just address lines. Things worked that way in the early 80s, but these days CPUs use complex, custom bus protocols.

    2. Re:Question for hardware gurus.. by Tassach · · Score: 2
      Nope. Can't be done. You could, in theory, make what amounts to a PPC motherboard that pluggs into a particular x86 socket, but this would be silly in the extreme and would serve no useful purpose. tHE chipset on an x86 motherboard are specifically designed to work a specific processor.

      A more intelligent solution would be to have a PPC daughter that lives on a PCI card and uses the host PC's memory, disk, etc.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
    3. Re:Question for hardware gurus.. by luciuskwok · · Score: 1
      A more intelligent solution would be to have a PPC daughter that lives on a PCI card and uses the host PC's memory, disk, etc

      That reminds me of the old OrangePC boards that you could plug into the Mac and use its video, hard disk, and memory. The board was a NuBus (I don't know if they did a PCI version) card with the standard PC connectors on the back for parallel ports, serial ports, etc.

      Having to go over the host PC's bus for memory and I/O makes things a bit slower, so you could have memory on the daughterboard, which some models of the OrangePC board could do.

      I don't think such a scheme would be commercially viable. OrangeMicro has stopped producing the OrangePC cards. It's just cheaper to buy a separate system.

  69. well.... by chinakow · · Score: 2, Informative

    you could buy a PPC machine from these people and if you ask real nice they might let you in on their suppliers

  70. Re:a "BUILD YOUR OWN $800 G4" how too + parts link by muchmusic · · Score: 1

    Thank you, I was looking for this link at work as I had it at home. Good post =)

    --
    -- If an artist saw things as they truly are, they would cease to be an artist.
  71. Re:Handshakes? by mbbac · · Score: 1

    Slashdot posted a new topic on me.

    --

    mbbac

  72. this would be cool by trybywrench · · Score: 1

    Building a home brew PowerPC brings up some other interesting points. How about instead of overclocking CPU's and case mods we have PCI bus overclocking and memory mods. Why not hack and tinker with the other major parts of a computer ( like I/O ) like we do with CPUs?

    --
    I came to the datacenter drunk with a fake ID, don't you want to be just like me?
  73. Re:WAREZ Quartz and carbon and cocoa all ride on t by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

    No, becuse Quartz, Carbon, and Cocoa are shipped as PowerPC binaries.

  74. Mac-On-Linux by Michael_Rose · · Score: 1

    You could of course run Mac-On-Linux on a PowerPC Based Linux system regardless or not if the underlying hardware was made by Apple. Modern day Apple Operating Systems do not require 'Macintosh ROMs' per say. They are included on the OS CD.

    http://www.maconlinux.com/

    Now if only there were a nForce2 based PowerPC board... ;)

    Take care!

  75. How about a Via C3? by nft · · Score: 1

    When I was looking at little embedded motherboards to play with, I came across the Via Eden with a 800mhz C3, standard dimms and everything onboard. They're nicer than most embedded 486's or that sort, and only $129 most places. Unless you need a teenie, tiny motherboard, why go arm?

    --
    "We must be the change we wish to see in the world." -Gandhi
  76. Gas Cars by Bullseye_blam · · Score: 1

    Yeah, but who wants to drive in a car that smells like a McDonalds? -Bullseye

  77. Even weirder... by Aapje · · Score: 2

    is that in the Netherlands we are talking about adapting diesel cars to use ureum. That's a component of urine, but is also used in fertilizer. The european laws will become very strict on NOx pollution (which causes acid rain) and ureum can neutralize it.

    I'm afraid that peeing in your gas tank won't work since the ureum must be added to the exhaust gasses, but I think that you should be able to build a pee-guzzling catalyst. Imagine the look on the faces of your friends as you tell them you are going to have a leak, but skip the rest room and walk to your car.

    --

    The Drowned and the Saved - Primo Levi
  78. It is possible to build one by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

    Motherboards can be found at http://www.macresq.com and http://www.shrevesystems.com/ although a lot of times they are refurbished and processors new can be found here http://www.sonnettech.com/ and http://eshop.macsales.com/ . Of course if you have time all these things can be found on http://www.ebay.com/. And for everything else use http://www.pricewatch.com/ for ram, video card, etc. As for specifications on each board starting from g3s go to http://www.info.apple.com/support/applespec.html.

    --
    Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
  79. build your own powerpc site link by slothtrop · · Score: 2, Informative

    Can't remember where I got this from... probably macslash. I've bookmarked it for rainy day, so I have not gone through all the details.

    http://www.macopz.com/buildamac/

  80. as for the above equipment by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

    since you will have an apple mobo everything software wise should be 100% compatible. You can run OS 9, linux, unix, bsd, darwin, and any version of OS X.

    --
    Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
    1. Re:as for the above equipment by madsenj37 · · Score: 1

      Mac OS 9 not the other companies OS 9 (I should proofread these things)

      --
      Choosing the lesser of two evils is a choice for evil.
  81. Code Morphing. by AYEq · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know this really doesn't answer his question but couldn't the transmeta chip be programmed to emulate PowerPc chips.Not that I have see a whole lot more transmeta mobo's out there.

  82. Simple, use an MCU by dutky · · Score: 2

    Motorola makes a couple of PowerPC based microcontrollers. These come with a number of usefull peripherals (USB endpoints, ethernet interfaces, serial ports, parallel I/O ports, etc.), some RAM and some EPROM all on a single chip. In decades past, Steve Ciarcia built a small publishing empire on the practice of building homebrew personal computers on similar microcontrollers (Z80 variants, in his case). The same approach could be used today. If you don't want to use a PowerPC, there are similar beasts available based on other popular architectures.

  83. Re:Go to Computer Renaissance and buy a couple UMA by Omega996 · · Score: 1

    i've got a couple of StarMax boxes - both 200MHz 604s. They run YDL 2.4 pretty well. At one time I struggled with SuSE 7.1 PPC on it, but the newer versions of SuSE no doubt work much better (7.1 still used the 2.2-series kernels, and there were some issues with the console driver and the ATI Mach-64VT chip used on the motorola logic boards). Keep in mind that an old-world Macintosh (any that doesn't use Open Firmware, which is anything made before the Blue and White G3) will require a small MacOS partition to run BootX from.

  84. So... by maddogsparky · · Score: 2
    What would you put in the motherboard processer socket? Perhaps a cheap intel clone that passes off control to the daughter board?

    you'd need to figure out how to talk to all the other busses on the motherboard (memory, AGP, USB, Firewire). I suppose that it would be best to use a bare-bones board that has lots of PCI slots and just insert a card for each bus you want to support. Perhaps the daughterboard would have a ribbon cable that attaches to the processor slot on the motherboard to control those items it can't directly access???

    --
    science is a religion
  85. B-plan by P0lyh34) · · Score: 1

    The subject says it all really. Lil french company is building an MATX MB that uses PPC cpu's, currently available with g3's, will eventually be offered with dual g4's. Features include Serial, Paralell, Modem, Ethernet, SPDIF,Sound, Midi, 1 AGP slot and 3 pci slots. Its based on a via produced chipset that was designed by some company who's name i can't frigin' remember. Currently your choices for OS on the board are Linux and MorphOS. Should also be noted this is a mutaul effort between 3 company's. MorphOS who are makeing one of its two OS's, B-Plan who are egenearing the board, and Thendic-France who is marketing the prebuilt version called the Pegasos. I don't think the B-plan boards are available to consumers, IE you have to buy them in orders of 10 or greater, and its about $1000 a board :\ I dunno if the $1000 price tag of doom comes with cpu or not either.

    --
    -Polyhead-
    1. Re:B-plan by anarkhos · · Score: 1

      The BETATESTERII product costs a lot less. Check it out for yourself:

      http://www.morphos-news.de/

      --
      >80 column hard wrapped e-mail is not a sign of intelligent
      >life
  86. I've got a deal for you! by repetty · · Score: 1

    So, cost is your overriding factor, eh? Well, have I've got a deal for you!

    Just for you:
    486DX/66 with 28MG RAM INCLUDED. I'll throw in the case, CD-ROM drive and 1GB hard drive for... $25!!!

    Total package is $175 than your best price!!!

    Best of all, it's x86-based, just like the orginal author did not want!
  87. I know this isn't what you wanted to hear... by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... but I'm typing this reply on a Mac that I pieced together for less than $250 all figured. I run OS 9.1 currently, but another $100 worth of parts and I can put OS X on here.

    Basically, I started with an old PowerCenter 120 (a PowerPC Mac Clone) with 32MB of RAM. Total cost? $47 from Ebay

    Next up, I added 128MB of RAM from Computer Renaissance... it's fussy about is RAM (5V DIMMs). Total cost: $30

    Next... I added an old SCSI drive I had knocking around (4Gb drive from an old server of mine). Total cost: $0

    THEN I added a Powerlogix G3-400 upgrade card, $85 from Other World Computing. Finally, added a $49 copy of OS9.1 and OSX 10.1 (a bundled special also from OWC).

    So what can I do with it? Well, I love the fact that I now have a machine that's relatively trouble-free, runs the applications I use most often with aplomb (word processing, email, Mozilla etc.) and provides me a REAL upgrade path to OSX. Yeah, OSX isn't strictly compatible with my hardware, but the only piece that's truly critical is the video; to be fixed by the addition of a Radeon 7000 in the next few weeks. Everything else can be worked around using XPostFacto.

    Worth a thought if you REALLY want to play with OS X but don't want to outlay on the hardware. FYI, this thing runs OS 9.1 faster than my neighbor's 400Mhz Imac... still remains to be seen how X will run.

    Total cost for the project: $300 or so
    Value of knowing my 5-year old Mac is more reliable and stable than anything with Microsoft OS's on it: priceless!

  88. 24x7 by Sloppy · · Score: 1
    The cheapest bang for the buck in this category is, as we all know, intel.
    Perhaps for certain values of "bang." It sounds like your "bang" involves a combination of name brand and speed. Other people whose "bang" is just speed, are going to say AMD has the most of offer. And other people's "bang" may involve a mixture of speed and low temperatures. There might even be some people out there whose "bang" involves operations that Altivec happens to be very good at.

    And some people's "bang" involves philosophical (and maybe even emotional and irrational) qualities that an Intel-worshipping infidel like you, would never understand. ;-)

    --
    As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
  89. 'cuz it's cool and different... by Chad+Page · · Score: 1

    What *other* excuse does a geek need? Building and configuring regular x86 boxen gets boring after a while.

  90. Well, back in the day... by badfrog · · Score: 1

    About '94, we were all looking forward to the alleged PowerPC systems running the "new" OS-2 Warp to come out. Supposed to be compatible with Windows, advantages of RISC processing.....blah blah...
    I bet it would have been a neat system.

  91. soldering problem by rip42 · · Score: 1

    The only problem I see is to solder the ball grid.

  92. homebuilt IBM??? by MadMagician · · Score: 1

    Why bother, you can get a six year old RS6000 for practically free, and they run forever. Like Linux, but more interesting -- for those who REALLY love system administration AIX Just TOTALLY ROX!!!!

  93. A related question... by daveman_1 · · Score: 2

    Anyone know where I can pick up parts to build an alpha system? From what I can tell building a PPC system from scratch is going to leave me with a somewhat rigged/dated machine. Personally, I have always been interested in building my own Alpha box. Where can one get Alpha processors/motherboards? I've so far had no luck finding such things...

    --
    Russian Russian Russian RussianDollSig DollSig DollSig DollSig
    1. Re:A related question... by bstadil · · Score: 1
      Anyone know where I can pick up parts to build an alpha system?

      Try Ebay they have 533Mhz boards from DEC. I bought a system for $150 or so a year ago. They can be installed in a normal ATX box just remove the backplate with the I/O ports etc. You will need ECC SDRAM but they can be gotten cheaply and the system is quite fast.

      --
      Help fight continental drift.
  94. Re: Quartz is what does the drawing and events by mfnickster · · Score: 1

    Here are some excerpts from Apple's own documentation, the Quartz Primer:

    "Quartz offers a sophisticated two-dimensional drawing engine and an advanced windowing environment...

    "Quartz is a powerful graphics system that delivers a rich imaging model, on-the-fly rendering, anti-aliasing, and compositing of two-dimensional graphics. At the heart of the Mac OS X graphics and windowing environment, Quartz supports a wide range of features, from low-level event handling and cursor management to the distinctive look and feel of Aqua, Mac OS X's new graphical user interface."

    "Quartz has two parts, Core Graphics Rendering and Core Graphics Services. The Core Graphics Services layer consists of the window server. The window server is a single system-wide process that coordinates low-level windowing behavior and enforces a fundamental uniformity in window appearance."

    Sounds like a job for a window manager to me. Here's what they say Aqua is: "Aqua is, in a nutshell, the beautifully functional look and feel of Mac OS X."

    I think it's safe to say that Quartz is both the windowing system and its API. Aqua is the Mac OS X standard interface elements, their style, and their behavior as implemented with Quartz and the Interface Builder.

    - MFN

    --
    "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
  95. Building a PowerBook by Moge · · Score: 2, Informative

    I recently wanted to buy a PowerBook G3 but did not have the 1200 Bucks that they are currently selling for. Solution. I got the parts in bits over Ebay and built one. I got Mac repair guides as well to help me with the instalation (all off ebay) and WAM for 500 bucks I got a brand new laptop and the satisfaction of building my own computer.

  96. Pegasos G3/G4 mobo by rEWDBOi · · Score: 3, Informative
    You shoul check out bplan's Pegasos G3/G4 mobo.. The Homepage isn't exactly clear as to wether it's released yet or yet another Amiga vaporware, but it sure sounds interesting:

    microATX Mainboard 236mm x 172mm ( 9"3 x 6"8 )
    • 133 MHz Processor Slot
    • Optional with 350 MHz G3 PowerPC® / 512k Cache
      up to Dual MPC 7450 G4 PowerPC® / 2 MB Cache at state of the art speedgrades
    • PC133 SDRAM Memory for a total of 2 modules
      maximum 2GB extension by availibility of modules
    • AGP Slot x 2, user selectable graphics card
    • PCI Subsystem with a total of 3 slots to be used for custom expansion, included one slot for Riser Card Option
    • IEEE1394 VIA VT6306 at 100/200/400 MBit Transfer rates with three ports
    • 10/100 MBit Network Realtek 8201 Phyceiver
    • USB I/O System VIA 8231 with a total of 4 ports
    • AC97 Sound Subsystem Sigmatel STAC 9766 Codec with Mic. In, Line In/Out and Headset support
    • optical S/PDIF output
    • IRDA for comunication with PDAs and other IRDA devices
    • ATA100 VIA 8231 with up to 4 devices
    • KBD for PS2 compatible keyboards
    • Mouse for PS2 compatible pointing devices
    • Seriell one channel RS232
    • Parallel standard Centronics
    • Floppy
    • Gameport to be used with PC style joysticks/gamepads
    • 56K Modem
      integrated
  97. I've got some diverse stuff you could buy by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    just send me $500 and I'll sent you some diverse items.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  98. non-HIppie lol by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    The hippies round here use bio-diesel.

    I know cos I take 25 liters out of the 1000 a month the co-op buys.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:non-HIppie lol by dman123 · · Score: 1
      I sincerly thank you for purchasing biodiesel. If you are not already politically active in this area, please do what you can to spread the word on biodiesel. I am afraid that federal or local mandates will not be enough to get the biodiesel market to succeed.

      Please see my clarification post if you have any doubts about my motives.

      --

      --
      dman123 forever!
      Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
  99. Just for clarification... by dman123 · · Score: 1
    ...I'm all for hippies buying biodiesel. I think that without interest from the individual, there would be no biodiesel or biomass industry.

    What I do have a problem with is when certain types go out on their own to make a biofuel that claims to be a fuel but is such low quality that it puts the "real" biofuel market in a bad light. This is exactly what happened in the parent's example in the UK (Wales). The news media all over the world treated these people as wacky (true) but then also slammed the principle behind trying to make biofuel (not good).

    In case you haven't figured it out yet I am in this industry and working to get general acceptance (and usage) by the masses. Cranks like these people who ruin engines only give ammunition to those that are afraid of biofuels.

    --

    --
    dman123 forever!
    Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
  100. It's ok, I have my own agenda by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    So your motives mean nothing to me 8)

    Want to stop the war in Iraq and reduce the stranglehold?

    Want to reduce the carcinogens?

    Like the smell of fish and chips?

    Use Biodiesel

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  101. Re: Quartz is what does the drawing and events by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 1

    From Apple: "Aqua is the new user interface introduced with Mac OS X. Mac OS X builds on the ease-of-use tradition of Mac OS 9, while providing a simpler, superior user experience. Aqua is the "spirit" of Mac OS X. It's a fresh and fun complement to Apple's innovative hardware design. Aqua makes use of color, transparency, and animation to enhance usability. It also delivers some new behaviors that make using a Macintosh even more fun and satisfying for all users, from computer novices to professionals."

    Aqua is the OS X user interface which to me means that it includes the windowing system.

    Quartz is part of the graphics system and includes a window manager, but OpenGL, Quicktime, and Quickdraw are also still there in the graphics system. It's possible to do graphics in OS X without using Quartz.

    Sorry for not being ulta-precise in my original message, but I still mean to refer to Aqua. Aqua is the entire user interface (the windowing system is a subset of the user interface). I do not mean to refer to Quartz because I do not wish to exclude Quicktime, OpenGL, the Application Kit, and other useful parts of OS X.

    --
    There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
  102. Re: Quartz is what does the drawing and events by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 2

    **RANT**

    Ya know, no one answered my original message... there has just been arguments over mac ROMS should be called open firmware and Aqua and other silly little nits. ...and a whole bunch of people pretending to be experts and just talking out of their ass.

    Sometimes Mac people are really assholes.

    I'm sure some Mac Zealots will now mod me down to -30 for this comment... I wish they would all just go back to macslash and stop destroying the discussions over here at slashdot. Enough with the mindless cheerleading already!

    harumph!

    --
    There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
  103. Re: Quartz is what does the drawing and events by mfnickster · · Score: 1

    It's possible to do graphics in OS X without using Quartz.

    I'd be very surprised if that's the case! Quartz interfaces with the I/O Kit, which is what talks to the hardware. It provides the drawing context for everything that appears on the display.

    Aqua is the entire user interface (the windowing system is a subset of the user interface).

    Sorry to be difficult, but I don't think that's entirely accurate. If you count the Core Graphic Services as part of Quartz (Apple does), then OpenGL, Quicktime and [Carbon] Quickdraw all depend on Quartz. Ars Technica has a good overview of the relationships.

    This is only relevant because you could replace Aqua with a different interface using Quartz. Without Quartz, there is no Aqua. The reverse isn't true.

    --
    "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
  104. Re: Quartz is what does the drawing and events by mfnickster · · Score: 1

    ...a whole bunch of people pretending to be experts and just talking out of their ass. Sometimes Mac people are really assholes.

    Easy there! I agree that some people can be really rude, and throw more heat than light. Just ignore the assholes, and try to filter the signal out of the noise. I'm certainly no expert, but in the spirit of mutual enlightenment, I'm trying to share what I've learned from Apple's site.

    Ya know, no one answered my original message...

    Looking over the thread, I thought most of your questions were answered (some rudely)...

    Q: If you could get Darwin running on such a homemade PowerPC (not made from old Mac parts, but built from 'scratch')... could you then take the pre-compiled parts of aqua out of Mac OS X and run this on your homemade powerpc computer?
    A: If Darwin runs, Quartz and Aqua should run too. They're basically just a bunch of PPC libraries and some services (a.k.a. system routines).

    Q: Doesn't darwin handle all of the interaction directly with the hardware?
    A: Yes, through the I/O Kit. The drivers are abstracted through it.

    Q: If the aqua binaries can run on your homemade powerpc, shouldn't everything work just fine?
    A: Theoretically, yes. No guarantees until someone tries it and makes it work.

    Q: what if you wrote a powerPC emulator to run on Darwin-x86. Could you then run Mac OS X with the emulator even though you didn't have the Mac ROMs?
    A: Since Mac ROMs aren't necessary to run Mac OS X, it should work. Old World machines will still have the ROMs, but no OS X system routines are contained in ROM.

    Q: what if you got Darwin running on an x86 chip with a PowerPC emulator? Could you, theoretically, get aqua to run on such a system?
    A: If you got Darwin running and you can emulate PPC instructions in the proper environment (cf. Mac-on-Linux), Aqua would probably run just fine.

    Q: Does OS X access the Mac ROMS directly or does it go through Darwin?
    A: OS X (including Darwin) doesn't access the ROMs or Open Firmware after booting. Open Firmware just does a self-test, initializes devices, and builds a device tree. Then it passes control to BootX, which starts the kernel and drivers. Firmware is then out of the picture.

    Hope this helps! I'm still learning too, and I would love to try to get OS X running on a home-built PPC.

    - MFN

    There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.

    Heh heh! I always thought the world was divided into two groups: "population bifurcators" and "non-population bifurcators." :)

    --
    "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
  105. Actually, there are ppc mobos.... by vortexau · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you'd followed stories on OS NEWS you would be aware that there are at least two available (or close to being available):

    The AmigaOneSE and the Pegasus.
    Both are to be shown at the WOASE show in the UK this weekend.
    Look for the story on http://amiga.org
    and on http://ann.lu

    As well as the OS' being developed for these, BOTH boards run Linux.
    .

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
    1. Re:Actually, there are ppc mobos.... by vortexau · · Score: 1

      Sorry, I missed the best link:
      To be shown at the WOASE Show in the UK.

      o Thendic France (With the bplan Pegasos and MorphOS)
      o AmigaOne and OS4

      Linux is an option!
      .

      --
      (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  106. DONE! by vortexau · · Score: 1

    At the WOASE Show in the UK THIS weekend, there are two PPC Mobos to be shown:

    o Thendic France (With the bplan Pegasos and MorphOS)
    o AmigaOne and OS4

    AND, both also run Linux!
    .

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  107. Re: Quartz Graphics and Windowing by mfnickster · · Score: 1

    I finally found the developer document I was looking for... this is a much more detailed description of how Mac OS X does its windowing. Evidently the window server's system interface is being kept private at the moment. :(

    - MFN

    --
    "Slow down, Cowboy! It has been 3 years, 7 months and 26 days since you last successfully posted a comment."
  108. Re:a "BUILD YOUR OWN $800 G4" how too + parts link by leandrod · · Score: 2
    > They have links to all the parts suppliers

    Nice site. Now if I could find something the like for Europe, better yet for Switzerland...

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin