Slashdot Mirror


Build Your Own PowerPC?

amokk asks: "Let's assume for a second that somebody would want to take the time and effort to build a Personal Computer but base it on a PowerPC architecture. Besides saying 'Buy a Mac' (I already have one) or 'Buy an IBM server', is there any way of acquirng the individual parts and slapping them together? Why you would want to do this isn't up for debate. Rather, this is one of those 'wouldn't it be neat if...' type of experiments."

121 of 320 comments (clear)

  1. The other part of the question... by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Is "do I want this to be Mac compatible, or Linux/someotherOS compatible".

    The latter answer is the easier one - the former is harder, since you would have to find "official" Apple parts to make sure the OS talked nice to all the pieces.

    Either way, the idea is an interesting one.

    1. Re:The other part of the question... by rmadmin · · Score: 3, Interesting

      For the latter I would suggest FreeBSD. Leave it in Runlevel 5, and install the OSX themese for KDE or Gnome (Your choice). But, I have this odd feeling that you are probably wanting the macintosh compatibility.

    2. Re:The other part of the question... by PythonOrRuby · · Score: 2

      One doesn't rule out the other. Witness Macs that dual-boot OS9/X and Linux.

    3. Re:The other part of the question... by Dark+Paladin · · Score: 3, Informative

      My point is not that you can't dual boot Mac/Linux machines - Yellow Dog Linux running on a separate boot from OS X is a great example.

      My query is if the author wants to build a Linux compatible PPC desktop (relatively easy), or build an OS X compatible laptop (relatively hard, and probably more expensive).

      My apologies for not making that clear.

    4. Re:The other part of the question... by Rick+the+Red · · Score: 2
      OK, so where can I (legally) buy a Mac BIOS chip? The bulk of it may be off-the-shelf, but there are Apple copyright parts -- only available from Apple -- which is why you don't see any Mac clones.

      --
      If all this should have a reason, we would be the last to know.
    5. Re:The other part of the question... by dhovis · · Score: 5, Interesting

      You know, I keep wondering if we'll ever see the return of Mac-clones. Because Darwin is open-source, it should be possible to port it to any other PPC-based machine. Quartz and carbon and cocoa all ride on top of Darwin and don't know what is underneath, so once you've ported Darwin, you should be able to install the full MacOS X.

      This would be a better situation for Apple than their old clone prorgam was, because Apple can force the other hardware vendors to port Darwin to their own clones and support it themselves, and pay Apple for the bit that provides the interface. It would also help Apple spread the cost of Darwin development out a bit.

      Probably a pipe dream, but still...

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    6. Re:The other part of the question... by PhysicsScholar · · Score: 2, Funny

      OK, so where can I (legally) buy a Mac BIOS chip?

      We have an undergraduate course here at my school where several of the laboratories consist of doing just that. One of the professors used to work for Apple, which explains why he has advanced knowledge in this area.

      If you email me, I could forward it to the appropriate scholar here at Imperial and see if he can't manufacture a few extra for you.

      Good luck.

      --

      Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S., Canada, B3H 3J5
    7. Re:The other part of the question... by Gizzmonic · · Score: 3, Informative

      Apple doesn't use a BIOS, they use OpenFirmware which is designed by Sun. Mac OS X does not require any type of "boot ROM" on the motherboard to load, so you wouldn't need an Apple part. There are a multitude of other reasons why you don't see Mac clones-think about it.

      --
      (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
    8. Re:The other part of the question... by bivaughn · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Linux compatbility is pretty much enough. MacOnLinux can run Jaguar on an RS/6000 now, so linux on a PPC system not designed by apple can work great. There is also work into getting Jaguar to boot on an AmigaOne PPC ATX motherboard, I think os9 already runs...

      -biv

    9. Re:The other part of the question... by spirality · · Score: 5, Informative

      Darwin is not open source.

      Here is a quote from the Darwin Website:

      We are pleased to announce the immediate availability of Darwin 6.0.1, the Open Source core underlying Mac OS X v10.2 "Jaguar". The Darwin kernel features many enhancements from FreeBSD 4.4 and the KAME IPv6/IPsec code, and is one of the first Open Source operating system releases to be built using GCC 3.1. Darwin 6.0.1 features improved support for POSIX threads and adds several reentrant C library functions, as well as numerous new and updated libraries including ncurses, bzip, and SASL. Darwin now uses bash as the default /bin/sh, and adds python and ruby as scripting languages.

      We are updating the Darwin Tools package enabling you to build Darwin components on top of Mac OS X itself. [Sep 23 2002]


      GPL no, open source yes...

      -Craig

    10. Re:The other part of the question... by dhovis · · Score: 5, Informative
      Darwin is an open source operating system without a GUI.

      A FAQ is available.

      I believe that there are a few components of MacOS X that Apple has licenced and cannot release the source to, so Darwin has replacements for those components, but it is supposed to be binary compatible with MacOS X.

      --

      --
      The internet is the greatest source of biased information in the history of mankind.

    11. Re:The other part of the question... by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2, Flamebait

      Apple's never going to start up clones again after getting burned so bad on them last time (and as a result, I'm never going to get an Apple system again.)

      Also, what company would be stupid enough to throw tons of money at building up a brand only to be at Apple's mercy? That takes a lot of faith, and you saw what happened last time someone had faith in Apple not to screw them over...

      This whole thing reminds me of this (older, 680x0 era) book "Build your own Macintosh and Save a Bundle".

    12. Re:The other part of the question... by SirTwitchALot · · Score: 4, Informative

      OpenFirmware is a consortium (granted dominated by sun.) It is a non machine specific framework that provides a standard boot time interface. It may look nothing like a pc's bios, but still could be considered a bios, without some type of bios, your system doesn't boot. While it's true that apple now uses openfirmware, that was not the case prior to the powerpc. And even though it's an open standard, it still must be implemented at a level that is specific to the specific hardware. A simplistic anology would be OpenFirmware:bios Posix:Linux

      --
      Go away, or I will replace you with a very small shell script.
    13. Re:The other part of the question... by 1010011010 · · Score: 2


      How fast is Jag in MOL? Can it take advantage of 3d hardware?

      --
      Napster-to-go says "Fill and refill your compatible MP3 player", which is a lie. It's not MP3. It's WMA with DRM.
    14. Re:The other part of the question... by fobbman · · Score: 2

      Unless something huge happens that gives Apple a much larger share of the market, I see no reason why someone would put out the millions of dollars to startup a computer company to compete for the small piece of the pie that Apple owns.

    15. Re:The other part of the question... by Dahan · · Score: 2

      BIOS is the Basic Input/Output System, and is a IBM PC-specific thing. OpenFirmware is firmware. BIOS is firmware. And your analogy is completely wrong too.

    16. Re:The other part of the question... by __past__ · · Score: 2

      On PPC it's even easier: If the web site of the FreeBSD/PPC project isn't outdated, it won't get as far as multi-user mode anyway.

    17. Re:The other part of the question... by namespan · · Score: 2

      My understanding is that the clone market was a losing game for everyone. Apple had their marketshare cannibalized, rather than expanded. UMAX, when they quit, said that they lost money on it. No gain for Apple, no gain for the cloner. Why bother?

      --
      Libertarianism is rich wolves and poor sheep playing gambler's ruin for dinner.
    18. Re:The other part of the question... by autocracy · · Score: 3, Funny
      Also, what company would be stupid enough to throw tons of money at building up a brand only to be at Apple's mercy? That takes a lot of faith, and you saw what happened last time someone had faith in Apple not to screw them over...
      I dunno... but I'd certainly say Dell is Microsoft's bitch...
      --
      SIG: HUP
    19. Re:The other part of the question... by littlerubberfeet · · Score: 2

      When I looked into doing this, I decided NOt to because I would have to have apple ROM chips. They do use ROM, and always have. My grandmother's performa 650, if you took the hard disk out, or deleted the system folder would boot from OS 6.0.1, stored in ROM. the apple archives describe this clearly. I am no as knowledgeable in the area of the G4 chipset, so I am not sure, but all the "build your own"/"repair macs" books mention that you need ROM

      --
      Sig (appended to the end of comments you post, 120 chars)
    20. Re:The other part of the question... by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      Apple doesn't care what kind of machine you run Darwin on... and if you can make a machine that runs Darwin and doesn't require licensing anything from Apple, then you are home free, no?

      No, because no one wants to run Darwin. People want machines with OS X preinstalled, and Apple controls that.

    21. Re:The other part of the question... by Gordonjcp · · Score: 2

      Bollocks, matey. The term BIOS was also used on CP/M systems.

    22. Re:The other part of the question... by PythonOrRuby · · Score: 2

      Oh, I understand the cost issue. I was just trying to make the point that if you could build something that would run OS X, you'd likely also get the ability to run Linux "for free".

  2. FP by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Look here, but it's kind of old. Oh and here also!

  3. Shreve Systems by SmackDown · · Score: 5, Informative

    You can buy refurb'ed Mac motherboards from Shreve Systems in Shreveport, LA. They are a really good source to start with.

    1. Re:Shreve Systems by unicron · · Score: 2, Troll

      That's the place next to Muddy May Suggin's Gator Farm, isn't it?

      --
      Finally, math books without any of that base 6 crap in them.
  4. My brother built several lab machines by PhysicsScholar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    He had a dozen or so free copies of Mac OS X (10.1 I believe) but no hardware onto which to place this neat new OS.

    So, he scoured eBay for the appropriate parts (motherboard, chip, RAM, SCSI hard disks) and pieced together all of the new machines from scratch.

    He told me the only real hard part was finding cases. I think he's still two cases short, but ended up simply mounting the components onto a piece of drywall and setting them flat on a lab table!

    --

    Department of Physics and Atmospheric Science, Dalhousie University, Halifax, N.S., Canada, B3H 3J5
    1. Re:My brother built several lab machines by HiredMan · · Score: 2
      In that case have him check out this mod...

      http://www.ahleman.com/ElectriClerk.html

      It's Harry Tuttle approved!

      =TKK

    2. Re:My brother built several lab machines by PCM2 · · Score: 5, Informative
      He had a dozen or so free copies of Mac OS X (10.1 I believe) but no hardware onto which to place this neat new OS...He told me the only real hard part was finding cases.
      Pardon me for saying so, but I'm pretty skeptical of this comment. Knocking together PPC hardware isn't necessarily going to get you a machine that can run Mac OS X. Just the fact that you say he used SCSI hard drives makes me suspicious. Early versions of Mac OS X were known to choke on Adaptec SCSI cards -- you might have to pull the card, then install the OS (on your internal IDE drive), then put the card back in and install drivers. What's more, Mac OS X still relies on some proprietary Apple chips/firmware. If you're saying your brother went and found old Macintosh motherboards etc., then it sounds a little more likely ... but considering the difficulty a lot of people have running Mac OS X on stock, store-bought G3 towers, let alone older motherboards, I doubt people will want to get any big ideas based on your post.
      --
      Breakfast served all day!
    3. Re:My brother built several lab machines by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      a link from another comment:

      http://www.macopz.com/buildamac/

      apparently a guide to what you need to build your mac from 'scratch', that is, from parts.

      but yeh, he probably went and got himself some mac parts. but parts still. and i guess it's a lot easier to build a mac compatible machine from mac parts instead of crusoe cpu's..(noshitsherlock)

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    4. Re:My brother built several lab machines by HiredMan · · Score: 2

      Sorry - was that Tuttle or Buttle? ;)

  5. Build your own computer? by silvaran · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Let's assume for a second that somebody would want to take the time and effort to build a Personal Computer

    God forbid. Would you prefer to buy a stock machine with sub-standard parts? Sure, there are several places (Dell) where you can customize the computer before you buy it, but nothing can match the customizability found in building your own computer. I just purchased a new computer, by taking some parts out of my old one, giving them to the service desk at my local computer shop, and telling them how to fill in the blanks. It runs solidly, I know I'm using compatible hardware, furthermore I know exactly what's in it. It beats the heck out of buying a computer with just a "sound card", "hard drive" and "motherboard", and no other descriptive names to tell you exactly what you're getting. Besides which I would imagine many on Slashdot would be perfectly capable of building their own computers.

    But yeah, PowerPC takes it a step farther.

    1. Re:Build your own computer? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      > I just purchased a new computer, by taking some
      > parts out of my old one, giving them to the
      > service desk at my local computer shop, and
      > telling them how to fill in the blanks

      What is this, an AOL forum? I thought this was Slashdot, where people etch their own fricken motherboards, not drop them off at the local shop to get an upgrade.

  6. AmigaOne by semaj · · Score: 5, Informative

    The AmigaOne G3 SE is a fairly generic ATX motherboard with 133MHz DIMM sockets, IBM 750CXe PowerPC chip (600Mhz), 4xPCI, 1xAGP, etc, etc.

    It runs AmigaOS 4 or PPC Linux quite happily. Plonk one of these in a standard case and you've got yourself a DIY PPC solution .. or is that a bit too easy? :-)

    --
    Meep meep
    1. Re:AmigaOne by CrosseyedPainless · · Score: 2

      It's a bit too expensive. Compuquick's quoting them for $550, just for a motherboard! Yikes.

    2. Re:AmigaOne by Amiga+Trombone · · Score: 2, Informative
      There's a Yahoo! group dedicated to the discussion of the Amiga One you may be interested in. From the group:

      This group is for the discussion of the AmigaOne series of PPC motherboards and Classic Amiga bridge cards developed by Eyetech and distributed by authorised Amiga retailers worldwide.

      You might want to post your query over there.
  7. Hmmmmm... by The+Mainframe · · Score: 3, Informative

    The limitation is really over whether or not you want to use the MacOS. If you could use, say, yellow dog linux, then your job is much easier. Buy your processors from Sonnet, your motherboard from any school (they're getting rid of those old 6100/66 machines like crazy... I have 22), grab your ram from the same places... Basically take a bunch of old machines, assemble one that works from their parts, add a new processor. Or you can do what I'm doing and chain a bunch of stock machines together via ethernet. The only problem is they draw 60 amps of current.
    Oh, yeah... see if you can get your hand on a workgroup server.

    --
    --Bennett Prescott
    Former Lord Of Packets
  8. Try this one? by Ogun · · Score: 4, Informative

    Pegasos
    Should be available now AFAIK.

    There is also the Amiga One which right now is mostly vapor (E.g. not purchasable at the moment)

    See, I mentioned both.

    --
    I found a fast warez site: http://warez.it.kth.se
    1. Re:Try this one? by Jhan · · Score: 3, Informative

      Except, of course, that the Amiga One was finished and shipping months ago, and no-one has a Pegasos board (excepting prototypes).

      Anyway, both are based on a Mai reference design. Pegasos is clearly (IMHO) the better product since it has socketed processors (A1 has a surface mounted G3 600MHz (?)). Eyetech will allegedly release an updated version of the A1 with socketed processor if the initial version sells well enough.

      PS. Yes, A1/Amiga OS Vs Pegasos/MorphOS is a very inflamed subject in Amigaland. Three sentence summary follows.

      The Pegasos (a new Amiga PPC motherboard) and MorphOS (an Amiga work-alike OS) was started when Amiga was essentially abandoned. Then, some former employees of Gateway and some Amiga enthusiasts bought the trademarks and started working towards a new, official Amiga platform. The two groups couldn't get along, and now we've wound up with two competing platforms, with a combined market measured in 5 digits, if that (sigh).

      --

      I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

  9. This might be a good start by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative
  10. PenguinPPC by BShive · · Score: 5, Informative

    Are you looking for something like this?

    From the site:

    A number of years back from folks in the Microelectronics unit of IBM came up with an idea. It was called POP for PowerPC Open Platform. Basically an open source motherboard design. Well here they are. The first POP boards. It's been a long wait and, like you, I hope it was well worth it.

    The boards do appear to be available - anyone tried them?

    1. Re:PenguinPPC by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Those boards are basically the same as Eyetech's/Hyperion's/Amiga's A1 and Bplan's Pegasos...

  11. another question... by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 3, Interesting

    If you could get Darwin running on such a homemade PowerPC (not made from old Mac parts, but built from 'scratch')... could you then take the pre-compiled parts of aqua out of Mac OS X and run this on your homemade powerpc computer?

    Doesn't darwin handle all of the interaction directly with the hardware? If the aqua binaries can run on your homemade powerpc, shouldn't everything work just fine?

    And a related question... what if you got Darwin running on an x86 chip with a PowerPC emulator? Could you, theoretically, get aqua to run on such a system?

    --
    There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
    1. Re:another question... by manly_15 · · Score: 2
      And a related question... what if you got Darwin running on an x86 chip with a PowerPC emulator? Could you, theoretically, get aqua to run on such a system?
      This could only happen if someone could succesfully create a PowerPC emulator. So far, no one has been able to do so.

      As per running Aqua on such a system, I would assume that Aqua needs to interact with the Apple ROM chips. In the past, part of the OS has been stored in the ROM chip, and it would make sense that OSX would continue to do so.
    2. Re:another question... by ellboy · · Score: 5, Informative

      This is incorrect. The Apple ROMs you're referring to haven't been used in a long time, like more than 5 years. All modern Macs use Open Firmware. This is exactly why people are asking about do-it-yourself Macs so often. It's now possible.

    3. Re:another question... by GMontag451 · · Score: 2
      Does OS X access the Mac ROMS directly or does it go through Darwin?

      There is *NO* Mac ROM!!! This has been repeated over and over again on Slashdot, and yet still people don't get it. There hasn't been a Mac ROM since the first iMac came out. They all use Open Firmware to boot.

    4. Re:another question... by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 2

      There is *NO* Mac ROM!!! This has been repeated over and over again on Slashdot, and yet still people don't get it. There hasn't been a Mac ROM since the first iMac came out. They all use Open Firmware to boot.

      ok.. sorry

      Does OS X access the Mac PROMS directly or does it go through Darwin?

      --
      There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
  12. Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by CySurflex · · Score: 5, Funny

    Next Weeek On Ask Slashdot: "Let's assume I want to pump gas into my car through the radiator and mix in diet cherry 7-up. WHY is not up for debate. I just need the schematics and blue prints of how to achieve this, and I need this NOW."

    1. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by Carmody · · Score: 3, Funny

      This would not be too difficult. As long as you don't want the car to RUN on that mixture, it really is just a question of a nozzle in the radiator that goes to the diet cherry 7-up mixing chamber, and then stores it somewhere for disposal later.

      --
      God is real unless declared integer
    2. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by McFly69 · · Score: 2, Funny

      As sick as it sounds I did something similar two years ago. I was running low on gas on the Mass Pike and I knew my car will make it another 2 miles. The nearest stations was at least 6 miles. So what did I do? Got soem of my diet coke and put 1/4 liter into the tank. The engine sounded like shit but made it fine. Pumped it up and my firebird has no problems.

      Please do not mod this, just wanted to add to the other poster and thought others might find it funny.

      --



      NO! NO! Please don't mod me, I'm too young to die a troll. *click* Oh the pain, the pain...
    3. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by Tall_Rob · · Score: 2, Funny

      I dunno, but imagine a Beowulf cluster of 'em. :-)

    4. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by Contact · · Score: 4, Offtopic
      You may joke, but a hot topic in the UK at the moment is the idea of running diesel engined cars on used cooking fat mixed with a little white spirit.

      This does apparently work (although I'm not sure about the long terms effects on the engine, or performance), and over here, where automotive fuels run to about 5 dollars a gallon, the potential savings are huge - apparently some supermarkets have been running out of cooking oil and have had to impose rationing, and I'm sure that restauranteurs are finding themselves unusually popular...

    5. Re:Next Week On Ask Slashdot... by CuCullin · · Score: 4, Informative

      The common term is biodiesel or greasel for the mixture. When used with new diesel engines, they actually run cleaner than a natural gas engine. Some have made their own biodiesel for as little as $.50 USD/gallon, for quite a large savings. In NJ, the price of diesel just went up about $0.10 USD... The primary considerations are seals, older rubber seals will break down and fail, spewing all over the place. The solution? Use newer plastic seals, they last much longer anyway. There is a power loss of appr. 5%, but on new engines you don't feel all that much of a difference.

  13. compatible or not... good point! by Sleepy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    The author should ask to ammend the question to include (or not) compatability with Mac PPC as a goal.

    Can you buy Motorola motherboards and pop in a CPU? Sure.

    That's it??

    It would be more interesting to consider the "platform" as part of the question. Some would be exclusively interested in compliant hardware that runs MacOS. Others would just want something that runs Linux.

    1. Re:compatible or not... good point! by jguthrie · · Score: 2

      If I were to ask the question, I wouldn't be interested in Macintosh compatability. Can you give me a quick link to somewhere I can find retailers for those PowerPC motherboards? A few google searches didn't result in anything like some place I could buy one of these.

    2. Re:compatible or not... good point! by Sleepy · · Score: 3, Informative

      retailers for the Motorola VME boards? Good luck!

      I would first search the ppcLinux email archives, then consider posting the question to the list. I know it's been a subject of much discussion there. I sold my G3 ages ago so I have not kept up on things in the PPC world.

      If you are starting from scratch -- not using an old Mac -- what's the advantage?

      I mean, sure, PPC might have a "cleaner" design but who gives a rats ass? The advantage of that is LOST when one considers that the compiler and library chain on Linux PPC is nowhere near as mature as on X86. Someone with more knowledge than myself could state why X86 gcc blows away the ppc port of gcc.

      Personally, I liked PPC most because it was low-power and so needed less active cooling. But the new VIA miniboards with the VIA (Cyrix) chip are relatively cool itels also. Cool and quiet is nice for things like embedded MP3.

      For a desktop, I don't see the value in PPC. Now maybe if Motorola and IBM woke up and LEVERAGED Linux as a "write once, complile & run anywhere' platform, but PPC chips are a small part of their business. Unlike Microsoft, Motorola has no "religion"... just look up the "anti- mother-company" threads where Motorola went on a witchhunt for anything "Motorolla Inside"... be it MacOS, or PPC NT. I don't mean now, because PPC NT4 is dead, but at one time it was supported.

    3. Re:compatible or not... good point! by chewedtoothpick · · Score: 4, Informative

      One thing you can try to get parts is going to your local 'authorized mac repair specialist.' The local mac repair shop where I live is usually okay about it. Aparently the only problem with building MACs is the bus structure between all of the cards for NIC etc... You are going to have to make sure all of your hardware is MAC compatible because the bus addressing etc... is supposedly a little different from that of PC's.

      --
      Erutangis ym si siht.
    4. Re:compatible or not... good point! by giminy · · Score: 2

      Hm...not in my experience. I've used 3c905's, intel pro100b's, and adaptec 2940uw's that were for PCs (they had pc microcode on the cards). They all work fine under linuxppc, you just have to make sure the drivers are compiled with the right endianness. The 2940 worked with a microcode flasher (had to update the instructions on the card's bios to have mac instructions, which is tricky because the pc versions have a smaller bios than the mac versions....someone made a stripped version tho), but I had to go and get the latest "unstable" nic drivers from donald becker and replace the drivers in the kernel.

      Apple's motherboards (at least the g3 and up ones) support pci 2.2, so there's technically no difference between the cards they can take and the cards a pc can take. You'll only run into trouble if the drivers expect different microcode on the card..

      --
      The Right Reverend K. Reid Wightman,
  14. Howto - Build your own Mac by kuwan · · Score: 4, Informative

    This site has instructions on what you need, where to get it, and how to put it all together. Pretty useful if you want to build your own Mac and don't want to pay Apple's prices.

    1. Re:Howto - Build your own Mac by Tycho · · Score: 3, Interesting

      The problem with building a Gigabit G4 and probably every other AGP G4 is that the chips on the bottom of the motherboard touch the case and use the case as a heat sink. When you use a standard ATX case those chips on the bottom contact nothing and are not properly cooled. This works for a while but you are going to end up with a fried motherboad eventually.

      --
      Impersonating Tycho from Penny Arcade since before there was a PA.
  15. Similar Questions: ARM-powered Desktop? by Hanno · · Score: 4, Interesting

    ...are there mainboards and CPUs available to end-users that are not in the sky-high price-range that manufacturers take for developer hardware?

    I'd be interested in building an ARM-based desktop computer, but it seems there is no normal mainboard sold to end-users. Or is it? ("Normal" = standard form factor, standard RAMs, IDE, USB and VGA included, possibly PS/2 and serial too.)

    Same question for the Crusoe, btw. Seems that the only desktop mainboard available is developers only...

    --

    ------------------
    You may like my a cappella music
    1. Re:Similar Questions: ARM-powered Desktop? by tchuladdiass · · Score: 2

      Don't know about ready-made ones, but you can build your own.

    2. Re:Similar Questions: ARM-powered Desktop? by chiller2 · · Score: 3, Informative
      A number of companies from the Acorn scene (yes there are still a few) are working on newer ARM based hardware.

      You should check the following links out...

      Castle Technologies (UK) - The Iyonix PC. It runs RISCOS 4 but can use ArmLinux/etc if you want it to. They've also brought out a USB podule for older Acorn systems. Castle site

      Aleph One have a line of StrongARM based evaluation boards, and ARMLinux related info. Lots of info for ARM developers.

      Uffenkamp (DE) sell Acorn/ARM hardware and software and I guess would be easier for you to get to. See their site.

      RiscStation (UK) have their own RISCOS/ARM based systems you can check out. See the RiscStation homepage for more info.

      You can get a good idea of the ARM hardware out there by following the Acorn/ARM news sites. There is a lot more but that should be enough to get you started :) chiller2
      --
      --- Commission free trading & free stock up to $500 - use http://share.robinhood.com/kelvinp6 :)
  16. Well, it depends... by Tom+Rini · · Score: 2

    If you want a PowerPC system, and you don't mind paying a good bit for it, Motorola has numerous systems that run in Linux which you can sometimes get Motorola to admit that they sell, and then sell you one. There's a few other vendors which sell systems as well (Force, SBS, IBM). All of these have a PCI slot of some sort so you might be able to get a video card.

  17. Procurement of the hardware by mao+che+minh · · Score: 3, Informative
    Why not assemble the unit from compatible parts from older PowerPCs with choice upgrade parts that are "Apple Certified" from online resellers of Apple hardware?

    Here are a few resellers of Apple hardware:
    Milagro and ETI Express

  18. This was a recent Slashdot story by Geek+Dash+Boy · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    I say we take off and nuke the entire site from orbit. It's the only way to be sure.
  19. Arstechnica thread by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative
  20. Easy to do (If you've got lots of money) by ivan256 · · Score: 5, Informative

    If you really want to build a system from parts there are several places you can go. Motorola sells evaluation platforms that consisto of a motherboard (essentially a backplane) and CPU modules that plug into it. It's calld Sandpoint. You can get third party CPU modules for it from Tundra (who also sells whole kits with their own system board). Marvell/Galileo sells a platform that is well suited to building a PC style machine with PPC hardware, and you can get a variety of processor cards for it ranging from low end G3 style processors up to dual 7450 processors.

    Some of the best PPC machines available right now can't be built from parts simply because they're on a single board. My current to y is the cyclades TS-100 it's only 1"x3"x3", has dual CPUs and can be had for under $200.

  21. Was already on /. (and I have the link, too) by incripshin · · Score: 5, Informative
    There was an article here a while back: Build a Macintosh From Scratch., which links to "a great step-by-step tutorial" There's your answer.

    incripshin

  22. A simple question... by LoadStar · · Score: 2, Interesting

    To be perfectly honest, what I hope is a valid, non-troll question: why?

    I mean, I can understand buying a Mac for the ease of use and integration of the Mac OS and it's associated applications. However, when you start talking about buying/building a PowerPC machine - I don't see the point.

    Those who say that the PowerPC is falling behind - fast - in processor performance have a very valid point. I'm a Mac fan, and I realize this. It is getting to the point that Intel-compatible processors are equal to or better than PowerPC processors at the same or lower cost. It's only the Mac OS that still gives reason to continuing to use the PowerPC.

    And as such, if you aren't talking a Mac OS machine, you can run Linux or BSD just as easily on a Intel-compatible processor and platform as you could if you built a PPC machine. More easily, actually, because you can get the parts to put the machine together so much easier.

    Note: I'm not talking a POWER server - that's a different beast, and there's reason for that as well. This is strictly talking about building or buying a non-Mac OS compatible PowerPC computer.

  23. Re:PoewPPC Linux is no longer updated what OS are by John+Hasler · · Score: 2

    Debian. See http://www.debian.org/ports/powerpc/ and http://penguinppc.org/ .

    --
    Warning: this article may contain humor, sarcasm, parody, and perhaps even irony. Read at your own risk.
  24. Try older machines by jmertic · · Score: 4, Informative

    Check out these guides for repackaging either a Beige G3 or Blue/White G3 in a standard ATX case. All that's needed that is "Apple offical" is the motherboard stuff; memory, video ( uses Mac PCI video cards ), HD, and CD-ROM are off the shelf PC items. They use ZIF CPUs which can be obtained from Apple, Sonnet, NewerTech, and many others.

  25. why??? by brer_rabbit · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Why you want to do this *IS* up for debate. If you're shooting for a unix (linux/whatever) platform, does it really matter that it's PowerPC? I mean, unix is general enough that unless you've got specific hardware requirements (and processor alone doesn't constitute this -- I'm talking wierd ass PCI cards or other barnyard oddities) it doesn't matter if you're on powerpc, intel, or sparc. The cheapest bang for the buck in this category is, as we all know, intel.

    I've no idea what you'd need to do to get this MacOS compatible. Do they still use dark matter (ROM) in those machines? But if you're not going for Mac compatibility I don't know why you want to roll your own.

    If you've got a warezhouse full of PowerPC assembly programs then that's a different story. Obviously you're going to need a specific processor to run them. Or maybe you're looking to do embedded system development on a PowerPC?

    Inquiring minds want to know. Ok, we don't really *want* to know, we'd really just like to laugh at the idea a bit more. :)

    1. Re:why??? by da_Den_man · · Score: 2
      "The cheapest bang for the buck in this category is, as we all know, intel."

      Actually, the cheapest bang for the buck is AMD.

      --
      You keep going until you die..."Me".
    2. Re:why??? by demon · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I've no idea what you'd need to do to get this MacOS compatible. Do they still use dark matter (ROM) in those machines? But if you're not going for Mac compatibility I don't know why you want to roll your own.

      No, the NewWorld machines (the PowerBook G3 "Lombard" and "Pismo", PowerBook G4, and all "candy-colored" Apples) use OpenFirmware, and use a ROM-in-RAM system, where the MacOS ROM image is an ELF binary with a Forth wrapper. The OF starts the Forth wrapper, which loads the image, jumps into it, then goes on like an OldWorld from there. The MacOS ROM is kinda picky about the hardware it's on from what I gather, so it probably wouldn't like a non-Apple PPC system. OS X might not care. But if you don't care about running MacOS, why wouldn't a commodity PowerPC system be the perfect answer?

      --

      Sam: "That was needlessly cryptic."
      Max: "I'd be peeing my pants if I wore any!"
  26. PowerPC briQ's by myov · · Score: 5, Informative
    You could try a briQ, running Yellow Dog Linux

    Specs:
    • 500 MHz G3 or G4 CPUs
    • 100 MHz 64-bit System Bus
    • 2 x 168 Pin DIMM sites (up to 1GB RAM)
    • 2.5" IDE internal drive
    • RS/232 serial
    • 10/100 ethernet
    • 64/66 expansion slot (adapts to PCI)*
    • programmable Vacuum Florescent Display (VFD)
    • weighs-in at just 1.85 lbs
    • 5.74 X 1.625 X 8.9 inches (same dimensions as CD-ROM)
    --
    I use Macs to up my productivity, so up yours Microsoft!
    1. Re:PowerPC briQ's by GlassHeart · · Score: 5, Informative
      You could try a briQ

      The G3 version costs $1,485, plus shipping. The G4 version costs $1,985, plus shipping. The person who asked the question wants to use it as a desktop computer, but this only has a 10 GB drive, no video card, and no CD-ROM drive.

      At the price of the G3, you can get an iMac which is superior in just about every way (for desktop applications) except the RAM size.

  27. hard to do by Gizzmonic · · Score: 5, Informative
    i've been trying to do this for awhile. The problem is that no one offers a (non-apple, non-ibm, non-motorola) PowerPC motherboard besides chaintech in the UK (fastest you'll get there is a 600mhz G3, and prices are higher than a comparable Apple machine. they basically exist to fleece amiga people.)

    Motorola and IBM don't sell their CPUs to end users. You can order a G4 or even a G5 (PPC 8500 series) from one of Mot's suppliers like Arrow, but I believe they force you to order in high quantities (40+ at a time).

    During the dot-bomb era, several companies like Eternal Computing and Silicon Fruit promised to offer affordable PowerPC motherboards to retail customers. Nothing ever came of it (insert Apple conspiracy theory here).

    I think there's a market for retail PowerPC motherboards, or there will be once IBM's 970 hits the market. It's fun to mess with exotic hardware like the PPC, and its performance is very impressive considering its limited clock speed. IBM has published a spec for PowerPC logic boards that is available for free on its website (i'm sure someone else has posted the link by now).

    Linux would run on these things in no time (maybe we could even build our own TiVOs with 'em). And Mac OS X would be easy to port, with or without Apple's help.

    I don't think IBM would like this idea very much however, since it might undercut their huge margins on PPC-based servers. On the other hand, if they manufactured and sold the motherboard for cheap, they could bring PPC to a much larger audience.

    --
    (-1, Raw and Uncut is the only way to read)
  28. Re:PoewPPC Linux is no longer updated what OS are by alfredo · · Score: 2

    PowerPPC lost out to the competition. YellowDog, Debian, NetBSD, Mandrake, SuSE, and a few others have taken up the slack. I use YellowDog on my iMac and am very happy with it.

    OSX with XWindows installed is about all one needs.

    I have considered building. A PPC machine would be nice.

    --
    photosMy Photostream
  29. Easy! by orkysoft · · Score: 2, Funny

    Just ask the "what if" machine! :-P

    --

    I suffer from attention surplus disorder.
  30. a "BUILD YOUR OWN $800 G4" how too + parts links by DABANSHEE · · Score: 5, Informative

    Macopz.com "build a Mac" page

    They have links to all the parts suppliers, the parts add up to $800

  31. Re:put another way... by eno2001 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I think the person is probably asking about commodity parts. Anyone can go into a local hole in the wall PC shop and buy an Intel/AMD compatible mobo and plug commodity hardware (video, NIC, sound, IDE HDs, etc...) into it and get a working computer out of it. But, is it possible to get a PowerPC based mobo with PCI/AGP slots, an IDE controller, USB in an ATX (I'm not a hardware guy, so ATX could be the wrong term) form factor and have it work with an OS like Linux? That would be a great way to get away from the WinTel world and avoid paying the steep prices that Apple fetches. However, since any mobos like this are likely to be made in a much smaller volume and harder to find (implying a small customer base), they would probably be fairly expensive anyway. It's a beautiful idea, but it's not a reality at this time.

    --
    -"...bad old ideas look confusingly fresh when they are packaged as technology" - Jaron Lanier (Digital Maoism on Edge.o
  32. Re:'wouldn't it be neat if...' by ralmin · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Yes, it would be wonderful to have an emulator for recent Macs, that was capable of running MacOS X!

    Microcode Solutions are writing an iMac emulator now, both an all-software emulation and a hardware emulation solution (PPC CPU on a PCI card). It currently still vaporware, but they say it is nearing completion.

    --
    Ralmin.

  33. Be VERY careful with the Marvell board by nyet · · Score: 2

    The cpu slot is VERY finicky.

    1. Re:Be VERY careful with the Marvell board by ivan256 · · Score: 2

      Oh, believe me, I know. Compare my e-mail address with the list of vendors that support their platform. If you think the current boards are finicky, you should have seen the early prototypes. :-)

  34. Does OS X need Open Firmware to run on a PPC? by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 2

    Does Aqua interact with Open Firmware directly, or does it go through Darwin?

    If got a fully functioning Darwin system running X-Windows on a PPC, couldn't you just copy the binary files for the Aqua windowing system over?
    (This would violate the OS X EULA -- but is it possible in theory?)

    --
    There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
    1. Re:Does OS X need Open Firmware to run on a PPC? by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      Aqua is the OS X windowing system.

      Quartz is the OS X windowing system.

  35. Mac on Linux by mbrubeck · · Score: 4, Informative

    Mac On Linux will let you run MacOS (including OS X) on any PowerPC system that runs Linux -- even if MacOS won't run natively on the hardware. Mac On Linux provides a MacOS-compatible virtual machine (but it doesn't emulate the processor, so it's nearly as fast as running native).

  36. Re:a "BUILD YOUR OWN $800 G4" how too + parts link by pldms · · Score: 5, Informative
    You might also enjoy this thread from the arstechnica forums. The joy, the pain, the smell of frying components...

    The main problem building a Mac PPC using a refurbished motherboard seemed to be the power supply, IIRC. Needs a 28v trickle feed.

    Anyway, worth a read.

    --
    Slashdot looked deep within my soul and assigned
    me a number based on the order in which I joined
  37. Sure, but it will cost you by afidel · · Score: 2

    There is no commodity market for generic PPC boards, but such boards do exist. For instance we use them for early development stages of software for our embedded systems. They are standard ATX boards with a PPC chip and the usual host of connectors plus some more developer centric things like bus taps to allow easy application of data analyzers to the PCI bus etc. The thing is because there are no economies of scale these boards cost as much as a complete low end system from Apple.

    --
    There are 4 boxes to use in the defense of liberty: soap, ballot, jury, ammo. Use in that order. Starting now.
  38. You want PPC boards? we got em. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Informative

    Try here for resellers.

    MicroATX mainboard (236 mm x 172 mm)
    133 MHz processor slot
    600 MHz PowerPC G3 750 CXe - to Dual PowerPC G4 MPC 7450
    PC133 RAM (two sockets), up to 2 GB
    AGP slot
    PCI subsystem with three slots, optional Riser Card
    IEEE1394 (Firewire) VIA VT6306 with 100/200/400 MBit data transfer
    10/100 MBit Realtek Phyceiver 8201 Ethernet
    USB I/O system VIA 8231 with four connectors
    AC97 sound subsystem Sigmatel STAC 9766 Codec with mic input, line in/out and headset connector
    IRDA for infra-red remote control
    ATA100 VIA 8231 with two channels for upto four ATA devices
    PS/2 mouse connector
    RS232 (serial) port
    Centronics port
    Floppy
    Gameport for PC-compatible joysticks
    Open firmware

    Two operating systems included : MorphOS and Linux

  39. Anyone remember CHRP? by barfarf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This was called the "common reference hardware platform". Before Apple usurped back the Power Computing, Motorola, and Umax clones, this was supposed to be one potential answer to building a non-mac powerpc box. Motorola came the closest to accomplishing this by implementing standard PC parts (like ps/2 ports) on their computer.

    At one time, back when Microsoft actually supported the PowerPC architecture, Firmworks and IBM actually made a dual-booting macintosh/NT computer in 1996. IBM's motivation was linux, I believe. Check these links out:

    http://www.firmworks.com/www/chrp.htm

    http://www.webopedia.com/TERM/C/CHRP.html

    http://maccentral.macworld.com/news/9908/19.ibm. sh tml

    I personally LOVED the thought of being able to go to a computer show and putting together an NT or a linux or a mac-compatible computer by purchasing individual parts.

    You know, it's really a damn shame this wasn't meant to be.

  40. Real Biodiesel... by dman123 · · Score: 2, Flamebait
    Here is my biased opinion on the subject...

    Unfortunately, it's people like these people in Wales that give industrially produced biofuels (such as biodiesel manufactured to ASTM D6751-02) a bad name. A bunch of wankers that ruin engines with chip particles and undecanted glycerin deserve to have the engines fail... Not to mention that it is technically illegal to evade taxes in this manner.

    For anyone wishing to get the non-hippie version of the biodiesel industry, check out www.biodiesel.org.

    --

    --
    dman123 forever!
    Filtering out the -1s and 0s since 1999.
  41. Why no ppc mobo? by kherr · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I'm no EE so maybe I'm way off, but I don't understand why a single mobo maker (e.g., Abit, Asus, Tyan) couldn't make just one PowerPC-based mobo, since all the other parts (IDE, PCI/AGP, et al) are the same. I would think minor changes to the clocking of the board and the right kind of CPU socket is all that's needed. Oh yeah, it would also need Open Firmware for booting.

    Sure the market is tiny compared to the x86 mobo market. But there's also no competition. Linux works great on the PowerPC so it would be easy to support a board like this. Someone take a risk and create the market!

  42. Acorn by Jhan · · Score: 3, Interesting

    You need to check out the Acorn community (or perhaps that's where you're coming from?). Acorn was an English Arm-based home computer of the late 80's that competed (none to sucessfully, outside Britain at least) against Amiga an Atari.

    Even though the Acorn community is now shriveled enough to make Amiga look healthy by comparision, they have been the one and only group pushing Arm-based desktops over the last decades.

    There seems to be at least a couple hardware resellers still in operation. The pricing didn't seem to extortionate to me, either.

    --

    I choose to remain celibate, like my father and his father before him.

    1. Re:Acorn by rodgerd · · Score: 2

      Acorn were the company, not the computer. And they didn't just use the ARM, they invented it (Acorn RISC Machine), and became the first company to produce a consumer RISC platform.

  43. Critical to Fighting Palladium by javacowboy · · Score: 2

    I know I'm probably being really paranoid and alarmist, but this Open PPC architecture may be necessary if Palladium and DRM succeed in keeping Linux off the PC desktop.

    The odds of Palladium locking out Linux from the PC platform are minimal at best, but in order to ensure the survival of OpenSource, it is probably best to make available an alternative computing architecture for Linux and OpenSource software in case Microsoft and the content providers get their way in crippling PCs.

    Open PPC (if I may call it that) may be essential to ensure the long-term survival of OpenSource and protect it and the internet from those who would attempt to restrict it.

    --
    This space left intentionally blank.
  44. Motorola Reference Motherboards by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Informative

    Motorola makes reference motherboards and pre-built systems based on them. You can run MontaVista Linux on them. There's a dual-1GHz model available.

    I haven't tried it myself. I suspect it's not cheaper than buying a Mac.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  45. Slashdot Recursion by BiOFH · · Score: 5, Funny
    --
    - I am made of meat.
  46. Question for hardware gurus.. by BigZaphod · · Score: 2

    Is it possible to interface an alternate CPU to a motherboard not originally designed for it? For instance, could a PowerPC be grafted onto a standard x86 motherboard? In my somewhat currently limited knowledge of such things, it seems that address lines are just address lines and it all really comes down to software. So if a new bios firmware could be connected to the new chip, and the right bus lines connected in the right places, the rest would just be software, right?

    I imagine there would be timing issues to deal with. Possibly voltage differences, too. I don't know. Like I said, I don't know much about this layer of things. :-)

    1. Re:Question for hardware gurus.. by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      No, address lines are not just address lines. Things worked that way in the early 80s, but these days CPUs use complex, custom bus protocols.

    2. Re:Question for hardware gurus.. by Tassach · · Score: 2
      Nope. Can't be done. You could, in theory, make what amounts to a PPC motherboard that pluggs into a particular x86 socket, but this would be silly in the extreme and would serve no useful purpose. tHE chipset on an x86 motherboard are specifically designed to work a specific processor.

      A more intelligent solution would be to have a PPC daughter that lives on a PCI card and uses the host PC's memory, disk, etc.

      --
      Why is it that the proponents of "one nation under God" are so eager to get rid of "liberty and justice for all"?
  47. well.... by chinakow · · Score: 2, Informative

    you could buy a PPC machine from these people and if you ask real nice they might let you in on their suppliers

  48. Re:WAREZ Quartz and carbon and cocoa all ride on t by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

    No, becuse Quartz, Carbon, and Cocoa are shipped as PowerPC binaries.

  49. Even weirder... by Aapje · · Score: 2

    is that in the Netherlands we are talking about adapting diesel cars to use ureum. That's a component of urine, but is also used in fertilizer. The european laws will become very strict on NOx pollution (which causes acid rain) and ureum can neutralize it.

    I'm afraid that peeing in your gas tank won't work since the ureum must be added to the exhaust gasses, but I think that you should be able to build a pee-guzzling catalyst. Imagine the look on the faces of your friends as you tell them you are going to have a leak, but skip the rest room and walk to your car.

    --

    The Drowned and the Saved - Primo Levi
  50. build your own powerpc site link by slothtrop · · Score: 2, Informative

    Can't remember where I got this from... probably macslash. I've bookmarked it for rainy day, so I have not gone through all the details.

    http://www.macopz.com/buildamac/

  51. Code Morphing. by AYEq · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I know this really doesn't answer his question but couldn't the transmeta chip be programmed to emulate PowerPc chips.Not that I have see a whole lot more transmeta mobo's out there.

  52. Simple, use an MCU by dutky · · Score: 2

    Motorola makes a couple of PowerPC based microcontrollers. These come with a number of usefull peripherals (USB endpoints, ethernet interfaces, serial ports, parallel I/O ports, etc.), some RAM and some EPROM all on a single chip. In decades past, Steve Ciarcia built a small publishing empire on the practice of building homebrew personal computers on similar microcontrollers (Z80 variants, in his case). The same approach could be used today. If you don't want to use a PowerPC, there are similar beasts available based on other popular architectures.

  53. So... by maddogsparky · · Score: 2
    What would you put in the motherboard processer socket? Perhaps a cheap intel clone that passes off control to the daughter board?

    you'd need to figure out how to talk to all the other busses on the motherboard (memory, AGP, USB, Firewire). I suppose that it would be best to use a bare-bones board that has lots of PCI slots and just insert a card for each bus you want to support. Perhaps the daughterboard would have a ribbon cable that attaches to the processor slot on the motherboard to control those items it can't directly access???

    --
    science is a religion
  54. I know this isn't what you wanted to hear... by Thumper_SVX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    ... but I'm typing this reply on a Mac that I pieced together for less than $250 all figured. I run OS 9.1 currently, but another $100 worth of parts and I can put OS X on here.

    Basically, I started with an old PowerCenter 120 (a PowerPC Mac Clone) with 32MB of RAM. Total cost? $47 from Ebay

    Next up, I added 128MB of RAM from Computer Renaissance... it's fussy about is RAM (5V DIMMs). Total cost: $30

    Next... I added an old SCSI drive I had knocking around (4Gb drive from an old server of mine). Total cost: $0

    THEN I added a Powerlogix G3-400 upgrade card, $85 from Other World Computing. Finally, added a $49 copy of OS9.1 and OSX 10.1 (a bundled special also from OWC).

    So what can I do with it? Well, I love the fact that I now have a machine that's relatively trouble-free, runs the applications I use most often with aplomb (word processing, email, Mozilla etc.) and provides me a REAL upgrade path to OSX. Yeah, OSX isn't strictly compatible with my hardware, but the only piece that's truly critical is the video; to be fixed by the addition of a Radeon 7000 in the next few weeks. Everything else can be worked around using XPostFacto.

    Worth a thought if you REALLY want to play with OS X but don't want to outlay on the hardware. FYI, this thing runs OS 9.1 faster than my neighbor's 400Mhz Imac... still remains to be seen how X will run.

    Total cost for the project: $300 or so
    Value of knowing my 5-year old Mac is more reliable and stable than anything with Microsoft OS's on it: priceless!

  55. A related question... by daveman_1 · · Score: 2

    Anyone know where I can pick up parts to build an alpha system? From what I can tell building a PPC system from scratch is going to leave me with a somewhat rigged/dated machine. Personally, I have always been interested in building my own Alpha box. Where can one get Alpha processors/motherboards? I've so far had no luck finding such things...

    --
    Russian Russian Russian RussianDollSig DollSig DollSig DollSig
  56. Building a PowerBook by Moge · · Score: 2, Informative

    I recently wanted to buy a PowerBook G3 but did not have the 1200 Bucks that they are currently selling for. Solution. I got the parts in bits over Ebay and built one. I got Mac repair guides as well to help me with the instalation (all off ebay) and WAM for 500 bucks I got a brand new laptop and the satisfaction of building my own computer.

  57. Pegasos G3/G4 mobo by rEWDBOi · · Score: 3, Informative
    You shoul check out bplan's Pegasos G3/G4 mobo.. The Homepage isn't exactly clear as to wether it's released yet or yet another Amiga vaporware, but it sure sounds interesting:

    microATX Mainboard 236mm x 172mm ( 9"3 x 6"8 )
    • 133 MHz Processor Slot
    • Optional with 350 MHz G3 PowerPC® / 512k Cache
      up to Dual MPC 7450 G4 PowerPC® / 2 MB Cache at state of the art speedgrades
    • PC133 SDRAM Memory for a total of 2 modules
      maximum 2GB extension by availibility of modules
    • AGP Slot x 2, user selectable graphics card
    • PCI Subsystem with a total of 3 slots to be used for custom expansion, included one slot for Riser Card Option
    • IEEE1394 VIA VT6306 at 100/200/400 MBit Transfer rates with three ports
    • 10/100 MBit Network Realtek 8201 Phyceiver
    • USB I/O System VIA 8231 with a total of 4 ports
    • AC97 Sound Subsystem Sigmatel STAC 9766 Codec with Mic. In, Line In/Out and Headset support
    • optical S/PDIF output
    • IRDA for comunication with PDAs and other IRDA devices
    • ATA100 VIA 8231 with up to 4 devices
    • KBD for PS2 compatible keyboards
    • Mouse for PS2 compatible pointing devices
    • Seriell one channel RS232
    • Parallel standard Centronics
    • Floppy
    • Gameport to be used with PC style joysticks/gamepads
    • 56K Modem
      integrated
  58. I've got some diverse stuff you could buy by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    just send me $500 and I'll sent you some diverse items.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  59. non-HIppie lol by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    The hippies round here use bio-diesel.

    I know cos I take 25 liters out of the 1000 a month the co-op buys.

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  60. It's ok, I have my own agenda by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    So your motives mean nothing to me 8)

    Want to stop the war in Iraq and reduce the stranglehold?

    Want to reduce the carcinogens?

    Like the smell of fish and chips?

    Use Biodiesel

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  61. Re: Quartz is what does the drawing and events by EccentricAnomaly · · Score: 2

    **RANT**

    Ya know, no one answered my original message... there has just been arguments over mac ROMS should be called open firmware and Aqua and other silly little nits. ...and a whole bunch of people pretending to be experts and just talking out of their ass.

    Sometimes Mac people are really assholes.

    I'm sure some Mac Zealots will now mod me down to -30 for this comment... I wish they would all just go back to macslash and stop destroying the discussions over here at slashdot. Enough with the mindless cheerleading already!

    harumph!

    --
    There are 10 types of people in this world, those who can count in binary and those who can't.
  62. Re:put another way... by Lars+T. · · Score: 2

    Pssst! Don't let the "build your own PC" guys hear that.

    --

    Lars T.

    To the guy who modded me down from perfect to terrible Karma - Apple haters still suck

  63. Actually, there are ppc mobos.... by vortexau · · Score: 2, Informative

    If you'd followed stories on OS NEWS you would be aware that there are at least two available (or close to being available):

    The AmigaOneSE and the Pegasus.
    Both are to be shown at the WOASE show in the UK this weekend.
    Look for the story on http://amiga.org
    and on http://ann.lu

    As well as the OS' being developed for these, BOTH boards run Linux.
    .

    --
    (David Bowman, EVA near HUGE Monolithic Win-PC in orbit around Jupiter) "My God - its full of Malware!"
  64. Re:a "BUILD YOUR OWN $800 G4" how too + parts link by leandrod · · Score: 2
    > They have links to all the parts suppliers

    Nice site. Now if I could find something the like for Europe, better yet for Switzerland...

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin