Slashdot Mirror


Evolution Reaches A New Milestone

dalutong writes "Ximian has recently released Evolution v1.2 to the masses. New features include (among other ones that don't affect me as much) optional Emacs and XEmacs bindings in the email composer and much faster mailbox indexing (and thus loading.) It's nice to know evolution hasn't stopped."

150 of 425 comments (clear)

  1. mutated? by dirvish · · Score: 5, Funny

    Evolution has reached a new milestone

    Does that mean there was a beneficial mutation?

    1. Re:mutated? by Xenographic · · Score: 2, Funny

      Yeah, when I read it, I thought that someone had grown a 3rd eye or something :]

      Until I realized that they meant the *OTHER* evolution...

    2. Re:mutated? by Burgundy+Advocate · · Score: 2, Funny

      use a better example, such as giraffes and their long necks

      Indeed. The giraffes who were able to stretch their necks longer were able to have offspring, and their necks were then longer.

      It's kind of like when professional bodybuilders have children -- their children get bodybuilder genes passed on. In fact, if more parents would get to the gym, not as many children would be obese.

      It's like no one ever learned anything from Darwin.

      --
      Dragging people kicking and screaming into reality since 1996.
    3. Re:mutated? by dirvish · · Score: 2, Funny

      Let me get this straight...they can reproduce but they are not living things. That doesn't seem right.

      I better make sure my car hasn't started reproducing...

    4. Re:mutated? by larry+bagina · · Score: 2, Insightful
      actually, there are fortuitous mutations. Cells have complex mechanisms to detect and fix mutations, and it is true that many mutations either have no effect, or have a negative effect, but it's silly to say they only cause intense damage. Would you say that the only result of a lottery is losing? Most people will wind up poorer (but not wiser), but someone also ends up wining big.

      A classic example is sickle cell anemia, which is caused by a one-codon mutation, resulting in red blood cells which have a decreased lifetime. However, in Africa (where sickle cell anemia originates), it is (or was) beneficial because it provided protection against malaria, providing the person with a longer lifespan (as compared to a non-mutated person who dies of malaria at age 3 without producing any children).

      --
      Do you even lift?

      These aren't the 'roids you're looking for.

    5. Re:mutated? by belroth · · Score: 2
      If I remember correctly for a person to have sickle-cell both parents have to pass on the gene, but having the gene from only one parent provides protection from malaria without the problems.

      From an evolutionary viewpoint this is a good bet - malaria has been one of humanitys biggest killers (if not the biggest). As a species the sickle cell gene makes sense - if you're unlucky to have it from both parents it royally sucks.

      --
      I hereby inform you that I have NOT been required to provide any decryption keys.
  2. I know I am a feat of nature by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 3, Funny

    But I normally do try and keep it quiet. Please no more slashdot headlines about me, ok?

    --
    I live in a giant bucket.
    1. Re:I know I am a feat of nature by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

      "I know I am a feat of nature...But I normally do try and keep it quiet. Please no more slashdot headlines about me, ok?"

      Parent poster wasn't being a troll, he was trying to be funny. It wasn't funny unless you're into comedians like Bob Saget, but it wasn't trolling.

  3. Mandatory emacs joke by GreyWolf3000 · · Score: 3, Funny
    New features include (among other ones that don't affect me as much) optional Emacs and XEmacs bindings in the email composer and much faster mailbox indexing (and thus loading.)

    Does that mean the kitchen sink is also included, or will that come along with the next release?

    Har har. Hopefully, others trying to make this joke will see this post, and see that it is not funny, and think twice.

    --
    Slashdot: Where people pretend to be twice as smart as they really are by behaving like children.
  4. Emacs vs. XEmacs? by Istealmymusic · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Why do Emacs and XEmacs have to be listed differently and separately? Is there a reason for their duplicity, or does xemacs run on X11? Someone fill me in.

    --
    "The lesson to be learned is not to take the comments on slashdot too literally." --Vinnie Falco, BearShare
    1. Re:Emacs vs. XEmacs? by ruckc · · Score: 2, Informative

      XEmacs is Emacs with an X interface.
      I think XEmacs has some different bindings than Emacs.

    2. Re:Emacs vs. XEmacs? by The+OPTiCIAN · · Score: 2, Informative

      XEmacs is Emacs with an X interface.

      Um.. no it's not.. it's a different fork in the source. The X is (or was) about 'eXtended'. They both have a X interface, they both have a terminal interface.

      --


      Believe with me, my saplings.
    3. Re:Emacs vs. XEmacs? by rodgerd · · Score: 5, Informative

      This explains the split between Emacs and Lucid Emacs and the journey to Emacs/XEmacs in more detail than you ever could have wanted.

    4. Re:Emacs vs. XEmacs? by ninewands · · Score: 2

      ... and, IMHO, Xemacs is vastly superior to GNU Emacs ... both in X and in the console ...

      But then I guess that's why they make chocolate and vanilla ...

  5. Re:Habits by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2, Funny

    Did you just imply there is a better text editor than vi?

    I sincerely hope you did not, and I will refrain from killing you if it was an honest gramatical slip. Otherwise expect to meet my shotgun as soon as I figure out where you live.

    Thank you, and good day.

    --
    I live in a giant bucket.
  6. The history of the world by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    2.5 million B.C.: OOG the Open Source Caveman develops the axe and releases it under the GPL. The axe quickly gains popularity as a means of crushing moderators' heads.

    100,000 B.C.: Man domesticates the AIBO.

    10,000 B.C.: Civilization begins when early farmers first learn to cultivate hot grits.

    3000 B.C.: Sumerians develop a primitive cuneiform perl script.

    2920 B.C.: A legendary flood sweeps Slashdot, filling up a Borland / Inprise story with hundreds of offtopic posts.

    1750 B.C.: Hammurabi, a Mesopotamian king, codifies the first EULA.

    490 B.C.: Greek city-states unite to defeat the Persians. ESR triumphantly proclaims that the Greeks "get it".

    399 B.C.: Socrates is convicted of impiety. Despite the efforts of freesocrates.com, he is forced to kill himself by drinking hemlock.

    336 B.C.: Fat-Time Charlie becomes King of Macedonia and conquers Persia.

    4 B.C.: Following the Star (as in hot young actress) of Bethelem, wise men travel from far away to troll for baby Jesus.

    A.D. 476: The Roman Empire BSODs.

    A.D. 610: The Glorious MEEPT!! founds Islam after receiving a revelation from God. Following his disappearance from Slashdot in 632, a succession dispute results in the emergence of two troll factions: the Pythonni and the Perliites.

    A.D. 800: Charlemagne conquers nearly all of Germany, only to be acquired by andover.net.

    A.D. 874: Linus the Red discovers Iceland.

    A.D. 1000: The epic of the Beowulf Cluster is written down. It is the first English epic poem.

    A.D. 1095: Pope Bruce II calls for a crusade against the Turks when it is revealed they are violating the GPL. Later investigation reveals that Pope Bruce II had not yet contacted the Turks before calling for the crusade.

    A.D. 1215: Bowing to pressure to open-source the British government, King John signs the Magna Carta, limiting the British monarchy's power. ESR triumphantly proclaims that the British monarchy "gets it".

    A.D. 1348: The ILOVEYOU virus kills over half the population of Europe. (The other half was not using Outlook.)

    A.D. 1420: Johann Gutenberg invents the printing press. He is immediately sued by monks claiming that the technology will promote the copying of hand-transcribed books, thus violating the church's intellectual property.

    A.D. 1429: Natalie Portman of Arc gathers an army of Slashdot trolls to do battle with the moderators. She is eventually tried as a heretic and stoned (as in petrified).

    A.D. 1478: The Catholic Church partners with doubleclick.net to launch the Spanish Inquisition.

    A.D. 1492: Christopher Columbus arrives in what he believes to be "India", but which RMS informs him is actually "GNU/India".

    A.D. 1508-12: Michaelengelo attempts to paint the Sistine Chapel ceiling with ASCII art, only to have his plan thwarted by the "Lameness Filter."

    A.D. 1517: Martin Luther nails his 95 Theses to the church door and is promptly moderated down to (-1, Flamebait).

    A.D. 1553: "Bloody" Mary ascends the throne of England and begins an infamous crusade against Protestants. ESR eats his words.

    A.D. 1588: The "IF I EVER MEET YOU, I WILL KICK YOUR ASS" guy meets the Spanish Armada.

    A.D. 1603: Tokugawa Ieyasu unites the feuding pancake-eating ninjas of Japan.

    A.D. 1611: Mattel adds Galileo Galilei to its CyberPatrol block list for proposing that the Earth revolves around the sun.

    A.D. 1688: In the so-called "Glorious Revolution", King James II is bloodlessly forced out of power and flees to France. ESR again triumphantly proclaims that the British monarchy "gets it".

    A.D. 1692: Anti-GIF hysteria in the New World comes to a head in the infamous "Salem GIF Trials", in which 20 alleged GIFs are burned at the stake. Later investigation reveals that many of the supposed GIFs were actually PNGs.

    A.D. 1769: James Watt patents the one-click steam engine.

    A.D. 1776: Trolls, angered by CmdrTaco's passage of the Moderation Act, rebel. After a several-year flame war, the trolls succeed in seceding from Slashdot and forming the United Coalition of Trolls.

    A.D. 1789: The French Revolution begins with a distributed denial of service (DDoS) attack on the Bastille.

    A.D. 1799: Attempts at discovering Egyptian hieroglyphs receive a major boost when Napoleon's troops discover the Rosetta stone. Sadly, the stone is quickly outlawed under the DMCA as an illegal means of circumventing encryption.

    A.D. 1844: Samuel Morse invents Morse code. Cryptography export restrictions prevent the telegraph's use outside the U.S. and Canada.

    A.D. 1853: United States Commodore Matthew C. Perry arrives in Japan and forces the xenophobic nation to open its doors to foreign trade. ESR triumphantly proclaims that Japan finally "gets it".

    A.D. 1865: President Lincoln is 'bitchslapped.' The nation mourns.

    A.D. 1901: Italian inventor Guglielmo Marcoli first demonstrates the radio. Metallica drummer Lars Ulrich immediately delivers to Marcoli a list of 335,435 suspected radio users.

    A.D. 1911: Facing a break-up by the United States Supreme Court, Standard Oil Co. defends its "freedom to innovate" and proposes numerous rejected settlements. Slashbots mock the company as "Standa~1" and depict John D. Rockefeller as a member of the Borg.

    A.D. 1929: V.A. Linux's stock drops over 200 dollars on "Black Tuesday", October 29th.

    A.D. 1945: In the secret Manhattan Project, scientists working in Los Alamos, New Mexico, construct a nuclear bomb from Star Wars Legos.

    A.D. 1948: Slashdot runs the infamous headline "DEWEY DEFEATS TRUMAN." Shamefaced, the site quickly retracts the story when numerous readers point out that it is not news for nerds, stuff that matters.

    A.D. 1965: Jon Katz delivers his famous "I Have A Post-Hellmouth Dream" speech, which stated: "I have a dream that one day on the red hills of Georgia the geeks of former slaves and the geeks of former slave geeks will be able to sit down together at the table of geeks... I have a dream that my geek little geeks will one geek live in a nation where they will not be geeked by the geek of their geek but by the geek of their geek."

    A.D. 1969: Neil Armstrong becomes the first man to set foot on the moon. His immortal words: "FIRST MOONWALK!!!"

    A.D. 1970: Ohio National Guardsmen shoot four students at Kent State University for "Internet theft".

    A.D. 1989: The United States invades Panama to capture renowned "hacker" Manual Noriega, who is suspected of writing the DeCSS utility.

    A.D. 1990: West Germany and East Germany reunite after 45 years of separation. ESR triumphantly proclaims that Germany "gets it".

    A.D. 1994: As years of apartheid rule finally end, Nelson Mandela is elected president of South Africa. ESR is sick, and sadly misses his chance to triumphantly proclaim that South Africa "gets it".

    A.D. 1997: Slashdot reports that Scottish scientists have succeeded in cloning a female sheep named Dolly. Numerous readers complain that if they had wanted information on the latest sheep releases, they would have just gone to freshsheep.net

    A.D. 1999: Miramax announces Don Knotts to play hacker Emmanuel Goldstein in upcoming movie "Takedown"

    1. Re:The history of the world by iabervon · · Score: 3, Funny

      A.D. 1989: The United States invades Panama to capture renowned "hacker" Manual Noriega, who is suspected of writing the DeCSS utility.

      After the CIA keeps advising the president to "Remove The F'ing Manuel", I assume?

      A.D. 1941: Outcomes of critical World War II battles are held up for years due to German allegations that the British illegally acquired trade secrets. Four years later, all of their money tied up in legal bills, Germany files for bankruptcy. Documents are eventually declassified that prove they were right all along.

    2. Re:The history of the world by serutan · · Score: 2

      For an anonymous coward, you sure put a lot of effort into this. And a damn fine effort it is. Funny as hell, especially the Gutenberg one. Time to come out of the closet and get a login!

    3. Re:The history of the world by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Informative

      It would be even funnier if I did not read this on /. about 2 years ago.

    4. Re:The history of the world by roman_mir · · Score: 3, Redundant

      Ha! So you believe he actually wrote this? I read this post about 2 years ago on /. it is hard to say if this is the same AC who wrote the original.

  7. Phew by HRbnjR · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I beat the Slashdotting by grabbing this a mere hour ago :-)

    The blurb fails to mention the one new feature which makes this release very worthwhile, at least for me... Sound support! You can now have it play a sound on receipt of any incoming mail. Even better, you can use sounds as actions in filters, so you can set it up to not beep at you every 30 seconds when you receive spam or mail list traffic.

    Also of note is the increased feeling of polish moving from 1.08. I really can't wait for the 1.4 release when it's ported to Gnome 2.

    1. Re:Phew by Captain+Large+Face · · Score: 5, Funny

      You can now have it play a sound on receipt of any incoming mail.

      I will go to Hell for this. Sorry.

    2. Re:Phew by HRbnjR · · Score: 4, Informative

      Reply to myself to answer questions to other replies...

      1) No, I'm not kidding. Hence the "even better" line. I only use the filter activation, not the catch all sound.

      2) Evolution filter actions can be activated on any of their filter criterions, which includes: Recipient, Subject, Specific Header, Message Body, Expression, Date Sent/Received, Label, Score, Size, Status, Follow Up, Attachments, Mailing List, Regex, Source Account, and Shell Command.

      So, with Shell Command's as criterion AND actions, that basically means you can plugin whatever you want if it's not already in that exhaustive list.

      In short, it's TOTALLY customizable to do just about anything I can personally imagine.

      Personally, I use procmail to categorize my email into several separate pop boxes on the server, so I criterion playing a sound off my main spam free Source Account, and also added it as an action to my 'folderization' filters for a few important mailing lists.

      And yes, I used Outlook on my Win work box for a long time, and yes, it has been FAR ahead of Free Software offerings. I liked Outlook quite a bit actually. But that's not the point, the point is that now Evolution meets /my/ needs just as well as Outlook did, except for possibly...

      I'm looking forward to the Gnome 2 port mainly for the XFT fonts and Anti-Aliasing.

      I think with Gnome 2.2 when things get a little more polished and the apps ported, Evolution 1.2, Galeon 2, etc, then the GNU/Linux desktop will really start to become viable for many people.

    3. Re:Phew by Surak · · Score: 5, Funny

      And yes, I used Outlook on my Win work box for a long time, and yes, it has been FAR ahead of Free Software offerings. I liked Outlook quite a bit actually. But that's not the point, the point is that now Evolution meets /my/ needs just as well as Outlook did, except for possibly... ...virus support? :-P

  8. Where's VI Support? by md17 · · Score: 4, Funny


    I used to like Evolution, but after this low blow, I think I might change my mind. How can they add Emacs support and not VI support? Since everyone knows that VI is better than Emacs.
    </sarcasm>

    1. Re:Where's VI Support? by CMonk · · Score: 2

      But seriously. In theory you can use any bonobo component as your text editor. Here is someone already using VIM... http://www.opensky.ca/gnome-vim/

    2. Re:Where's VI Support? by Spy+Hunter · · Score: 2

      VI lovers will just have to use KMail instead.

      --
      main(c,r){for(r=32;r;) printf(++c>31?c=!r--,"\n":c<r?" ":~c&r?" `":" #");}
    3. Re:Where's VI Support? by Surak · · Score: 2

      Try mutt. It supports using any external mail editor, including vi.

    4. Re:Where's VI Support? by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 3, Funny

      Ximian decided not to support VI because it isn't a prime number. You'll have to wait for VII to come out.

      --
      Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
    5. Re:Where's VI Support? by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2

      just m-x viper-mode and you've the best of both worlds (literally, you can use the emacs movement commands while in edit-mode :-)

      Moral: emacs support gives you vi support, buth vi support doesn't give you emacs support.

    6. Re:Where's VI Support? by unclebulgaria · · Score: 2, Funny

      How true! Emacs doesn't even boast a Paperclip

  9. yeah right... by Frac · · Score: 5, Funny

    "It's nice to know evolution hasn't stopped."

    If you try to download it from Kansas, you'll get a 404 telling you that evolution never existed.

    1. Re:yeah right... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

      "If you try to download it from Kansas, you'll get a 404 telling you that evolution never existed."

      Don't you mean you'll get a 403, permission denied?

    2. Re:yeah right... by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2

      You are both right: permission is denied to tell anyone that evolution ever existed!

  10. A few thoughts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Informative

    I think Evolution is VERY comparable to Outlook. I love some of the features that it has that Outlook lacks. For instance the ability to view HTML formatted mail but not download embedded images off the net. This means no more dot clear images tracking the message and no auto-run scripts doing dirty deeds.

    VFolders, a method of storing searches in a folder view format, are very nice. I must confess though, I don't use it much. I only have 5 VFolders configured.

    Calendaring and contact management is great too, though I can't speak for Exchange interoperability with the Calendar, I feel confident based on Evolution that the connector would be good too.

    As a whole I strongly recommend Evolution. It is an Outlook killer. Unfortunately though, it doesn't forward Melissa, Code-Red, Anna Kourikova, I Love You..... ;)

    1. Re:A few thoughts: by Skyshadow · · Score: 2
      VFolders, a method of storing searches in a folder view format, are very nice. I must confess though, I don't use it much. I only have 5 VFolders configured.

      I'll admit I have a hard time doing cross-folder searches, although I'll admit that it's probably because I haven't spent enough time learning how.

      Which, of course, means that 98% of people won't, either.

      What I'd really, *really* like to see is an easy-to-use email search function. If I could google through my email to find something (I often forget what misc. coworker sent me that important doc), and do it easily and intuitively, I'd be a happy man.

      --
      Every year during my review, I just pray the words "slashdot.org" aren't mentioned.
    2. Re:A few thoughts: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Yea, with sound support that's activated on filters and the vsubjects and everything. Evolution is a killer everyday e-mail client.

      The one thing that it's missing and I don't think they plan on adding is allowing you to leave the messages on server, but delete them from the server when you delete them like Outlook does. I don't think it'd be that hard....maybe something for me to code myself.

    3. Re:A few thoughts: by psychosis · · Score: 2

      My most frequest VFolder is just one that is of all unread messages, regardless of the folder. Also one for stuff received in the last 24 hours, and sent in the last 24 hours.
      For searching, the quick-search bar at the top of the mail folder windows is a god-send. just select the search criteria (i.e. "message body contains"), then the search specification (i.e. "sales figures"), and click search. you can even save searches for quick reference later. ("I'm always looking for the most recent sales figures" - save a search with attachments and 'sales figures' in the message body.)

      overall, i echo the kudos to Evolution above. great app, and i wish we used exchange 2000 at work so i could get rid of the win desktop alltogether and use ximian connector.

    4. Re:A few thoughts: by Lumpy · · Score: 2

      actually I wish someone would invent a hack or patch to remove the ability to view HTML from outlook and evolution. It's fricking stupid to send email as html. and it causes mre trouble than it's worth..

      if I had a hack to do it I'd deploy it to EVERY desktop in my company silently and mention as the complaints started "New company policy in reducing email and network load."

      email should be PLAIN ASCII TEXT ONLY.

      sorry, if I seem jaded, but I'm forced to deal with an exchange server every day... and exchange is the absolutely the worst email server ever invented... I cant believe that any company would intentionally install and maintain the crap that it is.

      --
      Do not look at laser with remaining good eye.
    5. Re:A few thoughts: by Trinition · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Great, now all we need is for it to have the one feature that Outlook still has over it. No, not Exchange integration. I mean running on Windows. I'll stick with my Microsoft utlook (*sigh*) fo rnow.

    6. Re:A few thoughts: by reaper20 · · Score: 2

      It won't strip the original message of HTML, but Mozilla Mail will display HTML messages as "plain text".

      It works really well.

    7. Re:A few thoughts: by steveha · · Score: 3, Informative

      The one thing that it's missing and I don't think they plan on adding is allowing you to leave the messages on server, but delete them from the server when you delete them like Outlook does.

      I'm not sure why you think that feature is missing. I use Evolution that way, every day: my email lives on an IMAP server.

      Sometimes Evolution doesn't show me the latest messages until I hit the "Send/Receive" button. The tree view will show "Inbox (5)" but I don't see the 5 messages until I hit "Send/Receive". Other times I don't need to hit that button. Its odd but not hard to live with.

      Also, I'm pretty sure you can leave messages on a POP3 server too. Check the "leave messages on the server" option. I don't use POP3 so I can't be certain whether it will delete messages from the server when you delete them locally, or not.

      steveha

      --
      lf(1): it's like ls(1) but sorts filenames by extension, tersely
    8. Re:A few thoughts: by digitect · · Score: 2
      --
      There is no need to use a SlashDot sig for SEO...
    9. Re:A few thoughts: by perlyking · · Score: 2

      Evolution is a bad example of trying to mimic windows applications. I use Outlook every day (have to at work) and I though Evolution might be able to offer me similar features with less bloat at home.
      I tried the version that came with MDK 9 so it may have changed since then but it lack some of the easy intuitive use of outlook, e.g you get an email - you cant drag it to the calendar and have it enter itself as an appointment. Another is I couldnt find any way for it to notify me nicely that I have unread mail.

      --
      no sig.
    10. Re:A few thoughts: by Arthur+Dent · · Score: 2
      There is a COM Addin to remove HTML from outlook available at NT BugTraq.

      It has a nasty bug when using Outlook with an IMAP server, but since you're using it with Exchange, that should not be a problem.

      See, I knew Russ would be good for something :).

  11. 42nd milestone by Shadow+Wrought · · Score: 2

    "Evolution Reaches A New Milestone" I guess that means it can operate its digital watch without any need of aid...

    --
    If brevity is the soul of wit, then how does one explain Twitter?
  12. Nah by Tim · · Score: 5, Funny

    They just renamed it "Intelligent Design"

    (rim-shot)

    --
    Let's try not to let fact interfere with our speculation here, OK?
    1. Re:Nah by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      So you mean Evolution was made from /dev/urandom instead of by intelligent designers? ;)

  13. Bring on the GTK2 version by Plug · · Score: 5, Informative

    Isn't it nice when you're having a discussion on IRC about Evolution needing to be ported to GTK2, you Google for the time line and get a post from July saying it'll be worked on after Evolution 1.2.

    Then, I thought "well, I'll read the latest months news on the Evolution mailing list" and see this announcement.

    Lo and behold, a trip to Slashdot, and what has just been posted.

    This all happened between my morning and lunchtime Slashdot reading! Woo, the universe is on fire today. Perhaps if I think about Duke Nukem Forever it'll be out by next Tuesday.

    Applause to Ximian for their new release and to the GTK2 developers everywhere. Gnome 2 is turning KDE users' heads.

    1. Re:Bring on the GTK2 version by salmo · · Score: 3, Informative

      If you check out the Gnome summary released today, you will also see that Evolution tops the CVS commits list partly due to the activity on the GTK2 port. mmmmm. gtk2 evolution. Next thing you know Mozilla will be all GTK2ed and AAed.

    2. Re:Bring on the GTK2 version by reaper20 · · Score: 3, Informative

      Daily GTK2 Mozilla builds are being provided by mozilla.org.

    3. Re:Bring on the GTK2 version by Skweetis · · Score: 3, Funny
      This all happened between my morning and lunchtime Slashdot reading! Woo, the universe is on fire today. Perhaps if I think about Duke Nukem Forever it'll be out by next Tuesday.

      Perhaps you could think about my incredibly boring and mind-numbing inventory/documentation project?

  14. Re:Habits by noshellswill · · Score: 2, Funny

    Try NotePad, pad're ... it comes free-as-beer like mp3 & midi support on every rock-solid WinME system.

  15. Re:So... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "Yeah, innovation never started either cause it's such a ripoff of Outlook. I hope Microsoft sued their hippy asses for all they're worth (i.e. nothing)."

    The nice thing about Open Source is that you've got companies like Microsoft who've already done the R&D and QA for you!

  16. Re:The plusses of integration by Tet · · Score: 3, Informative
    On the flip side, implementing for "The X Window System" (I think I got that right. . .) means that development is always going to be playing catch up to Microsoft.

    Sigh. No. There's nothing about X11 that dictates that. In fact, in many respects, X11 is far more advanced than Windows. It's down to the authors of the application as to whether they want to copy or to innovate. Sadly with Evolution, they seem to mostly be going for the former, but that's their choice. If Ximian were targeting Windows instead of X11, I'm sure they'd still be bringing out essentially the same product.

    --
    "The invisible and the non-existent look very much alike." -- Delos B. McKown
  17. Why Open Source Needs Microsoft by LordSah · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see Evolution as a great example that open-source cannot be end-all solution to the world's software problems. A big reason is usability: open-source doesn't have the resources to research and develop effective UI. Usability experts, consumer studies, prototype testing and well-designed feedback loops are all needed to design user interfaces that are intuitive and efficient.

    It takes for-profit companies, with a lot of money to throw at the problem, to design original and effective UI's. Evolution neatly copies Microsoft Outlook's user experience. It's a good thing that MS put all that work into designing the UI, and didn't give Ximian any guff over using it.

    From the cover-my-ass dept: I'll admit that there are some exceptions. But by and large, the UI on open-source sucks unless they are copied from for-profit software, such as Outlook (for Evolution), NEXTStep or Windows (for various Window Managers), Wordperfect/MSWord (various word processors). And before somebody says that you don't need UI--Random J User cannot effectively use text-console programs without a lot of training.

    1. Re:Why Open Source Needs Microsoft by plierhead · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It takes for-profit companies, with a lot of money to throw at the problem, to design original and effective UI's.

      This is utterly true, and it is refreshing to see someone highlighting it. To go even further, designing an effective UI is something you simply can't get right in one go, no matter how much money and experts you throw at it. Most products only develop a good UI after several versions, based on a *lot* of user feedback.

      So Microsoft has to fork out on developing this great UI, and anyone who cares to can come along and pick it up for free and leverage it. Thats a great thing. And ironically its how Microsoft got where they were in the first place - not by being great innovators but by being "fast followers".

      There might be a lot more OSS successes if more people swallowed their pride, decided they didn't have to reinvent the wheel, and became fast followers themselves.

      --

      [x] auto-moderate all posts by this user as insightful

    2. Re:Why Open Source Needs Microsoft by LordSah · · Score: 2

      I'll amend my argument then. Open-source doesn't NEED crap. But it certainly benefits greatly from having closed-source shops doing a lot of their work for them. Open-source is largely a bunch of programmers who work on a project because they want to. Those same programmers aren't too interested in interviewing 100's of people off the street to see what they think of a prototype user interface. Those same programmers don't spend money hiring technical communication folks to design user interfaces. Those same programmers make the software look like how they want, and as such, it can be very difficult for non-programmers to use. Or worse, they're only interested in doing the nifty algorithmic work under the hood, and don't bother thinking about UI at all.

      Let's #define "Random J User" to be "Random J User Who We're Targeting With Our Software" When you're talking about operating systems (unless that OS isn't intended for desktop use), email software, word processors, games, etc, then the new Random J User is anyone who uses a computer casually. An intuitive UI is extremely important for this audience, and as such the old Random J User is fine metric for this software. GCC doesn't need to worry about that metric because its "Random J User" is "C Programmer Working On A Unix-derivative".

      Ximian realizes this, which is why they designed their software after Outlook. Outlook's interface is awesome for its audience, which happens to be the same audience Evolution is targeting. Ximian didn't have the capability to build a unique UI that was as effective, so they stole one.

    3. Re:Why Open Source Needs Microsoft by mijok · · Score: 2, Interesting

      UI design costs money but so does coding and that raises a question: Why don't usability experts contribute to open source projects the same way people writing the code do? Is it because they don't want to contribute for free or is it because coders are likely to ignore their recommendations anyway in favor of their own personal preferences and then say "I'm doing this voluntarily so don't tell me what to do!" I'm just asking - not trying to offend anyone.

      --
      Karma. Moderation. Is my .sig good now?
    4. Re:Why Open Source Needs Microsoft by LordSah · · Score: 2

      One could just as easily claim that open source doesn't have the resources to research and develop fast, flexible, complete, or efficient software systems.

      Open-source has one resource: programmers. That's all you need to build a fast, super-tight piece of software. OSS doesn't have money, which is what you need a lot of times in the software industry. Another great example is open source games vs. commercial games. Commercial game companies have artists, musicians, directors and animators. If an open source game has one or two of these sorts of people, they're really lucky. Generally though, the developers working on the game lack these skills, and they end up with shitty game. That game may have a great 3D engine, or super-clean multiplayer model, but it'll still look like shit and lack content. Content is what really makes or breaks a game in the industry.

      I guess I'm trying to say that there will always be a need for commercial software, regardless of what RMS says. I'm not saying that OSS doesn't have a place, and that folks should dump Linux/BSD/Gimp/XBill for something expensive. The world of software development would move far too slow if there wasn't any money in it.

    5. Re:Why Open Source Needs Microsoft by Shelled · · Score: 2

      Except for the addition of 'My' to desktop icons, a discernable shift towards the KDE-look and a constant re-juggling of lower level system menus, XP's desktop has changed very little since Win 95. Apparently the great UI was discovered some time in the early nineties.
      Windows development is driven by refinement of a familiar configuration, not innovation. There may be vastly more efficient and advanced window managers already in use but they wouldn't fly with MS's target user. Famiarity & popularity != best.

    6. Re:Why Open Source Needs Microsoft by epukinsk · · Score: 2

      It takes for-profit companies, with a lot of money to throw at the problem, to design original and effective UI's.

      You could just as easily say "it takes for-profit companies, with a lot of money to create a enterprise-class operating system." I think you're underestimating the Free Software community.

      The truth is, it takes talented, experienced usability experts with time, human resources and testing facilities to create original and effective UIs. I predict that as OSS solutions mature, you're going to see usability hackers flocking to OSS the same way you see kernel hackers flock to Linux and FreeBSD.

      It's the same mechanism that draws kernel hackers to Linux. People who dedicate their lives to usability want to be able to change and develop and improve their computing environment in the same way that kernel hackers want to improve the kernel they run.

      If a usability expert is running Windows, and they think Windows Media player's interface is crap, they can't do a damn thing about it. They aren't interested in implementing a brand new media player from scratch. But if they are running Linux, they can take GStreamer or the command-line version of XMMS and write their own GUI. Or take Rhythmbox's GUI and modify it to vibe with their UI expertise.

      That's a powerful, powerful draw. Unfortunately, the tools need to be *as good* as Windows before we'll really start seeing usability experts migrating. But just like Kernel developers started migrating in droves when Linux was mature enough for their needs, so will UI developers.

      Erik

    7. Re:Why Open Source Needs Microsoft by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2

      Except that you assume that the customer's needs/desires are what motivate the for-profit corp., when actually its all about increasing shareholder value. With fair-competition, the two would (should) be synonomous. Today, we've a monopoly in control, and its obvious that UI issues and bug reports and security issues aren't all that important. Else, I'd be able to right-click block images.ad.in.your.face.com. DRM isn't from the user's side of interfacing. With Free Software we actually have software written to work the way users want it too, rather than the way consumers are to be trained to act.

    8. Re:Why Open Source Needs Microsoft by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      Fun work vs. Just work.

      Why isn't there a free accounting agency that goes around and balances peoples check books for them. Why isn't there a free lawn service that comes by and mows my lawn just because they like to.

      Some things you will always need to pay for. Other things will take a little longer before they get the same circulation that software has.

      As it gets easier it will come.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
    9. Re:Why Open Source Needs Microsoft by ArsonSmith · · Score: 2

      yes, but the way I am looking at it is also the amount of payoff for free work. If I do my lawn for free (I guess I do anyway) and someone else was able to just copy what they wanted with nearly zero effort than my goal would be to either be completely lazy and just copy other peoples lawns or come up with the best/newest/neatest lawn I can to gain status in the lawn maintance community. If I can do work for my self and it help 1000 people I am more likly to do it.

      --
      Paying taxes to buy civilization is like paying a hooker to buy love.
  18. Unstable by bombdotcom · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Too bad evolution has been -- for me -- one of the most unstable apps I've ever used. It breaks due to dependency problems (wombat, bonobo, gconf, etc.) every time I upgrade something via red-carpet. At this moment, I can't even start evolution due to some stupid dependency problem that's not adequately explained in any docs, error messages, or mail lists I've been able to find. I could never recommend it to a friend.

    Good thing I prefer pine configured to use vi as its composer anyway.

    1. Re:Unstable by StarHeart · · Score: 2

      You main problem is likely red-carpet. Red-carpet does a poor job at handling dependecies and Ximian does a just as bad job at making rpms. Personally I either use RedHat's Rawhide rpms for evolution, or like in the case of 1.2, I compile my own rpm based on their rawhide src.rpm.

      --
      Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
  19. Re:OSX Support by pleclair · · Score: 2, Informative
    apparently, evolution can be run under OSX, but its hard:

    http://primates.ximian.com/~aaron/doing/evo-osx.ht ml

    I think this doc is a few months old, but at least, with some effort, evolution has been run on OSX by at least one guy. he did have to build it from scratch, though, and says that it isn't "for the faint of heart" *support*, yes, is another thing ... i wouldn't hold my breath, but I know several ximian people with macs, so maybe they'll get frustrated and do it ;-)

  20. Re:The plusses of integration by Com2Kid · · Score: 2, Interesting
    • Sigh. No. There's nothing about X11 that dictates that.


    Neccitating building from the ground up mayhaps?

    Ok put it this way;

    implementing window transparency support in, err, Windows, is ONE LINE OF CODE (namely an API call. :) )

    Actual programs to do something with this (put a UI around it and all that) can take up, oh, 5 or 6 kilobytes of code compiled.

    Heh.

    The API call is stable, it has been there since Windows 2000, it is not going anywheres anytime soon, though developers who don't mind pissing off Windows 2000 customers (which they should be mindful of. ^_^ ) can even use hardware acceleration for some of the GUI elements.

    About the only thing that X-11 seems to give to developers is some damn fine networking material. Now I will grant that Windows, err, sucks when it comes to remote usage. It sucks and it sucks horribly. 128kbit is not enough. 256kbit is not enough. Quite frankly I do not know the minimum bandwidth that IS enough, Netmeeting sucks. A lot. Heh. But it does its job, more or less. On occasion.

    But cruddo, anything else? Want to play a video in a window? Sound? Music? Heck just shoving GUI elements together even. Things integrate with less seems and less work then they do on X-11.

    The reason for this should be quite obvious. The Windows API sucked for the longest time. Heck it was revised a few times and came out sucking even MORE.

    But MS is nothing else if not persistent. They kept at it until they had something usable on their hands. Usable AND modern (more or less. :P ) While it isn't OSX, it also doesn't need to thwamp the CPU to get anything done (heh).

    X-11, err, well. Heh. There isn't much actually to it. . . . It is not very close to the hardware, which is a good thing for portability, but it makes creating a consistent user experience all that much harder.
  21. Source bizarreness by salimma · · Score: 2, Informative

    .. Evo 1.2 has been announced on Ximian's website for quite a few hours, and has even made it to FootNotes, but..

    Neither gnome.org or ximian's FTP servers carry the source, whether tarball or src.rpm. Oversight in a moment of excitement, or company policy? I sure hope it's the latter.

    Oh, and CVS for evolution-1-2-branch is already bumped up to 1.2.0.99, so obviously they have had the time to release the source ...

    --
    Michel
    Fedora Project Contribut
    1. Re:Source bizarreness by StarHeart · · Score: 2

      Yeah, I had trouble finding the source too. Then I went to #evolution on irc.gnome.org and was pointed to the Gnome Evolution directory. You will also want to get gal 0.21, gtkhtml 1.1.6, soup 0.7.4, etc.

      --
      Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
    2. Re:Source bizarreness by maw · · Score: 2
      Neither gnome.org or ximian's FTP servers carry the source, whether tarball or src.rpm.

      I put source there today; see ftp://ftp.ximian.com/pub/ximian-evolution/source/.

      Oversight in a moment of excitement, or company policy? I sure hope it's the latter.

      I think you mean the former. :) The answer is closer to the former, but actually is neither. There have been some (internal) infrastructural changes recently; one oversight due to the changes was the provision for source to be released automatically.

      --
      You're a suburbanite.
    3. Re:Source bizarreness by salimma · · Score: 2

      I meant the former, yes. Big apologies to everyone at Ximian :) Thanks for the response.

      Binary (and source) RPM for Red Hat 8.0 using Red Hat's spec is available at http://messlab.sourceforge.net for those not using Red Carpet

      --
      Michel
      Fedora Project Contribut
  22. Re:pine still wins out by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 5, Insightful

    (Pay no attention to the trolls. They're probably just 15 year old immature boys).

    I've used pine for the last 8 years, and it's a great program. I still consider it easier-to-use then Evolution. I've switched between Pine and Evolution a dozen times in the last 2 years. My fingers still autotype the Pine keybindings.

    Several things that Evolution has over Pine:

    - It's not just an email program. It's also a Contact Manager (Pine only has an addressbook), a Calendaring program, and a Todo list.
    - Pine does not display message threads very well
    - More intuitive message filters
    - Simpler to setup multiple mail accounts
    - It displays HTML and Graphics appropriately. My friends/coworkers keep sending me HTML email (HTML can be useful in email sometimes), and Pine munges 1/5 of the messages...

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  23. Re:So... by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    "

    The nice thing about Open Source is that you've got companies like Microsoft who've already done the R&D and QA for you!"

    -1, Troll


    Oh come on guys, it's a joke. Laugh.

  24. Evolution by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Evolution is one of those pieces of OSS, that you can point at and say: "OSS can deliver, there, eat this". It belongs to the group of amazing projects like Apache, Samba and Mozilla if you ask me. Now if we had some great multimedia programs (MPlayer is getting close though).

  25. Here's the link for [What's New in 1.2] by QuietRiot · · Score: 2

    Here's a link to the User's Guide and to What's New.

    Fun things:
    mmmmmmmm...... Signature Editor
    sounds on mail arrival!!

  26. upgrade possible? by gol64738 · · Score: 2

    i'm the sysadmin for a group of developers. we all run redhat 8.0 and i want to stay with .rpm packages that utilize standard redhat 8.0 libraries.
    we usually use RHN (RedHat Network) for keeping our packages up to date, but i have a feeling it's going to be a long, long time before Redhat incorporates this new Evolution into their package list.

    anyone have any ideas what i can do to get this new Evolution running on our Redhat 8.0 machines without having to deviate from our current upgrade strategy?

    1. Re:upgrade possible? by StarHeart · · Score: 2

      Evolution 1.1.90 is already in rawhide, so Evolution 1.2 will likely be in 8.1, but that is probably still many months away. They may even be using Evolution 1.4(gtk2) by then since they switched to Gnome2 with RedHat 8.0.

      Personally I had already installed gal 0.21, gtkhtml 1.1.5, and Evolution 1.1.90(Release Candidate) from rawhide. Then when I found 1.2 was out on Slashdot I downloaded gtkhtml 1.1.6 and Evolution 1.2.0 tarballs from the Gnome FTP Server. Then I used the rawhide src rpms, changed the version number, changed the version of Mozilla it was looking for since I am using Mozilla 1.2b(Evolution uses Mozilla's nss and nspr for SSL support), and rebuilt the package.

      --
      Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
    2. Re:upgrade possible? by reaper20 · · Score: 2

      The messlab apt4rpm repository has had the evolution betas for quite some time now. I'm sure it will get updated in the next day or so to 1.2. I've been running it on my RH8 system since he set it up, it's the easiest way to upgrade evo. :)

    3. Re:upgrade possible? by davehaas · · Score: 2, Informative

      I'm running a fresh install of RedHat 8.0 on my Thinkpad T20. I downloaded the rpms from this Ximian ftp mirror site (other mirrors can be found here), moved them into a temporary directory, did an `rpm -e bonobo-conf-devel gtkhtml-devel`, then performed an `rpm -Uhv *rpm` from inside that temp directory. Evolution 1.2 installed perfectly, required no other file or library dependencies, and broke no existing file or library dependencies.

      This definitely takes you off the path of pure RedHat Network up2date strategy, at least where those files/libraries are concerned, but for me it's worth the hassle of having the latest version of Evolution running on my system... YMMV, no warranty, etc.

      --
      Dave Haas
      Chief Operating Officer
      PopCap Games
  27. It'll only be an 'outlook killer' by myowntrueself · · Score: 5, Insightful

    when people can import their outlook data files (.pst files etc) complete with calender, contacts lists, tasks and of course email.

    I *know* one can export outlook data files to imap (uh, correct me if I'm using the wrong acronym there) and then re-import them to unix mail format (theres a howto on this), but, importantly;
    this causes *EVERYTHING* to appear as an email item, including calender entries, contacts lists everything comes across as a piece of email. Which I regard as a lot less than useful...

    Some might say thats better than nothing, I say *phhfft*

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
    1. Re:It'll only be an 'outlook killer' by myowntrueself · · Score: 2

      yeah but then you need the exchange server infrastructure...

      What I'd like to see is a simple file conversion.

      --
      In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  28. Re:The plusses of integration by LordSah · · Score: 2

    I use XP's Remote Desktop over a dsl connection quite regularly. In school, I used X remotely (again, over a dsl connection). Subjectively, I think that Remote Desktop is quite a bit smoother. I can't quote specific numbers or anything, but I'm much happier with the responsiveness and ease of use of RD over X.

    X is still more versatile (I don't think one Windows box can have more than one RD connection to it at once), but MS is catching up.

  29. evolution expunge by asv108 · · Score: 2
    I've been using Evolution for almost a year now and I am not missing outlook one bit. Evolution was the reason why I was able to switch to Linux on the desktop. However; one thing that irks me about Evolution is when you hit delete, it does not move the message to the trash like a normal e-mail client, instead the message is "marked" and then you need to "expunge" the e-mail, which instead of moving it to the trash it permenantly erases the message. Does any evolution user here know how to change it so delete moves a message to the trash?

    This is version 1.1, not 1.2. From a useability standpoint shouldn't evolution's delete function like most other e-mail clients?

    1. Re:evolution expunge by Plug · · Score: 2

      It bothers some people, but that's how IMAP works and that's how Outlook (especially Express) handles IMAP. And like it or not, Evolution is 'based on' Outlook (in the loosest sense.)

      You mark a message as deleted, and then you purge each folder as you finish. I personally prefer this behaivour to moving all my messages from dozens of folders into a single trash that I'll never check through or find anything in.

      Doesn't it have an "auto expunge on leaving folder" option anyway?

      From a usability standpoint perhaps it should offer the option either way. It's open source remember. Go hack it in.

    2. Re:evolution expunge by StarHeart · · Score: 2

      As mentioned below there is a "Hide Deleted Messages" option. Evolution annoyed me to no end when I first started using it till I found that option. Mozilla Mail does the same delete purge thing it just always hides the deleted messages. Where this is still annoying is when you ssh into the server and use mutt/pine to check your mail and see all the deleted messages.

      --
      Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
    3. Re:evolution expunge by StuffYourReligion · · Score: 2

      There is a option that you can check on one of the menus that automatically moves mail you delete to the trash. It's there, I don't remember where but look for it...I use it. That thing annoyed me too until I noticed the option.

      No there isn't, and I sure wish there was. You must be thinking of the "Hide Deleted Messages" (which is in the "View" menu, FYI).

      Me, I like the "traditional" Trash folder. Evolution's vFolder Trash absolutely sucks, and you only have to read the Evolution mailing list archives to confirm that I'm not alone in thinking that.

      I like being able to delete messages somewhat indiscriminately (keep that Inbox clean), and then if I change my mind or need some info I didn't think would be important, I can search through the trash and find it. With other mailers in the past, I would generally go back and mass-delete "trashed" messages that are more than a month or two old. I'd like to be able to do that again (or perhaps better yet, automate the process, specifying how many days is "old enough" to throw away).

      Actually, I still have a real Trash folder in my IMAP store, and when I use my webmail client, that's where my deleted messages go. It's great. But with Evolution, deleted messages get flagged into a global "Trash" folder, and if I don't expunge my Inbox regularly, the Inbox gets big and ugly (==slow). If I DO expunge my Inbox, I lose everything I've ever deleted, with no chance of ever getting it back. The result? I keep LOTS of crap in my Inbox that I don't want there, because I'm afraid to delete it.

      As far as the "Hide deleted messages" feature goes, that is of course indispensable using the current system. I'll admit it's also convenient to be able to "unhide" them and undelete a message that was flagged for deletion. I don't have a problem with that marking messages for later deletion at all (in fact, deleting messages for real would be terribly slow, especially with traditional single-file mbox folders). But "expunge" should never touch the Trash (unless you're looking at the Trash)--it should only clean up the current folder!

      I suppose one compromise that I could deal with is if the "Expunge Folders" feature had an option to only destroy-for-all-eternity messages that are more than n days old. But there's not even that. In Evolution, when you expunge, you lose everything you ever deleted right up 'til the moment before.

      If I had to give up all my gripes about Evolution but one, this would be it.

      And yes, sigh.... all gripes aside, Evo rocks!

      --
      I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
  30. Re:So... by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "Oh come on guys, it's a joke. Laugh. "

    It's a lot funnier when you look at the Outlook-esque interface of Evolution and then compare it to ... Outlook! Heh.

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  31. Re:pine still wins out by glytch1000010 · · Score: 2, Funny

    i love pine. been using it for about 3 years now. i've tried mozilla mail, sylpheed, evolution, kmail. pine spanks them all. and slrn for news (:

    --
    Slackware, the quicker booter-upper
  32. Re:Any plans for Mac OS X support? by ekidder · · Score: 2

    Err? I was using Entourage for quite a bit of POP and IMAP stuff. Now, I wasn't using Exchange at the same time, which may have been an issue. I've had that problem with Outlook on Windows as well. My solution was to setup multiple profiles for Outlook: Work (Exchange) and Home (POP3 x 2, IMAP x 2). I'm not sure if Entourage supports that. Now, though, I'm using Mail.app, so.. err, well, no point really.

  33. Outlook and VB by BrookHarty · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Can you run visual basic scripts on Evolution mail on exchange? (Or some other scripting language)

    One of the things I do when my email gets too big, run a vb script that saves all attachments. Then deletes the attachment from the email. I can take a 100meg folder and reduce it to 5 megs. Currently I have a few mailing lists and that plus normal work email its easy to get about 30 megs of email a day. (hourly statistics, office docs, etc)

    Can you administrate permissions on your outlook folders and mailing lists with evolution mail? (exchange compatible question again)

    We have a few emailing lists for vendors/interal departments/etc, and I need to be able to add/remove them.
    Also we give permission to our folders when we are on vacation, so people can scan for any customer who emailed us directly without going to the correct support email address. (Ya, customers would never do that would they?)

    Rich format or just html for email?

    I know when I'm trying to work with someone its nice to highlight some instructions in yellow, or key parts. Rich Text is very handy for that. I guess html would be ok, but I tend to stay away from that in outlook.

    Meeting options?

    I saw the screenshot of the meeting availability option, does that work with exchange's availability meeting info?

    Netmeeting (for meetings)

    Some of our meetings are spread around the US, so we use netmeeting so people can watch the powerpoint slideshow. Also a few of us can work on a document at the same time, or watch someone give a demo. All the netmeeting info is included in the email, the user just has to click and view. (That is still confusing for some people...)

    Recall emails.

    Can you recall an email after you sent it? I see people doing that all the time, i normally turn it off so they cant recall and hide the evidence. :>

    PST files.

    I'm currently using office undervmware. But I share my configs/rules/etc on a windows share, so I can boot into winxp when I want the extra speed (laptops are slow..), when I need to work on very large excel spreadsheets.

    Hell, one of the reasonsI can use Koffice/OO/SO is sometimes they use =hex2dec office addins, or other nonstandard stuff.
    -
    You can go a long way with a smile. You can go a lot farther with a smile and a gun. - Al Capone (1899 - 1947)

    1. Re:Outlook and VB by slide-rule · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Recall emails.
      Can you recall an email after you sent it? I see people doing that all the time, i normally turn it off so they cant recall and hide the evidence.


      "Recall" is an Outlook hack (in my opinion and understanding). It sends a second message that tells the client "hey, if you got this other message, and it is still on the server, and the user hasn't read it yet, and they haven't turned this feature off, and its Tuesday and raining, then silently delete that message before the user sees it."

      Given at work I have all my mail configured to re-route into a PST, "recalls" don't work, so I get two messages from some dork. (Worked out great once to figure out who the hell was anonymously spamming the entire company every day and redirect some geek hell on his a$$, but that's another story ... when the first message had his full sig accidentally appended.)

      I don't know if Evo. supports a way of doing this (i.e., sending a message that causes another message to disappear) but I'd wager it would rely on the server and/or client to know what/how to do this, and given you can't control your mom or grandmother's AOL client (generic "your"), I can't imagine it'd serve much purpose.

      MS Outlook innovation? Depends on your point of view, I guess.

    2. Re:Outlook and VB by big.ears · · Score: 2


      MS Outlook innovation? Depends on your point of view, I guess.

      Hardly. Many monolithic email solutions of yesteryear had this. Like a product called All-in-One which my college used on a vax until the mid 90s. It actually only held a single copy of any email sent to a distribution list, and everyone's inbox would just have pointers to it. It may have been efficient storage-wise, but that thing could be incredibly slow when the system was busy. Anyway, when email was centrally managed like this, it made recalls easy and undetectable. The email was just removed and nobody was the wiser.

    3. Re:Outlook and VB by IamTheRealMike · · Score: 3, Informative
      One of the things I do when my email gets too big, run a vb script that saves all attachments. Then deletes the attachment from the email. I can take a 100meg folder and reduce it to 5 megs. Currently I have a few mailing lists and that plus normal work email its easy to get about 30 megs of email a day. (hourly statistics, office docs, etc)

      Well, there's no VB implementation for Linux afaik, so no. You can do something similar though with external scripts I think. I'm curious about this too actually, I'll look into it.

      Can you administrate permissions on your outlook folders and mailing lists with evolution mail? (exchange compatible question again)

      No idea, sorry, I'd guess if this is an Exchange server feature then the Connector would adhere to its rules

      Rich format or just html for email?

      Come on, use your noggin! HTML of course, why bother with rich text when HTML can do it all? Bear in mind outside of Outlook land, html isn't at all dangerous, so it's perfectly trustable.

      Meeting options?

      I saw the screenshot of the meeting availability option, does that work with exchange's availability meeting info?

      As a meeting option wouldn't be useful without a server to coordinate on, and Ximian don't make a server, I'd guess the answer would have to be yes.

      Netmeeting (for meetings) Some of our meetings are spread around the US, so we use netmeeting so people can watch the powerpoint slideshow. Also a few of us can work on a document at the same time, or watch someone give a demo. All the netmeeting info is included in the email, the user just has to click and view. (That is still confusing for some people...)

      Unless NetMeeting runs under Wine, no. I believe the rdesktop protocol it uses is available on Linux too now, but I don't know exactly.

      Recall emails.

      No, that's a non-feature imho. You said it yourself, you don't use it, most people get by without it somehow. Not a big loss.

      I'm currently using office undervmware.

      You may wish to look into CrossOver office

  34. Re:pine still wins out by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    "With pine I can use all the keyboard shortcuts I'm used to. To each his^H^H^Hher own, I guess."

    Is that why you're using ctrl+6+h instead of a backspace key?

  35. Re:The plusses of integration by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

    Well, actually until the hardware vendors support linux as they do windows, X11 will be behind the times. My box is a gaming/work box, so I have to dual boot.

    New gfx cards are hardly supported by Xfree, and even the CVS takes a while to catch up. And (OpenGL/DRM/etc) takes longer for X11.

    I dont even consider X usable on the network, tightvnc or remote desktop does a better job at that.

  36. Agreed, somewhat by robbo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I use evo for IMAP at home and school, and have encountered period instability. I have 1.2 installed and so far no real problems, although the now-famous Emacs bindings don't seem to work. I've heard horror stories from friends, though, claiming it messed up their contacts. I'm afraid to try the sound support.

    Btw, anyone know if there will eventually be newsgroup support? That's the one feature that keeps me bouncing back to mozilla.

    --
    So long, and thanks for all the Phish
    1. Re:Agreed, somewhat by StarHeart · · Score: 2

      I really don't know, but last I heard they had given up on news support. If you want real news support use Pan. Pan has all the nice features.

      Pan Homepage

      --
      Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
    2. Re:Agreed, somewhat by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2

      NNTP support is available, but it's not enabled by default (The code is unmaintained), and Ximian has decided to focus on more important projects first.

      I think you can build from source with --enable-nntp .

      I have to admit, I really want Evo NNTP suppport.

      I just want a single news/mail reader. Pan is ok, Mozilla NNTP doesn't work for me, but I really want tighter integration with my mail client.

      --
      "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  37. IMAP by oliverthered · · Score: 2

    imap is fixed in that it won't download your whole folder list in a nasty infinate loop by default.

    There's also a global pref's option, instead of different options depending upon what 'folder' your viewing.

    still isn't QT though, I might have to port the ui!

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  38. It can't do PST files though by bogie · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I find it odd that you would clone Outlook and then not be able to import the files that Outlook uses. I mean no matter what Ximian says, Evolution IS an Outlook clone for linux users.

    Without the ability to import PST files they are completely ignoring the very users which they are trying to attract. Unless of course they aren't interested in those users, which I would have a hard time believing considering how the program has been designed.

    More on Evolution itself, I think besides the PST thing, its a fantastic program. Compared to the early versions, it launches and closes in a reasonable period of time. It's good looking and really I think is without a doubt the best opensource "full-featured" email/Pim every made.

    One thing I also wonder about is a win32 port of the program. Just like OpenOffice eases the transition because you can get started on a windows version first, so would a windows version of Evolution. I know, easier said then done, but its something to think about.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
    1. Re: It can't do PST files though by Bi9Kahuna · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, it takes a few steps, but it can be done.

      The way I did it, back when I moved to Linux full time on my desktop a little over a year ago, was to import all of my outlook express email into Mozilla, and then from Mozilla into Evolution. I'm not sure, but I'd imagine that the same technique would work for regular Outlook files.

    2. Re:It can't do PST files though by leighklotz · · Score: 3, Informative

      You can set up an imap store on a Linux server and drag the messages from the Exchange folder to the imap folder. For that matter, you can drag them back to the Exchange server.

    3. Re: It can't do PST files though by StuffYourReligion · · Score: 3, Informative

      Well, apparently you can do it from Outlook (Express or not), but you have to do it under Windows. That is to say: run Mozilla under 'doze, convert the PST files (does Express really use PST? I don't think so), and then Evolution can import them from Mozilla in linux.

      The problem is that lookOut files are in a proprietary format, and the only way Mozilla can do it is to take advantage of a Microsoft DLL file that--you guessed it--does not work/exist under linux ;)

      DMCA issues (if applicable) aside, I'm sure the *nix community as a whole (and 'doze users hoping to switch) would welcome someone writing a PST->mbx (or PST->Maildir!) converter for *nix.

      The Evolution team at Ximian is very small and right now, after this release, they're focused soley on the GNOME 2 port.

      That means no more new features for a while (and this applies to just about every other great idea people mentioned in this article's comments). But they're not very receptive to new ideas anyway, they usually respond (if they're in a good mood) "you want it? you code it. we're busy."

      You should have a look at the wishlist items in bugzilla.ximian.com. Some of the most requested (and IMHO useful) features have sat there neglected for well over a year! So as far as a PST converter goes, I think you can pretty much forget it in the forseeable future.

      All this said, Evolution is a great program, despite its flaws. It's all I've used for e-mail for over a year, and 1.2 kicks ass compared to 1.0x.

      --
      I have no special gift, I am only passionately curious. --Albert Einstein
  39. What you really want to know - 1.2 Release Notes by updog · · Score: 2, Informative

    You can go directly to the release notes here..

  40. Vaguely related by mao+che+minh · · Score: 2

    I want to support Ximian, but I have no need to buy their products directly. However, does Ximian receive money from the packaging of Evolution with Redhat? I paid $40 for my shiny new RH8, I wonder if any of that money made it's way into the pockets of other FOSS companies?

  41. Re:Can't snag this with apt yet by magnified_plaid · · Score: 3, Informative

    I hate to feed the trolls, but debian unstable has xfree 4.2.1 as a quick look at the xfree86 package page would reveal.

    Actually it's in testing as well.

    --
    Semper Ubi Sub Ubi
  42. Evolution and DNA? by einhverfr · · Score: 5, Funny

    Hmmm....

    "its nice to see that Evolution hasn't stopped"

    And when I clicked on the link, I got an ad for Helix DNA.....

    --

    LedgerSMB: Open source Accounting/ERP
  43. winders port? by sstory · · Score: 2
    as a bitter Outlook user, I want to move to something else. Don't talk to me about Netscape, that just sux. Evolution's gotten a lot of press lately, and the screenshots I've seen of it look great. So I have 2 questions: Does anyone know if Evolution will be ported to Windows? and otherwise, are there any good alternative email clients currently on windows? To avoid confusion let me specify that I mean good in an average-person sense, not an elite haxor command-line sense.

    thanks.

    1. Re:winders port? by jmv · · Score: 2

      Does anyone know if Evolution will be ported to Windows?

      Don't count on a native Windows port... unless you want to do it! I don't think it fits the Ximian (or any other company) business model at all. Of course, it's might be possible to compile it using Cygwin, but then installing Linux is probably much simpler.

    2. Re:winders port? by sstory · · Score: 2
      thanks. I just tried Mozilla and while I still don't like the Netscrapish Browser, the email client, particularly when skinned, is very cool. I am off Outlook! And when I move to Linux, i'll use evolution. With Mozilla I just wish I could get rid of the netscapular problem that when sending emails with no subject line an annoying dialog box pops up about it. There doesn't seem to be a way to eliminate that.

  44. Re:The plusses of integration by thasmudyan · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I think you're absolutely right. (This is getting off topic but since this entire thread formed here anyway I might as well say something about that...)
    There are a lot of people who think that:

    - "No, OSS GUI interfaces are not broken, they are in fact superior (just not ...well usable)"
    - "X is so much more advanced" when it is in fact a pain in the ass and slow as hell even when used over what it is made for - network connections.
    - "By the way text mode is the way to the future, GUI is for faggots" which I think doesn't need any further comment
    - "Linux has sooo *not* a dependency hell but Windows has" ignoring the fact that Linux libraries situation (source and compiled objects alike) is totally out of hand because often times you can't even run two apps alongside because they need different versions
    - "Linux software installation is just so smooth" when in reality one can install even complicated apps on Windows and OSX within mere minutes while on Linux you are lucky if it takes under 2 hours to get something running.

    Now, all this is not neccessarily a bad sign for the state of the OSS developer community, if people would just *recognize* the problems and try to fix them in the future. But sadly nobody seems to care, quite on the contrary. Everyone pointing out these problems will be marked "flamebait" disregarding the fact that a well meaning wake-up call often originates from a friendly corner.

  45. By your logic, Windows is more secure than Linux by Ilan+Volow · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Microsoft has billions of dollars in the bank and with all that money they must be spending hundreds of millions of those dollars on security research, therefore windows must be more secure than linux, right? There's no way that some weird Finnish guy and a couple hundred of non-rich hobbyists submitting patches could come up with an OS core more secure than something made by a large corporation like Microsoft, right?

    Contrary to popular belief in the linux community, Microsoft is actually one of the software companies most frequently criticized by usability professionals. They are the most frequent inductee in the Interface Hall of ShameJust because they've got more money than some industrialized nations doesn't mean they aren't capable of cranking out some horrendously bad designs. If Microsoft had effective usability, they never would have come out with Window-in-Window MDI, multi-row tabs, or any of the other atrocities they've released over the years. Unfortunately, Open Source Software has incorporated more than their fair share of these stupid designs in the mistaken belief that microsoft knew what they were doing.

    A developer community is only successful in areas where they have very strong beliefs and values that are advantageous. Linux has succeeded so well on the server because the linux development community had very strong values regarding security and stability, and these sorts of values were advantageous on the server. Unfortunately, linux people are unix people, and unix people have had a long standing tradition of calling end-users stupid, telling them to go RTFM, and decrying the field of usability as BS and usability folks as "whiners".

    Who'd want to do usability for free for people who say things like:
    • "Don't whine about what you're getting for free"
    • "Free Software does not entitle you to a usable interface"
    • "I can't believe some people get paid to criticize the work of others"
    • "Usability is in the eye of the beholder. Don't listen to any of these 'Usability Experts'"
    • "If you want to improve the interface, learn how to code and submit a patch."


    Open Source doesn't need money to improve usability. It needs an attitude adjustment.

    --
    Ergonomica Auctorita Illico!
  46. Re:gnome armageddon by StarHeart · · Score: 2

    Oh yeah, forgot to say, Havoc Pengington is EVIL!

    --
    Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
  47. Re:The plusses of integration by Com2Kid · · Score: 2, Interesting
    • I dont even consider X usable on the network, tightvnc or remote desktop does a better job at that.


    TightVNC is in my experience just a tad wee bit slower then remote desktop for Windows to Windows connections. 800x600@8bit color over a 128kbit upstream 1.5Mbit downstream.

    I guess I should try it again now that I am at 256kbit upsteam, but for some reason I doubt it will be too much better, remote desktop did not improve much. . . .
  48. Re:pine still wins out by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2

    Yeah, I think the final switche happened when I needed a good program to maintain my contact list, and an easy way to send email to people in the contact list.

    So, it was either Pine + some ascii contact list + perl scripts , or it was evolution.

    And then I needed a todo list that was integrated with a calendar...

    Now all I need is for my Calendar to connect to various iCal or other calendar servers, and for my todo list to integrate with Bugzilla, and I'm set!

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  49. Some thoughts on Evo 1.2 by zwalters · · Score: 2, Informative

    I've been using the beta version of 1.2 for a week or so. Here are my thoughts:

    1)The searches are considerably faster.

    I'm a big pine fan, but evolution won me over on the basis of a single feature: the ability to search large folders quickly. I know it's possible to grep a mail directory, and I've even done so in the past, but the ease (and speed) of searches in evolution is so much greater that it effectively gives you a capability you didn't have before. This is astoundingly useful. For example, if I search my mail folder (28,776 messages) for "crackbaby," it takes 7 seconds to find the single message containing that word (somehow, I'm saddened that it was so few.)

    As long as searches keep getting faster, evolution will keep getting better.

    2)Bringing up new windows still takes a while, especially when the program has been running for a few days.

    3)I'm a little disgusted by the fact that they've changed the key for going to the next unread message from 'n' to '.'. From what I've read on the developer's list, this was a big item of debate, and was ultimately won by the camp that wants the interface to be as natural for Outlook users as possible. It still sucks for us pine guys.

    3)Nitpicking, but they need to add a keyboard shortcut for "Reply to List." As I understand Ximian's strategy, a large portion of the audience they target (at least for Connector sales) are the professionals who need to have two computers on their desk -- Linux to do all their work, Microsoft for things like email & word processing. Just my own opinion, but I'd expect such people to be disproportionately subscribed to high-volume lists. (Anybody with better information than my own, please respond).

    All in all, I see 1.2 as a nice improvement, except for one or two nitpicks. Keep it up, Ximian!

    1. Re:Some thoughts on Evo 1.2 by vidarh · · Score: 2

      Evolution really needs a way of modifying keymappings easily (if it already has one, I'd love to hear about it - haven't found it). What pissed me off when I upgraded was the move from "q" to "`" for turning the preview pane on and off. I do that frequently, and I still haven't found a way of generating backtick in a way that Evolution recognizes, so currently I'm stuck using the menus, slowing me down considerably.

  50. Re:pine still wins out by irix · · Score: 2

    I still use pine when I am dialed in, but when I am at work I have been running Evolution for about 8 months.

    I guess I never got attached enough to the pine shortcuts to miss them, and some things (e.g. looking up several recipients from an LDAP address book) are much faster from Evo than from pine.

    I have to say that Evolution is one fantastic application. I have been keeping up-to-date using Ximian Red Carpet, and I haven't had a problem the entire time. Kudos to the Ximian Evo hackers.

    --

    Do you even know anything about perl? -- AC Replying to Tom Christiansen post.
  51. Re:What OSS really needs: UIForge by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    What we really need is a large forum for communicating User Interface ideas to programmers. The problem with OSS is that it tends to expect /everybody/ to be able to pick up the code and remove the horrible from apps. This just isnt the case.
    It's true, we can't afford consultants and experts to tell us what 70% of potential customers would like to see, but we do have this whole internet out there, and something should be done to harvest the feedback.
    Not saying that no options are out there right now, only that the current options arent working, and there needs to be better ways for /normal/ users, not programmers, not even just people who prefer OSS, just users of programs to, basically, complain. Until the OSS Community has a real and good forum for complaining, we arent going to see programmers taking notice and fixing things like UI problems.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  52. Havoc Pennington is EVIL! by Tumbleweed · · Score: 2

    Well, duh, check out his first name! :)

    ( just kidding, Havoc - I have no idea if you're evil or not. But seriously - what's your _middle_ name? :)

  53. Re:Can't snag this with apt yet by ealar+dlanvuli · · Score: 2

    I'm thinking 11/11/11 would be a good guess...

    --
    I live in a giant bucket.
  54. Re:gnome armageddon by 1jpablo1 · · Score: 2, Interesting
    I find somewhat strange your statment about gnome being promising because it's written in C. Following that logic, I'd say it should be written in assembler, isn't it?

    Seriouslly, it's more efficient to code in something like ocaml, or ruby (with critical parts in C/C++) than in a "low" level language such as plain C.

    But, anyone is free to spent its own time as one wishes, so I won't complain.

    Regarding the direccion taken by the developers, it's of course sad if they wont listen to some users, but this being free software, anyone could fork the code. That's why I don't think this situation is such a tragedy.

    Personally I do like evolution, but at any rate prefer the whole kde desktop than gnome's.

  55. Re:The plusses of integration by be-fan · · Score: 2

    You, frankly, are a tard. Complaining that X doesn't do audio and whatnot is like complaining that the GDI doesn't do audio. You get all those fancy features (except for Window transparency, which as yet to be used as anything more than eye candy) if you use something comparable to Win32, like Qt or GTK+ and the necessary open source libraries like lib XML. True, it's not integrated like Win32, but who gives a flying fuck? If googling for 20 minutes to find the best library for a particular task is too much of a time drain, you're working on some *very* trivial projects. The upside, though, is it allows competing implementations, which leads to better implementations overall. Just compare the APIs today. UNIX has a bunch of fragmented, but high quality APIs. Win32 is integrated, but still sucks.

    PS> And Windows remote desktop works just fine over my 1.5/384kbps DSL line (usably, 256 kbps).

    --
    A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  56. Red Carpet also released. by StarTux · · Score: 2

    Also you can get a new version of Red Carpet that works with the newer distributions, guess you want a list:

    Mandrake 9.0
    Redhat 8.0
    SuSE 8.1

    Thats it for now, but sure does make the job of getting Evolution simpler. Not to mention the eventual release of all the other goodies :).

    StarTux

  57. Why emacs key bindings? by Dunkalis · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Wonderful. They take an email client, and add emacs key bindings, thinking all of us emacs users will switch over. Why switch to Evolution when we have an email client, a newsreader, a web browser, a text editor, a blender, and a kitchen sink in one 20MB tarball? If I want to use emacs-style bindings for my email, I'll use emacs, thank you very much :).

    The question is *. The solution is emacs.

    --
    Slashdot is a waste of time. I enjoy wasting time.
  58. Red Carpet has always been fine by Chuck+Chunder · · Score: 2

    on my RedHat 7.3 system, just as another datapoint.

    --
    Boffoonery - downloadable Comedy Benefit for Bletchley Park
  59. Compile evolution with only email support? by Moloch666 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Looking at the Makefile in FreeBSD ports I don't see any such options --disable-calendar, etc.

    I just need a good X email client that will handle HTML good and put the red underline on mispelled words. Like KMail with that feature would be fine. Even better Eudora for X. Eudora is my favorite client.

    Oh well I guess my search continues or I break down and install evolution with added features I don't need.

    --
    Understanding is a three-edged sword. -- Kosh Naranek
  60. Re:The plusses of integration by ninewands · · Score: 2
    Quoth the poster:
    I dont even consider X usable on the network, tightvnc or remote desktop does a better job at that./blockquote?
    Odd, I'd say the same thing about Windows. I frequently run X apps on my Linux box at home through a gzipped ssh tunnel from my Sun workstation at work. It is remarkably responsive even though I STILL haven't managed to convince the U to shut down P2P (which consumes 40% of our gateway's bandwidth) on the campus network. Everytime I've used vnc or Netmeeting to remotely operate a Windows box, it has been a total slug.

    I guess different people just have different expectations ...
  61. Re:The plusses of integration by civilizedINTENSITY · · Score: 2

    - "No, OSS GUI interfaces are not broken, they are in fact superior (just not ...well usable)"
    obviously trolling
    - "X is so much more advanced" when it is in fact a pain in the ass and slow as hell even when used over what it is made for - network connections.
    It is network transparent with complexity costs. And yes, this does mean its more advanced.
    - "By the way text mode is the way to the future, GUI is for faggots" which I think doesn't need any further comment
    obviously trolling: the right tool for the job; nobody does Computational Visualization work without graphics
    - "Linux has sooo *not* a dependency hell but Windows has" ignoring the fact that Linux libraries situation (source and compiled objects alike) is totally out of hand because often times you can't even run two apps alongside because they need different versions
    which means they aren't from the same distribution versions...i had to ditch my CDBurner's software when I upgraded to w2k...oh well
    - "Linux software installation is just so smooth" when in reality one can install even complicated apps on Windows and OSX within mere minutes while on Linux you are lucky if it takes under 2 hours to get something running.
    depends on what your doing: apt-get is the sweetest updater i've *ever* used, rpm is coming along (grpmi looks sweet), and if you stay within your distribution its mostly a no-brainer as long as hardware doesn't bite your butt, which mandrake seems to have a handle on with autoprobing

    We do have issues to resolve, but I'd hate to give up Xfree when Moore's law seems to suggest the cost/benifit will be ever lessening and just as network transparancy could really start being useful.

  62. Re:gnome armageddon by StarHeart · · Score: 2

    While what you say about GConf reassures me about it in some ways. It is still a central repostiory of keys and values. That alone reminds me way too much of the registery. Even with comments it is still a pain. Another serious problem is when many developers say Oh, I think 1% of users will use this option so you will have to set it in GConf instead of the application. I think that is really wrong. Especially since most of the time what they think is 1% is really like 25%.

    Of course GConf isn't nearly as horrible as the new menu system which is just god awful.

    --
    Havoc Penington, the bane of my Linux desktop.
  63. I found this at least by bogie · · Score: 3, Informative

    http://www.cyberus.ca/~phoenix/outport/

    which exports Calendar,Contacts, and Tasks to Evolution.

    That just leaves doing the manual mail part via Mozilla.

    I guess that works, but its still a bit messy and not really appealing except for individual users. Its still better than nothing though I suppose.

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  64. I INVOKE THE DMCA! by EvilAlien · · Score: 2

    ... for using my markup!

    The cease and desist letter is on its way, chump, pray that your lawyer is as slimey and petty as mine!

    I might as well say something on topic that may be of interest. I use Evolution as my primary email application at home, and love it. It has features that has allowed me to kiss Outlook goodbye, and the PDA conduits to sync up the calendar etc with my Palm are fantastic. I wish there was better GnomeCard importation/integration support (I'm having a hell of a time getting Evo 1.08 to import GnomeCard entries synced from my Palm correctly), I've yet to try 1.2 so maybe this issue is resolved. Anyone try this out?

    Until one of two things happens (my office migrates to Exchange 2000 or Ximian releases older Exchange server support) I won't be able to use Evolution in the corporate environment, but I intend to as soon as it is feasible.

    And now, a treat for those of you with mod points to get rid of...

    Guide to Moderators:
    1. Sarcastic DMCA references are not funny enought o earn modding up on their own, but are still above Domo-Kun/Kitten references in the 'net cliche scale
    2. Use of "pray" and "lawyer" in the same sentence is worth "+1 Isn't it ironic?"
    3. Meta-reference to bad Alanis song in Guide to Moderators is worth "-1 Bad taste in music"
    4. Lack of beowulf cluster, Linux, or anti-Microsoft comments are worth "-1 off meta-topic"
    5. Including of "beowulf cluster, Linux, or anti-Microsoft" comments in Guide are worth "+1 Insightful" for cutting commentary on sociology of Slashdot
    6. Guide itself is worth "-1 Offtopic" for the obvious reasons

    Thank you for choosing EvilAlien.

    --
    perl -e 'print $i=pack(c5, (41*2), sqrt(7056), (unpack(c,H)-2), oct(115), 10)'
  65. it hasnt stopped... by hpavc · · Score: 2, Funny

    ... its just legally bound to share science classroom time with 'intelligent design theory' in the ohio classroom.

    --
    members are seeing something, your seeing an ad
  66. vs. kmail? by siskbc · · Score: 2

    So I'm using kmail right now...kind of annoying in ways...but not too bad. I'm very receptive to using a new email client. Their site wasn't incredibly clear - does anyone consider evolution to be be significantly better than kmail? Anyone used both?

    --

    -Looking for a job as a materials chemist or multivariat

    1. Re:vs. kmail? by Mnemia · · Score: 2

      Mozilla's built in mail is actually quite good - comparable to KMail. I used Kmail for a long time but switched so that I could use the same mail client on Windows and Linux. Evolution seems way too much like Outlook to me - and I despise Outlook's interface. Just the memory of supporting Outlook's broken UI at my old job makes me want to shudder.

  67. Re:Whoops! (And a scripting question) by tinomeinen · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yes, happened to me too: calender crashed, and contact list completely whiped away.
    Do the following:

    exit evolution
    killev
    restart evolution

    Now everything works and you have your contacts back end the calender works.
    Tino Meinen

  68. Ximian Red-carpet for Redhat 8.0, Mandrake 9.0 by illegalien · · Score: 2, Informative

    On a related note....

    Ximian red-carpet is available for Red Hat 8.0, Mandrake 9.0, or SuSE 8.1 at http://ximian.com/products/redcarpet/download.html

  69. Re:I'm kinda mixed on evolution still.. by stefanlasiewski · · Score: 2

    >>>he can't use Evolution because you can't edit existing message and resave them

    It's not really a saved email message if you edit and resave it. Few people have the need to edit a saved email message especially from within the email client.

    You can edit the Calendar and todo elements from within Evolution. If that's not enough, have you entered your request into bugzilla? That way others could support your idea if it's a good idea.

    And then there's always the commandline... the files are right there, and they are plain text. Might screw up the metadata if you make too many large edits, but most email clients will have similar problems.

    But really, don't expect Ximian to support every obscure feature request out there.

    --
    "Can of worms? The can is open... the worms are everywhere."
  70. Re:I'm kinda mixed on evolution still.. by alizard · · Score: 2
    few people have the need to edit and resave e-mail

    Thanks for the warning. I'm about to install Linux on my workstation for the first time, you saved me the trouble of downloading the new version of Evolution and seeing if the how-to instructions given elsewhere on the thread work just barely in time.

    Everybody has a different style of working. I use one of my e-mail folders as a notebook and add discrete entries by sending myself e-mail. I frequently have to update those entries.

    If they're never going to support something I use, why bother with Ximian?

  71. Very sensible and I totally agree by myowntrueself · · Score: 3, Funny

    Plus, its the only thing that could make outlook express safe!
    (Except pulling the plug on the network connection)

    --
    In the free world the media isn't government run; the government is media run.
  72. my showstoppers.. by LinuxHam · · Score: 3, Informative

    1) I don't want to have to receive everyone's full calendar by email in order to search for free time (when not using Exchange). Last I checked there was a way to enter the URL of someone else's calendar, but no instructions in the manual on how to format the calendar on the web/ftp site. And certainly nothing about how to put it up there. Put some WebDAV hooks into Evo and let an Apache server act as a "calendar hub".

    2) Would be nice to sync my calendar with Yahoo! That's what keeps my wife on Windows.

    3) Perhaps a plugin API for syncing to address books on cellphones.

    That's all for now. I can't move until those work. Pine and Yahoo! until then.

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  73. Re:Umm.. you've no doubt heard of CVS.. by salimma · · Score: 2

    Number 1: I could not find the CVS tag for the release itself, only the release branch

    Number 2: autogen.sh from the CVS branch does not run cleanly on RH8.

    The source is now available, yes, but it was not so for quite a few hours after release.

    --
    Michel
    Fedora Project Contribut
  74. Evolution on Windows... by Spoing · · Score: 3, Informative
    In the short term, when using Windows, the most stable and simplest thing you can do is use a VNC viewer pointed at a *nix box that has Evolution on it. Otherwise, take a look at these efforts to get Gnome and other programs ported using Cygwin;
    1. http://homepage.ntlworld.com/steven.obrien2/index. html

      http://marc.theaimsgroup.com/?l=gnome&m=1010157075 21446&w=2

      http://www.geocities.co.jp/SiliconValley/1596/en/c ygwin.html

    Unfortunately, I don't see any new efforts at a port of Evolution to Windows, but as it improves folks will start to demand it everywhere they are.

    Mac OSX users are much more lucky -- they can get Evolution right now. Fink lists it as a ported app.

    It would be nice to have a Windows CD with all X apps so that folks can see that *nix systems aren't usually text-based or some ugly form of CDE. Till then, I've found the boot CD and full Debian distributionKnoppix to be an ideal introduction. Blew the socks off of a admin I showed it to who didn't know it was possible, and impressed others who like the idea of Linux but can't be bothered with actually learning anything (kids, job, wife, do the math).

    --
    A firewall can not protect you from yourself. Turn off what you do not need. Do not use the firewall to do your work.
  75. Calendar sharing by rosewood · · Score: 2

    I am getting headaches trying to give cheap calendar sharing in outlook xp since you cant do netfolders anymore :

    Can Evolution do something similar to netfolders or easily do contact list and cal. sharing?

  76. Re:Habits by packeteer · · Score: 2

    Actually its not free at all. You must pay for the whole OS first. Notepad is not bad in itself but it cannot be purchased separatly. Although i have found it IS the perfect program to write your code and compile later with an external compiler. And nothing can beat windows explorer to organize all your source/header files.

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  77. Re:What OSS really needs: UIForge by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2

    The point of UIForge as opposed to regular forums would be organization. "Sorting through thousands of suggestions" would be replaced with a few dozen or hundred suggestions grouped together by what they say.
    If you can get perl to do your sorting for you, it's not nearly as bad.

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  78. funny thing about gnomes by squarefish · · Score: 2

    I've been reading about them in the news a lot lately

    --
    Creationists are a lot like zombies. Slow, but powerful and numerous. And they all want to eat our brains.