Slashdot Mirror


Japan Considers Moving Away From Windows

dm24_99 writes "According to this article at Japan Today, the Japanese government is considering abandoning Microsft Windows in a plan to boost computer security within the government. The government is very interested in alternatives, especially Linux." Of course, like the bank reform being proposed, who knows when this will actually happen.

34 of 323 comments (clear)

  1. Why asian contries in particular? by Slashdotess · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm just curious, is there something that attracts asian countries to Open Source rather than let's say, North Americans?

    1. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because paying Microsoft is supporting a foreign nation instead of your own. Given the choice, you always want to invest in your own country. You get much better support that way, too.

    2. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by vivIsel · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not just asian countries. A north american only needs look so far as...south america. While I can't find the article, there has been more than one south american country considering the switch to open source or actually doing it.

    3. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      However much MS say their software "builds" economies the fact is that for anyone outside the US the software is an import i.e. money leaves the country to buy it. Not good. It is also rumoured to contain back doors making it unsuitable unless you like being spied upon. Most don't.

      Another possibility is that threatening to use open source encourages MS to make huge donations and be very nice to you. If bribary is normal in your country then there is also the possibility of greatly improving your standard of living by being a decision maker in a government or educational establishment. MS can then buy out all your countries government bodies and universities to make absolutely sure open source will never ever see the light of day in any place that matters.

      I would hope that the Japanese government is considering open source for the first reasons in the first paragraph more than the second.

    4. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by dazdaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      The answer is very simple. Money. The asian business community's simply cannot afford the Western licensing costs charged by Microsoft so many don't pay. Now that there is increasing Governmental software licensing enforcement, it's pushing company's towards a legalised solution, and Open Source is a good investment.

    5. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by rseuhs · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Despite many announcements and press-releases, Microsoft is very strong in developing countries (including south America).

      In industrial countries where labour is expensive, like Germany and Japan, Linux is making inroads on desktops and has already marginalized Windows on Servers:

      Japan
      Germany

      For developing countries, the cost of hiring many people to babysit Windows computers is no problem, but where labour cost is high, the switch to Linux can pay off already in the first year.

      (Yes I know, that contradicts to Microsoft "Windows-TCO-is-low" propaganda, but so is reality.)

  2. Shure it will happen... by The+J+Kid · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport will set up a panel of experts to study the alternatives and what systems other governments use in the next fiscal year beginning April 1, the newspaper said.

    For once, /. editors might be actually right in saying this won't happen for a long time...

    --
    Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
  3. Seems like a ploy... by vjmurphy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sounds like Japan got wind of all the stuff Microsoft and Gates have been handing out to India and want a piece of the action.

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
  4. Unicode, unicode, unicode... by ites · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Linux support for Unicode is/will be a major factor in any progress in the Asian market. Windows supports Unicode but it is (frankly) so painful to make work in applications that decent Linux support would be a major selling point.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:Unicode, unicode, unicode... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In theory, if Linux sets up Unicode so it supports the 1,980 kanji characters and the entire hiregana and katakana character sets that every Japanese high school graduate should know (this is the Japanese Ministry of Education requirement) it can be done.

      Didn't TurboLinux work like this?

    2. Re:Unicode, unicode, unicode... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

      There may be thousands of kanji characters, but those beyond the 1,980 characters that the Ministry of Education requires for passing the final high school exams in Japan are rapidly falling into disuse.

      Newspapers, periodicals and manga (the Japanese equivalent of comic books) published in Japan usually conform with the Ministry of Education standard for ease of printing reasons. In fact, there are articles in Japanese newspapers and periodicals on kanji that are falling into disuse.

  5. Great! by Omkar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More significant than any possible actual system change is the fact that Japan is actually considering dropping MS. As Linux and open source is taken more and more seriously, maybe people won't fall for the same closed source propaganda anymore. Microsoft may actually have to compete on quality, rather than reliability.

  6. If the Japanese do change.... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...First, they'll have to figure out the cost of changeover and supporting Linux, FreeBSD, etc. Software may be extremely cheap but supporting it could consume quite a lot of IT man-hours.

    Besides, the Japanese are already heavily invested in commercial UNIX systems. I believe many Japanese government ministries are running minicomputers and mainframes built in Japan using UNIX.

    Anyway, the Japanese should check with IBM Japan on this. After all, the biggest commercial supporter of Linux is IBM, and IBM definitely has the resources to do Linux installations from department servers all the way up to supercomputers.

    1. Re:If the Japanese do change.... by FreeUser · · Score: 4, Informative

      ..First, they'll have to figure out the cost of changeover and supporting Linux, FreeBSD, etc. Software may be extremely cheap but supporting it could consume quite a lot of IT man-hours.

      Stop parrotting the Microsoft line about cost of use. As one who has worked in IT a very long time, and has administered large Windows networks, UNIX networks, GNU/Linux and FreeBSD networks, I can unequivocably say that the line you are spewing is both deceptive and wrong.

      The cost of maintaining and supporting UNIX systems in general, and GNU/Linux systems in particular, is a tiny fraction of the cost to maintain and support the equivelent number of Windows systems. A tiny fraction. Maintaining 20 Windows NT/2k systems requires one full-time employee (one who is competent ... if you're hiring new MSCEs off the street, double the number ... at least ... and hope for the best, because it is going to be a rocky ride). OTOH a single, competent person can easilly administer two hundred or more GNU/Linux systems in the same number of man-hours.

      The only real cost is the changeover itself ... retraining people on the new system, which costs time and money [a real cost, but one that is in generaly much lower than the propoganda from Redmond would have you believe. Again, they have an agenda, and it isn't your best interests they are concerned with]. Once the changeover is complete, the cost savings in every respect: time (user and administrator man-hours), cost (costs due to downtime are much lower, cost of software is negligable, cost of support is lower, etc.), and deployment logistics (no chasing proprietary, moving targets, no forced upgrades according to the vendor's schedule, not yours, etc.) are immense.

      When Microsoft, or those who parrot them, start talking about how much it is going to cost to support open systems vs. their ever-changing, buggy, insecure, and downright shoddy wares, grab ahold of your wallet and back away, carefully, for they are lying to you outright, almost certainly as a prelude to taking more of your time and money. In any other business it would be called fraud.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
  7. How much money? by pr0t3uS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm interested how much money will that cost MS. $100 millions for AIDS and $400 millions for fighting Linux like they did in India will certainly not be enough here. And may i add that I'm surprised how much an afternoon hobby of some of us cost that company.

  8. Security is a state of mind, not product ... by LL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I suppose we shouldn't be surprised at governments decreeing security by fiat (cough*CLipper*cough). Companies have recognised that risk management is key to avoiding many of the problems (e.g. middle office to vet orders/inventory/accounts) yet they consider hiring sysadmins who hold paper certificates as a panacea for electronic security? If you are vitally concerned with information security (e.g. trade secrets), then it is incumbant on cultivating the right culture and habits (logging off away from desk). It might be feasible to leave houses unlocked in small towns where everyone knows everyone else (social sanctions in shunning property violation offenses) but we have deadbolts, invisible IDs and security guards in cities. Similarly security is mainly a systematic process of educating users in using keys (PGP), selecting secureable devices (OpenBSD) or hiring suitable external expertise. Just expecting a single silver bullet of replacing an OS (no matter how good/badly secure it is perceived to be) seems to be on the order of Caute v the tide.

    LL

  9. Getting some industry back? by miffo.swe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have always been amazed by how almost every country pays MS tax even if they have both the skills and the industry to make their own software. Migrating to something from your own country would indeed put the money back in your pocket instead of shipping it abroad. Localization isnt just the language, the culture has a significant part of how a computer should interact too. There are big advantages of having your own software industry. The distance from a company in the USA to EU, Japan etc. is big both in culture and in communication. Microsoft develops mainly for the american culture wich shines through the product.

    Having the development in your country should atleast in theory give a much better adapted set of applications that if you buy a ironed out fit_all_suit-everything version like Microsofts products.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Getting some industry back? by sql*kitten · · Score: 4, Interesting

      have always been amazed by how almost every country pays MS tax even if they have both the skills and the industry to make their own software. Migrating to something from your own country would indeed put the money back in your pocket instead of shipping it abroad.

      You think? Why do you suppose the countries have the same railway gauge, the same electrical outlet voltage, the same basic design for telephones and kitchen sinks? Because doing your own thing doesn't work in the modern world, what matters is interoperability. Spending money in your own country's software is a red herring, because it will sacrifice economies of scale and waste resources on compatibility with other country's software. If a country spends as much on development as MS but only has a local market to sell into, then everyone will be paying a multiple of what MS changes now.

      Consider other industries. Protecting the US steel industry is great for American steel producers, but it kinda sucks for American steel users, like automakers, who're paying over the odds. Subsidizing European farmers is great for European farmers, but it kinda sucks for the average family, whose grocery bill is higher than it should be.

      The distance from a company in the USA to EU, Japan etc. is big both in culture and in communication. Microsoft develops mainly for the american culture wich shines through the product.

      The whole business world is Western-oriented. English is the global language, global corporations stock is listed in Tokyo, New York and London. You can bet that if an Indian businessman and a Japanese sit down to do business, they'll do it in English.

      And Microsoft spend billions on localizing their products to local markets. They aren't an American company any more than Sony is a Japanese country: they both take a global view.

      Having the development in your country should atleast in theory give a much better adapted set of applications that if you buy a ironed out fit_all_suit-everything version like Microsofts products.

      Working the same way everywhere is a strength, not a weakness.

    2. Re:Getting some industry back? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 5, Informative
      Why do you suppose the countries have the same railway gauge, the same electrical outlet voltage, the same basic design for telephones and kitchen sinks?

      I actually thought you were sarcastic until I read till the end. Presuming you're a Brit, but surely,

      • ... you've heard of that 110 V thing they have in US, as opposed to the 220V you have out there in Britain and most Commonwealth countries?
      • ...seen that the rest of Europe (and indeed US) drives on the left?
      • ... noticed that US uses NTSC while Europe uses PAL?
      • ... you haven't travelled by train from Mongolia to Russia. Apparently, there's this border station where they lift the cars above the ground with cranes and manually compress the wheels to fit the narrower Russian gauge.
      The whole business world is Western-oriented. English is the global language, global corporations stock is listed in Tokyo, New York and London. You can bet that if an Indian businessman and a Japanese sit down to do business, they'll do it in English.

      I agree here with your thesis, but a small nitpick; English is definitely the global business language, but if my experience with my Chinese friends is any indication, Asian (ie Korean, Japanese and Chinese) users certainly seem to prefer an interface in their mother tongue rather than a generic English one, even if they read and write okay-ish English. So yes, Microsoft spends quite a lot on internationalisation, but no, this is despite English emerging as the de-facto business language for the world.

      They aren't an American company any more than Sony is a Japanese country: they both take a global view.

      Interesting typo. ;-)

    3. Re:Getting some industry back? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
      Because doing your own thing doesn't work in the modern world, what matters is interoperability.

      Exactly. That's why we have global standards such as the Metric System. Any country that would use some other system would be at a great disadvantage, and would never be able to achieve any measure of economic success.

  10. Re:consider the source by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    Whoa!

    Bringing level headed thinking into /. goes against the RFC. Your karma shall be appropriately decimated.

    The Editors

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  11. Re:consider the source by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 5, Informative
    Wait until you hear it from Yomiuri or Asahi shimbun-- then bother to burn some brain cells.

    According to the article, the original source of the news is Asahi Shimbun...

    --
    Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
  12. Steve 'n' Bill Pack Yer Bags..... by dmaxwell · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder what Steve and Bill are going to do with all of those frequent flyer miles? They sure have been racking them up lately haven't they?

    I heard that Walmart will give you a really neat Microtel PC for a quarter million miles.

  13. Re:Security. by miffo.swe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bear in mind that linux has a strong tradition of unveiling every security risk found no matter how small. Most holes found recently have been found by audits, not by intrusions in linux boxens. The more holes found and fixed the better. We have no idea of just how many holes there are in windows because we cant quip about it if we buy access to the code. An independant audit of windows is impossible. In linux whoever has the time and care can do an audit. Security should be discussed, bashed and nagged about constantly.

    If you look at how many holes that have been found in the core of linux and GNU tools the numbers are in favour for linux by far. Its mostly addons and applications that have holes in them.

    Dont forget that a serious admin can choose secure parts for his server and thus build an pretty much idiot proof server if he has the knowledge relatively easy. In windows thats impossible because "this is what you get, live with it".

    The existence of theese linux boxens with different ftpd, httpd, sshd etc etc gives a diversified net, just like in nature. If you find a hole in an application there is less chance of someone else having the axact same config.

    That said there are a lot to be done in linux security but i still think its a better choice for a server since you have the power yourself and you dont have to wait for someone else to do the job. If its important you can do it yourself and that is worth more than money if your data is sensitive.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  14. The Asahi Shimbun Japanese version of the article by paku · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://www.asahi.com/business/update/1116/005.html

  15. Payola by jmorris42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Doesn't bother me either way. Think it through. If they are looking for the payola that means M$ will be paying every country on the planet in just another year or two. Who would want to be left off the gravy train if all you have to do is say "We might migrate" and millions of dollars flow out of Redmond And they can do it again in a year or two. Bribes only work when you are trying to prevent the appearance of a 'showcase' installation and they are a stopgap measure at best.

    Eventually we will get a few governments converting simply because M$ has succeeded too well at getting the US Govt to lean on poor countries on the 'piracy' issue. Since they CAN'T pay they only really have two choices, get M$ to donate licenses or migrate.

    Longterm M$ needs a better answer than paying their customers to use their product. These tactics are just to buy time to come up with a real strategy. That will be the time for fear. They are now clear of the Justice Dept and are free to act. Expect them to act as soon as Bill G and Monkey Boy come up with a plan they like.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  16. Asian countries except Japan are Microsoft-centric by rseuhs · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Actually most Asian countries are pretty Microsoft-centric.

    Except Japan, where Microsoft is already dead on servers:

    see here

    I take this announcement much more seriously than all the announcements from China lately. The Japanese are able and willing to abandon Windows completely - unlike the Chinese.

  17. Bargaining chips ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is Linux being used by goverments and large clients as a "bargaining chip" to gain consessions
    from M$?

  18. All in one go? by melonman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    > the Japanese government is considering abandoning Microsft Windows

    I struggle with the idea of a whole country, or even a whole administration, changing OS at midnight one Saturday. Surely this sort of thing is going to happen one department at a time, and, probably, one office at a time in a lot of cases. Most government departments have a significant amount of bespoke software that would need tweaking, if not rewriting. Even if the decision was taken on a nationwide basis, I would expect the changeover to take at least the lifetime of the average corporate PC, ie 2-4 years.

    While Linux might be wonderful for a lot of purposes, I can't see all the government graphic designers being thrilled with the current choice of Linux frame-based DTP packages, for example. So you are going to have Windows (and, probably) Mac ghettos for a long long time.

    And I think we can assume that the security people at least would like to be able to run all the programs the people they are spying on can run...

    --
    Virtually serving coffee
  19. Re:consider the source by rseuhs · · Score: 5, Informative
    Wait until you hear it from Yomiuri or Asahi shimbun-- then bother to burn some brain cells.

    Would it make any difference for an illiterate like you?

    From the article, the first paragraph:

    The Japanese government is reviewing the possibility of no longer using Microsoft Corp's Windows operating system as part of its plans to boost computer security within the government, the Asahi Shimbun newspaper reported Saturday.

  20. Oshiri kara hanashimasuka? by wirefarm · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's 1945 kanji known as Joyu (sp?) that are the bare minimum needed for literacy - those are the ones you learn through high school and the ones that they pretty much stick to in newspapers and official documents. Plus in Manga, of course, where they have a larger percentage of 'semi-literate' and younger readers. Believe it or not, Japanese literature actually does get a bit deeper than this - they have books and magazines that use lots of difficult characters that must be supported in the fonts and character sets.
    After the initial 1945, there's another 18,000 or so that, while less common, are certainly not 'falling into disuse' - some percentage are only used for names and such nowadays, buy that pretty much makes them a requirement. After all, how do you sell someone a computer incapable of displaying his name or the name of a polititian? Sure, you could spell it out in katakana, but that's just lame.

    It gets trickier, because there are several encodings in common usage, such as JIS, Shift-JIS and EUC, all which must be supported in any viable operating system. As far as I know, Unicode is a latecomer and not really an important player yet in Japan. It does show promise, though. Until then, systems will have to transparently guess which encoding to use. One of the first words you learn in Japanese when dealing with DBCS information systems is Mojibake - garbage rendering of text.

    The good news is that Linux does a great job of handling all of the encoding issues. I use it daily for this stuff and it certainly surpasses anything I've seen on Windows, though IMHO, Mac is a bit slicker. (No surprise there.)

    As an aside, I was once venting frustration to a friend while studying kanji - "When are the Japanese going to give up this crap and just use roman letters like the rest of the world??"
    "Never!" she replied, "Because once you've learned kanji, it's too fscking convenient!"

    If you're really interested in this stuff, do a Google for 'Jim Breen', the professor from Monash who is possibly the leading expert in the field - he's also a hell of a nice guy.

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  21. Re:They're all moving to Apple! by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cool site. Apple has great computers (I'm using one now), and a operating system that is a thing of beauty and a joy forever. It pleases me greatly to see any Apple growth in any market.

    That said, Linux gives Japan one thing not even Apple can: a customizable operating system for all that cool Japanese hardware. Sharp has been one of the first Japanese companies to realize this, and go with it, producing the Linux based Zaurus PDA. That very same Japan Today website also contained an article about Sharp and IBM teaming up to provide some kind of wireless, Linux based, services.

    Sharp's successes and this decision by the Japanese government might encourage other Japanese computer hardware makers to throw off the Microsoft yoke. Linux would give them more room to innovate (unlike Microsoft who issues yearly hardware specs on what it wants PCs to be that year) while connecting them with open standards to other versions of Linux and other operating systems from around the world.

    "At this moment, it has control of systems all over the world.
    And...we can't do a damn thing to stop it."
    Miyasaka, "Godzilla 2000 Millennium" (Japanese version)

  22. Pronouncing Linux in Japan.... by Rai · · Score: 4, Funny

    I know this is bad taste, but I wonder if they'll pronounce it "Rinux."

    Yes, yes. I'm the insensitive clod of this topic. No offense intended :)

  23. Linux is widespread in Japan - here are some stats by dwheeler · · Score: 4, Interesting
    There's actually quite a bit of Linux use in Japan. A Japanese paper called the Linux white paper 2003 found that overall use of GNU/Linux jumped from 35.5% in 2001 to 64.3% in 2002 by Japanese corporations, and GNU/Linux was the most popular platform for small projects. It also found that 49.3% of IT solution vendors support Linux in Japan, as well as a number of other interesting statistics.

    If you don't read Japanese, you can find a summary of interesting results in Why Open Source Software / Free Software (OSS/FS)? Look at the Numbers! ; look for the text starting with "A Japanese survey found".

    --
    - David A. Wheeler (see my Secure Programming HOWTO)