Slashdot Mirror


Japan Considers Moving Away From Windows

dm24_99 writes "According to this article at Japan Today, the Japanese government is considering abandoning Microsft Windows in a plan to boost computer security within the government. The government is very interested in alternatives, especially Linux." Of course, like the bank reform being proposed, who knows when this will actually happen.

108 of 323 comments (clear)

  1. Why asian contries in particular? by Slashdotess · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I'm just curious, is there something that attracts asian countries to Open Source rather than let's say, North Americans?

    1. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Because paying Microsoft is supporting a foreign nation instead of your own. Given the choice, you always want to invest in your own country. You get much better support that way, too.

    2. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by vivIsel · · Score: 4, Informative

      It's not just asian countries. A north american only needs look so far as...south america. While I can't find the article, there has been more than one south american country considering the switch to open source or actually doing it.

    3. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by Air-conditioned+cowh · · Score: 4, Insightful

      However much MS say their software "builds" economies the fact is that for anyone outside the US the software is an import i.e. money leaves the country to buy it. Not good. It is also rumoured to contain back doors making it unsuitable unless you like being spied upon. Most don't.

      Another possibility is that threatening to use open source encourages MS to make huge donations and be very nice to you. If bribary is normal in your country then there is also the possibility of greatly improving your standard of living by being a decision maker in a government or educational establishment. MS can then buy out all your countries government bodies and universities to make absolutely sure open source will never ever see the light of day in any place that matters.

      I would hope that the Japanese government is considering open source for the first reasons in the first paragraph more than the second.

    4. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by jodo · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uh... Don't think Germany is asian. Remember this slashdot article As Germany goes so goes the EU. And the EU is or will be the largest world economy. Japan is currently the second largest national economy.(IIRC)
      It makes perfect sense for governments to turn their backs on private/U.S. software and embrace open software solutions. The economic impact for M$ will ultimately be severe. I think it is in the U.S. economic interest to promote open source and or competitive alternatives to the M$ monopoly. So that we [speaking as a usian (tm) of course] remain competitive.
      And that is why the recent court decision r.e. M$ is a tragedy for all concerned.

      --

      "Don't Follow Leaders." Bob Dylan
    5. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by dazdaz · · Score: 4, Informative

      The answer is very simple. Money. The asian business community's simply cannot afford the Western licensing costs charged by Microsoft so many don't pay. Now that there is increasing Governmental software licensing enforcement, it's pushing company's towards a legalised solution, and Open Source is a good investment.

    6. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by rseuhs · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Despite many announcements and press-releases, Microsoft is very strong in developing countries (including south America).

      In industrial countries where labour is expensive, like Germany and Japan, Linux is making inroads on desktops and has already marginalized Windows on Servers:

      Japan
      Germany

      For developing countries, the cost of hiring many people to babysit Windows computers is no problem, but where labour cost is high, the switch to Linux can pay off already in the first year.

      (Yes I know, that contradicts to Microsoft "Windows-TCO-is-low" propaganda, but so is reality.)

    7. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by thrillseeker · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Better average education level?

    8. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by AstroDrabb · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Trade is a two way street. With M$, it is a one
      way street. Japan and the US will always have
      goods/commodities that are traded. Look at all
      the cars Japan sends to the US. Not buying M$
      software will have no effect on the US/Japan
      trade market. I can see your point of how trade
      if vital, however when it comes to software, that
      is a little different. There are also, _many_
      other reason a foriegn govt. doesn't want M$
      junk. There is the issue of trust. M$ was
      allowing the NSA to have a "backdoor" in
      win98/nt/2k.

      http://www.beachcalifornia.com/privacy6.html
      ht tp://www.cypherspace.org/~adam/hacks/ms-nsa-key. html

      How can the Japaneese govt. trust their most
      private data to closed sourced software. They
      don't know what the software is doing or what
      data is being transmitted back to M$.

      --
      If Tyranny and Oppression come to this land,
      it will be in the guise of fighting a foreign enemy. -James Madison
    9. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      MS can then buy out all your countries government bodies and universities to make absolutely sure open source will never ever see the light of day in any place that matters.

      Despite what Microsoft-fanboys told you, this is nonsense.

      Actually most sentences that contain the word "never" are complete and utter nonsense.

      True is:

      MS can then buy out some of your contiries government bodies and universities to make absolutely sure open source will not see the light of day in the next year in most places that matter.

      So what. They can only slow Linux down for a year or two, they can't stop it. This bribery will just attract more and more "we will migrate away" threats. They can't pay everyone to run Windows. *most* users will have to pay, not the other way around

    10. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by jellybear · · Score: 2

      In that case Ricardo's should be that it is good to trade with any country where you have good relations, IF the product isn't overpriced and doesn't suck. If the product is not worth it, then we are speaking not about trade, but about tribute.

    11. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by morgajel · · Score: 2

      china, japan peru, germany, france, etc...
      I'd like to see someone actually build a world map with all the opensource-leaning countries marked.
      that way we can see where it's growing...
      This talks about some of the countries switching....
      I don't know, I guess it would just be nice to have a master list... maybe the EFF could do this?

      --
      Looking for Book Reviews? Check out Literary Escapism.
    12. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by Lemmy+Caution · · Score: 2

      I think Ricardo's evaluation of the situation is completely outdated, and doesn't take into account the advantages of developing economic diversity domestically, nor does it account for differences in technological development. It is not good for a country to export raw materials and import finished ones. And in this case, it may be better to invest in the development of a native software industry.

    13. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by Black+Copter+Control · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Now there's an interesting pattern here: Japan, Germany and Brazil. Conspiracy theories apart, these are countries where three UnitedLinux members (Turbolinux, SuSE and Connectiva) are based. Coincidence?

      Chances are that Columbia is further along the road of officially adopting Open Source than any of those three. Is there a distribution coming out of Columbia??

      Yes it's good to support a distribution that's based in oyour country, but the nice thing about Linux is that -- because it's OS -- you can provide meaningful support for the OS without being the official source of it. If Canada decided to go RedHat or Debian, for example, I could start up a company to provide support. I could either depend on the original distributors for support, or I could do the support myself.

      As an example: a friend of mine is having problems with ftp/xinetd on a redhat installaton. We don't have to wait for RedHat to get around to fixing this problem. I can download the source, insert (or uncomment) debug statements and solve the problem myself.Once it's tracked, I can forward the fix to RedHat to fold into the official release.

      No matter where the distribution is sourced, my company doesn't have to wait on what is financially advantageous to RedHat to get the fix. If RedHat isn't willing to do the work, then the work and, (almost as importantly) the payment for the work, can occur locally.
      Not being entirely dependent on a foreign company for support and being able to keep support payments inside the country are both incentives to any government.

      --
      OS Software is like love: The best way to make it grow is to give it away.
    14. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      Correct. That is why the software is pirated. Now, not all of it is -- somewhere, *someone* had to buy a copy of Chinese Microsoft Windows to get the original copy, but the piracy rates are overwhelming in developing nations.

    15. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by cscx · · Score: 2

      "We envy your large, American penis!"

    16. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by be-fan · · Score: 3, Insightful

      That's really not true. In a lot of countries, trade is very one-sided, and it only hurts the country. Take countries around the Indian subcontinent. In those countries, there is a small upper class with a significant amount of spending power. However, they tend to spend most of their money on foreign products, so instead of the money having a "trickle-down" effect (as Reagen-ites like to call it) it just leaves the economy entirely. On the other hand, those countries don't sell nearly enough to make up for what they buy. As a result, money continually leaves those countries, instead of staying within them. Trade is only helpful when it's really "trade," implying an equal exchange on both sides. This, btw, is one reason (of many) people are afraid of globalization. Countries (especially the US*) and others tend to open up markets for their products, rather than creating mutually benificial two-way relationships.

      *> I'm not saying, btw, that this is a negative intention on the part of these countries. It's just that the US is self-sufficient in most things (food, etc) so we have a lot to sell, but not a whole lot to buy.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    17. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      Most Apache servers run on Linux or BSD, only very few on Solaris and even fewer on Windows.

      Anyway, my main point was that a) Windows is being marginalized on servers and b) because of that, it's not that much of a problem to scrap Windows altogether. Windows is only used for a rather small (and shrinking) minority of servers. Because it is shrinking it wouldn't take long anyway until Windows is de-facto gone on Japanese servers. - Even without the extra effort from the government. The government is not really starting anything new here, they are just accelerating the existing market movement away from Windows and towards Linux and BSD.

      Wether they are switching the remaining legacy Windows computers to Linux or BSD doesn't make much of a difference, Linux and BSD are interchangeable in all aspects that matter.

    18. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by nicodaemos · · Score: 2
      be-fan mumbled ...
      It's just that the US is self-sufficient in most things (food, etc) so we have a lot to sell, but not a whole lot to buy.

      I guess the fact that we don't have a lot to buy is why we consistently have a trade deficit? Bzzzt. Thanks for playing. Johnny can you tell our contestant about our consolation prize ...
    19. Re:Why asian contries in particular? by Citizen+of+Earth · · Score: 2

      It's just that the US is self-sufficient in most things (food, etc) so we have a lot to sell, but not a whole lot to buy.

      Perhaps you're not aware the the US has a significant trade deficit, i.e., it imports more stuff than it exports.

  2. Yet one more buyer tactic ? by BESTouff · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I hope they don't say this just to have Bill or Steve come and make a good deal. These days ...

  3. Shure it will happen... by The+J+Kid · · Score: 5, Funny

    The Ministry of Land, Infrastructure and Transport will set up a panel of experts to study the alternatives and what systems other governments use in the next fiscal year beginning April 1, the newspaper said.

    For once, /. editors might be actually right in saying this won't happen for a long time...

    --
    Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    1. Re:Shure it will happen... by halftrack · · Score: 3, Informative

      Err ... do you know what a fiscal year is. A fiscal year beginning April 1. may very well begin April 1. 2003.

      A fiscal year is a twelve month periode, but not bound to the gregorian year. The term is usually used in economics.

      --
      Look a monkey!
    2. Re:Shure it will happen... by The+J+Kid · · Score: 2, Funny

      Err ... do you know what a fiscal year is. A fiscal year beginning April 1. may very well begin April 1. 2003.

      Hey! So you're the one who gets all huffy when people pull pranks on you on the 1st of April!

      --
      Moderation: +4. Modded 70% Funny and 30% Overrated. 100% Saturated.
    3. Re:Shure it will happen... by jawtheshark · · Score: 2, Informative

      Japanes fiscal years always start on 1 April. It's not an April fools thing at all. I work for a Japanese company, so I know.
      As far as I'm informed even raising classes in school is around that period. They do not change like we do at the end of the summer. They raise in class "in the middle of the year". I might be wrong about this, but I'm sure about the fiscal year.

      --
      Ahhh...the great dumpster continuum. Many a free computer will be found there. -- sowth (748135)
  4. Seems like a ploy... by vjmurphy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Sounds like Japan got wind of all the stuff Microsoft and Gates have been handing out to India and want a piece of the action.

    --
    Vincent J. Murphy
    Spandex Justice
  5. Unicode, unicode, unicode... by ites · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Linux support for Unicode is/will be a major factor in any progress in the Asian market. Windows supports Unicode but it is (frankly) so painful to make work in applications that decent Linux support would be a major selling point.

    --
    Sig for sale or rent. One previous user. Inquire within.
    1. Re:Unicode, unicode, unicode... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      In theory, if Linux sets up Unicode so it supports the 1,980 kanji characters and the entire hiregana and katakana character sets that every Japanese high school graduate should know (this is the Japanese Ministry of Education requirement) it can be done.

      Didn't TurboLinux work like this?

    2. Re:Unicode, unicode, unicode... by Khalid · · Score: 2

      Then the Japanese governement might just contract someone to do it, this will not a big spending for a such huge saving !

    3. Re:Unicode, unicode, unicode... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 5, Informative

      There may be thousands of kanji characters, but those beyond the 1,980 characters that the Ministry of Education requires for passing the final high school exams in Japan are rapidly falling into disuse.

      Newspapers, periodicals and manga (the Japanese equivalent of comic books) published in Japan usually conform with the Ministry of Education standard for ease of printing reasons. In fact, there are articles in Japanese newspapers and periodicals on kanji that are falling into disuse.

    4. Re:Unicode, unicode, unicode... by Neon+Spiral+Injector · · Score: 2

      Turbolinux is a Japanese distro. I would hope they had proper support for their native language.

    5. Re:Unicode, unicode, unicode... by HiThere · · Score: 2

      There was an argument about this on comp.lang.ruby a couple or three months ago. I believe that the basic outcome was that UniCode is still being adapted to handle the extended kanji, but that 32 bit UniCode would be able to do it, with few 64 bit extensions. 32 bit UniCode would be plenty, but there are these other languages that also need to be handled, e.g., SanScrit variants, etc., and when everything was added together it turned out that many of the rarer characters would require a double length extension. But everything in every language would be handleable, with lots of spare space. But that this did mean that there were large blocks of codes that signaled for double wide characters (i.e., 64 bit characters).

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
  6. Bank Reform by zero0w · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Well I don't think it's fair to compare with bank reform, after all. The accumulation of loans and debts have been too deep to be exposed... and the reform will be too embarassing to the Japanese themselves. Dumping Microsoft, on the other hand, at least won't be embarassing. I think the Japanese had put many effort in localizing Linux themselves. Of course others are right that it could be yet another tactic to negotiate a better deal with MS...

  7. Great! by Omkar · · Score: 4, Insightful

    More significant than any possible actual system change is the fact that Japan is actually considering dropping MS. As Linux and open source is taken more and more seriously, maybe people won't fall for the same closed source propaganda anymore. Microsoft may actually have to compete on quality, rather than reliability.

  8. but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    if they dont use windows, how will they see outside?!?

  9. If the Japanese do change.... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...First, they'll have to figure out the cost of changeover and supporting Linux, FreeBSD, etc. Software may be extremely cheap but supporting it could consume quite a lot of IT man-hours.

    Besides, the Japanese are already heavily invested in commercial UNIX systems. I believe many Japanese government ministries are running minicomputers and mainframes built in Japan using UNIX.

    Anyway, the Japanese should check with IBM Japan on this. After all, the biggest commercial supporter of Linux is IBM, and IBM definitely has the resources to do Linux installations from department servers all the way up to supercomputers.

    1. Re:If the Japanese do change.... by thrillseeker · · Score: 2, Insightful
      First, they'll have to figure out the cost of changeover ...

      One must also consider the often overlooked cost of not changing over...

    2. Re:If the Japanese do change.... by kasperd · · Score: 2

      One must also consider the often overlooked cost of not changing over...

      Indeed, and that const is not going to get any smaller by waiting.

      --

      Do you care about the security of your wireless mouse?
    3. Re:If the Japanese do change.... by FreeUser · · Score: 4, Informative

      ..First, they'll have to figure out the cost of changeover and supporting Linux, FreeBSD, etc. Software may be extremely cheap but supporting it could consume quite a lot of IT man-hours.

      Stop parrotting the Microsoft line about cost of use. As one who has worked in IT a very long time, and has administered large Windows networks, UNIX networks, GNU/Linux and FreeBSD networks, I can unequivocably say that the line you are spewing is both deceptive and wrong.

      The cost of maintaining and supporting UNIX systems in general, and GNU/Linux systems in particular, is a tiny fraction of the cost to maintain and support the equivelent number of Windows systems. A tiny fraction. Maintaining 20 Windows NT/2k systems requires one full-time employee (one who is competent ... if you're hiring new MSCEs off the street, double the number ... at least ... and hope for the best, because it is going to be a rocky ride). OTOH a single, competent person can easilly administer two hundred or more GNU/Linux systems in the same number of man-hours.

      The only real cost is the changeover itself ... retraining people on the new system, which costs time and money [a real cost, but one that is in generaly much lower than the propoganda from Redmond would have you believe. Again, they have an agenda, and it isn't your best interests they are concerned with]. Once the changeover is complete, the cost savings in every respect: time (user and administrator man-hours), cost (costs due to downtime are much lower, cost of software is negligable, cost of support is lower, etc.), and deployment logistics (no chasing proprietary, moving targets, no forced upgrades according to the vendor's schedule, not yours, etc.) are immense.

      When Microsoft, or those who parrot them, start talking about how much it is going to cost to support open systems vs. their ever-changing, buggy, insecure, and downright shoddy wares, grab ahold of your wallet and back away, carefully, for they are lying to you outright, almost certainly as a prelude to taking more of your time and money. In any other business it would be called fraud.

      --
      The Future of Human Evolution: Autonomy
    4. Re:If the Japanese do change.... by drinkypoo · · Score: 3, Interesting
      You know, one of the beauties of the current state of open source software on the desktop is that openoffice looks so much like microsoft orifice. Not everything is done in exactly the same way but enough is to where the user has to do relatively little adjusting. The desktops all work in basically the same way these days unless you get into really esoteric themes (they have the same gadgets to control the window that MSWin has, for example, and maybe they have a gnome button instead of a start button, but that's minimal) so there's not so much you have to learn to go from one environment to another as a user. As a "Power User" there's a lot to learn, and those people will want to spend the time at it, so there's a possible loss of productivity there, at least during spin-up :)

      As for supporting it once it's been installed, there are a zillion open source tools that make that far easier than doing it on windows; Windows has a neat administration toolkit but it fails more often than not.

      Since you bring up IBM, IBM bought this company Tivoli a while back which has an enterprise management package which is actually quite good. It allows you to do monitoring, scheduling, hard and soft-ware inventory, software distribution, and a number of other tasks from one centralized point. It runs on many different flavors of Unix plus OS/2 (needed it for a couple big contracts and to appease IBM) and NT. It has supported linux (first unofficially, then officially) for quite a while, is built from a common code base for all platforms, and is a CORBA application. It's also got a good GUI Abstraction system so you can make GUI customizations in exactly the same way across all platforms, and if you pay extra (ha ha) you can get a product which makes it fairly easy to extend the product.

      Tivoli's "competition" is CA Unicenter-TNG. I don't think I need to go into that, ha ha.

      Anyway if they talk to IBM Japan one assumes that IBM will try to sell them Tivoli, which actually doesn't suck and makes the administration of vast numbers of machines much easier.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    5. Re:If the Japanese do change.... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I think you're kind of forgetting that the installation process isn't exactly a trivial process. It means many hours of planning the change, uninstalling the old Windows software on servers and desktops, reinstalling everything under Linux, and configuring/tweaking the whole setup to work correctly.

      Given the state of the Japanese economy lately I don't think corporations are going to attempt this just yet given the high labor costs involved to do the conversion. They'll do it in a few years' time when the economy is better.

    6. Re:If the Japanese do change.... by Shelled · · Score: 2
      ...First, they'll have to figure out the cost of changeover and supporting Linux, FreeBSD, etc.

      It should be emphasized whenever the cost of changeover is discussed that it only affects the short term. It's a one-time cost with a minimal expenditure afterwards for potentially training new users. The cost of using commercial closed software is permanent and, as history clearly demonstrates, spiralling ever higher with decreasing rights for the consumer.

      As more industry moves to free alternatives the cost of support will naturally come down with familiarity. I really don't think all those IT people managing linux servers will have too much trouble extending their expertise to desktops.

  10. How much money? by pr0t3uS · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'm interested how much money will that cost MS. $100 millions for AIDS and $400 millions for fighting Linux like they did in India will certainly not be enough here. And may i add that I'm surprised how much an afternoon hobby of some of us cost that company.

  11. Re:Sure it will happen... by MtViewGuy · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Given Japan's rather poor economy nowadays I really have my doubts if they're willing to tackle the conversion in the near future--mostly because of the large number of IT man-hours needed to do the conversion and support the systems after the conversion.

  12. plan9 is unicode through and through by DrSkwid · · Score: 2

    including the c source code

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
  13. Security is a state of mind, not product ... by LL · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I suppose we shouldn't be surprised at governments decreeing security by fiat (cough*CLipper*cough). Companies have recognised that risk management is key to avoiding many of the problems (e.g. middle office to vet orders/inventory/accounts) yet they consider hiring sysadmins who hold paper certificates as a panacea for electronic security? If you are vitally concerned with information security (e.g. trade secrets), then it is incumbant on cultivating the right culture and habits (logging off away from desk). It might be feasible to leave houses unlocked in small towns where everyone knows everyone else (social sanctions in shunning property violation offenses) but we have deadbolts, invisible IDs and security guards in cities. Similarly security is mainly a systematic process of educating users in using keys (PGP), selecting secureable devices (OpenBSD) or hiring suitable external expertise. Just expecting a single silver bullet of replacing an OS (no matter how good/badly secure it is perceived to be) seems to be on the order of Caute v the tide.

    LL

  14. Getting some industry back? by miffo.swe · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I have always been amazed by how almost every country pays MS tax even if they have both the skills and the industry to make their own software. Migrating to something from your own country would indeed put the money back in your pocket instead of shipping it abroad. Localization isnt just the language, the culture has a significant part of how a computer should interact too. There are big advantages of having your own software industry. The distance from a company in the USA to EU, Japan etc. is big both in culture and in communication. Microsoft develops mainly for the american culture wich shines through the product.

    Having the development in your country should atleast in theory give a much better adapted set of applications that if you buy a ironed out fit_all_suit-everything version like Microsofts products.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
    1. Re:Getting some industry back? by sql*kitten · · Score: 4, Interesting

      have always been amazed by how almost every country pays MS tax even if they have both the skills and the industry to make their own software. Migrating to something from your own country would indeed put the money back in your pocket instead of shipping it abroad.

      You think? Why do you suppose the countries have the same railway gauge, the same electrical outlet voltage, the same basic design for telephones and kitchen sinks? Because doing your own thing doesn't work in the modern world, what matters is interoperability. Spending money in your own country's software is a red herring, because it will sacrifice economies of scale and waste resources on compatibility with other country's software. If a country spends as much on development as MS but only has a local market to sell into, then everyone will be paying a multiple of what MS changes now.

      Consider other industries. Protecting the US steel industry is great for American steel producers, but it kinda sucks for American steel users, like automakers, who're paying over the odds. Subsidizing European farmers is great for European farmers, but it kinda sucks for the average family, whose grocery bill is higher than it should be.

      The distance from a company in the USA to EU, Japan etc. is big both in culture and in communication. Microsoft develops mainly for the american culture wich shines through the product.

      The whole business world is Western-oriented. English is the global language, global corporations stock is listed in Tokyo, New York and London. You can bet that if an Indian businessman and a Japanese sit down to do business, they'll do it in English.

      And Microsoft spend billions on localizing their products to local markets. They aren't an American company any more than Sony is a Japanese country: they both take a global view.

      Having the development in your country should atleast in theory give a much better adapted set of applications that if you buy a ironed out fit_all_suit-everything version like Microsofts products.

      Working the same way everywhere is a strength, not a weakness.

    2. Re:Getting some industry back? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 5, Informative
      Why do you suppose the countries have the same railway gauge, the same electrical outlet voltage, the same basic design for telephones and kitchen sinks?

      I actually thought you were sarcastic until I read till the end. Presuming you're a Brit, but surely,

      • ... you've heard of that 110 V thing they have in US, as opposed to the 220V you have out there in Britain and most Commonwealth countries?
      • ...seen that the rest of Europe (and indeed US) drives on the left?
      • ... noticed that US uses NTSC while Europe uses PAL?
      • ... you haven't travelled by train from Mongolia to Russia. Apparently, there's this border station where they lift the cars above the ground with cranes and manually compress the wheels to fit the narrower Russian gauge.
      The whole business world is Western-oriented. English is the global language, global corporations stock is listed in Tokyo, New York and London. You can bet that if an Indian businessman and a Japanese sit down to do business, they'll do it in English.

      I agree here with your thesis, but a small nitpick; English is definitely the global business language, but if my experience with my Chinese friends is any indication, Asian (ie Korean, Japanese and Chinese) users certainly seem to prefer an interface in their mother tongue rather than a generic English one, even if they read and write okay-ish English. So yes, Microsoft spends quite a lot on internationalisation, but no, this is despite English emerging as the de-facto business language for the world.

      They aren't an American company any more than Sony is a Japanese country: they both take a global view.

      Interesting typo. ;-)

    3. Re:Getting some industry back? by Waffle+Iron · · Score: 5, Funny
      Because doing your own thing doesn't work in the modern world, what matters is interoperability.

      Exactly. That's why we have global standards such as the Metric System. Any country that would use some other system would be at a great disadvantage, and would never be able to achieve any measure of economic success.

    4. Re:Getting some industry back? by rseuhs · · Score: 2
      Spending money in your own country's software is a red herring, because it will sacrifice economies of scale and waste resources on compatibility with other country's software.

      They won't build anything from scratch, they will use KDE/Linux and will maybe modify some parts of KDE - if at all, it's already done for the most part.

      But essentially, you are right. Why should we use unstable, crappy software that runs only on glorified typewriters when we have an OS that runs on everything from mainframes down to embedded systems? Why should we run an insecure and slow OS that runs only on x86, when we already have an OS that runs on almost every CPU in existence?

      Standardizing on Linux makes much more sense than standardizing on Windows.

    5. Re:Getting some industry back? by miffo.swe · · Score: 2

      MS spends pocket money on localization. The only thing i have ever found different besides the language, time and currency is that non english versions are even worse and more buggy than english versions. Countries using linux WONT spend much money since the basis is already there. Only the localisation is left to carry out. Money spent in your country is a better trade balance and that is worth a hell of a lot to countries like Japan. Choosing another product isnt the same as subsidizing either.

      Even if it can seem to a ignorant american that everybody is like them doesnt in any way mean that it is the case. The differences in behaviour and values is very big indeed even if people tries to meet on common ground in business. To expect that everybody should adapt and behaive like us western have lost companies many contracts in foreign countries.

      I am one of those that think computers should eventually adopt how we humans work. To make a human work as a computer is impossible.

      Working the same way everywhere, thats something that really sounds like communism to me. People are different so lets accept that and move on. Who wants to live in a world full of faceless clones?

      --
      HTTP/1.1 400
    6. Re:Getting some industry back? by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 3
      I have always been amazed by how almost every country pays MS tax even if they have both the skills and the industry to make their own software.
      That's because short-term oriented bourgeois run the show. The bourgeois aren't interested in anything that is not immediate. The bourgeois universe is strictly short-term. So, for them it's better to buy an unsuitable read-made "solution" than plan ahead for the future and take more time to develop a better-suited one.
    7. Re:Getting some industry back? by drinkypoo · · Score: 2
      you haven't travelled by train from Mongolia to Russia. Apparently, there's this border station where they lift the cars above the ground with cranes and manually compress the wheels to fit the narrower Russian gauge.

      They have to manually compress the wheels because the automatic compression was buggy. Also, when wheels are compressed, when the train is damaged you lose twice as many wheels. I hear they are considering upgrading to NTTS 5.0 (New Technology Track System) which will remember where those lost wheels went and automatically reattach them for you, but until that upgrade comes through they will have to continue with manual compression as usual.

      --
      "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
    8. Re:Getting some industry back? by The+Cydonian · · Score: 2

      You're probably right; was quoting that off the head, remember reading about it in Time (the Asia-by-Rails edition I think). But the point still stands; there is no uniformity in international track gauge standards.

    9. Re:Getting some industry back? by jellybear · · Score: 3, Funny

      There's no tax on the Metric System!

    10. Re:Getting some industry back? by HiThere · · Score: 2

      ...The bourgeois aren't interested in anything that is not immediate. The...

      I believe that this preference didn't truely become dominant until it was endorsed by the Harvard Business School. I suppose you could pretend that those people aren't aristocrats... to me, however, they seem to have all the bad features of aristocrats, though they do seem to be missing the few redeeming features.

      I think I noticed this change starting during the 1970's. People have always had a tendency toward being shortsighted, but they have generally considered it a failing. Then the Harvard School of Economics (I think) started churning out MBAs that believed that the true value of a company was what it's value was at the next quarterly report. Long term planning was denigrated, and short-sightedness was exhalted. And as far as I can tell, they're still churning them out. And these are the people whose only legitimate social role (or the only one that I see) was to engage in long range planning.

      When I'm feeling paranoid, I suspect deliberate sabotage. Then I try to figure out who benefits. And it looks to me like EVERYONE looses from this ploy.

      --

      I think we've pushed this "anyone can grow up to be president" thing too far.
    11. Re:Getting some industry back? by Shelled · · Score: 2

      The Imperial US appears to interoperate quite well in a Metric world.

    12. Re:Getting some industry back? by kadehje · · Score: 2

      seen that the rest of Europe (and indeed US) drives on the left?

      I understand your point you were trying to make, but I think you wanted to reverse left and right in your argument. That is, in the UK and many Commonwealth countries, they drive on the left, and in North America and continental Europe driving is done on the right.

      As far as I know, the only place in the U.S. where driving on the left is common is Boston and its immediate bordering cities and suburbs. In fact most traffic conventions are ignored or perverted in this area: for instance, red lights in addition to green lights are interpreted to mean "proceed at your current speed through the interesection" while yellow lights mean "please place your accelerator pedal on the floor as you go through this intersection." And everyone except for the police officers around here seems to read speed limits as meters/sec. values instead of MPH or km/h values. :)

    13. Re:Getting some industry back? by jorbettis · · Score: 2

      The guy obviously British, not American. They're like Americans except that they have funny accents and tend to get really physical when their sports teams do poorly.

      I know you just wanted to have a good 'ole anti-american rant, sorry to spoil it with reality. :<

      --

      Jordan Bettis

      ``Wherever you go, there's another stupid sigfile quote.''
  15. Re:consider the source by grub · · Score: 4, Funny


    Whoa!

    Bringing level headed thinking into /. goes against the RFC. Your karma shall be appropriately decimated.

    The Editors

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  16. Re:consider the source by Dot.Com.CEO · · Score: 5, Informative
    Wait until you hear it from Yomiuri or Asahi shimbun-- then bother to burn some brain cells.

    According to the article, the original source of the news is Asahi Shimbun...

    --
    Mother is the best bet and don't let Satan draw you too fast.
  17. Why Linux? by SQL+Error · · Score: 2

    Why does Japan need Linux when they have all these wonderful operating systems that can plug directly into your brain and have cute holographic girls who pop up to inform you when there's a problem?

    It must be true, I saw it on TV!

    And you'd think they'd rebuild Tokyo Tower somewhere else. I mean, it's what, the fourth time this month it's been destroyed by giant monsters.

  18. Steve 'n' Bill Pack Yer Bags..... by dmaxwell · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder what Steve and Bill are going to do with all of those frequent flyer miles? They sure have been racking them up lately haven't they?

    I heard that Walmart will give you a really neat Microtel PC for a quarter million miles.

  19. Re:Security. by miffo.swe · · Score: 5, Informative

    Bear in mind that linux has a strong tradition of unveiling every security risk found no matter how small. Most holes found recently have been found by audits, not by intrusions in linux boxens. The more holes found and fixed the better. We have no idea of just how many holes there are in windows because we cant quip about it if we buy access to the code. An independant audit of windows is impossible. In linux whoever has the time and care can do an audit. Security should be discussed, bashed and nagged about constantly.

    If you look at how many holes that have been found in the core of linux and GNU tools the numbers are in favour for linux by far. Its mostly addons and applications that have holes in them.

    Dont forget that a serious admin can choose secure parts for his server and thus build an pretty much idiot proof server if he has the knowledge relatively easy. In windows thats impossible because "this is what you get, live with it".

    The existence of theese linux boxens with different ftpd, httpd, sshd etc etc gives a diversified net, just like in nature. If you find a hole in an application there is less chance of someone else having the axact same config.

    That said there are a lot to be done in linux security but i still think its a better choice for a server since you have the power yourself and you dont have to wait for someone else to do the job. If its important you can do it yourself and that is worth more than money if your data is sensitive.

    --
    HTTP/1.1 400
  20. Re:Japansese Language Support is needed the most by BigWhale · · Score: 3, Informative

    There is something (ok, better there was at least two years ago) called UniCon and UniKey. Which had support for japanese/korean/china simplified/china traditional characters. I'm not sure who developed this little piece of code, it might be that someone from TurboLinux, not sure tho, but it worked like a charm (for someone that doesn't know anything about this writings... ;> )

    You simply booted kernel in frambuffer, modprobed unicon and you had the ability to display the double-byte characters on your screen. Then for keyboard input you loaded unikey module and there was status line on the bottom where you could by pressing shift-space or ctrl-space or something like that, enter all syllables and the thing also checked if they are valid. You couldn't just write some nonsense...

    So the support looked pretty much ok.. At least for me... :))

    --
    The Sig, the sig
  21. The Asahi Shimbun Japanese version of the article by paku · · Score: 4, Interesting

    http://www.asahi.com/business/update/1116/005.html

  22. Payola by jmorris42 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Doesn't bother me either way. Think it through. If they are looking for the payola that means M$ will be paying every country on the planet in just another year or two. Who would want to be left off the gravy train if all you have to do is say "We might migrate" and millions of dollars flow out of Redmond And they can do it again in a year or two. Bribes only work when you are trying to prevent the appearance of a 'showcase' installation and they are a stopgap measure at best.

    Eventually we will get a few governments converting simply because M$ has succeeded too well at getting the US Govt to lean on poor countries on the 'piracy' issue. Since they CAN'T pay they only really have two choices, get M$ to donate licenses or migrate.

    Longterm M$ needs a better answer than paying their customers to use their product. These tactics are just to buy time to come up with a real strategy. That will be the time for fear. They are now clear of the Justice Dept and are free to act. Expect them to act as soon as Bill G and Monkey Boy come up with a plan they like.

    --
    Democrat delenda est
  23. Won't these stop? by tomstdenis · · Score: 2, Funny

    In other news...

    {insert country name} has decided to move away from Windows to [linux|bsd|QNX|opendos] due to [political|security|economic] reasons. The [OSS|GNU|Richard Stallman] is [very|GNU] happy. ... Move along... nothing to see.

    --
    Someday, I'll have a real sig.
  24. Asian countries except Japan are Microsoft-centric by rseuhs · · Score: 5, Interesting
    Actually most Asian countries are pretty Microsoft-centric.

    Except Japan, where Microsoft is already dead on servers:

    see here

    I take this announcement much more seriously than all the announcements from China lately. The Japanese are able and willing to abandon Windows completely - unlike the Chinese.

  25. Re:Not surprising.. by FooBarWidget · · Score: 2

    What? You didn't know Japan is capitalist?! *gasp*!

  26. Bargaining chips ?? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Is Linux being used by goverments and large clients as a "bargaining chip" to gain consessions
    from M$?

  27. All in one go? by melonman · · Score: 5, Interesting

    > the Japanese government is considering abandoning Microsft Windows

    I struggle with the idea of a whole country, or even a whole administration, changing OS at midnight one Saturday. Surely this sort of thing is going to happen one department at a time, and, probably, one office at a time in a lot of cases. Most government departments have a significant amount of bespoke software that would need tweaking, if not rewriting. Even if the decision was taken on a nationwide basis, I would expect the changeover to take at least the lifetime of the average corporate PC, ie 2-4 years.

    While Linux might be wonderful for a lot of purposes, I can't see all the government graphic designers being thrilled with the current choice of Linux frame-based DTP packages, for example. So you are going to have Windows (and, probably) Mac ghettos for a long long time.

    And I think we can assume that the security people at least would like to be able to run all the programs the people they are spying on can run...

    --
    Virtually serving coffee
    1. Re:All in one go? by subsolar2 · · Score: 2
      > the Japanese government is considering abandoning Microsft Windows
      I struggle with the idea of a whole country, or even a whole administration, changing OS at midnight one Saturday. Surely this sort of thing is going to happen one department at a time, and, probably, one office at a time in a lot of cases. Most government departments have a significant amount of bespoke software that would need tweaking, if not rewriting. Even if the decision was taken on a nationwide basis, I would expect the changeover to take at least the lifetime of the average corporate PC, ie 2-4 years.
      I remember reading somewhere about sweden swiching from driving on the left to the right side ... one night changing all the signs, lights, etc. and everybody starting driving on the right. From what I heard the switchover was pretty painless. Of course it took several years of planning up-front to pull this off. With enough planning you can pull-off just about any change.

      subsolar

  28. Re:consider the source by rseuhs · · Score: 5, Informative
    Wait until you hear it from Yomiuri or Asahi shimbun-- then bother to burn some brain cells.

    Would it make any difference for an illiterate like you?

    From the article, the first paragraph:

    The Japanese government is reviewing the possibility of no longer using Microsoft Corp's Windows operating system as part of its plans to boost computer security within the government, the Asahi Shimbun newspaper reported Saturday.

  29. Oshiri kara hanashimasuka? by wirefarm · · Score: 5, Informative

    There's 1945 kanji known as Joyu (sp?) that are the bare minimum needed for literacy - those are the ones you learn through high school and the ones that they pretty much stick to in newspapers and official documents. Plus in Manga, of course, where they have a larger percentage of 'semi-literate' and younger readers. Believe it or not, Japanese literature actually does get a bit deeper than this - they have books and magazines that use lots of difficult characters that must be supported in the fonts and character sets.
    After the initial 1945, there's another 18,000 or so that, while less common, are certainly not 'falling into disuse' - some percentage are only used for names and such nowadays, buy that pretty much makes them a requirement. After all, how do you sell someone a computer incapable of displaying his name or the name of a polititian? Sure, you could spell it out in katakana, but that's just lame.

    It gets trickier, because there are several encodings in common usage, such as JIS, Shift-JIS and EUC, all which must be supported in any viable operating system. As far as I know, Unicode is a latecomer and not really an important player yet in Japan. It does show promise, though. Until then, systems will have to transparently guess which encoding to use. One of the first words you learn in Japanese when dealing with DBCS information systems is Mojibake - garbage rendering of text.

    The good news is that Linux does a great job of handling all of the encoding issues. I use it daily for this stuff and it certainly surpasses anything I've seen on Windows, though IMHO, Mac is a bit slicker. (No surprise there.)

    As an aside, I was once venting frustration to a friend while studying kanji - "When are the Japanese going to give up this crap and just use roman letters like the rest of the world??"
    "Never!" she replied, "Because once you've learned kanji, it's too fscking convenient!"

    If you're really interested in this stuff, do a Google for 'Jim Breen', the professor from Monash who is possibly the leading expert in the field - he's also a hell of a nice guy.

    --
    -- My Weblog.
    1. Re:Oshiri kara hanashimasuka? by wirefarm · · Score: 2

      BTW, someone mentioned earlier that Kanji is spelled out using Katakana. This is wrong. All Kanji are spelled out using Hiragana, as becomes clear when taking a look at Furigana, which are simply Hiragana, and show the pronounciation of a character of Kanji.

      Actually you could use either - a good rule to follow is that if you would put the word in italics, use katakana. It's used for foreign words, too, the same way you would italicize a foreign word in English. Once a foreign word has been in the language long enough, say 300 years, it becomes like a native word and you use hiragana, but even this is rare and somewhat debatable. I've heard that this is the case with the word for 'Thank You', 'Arigato', which is always spelled out in hiragana, even though it probably came from the Portugese word 'Obrigato' (spelling?).
      Cheers,
      Jim

      --
      -- My Weblog.
    2. Re:Oshiri kara hanashimasuka? by achurch · · Score: 2

      Once a foreign word has been in the language long enough, say 300 years, it becomes like a native word and you use hiragana, but even this is rare and somewhat debatable. I've heard that this is the case with the word for 'Thank You', 'Arigato', which is always spelled out in hiragana, even though it probably came from the Portugese word 'Obrigato' (spelling?).

      This is so far wrong . . . The word "arigato" (ããSãOEãã) is derived from the adjective "arigatai" (æoeãSé£ã), which literally means "unlikely/difficult to exist" (aru "to be, to exist" + -gatai "difficult to X") but has the connotation of "appreciated, thankful" (is "thankful" a word in English? I forget, but you get the idea). In fact, you can even write it using kanji (æoeé£ã), and many people do so in formal letters and the like. 100% Japanese, since before the Japanese even know Portugal existed.

    3. Re:Oshiri kara hanashimasuka? by wirefarm · · Score: 2

      I stand corrected.
      As I said, it was something I had heard and thought interesting. It made sense at the time, as I know that the Portugeuse were active here in the 1600's.
      Thanks -
      Jim

      --
      -- My Weblog.
  30. Re:Linux rules windoze sucks by FooBarWidget · · Score: 2

    You know, it is because of the small number of people like you that most Windows user see the Linux community (as a whole) as a bunch of anti-Microsoft elitists!!

  31. Hehe... by HungWeiLo · · Score: 3, Funny

    Well, in Japan corporate culture, it is a bad thing to be put in a window seat in a company... Rimshot.

    --
    There are a huge number of yeast infections in this county. Probably because we're downriver from the bread factory.
  32. Thank you very much! by Idou · · Score: 3, Interesting

    For the last couple years I have been depressed about Japan's response to Linux, because I read somewhere that MS had 90% of their webservers . . . your link proves that whatever I read was either FUD, really OLD news, or a stupid misunderstanding. Today is a good day!!!

    Sorry, but who cares what the U.S. thinks about Linux and Open Source. Next year I am moving to Japan for good this time and am never looking back!

    btw, have you tried Mandrake 9.0!? I just installed it on my main system today and it is EXCELLENT (great Japanese suppor)!

    --
    Sdelat' Ameriku velikoy Snova!
  33. Re:consider the source ( wolf ) by Mongoose · · Score: 2

    I read JapanToday has much as I read /.

    Sure it's liberal as hell just like western news outlets, and does cater to westerners in and out of Japan since it's in _English_. However like /. what it loses in transmission of ideas it makes it up with posting from individuals and being entertaining... and we all know the Pop Vox pics of j-girl hotties beats /. anyday.

  34. Fighting Linux ? by Quazion · · Score: 2

    You mean Cancer i hope.

  35. Re:consider the source by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 2

    nikko wrote:

    > Wait until you hear it from Yomiuri or Asahi
    > shimbun-- then bother to burn some brain cells.

    Exactly what part of "the Asahi Shimbun newspaper reported Saturday" did you not get? Japan Today is quoting an Asahi Shimbun article.

    Why is the parent at score 5 if they didn't even bother to read the article?

    "At this moment, it has control of systems all over the world.
    And...we can't do a damn thing to stop it."
    Miyasaka, "Godzilla 2000 Millennium" (Japanese version)

  36. Linux - security - no. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Some people actually believe that Linux is more secure than Windows. How sad.

    http://www.theregister.co.uk/content/55/28118.ht ml

  37. Of course they are moving away from MS! by teamhasnoi · · Score: 3, Funny
    Windows doesn't support 50,000 button keyboards with 27 shift keys.

    You'd think that the guys who came up with the shortest poems in the world would have been all about a smaller character set.

  38. Re:They're all moving to Apple! by Melantha_Bacchae · · Score: 4, Insightful

    Cool site. Apple has great computers (I'm using one now), and a operating system that is a thing of beauty and a joy forever. It pleases me greatly to see any Apple growth in any market.

    That said, Linux gives Japan one thing not even Apple can: a customizable operating system for all that cool Japanese hardware. Sharp has been one of the first Japanese companies to realize this, and go with it, producing the Linux based Zaurus PDA. That very same Japan Today website also contained an article about Sharp and IBM teaming up to provide some kind of wireless, Linux based, services.

    Sharp's successes and this decision by the Japanese government might encourage other Japanese computer hardware makers to throw off the Microsoft yoke. Linux would give them more room to innovate (unlike Microsoft who issues yearly hardware specs on what it wants PCs to be that year) while connecting them with open standards to other versions of Linux and other operating systems from around the world.

    "At this moment, it has control of systems all over the world.
    And...we can't do a damn thing to stop it."
    Miyasaka, "Godzilla 2000 Millennium" (Japanese version)

  39. Pronouncing Linux in Japan.... by Rai · · Score: 4, Funny

    I know this is bad taste, but I wonder if they'll pronounce it "Rinux."

    Yes, yes. I'm the insensitive clod of this topic. No offense intended :)

  40. Technical reasons for avoiding Microsoft by Futurepower(R) · · Score: 2


    Most people don't realize the strong technical reasons why an organization would want to consider other operating systems. Here is an article which gathers facts and links: Windows XP Shows the Direction Microsoft is Going.

  41. Following in India's footsteps. by mrtrumbe · · Score: 2, Funny
    Japan: Yeah, we're giving up Windows. All Linux from here on out.
    Bill: Wait! Would one...hundred...billion...dollars change you mind.
    Japan: Ehhhhhh-xcellent.

    Taft

  42. Not about "security"--about money... by waltc · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This is a beancounter's idea, obviously--someone who thinks Linux is "free" *chuckle*...

  43. Re:Open Source for security reasons? by Cheese+Cracker · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It's not hard to find exploitable servers of any OS, be it Linux, BSD, Solaris or even Windows in Japan - the Far East's insecurity is legendary.

    The point is, you can't expect any OS to be secure if you don't keep up with the latest security patches.


    Probably true, but standardizing on Linux has its advantages in the long run. They can build up their own Linux development and support, and thereby tailor the security themselves instead of relying on someone else to do it for them.

    They would be better off using the money to train their admins to some degree of competence.

    They'll come up to speed... trust me. People laughed at the Japanese doing cars in the 60s and 70s... who's making some of the best cars around nowadays?

  44. Re:Asian countries except Japan are Microsoft-cent by rseuhs · · Score: 2

    Most of the "other" webservers are Roxen server which was open-sourced recently.

  45. Re:Asian countries except Japan are Microsoft-cent by sheldon · · Score: 2, Informative

    Internet exposed web servers make up perhaps 10% of the total server market.

    I don't see how you can reasonably make any conclusions based on the statistics you just posted.

  46. good deal or not ... by Lewis+Mettler,+Esq. · · Score: 2

    You can say whatever you wish. But, if Bill and Steve have to show up all the time to permit a lower sales price (special deal), Microsoft is in trouble. If Bill or Steve were worth their salaries, the price would go up when they visit not down.

    Regardless of the reason, Microsoft is beginning to feel the price pressure. And, it will never let up. Just remember for Microsoft to discount 10% on price is about the same as losing a 10% share of the market. At least on day one it is.

    If you combine a price decrease (or special concession) with a loss in market share the impact can be significant. Remember in most markets Microsoft can not increase sales by lowering the price. About all they can do is put off the loss in market share. But, that will not be forever.

    Besides price is not the only disadvantage facing the monopolist. "Bad will" also plays a role. As does lack of trust. And, the more that the US Government and Microsoft get together in secret deals the faster all other companies will flee.

    One of the stupidest things the DOJ has done is to insert itself into the excuses for Microsoft to refuse to turn over API information, etc. Every government elsewhere can read that and see that there is a secret deal between Microsoft the monopolist (who gets enormous political favors from the US) and the federal government (who should not be trusted by other governments anyway).

    What happened to the "trust but verify" philosophy?

    The DOJ simply should never be making secret deals with any company much less a convicted monopolist.

    The DOJ is run by idiots.

    --
    NexuSys - Linux support by the best
  47. Open Source is Better for national security by Eric+Damron · · Score: 2

    I think that open source is a wise choice for any non-US country. Look at the number of spying tools were found on the Boeing jet that we sold to the Chinese.

    I don't see how any country that is concerned with its internal security could use any closed source OS without worrying about such shenanigans.

    --
    The race isn't always to the swift... but that's the way to bet!
  48. Re:Asian countries except Japan are Microsoft-cent by schon · · Score: 3, Informative

    Most of the "other" webservers are Roxen server which was open-sourced recently.

    Recently? Roxen (and Caudium, which was forked from it a couple of years ago) has always been released under the GPL.

  49. You are missing the point. by jotaeleemeese · · Score: 2, Insightful

    The auditability of closed source software is nil.

    Which goverment can say with a straight face that any close dource solution is safe, secure, etc.?

    Not so with OSS where all is transparent. And democracy is all about transparency, accountability and auditability.

    Goverments should not be using closed source software. They should demand to see the source.

    --
    IANAL but write like a drunk one.
  50. Re:What are you talking about? by wirefarm · · Score: 2

    The anecdote I related was almost 4 years ago when I was just beginning to learn to read Japanese - during a lesson that was pretty frustrating... I mentioned it because I found it to be true. You can pack a hell of a lot of meaning into a single kanji. (Ever wonder why browsing the web in Japanese on a cellphone can be a lot more tolerable than in english? It's because Kanji is about 5 times more efficient in conveying meaning.)
    I've kept with the studying and I'm not bad at reading it now, to the point where I can extract a lot more meaning from a chunk of text with kanji than I could if the same text were written in romaji or kana, so, I may still be an asshole, but not for the reasons you mentioned...

    Cheers,
    Jim in Tokyo

    --
    -- My Weblog.
  51. Re:Asian countries except Japan are Microsoft-cent by dcavanaugh · · Score: 3, Interesting

    "The Japanese are able and willing to abandon Windows completely - unlike the Chinese."

    Do not underestimate the Chinese. Piracy is still rampant in China, and you can still get any M$ product you want for $4 per CD. On the other hand, M$ is getting serious about "product activation", BSA love letters, and other anti-piracy initiatives. The Chinese may have been willing to tolerate the security and stability issues at $4/product, but full sticker price is another matter entirely.

  52. silly seaman. by twitter · · Score: 2
    ...I'm surprised how much an afternoon hobby of some of us cost that company.

    What cost? Bribes are always made with the expectation of greater returns. In any case M$ would not have a thing to worry about making them if they spent their research dollars on QC instead of stupid schemes to own all the world's computers and the information on them. If they did that, perhaps their "products" could compete with your hobby. Such is life, that greedy people never do well in the long run. As it is, they have ruined their reputation and this is what will cost them.

    Sianaura, Bill.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  53. yah! consessions. I like peanuts. by twitter · · Score: 2
    Is Linux being used by goverments and large clients as a "bargaining chip" to gain consessions
    from M$?

    Sure they do, how else do you think the US DoJ put to gether such a stunning setlement? Just think of all the "consessions" Japan will be able to wring with this. They might get to run their software as they please, look at snapshots of M$ source code, modify that code and share their modifications, Errr, wait a minute!

    Ever thought that people elsewhere in the world would just have noticed that M$ is unstable, insecure, the EULA says they can look at your data and upload any old program they chose, and costs load of money too? They might have also noticed this little thing called free software that works better. Hmmmm, even M$'s own survey showed that people around the world both know about and think well of free software.

    The damb cracked two years ago, what you are seeing now are chunks of M$ junk washed away in the flood. M$ is not dying, they are dead and don't know it. The fools are still openly planning stupid junk like Paladium, DRM and in general proving everyone's most paranoid dream about their intentions to be a underestimate. Germany, Japan, the EU, India, Wall Street, Bankers, IBM all have something in common.

    --

    Friends don't help friends install M$ junk.

  54. Linux is widespread in Japan - here are some stats by dwheeler · · Score: 4, Interesting
    There's actually quite a bit of Linux use in Japan. A Japanese paper called the Linux white paper 2003 found that overall use of GNU/Linux jumped from 35.5% in 2001 to 64.3% in 2002 by Japanese corporations, and GNU/Linux was the most popular platform for small projects. It also found that 49.3% of IT solution vendors support Linux in Japan, as well as a number of other interesting statistics.

    If you don't read Japanese, you can find a summary of interesting results in Why Open Source Software / Free Software (OSS/FS)? Look at the Numbers! ; look for the text starting with "A Japanese survey found".

    --
    - David A. Wheeler (see my Secure Programming HOWTO)
  55. Brilliant Story Positioning by serutan · · Score: 2

    Just a couple slots away from the article about dominoes falling. Sweet!

  56. Unicode is excellent for Japanese by GCP · · Score: 2

    Just ask any Japanese engineer worth his weight in rice and they will tell you that Unicode does not satisfy the needs of Japanese text processing.

    And they'll be wrong, unless they mean every need, in which case nothing does.

    Most of what you're hearing is uninformed urban legend, because most Japanese engineers are no better informed about Japanese text issues than most Western engineers are about Western text issues.

    There are numerous issues with Unicode not providing fair ground for Japanese specific Kanji.

    None of much importance compared to the issues in legacy Japanese encodings. Unicode is a dramatic improvement over any common Japanese alternative, which is why it has so much support from Japan's own national representatives on international standards committees.

    --
    "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
    1. Re:Unicode is excellent for Japanese by GCP · · Score: 2

      Sorry about my delay in replying, but maybe you'll see this anyway.

      Since I pretty much agree with everything you said in this posting, our opinions may not differ significantly.

      One nit I would pick is that while most Japanese teams have a copy of the "JIS manual" you mention, that doesn't mean that they have any deep understanding of the *issues*. US teams have CP1252 charts and MacRoman charts and Latin-1 charts and yet few have much understanding of the Euro sign "issue".

      It's a "nit" because who can be said to have a "deep understanding" is a pretty fuzzy question, but the normal complaints I hear about Unicode in Japan make it clear that their (fading) aversion to Unicode comes about mainly due to misunderstanding and urban legend.

      I've had so many conversations with Japanese who tell me that Shift-JIS fonts are better for Japanese than Unicode fonts, then they're surprised when I point out that "Shift-JIS fonts" *are* Unicode fonts (well, almost always).

      Or those who rail against "han unification" without realizing it was invented in Japan to solve Japanese text processing problems...

      Or those who talk about Unicode not having the characters needed for Japanese, but when I ask which official Japanese character sets, the characters chosen by the Japanese for themselves, are not either already in Unicode or scheduled for inclusion, the best I've ever heard them come up with has been either a massive glyph list one guy is working on or the Morohashi dictionary, both of which have been rejected by Japan's own standards agency.

      I just don't think that the frequency with which you hear Japanese spouting off about the inadequacy of Unicode should be taken too seriously.

      --
      "Those who have never entered upon scientific pursuits know not a tithe of the poetry by which they are surrounded."
  57. Re:HAR HAR HAR! YOU SAID M$!!! by jmorris42 · · Score: 2

    Nah, everybody knows what it means so it is a pretty effective shorthand. And considering the latest news (that everyone with a functioning braincell already knew) about their 85% margins on Windows and 75+% on Office that pretty much sums them up. They are pretty much a cash machine.

    --
    Democrat delenda est