Slashdot Mirror


The Darker Side of Computer Recycling

Makarand writes "We all know that with electronics it is very difficult to be green. We leave our computer waste in the recyle bin lest dangerous chemicals like lead and mercury seep into our landfills. The more dedicated environmentalists make a trip to the local recyling center where they may be asked around to pay around $15-$30 to recycle their old PCs. But guess what -- these 'recyclers' merely ship 50-80% of this stuff overseas. The Mercury News has a report on this ugly side of the PC industry which merely exports the recycling problems instead of solving them."

45 of 308 comments (clear)

  1. I Have But One Word for Computer Recycling: by cliffy2000 · · Score: 5, Funny

    eBay.

    1. Re:I Have But One Word for Computer Recycling: by Elbereth · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The schools don't want it. They buy Dell/IBM/Compaq PCs and have support contracts with those manufacturers. They also would also need to buy a license for Windows XP. Your license is non-transferable. What do they do when your PC's memory goes faulty? Who do they contact for a replacement? The fly-by-night Pricewatch vendor you bought it from? What are they going to use your Pentium 133 for, anyways? They're not going to be doing any physics simulations on it. You want to explain to them why they should make this the lone Linux PC in their entire computer lab? Especially after they see how horribly slow KDE runs with 32MB RAM and a 2MB video card that doesn't have XF86 4.x drivers...

    2. Re:I Have But One Word for Computer Recycling: by voodoo1man · · Score: 3, Interesting
      The above comment is only too true. I've studied in NY regents and Alberta public schools, and the technology situation truly is sad.

      The tech spending is entirely controlled by the highed level Board of Ed. goons, whose pockets are no doubt well buttered by the computer companies. I don't know what the situation is now, but 5 years ago NY public schools could only buy/accept Macs (I think this was largely for support reasons, and in that case it did make some sense). At least they were thrifty about it - my middle school still used Apple IIs for the word-processing class.

      In Calgary, Alberta it's downright horrible. The schools don't take anything less than Pentium 166s, and put fresh copies of Windows 95 on them. They have huge contracts with Compaq (each school buys a few dozen new PCs a year which it doesn't need) and that Bess censorware company for providing a filtered proxy. Support for anything took literally months, the proxies were incredibly slow, and almost always in a half-broken state. They also ran their central record-keeping systems on NT - these always crashed every couple of weeks (at least the staff got extra coffee breaks.)

      The biggest reason behind this is the inept staff and management public schools have - the only kind they can afford. It's really too bad.

      --

      In the great CONS chain of life, you can either be the CAR or be in the CDR.

    3. Re:I Have But One Word for Computer Recycling: by GnuAge · · Score: 3, Informative

      The schools don't want it...What are they going to use your Pentium 133 for, anyways?

      In the SF Bay Area you can call Project Infomed, which will send some poor schlemiel to collect your old Pentium or better computer and even give you a receipt so you can take a tax deduction. We send the donated machines to Cuba, where they are used by healthcare workers to access medical databases and research, locate supplies, communicate etc. Though we have a new license application under review, for the moment the Departments of Commerce, State and Defense won't let us send anything faster than a Pentium 200, since putting that much raw computing power in the hands of Cuban doctors could endanger the security of the Free World. Right now I'd say that the average machine that we are sending is about a Pentium 120 with 32 MB of RAM and a 850 MB hard drive. They will probably continue using these old boxes for many years. So far I believe we have sent about 2,500 computers to the island.

      We can also use anyone who can volunteer a little time to twirl a screwdriver or schlep hardware at our regularly scheduled work sessions in San Jose and Oakland.

  2. A friend of mine from China by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    has a cousin who has some unpleasant health problems from living in a contaminated area where they do a lot of CPU recycling. It's a real disaster -- her cousin could tell you some stories, including the time that she found a piece of circuit board in her dinnertime meal (!).

    1. Re:A friend of mine from China by user32.ExitWindowsEx · · Score: 5, Funny

      She wasn't having a bag of chips, was she? /me ducks.

      --
      "Evil will always triumph because good is dumb." -- Dark Helmet
    2. Re:A friend of mine from China by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah right, your story is complete BS.

      It makes no sense .. how can a peice of circuit board make it into her meal?


      Many ways. For example, it could be carried by a swallow.

  3. Basement by isorox · · Score: 5, Funny

    /me turns head and looks at pile of old cases, containing semi-working bits and bobs.

    $30 a piece? Thats more then it'd cost to send them to a random address with no return address on.

    MPAA anyone?

    1. Re:Basement by packeteer · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You know they are goign to toss it on the side of the road somewhere else in an even more broken situation... Now lead and othe chemicals are in the ground thanks to oyur lazyness.

      I support the idea of putting a small tax on new computers sold to pay for recycling the old ones. As much as it sucks it the only way we can pull this off.

      --
      unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
    2. Re:Basement by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      the only problem with this is that taxes with a purpose for the most part very rarely do the intended job. Look at the lotto's education tax for example.

      With all the billions in money the lotto has brought in - our schools in california are dilapidated pieces of shit.

      I agree that the companies that make the crap should be responsible for ensuring that they get cleaned up properly - a "tax" (meaning that its actually legislated as a tax) is not the solution.

      Rather the legislation should require the actual companies (like Intel) to start REAL clean-up programs and actually build facilities for reclaiming the toxics in their machines.

      An the consumers should get *CREDIT* for returning machines to these facilities. not fucking taxed money that isnt going to do a damn thing in the first place.

    3. Re:Basement by Rebel+Patriot · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Rather the legislation should require the actual companies (like Intel) to start REAL clean-up programs and actually build facilities for reclaiming the toxics in their machines.

      What makes it Intel, or AMD's responsability to do this? Why should they be shouldered with the burden of disposing of YOUR waste properly. Just because they built the product does not mean they are responsible for how it is disposed. If the government is going to require a product to be recyced, the government needs to handle that itself.

      To say that Intel should have to build facilities to see to it that electronic goods they may have made are properly disposed of is akin to saying that Coca~Cola and Pepsi need to build aluminum recycling plants nation-wide, or that the New York Times and Chicago Tribune et al should be forced to build paper recycling plants nationwide. This is unfair and ludicrous.

      Where does it stop? If I am a small buisiness owner making $30,000 a year profit manufacturing widgets that use mercury, should I be forced to bild a wdiget recycling plant? I would much rather see some sort of tax impossed on new PC sales to have PC drop-off places around the nation. I for one cannot recycle my old PCs 'cause I have no earthly idea where the hell to send them. This is never mentioned to anyone who buys a PC, and down here in the Georgia swamps, most people can't afford to ship a heavy metal box hal-way across the State or country.

      --
      Slackware forever. Honestly, what else would you trust when it absolutely positively has to be stable, secure, and easy
    4. Re:Basement by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Why should they be shouldered with the burden of disposing of YOUR waste properly"

      MY waste. You need to re-think your whole frame of reference here. First of all do you know how toxic chip fabs are?

      Do you even have any idea how many superfund toxic cleanups there are in silicon valley? Do you know where the most toxic (based on superfund site density) place in the country is.

      It is not MY waste. You think that just because i buy a computer from them - that now the toxic product that THEY created is now solely my responsibility? "sorry buddy - to bad you have cancer. You bought the machine - you opened the EULA. Its not our fault that your water table is polluted to the point of being undrinkable" Why is it the responsibilty of any company to be even remotely concerned with the full LIFE CYCLE of a product they create.

      You my friend are clearly an idiot if you think that the full life cycle of any product simply ends when a company either sells that product or just decides to no longer support it.

      Since you have the view that nobody should care - especially not the companies that made the product in the first place - you should have to live on land that gets the benefit having all this crap dumped onto it.

      And yes - I have long though that all container companies should have to be at least partly involved in the responsibility of recycling their products - like coke and pepsi. However the significant difference here is that toxicity factor of the components under discussion - and if you are to naive to notice or even admit the difference - you should refrain from participating.

      thankyouverymuch.

    5. Re:Basement by _ph1ux_ · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Another thing I wanted to point out was that I was expressing concern with the idea of a tax specifically.

      meaning; that if we realyl want something to be done about this issue - the legislation should stipulate the cost recovery method in a means other than what is traditionally thought of as a tax. Taxes have been written so much and so many times that the tax writers are experts in wording and creating them so as to provide a miriad of loopholes which serve the purpose of siphoning off the money gained from the tax towards uses that are in no way related to the object of the tax in the first place.

      Of course in implementation the costs would be exactly a "tax" in that it will be a cost passed onto the consumer (given the cost of hardware at this point - I think we all can afford a little increase in the cost of a component) - however the major difference is that the money collected by this "tax" would be so strictly watched and regulated that maybe something would ACTUALLY GET FUCKING DONE in this country - and the world would start to actually be a better place due to the computer industry rather than in spite of it.

      It would be nice if there were a regulatory body that could over see this - but given the tendancy for corruption (ICANN) in computing regulatory bodies - it would be best if we could have some people who know how to actually write shit that works come up with something that has the least chance of being abused.

      Remember when Energy Star was actually trying to mean something. When was the last time you saw an Energy star logo as a valid amrketing push.

  4. What's even scarier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Is how China is using the computers we ship over there!

    It turns out they have a huge cyborg program in the works, and are literally turning their excess population in human/computer hybrids! They saw they Borg on Star Trek and were apparently quite impressed with their efficiency. Watch out! The Chinese Borg Army will be coming very soon!

    1. Re:What's even scarier... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

      I am 7 of 8.999932. You will be assimilated. Resistance is A Fatal Exception has occurred at 0000:00000000 in win.exe. The current application will be terminated.

      * Press any key to terminate the current application.
      * Press CTRL+ALT+DELETE to restart your computer. You will lose any unsaved information in all applications.

      Press any key to continue _

  5. BBC news links by slug359 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Graphic article/pictures from the BBC:
    article and in pictures

  6. what a great idea... by Quasar1999 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Speaking of shipping problems somewhere else... can we ship the RIAA execs there too?

    --

    ---
    Programming is like sex... Make one mistake and support it the rest of your life.
  7. Exporting == solving by ObviousGuy · · Score: 3, Flamebait

    We have a problem. It is pollution of our local environment by decomposing (!) computer parts. The solution is to get rid of those parts so that our own environment is not hurt.

    Easiest solution: ship it somewhere else.

    The countries that we ship these things to are HAPPY to take them. It makes them money and it gives them spare computer parts.

    If you think that taking away another country's means of existence is the right thing to do, perhaps it's time to sign up at your local anarchist hovel for the spring trip to the WTO meeting.

    Trade that is welcomed by both parties is not bad. Just because third party interlopers feel the need to stamp and huff about it, it doesn't mean that it should be done away with.

    --
    I have been pwned because my /. password was too easy to guess.
    1. Re:Exporting == solving by Ben+Escoto · · Score: 5, Insightful
      Trade that is welcomed by both parties is not bad. Just because third party interlopers feel the need to stamp and huff about it, it doesn't mean that it should be done away with.
      And if your child was trying to chew on nails / [something pointy] for fun, would you let it find out for itself if it was harmful, or would you suggest a few alternatives for it?
      Your comparison to children is telling, because your argument, like many anti-trade arguments, rests on paternalism. It's common for first worlders to assume that they know better than the democratic governments elected by the people they are trying to help, or even the people themselves. Surprise, intelligence isn't limited to the rich. Poor people are often perfectly capable of evaluating the pros and cons of their own choices.
    2. Re:Exporting == solving by GT_Alias · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Hmmm....so I guess you didn't look at this.

      Happy to take them? I'd wager the general population has zero choice in the matter, it's the people who actually collect and keep the money that are "HAPPY" to make the trade. And its the people who take the money who don't give a damn how much mercury or lead seeps into the same water supply that drinking water is drawn from.

      To make a blanket statement that these country's people are happy to take this junk from us -- for spare parts !?!?! -- is being incredibly ignorant of the problems this "welcomed" trade is causing for the general population.

    3. Re:Exporting == solving by terraformer · · Score: 3, Interesting

      No, in fact all it is doing is taking our problem and making it someone elses. I have two degrees in ES and have some knowledge on the subject. What happens is we send our old crap over to asia where a bunch of dirt poor people who pick through piles of smashed electronics for the precious metals. These piles are generally uncovered and on top of dirt. The process of smashing the electronics allows rain water to filter through the piles sending a toxic coctail leeching into the ground water. For the priviledge of having their ground water contaminated for centuries, they are paid pennies a day.
      Exporting != solving.

      --
      Who are you? The new #2 Who is #1? You are #617565. I am not a number, I am a free man! Muhahaha.
    4. Re:Exporting == solving by gavinR · · Score: 5, Insightful
      It's common for first worlders to assume that they know better than the democratic governments elected by the people they are trying to help, or even the people themselves. Surprise, intelligence isn't limited to the rich. Poor people are often perfectly capable of evaluating the pros and cons of their own choices.

      While I agree with your assessment of his tone, you are mistaken in implying that "poor people" are the ones making the decisions regarding international trade. "Poor people" are not deciding to import the toxic electronic waste of first-world, but they are the ones who will be living and working with it. "The rich" who actually make these decisions will be far, far away.

      The poster's analogy should have been something more along the lines of "If you saw an adult feeding nails (or other sharp things) to a child, should you do something about it?" While the comparison may use paternalistic terms, I don't believe that invalidates the analogy.
    5. Re:Exporting == solving by NanoProf · · Score: 4, Informative

      Umm, mainland China is not democratic.

      --
      Curtains for windows?
  8. Speaking of recycling... by Wakko+Warner · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I remember reading about this here in August.

    - A.P.

    --
    "Remember when the U.S. had a drug problem, and then we declared a War On Drugs, and now you can't buy drugs anymore?"
  9. Obviously this is not an ideal solution.. by EvilCabbage · · Score: 4, Interesting

    .. but what is?

    What can we do to eliminate the problem, or, at the very least, tone the issue down a little?

    The hardware in question is either too far beyond repair, or to old to serve a useful purpose, so is it best to approach this from a toxic waste disposal point of view, slap an extra $100 onto the cost of your new PC, and treat old computing gear like medical/chemical waste?

  10. One Big Freaking Missile by Flamesplash · · Score: 4, Funny

    I've always said we should just pack our garbage into a missile and fire it at the sun, and it seems like an even better solution now.

    Some may say that the problems of the missile exploding and reigning fire and computers upon people is bad, but just think about it. If that thing explodes over your neighborhood. BAM! Computers for everone on the block.

    --
    "Not knowing when the dawn will come, I open every door." - Emily Dickinson
  11. There is Money to Be Made by pgrote · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Nothing has changed since the last time this was brought up or the time before that.

    People need to understand that the countries that these parts are shipped to either A) Want them. B) Don't care about the damage they do.

    I read the article, but there are no new insights into this at all. Take this quote for instance:

    "``I don't know yet if I like this work,'' said Li, 30, who had been on the job about one month. ``But back home there are no jobs. There is no money. There is nothing to do.''"

    That is the plain and simple truth to this. There is a market for this crud. They are making money by doing it. Is it the most healthy way of doing it? More than likely not, but it is a way to make money.

    Someone needs to publish that link about the place in India that takes apart oil tankers. Big Karma boost in that.

  12. It's a bigger problem by drmofe · · Score: 4, Informative

    Here's another part of the problem:

    Incremental upgrading is part of the drive that keeps the marketing-PR-coup of Moore's Law running.

    I just finished a book chapter entitled "The Leapfrog Effect" that details some of the ways in which developing nations HAVE to run their technology into the ground before upgrading. They can't afford to make the incremental steps. In fact, as it turns out, neither can the so-called "developed world" - they just hide many of the true costs.

    Upgrade when you have to, not just because you are bored and there's a new game out that needs incrementally better hardware.

    STF

    "The Leapfrog Effect" is a chapter in: Managing Globally with Information Technology (Sherif Kamel, ed). IDEA Group Publishing (in press)

  13. Re:Psst! by packeteer · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Haha... ok so what your saying is we take the ground water and filter out the lead to use? Of course the elements exist but they are not in a position to hurt us. Your argument is basically that 99.9% of environmental scientists are totally off in thinking that chemicals getting dumped is a bad thing.

    --
    unzip; strip; touch; finger; mount; fsck; more; yes; unmount; sleep
  14. Interesting anecdote by no_such_user · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I called Dell a few days ago looking to get pricing information. It turns out, with their low-end offering in the Dimension line, you can choose Wordperfect Office, MS Office SBE, or MS Office Pro -- bt not MS Works. On a low-end PC. WTF?

    So I called Dell, asking if they could override this and somehow install Works. The rep said: "No." I said "No big deal I guess. I have Office 97 Pro from an old PC which I can install instead." This got him revved up.

    Rep: "Well, sir, that's not legal."

    Even after explaining that I bought this product at a retail store, and told him that the old PC was being tossed because it was no longer working, I could hear that he still wanted to lecture me.

    So I reiterated, "I'm literally throwing out this computer because it doesn't work -- my license therefore is unused, and I can install it on my new PC, right?"

    Rep: "That's illegal. Throwing away a PC is illegal. You might be able to see if someone would take it for parts if you gave them $30 or $40, but you can't just throw it away. You might be able to ask the manufacturer to take it back."

    I did know this already, and had planned to bring it to my local waste facility for recycling.

    But here's the punchline...

    Me: "It's a Dell. Will you take it back?"
    Rep: "No."

    1. Re:Interesting anecdote by Forkenhoppen · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Put the old floppy drive or a stick of ram from the old machine into the new one. Install your copy on the "same upgraded" machine. Remove the floppy/stick of ram to "complete" the upgrade.

      Tada. Legal carry-over of licence to the.. uh.. same machine. ;)

      IANAL.. blah blah blah..

  15. For those of you new here... by bedessen · · Score: 4, Interesting
    This meme seems to come up every so often on slashdot. For previous discussions, take your pick:

    Unintended Results From U.S. Hardware Dumps In Asia [2/25/02]

    China Bans U.S. Electronic Scrap [6/1/02]

    Recycling The First World, in the Third [8/23/02]

    I seem to recall all of these had the usual accompanying photojournalism showing women picking through bushels of desolderied TTL gates and such.

    (I'm not saying this is a dupe, I'm just pointing out previous discussions.)

  16. Nothing new... and it's not just computers by JaredOfEuropa · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I'm not in the least bit surprised, having read a few court transcripts of cases against recycling firms.

    Make no mistake, waste disposal is about big bucks. For many materials such as chemical waste, waste oil, contaminated soil, and manufactured products such as computers, batteries and cars, the costs for recycling are enormous. Consumers, governments and environmentally-conscious firms know this, but are still often willing to pay the hefty disposal fees.

    Enter the recycling company. They'll take your toxic waste in exchange for your dollars... and now they have a choice. They can actually dispose of the waste properly while making a small profit, or just dump it somewhere and make a ton of money. So, the oil ends up in the sea, the chemicals are dumped somewhere in Poland, the contaminated soil is diluted with good soil and used in horse riding arena's. The computers end up in China where the valuable items are salvaged by less-than-clean methods.

    With the great anounts of money to be made in recycling by sweeping waste under the rug, it is no surprise criminal organisations have taken an interest, and are at least partly involved in a number of recycling firms. In Holland, reputed to be an environmentally conscious country, none of the larger recycling firms has clean hands, and have used any and all of the above methods to cheaply get rid of waste. It's not just the computers, people.

    --
    If construction was anything like programming, an incorrectly fitted lock would bring down the entire building...
  17. When is a computer not useful!? by stevejsmith · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I'd take any old computer! As long as it's a 486 or higher, it's still useful. Especially to a geek! Or give it to your child. Or just put it somewhere and use it as a typewriter. Or a print server. Or a regular ol' server. Or a file server. Or a router. Or a dildo. Er...maybe not the last one...but you catch my drift.

  18. Possible to use safer materials in new PCs? by Ryu2 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I'm not an engineer, so this is an honest question... are there any substitutes for the toxins that go into PCs, like lead, mercury, etc?

    If there are, perhaps we should be using those environmentally safer alternatives, even though they may cost more initially? Just like we've removed lead from our gasoline, maybe it's time we figured out how to remove lead and other toxins from our PCs.

    --
    There's 10 types of people in this world, those who understand binary and those who don't.
    1. Re:Possible to use safer materials in new PCs? by distributed.karma · · Score: 4, Informative

      From the article it seems that the worst problem isn't the material in the computer. It's the dangerous chemicals used to treat the waste -- for instance soaking the motherboard in a strong acid to extract gold and other valuables. Likewise, the cable coatings may not be that harmful per se, but the method of burning them to extract the copper will probably produce harmful compounds.

      --

      --
      If you moderate this, then your children will be next.

  19. Re:it's all a sham by NeoSkandranon · · Score: 4, Informative

    rare Earth metals such as silicon, glass, and copper, not to mention metal for cases

    Sillicon and copper are rare-earth metals? My periodic table must be a bit out of date...

    --
    If you can't see the value in jet powered ants you should turn in your nerd card. - Dunbal (464142)
  20. Most people here are wrong by Zeddicus_Z · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see a lot of mis-guided and mis-informed posts on this subject. Not surprising really, since the waste 'recyclers' don't exactly advertise their business practices.

    1) In most cases, the countries involved in importing PC waste *do not* ask for it. Recent case-in-point being China, which after banning the import of US PC waste *still* cops both US and non-US PC waste. The people don't want it*, the government doesn't want it. But the businesses can make a f*#ckload of money doing it, so it continues.

    2) One previous poster has pointed out that the Chinese people *want* the waste dumps to continue, so that they may work. To which I say, "utter bullshit". If you're a techie and, because of the economic climate are forced to work as a dish pig in the local diner, does that mean that you *want* to work there? No. You work there because *that's all there is!* It's the same with the people in China and other 3rd/2nd-world countries who panhandle our old 286 motherboards in corrosive acid for the tiny amounts of gold on the traces.

    3) For anyone who thinks putting this crap in landfil is a *good* solution (like one previous poster) - lead, arsenic and other chemicals that remain on PCBs and other PC parts can *kill* you. If you don't believe me, try regularly eating old-paint flakes that contain lead.

    4) To all the people who cite refurbishment of old PC parts, networked clusters and the like: You must look at the entire energy chain before you can assert that refurbishment of old equipment is better than replacing with new. Five networked 486's are all going to need power. They're all going to give off at least some amount of ozone. Basically, they're all going to pollute when running. Compare this to the pollution and energy usage of the single Athlon 1GHz you would have replaced it with, combined with the energy cost and pollution generated by recycling the old machines properly. Once you have your result (and you better use a proper equation, not just some approximations), THEN you can talk about refurbishment being more environmentally friendly than proper recycling.

    --
    Janie took my gun...
  21. Obvious troll for many reasons... by t0qer · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I've pointed out the population explosion in the bay area many times, every time I bring that point up I get modded into oblivion... But fuck it, I got karma to burn...

    First let me explain why I'm an expert on this. My family has lived in san jose since 1901, we started out here as immigrant sicilian ranchers, and over the years went from being just the fruitpickers to owning a lot of east side san jose, and now we own strip malls (w00t) I hang out on slash because during the boom, I was quite the sysadmin, and came to know this place.

    Back to the subject of enviromental disasters...

    My great grandfather, grandfather, heck even my uncles could go to any stream in the bay area and fish without worries of toxic fish with 3 eyes. Before milpitas became a great big office complex they would take their shotguns out to the duck blinds and get duck.

    These days though, there isn't shit left. Guadelupe river has a big sign "DONT EAT THESE FISH POISONOUS" all along it's banks. They say it's because of the "quicksilver" (read mercury) mines that were prevalent in the almaden valley area, but those existed WAY before IBM, which sits along the coyote creek which is a feeder into the Guadelupe.

    What does this have to do with recycling computer stuff? Well let me tell you....

    Since i've pretty much been jobless the last 2 years, i've gone back to my second love of bicycle riding. Riding a bike is a lot differerent than driving a car because if you want to stop to look at something.. No big deal. Hit the breaks and stop for a minute..

    Last week I was riding along almaden expressway when I saw an AT style case laying in the creekbed (Almaden expressway runs along the guadelupe) I parked my bike, walked over and decided to take a look.

    It looked like an old pentium class PC, I whipped out my swiss army knife's phillips attatchment to see what was under the hood..

    Well, there was definetly a p133 in there. Nice of socket7 to make it easy to pocket this little treasure. Ram turned out to be 4 16bit EDO ram modules totaling 64 megs.

    Hard drive had enough oxidation where I didn't want it, same went for the floppy....

    But the point i'm trying to make is here in SV people have been dumping this type of semi usefull electronic shit for years in our creeks, and the combination of population explosion with enviromental hazzards has really fucked up the ecology of SV.

    Now moderators, (and rob, cause i know you mod my shit once in a while) please.. This is the god honest truth i'm telling here, any negative mods would be an injustice to the truth (isn't that what good journalism is about anyways?)

    Compare San Jose ecological system with a close sister city like portland. Portland OR. has just as many bright talented people as SJ/SV (think M$) The health of their river and stream systems just blows doors over anything we have because they took the time to think ahead (should we whore ourselves out for business or should we keep quality of life in mind)

    Here in SJ, people are basically dumping their systems in the creeks and steams. Maybe i'm just being a bit optimistic here, but since so many of us geeks are outta work right now shouldn't we do something about it??? Seriously folks, go download some "router centric" version of *nix, turn those old POS 133's into broadband routers for those not in know. WTF I can find any ISA 3com NIC at a surplus store for less than a dollar.

    I love what I used to do, I loved edumucating people on just how they can get the most out of their pc's. In this day and age of firewire capture and such, we need to let people know that their old 486-pentium 200mhz still got some life left in them in the form of hella phat broadband routers that will not only protect them from the evil assholes of the internet, but will log it too (Soooooo much better than my old linksys router)

    You know... this is our scene.. And despite GWB being a total cocksucking dickhead to technology (yeah i hear you GWB, u n daddy want oil) we put our faith, our geeky little belief in thing like fuel cells, organic LED's and the like because ultimately we know it's better.

    I can't really comment much on the havoc IBM and other companies have wreaked havoc on our ecology, but I know what we gotta do to stretch out the "usefullness" of what we got. And folks, there are two ways you can fucking approach it..

    A. educate people..
    B. stick your head up your ass.

    So my advice to all of you is, if you want to prevent this sort of crap from continueing, DO IT FOR FREE!!! seriously, I consider myself an out of work techno hippie. Set up that killer BSD server with no backdo0rz fo free. Fuck it, aint no shame in promotin yo name. Trust me folks, all the no-geek people out there will love it when you show them how they can use their sprintlink wirelesss dsl to link to an 20 gig archive of data being served over a wireless link. Just don't whine about it, do something!@!!!!!

    Well, i hope I've inspired folks to do something instead of whining about it. Sorry u all but im on my second glass of wine and aint coming down. (still can type :) geek cominucae continues) Since we're the teachers its up to us to show the y to the (quote"l4m3rz"unquote) the path to rightiousnuss.

    Becoming an enviromentall activist on this subject requies more than post on /. ..... it requires some action.

    Yours Truly...

    --toq

  22. How similar? by NanoProf · · Score: 3, Interesting

    How similar is an interesting question- in each country it's a nasty job, but is there any information on the relative working conditions, the level of education of the workers as to the health and environmental issues, and the avenues of recourse for workers in cases of abuse? Any correlation with the degree of democracy?

    --
    Curtains for windows?
  23. computer recyling by starjax · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I helped start a computer recycling business (provided business, computer expertise, and moral support). My friend is still running the business after 5 years. The industry is going through lots of changes, however not once has he ever sent something overseas. In fact nothing ends up in the landfill. He is proud to exceed all epa, federal, state, and local guidelines. I cant imageing that shipping stuff overseas would save money. I also wonder if the origanators of the salavage are aware of how its being disposed of. At least everytime I hear of this story I cringe. Maybe its cause Im in the midwest, but dont know of any salvage operator that does this. I would be interested to hear from other people in the business. starjax

  24. not just computers- radioactive waste as well by call+-151 · · Score: 4, Informative
    There was a recent Guardian article about how Kazakhstan was looking towards importing European nuclear waste as a way of rescuing their economy. The company planning this expects to use abandoned uranium mines; the company president was quoted as
    We get $10 for extracting a cubic metre of uranium. We would get $100 to deposit the same amount of nuclear waste.
    (I think he meant extracting uranium ore- $10/ m^3 is a very good price for uranium...)


    It makes more sense when you realize that they already have their own huge radioactive disposal problem, and the marginal cost of a little bit more disposal is much less than what other, far more crowded European countries would be willing to pay to get it off their hands. They are the ninth largest country in the world with a population of 16 million, so there is significantly more room for waste disposal than in nearby Western Europe, which may be the region in the world most sensitive to waste disposal concerns of all kinds.

    Just as in other environmental decisions, there are immediate and long-term goals that need to be balanced. Economic factors affect these decisions- an affluent community would rather have an expensive recycling facility, whereas an impoverished community would think it is nuts to spend big bucks on that and would go with the cheaper, traditional solution of a town dump, complete with perpetual tire-fire. These decisions are motivated by economic factors- given ample resources, most everyone would prefer a cleaner environment. But not everyone is willing to pay for it, so there ends up being disparity between decisions that affect the environment based upon local economic conditions.

    Internationally, this comes as third-world countries which are happy to exchange cleaner air for lower-cost production which allows essential economic growth. Presumably, residents (or at least political representatives of residents) value the immediate economic boon over the long-term consequences. In the case of disposal, since there are already large waste-disposal issues of their own, the marginal cost of slightly larger waste-disposal issues apparently is outweighed by the massive price other countries would be willing to pay to get it off their hands. Unfortunately, decisions like these (trading in a long-term cost for a short-term benefit), are often political, and political decisions rarely favor long-term sustainable policies over short-term boons.

    --
    It's psychosomatic. You need a lobotomy. I'll get a saw.
  25. Wrong, wrong and wrong by Goonie · · Score: 3, Informative
    How did the United States or Australia for that matter prosper when they never have relied on agricultural exports as a foundation of their economy?

    Oh, please. I don't know enough about early US history, but I certainly know enough about early Australian history to be able to tell that in Australia's case that's complete and utter crap.

    Australia basically remained a prison colony until one British officer figured out that Australia was a damn good place to raise sheep and grow high-quality wool. The next big discovery was that there was a crapload of gold in various parts of Australia, which brought in a huge wave of immigrants. Many of those went into farming after the initial gold boom ended.

    Australia's exports are still concentrated around agriculture and mining. The latest boom export industry? Wine. The biggest issue in negotiations on a free trade deal with the US? US agricultural protectionism. Trust me, agricultural exports are *vital* to Australia.

    --

    Any sufficiently advanced technology is indistinguishable from a rigged demo
    --Andy Finkel (J. Klass?)
  26. Merc misses good program in their backyard by kellan1 · · Score: 5, Informative

    Its too bad the Merc was too busy spreading the bad news to spread a little good news as well.

    Alameda Country Computer Resource Center is an excellent program, about 30 minutes from the Mercury's office, recycles and reuses, and installs Linux on much of what passes through their doors, and ships what they can't use to a special facility in Canada where it is smelted for valuable ores. (and no it doesn't get dumped in Canada, they have stricter laws about that kind of thing then we do)

    Also they only charge $10 for computer drop off not $30, and accept a number of items for free. They publish a schedule of fees on their website.

  27. CBC TV's Marketplace did this story by Factomatic · · Score: 3, Informative

    The CBC TV investigative consumer news show Marketplace did a story on high-tech trash earlier this year.

    They talked to Seattle's Basel Action Network, which made one of the earliest documentary videos of a cluster of villages in Guiyu, China, where 100,000 people live and work in what is essentially a giant computer dumping ground.

    You can watch the report in Quicktime or in Real Video format.