Slashdot Mirror


LaCie Releases 500GB Add On Drives

Glewtion writes "LaCie has release their "Big Disk" - a large capacity FireWire case (400 / 500GB) with decent specs. The only thing they're not clear on is the fact that there are two drives in the case...but that only seems logical. Looks like it's only available in Europe though, so here's a link to a French Hardware site's description of it (translation courtesy of Google). Pretty cool for a portable MP3 collection. Here's the LaCie page." What's not apparant is that this case has two drives in it apparantly. Very Slick.

140 of 393 comments (clear)

  1. And, in case you didn't notice... by srw · · Score: 5, Funny

    they're not clear about the fact there are two drives in the case!

    1. Re:And, in case you didn't notice... by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 2

      I didn't know that either until I read the links. Then it was very apparent that it had two hard drives. Reading, what a gift.'

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
    2. Re:And, in case you didn't notice... by sharkey · · Score: 3, Funny

      RAID 0 (Stripping)

      Ooooo, take it off, baby! Work those spindles! Oh yeah, oh yeah.

      --

      --
      "Outlook not so good." That magic 8-ball knows everything! I'll ask about Exchange Server next.
    3. Re:And, in case you didn't notice... by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 2

      Redundant=4 Funny=2

      Hehehe. I think we have a good measurement of the average slashdot moderator right here.

  2. Redundancy... by Radi-0-head · · Score: 5, Funny

    So is this disk as redundant as the editor's comments?

    1. Re:Redundancy... by glenebob · · Score: 4, Funny

      It may not be apparant, but apparantly so.

    2. Re:Redundancy... by G-funk · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Or mp3???

      Well by my quick calculations based on my own mp3 collection (a measly 11gb and 169 hours), 500gib is about 320 days playback non-stop for an mp3 collection, and although there are people who just collect mp3s like they're matchbox cars, I find it hard to believe anybody can identify 320 days worth of music they actually like.

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    3. Re:Redundancy... by fusiongyro · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Maybe it's not for Mp3s. I'm interested in converting my audio collection to FLAC format so I don't have to tolerate loss of quality. If I do that, I computed that my puny 15 GB colletion would take up about 100 GB, maybe more. And so I have room to grow, I'd want to have more like 300 or 400 GB of free space to do this.

      I've been planning on buying a RAID set up to accomplish this. RAID, as you all know, uses more than one disk. You all know, apparantly, that the R in RAID is for redundancy. I'm not being redundant, I hope. RAID would give me the room for this, as you all know, by using one disk.

      Apparantly.

      So like, I need a lot of space. And this looks cool (though it might not be obvious). :)

      --
      Daniel

    4. Re:Redundancy... by aero6dof · · Score: 3, Funny

      Remember to re-post this comment next week when the story is repeated.

    5. Re:Redundancy... by matt-fu · · Score: 3, Informative

      I find it hard to believe anybody can identify 320 days worth of music they actually like.

      Yeah, that's a lot of music. Over 7000 albums worth of music, in fact. I think that at the 500 gig point though, you're storing more than just mp3s. You're storing DivXes, ISOs, old email, etc. I built a 240G server a few months ago and I've been really surprised at how much space I've taken up on it just from being sloppy about what I keep around and what I don't.

      Another thing to consider is that if you have 500G worth of storage you can actually store your music as wavs instead of putting up with mp3s, which is a nice thing if you are seriously backing up your CD collection.

    6. Re:Redundancy... by pVoid · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Hey dude,

      I don't know about you, and I'm not trying to be snob or stylish or anything, but if I go to HMV, 40% of the Jazz collection attracts my attention. That's a whole floor of CDs probably 500 days worth of music.

      And that's *only* jazz.

    7. Re:Redundancy... by G-funk · · Score: 2

      Yeah you're right, i forgot about stuff like jazz... I was thinking more rock/techno/hip-hop/rnb where 90% of what's released is utter shit...

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    8. Re:Redundancy... by jonathan_ingram · · Score: 2

      APE and FLAC are the two main formats.

      APE is fine if you're on Windows, but it has a very unclear licence and the non-Windows version is completely unsupported/unmaintained.

      FLAC does not compress as well as APE, but decompression uses a *lot* less processing time, the format and code are both completely open, and they're integrating themselves into the Ogg framework.

      With Speex, Vorbis, and FLAC all using the Ogg framework, Ogg audio covers low bitrate voice, medium bitrate music, and high bitrate lossless archival.

    9. Re:Redundancy... by Kintanon · · Score: 2

      If you snagged like... 5 of these big ol' drives you could get damn near every work of classical music ever written, and probably store it in .WAV so you don't have to lose all of your background instruments.... Mmmmmm.....

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    10. Re:Redundancy... by the_rev_matt · · Score: 2

      Hmmm, I've got 95g worth right now, and I haven't started in on my classical CDs/LPs or Jazz or Blues yet. Based on my rock/pop collection, I figure when all my Classical/Jazz/Blues are on there, it will be about 350g. That's not including at least 60 titles I haven't bought yet that I want (King Crimson has been releasing several albums/year lately that I haven't caught up with, and I only half about half of Zappa's catalog thus far, add to that great older albums being released on CD for the first time...).

      --
      this is getting old and so are you

      blog

  3. Coming to Australia soon by Zeddicus_Z · · Score: 5, Informative

    We have one of these babies in the labs right now for review. According to LaCiE they'll be released in Australia (and I would assume, althought I may be wrong) and Asia/Pacific soon - probably for Xmas.

    --
    Janie took my gun...
    1. Re:Coming to Australia soon by G-funk · · Score: 2

      As an aussie, I'm wondering do you have any idea on the local price?

      --
      Send lawyers, guns, and money!
    2. Re:Coming to Australia soon by FrenZon · · Score: 3, Informative

      200GB - $1062

      400GB - $1852

      500GB - $2256

      From zytech.com.au

    3. Re:Coming to Australia soon by Cutriss · · Score: 2

      If you had checked the link in the story, you'd see the pricing of $899 US for the 500 GB model.

      --
      "Mod, mod, mod...and another troll bites the dust."
    4. Re:Coming to Australia soon by FrenZon · · Score: 2

      Actually, those prices were AUD - I had meant to reply to the other poster who was asking about AU prices, but slashdot's lynx interface was a bit naff, so I replied to the parent of that post.

  4. 500 GB... by urbazewski · · Score: 3, Interesting
    great --- I'll never have to delete another email.

    annmariabell.com

    --
    foldplay your photos won't know what hit them.
  5. what's also apparent by dzym · · Score: 3, Funny

    ... is that the editor apparently cannot spell apparent. And not only did he apparently misspell it once, he apparently misspelt it twice.

  6. Portable mp3's? by neksys · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Christ... by my rough calculations, you could hold 8,000-10,000 full albums on that sucker, if we assume that you have about 14 tracks on an album, with each track being about 4 megs. That's an ungodly amount of music - sometimes these little "comments" people add to their stories just irritate me. They seem to exist solely for the wannabe geek factor... I can almost see the submitter thinking, "Hey, what additional comments can I add that will *impress* people? I'm a geek too, right?"

    1. Re:Portable mp3's? by ottothecow · · Score: 2, Interesting
      why can I only get this as firewire? I WANT ONE IN MY CASE

      my mp3 server would love 500gb in a 5.25 drivebay, and that is plenty fast for playing mp3s. And if you need it faster and faster just raid-0 it and go.

      I have never really be a fan of the external drive (what good is a 48x burner on USB 1)as a nice ribbon cable has always been faster than whatever I can plug into the back of my case (external scsi exempt) but firewire and firewire 2 are looking good. Personally I prefer them to USB2.0 but I hope that the competition makes them a standard not an obscurity.

      --
      Bottles.
    2. Re:Portable mp3's? by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      ITS TWO DRIVES!, its not a 500GB drive, its 2 250s. Thats still a lot of music, i've had a 20GB(18.6) archos jukebox for almost a year now and its still not full.

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
    3. Re:Portable mp3's? by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm pretty sure the target for these isn't billy hardcores mp3 collection, or filthy mcnasties porn jamboree.

      MP3s are small potatoes. Even the most 'hardcore' I've seen have no more than a few dozen cd-rs full. It's hardly the killer app for big storage.

      These would be good in settings where one would need to archive big amounts of data, and still retain access to it in the short term. Maybe raw video footage, maybe great big uncompressed image files - blueprints or the like. I could think offhand I could use one of these to store all the ghost images of all the different workstations I would need to rebuild, and be able to carry it around.

      You know, big stuff.

      I guess someone could get one just to 'brag' about it.

      Either way, it's 2 200+ gig drives in a raid array. It's not like it couldn't already be done. You can already buy a little box to convert your IDE drive to an external firewire. So put the two together, you have this.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:Portable mp3's? by Kenshin · · Score: 2
      I'm pretty sure the target for these isn't billy hardcores mp3 collection, or filthy mcnasties porn jamboree

      Hey! Don't insult Philty McNasty! He's a perfectly upstanding member of my community! I watch wrestling at his place all the time...

      --

      Does it make you happy you're so strange?

    5. Re:Portable mp3's? by be-fan · · Score: 2

      You've obviously never seen those DirectConnect servers that require you to share 100GB before they even let you in...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    6. Re:Portable mp3's? by mhesseltine · · Score: 2
      Perhaps video archiving though.
      Translation...Pr0table Pr0n!!
      --
      Overrated / Underrated : Moderation :: Anonymous Coward : Posting
    7. Re:Portable mp3's? by majestynine · · Score: 5, Funny

      Insert standard comments:

      -Wow thats a lot of storage for all my porn
      ---I have more porn than you
      -----You're both fucking loosers

      -When is this possibly going to be adopted by consumers?

      -How are we going to back this much space up?
      ---With another disc/drive, stupid!

      -Bah, I still use 5 1/2 floppies
      ---You are a smelly gnu/hippy

      -Wow, the MPAA/RIAA/whoever it is we're hating this week/Disney are really going to hate this!

    8. Re:Portable mp3's? by Wheel+Of+Fish · · Score: 3, Informative

      Firewire certainly is up to snuff for video editing. With a 400MB/s bus speed, the limitation is with the drive itself. You need at least a 7200RPM drive to play back and edit standard def video in real time.

      I have a 120GB 7200 RPM Western Digital firewire hard drive (Mac formatted) that I use for editing with Final Cut, and another WD 80GB 7200 RPM firewire drive (PC formatted) for Premiere and Avid use. They're very handy when you need to float between editing stations - just plug in the drive and pick up where you left off.

      A 500 GB drive would be great (the 120 gigger is already half full), but you're right about this drive's specs - it just isn't fast enough.

    9. Re:Portable mp3's? by Stonent1 · · Score: 2, Funny

      Video editing requires a much faster harddrive than the specs mention. Firewire is not up to snuff.

      Oh? Then how did people video edit 4 years ago when no drives weren't as fast as firewire is today?

    10. Re:Portable mp3's? by Blkdeath · · Score: 2
      I'm guessing you're not a college student...I'm certainly not "billy hardcore", but I personally have 16 gigs and counting worth of just mp3's, and I can guarantee you there's people around here with even more.
      "A few dozen" - let's say two dozen @ 800MB/disc = 24*800 = 19.2GB. Let's assume three dozen = 36*800 = 28.8GB. Four dozen = 48*800 = 38.4GB.

      Sorry, it's late and I got irked, but we're still not up at the .5TB range.

      --
      BD Phone Home!

      Shameless plug. Like you weren't expecting it.

    11. Re:Portable mp3's? by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      While you wouldn't physically fit this in a case since it is two drives, it is worth noting that firewire and USB 2.0 are both internal and external specs. Most firewire cards have an internal connector for firewire drives inside the case, and I've noticed it on the USB boards we've gotten lately. Serial ATA only makes sense because it is backwards compatible, but internal firwire is a much better bus...

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    12. Re:Portable mp3's? by NMerriam · · Score: 2

      Video editing requires a much faster harddrive than the specs mention. Firewire is not up to snuff.

      huh? People have been editing digital video for years on systems much slower than this. Broadcast quality DV is actually pretty low bitrate compared to the 25+ Mbit/sec throughput you had to have a few years ago when everything was analog. We run an entire DV editing lab off of systems built with stock 5400 RPM IDE drives. You used to have to have SCSI RAID systems just to keep from dropping frames during capture.

      --
      Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    13. Re:Portable mp3's? by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

      insert standard comments

      -- We're sure going to need this much space for the next version of Windows!

    14. Re:Portable mp3's? by d-man · · Score: 2, Funny

      You seem to have forgotten:

      Imagine a Beowulf cluster of these!

      1) Buy one of these.
      3) Profit.

      --
      Unix: Where /sbin/init is still Job 1.
    15. Re:Portable mp3's? by mosch · · Score: 2
      400 gigs would also be enough to hold about 1000 cds in a losslessly compressed format, which is... not enough to hold all my cds. it'd also hold about 80 or so dvds, which is.... not enough to hold all my dvds. and those aren't even interesting applications.

      it'll hold about 10 hours of 48 track 24/88.2 audio, a small fraction of an engineering firm's drawings or a small fraction of the raw video used by a film editor. people with servers that can boot from firewire could use them as a portable emergency recovery drive...

      The fact that you don't currently have a use for a nicely packaged, relatively inexpensive mass storage device does not mean that nobody needs one.

      if you really think that 400 gig firewire drives exist solely to stroke egos, go to a therapist now, because you're a pathetically insecure fuck.

    16. Re:Portable mp3's? by pVoid · · Score: 2
      You're a geek, but you're wrong.

      I have roughly 60 Gigs worth of mp3s, and, I SHIT YOU NOT: I haven't even scratched the surface of what I want in terms of Jazz.

      500 is just a number, and I'm pretty sure I'll get there pretty quickly if I can afford it.

    17. Re:Portable mp3's? by Big+Jason · · Score: 2, Informative

      Dude, Firewire in its current incarnation is 400 megabits/sec, or roughly 50 megabytes/sec. I believe 1.2Gbps is coming.

    18. Re:Portable mp3's? by dildatron · · Score: 2

      it depends on what you are talking about. firewire is plenty fast for joe blow to do DV editing. it is fast enough for linear editing.

      --


      If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
    19. Re:Portable mp3's? by cheezedawg · · Score: 3, Informative
      How on earth is firewire a "much better bus"?

      First generation 1.5 Gbps SATA is over 3 times faster than current 400 Mbps firewire, and 2nd gen 3.0 Gbps SATA will probably be out by the time the 1.6 Gbps firewire becomes a reality

      The only reason SATA can be backwards compatible is because the protocol is so dang flexible- it can also do a lot more than just standard PATA features

      SATA uses 250 mV signalling which makes it really easy to integrate it into ICs

      The 1.5 Gbps for SATA is dedicated to each port, rather than the shared bandwidth of a firewire port (the 63 devices per port or whatever the limit is)

      Native firewire storage devices are VERY hard to find, and non-native solutions are at the mercy of the firewire bridge chip on the device. The bandwidth that those chips can crank out is often as low as 12 MB/sec- nowhere near the 50 MB/sec potential of the bus or even an IDE drive.

      Don't get me wrong- firewire is pretty cool and there are a lot of good uses for it, but I think that SATA is a much better solution for storage, and I don't think that blanket claims like yours are justified.

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
    20. Re:Portable mp3's? by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

      "25+ Mbit/sec throughput you had to have a few years ago when everything was analog"

      Yeah, those old 'analog' bits were pretty lame %-P.

      I assume you meant 'uncompressed'.

    21. Re:Portable mp3's? by GMontag451 · · Score: 2

      Firewire is most certainly up to snuff. At 400 Mb/sec it can stream DV (26.5 Mb/sec) in real time quite easily. Hell, it could stream a full 1080i HDTV stream with 24-bit 96kHz audio (375.5 Mb/sec). There needs to be a (-1 Incorrect) moderation.

    22. Re:Portable mp3's? by GMontag451 · · Score: 2

      DV is 26 Mbit/sec.

    23. Re:Portable mp3's? by Hadlock · · Score: 2

      where does one go to sign up for somthing like this? seriously. i just hit the 100 gig mark about 2 months back... of course, i probably already have most of what they're sharing (non porn, at least)....

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
    24. Re:Portable mp3's? by Matey-O · · Score: 2

      But how much HAVEN'T you listened to? I mean, you've only got Two Ears.

      Don't you?

      --
      "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    25. Re:Portable mp3's? by evilviper · · Score: 3, Informative
      Firewire certainly is up to snuff for video editing. With a 400MB/s bus speed, the limitation is with the drive itself.

      That would be nice if true... Unfortunately, the "B" in "MB" is LOWERCASE... i.e. It's 400 MegaBITS, not bytes... Meaning it's 1/8th that speed in MegaBYTES. That would make it 50MB... Although technically slightly slower than USB2.0, in real world tests, Firewire is FAR faster.

      http://www6.tomshardware.com/storage/02q2/020426/w dfirewire-04.html
      http://www.barefeats.com/fire18.html
      --
      Slashdot gets worse every day... Pipedot: News for nerds, without the corporate slant
    26. Re:Portable mp3's? by be-fan · · Score: 2

      Direct Connect is a p2p protocol. If you go to you can find out all about it.

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
    27. Re:Portable mp3's? by GreenKiwi · · Score: 2

      With a 400MB/s bus speed, the limitation is with the drive itself.

      Ummm... NO.... it's 400mb/s!

      That amounts to about 50MB/s.

      So about half the speed of an ATA100 bus.

    28. Re:Portable mp3's? by MrResistor · · Score: 2

      Unfortunately, the "B" in "MB" is LOWERCASE... i.e. It's 400 MegaBITS, not bytes... Meaning it's 1/8th that speed in MegaBYTES. That would make it 50MB.

      That's still plenty fast for video editing.

      I do customer service repair on top end digital video production equipment, specifically storage RAIDs. My typical test for current SCSI RAIDs is simultaneous playback and record of 2 50Mbps streams[1]. That's the bandwidth limit (or very close, anyway) of the best Digital Video Server you can buy, and nobody runs them as hard as I do.

      For one thing, 50Mbps is a ludicrous quality level, and I very much doubt anyone uses that level of quality in the real world (at least for standard TV). Also, if you're dealing with multiple streams at the same time you're going to be sitting at a switcher, not a PC.

      So, firewire should be more than adequate for any current non-live video editing purpose. If you're doing lots of effects rendering, though, it may not be adequate, and I know of desktop editing/rendering solutions which are SCSI-based for this reason (they often have the SCSI bus integrated into the card doing the rendering in order to eliminate the potential PCI bus limitations).

      [1] That's for a RAID3 LUN with 5 10kRPM drives (an additional LUN doesn't increase available bandwidth, just capacity) in a fibrechannel chassis. Sometimes I go as low as a single 36Mbps stream for older, slower drives (believe it or not, people are still using 4GB SCSI drives, albeit generally with 4 5-drive LUNs). I only go to 60Mbps on the rare occasions when I have 5 drives in a RAID0, although that's only one stream.

      Let me reiterate that this is a top quality video system. I don't know what the entire system costs, but I know that we sell a fully populated RAID chassis for for somewhere in the neighborhood of $50k, and it's just an accessory to the actual system, which has internally the RAID0 array listed above.

      Oh, and yes I do mean b, not B.

      Anyway, I'm not disagreeing with you, just putting your statements in the context of the parent post.

      --
      Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
    29. Re:Portable mp3's? by GMontag451 · · Score: 2

      No, I'm not. All the numbers in my post were in megabits. My number for the bandwidth of HDTV was incorrect though, because I did the calculations wrong. 1080i is approximately 746 Mbit/sec, which FireWire wouldn't be able to stream, although FireWire 2, which is supposed to be out sometime soon at 3.2 Gbps, would have no trouble streaming it.

    30. Re:Portable mp3's? by GMontag451 · · Score: 2

      No I don't. What is wrong with you? Can you not read or something? The only units I used in either of my posts were Mb/sec, Mbit/sec and Mbps, all of which are acceptable unit abbreviations for megabit per second.

    31. Re:Portable mp3's? by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

      Q: How many indie-snobs does it take to change a lightbulb? ~obligatory i dunno A: You havn't heard that joke?!?

      --
      "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  7. warranty? by halo8 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    The French Translation Page says it has a 2 year warranty.. yet the Company page says 1..

    Odd...

    --
    The More Knowledge you have the Luckier you Get- J.R. Ewing
    1. Re:warranty? by sporty · · Score: 5, Funny

      Consider it a metric conversion error :)

      --

      -
      ping -f 255.255.255.255 # if only

    2. Re:warranty? by punkass · · Score: 2

      Don't joke...have you ever read about the cluser that is the Metric Calendar?

      --
      "Nobody owns the fucking words man." - James Dean
    3. Re:warranty? by !splut · · Score: 5, Funny

      French years are shorter. They felt the American year was killing off their French culture.

      --
      The angel in the oatmeal.
    4. Re:warranty? by fobbman · · Score: 3, Funny

      Apparently it's because there are apparently two drives in the case, which would, apparently, mean that there are two one-year warrantees. Which would mean two years, apparently.

    5. Re:warranty? by Loki_1929 · · Score: 2

      "They felt the American year was killing off their French culture."

      Killing? ... Don't the French usually surrender when that starts happening?

      --
      -- "Government is the great fiction through which everybody endeavors to live at the expense of everybody else."
  8. it had to happen by newsdee · · Score: 5, Funny

    Earlier today I bought a 80gb usb2 drive.
    I knew computers are obsolete as soon as you leave the store, but this is ridiculous. :-)

  9. Re:How much time by Zebbers · · Score: 2

    people pay?

  10. Finally! by TiMac · · Score: 5, Funny
    SWEET! Now according to the "expert" here I'll have enough HD space on my Mac for a whole 50 minutes of video!

    Dumbass...

    --

    1. Re:Finally! by TiMac · · Score: 3, Informative
      Dammit...Shoulda hit Preview...

      "a whole 50 HOURS" of video.

      --

    2. Re:Finally! by TiMac · · Score: 2
      I don't think so.

      I think if he meant 60 minutes, he would have said 1 hour, to compare hours to hours. When was the last time you heard someone say "the nearest Exxon station is 1 to 1.5 miles down the road...but there's a Texaco 5280 feet away." Comparisons are generally made "Apples to Apples."

      Also, if it were a typo it wouldn't prove his point, because 1-1.5 hours of WMV is basically the same as 60 minutes of DV...its not a drastic difference, which he made it out to be.

      Additionally, because he made mention of the various Pro-Mac users that had commented on "Part 1" in "Part 2" he obviously read some...and at least the first 2 mention that same issue...I bet he would have changed or retracted it if it were a typo.

      --

    3. Re:Finally! by UserChrisCanter4 · · Score: 2

      No, he's correct. Your standard DV format does consume on the order of 1GB per 5 minutes of video. Of course, when you capture to WMP, you're playing compression games. Go ahead and compare the video quality, though, and you'll see where the issue comes up. It's like saying, "This 64MB MP3 player is better than that CD player over there, because it contains an hour of music in 1/11th the space". Well, yes, it does, and at a loss to the audio, or in the WMP example, video quality.

  11. you are wrong by Slashdotess · · Score: 2

    firewire is 400 mb/s.. ata 100 is 100 mb/s (hence the 100)

    1. Re:you are wrong by Door-opening+Fascist · · Score: 4, Informative

      Beware the difference between megaBITS and megaBYTES. mb is megaBIT and MB is megaBYTE. One byte is eight times larger than one bit, so it turns out IEEE 1384 is slower by a factor of two than ATA/100.

      Also remember that this is interface bandwidth we're talking about. One fast 50MB/s drive is all that's needed to swamp an IEEE 1384 interface, whereas even ATA/100 can handle two of those suckers on a channel (ignoring master/slave issues).

    2. Re:you are wrong by frohike · · Score: 2

      Also remember that this is interface bandwidth we're talking about. One fast 50MB/s drive is all that's needed to swamp an IEEE 1384 interface, whereas even ATA/100 can handle two of those suckers on a channel (ignoring master/slave issues).

      I could rob a bank for a million dollars! (ignoring law enforcement issues) ;) I hate to deflate that comment there, but you can't ignore the master/slave issues when making such a comparison :)

    3. Re:you are wrong by Sheepy · · Score: 2, Informative

      mb is millibit - not very useful Mb is megabit MB is megabyte But see also kibi (Ki), mebi (Mi), gibi (Gi), tebi (Ti), pebi (Pi) and exbi (Ei).

  12. Talk about alot of space... by spoons67 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    But one question. Though its been made terribly obvious to us that it's two drives, does it appear as two drives to your computer? If so, how does it manage that?

    --
    Begun, this browser war has.
    1. Re:Talk about alot of space... by Door-opening+Fascist · · Score: 2

      I'm guessing some form of RAID is used. Either striping or JBOD would make sense here, although they'd better be damn certain the drives don't fail, as either of them leaves you SOL if a drive fails and you haven't been backing up.

    2. Re:Talk about alot of space... by BrookHarty · · Score: 2

      I'd like to know if the drives show up as 1 or 2 drives. Also can you raid firewire drives? How about booting off firewire? :)

    3. Re:Talk about alot of space... by Door-opening+Fascist · · Score: 2

      I would assume so. Firewire drives are of the same construction as ATA drives, just with a different interface. I'm not sure about booting though, as that would probably take firmware upgrade in the BIOS.

  13. And the site says.... by imag0 · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...Out of standard, considering each one of these storage units integrates two hard disks and a bridge FW/RAID, it is possible to configure them in RAID 1 (Mirroring) or RAID 0 (Stripping).

    And the answer, dear asshat, is yes

  14. If only my TiVo had Firewire.... by wowbagger · · Score: 4, Interesting

    If only the TiVo had a Firewire interface....

    Imagine getting 2 of these drives - 1TB on your TiVo.

    Of course, I'd want a faster processor, or parsing the "Now Showing" list would take forever!

    1. Re:If only my TiVo had Firewire.... by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 2

      Can you actually attach anything to that FireWire port?

  15. Me no need spellchekr!?!! by mondoterrifico · · Score: 2, Funny

    "What's not apparant is that this case has two drives in it apparantly. Very Slick."

    Me passed grade 4. Me can speel grate! Me want job!

    Slashdot editors...continuing the assualt on all things grammatical!

  16. Re:Why not set up a RAID in a box? by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 3, Funny

    Just in case you drop it in a lake or something, or the building burns down. Good idea!

    Tim

    --
    Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  17. When compressed via divix... by rusty0101 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    Most people don't have enough movies to fill two of these things. With a couple of these, a Dazzel Holywood DV converter, and a DVD burner, you could easily go into business converting Home videos to DVDs for people.

    Whether you could make any money at it would depend upon what type of home videos they brought in, and what you got them to agree to let you do with the stuff...

    -Rusty

    --
    You never know...
    1. Re:When compressed via divix... by be-fan · · Score: 3, Funny

      Most people don't have enough movies to fill two of these things.
      >>>>>>>>
      You've obviously never seen a college campus network...

      --
      A deep unwavering belief is a sure sign you're missing something...
  18. According to the french site by Slashdotess · · Score: 2, Informative

    According to the French site you can configure them to work in RAID-0 or 1 so I'd assume the computer would see them as one drive from the onboard RAID controller, otherwise a software controlled RAID wouldn't sustain 400 Mb/s, as they claim.

  19. Re:Eh. by A+non+moose+cow · · Score: 2

    ...and since max sustained data rate from most hard drives is about 40MB/s, unless you are using raid it does not really make that much difference how fast your drive bus is.

  20. I love the translations by core+plexus · · Score: 3, Funny
    "The case is out of aluminium and ZAMAC, a supposed alloy..." Hmmm, not sure what it is? A "supposed alloy".

    "...and can pile up horizontally on other of the same peripherals models..." Hey! Get off my other of the same peripherals models!

    "Sympathetic, the new system of comment, Ca will avoid the comment of twisted which spends their time insulting:p" Sounds like my voice recognition software is glitching up again. And many more.

  21. I thought 1TB/$5,000 was cool .... by timothy · · Score: 4, Insightful

    This was a neat story, IMO:
    ("The Amazing $5k Terabyte Array")

    That's not too long ago.

    Now, for the same money, you can get twice the storage (4 of these), *and* a decent (though not high-end) laptop; you can fit your 2TB array and associated computer into a briefcase.

    That's a lot.

    timothy

    --
    jrnl: http://tinyurl.com/c2l8yr / foes: http://tinyurl.com/ckjno5
  22. big enough? by DarkHelmet · · Score: 2
    Hmmm, I wonder if I could fit the internet on it...

    Well, if not that, at least the whole red light district of it </sarcasm>

    --
    /^[A-Z0-9._%+-]+@[A-Z0-9.-]+\.[A-Z]{2,4}$/i
  23. NAS by simpl3x · · Score: 2

    in addition to drives like this, Lacie intends to have a NAS storage head or unit in the future (http://www.lacie.com/technologies/technology.cfm? id=F8B7B736-7F7A-11D6-98090090278D3ED0). their AIT2 is also pretty nifty!

  24. And just twice as likely to fail! by autopr0n · · Score: 2

    Actualy I have two drives tied together with windows spanning (220gigs), but I hope its a temporary solution. In the future I definetly plan on having at least some redundancy involved, probably the one where you take 3 drives and the 3rd stores the XOR of the other two.

    --
    autopr0n is like, down and stuff.
    1. Re:And just twice as likely to fail! by benwb · · Score: 2

      For most applications RAID-5 is a better choice, but you pay a lot if you have a disk failure. RAID-3 is a much better choice for situations where you need guaranteed performance in the event of a disk failure.

  25. That's a lot of MP3s by not_cub · · Score: 5, Informative
    Pretty cool for a portable MP3 collection.

    500GB = 4194304000Kbits
    = 16384000 secs @ 256kbps
    = 3792.6 72min albums @ 256kbps
    = $20,000 worth of CDs, assuming you can find them at $5 each.

    Not to mention the fact that that's half a year of music. So pretty cool for a radio station on a mission never to play a top 40 hit ever again maybe?

    I would like to nominate "Pretty cool for a portable MP3 collection" as the most fatuous comment on slashdot now that "Imagine a beowulf cluster of these" is dead.

    not_cub

    --
    q='echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"';s=\';b=\\;echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"
    1. Re:That's a lot of MP3s by chazzf · · Score: 2

      What about a Beowulf Cluster of Slashdot meta-comments?

      --
      No statement is true, not even this one.
    2. Re:That's a lot of MP3s by Tokerat · · Score: 3, Funny


      Imagine a pretty cool beowulf cluster of these portable MP3 collections?

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  26. Fear of HD editing by benwaggoner · · Score: 5, Informative

    Well, if you wanted to use this for HD editing...

    1920x1080 pixels
    30 frames a second
    16 bits per pixel*
    That's be 949 Mbps, or 118 MB per second.

    Or about 70 minutes of uncompressed editing on this at max resolution.

    Of course, being FireWire, it'll have a lowly peak data rate of 400 Mbps. We'd need the 1394b 1600 Mbps standard for this to be useful for uncompressed HD editing. This is why honkin' Ultra-160 RAID systems are used for this kind of work!

    The good thing is that over the air HD transmissions are a measly 19.2 Mbps. That'd give you 58 hours or so.

    * (it's YUV with chroma sampled at 4:2:0, so there is one luma bitmap at 1920x1080, and two chroma bitmaps at 960x520, all at 8 bits per channel).

    1. Re:Fear of HD editing by _LORAX_ · · Score: 4, Informative

      Actuall for clarification...

      YUV 4:2:0 is 12 bits per pixel since the chroma is only samples every other line. YUV 4:2:2 is 16 bits per pixel.

      so thats...

      711 Mbps or 89 MBps or about (wierd) 89 minutes of uncompressed HD based on the fact that 500GB actually means 500000000000 bytes.

    2. Re:Fear of HD editing by Sycraft-fu · · Score: 2

      However, unless I'm mistaken (and I could be, I'm an audio guy, not video) DV video that comes form modern digital cameras is comrpessed. I don't believe it's huge comrpession, but still significant.

      Also I think YUV 4:2:0 is 12-bit, not 16-bit. 4:2:2 is 16-bit I think.

    3. Re:Fear of HD editing by benwaggoner · · Score: 2

      Doh! Of course. I was thinking of 4:2:2, which is used for lossless editing of standard def content. HD uses 4:2:0 instead.

    4. Re:Fear of HD editing by benwaggoner · · Score: 2

      DV uses 4:1:1, and is about 6.5:1 compressed from the original. Works out to be 25 Mbps.

      For playback that doesn't require editing, modern codecs can look darn good at a 50:1 compression. WMV9 can do GREAT at 2Mbps at 720x480 interlaced.

  27. What is not apparent by kobotronic · · Score: 3, Funny

    "What's not apparant is that this case has two drives in it apparantly."

    I love the little comments after slashdot story submissions. :)

  28. your 80gig drive is obsolete. by minitrue · · Score: 5, Funny

    Yes, your 80gb drive is now obsolete. It is completely unusable with your current configuration. Throw it out now. Or for more eco-friendly processing, please mail it to:

    Me
    c/o Obsolete Hardware Dept.
    NY,NY 10001

    We will kindly take care of any obsolete hardware you may have around your house including sub 2GHz Athlons and P4s, 64MB GeForce cards, and low capacity hard drives of 100GB or less. Do not worry about our processing fee for it will be absorbed in the premium you pay for buying the fastest neatest doodad. Click here to receive notice when we launch our innovative program for disposing of your automobile once it loses that new car smell! ;-)

    1. Re:your 80gig drive is obsolete. by Tokerat · · Score: 2

      Apparantly many will believe such things, as they strive to get the latest and greatest, apparently.

      --
      CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  29. hmmm... by Sj0 · · Score: 2, Redundant

    If you have a 500GB mp3 collection, the RIAA would like to have a word with you. ....and maybe, just maybe, it's time to get off kazaa. Seriously. Just doing some rough calculations, That's over 5,000 hours of standard quality MP3 audio. over 200 days!

    --
    It's been a long time.
    1. Re:hmmm... by Sj0 · · Score: 2

      Okay, even doubling file size, it's STILL over one-hundred days of MP3s.

      --
      It's been a long time.
  30. Help! I need context! by Cap'n+Canuck · · Score: 2, Funny

    500GB - how many Libraries of Congress is that?

    1. Re:Help! I need context! by DarkVein · · Score: 2

      I'd like to keep a personal copy of the Library of Congress. Maybe two, so that I can have one version to make notes in. Can I do that?

      --

      I'm as mimsy as the next borogove but your mome raths are completely outgrabe.

    2. Re:Help! I need context! by io333 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Last I saw, the LOC was 13 TeraBYtes. You'd need 26 of these drives. Alternatively, Each drive holds ~4% of a LOC. Yes, I understand your question was kind of a joke, but I thought I'd do the math real quick just to consider the implications. I wonder if anyone has a good estimate of how long it will be until the typical consumer PC has sufficient storage space to hold the LOC?

    3. Re:Help! I need context! by ottffssent · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It's not "how long until the typical PC can store the LOC?", it's "how long ago's LOC can the typical PC store?"

      How big was the LoC 5 years ago? Under a few hundred gig, I'll bet. Today's LoC is (or so I read on Slashdot so it must be true) about 13TB. So how long will it take for desktops to reath 13T? Well, at their current ~40%/yr increase, about 13-14 years. At which point the LoC will undoubtedly have swollen to about another 13-14 years worth of PC evolution. But I don't think *anyone* thinks hard drives will continue to scale for almost 15 years. The superparamagnetic effect has been looming for the past 5 years or so and lord knows how much money has managed to push it off a few more years, but we're rapidly approaching the point where the amount of energy difference between a N and a S magnetic domain is the same as the amount of thermal energy present - presto, a random collection of bits.

      Maybe materials science will surprise us once again. The road started with MR (magnetoresistive), then GMR (giant magnetoresistive) and something else whose TLA I can't remember. Then Pixie Dust, and now Pixie Dust2 (5 layers rather than 3) pushing 80Gb/sq. in (if memory serves). A 3-platter design using 3.5" platters with a 1" hole for the servo could pack just over 500GB in. Now figure buying them for $200 - suddenly ripping your DVDs to disc doesn't seem quite so stupid. My mind rebels at the thought of 5T of RAID5 storage in a 3U rack, with 2 hot-spares. I also cringe at the thought of formatting that. Or fscking.

  31. Some people make things that others will buy. by Glytch · · Score: 4, Funny

    You know, like computer peripherals that work with computers that currently exist.

    And when was the last time you saw an external hot-swappable ATA plug?

    Hey, tell you what. I've currently got a bridge under construction. I'll let you drive on it for the low monthly rate of $50 per month. Come on! Only $50 monthly for unlimited use of my yet-to-be-built bridge! That's a hell of a deal, friend.

    If you don't like that, I've also got a $10 per month bridge just down the river. It's only two lanes, and it's sealed at both ends, but it's still a bargain.

  32. better translation by Permission+Denied · · Score: 5, Informative
    I'm 'merican, so be nice :)

    LaCie France launches its new "Big Disk" hard drives which hold 500 MB and 400 MB and use firewire.

    Firewire can theoretically deliver 400 Mbps, and these disks have a sustained transfer rate of 30 to 40 MB/s [Ed: note the unit change: 240 to 360 Mbps]. The casing is aluminum and ZANAC, an alloy believed to increase robustness and provide better heat dissipation.

    The disks come in a 5 1/4 inch format and can be stacked on top of each other or installed vertically in a rigid base. [Ed: vibration causes disks to fail very quickly, best not keep this thing on your desk]. Since each unit comes standard with two internal hard disks and a FW RAID bridge, it's possible to configure them in RAID 1 (Mirroring) or RAID 0 (Stripping) [Ed: he meant "striping" - Freudian slip?]

    And how much does this cost in France?

    The LaCie Big Disk 400 MB (7200 rpm / 8 MB cache) costs 999 Euros HT (1195 Euros TTC). [Ed: HT = hors taxe, no tax, TTC = toutes taxes compris, all taxes included; dollar is roughly equivalent to Euro].

    And the LaCie Big Disk 500 MB (5400 rpm / 2 MB cache) is available for 1124 Euros HT (1344 Euros TTC).

    They come with a 2-year warranty and a CD with the Silverlining utility (Mac and Windows) and the Silverkeeper backup software (Macintosh).

    ------

    Comments talk about the new moderation system at the site and the site's resident trolls. Google translation does quite a job on the colloqial 'net language they use. A nice French pr0n banner at the bottom to even things out (vis-a-vis RAID 0 stripping).

    1. Re:better translation by Permission+Denied · · Score: 2

      Of course, I meant "GB" instead of "MB" in most places. Although it would also be news if, in fact, it were a half-gig drive costing upwards of a thousand dollars in 2002.

  33. Two words... by LinuxHam · · Score: 2

    satellite usenet

    shouldn't take THAT long to fill 500GB with a continuous full usenet feed at 128k or 256k. maybe a week or two. More realistically, cron a binary harvester against localhost, expire articles every few days, and stream mp3's through your stereo using MServ to vote up and down individual tracks. Now THAT's what I call "the sounds of the Internet" :)

    --
    Intelligent Life on Earth
  34. Re:Eh. by JebusIsLord · · Score: 5, Informative

    OK so... Serial ATA debuts at 133MB/s AFAIK, while the current ATA/6 Spec is also 133MB/s. Firewire runs at 400Mb/s, or rather 50MB/s if we are to convert. So yes, is a tad slower. HOWEVER, ATA/66 is generally considered fast enough for modern drives, since the average drive bursts slower than that. In fact, in a comparison of the 4 fastest IDE drives available at storagereview.com the western digital 200MB 7200RPM 8MB cache drive managed to win out with a sustained transfer rate of 16.4MB/s. I'm not even going to mention that IDE has a maximum cable length (32 inches i believe) that precludes its use externally, and firewire does not. So you were saying?

    --
    Jeremy
  35. Where does it say there are two HDs? by jerrytcow · · Score: 2

    I would have thought it was two drives (since I haven't seen any drives larger than 250 GB), but I don't see how you can fit two drives in a 6.7x1.7x10.6" case. I have an external firewire drive and it's only about an inch smaller width and depth - not much extra room in the case either. And why is there only a 2 MB cache in the 500 GB version? Since every drive I've seen has at least 2 MB cache wouldn't a two drive RAID have at least 4 MB of cache?

  36. God... by Peterus7 · · Score: 4, Funny
    I tried explaining this to my g/f, and why this was so neat....

    The back of my head still hurts from her smacking me...

    jk.

  37. Re:Eh. by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2
    IDE has a maximum cable length (32 inches i believe)
    18 inches, actually, according to the ATA standards. But just try to find ATA cables that short.
  38. Re:Eh. by jerrytcow · · Score: 2
    the western digital 200MB 7200RPM 8MB cache drive managed to win out with a sustained transfer rate of 16.4MB/s

    I think you were looking at seek times, my laptop drive gets better than 16 MB/sec. The WD 200JB gets almost 60 MB/sec transfer rate.

    Here's a review page for the WD 200 GB drive and others.

  39. Digital Video storage claims way off by magnum3065 · · Score: 3, Informative

    I was curious about their claim that the drive can hold 2 days of uncompressed digital video since they didn't make any reference to the resolution or frame rate of the video they were talking about. I quickly found some figures here for storage rates for video. Based on their figures for NTSC video stored uncompressed in MJPEG format the video should run about 20MB/s not including the audio they factor in later. At this rate 500GB will only store 7 hours of uncompressed video, only 30% of what they claim. Now, I know companies like to tweak their statistics to make their products seem better, but this seems very misleading.

    1. Re:Digital Video storage claims way off by pandemonia · · Score: 2, Informative

      Well, NTSC DV is about 220 Megs/Minute (or 5 minutes/Gig), which means that 500 gigs is good for about 2500 minutes, or 41.67 hours of DV-Compressed video.

      --
      -mz
  40. naw, WAV baby by mixmasta · · Score: 2, Interesting

    forget crappy mp3....

    I think flac is cool but is too little, too late at this point. With 500 gig I don't need to compress at all, saving my time, and as my music collection grows it won't outstrip hard disk gains.

    DVD iso's are a totally different story though :-P

    --
    #6495ED - cornflower blue
  41. LaCie Drives by rattler14 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I just got my external 120 GB firewire drive in the mail 2 or 3 days ago (figures they just released a new model... but it's not like i would have spent the money for the 400GB version). I must say, it works extremely well with my G4 powerbook. In fact, it't access speed when flipping between the directories is noticeably faster. They are fairly small too, i just tuck the drive behind my monitor.

    All and all, i'm very pleased with it so far. I've transferred about 60+ of files too it, never even a hiccup in speed.

    plus, it comes with all sort of diagnostics on the drive (preformatted in HFS+) format.

    definitely worth the $270, especially for a powerbook limited by the size of the hard drive you can afford to put into it.

    --
    my last sig was too controversial... now, a new and improved useless sig!
  42. Re:Looks like it IS available in the US by RebelTycoon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Nope, its just so Americans can understand how much it costs...

  43. That's .025 Libraries of Congress... by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 2

    500 GB is about a fortieth of the Library of Congress, according to Wikipedia.

    Compression would bring this down, and with good compression you could bring it down to maybe a 5th of the Library of Congress considering English has, according to Shannon's estimates, between 0.6 and 1.2 (probably closer to 1.2) bits of entropy per chararcter.

    \begin{wishful thinking}
    Just wait until holographic technology hits the mass market, then we can get it onto one CD-sized disk!
    \end{wishful thinking}
    \end{slashdot post}

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
    1. Re:That's .025 Libraries of Congress... by DarkVein · · Score: 2

      Wikipedia says that the LOC has 20TB of text.

      This is significant, because the LOC also archives art, music, microfilm (part of which could be considered text), and films. The LOC in its entirety is certainly much larger than 20TB.

      --

      I'm as mimsy as the next borogove but your mome raths are completely outgrabe.

  44. m=milli by goldfndr · · Score: 3, Funny
    Beware the difference between megaBITS and megaBYTES. mb is megaBIT and MB is megaBYTE. One byte is eight times larger than one bit, so it turns out IEEE 1384 is slower by a factor of two than ATA/100.
    Sorry, "mb" is millibit.

    --
    Copyrights, Patents, Trademarks: temporary loans from the Public Domain, not real property ("intellectual" or otherwise)
  45. Damn by Tokerat · · Score: 2

    I come to the comments looking for reactions to this new drive and I see people mostly making the same, overused, modded up six other times already joke. Mostly...

    Oops.

    (The apparantly unobvious thing about my sarcasm is that it's apparant to pretty much only the people who watch South Park. Apparantly...)

    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  46. WiebeTech Firewire RAID by MichaelCrawford · · Score: 3, Informative
    Check out the WiebeTech Firewire Raid.

    Check out the comparitive review at barefeats in which they conclude that the WiebeTech product performs better than the competition.

    Note that if you don't have firewire hardware on your box, you can get a PCI or Cardbus card to do it. There is a compatibility list at www.linux1394.org. I'm using one of the Belkin cards in my PC, and it works well.

    Disclaimer, so you don't think I'm astroturfing: WiebeTech is my current consulting client.

    --
    Request your free CD of my piano music.
  47. Re:Not sure. by dildatron · · Score: 2

    actually, both windows and linux can theoretically support 2TB of data per server, possibly more by now. I have never tried THAT much on one server, but I do test 7TB disk arrays, and I am fairly certain the limit is still at 2TB for windows and linux. someone please correct me if i am wrong. i have never "tested" this fact, but thre is documentation of it if you are willing to look.

    --


    If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
  48. Re:Not sure. by dildatron · · Score: 3, Informative

    i should have mentioned that the BIOS is often the main limiting factor, not the OS.

    ext2 is capable of 4TB maximum, with a max files size of 2TB. ext3 is the same, i belive.

    ntfs has a theoretical max space limitation of 16 exabytes.

    also note there are other limitations besides the theoretical limits... bios, interface, software, and max # of LUNs just to name a few. reliastically, a few terabytes is probably the ceiling for now for joe blow hardware.

    --


    If you had nuts on your chin, would they be chin nuts?
  49. Re:Eh. by JebusIsLord · · Score: 2

    It appears you are right about the 60MB/sec transfer rates, but the number I quoted was 3 pages past yours and was called "legacy transfer rates". I'm not really sure what this entails though - cacheless transfers? The numbers you presented do seem more relevant. Either way its below half of what ATA/133 is capable of, and 60MB/sec is exactly what USB2.0 does theoretically.

    --
    Jeremy
  50. DV Video by Christopher+Bibbs · · Score: 2

    ~13GB per hour. At which rate you'll be able to get less than 40 hours on to one of these drives. Or less than the amount of video a film student can shoot in a semester.

  51. Re:Eh. by Perdo · · Score: 2

    Smoking the herb tonight? THe drive you linked to transfers at 56 MB/s per second. The Maxtor drives used in LaCie's housing transfer at 60 MB/s. In a striped raid array, those disks would push 90 MB/s sustained transfer.

    Buy the bare drives if you need the space. The houseing, along with firewire's limited performance, will gate the performance of these drives which otherwise could almost double the performance of the Lacie unit, at a significant discount in cost.

    --

    If voting were effective, it would be illegal by now.

  52. Great For Backups by moosesocks · · Score: 3, Informative

    I've owned two LaCie pocketdrives for a little under a year (48gb and 30gb), and I must say that they've been a godsend for a geek like myself.

    I can store all my stuff on them. Take them to virtually ANY PC in existance, (anything with usb or firewire - just about any OS works - linux, mac, windows... no drivers required), and "it just works".

    The most practical application i've found for these drives is doing backups of my pcs or client's pcs before doing major upgrades, etc.

    I can take my Mp3 collection anywhere. I once even configured one of them to be a BOOTABLE LINUX DRIVE which I could use ANYWHERE (on older pcs, i needed a bootdisk, but the idea was still cool...)

    The only gripe with the 500gb drive is that it's too big to tote around like the pocketdrives, which fit into a pocket, run completely silent, have a shock absorbant silicone buffer, can be self-powered on firewire, etc.

    Either way, all geeks can benefit from external usb/firewire drives. Before I got them, I never envisioned needing one, but now that I own two, I couldn't envision living without them.

    --
    -- If you try to fail and succeed, which have you done? - Uli's moose
  53. Pretty good deal by bill_mcgonigle · · Score: 3, Informative

    My knee-jerk reaction to these products, especially from LaCie, has usually been, "wow, they're getting a nice premium for doing some integration". So, pricing them, I find the maxtor 250's are going for $400 a pop, add in a hundred bucks for a case/ATAFirewire bridge, and you've got only a hundred bucks left for doing your hardware striping. Probably with the right IC you could come in $50 under, but this is still a good deal.

    --
    My God, it's Full of Source!
    OUTSIDE_IP=$(dig +short my.ip @outsideip.net)
  54. Won't work (probably) under Linux by jamieo · · Score: 2

    I have a similar enclosure to this made by Miglia (Mediabank). You can basically put 2 3.5" hard drives in there as master/slave and connect up the firewire cable.

    It's neat but doesn't work under linux. The ieee1394 stack in Linux doesn't support multiple LUNs for a device, and so it can only see the first disk in the box. I highly suspect that the Lacie drive will be the same. It's probably just using an updated version of the Oxford chipset that can cope with drives over 120Gb. From the ieee1394-devel mailing list, there's been no serious action to work on this.

    Firewire drives are well cool though.

    Jamie

  55. Wow... by marhar · · Score: 2

    Imagine one of these hooked up to a beowulf cluster! ;-)

  56. Re:**WARNING** Major Brag, read at your own risk by not_cub · · Score: 2
    Didn't say it couldn't happen. In fact, I'm impressed.

    11600 albums ~= 1.6 albums/day since CDs were introduced in 1982
    ~= 90m of shelf space

    Again, the logistics are impressive, as is your voracious appetite for new music.

    not_cub

    --
    q='echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"';s=\';b=\\;echo "q=$s$q$s;s=$b$s;b=$b$b;$q"
  57. feh by ErikZ · · Score: 2

    Big Deal. Maxtor sells external 250GB Firewire/USB2 drives. The cool thing is that they come with backup software and a button on the case.

    Push the button, make a backup.

    I've been looking at this as a backup solution, I just need to get a firewire or a USB2 card.

    --
    Democrats or Republicans. They are both taking us to the same place and they are not afraid of us anymore.
  58. not as big as it looks by tylerh · · Score: 2

    {begin parochialism}I find it hard to believe anybody can identify 320 days worth of music they actually like.{end parochialism}

    It's pretty easy - just leave pop music behind and explore "serious" music (eg. classical or jazz).

    First, you really can tell the difference betwee 128 and 192, particularly in the bass when the full dynamic rage is blasting (think a Beethoven finale). Also, some high end voice loses some clarity (think Ella Fitzgerald). So that increases storage needs 50% right there. Next, the typical pop CD contains a bit over 1/2 an hour of music, while classical CD's often run to 70 minutes or more. Lastly, with serious music, it's not just the piece, but the performance. The same composition with a different performer can be a completely different experience. You can hear this easily with Chopin and operas, but it is also true of any symphonic work worth hearing. Talking about jazz without referencing the performer (and the performance for the really good stuff) is a complete waste of time. "remixes" are as old as music performance itself. So if you like a piece, you will have multiple, high-quality copies. I personally have three copies each of Shostakovich's 8th string quartet and Beethoven's symphonies.

    If you are into live performances, then you're using .shm or something simlar, and those run about 5 times the size of the equivalent mp3. Lastly, the true audio file/snob will leave his/her music as .wav. For me, that would immediately move my collection over the 100 gig mark. And who says this is just about mp3? This drive would only hold 100 DVDs. If you wanted to capture in HDTV format, it would hold even less.

    Never underestimate the human need to fill all available disk space.

    --
    "one treats others with courtesy not because they are gentlemen or gentlewomen, but because you are" --G. Henrichs
  59. Re:Eh. by MrResistor · · Score: 2

    60MB/sec is exactly what USB2.0 does theoretically.

    Yeah, but in the real world Firewire is faster than USB2.0.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  60. Re:Eh. by MrResistor · · Score: 2

    Finding them isn't the issue, you can find 18" ATA cables if you look. The problem is using them, their just too damned short! They're barely usable for one drive, and for two drives you'd need a custom (very cramped) case. That's why you don't see them at your local computer store; nobody wants them!

    If you really want a drive cable that's hard to find, though, try finding a laptop IDE cable (44-pin) that's 18", or even longer than 6" for that matter.

    --
    Under capitalism man exploits man. Under communism it's the other way around.
  61. Re:Eh. by Eric+Smith · · Score: 2
    Which is, of course, why Serial ATA is spec'd for cable lengths up to 1M.

    If I had to set up a server today, using plain 'ol parallel IDE drives on a plain 'ol IDE port, I'd stick Serial ATA adapters on everything and dump the parallel cables entirely.