Slashdot Mirror


Truth, Ownership, and the Scientific Tradition

number6x writes "The Physics Today website has an article by Robert Laughlin titled "Truth, Ownership, and the Scientific tradition". The article deals with some recent blunders in the scientific community like the falsification of data at lucent covered here on slashdot. The article is mainly about the conflict between the free exchange of ideas that the scientific community needs to survive, and the demand for property ownership that commercial sponsors demand."

260 comments

  1. french "artists" by everyplace · · Score: 0, Informative

    I'm still laughing over those french guys who got the papers submitted to the international physics journals. That and their honorary PhD's.

    1. Re:french "artists" by Chembryl · · Score: 2, Interesting

      They won their PhDs fairly. They weren't honorary. The nature of science (for good or for ill) is that unless someone can disprove your work then yours is as good as anyone elses.

      --
      - This and all my posts are public domain. I am a Physicist. I am not your Physicist. This is not Physically advice
    2. Re:french "artists" by everyplace · · Score: 2, Interesting

      So what happens when you get your PhD through these means, and then someone says "Well, nice work, but everything you've done is utter garbage, and you've made fools of an entire community." as was the case in this scenario?

      As performance artists though, I give them the highest regard.

    3. Re:french "artists" by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      The idea is that the folks on the PhD committee need to understand the work well enough to vet it. Which means that one responsibility of a dissertation is to explain your work in a way that is understandable at a minimum to the committee deciding on your degree. And of course the orals need to answer any lingering questions in the minds of the committee that your work is valuable. So if their works is nonsense, and they have PhDs, it's the responsibility of the committee members who granted them the degree without properly vetting their work.

      If.

    4. Re:french "artists" by Chembryl · · Score: 1
      Its perfectly valid for someone to say their work was garbage. In this case John Baez never even looked at their work before assuming that just because they had been on French TV they were incapable of getting a PhD.

      Remember, there is more to getting a PhD than just writing a thesis.

      Incidently, if this *was* joke then perhaps they would have owned up to it when the issue was hot?

      --
      - This and all my posts are public domain. I am a Physicist. I am not your Physicist. This is not Physically advice
    5. Re:french "artists" by user+flynn · · Score: 1


      The nature of science (for good or for ill) is that unless someone can disprove your work then yours is as good as anyone elses.

      It's not whether comeone can 'disprove' your work, it's whether your work is falsifiable.

      --
      In the distance you hear an ominous moo.
  2. The truth is: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Slashdot editors are paedophiles and Linux is unfit for desktop and server use.

  3. Scott Lockwood The Oathbreaker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Thoughout history, many names have been used to describe those who are on the wrong moral path in life: coward, criminal, fiend, monster, vagrant, lunatic. It's without question that William Scott Lockwood III is all of these things, but these are things that can be forgiven. William Scott Lockwood III's sins run deeper.

    In many cultures, the greatest moral offense a man can commit isn't murder, robbery, rape, arson, or even blasphemy. In these cultures, there's a word for someone who is even lower than the murderers and rapists, because he has demonstrated with clear finality his lack of moral character. This one word, never used carelessly, reserved only for the lowest of the low is oathbreaker.

    Many societies value personal honor, honesty, and integrity above anything else. People can make mistaks, and still maintain their honor if they take accountability for their actions. But the oathbreaker is the lowest of the low, never to be forgiven, and never to be trusted. This is because he has voluntarily sacrified the only thing that every man brings with him into the world, and the only thing that every man (hopefully) takes with him into the grave: his honor.

    When a man's honor is gone, he has nothing.

    Ladies and gentlemen, William Scott Lockwood III has nothing. If our society were still built on the concept that a man's word is sacred and that honoring others with the truth is a noble goal, William Scott Lockwood III would be dead right now.

    A man's word is his bond, and when he breaks his word, he's no longer a man at all. He's worse than a coward, worse than a liar, and worse than a thief, but he's all these things and more. He's an oathbreaker.

    In the past, oathbreakers become nonpersons. They stand below even murderers and thieves. Even beggars would not give or recieve comfort from an oathbreaker. Quite often, they were simply killed outright. Sometimes, they were merely cut off from honest society, trusted by no one, alienated until the day they died. After their death, their families were shunned and distrusted forever, because a man holds in his hand no only his own honor, but the honor of his family as well.

    The Lockwood family has no honor left. The Lockwood family has no place in honest society, among civilized humans, because they have no honor, and they are not a part of civilization.

    Killing an oathbreaker was considered to be an act of mercy, sending a tortured soul on to final judgement instead of forcing him to live an empty, hollow life.

    Maybe it's time that we bring back the practice of killing oathbreakers, and ensuring that their bloodline does not propogate. Maybe a lack of honesty is what's wrong with our society. Maybe that's why everything is falling into chaos around us. When you can't trust a man's word, what basis is there for civilization?

    I think upon consideration that you will agree: William Scott Lockwood III is less than a gentlemen, less even than a man, less even than a human, less even than an animal. William Scott Lockwood III is an oathbreaker.

  4. Vlad - Official Position by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    It is time to set the record straight regarding the situation with respect
    to Vladinator/JCB/Reza/Lonesome Cowboy Burt/Whatever other aliases he may be
    using. The situation has been confused due to the recent world-wide influx
    of Vlad-haters, helper-cells, interested third parties and the occasional
    Vlad sympathizer.

    Let us start with a basic tenet of the Association of Anti-Vlad Avengers:
    There is no difference between William Scott Lockwood III and those who
    aid him, give him comfort, and/or use him as a substandard, "Always Save"
    hosting solution.
    Though we may have no direct quarrel with you, Mr. "Trollaxor",
    you appear to be friendly with Mr. Lockwood and - by your own admission - are
    using him as a substandard "Always Save" hosting solution. Consider the fact
    that if you were using a respectable host for your web site, you would not be
    having the difficulties you are having now. Also, with this attempt at
    ferreting out information for Mr. Lockwood, you are aiding and abetting our
    sworn enemy and have aligned yourself in direct oposition to a powerful
    internet force (that is, the AAA and its splinter groups).

    This brings us to a primary characteristic of the AAA which has
    been detailed elsewhere, but which I will repeat here in interest of
    completeness: no single cell, as an entity, is aware of the members of
    any other cell.
    The structure of our association works as follows. Each
    cell is composed of no more and no less than three members who all reside in
    a roughly similar geographic area. One of the three members is designated
    as a messenger. This messenger is the only member in contact with a messenger
    from exactly two other cells. In this way, the members of each cell remain
    anonymous to the members of any other cell. If a messenger has been compromised,
    the corresponding cell is responsible for "cleansing" that messenger and
    replacing him or her with a new messenger. Such a cell will remain on
    probation - meaning they will only be allowed contact with a single other
    cell - until such time as the new messenger has been operating for no less
    than six months.

    Our activities are clandestine and even if another cell wanted to
    share the information you request, it would not be able to because it
    would not be privy to said information.

    As you can see the AAA, though very loosely connected, operates
    in a highly efficient manner and is deadly serious about the stated goals
    of the organization: namely, the complete, unconditional eradication of
    Vladinator, in any and all forms, from the internet.

    We have been following the current situation with Vladinator's hosting
    service quite closely and we estimate the damages to be severe at this point.
    However, we cannot agree to end our champaign any sooner than already decided
    upon. We may have shown mercy in this, our second major attack, if Mr.
    Lockwood had shown the proper degree of humility at our hands. Instead,
    Mr. Lockwood responded with his usual barrage of
    lies
    and vitriol.
    For this reason, and the fact that we are otherwise bored, we have extended the
    length of this attack. We realize that Mr. Lockwood's hosting company will try
    various tricks to deflect our attack, things such as firewalls and IP banning. Eventually,
    they will succeed in eliminating the current attack at which point we will rest for
    a period of not less than seven days prior to initiating another attack.

    We predict that the end of this second wave will result in another round of
    cockiness from Mr. Lockwood, given the highly reactionary character that he is.
    The next attack, which will be the "third wave", will be far more subtle than the
    current attack and will undoubtedly shake Mr. Lockwood's faith in his current
    alliances and dealings. This cycle of attack/end attack/Lockwood gets cocky/
    attack again is necessary to wear down Mr. Lockwood's self-confidence and
    general desire for continued existence.

    As for the fate of Trollaxor.com, I would suggest you find a more suitable,
    respectable host for your web site. Had you chosen your hosting solution more
    wisely to begin with, you would not find yourself in the same sinking ship with
    the rest of Lockwood's "customers". We would also like to remind you that it
    is not we who are the enemy, it is William Scott Lockwood III who has
    brought this upon himself and those who do business with him.
    Yes, our attacks
    have been harsh and our dealings with Mr. Lockwood have been merciless, but simply
    going over Mr. Lockwood's internet history shows that our cause is just and in the
    best interests of the internet community at large. If we must sacrifice "innocent"
    sites such as yours and kuro5hin, then so be it. It is a very small price to pay
    for a truly Vladinator-free internet. An internet where true innocents can browse,
    write and engage in discussion without fear of being choked at the hands of a
    slobbering troglydite with bad glands
    and a spastic colon.

  5. Vladequacy - The Secrets Revealed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=20721&cid=4682 572
    <bc> hehe
    <bc> god I suck
    <bc> hey FI
    <First_Incision> I will not discout the possibility that you suck.
    <bc> A wise move FI
    <abu_zeqqzeqq> bc: if craig is as fucked up as he seemse
    <abu_zeqqzeqq> that will push him to new extremes...
    <bc> hehee
    <First_Incision> I never understood the stone women thing. Is osm still perving around somewhere?
    <momocrome> http://www.clusterlizard.org
    <momocrome> osm's site ^^
    <bc> yes, though who knows what he's up to
    <abu_zeqqzeqq> bc: change your nick to "Abu'l Hayjeh "
    <momocrome> he has a bunch of uninspired match.com pseudo-trolls
    <momocrome> picking on hapless, lonely women
    <bc> that irc log is hilarious
    <dmg> that takest the biscuit
    <bc> [bc] vlad... i'2 type 'mo ;but i drunk.
    <dmg> I laughed
    <momocrome> post the text to 20721
    <momocrome> stir the pot a bit
    <momocrome> I am going to rise to their baiting
    <momocrome> even thoughI haven't been singled out
    <bc> haha
    <bc> I must read more now
    <bc> county: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=20721&cid=4675 437
    <ivan> Ignore the superfluous comma.
    <bc> does that seem accurate to you?
    <ivan> All of them =)
    <ivan> thx
    *** First_Incision is now known as fi-away
    <ivan> I can't say, bc. I didn't read it.
    <ivan> Should I?
    <bc> Yes, you should
    <ivan> Haha!
    <abu_zeqqzeqq> http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_686841.html?m enu=news.weirdworld.sexlife
    <ivan> It almost looks real.
    <ivan> The one problem is that shoeboy is LOLing too much and Vladinator isn't doing it enough.
    <bc> I'm kind of insulted. It represents me as a pathetic drunk with delusional fantasies that I'm liked by females, and that seems entirely untrue
    <abu_zeqqzeqq> gratuituous kylie pictures. Proof Allah(SWT) and Mohammed (PBUH) are REAL
    <ivan> It does seem entirely untrue that you're liked by females.
    <abu_zeqqzeqq> bc at least you are worthy of parody
    <bc> hehe
    <abu_zeqqzeqq> some of us are become stalinesque non-persons.
    <abu_zeqqzeqq> airbrushed out of trolling history
    <ivan> abu and I didn't even get noticed :(
    <bc> craig&osm&trollaxor prolly still like you, dmg
    <ivan> "Where's the part where Barry Corrington slags on Jin Wicked for half an hour then kisses her ass when she logs in?"
    <ivan> Has Jin ever been in here?

  6. What's with the upped signal-to-noise today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Anybody?

    1. Re:What's with the upped signal-to-noise today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      It is pretty remarkable, I have to say. I mean, where is this stuff coming from?

    2. Re:What's with the upped signal-to-noise today? by ContemporaryInsanity · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Good question, what *is* going on ?!?

    3. Re:What's with the upped signal-to-noise today? by turgid · · Score: 1

      Has someone decided to go mad since it's Friday 13th? Is this some kind of automated troll "spamming?"

    4. Re:What's with the upped signal-to-noise today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps Ralskys trying to get his own back 8o)

    5. Re:What's with the upped signal-to-noise today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Upped signal to noise ratio would imply an increase in the quality of comments (more signal, less noise). Since the crapfloods appear to be better reading than most of the comments on this PoS site, that would appear to be true.

    6. Re:What's with the upped signal-to-noise today? by TracerJPN_USMC · · Score: 1

      I dunno. But its making me regret browsing at -1. People need to get a life.

      --
      magnanomous.
    7. Re:What's with the upped signal-to-noise today? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Dopey articles that noone in their right mind could insightfully comment on?

      That and in soviet russia, gay is linux and hot grits pours portman down your pants!

  7. Amherst-Fag and the Libertarian by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    From: "80md"
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] Evil enemies of Liberty
    Date sent: Sat, 18 Nov 2000 00:36:06 EST
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0035)

    >From: "Craig McPherson" <craig@laceyonline.com>
    >
    >I've heard that outside the United States, those are the only five sports
    > that exist (Soccer, Polo, Spooning, Curling, and Snuckers), and I don't
    >even know what the HECK four of them are.

    Well, it's easy to understand why they do these things: They're undernourished, because they don't have much food out there in all the poor countries. So the average foreigner is about four foot six, maybe five feet tops, and they weigh about eighty pounds. Their teeth tend to fall out, and their bones are brittle as hell because they don't have milk. That's because their "commissars" took all their cows away. So you see, these poor "Europeans" as they call themselves, and the "Canadians" and whatnot, all these people are frail weaklings. They have no knowledge of freedom either, because they don't have a Genesis Document guaranteeing their rights, and they're given to sodomy and other degenerate practices because they've never been exposed to Christianity. Christianity is banned in Europe, did you know that? It's true. The Socialists always ban religion when they seize power. Of course, the Europeans were never free to begin with, so they don't know any better. They've always been slaves. It's all the same to them.

    So their poor diet, their atheism, their slavehood, and their homosexuality have robbed them of their strength and their manhood. Therefore, they play girl games like Snuckers, Privet, and Gloon. While we eat our peas for the souls in Purgatory, they HAVE no peas. They limply push a ball around a field, with no manly, bone-crunching collisions to build their flaccid
    characters. Where even our most girlish pseudomen play tennis, they teach badminton to their soldiers.

    >Man, we need to get rid of those other countries. They want to abolish
    >our sports and force us to play homosexual female sports like Polo and
    >Spooning, whatever they are.

    It's sad, but true. In fact, we'd only be putting them out of
    their misery. They'd thank us if they understood.

    --
    80md

    "Harry Browne seems to think he knows me personally --
    I get a letter from him every week asking for money."
    -- Craig

    (This is CP0035)

  8. VLADEQUACY RAW & UNCUT 1 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll


    Session Start: Fri Nov 15 04:59:49 2002
    *** Now talking in #adequacy
    *** Topic is '#codependence therapy.'
    *** Set by ubu on Wed Nov 13 23:08:59
    *** wsl3 has quit IRC (Connection reset by peer)
    *** wsl3 (~vlad@cloaked.client.attbi.com) has joined #adequacy
    *** Disconnected
    Session Close: Fri Nov 15 11:29:49 2002

    Session Start: Fri Nov 15 11:33:04 2002
    *** Now talking in #adequacy
    *** Topic is '#codependence therapy.'
    *** Set by ubu on Wed Nov 13 23:08:59
    *** wsl3 has quit IRC (Connection reset by peer)
    *** Vladinator (~vlad@12-250-246-112.client.attbi.com) has joined #adequacy
    *** Vladinator is now known as wsl3
    *** bc (gallus@modem-941.lynx.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    *** ChanServ sets mode: +o bc
    [Captain_Tenille] beeeceeee
    [bc] 'ello
    [ubu] hello, bic
    [ubu] how are things?
    [bc] alright
    [ubu] we had a ridiculously interesting evening last night.
    [bc] I'm better today, I sought legal advice
    [ubu] ah? how was that?
    [bc] about, ubu?
    [bc] it was fine
    [Captain_Tenille] I had to take the gf to the emergency room last night.
    [Captain_Tenille] [--- not much sleep
    [bc] oh yes, I remember you saying that was due
    [ubu] yeesh, what for, CT?
    [Captain_Tenille] We thought her miscarriage was done yesterday morning.
    [Captain_Tenille] Turns out, it wasn't.
    [Captain_Tenille] She went downhill all evening, then woke up around 1:15 with excrutiating cramps.
    * ubu moans.
    [ubu] i'm so sorry.
    [Captain_Tenille] Like, screaming and writhing in pain bad.
    [bc] shitey
    [Captain_Tenille] Took her in, and waited for fucking ever.
    [Captain_Tenille] I waited so long I thought they were doing a D&C and hadn't told me. Turned out she had to wait around too. She got vicodin, at least.
    [cyndrekit] sucky CT
    [cyndrekit] I had a really good friend misscarry
    [cyndrekit] it went on for several days
    [Captain_Tenille] It's been going on since Tuesday or Wednesdayish, I think.
    [Captain_Tenille] We found out something might have been amiss only last Wednesday (the 6th).
    [ubu] i am so sorry.
    [bc] coo, & I always thought it an unpleasant thing that last 30 minutes
    * cyndrekit hugs Captain_Tenille
    [cyndrekit] bc: na, the body has to clean everything out
    *** ubu (ubu@cloaked.ne.client2.attbi.com) has left #adequacy
    [Captain_Tenille] Um, bye ubu
    [cyndrekit] so is everything fine now?
    [bc] I think he found that distressing ct, for personal reasons, so quit without saying anything
    [Captain_Tenille] She's home sleeping.
    [Captain_Tenille] Oh.
    [cyndrekit] ya, it takes a toll
    *** ubu (ubu@cloaked.ne.client2.attbi.com) has joined #adequacy
    *** ChanServ sets mode: +o ubu
    [cyndrekit] make her eat - esspecially veggies with iron
    [cyndrekit] like spinach
    [cyndrekit] well, when she wakes up
    [ubu] i just learned that the House Un-American Activities Committee was originally founded by a Democratic Senator, Samuel Dickstein, to ferret out Ku Klux Klansmen, "fascists", and other right-wing groups.
    [ubu] it was called the Dickstein Committee for years, and Communists and liberals alike were very happy with it.
    *** elby (jlb@hagbard.io.com) has joined #adequacy
    *** ChanServ sets mode: +o elby
    [ubu] only after Martin Dies of Texas became its chairman did it turn its attentions to Communists in the government, at which point the Communists protested loudly that they were being persecuted, and their civil liberties violated.
    [elby] i am looking for therapy please.
    [bc] hey elby!
    [bc] what may I help you with
    [bc] state your case and insert $5 into machine
    [bc] this is the automated psycholigist
    [elby] Well, sometimes I cry when I masturbate
    * elby inserts $5.
    [bc] How do you feel when you cry when you masturbate?
    [elby] I feel sad.
    [bc] How do you feel when you feel sad?
    [elby] ... Sad.
    [elby] You are a crappy psychologists, i want my $5 back!
    [cyndrekit] Hey elby!
    [bc] Tell me about your mother
    [elby] She has very soft hands.
    [elby] hi cyn :)
    [ubu] bc, county tells me i'm awkward.
    [ubu] i don't think that's fair.
    [bc] you are awkward. You never let anyone relax
    [ubu] really?
    [ubu] how's that?
    [ubu] are you calling me high-maintenance?
    [elby] I went to an odd funeral yesterday
    [bc] Well, people are happily throwing around assumptions and having light hearted fun, and then you arrive with your demands for proof and urgent questioning
    [bc] why odd?
    [elby] Sort of a distant relative, never really knew the guy
    [elby] but he lived in some backwoods town
    [elby] at about 73 he passed
    [elby] and he owned a topless bar
    [bc] cool
    [elby] There were a hell of a lot of interesting stories told about him.
    [bc] so were all his stripper employees there?
    [elby] Would have been interesting to know him more.
    [bc] dresed in black?
    [elby] No but there were bikers
    [elby] I think one ex-stripper was there
    [bc] heh
    [ubu] demands for proof?
    [ubu] what in God's name do you mean by that?
    [bc] pity you never got in with him while he was alive, or paid any interest in your own flesh and blood. You could be the owner of a strip joint by now
    [bc] ubu: see? You are doing it right now.
    [ubu] i demand proof.
    [bc] "[ubu] what in God's name do you mean by that?" [-that.
    [ubu] hahaha!
    [ubu] oh yeah, that. i guess that's awkward.
    [bc] haha
    [cyndrekit] wow, that was a trap he woulden't have been able to avoid
    [cyndrekit] good one bc
    [ubu] he really did get me, there.
    [bc] heh
    [elby] not really my own flesh and blood bc
    [elby] not really directly related to me
    [bc] well, if that salves your guilt, that's fine.
    [elby] It's my half brothers father's stepfather.
    [ubu] stingray softly sleeps
    [ubu] my probing will not wake him
    [bc] I keep my half brother's father's stepfather very close, and so should you have.
    [ubu] sweet dreams, little one.
    [elby] haha
    [elby] Took you long enough.
    [ubu] i poke, poke his face
    [ubu] and yet he still ignores me
    [elby] But BC, they lived in.... *shudder* oregon
    [ubu] poke... poke... poke... poke... poke
    [bc] well elby, such a misfortune should have motivaed you to help them however you could.
    [cyndrekit] oy! down ubu!
    [cyndrekit] your being abnormaly odd
    [bc] pokey poke
    [bc] A clip from the nine equals six to the grave, A to the muthafuckin' K, homeboy!
    [elby] bc is a hard motherfucker.
    [ubu] korean!
    *** Disconnected
    *** Attempting to rejoin...
    *** Rejoined channel #adequacy
    *** Topic is '#codependence therapy.'
    *** Set by ubu on Wed Nov 13 23:08:59
    [Captain_Tenille] Interesting: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=20721&cid=4675 729
    [bc] coo
    [bc] he got everyone
    [bc] except jsm
    [bc] and he knows all the names, even obscure ones
    [bc] which means it must be somebody on teh inside
    [elby] boring.
    [bc] the only one he didn't get was warren mann
    [elby] haha
    [elby] Oh, I'm sure craigs and warrens copies of the mailing list info has been spread all over.
    [bc] heh
    [elby] big deal, all we ever talked about were our silly slashdot conspiracies and some people used their real names in their email addresses.
    [elby] I'm flattered people still care though :)
    [bc] heh
    *** Disconnected
    *** Attempting to rejoin...
    *** Rejoined channel #adequacy
    *** Topic is '#codependence therapy.'
    *** Set by ubu on Wed Nov 13 23:08:59
    [bc] hmm
    [elby] ok see you guys around, logging
    [bc] bye elby
    [elby] i check my io email more often than my aq mail if anyone needs to get in touch with me :)
    *** elby has quit IRC (Quit: BitchX: its everywhere you want to be)
    * bc ponders his great hunger
    *** Captain_Tenille has quit IRC (Connection reset by peer)
    *** Captain_Tenille (~jeremy@216-210-218-82.atgi.net) has joined #adequacy
    [Captain_Tenille] zuul, what's the word?
    [zuul] Thunderbird!
    [Captain_Tenille] zuul, what's the price?
    [zuul] Forty twice!
    [em] hey bc
    [em] did you know that hospitals in the UK are underprepared for a nuke attack?
    * em reads the news.
    [em] "Congress on Friday passed legislation that would make it a crime to insert illicit or pornographic material into packaged food products."
    [bc] underprepared eh? hmph
    [em] http://www.cnn.com/2002/ALLPOLITICS/11/15/product. tampering.ap/
    [em] lol
    [em] so I can stick pr0n inside food packages, it's legal
    [em] well, until sometime next week
    [Captain_Tenille] Better hurry
    [me0w] I am hungry
    [bc] me too
    [bc] 'cept I just can't be bothered cooking
    [me0w] bc, I would make you lunch
    [bc] I haven't had anything to eat all day, and I got up at 6 and have been busy as hell
    [me0w] Although, I guess it is dinner time over there.
    [bc] me0w, luncheon would be perfect anyway. I don't feel like anything overheavy
    [me0w] I made a yummy salad dressing the other day.
    [bc] huh, is putting pornography inside food products a big problem in USia?
    [bc] mm. I like salad, except for the lettuce part
    [cyndrekit] i never heared of it
    [bc] which I don't like much at all
    [bc] especially if it is red
    [bc] red lettuce is bogging
    [me0w] I like romaine lettuce
    [me0w] which is green
    * bc all of a sudden has a great yen for radishes
    *** ubu is now known as ubu_away
    [bc] covered in salt
    [em] the motivation for the law seems not to have been pr0n, but a KKK pamphlet found by a 10-year old
    [bc] eh
    [bc] that's insane
    [bc] people should be allowed to put whatever the like in food
    [bc] bloody fascists!
    * em discovers that Belarus is a nasty place
    [Captain_Tenille] You *just* figured that out?
    [bc] em lives in the groves of academe, ct, not in "the real world"
    [bc] his horizons extend no farther than a copy of the Times Literary Supplement while a hot graduate student felates him
    [bc] no wonder (incredible!) he didn't know about Belarus! Would you?
    [Captain_Tenille] I know about Belarus. Have for years.
    [Captain_Tenille] Of course, I've always been a history nut.
    [bc] http://www.opendemocracy.net/themes/article.jsp?id =3&articleId=757
    [bc] fun
    [bc] I've never heard the House of Commons described as "dignified" though
    [bc] it's very clearly anything but
    [em] it's british. anything with that ridiculou accent sounds dignified out here.
    [bc] what ridiculous accent?
    [Captain_Tenille] Any of your ridiculous accents.
    [cyndrekit] hehe
    [bc] s'the mother tongue!
    [Captain_Tenille] Remember, the English spoken in the Pacific Northwest is the least accented English in the world.
    [Captain_Tenille] You need to learn to talk like me.
    [bc] er, you mean the most accented
    [Captain_Tenille] No, least.
    [bc] furthest away from what I speak = most accented
    [Captain_Tenille] Us, and St. Louis.
    * bc is accentless
    [Captain_Tenille] From what I understand.
    [Captain_Tenille] em, care to comment?
    [em] heh, i feel sorry for australians and new zealanders.
    [em] they get confused for all sorts of things in USia
    [bc] ct, it is all relative. Posh english people have the conceit that they have no accent. So, it now appears, do people in the pacific northwest
    [em] so I was talking with this australian friend the other day. She told me that one of our first-year students called her by the nickname of somebody else-- an understandable error.
    [Captain_Tenille] They train newscasters how to talk here, for Christ's sake!
    [em] and
    [bc] it seems hard to me to see how any accent can be stronger than another, they are all equivalent
    [bc] just different
    [em] she was telling him, "Oh, don't worry. The receptionist always confuses me an Melanie [this other student, from New Zealand]"
    [em] so the kid goes: "Oh, that's because you're both British!"
    [bc] heh
    [em] OTOH this new kid in our department is an idiot.
    [bc] if I moved to america, I wouldn't be understood at all. it'd quickly get on my tits, i suspect
    [em] quite liable to open his mouth while keeping his ears closed.
    [em] bc: maybe not
    [bc] "ah sed ah wont a cuppa COFFEE!"
    [em] I always assumed scottish people would be completely uncomprehensible.
    [bc] em, my father lived there once, he had problems
    [em] when I actually met some, I found them easier than a lot of brits.
    [bc] also, the scottish people you met were doubtless posh
    [bc] why else would they be going to parties in Stanford?
    [em] dunno there.
    [bc] working class accents in glasgow can be incomprehensible to *me*
    [bc] and that's their norm
    [bc] just today:
    [bc] guy I was talking to said "On the second floor."
    [bc] which I interpreted as "On the first of february."
    [bc] dunno how I managed that. "on" is "oan", "second" becomes "secant", it ends with a t sound, and "floor" in glaswegian is like "flare"
    [bc] and I'm not from glasgow! so it takes getting used to
    *** Sulla (gallus@modem-3511.lemur.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    * Captain_Tenille yawns
    *** bc has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
    [Sulla] One young man sat on a concrete block spouting antiglobalization slogans while warming himself with a hot Whopper. This was funny, but also a little depressing. The Left, I thought, is in trouble.
    [Sulla] ^^hehe
    *** Sulla is now known as bc
    [cyndrekit] where is that from?
    [bc] http://www.boston.com/dailyglobe2/314/focus/Critiq ue_of_pure_comedy+.shtml [-there, cyndrekit
    [cyndrekit] thought so
    [cyndrekit] sounded almost to clever to be you. ;)
    [bc] heh :-\
    [bc] you mean "not clever enough"
    [cyndrekit] hehe
    [cyndrekit] yea... thats it...
    [cyndrekit] ;)
    [bc] good :)
    *** Captain_Tenille is now known as Captain_Lunch
    [bc] em
    [bc] you should bring back aqbot
    *** momocrome (~momocrome@cloaked.client.attbi.com) has joined #adequacy
    [bc] hey vaginux
    [momocrome] ok, let's try it out
    *** momocrome is now known as vaginux
    [bc] looking sharp in your new suit!
    [vaginux] lessee if I get some crap
    [bc] hehe, going to join #k5?
    [vaginux] already in #k5, #everything, #slashdot
    [bc] coo, that's lots of channels
    [bc] I bet you like all of them better than us :(
    [vaginux] not at all. I want to hurt those other channels
    [bc] hehe!
    [vaginux] i want to make them pay for my years of suffering
    [bc] I think I will drop into #k5, haven't been in there in yonks
    [vaginux] I always get picked on by geeks
    [bc] but I need a new nick, I don't want the usual attacks I get
    [bc] haha!
    [bc] yes, they are bad those geeks, with their love of sport and bullying ways
    [vaginux] hmm. do you want it to be mundane or a touch more controversial?
    [bc] I'm trying to think of what the name of that 52yo woman tombuck laid is
    [vaginux] speaking of whuch, who did the KKK story that's in the k5 queue?
    [bc] tuppy something
    [bc] dunno, vaginux, it was funny though
    [cyndrekit] how about just candice?
    [bc] hmm
    [cyndrekit] or do you want someone established?
    [bc] I'll try to find it
    *** bc is now known as tuppy_owens
    [tuppy_owens] candice, cyndrekit?
    [cyndrekit] I thought you were just lookin for any female name
    [cyndrekit] so i thought i would throw that one out
    [tuppy_owens] heh
    [me0w] hehehehehehhe
    [tuppy_owens] hehe

  9. Amherst-Fag and the MOMOCROME by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: [k22320inchfan] gbd on #trolls
    Date sent: Thu, 14 Dec 2000 22:06:25 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0004)

    Right now, "gbd" is on #trolls. His host is
    remarkably similar to momocrome's: gbd is
    ~gbd@adsl-63-200-62-16.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net
    (george), whereas momocrome is
    ~natalie_p@cloaked.dsl.lsan03.pacbell.net (MOMOCROME).
    Yet, he's able to present compelling evidence that he
    is the one who currently holds the "gbd" usernick on
    slashdot, who I do consider to be the real gbd in
    light of the circumstances surrounding how I gave him
    the account. Gbd's address looks like it's from SF,
    whereas momocrome's is from LA, so that would suggest
    they're not the same. But does anyone else have a
    pacbell.net address that we know?

    (This is CP0004)

  10. IN SOVIET RUSSA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Data falsifies YOU!

    1. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSA by turgid · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      In soviet Russia, Soviet Russia jokes are tired of YOU!

  11. Amherst-Fag and the Jurisprudence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: [k22320inchfan] No respect
    Date sent: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 08:57:36 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0018)

    Today was the appointed date for jury duty (postponed since this summer, since the idiots at the courthouse failed to divine that calling a student to duty in the county where he studies rather than resides permanently doesn't make any sense). It was my hope to get on a jury, since I highly value the (unconstitutionally diminishing) role of the jury in American jurisprudence.

    I showed up this morning at the courthouse. After some buffoonery at the security check (hint: don't carry a cpu in your backpack when arriving for jury duty), I went upstairs where I signed in and was informed that I had already missed the video (shucks). I filled out some paperwork and was redirected to the grand-jury room.

    This was a potential mixed blessing. Grand juries, as distinguished from petite ("normal") juries, are the first line that the state must cross before obtaining an indictment for the accused. They consist of 23 laypersons whose standard is "probable cause" rather than "reasonable doubt" and vote by majority rule whether to issue an indictment. The prosecutor presents his witnesses and evidence, and the defendant has no representation. Normally, the grand-jury trial is brief and 99% or so of all grand juries return an indictment. Prosecutors often refer to this statistic as the "ability to indict a ham sandich" if they so please. Grand juries usually sit for one day per week for three months, something that would screw up any student's semester.

    The good thing about grand juries is that they have almost infinite investigatory powers to do whatever they please. What is not commonly understood is that the role of the grand jury isn't just to return a verdict in the form of an indictment; it's for members to question witnesses, subpoena evidence the prosecutor didn't present, and generally get the whole story. It's even within the power of the grand jury to expell the prosecutor and judge if the jury so decides.

    I was prepared to give them hell. Once on a jury
    (grand or otherwise), I was going to be the asshole
    lawyer the defendant isn't allowed to have. I was
    going to subpoena bank records, grill prosecutorial
    witnesses, and vote to nullify anything I considered
    unjust (even when "legal"). I was going to persuade
    enough fellow jurors to kick out anyone we didn't
    like, especially the prosecutor. In short, I was
    going to troll the legal system.

    But I didn't get that opportunity. After an hour of
    sitting in the grand-jury room, we were informed that
    we weren't waiting for a grand-jury seating: instead,
    a petite-jury seating.

    Petite juries, in states that value the constitution,
    are 12-person panels that sit and hear evidence in the
    actual criminal trial. Their role is ostensibly to
    decide the facts and apply the law as directed by the
    judge. Their actual role under the constitution
    (though the Supreme Court doesn't require that you be
    informed of this) is to sit in judgment not just on
    the facts but also on the law. Again, I was hoping to
    get a chance to nullify stuff: this time, drug laws
    and other things I believe unconstitutional.

    Again, I was denied. Only five minutes later, we were
    informed that all the cases pending today were
    plea-bargained, and we were "free to go". A sigh of
    relief was heard throughout the room, as people who
    didn't want to be there were grateful that they didn't
    have to serve on a jury and perform the duty they
    didn't want to perform. I was disgusted.

    That's what's most wrong with plea bargaining in this
    country. Not that 90% of cases never reach public
    scrutiny because they're decided in the hallways of
    courthouses. Not that people serve penalties for
    unconstitutional charges. Not that real criminals get
    off with reduced sentences. Not that the legislatures
    feel free to pass an absurd number of laws without
    caring whether the court system can handle the load of
    giving each citizen true justice.

    None of that.

    What's wrong is that I, a troll, have been kept off my
    damn jury. No respect.

    (This is CP0018)

  12. Scott Lockwood - Unbalanced Mental-Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    It's been my experience that people who cry "whaaa, whaaa, I'm going to sue you!" or "whaaa, whaaa, I'm going to come to your house and kick your ass!" or "whaaa, whaaa, I'm going to call the police and have them arrest you for being mean to me" whenever they feel personally offended on the Internet tend to be terribly immature and have serious emotional problems. People who aren't confident with themselves and feel inferior about their own abilities try to boost their own self-esteem by making empty threats of lawsuits or physical assault whenever they're on the losing end of a flamewar.

    His face will turn red, he'll start to wheeze and stutter, and he will angrily type, "Yeah, well, just wait until I tell my uncle at the CIA about how rude you've been to me! He'll come and arrest you and you'll go to jail and I'll sue you for everything you have! Then I'll kick your ass, and have sex with your girlfriend!"

    He will then drag his corpulent, out-of-shape, virginal body across the basement to bed and drift off to slumber thinking "Wow, I'm sure I really scared those bastards! I'm sure they'll think twice before disagreeing with ME again!" He'll feel only a slight twinge of hollow emptiness the next day when he sees his uncle, who rather than working for the CIA, is actually the assistant janitor at the local McDonald's.

    A few people who seem to fit the stereotype quite well of being absolute assholes on the Internet and then threatening to sue or call the FBI, CIA, and KGB when anyone who calls them on it:

    Bernard Shifman

    Robert Novak

    Scott Lockwood

    Were these three people long-lost triplets, seperated at birth? Why do they behave in exactly the same way? Do they share a common mental disease? Or are they all actually the same person? We may never know.

  13. Evil Is Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Why Evil is Good

    I hate victims. Victims are the albatross hung from the neck of society. The
    term is not even acknowledged by any other species. I am certain if there are
    intelligent beings elsewhere in the universe, they follow the strict principle
    of Natural Selection. Only the Strong shall survive. Mankind cannot survive
    as long as its virility is diluted by the weak.

    Peace-and-Love hippies, retards, cripples, depressives, sickling, addicts
    and whiners are all victims of one kind or another. Larger examples of victims
    can also be found: the entire nations of Israel and Englund, for example, are
    constantly victimized and/or whining about their lack of power in the world. In
    fact, the entire continent of Europe is nothing but a festering sewer of whiners
    and welfare states. If we, the strongest nation on Earth, had a decent Ruler,
    the entire junk-heap of Eurotrash would be burned to create a cloud of such lethal
    density it would waft over to Asia and take out the victims that were left over from
    World War II. The great black column of suffocating smoke would rise high into the
    atmosphere, reaching for the very edges of outer space - a giant, living monument
    to our strength. The unviable ashes of the once living garbage would orbit the Earth,
    forever reminding future generations of the price of weakness.

    World War II. Probably the greatest single era in the history of the planet, barring
    the time before Man and Man's distorted, unnatural philosophies of "common good" and
    "protecting the innocent". The time of Germany and its rule by a man of great vision.
    A man who saw the virtue of evil. Every single class of victim described above was
    dealt with in the harshest possible manner. Most people focus on the genocidal aspect
    of Hitler's activities but his vision was much wider, encompassing every brand of
    weakling from ethnic victims to sexual deviants. Unfortunately the United States,
    led by a cripple, had to involve our great military might on the wrong side of the
    war. The least Roosevelt could have done was to allow Germany to finish raping
    France and reduce Englund to rubble.

    We paid for our mistake in World War II. We were punished for choosing the wrong
    side in the Great War by a period of non-violent "Cold War". The term "Cold War"
    itself is the mark of the true Beast: the peace lover. A true leader - a Ruler -
    would have unleashed the full might of our nuclear arsenal upon every nation on the
    Earth, banishing them forever to particles of glowing dust blowing through the winds
    of history. And look what our lack of action has gotten us: A planet filled with
    human garbage, eternal sufferers suckling from the breast of the Mighty.

    It is beyond my comprehension. Not only am I forced to allow the weak to survive,
    but I - we - are forced to subsidize their pathetic existence. Every cripple
    creeping along the sidewalk. Every degenerate elderly woman with osteoporosis who
    parks in the handicap parking spot. Every worthless, lazy hippy who cries for peace
    and marches on a public university. Every sickling child perpetually hospitalized
    because its fetid welfare mother smoked too many drugs during her pregnancy. Every
    30 year old retard wiping its nose all over its Scooby Doo coloring book. Every
    drunk little whore seeking "justice" in our courts for her rape. All of them,
    and more, deserve nothing but death. In the Natural World, every single one of these
    leeches would be lion fodder.

    Even the "Good Book", the Bible - which is actually nothing more than the sick fantasies
    of opium addicts - predicts the outcome of Nature: "The meek shall inherit the Earth".
    Yes, I know what you're saying, but you are wrong. This phrase has been twisted by the
    weak, the cripple, the Jew to give their pathetic lives some ray of hope. This phrase
    does not mean that the Victim will Rule the world. That is laughable. That is impossible.
    The meek shall inherit the Earth for the one and only reason that they will be buried in
    it.

    To the strong who have read this: Thank you. Together, we will conquer. To the weak who
    will whine in the comments below: Your days are numbered, trash.

    1. Re:Evil Is Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sounds like someone got beaten up after trying to take a handicap parking spot from a man in a wheelchair.

  14. Fraudativeras by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Fraudativeras!!

  15. The History of William Scott Lockwood by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    WSL throughout the ages!

    William Scott Lockwood 1 - Born 1924 to unknown parents. Abandoned in a trash can in New Orleans by his opium-addicted prostitute mother just minutes after birth. Raised in a Catholic orphanage staffed by pedophile priests. Named himself "William Scott Lockwood 1", combining the names of his three favorite Priests/lovers at the orphanage. After puberty, the priests started to ignore him in favor of the younger boys, and he felt jealous and alienated. He ran away at age 14 and lived in the gayest part of the French Quarter, sucking cocks for spare change. At age 17, his first and only sexual encounter with a female (a woman on Bourbon Street during Mardi Gras who claimed she was actually a male Drag Queen) resulted in the conception of a child. The woman, Fannie Sassaman, quickly left town and gave birth to the child in secret, without telling WSL1 that they had conceived a son together. WSL1 died in 1949 when his herpes infection migrated to his brain.

    William Scott Lockwood 2 - Born 1942 to Fannie Sassaman by WSL1. Originally named Ezekiel Sassaman and raised as a good Jewish boy. A botched circumcision by a drunken Mohil left him with an almost nonfunctional penis. From the ages of 3 to 8, he was forced by his mother to shovel coal on a railroad for a living. At age 8, he learned of the true identity of his father, converted to Catholicism, and went to New Orleans to search for his father. (Fannie Sassaman's story doesn't end there, but we'll save it for a later date.) Ezekiel Sassaman renamed himself William Scott Lockwood 2 after his father, who he found lying dead in a gutter when he reached New Orleans. He joined up with a railroad hobo gang, and spent the next two decades riding the rails and carrying out a string of brutal rapes and murders around the country. His damaged penis kept him from conceiving any children, but in 1969, God blessed him with a miracle: one of the women he raped conceived a child. He married her, and shortly thereafter, WSL3 was born. WSL2 quit the railroad gang after his son's birth and settled down with his victim/wife. He is still wanted by the FBI as one of the most notorious serial killers of this century. He is considered heavily armed, extremely dangerous, and morbidly obese. Let the FBI know if you have seen this man. They have offered a $1,000,000 reward for any information leading to his arrest, capture, or death. After a recent sighting at an Illinois hospital, he is once again at large.

    William Scott Lockwood 3 - Born 1969 to a nondescript obese housewife by WSL2. Much has already been written about the life of this man, so I won't cover territory that has already been excellently covered by others before me. Oh, and he runs an obscure website, but only about 5 people actually visit it. Currently struggling with AIDS, heart disease, high blood pressure, diabetes, chronic stress, liver disease, herpes, genital warts, crabs, the Clap, bad acne, morbid obesity, hypertension, and several unidentified illnesses.

    William Scott Lockwood 4 - Born 1992 to Wife #2 by WSL3. Mentally scarred by the abuse and molestation he suffered at the hands of his father at a young age. At age 3, he convinced his mother to divorce WSL3, but that didn't stop the abuse, as WSL3 began a campaign of stalking against Wife #2 and WSL4. WSL4 holds the world record as the youngest person to independently get a restraining order issued against his own father, in 1996 at the age of 4. WSL3 lost interest in WSL4 on his sixth birthday, reportedly saying "they're just not sexy anymore when they get that old." His father left him with an AIDS infection, though, and he isn't expected to last much longer.

    William Scott Lockwood 5 - ???

    William Scott Lockwood 6 - PROFIT!!!

  16. Amherst-Fag and the Mae Ling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    From: cptroll
    To: <k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org>
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] Linux Magazine, Rubber and bolts.
    Date sent: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:03:43 -0400
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org

    (This is CP0032)

    Aren't you still doing the Arkansas thing? Doesn't jive....

    Craig McPherson <craig@laceyonline.com> wrote:

    >Shut up, WILLIAM HENRY GATES. How does STEVE BALMER'S
    >SEMEN taste??? Do you enjoy that AIDS-INFESTED JISM as you
    >MASTURBATE to PHOTOGRAPHS of YOUNG CHILDREN?
    >
    >On 27 Oct 00, at 14:22, rev wrote:
    >
    >> I knew you were gdb you bastard!
    >> ----- Original Message -----
    >> From: "Craig McPherson" <craig@laceyonline.com>
    >> To: <k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org>
    >> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 8:17 PM
    >> Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] Linux Magazine, Rubber and bolts.
    >>
    >>
    >> > You should try MAXIMUM LINUX. It has MAE LING MAK. There's
    >> > a picture of her in every issue wearing nothing but a VAIO! And the
    >> > VAIO runs Linux! 'Cept she can't get the sound to work.
    >> >
    >> > MAE LING MAK is a SECURITY EXPERT. She wrote a
    >> > SECURITY ARTICLE for MAXIMUM LINUX about ADVANCED
    >> > SECURITY. She suggested that you PROTECT your e-mail from
    >> > HACKERS, you do this:
    >> >
    >> > alias pine='blahblahblah'
    >> > alias foo='pine'
    >> >
    >> > If you do this ADVANCED SECURITY stuff, an EVIL HACKER who
    >> > breaks into your account an tries to read your e-mail with PINE will
    >> > get an error when he types "pine", not knowing that to get into PINE,
    >> > he ACTUALLY has to type "foo"! But MAE LING MAK knows, so SHE can
    >> > read her e-mail but the EVIL HACKERS can't.
    >> >
    >> > Isn't MAE LING MAK smart? I like her ass the best.
    >> >
    >> > Also, you need to GO READ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy
    >> >
    >> > You don't not understand the BASIC CONCEPTS of FREE
    >> > SOFTWARE. You don't understand the difference between
    >> > PHYSICAL VALUE and INTELLECTUAL VALUE. A MAGAZINE
    >> > has physical value, it costs MONEY to COPY and DISTRIBUTE. It
    >> > exists as a PHYSICAL OBJECT, therefore it has PHYSICAL
    >> > VALUE. SOFTWARE does not. It can be COPIED and
    >> > DISTRIBUTED for FREE. Some EVIL SOCIALIST SOFTWARE
    >> > COMPANIES try to CHARGE for software ANYWAY, and place
    >> > RESTRICTIONS on the user's RIGHT to USE, and DISTRIBUTE it!
    >> > They assign INTELLECTUAL VALUE to the software. This is
    >> > morally WRONG. Get it RIGHT, fsckwit.
    >> >
    >> > Also, you're using MICROSOFT OUTLOOK EXPRESS, which
    >> > proves you're STUPID.
    >> >
    >> > You can't compare a MAGAZINE to SOFTWARE, just like you
    >> > can't compare YOUR MOTHER to a FEMALE. They're completely
    >> > different things.
    >> >
    >> > SUCK IT DOWN AND CHOKE ON IT, AND DIE. SUCK IT DOWN
    >> > AND CHOKE ON IT. SUCK IT DOWN. SUCK IT. SUCK. I'LL
    >> > BURN YOU ALL ALIVE. I'LL BURN YOU ALL. I'LL BURN YOU.
    >> > BURN YOU ALL. BURN YOU. BURN. BURN. BURN.
    >> > BURNING. BURNING. BURNING BURNING FIRE. DEATH AND
    >> > PAIN AND FIRE.

    (This is CP0032)

  17. Amherst-Fag and the Corrosion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] the real anne marie stood up
    Date sent: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 08:20:23 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0017)

    Please elaborate. For example, does that mean you're
    lifting your k5 "no troll" ordinance?

    --- John Montoya <johnsaulmontoya@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >
    > --- Ceee Peee <cptroll@yahoo.com> wrote:
    > > My intentions
    > > and hopes aren't to destroy k5
    >
    > nahhh, fuck 'em.
    >
    > dd
    >
    > __________________________________________________
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
    > http://photos.yahoo.com/

    (This is CP0017)

  18. Taking Over Microdot Duties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll
    2002 December 6


    Dear Sirs and Madams:


    My friend Purple / Red / Blue / Green / Cyan / Violet / Orange / Black / Crimson Microdot has just informed me that he has recently been IP banned from Kuro5hin. Consequently, the onus has temporarily fallen to me of carrying out the sacred duties of the Microdot until he can resolve the situation and resume operations as before.


    I know that I have big shoes to fill, and I won't claim that I'll be able to live up to the accomplishments of my predecessor. I won't even claim that I'm qualified for the job, however, I know that Kuro5hin needs a Microdot, and I will do anything within my power to adequately fill in for the true Microdot while he is indisposed.


    The true Microdot wishes me to convey his sincere regrets to all of you over being temporarily forcibly separated from you. This is a situation that was beyond his control, and he is doing what he can to find a workaround. Until then, I'll do my part to try to fill the void, because Kuro5hin without the Microdot is just not Kuro5hin. (We won't even mention a certain Yellow imposter, who is an embarrassment to the Microdot name and to himself.)


    I can never be the original Microdot, but I'm going to try my best to get into the Microdot mindset, and find my own personal style as well. If you like me, then perhaps when the real Microdot overcomes his IP-ban, I'll continue to work side-by-side with him. If you don't like me, then e-mail some certain people and request/demand that the original Microdot have his IP-ban removed as soon as possible.


    This is all that I have to say at the moment. Until the services of the Standing Junior Microdot are needed again, I wish you all good night... and Godspeed.


    Warmest Possible Regards,

    Teal Microdot

  19. William Scott Lockwood Is a Terrorist by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Troll

    Vlad--



    You fat fucking piece of shit! Why didn't you tell us you were involved
    with the Al-Quaida network of terrorist cells in the United States? We would
    have understood! And arrested you, granted, but what kind of American are
    you?



    Your years in the Navy (all eight of them) ought to have taught you a
    little patriotism. Maybe it was the constant hazing with coin-filled socks
    by your fellow enlisted, or the constant write-ups by the officers, that led
    to a bitterness too intense for most to taste. Maybe. But if that wasn't it,
    the dishonorable discharge for obesity and latent homosexuality probably put
    you over the top. Who knew a military career could lead to hating the United
    States of America so much that you'd aid Osama bin Laden and his army of
    fanatics in bringing our economy to its knees.



    Of course, it's possible it wasn't just your military career's string of
    embarrassments over the years that led to your rash America-hating
    decisions. Perhaps it was your mental health. It's no mystery to anyone
    anymore that you have a martyr complex, chronic (or "major," as you call it)
    depression, psychotic delusions of persecution (which lead to actual
    persecution), and anti-social disorder. If it were me with the string of
    divorces, restraining order filed by my own children, or the job record
    longer than the Mississippi, I'd be in a therapists office or on pills or
    something. And if none of that worked, I'd kill myself (hint, hint).
    I imagine the feeling that never being able to succeed breeds would work its
    way into anyone's skull. I mean, after the second wife I would have bought a
    plane ticket to Yemen. You're on wife #4, and on top of that (listen for the
    rafters breaking) she weighs 400 fucking pounds.



    Well, here's my wish to you that you get what you deserve-- which is
    Osama bin Laden and a dozen of his most well-hung, bearded, filthy Muslim
    terrorist commandos pumping their huge circumcised cocks in and out of every
    orifice of your bloated, sweating body. And, of course, I hope that you
    break your jaw on Osama bin Laden's bucking love-bazooka and then choke to
    death on his deluge of Islamic semen and go straight to the lowest pit of
    Hell positioned directly under Satan's squatting haunches for all of
    eternity.



    Fuck you, Vlad!


  20. life sciences vs. physics by lovebyte · · Score: 3, Insightful

    From the article:
    This is especially true vis-à-vis the life scientists, who have more money, less oversight, and much more tolerance for imprecision than physicists. Rather than allow ourselves to be defined by the property we generate, I suggest we take the high ground and turn ourselves into the gold standard of truth. This is the way to make physics relevant and important in this "age of biology."

    Do I see some bitterness in the physics community? It is seen nowadays as very important for humanity to spend more money on the life sciences and less on physics. And the physics guys do not like it!
    Tough.

    --

    I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

    1. Re:life sciences vs. physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Do I see some bitterness in the physics community? It is seen nowadays as very important for humanity to spend more money on the life sciences and less on physics. And the physics guys do not like it!
      Tough."

      I think you are breathing too much into the statement you're referring to. What physicists are annoyed at is that their research interests are soley judged by the potential amount of money it can make. Physics has a long tradition of basing itself on the pursuit of knowledge, and more importantly, the truthfulness of that knowledge. Replacing "academic interest" with "potential revenue" has many adverse effects, of which some are appearing now. The issue is not about how much money physics gets, but what is being used to justify research.

      The author was of the opinion that the life sciences are not as rigorous in testing the veracity of research results. I do not know if this is true, but it would be not be surprising -- biological systems are much more complex and harder to control.

      I fully agree with the author of the Physics Today article that the corporatisation of universities is quite dangerous.

    2. Re:life sciences vs. physics by lovebyte · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I think you are breathing too much into the statement you're referring to.
      I don't think so. I know that physics labs have less money now than before and that the public grants have gone to life sciences. And some people at (for instance) the CERN are quite pissed off by that. And I understand them. But then I work in the life sciences, so ...

      The author was of the opinion that the life sciences are not as rigorous in testing the veracity of research results.
      Very true. But biology is where physics was at the time of Newton. Each big science domain is doing what it can with what it has. I don't think that applying a physics point of view to just life sciences or any other scientific domain is right.

      I fully agree with the author of the Physics Today article that the corporatisation of universities is quite dangerous.
      So do I.

      --

      I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

    3. Re:life sciences vs. physics by simong_oz · · Score: 3, Insightful

      It always goes in cycles - each science has it's day. The buzzwords at the moment which will secure you large amounts of funding are:

      DNA
      genetic engineering
      tissue engineering
      anyone want to add some more?

      Use all these in a sentence and submit to your favourite funding agency.

      It is seen nowadays as very important for humanity to spend more money on the life sciences and less on physics.

      It has been like this for quite some time - research with medical applications has always been well funded because the medical community is very good at procuring and protecting research funding. A decade or so ago it was AIDS/cancer, now it's anything to do with DNA/genes.

      --
      "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
    4. Re:life sciences vs. physics by rknop · · Score: 2
      DNA
      genetic engineering
      tissue engineering
      anyone want to add some more?

      Astrobiology

      That's good for NASA funding. Perversely, finding extrasolar planets is called "astrobiology", even though no organic molecules are necessarily involved.... Astronomers who work on other things and who can figure out how what they do is related to young solar systems would do well to mention that connection in their proposal, in the title if at all possible.

      -Rob

    5. Re:life sciences vs. physics by rknop · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The author was of the opinion that the life sciences are not as rigorous in testing the veracity of research results.

      Very true. But biology is where physics was at the time of Newton. Each big science domain is doing what it can with what it has. I don't think that applying a physics point of view to just life sciences or any other scientific domain is right.

      I suspect the author of the article would agree with you. I think the argument isn't so much "let's be very rigorous to prove that we are better than the biologists." It's more that physicis is no longer the premiere cutting edge technological science as it was in the 20th century; increasingly, biology is taking up that mantle. Instead of continuing as an also-ran has-been, the author seems to be proposing that physicists change their attitude to try and distinguish themselves as useful and productive in a different philosophical area, an area that much of the biological sciences probably won't really be strongly pushing into for at least a few decades.

      Mind you, I personally think that applying a (fill in the blank scientific) point of view is right, almost always. However, you then need to evaluate how useful that exercise was. Not performing the excercise out of some sense of "not right" is just as harmful as refusing to make progress in biology because the field can't currently live up to physics standards of rigor. Keep an open mind in both directions; apply as many reasonable scientific perspectives as you can to see if you learn anything in the process.

      -Rob

    6. Re:life sciences vs. physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Seems as though Professor Laughlin must have just received notice that his latest grant proposal was rejected, his corporate backing has withdrawn, and his patent applications were denied. What else would explain his bitter view of science, where (last I looked) knowledge is doubling at a breakneck pace?

    7. Re:life sciences vs. physics by jstott · · Score: 1
      DNA
      genetic engineering
      tissue engineering
      anyone want to add some more?

      Anything related to counter-terrorism.

      -JS

      --
      Vanity of vanities, all is vanity...
    8. Re:life sciences vs. physics by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 2

      > anyone want to addd some more?

      Quantum Computation
      Polymer Electronics
      Spintronics
      Quantum Cryptography
      Informatics (Which I suppose can include Bioinformatics, and is really a branch of thermodynamics)
      Quantum

      Biophysics in general seems to be quite a popularised area. There is some very interesting work going on w.r.t. neurons and neural mechanisms, both experimental and theoretical.

      However, some governments seem to like the quick appliciability of modern biological research to everyday life. This forgets that most of this has come from fundamental advances in physics, often in very unrelated fields that happened many years before they were applied to biology. E.g. discovery of the structure of DNA was worked out using x-ray diffraction. If x-rays hadn't been discovered out of research into cathode ray tubes 70 years earlier, then genetics wouldn't have got started.

      I think it mostly comes down to politicians having to have simple soundbite justifications for any money spent, which is quite hard to do, for say, the LHC, or research into the early universe.

    9. Re:life sciences vs. physics by lovebyte · · Score: 1

      I think it mostly comes down to politicians having to have simple soundbite justifications for any money spent, which is quite hard to do, for say, the LHC, or research into the early universe.

      I think that it is not easy to strike a balance between fundamental and applied science. You are right in that more and more money seem to go to applied research than to fundamental research. But maybe it is better that way. I don't know what the balance should be and I don't know anyone who does.

      --

      I'll do it for cheesy poofs.

    10. Re:life sciences vs. physics by Doctor+Fishboy · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Speaking as a physicist (well, astronomer) the past decade or so has seen the rise of biology in the public's eyes, and the flow of money to the life sciences. If your science is purely defined by public popularity, though, you'd better hope that the public stays interested in biology.

      We haven't had the equivalent of a public relations disaster for biology yet, which would cause public opinion to turn against it. All you need is a biological Chernobyl and you'll be tarred with the same brush that physicists have had applied to them. Not that I'd want anything like that, God forbid.

      Also, is the authour of the article a bit bitter? Yes, but he does not speak for all physicists.

      Don't get me wrong, I'd like a larger grant for some of my research, but we can't always get what we want, and if I *needed* the money, then I should bloody well write a better grant the next time around. Shame on me, not shame on the biologists. My personal moan aside, I think that money in science is well spent, whatever field it is in. If the research is exciting and interesting, by and large it does get funded.

      I think there's the relatively modern issue of corporate interests and how they affect the flow of ideas in a given subject, and it just so happens that biology is the science that is facing this at the moment.

      Hurm. Time for coffee!

      Dr Fish

    11. Re:life sciences vs. physics by WatertonMan · · Score: 2
      Do I see some bitterness in the physics community? It is seen nowadays as very important for humanity to spend more money on the life sciences and less on physics. And the physics guys do not like it! I think the problem is that basic science isn't funded well, regardless of discipline. Yes work in the life sciences is funded, but often with an emphasis on technology rather than understanding. You hear about all this work in neurology, genetics and so forth because of potential things that can be sold. Yet there are plenty of issues that don't get funded which are foundational.

      One can argue that the advance in other areas of technology arose because funding at basic research was so good. It then had a "bubble up" effect.

      Having said that though, lets be honest. Physics, even basic theoretical physics, was largely subsidized by the cold war. There were a lot of theoreticians doing what they liked on the side while getting paid for research in more applied areas. Further the biggest area of physics research right now is material science. And it isn't as if there is this huge funding shortage there.

      So in a sense the poster is right. There is a bit of jealousy now that physics isn't quite the high rolling area it was up through the end of the cold war. However part of the problem is that in physics, most of the easy to answer problems are solved. What's left is [i]so[/i] complex and difficult and [i]so[/i] expensive that one has to be somewhat cautious in funding. I mean do we really need to spend a few billion dollars on the next collider to find the weight of the latest theoretical particle? Especially when the real work is in what is more fundamental. And there is still a ways to go before the superstring theorists and quantum loop theorists have much to give us that can be reasonably tested.

      Having said all that one branch of physics/chemistry is about to make a comeback. Apparently a lot of the cold fusion stuff has been doing quite well the past few years. It has been duplicated in over 1000 different experiments. The remaining problems are in getting the proper impurities into palladium and doing some admittedly difficult material science work. (Which isn't to say one is even remotely close to making it a power source) So while the life sciences are deservedly getting the press today, energy problems along with global warming will push things back into the court of physicists and chemist within a few years.

    12. Re:life sciences vs. physics by RayBender · · Score: 1
      Your post was going so well... but then you had to bring up cold fusion. If it has been replicated, can you give references? And not just a google search, but preferably point to a properly peer-reviewed journal article.

      --
      Human genome = 3 billion base pairs = 6 GBit. Windows + Office = 20 Gbit. Which is more impressive?
    13. Re:life sciences vs. physics by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      I don't think so. I know that physics labs have less money now than before and that the public grants have gone to life sciences. And some people at (for instance) the CERN are quite pissed off by that. And I understand them. But then I work in the life sciences, so ...

      I worked at CERN for 2 years. Let us get something straight here, the lab budget was over a billion dollars a year. LEP had not one but four versions of the same experiment, each costing over a billion to build and far more to operate.

      The only reason there were four experiments at LEP rather than two was politics.

      The fact that CERN now trumpets itself as the birthplace of the Web rings hollow to those of us who worked on the Web at CERN. The Web reseach at CERN was closed down by the physicists because they were jealous of the press the Web got for a project outside CERN's 'core mission'. So much for the value of interdisciplinary research!

      Life sciences have incredible potential, anti-cancer drugs, anti-viral drugs, gene therapy, replacement parts. Why shouldn't that potential be measured against the value of measuring Z0 structure functions to an extra decimal place?

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    14. Re:life sciences vs. physics by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      The author was of the opinion that the life sciences are not as rigorous in testing the veracity of research results.

      That is untrue. The physicists I worked with were extreemly negligent in their verification procedures. As my college tutor, Tony Hoare put is, Physicists used to repeat each other's experiments, now they run each other's code.

      If you take a hard look at the quality of the creaky FORTRAN decks used to analyse the results of the billion dollar experiments the physicists get you will see what I mean. All four experiments at LEP used the same GEANT monte-carlo simulation code and PAW analysis code. This at a time the code would not even compile unless the compiler warnings were turned off.

      Sorry, until the physicists put their house in order they simply have no right to go attacking any other groups.

      What physicists are annoyed at is that their research interests are soley judged by the potential amount of money it can make.

      And the LHC is expected to make how much money? The claim is completely ridiculous. Only physicists get billion dollar experiments. I am not aware of any billion dollar experiment that was justified on a commercial basis. In comparison intellectual property claims are often the alpha and omega in the life sciences.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    15. Re:life sciences vs. physics by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      If your science is purely defined by public popularity, though, you'd better hope that the public stays interested in biology. We haven't had the equivalent of a public relations disaster for biology yet, which would cause public opinion to turn against it. All you need is a biological Chernobyl and you'll be tarred with the same brush that physicists have had applied to them.

      Well if scientists want public funding for billion dollar experiments they had better have public support...

      However one of the interesting aspects of the physics funding situation is the way that there is a seemingly inexhaustible supply of funds for large scale particle physics colliders which have no practical application I am aware of while fusion research has to scramble for every dollar while trying to solve the energy problem. This is in large part due to the fission mafia's attempt to sink every competing energy source the way they killed public funding for alternative energy research in the 80s (see Salter's duck).

      I think though that Chernobyl has less to do with the problems of physics than the end of the cold war. The gravy train for physics research and in particular particle physics had everything to do with the national prestige attached to 'nuclear' research which had everything to do with the bomb. That is why the US just had to build their own SSC and build it in Texas rather than work on the LHC at CERN or site the project close to Canada who had offered to provide the power if that happened.

      Nulcear power was a spent commercial force after three mile island. The incredible stupidity of siting a nuclear plant that close to Manhattan island exposed the industry as negligent and careless. By the time that Chernobyl happened nuclear power was already dead.

      The problem with the life sciences is finding out if a Chernobyl has occurred. It took several decades before DDT was identified as the cause of the declining populations of perdatory birds. It took even longer to connect smoking to cancer and heart disease. The problem with genetically modified foods is that nobody knows what adverse effects may be linked to them in 20 years time.

      We may even have seen a Chernobyl already. There is an interesting correlation between the sites of the earliest identified cases of AIDS and the testing of polio vaccines cultured on monkey kidneys

      This link is of course unproven, but it is not exactly disproven either, nor is the alternative cut hunter theory particularly persuasive given that there have been cut hunters eating monkeys since Homo Spaiens appeared on the planet but AIDS has only appeared in the past 50 years.

      The 'scientific' response to this theory would be to examine it as a matter of urgency. Instead the reponse from the biologists has been pretty much the response of the physicists to Chernobyl; no not us, could not possibly happen here, no three mile island was not comparable, it was the fault of those heathen communists, etc.

      Instead of examining the polio vaccine theory it was silenced by means of a law suit brought by Koprowski, the leader of the polio trial. I do not consider that to be an adequate standard of scientific proof.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    16. Re:life sciences vs. physics by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      Your post was going so well... but then you had to bring up cold fusion. If it has been replicated, can you give references? And not just a google search, but preferably point to a properly peer-reviewed journal article.

      Actually there is a genuine 'cold fussion' effect, just not the bogus Fleicheman and Pons variety.

      If you take a muon and put it in orbit arround a tritium atom in place of the electron it is much heavier and thus orbits much closer... Ahh just read the article...

      The real outrage that Fleiechman and Pons did was to discredit a whole line of research with their actions. There is no reason why cold fusion should be rejected as impossible just because the field has attracted cranks. Before Harrison the search for longitude was the domain of cranks and lunatics.

      BTW the big problem with muon catalysed fusion is that creating muons is an energy intensive process and the muons decay rapidly so getting one to decay is hard. However one could imagine using a muon catalysed reaction as the ignition chain for a self-sustaining reaction.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    17. Re:life sciences vs. physics by crgrace · · Score: 1

      However one of the interesting aspects of the physics funding situation is the way that there is a seemingly inexhaustible supply of funds for large scale particle physics colliders which have no practical application I am aware of while fusion research has to scramble for every dollar while trying to solve the energy problem. This is in large part due to the fission mafia's attempt to sink every competing energy source the way they killed public funding for alternative energy research in the 80s (see Salter's duck).
      Two points of issue here. First, particle physics research over the last fifty years is what made the solid-state revolution (and chips and affordable computers) possible. Only through linear accelerators was the crystal structure and properties of semiconductors properly worked out. Also, many technologies have come out of high-energy physics (particularly in the RF and signal-processing areas) in much the same way the Apollo program was helpful: Such difficult problems require new invention which can have useful application far beyond its intended use. I designed several integrated circuits for the BaBar detector at the Stanford Linear Accelerator (SLAC) and I can tell you that the physicists on that project were top-notch.
      As for your fusion power comment, I must say that, for one thing, there hasn't been too much funding because there hasn't been too much progress. Second, the National Ignition Facility at LLNL sure cost a pretty penny...
      Carl

    18. Re:life sciences vs. physics by Zeinfeld · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Two points of issue here. First, particle physics research over the last fifty years is what made the solid-state revolution

      That is untrue. There are no sub-nuclear effects that are employed in semi-conductors. Rutherford and Chadwick's work on the structure of the atom was all pre-war and that is what the physics of semiconductors is based on. I have degrees in electronics and particle physics, the quantum mechanics used in solid state uses a completely different notation to that used in particle physics.

      Only through linear accelerators was the crystal structure and properties of semiconductors properly worked out

      You were almost close. Accelerators are used for chrystalography but not lineacs, It is the bremstralung radiation that you get from accelerating a charged particle arround a curve that provides the high powered radiation. The crystaline structure of silicon GaAs etc are all very simple and were deduced long before quantum mechanics, let alone particle physics. I very much doubt that any crystal structure that had such a high degree of complexity it could only be deduced using those techniques would be far too complex to be useful for VLSI.

      As for your fusion power comment, I must say that, for one thing, there hasn't been too much funding because there hasn't been too much progress.

      How much progress has there been in particle physics? Why would basic research into the fusion process be intrinsically less interesting than finding out the structure function of the z0 etc?

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    19. Re:life sciences vs. physics by crgrace · · Score: 2

      Thank you for the education... I surrender.

    20. Re:life sciences vs. physics by WatertonMan · · Score: 2
      Umm they have conferences every year. While the term is still a bit of a dirty word among physicists here it is very well funded in Japan. I know that at the college I used to go to, BYU, Steve Jones was continuing research, although I don't know if he is still active in that field.

      The big debate was that the experiments were very hard to conduct and the evidence was from caloromic readings while the physicists wanted various nuclear reaction evidence. The problem was that while caloromic readings were very persuasive scientists had no idea what was going on inside the palladium.

      Probably the best papers are by Michael McKubre over at Stanford. Here's a good transcript of his talk at this year's conference on cold fusion. He's written a lot on the topic and gave a fascinating hour long interview to KUER in SLC. I'll not post the link to avoid slashdotting a small NPR station. For peer reviewed papers I was looking at LANL, but the links I had appear to have been moved behind a firewall. HEre are some I found doing a bit of looking:

      Anomalous Behavior of the Pd/D System

      Correlation of Excess Power and Helium Production During D2O and H20 Electrolysis Using Palladium Cathods

      The Emergence of a Coherent Explanation for Anomalies Observed in D/Pd and H/Pd System

      Some Thoughts on the Nature of the Nuclear-Active Regions in Palladium

      I'm sure there are more if you do a little searching.

    21. Re:life sciences vs. physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As a physicist myself, its always unnerving for science dollars to go to the so-called "soft", or "unreal" sciences.

      (The easy test, of course, is in the name of the discipline. A fake science ends in '-ology'.

      Compare:
      - Psychology
      - Anthropology
      - Astrology
      - Biology
      - Sociology

      with real sciences:
      - Chemistry
      - Astronomy
      - Physics
      - Computer Science

  21. Newton, Darwin, Einstein and ownership... by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Interesting


    One interesting element about these three chaps is that when they had their great ideas there was no way to make money from it so no-one is interested. What we are talking about here are experimental scientists where there is a direct effect of their work. "Blue sky" scientists were less prone to these problems in the past because companies tended not to fund them. With the rise of "corporate universities" and corporate science the drive has been to be more accountable.

    Einstein didn't get funding for his research 100 years ago, what would happen if the next Einstein comes along and demonstrates that cold fusion is possible, clean and safe... but is sponsored by Exxon ?

    The corporatisation of science means the ethics of corporations now apply. Science will have an "Enron" scenario within the next few years.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:Newton, Darwin, Einstein and ownership... by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 5, Insightful

      what would happen if the next Einstein comes along and demonstrates that cold fusion is possible, clean and safe... but is sponsored by Exxon?

      Obviously, Exxon would then shift their focus to Cold Fusion, lock everone out of the industry via way of patents and bs intellectual property, and they would pretty much have a monopoly on energy production in the end.

      Dispite what most people think the oil industries AREN'T out to kill all other forms of energy production. They just want to make sure that by the time the oil DOES run out they are the ones that own the new source.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    2. Re:Newton, Darwin, Einstein and ownership... by simong_oz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      With the rise of "corporate universities" and corporate science the drive has been to be more accountable.

      Corporate universities are a byproduct of today's corporate society where the emphasis is on money - earning, spending, getting, justifying spending other people's, etc.

      The problem has filtered down to universities - because they spend public money (ie. taxes), that money has to be justified. You simply can't justify academia in monetary terms, and so universities have had to change. But that change has been brought on by the public demand that government be accountable and transparent (and so it should be).

      The other big problem is that more and more government funding is being cut. The only other avenue for funding is sponsorship by corporate entities who won't sponsor research that doesnt have a product they can make money from (because the companies are accountable themselves), and the problem will continue to spiral downwards.

      The real problem here is the money counters trying to put a monetary value on research [output]. In a similar vein, the reason that publication is so out of control now (ie. the emphasis is on getting as many publications as possible) is that people thought this was a good way to measure academic output.

      --
      "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
    3. Re:Newton, Darwin, Einstein and ownership... by lazyl · · Score: 1

      Congrats on rehashing the point of the article.

      --
      Aw crap, ninjas!
    4. Re:Newton, Darwin, Einstein and ownership... by kalidasa · · Score: 2

      Einstein got a very cushy university professorship out of his work (which, while not enough reward for what he contributed to society, was at least some reward). Newton was the Lucasian Professor of Mathematics (a VERY major academic appointment in his day), and so received funding for his work. Darwin, on the other hand, I don't think did get funding for his work (his job on the Beagle was unfunded). Don't know how much many he made from publishing.

    5. Re:Newton, Darwin, Einstein and ownership... by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Dispite what most people think the oil industries AREN'T out to kill all other forms of energy production. They just want to make sure that by the time the oil DOES run out they are the ones that own the new source.

      And they want to make sure they make a killing until then. Just like farmers make more money when food is scarce, oil companies will profit immensely if there is an energy crisis. OTOH, a gradual, smoothly managed transition will just bring extra costs for the new infrastructure needed for different energy sources, with no extra profit to be squeezed out.

    6. Re:Newton, Darwin, Einstein and ownership... by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 4, Interesting

      You can justify basic research in monetary terms, but one of the many problems is that any changes made by a current government won't have an effect until the next government is in power. It might take 40 years for some basic research to get out of the lab (superconductors say). Governments need quick results and easy soundbites to survive in the modern media.

      I work in the Cambridge Astrophysics group, and many people there are doing very fundamental research, but also coming up with immediately applicable side results. The problem is that these are often not obvious from the official description of the research. For example, data analysis techniques developed for CMB observations can be applied to general pattern matching, and image analysis. However when the Particle Physics and Astronomy Research Council's funding is discussed, this kind of thing is often forgotten. Fortunately, the current government is being reasonably enlightened about this kind of thing.

    7. Re:Newton, Darwin, Einstein and ownership... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Newton and Einstein got their positions after their intellect (through their work) was realized. The difference here is that the research that led to their (most fameous) work was not compensated by university professorships or distinguished chairs. Of course, once they got their cushy positions it made it much easier to have the freedom to continue working on whatever they wanted.

    8. Re:Newton, Darwin, Einstein and ownership... by rtv · · Score: 1

      According to Alan Morehead's 'Darwin and the Beagle', Darwin's post was unpaid, but not unfunded. Every scientist costs far more than her salary to employ. Darwin had a bunk and meals at the very least, paid for by the British government.

    9. Re:Newton, Darwin, Einstein and ownership... by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      One interesting element about these three chaps is that when they had their great ideas there was no way to make money from it so no-one is interested.

      Darwin's return from his voyage on the Beagle was anticipated by the leading naturalists of his day. He was an instant celebrity and rapidly became one of the leading naturalists of his day. The origin of species had the effect it did largely because it came from someone who was already established as a major scientific author.

      While Darwin was financially secure, Larmark whose work he often criticised had made his living from science and a good one too.

      Newton was also well off, but his recent predecessors Gallileo and daVinci had made their living from patronage.

      Einstein worked at a patent office for a short time but rapidly found a university position.

      All three were known internationally within a few years of their first major publications.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    10. Re:Newton, Darwin, Einstein and ownership... by Cyno · · Score: 2

      Or Exxon would pay the scientist to keep quiet. Something like cold fusion would be reason enough for sovereign countries to steal the technology and implement their own power sources. Exxon and all oil companies and all capitalist nations would lose control. That's a very very very bad thing in the eyes of any exec in any oil corp as well as the current US administration. Its not like the US is all about freedom and the well-being of mankind. Its only about money. A very close-minded perspective form my point of view.

    11. Re:Newton, Darwin, Einstein and ownership... by Cyno · · Score: 2

      Off topic, but... I feel like the US has the technology and resources to make a major difference in this world. We could improve the quality of life for EVERYONE and do it within our lifetimes. We would simply have to shift our focus, collectively, from money to making this more efficient and thinking creatively about how to spread the resources and educate the population to use all this technology to produce for eachother.

      What would happen if we got rid of the patent system and let all these tech companies build products using all available technology? What would happen if we realized that our tech companies are more valuable to us when they produce stuff than when they lay off their employees and close their doors? Or if we shifted our media system to promote education and science and technology and creativity and togetherness. Yeah, yeah, yeah, I know, we'd all go broke and starve cuz we couldn't afford to eat at Taco Bell anymore.

    12. Re:Newton, Darwin, Einstein and ownership... by machine+of+god · · Score: 1

      Yeah. Where does this game not apply, seriously. "You ivory tower intellectuals must not lose touch with the world of industrial growth and hard currency. It is all very well and good to pursue these high-minded scientific theories, but research grants are expensive and you must justify your existence by providing not only knowledge, but concrete and profitable applications as well." CEO Nwabudike Morgan, The Ethics of Greed On the plus side, since they always have so much money, it's easy to just mind control every city and win that way. I always thought our future social engineering was set for mind control anyway.

    13. Re:Newton, Darwin, Einstein and ownership... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "And they want to make sure they make a killing until then"

      Do you seriously think that energy companies are "hiding" hideously expensive R&D results just to keep "making the killing" of selling black ooze from the ground that EVERYBODY knows how to make into energy?

      You can't get your panties in a bunch that "capitalism is based on selfish greed" (supposedly a bad thing) and then demonstrate it by having straw men act in completely unselfish and ungreedy ways!

    14. Re:Newton, Darwin, Einstein and ownership... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Obviously, Exxon would then shift their focus to Cold Fusion, lock everone out of the industry via way of patents and bs intellectual property, and they would pretty much have a monopoly on energy production in the end.

      Not true. Did Xerox do that with Ethernet, GUIs, the mouse, laser printers - which it invented?

      Did IBM do that with minicomputers? Or 386 PCs?

      Did the tobacco industry do that with 'safe cigarette' research?

      No, they killed it because it was a threat to their exisiting, more profitable line of research. Industry is replete with examples of research which was canned in-house, but flourished elsewhere at companies with less to lose.

  22. This man is right on the money. by iq+in+binary · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I appreciate this man's writing, he is thorough and insightful. His statements about the science world give you an idea about the "empirical" knowledge going around in the scientific community today, some slightly false and some completely fabricated.

    I agree with his opinion on scientists under stress, for a paid scientist is just like any other working individual; mindful of their family and bills. He has done an excellent job of humanizing the average Joe scientist.

    At that, I literally clapped when I got to the part about physics. He said what I've been saying all along, Physics is the Open Source of the science community.

    Keep posting articles from this man, whoever is reading, I would like to see more of his work.

    --
    Of all the Universal Constants, here's one I know: Nice guys finish last ;)
    1. Re:This man is right on the money. by joib · · Score: 2


      I appreciate this man's writing, he is thorough and insightful. ...

      Keep posting articles from this man, whoever is reading, I would like to see more of his work.


      Well, considering that he (and two other guys) got the Nobel prize in physics a few years ago (for the discovery and explanation of the fractional quantum hall effect), you'd kinda expect him to be able to write insightful stuff.. :)

    2. Re:This man is right on the money. by Cyno · · Score: 2

      The quantum hall effect is pretty cool. Its possible to get a fraction of the electrical charge of an electron when using superconductors and powerful magnetic fields. When an electric current is applied to sheet metal with an interacting magnetic field it creates this quantum hall of electrons that flow at a perpendicular angle to both the magnetic field and the electric current in the sheet metal. And when it is cooled I guess the quantum hall begins to have these steps in voltage resulting in fractional electron charges.

      I probably can't explain it very well, but there's more info here:
      http://www.bell-labs.com/news/1998/october/ 13/2.ht ml

      Wish I had the time to study physics. Physics is fun!

  23. The Incredible Troll FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Although fragments of this most classic and infamous piece of troll history have been found and preserved throughout the ages, the complete document has been missing for many years and was thought to have been lost or destroyed during the last year of the previous millennium. Well, here it is: the first EVAR Slashdot Troll FAQ, dated March 16th 2000.

    * * * *

    God help us all ... (Troll FAQ) (Score:0)
    by Anonymous Coward on 05:15 AM March 16th, 2000 CST (#810)

    But mainly help me. I had a long, dull business trip Tues. and Wed., and as a result I wrote the following (5000 words and still unfinished) Slashdot Troll FAQ. I haven't been able to build on 80md's original due to lack of connection, but the doct. below still needs revised. Specifically, it needs to be made more entertaining. See whatcha think.



    jsm

    Slashdot troll FAQ

    1. What do trolls do?

      We post inflammatory, satirical or just plain weird comments on slashdot, aiming to draw attention to ourselves and to distract discussion away from the matter at hand. We use satire, wit, art and other cultural weapons to give fun to the clueful and embarrass the clueless.
      1. What are the characteristics of a good troll?

        A good troll is a statement designed to inflame the passions of a certain type of reader. A troll is a contrary or controversial statement, which attacks a preconception of someone who is likely to read it, causing them to suspend their normal standards of critical thinking, and to fire off a combative response, without thinking that they are being had. This is the "classic" troll, aimed at enticing someone to make a fool of themself.
      2. Are there any other kinds of troll?

        Yes. The "surrealistic" troll is a piece of prose, rambling, comic or just downright weird, inserted into a discussion where it seems at once utterly irrelevant and curiously in place. The common thread linking the types of trolls is that a certain kind of personality (read - far too uptight) gets irrationally annoyed by them.
      3. What are "characters"?

        Some kinds of trollish statement have been proven to work again and again, so naturally, some trolls have taken advantage of this fact to repeat them again and again. Certain individual trolls are more or less identified with certain types of trollish statement, and thus we have the idea of a "character" - a fictitious entity which is supposed to actually hold the views which are expressed in the troll's posts. Some of these characters have distinct personalities and maintain narrative coherence from troll to troll (see the "Microsoft Linux" episode between streetlawyer and DMG); some of them show up expressing the same or similar points of view again and again (the RWM and derivatives).
      4. What are some of the characters?

        The number one maximally 1337 troll character is the RWM; the most established troll, with the most solid track record behind him. Opensource man and his creations is the oldest surreal troll; gnarphlager and auntfloyd also adopt this style. Paranoid Man is getting off the ground, and DMG and streetlawyer have their fans. Mindless Bastard is more of a style of trolling than a character per se. There are lots more people posting trolls than are listed here; these are just the repeating characters.
      5. What is an RWM?

        RWM is the Right Wing Maniac, a character with a hotch-potch of (often mutually incompatible) libertarian, Christian, and Objectivist views, who typically (mis)applies the general principles of his world-view to various slashdot topics. He tends to be keen on referring to people as "socialists", particularly if they consider themselves to be conservatives. Sometimes he's more of a religious nut; sometimes it's more the free market which rings his bell. There is also a Left Wing Maniac with a yen for spouting dialectical materialism, but he hasn't done much recently. It's worth noting that it is very rare to find a RWM troll thread in which at least one participant doesn't agree with most of RWM's views.
      6. What is a DMG?

        DMG is the Dumb Marketing Guy. He claims to have been involved in Linux for "at least four years, since the very beginning", and offers unsolicited "open source" marketing advice on Linux advocacy to the members of the community. He often takes a rather hurt tone in response to the welter of abuse which is the usual response to his advice.
      7. How about the other characters?

        For crying out loud, they ought to be self-explanatory, surely to heck?
      8. What's with the "cheese" thing?

        Buggered if I know. Lots of trolls mention cheese, and seem to indicate that cheese has some sort of significance. Maybe it does.
      9. Why does streetlawyer swear so much?

        Because he had a hard life, dragging himself up from the streets to get his fucken law degree from fucken Hah-vud, OK?
      10. What you said really offended me!

        Well, sorry. But really, nobody cares (see below). You're too easily offended. Now purge the post from your board, log our IP address and go back to drawing your "After Y2K" comic (which is shit, by the way).

    2. What don't trolls do?

      We don't do boring, uncreative shit which just makes slashdot harder to read. We're not into denial of service attacks - they aren't very funny. We're probably harsher opponents of the spam bunch than you are, because anything which encourages people to browse at levels above -1 makes our work harder.
      1. Those cut & pastes which fill up the forums, are those you guys?

        Nope. Nezh.
      2. How about that obscene ASCII art I just saw?

        Nope. Nada.
      3. Thank God you've got nothing to do with "open source Natalie Portman", or "naked and petrified"!

        Errrr, well actually yes we have. Both of those ongoing trolls were written by regulars on the troll forum, and you're not going to find condemnation of them in this FAQ.
      4. What?

        Read them. Untwist your underwear, stop fulminating over the momentary interruption to your terribly important discussion about Slackware and have a look at some of these posts. Open source Natalie Portman was a fine piece of Burroughsian prose and if you don't agree that it was, then you're wrong. The whole "Naked and petrified" thing was an absolute triumph - it provoked a huge amount of reaction, entertainingly interfered with a few people's heads by sexualising the context of slashdot and is still talked about, several months after the original author stopped bothering.
      5. But that naked and petrified stuff was really sick!

        Sick to you, but that was actually the guy's genuinely held sexual fantasy. He was erotically excited by the thought of women turned to stone, and was letting the world know about it. Don't pretend that you weren't interested - it's absolutely fascinating.
      6. You're kidding me!

        Nope. I was taken aback myself, but there are several sites on the Net with active discussion boards on this very subject. It's not that very different from the subject of "The Fermata" by Nicholson Baker, where the hero has the power to stop time, effectively turning women into statues. And that is quite a common paraphilia.
      7. Well, I thought it was offensive to women. Wasn't it tantamount to a rape fantasy?

        No, it was a petrification fantasy. Which is something rather less threatening, because harder to act out (how many people really believed that anyone could actually turn Natalie Portman to stone?)
      8. What does Natalie Portman think about being "open sourced"?

        I'm sure she's not wonderfully happy about being the subject of someone else's tawdry sexual fantasies, but it kind of comes with the job. I doubt she loses much sleep.
      9. You keep saying I should read this stuff. How can I?

        Opensourceman's works (including the Star Wars series and Fat-time Charlie) are available online at: Craig MacPherson has a website at: , which probably has a few things on it to do with the petrification thing.

    3. So gritsboy and scooby doo are trolls then? And Trollmastah?

      Wellllll .... they're a step above the cut 'n' pasters. And sometimes they can be funny if you're in a silly mood. But they don't contribute to the troll forums, and it's not what I personally would call incredibly creative. Some people like running jokes and some don't. The original Trollmastah has contributed some good material, but there's a lot of imitations about.

    Why, for God's sake?

    For a variety of reasons, but mainly to puncture the self-importance of a few people who deeply deserve it. Slashdot has a lot of very clever people posting, but vastly more individuals with a serious perception/reality gap with regard to their own intelligence. People who believe themselves to be perceptive, clueful, even deep thinkers while merely reciting lists of conventional wisdom deserve to be taken for a ride. And there's the sheer Skinnerian joy of it - if somebody, or some group of people have buttons, it's inhuman not to take delight in pushing them.

    1. Why do you spend such effort on being assholes?

      In order to do it properly.
    2. What's your problem with moderation?

      No problem. Whining about moderation is for the moderation thread. Several trolls moderate more or less frequently (and meta-moderate - be very afraid), and there is very little genuine complaint about moderation on the troll threads. Any remarks about $3 crack are meant in a spirit of fun and affection, and are usually merely cris de coeur when a finely crafted troll has been rumbled in the first few seconds and down-modded.
      1. What about "Portrait of a Moderator"?

        That was funny.

    3. Why don't you go and troll somewhere other than slashdot?

      Where is there? We've had a token go or two at Nitrozac and kuro5hin, and an abortive attempt to troll some of the statuephilia discussion boards with discussions about technology, but it just doesn't feel right. If you ain't on slashdot, you ain't, basically, trolling.
    4. No, why don't you fuck off? You contribute nothing to this site.

      That isn't even true. Several of the troll regulars have enough Karma to post with the +1 bonus when they use their regular identities, which puts them in the top decile, according to Rob Malda. And there is a definite audience for quality trolls. Have you just been trolled? Is that why you're so angry? Calm down, it'll be someone else's turn in the barrel on Friday.
    5. Don't you have anything better to do?

      To paraphrase gnarphlager, yes, we have many better things to do, but we're not going to do them.

    How can I recognise a troll?

    If you want to spot a troll, then you're basically entering into a game, played against us. You have to keep your guard up, adopt a critical attitude to what you read and decide whether it is plausible that someone is actually posting that view. For our part, we will intermingle fact and fiction, invent plausible-sounding references and (always) attempt to attack your emotional involvement in a topic in order to make you drop your guard. The more ridiculous the proposition we sneak under your guard, the more we win. The angrier you get, the more we win. And you? As the computer said in War Games "The only way to win is not to play".

    1. What are the characteristics of a troll?

      Usually, a troll will resemble a normal slashdot post, but will contain at least one thing which is not true. A good troll will contain material which obviously couldn't possibly be true, and would not fool anyone who gave it a moment's thought. The troll will also contain an inflammatory or controversial statement, designed to make sure that nobody does give it a moment's thought. Criticism of Linux, strong or offensive political views, mockery of "computer geeks", claims about the inferiority of women/Canadians/Perl, all of that stuff. Interestingly, having experimented with using outright, Bell-Curve-like racist statements to act as the controversial part of the troll, I've found that they never offend anyone, which I guess shows what a lily-white place slashdot is.


      Obviously these rules apply more to the classic satirical model of a troll, but there is a strong family resemblance in the surrealist model. Looking at the best work of osm, gnarphlager, auntfloyd et al., you pick up a strong sense of the underlying form. There is the (often highly tenuous) link to the subject matter, the building sense of cognitive dissonance and then the denouement in which the troll moves into the realm of pure surrealist prose (or "gets silly", depending on how you look at it). Typically, when reading such a troll for the first time, and in the context of the thread, the reader's reaction goes through stages.

      At the opening of the troll, in which the technological subject matter is being obliquely referred to, the reader is curious. There is an unconscious assumption that what is being used is a metaphor, which appears opaque but will actually make an argument clear (in such a way the surrealist trolls subvert the category of metaphor as used in scientific discussions). Then, the tension between the what the reader wants to read and what he/she sees on the page grows, but the reader still tries to hang on to the idea that he/she is reading "News for Nerds". Finally, when the reality (that is, the unreality) of the troll is revealed, the reader is outraged at having been tricked.


      Thus, we can see that the distinction between the classical and surrealist trolls is one of inversion; metaphor versus metonymy. The classical troll traps the reader in metaphor, creating the "character" or authorial fiction, which the reader takes as a metonymy for "The Other" - the fictional creature on the screen is espousing Microsoft, or Libertarianism, or something else which must be ritually reacted to, rather than read as if it were a metaphorical text. The surrealist troll appears to use metaphor, but creates no authorial fiction. The piling up of the metonymic symbols of trolldom (cheese, Natalie Portman, the Troll itself) draws the reader into the pure text, looking for a meaning (or metaphor) which is always deferred. The reader wants to create an authorial fiction, but this is denied - and it is this denial which is the source of his/her rage. The surrealist troll lets the reader down with a bump - the satirical troll, in its purest form, never lets the reader out at all, leaving him/her stuck in a world which is false, because he/she is being manipulated by the authorial fiction. Classical trolling is about the use of metaphor to create metonymy; surrealist trolling is using metonymy to create metapor.

      1. Wow, that's pretty deep.

        YHBT. YHL. HAND. (Ha ha, only serious)

    2. Do you always list the trolls in these forums?

      Pretty much so, yeah. There's been "trolltalk", "trolltalk2", "31337troll" and a bunch of others. It's good to be able to see other people's work, to discuss trolling, and on occasion to have a way of proving for sure that something you wrote was a troll, to a particularly persistent mark.
    3. What's the current 31337 forum?

      If I could tell you, I'd have to kill you. There have been a few problems with people stalking some of the trolls, and spamming the troll forums with whitespace to make them unusable. There's no big secret or anything, it's just that we'd like to think that finding the troll forum requires a modicum of commitment and ingenuity. There's one pretty well-trafficked troll forum which is listed in most of the usual indices. Look, fuck it, you used to be able to find BBSes, didn't you? This is no different.
    4. Isn't that a bit hypocritical, to keep moving the troll forum because it gets trolled?

      Yada yada yada.
    5. But if I know the sid of the 1337 forum, I can read the trolls as they happen?

      Welllllll ..... yeah ... I suppose that technically you can, and you need never be taken in by a troll again. But that's a bit lame, don't you think? This is meant to be a game, after all.
    6. What should I do if I suspect a troll?

      Write a nice, long post, beginning with the phrase "I'm sure this is a troll, but ....", get really angry, call everyone a bunch of assholes and always reply to follow ups : -) Nahhh, that's what we'd like you to do.
      1. Well what should I do, then?

        The only approved, correct, 1337 way to deal with a troll is not to reply at all. Don't say anything. Just sit back and feel smugly self-satisfied that you caught the troll. Go on. People always seem to say the word "smug" as if it were a bad thing, but how can something that feels so good be wrong? Smirk. Once the troll is "dead" (once the author has taken credit for it and admitted the troll), you might want to post a message about it. You'll probably get a nice reply.
      2. Should I alert others to the troll?

        Wellllll .... if you really must, I suppose you can, but it is a bit lame and lacks eliteness. For one thing, it makes you look like a bit of a spoilsport. For another, it gives unfair clues to people who have no idea of what to do with them. For yet another, it's quite possible that the people you warn will ignore you. Either that, or start arguing with you, saying things like "Well it may be a troll but ....". In which case, you're now the one who's wasting bandwidth by starting fruitless discussions; ie, you've turned into a troll yourself. If you must go through this, however, just post up "This is a troll", or something. Don't link to the troll forum post claiming credit - that is truly lame.
      3. How about if I reply to the points made in the troll, but preface my post with the words "I'm pretty sure this is a troll, but in any case"?

        Then you should be prepared to live with being a laughing stock. We live off people like you, who simply can't stop themselves from pouring out conventional wisdom, even when they know they are being made monkeys of. And no, the "I'm pretty sure ..." disclaimer doesn't make you look ironic and knowing.

    7. Why shouldn't I link to the troll forum post if I spot a troll?

      Well, fundamentally, it lacks class. For one thing, you're feeding the troll while pretending not to feed it, which is dishonest. For another, you're encouraging lots of enraged people to visit the troll forum. This means that the troll forum gets spammed, the trolls move, and you now will be forced to spot trolls for yourself rather than reading them off the list, lamer. Also, the trolls can't tell who it was who brought the spammer there, so all the other people who used to enjoy reading the daily trolls don't find out where the new forum is.

    How can I start trolling for myself?

    "Just do it", as that noted provider of employment to Indonesian children once said. Your first trolls are unlikely to be offensive enough to draw many responses, but once you lose your disinclination to be unpleasant, results will follow. Of course, you may incipiently be a natural trolling genius like dmg, who got huge pops from the get-go. Choose a story which will get a lot of traffic, try to get an early, top-level post, etc, etc (here might follow a whole load of shit from the Karma HOWTO which I'm not going to reproduce). And, offend. You might want to start off with a right-wing maniac troll.

    1. What are the key elements of an RWM troll?

      RWM is the source from which it all flows. Like an origami master building everything from a folded base, or a woodworker turning a chair-leg, the entirety of the art is encapsulated in this one element. It is possible to dedicate your entire trolling career to the perfection of the RWM (troll gods 80md and 70% more or less have done). If you can't write an RWM troll, you can't write a troll.


      The key to the RWM troll is to realise its heritage from Usenet. Usenet trolling was all about cross-posting controversial statements to start flame-wars between different newsgroups. On slashdot, you can't cross-post, so you have to identify people who can be brought into conflict where you are. The beauty of the RWM troll is not so much that he sets rightwingers against leftwingers, but that he creates cognitive dissonance in rightwing readers, because they want to agree with his conclusions (or at least, his less obviously mad ones), but can't bring themselves to accept his reasoning (or simulation thereof). RWM also exploits the fact that a lot of people with right-wing views haven't necessarily thought out those views very comprehensively, and so are vulnerable to cognitive dissonance caused by the inconsistency of what they believe. Among the elements of right-wing mania are:

      • Libertarianism. Everything should be legalised, even obviously destructive things. All government regulations should be removed. The market will protect your privacy, as firms which don't give you privacy will go out of business. Everything which is, is for the best, otherwise the market would have got rid of it. Yes, free speech does include child pr0n. Etc.
      • Corporation-worship. Capitalism works, boyeee. Big companies are the lifeblood of the country and the technology industry. They're successful, so they must be good, so they should be given all those responsiblilities which currently belong to the government. Only the government can censor (it's probably in the dictionary definition), so anything a corporation can do is morally right. The property rights of companies are more important than any rights you think you have.
      • Religious nuttery. Everything is potentially Satanic, even things which seem quite innocuous. The liberals, relativists and communists are indoctrinating our children. There is a conspiracy afoot against Christians, and the downward moderation of this post just goes to prove it. Evolution is by no means proven.
      • Americanism. USA! USA! USA!

      Obviously, everyone who disagrees with a RWM is a socialist, even if they don't think they are.

    2. What are the key elements of a "character" troll?
    3. I think I want to do a surrealist troll, what should I do?
    4. How much effort should I put into a troll?
    5. How can I get more replies?
    6. Should I "feed" my trolls?
    7. When should I admit to being a troll?

    Further information

    1. Other FAQs
    2. Useful research sites
    3. Credits.


  24. Amherst-Fag and the Lockwood Betrayal by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] Vlad needs to be terminated
    Date sent: Thu, 4 Jan 2001 01:32:20 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0012)

    Did you guys get to it before vlad deleted the img tag to hello.jpg? Apparently authors are given free reign to put all sorts of html in their stories.

    I wouldn't worry too much about vlad fucking things up. Our own slash site would be ideal, of course, but short of that, I'm in favor of using a site where we have registered authors who can clean up the crap and play with the settings. Today, I gave myself god mode (such wonderfully secure stuff, slashcode is) and created author "gbd" for the purpose of posting gbd's communism article (vlad'll shit a brick, I'm sure) before deleting the author to clean up -- it's not out of the question to create other authors for the rest of you guys, though the polite thing would be to run it by vlad first. I also got ahold of vlad's slashdot password, though I don't plan to do anything with it (he already metamodded). He's not the brightest in the bunch, but he's tame, and I'm not sure he's figured out the db enough to track us down.

    I'm still working out the details so don't quote me, but a potentially workable scenario by my metric is: we each get author status, we post a hidden section article on geekizoid as no-comments (like zengan did with the iraq article way back when), and since we're all authors, we can override the "no comments" aspect and post away. Someone might still be able to find t, but at least the signal/noise level won't be any orse than we ourselves make it.

    --- jlb wrote:
    > On Thu, 4 Jan 2001, John Montoya wrote:
    > > And actually, his "Alan Greenspan" story was quite
    > > funny.
    >
    > Just found out, that was by cp, fyi.
    >
    > You didn't think vlad came up with it, did you? :)
    >
    > --
    > "Is this real?"
    > "Does it matter?"
    >

    (This is CP0012)

  25. Amherst-Fag and the Cute Teen Girl by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: cptroll
    To: <k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org>
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] New Debian advertisements, by me!
    Date sent: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 15:55:53 -0400
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org
    (This is CP0025)

    Hey, you missed part of her armpit. She's a statue with a living,
    breathing armpit. I'm trying to find some irony there, but I can't.
    Otherwise, jolly good show.

    Craig McPherson <craig@laceyonline.com> wrote:
    >I've done some unofficial new advertisements for Debian Linux.
    >http://users.ipa.net/~cmcpher/newad.jpg

    (This is CP0025)

  26. Amherst-Fag and the Whoring of Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: cptroll
    To: <k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org>
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] Have I gone soft?
    Date sent: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:01:08 -0400
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org
    (This is CP0024)

    Marc Stauffer <marc@ksac.com> wrote:

    >: True. I still think karma as a persistent user property ought to be
    >: eliminated. It's fine to score individual comments, and even to award a
    >: special +1 comment bonus to selected "good posters", but karma as a prop for
    >: the self-esteem of pathetic geeks, or as a game, is dumb. At the very least,
    >: karma should not be displayed, not even one's own karma. And if it's going
    >: to exist, it ought to be aged so that my recent activity is treated as a
    >: better predictor of the value of my next comment than something I wrote a
    >: year ago.

    Bah, I'd hate this, but then I'm too much a karmawhore at heart. But if we could somehow increase the amount of quality moderation (to get rid of brainless drivel, not just spam) and rely on our abilities to craft quality-sounding trolls, then I wouldn't complain too much if we got rid of karma altogether and got rid of the +1 bonus along with it. Originally, the +1 bonus was reserved by just a few, but now every lamer and his dog has it. It's lost all meaning.

    >What this doesn't solve, however, is the inherent problems
    >with moderation. Not with the system, mind you, but with the
    >users. There needs to be stricter policies, e.g. no
    >usernames displayed when you moderate, or something along
    >those lines, and the penalties for crummy mods need to be
    >higher. In fact, people need to be banned from moderating
    >more often since they simply suck at it.

    I'd been thinking along the lines of hiding usernames during moderation, if nothing else than to help us trolls with recognizable usernames who get unfair moderation simply for being trolls in general than just on a particular post. I can see several0 problems, though:

    1) It won't stop the most dedicated of trollbusters who will keep a separate window open as AC where they can see people's usernames. These are the moderators who most need to be stopped, and yet this restriction won't do so.

    2) It will add a social cost to moderating itself. People might just start throwing their points at crap just to get back to normal mode where they can see who's talking. But it could cut both ways.

    3) It'll increase the amount of noisy replies screaming: "Moderators! Don't you realize streetlawyer/flatpack/etc. is the one saying this?!?!?!" We don't need that.

    4) You'd have to hide .sig files as well. Not a big deal.

    (This is CP0024)

  27. VLADEQUACY RAW & UNCUT 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    [bc] momomomo
    [momocrome] KKK and the kuro5hin/modsub - a monograph of prophecy
    [momocrome] Dear Reader, there will be flames./
    [bc] heh
    [momocrome] there is a lot of wackyness in today's queue
    [bc] there's been this running anti-liberal crapflooding
    [momocrome] I have a dry story about low-emission engines and electric hybrids nearly ready
    [bc] up from the grass roots
    [bc] heh, nice
    [momocrome] it would be hailed as a masterwork during a flood like this
    [bc] yes, it'll get a zillion FPs
    [bc] make sure it is typo-free and don't bother with edit mode, post it straight
    [momocrome] I'll crack it open
    [momocrome] I was also working on a history of the Rastafarian Faith...
    [momocrome] maybe that would be more timelyu
    [bc] hmmn, which is closer to completion?
    [bc] get something out there fast to capitalise on friday busyness and frustration
    *** cyn-away is now known as cyndrekit
    *** Retrieving #adequacy info...
    *** Captain_Tenille (~jeremy@216-210-218-82.atgi.net) has joined #adequacy
    *** Sulla (gallus@modem-284.lynx.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    *** bc has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
    *** Sulla is now known as bc
    [momocrome] trollaxor is making the rounds in #kuro5hin
    [momocrome] oops he's left
    [bc] wanker
    [momocrome] I thought you might want to say hi to him, bc
    [bc] not really :)
    [bc] I won't forgive him for his involvement in the vlad-persecution and, in general, his fuckwitishness
    [Captain_Tenille] Hmm. Just left #giz, too
    [momocrome] bc?
    [bc] what?
    [momocrome] i am msging you thx
    [momocrome] a private msg for bc... do you accept?
    [cyndrekit] i will
    [cyndrekit] zuul, seen perdida?
    [zuul] perdida was last seen on #adequacy 2 days, 20 hours, 26 minutes and 34 seconds ago, saying: byeees [Tue Nov 12 18:40:22 2002]
    [shoeboy] hullo
    [Captain_Tenille] Hey shoeboy
    [shoeboy] hey ct
    * shoeboy is bored bored bored
    [Captain_Tenille] How goes?
    * Captain_Tenille is on the verge of falling asleep
    [momocrome] wow, first trollaxor, now shoeboy. it's like 2000 A.D. all over again.
    [shoeboy] watching cpu activity on a server
    [shoeboy] it's almost hypnotic
    [shoeboy] I've got a task that wakes every 2 seconds, so it's nice an rhythmic
    [Captain_Tenille] "We now return to the thrilling conclusion to "CPU Levels on a Server". There will be no further interruptions."
    [shoeboy] 33% activity across 4 processors
    [shoeboy] spikes every 2 seconds
    [shoeboy] exciting
    [momocrome] so is that four physical processors, or two hyperthreaded xeons?
    [shoeboy] 4 physical procs
    [shoeboy] hyperthreading is garbage
    [momocrome] :)
    [Captain_Tenille] Awww
    [momocrome] Hyperthreading is the flavor of the month.
    [Captain_Tenille] Someone is making a lasagna for my gf and I.
    [shoeboy] hrm... I was reading the wrong counter, cpu is only at 8%
    * bc smacks his lips
    [bc] food was excellent
    [bc] now for smoke
    [bc] hi shoe btw
    * shoeboy finished "Flasman and the Mountain of Light" last night
    [bc] great :) How'd you find it? Is it the one where he takes the drug and it makes him recklessly courageous?
    [bc] I was LMAO at that
    [shoeboy] no, it's the one covering the sikh war
    [bc] oh, the Koh I Noor?
    [bc] Khalsa etc?
    [Captain_Tenille] Isn't that a large jewel of some sort?
    [shoeboy] yeah
    [shoeboy] that's the one
    [bc] that's a good one
    *** dmg (dmg@host217-35-30-85.in-addr.btopenworld.com) has joined #adequacy
    [Captain_Tenille] I can't remember if it's a diamond or an emerald
    [shoeboy] the bit where he's instructing the Sikh Wazir on how to lose is brilliant
    [shoeboy] it's a diamond
    [bc] I love the idea of all the intrigue
    [dmg] whasssssuuuuup ?
    [bc] one side trying to lose, but make it look like they had tried
    [bc] hey dmg :)
    [dmg] hey bc
    [dmg] http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=20721&cid=4679 945
    [dmg] I don't like it one bit...
    [Captain_Tenille] Is that the list of names?
    [dmg] yeah
    * Captain_Tenille posted that in here earlier today
    [dmg] Mr McP
    [dmg] up to his old tricks
    [dmg] or
    [bc] yes. It' probably craig, perhaps osm
    [Captain_Tenille] Do we know anyone in Arkansas?
    [dmg] and anti McP trying to discredit Mr McP
    [dmg] why Arkansas ?
    [Captain_Tenille] Doesn't craig live there?
    [shoeboy] yup
    [Captain_Tenille] Maybe a hit could be put out on him.
    [bc] he lives not too far from kansas City
    [Captain_Tenille] Arkansas is a small state.
    [bc] which is where he and osm and trollaxor get together to take photos of them in their "phoneboys" garb ;)
    [dmg] isn't KKKlinton from Arkansas ?
    [Captain_Tenille] Ja.
    [Captain_Tenille] bc: Where's osm from?
    [momocrome] osm is kansas too, iirc
    [bc] KC is where he lives
    [bc] same as trollaxor
    [Captain_Tenille] Ah.
    [dmg] the intrigue
    [Captain_Tenille] I knew trollaxor lived there, but not osm.
    [shoeboy] I wonder where Craig got my name?
    [dmg] trolling subculture is just so....
    [bc] yay, fujaba downloaded after only 4 attempts, damned germans
    [Captain_Tenille] So much intrigue over absolutely NOTHING!
    [dmg] intenst
    [bc] hehe shoe
    [dmg] shoeboy:
    [dmg] wasn't he on the list ?
    [momocrome] heh shoeboy
    [shoeboy] dmg, I've never been on the list
    [dmg] I could have sworn...
    [bc] the list is dead anyway
    [dmg] at least 20721 is quite funny at the moment
    [dmg] in a manic depression/add sort of way
    [bc] there's one post every 6 months and has been for 18 months
    [dmg] bc: which list are you talking about ?
    [bc] k22320
    [dmg] k22320inchfan ?
    [dmg] oh
    [bc] no, the other one
    [dmg] editors@
    [dmg] adequacy.org
    [bc] nono
    [bc] not that one either
    [bc] you know, the *real* one. Weren't you invited?
    [dmg] what the real TOP SECRET one that noone knows about ?
    [dmg] ok
    [dmg] we are on the same page now.
    [bc] hehe
    [bc] k22320, I meant, for being totally dead
    [dmg] aha
    [dmg] I met spiralx and IAT last night
    [bc] *k22320inchfan is dying
    [dmg] red ink
    [dmg] etc
    [dmg] kreskin
    [dmg] face facts
    [bc] charnel house
    [dmg] all practical purposes
    [dmg] netcraft
    [dmg] look at the figures
    [dmg] IAT had a goth woman move into his flat
    [dmg] from match.com :-) LOL
    [bc] wow really?!?
    [dmg] yeah
    [bc] I'm sure I'm the one that showed him match.com
    [bc] also, last I saw him was sunday
    [dmg] she sat around all day watching "monarch of the glen" on tv
    [bc] he was moaning about having split up with his gf
    [dmg] that's her
    [bc] redhead?
    [dmg] she was 15st, goth, redhead 6'2"
    [dmg] allegedly
    [bc] haha! That lying bastard, he was criticising hotornot and internet dating
    [dmg] he is going to try again...
    [bc] anyway, this means but one thing: match.com must be searched for iat's ex-gf
    [dmg] LOL LOL LOL LOL
    [dmg] keywords goth "monarch of the glen"
    [dmg] tv
    * Captain_Tenille is mistrustful of girls taller than him
    [bc] haha
    [dmg] I am mistrustful of the female sex
    [dmg] in general.
    [dmg] especially after my eventful wednesday evening... :-)
    [Captain_Tenille] I am six feet tall.
    [Captain_Tenille] Any female taller than that is a mostrosity and a mutant!
    [dmg] no no no
    [dmg] we are all equal in the eyes of god
    [bc] what happened on wed?
    [dmg] tall, short
    [dmg] white black
    [dmg] libertarian, communist
    [dmg] bc: you know my friend ?
    [bc] yes
    [dmg] I was right about her
    [dmg] she DID want me.
    [bc] and she told you as much?
    [dmg] I am now sporting a sex-related injury :-)
    [bc] haha
    [dmg] its not funny :-)
    [dmg] my leg hurts
    [bc] good. Yes, it is funny though
    [dmg] when I put weight on it
    [dmg] it was so amusing.
    [bc] another #adequacy dating advice success!
    [dmg] it was pretty much the most rampant sex I have had in my life...
    [dmg] so much for her protestations of not being interested :-)
    [bc] hehe
    [dmg] #adequacy rules !!!!
    [dmg] doing the right thing for the wrong reasons!!!
    [dmg] I was late for work
    [bc] you're lucky. All I came home to on wednesday was a fucking nasty writ from Ayr Sherriff County Court.
    [dmg] LOL
    [bc] well, not from them, but requesting that I appear before them
    [dmg] Which reminds me, better go and pay my credit card bill brb
    [bc] "request" being more like "appear or else"
    [Captain_Tenille] GodDAMN it!
    [Captain_Tenille] My fucking office chair just broke!
    [bc] haha
    [Captain_Tenille] I loved that chair.
    [bc] did it happen while you were sitting in it, with the result that you spread everywhere hilariously?
    [Captain_Tenille] No. It fell over after I stood up, and one of the bottom things broke off.
    [Captain_Tenille] It had been breaking for a couple of weeks.
    * Captain_Tenille has not had a pleasant past couple of weeks.
    [bc] heh :\
    [bc] fuck sake, fucking fucking fujaba gives and exception on the one major piece of functionality I wanted
    [bc] goddamned thing
    [bc] "write once, run anywhere" [-haha
    [dmg] bc what do the authorities want with you ?
    [dmg] presumably they are trying to coerce you
    [dmg] in some way
    [bc] they are, but rightfully. it is not the government that is coercing me, but I private organisation I have breached a contract with
    [cyndrekit] hehe this is by far my favorite scoop site design wise http://www.artificialcheese.com/
    [bc] and now have to plea with, though hopefully I should be successful
    [dmg] bc: I am surprised
    * Captain_Tenille is bored
    [dmg] I thought you of all people would honour a voulantary contract!
    [dmg] being an anarcho-capitalist/libertarian and all that
    [bc] well I would have, but I didn't realise I was breaking it until it was too late
    [dmg] ignorance is no defence
    [bc] ]:(
    [bc] everybody makes mistakes and suffers the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune
    [dmg] yes, but a contract is a CONTRACT. Its the fundamental bedrock of society....
    [bc] I agree! And people break them, sometimes in error, sometimes deliberately, and in both cases restitution is just
    [dmg] you will get what's coming to you, mark my words...
    [bc] I willfully submit to the court and can only plead before them, they are human beings and shall hopefully see my POV
    [bc] and grant me a return into the contract as it was before
    [dmg] I hope they don't let you get away with anything....
    [Captain_Tenille] What did you not do, bc?
    [dmg] after all, a contract is legally binding, and freely entered in to.
    [dmg] it would be a mockery and a travesty if they let you get away with flouting it.
    [bc] of course it is, dmg, however it is not a mockery and a travesty if they accept all too human error at their discretion, Humanity is at the heart of our justice system too, and the company whose contract I have breached is composed of employees who are human beings, and should see this as nothing but a simple error
    [dmg] bc: I expect the contract will have a just penalty clause for this kind of situation...
    [bc] I don't think it does. It is a fairly unusual situation
    [bc] but I am willing to accept penalties
    [dmg] slashdot blatantly trolls it's moronic readership again.... http://ask.slashdot.org/askslashdot/02/11/13/21272 27.shtml?tid=109
    [dmg] "While I did pay Microsoft for Office for Mac, I try to avoid filling their coffers whenever possible, so for all the family/friends who rely on me for computer recommendations I recommend Mac or Linux."
    [dmg] Wanker.
    [dmg] Liar too :-)
    [bc] haha
    [bc] holy crap
    [dmg] its straight from the "howto"
    [dmg] category "elitism"
    [bc] I especially like this bit:
    [bc] My own situation is that I use an IT-mandated Win98 (ugh) laptop at work, but at home I'm Mac OS X all the way.
    [bc] huh??
    [dmg] WIn98 and MacOs are virtually indistinguishable to normal people.
    [bc] My own situation is that I use an Prprietary system I (ugh) laptop at work, but at home I'm Proprietary System II all the way.
    [dmg] exactly
    [dmg] but who gives a fuck, anyway ?
    [dmg] its just a fucking computer.
    [dmg] Its not a life-or-death issue.
    *** Captain_Tenille has quit IRC (Quit: Time to go)
    [bc] it's not anti-proprietary reasoning, it isn't anti-crapsoftware reasoning, it is anti-MS reasoning and that's it
    [bc] yes
    [bc] it's a damned computer! who cares
    [dmg] I just want to get my work done.
    [bc] What keeps me on windows? (Score:5, Funny)
    [bc] by Real World Stuff on Friday November 15, @04:26PM (#4680158)
    [bc] (User #561780 Info | http://www.elbbs.com/elbbs/jude/hegebaby.html | Last Journal: Friday November 08, @01:30PM)
    [bc] Why the Microsoft ads on Slashdot of course!
    [dmg] I don't want to edit my /etc/resolv.conf, or tweak my registry, or any of that hippie geek bullshit, I just want to do my fucking work.....
    [bc] same here
    [bc] I like that windows is so closed
    [bc] otherwise I'd just be horsing around forever
    [bc] all the time
    [dmg] Looks like the yanks may have caught Osama!!!
    [bc] as it is, it just works
    [bc] wow really??
    [dmg] http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/world/americas/2482545. stm
    [dmg] doesn't mention him by name...
    [dmg] but I bet al-jazeera is well infiltrated by MI5/6
    [dmg] and they seem to have a hotline to him
    [bc] hmmn
    [bc] I doubt they are well-infiltrated
    [dmg] "I can't tell you when, I can't tell you where, I can't tell you how," said one unnamed official. "But this is a big deal."
    [dmg] Who else can they be talking about ?
    [bc] Sources told the Reuters news agency that the person who had been captured was neither al-Qaeda leader Osama Bin Laden's right-hand man, Ayman al-Zawahri, nor operational leader Khalid Shaikh Mohammed, nor Bin Laden's son Saad.
    [bc] heh, who does that leave I wonder?
    [dmg] I need to go check out my conspiracy sites...
    [dmg] http://argument.independent.co.uk/commentators/sto ry.jsp?story=351901
    [bc] dmg, you'll like this a lot: http://reason.com/0210/artifact.shtml
    [dmg] Bin Laden is alive
    [dmg] Fucking-A!!!!
    [bc] hehe
    [dmg] I LOVE it....
    [dmg] it hints at so much
    [dmg] without actually saying anything.
    [bc] I love the blurb underneath
    [bc] what were they thinking?
    [dmg] the latin phrase is the icing on the cake
    [bc] "Hmmn, a big eye looking over the earth, that will be reassuring and comforting!"
    [dmg] someone has an awesome sense of humour
    [bc] that agency is big and nasty though
    [dmg] I am surprised that the Euro does not feature pyramids on its banknotes.
    [bc] they are doing the supposed Carnivore II stuff
    [dmg] oh
    [bc] http://reason.com/sullum/111502.shtml
    [dmg] this will be logged then.
    [bc] I love reason.com
    [dmg] bin laden, terrorism, dirty bomb, al-quaida
    [dmg] oklahoma city
    [dmg] fbi
    [dmg] cia
    [dmg] etc
    [bc] that and justin raimondo and von mises and aldaily are worth a daily read
    [bc] as well as being a sexy, sexy man
    [dmg] men are not sexy to me.
    [dmg] except Sam Sloan.
    [dmg] he has the experience of life
    [bc] I find justin sexier than sam sloan
    [bc] though sam is pretty sexy
    [dmg] were I ever to turn gay and desire rampant butt sex
    [bc] http://www.antiwar.com/justin/justincol.html
    [bc] just look at his rugged good looks
    [dmg] Sam would be the man for the job.
    [bc] (and remember, he actually is gay)
    [dmg] bc: everyone is bisexual
    [dmg] "gays" are just repressed
    [bc] hehe
    [dmg] "The US was finally forced to acknowledge yesterday that the man some of them had claimed to be dead was still very much in the land of the living - and uttering the kind of threat that fulfils the worst nightmares of Western leaders."
    [bc] "Most of us 'neo-isolationists,' a disparate, contentious lot, are realy [sic] not 'neo' anything. We are old church and old right, anti-imperialist and anti-interventionist, disbelievers in Pax Americana. We love the old republic, and when we hear phrases like 'New World Order,' we release the safety catches on our revolvers." --Pat Buchanan
    [bc] I love that!
    [dmg] is that they are too intellectual for the masses.
    [dmg] we need "new Conservatives"
    [dmg] Thatcherism with better marketing
    [bc] there're the "neoconservatives" in USia
    [bc] so the label is really taken, by the wrong people
    [bc] our conservatives just suck
    [dmg] I am economically right wing, and socially, I don't give a fuck what you do so long as I don't have to subsidise it....
    *** Sulla (gallus@modem-2446.porcupine.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    [Sulla] damn
    *** bc has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
    *** Sulla is now known as bc
    [dmg] thanks to #adequacy I had some of the best sex of my life...
    [dmg] bc:
    [dmg] how do I set the topic
    [bc] first, get yourself opped
    [bc] then /topic whatever you want the topic to be here
    [bc] to op yourself, type /msg nickserv identify yerpass
    [dmg] can you op me
    [bc] /msg chanserv op #adequacy dmg
    [bc] ok wait a sec, I'll reg myself
    [dmg] that didnt work
    *** ChanServ sets mode: +o dmg
    [cyndrekit] whats going on?
    [bc] there
    [bc] cyn?
    [cyndrekit] ahh
    [cyndrekit] topic changes
    [dmg] it still doesn't work :-(
    [bc] eh??
    [bc] /topic test
    [cyndrekit] i can do it
    [bc] try that
    [dmg] I type "/topic" test
    [bc] you do it in quotes?
    [dmg] "no topic is set"
    [bc] huh
    [dmg] does it make a difference ?
    [bc] are you using trillian?
    [dmg] bc: yes
    [bc] can you right click or whatever or try clicking on the topic or whatever, they have probably gui-ed it
    [dmg] nothing happens
    [bc] hmm
    [bc] try /quote topic test
    [bc] ?
    [bc] oh
    [dmg] "No Topic is set"
    [bc] when I do /quote topic test, it does that too
    [bc] so yer fucked unless you use a different client seems to me
    [bc] tell me what you want the topic to be, and I'll do it
    *** bc (gallus@modem-2446.porcupine.dialup.pol.co.uk) has left #adequacy
    *** bc (gallus@modem-2446.porcupine.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    *** ChanServ sets mode: +o bc
    [dmg] bc:
    [dmg] thanks to #adequacy I had some of the best sex of my life...
    [dmg] thats the topic
    *** bc changes topic to 'thanks to #adequacy I had some of the best sex of my life... (dmg, not me, obviously)'
    [dmg] well dony
    [bc] woohoo!
    * bc continues searching for a UML modeller that is free and works, goddamnit to hell
    [dmg] did you know tombuck is a wannabe slashdot troll ?
    [dmg] http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=44937&cid=4658 776
    [cyndrekit] "how many #adequacy ops does it take to change a topic?"
    *** Retrieving #adequacy info...
    [bc] LOL
    [bc] @cyn
    [cyndrekit] hehe
    [dmg] cyn: adequacy ops don't do "techie" stuff. They pay someone else to do it
    [cyndrekit] so iv'e noticed...
    [cyndrekit] ;)
    [bc] that's tombuch dmg?? coo
    [dmg] apparently
    [dmg] he's new to trolling
    [bc] he got 22 mod points spent on him, that's pretty impressive
    [dmg] not bad
    [dmg] slagging off NASA always pulls them in.
    [bc] I remember my first successful troll like it was yesterday
    [bc] oh the exhilleration!
    [bc] it was a post called "Why HAL should never be developed"
    [bc] by Kiss the Blade
    [bc] that was trademarkedly luddite, anti-techi, and snooty and superior and artistic and such
    [bc] in a boring story about 2001: A Space Odyssey or some crap
    [dmg] KTB was good
    [bc] it was a laugh, and about my 3rd ever post, and it got 40 replies
    [dmg] trolling
    [dmg] those were the days
    [dmg] nowadays it has become impossible to troll
    [bc] that was at eexactly the same time as everybody abandoned sid=trolltalk for the k5 trolltalk sid :\
    [dmg] Baudrillard would say that trolls are indistinguishable from genuine opinions
    [dmg] they are simulacra
    [bc] and I didn't know any of you lot, so I was left all alone, and nobody noticed my sublime period of success ]~((
    [dmg] ive been thinking about that a lot.
    [dmg] It does not matter whether the expounder of a viewpoint is sincere

  28. VLADEQUACY RAW & UNCUT 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    [dmg] and then I will be in Tokyo/south Korea in April
    [dmg] Who are you anyway Lumpen ?
    [bc] you are drunk ever 36 hours
    [dmg] I am not sure I should be giving this information out.
    [Lumpen] Just a fan, dmg.
    [county] Well, I need to stay sober for now, because I have a date!
    [First_Incision] why am I always sober? I should take up this drinking thing.
    [county] Yes, do.
    [First_Incision] maybe I just need to get used to it. I could never drink enough to get drunk. Once I could feel stupidity creeping up, I could never bring myself to continue.
    [county] Strange.
    [dmg] county: did you get your date from reading the excellent dating advice available here on #adequacy ?
    [county] Once I can feel stupidity creeping up, I can't bring myself to stop.
    [county] dmg, I actually lied about having a date.
    [Lumpen] does #adequacy have a dating-advice bot?
    [dmg] county: its IRC
    [dmg] you can lie if you want
    [First_Incision] Lumpen: it should!
    [First_Incision] zuul, dating?
    [zuul] first_incision: wish i knew
    [First_Incision] zuul, women?
    [zuul] bugger all, i dunno, first_incision
    [First_Incision] zuul, men?
    [zuul] men are really just boys with financial responsibilities
    [dmg] zuul, should I visit a whore ?
    [zuul] dmg: wish i knew
    [county] I witnessed an shocking display of female pettiness and cruelty today. It put me off.
    [Lumpen] /msg datebot Why aren't women drawn to my l33t Linux skilz?
    [First_Incision] zuul, linux
    [zuul] hmmm... linux is a big POS half rate OS that encourages pirates and blatant faggotry!!!!!
    [bc] perhaps you aren't skillful enough
    [First_Incision] there you go!
    [bc] if you can use these skills to make lots&LOTS of money, they will be drawn to those skills
    [Lumpen] Not skilzful enough?
    [dmg] zuul, bsd
    [zuul] rumour has it bsd is dying
    *** bc has quit IRC (Connection reset by peer)
    *** Sulla (gallus@modem-2446.porcupine.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    [Lumpen] But I installed the Linux on my home b0xen all by myself!
    [Lumpen] You should just reopen Adequacy. The joke has gone on long enough.
    [First_Incision] Perdida has her Iniquity "Daily", but I can't seem to finish an article for it.
    [Lumpen] Iniquity?
    [First_Incision] www.iniquitydaily.com
    [dmg] adequacy is dead. Red ink flowed like a river of blood! you didn't have to be Kreskin to see that it was dying. Fact: adequacy is dead.
    [county] perdida has a scoop site?
    [county] Oh heavens, do spare us.
    [Lumpen] It looks like the most recent article on iniquitydaily was posted about a month ago.
    [First_Incision] yeah
    [Lumpen] Lame.
    [First_Incision] And it was a k5 reject
    [cyn-away] bc knows more about it

  29. Kuro5hin Abandons Democracy for Censorship by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    It's time to add Rusty Foster to "the list" of people who shouldn't be breathing.

    Kuro5hin, "the democratic news site", has abandoned all pretenses of Democracy and has gone into full Fascist/Censorship mode.

    These are the recent deeds of Kuro5hin.org:

    1. Deleting numerous comments entirely, circumventing the site's established ratings procedure. Many of the comments deleted were highly rated at the time of deletion, indicating that THE PEOPLE wanted them to stay.

    2. Disabling numerous user accounts. Many of these accounts were disabled before they even posted anything.

    3. Enacting IP bans against several users, and adding additional IP bans as these persecuted people kept changing IPs to avoid censorship.

    4. Deleting many diaries, including several that contained no abusive/offensive content, for no reason and with no warning or notice.

    5. Keeping all this secret, because Rusty Foster knows he would be lynched by his readership if his Nazi-like practices were evar revealed.

    Disabling dozens of accounts... deleting dozens of comments... banning dozens of IPs and several entire subnets... is this Democracy??

    Rusty Foster is going to be second against the wall when the revolution comes, right behind his gay lovebuddy William Scott Lockwood III.

  30. Scott Lockwood The Oathbreaker by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Thoughout history, many names have been used to describe those who are on the wrong moral path in life: coward, criminal, fiend, monster, vagrant, lunatic. It's without question that William Scott Lockwood III is all of these things, but these are things that can be forgiven. William Scott Lockwood III's sins run deeper.

    In many cultures, the greatest moral offense a man can commit isn't murder, robbery, rape, arson, or even blasphemy. In these cultures, there's a word for someone who is even lower than the murderers and rapists, because he has demonstrated with clear finality his lack of moral character. This one word, never used carelessly, reserved only for the lowest of the low is oathbreaker.

    Many societies value personal honor, honesty, and integrity above anything else. People can make mistaks, and still maintain their honor if they take accountability for their actions. But the oathbreaker is the lowest of the low, never to be forgiven, and never to be trusted. This is because he has voluntarily sacrified the only thing that every man brings with him into the world, and the only thing that every man (hopefully) takes with him into the grave: his honor.

    When a man's honor is gone, he has nothing.

    Ladies and gentlemen, William Scott Lockwood III has nothing. If our society were still built on the concept that a man's word is sacred and that honoring others with the truth is a noble goal, William Scott Lockwood III would be dead right now.

    A man's word is his bond, and when he breaks his word, he's no longer a man at all. He's worse than a coward, worse than a liar, and worse than a thief, but he's all these things and more. He's an oathbreaker.

    In the past, oathbreakers become nonpersons. They stand below even murderers and thieves. Even beggars would not give or recieve comfort from an oathbreaker. Quite often, they were simply killed outright. Sometimes, they were merely cut off from honest society, trusted by no one, alienated until the day they died. After their death, their families were shunned and distrusted forever, because a man holds in his hand no only his own honor, but the honor of his family as well.

    The Lockwood family has no honor left. The Lockwood family has no place in honest society, among civilized humans, because they have no honor, and they are not a part of civilization.

    Killing an oathbreaker was considered to be an act of mercy, sending a tortured soul on to final judgement instead of forcing him to live an empty, hollow life.

    Maybe it's time that we bring back the practice of killing oathbreakers, and ensuring that their bloodline does not propogate. Maybe a lack of honesty is what's wrong with our society. Maybe that's why everything is falling into chaos around us. When you can't trust a man's word, what basis is there for civilization?

    I think upon consideration that you will agree: William Scott Lockwood III is less than a gentlemen, less even than a man, less even than a human, less even than an animal. William Scott Lockwood III is an oathbreaker.

  31. The HOW2TROLL Trolling Workshop 1 - Profit by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    PREPARE FOR THE HOW2TROLL TROLLING WORKSHOP
    Dedicated to teaching quality Trolling skillz

    STEP 1 : Pick a story and search through for a highly-rated or otherwise prominent comment in which someone uses a nubmered list. For example, you want to find something like this:

    EXAMPLE:

    1. Blah!
    2. Blah!
    3. Blah!
    For example, I selected this post as a prime target. There are only a few things to keep in mind: pick an active story and a comment that'll be seen by a lot of people as the target of your troll. The comment MUST contain a numbered list, similar to the above, although the exact style of numbering can vary. Also, try to pick a comment that hasn't already been trolled this way. Every comment with a numbered list will eventually get hit, so you want to be quick.

    STEP 2 : Take careful note of the method of numbering that your target post is using. It really doesn't matter, as long as it's numbered. For example, in this post I use text like "STEP 1", "STEP 2", etc. Note this carefully. This method of trolling makes the most sense when the list is a list of ordered steps (such as this vary document you are reading), BUT if the numbered list is something different, such as "REASON 1:", "REASON 2:", etc., hit it anyway! Your troll will be more esoetric and non-sequitur, but all the better: trolling doesn't always HAVE to make sense. Sometimes it's fun to confuse people.

    STEP 3 : Now you'll put the information gained from step 2 to good use, as you attack the target you selected. This is where it gets complicated, so pay attention. This is easiest to explain with a couple of examples. Let's say your target looks like this:

    TARGET POST:

    • 1. I am a Slashbot!
    • 2. Gosh, I hope I don't get trolled!
    • 3. Blah blah blah, whore for karma!
    • 4. In conclusion, I'm SO smart!

    Now, to pull off your masterfult act of trollage, you'll want to sneak in, post a reply, and do this:

    TROLL REPLY:

    • 4. ???
    • 5. PROFIT!
    Let's say that the post you're replying to is a bit more complex:

    TARGET POST:
    Reasons Linix is so great!
    *REASON 1: My allowance won't cover expensive software.
    *REASON 2: Completely off-topic rant about Microsoft.
    *REASON 3: I love Linix!!

    Now you want to come in and do this:

    TROLL REPLY:
    *REASON 4: ???
    *REASON 5: PROFIT!

    Note what I did there: I emulated the exact style of his numbered list, and then added to it in order to cleverly troll him. THAT is the key. If he numbers his list using bold, use bold. If your target uses all caps, use all caps. If he uses Roman Numerals, use Roman Numerals (hint: I II III IV V VI VII VII IX X, then everything repeats from there), etc. Make YOUR list seem like an naturally-flowing conclusion to your TARGET's list. Then give him HELL! Here's the general key:

    TARGET POST:
    1. Blah!
    2. Blah!
    3. Blah!
    ...
    X. Blah!

    TROLL REPLY
    X+1. ???
    X+2. PROFIT!

    I know it gets complicated when you throw in the algebra, but you should be able to do it. Keep track of the numbers on a piece of paper if you have to. It's vary difficult, but once you try it out, you'll get the hang of it. It's an aquired skill that can only be improved through hard work and practice. So get out there and troll!

    Here's a summary:

    STEP 1 : Pick your target (active, contains numbered list)
    STEP 2 : Gather information (style of the numbered list)
    STEP 3 : Nail the target by adding on to his own list!
    STEP 4 : ???
    STEP 5 : PROFIT!

    See, I even did it to my own damn list! That's how easy it is once you become a master at this discipline of trolling! Good luck, young Jedi!!! Go out and troll the world, you motherfucking cuntrag bitches!!

  32. First post by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Sug min kugar

  33. VLADEQUACY RAW & UNCUT 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    *** Sulla is now known as bc_dvd
    [bc_dvd] bye :)
    [momocrome] hi
    *** cdromgurl has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 300 seconds)
    [county] Hi and bye to all of you, as appropriate.
    *** cyndrekit (~be590@cloaked.sierratel.com) has joined #adequacy
    *** ChanServ sets mode: +o cyndrekit
    [county] cyndrekit, hello.
    [cyndrekit] hello county
    [cyndrekit] did bc actually get a dvd?
    [cyndrekit] I am shocked.
    [cyndrekit] ;)
    [county] I wonder what it is.
    [me0w] Hello
    [county] Greetings, me0w.
    [me0w] Good day
    [cyndrekit] hi hi
    [em] http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/021 115/168/2oxdj.html
    [cyndrekit] is there a story to go with it?
    [em] yes
    [cyndrekit] oh cool, found it
    [em] the photo is just too cool.
    * momocrome moans
    [momocrome] too much drunk for one night
    [county] It's not night!
    [me0w] Soon it will be.
    [momocrome] oh last night's what I mean
    [county] You didn't seem that drunk.
    *** cyndrekit has quit IRC (Connection reset by peer)
    *** seventypercent has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 300 seconds)
    *** me0w (meow@labyrinth.cs.rogers.wave.ca) has left #adequacy
    *** me0w (meow@labyrinth.cs.rogers.wave.ca) has joined #adequacy
    *** bc (gallus@modem-1926.orangutan.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    *** bc_dvd has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
    *** collins (~nigel@cloaked.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net) has joined #adequacy
    *** collins (~nigel@cloaked.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net) has left #adequacy (hmph)
    [wsl3] Has anyone in here actually had a child?
    *** Sylvain (~martinez@bombillo.Stanford.EDU) has joined #adequacy
    *** ChanServ sets mode: +o Sylvain
    [wsl3] Has anyone in here actually had a child?
    [me0w] I have a cat ...
    [me0w] She's kind of like a child.
    [bc] hello!
    [me0w] hi!
    [bc] damn, missed cyn
    [bc] that film was great
    [county] What was it?
    [bc] it was "Contact", county
    [bc] I liked the way it explored revelatory experiences
    [county] Have I mentioned that I've nursed an infatuation for Jodie Foster?
    [bc] and scepticism as opposed to faith
    [bc] you know what? I was just thinking about that
    [county] About what?
    [bc] I never really used to like her, because she seems quite sharp nosed and hard faced, in that way
    [bc] but now, well, now I see. She seemed so vulnerable in that film
    [county] I like well-defined faces.
    [county] I can see why her's might be too sharp for you, though.
    [bc] and you just wanted to protect her against the world
    [momocrome] i hate kitten, but I am hung over and foggy headed
    [bc] it is quite sharp, but I see beyond that now
    [county] I like faces with character, not just formless fleshy masses, that so many other girls seem to have.
    [county] Don't hate kitten, momocrome.
    [county] There's no point.
    [county] I just don't understand how he thinks he's different than the people he's always railing on.
    [county] It's really funny, actually.
    [bc] hehe
    [bc] it's true, county
    [bc] he constantly moans about people being "arrogant", or "narrow minded"
    [county] I try to point it out now and then, but he just doesn't see it.
    [bc] and you think "whaaa?"
    [county] I think stouts are my favorite.
    [bc] kitten is the most narrow minded & arrogant chap on the internet
    [me0w] I am going out drinking tonight.
    [county] One of my bus infatuations, the one who was being picked on, has a somewhat sharp face.
    [county] Actually, I love her face.
    [bc] I hope you have a voice of reason, me0w
    [county] It's pretty, but not beautiful, by normal standards.
    [county] But it just looks so carefully crafted, somehow.
    [bc] is the sharp faced bus infatuation the same girl as the one with the limp?
    [county] It looks like someone wanted her face to look just like that, and they invested endless time in carefully crafting it.
    [county] You know what I mean?
    [me0w] bc: I do, although this voice of reason is a little suspect ..
    [county] (No, the limping girl is someone else, and she doesn't generally limp.)
    [bc] why me0w, is this voice of reason American or something? I know you hate Americans. An American Voice of Reason would probably advice you to lick the most repugnant people in the room, as retaliation.
    [bc] county: yes, I do know
    [bc] interesting faces are nice
    [county] When I see her, I want to hold her face in my hands and kiss it.
    [county] But that's not a polite thing to do on a bus.
    [county] You're wrong about us American's, bc. An American voice of reason wouldn't feel any ill will toward me0w, despite her hatred.
    [bc] get to know her first, and do it later. Have her melt
    [county] It would just feel sadness and hurt.
    [county] "Americans"
    [Sylvain] hey bc
    [bc] county, my impression of Americans is that they are friendly and kind, and idealistic, but that if you cross them they take a just vengeance
    [bc] hey em
    [county] Cross us, yes. Simply hating us but doing nothing about it is not crossing us.
    [bc] that seems fair enough
    [bc] though who knows, me0w yank-hatred is such that it wouldn't surprise me to find she has crossed the line
    [me0w] bc: this voice of reason has been my friend since HS, and on several occasions, while I was not quite in the right fram of mind, he got me to do silly things.
    [county] It's mean and hurtful, yes, but that's not enough. We Americans only retaliate when actual harm is done.
    [me0w] I do not have individual-yank hatred.
    [county] I hope she hasn't crossed the line. America's wrath is great toward those who hurt her.
    [bc] he sounds like a splendid chap, me0w. He should tell you to lick a lovely, yooung 16yo with lots of acne
    [me0w] bc: He would tell me to go and make out with girls.
    [bc] what?? That's only because he gets off on it himself, the weirdo perv
    [county] Lesbian sex must be the least arousing thing in existence.
    [bc] agreed, county, but I understand many chaps find it appealing
    [county] But oh, man.
    [county] This is nice.
    [bc] generally ones with supressed homosexual urges themselves, I understand
    [county] I have that warm, content feeling that comes with a few boozes and just finishing a delicious salami and pepper jack sandwich.
    [bc] I want to have faith in something
    [bc] I don't know what, but it seems to make people happy
    [bc] so it must be worth a shot
    [me0w] He likes to make me do these things and take pictures
    [bc] he's sounding more&more sick
    [county] What sort of things?
    [me0w] He teases my SO with the pictures.
    [county] I'm only asking so we can get a good idea of how sick he is.
    [bc] "teases"? If I had a gf who french kissed girls in strange clubs, and a friend who took pictures of this and then showed them to me, I'd be jolly well angry, and likely explode in anger and start shouting at people
    [bc] It takes all sorts, eh county
    [county] I wouldn't want a girl that french kisses other girls.
    [Sylvain] is it just me, or has this channel become too serious?
    [county] This channel is a joke, Sylvain.
    [bc] Sylvain, it's great. Since the regulars left, the channel has become more&more&more fun
    [county] I like this channel. It's a lot of bullshit, a lot of heartfelt confession, and a lot of fighting.
    [county] I can't think how it could be improved.
    [bc] that's pretty much why I like it. What makes it tolerable is that a lot of the time, you can't really tell which is which
    [county] For example, I quite like my online relationship with luisa.
    [bc] serious? or bullshit? serious fight? bullshit fight? confession or or bullshit? fight? mixing it up to cause a fight? Who can tell.
    [county] It's all fighting mixed with lies and truths.
    [bc] I hope ubu has extensive logs of #kuro5hin
    [bc] actually, do you, county?
    [bc] going back a year or so?
    [county] Well, I log whenever I'm in there.
    [bc] I wish to find something
    [county] I should point out that I've only been online for a month or so.
    [bc] yes, but I understand you are friendly with someone who was here before, it was just on the offchance he gave you his logs
    [county] Well, I have #k5 logs going back over a year, yes.
    [bc] what size are they when zipped up would you guess?
    [bc] nothing vast, right? not 50mb or something absurd?
    *** dmg (~dmg@cloaked.in-addr.btopenworld.com) has joined #adequacy
    [bc] hello dmg
    [dmg] whassup bc
    [Sylvain] hey dmg
    [bc] not much
    [dmg] hey sylvain
    [bc] I just watched "contact" dmg, which has led me to believe I need faith in my life.
    [county] I have a bit over 100mb of #k5 logs, bc.
    [bc] em probably hates that film, for its inclusion of arecibo and the airbrushing out of native 'Ricans, only mentioned in passing for their superstitious beliefs about the telescope
    [bc] crap, that's loads county
    [bc] bugger it
    [dmg] contact ? Is that with whatshername from silence of th e lambs
    [Sylvain] superstitious beliefs indeed
    [bc] yes dmg
    [dmg] I dont like her voice
    [Sylvain] the visiting scientists don't leave ALL that much money as they think
    [county] Silence, dmg.
    [county] She is my infatuation of the moment.
    [bc] yes. She was mine first though
    [bc] I spent the film marvelling at her vulnerability
    [county] I liked her before you watched the film, bastard!
    [dmg] you would like "the accused" then...
    [dmg] she is more vulnerable in that.
    [dmg] I just cannot stand her voice
    [bc] She only came to my notice during the film, really. She fits the archetype that I like in women, so it can be said that I have always liked her, as long as I have been alive.
    [dmg] eurrgh
    [county] Her voice, or her accent?
    [dmg] her voive
    [dmg] voice
    [dmg] it just annoysh me
    [county] I never found it annoying.
    [county] hmm.
    [dmg] itsh sho annoying
    [bc] I like it. It seems to have a nice burr
    [me0w] My SO's drunken sister keeps messaging me. =/
    [bc] she's like a female sean connery
    [dmg] bc: exactly
    [dmg] she shertainly ish
    [bc] me0w, give her my aim and tell her to msg me
    [county] Have her msg me.
    [bc] I think I'd enjoy talking to a drunken woman!
    [me0w] bc: She is on Y!
    [dmg] get her on #adequacy
    [county] I want a drunk girl to torment.
    [county] ARGH
    [bc] that's okay, I'm on yahoo too me0w
    [me0w] I don't think she knows how to irc.
    [county] I WANT A DRUNK GIRL TO TORMENT SO MUCH
    [me0w] She does use that horrible habbo hotel junk
    [county] Huh?
    [bc] trillian just connected me to aim, yahoo, msn and icq. Now tell her to msg me! My ID on yahoo is tinyp3a. DO IT.
    [bc] I WANT TO TORMENT COUNTY SO MUCH
    [county] ]:(
    [me0w] Be nice
    [county] I am a fragile angel.
    [me0w] she is my future sister-in-law
    [bc] I'm always nice :\
    [dmg] trillian can connect to msn ?
    [dmg] wow!
    [dmg] I never realised that.
    [county] bc steals every woman I want.
    [county] Every one :(
    [me0w] bc, I gave her your id
    [bc] wow!
    [bc] she really is drunk
    [Sylvain] paste example
    [dmg] bc is from www.girlfriendstealers.com
    [county] dmg, he did steal my girlfriend.
    [county] Actually.
    [dmg] http://www.girlfriendstealer.com/
    [bc] [censored]: helloo?1
    [bc] tinyp3a: hello!
    [bc] [censored]: howw s u?
    [county] I can't believe I forgave him for that.
    [me0w] bc, please keep in mind that she is only 17
    [dmg] women come and go.
    [county] dmg, I loved her!
    [county] And bc stole her :(
    [dmg] those are the breaks.
    [dmg] bc is irresistible to women.
    [dmg] he is like Sam Sloan in that respect
    * Sylvain looks at a list of ebay sections, notices "charity"
    [county] Yeah. And when I cut his hands and feet of, burn his face off with acide, and leave him to die, those will be the breaks, eh?
    [dmg] well yes.
    [county] "acid"
    [dmg] bc takes full responsibility for his actions.
    [bc] [censored]: LoL AWW U SHOULDA!!
    [dmg] he is an anarcho-capitalist libertarian
    * bc ROFL
    [dmg] who was this woman anyway ?
    [dmg] she cannot have been in love with you if she let bc steal her away
    [county] me0w's SO's sister.
    [bc] county, I asked to speak to her first
    [bc] so I didn't steal her at all
    [bc] she is verrry drunk
    [county] I thought of it first, bc, but my intoxication is slowing down my typing.
    [Sylvain] bc: i don't think that will appease county's perception of entitledness.
    [county] Ask her for naked pictures of Jin Wicked, bc.
    [dmg] I have some of those
    [county] Yeah? Lucky you.
    [dmg] she keeps crapflooding my mailbox with them
    [dmg] attention-seeker.
    [county] She's a pain, in that respect.
    [county] And every other respect.
    [dmg] its like,
    [county] With no respect.
    [dmg] stop spamming me with nude photos.
    [dmg] If I wanted to see that sort of thing I would get a girlfriend.
    [county] I want to see it, and I can't get a girlfriend.
    [county] You're attractive, confident, and wordly.
    [Sylvain] dmg: you'd get a girlfriend to see nude *photos*?
    [county] I'm a geeky pud.
    [dmg] no if I wanted to see nude women
    [dmg] Id get a girlfriend
    [county] Or you'd just sleep around. Slut.
    [dmg] aha the old double standard
    [county] Not all nude women were created equal, though.
    [dmg] we are all equal in the eyes of Allah (SWT) apart from the Infidels
    *** dmg is now known as Abu_Nidal
    [county] There's only one girl I want to see naked, actually.
    [bc] damn
    [bc] she's too drunk to realise that when I say I'm living under a glacier, I'm joking :\
    * me0w giggles
    *** Abu_Nidal is now known as dmg
    [dmg] Scotland is an icy barren wasteland though, bc
    [me0w] time for showering
    [dmg] she could be forgiven
    [Sylvain] bc maybe that's not drunkenness.
    [bc] also, she speaks like a black Londoner with hyper estuary english
    [Sylvain] it's perhaps stupidity augmented by adolescence and drunkenness.
    [dmg] hold on one moment. if she is 17 and drunk, is she not guilty of an offence ????
    [Sylvain] nope.
    [dmg] Should not we be reporting her to the authorities
    [dmg] ???
    [dmg] or the person who supplied the alcohol
    [bc] LOL
    [Sylvain] somebody else is
    [dmg] In the UK the alcohol age is 5
    [dmg] for consumption in the home
    [county] You must be kidding.
    [dmg] how enlightened compared to our other stupid laws.
    [dmg] no, its 5
    [dmg] seriously
    [county] Why have an age at all?
    [dmg] Ill find a web page if I can to PROVE it
    [county] Yeah, because web pages are always right!
    [bc] she's away now
    [bc] [censored]: BywebYE!!
    [bc] which is sort of a relief
    [bc] hehe
    [county] I bet you got lots of fantastic drunken cybersex ]:(
    [bc] don't be revolting county
    [bc] I am a people person
    [dmg] http://www.icap.org/pdf/report4updated.pdf
    [bc] people interest me, and I like to find out all about them
    [bc] there is no other motivation
    [county] I'm not going to try to read through a pdf in this condition.
    [dmg] one moment
    [dmg] fucking cut-n-paste doesn't work
    [county] I think I'd like another salami sandwish
    [dmg] In bars and off-licensed premises the MDA and MPA are 18. The MPA for
    [dmg] beer and cider is 16 when purchased for consumption with meals
    [dmg] (except when in a bar). Children over five may consume alcoholic
    [dmg] beverages at home with their parent's consent.
    [bc] pdf sucks
    [dmg] basically if you have cool parents you can get pissed once you start infant school
    [dmg] but if you are over 18 and want to drink after 11pm, you are shit out of luck
    [dmg] its a contradiction to be sure...
    [Sylvain] there are some exceptions to alcohol laws here in USia IIRC
    [Sylvain] e.g. it's allowed to give a child some wine if required by a religious ritual
    [dmg] * In 19 states alcohol consumption by youth under 21 is not specifically
    [dmg] illegal.
    [dmg] ** Exceptions to the 21 law in some states include possession for
    [dmg] religious purposes when accompanied by a parent, spouse or legal
    [dmg] guardian; medical reasons; in private clubs or establishments; in the
    [dmg] course of lawful employment by a duly licensed manufac
    [Sylvain] e.g. catholic communion frequently involves a bit of wine.
    [bc] I remember when I first got drunk
    [bc] I thought "I want to spend the rest of my days in this condition"
    [bc] it was a revelation
    [bc] I think I have found my faith already
    [dmg] I was about four when I first got drunk. on Babycham believe it or not. My mum did not realise it was alcoholic :-)
    *** Sylvain changes topic to '[ bc] I remember when I first got drunk || [ bc] I thought "I want to spend the rest of my days in this condition"'
    [bc] I had a good swig of scotdch when I was 6 months old and got drunk
    [bc] that was quite impressive. I saw the glass of double scotch, grasped it in two hands, and swigged it right down
    [bc] well, I can't in truth remember if it got be drunk, or anything about it at all, but I'm sure it must've
    [dmg] thats pretty funny
    [dmg] you could have died however.
    [Sylvain] he wouldn't have understood it.
    [bc] nah, I took it like a baby
    [Sylvain] no trauma for him
    [Sylvain] what's the problem with dying when you're a perfectly innocent being?
    [Sylvain] it's only when we grow old and come to appreciate that life is valuable that we have a problem with it
    [county] I am a perfectly innocent being.
    [dmg] what about original sin ?
    [Sylvain] 16:31 [ county] I WANT A DRUNK GIRL TO TORMENT SO MUCH
    [bc] you'll note he didn't actually do it, em
    [bc] county has control of his desires
    [county] I actually don't even think I wrote that.
    * Sylvain sings: Nwel a rive pou nou pa pedi lespwa nou!
    [county] The wind has really picked up here.
    [county] It's almost violent.
    [dmg] im going to bed
    [dmg] its past my bedtime
    * bc bought a bottle of Appleston Estate 40 year old today,Sylvain
    [dmg] bloody IRC
    [bc] night dmg!
    [dmg] night night everyone
    *** dmg has quit IRC (Quit: Trillian (http://www.ceruleanstudios.com))
    [county] What's that, bc?
    [Sylvain] bc: wow.
    [bc] it's an excellent rum
    [Sylvain] how much was it?
    [bc] a bloody fortune
    [Sylvain] fuck. the oldest rum i've ever had is 12 years.
    [county] Ah, a rum.
    [Sylvain] any words on how good it is beyond "excellent"?
    [county] The oldest rum I've had was also 12 years.
    [bc] it tastes nice. Older rums seem to become more whiskyish, somehow, it is hard to explain
    [bc] much more complex
    [county] Now you just need some forty year old coke.
    [bc] it is aged in the tropics, too
    [bc] apparantly that means it ages more rapidly
    [bc] at about 3x the rate of a spirit aged in, say, canada
    [bc] anyway, I don't know. It tastes very nutty, somehow
    [Sylvain] but how expensive was it?
    [bc] em: £10,000
    [bc] http://www.canoe.ca/LifewiseFoodWine01/0314_winewe d_par.html
    [Sylvain] yeah, right, like you have 15,795.99 USD
    [bc] :\
    [bc] it's really nice with coke though!
    *** Sylvain sets mode: +b *!*gallus@*.orangutan.dialup.pol.co.uk
    *** bc was kicked by Sylvain (Trolling is strictly forbidden in this channel.)
    *** Sylvain sets mode: -b *!*gallus@*.orangutan.dialup.pol.co.uk
    *** bc (gallus@modem-1926.orangutan.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    *** ChanServ sets mode: +o bc
    [bc] :\
    [bc] wouldn't that be lovely though?
    *** iat (iat@cloaked.bear.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    *** ChanServ sets mode: +o iat
    [bc] I'd be scared to drink it
    [bc] hey iat!
    [iat] hey bc
    [iat] whassup bc?
    [bc] not much
    [bc] how's the online dating scene going? =)
    [iat] i finally got rid of my woman. she came to get rid of her shit from my flat this evening. i'm getting pissed and then tomorrow im gonna get on with my life
    * county sighs
    [bc] dmg was telling me about it, er, your troubles with her
    * county weeps
    [iat] dmg said you're coming to london next month
    [iat] heh, someone gave her rohypnol last night!
    [county] That's horrible.
    [iat] i don't know who would be fucked up enough to waste good rohypnol on her
    [bc] did he? He's wrong. I was going to, but something disastrous happened. I may come in January, but not december, that's been off for ages due to commitments
    [iat] bah, we all want to meet you
    [iat] what did dmg say about me/it/her?
    [bc] hehe. I'll come down sooner or later
    [bc] he was talking about how you met her on match.com (!)
    [bc] which reminds me, I have to search march.com insanely to find her
    [iat] yeah, it's either that or start fucking my secretary. i saw it as the lesser of two evils
    [me0w] bc, And how was she?
    [bc] there really can't be that many overweight, red headed, goth girls from london on mach.com
    [iat] you'd be surprised
    [county] No more than twenty or so, I'd guess.
    [bc] me0w: very drunk. Spoke in estuary english. Seemed good natured though, through the disgraceful mists of her underage drinking
    [iat] btw, you forgot moustachiod
    [iat] otoh, there are no biologists with pds living in edinburgh on match
    [bc] :\
    [county] Why on earth did you even have anything to do with her, iat?
    [bc] I found one I liked on match.com
    [me0w] bc, She is a nice girl ... a little thick at times
    [iat] county: i wanted to get my redhead fetish out of the way
    [bc] but I'm not showing her to you iat, you'd steal her
    [iat] i wasn;t sure if the "ginger pubes" thing was a liberal myth
    [me0w] bc, I think there is a picture of her in my gallery
    [iat] of course i'd steal her, i'm a stud
    [bc] heh me0w. She seemed nice. Drunk for sure, drunk as a Lord, it was terrifically amusing
    [me0w] bc, Unfortunately her typing doesn't get much better
    [iat] bc: where's your bondage pr0n collection stored on aq?
    [county] A stud? You seem like a poorer middle class fellow, somewhat on the ugly side.
    [iat] upper middle class, only slightly ugly thank you
    [iat] but, i am hung like a mouse
    [iat] emr, moose
    *** Sulla (gallus@modem-2093.python.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    [Sulla] me0w, are you trying to say that she mayn't have been drunk at all, or was only tipsy, and that she isn't really too different when sober?
    [Sulla] iat: I forget. I never look at it, and it isn't "my collection"
    [me0w] bc, She was drunk.
    [iat] whose collection is it then?
    [me0w] bc, But when she is sober I often have a dificult time understanding what she is saying.
    [Sulla] it is me0ws and I put it there cos perdida wanted it for some story relating to 80's bdsm pornography for her site
    [me0w] bc, she likes to type in some sort of sms speak
    [Sulla] hehe
    [Sulla] that would explain whey she says "da" for "the"
    [me0w] bc, ahaha you still have those pictures?
    [iat] who is me0w anyway? there's all these new faces since i last frewuented #aq?
    [Sulla] me0w yes, and embrassingly, someone posted the link into my diary and made all sorts of insinuations
    [Sulla] mind you, since I've claimed to be a rapist on k5 before it isn't like I can sink much lower
    *** bc has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
    [iat] anyway bc, you never told me where you keep it
    [me0w] bc, and they weren't even good pictures
    [Sulla] iat, me0w is this bird wot came here from #k5 who is quite nice and stuff, though canadian (french)
    [county] Does me0w speak french?
    [Sulla] iat, I'll look out the url
    [iat] i work with a REAL french canadian, her mother's french and her father's canadian. she's never been near "french candian" territory
    [county] Sulla, so you really do have a bondage porn collection?
    [county] I thought that was myth.
    [Sulla] http://www.adequacy.org/images/bc/violate.me.uk/pi ctures/xxxpics/
    [Sulla] it's not my fucking collection!
    [Sulla] jesus H christ
    [me0w] bc, you know, I've never actually looked at all of them
    [county] Yeah, whatever.
    [iat] it appears to be quite a copmorehensive collection bc
    [Sulla] there are perfectly legitimate reasons the pics are there
    [county] So you find this appealing, bc? http://www.adequacy.org/images/bc/violate.me.uk/pi ctures/xxxpics/4ladies/0208.jpg
    [Sulla] me0w, neither have I
    [Sulla] I just looked at some funny 80's ones
    [me0w] bc, I looked at the ones that perdida pointed out
    [Sulla] http://www.adequacy.org/images/bc/violate.me.uk/pi ctures/xxxpics/BonkSeries/bonk054.jpg
    [Sulla] I'm sorry, that makes me laugh and laugh
    [county] These are amusing and sexy at the same time. I love it!
    [Sulla] anyway, when I can be bothered, I'll delete the whole lot
    [me0w] bc, was there a series of hunchback pictures?
    [Sulla] yes me0w
    [Sulla] the "bonk" series
    [Sulla] http://www.adequacy.org/images/bc/violate.me.uk/pi ctures/xxxpics/BonkSeries/bonk070.jpg
    [Sulla] that's also pretty damned hilarious
    [county] I'll give you $728 for all these pictures, Sulla.
    [Sulla] some of them are funny, but all the rest are just crude and nasty
    [Sulla] county, it's a deal!
    *** Sulla is now known as bc
    [county] Fantastic!
    [bc] I love the leer on the guy's face
    [bc] so cheesy
    [me0w] county, I could just mail you the cd they came from
    [bc] that's a nice offer, eh county? You should accept
    [county] The truth is, I like nothing more than pictures of bound and tormented women.
    [county] However, I prefer not to post my mailing address in the channel.
    [bc] then msg it to me0w
    [county] Msg? I don't know what you mean by that.
    [bc] liar
    [county] Oh, that hurts :(
    [bc] iat has gone quite quiet since I posted the link, eh?
    [bc] I wonder what he is doing?
    [iat] heh
    [me0w] Wanking?
    [iat] smoking and drinking
    [county] I'm wanking.
    [county] How could I not?
    [county] All these photographs of naked women tied up!
    [county] It's paradise, from my perspective.
    [iat] i love smoking
    [iat] i just wish it didn't cost so much
    [bc] I thought you were a health freak?
    [iat] not these days
    [bc] good move
    [bc] welcome to the "cool set"
    [iat] the pressures of work have turned me into a nicotine-fuelled anorexic
    [county] I have never, ever smoked.
    [county] I probably should.
    [bc] you'd like it
    [iat] i have never, ever smoked crack
    [bc] everybody with an addictive personality should have many addictions
    [county] I don't have an addictive personality.
    [bc] You do. Oh god you do.
    [bc] You are always looking for a hit
    [county] Explain!
    [county] I'm addicted to little.
    [county] Just alcohol and that girl from work's ass.
    [bc] you don't just talk to people. You have angles, you attack and duck and weave, you seek the high of torture and humiliation of others in everything you say
    [county] No :(
    [county] Not others, women.
    [county] I only want to hurt females.
    [county] Please keep that straight.
    [bc] You do it to vlad often enough, phoneboy
    [me0w] I dunno what to wear
    [county] Oh, that's different.
    [iat] bc: will you stop saying "humiliation"? the "iat" bit interrupts my mp3s by making acidmax make sounds
    [bc] hehe, okay iat, I didn't realise I said humiliation so often :\
    [county] My motivation for tormenting vlad is entriely different than my motivation for tormenting, say, luisa.
    [bc] me0w, wear leather and stuff
    [bc] I don't know
    [county] me0w, dress chastly.
    [county] It's incredibly sexy.
    [bc] me0w, wear a denim skirt with a sort of white lacery around the pockets that looks lovely and homely, and a black t-shirt above that is slinky and just has strap things over the shoulders so it is more of a dress, really.
    [bc] let your hair hang down forward over your bosom, to each side, following the contours perfectly
    [me0w] bc, I don't own any denim skirts
    [me0w] and I only have a leather corset
    [bc] hmmmn
    [county] I told you, me0w.
    [iat] bc: what happened to your general knwoledge bot?
    [county] Dress chastly.
    [county] It will draw guys like you can't believe.
    [bc] wear a turqoise top, that is very close fitting and very slightly see-through, revealing a white bra underneath on the edge of awareness, and making men think you are less calculating and more genuine than those other dolled up girls. Underneath, wear black trousers that are practical looking though ladylike, covered in pockets
    *** iat sets mode: +o bc
    [bc] iat: It's on my hard drive. I got bored with it and moved onto other things
    [county] The white bra is a good idea.
    [iat] what are you coding now, j00 1337 hax0r j00?
    [me0w] bc, I don't own a turqoise top
    [county] When I see a white bra, my instinct is to assume it was displayed on accident, becuause my tendancy is to feel white-bra-clad people are pure and innocent.
    [me0w] and I don't know if I have a white bra
    [county] ]:(
    [me0w] wait wait
    [me0w] I found a white bra
    [bc] I'm writing a new peer2peer filesharing system that will specialise in text, pdf and html documents that the man would like to keep down. it will allow you to search for strings inside the text body, and return results, google like, that show the context
    [bc] zool me0w!
    [county] she had a blue bra, it was lovely. I hate it now, though I loved it then!
    [bc] okay, do you have any slightly see-through tops at all?
    [county] Oh god, she looked lovely in it.
    [bc] what we are going for here is the thrown-on, unsophisticated but lovely look
    [me0w] I have a whole collection of see through wear
    [me0w] but I don't think it would be appropriate for the places I'm going this evening
    [county] "see-through" should be hyphenated.
    [iat] bc "the man" doensn't care about text files
    [bc] bugger appropriate. Look like a lost fawn in the wilderness
    [bc] he does, iat, more than any other media
    [iat] approprIATe interrupts my mp3s. plz stop tnx
    [me0w] these pants require a thong
    [bc] my filesharing network will have terrorist plans, blueprints, and government leaks and such
    [bc] and books
    [iat] no-one will use it for anything other than war3zing books
    [bc] I will provide that service. It's more than a filesharing network, I intend it to be a peer-2-peer knowledge base sort of deal
    [bc] you can do context searches and it will return a few paeges or a chapter from a book say
    [bc] and it will allow a wikipedia type self editing bit
    [iat] how long have you been programming?
    [bc] but everything will be peer-2-peer, the whole encyclopaedia
    [iat] aargh, not wikipedia!
    [bc] not like that, but that's the model. Imagine a wikipaedia not located on any machine, but spread across a peer-2-peer netowrk. it could hold the Truth, regardless of what government or corporate law tries
    [bc] it's a powerful concept for political and informational insurgency
    [iat] there is no TRUTH
    [bc] you state that like it is a truth
    [bc] well, it's not!
    [iat] of course
    [iat] there is not truth... even to say that is not true... but to say its not true is also not true
    [bc] it won't hold any particular truth, many truths and narratives
    [bc] it shall be thoroughly decentralised and beyond the control of anyone, that is the point
    [county] Quite right, bc. There are many truths, in this modern age.
    [bc] must smoke
    [iat] why not smoke then?
    [bc] I'm ahead of you, iat
    [iat] i've smoked 19 since 7:30 and have just 1 left :(
    [bc] wow that's lots
    [county] are there just 20 in a pack/:?
    [iat] yeah, how many did you think there were?
    [bc] yes, unless you get Rothman's Royals
    [iat] oh yeah
    [bc] which have 24, for some reason
    [county] iat, I've never smoked.
    [iat] or 10 packs, but you can't get those in usia
    [bc] just think iat, if you had got Royals, you'd have 5 left now
    [iat] heh
    [me0w] I have a favour to ask ...
    [iat] but they wouldn't taste half as nice as mmy marlboro lights
    [bc] what's that me0w?
    [bc] yuk
    [me0w] bc, I need an opinion
    [bc] I don't like Marlboro lights. I'm a Dunhill man
    [me0w] bc, you know what my site currently looks like right?
    [bc] yes
    [bc] yes I do
    [iat] dunhill?
    [me0w] bc, ok ... do you like that format or this one: http://violate.me.uk/blog/
    [bc] I browse it every 20 minutes
    [iat] dunhill are for poor people, eight?
    [iat] erm, right even
    [bc] they are not for poor people
    [bc] just the opposite
    [iat] heh
    [iat] my marlboro light costs me 4.70 a pack
    [iat] beat that
    [bc] this one has a more traditional bloggy feel me0w, but won't it mean the front page won't change as radically so often? I suppose I like it better in that you can see the previous articles, but less in that the front page doesn't periodically change radically, so that you don't know what will appear. It's prolly more sensible though
    [bc] also, the right hand side seems wider somehow
    [bc] mine cost £4.95
    [bc] suck it!
    [bc] and that's without inflated london prices
    [iat] bah
    [bc] it must be the pics making the right wider
    [iat] that's stupid
    [me0w] bc, the pics do make it wider
    [iat] are dunhills those ones that have the wide packets that don't fit in your pocket?
    [me0w] bc, this new system is a modifed blogger
    [bc] those are dunhill internationals, iat, which I often get too, and are about £5.40
    [iat] i know a gay guy who smokes the methol ones of those
    [iat] draw your own conclusions
    [bc] I see. Well, me0w, it makes the site less characterful and "homebrew", but probably more sensible and easier to navigate
    [bc] depends what you want I suppose
    [bc] iat, menthols of any stripe are for the less manly
    [iat] heh. yeah
    [bc] same as marlboro lights
    [bc] female student's smoke, that
    [iat] bah
    [iat] marlboro lights are for those people who smoke but dont want to admit it to themselves
    * momocrome has a crush on Siân Phillips
    [iat] which does cover many female students i guess
    [bc] you should have a commenting system me0w
    [bc] what an ego-site then!
    [bc] who, momocrome?
    [bc] she sounds suspiciously welsh
    [bc] I hope you haven't started liking welsh people
    [momocrome] welch
    [bc] I might have known it :(
    [bc] poor momocrome
    [iat] "mr blue sky, please tell us why you had to hide away for so long!"
    [bc] ??
    [iat] i'm singing
    [bc] I thought it was some sort of prayer
    [iat] no, it's ELO
    [bc] oh
    [bc] Electric Light Orchestra?
    [iat] bah, i'm in danger of losing my lightweightedness
    [iat] i've had 8 bottles of stella and am not feeling tired :(
    [iat] yeah, electric light orchestra
    [iat] i've always wondered how the words fit togeth in that phrase
    [bc] you should try yourself spirits now that beer doesn't provide the kick it once did
    [iat] is it: electric... light orchestra, or electric light.... orchestra?
    [bc] look at county, he was drinking spirits insanely, now he is probably unconscious
    [iat] i don't like spirits, they give me a hangover
    [bc] try a clean ethanol-only spirit then
    [bc] like vodka
    *** Lumpen (~guest@cloaked.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net) has joined #adequacy
    [iat] an "ethanol only" spirit is surely pure ethanol
    [bc] I mean, a spirit without any methanol
    [bc] methanol is bad for hangovers
    [bc] wine has loads of it
    [iat] do they normally put methanol in spirits?
    [bc] especially red wine
    [bc] and the murkier spirits
    [bc] iat, methanol is a natual alcohol of the fermentation process
    [bc] there's usually much less of it than ethanol, but most drinks have it to varying amounts
    [iat] is it? methanol is just a shorter carbon chain right?
    [iat] can you get pissed off methanol?
    [bc] I think so. Maybe longer, damned if I know
    [bc] yes you can
    [bc] it's an alcohol
    [bc] but it gives you a much worse hangover
    [momocrome] you'll go blind instantly when you get drunk off methanol
    [iat] methanol is CH2OH from memory
    [bc] which is why booze that has more of it gives you a worse hangover
    [iat] ethanl is CH3CH20H
    [bc] but generally they have little, but still enough for headaches
    [bc] wine for example, I think only 5% of the alcohol in it is methanol
    [bc] I forget, but a small amount
    [iat] i'm fine off white wine, but red wine gives me shokcing headaches the morning after, as does guiness
    [iat] oh dear, craig's gone mad again
    [bc] red wine is the worst
    [bc] iat: where?
    [iat] 20721
    [bc] I must look
    [bc] I sort of provoked him
    [iat] was it you stirring shit bc?
    [momocrome] i have done my part as well
    [iat] shame on you, vlad must be eliminated
    [bc] I did a post attacking craig, yes
    [bc] saying he should fantasise about he petrified virgin mary
    [bc] and iat, goddamnit, phoning up vlad and stuff is totally over the line
    [bc] and he's an insane fucker!
    [iat] heh, what about garden gnomes?
    [bc] no not me
    [momocrome] it is actually illegal behaviour
    [momocrome] but more than that, it is supid
    [momocrome] suuupid
    [momocrome] stupid
    [bc] damned right
    [bc] and not only that, the fucker posted all our names to the sid
    [momocrome] this isn't trolling, it is thug-like cruelty
    [bc] fuck him!
    [iat] informal #adequacy poll. should iat have another drink?
    [bc] yes momocrome
    [bc] and yes iat
    [iat] 1) no, he should sleep
    [momocrome] yes, iat
    [momocrome] 2) yes, iat
    [iat] 2) no, he has no more fags, and booze with no fage makes iat sad
    *** Lumpen is now known as FcmfAC
    [iat] 2) yes, he still has too much booze to fit it into his cupboards
    [iat] 4) yes, he's still not pissed
    [iat] 5) yes, why not:?
    [momocrome] pop up to the corner chop and procure a acket of fags
    [iat] which one?
    [iat] corner shop is not only closed. but it's on the common council estate
    [momocrome] do you have a crowbar?
    [FcmfAC] Ah, well.
    [iat] if i had some rizlas, i could smoke my fag butts again
    [FcmfAC] It's going to go down in flames.
    [iat] more booze it is then
    [FcmfAC] http://www.kuro5hin.org/displaystory/2002/11/16/20 3653/05
    [iat] bc, can you dcc me some fags?
    *** bc sets mode: +b *!*tarque@*.telesp.net.br
    Session Close: Sat Nov 16 20:16:23 2002

    Session Start: Sun Nov 17 23:05:59 2002
    *** Now talking in #adequacy
    *** Topic is ' I remember when I first got drunk || I thought "I want to spend the rest of my days in this condition"'
    *** Set by Sylvain on Sat Nov 16 18:51:55
    shhhh
    *** ChanServ sets mode: +b ws13!*@*
    Session Close: Sun Nov 17 23:06:59 2002

  34. Amherst-Fag and the Bacon by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: cptroll
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] why the internet rules
    Date sent: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 17:29:43 -0500
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0037)

    Did you get that from ilovebacon.com? Because if you did, then I'm disappointed you didn't note how those industrious Germans are at it again. Who else could pick up on the failure of dogs to read their 'no pooping' signs (http://ilovebacon.bla-bla.com/noway/110300.shtml) and pioneer an entirely PICTOGRAPHIC version (http://ilovebacon.bla-bla.com/noway/112100c.shtml ).

    Without such innovation at home, it's little wonder Amerika is scraping
    the bottom of the corporate barrel abroad.

    jlb <jlb@io.com> wrote:
    >http://www.d111.k12.id.us/BHS/BHS.htm

    (This is CP0037)

  35. Amherst-Fag and the GDB 2 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: cptroll
    To: <k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org>
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] Let's try this one again: gbd et al
    Date sent: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 19:10:38 -0400
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org
    (This is CP0031)

    If he's not a real person (craig?), then he's doing a good job of hiding it. If I had a geographical breakdown of known USian trolls, then I could assure myself that it wasn't one of them and therefore someone unique.

    On the topic of vladinator:
    "as far as VLADINATOR is concerned there is a story behind that, but i am still in the process of putting all the details together but the story will be told. i dont REALLY think that he is a communist i just like to say that because it bugs him. but there is a REASON for the fued and i'll be revealing it."

    Which just sounds like he's dicking around with vlad. But in the other emails, the tone changes to "and do not listen to vladinator, there is no telling what he might do." and "but DO NOT listen to vladinator!! the man is pure evil"

    When I myself (with gbd's permission) dicked around with Vlad for trying to steal gbd's account by successfully impersonating gbd to Vlad (just to confuse Vlad, mostly), gbd replied:

    "actually this is going to sound SILLY but could you let vladinator know that you're just joking and are not really me (george), i plan on explaining things better here in the NEAR FUTURE but that will only work with things as HONEST as POSSIBLE."

    which sounds like it'll be fun.

    On the subject of "the trolls", gbd said:

    "anyway please don't give this mail address out to the trolls, like i said earlier i DON'T want them flooding me with spam and stuff which is why i am trying to do this as PRIVATE as i possibly can"

    which as I've said, I'm respecting.

    If anyone has any questions for him, I could probably put them to him.

    rev <hanales@hotmail.com> wrote:
    >So are you saying that gbd is a real person?
    >You must share some of his insights (without revealing his address of
    >course)

    (This is CP0031)

  36. a questionable assertion by kedi · · Score: 5, Interesting

    From the article: "For a research investment to be justified, it must produce value equal to or greater than that of the investment."

    I find this extremely questionable. History is full of scientific discoveries and ideas which were not able to produce equal or greater value for long time. Can anyone enlighten me about the value produced by Einstein's research?

    1. Re:a questionable assertion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

      Please stop trying to hold an actual discussion of the article, people are trying to crapflood in here.

    2. Re:a questionable assertion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      First- I didn't read the article...

      Second - I think you have slightly missed the point of that sentence. The sentence is pointing out that research for research's sake isn't very welcome in the CORPORATE environment where a greater return on investment is desired. (The point being, that science is BECOMING too corporate-centric as opposed to more "expanding the boundaries of human knoweldge" centric as it was in the past.) So, you aren't really in dispute.

    3. Re:a questionable assertion by kedi · · Score: 3, Informative

      AC wrote: "I think you have slightly missed the point of that sentence. The sentence is pointing out that research for research's sake isn't very welcome in the CORPORATE environment where a greater return on investment is desired. (The point being, that science is BECOMING too corporate-centric as opposed to more "expanding the boundaries of human knoweldge" centric as it was in the past.) So, you aren't really in dispute."

      Thanks. I re-read the article and realised that you are right. Thanks for pointing that out.

      BTW. on searching I found that Prof. Robert B. Laughlin received a Noble Prize in Physics in 1998 [http://large.stanford.edu/rbl/index.htm]
      [http:/ /www.nobel.se/physics/laureates/1998/]

      kedi

    4. Re:a questionable assertion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      From the article: "For a research investment to be justified, it must produce value equal to or greater than that of the investment."

      I find this extremely questionable. History is full of scientific discoveries and ideas which were not able to produce equal or greater value for long time. Can anyone enlighten me about the value produced by Einstein's research?


      Read that paragraph more closely. The quoted statement is not Laughlin's belief. It is a standard he says is applied to "research linked to property".
    5. Re:a questionable assertion by dcollins · · Score: 3, Informative

      From the article: "For a research investment to be justified, it must produce value equal to or greater than that of the investment."

      I find this extremely questionable. History is full of scientific discoveries and ideas which were not able to produce equal or greater value for long time. Can anyone enlighten me about the value produced by Einstein's research?


      Einstein's most important results had no research investment funding it whatsoever. Hence, it does not serve as a counterexample to an assertion about "research investment".

      --
      We know where leadership by an anti-intellectual "strongman" who scapegoats minorities and likes boisterous rallies goes
    6. Re:a questionable assertion by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Einstein's first Nobel prize was for the photoelectric effect, which clarified the basic physics of how metals interact with light, and how electrons behavein materials. These results go straight into semiconductor physics, and electron guns in CRTs. Are the TV and semiconductor device industries a big enough return?

      Also, Einstein invented and received a patent on(in conjunction with Leo Szilard) an electromagnetic pump for pumping metallised fluids with no moving parts.

      As for general relativity, if that wasn't taken into account, then GPS systems would be inaccurate, satelite orbits wouldn't be entirely correct, and so geostationary orbits wouldn't work so well, etc. etc. etc.

      Also, possibly no nuclear power, which gives us 1/5 of the world's electricity, and is just about the only hope for continuing growth of power usage at current (no pun, honestly) rates (renewables just can't provide enough power if you assume continuous growth of power demands at current rates for about 60 years) in the form of fusion power.

      And then there are all sorts of social gains that can be assigned costs that Einstein as a populariser of science is partially responsile for. I'm no sociologists, so I won't expand on that here.

    7. Re:a questionable assertion by 5KVGhost · · Score: 2

      Good post.

      Einstein's work was also instrumental, of course, in giving the US an early lead on the development of atomic weapons. Had history gone differently that advantage may have belonged to Germany, the USSR, or even Japan. Given the balance of power and the regimes in charge at the time that would have been rather unhealthy for the world as a whole.

    8. Re:a questionable assertion by kedi · · Score: 1

      dcollins wrote: Einstein's most important results had no research investment funding it whatsoever. Hence, it does not serve as a counterexample to an assertion about "research investment".

      The point I was trying to make is that if Einstein had had to justify his research on the basis of producing greater value, he would possibly had not got the funding if he rquired it, since there was no direct possibility of making money out of it then.

      In my original post, as I admitted in another post, I did not correctly read Prof. Robert Laughlin's article, who is actually saying what I wanted to say.

    9. Re:a questionable assertion by kedi · · Score: 1

      Mr_Dyqik wrote: "Einstein's first Nobel prize was for the photoelectric effect, which clarified the basic physics of how metals interact with light, and how electrons behavein materials. These results go straight into semiconductor physics, and electron guns in CRTs. Are the TV and semiconductor device industries a big enough return?"

      Big enough return for whom? For society/humanity yes, for companies who made money out of it without paying for the findings yes, but for Einstein not in monetary terms. I wonder if he could have got any funding for testing his theories in the beginning of last century.

      Thanks for educating me on wider uses of Einstein's work though.

      Since you seem to argue that "Also, possibly no nuclear power,.." I have a question: could one argue and calculate the flip side of the nuclear power and blame Einstein for Hiroshima, Nagasaki, Chernobyl, other smaller accidents and effects hidden from public eye? No Einstein - No Hiroshima - No Chernobyl. I am not stating anything here, just posing a simple question.

      kedi

    10. Re:a questionable assertion by kedi · · Score: 1

      5KVGhost wrote: "Einstein's work was also instrumental, of course, in giving the US an early lead on the development of atomic weapons. Had history gone differently that advantage may have belonged to Germany, the USSR, or even Japan. Given the balance of power and the regimes in charge at the time that would have been rather unhealthy for the world as a whole."

      I don't agree with the underlying belief that US was and is healthier.

      This line of discussion is interesting but will be deemed off topic by the rest, but I would make one suggestion: How about thanking Hitler for taking power in January 1933, thus compelling Einstein not to return to Germany? Wouldn't that be acknowledgment of Hitler's contribution to "civilization". Or should one also thank FBI for not tightening the screw enough on him after the war, so as to force him to leave again to somewhere else? Stories about "relationship" of Einstein and the FBI have been posted earlier on /.

      kedi

    11. Re:a questionable assertion by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      Einstein's most important results had no research investment funding it whatsoever.

      Didn't Einstein receive a Nobel Prize for his demonstration of the particle-like qualities of light? I'd say that qualifies as one of his "most important results", wouldn't you?

      And weren't those results based on actual empirical experiments, using actual lab equipment to observe and manipulate light? Where did this equipment come from? Who paid for it?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    12. Re:a questionable assertion by budgenator · · Score: 2

      Can anyone enlighten me about the value produced by Einstein's research?
      well lets see Einstien basical invented Quantum Mechanics which lead to tranistors, which lead to Integrated circuits, which lead to computers, and Microsoft is worth what about 11 Billion dollars.

      adding in all of the branches between Einstien and Gates and you'd come up with just about everything we think of as having value.

      --
      Apocalypse Cancelled, Sorry, No Ticket Refunds
    13. Re:a questionable assertion by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      How about thanking Hitler for taking power in January 1933, thus compelling Einstein not to return to Germany?

      With blatant disregard for Godwin's Law, I'll bite: Why on earth would I want to thank Hitler for that? If he hadn't started his genocidal campaign, Einstein would have been free to exercise his great intellect in Germany, remaining intimately connected to the thriving and lively European physics community. Hitler's bigotry and warmongering shattered this community, drove some of the best minds in Physics to the ends of the earth, disrupted their communication with each other... and that's not the worst of it:

      What if we'd all been at peace when the power of the atom was first realized and harnessed? With no urgent need to build a superweapon, might we not have progressed calmly into a world of ubiquitous, safe nuclear power? No hysteria, no Cold War, no Hiroshima or Nagasaki... No, Hitler didn't do us any favors by driving Einstein out of Germany.

      On another note, the U.S. today is no healthier than Nazi Germany under Hitler? What tipped you off? Was it the genocidal death camps scattered across our heartland?

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    14. Re:a questionable assertion by phliar · · Score: 2
      From the article: "For a research investment to be justified, it must produce value equal to or greater than that of the investment."

      I find this extremely questionable.

      You missed his point. It is precisely because research cannot return value (in the short term) greater than or equal to the investment made that a corporation cannot justify it. Businesses exist to make money for their owners, not to increase the store of knowledge that society has. A scientist who works for a company thus is torn between two conflicting desires: the desire to find "truth" and the desire to keep food on the family's table. A huge part of science is the null result: good experiments are those that try to falsify a theory, and since we hope we have for the most part good theories, good experiments tend not to result in financial gains for the corporation.

      I believe that fundamental research in science should be supported by society. Computer science research (e.g. new layout algorithms, not new whiz-bang word-processor programs) should be also. Scientists should only be supported (either by society or by corporations) with no strings attached besides those of general acceptance of results in the scientific community, e.g. peer-reviewd publications.

      --
      Unlimited growth == Cancer.
    15. Re:a questionable assertion by kedi · · Score: 1

      susano_otter wrote: With blatant disregard for Godwin's Law, I'll bite:

      Good, that is what I expected and wished. I dislike Hitler as much as any average human being.

      "Why on earth would I want to thank Hitler for that? If he hadn't started his genocidal campaign, Einstein would have been free to exercise his great intellect in Germany, remaining intimately connected to the thriving and lively European physics community. Hitler's bigotry and warmongering shattered this community, drove some of the best minds in Physics to the ends of the earth, disrupted their communication with each other... and that's not the worst of it:"

      Good, No one should thank Hitler.
      I only wrote that to show the pointlessness of contention of 5KVGhost when he said:
      "Einstein's work was also instrumental, of course, in giving the US an early lead on the development of atomic weapons."

      If "...in giving the US an early lead" was the key, then one should thank who caused that lead possible. Since I do not believe in specualtive statements in history (like if Hitler would not have been born, like if King of England had not been so opperessive, like if Sweden had developed nuclear bomb, like if Kennedy was not asasinated, like if Reagan had not survived the assasination attempt, etc etc), the ususal cause and effect ideas do not apply in history.

      "On another note, the U.S. today is no healthier than Nazi Germany under Hitler? What tipped you off? Was it the genocidal death camps scattered across our heartland?"

      This is where I feel like biting but will not bite.

      How about taking a look at Germany right before Hitler got elected? He got elected with more votes, not less as in present day US. He also could increase his votes from 14 to 38 million after being in power for a year or so. I am not suggesting that Bush is Hitler, but pointing to a direction things may take. BTW Einstein left Germany already before Hitler came to power and started his genocidal campaign.

      What I was and am trying to say is that Germany was "unhealthy for the world as a whole" then just like the US is "unhealthy for the world as a whole" now, because of not what they did to their own citizens (which is not the current discussion), but what and why they are doing to the world. Yes I do think present Germany is more healthy for the world than present US.

      I think we will talk to each other again when a more relevant topic comes up.

      DISCLAIMER: I am not a native speaker of English, so my experessions may not be conveying what I really mean. I will only have to try again and again to expalin what I mean, even though that is not a guarantee of calrifying everything.

      kedi

    16. Re:a questionable assertion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Not only did Einstein (note spelling) not "invent quantum mechanics", Einstein HATED quantum mechanics.

      I certainly hope you're trolling.

    17. Re:a questionable assertion by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 2

      Einstein got two Nobel prizes though, which come with a check for 1 million US (nowadays, I don't know how much back then). His fame attracted students to him, which under Germany's university system means more cash. Einstein wasn't particularly interested in developing his theories into useful products, but as I stated before, he did work on a refrigerator pump, reportedly motivated by a news article about the asphyxiation of a family when their fridge pump failed, leaking toxic gases into their flat.

      I think that to count all the results from any scientific progress over all results for all time.

      On the nuclear front, I agree that the current state of the nuclear fission industry is not entirely healthy, but since the current alternative is a 10% rise in CO2 emissions, I'm not convinced its wholly bad (radiation effects from power plant accidents are a lot more local than global warming effects). Nuclear weapons are abhorrant, but so are chemical, biological and even the most powerful conventional weapons (I believe FAE bombs can inflict damage over a similar area to the Nagasaki bomb, just without the delayed effects).

      However, nuclear fusion power could be a major boost to the human race, with relatively little downside compared to all current power generation methods, and fission power appears to have been a necessary step towards its development.

  37. Happy New Year B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    MAUREEN: I think we need an agent!
    MARK: We?
    JOANNE: That's selling out.
    MARK: But it's nice to dream.
    MAUREEN: It's network TV, and it's all thanks to me.
    MARK: Somehow I think I smell the whiff of a scheme.
    JOANNE: Me too!
    MAUREEN: We can plan another protest.
    JOANNE: We?!
    MAUREEN: This time you can shoot from the start, you'll direct, starring me!
    ALL: 5, 4, 3... Open sesame!! Happy new year, Happy new year Happy new...
    BENNY: I see that you've beaten me to the punch.
    ROGER: How did you know we'd be here?
    BENNY: I had a hunch.
    MARK: You're not mad?
    BENNY: I'm here to end this war. It's a shame you went and destroyed the door
    MIMI: Why all the sudden the big about face?
    BENNY: The credit is yours; you made a good case.
    ROGER: What case?
    BENNY: Mimi came to see me and she had much to say.
    MIMI: That's not how you put it at all yesterday!
    BENNY: I couldn't stop thinking about the whole mess. Mark -- you want to get this on film!
    MARK: I guess.
    BENNY: I regret the unlucky circumstances of the past seven days.
    ROGER: Circumstance? You padlocked our door!
    BENNY: And it's with great pleasure on behalf of CyberArts that I hand you this key.
    ANGEL: Golf claps.
    MARK: I have no juice in my battery!
    BENNY: Reshoot!
    ROGER: I see -- this is a photo opportunity!
    MAUREEN: The benevolent god ushers the poor artists back to their flat. Were you planning on taking down the barbed wire from the lot, too?
    ROGER: Anything but that!
    BENNY: Clearing the lot was a safety concern; we break ground this month but you can return.
    MAUREEN: That's why you're here with people you hate, instead of with Muffy at Muffy's estate
    BENNY: I'd honestly rather be with you tonight than in Westport --
    ROGER: Spare us old sport, the soundbite.
    BENNY: Mimi -- since your ways are so seductive,
    MIMI: You came on to me!
    BENNY: Persuade him not to be so counterproductive.
    ROGER: Liar!
    BENNY: Why not tell them what you wore to my place?
    MIMI: I was on my way to work!
    BENNY: Black leather and lace! My desk was a mess; I think I'm still sore!
    MIMI: Cause I kicked him and told him I wasn't his whore!
    BENNY: Does your boyfriend know who your last boyfriend was?
    ROGER: I'm not her boyfriend; I don't care what she does!
    ANGEL: People! Is this any way to start a new year? Have compassion, Benny just lost his cat!
    BENNY: My dog -- but I appreciate that.
    ANGEL: My cat had a fall and I went through hell.
    BENNY: It's like losing a -- how did you know that she fell?
    COLLINS: Champagne?
    BENNY: Don't mind if I do! To dogs!
    ALL: No, Benny -- To you!
    ANGEL: Let's make a resolution
    MIMI: I'll drink to that.
    COLLINS: Let's always stay friends.
    JOANNE: Though we may have our disputes,
    MAUREEN: This family tree's got deep roots;
    MARK: Friendship is thicker than blood.
    ROGER: That depends.
    MIMI: Depends on trust,
    ROGER: Depends on true devotion,
    JOANNE: Depends on love,
    MARK: Depends on not denying emotion!
    ROGER: Perhaps...
    ALL: It's gonna be a happy new year.
    ROGER: I guess...
    ALL: It's gonna be a happy new year.
    ROGER: You're right!
    ANGEL: It's gonna be a happy new year!
    ROGER AND MIMI: I'm sorry.
    ROGER: Coming?
    MIMI: In a minute -- I'm fine -- go.
    THE MAN: Well, well, well. What have we here? It's gonna be a happy new year...

  38. Happy New Year B by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    MAUREEN: I think we need an agent!
    MARK: We?
    JOANNE: That's selling out.
    MARK: But it's nice to dream.
    MAUREEN: It's network TV, and it's all thanks to me.
    MARK: Somehow I think I smell the whiff of a scheme.
    JOANNE: Me too!
    MAUREEN: We can plan another protest.
    JOANNE: We?!
    MAUREEN: This time you can shoot from the start, you'll direct, starring me!
    ALL: 5, 4, 3... Open sesame!! Happy new year, Happy new year Happy new...
    BENNY: I see that you've beaten me to the punch.
    ROGER: How did you know we'd be here?
    BENNY: I had a hunch.
    MARK: You're not mad?
    BENNY: I'm here to end this war. It's a shame you went and destroyed the door
    MIMI: Why all the sudden the big about face?
    BENNY: The credit is yours; you made a good case.
    ROGER: What case?
    BENNY: Mimi came to see me and she had much to say.
    MIMI: That's not how you put it at all yesterday!
    BENNY: I couldn't stop thinking about the whole mess. Mark -- you want to get this on film!
    MARK: I guess.
    BENNY: I regret the unlucky circumstances of the past seven days.
    ROGER: Circumstance? You padlocked our door!
    BENNY: And it's with great pleasure on behalf of CyberArts that I hand you this key.
    ANGEL: Golf claps.
    MARK: I have no juice in my battery!
    BENNY: Reshoot!
    ROGER: I see -- this is a photo opportunity!
    MAUREEN: The benevolent god ushers the poor artists back to their flat. Were you planning on taking down the barbed wire from the lot, too?
    ROGER: Anything but that!
    BENNY: Clearing the lot was a safety concern; we break ground this month but you can return.
    MAUREEN: That's why you're here with people you hate, instead of with Muffy at Muffy's estate
    BENNY: I'd honestly rather be with you tonight than in Westport --
    ROGER: Spare us old sport, the soundbite.
    BENNY: Mimi -- since your ways are so seductive,
    MIMI: You came on to me!
    BENNY: Persuade him not to be so counterproductive.
    ROGER: Liar!
    BENNY: Why not tell them what you wore to my place?
    MIMI: I was on my way to work!
    BENNY: Black leather and lace! My desk was a mess; I think I'm still sore!
    MIMI: Cause I kicked him and told him I wasn't his whore!
    BENNY: Does your boyfriend know who your last boyfriend was?
    ROGER: I'm not her boyfriend; I don't care what she does!
    ANGEL: People! Is this any way to start a new year? Have compassion, Benny just lost his cat!
    BENNY: My dog -- but I appreciate that.
    ANGEL: My cat had a fall and I went through hell.
    BENNY: It's like losing a -- how did you know that she fell?
    COLLINS: Champagne?
    BENNY: Don't mind if I do! To dogs!
    ALL: No, Benny -- To you!
    ANGEL: Let's make a resolution
    MIMI: I'll drink to that.
    COLLINS: Let's always stay friends.
    JOANNE: Though we may have our disputes,
    MAUREEN: This family tree's got deep roots;
    MARK: Friendship is thicker than blood.
    ROGER: That depends.
    MIMI: Depends on trust,
    ROGER: Depends on true devotion,
    JOANNE: Depends on love,
    MARK: Depends on not denying emotion!
    ROGER: Perhaps...
    ALL: It's gonna be a happy new year.
    ROGER: I guess...
    ALL: It's gonna be a happy new year.
    ROGER: You're right!
    ANGEL: It's gonna be a happy new year!
    ROGER AND MIMI: I'm sorry.
    ROGER: Coming?
    MIMI: In a minute -- I'm fine -- go.
    THE MAN: Well, well, well. What have we here? It's gonna be a happy new year...

  39. Amherst-Fag and the Poor Judgement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: [k22320inchfan] Sorry about that, all
    Date sent: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:51:12 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0006)

    Demonstrating poor judgment on my part, I lobbed
    another at the k5 queue
    (http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=displaystory&sid=2000 /12/20/01446/325).
    It's not half as big a troll as the last one, but,
    well, I guess people are still angry about the last
    one. Let's just say the only thing geeks defend more
    than their porn is their smokes.

    JSM, I'm disappointed you didn't show some guts and
    just mod it down. Have I pissed enough in your
    swimming pool yet? Heck, they're slandering you in
    there, equating the two of us. Even rusty's annoyed,
    and he has a sense of humor (though his reasoning
    isn't so hot).

    I think I'll leave k5 alone for a while. I'm leaving
    town in two days and won't be back for a couple weeks,
    though I'll have net access in between. Maybe when I
    get back, I'll have developed some maturity. 'Night,
    all.

    (This is CP0006)

  40. Slashdot Trolling History - Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Do you want to know more about the history of Slashdot trolling? Would you like to know more about the fine people behind the popular and controversial news site Adequacy.org? Vary soon, you will!

    You're in luck, because I've obtained a rare and wonderful bit of trolling history: complete e-mail logs of the K22320inchfan mailing list! Yes, that's right: when Scott Lockwood's inanity forced the elite of the Slashdot trollers (who later went on to form the popular and controversial news site Adequacy.org) off of their hidden sids, they migrated to a secret mailing list known as K22320inchfan, behind closed doors, where they conducted their trolling out of the public eye. The general public has never been privy to these secret machinations: until now!!!

    Yes, that's right, ladies and gentlemen! In the vary near future, the entire e-mail history of the K22320inchfan mailing list will be posted to the teh Intarweb and revealed to the world! The secrets of the elite trollers will finally be available to the common man, and to evaryone else!

    Features include:

    Over 8 megabytes of text!

    Over 3000 messages!

    Secrets you won't find anywhere else!

    The true identities of all your Adequacy favorites!

    Learn where they live, work, and play!

    Learn who they like, and who they hate!

    Totally raw and uncensored!

    ???

    PROFIT!!

    All this, and more, will be available to you soon online, as part of the most revolutionary project in the history of trolling. Learn all the secrets that Vladequacy does not want you to know. All 3000+ messages are coming your way soon!

    Here's a preview!

    * * * *

    From: Barry Corrigan <barry@bjcorrigan.fsnet.co.uk>
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] talk about smoking crack...
    Date sent: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 07:41:16 +0000
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com

    I find it interesting that it is possible to extend your ego to the internet to the degree that siggy seems to have done. I haven't used the
    internet for very long (thats the UK for you), but I can certainly see how its possible to end up actually caring about some online persona.
    Personally, I don't give a shit, but thats because I don't have an online persona that is actually me (does this post negate that? I'm not telling you ;). If someone had created a 'KTB' character on k5 before I had, I would probably have been annoyed, but only because I may want to extend the character, insofar as I have developed it, onto k5 as well. The thing is, *I* am not really on the internet much at all. It seems that Siggy is, though, from what I can tell. He seems to be really into writing those torrid diaries, and exploring rather private parts of his personality in the most public of places - such as his sexuality, as 'Going For -100 Karma' publicised on /. If he really is exposing his true self to the k5 audience, this may be why he has become so defensive about the 'Bojay Iverson' thing - I would certainly be in a panic in his situation, if I thought the online world could reach into the real world and give me a kicking. I don't think I'll ever write diaries on k5, or if I do, they won't be about me, thats for sure. It freaks me out a little how easy it is to get information about someone on the internet, and the last thing I want want is an online diary, that will never expire, being accessible to all and sundry. I don't know, I just find the idea of posting your personal thoughts for all the world to see rather strange, if not a little
    creepy. Perhaps its a Britain-America thing, I've heard that Americans are not shy, in fact sometimes I think they have never heard of the concept of embarrassment. So there you go ;)

    Sorry for this bollocks.

    On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, you wrote:
    > Hi. I couldn't stay away, so I scrounged up some 'net
    > access. Hi.
    >
    > I was talking with rusty indirectly about this, last
    > night. He was asking me why I wanted k5 Anne Marie's
    > nick -- that is, why I wanted to carry that "slashdot
    > baggage" over with me to k5, the same way siggy did.
    > It's funny, that way. I wanted k5 Anne Marie because
    > it's a lovely character troll of mine. Siggy wanted
    > "Signal 11" because it's the only way he's ever gotten
    > a lot of (any) attention. He's afraid to be just
    > Bojay Iverson, and it really comes across.
    >
    > --- Barry Corrigan
    > wrote:
    > >
    > > Wow. I think I understand now why everyone seems to
    > > dislike Signal 11 so much.
    > > I mean, that has to be one of the most arrogant
    > > things I've read, ohhh, all
    > > week!
    > > It was also extremely funny. Does he think he is an
    > > internet celebrity or
    > > something? In that post he came across as a jaded
    > > Hollywood star.
    > > Oh well, back to the horribleness of Java...
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, you wrote:
    > > >
    > >
    > http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=comments&sid=2000/12/2 0/21124/277&cid=4#4
    > > >
    > > > "Most of the best trolls on slashdot, I suspect,
    > > were inspired by me. "
    > > >
    > > > i actually feel sorry for the guy. he needs some
    > attention.

  41. Amherst-Fag and the Mann by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] sunday adventure at deny's
    Date sent: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 14:15:42 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0014)

    Sometimes I'm jealous of you, Warren. Not the
    paranoia or the psychotropic haze you walk around in
    often, but the way even the smallest experiences are
    so well /lived/ by you. If I were to go to Denny's
    (only slightly higher on my list than Cracker Barrel
    -- a racist homophobic trailertrash chickenshit
    restaurant, for the edification of the Brits in the
    audience), it'd hardly register on my mind to notice
    half the stuff you do. Sure, I can remember lots in
    hindsight, like the Weslyan wicca-ish waitress who
    served me and my gf's family at a veganish restaurant
    in Middletown, CT at lunch today, but you turn it into
    your own opera.

    Maybe I'm depressed. Maybe I'm just normal. I'd like
    to think it's the former.

    (This is CP0014)

  42. Amherst-Fag and the Poor Judgement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: [k22320inchfan] Sorry about that, all
    Date sent: Wed, 20 Dec 2000 00:51:12 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0006)

    Demonstrating poor judgment on my part, I lobbed
    another at the k5 queue
    (http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=displaystory&sid=2000 /12/20/01446/325).
    It's not half as big a troll as the last one, but,
    well, I guess people are still angry about the last
    one. Let's just say the only thing geeks defend more
    than their porn is their smokes.

    JSM, I'm disappointed you didn't show some guts and
    just mod it down. Have I pissed enough in your
    swimming pool yet? Heck, they're slandering you in
    there, equating the two of us. Even rusty's annoyed,
    and he has a sense of humor (though his reasoning
    isn't so hot).

    I think I'll leave k5 alone for a while. I'm leaving
    town in two days and won't be back for a couple weeks,
    though I'll have net access in between. Maybe when I
    get back, I'll have developed some maturity. 'Night,
    all.

    (This is CP0006)

  43. Amherst-Fag and the Kuro5hin Abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] advice?
    Date sent: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 04:34:58 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0013)

    Indeed, whimsy is an open account (for posting whimsical diaries) whose password is 'whimsy'. I've contributed some diaries (principally, "I was there watching the world go by" and "How to calculate your social security income") and so have felt free to abuse the account for comment posting in Anne Marie stories. My guess is the other whimsy poster is tewl, since she posted something about "oh, I didn't realize annemarie=cp" in k5tt a while back.

    I share your incredulity. Anyone who reads through k5tt would know the truth. Anyone who suspected could do a search on my (cp's) comments and see I only post in anne marie's stories. Oh well. It's fun to see rusty defend me.

    --- James <spiralx@spazmail.com> wrote:
    > --- =?iso-8859-1?q?I=20am=20Troll?=
    > <i_am_troll@yahoo.co.uk>
    > > wrote:
    > >I thought that you were Whimsy? Why did you just
    > out
    > >yourself and then ask us to mod it down? Explain
    > now,
    > >or I'll moderate the comment up.
    >
    > Nah, Whimsy is an open account anyone can use if
    > they know the password, which is lost to me, but
    > could be "whimsy". So at least one other person
    > remembers the password and knows that cp is anne
    > marie.
    >
    > What I'd like to know is how on Earth has cp managed
    > to keep the fact that he is Anne Marie quiet so
    > well? I mean, he hardly tried to keep it quiet with
    > trolltalk posts and so on, and yet very few seem to
    > know who Anne Marie actually is...
    >
    > J
    >
    > P.S. I really want to smoke. Bugger. Giving up
    > sucks.

    (This is CP0013)

  44. Amherst-Fag and the Educated Escort 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] the real anne marie stood up
    Date sent: Sun, 7 Jan 2001 20:24:36 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0016)

    Agreed, but I have to find better ones. As much as I liked the dementia-causes-popmusic-preference one, the k5 crowd just didn't care. Like on /. after a long series of trolls, it's time to whore [the queue] again.

    One of these days I'm going to write an op/ed meta story called "Hi, I'm Anne Marie. You're all hypocrites." But I think I'll hold back, now.

    BTW, the ktb=educatedescort cries are hilarious, at least to me. Soon, rusty'll have to change k5's motto to "Technology and culture from the trenches and stuff about Anne Marie". I'd feel remorse, but a) I like the attention and b) I give k5 more credit than that; it's more resilient than /. ever was. My intentions and hopes aren't to destroy k5 but to become a watershed event in its history, fit to go into next year's year-in-review. Looks like I'm succeeding.

    --- jlb wrote:
    > As those of you who are interested have probably
    > already seen, the real
    > anne marie has posted a story on k5 saying that
    > she's not the AM account
    > on k5 or slashdot. She apparently put something in
    > the html source of her
    > educatedescort site saying as much.
    >
    > My advice to cp: keep posting stories like nothing,
    > at all, has changed.
    >
    > -lb
    >
    > --
    > "Is this real?"
    > "Does it matter?"
    >

    (This is CP0016)

  45. Slashdot Trolling History - Cool by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Do you want to know more about the history of Slashdot trolling? Would you like to know more about the fine people behind the popular and controversial news site Adequacy.org? Vary soon, you will!

    You're in luck, because I've obtained a rare and wonderful bit of trolling history: complete e-mail logs of the K22320inchfan mailing list! Yes, that's right: when Scott Lockwood's inanity forced the elite of the Slashdot trollers (who later went on to form the popular and controversial news site Adequacy.org) off of their hidden sids, they migrated to a secret mailing list known as K22320inchfan, behind closed doors, where they conducted their trolling out of the public eye. The general public has never been privy to these secret machinations: until now!!!

    Yes, that's right, ladies and gentlemen! In the vary near future, the entire e-mail history of the K22320inchfan mailing list will be posted to the teh Intarweb and revealed to the world! The secrets of the elite trollers will finally be available to the common man, and to evaryone else!

    Features include:

    Over 8 megabytes of text!

    Over 3000 messages!

    Secrets you won't find anywhere else!

    The true identities of all your Adequacy favorites!

    Learn where they live, work, and play!

    Learn who they like, and who they hate!

    Totally raw and uncensored!

    ???

    PROFIT!!

    All this, and more, will be available to you soon online, as part of the most revolutionary project in the history of trolling. Learn all the secrets that Vladequacy does not want you to know. All 3000+ messages are coming your way soon!

    Here's a preview!

    * * * *

    From: Barry Corrigan <barry@bjcorrigan.fsnet.co.uk>
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] talk about smoking crack...
    Date sent: Fri, 22 Dec 2000 07:41:16 +0000
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com

    I find it interesting that it is possible to extend your ego to the internet to the degree that siggy seems to have done. I haven't used the
    internet for very long (thats the UK for you), but I can certainly see how its possible to end up actually caring about some online persona.
    Personally, I don't give a shit, but thats because I don't have an online persona that is actually me (does this post negate that? I'm not telling you ;). If someone had created a 'KTB' character on k5 before I had, I would probably have been annoyed, but only because I may want to extend the character, insofar as I have developed it, onto k5 as well. The thing is, *I* am not really on the internet much at all. It seems that Siggy is, though, from what I can tell. He seems to be really into writing those torrid diaries, and exploring rather private parts of his personality in the most public of places - such as his sexuality, as 'Going For -100 Karma' publicised on /. If he really is exposing his true self to the k5 audience, this may be why he has become so defensive about the 'Bojay Iverson' thing - I would certainly be in a panic in his situation, if I thought the online world could reach into the real world and give me a kicking. I don't think I'll ever write diaries on k5, or if I do, they won't be about me, thats for sure. It freaks me out a little how easy it is to get information about someone on the internet, and the last thing I want want is an online diary, that will never expire, being accessible to all and sundry. I don't know, I just find the idea of posting your personal thoughts for all the world to see rather strange, if not a little
    creepy. Perhaps its a Britain-America thing, I've heard that Americans are not shy, in fact sometimes I think they have never heard of the concept of embarrassment. So there you go ;)

    Sorry for this bollocks.

    On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, you wrote:
    > Hi. I couldn't stay away, so I scrounged up some 'net
    > access. Hi.
    >
    > I was talking with rusty indirectly about this, last
    > night. He was asking me why I wanted k5 Anne Marie's
    > nick -- that is, why I wanted to carry that "slashdot
    > baggage" over with me to k5, the same way siggy did.
    > It's funny, that way. I wanted k5 Anne Marie because
    > it's a lovely character troll of mine. Siggy wanted
    > "Signal 11" because it's the only way he's ever gotten
    > a lot of (any) attention. He's afraid to be just
    > Bojay Iverson, and it really comes across.
    >
    > --- Barry Corrigan
    > wrote:
    > >
    > > Wow. I think I understand now why everyone seems to
    > > dislike Signal 11 so much.
    > > I mean, that has to be one of the most arrogant
    > > things I've read, ohhh, all
    > > week!
    > > It was also extremely funny. Does he think he is an
    > > internet celebrity or
    > > something? In that post he came across as a jaded
    > > Hollywood star.
    > > Oh well, back to the horribleness of Java...
    > >
    > >
    > >
    > > On Fri, 22 Dec 2000, you wrote:
    > > >
    > >
    > http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=comments&sid=2000/12/2 0/21124/277&cid=4#4
    > > >
    > > > "Most of the best trolls on slashdot, I suspect,
    > > were inspired by me. "
    > > >
    > > > i actually feel sorry for the guy. he needs some
    > attention.

  46. Amherst-Fag and the Corrosion by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] the real anne marie stood up
    Date sent: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 08:20:23 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0017)

    Please elaborate. For example, does that mean you're
    lifting your k5 "no troll" ordinance?

    --- John Montoya <johnsaulmontoya@yahoo.com> wrote:
    >
    > --- Ceee Peee <cptroll@yahoo.com> wrote:
    > > My intentions
    > > and hopes aren't to destroy k5
    >
    > nahhh, fuck 'em.
    >
    > dd
    >
    > __________________________________________________
    > Do You Yahoo!?
    > Yahoo! Photos - Share your holiday photos online!
    > http://photos.yahoo.com/

    (This is CP0017)

  47. Amherst-Fag and the Whoring of Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: cptroll
    To: <k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org>
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] Have I gone soft?
    Date sent: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:01:08 -0400
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org
    (This is CP0024)

    Marc Stauffer <marc@ksac.com> wrote:

    >: True. I still think karma as a persistent user property ought to be
    >: eliminated. It's fine to score individual comments, and even to award a
    >: special +1 comment bonus to selected "good posters", but karma as a prop for
    >: the self-esteem of pathetic geeks, or as a game, is dumb. At the very least,
    >: karma should not be displayed, not even one's own karma. And if it's going
    >: to exist, it ought to be aged so that my recent activity is treated as a
    >: better predictor of the value of my next comment than something I wrote a
    >: year ago.

    Bah, I'd hate this, but then I'm too much a karmawhore at heart. But if we could somehow increase the amount of quality moderation (to get rid of brainless drivel, not just spam) and rely on our abilities to craft quality-sounding trolls, then I wouldn't complain too much if we got rid of karma altogether and got rid of the +1 bonus along with it. Originally, the +1 bonus was reserved by just a few, but now every lamer and his dog has it. It's lost all meaning.

    >What this doesn't solve, however, is the inherent problems
    >with moderation. Not with the system, mind you, but with the
    >users. There needs to be stricter policies, e.g. no
    >usernames displayed when you moderate, or something along
    >those lines, and the penalties for crummy mods need to be
    >higher. In fact, people need to be banned from moderating
    >more often since they simply suck at it.

    I'd been thinking along the lines of hiding usernames during moderation, if nothing else than to help us trolls with recognizable usernames who get unfair moderation simply for being trolls in general than just on a particular post. I can see several0 problems, though:

    1) It won't stop the most dedicated of trollbusters who will keep a separate window open as AC where they can see people's usernames. These are the moderators who most need to be stopped, and yet this restriction won't do so.

    2) It will add a social cost to moderating itself. People might just start throwing their points at crap just to get back to normal mode where they can see who's talking. But it could cut both ways.

    3) It'll increase the amount of noisy replies screaming: "Moderators! Don't you realize streetlawyer/flatpack/etc. is the one saying this?!?!?!" We don't need that.

    4) You'd have to hide .sig files as well. Not a big deal.

    (This is CP0024)

  48. Why by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    YHBT YHL HAND

  49. Science serves at the pleasure of Engineering by coloth · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Does engineering eat science's crumbs, or does science serve engineering's beck and call?

    Of course the two are inderdependent. To a huge majority of people, most of whom have some kind of say in how resources are allocated, the goals of the scientist, however, often seem esoteric and even blasphemous.

    However, the goals of the engineer are very clear: envision, design, implement, sell. Cars, computers, bridges, perfume bottles, guns.

    Which is more important, Ms. Voter, the Scientist or the Engineer? Now, don't go thinking too much!

    (disclaimer: I'm an engineer)

    --

    Machines take me by surprise with great frequency. -A. Turing

    1. Re:Science serves at the pleasure of Engineering by Mr_Dyqik · · Score: 2

      And yet you quote Turing, a mathematician. hmm.

      I'm not sure that you can divide some work into that done by engineers and scientists so easily.

      I'm nominally a physicist, but I develop high frequency radio receivers for astronomy. This looks remarkably like engineering, in that I have to design a product for reproducibility, to specifications. Admittedly I don't have to then sell the thing, mainly because we have to see if the current designs can be improved first.

      To do this engineering type thing, I have to work with and develop theoretical techniques for calculating EM fields, develop theories for describing the performance of the receivers etc.

    2. Re:Science serves at the pleasure of Engineering by coloth · · Score: 1

      And yet you quote Turing, a mathematician. hmm.

      Well, he was nominally a mathematician, but he was also a philosopher, computer scientist, cryptographer, and biologist.

      I guess I was trying to be a bit controversial by pitting engineers against scientists. Clearly, it is a chicken and egg relationship.

      My main thought was that I think the general public has a much better grasp of the role of the engineer than the scientist, which likely affects public funding for "pure" science.

      As for myself, my actual degree is in "computer systems engineering", though my degree was similar to my friends' "computer science" degrees. Both were granted by the Department of Engineering.

      Just the way you describe your job, I personally think most science and engineering involves a combination of both disciplines.

      --

      Machines take me by surprise with great frequency. -A. Turing

    3. Re:Science serves at the pleasure of Engineering by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      I'm not sure that you can divide some work into that done by engineers and scientists so easily.

      Science and Engineering are clear words, and any task can be clearly labled as "Science" (where the product is knowledge) or "Engineering" (where the product is application of knowledge.)

      The proper form is for "Scientists" to do complex "Engineering" tasks so as to fund their "science". And, of course, in doing the "Science" they'll probably have to do some "engineering" to get it to work.

      "Scientist" should probably be a subset of "engineer", as it's always easier to apply knowledge than to improve upon it. (Though, of course, an "engineer" with as much schooling as a "scientist" should be just as valueable, if not more...)

    4. Re:Science serves at the pleasure of Engineering by Idarubicin · · Score: 2
      "Scientist" should probably be a subset of "engineer", as it's always easier to apply knowledge than to improve upon it.

      Yikes. What kind of engineering does a theoretical physicist do? I mean the sort that develops models of the universe, not the sort that builds supercolliders.

      I think that the distinction between application of existing known principles and the development of new ideas is sufficient to keep scientists and engineers in separate categories. Engineers may be called upon to apply the knowledge they have in extremely creative ways, but that's not the same thing as developing that knowledge from scratch. Similarly, many scientists (the experimentalists, at least) often have to perform various sorts of engineering in the course of their work--but I wouldn't want them trying to build bridges. (Q: You just woke up in a lecture hall. There appears to be a demo in progress and you've forgotten what class you're supposed to be in--how do you tell? A: Demo is slimy: Biology. Demo woke you when it blew up: Chemistry (if it smells bad, Organic Chemistry). Instructor appears puzzled because demo does not work: Physics.)

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    5. Re:Science serves at the pleasure of Engineering by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      However, the goals of the engineer are very clear: envision, design, implement, sell.

      This is a common misconception. Engineers do not fundamentally care about the "sell" part of the above. They care about "use" instead. There is a vital difference. "Sell" is only of interest if it is a necessary pathway to "use." But most engineers feel real pride when they see what they have worked on being used in real life by our fellow human beings. (Even in the case of guns or nuclear weapons, where "use" clearly doesn't mean "kill people" but rather "deter someone from killing us.")

      That is the big difference between Engineers and most businessmen. Businessmen don't really seem to care that much that what they do delivers real value in improving people's lives. Part of the reason there are communication problems between businessmen and engineers is that many businessmen do not see how actual use can be so important to the engineers, and many engineers can not see how something as obviously fundamental as actual use and value manages not to figure in businessmen's eyes.

      After many years of observing the two, I have come to the conclusion that businessmen do not actually believe that they are being crooks when they convince someone to buy something that that person has no use for. They honestly believe that the proof of the pudding is in the selling rather than the eating.

      To them, the engineers and scientists often seem hopelessly old fashioned for honestly believing in things like truth, liberty, equality, and the dignity of human lives.

    6. Re:Science serves at the pleasure of Engineering by MalleusEBHC · · Score: 2

      However, the goals of the engineer are very clear: envision, design, implement, sell.

      Not only do I agree with the parent's view that "use" is more important to an engineer fundamentally than "sell," but I think it is vital to add "make work" after implement. Every engineer will tell you that things don't always come out as planned all the time. One of the most rewarding things about engineering is taking that difficult problem and massaging it, working with it, and sometimes smashing it with a very large blunt object (*Warning* - Only if the two previously mentioned methods failed.) until you can make it work as planned. There is nothing more rewarding than the feeling of standing back and watching something that is the byproduct of your ingenuity go to work.

    7. Re:Science serves at the pleasure of Engineering by coloth · · Score: 1

      "use" is more important to an engineer fundamentally than "sell,"

      I disagree strongly with this. My job as an engineer, as I have been taught, and a critical point in distinguishing the engineer's work from that of the amateur or dilettante is that the engineer must make do with an economy of resources, be it time, money, materials, space, whatever.

      This economy is a result of the engineer's mission to solve a problem well, elegantly and in a repeatable fashion, at minimal cost of production and distribution, and in the minimum amount of time. Without the fundamental goal of having to sell the product, or hold it accountable to some kind of economy, there would be no reason for the discipline of engineering.

      --

      Machines take me by surprise with great frequency. -A. Turing

    8. Re:Science serves at the pleasure of Engineering by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      Yikes. What kind of engineering does a theoretical physicist do? I mean the sort that develops models of the universe, not the sort that builds supercolliders.

      What kind of SCIENCE does a theoretical physicist do? If they're discussing things that are never tested, then they're simply engaging in conjecture, not science. ... Similarly, many scientists (the experimentalists, at least) ...

      I don't know if I can say this loud enough:

      If you aren't testing your hypothesis with real experiments, you're not doing science!

      Einstein spent years conjecturing about the nature of relativity in his home. It wasn't until he could make and test a prediction based on his hypothesis that he could be considered to be doing science--and it's not until the hypothesis could be tested that it became at all proper to call it a theory in the scientific sense of the word.

    9. Re:Science serves at the pleasure of Engineering by daniellabee · · Score: 1

      What do you mean "If you aren't testing your hypothesis with real experiments, you're not doing science!"? Theoretical physicists are discussing things, making new ideas that other physicists are able to experiment with.

      I have an engineering degree and I am currently working on Physics degrees and when asked what I am, I say I am a scientist not an engineer becuase I feel that there is more that I can do in science than engineering(even though I know that this means I won't make a lot of money but that is not important to me at all).

      A part of doing science is thinking and coming up with new ideas. Conjecture is just a huge part of it. Science is deffinatly not a subset of engineering. It takes someone with a different mind to be a scientist and I don't think that people who don't understand this should knock it. And I am not just saying this to you because I say it to my family as well, they are all engineers and hate the fact that I am doing physics.
      So right now I am working on my own ideas(only through conjecture, not expermenting yet) as I am studying to finish my degrees, do you think that I am not doing science because I think I am.

    10. Re:Science serves at the pleasure of Engineering by Idarubicin · · Score: 3, Insightful
      What kind of SCIENCE does a theoretical physicist do? If they're discussing things that are never tested, then they're simply engaging in conjecture, not science.

      Ultimately, it is science if the hypotheses (or conjectures, if you prefer) they develop can in principle be experimentally disproven, and can be used to make predictions.

      If you aren't testing your hypothesis with real experiments, you're not doing science!

      I suppose the question becomes, "Is Stephen Hawking a scientist?" The evaporation of black holes is something that we are not currently able to simulate in the lab. Nevertheless, the idea is a natural (brilliant, elegant, and inspired, but natural) extension of concepts of entropy and quantum mechanics. (I grossly oversimplify, but there's lots more about it on the web for those that are interested.) Furthermore, it makes predictions about what should happen to a black hole, which meets my second criterion. These predictions cannot be tested at this time, but will in principle be testable in the next generation of supercolliders. Until such time, Hawking's ideas still can spark lively debate--which is exactly as it should be.

      Does this mean that we should not be allowed to consider theoretical physicists and cosmologists real scientists until technology matures to the point where their hypotheses can be tested? I submit that scientists are people who put forth rational hypotheses based on whatever incomplete information is available, and are prepared to test their hypotheses--or allow others to do so--when technology and funding allow. Real scientists should be able to recognize the difference between a hypothesis and an accepted theory and trust the two accordingly.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    11. Re:Science serves at the pleasure of Engineering by Planesdragon · · Score: 1

      What do you mean "If you aren't testing your hypothesis with real experiments, you're not doing science!"? Theoretical physicists are discussing things, making new ideas that other physicists are able to experiment with.

      It's conjecture. It's a vital part of science, sure, but it's not "science" anymore than near-future Science Fiction is.

      If you're just TALKING about what a bridge might look like, and you're not writing anything down or taking any measurements or doing any math, you're not engineering--even if your conversation leads to that bridge's construction.

      A part of doing science is thinking and coming up with new ideas. Conjecture is just a huge part of it. Science is deffinatly not a subset of engineering. It takes someone with a different mind to be a scientist and I don't think that people who don't understand this should knock it. And I am not just saying this to you because I say it to my family as well, they are all engineers and hate the fact that I am doing physics.

      You are not different. You are not special. It does NOT take a differnet type of mind to be a scientist--or rather, if it does, you and almost no one living has that special mind.

      Forget about your rebellion against your Engineering-family for a minute. Science is based on the concept of testing ideas; Engineering is implementing those ideas. Were it not for Science, Engineering would continue just fine at its current rate--but were it not for engineering, science would be nothing more objectively truthful than fever dreams and religious theology.

      So right now I am working on my own ideas(only through conjecture, not expermenting yet) as I am studying to finish my degrees, do you think that I am not doing science because I think I am.

      You are NOT doing science. You are conjecturing, which could be an important first step, but until you're doing semi-regular experiments it's not science.

      Don't get me wrong: conjecture and speculation are important, and without them science wouldn't exist. But Science needs conjecture/speculation, then research, then experimentation, and then revision.

      If you're just speculating, you're a person.

      If you're just speculating and researching, you're a scholar.

      If you're just speculating, researching, and "experimenting", you're an engineer.

      If you speculate, research, experiment, and revise, then and only then are you a science-doing scientist.

      You are near the road that is science, but you aren't on it yet. You're probably further along than I am, but you're not there yet.

    12. Re:Science serves at the pleasure of Engineering by Planesdragon · · Score: 2

      I suppose the question becomes, "Is Stephen Hawking a scientist?"

      No. He's an apparantly brilliant theoreticist. But unless he devises and helps organize experiments for his ideas, he's not a scientist.

      And until his ideas ARE tested, they shouldn't be considered as "true" or even an ancilliary part of scientific dogma. At least, not if scientists want to maintian that they're after truth, and not merely members of an atheist church.

      Does this mean that we should not be allowed to consider theoretical physicists and cosmologists real scientists until technology matures to the point where their hypotheses can be tested?

      No, we shouldn't. They can be honored and even paid for out of "science budgets", but they're not doing science anymore than altar boys are performing marriages.

      I submit that scientists are people who put forth rational hypotheses based on whatever incomplete information is available, and are prepared to test their hypotheses--or allow others to do so--when technology and funding allow.

      Does that mean that my hypothesis of an extant god who wishes to test our faith makes me a scientist? I'm more than willing to test my belief when the opportunity arises, but science isn't quite at the point where we can speak to departed souls...

      Unless the hypothesis is being tested AND being found to not need major revisions, it shouldn't be considered either good science or a real Theory--no matter how smart the person saying it is.

      Real scientists should be able to recognize the difference between a hypothesis and an accepted theory and trust the two accordingly.

      Bullocks.

      A real scientist should trust ONLY that which is proven by objective and replicable emperical data. If they want to believe in more than that, they can on their own personal time.

      When they put on their lab coat and "scientist hat," they need to put their religious biases and hero-worship aside and be as unemotional as they can possibly be. Anything less, and we risk sliding back to "knowledge by decree" rather than the basic underpinings of science.

    13. Re:Science serves at the pleasure of Engineering by Idarubicin · · Score: 2
      No, we shouldn't. They can be honored and even paid for out of "science budgets", but they're not doing science anymore than altar boys are performing marriages.

      The scientific method has many steps, the first of which is to formulate hypotheses based on available information. Confirmation of hypotheses through experimentation (leading to refined theories; lather, rinse, repeat) is a critical part of the process, but why can't the work be divided up--in time, in space, and among different people? Should experimentalists who spend their time testing other people's theories be considered mere technicians, unworthy of the title of "scientist"?

      Theoreticians are just scientists who have to work with very incomplete information. Hawking obviously isn't working in a vacuum--he knows about general relativity, the likely existence of black holes, quantum theory, thermodynamics. Combining those ideas into more comprehensive theories that are subject to experimental disproof is an important first step.

      Does that mean that my hypothesis of an extant god who wishes to test our faith makes me a scientist? I'm more than willing to test my belief when the opportunity arises, but science isn't quite at the point where we can speak to departed souls...

      First, you're presupposing the existence of an immortal soul. I don't think it's appropriate to beg that question. In fact, I think it would be an excellent starting point for you as a scientist. Propose to me an experiment that would demonstrate the existence of an immortal soul. Describe your hypothetical soul. One possible outcome of your experiment must serve to disprove your hypothesis.

      If your hypothesis cannot be disproved by experiment, then it's not a legitimate hypothesis in the scientific sense. Taking again the example of black hole evaporation, Hawking has described the process. He predicts its outcome. Though not yet available in the lab, small black holes will likely soon be created. The experiment has already been sketched out, and its results may conclusively confirm or refute Hawking's work. An experiment can be conceived, it will support or contradict clearly the hypothesis.

      I agree wholeheartedly with your disdain for "knowledge by decree", but I think that your definition of the term "scientist" is too narrow.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  50. Amherst-Fag and the Mae Ling by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: cptroll
    To: <k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org>
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] Linux Magazine, Rubber and bolts.
    Date sent: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 22:03:43 -0400
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org

    (This is CP0032)

    Aren't you still doing the Arkansas thing? Doesn't jive....

    Craig McPherson <craig@laceyonline.com> wrote:

    >Shut up, WILLIAM HENRY GATES. How does STEVE BALMER'S
    >SEMEN taste??? Do you enjoy that AIDS-INFESTED JISM as you
    >MASTURBATE to PHOTOGRAPHS of YOUNG CHILDREN?
    >
    >On 27 Oct 00, at 14:22, rev wrote:
    >
    >> I knew you were gdb you bastard!
    >> ----- Original Message -----
    >> From: "Craig McPherson" <craig@laceyonline.com>
    >> To: <k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org>
    >> Sent: Friday, October 27, 2000 8:17 PM
    >> Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] Linux Magazine, Rubber and bolts.
    >>
    >>
    >> > You should try MAXIMUM LINUX. It has MAE LING MAK. There's
    >> > a picture of her in every issue wearing nothing but a VAIO! And the
    >> > VAIO runs Linux! 'Cept she can't get the sound to work.
    >> >
    >> > MAE LING MAK is a SECURITY EXPERT. She wrote a
    >> > SECURITY ARTICLE for MAXIMUM LINUX about ADVANCED
    >> > SECURITY. She suggested that you PROTECT your e-mail from
    >> > HACKERS, you do this:
    >> >
    >> > alias pine='blahblahblah'
    >> > alias foo='pine'
    >> >
    >> > If you do this ADVANCED SECURITY stuff, an EVIL HACKER who
    >> > breaks into your account an tries to read your e-mail with PINE will
    >> > get an error when he types "pine", not knowing that to get into PINE,
    >> > he ACTUALLY has to type "foo"! But MAE LING MAK knows, so SHE can
    >> > read her e-mail but the EVIL HACKERS can't.
    >> >
    >> > Isn't MAE LING MAK smart? I like her ass the best.
    >> >
    >> > Also, you need to GO READ http://www.gnu.org/philosophy
    >> >
    >> > You don't not understand the BASIC CONCEPTS of FREE
    >> > SOFTWARE. You don't understand the difference between
    >> > PHYSICAL VALUE and INTELLECTUAL VALUE. A MAGAZINE
    >> > has physical value, it costs MONEY to COPY and DISTRIBUTE. It
    >> > exists as a PHYSICAL OBJECT, therefore it has PHYSICAL
    >> > VALUE. SOFTWARE does not. It can be COPIED and
    >> > DISTRIBUTED for FREE. Some EVIL SOCIALIST SOFTWARE
    >> > COMPANIES try to CHARGE for software ANYWAY, and place
    >> > RESTRICTIONS on the user's RIGHT to USE, and DISTRIBUTE it!
    >> > They assign INTELLECTUAL VALUE to the software. This is
    >> > morally WRONG. Get it RIGHT, fsckwit.
    >> >
    >> > Also, you're using MICROSOFT OUTLOOK EXPRESS, which
    >> > proves you're STUPID.
    >> >
    >> > You can't compare a MAGAZINE to SOFTWARE, just like you
    >> > can't compare YOUR MOTHER to a FEMALE. They're completely
    >> > different things.
    >> >
    >> > SUCK IT DOWN AND CHOKE ON IT, AND DIE. SUCK IT DOWN
    >> > AND CHOKE ON IT. SUCK IT DOWN. SUCK IT. SUCK. I'LL
    >> > BURN YOU ALL ALIVE. I'LL BURN YOU ALL. I'LL BURN YOU.
    >> > BURN YOU ALL. BURN YOU. BURN. BURN. BURN.
    >> > BURNING. BURNING. BURNING BURNING FIRE. DEATH AND
    >> > PAIN AND FIRE.

    (This is CP0032)

  51. Off Topic: Learning From kuro5hin by krystal_blade · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Gee, the censorship at kuro5hin has seemed to misplace a large amount of village idiots.

    Perchance the slashdot community could take a moment and reflect on how (like open source) this shared experience can be used to control the nuisances on this site.

    I propose, and throw my full support towards adoption of kuro5hin standards for IP blocking, and removal of posts.

    The removal of posts would be an easy process. If a post is rated a -1 or less, a moderator should be able to elect to delete the post.

    This, of course, would no longer be called moderating. It would be editing.

    It would truly kick ass to see non T-SPAMMED stories here. (Troll SPAMMED, or Thread SPAMMED)

    krystal_blade

    --
    It will be easy to motivate our fellow man; there is hardly anything people treasure more than not being annihilated.
  52. Amherst-Fag and the Educated Escort 3 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: [k22320inchfan] you know the drill
    Date sent: Wed, 3 Jan 2001 00:38:57 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0011)

    Gimme some juice:
    http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=displaystory;sid=2001/ 1/3/22048/19424&mode=mod
    erate

    Actually, it's bound to get modded up on its own because: 1) it's controversial but hardly a troll 2) it conforms to k5 groupthink as a topic for discussion and 3) it has jsm's blessing, something none of Anne Marie's previous submissions ever had. The only thing it has going against it is an annoying misspelling of "K/Clan" in KKK for good measure.

    Mostly, I'm just cleansing the k5 pallate for tomorrow's big troll submission: Switzerland has a referendum to give animals human rights (http://www.sunday-times.co.uk/news/pages/sti/2000 /10/08/stifgneur01002.html). Lots of potential, and ideas are welcome. (I already have a link to a story about an Egyptian sacrificial ram chasing its owner off a roof.)

    (This is CP0011)

  53. Nice Euphemism! by Mirk · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I really liked this part of the article:
    Anyone who has worked in industry long enough to have experienced a business cycle knows how unbearable the job pressure can get when a company is in trouble and how this pressure can turn otherwise excellent and honest scientists into willing deceivers. It is neither uncommon nor hard to understand. Threaten a resourceful person with loss of home and endangerment of family and it is scarcely surprising that the person "innovates."

    There you have it ``innovation'' == ``dishonesty''

    Over to you, Microsoft ... :-)

    --

    --
    What short sigs we have -
    One hundred and twenty chars!
    Too short for haiku.
  54. Amherst-Fag and the Hijacked Account by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] talk about smoking crack...
    Date sent: Thu, 21 Dec 2000 23:26:33 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0007)

    Hi. I couldn't stay away, so I scrounged up some 'net
    access. Hi.

    I was talking with rusty indirectly about this, last
    night. He was asking me why I wanted k5 Anne Marie's
    nick -- that is, why I wanted to carry that "slashdot
    baggage" over with me to k5, the same way siggy did.
    It's funny, that way. I wanted k5 Anne Marie because
    it's a lovely character troll of mine. Siggy wanted
    "Signal 11" because it's the only way he's ever gotten
    a lot of (any) attention. He's afraid to be just
    Bojay Iverson, and it really comes across.

    (This is CP0007)

  55. By MV - Why Scott Lockwood Sucks by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    As quite possibly the only member of the old-school Slashdot trolls to ever actually attempt a serious and meaningful conversation with Mr. Lockwood (it worked, briefly), I feel compelled to comment on this.

    That Geekizoid is an inanity is beyond dispute. That it is what it is almost entirely because of Mr. Lockwood is also beyond dispute. That Mr. Lockwood has, furthermore, contributed substantially to the deterioration of every site to which he has ever posted, save only those which were beyond redemption before he ever saw them (a category which arguably includes Slashdot), I will not dispute. That all of this, along with the other charges leveled against him, proves that Mr. Lockwood sucks, I will not dispute.

    The real question behind all this, though, is not whether Mr. Lockwood sucks, but why Mr. Lockwood sucks. One might say that it does not matter, noting, by analogy, that one does not psychoanalyze a rabid dog, but instead simply puts it out of its misery. But it does matter, for in his own odd and frightening way, Scott Lockwood is Everyman. If you do not understand him, you do not understand anyone, probably including yourself.

    Everyone, seemingly, detests Mr. Lockwood. Given that he had been married four times before he turned 30, this "everyone" may well include three ex-wives (last I heard, we're still waiting for his inevitable fourth divorce). From various anecdotes he has let drop over the years, there are a variety of real-life acquaintances, co-workers, and blood relatives in this category as well. So clearly, this is not just an online phenomenon; Mr. Lockwood is not a caring, sensitive man who lets off steam late at night by flaming people on weblogs. He is like this all the time. It is not a pose. It is the real Scott Lockwood, at 200 proof.

    Mr. Lockwood himself is not unaware of this. He knows (and wishes it were not so) that dislike follows him around like the odor of alcohol trails after a drunk. But he has no idea why this is so. He knows it has to do with his abrasive and temperamental demeanor; he knows that his argumentative and self-righteous comments, and his complaints of being mistreated, win him no friends. But the connection between the cause and the effect, and the difference between his conduct and most other people's, escapes him. He has given up hope of understanding or improving the situation; he expects that it will continue, without change, for the rest of his life.

    Mr. Lockwood does not understand that all of these things are symptomatic of a malaise that underlies his entire life. It is a condition that he was very nearly born with, and one which victimizes nearly all people to some degree. Most of us are not nearly as bad off as Mr. Lockwood; but there are some that have much more severe cases than him. Many rapists, murderers, and other violent criminals fall into that latter category. But even those of us who merely think ourselves better or smarter than everyone else, or who consider ourselves fit to decide what is right for everyone else, or who mock others for what they believe, are victims of this condition to some degree. I include myself in this; I do not claim (yet) to be speaking from a perspective completely outside the state of disease.

    Mr. Lockwood's problem, to put it simply, is that he perceives the universe to be antagonistic to him. He has divided the universe into Self and Other, and decided that these two are eternal antagonists. Everything is his enemy; every action that anyone takes (other than to praise him), he perceives as some sort of attack, and he retaliates accordingly. He is convinced, although probably only subconsciously, that his life is a war in which he stands alone against all the forces of the universe. It is, in essence, the ultimate in paranoia.

    As I wrote above, nearly everyone shares this condition to some extent. Many serial killers operate on the principle that, life being a never-ending battle that they will ultimately lose, they should take as many of the "enemy" with them as they can before they fall. But even ordinary people mostly act on analogous principles. Many people exploit the world around them in destructive or insensitive ways, or mistreat their fellow humans needlessly. This is all a consequence of defining the Other as an enemy; and this, in turn, is based on the fundamental error of dividing the universe into Self and Other.

    What we all (Mr. Lockwood included) should strive for is an end to this division, which is really only a matter of mental habits, not an a priori property of existence. It derives from the infant's perception that part of what he perceives obeys his will and sends him sensory input (Self), and the rest does not (Other). The antagonism between these two hypothesized entities derives from the instinctive desire on the child's part to impose his will on everything; Other does not do what he wants, and is therefore the enemy. And so the infant makes the fundamental error that haunts him, in most cases, for the rest of his life.

    This is what makes Mr. Lockwood tick. It is probably also what makes you tick. Think about that carefully before flaming him simply because his case is a bit worse than yours -- if indeed you are better off.

    --mv

  56. Esther Sassaman - Hotshot Journalist On The Rise by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Surely, Mr. Traficant is quaking in his boots at the prospect
    of being interviewed by Ms. Sassaman. Ms. Sassaman's reporting
    is the most hard-hitting; the most insightful; the most
    fact-based. Every interview she does (how many... two now?) opens
    a Pandora's box of corruption and intrigue.

    Ms. Sassaman concocts many a rich fantasy in her clouded mind. Her
    writing never seems to hit the mark. That is because it is never
    based in anything resembling reality. How many times have we been
    teased with suggestions of "having it cold" that a "certain large
    company" is involved in far-reaching scandal? How many times have we
    been promised penetrating interviews with the rich and famous?

    I think it has become painfully obvious that Ms. Sassaman lives in
    a world completely of her own manufacture. "I'm going to interview Jamez
    Traficante." "I'm going to blow the lid off of nookie." "I'm going
    to expose the corruption going on in Russian Blue cat farms."

    Yes. We believe you, Esther. Now, go in for your schizophrenia
    treatment and quiet down.

    Now, there is nothing wrong with living in a fantasy. And there is
    nothing wrong with setting goals for yourself. But Kuro5hin has had
    enough of Ms. Sassaman's blatant and admitted trolling and attention
    farming. After having read this diary entry several times, I can see
    no other purpose than to say to all of Kuro5hin: "Look at me! I'm a
    hot-shot journalist and I'm going to interview Jamez Traficante! Please
    heap your adulation on me now!"

    Sorry, not this time. Perhaps a better place to have posted this
    diary would have been Adequacy,
    which is the intended victim of this fantasy interview. What, pray tell, was
    the reason for posting this here? To get more traffic for Adequacy,
    which has been in steady decline for several months now? Probably. And,
    of course, personal attention.

    In summary, I guess I can only point out that I have spoken to people who
    were under the influence of LSD and still had more grounding in reality than
    Ms. Sassaman. Perhaps she would do well to pack her knapsack and hitch a
    ride to China, where her delusions of grandeur and fantasies of conspiracy
    could be put to good use in a propaganda machine.

    Bye.

  57. Amherst-Fag and the Kuro5hin Abuse by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] advice?
    Date sent: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 04:34:58 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0013)

    Indeed, whimsy is an open account (for posting whimsical diaries) whose password is 'whimsy'. I've contributed some diaries (principally, "I was there watching the world go by" and "How to calculate your social security income") and so have felt free to abuse the account for comment posting in Anne Marie stories. My guess is the other whimsy poster is tewl, since she posted something about "oh, I didn't realize annemarie=cp" in k5tt a while back.

    I share your incredulity. Anyone who reads through k5tt would know the truth. Anyone who suspected could do a search on my (cp's) comments and see I only post in anne marie's stories. Oh well. It's fun to see rusty defend me.

    --- James <spiralx@spazmail.com> wrote:
    > --- =?iso-8859-1?q?I=20am=20Troll?=
    > <i_am_troll@yahoo.co.uk>
    > > wrote:
    > >I thought that you were Whimsy? Why did you just
    > out
    > >yourself and then ask us to mod it down? Explain
    > now,
    > >or I'll moderate the comment up.
    >
    > Nah, Whimsy is an open account anyone can use if
    > they know the password, which is lost to me, but
    > could be "whimsy". So at least one other person
    > remembers the password and knows that cp is anne
    > marie.
    >
    > What I'd like to know is how on Earth has cp managed
    > to keep the fact that he is Anne Marie quiet so
    > well? I mean, he hardly tried to keep it quiet with
    > trolltalk posts and so on, and yet very few seem to
    > know who Anne Marie actually is...
    >
    > J
    >
    > P.S. I really want to smoke. Bugger. Giving up
    > sucks.

    (This is CP0013)

  58. What I Am All About by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Hi. My name is Theodore "Teddy" Devon, and I'm a 32 year old single gay
    white male, who just happens to be an Aquarius/Pisces cusp. If you know
    anything about astrology, it fits me perfectly. I'm 6'1" (without my heels),
    and 160 pounds. I have (for now) kinda short pink hair. But the style and
    color are always changing!!! I am origionaly from Detroit, MI. But I moved
    here to Joliet from Missouri. I've lived all over the Chicago area in
    general. You get the picture. Oh, and just for all you ignorant bastards out
    there who don't like "femme" guys, you won't like me. If you couldn't tell
    by the pic above, yes, I act like a fag. I'm a queen, The Queen to be exact,
    a flamer, you name it, I've been called it. I am who I am, and I'm not
    ashamed or embarassed. And I will not censor or change myself for anyone or
    anything. So if you can't deal with that, I'm sure you can't deal with me.

    Cher, Cher, and more Cher. Cher is my idol, my hero, my god, my everthing. I
    love her so much. She has had such an impact on my life. Along with Linda
    Hamilton. They are beyond fierce. So yes, music and movies are a big part of
    what I'm about. I'm a pop princess when it comes to music. Cher of course,
    Geri Halliwell (ex Ginger Spice), Madonna, the A*Teens, and Tina Turner.
    When it comes to movies, I worked at a video rental store for three years so
    I've seen just about every one. But I usually see movies for who is in them,
    not what they are about. You see some pretty bad movies that way, but a lot
    of really amazing, interesting ones that you wouldn't have seen otherwise.

    My best friend, my other half, my life, my soul, my everthing, William Scott
    Lockwood. I love you more than you will ever know.

  59. New /. dept? by Lethyos · · Score: 2

    from the department-of-redundancy-department.

    --
    Why bother.
  60. The Incredible Troll FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Although fragments of this most classic and infamous piece of troll history have been found and preserved throughout the ages, the complete document has been missing for many years and was thought to have been lost or destroyed during the last year of the previous millennium. Well, here it is: the first EVAR Slashdot Troll FAQ, dated March 16th 2000.

    * * * *

    God help us all ... (Troll FAQ) (Score:0)
    by Anonymous Coward on 05:15 AM March 16th, 2000 CST (#810)

    But mainly help me. I had a long, dull business trip Tues. and Wed., and as a result I wrote the following (5000 words and still unfinished) Slashdot Troll FAQ. I haven't been able to build on 80md's original due to lack of connection, but the doct. below still needs revised. Specifically, it needs to be made more entertaining. See whatcha think.



    jsm

    Slashdot troll FAQ

    1. What do trolls do?

      We post inflammatory, satirical or just plain weird comments on slashdot, aiming to draw attention to ourselves and to distract discussion away from the matter at hand. We use satire, wit, art and other cultural weapons to give fun to the clueful and embarrass the clueless.
      1. What are the characteristics of a good troll?

        A good troll is a statement designed to inflame the passions of a certain type of reader. A troll is a contrary or controversial statement, which attacks a preconception of someone who is likely to read it, causing them to suspend their normal standards of critical thinking, and to fire off a combative response, without thinking that they are being had. This is the "classic" troll, aimed at enticing someone to make a fool of themself.
      2. Are there any other kinds of troll?

        Yes. The "surrealistic" troll is a piece of prose, rambling, comic or just downright weird, inserted into a discussion where it seems at once utterly irrelevant and curiously in place. The common thread linking the types of trolls is that a certain kind of personality (read - far too uptight) gets irrationally annoyed by them.
      3. What are "characters"?

        Some kinds of trollish statement have been proven to work again and again, so naturally, some trolls have taken advantage of this fact to repeat them again and again. Certain individual trolls are more or less identified with certain types of trollish statement, and thus we have the idea of a "character" - a fictitious entity which is supposed to actually hold the views which are expressed in the troll's posts. Some of these characters have distinct personalities and maintain narrative coherence from troll to troll (see the "Microsoft Linux" episode between streetlawyer and DMG); some of them show up expressing the same or similar points of view again and again (the RWM and derivatives).
      4. What are some of the characters?

        The number one maximally 1337 troll character is the RWM; the most established troll, with the most solid track record behind him. Opensource man and his creations is the oldest surreal troll; gnarphlager and auntfloyd also adopt this style. Paranoid Man is getting off the ground, and DMG and streetlawyer have their fans. Mindless Bastard is more of a style of trolling than a character per se. There are lots more people posting trolls than are listed here; these are just the repeating characters.
      5. What is an RWM?

        RWM is the Right Wing Maniac, a character with a hotch-potch of (often mutually incompatible) libertarian, Christian, and Objectivist views, who typically (mis)applies the general principles of his world-view to various slashdot topics. He tends to be keen on referring to people as "socialists", particularly if they consider themselves to be conservatives. Sometimes he's more of a religious nut; sometimes it's more the free market which rings his bell. There is also a Left Wing Maniac with a yen for spouting dialectical materialism, but he hasn't done much recently. It's worth noting that it is very rare to find a RWM troll thread in which at least one participant doesn't agree with most of RWM's views.
      6. What is a DMG?

        DMG is the Dumb Marketing Guy. He claims to have been involved in Linux for "at least four years, since the very beginning", and offers unsolicited "open source" marketing advice on Linux advocacy to the members of the community. He often takes a rather hurt tone in response to the welter of abuse which is the usual response to his advice.
      7. How about the other characters?

        For crying out loud, they ought to be self-explanatory, surely to heck?
      8. What's with the "cheese" thing?

        Buggered if I know. Lots of trolls mention cheese, and seem to indicate that cheese has some sort of significance. Maybe it does.
      9. Why does streetlawyer swear so much?

        Because he had a hard life, dragging himself up from the streets to get his fucken law degree from fucken Hah-vud, OK?
      10. What you said really offended me!

        Well, sorry. But really, nobody cares (see below). You're too easily offended. Now purge the post from your board, log our IP address and go back to drawing your "After Y2K" comic (which is shit, by the way).

    2. What don't trolls do?

      We don't do boring, uncreative shit which just makes slashdot harder to read. We're not into denial of service attacks - they aren't very funny. We're probably harsher opponents of the spam bunch than you are, because anything which encourages people to browse at levels above -1 makes our work harder.
      1. Those cut & pastes which fill up the forums, are those you guys?

        Nope. Nezh.
      2. How about that obscene ASCII art I just saw?

        Nope. Nada.
      3. Thank God you've got nothing to do with "open source Natalie Portman", or "naked and petrified"!

        Errrr, well actually yes we have. Both of those ongoing trolls were written by regulars on the troll forum, and you're not going to find condemnation of them in this FAQ.
      4. What?

        Read them. Untwist your underwear, stop fulminating over the momentary interruption to your terribly important discussion about Slackware and have a look at some of these posts. Open source Natalie Portman was a fine piece of Burroughsian prose and if you don't agree that it was, then you're wrong. The whole "Naked and petrified" thing was an absolute triumph - it provoked a huge amount of reaction, entertainingly interfered with a few people's heads by sexualising the context of slashdot and is still talked about, several months after the original author stopped bothering.
      5. But that naked and petrified stuff was really sick!

        Sick to you, but that was actually the guy's genuinely held sexual fantasy. He was erotically excited by the thought of women turned to stone, and was letting the world know about it. Don't pretend that you weren't interested - it's absolutely fascinating.
      6. You're kidding me!

        Nope. I was taken aback myself, but there are several sites on the Net with active discussion boards on this very subject. It's not that very different from the subject of "The Fermata" by Nicholson Baker, where the hero has the power to stop time, effectively turning women into statues. And that is quite a common paraphilia.
      7. Well, I thought it was offensive to women. Wasn't it tantamount to a rape fantasy?

        No, it was a petrification fantasy. Which is something rather less threatening, because harder to act out (how many people really believed that anyone could actually turn Natalie Portman to stone?)
      8. What does Natalie Portman think about being "open sourced"?

        I'm sure she's not wonderfully happy about being the subject of someone else's tawdry sexual fantasies, but it kind of comes with the job. I doubt she loses much sleep.
      9. You keep saying I should read this stuff. How can I?

        Opensourceman's works (including the Star Wars series and Fat-time Charlie) are available online at: Craig MacPherson has a website at: , which probably has a few things on it to do with the petrification thing.

    3. So gritsboy and scooby doo are trolls then? And Trollmastah?

      Wellllll .... they're a step above the cut 'n' pasters. And sometimes they can be funny if you're in a silly mood. But they don't contribute to the troll forums, and it's not what I personally would call incredibly creative. Some people like running jokes and some don't. The original Trollmastah has contributed some good material, but there's a lot of imitations about.

    Why, for God's sake?

    For a variety of reasons, but mainly to puncture the self-importance of a few people who deeply deserve it. Slashdot has a lot of very clever people posting, but vastly more individuals with a serious perception/reality gap with regard to their own intelligence. People who believe themselves to be perceptive, clueful, even deep thinkers while merely reciting lists of conventional wisdom deserve to be taken for a ride. And there's the sheer Skinnerian joy of it - if somebody, or some group of people have buttons, it's inhuman not to take delight in pushing them.

    1. Why do you spend such effort on being assholes?

      In order to do it properly.
    2. What's your problem with moderation?

      No problem. Whining about moderation is for the moderation thread. Several trolls moderate more or less frequently (and meta-moderate - be very afraid), and there is very little genuine complaint about moderation on the troll threads. Any remarks about $3 crack are meant in a spirit of fun and affection, and are usually merely cris de coeur when a finely crafted troll has been rumbled in the first few seconds and down-modded.
      1. What about "Portrait of a Moderator"?

        That was funny.

    3. Why don't you go and troll somewhere other than slashdot?

      Where is there? We've had a token go or two at Nitrozac and kuro5hin, and an abortive attempt to troll some of the statuephilia discussion boards with discussions about technology, but it just doesn't feel right. If you ain't on slashdot, you ain't, basically, trolling.
    4. No, why don't you fuck off? You contribute nothing to this site.

      That isn't even true. Several of the troll regulars have enough Karma to post with the +1 bonus when they use their regular identities, which puts them in the top decile, according to Rob Malda. And there is a definite audience for quality trolls. Have you just been trolled? Is that why you're so angry? Calm down, it'll be someone else's turn in the barrel on Friday.
    5. Don't you have anything better to do?

      To paraphrase gnarphlager, yes, we have many better things to do, but we're not going to do them.

    How can I recognise a troll?

    If you want to spot a troll, then you're basically entering into a game, played against us. You have to keep your guard up, adopt a critical attitude to what you read and decide whether it is plausible that someone is actually posting that view. For our part, we will intermingle fact and fiction, invent plausible-sounding references and (always) attempt to attack your emotional involvement in a topic in order to make you drop your guard. The more ridiculous the proposition we sneak under your guard, the more we win. The angrier you get, the more we win. And you? As the computer said in War Games "The only way to win is not to play".

    1. What are the characteristics of a troll?

      Usually, a troll will resemble a normal slashdot post, but will contain at least one thing which is not true. A good troll will contain material which obviously couldn't possibly be true, and would not fool anyone who gave it a moment's thought. The troll will also contain an inflammatory or controversial statement, designed to make sure that nobody does give it a moment's thought. Criticism of Linux, strong or offensive political views, mockery of "computer geeks", claims about the inferiority of women/Canadians/Perl, all of that stuff. Interestingly, having experimented with using outright, Bell-Curve-like racist statements to act as the controversial part of the troll, I've found that they never offend anyone, which I guess shows what a lily-white place slashdot is.


      Obviously these rules apply more to the classic satirical model of a troll, but there is a strong family resemblance in the surrealist model. Looking at the best work of osm, gnarphlager, auntfloyd et al., you pick up a strong sense of the underlying form. There is the (often highly tenuous) link to the subject matter, the building sense of cognitive dissonance and then the denouement in which the troll moves into the realm of pure surrealist prose (or "gets silly", depending on how you look at it). Typically, when reading such a troll for the first time, and in the context of the thread, the reader's reaction goes through stages.

      At the opening of the troll, in which the technological subject matter is being obliquely referred to, the reader is curious. There is an unconscious assumption that what is being used is a metaphor, which appears opaque but will actually make an argument clear (in such a way the surrealist trolls subvert the category of metaphor as used in scientific discussions). Then, the tension between the what the reader wants to read and what he/she sees on the page grows, but the reader still tries to hang on to the idea that he/she is reading "News for Nerds". Finally, when the reality (that is, the unreality) of the troll is revealed, the reader is outraged at having been tricked.


      Thus, we can see that the distinction between the classical and surrealist trolls is one of inversion; metaphor versus metonymy. The classical troll traps the reader in metaphor, creating the "character" or authorial fiction, which the reader takes as a metonymy for "The Other" - the fictional creature on the screen is espousing Microsoft, or Libertarianism, or something else which must be ritually reacted to, rather than read as if it were a metaphorical text. The surrealist troll appears to use metaphor, but creates no authorial fiction. The piling up of the metonymic symbols of trolldom (cheese, Natalie Portman, the Troll itself) draws the reader into the pure text, looking for a meaning (or metaphor) which is always deferred. The reader wants to create an authorial fiction, but this is denied - and it is this denial which is the source of his/her rage. The surrealist troll lets the reader down with a bump - the satirical troll, in its purest form, never lets the reader out at all, leaving him/her stuck in a world which is false, because he/she is being manipulated by the authorial fiction. Classical trolling is about the use of metaphor to create metonymy; surrealist trolling is using metonymy to create metapor.

      1. Wow, that's pretty deep.

        YHBT. YHL. HAND. (Ha ha, only serious)

    2. Do you always list the trolls in these forums?

      Pretty much so, yeah. There's been "trolltalk", "trolltalk2", "31337troll" and a bunch of others. It's good to be able to see other people's work, to discuss trolling, and on occasion to have a way of proving for sure that something you wrote was a troll, to a particularly persistent mark.
    3. What's the current 31337 forum?

      If I could tell you, I'd have to kill you. There have been a few problems with people stalking some of the trolls, and spamming the troll forums with whitespace to make them unusable. There's no big secret or anything, it's just that we'd like to think that finding the troll forum requires a modicum of commitment and ingenuity. There's one pretty well-trafficked troll forum which is listed in most of the usual indices. Look, fuck it, you used to be able to find BBSes, didn't you? This is no different.
    4. Isn't that a bit hypocritical, to keep moving the troll forum because it gets trolled?

      Yada yada yada.
    5. But if I know the sid of the 1337 forum, I can read the trolls as they happen?

      Welllllll ..... yeah ... I suppose that technically you can, and you need never be taken in by a troll again. But that's a bit lame, don't you think? This is meant to be a game, after all.
    6. What should I do if I suspect a troll?

      Write a nice, long post, beginning with the phrase "I'm sure this is a troll, but ....", get really angry, call everyone a bunch of assholes and always reply to follow ups : -) Nahhh, that's what we'd like you to do.
      1. Well what should I do, then?

        The only approved, correct, 1337 way to deal with a troll is not to reply at all. Don't say anything. Just sit back and feel smugly self-satisfied that you caught the troll. Go on. People always seem to say the word "smug" as if it were a bad thing, but how can something that feels so good be wrong? Smirk. Once the troll is "dead" (once the author has taken credit for it and admitted the troll), you might want to post a message about it. You'll probably get a nice reply.
      2. Should I alert others to the troll?

        Wellllll .... if you really must, I suppose you can, but it is a bit lame and lacks eliteness. For one thing, it makes you look like a bit of a spoilsport. For another, it gives unfair clues to people who have no idea of what to do with them. For yet another, it's quite possible that the people you warn will ignore you. Either that, or start arguing with you, saying things like "Well it may be a troll but ....". In which case, you're now the one who's wasting bandwidth by starting fruitless discussions; ie, you've turned into a troll yourself. If you must go through this, however, just post up "This is a troll", or something. Don't link to the troll forum post claiming credit - that is truly lame.
      3. How about if I reply to the points made in the troll, but preface my post with the words "I'm pretty sure this is a troll, but in any case"?

        Then you should be prepared to live with being a laughing stock. We live off people like you, who simply can't stop themselves from pouring out conventional wisdom, even when they know they are being made monkeys of. And no, the "I'm pretty sure ..." disclaimer doesn't make you look ironic and knowing.

    7. Why shouldn't I link to the troll forum post if I spot a troll?

      Well, fundamentally, it lacks class. For one thing, you're feeding the troll while pretending not to feed it, which is dishonest. For another, you're encouraging lots of enraged people to visit the troll forum. This means that the troll forum gets spammed, the trolls move, and you now will be forced to spot trolls for yourself rather than reading them off the list, lamer. Also, the trolls can't tell who it was who brought the spammer there, so all the other people who used to enjoy reading the daily trolls don't find out where the new forum is.

    How can I start trolling for myself?

    "Just do it", as that noted provider of employment to Indonesian children once said. Your first trolls are unlikely to be offensive enough to draw many responses, but once you lose your disinclination to be unpleasant, results will follow. Of course, you may incipiently be a natural trolling genius like dmg, who got huge pops from the get-go. Choose a story which will get a lot of traffic, try to get an early, top-level post, etc, etc (here might follow a whole load of shit from the Karma HOWTO which I'm not going to reproduce). And, offend. You might want to start off with a right-wing maniac troll.

    1. What are the key elements of an RWM troll?

      RWM is the source from which it all flows. Like an origami master building everything from a folded base, or a woodworker turning a chair-leg, the entirety of the art is encapsulated in this one element. It is possible to dedicate your entire trolling career to the perfection of the RWM (troll gods 80md and 70% more or less have done). If you can't write an RWM troll, you can't write a troll.


      The key to the RWM troll is to realise its heritage from Usenet. Usenet trolling was all about cross-posting controversial statements to start flame-wars between different newsgroups. On slashdot, you can't cross-post, so you have to identify people who can be brought into conflict where you are. The beauty of the RWM troll is not so much that he sets rightwingers against leftwingers, but that he creates cognitive dissonance in rightwing readers, because they want to agree with his conclusions (or at least, his less obviously mad ones), but can't bring themselves to accept his reasoning (or simulation thereof). RWM also exploits the fact that a lot of people with right-wing views haven't necessarily thought out those views very comprehensively, and so are vulnerable to cognitive dissonance caused by the inconsistency of what they believe. Among the elements of right-wing mania are:

      • Libertarianism. Everything should be legalised, even obviously destructive things. All government regulations should be removed. The market will protect your privacy, as firms which don't give you privacy will go out of business. Everything which is, is for the best, otherwise the market would have got rid of it. Yes, free speech does include child pr0n. Etc.
      • Corporation-worship. Capitalism works, boyeee. Big companies are the lifeblood of the country and the technology industry. They're successful, so they must be good, so they should be given all those responsiblilities which currently belong to the government. Only the government can censor (it's probably in the dictionary definition), so anything a corporation can do is morally right. The property rights of companies are more important than any rights you think you have.
      • Religious nuttery. Everything is potentially Satanic, even things which seem quite innocuous. The liberals, relativists and communists are indoctrinating our children. There is a conspiracy afoot against Christians, and the downward moderation of this post just goes to prove it. Evolution is by no means proven.
      • Americanism. USA! USA! USA!

      Obviously, everyone who disagrees with a RWM is a socialist, even if they don't think they are.

    2. What are the key elements of a "character" troll?
    3. I think I want to do a surrealist troll, what should I do?
    4. How much effort should I put into a troll?
    5. How can I get more replies?
    6. Should I "feed" my trolls?
    7. When should I admit to being a troll?

    Further information

    1. Other FAQs
    2. Useful research sites
    3. Credits.


  61. This has been building for a long time... by dpbsmith · · Score: 5, Interesting

    In the seventies, I was a graduate student in zoology. I thought I saw a distinct change in culture occurring.

    On the one hand you had people typified by older zoologists, who were gentlemanly academic putterers, studying animals and publishing papers. Their ambitions seemed to be a full professorship, continuously funded grants, support for their graduate students, and a bit more lab space.

    On the other hand you had people typified by younger molecular biologists, who were hard-driving, competitive, and occasionally arrogant. Some of them gave me the impression that commercial success was in the back of their minds--maybe not even far in the back.

    I don't mean to suggest this was a zoology-versus-molecular-biology thing. It was more a change in the zeitgeist. During the years I was a grad student I was certain that I was seeing science becoming more and more competitive.

    You could see the "methods" sections in papers becoming shorter and more perfunctory, for example. I was aware of at least some cases in which scientists guarded some of their techniques because they WANTED to be able to get results that others could not get.

    As anyone who's read "The Double Helix" knows, competition in science was not new. It was, of course, hard to be sure, then and now, how much of this perception was accurate and how much was just my growing awareness of what had always been there.

    Naturally, this was a frequent topic of spirited conversation.

    I remember saying, "Well, IF my perceptions are correct, one of the things we should expect to see over the next decade or so is an increasing number of scandals involving faked data."

    And I really think this is what we've seen.

    (Of course I don't have numbers to back this up--faked data is not new, either).

    1. Re:This has been building for a long time... by simong_oz · · Score: 5, Insightful

      You could see the "methods" sections in papers becoming shorter and more perfunctory, for example.

      Along the same lines:

      In my experience, it is extremely rare to find a journal/conference publication that includes enough information in the methods section to allow others to either check or verify the work or use the findings themselves. Vital information is almost always missed out - it's an artifial intellectual property control, and, as the parent post says, makes it easier for data to be faked.

      --
      "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
    2. Re:This has been building for a long time... by jstott · · Score: 2, Interesting
      In my experience, it is extremely rare to find a journal/conference publication that includes enough information in the methods section to allow others to either check or verify the work or use the findings themselves.

      Probably depends on the field of research. Working in physics, I've never had that problem.

      -JS

      --
      Vanity of vanities, all is vanity...
    3. Re:This has been building for a long time... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      G. Mendel may have faked his data...

      R.A. Fisher intended his provocative 1936 paper titled "Has Mendel's Work Been Rediscovered?" to chide the 20th century scientific and statistical researcher community for its inability to read with adequate scrutiny.

      "Mendel's contemporaries may be blamed for failing to recognize hisdiscovery, perhaps through resting too great a confidence on comprehensive compilations. It is equally clear, however, that since 1900, in spite of theimmense publicity it has received, his work has not often been examined with sufficient care to prevent its many extraordinary features being overlooked, andthe opinions of its author being misrepresented. Each generation, perhaps found in Mendel's [1865] paper only what it expected to find: ... . Only a succession of publications, the progressive building up of a corpus of scientific work, and the continuous iteration of all new opinions seem sufficient to bring a newdiscovery into general recognition." (1936, p. 137)"

    4. Re:This has been building for a long time... by kovi · · Score: 1

      > G. Mendel may have faked his data..

      Sorry, but IMO what you quoted does not indicate any foulplay or faking by Mendel. Fisher merely says that Mendel's findings well not researched sufficiently enough and/or understood well enough by the others. He also says that some researchers were, to some extend, too "subjective" when they interpreted the meaning of Mendel's work. This is really nothing new (at least in the field I am working in).

      Anyway, nowadays scientific papers undergo peer review before they are published, and if reviewers would do their job as they should, bad articles, bad data, and wrong conclusions would be rejected. Since this clearly does not take place, perhaps the entire system of scientific publishing needs to be re-evaluated.
      I also believe that this shortening of methods section mentioned before is actually a sign of our times - check out how "Materials and Methods" of biological papers look like in so-called "leading" scientific journals, like "Nature" or "Science". It's a f[*] joke ! In addition, in some papers a lot of important claims is based on "unpublished results", which makes them impossible to evaluate, because the experiment's methodology is not available at all. A perfect ground for faking results.

      Regards,
      kovi

    5. Re:This has been building for a long time... by Sir+Holo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      You could see the "methods" sections in papers becoming shorter and more perfunctory, for example.

      and... Along the same lines:

      In my experience, it is extremely rare to find a journal/conference publication that includes enough information in the methods section to allow others to either check or verify the work or use the findings themselves. Vital information is almost always missed out - it's an artificial intellectual property control, and, as the parent post says, makes it easier for data to be faked.

      and...

      Probably depends on the field of research. Working in physics, I've never had that problem.


      It can often appear to be the case that enough details are not included in articles, but it really depends on the field, and upon the research group. Part of the driver for this is the "number of publications per year" metric used to evaluate the value of scientific work. What happens is that a group may be using a technique that is pretty standardized, either within their individual lab or within their field of expertise. A person "skilled in the art" can often get enough detail to duplicate the work. And, since the game is to publish every little new thing, it would be a waste of paper to fully detail the experimental technique in each and every publication. It would also eat up a lot of the space in which researchers would rather publish their hot new results. A common practice of good research groups is to occasionaly write one big paper describing the details of the technique, and to refer to that in subsequent papers.

      And this is a good thing. In the end, lots of short papers tends to keep everyone at the same pace in the development of a topic. If everyone published only a magnum opus every five years, the result would be a significant amount of dispersion in research directions, possibly in directions that were not fruitful (in terms of being based on good assumptions and a of the state of the art, the current mind on the topic).

      It's "two heads are better than one." With short papers, everyone must keep tabs on one another, and short papers help keep everyone focused.

      I'm not saying that important information isn't intentionally withheld from the papers. It is. But, science is a race, and you don't want other groups to get the jump on you by giving away your secret. If a reader follows the publication record of a good group, s/he will find that these details eventually come out, in later publications. It's a sort of short-term trade secret approach. Optimally, one keeps a detail secret long enough to do some strong fundamental work in an area. The secret is later (a year or two) released, so anyone can expand on the ideas. If the work was good and is widely read, in the end it gains the researcher the advantage of being a heavily referenced source on the topic (another metric used to evaluate the value of scientific work).

      Disclaimer: I am a materials scientist, and this is the field from which I am drawing on for these observations, although I do believe they probably apply in other fields where several groups are working in a particular area.

    6. Re:This has been building for a long time... by Idarubicin · · Score: 3, Insightful
      On the one hand you had people typified by older zoologists, who were gentlemanly academic putterers, studying animals and publishing papers.

      I will paraphrase Ernest Rutherford, since I can't find a definitive version of his quotation on the Web right now. He said something to the effect of, "All science is either physics or stamp collecting."

      More generally, research can be lumped into two broad (and overlapping) camps: phenomenology and investigation. Phenomenology involves making more and more detailed reports of the world, but does not require one to perform experiments or formulate hypotheses. Investigation includes attampts to gain a "deeper" sort of understanding of problems--it is not merely stamp collecting.

      Unfortunately, much of biology was trapped in phenomenological models until relatively recently. Until the development of tools to pursue the study of molecular biology and genetics, we were limited to a basic acceptance that heredity existed, and some handwaving about evolution and so forth--and we could label all of our stuffed specimens, because taxonomy just takes a sharp eye and some good guesswork. (Even so, many species are now being reclassified as genetics tools are brought to bear on them. The taxonomic kingdoms I learned in school are not the ones being taught now.)

      In physics, you can look at a system and in principle describe all of the interactions at work. If it is a simple system, you can perform calculations that predict how it will evolve over time.

      In biology, take a single cell. We still can't describe everything that goes on in that little cubic-micron space, though we're getting closer. We're finally starting to understand the way many of the more important chemical pathways within cells operate. We can fold simple proteins in simulation. Some of the genetic tinkering we can do actually has predicatable effects.

      So of course biology is changing as a field--it is graduating from stamp collecting to science. That will attract new attitudes, new people--and new funding.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    7. Re:This has been building for a long time... by Jonathan · · Score: 2

      In my experience, it is extremely rare to find a journal/conference publication that includes enough information in the methods section to allow others to either check or verify the work or use the findings themselves.

      Probably depends on the field of research. Working in physics, I've never had that problem

      So, you knew that Schon was faking data long before anyone else figured that out? He *was* a physicist, you know, and published in the most respected physics journals.

  62. The Incredible Troll FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Although fragments of this most classic and infamous piece of troll history have been found and preserved throughout the ages, the complete document has been missing for many years and was thought to have been lost or destroyed during the last year of the previous millennium. Well, here it is: the first EVAR Slashdot Troll FAQ, dated March 16th 2000.

    * * * *

    God help us all ... (Troll FAQ) (Score:0)
    by Anonymous Coward on 05:15 AM March 16th, 2000 CST (#810)

    But mainly help me. I had a long, dull business trip Tues. and Wed., and as a result I wrote the following (5000 words and still unfinished) Slashdot Troll FAQ. I haven't been able to build on 80md's original due to lack of connection, but the doct. below still needs revised. Specifically, it needs to be made more entertaining. See whatcha think.



    jsm

    Slashdot troll FAQ

    1. What do trolls do?

      We post inflammatory, satirical or just plain weird comments on slashdot, aiming to draw attention to ourselves and to distract discussion away from the matter at hand. We use satire, wit, art and other cultural weapons to give fun to the clueful and embarrass the clueless.
      1. What are the characteristics of a good troll?

        A good troll is a statement designed to inflame the passions of a certain type of reader. A troll is a contrary or controversial statement, which attacks a preconception of someone who is likely to read it, causing them to suspend their normal standards of critical thinking, and to fire off a combative response, without thinking that they are being had. This is the "classic" troll, aimed at enticing someone to make a fool of themself.
      2. Are there any other kinds of troll?

        Yes. The "surrealistic" troll is a piece of prose, rambling, comic or just downright weird, inserted into a discussion where it seems at once utterly irrelevant and curiously in place. The common thread linking the types of trolls is that a certain kind of personality (read - far too uptight) gets irrationally annoyed by them.
      3. What are "characters"?

        Some kinds of trollish statement have been proven to work again and again, so naturally, some trolls have taken advantage of this fact to repeat them again and again. Certain individual trolls are more or less identified with certain types of trollish statement, and thus we have the idea of a "character" - a fictitious entity which is supposed to actually hold the views which are expressed in the troll's posts. Some of these characters have distinct personalities and maintain narrative coherence from troll to troll (see the "Microsoft Linux" episode between streetlawyer and DMG); some of them show up expressing the same or similar points of view again and again (the RWM and derivatives).
      4. What are some of the characters?

        The number one maximally 1337 troll character is the RWM; the most established troll, with the most solid track record behind him. Opensource man and his creations is the oldest surreal troll; gnarphlager and auntfloyd also adopt this style. Paranoid Man is getting off the ground, and DMG and streetlawyer have their fans. Mindless Bastard is more of a style of trolling than a character per se. There are lots more people posting trolls than are listed here; these are just the repeating characters.
      5. What is an RWM?

        RWM is the Right Wing Maniac, a character with a hotch-potch of (often mutually incompatible) libertarian, Christian, and Objectivist views, who typically (mis)applies the general principles of his world-view to various slashdot topics. He tends to be keen on referring to people as "socialists", particularly if they consider themselves to be conservatives. Sometimes he's more of a religious nut; sometimes it's more the free market which rings his bell. There is also a Left Wing Maniac with a yen for spouting dialectical materialism, but he hasn't done much recently. It's worth noting that it is very rare to find a RWM troll thread in which at least one participant doesn't agree with most of RWM's views.
      6. What is a DMG?

        DMG is the Dumb Marketing Guy. He claims to have been involved in Linux for "at least four years, since the very beginning", and offers unsolicited "open source" marketing advice on Linux advocacy to the members of the community. He often takes a rather hurt tone in response to the welter of abuse which is the usual response to his advice.
      7. How about the other characters?

        For crying out loud, they ought to be self-explanatory, surely to heck?
      8. What's with the "cheese" thing?

        Buggered if I know. Lots of trolls mention cheese, and seem to indicate that cheese has some sort of significance. Maybe it does.
      9. Why does streetlawyer swear so much?

        Because he had a hard life, dragging himself up from the streets to get his fucken law degree from fucken Hah-vud, OK?
      10. What you said really offended me!

        Well, sorry. But really, nobody cares (see below). You're too easily offended. Now purge the post from your board, log our IP address and go back to drawing your "After Y2K" comic (which is shit, by the way).

    2. What don't trolls do?

      We don't do boring, uncreative shit which just makes slashdot harder to read. We're not into denial of service attacks - they aren't very funny. We're probably harsher opponents of the spam bunch than you are, because anything which encourages people to browse at levels above -1 makes our work harder.
      1. Those cut & pastes which fill up the forums, are those you guys?

        Nope. Nezh.
      2. How about that obscene ASCII art I just saw?

        Nope. Nada.
      3. Thank God you've got nothing to do with "open source Natalie Portman", or "naked and petrified"!

        Errrr, well actually yes we have. Both of those ongoing trolls were written by regulars on the troll forum, and you're not going to find condemnation of them in this FAQ.
      4. What?

        Read them. Untwist your underwear, stop fulminating over the momentary interruption to your terribly important discussion about Slackware and have a look at some of these posts. Open source Natalie Portman was a fine piece of Burroughsian prose and if you don't agree that it was, then you're wrong. The whole "Naked and petrified" thing was an absolute triumph - it provoked a huge amount of reaction, entertainingly interfered with a few people's heads by sexualising the context of slashdot and is still talked about, several months after the original author stopped bothering.
      5. But that naked and petrified stuff was really sick!

        Sick to you, but that was actually the guy's genuinely held sexual fantasy. He was erotically excited by the thought of women turned to stone, and was letting the world know about it. Don't pretend that you weren't interested - it's absolutely fascinating.
      6. You're kidding me!

        Nope. I was taken aback myself, but there are several sites on the Net with active discussion boards on this very subject. It's not that very different from the subject of "The Fermata" by Nicholson Baker, where the hero has the power to stop time, effectively turning women into statues. And that is quite a common paraphilia.
      7. Well, I thought it was offensive to women. Wasn't it tantamount to a rape fantasy?

        No, it was a petrification fantasy. Which is something rather less threatening, because harder to act out (how many people really believed that anyone could actually turn Natalie Portman to stone?)
      8. What does Natalie Portman think about being "open sourced"?

        I'm sure she's not wonderfully happy about being the subject of someone else's tawdry sexual fantasies, but it kind of comes with the job. I doubt she loses much sleep.
      9. You keep saying I should read this stuff. How can I?

        Opensourceman's works (including the Star Wars series and Fat-time Charlie) are available online at: Craig MacPherson has a website at: , which probably has a few things on it to do with the petrification thing.

    3. So gritsboy and scooby doo are trolls then? And Trollmastah?

      Wellllll .... they're a step above the cut 'n' pasters. And sometimes they can be funny if you're in a silly mood. But they don't contribute to the troll forums, and it's not what I personally would call incredibly creative. Some people like running jokes and some don't. The original Trollmastah has contributed some good material, but there's a lot of imitations about.

    Why, for God's sake?

    For a variety of reasons, but mainly to puncture the self-importance of a few people who deeply deserve it. Slashdot has a lot of very clever people posting, but vastly more individuals with a serious perception/reality gap with regard to their own intelligence. People who believe themselves to be perceptive, clueful, even deep thinkers while merely reciting lists of conventional wisdom deserve to be taken for a ride. And there's the sheer Skinnerian joy of it - if somebody, or some group of people have buttons, it's inhuman not to take delight in pushing them.

    1. Why do you spend such effort on being assholes?

      In order to do it properly.
    2. What's your problem with moderation?

      No problem. Whining about moderation is for the moderation thread. Several trolls moderate more or less frequently (and meta-moderate - be very afraid), and there is very little genuine complaint about moderation on the troll threads. Any remarks about $3 crack are meant in a spirit of fun and affection, and are usually merely cris de coeur when a finely crafted troll has been rumbled in the first few seconds and down-modded.
      1. What about "Portrait of a Moderator"?

        That was funny.

    3. Why don't you go and troll somewhere other than slashdot?

      Where is there? We've had a token go or two at Nitrozac and kuro5hin, and an abortive attempt to troll some of the statuephilia discussion boards with discussions about technology, but it just doesn't feel right. If you ain't on slashdot, you ain't, basically, trolling.
    4. No, why don't you fuck off? You contribute nothing to this site.

      That isn't even true. Several of the troll regulars have enough Karma to post with the +1 bonus when they use their regular identities, which puts them in the top decile, according to Rob Malda. And there is a definite audience for quality trolls. Have you just been trolled? Is that why you're so angry? Calm down, it'll be someone else's turn in the barrel on Friday.
    5. Don't you have anything better to do?

      To paraphrase gnarphlager, yes, we have many better things to do, but we're not going to do them.

    How can I recognise a troll?

    If you want to spot a troll, then you're basically entering into a game, played against us. You have to keep your guard up, adopt a critical attitude to what you read and decide whether it is plausible that someone is actually posting that view. For our part, we will intermingle fact and fiction, invent plausible-sounding references and (always) attempt to attack your emotional involvement in a topic in order to make you drop your guard. The more ridiculous the proposition we sneak under your guard, the more we win. The angrier you get, the more we win. And you? As the computer said in War Games "The only way to win is not to play".

    1. What are the characteristics of a troll?

      Usually, a troll will resemble a normal slashdot post, but will contain at least one thing which is not true. A good troll will contain material which obviously couldn't possibly be true, and would not fool anyone who gave it a moment's thought. The troll will also contain an inflammatory or controversial statement, designed to make sure that nobody does give it a moment's thought. Criticism of Linux, strong or offensive political views, mockery of "computer geeks", claims about the inferiority of women/Canadians/Perl, all of that stuff. Interestingly, having experimented with using outright, Bell-Curve-like racist statements to act as the controversial part of the troll, I've found that they never offend anyone, which I guess shows what a lily-white place slashdot is.


      Obviously these rules apply more to the classic satirical model of a troll, but there is a strong family resemblance in the surrealist model. Looking at the best work of osm, gnarphlager, auntfloyd et al., you pick up a strong sense of the underlying form. There is the (often highly tenuous) link to the subject matter, the building sense of cognitive dissonance and then the denouement in which the troll moves into the realm of pure surrealist prose (or "gets silly", depending on how you look at it). Typically, when reading such a troll for the first time, and in the context of the thread, the reader's reaction goes through stages.

      At the opening of the troll, in which the technological subject matter is being obliquely referred to, the reader is curious. There is an unconscious assumption that what is being used is a metaphor, which appears opaque but will actually make an argument clear (in such a way the surrealist trolls subvert the category of metaphor as used in scientific discussions). Then, the tension between the what the reader wants to read and what he/she sees on the page grows, but the reader still tries to hang on to the idea that he/she is reading "News for Nerds". Finally, when the reality (that is, the unreality) of the troll is revealed, the reader is outraged at having been tricked.


      Thus, we can see that the distinction between the classical and surrealist trolls is one of inversion; metaphor versus metonymy. The classical troll traps the reader in metaphor, creating the "character" or authorial fiction, which the reader takes as a metonymy for "The Other" - the fictional creature on the screen is espousing Microsoft, or Libertarianism, or something else which must be ritually reacted to, rather than read as if it were a metaphorical text. The surrealist troll appears to use metaphor, but creates no authorial fiction. The piling up of the metonymic symbols of trolldom (cheese, Natalie Portman, the Troll itself) draws the reader into the pure text, looking for a meaning (or metaphor) which is always deferred. The reader wants to create an authorial fiction, but this is denied - and it is this denial which is the source of his/her rage. The surrealist troll lets the reader down with a bump - the satirical troll, in its purest form, never lets the reader out at all, leaving him/her stuck in a world which is false, because he/she is being manipulated by the authorial fiction. Classical trolling is about the use of metaphor to create metonymy; surrealist trolling is using metonymy to create metapor.

      1. Wow, that's pretty deep.

        YHBT. YHL. HAND. (Ha ha, only serious)

    2. Do you always list the trolls in these forums?

      Pretty much so, yeah. There's been "trolltalk", "trolltalk2", "31337troll" and a bunch of others. It's good to be able to see other people's work, to discuss trolling, and on occasion to have a way of proving for sure that something you wrote was a troll, to a particularly persistent mark.
    3. What's the current 31337 forum?

      If I could tell you, I'd have to kill you. There have been a few problems with people stalking some of the trolls, and spamming the troll forums with whitespace to make them unusable. There's no big secret or anything, it's just that we'd like to think that finding the troll forum requires a modicum of commitment and ingenuity. There's one pretty well-trafficked troll forum which is listed in most of the usual indices. Look, fuck it, you used to be able to find BBSes, didn't you? This is no different.
    4. Isn't that a bit hypocritical, to keep moving the troll forum because it gets trolled?

      Yada yada yada.
    5. But if I know the sid of the 1337 forum, I can read the trolls as they happen?

      Welllllll ..... yeah ... I suppose that technically you can, and you need never be taken in by a troll again. But that's a bit lame, don't you think? This is meant to be a game, after all.
    6. What should I do if I suspect a troll?

      Write a nice, long post, beginning with the phrase "I'm sure this is a troll, but ....", get really angry, call everyone a bunch of assholes and always reply to follow ups : -) Nahhh, that's what we'd like you to do.
      1. Well what should I do, then?

        The only approved, correct, 1337 way to deal with a troll is not to reply at all. Don't say anything. Just sit back and feel smugly self-satisfied that you caught the troll. Go on. People always seem to say the word "smug" as if it were a bad thing, but how can something that feels so good be wrong? Smirk. Once the troll is "dead" (once the author has taken credit for it and admitted the troll), you might want to post a message about it. You'll probably get a nice reply.
      2. Should I alert others to the troll?

        Wellllll .... if you really must, I suppose you can, but it is a bit lame and lacks eliteness. For one thing, it makes you look like a bit of a spoilsport. For another, it gives unfair clues to people who have no idea of what to do with them. For yet another, it's quite possible that the people you warn will ignore you. Either that, or start arguing with you, saying things like "Well it may be a troll but ....". In which case, you're now the one who's wasting bandwidth by starting fruitless discussions; ie, you've turned into a troll yourself. If you must go through this, however, just post up "This is a troll", or something. Don't link to the troll forum post claiming credit - that is truly lame.
      3. How about if I reply to the points made in the troll, but preface my post with the words "I'm pretty sure this is a troll, but in any case"?

        Then you should be prepared to live with being a laughing stock. We live off people like you, who simply can't stop themselves from pouring out conventional wisdom, even when they know they are being made monkeys of. And no, the "I'm pretty sure ..." disclaimer doesn't make you look ironic and knowing.

    7. Why shouldn't I link to the troll forum post if I spot a troll?

      Well, fundamentally, it lacks class. For one thing, you're feeding the troll while pretending not to feed it, which is dishonest. For another, you're encouraging lots of enraged people to visit the troll forum. This means that the troll forum gets spammed, the trolls move, and you now will be forced to spot trolls for yourself rather than reading them off the list, lamer. Also, the trolls can't tell who it was who brought the spammer there, so all the other people who used to enjoy reading the daily trolls don't find out where the new forum is.

    How can I start trolling for myself?

    "Just do it", as that noted provider of employment to Indonesian children once said. Your first trolls are unlikely to be offensive enough to draw many responses, but once you lose your disinclination to be unpleasant, results will follow. Of course, you may incipiently be a natural trolling genius like dmg, who got huge pops from the get-go. Choose a story which will get a lot of traffic, try to get an early, top-level post, etc, etc (here might follow a whole load of shit from the Karma HOWTO which I'm not going to reproduce). And, offend. You might want to start off with a right-wing maniac troll.

    1. What are the key elements of an RWM troll?

      RWM is the source from which it all flows. Like an origami master building everything from a folded base, or a woodworker turning a chair-leg, the entirety of the art is encapsulated in this one element. It is possible to dedicate your entire trolling career to the perfection of the RWM (troll gods 80md and 70% more or less have done). If you can't write an RWM troll, you can't write a troll.


      The key to the RWM troll is to realise its heritage from Usenet. Usenet trolling was all about cross-posting controversial statements to start flame-wars between different newsgroups. On slashdot, you can't cross-post, so you have to identify people who can be brought into conflict where you are. The beauty of the RWM troll is not so much that he sets rightwingers against leftwingers, but that he creates cognitive dissonance in rightwing readers, because they want to agree with his conclusions (or at least, his less obviously mad ones), but can't bring themselves to accept his reasoning (or simulation thereof). RWM also exploits the fact that a lot of people with right-wing views haven't necessarily thought out those views very comprehensively, and so are vulnerable to cognitive dissonance caused by the inconsistency of what they believe. Among the elements of right-wing mania are:

      • Libertarianism. Everything should be legalised, even obviously destructive things. All government regulations should be removed. The market will protect your privacy, as firms which don't give you privacy will go out of business. Everything which is, is for the best, otherwise the market would have got rid of it. Yes, free speech does include child pr0n. Etc.
      • Corporation-worship. Capitalism works, boyeee. Big companies are the lifeblood of the country and the technology industry. They're successful, so they must be good, so they should be given all those responsiblilities which currently belong to the government. Only the government can censor (it's probably in the dictionary definition), so anything a corporation can do is morally right. The property rights of companies are more important than any rights you think you have.
      • Religious nuttery. Everything is potentially Satanic, even things which seem quite innocuous. The liberals, relativists and communists are indoctrinating our children. There is a conspiracy afoot against Christians, and the downward moderation of this post just goes to prove it. Evolution is by no means proven.
      • Americanism. USA! USA! USA!

      Obviously, everyone who disagrees with a RWM is a socialist, even if they don't think they are.

    2. What are the key elements of a "character" troll?
    3. I think I want to do a surrealist troll, what should I do?
    4. How much effort should I put into a troll?
    5. How can I get more replies?
    6. Should I "feed" my trolls?
    7. When should I admit to being a troll?

    Further information

    1. Other FAQs
    2. Useful research sites
    3. Credits.


  63. The Incredible Troll FAQ by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    Although fragments of this most classic and infamous piece of troll history have been found and preserved throughout the ages, the complete document has been missing for many years and was thought to have been lost or destroyed during the last year of the previous millennium. Well, here it is: the first EVAR Slashdot Troll FAQ, dated March 16th 2000.

    * * * *

    God help us all ... (Troll FAQ) (Score:0)
    by Anonymous Coward on 05:15 AM March 16th, 2000 CST (#810)

    But mainly help me. I had a long, dull business trip Tues. and Wed., and as a result I wrote the following (5000 words and still unfinished) Slashdot Troll FAQ. I haven't been able to build on 80md's original due to lack of connection, but the doct. below still needs revised. Specifically, it needs to be made more entertaining. See whatcha think.



    jsm

    Slashdot troll FAQ

    1. What do trolls do?

      We post inflammatory, satirical or just plain weird comments on slashdot, aiming to draw attention to ourselves and to distract discussion away from the matter at hand. We use satire, wit, art and other cultural weapons to give fun to the clueful and embarrass the clueless.
      1. What are the characteristics of a good troll?

        A good troll is a statement designed to inflame the passions of a certain type of reader. A troll is a contrary or controversial statement, which attacks a preconception of someone who is likely to read it, causing them to suspend their normal standards of critical thinking, and to fire off a combative response, without thinking that they are being had. This is the "classic" troll, aimed at enticing someone to make a fool of themself.
      2. Are there any other kinds of troll?

        Yes. The "surrealistic" troll is a piece of prose, rambling, comic or just downright weird, inserted into a discussion where it seems at once utterly irrelevant and curiously in place. The common thread linking the types of trolls is that a certain kind of personality (read - far too uptight) gets irrationally annoyed by them.
      3. What are "characters"?

        Some kinds of trollish statement have been proven to work again and again, so naturally, some trolls have taken advantage of this fact to repeat them again and again. Certain individual trolls are more or less identified with certain types of trollish statement, and thus we have the idea of a "character" - a fictitious entity which is supposed to actually hold the views which are expressed in the troll's posts. Some of these characters have distinct personalities and maintain narrative coherence from troll to troll (see the "Microsoft Linux" episode between streetlawyer and DMG); some of them show up expressing the same or similar points of view again and again (the RWM and derivatives).
      4. What are some of the characters?

        The number one maximally 1337 troll character is the RWM; the most established troll, with the most solid track record behind him. Opensource man and his creations is the oldest surreal troll; gnarphlager and auntfloyd also adopt this style. Paranoid Man is getting off the ground, and DMG and streetlawyer have their fans. Mindless Bastard is more of a style of trolling than a character per se. There are lots more people posting trolls than are listed here; these are just the repeating characters.
      5. What is an RWM?

        RWM is the Right Wing Maniac, a character with a hotch-potch of (often mutually incompatible) libertarian, Christian, and Objectivist views, who typically (mis)applies the general principles of his world-view to various slashdot topics. He tends to be keen on referring to people as "socialists", particularly if they consider themselves to be conservatives. Sometimes he's more of a religious nut; sometimes it's more the free market which rings his bell. There is also a Left Wing Maniac with a yen for spouting dialectical materialism, but he hasn't done much recently. It's worth noting that it is very rare to find a RWM troll thread in which at least one participant doesn't agree with most of RWM's views.
      6. What is a DMG?

        DMG is the Dumb Marketing Guy. He claims to have been involved in Linux for "at least four years, since the very beginning", and offers unsolicited "open source" marketing advice on Linux advocacy to the members of the community. He often takes a rather hurt tone in response to the welter of abuse which is the usual response to his advice.
      7. How about the other characters?

        For crying out loud, they ought to be self-explanatory, surely to heck?
      8. What's with the "cheese" thing?

        Buggered if I know. Lots of trolls mention cheese, and seem to indicate that cheese has some sort of significance. Maybe it does.
      9. Why does streetlawyer swear so much?

        Because he had a hard life, dragging himself up from the streets to get his fucken law degree from fucken Hah-vud, OK?
      10. What you said really offended me!

        Well, sorry. But really, nobody cares (see below). You're too easily offended. Now purge the post from your board, log our IP address and go back to drawing your "After Y2K" comic (which is shit, by the way).

    2. What don't trolls do?

      We don't do boring, uncreative shit which just makes slashdot harder to read. We're not into denial of service attacks - they aren't very funny. We're probably harsher opponents of the spam bunch than you are, because anything which encourages people to browse at levels above -1 makes our work harder.
      1. Those cut & pastes which fill up the forums, are those you guys?

        Nope. Nezh.
      2. How about that obscene ASCII art I just saw?

        Nope. Nada.
      3. Thank God you've got nothing to do with "open source Natalie Portman", or "naked and petrified"!

        Errrr, well actually yes we have. Both of those ongoing trolls were written by regulars on the troll forum, and you're not going to find condemnation of them in this FAQ.
      4. What?

        Read them. Untwist your underwear, stop fulminating over the momentary interruption to your terribly important discussion about Slackware and have a look at some of these posts. Open source Natalie Portman was a fine piece of Burroughsian prose and if you don't agree that it was, then you're wrong. The whole "Naked and petrified" thing was an absolute triumph - it provoked a huge amount of reaction, entertainingly interfered with a few people's heads by sexualising the context of slashdot and is still talked about, several months after the original author stopped bothering.
      5. But that naked and petrified stuff was really sick!

        Sick to you, but that was actually the guy's genuinely held sexual fantasy. He was erotically excited by the thought of women turned to stone, and was letting the world know about it. Don't pretend that you weren't interested - it's absolutely fascinating.
      6. You're kidding me!

        Nope. I was taken aback myself, but there are several sites on the Net with active discussion boards on this very subject. It's not that very different from the subject of "The Fermata" by Nicholson Baker, where the hero has the power to stop time, effectively turning women into statues. And that is quite a common paraphilia.
      7. Well, I thought it was offensive to women. Wasn't it tantamount to a rape fantasy?

        No, it was a petrification fantasy. Which is something rather less threatening, because harder to act out (how many people really believed that anyone could actually turn Natalie Portman to stone?)
      8. What does Natalie Portman think about being "open sourced"?

        I'm sure she's not wonderfully happy about being the subject of someone else's tawdry sexual fantasies, but it kind of comes with the job. I doubt she loses much sleep.
      9. You keep saying I should read this stuff. How can I?

        Opensourceman's works (including the Star Wars series and Fat-time Charlie) are available online at: Craig MacPherson has a website at: , which probably has a few things on it to do with the petrification thing.

    3. So gritsboy and scooby doo are trolls then? And Trollmastah?

      Wellllll .... they're a step above the cut 'n' pasters. And sometimes they can be funny if you're in a silly mood. But they don't contribute to the troll forums, and it's not what I personally would call incredibly creative. Some people like running jokes and some don't. The original Trollmastah has contributed some good material, but there's a lot of imitations about.

    Why, for God's sake?

    For a variety of reasons, but mainly to puncture the self-importance of a few people who deeply deserve it. Slashdot has a lot of very clever people posting, but vastly more individuals with a serious perception/reality gap with regard to their own intelligence. People who believe themselves to be perceptive, clueful, even deep thinkers while merely reciting lists of conventional wisdom deserve to be taken for a ride. And there's the sheer Skinnerian joy of it - if somebody, or some group of people have buttons, it's inhuman not to take delight in pushing them.

    1. Why do you spend such effort on being assholes?

      In order to do it properly.
    2. What's your problem with moderation?

      No problem. Whining about moderation is for the moderation thread. Several trolls moderate more or less frequently (and meta-moderate - be very afraid), and there is very little genuine complaint about moderation on the troll threads. Any remarks about $3 crack are meant in a spirit of fun and affection, and are usually merely cris de coeur when a finely crafted troll has been rumbled in the first few seconds and down-modded.
      1. What about "Portrait of a Moderator"?

        That was funny.

    3. Why don't you go and troll somewhere other than slashdot?

      Where is there? We've had a token go or two at Nitrozac and kuro5hin, and an abortive attempt to troll some of the statuephilia discussion boards with discussions about technology, but it just doesn't feel right. If you ain't on slashdot, you ain't, basically, trolling.
    4. No, why don't you fuck off? You contribute nothing to this site.

      That isn't even true. Several of the troll regulars have enough Karma to post with the +1 bonus when they use their regular identities, which puts them in the top decile, according to Rob Malda. And there is a definite audience for quality trolls. Have you just been trolled? Is that why you're so angry? Calm down, it'll be someone else's turn in the barrel on Friday.
    5. Don't you have anything better to do?

      To paraphrase gnarphlager, yes, we have many better things to do, but we're not going to do them.

    How can I recognise a troll?

    If you want to spot a troll, then you're basically entering into a game, played against us. You have to keep your guard up, adopt a critical attitude to what you read and decide whether it is plausible that someone is actually posting that view. For our part, we will intermingle fact and fiction, invent plausible-sounding references and (always) attempt to attack your emotional involvement in a topic in order to make you drop your guard. The more ridiculous the proposition we sneak under your guard, the more we win. The angrier you get, the more we win. And you? As the computer said in War Games "The only way to win is not to play".

    1. What are the characteristics of a troll?

      Usually, a troll will resemble a normal slashdot post, but will contain at least one thing which is not true. A good troll will contain material which obviously couldn't possibly be true, and would not fool anyone who gave it a moment's thought. The troll will also contain an inflammatory or controversial statement, designed to make sure that nobody does give it a moment's thought. Criticism of Linux, strong or offensive political views, mockery of "computer geeks", claims about the inferiority of women/Canadians/Perl, all of that stuff. Interestingly, having experimented with using outright, Bell-Curve-like racist statements to act as the controversial part of the troll, I've found that they never offend anyone, which I guess shows what a lily-white place slashdot is.


      Obviously these rules apply more to the classic satirical model of a troll, but there is a strong family resemblance in the surrealist model. Looking at the best work of osm, gnarphlager, auntfloyd et al., you pick up a strong sense of the underlying form. There is the (often highly tenuous) link to the subject matter, the building sense of cognitive dissonance and then the denouement in which the troll moves into the realm of pure surrealist prose (or "gets silly", depending on how you look at it). Typically, when reading such a troll for the first time, and in the context of the thread, the reader's reaction goes through stages.

      At the opening of the troll, in which the technological subject matter is being obliquely referred to, the reader is curious. There is an unconscious assumption that what is being used is a metaphor, which appears opaque but will actually make an argument clear (in such a way the surrealist trolls subvert the category of metaphor as used in scientific discussions). Then, the tension between the what the reader wants to read and what he/she sees on the page grows, but the reader still tries to hang on to the idea that he/she is reading "News for Nerds". Finally, when the reality (that is, the unreality) of the troll is revealed, the reader is outraged at having been tricked.


      Thus, we can see that the distinction between the classical and surrealist trolls is one of inversion; metaphor versus metonymy. The classical troll traps the reader in metaphor, creating the "character" or authorial fiction, which the reader takes as a metonymy for "The Other" - the fictional creature on the screen is espousing Microsoft, or Libertarianism, or something else which must be ritually reacted to, rather than read as if it were a metaphorical text. The surrealist troll appears to use metaphor, but creates no authorial fiction. The piling up of the metonymic symbols of trolldom (cheese, Natalie Portman, the Troll itself) draws the reader into the pure text, looking for a meaning (or metaphor) which is always deferred. The reader wants to create an authorial fiction, but this is denied - and it is this denial which is the source of his/her rage. The surrealist troll lets the reader down with a bump - the satirical troll, in its purest form, never lets the reader out at all, leaving him/her stuck in a world which is false, because he/she is being manipulated by the authorial fiction. Classical trolling is about the use of metaphor to create metonymy; surrealist trolling is using metonymy to create metapor.

      1. Wow, that's pretty deep.

        YHBT. YHL. HAND. (Ha ha, only serious)

    2. Do you always list the trolls in these forums?

      Pretty much so, yeah. There's been "trolltalk", "trolltalk2", "31337troll" and a bunch of others. It's good to be able to see other people's work, to discuss trolling, and on occasion to have a way of proving for sure that something you wrote was a troll, to a particularly persistent mark.
    3. What's the current 31337 forum?

      If I could tell you, I'd have to kill you. There have been a few problems with people stalking some of the trolls, and spamming the troll forums with whitespace to make them unusable. There's no big secret or anything, it's just that we'd like to think that finding the troll forum requires a modicum of commitment and ingenuity. There's one pretty well-trafficked troll forum which is listed in most of the usual indices. Look, fuck it, you used to be able to find BBSes, didn't you? This is no different.
    4. Isn't that a bit hypocritical, to keep moving the troll forum because it gets trolled?

      Yada yada yada.
    5. But if I know the sid of the 1337 forum, I can read the trolls as they happen?

      Welllllll ..... yeah ... I suppose that technically you can, and you need never be taken in by a troll again. But that's a bit lame, don't you think? This is meant to be a game, after all.
    6. What should I do if I suspect a troll?

      Write a nice, long post, beginning with the phrase "I'm sure this is a troll, but ....", get really angry, call everyone a bunch of assholes and always reply to follow ups : -) Nahhh, that's what we'd like you to do.
      1. Well what should I do, then?

        The only approved, correct, 1337 way to deal with a troll is not to reply at all. Don't say anything. Just sit back and feel smugly self-satisfied that you caught the troll. Go on. People always seem to say the word "smug" as if it were a bad thing, but how can something that feels so good be wrong? Smirk. Once the troll is "dead" (once the author has taken credit for it and admitted the troll), you might want to post a message about it. You'll probably get a nice reply.
      2. Should I alert others to the troll?

        Wellllll .... if you really must, I suppose you can, but it is a bit lame and lacks eliteness. For one thing, it makes you look like a bit of a spoilsport. For another, it gives unfair clues to people who have no idea of what to do with them. For yet another, it's quite possible that the people you warn will ignore you. Either that, or start arguing with you, saying things like "Well it may be a troll but ....". In which case, you're now the one who's wasting bandwidth by starting fruitless discussions; ie, you've turned into a troll yourself. If you must go through this, however, just post up "This is a troll", or something. Don't link to the troll forum post claiming credit - that is truly lame.
      3. How about if I reply to the points made in the troll, but preface my post with the words "I'm pretty sure this is a troll, but in any case"?

        Then you should be prepared to live with being a laughing stock. We live off people like you, who simply can't stop themselves from pouring out conventional wisdom, even when they know they are being made monkeys of. And no, the "I'm pretty sure ..." disclaimer doesn't make you look ironic and knowing.

    7. Why shouldn't I link to the troll forum post if I spot a troll?

      Well, fundamentally, it lacks class. For one thing, you're feeding the troll while pretending not to feed it, which is dishonest. For another, you're encouraging lots of enraged people to visit the troll forum. This means that the troll forum gets spammed, the trolls move, and you now will be forced to spot trolls for yourself rather than reading them off the list, lamer. Also, the trolls can't tell who it was who brought the spammer there, so all the other people who used to enjoy reading the daily trolls don't find out where the new forum is.

    How can I start trolling for myself?

    "Just do it", as that noted provider of employment to Indonesian children once said. Your first trolls are unlikely to be offensive enough to draw many responses, but once you lose your disinclination to be unpleasant, results will follow. Of course, you may incipiently be a natural trolling genius like dmg, who got huge pops from the get-go. Choose a story which will get a lot of traffic, try to get an early, top-level post, etc, etc (here might follow a whole load of shit from the Karma HOWTO which I'm not going to reproduce). And, offend. You might want to start off with a right-wing maniac troll.

    1. What are the key elements of an RWM troll?

      RWM is the source from which it all flows. Like an origami master building everything from a folded base, or a woodworker turning a chair-leg, the entirety of the art is encapsulated in this one element. It is possible to dedicate your entire trolling career to the perfection of the RWM (troll gods 80md and 70% more or less have done). If you can't write an RWM troll, you can't write a troll.


      The key to the RWM troll is to realise its heritage from Usenet. Usenet trolling was all about cross-posting controversial statements to start flame-wars between different newsgroups. On slashdot, you can't cross-post, so you have to identify people who can be brought into conflict where you are. The beauty of the RWM troll is not so much that he sets rightwingers against leftwingers, but that he creates cognitive dissonance in rightwing readers, because they want to agree with his conclusions (or at least, his less obviously mad ones), but can't bring themselves to accept his reasoning (or simulation thereof). RWM also exploits the fact that a lot of people with right-wing views haven't necessarily thought out those views very comprehensively, and so are vulnerable to cognitive dissonance caused by the inconsistency of what they believe. Among the elements of right-wing mania are:

      • Libertarianism. Everything should be legalised, even obviously destructive things. All government regulations should be removed. The market will protect your privacy, as firms which don't give you privacy will go out of business. Everything which is, is for the best, otherwise the market would have got rid of it. Yes, free speech does include child pr0n. Etc.
      • Corporation-worship. Capitalism works, boyeee. Big companies are the lifeblood of the country and the technology industry. They're successful, so they must be good, so they should be given all those responsiblilities which currently belong to the government. Only the government can censor (it's probably in the dictionary definition), so anything a corporation can do is morally right. The property rights of companies are more important than any rights you think you have.
      • Religious nuttery. Everything is potentially Satanic, even things which seem quite innocuous. The liberals, relativists and communists are indoctrinating our children. There is a conspiracy afoot against Christians, and the downward moderation of this post just goes to prove it. Evolution is by no means proven.
      • Americanism. USA! USA! USA!

      Obviously, everyone who disagrees with a RWM is a socialist, even if they don't think they are.

    2. What are the key elements of a "character" troll?
    3. I think I want to do a surrealist troll, what should I do?
    4. How much effort should I put into a troll?
    5. How can I get more replies?
    6. Should I "feed" my trolls?
    7. When should I admit to being a troll?

    Further information

    1. Other FAQs
    2. Useful research sites
    3. Credits.


  64. One of the big problems in science now... by TheWhaleShark · · Score: 3, Insightful

    There's a big pressure now for people in the Biological sciences to produce something useful. When you put science under pressure like that, you're bound to see lots of people cutting corners, falsifying data, and generally doing things against the great principles of science.

    That's a big side effect of corporate funding for science; if some corporation is giving you money to research, say, some new gene, they want viable results and they want them soon. They don't understand that you can't rush science; if you do that, you get an inferior (and often dangerous) product. Hell, just watch an ad for any new allergy medication; the side effects take up most of the ad time.

    The real problem is that there needs to be more funding from different sources (government funding, mehtinks?) so that particular labs won't represent the goals of one lone corporation; if you have to answer to many people, you're bound to take your time.

    It's a big nasty mess, and one that really needs to be resolved. We can only go on like this for so long before someone fucks up royally and everyone pays for it.

    --
    "It never got weird enough for me." - HST (RIP)
    1. Re:One of the big problems in science now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      you can't rush science; if you do that, you get an inferior (and often dangerous) product. Hell, just watch an ad for any new allergy medication; the side effects take up most of the ad time.
      That has absolutely nothing to do with the quality of the science behind the medication. It has to do with the legal requirements placed on the companies producing them. If these companies marketed peanuts, you'd see the same list of possible side effects.
    2. Re:One of the big problems in science now... by geekee · · Score: 2

      And how is this different from university research? There is just as much pressure to produce results, both to continue receiving funding and to gain tenure. Therefore, there is the same incentive to for "lots of people cutting corners, falsifying data, and generally doing things against the great principles of science". At least in industry, if your product is bs you will usually fail (ionic bracelets excluded).

      --
      Vote for Pedro
  65. La Vie Boheme by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    LA VIE BOHEME

    Restaurant Man: No please no, not tonight please no, mister - can't you go - not tonight - can't have a scene!
    Roger: What?
    Restaurant Man: Go, please go; You - hello, sir - I said, "No", Important customer!
    Mark: What am I - just a blur?
    Restaurant Man: You sit all night - you never buy!
    Mark: That's a lie - that's a lie, I had a tea the other day
    Restaurant Man: You couldn't pay!
    Mark: Oh yeah.
    Collins: Benjamin Coffin III -- here?
    Restaurant Man: Oh no!
    All: Wine and beer!
    Maureen: The enemy of Avenue A. We'll stay.
    Restaurant Man: Oiy vey!
    Collins: What brings the mogul in his own mind to the Life Cafe?
    Benny: I would like to propose a toast, to Maureen's noble try. It went well.
    Maureen: Go to hell!
    Benny: Was the yuppie scum stomped? Not counting the homeless, how many tickets weren't comped?
    Roger: Why did Muffy --
    Benny: Alison!
    Roger: Miss the show?
    Benny: There was a death in the family if you must know.
    Angel: Who died?
    Benny: Our Akita--
    All: Evita!
    Benny: Mimi - I'm surprised, a bright and charming girl like you, hangs out with these slackers, (who don't adhere to deals). They make fun - yet I'm the one attempting to do some good, or do you really want a neighborhood where people piss on your stoop every night? Bohemia, Bohemia is a fallacy in your head. This is Calcutta; Bohemia is dead.
    Mark: Dearly beloved we gather here to say our goodbyes Here she lies, no one knew her worth, the late great daughter of mother earth, on this night when we celebrate the birth, in that little town of Bethlehem, we raise our glass - you bet your ass to - La vie Boheme
    All: La vie Boheme, La vie Boheme, La vie Boheme, La vie Boheme.
    Mark: To days of inspiration, playing hookey, making something out of nothing, the need to express - to communicate, to going against the grain, going insane, going mad. To loving tension, no pension, to more than one dimension, to starving for attention, hating convention, hating pretension, not to mention of course, hating dear old mom and dad! To riding your bike, midday past the three piece suits, to fruits - to no absolutes - to Absolut - to choice - to the Village Voice - to any passing fad!
    Maureen: Is the equipment in a pyramid?
    Joanne: It is, Maureen
    Maureen: The mixer doesn't have a case. Don't give me that face!
    Mr. Grey: Ahhemm.
    Maureen: Hey Mister - she's my sister!
    Restaurant Man: So that's five miso soup, four seaweed salad, three soy burger dinner, two tofu dog platter and one pasta with meatless balls.
    Boy: Ugh!
    Collins: It tastes the same
    Mimi: If you close your eyes
    Restaurant Man: And thirteen orders of fries. Is that it here?
    All: Wine and beer!
    Mimi & Angel: To hand-crafted beers made in local breweries, to yoga, to yogurt, to rice and beans and cheese, to leather, to dildos, to curry vindaloo, to huevos rancheros and Maya Angelou.
    Maureen & Collins: Emotion, devotion, to causing a commotion. Creation, vacation--
    Mark: Mucho masturbation!
    Maureen & Collins: Compassion, to fashion, to passion when it's new
    Various: To Sontag, to Sondheim, to anything taboo. Ginsberg, Dylan, Cunningham and Cage, Lenny Bruce, Langston Hughes, to the stage! To Uta, to Buddha, Pablo Neruda, too. Why Dorothy and Toto went over the rainbow to blow off Auntie Em. La vie Boheme!
    Maureen: And wipe the speakers off before you pack!
    Joanne: Yes, Maureen
    Maureen: Well - hurry back!
    Mr. Grey: Sisters?
    Maureen: We're close.
    Various: Brothers! Bisexuals, trisexuals, homo sapiens, carcinogens, hallucinogens, men, Pee Wee Herman, German wine, turpentine, Gertrude Stein, Antonioni, Bertolucci, Kurosawa, Carmina Burana. To apathy, to entropy, to empathy, ecstasy
    Vaclav Havel - The Sex Pistols, 8BC, to no shame - never playing the Fame Game-- to marijuana! To sodomy, it's between God and me... to S & M.
    Benny: Waiter...Waiter...Waiter
    All: La vie Boheme!
    Collins: In honor of the death of Bohemia an impromptu salon will commence immediately following dinner... Mimi Marquez, clad only in bubble wrap, will perform her famous lawn chair-handcuff dance to the sounds of iced tea being stirred.
    Roger: Mark Cohen will preview his new documentary about his inability to hold an erection on high holy days.
    Mark: Maureen Johnson, back from her spectacular one-night engagement at the eleventh street lot, will sing Mative American tribal chants backwards through her vocoder, while accompanying herself on the electric cello - which she has never studied.
    Benny: Your new boyfriend doesn't know about us?
    Mimi: There's nothing to know.
    Benny: Don't you think that we should discuss --
    Mimi: It was three months ago.
    Benny: He doesn't act like he's with you.
    Mimi: We're taking it slow.
    Benny: Where is he now?
    Mimi: He's right -- hmm. Where'd he go?
    Mark: Roger will attempt to write a bittersweet, evocative song. That doesn't remind us of "Musetta's Waltz"
    Collins: Angel Dumott Schunard will now model the latest fall fashions from Paris while accompanying herself on the 10 gallon plastic pickle tub.
    Angel: And Collins will recount his exploits as an anarchist - including the successful reprogramming of the M.I.T. virtual reality equipment to self-destruct, as it broadcast the words: "Actual reality - Act Up - Fight AIDS"
    Benny: Check!!
    Mimi: Excuse me - did I do something wrong? I get invited - then ignored - all night long.
    Roger: I've been trying - I'm not lying, no one's perfect. I've got baggage!
    Mimi: Life's too short, babe, time is flying. I'm looking for baggage that goes with mine
    Roger: I should tell you --
    Mimi: I've got baggage too --
    Roger: I should tell you --
    Mimi: I got baggage too --
    Roger: I should tell you --
    Both: Baggage - wine --
    Others: And beer!
    Mimi: AZT break
    Roger: You?
    Mimi: Me. You?
    Roger: Mimi...

  66. William Scott Lockwood III Exposed! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Before you visit the new crapflooder website, www.sporks-r-us.com, there are a few points you should review about the owner and administrator of SRU, Vladinator. Scott (Vladinator's "real life" handle he goes by in public) won't tell you any of the following facts because he's afraid you'll be put off by his sordid, depraved, criminal past and close your browser window before he can log your IP address and password!


    It is my duty to you, gentle reader, to make sure all of the relevant knowledge is out in the air before you do something you may regret, like registering an account or posting in a discussion on www.sporks-r-us.com.



    PLEASE review the following facts about Vladinator:


    • morbidly obese!
    • "recovering" alcoholic!
    • "recovering" smoker!
    • swings (i.e., seeks promiscuous sex with strangers!)
    • divorced three times!
    • current wife (#4) weighs over 400lbs!
    • can't hold employment for more than a few months!
    • high-school dropout!
    • dishonorably discharged from the Navy after eight years of failure!
    • leader of the Slashdot crapflooder gang!
    • incites others to hack innocent websites!
    • perpetually flatulent!
    • prescription and illegal drug abuser!
    • uses the following aliases all over the Internet!

      ( and often posts communications between them to make them appear to be more than one person!!! ):

      • Lonesome Cowboy Burt
      • Pinkerton Floyd
      • Quick Star
      • Reza ( supposedly his wife!!! )
      • William Scott Lockwood III
      • wsl3
      • Vladinator

    • restraining order against him by his own children!
    • callous software pirate and user of hacker tools!
    • uses Linux, a known homosexual operating system!
    • laid waste to message forums on Kuro5hin, MacNN, MacSlash, MsGeek, and Slashdot!
    • paid over $50 for tools to abuse Kuro5hin into mojopacolypse Hell!

  67. Amherst-Fag and the Story Submission by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: cptroll
    To: <k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org>
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] how long do story submissions usually take?
    Date sent: Sun, 29 Oct 2000 18:10:04 -0500
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org
    (This is CP0034)

    The biggest possibility is that they're saving it for jamie to do some background research and write up a big article (more than just a blurb). That would seem likely, except you'd probably have heard from your friend about it, since he's the first one they'd contact (except if jamie doesn't work on weekends and they're actually /saving/ it for later, but that doesn't seem to be the case if you look at jamie's past articles -- they're all over the week). Alternatively, they're just saving it for a weekday where there's more traffic and more visibility.

    I once had a submission take more than a day to get rejected, but that was only because it first got accepted before eventually having that acceptance rescinded. I never did figure that one out.

    I'm personally annoyed, because being as pathetic as I am, I actually got up early several times this morning to check the front page and make sure it hadn't been posted over night. I obviously care too damn much.

    jlb <jlb@io.com> wrote:

    >It's been in the queue over 24 hours now, I think, not rejected yet. How
    >long does this usually take? (In the past, my story suggestions usually
    >get rejected right away.:)
    >
    >Maybe they're checking up on the facts.
    >
    >*waits for laughter to die down*
    >
    >Okay, but why is it taking so long? Do you think any of you who talk to
    >rub & co could ask them to try and push the story through? I do have
    >some personal interest in it, besides being decent troll fodder.
    >
    >-lb

    (This is CP0034)

  68. Let them own it by ACNiel · · Score: 2, Funny

    I say, let the corporate sponsors own all the half-assed, under-researched, falsified, or otherwise suspect IP.

    Let the scientists use this money to fund real reasearch in which they freely share ideas.

    Everybody wins. The corporations have never cared if something really works, only if they can market it. They have their IP, and we have the real research.

  69. Lies by ivrcti · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I found it fascinating that at only one place in the article, buried at the end of a long and complex paragraph did the author use the terms lies. He frequently used euphemisms such as "creative", but only once he did directly refer to dishonesty. Yet in the end, this sort of scientific smoke is simple dishonesty at its core. Only when a man chooses to surrender his personal integrity, do these problems occur. Our attempt to color them with quiet shades of pastel only makes the behavior more likely.

    What does this say about our culture in general and the effect on our scientific community?

    1. Re:Lies by simong_oz · · Score: 2

      a very insightful comment. It's interesting that when you get right down to the morals of it, it's very similar to the Enron scandal. Which had the news headlines?

      What does this say about our culture in general and the effect on our scientific community?

      Our culture at this point in time is focussed almost entirely on money and possessions (which are really just a measure of money). But this obsession is driven by the public - during the IT job boom for example, people could switch jobs at the drop of a hat or demand outrageous salary increases or they would up and go to the company that would pay up. Why? They wanted more money, pure and simple.

      --
      "Because it's there." - George Mallory, when asked why he wanted to climb Mt Everest, March 18, 1923 (New York Times)
    2. Re:Lies by greenrd · · Score: 2, Insightful
      The Enron executives were responsible for stealing money, gutting their own corporation, and laying waste to their employee's pension scheme, as well as just fraud. The recent nanotech fraud case and others didn't have quite the same impact.

    3. Re:Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I for one feel very demoralized by corporate culture. I spent many many years learning science and engineering. Only to find out that corporations are more interested in who bought they coffee creamer, and more importantly who CONTROLS the coffee creamer, than any serious engineering practices..

      Sad.. to see the end of sensibility in america. Only the academics have a glimmer of hope.

      All is very sad in american politics and business.

    4. Re:Lies by Sir+Holo · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I found it fascinating that at only one place in the article, buried at the end of a long and complex paragraph did the author use the terms lies. He frequently used euphemisms such as "creative", but only once he did directly refer to dishonesty.

      You've probably never won a proposal, I'll bet. ;-P

      In proposals, you have to tell a good story. And no one can tell the future. Which of these would you pick?

      "An understanding of this mechanism could lead to the prevention of 20 % of all cancers within ten years."

      or

      "We expect to make an incremental advance in our understanding of the relation between the physico-chemical fliberty flap and the occurrence of randomonucleopyrolysistic neurophononisms."

    5. Re:Lies by jafac · · Score: 2

      Well, the right-wingers out there will say it's because we're teaching evolution in the schools instead of the ten commandments.

      But maybe - just maybe, we need to revisit ethics and critical thinking as requirements for grade school kids in America. It seems as if there's a whole generation of people, Lawyers, Doctors (ie. Drug pushers for the pharmaceutical industry), Business execs (Enron), Recording execs, politicians, priests (come here little altar boy, I've got a prayer ritual for you. . .), Televangelists (I have flaws, but I'm forgiven, you'll be damned and go to hell if you don't tithe...) and now, scientists, are all becoming known for their ethical shortcomings.

      Ten commandments are fine and dandy, but try to put "don't covet thy neighbor's ass" into the context of "don't buy a politician, so you can get rich", and it apparently misses something.

      --

      These are my friends, See how they glisten. See this one shine, how he smiles in the light.
    6. Re:Lies by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Ten commandments are fine and dandy, but try to put "don't covet thy neighbor's ass" into the context of "don't buy a politician, so you can get rich", and it apparently misses something.

      It's the "get rich" part that seems to be the problem in America.

      From an old book I read once:

      "Do not store up treasures on earth...store up treasures in heaven"

      "It is easier for a camel to pass through The Eye of The Needle[1] than a rich man to pass into the gates of heaven"

      "Consider the flowers of fields; they do now sow, neither do they reap, but the Heavenly Father cares for them"

      If people in the US followed up on some of those ideas, they might find the world were a happier place.

      Disclaimer: I'm not a Christian, but anyone who has the guts to actually follow the New Testament as originally written (including the hard parts, like divesting themselves of all material possessions and living a life of pacifism and sharing) has my respect. The world could use more people who believe in peace and mutual respect.
      --
      AC

      [1] Later translations tend to have this version, with the explanation that "The Eye of The Needle" was a city gate notorious for it's narrowness. The image is one of an overburdened camel not being able to fit because of his excess baggage.

  70. Re:Off Topic: Learning From kuro5hin by jem · · Score: 1

    I disagree. There is little difference between unfair moderation resulting in deletion and censorship. Sure the comments here have a bad signal to noise ratio but I wouldn't have it any other way.

    I like being able to take the bait from a Troll like you. It gives /. flavour.

  71. Taking Over Microdot Duties by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    2002 December 6


    Dear Sirs and Madams:


    My friend Purple / Red / Blue / Green / Cyan / Violet / Orange / Black / Crimson Microdot has just informed me that he has recently been IP banned from Kuro5hin. Consequently, the onus has temporarily fallen to me of carrying out the sacred duties of the Microdot until he can resolve the situation and resume operations as before.


    I know that I have big shoes to fill, and I won't claim that I'll be able to live up to the accomplishments of my predecessor. I won't even claim that I'm qualified for the job, however, I know that Kuro5hin needs a Microdot, and I will do anything within my power to adequately fill in for the true Microdot while he is indisposed.


    The true Microdot wishes me to convey his sincere regrets to all of you over being temporarily forcibly separated from you. This is a situation that was beyond his control, and he is doing what he can to find a workaround. Until then, I'll do my part to try to fill the void, because Kuro5hin without the Microdot is just not Kuro5hin. (We won't even mention a certain Yellow imposter, who is an embarrassment to the Microdot name and to himself.)


    I can never be the original Microdot, but I'm going to try my best to get into the Microdot mindset, and find my own personal style as well. If you like me, then perhaps when the real Microdot overcomes his IP-ban, I'll continue to work side-by-side with him. If you don't like me, then e-mail some certain people and request/demand that the original Microdot have his IP-ban removed as soon as possible.


    This is all that I have to say at the moment. Until the services of the Standing Junior Microdot are needed again, I wish you all good night... and Godspeed.


    Warmest Possible Regards,

    Teal Microdot

  72. Other Things Being Equal, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Adequacy Still Sucks Ass!

  73. I Am Jared Stattlemeyer by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Dear Trolls,

    It has occured to me that you think that chainrust is me. I have received replies for emails I did not write, and other nonsense.

    Thankfully, Chainrust (aka Pumpernickel and other nicks according to you) has contacted me to make the situation clear. Let me clear it further for the challenged of us out there:

    Chainrust's name is not Jared Stattlemeyer. You have hardly any chance of finding his real identity (no, I will not tell you).

    I am not Chainrust of Adequacy or Slashdot or K5.

    The phone numbers you have published are not mine, but they may be of some other Jared Stattlemeyer, an Astroglide user in Jerusalem. The same goes for the email addresses.

    In short, you are dumb. Very very dumb. The next time you decide that you can come to the right conclusions based on an incomplete evidence, please remember the above.

    Oh, and by the way. I have your IPs. You visited my site, after all, didn't you? Does 64.94.151.187 look familiar? I have more. Think about that if you decide to harass that fellow in Jerusalem via phone. I will be the first to consult him on how to file a formal complaint with the police (I happen to volunteer in the Civil Guard). The "Jewish country" and US have signed agreements just for such cases.

    Best regards,

    Jared Stattlemeyer

  74. Amherst-Fag and the Text of Lameness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: cptroll
    To: <k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org>
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] Alyssa Milano
    Date sent: Sat, 14 Oct 2000 19:20:14 -0400
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org
    (This is CP0020)

    She was that kid from Who's the Boss (and a Schwarzenegger flic), right?
    Damn, she's aged gracefully. So how'd she get stuck doing 1800COLLECT ads
    with Arsenio Hall, while Leonardo Dicaprio moved past Growing Pains and
    into great roles like Total Eclipse? It's states like Ohio that do it, I
    tell ya. Our nation is without taste.

    Marc Stauffer <marc@ksac.com> wrote:

    >THe Alyssa Milano E! true holywood story just started for anyone
    >interested in her pouting breasts. 7:30 Eastern Standard. rev

    (This is CP0020)

  75. Amherst-Fag and the Jurisprudence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: [k22320inchfan] No respect
    Date sent: Mon, 8 Jan 2001 08:57:36 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0018)

    Today was the appointed date for jury duty (postponed since this summer, since the idiots at the courthouse failed to divine that calling a student to duty in the county where he studies rather than resides permanently doesn't make any sense). It was my hope to get on a jury, since I highly value the (unconstitutionally diminishing) role of the jury in American jurisprudence.

    I showed up this morning at the courthouse. After some buffoonery at the security check (hint: don't carry a cpu in your backpack when arriving for jury duty), I went upstairs where I signed in and was informed that I had already missed the video (shucks). I filled out some paperwork and was redirected to the grand-jury room.

    This was a potential mixed blessing. Grand juries, as distinguished from petite ("normal") juries, are the first line that the state must cross before obtaining an indictment for the accused. They consist of 23 laypersons whose standard is "probable cause" rather than "reasonable doubt" and vote by majority rule whether to issue an indictment. The prosecutor presents his witnesses and evidence, and the defendant has no representation. Normally, the grand-jury trial is brief and 99% or so of all grand juries return an indictment. Prosecutors often refer to this statistic as the "ability to indict a ham sandich" if they so please. Grand juries usually sit for one day per week for three months, something that would screw up any student's semester.

    The good thing about grand juries is that they have almost infinite investigatory powers to do whatever they please. What is not commonly understood is that the role of the grand jury isn't just to return a verdict in the form of an indictment; it's for members to question witnesses, subpoena evidence the prosecutor didn't present, and generally get the whole story. It's even within the power of the grand jury to expell the prosecutor and judge if the jury so decides.

    I was prepared to give them hell. Once on a jury
    (grand or otherwise), I was going to be the asshole
    lawyer the defendant isn't allowed to have. I was
    going to subpoena bank records, grill prosecutorial
    witnesses, and vote to nullify anything I considered
    unjust (even when "legal"). I was going to persuade
    enough fellow jurors to kick out anyone we didn't
    like, especially the prosecutor. In short, I was
    going to troll the legal system.

    But I didn't get that opportunity. After an hour of
    sitting in the grand-jury room, we were informed that
    we weren't waiting for a grand-jury seating: instead,
    a petite-jury seating.

    Petite juries, in states that value the constitution,
    are 12-person panels that sit and hear evidence in the
    actual criminal trial. Their role is ostensibly to
    decide the facts and apply the law as directed by the
    judge. Their actual role under the constitution
    (though the Supreme Court doesn't require that you be
    informed of this) is to sit in judgment not just on
    the facts but also on the law. Again, I was hoping to
    get a chance to nullify stuff: this time, drug laws
    and other things I believe unconstitutional.

    Again, I was denied. Only five minutes later, we were
    informed that all the cases pending today were
    plea-bargained, and we were "free to go". A sigh of
    relief was heard throughout the room, as people who
    didn't want to be there were grateful that they didn't
    have to serve on a jury and perform the duty they
    didn't want to perform. I was disgusted.

    That's what's most wrong with plea bargaining in this
    country. Not that 90% of cases never reach public
    scrutiny because they're decided in the hallways of
    courthouses. Not that people serve penalties for
    unconstitutional charges. Not that real criminals get
    off with reduced sentences. Not that the legislatures
    feel free to pass an absurd number of laws without
    caring whether the court system can handle the load of
    giving each citizen true justice.

    None of that.

    What's wrong is that I, a troll, have been kept off my
    damn jury. No respect.

    (This is CP0018)

  76. VLADEQUACY RAW & UNCUT 10 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    *** Sulla is now known as bc_dvd
    [bc_dvd] bye :)
    [momocrome] hi
    *** cdromgurl has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 300 seconds)
    [county] Hi and bye to all of you, as appropriate.
    *** cyndrekit (~be590@cloaked.sierratel.com) has joined #adequacy
    *** ChanServ sets mode: +o cyndrekit
    [county] cyndrekit, hello.
    [cyndrekit] hello county
    [cyndrekit] did bc actually get a dvd?
    [cyndrekit] I am shocked.
    [cyndrekit] ;)
    [county] I wonder what it is.
    [me0w] Hello
    [county] Greetings, me0w.
    [me0w] Good day
    [cyndrekit] hi hi
    [em] http://story.news.yahoo.com/news?tmpl=story&u=/021 115/168/2oxdj.html
    [cyndrekit] is there a story to go with it?
    [em] yes
    [cyndrekit] oh cool, found it
    [em] the photo is just too cool.
    * momocrome moans
    [momocrome] too much drunk for one night
    [county] It's not night!
    [me0w] Soon it will be.
    [momocrome] oh last night's what I mean
    [county] You didn't seem that drunk.
    *** cyndrekit has quit IRC (Connection reset by peer)
    *** seventypercent has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 300 seconds)
    *** me0w (meow@labyrinth.cs.rogers.wave.ca) has left #adequacy
    *** me0w (meow@labyrinth.cs.rogers.wave.ca) has joined #adequacy
    *** bc (gallus@modem-1926.orangutan.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    *** bc_dvd has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
    *** collins (~nigel@cloaked.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net) has joined #adequacy
    *** collins (~nigel@cloaked.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net) has left #adequacy (hmph)
    [wsl3] Has anyone in here actually had a child?
    *** Sylvain (~martinez@bombillo.Stanford.EDU) has joined #adequacy
    *** ChanServ sets mode: +o Sylvain
    [wsl3] Has anyone in here actually had a child?
    [me0w] I have a cat ...
    [me0w] She's kind of like a child.
    [bc] hello!
    [me0w] hi!
    [bc] damn, missed cyn
    [bc] that film was great
    [county] What was it?
    [bc] it was "Contact", county
    [bc] I liked the way it explored revelatory experiences
    [county] Have I mentioned that I've nursed an infatuation for Jodie Foster?
    [bc] and scepticism as opposed to faith
    [bc] you know what? I was just thinking about that
    [county] About what?
    [bc] I never really used to like her, because she seems quite sharp nosed and hard faced, in that way
    [bc] but now, well, now I see. She seemed so vulnerable in that film
    [county] I like well-defined faces.
    [county] I can see why her's might be too sharp for you, though.
    [bc] and you just wanted to protect her against the world
    [momocrome] i hate kitten, but I am hung over and foggy headed
    [bc] it is quite sharp, but I see beyond that now
    [county] I like faces with character, not just formless fleshy masses, that so many other girls seem to have.
    [county] Don't hate kitten, momocrome.
    [county] There's no point.
    [county] I just don't understand how he thinks he's different than the people he's always railing on.
    [county] It's really funny, actually.
    [bc] hehe
    [bc] it's true, county
    [bc] he constantly moans about people being "arrogant", or "narrow minded"
    [county] I try to point it out now and then, but he just doesn't see it.
    [bc] and you think "whaaa?"
    [county] I think stouts are my favorite.
    [bc] kitten is the most narrow minded & arrogant chap on the internet
    [me0w] I am going out drinking tonight.
    [county] One of my bus infatuations, the one who was being picked on, has a somewhat sharp face.
    [county] Actually, I love her face.
    [bc] I hope you have a voice of reason, me0w
    [county] It's pretty, but not beautiful, by normal standards.
    [county] But it just looks so carefully crafted, somehow.
    [bc] is the sharp faced bus infatuation the same girl as the one with the limp?
    [county] It looks like someone wanted her face to look just like that, and they invested endless time in carefully crafting it.
    [county] You know what I mean?
    [me0w] bc: I do, although this voice of reason is a little suspect ..
    [county] (No, the limping girl is someone else, and she doesn't generally limp.)
    [bc] why me0w, is this voice of reason American or something? I know you hate Americans. An American Voice of Reason would probably advice you to lick the most repugnant people in the room, as retaliation.
    [bc] county: yes, I do know
    [bc] interesting faces are nice
    [county] When I see her, I want to hold her face in my hands and kiss it.
    [county] But that's not a polite thing to do on a bus.
    [county] You're wrong about us American's, bc. An American voice of reason wouldn't feel any ill will toward me0w, despite her hatred.
    [bc] get to know her first, and do it later. Have her melt
    [county] It would just feel sadness and hurt.
    [county] "Americans"
    [Sylvain] hey bc
    [bc] county, my impression of Americans is that they are friendly and kind, and idealistic, but that if you cross them they take a just vengeance
    [bc] hey em
    [county] Cross us, yes. Simply hating us but doing nothing about it is not crossing us.
    [bc] that seems fair enough
    [bc] though who knows, me0w yank-hatred is such that it wouldn't surprise me to find she has crossed the line
    [me0w] bc: this voice of reason has been my friend since HS, and on several occasions, while I was not quite in the right fram of mind, he got me to do silly things.
    [county] It's mean and hurtful, yes, but that's not enough. We Americans only retaliate when actual harm is done.
    [me0w] I do not have individual-yank hatred.
    [county] I hope she hasn't crossed the line. America's wrath is great toward those who hurt her.
    [bc] he sounds like a splendid chap, me0w. He should tell you to lick a lovely, yooung 16yo with lots of acne
    [me0w] bc: He would tell me to go and make out with girls.
    [bc] what?? That's only because he gets off on it himself, the weirdo perv
    [county] Lesbian sex must be the least arousing thing in existence.
    [bc] agreed, county, but I understand many chaps find it appealing
    [county] But oh, man.
    [county] This is nice.
    [bc] generally ones with supressed homosexual urges themselves, I understand
    [county] I have that warm, content feeling that comes with a few boozes and just finishing a delicious salami and pepper jack sandwich.
    [bc] I want to have faith in something
    [bc] I don't know what, but it seems to make people happy
    [bc] so it must be worth a shot
    [me0w] He likes to make me do these things and take pictures
    [bc] he's sounding more&more sick
    [county] What sort of things?
    [me0w] He teases my SO with the pictures.
    [county] I'm only asking so we can get a good idea of how sick he is.
    [bc] "teases"? If I had a gf who french kissed girls in strange clubs, and a friend who took pictures of this and then showed them to me, I'd be jolly well angry, and likely explode in anger and start shouting at people
    [bc] It takes all sorts, eh county
    [county] I wouldn't want a girl that french kisses other girls.
    [Sylvain] is it just me, or has this channel become too serious?
    [county] This channel is a joke, Sylvain.
    [bc] Sylvain, it's great. Since the regulars left, the channel has become more&more&more fun
    [county] I like this channel. It's a lot of bullshit, a lot of heartfelt confession, and a lot of fighting.
    [county] I can't think how it could be improved.
    [bc] that's pretty much why I like it. What makes it tolerable is that a lot of the time, you can't really tell which is which
    [county] For example, I quite like my online relationship with luisa.
    [bc] serious? or bullshit? serious fight? bullshit fight? confession or or bullshit? fight? mixing it up to cause a fight? Who can tell.
    [county] It's all fighting mixed with lies and truths.
    [bc] I hope ubu has extensive logs of #kuro5hin
    [bc] actually, do you, county?
    [bc] going back a year or so?
    [county] Well, I log whenever I'm in there.
    [bc] I wish to find something
    [county] I should point out that I've only been online for a month or so.
    [bc] yes, but I understand you are friendly with someone who was here before, it was just on the offchance he gave you his logs
    [county] Well, I have #k5 logs going back over a year, yes.
    [bc] what size are they when zipped up would you guess?
    [bc] nothing vast, right? not 50mb or something absurd?
    *** dmg (~dmg@cloaked.in-addr.btopenworld.com) has joined #adequacy
    [bc] hello dmg
    [dmg] whassup bc
    [Sylvain] hey dmg
    [bc] not much
    [dmg] hey sylvain
    [bc] I just watched "contact" dmg, which has led me to believe I need faith in my life.
    [county] I have a bit over 100mb of #k5 logs, bc.
    [bc] em probably hates that film, for its inclusion of arecibo and the airbrushing out of native 'Ricans, only mentioned in passing for their superstitious beliefs about the telescope
    [bc] crap, that's loads county
    [bc] bugger it
    [dmg] contact ? Is that with whatshername from silence of th e lambs
    [Sylvain] superstitious beliefs indeed
    [bc] yes dmg
    [dmg] I dont like her voice
    [Sylvain] the visiting scientists don't leave ALL that much money as they think
    [county] Silence, dmg.
    [county] She is my infatuation of the moment.
    [bc] yes. She was mine first though
    [bc] I spent the film marvelling at her vulnerability
    [county] I liked her before you watched the film, bastard!
    [dmg] you would like "the accused" then...
    [dmg] she is more vulnerable in that.
    [dmg] I just cannot stand her voice
    [bc] She only came to my notice during the film, really. She fits the archetype that I like in women, so it can be said that I have always liked her, as long as I have been alive.
    [dmg] eurrgh
    [county] Her voice, or her accent?
    [dmg] her voive
    [dmg] voice
    [dmg] it just annoysh me
    [county] I never found it annoying.
    [county] hmm.
    [dmg] itsh sho annoying
    [bc] I like it. It seems to have a nice burr
    [me0w] My SO's drunken sister keeps messaging me. =/
    [bc] she's like a female sean connery
    [dmg] bc: exactly
    [dmg] she shertainly ish
    [bc] me0w, give her my aim and tell her to msg me
    [county] Have her msg me.
    [bc] I think I'd enjoy talking to a drunken woman!
    [me0w] bc: She is on Y!
    [dmg] get her on #adequacy
    [county] I want a drunk girl to torment.
    [county] ARGH
    [bc] that's okay, I'm on yahoo too me0w
    [me0w] I don't think she knows how to irc.
    [county] I WANT A DRUNK GIRL TO TORMENT SO MUCH
    [me0w] She does use that horrible habbo hotel junk
    [county] Huh?
    [bc] trillian just connected me to aim, yahoo, msn and icq. Now tell her to msg me! My ID on yahoo is tinyp3a. DO IT.
    [bc] I WANT TO TORMENT COUNTY SO MUCH
    [county] ]:(
    [me0w] Be nice
    [county] I am a fragile angel.
    [me0w] she is my future sister-in-law
    [bc] I'm always nice :\
    [dmg] trillian can connect to msn ?
    [dmg] wow!
    [dmg] I never realised that.
    [county] bc steals every woman I want.
    [county] Every one :(
    [me0w] bc, I gave her your id
    [bc] wow!
    [bc] she really is drunk
    [Sylvain] paste example
    [dmg] bc is from www.girlfriendstealers.com
    [county] dmg, he did steal my girlfriend.
    [county] Actually.
    [dmg] http://www.girlfriendstealer.com/
    [bc] [censored]: helloo?1
    [bc] tinyp3a: hello!
    [bc] [censored]: howw s u?
    [county] I can't believe I forgave him for that.
    [me0w] bc, please keep in mind that she is only 17
    [dmg] women come and go.
    [county] dmg, I loved her!
    [county] And bc stole her :(
    [dmg] those are the breaks.
    [dmg] bc is irresistible to women.
    [dmg] he is like Sam Sloan in that respect
    * Sylvain looks at a list of ebay sections, notices "charity"
    [county] Yeah. And when I cut his hands and feet of, burn his face off with acide, and leave him to die, those will be the breaks, eh?
    [dmg] well yes.
    [county] "acid"
    [dmg] bc takes full responsibility for his actions.
    [bc] [censored]: LoL AWW U SHOULDA!!
    [dmg] he is an anarcho-capitalist libertarian
    * bc ROFL
    [dmg] who was this woman anyway ?
    [dmg] she cannot have been in love with you if she let bc steal her away
    [county] me0w's SO's sister.
    [bc] county, I asked to speak to her first
    [bc] so I didn't steal her at all
    [bc] she is verrry drunk
    [county] I thought of it first, bc, but my intoxication is slowing down my typing.
    [Sylvain] bc: i don't think that will appease county's perception of entitledness.
    [county] Ask her for naked pictures of Jin Wicked, bc.
    [dmg] I have some of those
    [county] Yeah? Lucky you.
    [dmg] she keeps crapflooding my mailbox with them
    [dmg] attention-seeker.
    [county] She's a pain, in that respect.
    [county] And every other respect.
    [dmg] its like,
    [county] With no respect.
    [dmg] stop spamming me with nude photos.
    [dmg] If I wanted to see that sort of thing I would get a girlfriend.
    [county] I want to see it, and I can't get a girlfriend.
    [county] You're attractive, confident, and wordly.
    [Sylvain] dmg: you'd get a girlfriend to see nude *photos*?
    [county] I'm a geeky pud.
    [dmg] no if I wanted to see nude women
    [dmg] Id get a girlfriend
    [county] Or you'd just sleep around. Slut.
    [dmg] aha the old double standard
    [county] Not all nude women were created equal, though.
    [dmg] we are all equal in the eyes of Allah (SWT) apart from the Infidels
    *** dmg is now known as Abu_Nidal
    [county] There's only one girl I want to see naked, actually.
    [bc] damn
    [bc] she's too drunk to realise that when I say I'm living under a glacier, I'm joking :\
    * me0w giggles
    *** Abu_Nidal is now known as dmg
    [dmg] Scotland is an icy barren wasteland though, bc
    [me0w] time for showering
    [dmg] she could be forgiven
    [Sylvain] bc maybe that's not drunkenness.
    [bc] also, she speaks like a black Londoner with hyper estuary english
    [Sylvain] it's perhaps stupidity augmented by adolescence and drunkenness.
    [dmg] hold on one moment. if she is 17 and drunk, is she not guilty of an offence ????
    [Sylvain] nope.
    [dmg] Should not we be reporting her to the authorities
    [dmg] ???
    [dmg] or the person who supplied the alcohol
    [bc] LOL
    [Sylvain] somebody else is
    [dmg] In the UK the alcohol age is 5
    [dmg] for consumption in the home
    [county] You must be kidding.
    [dmg] how enlightened compared to our other stupid laws.
    [dmg] no, its 5
    [dmg] seriously
    [county] Why have an age at all?
    [dmg] Ill find a web page if I can to PROVE it
    [county] Yeah, because web pages are always right!
    [bc] she's away now
    [bc] [censored]: BywebYE!!
    [bc] which is sort of a relief
    [bc] hehe
    [county] I bet you got lots of fantastic drunken cybersex ]:(
    [bc] don't be revolting county
    [bc] I am a people person
    [dmg] http://www.icap.org/pdf/report4updated.pdf
    [bc] people interest me, and I like to find out all about them
    [bc] there is no other motivation
    [county] I'm not going to try to read through a pdf in this condition.
    [dmg] one moment
    [dmg] fucking cut-n-paste doesn't work
    [county] I think I'd like another salami sandwish
    [dmg] In bars and off-licensed premises the MDA and MPA are 18. The MPA for
    [dmg] beer and cider is 16 when purchased for consumption with meals
    [dmg] (except when in a bar). Children over five may consume alcoholic
    [dmg] beverages at home with their parent's consent.
    [bc] pdf sucks
    [dmg] basically if you have cool parents you can get pissed once you start infant school
    [dmg] but if you are over 18 and want to drink after 11pm, you are shit out of luck
    [dmg] its a contradiction to be sure...
    [Sylvain] there are some exceptions to alcohol laws here in USia IIRC
    [Sylvain] e.g. it's allowed to give a child some wine if required by a religious ritual
    [dmg] * In 19 states alcohol consumption by youth under 21 is not specifically
    [dmg] illegal.
    [dmg] ** Exceptions to the 21 law in some states include possession for
    [dmg] religious purposes when accompanied by a parent, spouse or legal
    [dmg] guardian; medical reasons; in private clubs or establishments; in the
    [dmg] course of lawful employment by a duly licensed manufac
    [Sylvain] e.g. catholic communion frequently involves a bit of wine.
    [bc] I remember when I first got drunk
    [bc] I thought "I want to spend the rest of my days in this condition"
    [bc] it was a revelation
    [bc] I think I have found my faith already
    [dmg] I was about four when I first got drunk. on Babycham believe it or not. My mum did not realise it was alcoholic :-)
    *** Sylvain changes topic to '[ bc] I remember when I first got drunk || [ bc] I thought "I want to spend the rest of my days in this condition"'
    [bc] I had a good swig of scotdch when I was 6 months old and got drunk
    [bc] that was quite impressive. I saw the glass of double scotch, grasped it in two hands, and swigged it right down
    [bc] well, I can't in truth remember if it got be drunk, or anything about it at all, but I'm sure it must've
    [dmg] thats pretty funny
    [dmg] you could have died however.
    [Sylvain] he wouldn't have understood it.
    [bc] nah, I took it like a baby
    [Sylvain] no trauma for him
    [Sylvain] what's the problem with dying when you're a perfectly innocent being?
    [Sylvain] it's only when we grow old and come to appreciate that life is valuable that we have a problem with it
    [county] I am a perfectly innocent being.
    [dmg] what about original sin ?
    [Sylvain] 16:31 [ county] I WANT A DRUNK GIRL TO TORMENT SO MUCH
    [bc] you'll note he didn't actually do it, em
    [bc] county has control of his desires
    [county] I actually don't even think I wrote that.
    * Sylvain sings: Nwel a rive pou nou pa pedi lespwa nou!
    [county] The wind has really picked up here.
    [county] It's almost violent.
    [dmg] im going to bed
    [dmg] its past my bedtime
    * bc bought a bottle of Appleston Estate 40 year old today,Sylvain
    [dmg] bloody IRC
    [bc] night dmg!
    [dmg] night night everyone
    *** dmg has quit IRC (Quit: Trillian (http://www.ceruleanstudios.com))
    [county] What's that, bc?
    [Sylvain] bc: wow.
    [bc] it's an excellent rum
    [Sylvain] how much was it?
    [bc] a bloody fortune
    [Sylvain] fuck. the oldest rum i've ever had is 12 years.
    [county] Ah, a rum.
    [Sylvain] any words on how good it is beyond "excellent"?
    [county] The oldest rum I've had was also 12 years.
    [bc] it tastes nice. Older rums seem to become more whiskyish, somehow, it is hard to explain
    [bc] much more complex
    [county] Now you just need some forty year old coke.
    [bc] it is aged in the tropics, too
    [bc] apparantly that means it ages more rapidly
    [bc] at about 3x the rate of a spirit aged in, say, canada
    [bc] anyway, I don't know. It tastes very nutty, somehow
    [Sylvain] but how expensive was it?
    [bc] em: £10,000
    [bc] http://www.canoe.ca/LifewiseFoodWine01/0314_winewe d_par.html
    [Sylvain] yeah, right, like you have 15,795.99 USD
    [bc] :\
    [bc] it's really nice with coke though!
    *** Sylvain sets mode: +b *!*gallus@*.orangutan.dialup.pol.co.uk
    *** bc was kicked by Sylvain (Trolling is strictly forbidden in this channel.)
    *** Sylvain sets mode: -b *!*gallus@*.orangutan.dialup.pol.co.uk
    *** bc (gallus@modem-1926.orangutan.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    *** ChanServ sets mode: +o bc
    [bc] :\
    [bc] wouldn't that be lovely though?
    *** iat (iat@cloaked.bear.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    *** ChanServ sets mode: +o iat
    [bc] I'd be scared to drink it
    [bc] hey iat!
    [iat] hey bc
    [iat] whassup bc?
    [bc] not much
    [bc] how's the online dating scene going? =)
    [iat] i finally got rid of my woman. she came to get rid of her shit from my flat this evening. i'm getting pissed and then tomorrow im gonna get on with my life
    * county sighs
    [bc] dmg was telling me about it, er, your troubles with her
    * county weeps
    [iat] dmg said you're coming to london next month
    [iat] heh, someone gave her rohypnol last night!
    [county] That's horrible.
    [iat] i don't know who would be fucked up enough to waste good rohypnol on her
    [bc] did he? He's wrong. I was going to, but something disastrous happened. I may come in January, but not december, that's been off for ages due to commitments
    [iat] bah, we all want to meet you
    [iat] what did dmg say about me/it/her?
    [bc] hehe. I'll come down sooner or later
    [bc] he was talking about how you met her on match.com (!)
    [bc] which reminds me, I have to search march.com insanely to find her
    [iat] yeah, it's either that or start fucking my secretary. i saw it as the lesser of two evils
    [me0w] bc, And how was she?
    [bc] there really can't be that many overweight, red headed, goth girls from london on mach.com
    [iat] you'd be surprised
    [county] No more than twenty or so, I'd guess.
    [bc] me0w: very drunk. Spoke in estuary english. Seemed good natured though, through the disgraceful mists of her underage drinking
    [iat] btw, you forgot moustachiod
    [iat] otoh, there are no biologists with pds living in edinburgh on match
    [bc] :\
    [county] Why on earth did you even have anything to do with her, iat?
    [bc] I found one I liked on match.com
    [me0w] bc, She is a nice girl ... a little thick at times
    [iat] county: i wanted to get my redhead fetish out of the way
    [bc] but I'm not showing her to you iat, you'd steal her
    [iat] i wasn;t sure if the "ginger pubes" thing was a liberal myth
    [me0w] bc, I think there is a picture of her in my gallery
    [iat] of course i'd steal her, i'm a stud
    [bc] heh me0w. She seemed nice. Drunk for sure, drunk as a Lord, it was terrifically amusing
    [me0w] bc, Unfortunately her typing doesn't get much better
    [iat] bc: where's your bondage pr0n collection stored on aq?
    [county] A stud? You seem like a poorer middle class fellow, somewhat on the ugly side.
    [iat] upper middle class, only slightly ugly thank you
    [iat] but, i am hung like a mouse
    [iat] emr, moose
    *** Sulla (gallus@modem-2093.python.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    [Sulla] me0w, are you trying to say that she mayn't have been drunk at all, or was only tipsy, and that she isn't really too different when sober?
    [Sulla] iat: I forget. I never look at it, and it isn't "my collection"
    [me0w] bc, She was drunk.
    [iat] whose collection is it then?
    [me0w] bc, But when she is sober I often have a dificult time understanding what she is saying.
    [Sulla] it is me0ws and I put it there cos perdida wanted it for some story relating to 80's bdsm pornography for her site
    [me0w] bc, she likes to type in some sort of sms speak
    [Sulla] hehe
    [Sulla] that would explain whey she says "da" for "the"
    [me0w] bc, ahaha you still have those pictures?
    [iat] who is me0w anyway? there's all these new faces since i last frewuented #aq?
    [Sulla] me0w yes, and embrassingly, someone posted the link into my diary and made all sorts of insinuations
    [Sulla] mind you, since I've claimed to be a rapist on k5 before it isn't like I can sink much lower
    *** bc has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
    [iat] anyway bc, you never told me where you keep it
    [me0w] bc, and they weren't even good pictures
    [Sulla] iat, me0w is this bird wot came here from #k5 who is quite nice and stuff, though canadian (french)
    [county] Does me0w speak french?
    [Sulla] iat, I'll look out the url
    [iat] i work with a REAL french canadian, her mother's french and her father's canadian. she's never been near "french candian" territory
    [county] Sulla, so you really do have a bondage porn collection?
    [county] I thought that was myth.
    [Sulla] http://www.adequacy.org/images/bc/violate.me.uk/pi ctures/xxxpics/
    [Sulla] it's not my fucking collection!
    [Sulla] jesus H christ
    [me0w] bc, you know, I've never actually looked at all of them
    [county] Yeah, whatever.
    [iat] it appears to be quite a copmorehensive collection bc
    [Sulla] there are perfectly legitimate reasons the pics are there
    [county] So you find this appealing, bc? http://www.adequacy.org/images/bc/violate.me.uk/pi ctures/xxxpics/4ladies/0208.jpg
    [Sulla] me0w, neither have I
    [Sulla] I just looked at some funny 80's ones
    [me0w] bc, I looked at the ones that perdida pointed out
    [Sulla] http://www.adequacy.org/images/bc/violate.me.uk/pi ctures/xxxpics/BonkSeries/bonk054.jpg
    [Sulla] I'm sorry, that makes me laugh and laugh
    [county] These are amusing and sexy at the same time. I love it!
    [Sulla] anyway, when I can be bothered, I'll delete the whole lot
    [me0w] bc, was there a series of hunchback pictures?
    [Sulla] yes me0w
    [Sulla] the "bonk" series
    [Sulla] http://www.adequacy.org/images/bc/violate.me.uk/pi ctures/xxxpics/BonkSeries/bonk070.jpg
    [Sulla] that's also pretty damned hilarious
    [county] I'll give you $728 for all these pictures, Sulla.
    [Sulla] some of them are funny, but all the rest are just crude and nasty
    [Sulla] county, it's a deal!
    *** Sulla is now known as bc
    [county] Fantastic!
    [bc] I love the leer on the guy's face
    [bc] so cheesy
    [me0w] county, I could just mail you the cd they came from
    [bc] that's a nice offer, eh county? You should accept
    [county] The truth is, I like nothing more than pictures of bound and tormented women.
    [county] However, I prefer not to post my mailing address in the channel.
    [bc] then msg it to me0w
    [county] Msg? I don't know what you mean by that.
    [bc] liar
    [county] Oh, that hurts :(
    [bc] iat has gone quite quiet since I posted the link, eh?
    [bc] I wonder what he is doing?
    [iat] heh
    [me0w] Wanking?
    [iat] smoking and drinking
    [county] I'm wanking.
    [county] How could I not?
    [county] All these photographs of naked women tied up!
    [county] It's paradise, from my perspective.
    [iat] i love smoking
    [iat] i just wish it didn't cost so much
    [bc] I thought you were a health freak?
    [iat] not these days
    [bc] good move
    [bc] welcome to the "cool set"
    [iat] the pressures of work have turned me into a nicotine-fuelled anorexic
    [county] I have never, ever smoked.
    [county] I probably should.
    [bc] you'd like it
    [iat] i have never, ever smoked crack
    [bc] everybody with an addictive personality should have many addictions
    [county] I don't have an addictive personality.
    [bc] You do. Oh god you do.
    [bc] You are always looking for a hit
    [county] Explain!
    [county] I'm addicted to little.
    [county] Just alcohol and that girl from work's ass.
    [bc] you don't just talk to people. You have angles, you attack and duck and weave, you seek the high of torture and humiliation of others in everything you say
    [county] No :(
    [county] Not others, women.
    [county] I only want to hurt females.
    [county] Please keep that straight.
    [bc] You do it to vlad often enough, phoneboy
    [me0w] I dunno what to wear
    [county] Oh, that's different.
    [iat] bc: will you stop saying "humiliation"? the "iat" bit interrupts my mp3s by making acidmax make sounds
    [bc] hehe, okay iat, I didn't realise I said humiliation so often :\
    [county] My motivation for tormenting vlad is entriely different than my motivation for tormenting, say, luisa.
    [bc] me0w, wear leather and stuff
    [bc] I don't know
    [county] me0w, dress chastly.
    [county] It's incredibly sexy.
    [bc] me0w, wear a denim skirt with a sort of white lacery around the pockets that looks lovely and homely, and a black t-shirt above that is slinky and just has strap things over the shoulders so it is more of a dress, really.
    [bc] let your hair hang down forward over your bosom, to each side, following the contours perfectly
    [me0w] bc, I don't own any denim skirts
    [me0w] and I only have a leather corset
    [bc] hmmmn
    [county] I told you, me0w.
    [iat] bc: what happened to your general knwoledge bot?
    [county] Dress chastly.
    [county] It will draw guys like you can't believe.
    [bc] wear a turqoise top, that is very close fitting and very slightly see-through, revealing a white bra underneath on the edge of awareness, and making men think you are less calculating and more genuine than those other dolled up girls. Underneath, wear black trousers that are practical looking though ladylike, covered in pockets
    *** iat sets mode: +o bc
    [bc] iat: It's on my hard drive. I got bored with it and moved onto other things
    [county] The white bra is a good idea.
    [iat] what are you coding now, j00 1337 hax0r j00?
    [me0w] bc, I don't own a turqoise top
    [county] When I see a white bra, my instinct is to assume it was displayed on accident, becuause my tendancy is to feel white-bra-clad people are pure and innocent.
    [me0w] and I don't know if I have a white bra
    [county] ]:(
    [me0w] wait wait
    [me0w] I found a white bra
    [bc] I'm writing a new peer2peer filesharing system that will specialise in text, pdf and html documents that the man would like to keep down. it will allow you to search for strings inside the text body, and return results, google like, that show the context
    [bc] zool me0w!
    [county] she had a blue bra, it was lovely. I hate it now, though I loved it then!
    [bc] okay, do you have any slightly see-through tops at all?
    [county] Oh god, she looked lovely in it.
    [bc] what we are going for here is the thrown-on, unsophisticated but lovely look
    [me0w] I have a whole collection of see through wear
    [me0w] but I don't think it would be appropriate for the places I'm going this evening
    [county] "see-through" should be hyphenated.
    [iat] bc "the man" doensn't care about text files
    [bc] bugger appropriate. Look like a lost fawn in the wilderness
    [bc] he does, iat, more than any other media
    [iat] approprIATe interrupts my mp3s. plz stop tnx
    [me0w] these pants require a thong
    [bc] my filesharing network will have terrorist plans, blueprints, and government leaks and such
    [bc] and books
    [iat] no-one will use it for anything other than war3zing books
    [bc] I will provide that service. It's more than a filesharing network, I intend it to be a peer-2-peer knowledge base sort of deal
    [bc] you can do context searches and it will return a few paeges or a chapter from a book say
    [bc] and it will allow a wikipedia type self editing bit
    [iat] how long have you been programming?
    [bc] but everything will be peer-2-peer, the whole encyclopaedia
    [iat] aargh, not wikipedia!
    [bc] not like that, but that's the model. Imagine a wikipaedia not located on any machine, but spread across a peer-2-peer netowrk. it could hold the Truth, regardless of what government or corporate law tries
    [bc] it's a powerful concept for political and informational insurgency
    [iat] there is no TRUTH
    [bc] you state that like it is a truth
    [bc] well, it's not!
    [iat] of course
    [iat] there is not truth... even to say that is not true... but to say its not true is also not true
    [bc] it won't hold any particular truth, many truths and narratives
    [bc] it shall be thoroughly decentralised and beyond the control of anyone, that is the point
    [county] Quite right, bc. There are many truths, in this modern age.
    [bc] must smoke
    [iat] why not smoke then?
    [bc] I'm ahead of you, iat
    [iat] i've smoked 19 since 7:30 and have just 1 left :(
    [bc] wow that's lots
    [county] are there just 20 in a pack/:?
    [iat] yeah, how many did you think there were?
    [bc] yes, unless you get Rothman's Royals
    [iat] oh yeah
    [bc] which have 24, for some reason
    [county] iat, I've never smoked.
    [iat] or 10 packs, but you can't get those in usia
    [bc] just think iat, if you had got Royals, you'd have 5 left now
    [iat] heh
    [me0w] I have a favour to ask ...
    [iat] but they wouldn't taste half as nice as mmy marlboro lights
    [bc] what's that me0w?
    [bc] yuk
    [me0w] bc, I need an opinion
    [bc] I don't like Marlboro lights. I'm a Dunhill man
    [me0w] bc, you know what my site currently looks like right?
    [bc] yes
    [bc] yes I do
    [iat] dunhill?
    [me0w] bc, ok ... do you like that format or this one: http://violate.me.uk/blog/
    [bc] I browse it every 20 minutes
    [iat] dunhill are for poor people, eight?
    [iat] erm, right even
    [bc] they are not for poor people
    [bc] just the opposite
    [iat] heh
    [iat] my marlboro light costs me 4.70 a pack
    [iat] beat that
    [bc] this one has a more traditional bloggy feel me0w, but won't it mean the front page won't change as radically so often? I suppose I like it better in that you can see the previous articles, but less in that the front page doesn't periodically change radically, so that you don't know what will appear. It's prolly more sensible though
    [bc] also, the right hand side seems wider somehow
    [bc] mine cost £4.95
    [bc] suck it!
    [bc] and that's without inflated london prices
    [iat] bah
    [bc] it must be the pics making the right wider
    [iat] that's stupid
    [me0w] bc, the pics do make it wider
    [iat] are dunhills those ones that have the wide packets that don't fit in your pocket?
    [me0w] bc, this new system is a modifed blogger
    [bc] those are dunhill internationals, iat, which I often get too, and are about £5.40
    [iat] i know a gay guy who smokes the methol ones of those
    [iat] draw your own conclusions
    [bc] I see. Well, me0w, it makes the site less characterful and "homebrew", but probably more sensible and easier to navigate
    [bc] depends what you want I suppose
    [bc] iat, menthols of any stripe are for the less manly
    [iat] heh. yeah
    [bc] same as marlboro lights
    [bc] female student's smoke, that
    [iat] bah
    [iat] marlboro lights are for those people who smoke but dont want to admit it to themselves
    * momocrome has a crush on Siân Phillips
    [iat] which does cover many female students i guess
    [bc] you should have a commenting system me0w
    [bc] what an ego-site then!
    [bc] who, momocrome?
    [bc] she sounds suspiciously welsh
    [bc] I hope you haven't started liking welsh people
    [momocrome] welch
    [bc] I might have known it :(
    [bc] poor momocrome
    [iat] "mr blue sky, please tell us why you had to hide away for so long!"
    [bc] ??
    [iat] i'm singing
    [bc] I thought it was some sort of prayer
    [iat] no, it's ELO
    [bc] oh
    [bc] Electric Light Orchestra?
    [iat] bah, i'm in danger of losing my lightweightedness
    [iat] i've had 8 bottles of stella and am not feeling tired :(
    [iat] yeah, electric light orchestra
    [iat] i've always wondered how the words fit togeth in that phrase
    [bc] you should try yourself spirits now that beer doesn't provide the kick it once did
    [iat] is it: electric... light orchestra, or electric light.... orchestra?
    [bc] look at county, he was drinking spirits insanely, now he is probably unconscious
    [iat] i don't like spirits, they give me a hangover
    [bc] try a clean ethanol-only spirit then
    [bc] like vodka
    *** Lumpen (~guest@cloaked.sea1.dsl.speakeasy.net) has joined #adequacy
    [iat] an "ethanol only" spirit is surely pure ethanol
    [bc] I mean, a spirit without any methanol
    [bc] methanol is bad for hangovers
    [bc] wine has loads of it
    [iat] do they normally put methanol in spirits?
    [bc] especially red wine
    [bc] and the murkier spirits
    [bc] iat, methanol is a natual alcohol of the fermentation process
    [bc] there's usually much less of it than ethanol, but most drinks have it to varying amounts
    [iat] is it? methanol is just a shorter carbon chain right?
    [iat] can you get pissed off methanol?
    [bc] I think so. Maybe longer, damned if I know
    [bc] yes you can
    [bc] it's an alcohol
    [bc] but it gives you a much worse hangover
    [momocrome] you'll go blind instantly when you get drunk off methanol
    [iat] methanol is CH2OH from memory
    [bc] which is why booze that has more of it gives you a worse hangover
    [iat] ethanl is CH3CH20H
    [bc] but generally they have little, but still enough for headaches
    [bc] wine for example, I think only 5% of the alcohol in it is methanol
    [bc] I forget, but a small amount
    [iat] i'm fine off white wine, but red wine gives me shokcing headaches the morning after, as does guiness
    [iat] oh dear, craig's gone mad again
    [bc] red wine is the worst
    [bc] iat: where?
    [iat] 20721
    [bc] I must look
    [bc] I sort of provoked him
    [iat] was it you stirring shit bc?
    [momocrome] i have done my part as well
    [iat] shame on you, vlad must be eliminated
    [bc] I did a post attacking craig, yes
    [bc] saying he should fantasise about he petrified virgin mary
    [bc] and iat, goddamnit, phoning up vlad and stuff is totally over the line
    [bc] and he's an insane fucker!
    [iat] heh, what about garden gnomes?
    [bc] no not me
    [momocrome] it is actually illegal behaviour
    [momocrome] but more than that, it is supid
    [momocrome] suuupid
    [momocrome] stupid
    [bc] damned right
    [bc] and not only that, the fucker posted all our names to the sid
    [momocrome] this isn't trolling, it is thug-like cruelty
    [bc] fuck him!
    [iat] informal #adequacy poll. should iat have another drink?
    [bc] yes momocrome
    [bc] and yes iat
    [iat] 1) no, he should sleep
    [momocrome] yes, iat
    [momocrome] 2) yes, iat
    [iat] 2) no, he has no more fags, and booze with no fage makes iat sad
    *** Lumpen is now known as FcmfAC
    [iat] 2) yes, he still has too much booze to fit it into his cupboards
    [iat] 4) yes, he's still not pissed
    [iat] 5) yes, why not:?
    [momocrome] pop up to the corner chop and procure a acket of fags
    [iat] which one?
    [iat] corner shop is not only closed. but it's on the common council estate
    [momocrome] do you have a crowbar?
    [FcmfAC] Ah, well.
    [iat] if i had some rizlas, i could smoke my fag butts again
    [FcmfAC] It's going to go down in flames.
    [iat] more booze it is then
    [FcmfAC] http://www.kuro5hin.org/displaystory/2002/11/16/20 3653/05
    [iat] bc, can you dcc me some fags?
    *** bc sets mode: +b *!*tarque@*.telesp.net.br
    Session Close: Sat Nov 16 20:16:23 2002

    Session Start: Sun Nov 17 23:05:59 2002
    *** Now talking in #adequacy
    *** Topic is ' I remember when I first got drunk || I thought "I want to spend the rest of my days in this condition"'
    *** Set by Sylvain on Sat Nov 16 18:51:55
    shhhh
    *** ChanServ sets mode: +b ws13!*@*
    Session Close: Sun Nov 17 23:06:59 2002

  77. Evil Is Good by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Why Evil is Good

    I hate victims. Victims are the albatross hung from the neck of society. The
    term is not even acknowledged by any other species. I am certain if there are
    intelligent beings elsewhere in the universe, they follow the strict principle
    of Natural Selection. Only the Strong shall survive. Mankind cannot survive
    as long as its virility is diluted by the weak.

    Peace-and-Love hippies, retards, cripples, depressives, sickling, addicts
    and whiners are all victims of one kind or another. Larger examples of victims
    can also be found: the entire nations of Israel and Englund, for example, are
    constantly victimized and/or whining about their lack of power in the world. In
    fact, the entire continent of Europe is nothing but a festering sewer of whiners
    and welfare states. If we, the strongest nation on Earth, had a decent Ruler,
    the entire junk-heap of Eurotrash would be burned to create a cloud of such lethal
    density it would waft over to Asia and take out the victims that were left over from
    World War II. The great black column of suffocating smoke would rise high into the
    atmosphere, reaching for the very edges of outer space - a giant, living monument
    to our strength. The unviable ashes of the once living garbage would orbit the Earth,
    forever reminding future generations of the price of weakness.

    World War II. Probably the greatest single era in the history of the planet, barring
    the time before Man and Man's distorted, unnatural philosophies of "common good" and
    "protecting the innocent". The time of Germany and its rule by a man of great vision.
    A man who saw the virtue of evil. Every single class of victim described above was
    dealt with in the harshest possible manner. Most people focus on the genocidal aspect
    of Hitler's activities but his vision was much wider, encompassing every brand of
    weakling from ethnic victims to sexual deviants. Unfortunately the United States,
    led by a cripple, had to involve our great military might on the wrong side of the
    war. The least Roosevelt could have done was to allow Germany to finish raping
    France and reduce Englund to rubble.

    We paid for our mistake in World War II. We were punished for choosing the wrong
    side in the Great War by a period of non-violent "Cold War". The term "Cold War"
    itself is the mark of the true Beast: the peace lover. A true leader - a Ruler -
    would have unleashed the full might of our nuclear arsenal upon every nation on the
    Earth, banishing them forever to particles of glowing dust blowing through the winds
    of history. And look what our lack of action has gotten us: A planet filled with
    human garbage, eternal sufferers suckling from the breast of the Mighty.

    It is beyond my comprehension. Not only am I forced to allow the weak to survive,
    but I - we - are forced to subsidize their pathetic existence. Every cripple
    creeping along the sidewalk. Every degenerate elderly woman with osteoporosis who
    parks in the handicap parking spot. Every worthless, lazy hippy who cries for peace
    and marches on a public university. Every sickling child perpetually hospitalized
    because its fetid welfare mother smoked too many drugs during her pregnancy. Every
    30 year old retard wiping its nose all over its Scooby Doo coloring book. Every
    drunk little whore seeking "justice" in our courts for her rape. All of them,
    and more, deserve nothing but death. In the Natural World, every single one of these
    leeches would be lion fodder.

    Even the "Good Book", the Bible - which is actually nothing more than the sick fantasies
    of opium addicts - predicts the outcome of Nature: "The meek shall inherit the Earth".
    Yes, I know what you're saying, but you are wrong. This phrase has been twisted by the
    weak, the cripple, the Jew to give their pathetic lives some ray of hope. This phrase
    does not mean that the Victim will Rule the world. That is laughable. That is impossible.
    The meek shall inherit the Earth for the one and only reason that they will be buried in
    it.

    To the strong who have read this: Thank you. Together, we will conquer. To the weak who
    will whine in the comments below: Your days are numbered, trash.

  78. Lockwood Fucks Up His Life by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    That latest one is too long to read...
    <wsl3> We need something new in there already...
    <wsl3> Hey, I know...
    <wsl3> ...
    <county> Generally, yes, Sulla.
    <wsl3> Much better.
    <county> And when I do talk to women I'm attracted to, I'm just biting and cutting.
    <wsl3> http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=20721&cid=4683 466

  79. Amherst-Fag and the Slashdot Bitchslap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] Experiment in whoring...
    Date sent: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 10:03:49 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0005)

    It's good to see you making a go at it again, but I'm
    confused as to why you're trying to whore up a
    bitchslapped account, because no matter what your
    karma is, you'll never stop defaulting to -1 (just ask
    warren). Your only option would be to start a new
    account -- "DMG" is still available....

    James can answer you better than I, but Jon Erikson is
    definitely not dead. I'm surprised to confirm that
    there aren't any comments on his users.pl page, but I
    guess this week belongs to Dan Hayes.

    (This is CP0005)

  80. Operations Manual 1a by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Outside of the core group , there are supporters,
    wellwishers, and fellow Vlad haters who share one binding aspect
    with us (disdain for Vladinator), but who aren't officially
    affiliated with us. Thus, we do not form a "gang" or any other
    recognizable command structure.

    There many, many people in the world who dislike Lockwood; some
    have formed into small groups to work together, but most act as free
    agents. We don't really know the identities of many people outside
    our core group, nor do we know whether a given person
    outside our core group is a free agent or is affiliated
    with another group.

    These activities are by nature clandestine and solitary, thus we
    only work freely with allies we've met in meatspace and can trust
    absolutely. I have no idea of the exact number of fellow Vlad-haters
    out there (I know it's large), or whether or not any of them have
    formed cabals similar to our own, so please don't go lumping us all
    together.

    Generally, we operate in clusters or "cells" where one member of
    one cell is designated as a messenger with a similarly designated
    member of another cell. If the designated messenger is discovered,
    that individual is "disposed of" and another individual is selected.

    In this way, no single cell is aware of how many members are in
    any other cell and the only thing known of the membership of other
    cells is the mutual identities of the messengers. Each cell is
    constructed such that only the messenger from one other cell
    is in contact with the messenger of any given cell. Therefore, we
    cannot form a "gang" as you call it.

    Instead, you would be more correct to refer to us as a "sweeping
    cluster of antibodies reacting to a foreign body in order to prevent
    it from damaging the host."

    Thanks bunches.

  81. Amherst-Fag and the Sleeping Girlfriend by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: [k22320inchfan] Have you ever had one of those days?
    Date sent: Sun, 24 Dec 2000 22:46:41 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0036)

    I'm sitting here, waiting for my gf to wake up enough
    to go finish getting ready for bed and go to sleep.
    Does that make any sense to anyone? How come they
    don't put this stuff in the manual?

    (This is CP0036)

  82. Amherst-Fag and the Slashdot Psychology by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: cptroll
    To: <k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org>
    Subject: [k22320inchfan] slashdot psychology:
    Date sent: Fri, 27 Oct 2000 23:45:41 -0400
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org
    (This is CP0033)

    Not to inject an actual troll discussion into Careertalk, but... how can their brains work this way?

    I got into the @Home article really late (http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=00/10/25/2131 217&cid=501) with a 95% accurate comment about how tort reforms during the '60s tolled the death knell of contract law in favor of strict liability for product manufacturers. The 5% fantasy part was the bit at the end:

    "For the most part, that's entirely justified, but it does produce odd results from time to time, like when an auto company was recently sued successfully because their cars didn't prevent consumers from locking their infants in the car on a hot day, forgetting they were there, and coming back to find a thoroughly asphyxiated baby."

    It proved not to be too late to get a response, however. A fellow named jetson123 chimed in with his thoughts and added at the end:

    "Usually, when you follow up on these stories, you'll find that there is quite a bit of justification for the judgement. (In this case, I suspect this refers to a design flaw many US cars have that makes it unnecessarily easy to accidentally lock yourself out.)"

    HOW CAN THEIR BRAINS WORK THIS WAY?!?! What does he think happens? The parent accidentally locks himself out of the car and watches helplessly as his baby roasts to death inside? Too lazy to break the damn window? I clearly stated that the parent *forgot* that the kid was there. Or is that part of the "design flaw" too?

    Sheesh.

    (This is CP0033)

  83. Amherst-Fag and the Harassment by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: cptroll
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] cp, is this you?
    Date sent: Mon, 4 Dec 2000 19:04:43 -0500
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0001)

    Nope. (I saw that diary this morning.) Anne Marie doesn't have a k5
    account (and I've updated her /. userbio to reflect it). As near as I can
    tell, it was registered by the same person who registered CmdrTaco on k5
    -- at least the garbage on the user page is consistent between the two.
    Anyone who wants to point out the inconsistencies is welcome (I'll
    refrain). Do you suppose if I <b>harass rusty</b> he'll give me the 'Anne Marie'
    account?... He is known to be troll-friendly....

    For now, I only post on k5 under "cp", though I have a 3k-range account
    I'm holding in reserve in case a low uid# is ever needed to win a penis
    contest. Technically, "Trivia Contest" was mine since I'm the idiot who
    started that idea (and it's wasted at least some of rusty's morning,
    though in a pleasant educational fashion), but that one's out of my
    control now. I'm exploring social-engineering options outside of the mere
    LWM disinformation/flaming I'm accustomed to.

    Luis Casillas <casillas@stanford.edu> wrote:

    >You may need a k5 account to see this:
    >
    > http://www.kuro5hin.org/?op=displaystory&sid=2000/ 12/4/145812/319
    >
    >The fact that the account is "Ann_a_ Marie" seems to argue against
    >it... Anyway, you were around for the original "Real Bruce Perens"
    >stuff, right?
    >
    >--
    >Luis Casillas
    >Department of Linguistics
    >Stanford University

    (This is CP0001)

  84. Scott Lockwood - Unbalanced Mental-Case by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    It's been my experience that people who cry "whaaa, whaaa, I'm going to sue you!" or "whaaa, whaaa, I'm going to come to your house and kick your ass!" or "whaaa, whaaa, I'm going to call the police and have them arrest you for being mean to me" whenever they feel personally offended on the Internet tend to be terribly immature and have serious emotional problems. People who aren't confident with themselves and feel inferior about their own abilities try to boost their own self-esteem by making empty threats of lawsuits or physical assault whenever they're on the losing end of a flamewar.

    His face will turn red, he'll start to wheeze and stutter, and he will angrily type, "Yeah, well, just wait until I tell my uncle at the CIA about how rude you've been to me! He'll come and arrest you and you'll go to jail and I'll sue you for everything you have! Then I'll kick your ass, and have sex with your girlfriend!"

    He will then drag his corpulent, out-of-shape, virginal body across the basement to bed and drift off to slumber thinking "Wow, I'm sure I really scared those bastards! I'm sure they'll think twice before disagreeing with ME again!" He'll feel only a slight twinge of hollow emptiness the next day when he sees his uncle, who rather than working for the CIA, is actually the assistant janitor at the local McDonald's.

    A few people who seem to fit the stereotype quite well of being absolute assholes on the Internet and then threatening to sue or call the FBI, CIA, and KGB when anyone who calls them on it:

    Bernard Shifman

    Robert Novak

    Scott Lockwood

    Were these three people long-lost triplets, seperated at birth? Why do they behave in exactly the same way? Do they share a common mental disease? Or are they all actually the same person? We may never know.

  85. Amherst-Fag and the Slashdot Bitchslap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] Experiment in whoring...
    Date sent: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 10:03:49 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0005)

    It's good to see you making a go at it again, but I'm
    confused as to why you're trying to whore up a
    bitchslapped account, because no matter what your
    karma is, you'll never stop defaulting to -1 (just ask
    warren). Your only option would be to start a new
    account -- "DMG" is still available....

    James can answer you better than I, but Jon Erikson is
    definitely not dead. I'm surprised to confirm that
    there aren't any comments on his users.pl page, but I
    guess this week belongs to Dan Hayes.

    (This is CP0005)

  86. Vladequacy - The Secrets Revealed by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=20721&cid=4682 572
    <bc> hehe
    <bc> god I suck
    <bc> hey FI
    <First_Incision> I will not discout the possibility that you suck.
    <bc> A wise move FI
    <abu_zeqqzeqq> bc: if craig is as fucked up as he seemse
    <abu_zeqqzeqq> that will push him to new extremes...
    <bc> hehee
    <First_Incision> I never understood the stone women thing. Is osm still perving around somewhere?
    <momocrome> http://www.clusterlizard.org
    <momocrome> osm's site ^^
    <bc> yes, though who knows what he's up to
    <abu_zeqqzeqq> bc: change your nick to "Abu'l Hayjeh "
    <momocrome> he has a bunch of uninspired match.com pseudo-trolls
    <momocrome> picking on hapless, lonely women
    <bc> that irc log is hilarious
    <dmg> that takest the biscuit
    <bc> [bc] vlad... i'2 type 'mo ;but i drunk.
    <dmg> I laughed
    <momocrome> post the text to 20721
    <momocrome> stir the pot a bit
    <momocrome> I am going to rise to their baiting
    <momocrome> even thoughI haven't been singled out
    <bc> haha
    <bc> I must read more now
    <bc> county: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=20721&cid=4675 437
    <ivan> Ignore the superfluous comma.
    <bc> does that seem accurate to you?
    <ivan> All of them =)
    <ivan> thx
    *** First_Incision is now known as fi-away
    <ivan> I can't say, bc. I didn't read it.
    <ivan> Should I?
    <bc> Yes, you should
    <ivan> Haha!
    <abu_zeqqzeqq> http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_686841.html?m enu=news.weirdworld.sexlife
    <ivan> It almost looks real.
    <ivan> The one problem is that shoeboy is LOLing too much and Vladinator isn't doing it enough.
    <bc> I'm kind of insulted. It represents me as a pathetic drunk with delusional fantasies that I'm liked by females, and that seems entirely untrue
    <abu_zeqqzeqq> gratuituous kylie pictures. Proof Allah(SWT) and Mohammed (PBUH) are REAL
    <ivan> It does seem entirely untrue that you're liked by females.
    <abu_zeqqzeqq> bc at least you are worthy of parody
    <bc> hehe
    <abu_zeqqzeqq> some of us are become stalinesque non-persons.
    <abu_zeqqzeqq> airbrushed out of trolling history
    <ivan> abu and I didn't even get noticed :(
    <bc> craig&osm&trollaxor prolly still like you, dmg
    <ivan> "Where's the part where Barry Corrington slags on Jin Wicked for half an hour then kisses her ass when she logs in?"
    <ivan> Has Jin ever been in here?

  87. This Person is an IMPOSTER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    This person is IMPERSONATING ME. He set up this account just to pretend to be me, just like the person with the "Scott Lockwood" account did. Please don't pay attention to him!

    Mr. "Quick Star" and Mr. Fake "Scott Lockwood", I have a message for you: get ready for a world of hurt. The first lesson is free.

    Have you ever seen the movies Where the Heart Is and Anywhere but Here starring Natalie Portman? How about the classic Meg Ryan romantic comedies When Harry Met Sally and Sleepless in Seattle? Well, THAT'S the style of Martial Arts I practice. I've perfected the ruthless and efficient OLSEN TWINS FASH-SLAP STANCE!

    How about the the classic Sci-Fi cult hits Plan 9 from Outer Space and The Rocky Horror Picture Show? Well, I know the martial arts from THOSE movies too! Let me show you THE PATHETIC TRANSVESTITE ALIEN STANCE!

    I've also recently started to learn the martial arts from several new movies such as Jackass: the Movie, My Big Fat Greek Wedding, and Jonah: A VeggieTales Movie. I really look forward to learning the martial arts from the upcoming movie Eight Mile starring my FAVORITE HERO EVAR, Eminem (a.k.a. Slim Shady & Marshall Mathers), so you'd better watch out for my ANGRY WHITE NIGGER STANCE!!!!

    I'm also learning even more martial arts from this web page [realultimatepower.net], including the deadly KUNG-FU NINJA JESUS ATTACK STANCE! Hi-YAH!!!

    I'm working to improve my rythm [klerck.org], flexibility [rotten.com], stealth skills [fartbuster.com], self-confidence [yahoo.com], and critical thinking [timecube.com] skills, so you'd better watch out, because very soon I will perfect my ultimate attack, THE LARD-LIKE ANTISOCIAL DEPRESSIVE ASSHOLE SPAMMER IMPOTENT PAEDOPHILE FELCHING FLATULENT WIGGER SUMO-SAMURAI CHILD-ABUSE RESTRAINING-ORDER UNWASHED BASTARDIZED ANAL IMMATURE CATHOLIC GOATFUCKER STANCE!!!!

    If that doesn't scare you... just wait and see. You'll get yours soon enough.

    As Nietzsche said, "If you stare too long into my ass [klerck.org], beware, for my ass [klerck.org] might start to stare back into you."

    -- Vlad

    I just LOVE Vladinator's site [olsentwins.com]. Especially the "flab" [olsentwins.com] section, where I learned to use a fold of my own stomach-flab as a Martial Arts weapon. Oh and the "aborted fetus" photos!

    Of course, don't forget to read Vladinator's entrails [olsentwins.com]. Here you will find how truly difficult it is to decide what to do on the weekends... have an orgy party? A faggot party? Go to the the mall naked and get arrested for public indecency? Have a sleepover and get woken up by Nigerians on the phone?

    In short, if you haven't seen Vladinator's site [olsentwins.com], you don't know what you're missing!

    I just LOVE Vladinator's site [olsentwins.com]. Especially the "flab" [olsentwins.com] section, where I learned to use a fold of my own stomach-flab as a Martial Arts weapon. Oh and the "aborted fetus" photos!

    Of course, don't forget to read Vladinator's entrails [olsentwins.com]. Here you will find how truly difficult it is to decide what to do on the weekends... have an orgy party? A faggot party? Go to the the mall naked and get arrested for public indecency? Try to sleep but get woken up by Nigerians on the phone?

    In short, if you haven't seen Vladinator's site [olsentwins.com], you don't know what you're missing!

    I just LOVE The Anti-Vlad Triad's site! Especially the "fash" section, where I learned to cut the bottom off of an old shirt to use as a hair enhancement! Oh, and the "dance party" photos!

    Of course, don't forget to read The Anti-Vlad Triad's emails! Here you will discover how truly difficult it is to decide what to do on the weekends... have a LAN party? A hash party? Go to the mall to look at underage girls? Have a sleepover and call Scott Lockwood at midnight?

    In short, if you haven't checked out The Anti-Vlad Triad's site, you don't know what you're missing!

  88. Amherst-Fag and the Whoring of Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: cptroll
    To: <k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org>
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] Have I gone soft?
    Date sent: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:01:08 -0400
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org
    (This is CP0024)

    Marc Stauffer <marc@ksac.com> wrote:

    >: True. I still think karma as a persistent user property ought to be
    >: eliminated. It's fine to score individual comments, and even to award a
    >: special +1 comment bonus to selected "good posters", but karma as a prop for
    >: the self-esteem of pathetic geeks, or as a game, is dumb. At the very least,
    >: karma should not be displayed, not even one's own karma. And if it's going
    >: to exist, it ought to be aged so that my recent activity is treated as a
    >: better predictor of the value of my next comment than something I wrote a
    >: year ago.

    Bah, I'd hate this, but then I'm too much a karmawhore at heart. But if we could somehow increase the amount of quality moderation (to get rid of brainless drivel, not just spam) and rely on our abilities to craft quality-sounding trolls, then I wouldn't complain too much if we got rid of karma altogether and got rid of the +1 bonus along with it. Originally, the +1 bonus was reserved by just a few, but now every lamer and his dog has it. It's lost all meaning.

    >What this doesn't solve, however, is the inherent problems
    >with moderation. Not with the system, mind you, but with the
    >users. There needs to be stricter policies, e.g. no
    >usernames displayed when you moderate, or something along
    >those lines, and the penalties for crummy mods need to be
    >higher. In fact, people need to be banned from moderating
    >more often since they simply suck at it.

    I'd been thinking along the lines of hiding usernames during moderation, if nothing else than to help us trolls with recognizable usernames who get unfair moderation simply for being trolls in general than just on a particular post. I can see several0 problems, though:

    1) It won't stop the most dedicated of trollbusters who will keep a separate window open as AC where they can see people's usernames. These are the moderators who most need to be stopped, and yet this restriction won't do so.

    2) It will add a social cost to moderating itself. People might just start throwing their points at crap just to get back to normal mode where they can see who's talking. But it could cut both ways.

    3) It'll increase the amount of noisy replies screaming: "Moderators! Don't you realize streetlawyer/flatpack/etc. is the one saying this?!?!?!" We don't need that.

    4) You'd have to hide .sig files as well. Not a big deal.

    (This is CP0024)

  89. The Information You Requested by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic
    SIR:


    This is TealMicrodot again, still filling in for my friend, the original Microdot, who is having some trouble with an IP-Ban at the moment. He was right about the rampant censorship happening here. Deleted accounts, IP bans, comments being entirely deleted rather than just hidden, weird stuff going on so that certain comments are visible when not logged in but invisible to logged in users -- this is Democracy? We have proof of all of this, and we're compiling all the evidence we get.


    Anyway, here's the hyena information you requested:


    Female hyenas are virtually indistinguishable from males. Their clitoris is enlarged and extended to form an organ of the same size, shape, and position as the male penis. It can also be erected. Their labia have folded up and fused to form a false scrotum that is not discernibly different in external form or location from the true scrotum of males.


    It even contains fatty tissue forming two swellings easily mistaken for testicles. Authors of the most recent paper on spotted hyenas found the appearance of males and females so close that sex could only be determined with certainty by palpation of the scrotum. Testes could be located in the scrotum of the male compared with soft adipose tissue in the false scrotum of the female.

  90. VLADEQUACY RAW & UNCUT 5 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    [dmg] and then I will be in Tokyo/south Korea in April
    [dmg] Who are you anyway Lumpen ?
    [bc] you are drunk ever 36 hours
    [dmg] I am not sure I should be giving this information out.
    [Lumpen] Just a fan, dmg.
    [county] Well, I need to stay sober for now, because I have a date!
    [First_Incision] why am I always sober? I should take up this drinking thing.
    [county] Yes, do.
    [First_Incision] maybe I just need to get used to it. I could never drink enough to get drunk. Once I could feel stupidity creeping up, I could never bring myself to continue.
    [county] Strange.
    [dmg] county: did you get your date from reading the excellent dating advice available here on #adequacy ?
    [county] Once I can feel stupidity creeping up, I can't bring myself to stop.
    [county] dmg, I actually lied about having a date.
    [Lumpen] does #adequacy have a dating-advice bot?
    [dmg] county: its IRC
    [dmg] you can lie if you want
    [First_Incision] Lumpen: it should!
    [First_Incision] zuul, dating?
    [zuul] first_incision: wish i knew
    [First_Incision] zuul, women?
    [zuul] bugger all, i dunno, first_incision
    [First_Incision] zuul, men?
    [zuul] men are really just boys with financial responsibilities
    [dmg] zuul, should I visit a whore ?
    [zuul] dmg: wish i knew
    [county] I witnessed an shocking display of female pettiness and cruelty today. It put me off.
    [Lumpen] /msg datebot Why aren't women drawn to my l33t Linux skilz?
    [First_Incision] zuul, linux
    [zuul] hmmm... linux is a big POS half rate OS that encourages pirates and blatant faggotry!!!!!
    [bc] perhaps you aren't skillful enough
    [First_Incision] there you go!
    [bc] if you can use these skills to make lots&LOTS of money, they will be drawn to those skills
    [Lumpen] Not skilzful enough?
    [dmg] zuul, bsd
    [zuul] rumour has it bsd is dying
    *** bc has quit IRC (Connection reset by peer)
    *** Sulla (gallus@modem-2446.porcupine.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    [Lumpen] But I installed the Linux on my home b0xen all by myself!
    [Lumpen] You should just reopen Adequacy. The joke has gone on long enough.
    [First_Incision] Perdida has her Iniquity "Daily", but I can't seem to finish an article for it.
    [Lumpen] Iniquity?
    [First_Incision] www.iniquitydaily.com
    [dmg] adequacy is dead. Red ink flowed like a river of blood! you didn't have to be Kreskin to see that it was dying. Fact: adequacy is dead.
    [county] perdida has a scoop site?
    [county] Oh heavens, do spare us.
    [Lumpen] It looks like the most recent article on iniquitydaily was posted about a month ago.
    [First_Incision] yeah
    [Lumpen] Lame.
    [First_Incision] And it was a k5 reject
    [cyn-away] bc knows more about it

  91. Amherst-Fag and the Slashdot Bitchslap by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] Experiment in whoring...
    Date sent: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 10:03:49 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0005)

    It's good to see you making a go at it again, but I'm
    confused as to why you're trying to whore up a
    bitchslapped account, because no matter what your
    karma is, you'll never stop defaulting to -1 (just ask
    warren). Your only option would be to start a new
    account -- "DMG" is still available....

    James can answer you better than I, but Jon Erikson is
    definitely not dead. I'm surprised to confirm that
    there aren't any comments on his users.pl page, but I
    guess this week belongs to Dan Hayes.

    (This is CP0005)

  92. VLADEQUACY RAW & UNCUT 9 by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    [luisa|||] i don't know if i can ever be that weak and female
    [luisa|||] i.e. find a guy worth that loss
    *** luisa|||| has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 300 seconds)
    [county] Why is it weak to confess your feelings to the one you feel for?
    [luisa|||] because then they've got you in the knees
    [luisa|||] why should i always be the one who cares the most?
    [luisa|||] and on top of that, have to cop to it?
    [Linux] hey grewat, big cop bust outside
    [county] Because, luisa, somebody has to, and if it's them, you'll reject them.
    [county] I'm not seeing many other options. How about you?
    [Linux] shouting and threatening tones
    [Linux] I am going to go walk the dogs past the bust while drunk
    [county] What bust?
    [Linux] dunno
    [Linux] they are shouting at drunks, I think
    [county] Who?
    [Linux] maybe there will be death
    [Linux] cops
    [Linux] many of them
    [Linux] 8 cars at least
    [luisa|||] eek
    [Linux] maybe I'll get shot
    [county] There are 8 cop-cars full of cops shouting at drunks?
    [Linux] yes
    [Linux] two drunks by the sound of things
    [luisa|||] county, if i find a guy i consider my equal
    [luisa|||] it would all work out
    [Linux] they are right past the corner of my building
    [luisa|||] wait
    [luisa|||] eight cops, two drunks?
    [luisa|||] that is Not Right.
    [Linux] i think so
    * luisa||| waits for a cool song to come on
    [county] You've never met a guy who you consider your equal?
    [Linux] luisa|||, are you actually listening to radio broadcasts of popualr music?
    [county] I suppose that makes sense, actually. Most are probably your superior or inferior.
    [county] I think it's fairly obvious which side I fall on.
    [luisa|||] you could be inferior
    [luisa|||] but you probably know lots of things i don't
    [luisa|||] and you also are more productive in daily life
    [county] I am so far beyond you, luisa.
    [county] Come on.
    [luisa|||] i love cheesy 80s music
    [luisa|||] nah, you are just different
    [luisa|||] the measure would be if i made you feel weak and helplessly resentful
    [luisa|||] that's inferior
    [luisa|||] and only assessable face to face
    [Linux] luisa|||, you spin me twice 'round, baby.
    [county] If you made me feel weak and helplessly resentful? Haha.
    [luisa|||] well, anyone who feels like a lesser person probably is
    [luisa|||] or at least is not worth bothering with
    [em] you guys still going on about this? God.
    [county] Only a few people have made me inferior, and none of them were at all like you.
    [luisa|||] it is friday night and neither of us are out carousing, em
    [luisa|||] whatever did you expect would occur?
    [em] neither am I.
    [luisa|||] but you are at uni
    [county] em, have you been drinking?
    [em] well, I went to a chamber chorale concert.
    [em] county: not a drop
    [em] maybe I should.
    [county] Probably. It makes you more tolerant.
    [luisa|||] anyhow, county, it is all moot
    [luisa|||] i am not going to bed with you
    [luisa|||] so the question of whether you are inferior or not will never come up
    [county] I'm not going to bed with you. What of it?
    [county] Anyway, it has come up, and it's been settled. I'm superior.
    [luisa|||] if you feel that you are
    [luisa|||] i do rather want to go to bed
    [luisa|||] but i just finished supper
    * em wonders if he has anything edible in the fridge.
    [luisa|||] i have lovely soup i made from random ingredients
    [Linux] katsup is a vegetable
    [luisa|||] only for bachelors
    [luisa|||] lord, it is four am rising
    [county] It's "catsup" or "ketchup."
    [luisa|||] okbed
    *** luisa||| is now known as gurl
    [Linux] night, wheesie
    [Linux] I am really nothing like a viking, btw
    [county] Oh, I'm sure.
    *** Linux is now known as momocrome
    *** county has quit IRC (Connection reset by peer)
    *** momocrome has quit IRC (Quit: )
    *** gurl has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 300 seconds)
    *** bc (gallus@modem-3167.panther.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    *** bc has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
    *** Marco` (nightfall@cloaked.tlv.netvision.net.il) has joined #adequacy
    [Marco`] Hi
    [Marco`] Anyone alive?
    * Marco` 's off
    *** Marco` has quit IRC (Quit: Going down now)
    [me0w] g'morning
    *** bc (gallus@modem-3080.monkey.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    [bc] hello
    [me0w] Hi bc
    [bc] hellow me0wsy
    * bc was just in the pub
    [bc] and you know what?
    [me0w] What?
    [bc] a woman in her late forties started coming onto me something dreadful
    [bc] unlike some, I wasn't in the least tempted
    [me0w] Ahhh ... So you had no Mr.Buck temptations ..
    [bc] certainly not :)
    [me0w] Well done!
    [bc] it's not a great achievement, I think these things are in your nature.
    [bc] Either you adore OAP's, or you don't.
    [bc] cool
    [bc] scotland beat south africa at the rugby!
    [me0w] I think though, in Mr. Buck's case, he may have been wearing some good quality Beer Goggles.
    [bc] that's a point. Still, I did have 3 pints, I wasn't entirely sober, but probably not as many Mr Buck. I think alcohol just decreases your reserve, it doesn't make you suddenly find things attractive you don't while sober
    [bc] I mean, if you wake up after a night out with a member of your own sex (for example), it prolly says something
    * bc has some prawns
    [me0w] This is why everyone needs a voice of reason when drinking. I take mine along whenever I am going to be consuming cast quantities of alcohol (the voice of reason is also known as the designated driver).
    [bc] hehe
    [me0w] cast = vast
    [bc] strange, I don't have problems. In fact, I reject much more impressively and fullsomely when drunk than when sober. I don't need no stinkin' voice of reason!
    [me0w] When I am intoxicated I run across a problem .... my tongue feels funny and I like to lick things (people). I need a voice of reason to keep me out of trouble.
    [bc] haha! I remember you mentioning this before. That's an awful affliction, though prolly pretty amusing
    [me0w] And apparently I become quite the mischevious girl and for this I also need the voice.
    [bc] to stop you mixing it up too much? Playing tricks and pranks
    [me0w] And the licking ...
    [bc] this makes you sound like quite the handful when pissed
    [me0w] A giggly handful, yes.
    [me0w] That's why I need a voice of reason.
    [bc] I don't think I'm too bad when drunk. In fact, I'm often the voice of reason for other people, despite that we have all drunk hideous amounts. I'm just the same as usual, but more exhuberantly, I suppose. I think I have a good head for booze by nature, that's prolly why
    [bc] mm that was tasty
    [bc] post-prandial smoke time
    [me0w] enjoy
    * bc wonders whether to watch "contact" on dvd, which he has, but hasn't watched, though he read the book years ago
    [bc] which I liked, I liked the way it was all about revelation, and its validity
    [bc] the woman in it was sort of like a hardcore kurobot at first, you know, utterly logical positivist and materialist and dismissive of anything that can't be proved utterly, of revelation, till it all comes back and bites her when she has her own revelatory experience
    [me0w] I don't think I have ever seen this film.
    [bc] it's supposed to be decent.
    [bc] I think a lot of people hated it, and another lot of people loved it
    [me0w] I will have to add it to my must see list of films.
    [bc] it's a sort of SF thing, in a way, and I think a lot of the people who disliked it were expecting some usual guns'n'aliens shite
    [me0w] I normally don't watch 'alien' movies.
    [bc] it's not really like that. The book wasn't at least. It's set present day
    [bc] they discover an alien signal
    [bc] this woman does
    [bc] and there's lots of politics and argument about it
    [bc] and she is hardcore rationalist and dismissive of the religious people
    [bc] but in the end, she ends up having an experience that everybody doubts she had, a revelation..
    *** Captain_Tenille (Captain_Te@64-42-74-104.atgi.net) has joined #adequacy
    [bc] hey ct
    [me0w] Good Afternoon Captain
    [bc] el capitano
    [Captain_Tenille] Ahoy
    [Captain_Tenille] What goes on in these parts?
    * Captain_Tenille finally got some sleep last night
    [bc] You are admirably offensive; you have won. I am offended, many times over. Now please, leave me the fuck alone. --infinitera
    [Captain_Tenille] ?
    [bc] I am not admirably offensive
    * Captain_Tenille wades through the k5rap
    [me0w] There was nothing interesting on K5 this morning
    [Captain_Tenille] Nope. Doesn't look like it.
    [Captain_Tenille] Yawn
    [Captain_Tenille] All right, time to make breakfast, I think
    [Captain_Tenille] I may be on later.
    *** Captain_Tenille has quit IRC (Quit: Making breakfast)
    [me0w] they leave so quickly
    [bc] yes
    [me0w] I made coffee, but now I find I'm too lazy to go and pour it.
    [bc] Catch 22 then
    [bc] you need some caffeine to rouse you to pour it :\
    [me0w] I need to hire someone to make it for me.
    [me0w] But this person must agree to be paid in post-it notes as I have no funds.
    [me0w] My new site format seems to be coming along. I might actually like it.
    [bc] hehe
    * bc is writing a ranty comment
    [me0w] Will it be exciting?
    [bc] maybe if you like seeing infinitera being attacked, otherwise it's prolly not your thing
    [bc] it will be 0ed though, as usual, by him
    [bc] but shant be in the hidden wueue for long
    [me0w] I will give it a 5 if it is exciting
    [bc] yay
    [bc] http://www.kuro5hin.org/comments/2002/11/15/17928/ 674/65#65
    [bc] there you go me0w
    [me0w] I am giving you a 5 for the number of words you used
    [bc] woohoo!
    [bc] I quite often start typing, and type and type and type in fury
    [bc] and I don't really attack him personally till towards the end
    [bc] infinitera is a twat
    [me0w] Well, I think the "I think you a cunt" might be a bit insulting
    [bc] it's possible ;)
    [me0w] For some anyway
    [me0w] I might take that as a compliment.
    [bc] I'd just laugh and respond in kind
    [bc] I don't understand the people who get so worked up about lack of civility on the internet
    [bc] it's all just a laugh
    [me0w] It is all for my amusement
    [bc] when ubu and I met, we were calling each other cunts immediately, and being dreadfully insulting. We knew instantly we liked the other
    [me0w] That is when you know it is true love.
    [bc] indeed. I don't love ubu like a brother, I love him like the homosexual partner I never had
    [me0w] I should send flowers to celebrate your relationship.
    [bc] that would be very nice of you. The anniversary is very soon, actually
    [me0w] Brilliant!
    *** gurl (~happy@dialup-64.152.253.58.Dial1.Houston1.Level3 .net) has joined #adequacy
    [bc] hi, gurrrrl
    [gurl] hullo, you
    [me0w] Hello
    [gurl] christ i overslept
    [bc] what time is it where you are? 11:30?
    [gurl] twelve thirty
    [bc] damn firemen
    [bc] striking bastards, is what they are
    [bc] there was a housefire here, the soldiers had to break the picketlines, and 6 people were injured due to smoke inhallation. The firemen deliberately tried to stop the aid going out to the fire
    [me0w] That isn't good.
    [me0w] I can understand the strike, but preventing aid is not ethical.
    [bc] the fire service should be shut down and replaced with a nice big charity
    [bc] they get £21,000 as a starting wage, the firemen, which is well above the national average wage, After a few years, it rises considerably further, and they have already been offered an 11% raise and rejected it - they are going for 30% (!)
    [bc] for what? 99% of the time they are sitting about playing cards
    [me0w] 21,000 is far too little
    [bc] the fire service should be like the RNLI
    [bc] me0w, that's a starting wage for a newly qualified fireman
    [bc] the national average wage for everyone is £17,000
    [bc] this isn't a rich country like America, with its closer embrace of capitalism, where the national average is more like £30,000
    [me0w] I guess I just know people who make more than that.
    [me0w] I still think 21,000 is rather low
    [bc] £21,000 is perfectly decent as a starting wage
    [bc] nurses get £14,000, soldiers £16000, as starting wages
    [bc] policemen £17,000
    [me0w] Nurses should get more, as well as police men
    [me0w] The train people should get less.
    [bc] well, ideally I'm sure everybody would be getting £1,000,000 annually, but I'm not willing to see the government take more than half my earnings away to give to these people. If they don't want to work for those wages, they can switch to the private sector.
    [bc] and yes, the train sods especially suck
    [bc] they went on strike at glasgow underground forcing me to walk 6 miles through highly dodgy parts of glasgow in the rain
    [me0w] I think that there are certain professions that should be paid more ... firefighters, police, nurses, teachers
    [bc] I think it is fine, as long as the money isn't stolen by threat of violence off others to do so.
    [gurl] er, no.
    [bc] a free market would sort them out, it is only ever public sector workers that strike anyway.
    [gurl] nothing teachers do warrants more money
    [bc] they'd pay fairly
    [gurl] nurses get paid very well for their hours and labour
    [me0w] nurses are underpaid
    [gurl] at least, if the flooded nursing schools are any indication
    [bc] also, funnily enough teachers in scotland just got a 25% increase a couple of years ago. There is now a big "brain drain" of the best teachers from england to scotland. heh!
    [me0w] Which is why there are a shortage - they go places where they will be better paid
    [gurl] yes, and that is the hospital down the road
    [gurl] it is a highly paid but stressful job
    [gurl] not everyone can hack it
    [gurl] thus, the shortage
    [bc] here, all the best doctors and nurses go to America
    [bc] where they get paid decently
    [me0w] A large number of nursing students in Canada go to the US, and the Middle East - they are usually paid more than double what they make here
    [bc] we in turn import from India and scandinavia
    [gurl] haha
    [gurl] but scanadinavia is supposed to be the perfect country!
    [gurl] all socialist paradise and whatnot
    [gurl] well, the countries in that region
    [bc] not judging by the delectable nurses at my local hospital, loads of whom are danish, norwegian, swedish
    [gurl] well, being raised socialist apparently doesn't kill the desire to earn a fair wage for services and all that
    [bc] norwegian especially, but I think that is because lots of norwegians come to scotland anyway, cos it is quite close
    [gurl] lord, i don't want to go bed shopping
    [bc] it certainly doesn't, gurl
    [bc] shopping in bed, or shopping for a bed?
    [gurl] for a bed
    [bc] get one that doesn't creak or have annoying springs
    [bc] the best bed I ever had was one that was a platform of wood planks, with a really thin mattress on top
    [bc] that thing was great
    [bc] prolly quite cheap, too
    [gurl] i just want a futon
    [bc] never tried one of those, are they good?
    [me0w] Get a sturdy futon
    [me0w] Over time the frame can bend
    [gurl] i was thinking a metal one
    [me0w] You'll want a thick mattress on it (if they give that option)
    [bc] cool
    * bc watches Only Fools and Horses
    [gurl] actually, i will go tomorrow since i cannot carry the sodding thing home with me
    [bc] hehe
    [gurl] i think i'll just take the bed frame from my old bed
    [gurl] and buy a new mattress
    [bc] heh. Sounds good
    *** Sulla (gallus@modem-385.llama.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    *** bc has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
    *** Sulla is now known as bc
    [gurl] it's a gorgeous day
    [gurl] but utterly cold and crystal clear out
    [bc] I love that
    [bc] cold and clear
    [bc] and sunny
    [bc] perfect weather as far as I'm concerned
    [bc] gurl, how did it go with that chap?
    [gurl] he friend zoned me
    [bc] ah hah
    [bc] I did that to a girl week last week after a date. It's surprisingly hard. Requires delicacy
    [gurl] so i have a perfectly nice male friend
    [bc] well that's something at least
    [bc] I have a nice big fillet steak and some English mustard
    [gurl] i have a hearty beef stew
    [bc] oh splendid
    [gurl] haha
    [gurl] i am reading about the french foreign legion
    [bc] oh yes. That's France's only *professional* section of the army eh?
    [bc] I know someone who served in it for 21 years
    [gurl] it is terribly intensive
    [bc] yes
    [bc] long marching through the desert and stuff
    [gurl] and no girls allowed!
    [bc] http://britishsas.8m.com/training.html
    [bc] ^I think that is about the globally hardest training&selection for any regiment
    [bc] they are insane
    [bc] as part of it, they have the applicant (after a week of insane marching and activity) look after a pet rabbit in the mountains for a while. he is completely alone, and must forage for his own food and protect the rabbit for ages. Then, he recieves an order to kill and eat the rabbit
    [bc] quite sadistic ;)
    [gurl] haha
    [gurl] there's a kill house?!
    [bc] they are special forces
    [bc] anti-terrorist stuff is one of their duties
    [bc] storming embassies, say, like when they stormed the Iranian embassy and freed all the hostages in London in the 80's
    [bc] they were the first special forces unit in the world, created during WWII
    [gurl] lordy
    [bc] Delta Force in the US was founded in the 70's by an American officer who lobbied for it after seeing the SAS and serving in an exchange program in the UK army
    [bc] but they aren't as good. They have a slightly different ethos. Delta Force peeps tend to be really big and brawny, and their modus operandi is to be flown in on a big helicopter and shoot everything up before being flown away again
    [bc] the SAS are different, in that they believe in more traditional marching and approaching the target on foot. They tend to get dropped far away, sneak about hundreds of miles, attack, and sneak away. And they operate in teams of 8 generally
    [bc] http://home.hccnet.nl/22.sas/Operation%20Nimrod.ht ml
    [bc] ^that was mad
    [bc] I remember watching it on tv
    [gurl] so the sas do it properlike
    [gurl] well, more like people think such things work
    [bc] of course! ie, no hostage deaths, all terrorists dead, seemingly miraculously
    [bc] it's sort of amazing
    [bc] another famous one was the scud stuff during the gulf war
    [bc] one of their missions went wrong, they were given wrong maps
    [bc] and they were euipped for desert conditions, but it was frequently -20C and snowing etc
    [bc] and they got discovered and stormed by two lorry loads of iraqi tropps, tanks, etc, from a local base
    [bc] so the 8 of them killed ALL of them, then walked 100km overnight carrying 80lb bergens in freezing conditions
    [bc] they are sort of insane those people. Not qute normal, but very good at what they do (wholesale, efficient slaughter)
    *** Captain_Tenille (~jeremy@216-210-218-82.atgi.net) has joined #adequacy
    [gurl] damn
    [bc] and also, cos it is UK army, it is not just UKians, they select from many countries in the commonwealth
    [gurl] reminds me of stephen king's gunslinger
    [bc] so canadians and australians and NZers and Nepalians can see the SAS as the peak of their career, if they are good enough to make it through selection
    [Captain_Tenille] SAS?
    [bc] yes
    [gurl] british special forces
    [Captain_Tenille] Aha
    * Captain_Tenille always thought MI5 and MI6 were cool acronyms
    [bc] hehe
    [Captain_Tenille] Although for the longest time I thought it was M16
    [Captain_Tenille] Which seemed odd
    [bc] ct, during WWI it went from MI1 all the way to MI20
    [bc] also, MI5 & MI6 didn't officially exist until very recently
    [Captain_Tenille] I was just about to ask what happened to MI1-4
    [gurl] heh
    [bc] having no constitutional checks, the government is free to deny they exist at all
    [gurl] haha
    *** county (midas@cloaked.client.attbi.com) has joined #adequacy
    [gurl] oh look@
    [gurl] er, nevermind
    [Captain_Tenille] The US gov denied the existence of the NSA forever.
    [bc] same as SAS, which didn't officially exist till the 90's,, and is still v.secret
    [Captain_Tenille] I don't think they officially acknowledge the Delta Force
    [bc] the SAS are fun because they are the first special forces group, and most other western country's special forces groups were founded, usually much later, on that model, often by officers who saw the SAS in exchange programmes and thought it a jolly good idea
    [bc] Delta Force being a case in point, in the 70's. Same with Germany's, france's. Greece's, Israel's, etc etc
    [bc] but SAS are teh best!
    [gurl] it is impressive what humans can be taught to do
    [Captain_Tenille] Is SAS just Green Beret style special forces, or does it include PSYOPS and Civil Affairs type stuff
    [Captain_Tenille] ?
    [bc] that's the other thing with the SAS, the complete lack of traditional army discipline, which was very new
    [bc] ct: it is mostly military and anti-terrorist
    [bc] there is another group that specialises in civil intelligence
    [bc] that sometimes work with the SAS, but the SAS are purely a military machine
    [Captain_Tenille] Civil Affairs handles the military's relations with the governments of the countries they're in.
    [Captain_Tenille] Should said government fall, they set up a caretaker government in it's place.
    * Captain_Tenille 's dad did that for a long time
    [bc] coo
    [gurl] bc, my sibling is all rotting in the county jail
    [bc] haha
    [bc] what'd he do?
    [gurl] his warrant caught up to him
    [bc] damn
    [gurl] he owes about 400£ in fines
    [Captain_Tenille] I just found out yesterday, actually, what my dad did after he worked as a codebreaker during the Vietnam War.
    [county] bc, you've millions, get gurl's brother out of the clink.
    [bc] he deserves it, county
    [bc] Contributing to the skill of the SAS is the Operations Research Unit which develops unique equipment for use by the SP team.
    [county] That's beside the point. She'll be indebted to you.
    [bc] ^^hehe, that's like "m" in james bond
    [gurl] bc, he found a job
    [gurl] and now he will lose it
    [gurl] because of extended absence
    [bc] damn it
    [bc] what's he fined for?
    [Captain_Tenille] Aren't you guys going to ask what my dad did?
    [bc] isn't that classified, ct?
    [Captain_Tenille] He didn't tell me much.
    [gurl] speeding ticket, i think
    [Captain_Tenille] Just enough to make me boggle.
    [Captain_Tenille] zuul, he?
    [zuul] he is not
    [bc] but he was army, eh? mad
    [Captain_Tenille] Wouldn't tell me what he did
    [gurl] then why build us up so cruelly]?
    [Captain_Tenille] NSA. That's all we would say.
    [Captain_Tenille] er, he
    [county] Come on, bc, give her brother a chance.
    [county] He's trying to turn is life around!
    [county] He's in jail because of ancient history.
    [bc] you're right county. I will bail him right away.
    [county] Good man.
    [county] I'm sure gurl will be very grateful.
    [gurl] some woman is presently trying to adopt me
    [county] But you're too old for that.
    [bc] is she older, and with grown up children who have flown the nest?
    [gurl] yeah, pretty much
    [gurl] except her grown kids are still in the nest
    [county] And she wants more.
    [gurl] she thinks i'm a unique snowflake
    [gurl] and wants to feed and clothe me and all that
    [bc] weird, gurl
    [gurl] aye
    [bc] weird weird weird
    [gurl] and the annoying guy at work who kept trying to pay me to go out with him
    [county] So are you going to take her up on it?
    [gurl] he got in a horrible car wreck and was fired
    [gurl] she is rather like mother
    [gurl] except less manipulative and deceitful
    [county] Did he get fired for getting in the car wreck?
    [gurl] not quite
    [gurl] he was fired for trying to come back to work
    [gurl] with a broken neck
    [bc] he offered you money? heh, how desperate
    [gurl] well, he is married
    [gurl] and also i don't want him
    [gurl] but he just couldn't seem to accept that
    [bc] "Please come out with me?" - "No." - "I'll give you £500."
    [county] That's really harsh.
    [bc] it's damned right, gurl
    [county] He was so dedicated to his work that he wanted to come in, but he got fired instead!
    [bc] I'm proud of you!
    [county] Couldn't they just tell him to go home and sleep it off?
    [gurl] he got in the accident whilst drunk
    [gurl] and it was off duty anyhow
    [gurl] so they can easily get him on inability to perform
    [gurl] and he could hardly even sit down
    [gurl] the doctor hadn't signed a release
    [gurl] so however cruel it sounds, they had every reasonable right to fire him
    [county] Still, to be unemployed and mangled in these times is difficult. He'll probably end up on the street.
    [gurl] no, his wife is utterly devoted and loving
    [gurl] and makes piles of money
    [gurl] she wanted only to take care of him
    [county] He has a devoted wife who makes lots of money, but wants a little on the side too?
    [county] That seems risky.
    [gurl] but he wanted to go drinking and sleep with other women
    [county] I should find a rich, devoted wife.
    [county] Having one could be convenient.
    [gurl] it was the only thing that saved him
    [county] Some guys have all the luck.
    [bc] hehe
    [gurl] i am sure bc would happily arrange for you to acquire a wealthy wife
    [bc] it's true. There's a lucky sod I know who's wife is a civil engineer making tons of cash. All he does is footer about spending her money on computers and crap. They love each other very much and seem very happy. Sickening, it is.
    [county] Yeah, I need someone to take care of me!
    [county] I'm tired of being responsible.
    [bc] BRB, mobile shop
    [gurl] have a beer
    [gurl] actually, have five or six
    [county] What's a mobile shop?
    [county] Anyway, that's too many beers.
    [gurl] well, however many will intoxicate you
    [gurl] women like to help men in that state
    [county] Haha!
    [county] What nonsense.
    [county] Women hate drunks.
    [gurl] depends on the drunk boy
    [gurl] i find some of them endearing
    [bc] damn it's cold
    [county] Well, what do you expect? Your house was built before heat was invented
    [county] What's a mobile shop, though?
    [bc] I am an endearing drunk boy. My cold reserve melts away, revealing a vulnerable and heartbreakingly fascinating character. I find that women are much more interested in me when drunk, than when sober.
    [county] uh huh
    [bc] county, a shop on wheels that drives around selling things. It parks outside my front door
    [county] What sort of things?
    [bc] in this instance, I got dunhills and Irn Bru, and a bottle of Gin
    [county] So you've gone back to the bottle.
    [county] tsk tsk.
    [bc] all sorts, county. There are many of them, in fact. Soem are mobile butchers, others mobile grocers and fishmongers. This one sells everyday necessities
    [county] Like I said, though, some guys have all the luck. When sober, I'm undesirable. When intoxicated, I'm undesirable in a different way.
    [county] Everyday necessities like dunhills, Irn Bru, and gin.
    [bc] Yup.
    [county] dunhills sound like cigarettes. What's Irn Bru?
    [bc] they sell what's sold most in the local community
    [bc] county: http://www.bevnet.com/reviews/irn-bru/index.asp
    [gurl] what's a good poll topick before i hotfoot it elsewhere?
    [bc] poll? hmmn
    [county] I don't think I've ever seen any of that, bc.
    [bc] favourite spirit?
    [gurl] irn bru is only in scotland
    [county] That would be all you can think of.
    [bc] county, well, it is actually illegal in the US, the FDA won't allow it to be sold there
    [bc] so it isn't surprising
    [county] gurl, "Favorite condiment to lick off nipples?"
    [bc] it contains too much iron, or something
    [county] Be sure to include horseradish as an option.
    [wsl3] county: Hot Thai Red Curry
    [bc] it's very very popular in russia though
    [Captain_Tenille] What on earth is it? And why is it illegal?
    [bc] ct, it's just a soft drink. It's illegal cos the FDA don't like it's iron content
    [wsl3] What is?
    [Captain_Tenille] Ah
    [gurl] man, i suppose i am not cut out for daytime drinking
    [gurl] my tummy hurts now
    [wsl3] gurl: Have some nice cock. That should solve the problem, but only if you get all the way down and get the protien suprise at the end.
    [gurl] i don't see how
    [gurl] protein makes my tummy hurt
    [wsl3] They'll cancel each other out.
    [gurl] i somehow doubt this.
    [gurl] i love my diary.
    [wsl3] Nah, I can show you if you want! :-)
    [county] Give up, wsl3. The fact is, you can only score with fatties.
    [wsl3] give it up county, the fact is, I don't care what you think. :-)
    [county] That doesn't make any sense, idiot. I wasn't trying to influence your opinion.
    [bc] I love your diary too, gurl =)))
    [gurl] hehe
    [wsl3] county: Uh huh.
    [gurl] there is nothing wrong with fatties, if they have attractive features
    [gurl] and don't look like useless lumps of crap
    [wsl3] Bingo!
    * wsl3 is a FFA
    [gurl] fatty fucker anonymous?
    [wsl3] LOL
    [wsl3] FFA == Fullfigured Female Admirer
    [gurl] oh god
    [county] Vlad's fatties look like useless lumps of crap, gurl.
    [gurl] i HATE those
    [wsl3] county is a useless lump of crap
    [county] These women aren't fat, gurl, they're disgustingly hyper-obese.
    [wsl3] gurl - hate what? Voluptous women?
    [county] 300lbs.
    [gurl] a girl can be voluptuous without being heavy
    [bc] FFA give BBWs TLC and have a GSOH
    [county] A three hundred pound woman isn't voluptuous.
    [county] She's hyper-obese.
    [wsl3] county: I know lots of attractive 300lb women.
    [gurl] no, that's a porker
    [gurl] i don't know any.
    [county] You don't know any!
    [county] You're delusional.
    [wsl3] Depends - what if she's like 6' tall?
    [gurl] and i know some decent looking big girls
    [gurl] then she shouldn't exceed 250
    [wsl3] gurl: Top size?
    [gurl] and that only if she is super muscular
    [wsl3] gurl: Nah - I've seen women as high as 400lbs that I'd do.
    [gurl] well, men are less picky about that
    [county] I'm not.
    [county] I'm not interested in girls much over 150.
    [gurl] well, that leaves the taller ones out
    [gurl] unless they are very slim
    [Captain_Tenille] Tall girls are overrated
    [wsl3] gurl: That depends - in general I don't find a woman attractive under 175 or so unless she is stunningly beautiful and has a personallity to match.
    [Captain_Tenille] *under* 175?
    [gurl] that is a shame for you, wsl3
    [county] I don't much like taller girls, gurl.
    [wsl3] under, yes.
    [gurl] i personally think too many people are heavy
    [county] Much beyond 5'6" is too tall, I think.
    * Captain_Tenille 's gf is 5'
    [wsl3] gurl: I don't find it a shame at all! I have a full, active, loving sex life, thank you very much. :-) lol
    [gurl] but that said, i don't mind heavy people who don't whine about it
    [gurl] of course you do
    * wsl3 doesn't whine - he has no cheese to go with it.
    [gurl] i know lots of plain couples that can't get enough of each other
    [Captain_Tenille] Off to get a hair cut.
    [Captain_Tenille] Ta ta.
    [gurl] which is great for them
    [gurl] hasta
    *** Captain_Tenille has quit IRC (Quit: Off to get hair cut)
    [bc] woohoo
    [bc] there's nothing wrong with plain people. Or even ugly people, if they are self confident enough and interesting and especially good natured enough
    [gurl] ok, i have to fix someone's cd rom
    [bc] happy hacking!
    [gurl] well, that is true of anyone
    [county] Aye, and there's the rub, bc.
    [gurl] there is no hacking involved!
    [county] It's easier to become beautiful than it is to become interesting or good natured.
    [gurl] it's purely a mechanical issue
    [county] If one isn't already.
    [bc] you are fixing a technical computer device
    [gurl] bof, i am fixing a thingy with serrated wheels
    [bc] with what, you say?
    [bc] that sounds complicated
    [gurl] little wheels with chopped bits
    [county] A serrated wheel? Isn't that a gear?
    [bc] I'm a man, I don't understand technical things, I just leave it to women
    [gurl] yeah, i guess
    [gurl] two little gears that aren't spinning the drive out
    [county] Well, get that cute little can of yours over there and start fixing things!
    [county] Chop chop!
    [gurl] i have to finish my beer
    [gurl] ;P
    [county] bc, what should I do with myself today?
    [bc] I think you should go to the pub
    *** gurl is now known as cdromgurl
    [county] It's kind of dismal out.
    [bc] and drink beer, play darts, and watch the match
    [cdromgurl] yes, do go, since i cannot
    [cdromgurl] wave
    [bc] that's why I didn't suggest the park, county
    [bc] bye happy hackess!
    [county] I don't know where any pubs are. In fact, I think they're illegal in Seattle.
    [bc] http://www.nwbrewpage.com/wabpubs/WestSea.html
    [bc] go there
    [wsl3] lol
    [bc] though I must say, the huge billboard sign at the front puts me off
    [bc] here, they just have a tiny sign
    [bc] I suppose Americans insist on the 25foot billboard treatment
    [county] That's really far away.
    [bc] get the metro then!
    [county] Anyway, going to a pub is way too social.
    [bc] you don't need to talk to anyone
    [bc] clearly, you aren't very familiar with pubs at all
    [bc] they can be profoundly antisocial
    [county] Of course I don't, but I feel odd being out by myself.
    [county] There isn't any point in going out to be anti-social.
    [wsl3] Go nude. That will get some attention.
    [county] Shut up.
    [wsl3] no
    [wsl3] You can forget about that.
    [wsl3] If I'm in front of my computer, and I see something I want to respond to, I will - same as you.
    [county] Shut up, really.
    [wsl3] No.
    [wsl3] really.
    [bc] blargle
    [wsl3] bc: What's new with Kip? Has anyone seen him?
    [bc] heis in London, that's all I know
    [county] I'm going to go shower.
    [county] When I come back, I'm going to have some booze, a pastrami sandwich, and pour at my innermost hopes and dreams.
    [county] "out"
    [wsl3] ah
    [bc] looking forward to it
    [wsl3] Well, I'll be quite for that.
    *** Sulla (gallus@modem-2383.lemur.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    *** bc has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 180 seconds)
    *** momocrome (~momocrome@cloaked.client.attbi.com) has joined #adequacy
    [Sulla] hey momo

  93. Amhesrt-Fag and the Excellent Karma by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    From: cptroll
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] tell me when to stop
    Date sent: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 13:38:49 -0500
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com (This is CP0039)
    (This is CP0040)

    Thanks, but you should give me a holler first, since I'm rarely bellow 40
    (I was at 44 after a capricious 5-point mod-down with another -1 on top);
    so +10 is overkill. While I'm beating this gift horse in the mouth, let
    me complain that my bobo comment is still languishing at -1 and won't be
    archived. ;-)

    I'm still waiting for michael to get off his ass and accept this one:
    2000-11-28 00:39:58 Yahoo, Mein Kampf, and Child Pornography
    (yro,internet) It's been sitting in his queue for a day now.

    =?iso-8859-1?q?Lunchtime=20Troll?= <lunchtimetroll@yahoo.co.uk> wrote:

    >I had mod points on two accounts and I gave them all
    >to Anne Marie as I saw that /bots have become pretty
    >obsessed with her. Are there any other accounts that
    >need a boost for the next time I have points?
    >
    >++tlt

    (This is CP0040)

  94. Creating "property" vs advancing the art by gillbates · · Score: 2
    For each of us aspiring to a technical career, there comes a moment when we must choose between creating knowledge and creating property. Both choices are legitimate and important, but only one is science.

    Interestingly, the same thing could be said of computer science and programmers. As a programmer, I have two options:

    • I can create intellectual "property" for the benefit of Corporate America(tm).
    • I can release the source code of my work so that the whole of society benefits.
    Unfortunately, I can make a living doing the first, but not the second. Even worse, should the company patent my ideas, I will be denying others the ability to use even rudimentary algorithms without the paying of exorbitant royalties; not only will I exclude my own work from the benefit of others, but I will be actively destroying the ability of other programmers to make a living.

    The choices aren't easy. Fortunately for my sake, my company isn't in the intellectual property business. But the type of coding that I would like to be doing (engineering modeling, GUI design, etc...) inevitably involves me assigning any intellectual property rights for my work to a corporate entity.

    --
    The society for a thought-free internet welcomes you.
  95. it should really be quite simple by g4dget · · Score: 3, Interesting
    (1) If it's published in a scientific, peer-reviewed publication, it must contain all the information to be reproducible; if it requires special materials for reproduction, the authors must make those evailable. Publishing irreproducible results goes by a different name: public relations and marketing, either for a company or a career; it has no place in science.

    (2) If people put their names on a paper, they should define their contributions and be responsible for the results. If they don't want to accept responsibility for parts of a paper because they didn't work on it, they should say so clearly.

    Unfortunately, it has become common practice for people to pad their publications through multiple authorships: five people writing five papers each only have one publication each, but five people putting their names on each other's publications have five publications each; so much more marketable for job hunting that works by counting publications.

    It doesn't look like much is changing. In response to the Schoen affair, the American Physical Society weasled out of a requirement of academic responsibility by all authors; things are just continuing the way they are. And scientific papers with little more substance than press releases are becoming increasing common, in particular in the biomedical sciences, as companies promise the sky and find them good PR and marketing materials. And editors are afraid to reject that junk.

    But since the peer review system and system of academic publications is becoming increasingly corrupt and useless, perhaps on-line publishing of results without peer review will become the norm. Then, it is really word-of-mouth and recommendations by known friends, as opposed to anonymous reviewers, that matter.

  96. uncovering the purpose of patents, copyrights, etc by The_Rook · · Score: 5, Insightful

    if you carefully read lauglin's essay, one of the things he laments is the secrecy behind which coorporate sponsored research takes place. i suppose it would be redundant to mention that the elimination of this secrecy is what patents and copyrights were originally designed to prevent.

    patents, exclusive licenses to new inventions, are granted for the sole purpose of encouraging inventors to publish, in full detail, their inventions. without patent protection, for example, texas instruments and fairchild semiconductor may not have ever told anyone how to make an integrated circuit. they would have made the first chips under a cloak of secrecy, sold them as black box devices, and bury the chips in epoxy to protect the secret.

    unfortunately, industry, the lawmakers, and even the courts have forgotten the whole idea of patents is to publish. industry wants to call patents property that should belong to the holder and anything that weakens the patent is the equivalent of a 'taking'. congress and the patent office are all to happy to agree. and the courts have screwed the matter up further by taking the position that engineers and inventors are not legally qualified to decide if they are infringing on a patent, and so are not allowed to even look at one when trying to come up with new inventions.

    --
    when religion is no longer the opiate of the masses, governments will resort to real opiates.
  97. Re:Off Topic: Learning From kuro5hin by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Slashdot has a nice filter for each discussion (between the story writeup and the comments). This works better, because what if you wanted to see the -1 comments? (Say you find them amusing or something.) The point is that not all people necessarily like +5 posts more than others; it's most likely that people will, which is why it's the default, but for the rest, there's an option.

    Perhaps the filter would benefit from a larger range of ratings... -5 to +5, perhaps. But then they should implement an option of looking at posts rated -5 and posts rated +5. I'd sure like to know what people said that got them rated so low. =P

  98. Ethics Guidelines for Physicists by Drog · · Score: 4, Informative
    As stated, the physics community has been scarred by two scandals recently. First the Berkeley scandal last July, in which scientists retracted their claim to have created element 118, after realizing that the crucial data analysis by Dr. Victor Ninov could not be confirmed. Then last September, nanotechnology superstar Dr. J. Hendrik Schön, of Bell Labs, was found guilty of falsifying data on the properties on superconductivity and organic electronics. He was fired and more than a dozen published papers were retracted).


    So last month, the American Physical Society, representing some 40,000 physicists, expanded the ethical guidelines for researchers, in their Statements on Profession Conducts document. The new guidelines call for more ethics training in science and urge all research institutions to adopt the same set of misconduct procedures. The guidelines also clarify co-authors' roles and duties, making it clear that when you put your name on a paper, your reputation is on the line.


    Biologists faced similar scandals during the Gallo and Imanishi-Kari cases in the 90's. Unlike Robert Gallo and David Baltimore, who survived the scandal virtually unscathed, the physicists involved in today's scandals are actually being held accountable.


    The above info was compiled from an article that originally appeared here.

    --

    Looking for political forums? Check out "The World Forum".

    1. Re:Ethics Guidelines for Physicists by tbmaddux · · Score: 2
      Unlike Robert Gallo and David Baltimore, who survived the scandal virtually unscathed, the physicists involved in today's scandals are actually being held accountable.
      Well, in the particular case of Baltimore and his collaborator (Imanishi-Kari), the allegations of misconduct were eventually found to be false, and Imanishi-Kari was exonerated. The article you linked noted that Baltimore suffered for his defense of his collaborator, which doesn't qualify as "virtually unscathed" IMO.

      So, these biologists were held accountable (at least for a while), but for something they didn't do.

      --
      Can't you see that everyone is buying station wagons?
  99. Edison and other 19th century scroundrals by peter303 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Scientific misconduct is nothing new, but in the long run things work out. The scientific method is inherently self-correcting, but sometimes that takes decades to work out.

    Some of the 19th century "competition" has become the stuff of legends. Edison vs. Telsa to design the national electric grid. Telsa's ideas won out. Edison vs. almost everyone else. The dinosaur pioneers Marshal and Cope. One used the others name for fossilized shit! But in the end the real facts survived and the garbage disappeared.

    1. Re:Edison and other 19th century scroundrals by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      um I believe his name was Tesla, as in Tesla Coil (the man who discovered alternating current, which at the time was the rival technology to Edison's discovery DC).

  100. Exxon giving 100 mil to Stanford for clean energy by peter303 · · Score: 2

    Fox-int-the-henhouse atory here!

  101. Patents Are The Solution by Compulawyer · · Score: 5, Informative
    There has always been a delicate balance between the open and free exchange of ideas like that which occurs in scientific dialog and the need for those who invest in scientific endeavors to be able to recoup their investment. Patents are the means by which this balance is struck.

    This is not a new idea. Article I section 8 of the United States Constitution provides that Congress may "promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries. . . " (capitalization in original). This clause is the basis of Congress's power to grant patents and copyrights.

    The trade-off is simple: Inventors are given a limited time (currently 20 years from date of the filing of a patent application) during which they may recoup their investment and profit from their work with the reassurance that they may sue to stop anyone who tries to get a free ride off their work by copying an invention and thereby trying to profit from the work of another. In exchange, the patent has to contain "a written description of the invention, and of the manner and process of making and using it, in such full, clear, and exact terms as to enable any person skilled in the art to which it pertains . . . to make and use the same, and shall set forth the best mode contemplated by the inventor of carrying out his invention." 35 U.S.C. sec. 112, para. 1.

    Section 112 is one of the most litigated provisions in the law. Ever. Each and every word has been exhaustively examined by the federal courts and has been found consistently to carry out the policy of ensuring that once the limited time for recouping an investment has passed, that society as a whole has enough information so that anyone in that technical area ("art") can make and use the invention simply by reading the patent.

    What are the alternatives to this regime? There are two that readily come to mind. The first is that if you believe that all scientific knowledge should be immediately available without restriction, then by all means, publish the work and make it freely available to anyone who wants it. No one will stop you from doing that (unless of course you are teaching how to build nuclear weapons, etc., ...). The second alternative is to protect your invention by keeping it as a trade secret.

    Trade secrets do little to promote the progress of science. They work more of a hindrance. Those who have chosen this route must ensure that their invention truly remains secret or their protection and ability to recoup their investment is lost or greatly diminished. The principal "progress" occurs when someone decides that the invention is too valuable to not have access to, and decides then to reverse-engineer the invention to discover its secrets. Trade secrets potentially last in perpetuity, so it is theoretically possible that no one will ever learn or benefit from the secret scientific advance.

    I am not blind - I know there are substantial problems with patent examinations that allow invalid patents to issue. However, the proper remedy for that is to ensure only good patents issue. How? First, by allowing the PTO to hire enough competent examiners to handle the work flow. The PTO is a self-sufficient agency. It is actually a significant profit center for the government. Much of the money paid into the PTO however is immediately diverted by Congress for other purposes instead of being put back into the PTO to improve the agency. Most recently, Congress drastically increased the size of user fees at the PTO to pay for Homeland Security. I am confident in saying the the diversion of user fees from the PTO is among the Top 3 Gripes of every patent attorney in the US.

    The execution may be flawed at times, but the policy is sound. We have advanced much further as a society by granting patents than we would have otherwise.

    --

    Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

    1. Re:Patents Are The Solution by Compulawyer · · Score: 2

      Yes, I felt strongly enough about this topic to give up my Moderator Points (at least in this thread) today so I could post. Do I feel strongly enough to Mod up my own post? I'm a Karma whore - what do you think? I'll rely on others' mods, TYVM.

      --

      Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

    2. Re:Patents Are The Solution by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      Trade secrets do little to promote the progress of science. They work more of a hindrance.

      A trade secret on an obvious idea does not impede my use of that obvious idea. A wrongly issued patent does.

      The problem with the bulk of the software patents issued by the USPTO in recent years (and by bulk I mean 95%+ of those I have read) is that they are completely obvious to anyone who has an understanding of the field.

      The legal standard of obvious is different - except of course when the USPTO attempts to justify its racket when the 'non-obvious' standard is held up as the guarantee of fairness.

      I have never once read a patent to get a good idea. The only reason I read patents is to make sure that I do not use the technology described by mistake.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
    3. Re:Patents Are The Solution by Compulawyer · · Score: 2
      A trade secret on an obvious idea does not impede my use of that obvious idea. A wrongly issued patent does.

      You cannot get any kind of legal protection for ideas. You can only protect the tangible expression of specific ideas. Hope you have a good lawyer if you have any affiliation whatsoever with a company that vigorously protects its trade secrets and you create something similar to what it is seeking to protect. If you think a civil patent suit is bad, try a federal criminal investigation for industrial or electronic espionage.

      The problem with the bulk of the software patents issued by the USPTO in recent years (and by bulk I mean 95%+ of those I have read) is that they are completely obvious to anyone who has an understanding of the field.

      This is a problem with patent EXAMINATION, not with patents themselves. I acknowledged as much toward the end of my post.

      The legal standard of obvious is different - except of course when the USPTO attempts to justify its racket when the 'non-obvious' standard is held up as the guarantee of fairness.

      Different? Different from what? To determine obviousness, the PTO looks to the prior art. If a combination of references describes each and every element of the inventlion, it is obvious so long as a person of ordinary skill in the art would have an incentive to combine the references. I have never heard of the PTO holding up anything as a guarantee of fairness.

      I have never once read a patent to get a good idea. The only reason I read patents is to make sure that I do not use the technology described by mistake.

      Use the technology described all you like - as long as you don't create something that contains all the elements and limitations of something described in the claims. The claims are the description of the invention. Omit just one element called for by a claim from your creation and you don't infringe. And if something is described but not claimed, it is automatically dedicated to the public. Most people think that the protection granted by a patent is much broader than what is actually granted. Most patent grants have a fairly narrow scope.

      --

      Laws affecting technology will always be bad until enough techies become lawyers.

    4. Re:Patents Are The Solution by Zeinfeld · · Score: 2
      You cannot get any kind of legal protection for ideas. You can only protect the tangible expression of specific ideas.

      The idea of one click shopping has been patented. As have many ideas. The theory of patent law bears no relationship to the actual corrupt practice.

      This is a problem with patent EXAMINATION, not with patents themselves.

      No, it is a problem with the USpTO, I have no problem with any of the European or in ternational patent offices. The specific problem is the US examination system which uniquely has no period of public review and opposition.

      --
      Looking for an Information Security student project suggestion?
      Try http://dotcrimeManifesto.com/
  102. why linux will continue to grow . . . . rant by kraksmoka · · Score: 1
    When that value takes the form of intellectual property--knowledge that one can sell--as it commonly does, it must be kept secret, since no one will buy knowledge that is available for free. The core content of useful industrial research can rarely, if ever, be submitted to public scrutiny. This secrecy increases the opportunity for impropriety and thus makes the knowledge inherently less reliable than comparable knowledge produced in the open.

    could not have said it better myself. how many private APIs will m$ hide for "security" (their own financial) until they get that point??

    how many people here doubt that they could become even larger if they shed the fat (webTV), opened up WinBlows, and stopped acting like a hyeena roaming the tech safari? all that without strangling the market or as they like to call it "promoting innovation, so long as we can tax it". when you have 40 bn in the bank, its easy to re-invent yourself in a more useful (less buggy maybe) form factor, see the Fruity competition for remake details and how a fat bank account lets you do that sort of thing.

    is even mentioned in the article as why bell labs had great scientific integrity for all those years. if we're going to put up with a monopoly, that does not mean that they cannot operate in the best interests of society (when they don't they are Sherman Acted).

    without bell labs, where would computing be today? bsd grew out of unix, from there, and hey, raise your hand if you like TCP/IP protocols and BIND

    /rant

    --
    "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
  103. Please do not mod spam replies up by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I read at +2 to avoid noise. This way I avoid the spams, but I get to ses spam replies that are modded up. That is very annoying.

    1. Re:Please do not mod spam replies up by smoondog · · Score: 2

      I read at +2 to avoid noise. This way I avoid the spams, but I get to ses spam replies that are modded up. That is very annoying.

      But what if the post starts at +2?

      -Sean

  104. Dissent by abhinavnath · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I disagree with the author's basic assumption: that the purpose of science is to find a higher truth, for its own sake, and that benefits to humanity are merely tangential spinoffs. I think science's purpose should be to create things that will improve the human condition, especially in fields of inquiry such as biology, where the results of scientific research can have almost immediate, tangible results on people.

    I understand the arguments for more or less undirected research, that electricity or quantum physics or [insert science here] would never have been discovered without it. I disagree. Directed research would, I feel, have lead us to all of our modern breakthroughs anyway. It frustrates me, as a student, to see scientists waste time, money and effort on questions that are fundamentally not that important. It is much better to look for an effective HIV protease inhibitor than it is to look for patterns in the mating habits of fruit flies.

    --
    My other sig is also a .Porsche
    1. Re:Dissent by frank_adrian314159 · · Score: 2
      Your opinion, quite frankly, is insane.

      Speaking as an engineer, I thank God for those individuals who pursue science for its own sake, who publish openly and forthrightly, and who make the world, in the long run, a better place. In industry, the *few* scientists who are actually allowed to do reasearch are usually so overworked trying to find the next profit center that they don't have time to actually find much that's an actual breakthrough. Science, like evolution, happens in bouts of puctuated equilibrium. The spikes in progress come from those few moments when some poor sap has time to make sure his brilliant new ideas are right before publishing them. In undustrial research labs, there isn't the time to do that.

      My big fear is actually that - as an economically driven society - we're eating the research faster than we're making it. When the research runs out, there won't be any more engineering breakthroughs based on it and the economic wheels will grind to a halt. This is why I don't begrudge the scientists the pittance that the federal government hands out to them. The bottom line is that it's economic security for all of us.

      P.S. Did you ever consider that the biologist working on the mating habits of fruit fies might be doing research that might lead to a breakthrough that could stop insects from breeding so much and save billions of dollars in crop damage? How about if his work led to a way to increase breeding rates in hard-to-grow crops? Or a way to get onco-rats to breed more quickly? If you really are a science major, I'd suggest you get a clue soon. Otherwise, you're likely to be trapped in a career that you are seriously non-suited for. Especially if you don't see the value in pure research.

      --
      That is all.
    2. Re:Dissent by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 3, Interesting
      It is much better to look for an effective HIV protease inhibitor than it is to look for patterns in the mating habits of fruit flies.


      You don't know any fruit farmers, do you?

      If you know what a retrovirus is, what a protease is, what a protease inhibitor is ... you know these things because of someone's "blue sky" research, years or decades ago, when they had no apparent importance. Directed research is good. It's important. It very obviously gives us a great many things that allow us to live happier, healthier, longer lives. But there has not been a single major technological advance in the last century or so -- and not that many major advances throughout human history -- that has not depended on basic scientific knowledge gained by someone doing research that, at the time, was about knowledge for knowledge's sake.

      And I really suggest you read up on fruit flies.
      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    3. Re:Dissent by abhinavnath · · Score: 2

      Well I'm glad I got an intelligent reply.
      I do not have a problem with *undirected* research. I have a major problem with *unfocussed* research. Let me give you an example. I've done research on the proteins involved in the development of fruit-flies - how do they make a wing where they need a wing, and so forth. This is pretty much "blue sky" research. However, as a by-product, people in that lab found an efficient, easy way to screen potential drugs for colon cancer. That's a great, immediate pay-off. Perhaps more importantly, solving the fruit flies development will provide valuable insight into the development of other more complex organisms.

      I've also done some research I'm not so proud of - on the parental effects of recombination in fruit flies. Basically, the more sex a female fruit fly has, the greater the probability of certain kinds of mutations in her offspring. This is presumably due to proteins in the male's semen. All well and good. Except - this system is *unique* to fruit flies. In every other organism we've studied, the system of recombination is drastically different. Although everyone involved in this research project was very nice and very well-meaning, I cannot help but think that it was something of a waste of time and resources.

      As you may have gathered, I know a bit about fruit flies and other weird and wonderful creatures. However, thanks for your reply and your spirited defence of pure science.

      --
      My other sig is also a .Porsche
    4. Re:Dissent by Daniel+Dvorkin · · Score: 2

      Okay, sounds like you know a lot about fruit flies -- more than I do, on a cellular level at least. But I'd like you to consider a couple of things about the reproductive research that you dismiss:

      1) Negative knowledge is still knowledge. Okay, now we know that fruit fly reproduction is unique, or at least has certain unique features. That uniqueness is in itself interesting. Why is it unique? Are we sure that it actually is unique -- e.g., perhaps the same mechanism operates in other organisms, but at a much lower level? Given that Drosophila is one of the most widely used lab animals in the world, does this uniqueness have any implications for using it in various kinds of research? Etc. It seems to me that these are all valid questions.

      2) If you're a fruit farmer, knowing things about fruit fly reproduction is a very, very good thing. New pesticides and/or new organic methods of pest control could very easily come out of this knowledge.

      3) "Of what possible use, sir, is a new-born babe?" You may not ever see anything useful come out of the research, and quite possibly no one who worked on the project ever will -- but five or ten or fifty years hence, it's entirely possible that someone else might.

      BTW, is any of this research available on-line? That kind of thing interests me. Reminds me of the guy I know at Woods Hole who is the world's leading expert on sea urchin reproduction. Whenever he has trouble getting a grant, he always threatens to start paying for his research by starting the world's first sea urchin porn site ...

      --
      The correlation between ignorance of statistics and using "correlation is not causation" as an argument is close to 1.
    5. Re:Dissent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I do not have a problem with *undirected* research. I have a major problem with *unfocussed* research.

      I studied mathematics at university; it's the most "abstract" of sciences, as far as I can tell, since the whole of reality is just one special case of a mathematical system. Albeit a very interesting special case, of course. ;-)

      I remember a story my professor told me in a course called "Introduction to Rings and Fields" -- abstract algebra that doesn't require "numbers" to perform computations upon. When we were starting the course, he mentioned that the most important real world developments of Field Theory was in two areas: Public Key Cryptography and Error Correcting Codes.

      One of the men who laid the groundwork for those two *major* breakthroughs (used every time you use a modem or a bank machine), was quoted as saying: "I do this only for my own amusement. There will never be a practical application for this work."

      Ten years later, his work was of immense value, the world over.

      Don't discount pure research. You don't know what you can do with something new until you try, and sometimes even the person who discovers something has no idea of the implications of it's existance.
      --
      AC

    6. Re:Dissent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The problem with your rather naive view is that is there is no way to know, before the fact, whether a piece of research is going to 'improve the human condition' or end up ruining it.

      How do you tell if an esoteric piece of maths research is going to be useful now or in a hundred years? How do you know if research into that strange type of radioactivity is going to result in power plants or bombs?

      You don't.

      The other problem with excusively relying on directed research, is the most creative minds and the absolute highest achievers do research for its own sake, and not that of other people. Physics, for Einstein and Feynman was a game, not a task.

      Waste is a side-effect of any creative process and we should view waste (in that context) as a sign of systemic healthiness and not, as you seem to think, a weakness or inefficiency.

    7. Re:Dissent by Crispin+Cowan · · Score: 2
      I disagree with the author's basic assumption: that the purpose of science is to find a higher truth, for its own sake, and that benefits to humanity are merely tangential spinoffs. I think science's purpose should be to create things that will improve the human condition, especially in fields of inquiry such as biology, where the results of scientific research can have almost immediate, tangible results on people.
      Science is the former: the search for knowledge for it's own sake. The latter (applying knowledge to make people's lives better) is known as "engineering."

      Heard at a conference 10 years ago:

      • Scientists build stuff in order to learn stuff.
      • Engineers learn stuff in order to build stuff.
      Crispin, who is a little of each
      ----
      Crispin Cowan, Ph.D.
      Chief Scientist, WireX Communications, Inc.
      Immunix: Security Hardened Linux Distribution
      Available for purchase
  105. dead wrong here by kraksmoka · · Score: 1
    In a truly competitive environment an industrial laboratory cannot do academic-style research--studies on the cutting edge of knowledge with no obvious immediate applicability.

    ok bro, now you've lost me. Xerox screwed up bigtime, but could have been the digiDocument company if they had played their cards right. it is just far more obvious to us today what they had at the time, than it was to the suits. don't mistake this for it not being possible

    and this is the same reason that m$ makes webTV, windoze CE, Pocket PC os, Smart (their imagination) phones and whatnot. if m$ had any real sense, they would start longer term R&D dept. well, they have one, kinda, but their current market stance (willing and aple to spy on you, aka Big Brother) is a deterrent to their management incorporating any of the better ideas.

    people are often bound by their own pre-concieved notions, and that is especially strong in academia. if you listen to your college professor father (like mine) too carefully, life gets suddenly boring, and you start "jumping thru hoops" and "playing the game". when a company gets monopoly position (like intel basically had for a while) they can leverage that to do serious longterm research.

    by the way, kudos for intel's monopoly management, and success in being the gorilla without being a monopoly.

    --
    "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
  106. The very sad thing is by phorm · · Score: 3, Insightful

    That it will make it that much harder to believe the real scientific breakthroughs. I mean, if you've got some scientists working a month of after-hours in a lab, and suddenly he comes through with cold fusion or a cure for AIDS. The next day, he's on the phone yammering about how he's done it, but because of the stress/caffeine/lack-of-sleep he can't remember the exact steps to making his project, and it's not quite working today. The scientific communicate will just hum and haw, ignoring his finding until they can be fully substantiated.

    Unfortunately, not all experiments are a 100% reproducable result. Sometimes there are outside factors that one doesn't think of (hey, the moon was full and the tide was high), that make an experiment very hard to produce. If scientists aren't trusted and can't immediately able to produce results, they won't be able to get the additional funding that may be required for further research (it worked, but doesn't now, but it worked, so why?).

    1. Re:The very sad thing is by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      The idea, however, is to have all your ducks in a row before applying for new funding.

      If you got the results you wanted, but then can't reproduce them, you have to sit down with your data and think long and hard about what you left uncontrolled, what could have an effect, and why. That's sort of the point of the whole process.

    2. Re:The very sad thing is by Idarubicin · · Score: 2
      Science aphorism #1: Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof.

      It's usually a good rule of thumb. And if someone does have a genuinely remarkable result, he or she will usually be believed eventually. At which point, the project will be turned over to a coworker who is capable of keeping a detailed lab notebook.

      Science aphorism #2: If you don't write it down, it never happened.

      Obviously, this only works for positive results. Negative results unfortunately still seem to happen even if you don't write them down. Records are an essential part of the scientific method. If you believe the fellow who cures AIDS and develops cold fusion while pulling an all-nighter in the lab--but, shucks, didn't get it down on paper--I've got some magic beans for you. No, I misplaced the certificate of authenticity the giant gave me, but you can take my word for it, right?

      --
      ~Idarubicin
    3. Re:The very sad thing is by phorm · · Score: 2

      I just compare it to some of the late-night hacking sessions I've had, fixing servers etc.
      1:30am, I've been coding like mad, fixing this and that and everything is running smoothly.
      2:00am, the jolt is wearing out and I'm getting droopy, so I log off and head to bed for the night

      8:00am, suddenly nothing's working anymore... processes dying, etc etc. Of course, in computers it's usually predictable, death starts to occur right about the time a lot of users start logging on.

      But the point is, even if it WORKED... and then suddenly didn't, and there were notes, how do you believe it?
      I'm not talking "I didn't take notes", I'm saying "I followed exact procedures XX and YY and got results ZZ". Sometimes it could be as simple as "it worked at night because there was no sunlight".... who knows.
      Ever has a car or appliance that only worked right when it gets to the mechanic? You'll know what I mean then :-)

    4. Re:The very sad thing is by Idarubicin · · Score: 2
      But the point is, even if it WORKED... and then suddenly didn't, and there were notes, how do you believe it?

      The point is that if there are accurate and detailed notes, you have a much better starting point to try and repeat the result. You know what reagents the chemist used. You can check for contamination at all the steps. You can run the experiment again late at night and see if the cleaner power helps. For that matter, you can evaluate the work in the cold light of day and look for gross errors of technique that were inadvertantly missed late at night.

      Scientists are usually willing to spend a significant amount of time working on a needle-in-a-haystack type of problem. They hate to be sent on a wild goose chase. Good notes make all the difference.

      The best way to get colleagues to believe you? Build a reputation for good technique and recordkeeping over years of scientific effort. Show them the steps you followed in your work. Respect their criticisms and listen to their advice. Other scientists will be falling all over themselves for a chance to get a piece of a new discovery.

      --
      ~Idarubicin
  107. To summarize the summary of the summary... by HarveyBirdman · · Score: 1
    ...scientists are human, and it's a serious problem in a society that still imagines scientists to be seekers of Truth & Justice.

    The problem is also compounded by a public that does not understand the vast gulf between a uncovering a simple correlation and finding a true cause and effect relationship between two things.

    Look at how many people still think that high power lines cause cancer after the guy who did the original study admitted to lying about some of the numbers. How many millions of dollars in property value were lost by the average Joe Homeowner near power lines because that jackass "researcher" had to put his ideology before reality? He found random statistical clustering and got people to believe in a fake cause and effect.

    In fact, not only are scientists susceptible to ideology, in my experience working in a scientific field, they can be MORE prone to ideological degeneration than most people. You listen to them talk about their field of expertise and can be impressed, then they comment on politics and you want to run screaming into the night plotting how best to take up arms against the mad scientist.

    --
    --- Ban humanity.
  108. professor rot, jeez by kraksmoka · · Score: 2, Insightful
    The tradition of sending government money down to universities without some value coming back has ended

    ok dude, i like your opinions about the value of scientific purity, and openness. but i think that your head is buried in a lot of historical sand.

    the Military-Industrial complex of the last 50 years has been driven by university research, and there was no "tradition" of giving without expecting a return. there is always a return, at minimum some gov. controls (see stem cells) at maximum, total control (see manhattan project @ U Chicago).

    please limit you traditions to historical fact.

    this comment is the result of what i call Academic Demetia. typical professor here, thinks that they give him all that money solely for the purpose of his enjoyment of the truly kewl geek toys that normal people can't afford (well, cept for the atom smasher i installed in my Volvo).

    wake up fella, the government owns more whores like you than you could find if you put LA, Amsterdam and Tel Aviv together and shook it up, and declared perpetual night. which is apparently, the sum of your historical knowledge, lemme guess, you didn't like "memorizing facts"????

    end disgruntled history major rant.

    --
    "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
    1. Re:professor rot, jeez by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting
      As one of Laughlin's students, I can tell you that he is more aware of the history of science funding than you give him credit for. Before he got his academic job, he worked for a few years at Bell Labs and for much of the 1980's at Livermore, designing bombs.

      Those bombs were central to the government relationship with physics. As long as physicists were needed to design them, the government was happy to fund "basic research" to maintain a healthy field. From the perspective of the government, the main value coming from this research was in the physicists being trained, not the results they published. Now things have changed, and the government research enterprise is being reshaped along the lines of corporate research labs.

      Also recognize that he is trying to persuade his intended audience of physicists to change their practices. It helps his case to remind them how the situation around them is changing.

    2. Re:professor rot, jeez by kraksmoka · · Score: 1
      dude, wish u had logged in to post this

      i agree, this is aimed at the scientific community. i also agree that his aim is persuasion, and to better accomplish this goal, it might be more important to use historical precident when talking, not just personal experience.

      to be scientific about this, using only one's own experience to convey a point of historical interest is like using your control group as your observation and control group.

      a little more objectivity in those points would carry them further in the non-scientific world.

      let me also point out that i have been friends to physicists doing that sort of research (well, Top Quark stuff with U Chi, out of FSU) and I do agree that there is a significant change underway in your field.

      however, as the post implies, the reason for this is the tendency of academic arguements to remain . .. . academic.

      kind of like this post

      i think the important idea is finding where the Mean lies between academic truth, and (feeling) forced to present science fiction to obtain $$. beaurocracies have a mind of their own, but they do hold the purse strings. nobody likes em, but they are here to stay, like roaches, they would be the only form of life to survive the bombs your professor made.

      and did all those physicists really want to make Alpha-Omega devices all those years? or was that just for the money?

      i do actually agree with his ideas, but there is a better way to express them. isn't that what scientific truth is really all about???

      prof. mclaughlin, if you're listenin, i'm on your side.

      --
      "You never want a serious crisis to go to waste." - Rahm Emanuel
  109. Who is Robert Laughlin by djbrums · · Score: 1

    In case you missed it, it's laughlin, not lauglin. One thing to consider when reading his opinion is he did win the nobel prize.

  110. The High Priesthood of Physics by Frodo2002 · · Score: 1

    Physics is a field with a unique conflict. It is captured best by the actions of the father of modern physics, namely Galileo. He was both the founder of the open source nature of physics and the high priesthood of physics. He used to set up his telescope in the town square and let people come and take a look. He spread physics to the people. On the other hand there was his lifelong running conflict with the church. (Whose doctrine he was subverting). The result was that he had to try and shape physics as a keeper of absolute truth, as a religion which would replace or surpass the religious doctrines of the time. That dimension of physics is still present today in the way in which common people view physics. (Pretty much as a high priesthood in my opinion). Robert Laughlin (for all his nobel prize winning intelligence) is trying to protect the "religious mystery" of physics from being sullied. Nothing more.

    So what do I think? I think the age of physics as a religion should be coming to an end and happily so. I think it is time that the true nature of physics was revealed. And who knows where it will go from there? It would hardly be in danger of dying. Physics will merely be something very different in the future. Laughlin's attempt to hold physics back from its natural evolution is the most certain way of killing it. Already I can see how physics is stagnating in the halls of power and if nothing moves it forward, I think its death is assured.

    1. Re:The High Priesthood of Physics by ggwood · · Score: 1

      Galileo was a devout Christian. His daughters were both sent to covenents. All his books were reviewed by the inquisition before they were published. Later in life, under a new pope, some of his works were re-examined and trouble started. I think Galileo was not trying to:

      "shape physics as a keeper of absolute truth, as a religion which would replace or surpass the religious doctrines of the time".

      Certainly, physics should be about truth - as close to absolute as we can find. If you want real certainty, try math. Galileo never imagined his work would replace religion. I believe he would have found the thought repugnant. See, for example, _Galileo's_Daughter_, or similar texts. These are not secrets.

      http://www.amazon.com/exec/obidos/tg/detail/-/01 40 280553/qid=1039813359/sr=8-1/ref=sr_8_1/102-486054 4-8813720?v=glance&s=books&n=507846

      Laughlin writes against the trend towards commercializing physics and keeping results secret. I would imagine you agree with him at least on the secrets part.

      I agree, and Laughlin would agree (I think) that Physics will be something very different in the future. He simply wants it to remain a science and not become an appendage of business. Would you not agree currently physics professors are more like Galileo with his telescope in the town square than, say, Microsoft is with their source code?

      The real danger is not patents. Those are public knowledge. The serious danger is trade secrets: science which is invented, then re-invented, ad infinitum, because all those with the money to fund the research and get the results choose to hide them.

      Honest.

      -Gregory Wood

      --
      a war on terrorism? How can we end a war on a method?
    2. Re:The High Priesthood of Physics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What a load of nonsense.

      You give no examples about how physics is stagnating.

      In the last 10 years alone, we have seen significant breakthroughs in particle physics & cosmology (string theory), astrophysics (galactic black holes, dark energy, the theory of the neutrino), information theory (cellular automata and complexity theory), materials physics (Carbon-60), nanotechnology, low temperature physics (bose-einstein condensates and superconductivity)... the list goes on!

    3. Re:The High Priesthood of Physics by Frodo2002 · · Score: 1

      Well, comment 2 is not worth replying to, but the estimable Mr. Wood raises some interesting issues.

      First of all, to put Galileo in perspective. He had the protection/advice of Cardinal Barberini who apparently was his friend. But he was still getting in trouble with the inquisition in 1616. He seems to have stopped making his views known then or certainly kept a bit quieter, probably under advisement from the Cardinal. In 1623 the same cardinal became pope and Galileo happily published "Dialogue..." presumably thinking that the church was going to become more open minded. Well of course the pope (formally Cardinal Barberini) could not look after him and that is when the shit hit the proverbial fan. - I am using "Physics, the Human Adventure" by G. Holton and S.G. Brush as my historical reference...

      Now, paraphrasing the same guys, Galileo firmly believed that all the laws of nature stemmed from the mind of God. As you say, he was a devout Christian. The same authors also observe the continually raging conflict between religious doctrine and science, even into the 20th century. What I was trying to argue is that 1. Galileo's religious attitude suggest that science is in pursuit of a higher objective truth. (the mind of God etc...) Einstein, Hawking and other high energy theorists/cosmologists are/were fond of trumpeting this view of physics. 2. The running conflict between the church and science forced scientists to often take a stance of presenting a higher truth than religion, thus continually placing itself in danger of looking like a religion... Just look at the language we use, for example: "The laws of nature". Utter crap. Newton's law is no immutable law set in stone. It works if you are going nice and slowly. It does not work if you are going really fast. It is just a model with a limited range of applicability.

      I would argue that science is not at all about seeking of higher truth. Some physicists would like to believe that, but I think the reality is somewhat different. Science is about making models of the world. Good models are those which are solvable and make testable predictions. This has very little to do with truth. All models have limited range of applicability. I don't think that general relativity holds a key to a higher truth than say newtonian mechanics. They simply represent different domains of applicability. I think that to think of doing physics as a pursuit of truth is completely erroneous and I do not think that good researcher (apart from string theorists/cosmologists) would think of doing physics from that perspective.

      Thus when Robert Laughlin starts talking about physics being a sort of keeper of the gold standard of truth, my hair stands on end. He knows physics is not like that, but he is portraying the public image of physics. The one which makes people think that physicists are sooo clever etc, etc... The image which we perpetuate in a desperate attempt to stay on top of the pile. I agree entirely about the whole business of the commercialization of science and the inherent dangers of that and keeping secrets. However, his motivation is what I am arguing against. His article morphs from the dangers of commercialism to a comparison between physics and "softer" sciences and that is where I start having problems.

  111. /. self-aggrandizement by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    like the falsification of data at lucent covered here on slashdot

    Yeah, three sentences, and a link to Reuters. Way to "cover" the story, Slashdot.

  112. Try engineer anything without science. by aepervius · · Score: 2

    Where do you think engineering got its grade ? Without the equation of physic and science engineering would not go past the "try and retry again randomly until it looks OK". Engineering IS NOT independant of science. It is one of its Offspring : application of scientific law (be it physics, mathematic or biology).

    --
    C. Sagan : A demon haunted world:
    http://www.amazon.com/gp/product/0345409469/
    visit randi.org
    1. Re:Try engineer anything without science. by coloth · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Engineering IS NOT independant of science

      Yes, of course you are correct. You know it, I know it. But to the voters who must choose between $5 billion to build a supercollider or $5 billion in freeways and bridges, will they choose the scientist or the engineer?

      I wrote my post poorly, so let me clarify. I was attempting to portray the dilemma of obtaining public funds for scientific research.

      The perfect example is NASA. What do most people ask? "How is that going to help us?" Most people aren't satisfied by knowledge for its own sake, especially when their tax money is involved.

      This is why, in my opinion, the public understands engineers better than scientists.

      --

      Machines take me by surprise with great frequency. -A. Turing

  113. The /. responses portray a very sad picture ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The article rightfully points to one of the hallmarks of civilization, as "representative government" (the word representative having as its underlying "idea" the idea of progress and happiness, not raw animal gratification of greed or whatever) and ... "banking."

    Where the so-called detached "scientific community" per se has gone wrong, has been in its consent to ... sorry to go here boys, our modern "I-believe-in-Disneyland" form of banking. (What is wealth? ... profit?).

    Admittedly, one of the ./'s got on the right track, with a prediction that "our" scientific community (which is really an anti-science, anti-humanity mob) will one day face its ... Enron.

    The largest force in the world today, is bar none, the power to emit fraudulent debt, by a political process of hairdoo-synchronistic LBO's and offshore bank accounts for a few people, euphamistically called "US corporations." Enron, and Worldcomp or whatever, have been ... urged along ... in an incremental way, by our fraudulent and anti-scientific anti-progress I-believe-in-Disneyland Trent-Lott-happly-plantation system of political economy and banking.

    But, you cry ... fraud in banking has nothing to do with fraud in science.

    Consider the history of science: Kepler, had published his discovery of gravity 80 years before the magi of all fraudsters, Newton, took claim to it, with financing by British East India Company mobster-bankers. I believe our failure started with a failure to be truthful about the history of science. Consider our failure today, to recognize Kepler and his progeny, such Leibniz (whose calculus does not presume that the differential and its simultaneous integral can be created from within a fixed domain called coordinate space) and Gauss, and their modern progeny, even as far as Vladimir Ladma, says it all.

    Edward Rosen of Chicago has done a translation of Copernicus' "Minor Papers." In one of his letters, Copernicus makes as good a case as can be made, against our modern IMF-Federal Reserve "I-believe-in-Disneyland" form of banking, or Trent Lott's "happy-plantation" form of political economy. (Copernicus was a political organizer! as well as a scientist.) It is no wonder to me, Kepler dedicated his discovery of gravity, to Copernicus. Could it be that Kepler too, joined with Copernicus, in the political effort to restore sensible banking to Eastern Europe? Consider for starters, the wars which followed, per Copernicus' prediction.

    But, who can dare to say anything of the "scientific repurcussions" ... of our modern form of banking ... by mobsters.

  114. All very interesting, however: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ingled out
    haha
    I must read more now
    county: http://slashdot.org/comments.pl?sid=20721&cid=4675 437
    Ignore the superfluous comma.
    does that seem accurate to you?
    All of them =)
    thx
    *** First_Incision is now known as fi-away
    I can't say, bc. I didn't read it.
    Should I?
    Yes, you should
    Haha!
    http://www.ananova.com/news/story/sm_686841.html?m enu=news.weirdworld.sexlife
    It almost looks real.
    The one problem is that shoeboy is LOLing too much and Vladinator isn't doing it enough.
    I'm kind of insulted. It represents me as a pathetic drunk with delusional fantasies that I'm liked by females, and that seems entirely untrue
    gratuituous kylie pictures. Proof Allah(SWT) and Mohammed (PBUH) are REAL
    It does seem entirely untrue that you're liked by females.
    bc at least you are worthy of parody
    hehe
    some of us are become stalinesque non-persons.
    airbrushed out of trolling history
    abu and I didn't even get noticed :(
    craig&osm&trollaxor prolly still like you, dmg
    "Where's the part where Barry Corrington slags on Jin Wicked for half an hour then kisses her ass when she logs in?"
    Has Jin ever been in here?

    Read the rest of this comment...
    [ Reply to This ]
    This Person is an IMPOSTER (Score:-1, Offtopic)
    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 13, @09:18AM (#4880139)
    This person is IMPERSONATING ME. He set up this account just to pretend to be me, just like the person with the "Scott Lockwood" account did. Please don't pay attention to him!

    Mr. "Quick Star" and Mr. Fake "Scott Lockwood", I have a message for you: get ready for a world of hurt. The first lesson is free.

    Have you ever seen the movies Where the Heart Is and Anywhere but Here starring Natalie Portman? How about the classic Meg Ryan romantic comedies When Harry Met Sally and Sleepless in Seattle? Well, THAT'S the style of Martial Arts I practice. I've perfected the ruthless and efficient OLSEN TWINS FASH-SLAP STANCE!

    How about the the classic Sci-Fi cult hits Plan 9 from Outer Space and The Rocky Horror Picture Show? Well, I know the martial arts from THOSE movies too! Let me show you THE PATHETIC TRANSVESTITE ALIEN STANCE!

    I've also recently started to learn the martial arts from several new movies such as Jackass: the Movie, My Big Fat Greek Wedding, and Jonah: A VeggieTales Movie. I really look forward to learning the martial arts from the upcoming movie Eight Mile starring my FAVORITE HERO EVAR, Eminem (a.k.a. Slim Shady & Marshall Mathers), so you'd better watch out for my ANGRY WHITE NIGGER STANCE!!!!

    I'm also learning even more martial arts from this web page [realultimatepower.net] [realultimatepower.net], including the deadly KUNG-FU NINJA JESUS ATTACK STANCE! Hi-YAH!!!

    I'm working to improve my rythm [klerck.org] [klerck.org], flexibility [rotten.com] [rotten.com], stealth skills [fartbuster.com] [fartbuster.com], self-confidence [yahoo.com] [yahoo.com], and critical thinking [timecube.com] [timecube.com] skills, so you'd better watch out, because very soon I will perfect my ultimate attack, THE LARD-LIKE ANTISOCIAL DEPRESSIVE ASSHOLE SPAMMER IMPOTENT PAEDOPHILE FELCHING FLATULENT WIGGER SUMO-SAMURAI CHILD-ABUSE RESTRAINING-ORDER UNWASHED BASTARDIZED ANAL IMMATURE CATHOLIC GOATFUCKER STANCE!!!!

    If that doesn't scare you... just wait and see. You'll get yours soon enough.

    As Nietzsche said, "If you stare too long into my ass [klerck.org] [klerck.org], beware, for my ass [klerck.org] [klerck.org] might start to stare back into you."

    -- Vlad

    I just LOVE Vladinator's site [sexuallymu...dchild.org] [olsentwins.com]. Especially the "flab" [sexuallymu...dchild.org] [olsentwins.com] section, where I learned to use a fold of my own stomach-flab as a Martial Arts weapon. Oh and the "aborted fetus" photos!

    Of course, don't forget to read Vladinator's entrails [sexuallymu...dchild.org] [olsentwins.com]. Here you will find how truly difficult it is to decide what to do on the weekends... have an orgy party? A faggot party? Go to the the mall naked and get arrested for public indecency? Have a sleepover and get woken up by Nigerians on the phone?

    In short, if you haven't seen Vladinator's site [sexuallymu...dchild.org] [olsentwins.com], you don't know what you're missing!

    I just LOVE Vladinator's site [sexuallymu...dchild.org] [olsentwins.com]. Especially the "flab" [sexuallymu...dchild.org] [olsentwins.com] section, where I learned to use a fold of my own stomach-flab as a Martial Arts weapon. Oh and the "aborted fetus" photos!

    Of course, don't forget to read Vladinator's entrails [sexuallymu...dchild.org] [olsentwins.com]. H

    Read the rest of this comment...
    [ Reply to This ]
    Amherst-Fag and the Whoring of Karma (Score:-1, Offtopic)
    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 13, @09:18AM (#4880142)
    From: cptroll
    To:
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] Have I gone soft?
    Date sent: Mon, 16 Oct 2000 13:01:08 -0400
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@methlab.nothing.org
    (This is CP0024)

    Marc Stauffer wrote:

    >: True. I still think karma as a persistent user property ought to be
    >: eliminated. It's fine to score individual comments, and even to award a
    >: special +1 comment bonus to selected "good posters", but karma as a prop for
    >: the self-esteem of pathetic geeks, or as a game, is dumb. At the very least,
    >: karma should not be displayed, not even one's own karma. And if it's going
    >: to exist, it ought to be aged so that my recent activity is treated as a
    >: better predictor of the value of my next comment than something I wrote a
    >: year ago.

    Bah, I'd hate this, but then I'm too much a karmawhore at heart. But if we could somehow increase the amount of quality moderation (to get rid of brainless drivel, not just spam) and rely on our abilities to craft quality-sounding trolls, then I wouldn't complain too much if we got rid of karma altogether and got rid of the +1 bonus along with it. Originally, the +1 bonus was reserved by just a few, but now every lamer and his dog has it. It's lost all meaning.

    >What this doesn't solve, however, is the inherent problems
    >with moderation. Not with the system, mind you, but with the
    >users. There needs to be stricter policies, e.g. no
    >usernames displayed when you moderate, or something along
    >those lines, and the penalties for crummy mods need to be
    >higher. In fact, people need to be banned from moderating
    >more often since they simply suck at it.

    I'd been thinking along the lines of hiding usernames during moderation, if nothing else than to help us trolls with recognizable usernames who get unfair moderation simply for being trolls in general than just on a particular post. I can see several0 problems, though:

    1) It won't stop the most dedicated of trollbusters who will keep a separate window open as AC where they can see people's usernames. These are the moderators who most need to be stopped, and yet this restriction won't do so.

    2) It will add a social cost to moderating itself. People might just start throwing their points at crap just to get back to normal mode where they can see who's talking. But it could cut both ways.

    3) It'll increase the amount of noisy replies screaming: "Moderators! Don't you realize streetlawyer/flatpack/etc. is the one saying this?!?!?!" We don't need that.

    4) You'd have to hide .sig files as well. Not a big deal.

    (This is CP0024)

    Read the rest of this comment...
    [ Reply to This ]
    The Information You Requested (Score:-1, Offtopic)
    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 13, @09:19AM (#4880147)
    SIR:

    This is TealMicrodot [kuro5hin.org] again, still filling in for my friend, the original Microdot, who is having some trouble with an IP-Ban at the moment. He was right about the rampant censorship happening here. Deleted accounts, IP bans, comments being entirely deleted rather than just hidden, weird stuff going on so that certain comments are visible when not logged in but invisible to logged in users -- this is Democracy? We have proof of all of this, and we're compiling all the evidence we get.

    Anyway, here's the hyena information you requested:

    Female [att.net] hyenas are virtually indistinguishable from males [geekizoid.com]. Their clitoris [the-clitoris.com] is enlarged [geekizoid.com] and extended to form an organ of the same size, shape, and position as the male penis [lpsg.org]. It can also be erected. Their labia [socialistworker.org] have folded up and fused to form a false scrotum that is not discernibly different in external form or location from the true scrotum [forkbomb.net] of males.

    It even contains fatty tissue [att.net] forming two swellings easily mistaken for testicles [iniquitydaily.com]. Authors of the most recent paper on spotted hyenas found the appearance of males and females [godaddy.com] so close that sex could only be determined with certainty by palpation [goatse.cx] of the scrotum. Testes could be located in the scrotum of the male compared with soft adipose tissue in the false scrotum of the female.

    Read the rest of this comment...
    [ Reply to This ]
    VLADEQUACY RAW & UNCUT 5 (Score:-1, Offtopic)
    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 13, @09:19AM (#4880152)
    [dmg] and then I will be in Tokyo/south Korea in April
    [dmg] Who are you anyway Lumpen ?
    [bc] you are drunk ever 36 hours
    [dmg] I am not sure I should be giving this information out.
    [Lumpen] Just a fan, dmg.
    [county] Well, I need to stay sober for now, because I have a date!
    [First_Incision] why am I always sober? I should take up this drinking thing.
    [county] Yes, do.
    [First_Incision] maybe I just need to get used to it. I could never drink enough to get drunk. Once I could feel stupidity creeping up, I could never bring myself to continue.
    [county] Strange.
    [dmg] county: did you get your date from reading the excellent dating advice available here on #adequacy ?
    [county] Once I can feel stupidity creeping up, I can't bring myself to stop.
    [county] dmg, I actually lied about having a date.
    [Lumpen] does #adequacy have a dating-advice bot?
    [dmg] county: its IRC
    [dmg] you can lie if you want
    [First_Incision] Lumpen: it should!
    [First_Incision] zuul, dating?
    [zuul] first_incision: wish i knew
    [First_Incision] zuul, women?
    [zuul] bugger all, i dunno, first_incision
    [First_Incision] zuul, men?
    [zuul] men are really just boys with financial responsibilities
    [dmg] zuul, should I visit a whore ?
    [zuul] dmg: wish i knew
    [county] I witnessed an shocking display of female pettiness and cruelty today. It put me off.
    [Lumpen] /msg datebot Why aren't women drawn to my l33t Linux skilz?
    [First_Incision] zuul, linux
    [zuul] hmmm... linux is a big POS half rate OS that encourages pirates and blatant faggotry!!!!!
    [bc] perhaps you aren't skillful enough
    [First_Incision] there you go!
    [bc] if you can use these skills to make lots&LOTS of money, they will be drawn to those skills
    [Lumpen] Not skilzful enough?
    [dmg] zuul, bsd
    [zuul] rumour has it bsd is dying
    *** bc has quit IRC (Connection reset by peer)
    *** Sulla (gallus@modem-2446.porcupine.dialup.pol.co.uk) has joined #adequacy
    [Lumpen] But I installed the Linux on my home b0xen all by myself!
    [Lumpen] You should just reopen Adequacy. The joke has gone on long enough.
    [First_Incision] Perdida has her Iniquity "Daily", but I can't seem to finish an article for it.
    [Lumpen] Iniquity?
    [First_Incision] www.iniquitydaily.com
    [dmg] adequacy is dead. Red ink flowed like a river of blood! you didn't have to be Kreskin to see that it was dying. Fact: adequacy is dead.
    [county] perdida has a scoop site?
    [county] Oh heavens, do spare us.
    [Lumpen] It looks like the most recent article on iniquitydaily was posted about a month ago.
    [First_Incision] yeah
    [Lumpen] Lame.
    [First_Incision] And it was a k5 reject
    [cyn-away] bc knows more about it

    Read the rest of this comment...
    [ Reply to This ]
    Amherst-Fag and the Slashdot Bitchslap (Score:-1, Offtopic)
    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 13, @09:20AM (#4880160)
    From: Ceee Peee
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] Experiment in whoring...
    Date sent: Sun, 17 Dec 2000 10:03:49 -0800 (PST)
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    (This is CP0005)

    It's good to see you making a go at it again, but I'm
    confused as to why you're trying to whore up a
    bitchslapped account, because no matter what your
    karma is, you'll never stop defaulting to -1 (just ask
    warren). Your only option would be to start a new
    account -- "DMG" is still available....

    James can answer you better than I, but Jon Erikson is
    definitely not dead. I'm surprised to confirm that
    there aren't any comments on his users.pl page, but I
    guess this week belongs to Dan Hayes.

    (This is CP0005) [www.ngngx]
    [ Reply to This ]
    VLADEQUACY RAW & UNCUT 9 (Score:-1, Offtopic)
    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 13, @09:20AM (#4880163)
    [luisa|||] i don't know if i can ever be that weak and female
    [luisa|||] i.e. find a guy worth that loss
    *** luisa|||| has quit IRC (Ping timeout: 300 seconds)
    [county] Why is it weak to confess your feelings to the one you feel for?
    [luisa|||] because then they've got you in the knees
    [luisa|||] why should i always be the one who cares the most?
    [luisa|||] and on top of that, have to cop to it?
    [Linux] hey grewat, big cop bust outside
    [county] Because, luisa, somebody has to, and if it's them, you'll reject them.
    [county] I'm not seeing many other options. How about you?
    [Linux] shouting and threatening tones
    [Linux] I am going to go walk the dogs past the bust while drunk
    [county] What bust?
    [Linux] dunno
    [Linux] they are shouting at drunks, I think
    [county] Who?
    [Linux] maybe there will be death
    [Linux] cops
    [Linux] many of them
    [Linux] 8 cars at least
    [luisa|||] eek
    [Linux] maybe I'll get shot
    [county] There are 8 cop-cars full of cops shouting at drunks?
    [Linux] yes
    [Linux] two drunks by the sound of things
    [luisa|||] county, if i find a guy i consider my equal
    [luisa|||] it would all work out
    [Linux] they are right past the corner of my building
    [luisa|||] wait
    [luisa|||] eight cops, two drunks?
    [luisa|||] that is Not Right.
    [Linux] i think so
    * luisa||| waits for a cool song to come on
    [county] You've never met a guy who you consider your equal?
    [Linux] luisa|||, are you actually listening to radio broadcasts of popualr music?
    [county] I suppose that makes sense, actually. Most are probably your superior or inferior.
    [county] I think it's fairly obvious which side I fall on.
    [luisa|||] you could be inferior
    [luisa|||] but you probably know lots of things i don't
    [luisa|||] and you also are more productive in daily life
    [county] I am so far beyond you, luisa.
    [county] Come on.
    [luisa|||] i love cheesy 80s music
    [luisa|||] nah, you are just different
    [luisa|||] the measure would be if i made you feel weak and helplessly resentful
    [luisa|||] that's inferior
    [luisa|||] and only assessable face to face
    [Linux] luisa|||, you spin me twice 'round, baby.
    [county] If you made me feel weak and helplessly resentful? Haha.
    [luisa|||] well, anyone who feels like a lesser person probably is
    [luisa|||] or at least is not worth bothering with
    [em] you guys still going on about this? God.
    [county] Only a few people have made me inferior, and none of them were at all like you.
    [luisa|||] it is friday night and neither of us are out carousing, em
    [luisa|||] whatever did you expect would occur?
    [em] neither am I.
    [luisa|||] but you are at uni
    [county] em, have you been drinking?
    [em] well, I went to a chamber chorale concert.
    [em] county: not a drop
    [em] maybe I should.
    [county] Probably. It makes you more tolerant.
    [luisa|||] anyhow, county, it is all moot
    [luisa|||] i am not going to bed with you
    [luisa|||] so the question of whether you are inferior or not will never come up
    [county] I'm not going to bed with you. What of it?
    [county] Anyway, it has come up, and it's been settled. I'm superior.
    [luisa|||] if you feel that you are
    [luisa|||] i do rather want to go to bed
    [luisa|||] but i just finished supper
    * em wonders if he has anything edible in the fridge.
    [luisa|||] i have lovely soup i made from random ingredients
    [Linux] katsup is a vegeta

    Read the rest of this comment...
    [ Reply to This ]
    Amhesrt-Fag and the Excellent Karma (Score:-1, Offtopic)
    by Anonymous Coward on Friday December 13, @09:21AM (#4880165)
    From: cptroll
    To: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com
    Subject: Re: [k22320inchfan] tell me when to stop
    Date sent: Tue, 28 Nov 2000 13:38:49 -0500
    Send reply to: k22320inchfan@lists.io.com (This is CP0039)
    (This is CP0040)

    Thanks, but you should give me a holler first, since I'm rarely bellow 40
    (I was at 44 after a capricious 5-point mod-down with another -1 on top);
    so +10 is overkill. While I'm beating this gift horse in the mouth, let
    me complain that my bobo comment is still languishing at -1 and won't be
    archived. ;-)

    I'm still waiting for michael to get off his ass and accept this one:
    2000-11-28 00:39:58 Yahoo, Mein Kampf, and Child Pornography
    (yro,internet) It's been sitting in his queue for a day now.

    =?iso-8859-1?q?Lunchtime=20Troll?= wrote:

    >I had mod points on two accounts and I gave them all
    >to Anne Marie as I saw that /bots have become pretty
    >obsessed with her. Are there any other accounts that
    >need a boost for the next time I have points?
    >
    >++tlt

    (This is CP0040) [www.u]
    [ Reply to This ]
    Creating "property" vs advancing the art (Score:2)
    by gillbates (106458) on Friday December 13, @09:29AM (#4880229)
    (http://www.angelfire.com/il/macroman)
    For each of us aspiring to a technical career, there comes a moment when we must choose between creating knowledge and creating property. Both choices are legitimate and important, but only one is science.

    Interestingly, the same thing could be said of computer science and programmers. As a programmer, I have two options:

    * I can create intellectual "property" for the benefit of Corporate America(tm).
    * I can release the source code of my work so that the whole of society benefits.

    Unfortunately, I can make a living doing the first, but not the second. Even worse, should the company patent my ideas, I will be denying others the ability to use even rudimentary algorithms without the paying of exorbitant royalties; not only will I exclude my own work from the benefit of others, but I will be actively destroying the ability of other programmers to make a living.

    The choices aren't easy. Fortunately for my sake, my company isn't in the intellectual property business. But the type of coding that I would like to be doing (engineering modeling, GUI design, etc...) inevitably involves me assigning any intellectual property rights for my work to a corporate entity.
    [ Reply to This ]
    it should really be quite simple (Score:3, Interesting)
    by g4dget (579145) on Friday December 13, @09:38AM (#4880276)
    (1) If it's published in a scientific, peer-reviewed publication, it must contain all the information to be reproducible; if it requires special materials for reproduction, the authors must make those evailable. Publishing irreproducible results goes by a different name: public relations and marketing, either for a company or a career; it has no place in science.

    (2) If people put their names on a paper, they should define their contributions and be responsible for the results. If they don't want to accept responsibility for parts of a paper because they didn't work on it, they should say so clearly.

    Unfortunately, it has become common practice for people to pad their publications through multiple authorships: five people writing five papers each only have one publication each, but five people putting their names on each other's publications have five publications each; so much more marketable for job hunting that works by counting publications.

    It doesn't look like much is changing. In response to the Schoen affair, the American Physical Society weasled out of a requirement of academic responsibility by all authors; things are just continuing the way they are. And scientific papers with little more substance than press releases are becoming increasing common, in particular in the biomedical sciences, as companies promise the sky and find them good PR and marketing materials. And editors are afraid to reject that junk.

    But since the peer review system and system of academic publications is becoming increasingly corrupt and useless, perhaps on-line publishing of results without peer review will become the norm. Then, it is really word-of-mouth and recommendations by known friends, as opposed to anonymous reviewers, that matter.
    [ Reply to This ]
    uncovering the purpose of patents, copyrights, etc (Score:5, Insightful)
    by The_Rook (136658) on Friday December 13, @09:38AM (#4880280)
    if you carefully read lauglin's essay, one of the things he laments is the secrecy behind which coorporate sponsored research takes place. i suppose it would be redundant to mention that the elimination of this secrecy is what patents and copyrights were originally designed to prevent.

    patents, exclusive licenses to new inventions, are granted for the sole purpose of encouraging inventors to publish, in full detail, their inventions. without patent protection, for example, texas instruments and fairchild semiconductor may not have ever told anyone how to make an integrated circuit. they would have made the first chips under a cloak of secrecy, sold them as black box devices, and bury the chips in epoxy to protect the secret.

    unfortunately, industry, the lawmakers, and even the courts have forgotten the whole idea of patents is to publish. industry wants to call patents property that should belong to the holder and anything that weakens the patent is the equivalent of a 'taking'. congress and the patent office are all to happy to agree. and the courts have screwed the matter up further by taking the position that engineers and inventors are not legally qualified to decide if they are infringing on a patent, and so are not allowed to even look at one when trying to come up with new inventions.
    [ Reply to This ]
    Ethics Guidelines for Physicists (Score:4, Informative)
    by Drog (114101) on Friday December 13, @09:54AM (#4880365)
    (http://www.scifitoday.com/)
    As stated, the physics community has been scarred by two scandals recently. First the Berkeley scandal last July, in which scientists retracted their claim to have created element 118, after realizing that the crucial data analysis by Dr. Victor Ninov could not be confirmed. Then last September, nanotechnology superstar Dr. J. Hendrik Schön, of Bell Labs, was found guilty of falsifying data on the properties on superconductivity and organic electronics. He was fired and more than a dozen published papers were retracted [www.cbc.ca]).

    So last month, the American Physical Society [aps.org], representing some 40,000 physicists, expanded the ethical guidelines for researchers, in their Statements on Profession Conducts [aps.org] document. The new guidelines call for more ethics training in science and urge all research institutions to adopt the same set of misconduct procedures. The guidelines also clarify co-authors' roles and duties, making it clear that when you put your name on a paper, your reputation is on the line.

    Biologists faced similar scandals [ucsd.edu] during the Gallo and Imanishi-Kari [nybooks.com] cases in the 90's. Unlike Robert Gallo [amazon.com] and David Baltimore [mit.edu], who survived the scandal virtually unscathed, the physicists involved in today's scandals are actually being held accountable.

    The above info was compiled from an article that originally appeared here [scifitoday.com].
    [ Reply to This ]

    * Re:Ethics Guidelines for Physicists by tbmaddux (Score:2) Friday December 13, @11:23AM

    1 | (2) | 3 (Slashdot Overload: CommentLimit 50)

    When you have to kill a man it costs nothing to be polite. -- Winston Churchill, on formal declarations of war
    All trademarks and copyrights on this page are owned by their respective owners. Comments are owned by the Poster. The Rest © 1997-2002 OSDN.
    [ home | awards | contribute story | older articles | OSDN | advertise | self serve ad system | about | terms of service | privacy | faq ]

  115. Isn't the differnace by oliverthered · · Score: 1

    That life scientists would be physicists if they went to 'that' level of tolerance.

    n.b. it's also far from pratical is not impossible.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  116. OSS, GPL or BSD by oliverthered · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It seems to me that RMS needs to come up with a GPL for scientific discoveries and inventions.

    The human genome should have been GPL'd not BSD'd

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    1. Re:OSS, GPL or BSD by ZaphodCrowley · · Score: 1

      Your genome maybe. I sure as hell want to profit off mine if at all possible :)

    2. Re:OSS, GPL or BSD by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Ok, I GPL myself.
      I am now a virus eating away at you profit.

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  117. New data just in! by infolib · · Score: 2

    (Of course I don't have numbers to back this up--faked data is not new, either).

    Since 1982, the frequency of faked data incidents has grown by 79%.
    (Ok, I made that result up myself, so what?)

    --
    Any sufficiently advanced libertarian utopia is indistinguishable from government.
  118. Code is Knowledge by jtriangle · · Score: 1

    Laughlin:
    "This secrecy increases the opportunity for impropriety and thus makes the knowledge inherently less reliable than comparable knowledge produced in the open."

    Me (Code = Knowledge therefore):
    "Code, like Knowledge, produced in secret is inherently less reliable than comperable code produced in the open."

  119. Oooooooh Troll, you're lucky this time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: -1, Offtopic

    Too bad I got my mod points after I have posted in this thread, Troll Boy.

  120. Newton Kept The Discovery Of Calculus Secret! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Newton's principia proved all of its results using classical geometry yet Newton actually used calcus, "fluxons" to derive the ideas.

    Newton became enamored of alchemy in later years and spent a great deal of effort on it.

    I'm not sure what it proves except that not all scientists work for the simple good of humanity, even if they wind-up accomplishing it.

  121. Face it, people will do anything to get ahead by schaefms · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I agree that corporate pressure is going to force some people to falsify documents, make false claims, etc., but those are the same people that would have done it under other pressure (e.g. Cold Fusion).
    Science doesn't have the "corner" on honest people that will sacrifice everything for the truth. Neither does engineering, computer science, whatever. People are going to do bad things no matter what field they're in and the field is supposed to have ways (e.g. peer review) to alleviate and correct those problems.
    I could just as easily say that the media causes these problems by publishing stories that have not gone through even minimum peer review - because in the media, accuracy is always second to newsworthiness and speed.

  122. Why they were exonerated by Drog · · Score: 1

    The facts behind the charges were pretty solid, as were the determinations. So why were they exonerated? As you can read here, less than a week before a 2-day congressional hearing was scheduled to review the allegations of scientific fraud, the National Institutes of Health reopened the inquiry and this time found "significant errors" in the paper, but "no evidence of fraud, conscious misrepresentations, or manipulation of data" by the authors. As you'll read in that article, the scientists basically thought that any government intrusion would be too much, and so the convictions were suddenly overturned. Ever since, this has been an example of how the scientific community was unable to police itself.

    --

    Looking for political forums? Check out "The World Forum".

  123. Re:uncovering the purpose of patents, copyrights, by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    "and the courts have screwed the matter up further by taking the position that engineers and inventors are not legally qualified to decide if they are infringing on a patent, and so are not allowed to even look at one when trying to come up with new inventions."[Emphasis mine]

    Where did you ever get the idea that researchers are not able to look at issued patents? Patents are public documents. Many companies require that their researchers keep abreast of the patent landscape.

    As to the *not legally qualified*, does the engineer or inventor have a legal background? Generally not. They are scientifically qualified, no doubt, but patents are legal documents, not scientific papers. Would I trust an engineers to cut my hair. No, I'd go to a stylist that specializes in that field. Would I go to the guy on the corner to tend to my money. No, I'd go to the bank. In the same vein, would I trust an engineer to give me legal advice on the scope/meaning of a patent? No, I'd go to a patent attorney.

  124. What's really changed? by egoots · · Score: 1

    Has anything really changed in the field of science since the "Betrayers of the Truth" book was written?

    Ok, maybe the people holding the purse strings, but that is about it. The pressure has always been there to "publish or perish" in the academic scientific community.

    Now, why is that? Well, it was all about grants. When I worked in academia (pre 1989), the grants were doled out by the various funding bodies. Their criteria was based on what you had published (seemingly) at least as much as what valid science you proposed. It was very much an old boys network.

    An example is in order here: The group I was with, was putting in for a 5 year multi-million dollar operating grant. A good portion of the proposal had some very weak science, but was included largely by the political power of the department head (against the sound judgement of many lower technical peons). The funding body sent a site visit team, who were made up of renowned researchers in the various areas of expertise. The review went okay except for the "weak science" area, which got lambasted by the reviewers... the net result was that the grant was not funded. Sounds correct so far (the system was working), right?... Well, "our" group leaders got together to post-mortem the review and decide how to proceed. So what did they do? Examine the weak science? NO! They proceeded to critique a bunch of the examiners by looking at their CV's and how many papers they had published. Then they formulated an appeal on this basis, trying to influence as many of their high level contacts as possible. Net result: They got a grant (thankfully, they left the weak science bit out).

    I left academia shortly thereafter...

    Now I ask, has anything changed? I am not so sure?

    1. Re:What's really changed? by Aardpig · · Score: 1

      Ok, maybe the people holding the purse strings, but that is about it. The pressure has always been there to "publish or perish" in the academic scientific community.

      I think that this hits the nail on the head, and gets to the bottom of the real rot at the heart of physics and related subjects.When a research project is applying for funding, the basic criterion which decides whether that funding is granted is the publication count of those scientists listed as part of the project.

      This tends to mean that a result, which 20 years ago would be published in a single paper, now is strung out into 3 or 4 papers:

      1. Introduction
      2. Experiment
      3. Results
      4. Conclusions
      5. Profit! (actually not -- every time I submit a paper to a journal, I sign a form passing the copyright over to the journal publishers. However, I retain the right to be recognised as the originator of the ideas contained in the paper).

      What this publication dilution means is that many (if not the majority of) papers published today contain far less content/originality/new ideas than those published 20 or more years ago. This dilution can be traced directly to the manner in which research funding is doled out -- more papers (although maybe less content) == more funding. Just look how the same thing happened with Enron; the management, fixated with the share price, let every other aspect of the company go to hell.

      This drive for publication gluttony is especially penalising to those individuals who publish single-author papers. This is because, typically, the publication count of a given author scales in proportion to the number of co-authors they work with. An example: a group of N collaborators each write a paper, but all include the other N-1 members of the collaboration on the publication list. Net result: N people get N papers where they are a first author or co-author.

      Clearly, if N is large, each individual gets lots of papers; if N is small, then your publication count gets screwed. This scaling effect is especially problematical for people who work on theoretical topics: the typical theoretical project has a single scientist working on it (Einsten, Heisenberg, Schrodinger, Heisenberg, Dirac, Feynman etc etc), while some experimental projects can have large numbers of collaborators. One example is particle physics; many of the papers coming out of CERN (the European accelerator located near Geneva) have over 100 authors on them, and the author list takes up the first few pages!

      This sort of situation provides the impetus to form large collaborations, since it ups the publication count of each member of the collaboration. However, a secondary property of these large collaborations is that they have a lot of political clout; it is difficult to kill the funding for 50 scientists than it is to kill the funding for one.

      So, what's the upshot of the drive to get a large publication list? IMHO, it pushes scientists into collaborations so large that

      • it penalizes theoreticians, since they naturally work in small groups or on their own,
      • it becomes impossible to kill funding for large but crap projects, even if these projects are taking funding away from smaller, more-productive projects,
      • it stifles imagination and progress -- how many profound scientific theories have been developed by a comittee?

      So, as long as the culture of funding scientists with large publication lists continues, we will increasingly move towards a culture of shoddy, comittee-based mediocrity.

      Of course, the only way out of this is to judge science on its own merits, rather than by counting numbers of papers published. This is, of course, the ideal of science itself, enshrined in practices such as peer review. However, the ultimate holders of purse string are not scientists -- they're politicians. And those scientists who whisper in these peoples' ears have, more often than not, got where they are because they are more familiar with Machiavelli than Mendeleyev.

      As a closing thought, remember Louis De Broglie. His doctoral thesis was 24 pages long. Today, on the basis of such a publication record, De Broglie would be shown the door with little thought. Yet, in those 24 pages, he layed down a large part of the groundwork for quantum mechanics. Go figure.

      --
      Tubal-Cain smokes the white owl.
  125. Vice-versa by blair1q · · Score: 2

    I think they got it backwards.

    It could easily be

    "The conflict between the free exchange of ideas that the scientific community demands, and the property ownership that commercial sponsors need to survive".

    We like to see the business community as demanding and unreasonable, and we like to see the scientific community as altruistic and open, but in the real world, business is based on not losing money and most science can (possibly) proceed without community-wide coordination.

  126. A couple unmentioned items by ggwood · · Score: 1

    First, Laughlin does not mention military research. This is by and large closed. (Not all of it is closed! I know many great glassy-systems people from the Naval Warfare in DC). Far more money is spent on military research than University research in the US. Many talented people in physics go to work for the military because there are not enough University positions. This is a shame because what frightens me more than what some of you have already brought up, "What if Einstein did not get funded?" rather, what if Einstein did get funded, but by the military and all his ideas became clasified, locked away never to be seen and shared among the academic community.

    My second point is that there are many, many more people in Physics now than there were 50 years ago. It used to be that a Physics Ph.D. was a gateway to numerous good job opportunities for the bright and hardworking. Now a Ph.D. is not. For the American citizen, this is a good thing. You get young smart people working hard to achieve one of the few tenured professorships opening up and those 95% or more who do not make it are tossed out on the scrap heap just as they turn old enough to stop spinning out new ideas. Oh, and you don't have to pay them much and by and large they don't get health care or any kind of job security. They are called post-docs. They are hired for a prescribed number of years, typically 1-3 and they are ubiquitus in physics today. It is estimated there are 30,000 of them in the US alone. On the order of 300 jobs open up for tenure track professorships at research universities per year in physics. About 1600 Ph.D's are granted in physics per year. (See www.aip.org when their site is back up).

    The people I know getting tenure have done this, moving all over the world every year or two, for about 10 years before getting a tenure track position.

    But by treating people so poorly, many smart young people are turned away. And this is the worst possibility of all. If Einstein did turn up today but decided to go get a job as a computer programmer because the field of physics was already so croweded, and the people treated so poorly, that he says to himself, "I don't need that kind of grief. Let one of those poor bastards figure out relativity."

    Of course, Einstein would have done physics anyways. It was in his personality. But how many great minds become discoraged and leave a dysfunctional system?

    --
    a war on terrorism? How can we end a war on a method?
  127. Can't Wait.... by Bilbo · · Score: 2

    Can't wait to see the MS "spin control" on this one. "Well, when you factor in long term preferences and TCO, you see that what he really meant to say was..."

    --
    Your Servant, B. Baggins
    1. Re:Can't Wait.... by Bilbo · · Score: 1

      (duh.... posted to wrong subject. OK, mod me out 'o sight. move along folks....)

      --
      Your Servant, B. Baggins
  128. Article unfairly critical to industry by geekee · · Score: 2

    The article is trying to argue that open source science is better than closed source science. The problem with the arguement is that closed source science gets strong feedback. That is, bs won't hold up when trying to create a product with it, and the company will ultimately fail. However, open source science in universities doesn't have as strong a feedback mechanism. At a university, the product is the published paper, and it results in funding for the university to do more research and for profs to get tenure. Therefore, there is as much temptation to falsify data at a university, but it's more difficult to catch the fraud. This is because when someone publishes a paper, it gets circulated and most people assume it's correct since it's usually difficult and expensive to reproduce the data. Therefore, a lot of papers are complete bs, but the authors get more funding from the govt and private grants anyway because nobody checks to see if the data is reaaly accurate. I would go so far as to say some profs have made a career out of this sort of thing.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  129. Re:uncovering the purpose of patents, copyrights, by geekee · · Score: 2

    Actually, patents prevent people from profiting off reverse engineering a product and selling a knock-off product. The fact that you need to reveal your ideas to the public is because it's the only good way to stake your claim to an idea. The fact that the knowledge becomes public domain is a side effect really.

    --
    Vote for Pedro
  130. Openness? by lousyd · · Score: 1

    This scaffolding is reliable and strong because it is lovingly maintained in public by the community of science, not because it is in anyone's self-interest to do so.

    If it's not in anyone's self interest to do so, then why does anyone do it? People do it because it *is* in their self-interest. In fact, that's what the rest of the article seemed to be about: that it is in our self-interest to promote openness in science.

    I'd have emailed this obvious oversight to the author of the article, but it seems that either him or the publisher do not value openness. A way to reach the author, or a suitable proxy, was not given.

    -Todd

    --
    If aspiration is a virtue, achievement cannot be a vice.
  131. Like propose the Quantum Afterburner by MZdoctor · · Score: 1

    Your comment on the media reminded me of the Quantum Afterburner episode. The QA was a silly idea put forward by Marlan Scully about a year ago in Physical Review Letters (050602) and I am still wondering why it was accepted. Within days it was covered by Physics World, New Scientist, Science and TRN News. The respective reporters obviously had absolutely no idea what they were writing about! As you say - in the media, accuracy is always second to newsworthiness and speed. It will be interesting to see how the funding bodies (NSF, ONR, AFOSR etc.) will view this when Scully has to report that after all his QA won't do what it's supposed to, i.e. save gas. He expected to have a working device within "a year or two". If he forgets to inform us of his progress I intend to remind him of his obligation to do so.

  132. Corporate Science vast improvement vs. State Sci. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "The corporatisation of science means the ethics of corporations now apply. Science will have an "Enron" scenario within the next few years."

    This is GREAT! There are a mere handful of Enrons. But nanny-state governments, and the universities that get their money from nanny-state governments, EVERY YEAR do far in excess of the crimes of Enron. (And bear in mind Enron is paying the price: the company is dead. In all the years of coverups and faulty accounting and backroom deals by governments, when was the last time one of them collapsed completely. The closest recent example is the 1993 Canadian Progressive Conservative Party, and that was just an administration rather than a government itself).

    So if I had my choice between science following the ethics of corporations, where 99.9% of them act very carefully with the money they know is a limited resource and the 0.1% who are dissenters fail miserably; and the ethics of governments, where 1.3 trillion is "saved" when the U.S. military pays its staff one day early, and the Canadian government spends over $1 billion dollars on a gun registry that can't even register 30% of the lowball 7 million estimate by the same government only to blame the overruns on their opposition.... I'll take the corporation every time, and never look back.

  133. Re: complete and utter hogwash. by guybarr · · Score: 2

    Cyno wrote:
    Exxon and all oil companies and all capitalist nations would lose control. That's a very very very bad thing in the eyes of any exec in any oil corp as well as the current US administration.

    That is the one of the most absurd comments I've read in /. for quite a while, and the competition is fierce.

    Of course the interest of oil companies is hiding such an invention, but the interests of the US (and all technologically advanced nations) are the complete opposite.

    why are litereally billions poured into fusion research if the US does not believe oil and coal should be replaced ? why does Japan, the EC and the US invest in plasma research ? you may criticize the internal distribution of money within that field, or the results obtained, but saying the US does not want oil replaced is plain nuts. and contrary to evidence (there is a whole bloody department of the US admin for this issue alone, the DOE, look it up, it's not a secret)

    criticize where critic's due (and the US does deserve that, many times), credit where it's due. Don't let hate overcome common sense.

    --
    Working for necessity's mother.
  134. fraud is rampant in biology by gacp · · Score: 1
    >The author was of the opinion that the life sciences are not as rigorous in testing the veracity of research results. I do not know if this is true, but it would be not be surprising -- biological systems are much more complex and harder to control.

    In my experience, the author is quite right. The day biology `gets audited' a lot of ugly stinking stuff will be exposed. How many professional `biologists' can even define life? So much pretense!

    A huge portion of funding for biology goes into `research' which only purpose is to justify itself, and that generates no novel knowledge but only kills trees to print worthless `papers' and foster these pseudo-researchers' careers.

    Dura veritas, sed veritas. Hard is the truth, but it is the truth.

    Once again, we see the need to push science to Version 2.0. See you there!

    --
    ``L'imagination au povoir.''
  135. Re:uncovering the purpose of patents, copyrights, by peter · · Score: 2

    It's a Bad Thing when the citizens can't understand the law even if they want to.

    --
    #define X(x,y) x##y
    Peter Cordes ; e-mail: X(peter@cordes , .ca)
  136. Re: complete and utter hogwash. by Cyno · · Score: 2

    But what happens to a capitalist society when you have free energy? We were talking about a hypothetical situation in which cold fusion were possible. All other forms of energy have severe costs and/or environmental impacts, all of which aid capitalist nations. Free energy, on the other hand, would take a lot of money out of the governments' pockets. How would it pay for roads? New taxes, which are not easy to pass. Any government would be stupid not to research free energy because the first one to discover a clean free energy source has a significant advantage over the rest, especially if it knows what to do with it. And if your government wasn't researching free energy you might think something was wrong. Anyway, what I was saying is that free energy is not in the best interests of capitalist governments. The status quo is.