Slashdot Mirror


More On Airplanes And Internet

fonixmunkee writes "as a sometimes-traveler for work, and a huge nerd, I am always excited about news like this. it appears that some airlines may start offering internet access next year when you need to get that internet fix at 35,000 feet. I was pleased when they started selling wireless internet in airports, so this is another welcomed suprise for techie travlers. apparently they want to use satellite to get high-speed connections to the planes in the air. pretty cool. " Too bad Northwest isn't going to have it for my DTW -> NRT -> KUL -> PER for CALU.

187 comments

  1. First post by Klerck · · Score: 0, Funny

    First first post from an airplane!

  2. Obvious pr0n remark by HiQ · · Score: 0, Troll

    Nerd + surfing from plane = Mile High Club

  3. I can see the use on transcontinental flights.. by 3.5+stripes · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I haven't flown in a while, do they also offer power connections for your laptop?

    Cuz a 12+ hour flight wouldn't be very much fun after your backup batteries die.

    And remember, the foldable tray will stop your willie from overheating:)

    --


    He tried to kill me with a forklift!
    1. Re:I can see the use on transcontinental flights.. by darkov · · Score: 5, Funny

      And remember, the foldable tray will stop your willie from overheating:)

      But that may be counteracted by the porn you are downloading. The tray is handy either way, though.

    2. Re:I can see the use on transcontinental flights.. by Mr.Ned · · Score: 2

      The transcontinental flights I've been on don't have adaptors for use in the regular section, just in buisness class or double-plus good class, whatever it's called now.

    3. Re:I can see the use on transcontinental flights.. by doctor_oktagon · · Score: 2, Funny

      It will allow you to e-mail your doctor, so he's waiting at the other end to treat the DVT (Deep Vein Thrombosis) you just developed from sitting looking at your laptop for 12 hours!

    4. Re:I can see the use on transcontinental flights.. by DeepRedux · · Score: 1

      A number of airlines have power, mostly toward the front of the plane. They all seem to require a special "Empower" connector. I have never seen a regular AC plug at the seat.

    5. Re:I can see the use on transcontinental flights.. by PD · · Score: 1

      I fly American Airlines and all their planes have a 12 volt cigarette lighter power plug under the seats. I carry an inverter with me and run my laptop the whole flight.

    6. Re:I can see the use on transcontinental flights.. by singularity · · Score: 2

      I was on a flight recently on American Airline flight (O'Hare to Tampa, FL). I believe the plane was an older Boeing MD80 that had been retrofitted. Every seat, even in coach, had a power adaptor under the seat. The best part was that it was not one of the airplane-specific ports, but rather a cigarette lighter outlet (meaning I could charge my Clie, then charge my turned-off cell phone, and then was able to work on my laptop).

      You are right, though, I would rather see power outlets as universal before Internet access in planes.

      I tend to fly quite a bit (Southwest, mostly) and have to say that the AA airplane was the first I had seen with power outlets in coach.

      American Airlines has a page that mentions their push into putting power outlets in planes.

      --
      - (c) 2018 Hank Zimmerman
  4. In flight electronics by CausticWindow · · Score: 3, Interesting

    I've always wondered why airlines got the policy that using a portable cd player or radio in flight is dangerous while laptops aren't.

    At least that's the situation on all domestic flights I've taken. I've got a suspicion that they want to compete with trains etc. for business customers and therefore don't give a damn about their own rules.

    --
    How small a thought it takes to fill a whole life
    1. Re:In flight electronics by HFShadow · · Score: 1

      Thats only during take off and landing, laptops are also to be off then. I got into a fight with a stewardess when she saw me resting my gps against the window during take off tho, she didnt seem too impressed with my arugment "Its not a cell phone though!"

    2. Re:In flight electronics by Duds · · Score: 1

      The way I've always been told you're fine using things like this once you're at altitude.

      I've always been asked to turn off electronics for takeoff and landing.

      Or yes, they're money grabbing sods :)

    3. Re:In flight electronics by buzban · · Score: 2

      radios are verboten, i believe, since they involve *radio* signals, and there's the potential interference issue. CD players are allowed anytime above 10K feet.

    4. Re:In flight electronics by dattaway · · Score: 4, Funny

      If only they wouldn't think I was a terrorist with my yagi antenna pointed out the window scanning traffic below and surfing other people's sessions...

    5. Re:In flight electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      I wouldn't try that trick now. They'll probably assume you're using the GPS for evil purposes to know when to strike or something like that.

      I asked if I could turn one on in February and the head passenger herder guy barked a firm "no" at me. He gave some BS excuse about FAA regs. Yeah, OK, whatever, it's up to the pilot anyway. He didn't even ask on my behalf.

      So, I did it anyway, but I left it in my bag, and just held the bag on my lap for a few minutes. It got enough of a signal long enough to get a position fix and speed - 505 mph. That was all I wanted to see, so I put it away.

      Until the current hysteria is forgotten, I'd advise leaving the GPS in your checked luggage.

    6. Re:In flight electronics by shepd · · Score: 1

      >radios are verboten, i believe, since they involve *radio* signals, and there's the potential interference issue.

      Well, transmitting ones, sure.

      But, IIRC, regular radios are banned because it isn't hard to get one that tunes to the aircraft band, and the _last_ thing the pilot needs during an emergency situation is a passenger putting their aircraft radio on speaker...

      Not to mention that in most contries the people do _not_ have the freedom to listen to all of the airwaves without a license, so bringing a scanner on crossborder flights is a no-no. For example, in the US the cellphone range is banned, and in the UK pretty much anything that isn't shortwave, medium wave or long wave is banned (including TV).

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    7. Re:In flight electronics by radish · · Score: 2

      Can you define "banned"? In the UK there's no problem buying unlocked scanners (unlike the US IIRC), they used to sell them in my local Tandy (Radio Shack). Of course they may be illegal to use, but I've never heard of that being the case.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    8. Re:In flight electronics by radish · · Score: 2

      Not in all cases. Some airlines ban CD players altogether, I forget which, but I think Al Italia may be one. I don't know whet their policy is on laptops as I haven't flown business with them (and I don't take laptops on holiday!).

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    9. Re:In flight electronics by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Can you define "banned"? In the UK there's no problem buying unlocked scanners (unlike the US IIRC), they used to sell them in my local Tandy (Radio Shack). Of course they may be illegal to use, but I've never heard of that being the case.

      Well, I'm basing this on both the reactions and telling-off I got for smuggling in my Canadian scanner in to the UK (nothing is banned in Canada) and what I've read on this site. Supposedly it was made illegal to monitor the police band some time ago, for example.

      ze important part:

      "Q. Am I breaking the law by owning a scanner?

      A. No, but it is illegal to use one to listen to frequencies other than general reception transmissions or those parts of the radio spectrum which your transmitting licence, if you have one, allows you to use. You could be prosecuted for this."

      Of course, with the correct licenses anything is legal. Although I am a little freaked out that in the UK you have to pay to use things like CB. ;-)

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    10. Re:In flight electronics by buzban · · Score: 2

      sorry, very narrow of me. i should say that mostof the big U.S. carriers allow CD players and the like above 10K feet. I can't speak for others (and shouldn't try! ;)

    11. Re:In flight electronics by inburito · · Score: 2

      Too bad that most radio receivers also "transmit". Oscillators inside the radios tuner circuitry (and maybe elsewhere) could theoretically interfere with aircraft systems. It is really these oscillators and the potential EMI that they cause that is the reason for banning them.

      If you want to read more about portable electronic devices and flying check this out.

      On a separate note I do remember flying on an airline that had the pilot-ground communications as one of the inflight radio-channels.

    12. Re:In flight electronics by Keith_Beef · · Score: 2

      Like you need to use one of those crippled GPS things to get the position of an airport, when you can find it on a street map...

    13. Re:In flight electronics by delcielo · · Score: 2

      The FAR's (Federal Aviation Regulations) on this matter were written in response to some test indicating that personal electronic devices could cause enough RF to penetrate the thin shielding in the wiring of older airliners and disrupt the flight control and navigational signals. In one well-known instance, a personal electronic device caused the needle to swing on a device used for precision instrument approaches (OBS - Omni Bearing Selector). While the airplane was on approach, the needle swung hard to one side, and the autopilot followed it, assuming that for whatever reason, the airplane had moved off course. I believe it was a video game that caused that particular incident; but you can imagine that if a video game can cause enough interference, any type of transmitter could easily cause fits.

      The cell phone issue is related; but different. When you climb, the cell phone is able to reach many times the number of cell towers it could before. It causes the cellular network a great deal of work then, handling the phone.

      --
      Hot Damn! It's the Soggy Bottom Boys!
    14. Re:In flight electronics by Abreu · · Score: 2

      Theres many airlines where in international flights you get to see a map on the videoscreen with the latest info from the on-board gps receiver: speed, altitude, position... all on a nice hipnotic computer map designed to lull you to sleep

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    15. Re:In flight electronics by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Transmitting ones? I know you're thinking of something with a microphone and a 'push to talk' button, but you'll find that many more radios actually transmit on some frequency.

      The magic word is: heterodyne

      But don't take my word for it - go get two FM radios, and tune them about 10.7 MHz apart - 94.3 MHz and 104.9 or 105.1 MHz were the two I'd use at one point. It's easier if you have a tuning knob on one of them, but you can usually make it work on digital tuners too.

      Notice what happens when one gets close enough to the other. Try moving them around and see how far the effect goes. Now consider this: the aircraft band is right next to the commercial FM band. Put that radio on 107.9, and you're throwing off an IF at 118.6. Oops!

    16. Re:In flight electronics by mbogosian · · Score: 2

      While the airplane was on approach, the needle swung hard to one side, and the autopilot followed it....

      <IncredulousShock>
      Are airlines really skimping that much that they're hiring pilots who use autopilot on approach?
      </IncredulousShock>

  5. So all of a sudden by elementik · · Score: 2, Interesting

    It's safe to use laptops etc on a plane... ?

    --
    --- Stop the world! I want to get off!
    1. Re:So all of a sudden by dattaway · · Score: 2

      I have always used my laptop on a plane. Airport security sometimes swabs it with a chemical like its a block of crack or something. But no one has a problem with it like I was talking into an annoying cellphone.

    2. Re:So all of a sudden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      It's safe to use laptops etc on a plane... ?

      As always. But still not during take-off or landing.

    3. Re:So all of a sudden by SeanWithoutPants · · Score: 1

      Swabs it with a chemical? Eek. Has this done any damage to your laptop's finish? While I have no plans to travel any time soon, I'd be somewhat worried about my Powerbook being swabbed with something potentially damaging. (Yes, I know it would only be cosmetic, but I'm quite shallow.)

      Thanks

    4. Re:So all of a sudden by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      They've done it to mine twice a couple months ago, and I have noticed no damage.

  6. Emergency procedures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    If you commit a crime via the Internet at 30,000 feet over the Pacific Ocean, whose jurisdiction does it fall in?

    1. Re:Emergency procedures by LucidityZero · · Score: 1

      If you commit a crime via the Internet at 30,000 feet over the Pacific Ocean, whose jurisdiction does it fall in?

      IIRC, the laws the country you have left apply untill you land.

      --
      Sig.i>
    2. Re:Emergency procedures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I don't think that's right. I remember taking a flight to London when I was a teenager. I didn't get offered a drink the first time the stewardess came around, but the second time I did.

    3. Re:Emergency procedures by JohnRlI · · Score: 1

      Well, current precedents being set would tend to indicate that regardless of local law concerning computer use you can be prosecuted wherever they want to prosecute you - ie wherever was affected by the crime. So in other words, you're screwed.

      --
      -- John Linford
    4. Re:Emergency procedures by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Australia, just like everything else you do on the Internet.

    5. Re:Emergency procedures by RealUlli · · Score: 3, Informative

      I'd guess it's like with ships: You fall in the jurisdiction of the country that aircraft is registered in. Exceptions might be aircraft on the ground, or in national airspace...

      Remember: a lot of ships fly flags of countries with very lax saftey laws - the only thing a country can do about one of those is keep it from entering its tree-mile-area (or was it 12-mile!?).

      Example at hand: what the EU is doing now is trying to get its members to ban tankers they deem unsafe from their harbors - unfortunately only after one of those sank a couple of hundred miles off the coast of Spain with about 70000 tons of heavy oil aboard. Being banned, those tankers hopefully have no more reason to go near European waters...

      Regards, Ulli

      --
      Simple things should be simple, complex things should be possible.
    6. Re:Emergency procedures by Gandalf04 · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Does it even matter whose jurisdiction the crime falls in?

      If the crime is against anything/anyone in the US, they will come after you, no matter where you commited the crime. Just look at how the FBI handled the Russians.

    7. Re:Emergency procedures by mpe · · Score: 2

      If you commit a crime via the Internet at 30,000 feet over the Pacific Ocean, whose jurisdiction does it fall in?

      Aircraft are governed by the same laws as ships. The jurisdiction is the flag of the aircraft.

    8. Re:Emergency procedures by Abreu · · Score: 2

      You are under the plane's jurisdiction. That is, if the plane has a US flag on it, you fall under US law, and so on.

      Actually, international law states that while on the air, the captain is the highest authority, and also the one bearing the responsibility of the crew and passengers, so if a passenger dies under mysterious circumstances during a flight, the captain is briefly arrested and interrogated while the cause of death is determined.

      Also in many countries (local laws apply if the plane is on the ground), if theres a plane crash and the captain survives, he is immediately arrested and accused of "involuntary homicide" (I think they call it "manslaughter" in the US, but Im not sure), and until the cause of the accident is determined, he is considered the prime suspect.

      --
      No sig for the moment.
    9. Re:Emergency procedures by mark_lybarger · · Score: 2

      they will come after you

      oh sure, they'll come after you. but when will they actually catch up wtih you?

    10. Re:Emergency procedures by ToteAdler · · Score: 1
      * Coastal States exercise sovereignty over their territorial sea which they have the right to establish its breadth up to a limit not to exceed 12 nautical miles; foreign vessels are allowed "innocent passage" through those waters;

      * Ships and aircraft of all countries are allowed "transit passage" through straits used for international navigation; States bordering the straits can regulate navigational and other aspects of passage;

      These are two points from the Law of the Sea treaty recognized by the UN. The countries also have a 200 naut. mile Exclusive Economic Zone to which they have exclusive rights to regulate the natural resources. Being that its an international treaty there are all sorts of exceptions and finer points but that's the basic gist of it. As for blocking ships from entering a countries waters, generaly it's up to the individual port to decide whether they'll allow a ship to enter their port although depending on the manifest a country my intercede but not usualy.

  7. IPSky by MosesJones · · Score: 5, Interesting


    A plug for a mate IPSky talks about the market and the issues and is a pretty good starting doc on this sort of stuff from a technical/management perspective. The interesting part of some of these elements is that it enables additional information to the pilots and potentially between planes. Getting the internet to the passengers is relatively simple, combining it with elements like TCAS to reduce the risk of collisions and also to enable less reliance on Air Traffic Controllers in areas where they have no Radar coverage.

    --
    An Eye for an Eye will make the whole world blind - Gandhi
    1. Re:IPSky by LondonLawyer · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      >> The easiest way to get shot is to carry a gun -- Atticus Finch

      Maybe then. Nowadays all you have to do is live in LA.

  8. Two words - VoIP and Routers... by jason718 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Inflight internet access, especially at a flat rates, makes me wonder about the potential for using VoIP. If the latency introduced by the satellite connection doesn't completely negate its use, using VoIP software on a laptop connected to the airplane's Internet connection would offer considerably cheaper inflight calls.

    Secondly, how long until we see groups of people smuggling on battery powered Linksys (et al) routers. $30 split a few ways is always cheaper...

    1. Re:Two words - VoIP and Routers... by Surak · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Secondly, how long until we see groups of people smuggling on battery powered Linksys (et al) routers. $30 split a few ways is always cheaper..

      It wouldn't be hard. Most of things draw DC from a power brick. RadioShack used to carry a power brick-type thing that would hold batteries in what would normally be the brick. And I imagine that there are or will be other third party solutions such as a rechargeable power brick for using routers with batteries before too long as portable, wireless high speed access becomes more and more important.

    2. Re:Two words - VoIP and Routers... by Jacco+de+Leeuw · · Score: 3, Interesting
      And I imagine that there are or will be other third party solutions such as a rechargeable power brick for using routers with batteries before too long...

      Hey, what about those fuel cells you have these days!?

      :-)

      --
      -------
      Warning: Slashdot may contain traces of nuts.
    3. Re:Two words - VoIP and Routers... by buzban · · Score: 2

      If the latency introduced by the satellite connection doesn't completely negate its use, using VoIP software on a laptop connected to the airplane's Internet connection would offer considerably cheaper inflight calls.
      couldn't be any worse than the phones they have on airplanes now....plus at $30, you'd save money if you only made a couple of calls. voice calls are like $5-10/min from a plane, and the quality is something akin to tin cans on a really, really long string that's got a few string repeaters in the middle... ;)

    4. Re:Two words - VoIP and Routers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Assuming the airplane's service is wireless, then get a laptop with two card slots or one card slot and built-in wireless support. Put one of them in the mode to talk to the plane, and the other one in ad-hoc mode to talk to your friends.

      Run some quick masquerading/NAT in the middle and you're done.

      I've been tempted to fire up those prism2 drivers that look like an AP to see who will associate with me. All those people with wireless cards that are constantly looking for a network would be easy to grab.

      The next big thing: rogue access points that aren't!

    5. Re:Two words - VoIP and Routers... by jason718 · · Score: 1
      Assuming the airplane's service is wireless, then get a laptop with two card slots or one card slot and built-in wireless support. Put one of them in the mode to talk to the plane, and the other one in ad-hoc mode to talk to your friends.

      Which raises the question - what's the take on wireless network cards on airplanes? I think it would fall in the same controlled area as any other type of radio transmitting device. Has anyone been asked to remove their wireless card during the flight?

    6. Re:Two words - VoIP and Routers... by jpmorgan · · Score: 2

      Air Canada now has standard 110 volt power-points available in every seat on their newest planes. I'm sure other airlines are considering similar measures.

    7. Re:Two words - VoIP and Routers... by jason718 · · Score: 1

      Good point - any restrictions on using power strips / outlet splitters? I'm sure most people would be using the power outlet for their laptop - as long as power strips are permitted, they could use it to power both their laptop and their router.

    8. Re:Two words - VoIP and Routers... by lucifuge31337 · · Score: 2

      What do you need an AP for? You can share in ad-hoc mode.

      --
      Do not fold, spindle or mutilate.
    9. Re:Two words - VoIP and Routers... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what's the take on wireless network cards on airplanes?

      There have been stories on Slashdot about companies like Boeing doing tests with technologies like 802.11b. If you think of it in terms of weight, it could be a real win for the airlines. Instead of bulky heavy Ethernet jacks (or worse, some proprietary crap) at every seat, you just install an access point or two and call it done.

      My hope is that they find a way to get 2.4 GHz operation approved along with the usual devices that are also allowed in flight. Anything else would be ugly, like plugging a modem into one of those seatback 'air phones' - it just doesn't work.

      And to answer your other question - I haven't heard of someone being asked to remove such a thing, but then I haven't known of someone using one in-flight anyway. There's not much to hear up there unless you have a buddy on board or you happen to find someone else sending probes for an AP.

  9. So... by REBloomfield · · Score: 2, Insightful

    we can use laptops, but not mobile phones, CD players, etc?
    What gives?
    Great idea, but bizarre....

    1. Re:So... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      we can use laptops, but not mobile phones

      So what about voice over IP and by-pass there silly rules about mobiles?

    2. Re:So... by gorilla · · Score: 2

      CD players have already been addressed above, but mobile phones are banned because if you're broadcasting from crusing distance, then you're going to be blocking a frequency in every cell you can see - dozens or hundreds of cells.

  10. It is safe. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    It is safe and permitted to user consumer electronics onboard aircraft with several exceptions. Wireless-radio communications devices are prohibited because they are naturally in the habit of emitting radio signals. Aswell devices are prohibited during take off and landing.

    1. Re:It is safe. by Geek_in_Marketing · · Score: 2, Interesting

      the problem, IMHO, is not with the equipment used - most of us are knowledgeable enough to know what we should and shouldn't operate in the air. But the same doesn't seem to apply to the cabin crew. On a recent BA flight to Paris, I was asked to turn off my MD player(note this - a player. Not any form of radio at all) because 'it could interfere with the flight instrumentation'. I politely explained what the mysterious object I was listening to was, but the cabin crew were adamant. How are they going to know the difference when it comes to people waving laptops and PDA's around? Some additional training for crew will be needed - cue an increase in flight fares to cover it?

      --

      "This is your life - and it's ending one minute at a time" - Narrator, Fight Club
  11. Operating Frequencys by Poppa_joe · · Score: 1

    Does any one know what frequency this would operate at? I have always wondered exactly what frequency interferes with flight electronics and which ones don't. Do hand cell phones interfere with flight systems in reality or is this just a way of making you pay to use the ones built into the back of the seats? I have wondered about this for a while.

    1. Re:Operating Frequencys by HFShadow · · Score: 1

      I had my phone in carry on and somehow it got turned on during the flight, didnt notice until we landed and i saw the battery was nearly dead (flight to europe + no nearby towers = higher transmit power = less battery life) Anyways, the plane didnt crash ;)

    2. Re:Operating Frequencys by Interfacer · · Score: 1

      Your cell phone doesn't work at 35000 ft because there is no carrier signal / antennae available. Interfacer

    3. Re:Operating Frequencys by Poppa_joe · · Score: 1

      That goes with out saying. But does using it at lower altitudes cause interference with other flight electronics?

    4. Re:Operating Frequencys by Sacarino · · Score: 5, Informative

      I work for a domestic carrier in the US, and one day while flying jumpseat to get to a conference we had one of the passengers sneak in a call on her cell phone, which somehow got into unsheilded wires and broadcast clear-as-day onto the aircraft's comm gear. It wasn't transmitting from us out to the world, mind you, but we could hear her conversation.

      additionally, I've heard that the reason CDRoms and discman players and the like are banned is due to the frequency wandering those things emit when spinning up/down and the interruption it causes with precision approach gear. I dont know how true that is.

      --
      -- El Sacarino tiene gusto de la chocha
    5. Re:Operating Frequencys by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

      It may have more to do with the fact that they don't want electronics running PERIOD. So rather than have to explain to every passenger that some devices are safe and some aren't, they just say "Sod it" and prohibit everything.

      It just might prevent arguments like "But HAM radios aren't on the list, so I just figured I could talk to my trucker buddies as I flew overhead!"

    6. Re:Operating Frequencys by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But it's not just electronics, mate.

      you can play your game boy advance all you want.... it's electronics that transmit excessive noise, intentional or otherwise.

      That's why you can't use ham radio on board, or a NavComm Transceiver, or those stupid Motorola family channel radios.

      ...and I've got a quid that says a ham radio is indeed on the list.

    7. Re:Operating Frequencys by shepd · · Score: 1

      >Do hand cell phones interfere with flight systems in reality or is this just a way of making you pay to use the ones built into the back of the seats?

      You shouldn't use your cellphone because it will DOS the provider's cell net. The nets aren't designed to hand over your call so fast and things get screwed up and you end up wasting a _lot_ more bandwidth than the cell provider wants you to.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    8. Re:Operating Frequencys by GigsVT · · Score: 1

      It just might prevent arguments like "But HAM radios aren't on the list

      Actually, Ham radios (transmit and recieve) are allowed by the FAA to be operated from flying commercial aircraft, so long as you have the pilot's permission. That doesn't prevent the airlines from making their own policies against them though.

      --
      I've had enough abrasive sigs. Kittens are cute and fuzzy.
    9. Re:Operating Frequencys by Cerlyn · · Score: 1

      It just might prevent arguments like "But HAM radios aren't on the list, so I just figured I could talk to my trucker buddies as I flew overhead!"

      Wouldn't it be more likely for people to be using Citizens Band (CB) radios to contact truckers? While I know some truckers that are hams, most are not. Us hams have to go through all sorts of hoops to keep CB users from using our equipment; mind you, they are trivial things, but all too often someone buys ham radio equipment that is not licensed and goes off on a tangent.

      In any case, while ham (amateur) radios are allowed on planes with permission, I doubt your 5 Watt CB signal is going to go very far (if it is allowed on planes at all). Besides, you're not allowed to use CB radios to send a message more than 100 miles, which means unless you're following that truck, you're going to lose them awfuly quickly.

    10. Re:Operating Frequencys by InadequateCamel · · Score: 1

      I didn't choose HAM radio because I thought it was banned. I was trying to choose something that your average flyer doesn't carry onboard an airplane. Perhaps I should have said "But fusion-powered lasersonic ninja-fast radios aren't on the list!" :-)

      I have my suspicions that on most flights, if you started using a HAM radio the airline staff would start getting pretty mad at you nonetheless, and many would probably tell you that they are not allowed, be it from ignorance or from having to explain to all the passengers how SOME radio/electronic equipment is good, but using others on a plane makes you a terrorist :-)

  12. All youI need now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ...is a printer and no longer do you have to use your imagination to join the solo mile hile club :-)

    But seriously, what would the point be of internet connection when you are flying? Other than reading news? Is email _really_ that important?

    1. Re:All youI need now... by UnknownBeetroot · · Score: 1

      Well, on those really long flights - transatlantic, or to western asia from where I am - I can imagine that it'd be slightly more entertaining than the in-flight movies.

      The logical next step would be for them to offer charging points so people can actually use their laptops for a fair amount of time. And I don't really see equipment like this interfering with the airplane... sure, something that can fly through electrical storms is going to go haywire and spiral down when I switch on my laptop. Sure.

      But gawd, it's going to make sitting next to people infinitely worse. Not just tinny music from your neighbours... but pretending to look away as they visit pron sites, watching crappy powerpoint presentations being put together by businessmen... hmm, maybe I've got those the wrong way round.

    2. Re:All youI need now... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No way, I bet they're filtering URL's. Imagine the legal implications when some granny type or soccor mom with kids accidentally gets a look at your favorite pr0n . .

  13. Pricing by tangledweb · · Score: 4, Interesting

    They are talking $30 per leg.

    I imagine that at those prices it will go the same way as inseat phones. One of the phone carriers is killing their $5 per minute service because there was on average 1.5 phone calls made per flight.

    If you are carrying all that extra weight, you have to be able to get people to buy it or it is just going out backwards.

    1. Re:Pricing by darkov · · Score: 5, Insightful

      They are talking $30 per leg. I imagine that at those prices it will go the same way as inseat phones.

      I dunno about you, but on a long (12-14 hour) international flight, I would happily pay that to relieve the boredom. And if you're travelling on business it's a small expense if it means you can be productive in some way, such as catching up on industry news, the competitors products, whatever. Like other monopoly players, the phone providers just priced themselves out of the market.

    2. Re:Pricing by snitty · · Score: 1

      They are talking $30 per leg. I imagine that at those prices it will go the same way as inseat phones. One of the phone carriers is killing their $5 per minute service because there was on average 1.5 phone calls made per flight.

      $30 seams reasonable for longer flights, and who honestly can't stay unplugged for a 3 hour flight. Granted more and more work nowadays needs to be done connected to the internet, but a fiar amout dosen't and it can interfere with productivity. Perhaps all businesses should have a no internet hour every day.

      --
      Modular Redundancy--Because 4 out of 5 Nodes agree
    3. Re:Pricing by Delphis · · Score: 1

      Perhaps all businesses should have a no internet hour every day.

      But *twitch* ... I don't think I could handle that! *twitch* *twitch* .. *gasps of breath* ...... Oooh... I'm still connected.. it's gonna be alright (especially since I control the company routers/firewalls). *sigh of relief*

      --
      Delphis
  14. Re:YOU'VE UNLEASHED THE FUCKING FURY by jason718 · · Score: 1
  15. Re:IN SOVIET RUSSIA by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    lamest post ever --The campain against lame /. posts

  16. Hrm by houseofmore · · Score: 5, Funny

    I wonder if streaming porn all the way to Vegas will take the fun out of it once you're there.

    1. Re:Hrm by thryllkill · · Score: 2, Insightful

      I'm sure there will be filters and such to keep that from happening. Not so you don't get to look at porn of course, but so that the kids in the seats around you don't look over your shoulder...

      --

      Note to self: No more arguing with the faithful.

    2. Re:Hrm by anonymous+loser · · Score: 2

      Only if you avoid the online casinos.

  17. Isn't it aeroplane by mab · · Score: 2, Informative

    Like the English and The Kiwi's spell it
    as one of that last stories points out, they where the first :)

    1. Re:Isn't it aeroplane by houseofmore · · Score: 1

      No, it's "Flying Machine"!

      And with Air New Zeland falling to bits in the sky, it's barely that! =)

    2. Re:Isn't it aeroplane by mab · · Score: 1

      I like the bit about having a worse landing in Wellington. I remember landing there, coming into the runway at about 45 dregrees because of the wind. Oh the days. I will have to get back to wellington havn't been there for 11 years

    3. Re:Isn't it aeroplane by houseofmore · · Score: 1

      Ya, my first trip to Wellinton was by plane. I think I was the only newbie on the flight, 'cause I was the only one screaming in terror each time a wing looked like it was going to tear through the runway.

      The next two times have been by car!

    4. Re:Isn't it aeroplane by shepd · · Score: 1

      I prefer to fly on the autogiro to the aerodrome, myself.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  18. Secure? by HugoQuixote · · Score: 2, Funny

    Wardriving at 30,000 feet...?

    Hmmm... maybe we'll start to see crackers taking flying lessons.

    --
    "I hate Cthulhu, Cthulhu hates me, I kill his cultists, He eats worlds for tea"
    1. Re:Secure? by UnknownBeetroot · · Score: 5, Funny

      Wardriving at 30k feet...?

      I have this insane vision of you getting a biplane next to this massive Boeing, leaning over with a stick of chalk and scawling symbols on th plane as pilots frantically call air traffic control about a possible hijacking...

      Hah, for a second I typed 'Boeing' there as 'Boing'. Kinda... fits.

    2. Re:Secure? by HugoQuixote · · Score: 1

      ...Heck, every plane in the Virgin fleet should have an Elder symbol on it somewhere... ^_^ Boing! Huzzah for silly noises.

      --
      "I hate Cthulhu, Cthulhu hates me, I kill his cultists, He eats worlds for tea"
  19. be faster to walk/use carrier pigeons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I DOWt anybuddy is going to be too excited about being able to check their email in flight, after waiting several hours, to get to the laptop disassembly counter, then several more hours to bored.

    1. Re:be faster to walk/use carrier pigeons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Maybe even to visit dictionary.com and LEARN HOW TO SPELL.

  20. In flight movie by paughsw · · Score: 5, Funny

    At least if the in flight movie is bad, I can download my own.

    1. Re:In flight movie by h0tblack · · Score: 2

      Virgin have a new v:port system on their Airbus A340-600's which has some degree of video and audio on demand (300 hours of VOD rather than the fixed channel based system they have on older planes). I got to use one of these on a three day old plane during a recent lang-haul flight and it's a lot better than the old system, you get a bigger screen too :) There's also the capability to do networked games - simple ones mind you - between seats, as well as sending e-mail and SMS messages (for a fee though).
      Best of all, the system runs on Linux :) It's based on the Matsushita MAS3000 system. Unfortunately I found this out because my system was having 'issues' and needed to be rebooted, at which point I as was greeted by Tux and some nice boot messages :)

  21. Notice who is doing this. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It ain't any of the big US based aitlines. They don't want to innovate, just whine while Southwest eats them for lunch.

    I swear, they're like the RIAA.

  22. YOU FAIL IT by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    perhaps you can use an airplane to fly to a country (perhaps soviet russia) in which failing the first post is tolerated
    YOU FAIL IT!

  23. Re:moron the billonlyUS stock markup FraUDs by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    -1? what the fud? that's about a plus 10, just for relevaNTs robbIE?

    you aren't in these felonious stock markup/?pr?/accepting money for false advertising/accouNTability debacles, are you. we're sure not. we hope you're not. if you are, it's best to square up right away. mod me up robbIE, you know what's gooing on DOWn hear, doN'T you?

  24. Internet Access In Places for years? by johnraphone · · Score: 1

    They have been trying to do Internet access in planes for years; I won't be surprised if this ends the same fate. I think the problem is that not too many people will use it and that people are not willing to pay $30 per flighty for access for just a few hours. They could have a monthly fee that would be more feasible.
    I wish them luck anyway.

  25. In other news by Timesprout · · Score: 3, Funny

    it was confirmed today that the reason for New Zealander Richard Pearse's crash and failure to claim first flight was caused by his modem cable reaching its elastic limit.

    --
    Do not try to read the dupe, thats impossible. Instead, only try to realize the truth
    What truth?
    There is no dupe
  26. You might want... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Too bad Northwest isn't going to have it for my DTW -> NRT -> KUL -> PER for CALU."

    Oooh. You might want to have that looked at by your doctor before it gets worse. In a few days, you could be ROTFLOL, IMNSHO, d00d.

  27. -1!@#$% by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    what's up with that? the guise from fuddles&fudstorm.con right in the announcer's booth wit you know robbIE. is VA lairy on the dole/viagra yet/still?

  28. ping by stud9920 · · Score: 2

    At least THAT's a place where the ping time won't be so low as on the ground

    1. Re:ping by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 2

      Actually, depending how they do it you could get some good in-flight lan games going.
      I guess you could do that now with 802.11b, But it might interfere with the flight control systems. Or atleast thats what they'll say now that they can charge you for the inflight lan..

      Just think of playing de_747[*] on a real 747.

      [*] Counterstrike map, CS comes with cs_747 but it sucks, IMO de_747 is much funner. think big plain flying in the air, T's have to bomb it.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
  29. the obligatory post by hashinclude · · Score: 0, Redundant

    Imagine a beowolf cluster over wireless of these (at 10K + altitude!)

    Enough already.

    --
    US is now divided as the "Red" and "blue" states. Red States = communist countries. Coincidence? I think not
  30. Privacy, anyone ? by forged · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Email in airplanes..... Great idea.

    Now all three passengers behind my seat and my two neighbors will know the name of my wife and kids, what a great week-end I have had, how bad the food was, and how much money the deal closed.

    Err, what if one of the three happened to be an executive from a competitor ? Think about it for a minute :)

    And I think that most people will not want to watch pr0n on my screen throughout the flight either !

    1. Re:Privacy, anyone ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There's this nifty thing called encryption. You should try it sometime.

    2. Re:Privacy, anyone ? by shepd · · Score: 1

      Solution:

      One
      Two

      Homemade: Buy a pair of fishing glasses, place polarizing filter over laptop screen. IIRC, you should be able to darken the laptop screen yet still see it fine with the glasses. YMMV, and I may not be describing this just right (but this product was once manufactured -- it may involve removing the polarizing filter that is already on your LCD instead).

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    3. Re:Privacy, anyone ? by forged · · Score: 2
      Yes, of course there are solutions for the privacy-minded. But how many people will go to the lengths of carryng special hardware ?

      My concerns were more for the average Joe and Jane taking a plane and happening to use their laptops onboard. I've tried a couple of times myself, and found that using a laptop in an airplane was not practical at all (unless all you do is play solitaire ;)

    4. Re:Privacy, anyone ? by forged · · Score: 2
      Great insight. Now, my fellow passengers not only have read my confidential emails (after decryption), but also have read my passowrds while I was typing them !

      Clever :)

    5. Re:Privacy, anyone ? by Phantasmo · · Score: 1

      I haven't flown in awhile, but it doesn't seem like EVERYONE would be able to see your screen/keyboard. I do know that my laptop screen is practically unreadable unless you're sitting directly in front of it (but it is somewhat dated).
      At best, maybe the person sitting next to you would be able to read what was on your screen, and you'd certainly notice them peering over.
      If you're using a good OS, you have to type in your password to log in anyway - typing another password a couple of times won't hurt if it lets you use GPG.

      --

      The US Army: promoting democracy through unquestioned obedience
  31. Make for a nice return flight by Timid_Monkey · · Score: 1

    I'm heading to Kenya for the holidays to visit a sister studying in Nairobi. It would be a great present from Northwest to find my flights back (NBO->AMS->DTW) allow for it!!

  32. More on Lufthansa's deal... by mudpuppy · · Score: 3, Informative

    Sky's the Limit for Cisco Aironet Wireless LAN Technologies "Any traveler with a laptop computer or portable device equipped with a Wi-Fi compliant NIC card or enabled with Wi-Fi embedded inside will be able to log onto the wireless network. As part of the service, Lufthansa will also operate a 10 Mbps Ethernet wired network onboard for those passengers without wireless-capable computers. With 380 seats, a typical Lufthansa 747 has as many network connection sites as a mid-sized company. "

    --
    faster faster... 'til the thrill of speed overcomes the fear of death...
  33. Stop calling that a crime by stud9920 · · Score: 2

    There hardly is such a thing as a computer crime. A crime is a possibly illegal bad action by which you physically harm one or more human or animal individual, like killing, or raping. Stealing may be in some cases, for instance stealing my paycheck will get me starving, stealing from the wal mart is not.

    What you meant is "if you commit a misdemeanor"

    1. Re:Stop calling that a crime by shepd · · Score: 1

      >There hardly is such a thing as a computer crime. A crime is a possibly illegal bad action by which you physically harm one or more human or animal individual, like killing, or raping.

      I'll call you on that one.

      What say you use the internet to hack street lights so cars crash or hack the airport so planes crash (assuming these are connected to the internet. if not, insert computer at home connected to both internet and modem in between).

      It certainly isn't impossible to physically harm others using the internet, and you'll be going to a criminal court for doing any of the above. For someone competent enough, I doubt it's even hard.

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
    2. Re:Stop calling that a crime by stud9920 · · Score: 2

      Well if I had a wire cutter and I would cut the wires to the street lights, I would not be less guilty. Because I do it on a computer doesn't mean it's worse. Of course you can commit crimes using a computer, but making special laws against them is as ridiculous as making special laws against wire cutters. This is this kind of stance that brought you the DMCA.

    3. Re:Stop calling that a crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      What say you use the internet to hack street lights so cars crash or hack the airport so planes crash

      You don't need a laptop for that. A small pocket knife is enough. And it doesn't need any ethernet sockets or power connectors either! Remember, you physically are in the damn plane!

    4. Re:Stop calling that a crime by CommieOverlord · · Score: 1

      So, gaining access to systems and stealing credit card or personal information isn't a crime?

      Stealing from the Wal-mart is a crime. It either causes peoples to lose jobs because the store is losing money or shuts down, or it causes prices to rise which in turn will make it even harder for those people just barely scraping by from paycheque to paycheque.

      Grow up.

    5. Re:Stop calling that a crime by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then don't imply you can't do those things on computers. Re-read your original psost, you pretty much said it was impossible to hurt someone else while using a computer.

      How's the 5th grade been treating you?

    6. Re:Stop calling that a crime by wastaz · · Score: 1

      What say you use the internet to hack street lights so cars crash or hack the airport so planes crash (assuming these are connected to the internet. if not, insert computer at home connected to both internet and modem in between). Yes..just dont hack the wrong airplane so you accidentially crash your own plane ~_^

      Now, that would really be a candidate for "most stupid death".
      The person in question hacked his own airplane and made it crash, coincidentially he used Windows ME on his laptop, the OS known for most crashes ever.

    7. Re:Stop calling that a crime by fishbowl · · Score: 2

      Well, you can't do it from thousands of miles away with a pocket knife. But, what the OP meant by "computer crime" was probably more along the lines of "listening to music."

      --
      -fb Everything not expressly forbidden is now mandatory.
  34. money by aggieben · · Score: 1

    Wireless in airports is expensive (upwards of $1 a minute in the few that I've seen it). I can't imagine what they'll charge for internet access in an in-flight airplane. It's going to be horrendous, and thus as useless to me as the wirless in the airports. Ho-Hum.

    --
    Don't become a regular here, you will become retarded. -- Yoda the Retard
    1. Re:money by operagost · · Score: 1

      The article says BA will be charging $30 US per flight. You're right- horrendous. But what do you expect, when the going rate for voice calls from US flights (not that I've ever seen a phone actually used) is $3 a minute?

      --

      Gamingmuseum.com: Give your 3D accelerator a rest.
  35. Hmmmm... by Corporate+Troll · · Score: 1

    Is it that what nerds refer to when they say that they are in the 10-mile high club?

    1. Re:Hmmmm... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      10-mile club, eh

      That would be 52,800ft.

      WTF are you doing at FL520? Flying an AWACS?

  36. It's been done by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Almost ten years ago, I worked for InFlight Phone Corp., which offered dial-up connectivity (19.2K, which was fast for the time) from commercial flights, along with digital voice phone, faxes, games, etc. Each seat had an embedded PC, talking to a file/radio server buried in the cargo bay.

    The system actually worked, and was installed in over 100 planes (mostly USAir). Unfortunately, it cost enormously more to set up and operate the system than customers were willing to pay, and the company went out of business.

    Years later, I was on a plane that still had the system installed (but turned off). The rumor around the office was that it cost $250K to remove the now-dead system from a plane, and the airlines weren't willing to foot the bill, so the dead system stayed in planes for years to come.

    1. Re:It's been done by Sacarino · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Years later, I was on a plane that still had the system installed (but turned off). The rumor around the office was that it cost $250K to remove the now-dead system from a plane, and the airlines weren't willing to foot the bill, so the dead system stayed in planes for years to come.

      Well, sure. All that crap was installed and computed in the zero-fuel weight of the aircraft. In order to remove it, you'd need to pay the mechanics to yank the parts out, drain the fuel (ALL the fuel - in the tanks, the fuel lines, etc), re-weigh the aircraft, resubmit the paperwork to the FAA in order to get the work approved, and possibly repeat a step if the feds dont like something.

      Never underestimate the red tape mess the FAA is capable of producing. Such a task could take an aircraft out of service for quite some time. Ask anyone in aviation; a plane that's not flying isn't making you money and could be costing you instead.

      --
      -- El Sacarino tiene gusto de la chocha
    2. Re:It's been done by cdrpsab · · Score: 1

      er, why not weigh the stuff removed and subtract it from the documented weight of the airplance. Just an idea.

    3. Re:It's been done by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

      Not as simple as just the weight. Key words are "Weight and balance"

      The C/G of the aircraft matter a whole lot. Removing 1000 lbs from the front affects it differently than the same 1000 lbs from the aft section.

  37. Re:IN SOVJET RUSSIA THEY USE NJETSCAPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    ..AND INTERNJET exploder.

  38. Hm... by debilo · · Score: 1

    Too bad Northwest isn't going to have it for my DTW -> NRT -> KUL -> PER for CALU.

    Yeah, and don't forget, like, your OAD that is attached to your BDT sticking out of your ROR pointing to your BRD for LITH.

  39. Internet connection by Boeing on a Airbus ??? by Uzull · · Score: 1

    Would be interesting to see if the system can be installed in a Airbus aircraft, as Lufthansa has a lot of those presently on routes over the Atlantic
    Soon (2007) there will be A380 with upto 470 seats. The story will become even more interesting

  40. We have a winner! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
    Every once in a while I see a post on /. that's so myopic, so immature, so arrogant that it deserves a prize. This post claiming that there's no such thing as computer crime is a prime example.

    What shall we call the award? The Slashdot Colonoscopy Award, for having your head that far up your own ass?

  41. Power connection by Richard+Kirk · · Score: 3, Interesting
    I would rather have a power connection than the internet connection. Usualy, there is plenty I want to do on a laptop, without getting an internet connection, and all the sysadmin fun and games that can involve. Sometimes I have almost flattened my laptop batteries waiting for the plane, just cleaning up my files and doing those jobs that you never get around to if there is anything else to do.

    PS. The folding tray may stop your todger from doing a Hindenberg, but the little magnetic catch may zorsch your hard disc.

    1. Re:Power connection by Chris+Hiner · · Score: 2

      The secret is knowing how to play "Spot the outlet" in the airport, so you can keep your laptop topped off before the plane gets there. Behind the trash cans is one good place to look. They have outlets, as the cleaning people need them.

      I used to get really strange looks when people would see me playing a flight simulator while on the plane.

  42. Interesting quote from the article by mikehunt · · Score: 2, Insightful

    "That price sounds about right to Rob Vollmer, 32, a principal in Crosby-Vollmer International Communications, a Washington-based public-relations firm.

    Vollmer, who has flown 140,000 miles this year, does so much work by e-mail that he sometimes feels compelled to surreptitiously check messages during flights with a wireless Palm device, though it's prohibited."

    I believe the correct word here is illegal!!!

    The clock has now started ticking Mr. Vollmer, expect the Feds to be banging on your door very soon!

  43. Imagine... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    ...a beowulf squadron of those...

  44. hmm by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This will never happen? Why? Terrorism.

  45. ...selling wireless in airports... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    "I was pleased when they started selling wireless internet in airports..."

    In Singapore airport, wireless and cable based internet access is free. When travelling last year via Singapore I wandered out of the plane and into the internet access area, booted up (using my cable as I had no wireless adapter) and I was online in the time it took for w2k to boot. You can get wireless adapters there to use too, or use an IR port if you have one.

  46. huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

    "...DTW -> NRT -> KUL -> PER for CALU"

    WTF???

    1. Re:huh? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Translated for the regular, non-retarded geek :)

      This flight is Detroit (DTW) -> Tokyo, Japan Narita (NRT) -> Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia (KUL) -> Perth, Australia (PER).

      the best part of this trip is leaving Detroit behind.

  47. Cut off? by Fuzzypig · · Score: 4, Interesting

    What about when your about to land? They just cut you off mid connection? About to send that document to the office, or in the middle of an important system/database callout fixing session and they just cut you loose! "Sorry about that Boss, I know we had 20,000 clients who couldn't connect for 4 hours, but Delta cut my service halfway through and I couldn't get back in til I got into the airport lounge, after customs, the gift shop, duty free, cavity search, etc!"

    --
    Windows guys please stop pissing on everyone and the Linux guys stop pissing in the wind, hoping to hit Windows guys!
    1. Re:Cut off? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So I'm supposed to miss my razor-close connecting flight while we hold in the approach corridor to allow you to finish sending your bloated MS Presentation file to your boss?

  48. Sigh!! by theprancinghorse · · Score: 4, Funny

    Now I won't be able to escape from /. anywhere.

  49. internet go by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2

    OK so now when I go to Japan on that god-awful 11 and a half hour flight I get to play go constantly on the kiseido internet go server ?

    I would pay for that.

    I'd have to be careful not to start a game that meant I'd still be playing when they switched the service off for landing though...

    graspee

  50. Why this is the dumbest idea ever by Goobah · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Has anyone ever thought of the security implications of allowing someone to have silent access to the rest of the world on an airplane? Let's set up the scenario: Some nutbag with a portable GPS device on his laptop is able to provide real-time coordinates to someone on the ground via AOL Instant messenger or some other chat program. With the elevated threat of surface to air shoulder-mounted rockets on the news lately, isn't this giving terrorists a new way to track planes? Call me paranoid, but as cool as it would be to be able to get an IRC fix at 40,000 feet, I just don't think its a very wise idea in these troubled times.

    1. Re:Why this is the dumbest idea ever by gl4ss · · Score: 2

      so, why can't the bad guy just go to the public phone aboard the plane and just tell the coords over phone.

      you know, airplane routes aren't exactly secrets, neither are schedules, although they might seem random..and of course you can always try the shakal way, just drive to near the airport and take your portable surface-to-air rocket from the car and shoot when the plane is leaving(iirc they tried this in 60's/70's(?) in paris)..

      'these troubled times' has also been the better part of the recorded history..

      --
      world was created 5 seconds before this post as it is.
    2. Re:Why this is the dumbest idea ever by Shamanin · · Score: 2

      The propagation delay for the satellite bounce down to ground station and then through the internet (while moving at 600 mph) would probably throw off your coordinates quite a bit anyway.

      And, I am not an expert on such things as shoulder-mounted rockets, but I would assume that they would be either out of range or rather inaccurate when a plane is flying at 30K feet.

      --
      come on fhqwhgads
    3. Re:Why this is the dumbest idea ever by jratcliffe · · Score: 2

      Not an issue. Man-portable SAMs, like the Stinger or the SA-7 Grail (used in the Kenyan attempt), etc., have very limited altitude/range ceilings: 13-15k feet in altitude, and ~5km in range. They're also infra-red based, so if the plane is far enough away that the missle bearer can't see it, he can't shoot at it either. I wouldn't worry about someone with a GPS giving precise locations.

      For info and diagrams: http://www.emergency.com/samissle.htm

    4. Re:Why this is the dumbest idea ever by rebbie · · Score: 1
      First, the data is publicly available. Just go here and enter an airline/flight number.

      Second, the above assumes you have a particular flight in mind. Planes are all over the place and if you don't care which one you hit you can just aim and shoot in LOTS of places. You can also wait for the desired airline brand to fly over and do this as they regularly fly low while preparing to land.

      --
      On a clear disk you can seek forever
  51. rate will be too high by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    As with the phone rate, which are really high, I guess they will charge something really high per minute. 2.99-3.99$/minute? :)

  52. The cell phone ban isn't about safety by smagoun · · Score: 2
    I'm a little leery of your anecdote; presumably you reported it to the correct authorities, since up until now there haven't been many (any?) documented cases where cell phones actually interfere with communication equipment onboard aircraft.

    A little digging reveals that the frequencies that cell phones operate on aren't the same frequencies aircraft use for navigation/communication, and those $5/minute airphones are actually cellular telephones!

    In fact, it turns out that the cell phone ban wasn't an FAA regulation until very recently - it was an FCC ban! The cell network isn't designed for rapidly-moving phones, nor is it designed for phones 30,000 feet up in the air. Instead, it's designed for stationary/slow-moving phones at or near ground level. An airborne cell phone can wreak havoc with the network; that's why the FCC banned them on airplanes. The ban has nothing to do with safety.

    ZDNet article on the topic.

    1. Re:The cell phone ban isn't about safety by Sacarino · · Score: 2

      I dont doubt that you are suspicious of what I posted. However, I was in the cockpit and I heard the phone call. We then had the flight attendants go back and find the woman - she described where she was to her caller friend when complaining about the engine noise.

      You are correct about the variances in frequencies, but I know what my ears heard, sir.

      In fact, the frequencies for aviation are:
      NAV -- 108.000-117.950 MHz
      COM -- 118.000-136.975 MHz

      You can actually dial in 108.00 on your nav receiver, turn on the ident, and listen to bleed-through from the upper-range FM stations using older analog transmitter equipment.

      Now, if you look at my original post, I never said "this is how it happened, why it happened, with a schematic." I just said it happened.

      If you'd like to debate it further, I'm willing to dive into the technical details with you... the mechanics and engineering crew that descended upon the aircraft during its next progressive inspection were very interested in the issue, since the pilot wrote it up in the logbook. (in case you're unfamiliar, a logbook write-up leads to paperwork which leads to the FAA... follow the papertrail)

      --
      -- El Sacarino tiene gusto de la chocha
    2. Re:The cell phone ban isn't about safety by Wakkow · · Score: 2

      I don't want to start a debate, but I'm sure many of us are interested in the technical details of how that happened..

  53. DTW - PER by sugar+and+acid · · Score: 1

    Detroit to Perth, for those people who don't know. Perth happens to be the major city furthest from the east coast of the usa.

    I'm a Perth boy living in Ann Arbor Michigan. So I have done this (not this particular route though). A couple of days of flying and floating around airports is not fun.

    You know your along way from home when your cheapest option to get home is an around the world ticket.

  54. Tech data by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I know someone who knows someone who knows someone...

    It's not "internet access", it's the ability to browse several "static" sites, updated on the ground before takeoff.
    In other words, you can check out http://www.sluggy.com Sluggy Freelance, but not http://www.hotmail.com read your e-mail.

  55. Appearently by motox · · Score: 1

    I am the only one traveling in economy class ;/ You know, the place where you worry more about how much space betweeen each seat you will find, so you can stretch your legs every now and then, and about what kind of weird food will they serve...

  56. Windows file shares & other fun by TarPitt · · Score: 2, Interesting
    Is the media shared? Can I set up dsniff or something and what what the executive in first class is up to? You know, watch him plotting corporate intrigue, closing that big deal, shredding accounting records, etc.?


    Will Windows file sharing be blocked? If not, it would be lots of fun to see who is in your network neighborhood. Kind of like the old days with cable modems.


    Could someone have a little pop-up window show up on passenger laptops that says "This plane has been boarded by alien space invaders. Stay calm. They mean us no harm"? Or maybe "I am Colonel Ogo Mumbasso from Nigeria. If you help me transfer money, I will arrange frequent flyer miles..."

    --
    If your children ever found out how lame you are, they'd murder you in your sleep
  57. Northwest Airlines? by goodEvans · · Score: 1

    Did anyone else notice that Northwest Airlines website is NWA.com? I mean, geez, them guys is WHITE!! Either that, or Dre and Ice have free flights for life...

  58. But in coach class... by TarPitt · · Score: 1
    ..what will they do when the person in front of you reclines their seat wayyyy back? At best, you can kiss off using your laptop the rest of the trip. At worst, your laptop monitor goes SCRUNTCH! as if catches in the seat behind you.


    Maybe instead of Internet access, they should work on giving passengers enough room to use their laptops.

    --
    If your children ever found out how lame you are, they'd murder you in your sleep
  59. When I fly... by KC7GR · · Score: 2

    ...I'm usually on vacation. For my part, I LIKE being 'unwired' for that time. It's one of the few times that I can actually read, write, sleep, or just stare out the window and think without any fear of interruption or mental "clutter."

    I have to wonder if this is going to have any impact on social skills, such as the art of good conversation, or meeting someone new? Is connectivity going to, eventually, become as ubiquitous as advertising, to the point where someone might panic if they can't get to their E-mail for a couple of hours?

    If that does happen, is it necessarily a Good Thing?

    All my hardware has an 'Off' switch. I'm not in the least afraid to use it! How many other people will be able to say the same ten years from now?

    --

    Bruce Lane, KC7GR,

    Blue Feather Technologies

  60. Don't get too excited yet by coinreturn · · Score: 3, Informative

    I am a Boeing employee who thought the whole idea was stupid when they first started Connexion. They deployed this whole ton of people for the project and ended up laying off 80% of them when they realized the airlines weren't interested - mainly because Boeing wants a huge cut of the profits. Last I heard, Boeing invested $400 million on this boondoggle. They were going to charge $30/hour for access and counted their profits by counting in-flight hours of planes in the US, ignoring the fact that most flight hours are commuter trips in the one-hour range where you can barely get your laptop out before the announcement that you have to turn it off comes on.

    1. Re:Don't get too excited yet by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      I work as a grant recipiant on a NASA joint venture with Boing on this technology. I can tell you that the main reason why this has been delayed has been shitty modems. We have been trying to improve the IF carrier synchronization and the symbol synchronization schemes used on the modems. Currently they will lose synchronization at around 10dB SNR. This easily occurs during plane banking maneuvers. The satellite recievers are flat phase array devices which can "steer" the beam to the satellite without requiring the traditional parabolic dish. On a test van at NASA i have seen these antennas which Boening rents to NASA. They are approximately 2ft square and 6in thick and housed in weatherproof plastic. The cost for airtime on the satellite is purchased by the half hour (I cannot rememeber the price, but upwards of $20000/half hour comes to my mind) and is the most expensive part in the long run. I can tell you that the current technology uses 256 or 512Mb/s QPSK signalling on 4.6MHz carrier. Direct Sequence Spread Spectrum is used and bumps the bandwidth to 36MHz. Synchronization improvements are needed because of the nature of TCP/IP over this link. When synchronization is lost, TCP takes a while to ramp back to normal operation. A loss of synchronization can lead to a blackout of over 30 seconds followed by a period of reduced performance.

      NASA grant recipient

  61. Plane locations can't be secured by Jerf · · Score: 2
    You're worried about securing the unsecurable. If you're a terrorist and you want to shoot down a plane, and you don't care which one, it's pretty damned easy to find one.

    Procedure:
    1. Go outside on a cloudless day.
    2. Look around.
    If you're within 10 miles of an airport (even a minor one), odds are, hey, there's a plane!

    GPS coords don't add much to information already so available all you have to do is literally open your eyes and it comes streaming in. From what I've seen on the news, most missles are fired at planes taking off or landing (usually taking off from what I've seen), in plain sight. You just can't hide a plane taking off, so please, on behalf of all us freedom-loving citizens, don't propose half-assed "solutions" to the non-problem; we've got government officials working on that full-time already and God-forbid one of them see this "non-problem" of yours and decide to try your non-solution.... more freedoms gone for no gain whatsoever, just to make someone look like they're "doing something".
  62. GPS not allowed in-flight by coinreturn · · Score: 1

    If you check the in-flight rag, you'll find that the airlines don't allow passengers to use GPS receivers. I know this because I used to use mine to watch the flight path when I was totally bored. That was before they thought to disallow their use (they weren't yet common).

  63. Huge Nerd Penalty by COLUG · · Score: 1

    "as a sometimes-traveler for work, and a huge nerd..."

    Watch out for the Huge Nerd penalty when flying.

  64. While your at it by Shamanin · · Score: 2

    Uh, won't they have to re-weigh the aircraft with the new equipment added for THIS service anyway?

    --
    come on fhqwhgads
  65. Anyone thought about Laptop battery time? by Neutropia_1 · · Score: 1

    I hear everyone talking about using it for international flights - but seriously, how would you be able to even take advantage of it with the crappy up time of current batteries? I mean, we're talking 3 hours TOPS.

    I think that if they are going to start adding services like this, than they need to add DC sockets like in automobiles, allowing the use of laptops or other devices (at least for transcontinental jets).....

    1. Re:Anyone thought about Laptop battery time? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Already been done...

      At least on Air Canada flights (yes, I'm a canuck) they offer DC power for some brands of
      portables right off the arm of the seat. They
      have adapters for IBM, Compaq, among others I
      can't remember.

      No Internet access though :(

  66. Webcams by macemoneta · · Score: 1

    If aircraft are Internet connected, they should have webcams installed around the cabin sending time-lapse images to the ground (tunneled for security). The cameras don't have to be visible (and probably shouldn't be).

    If they're going to disarm all the passengers, preventing/limiting their response to a problem (hey, I'd just as soon have child-proof Mace cannisters at each seat), then at least the ground will be able to "tune in" and monitor aircraft. It would also help identify those causing a problem.

    This isn't a privacy issue; you don't have any expectation that no one can see you when you are on a plane, especially airline personnel.

    --

    Can You Say Linux? I Knew That You Could.

  67. Is this a new low for slashdot? by Maxwell · · Score: 1

    The number of people replying who have obviously never flown in a plane is just astounding.

    "can we use a laptop?"
    You can use electronic devices once the plane is over 10,000 feet. The captain will announce it. On an Airbus the light over your seat will com one, you know the one that says "approved electronic devies..." That includes laptops, CDRom, radios what ever.

    "what about battery life! no one thought of that! I am so smart!"

    plug in you laptop using the power port under your seat. Virtually all long haul (57,67,77, A3x) planes have these.

    The cell phone thing has been explained, although they do work, same deal for two way pagers BTW.

    Oh yeah, Perth is pretty boring, although King's park is cool.

    JON

  68. Here's a novel idea! by RandomHavoc · · Score: 2, Insightful
    Read a book!

    The U.S. spent a million dollars developing a pen that could work in space. The Soviets used pencils.

    And porn is available in dead tree format too!

    --

    --
    But then again I thought VCR+ was a stupid idea and would die a quick death--so what do I know?
  69. After the required rummaging and strip search by RY · · Score: 0
    I can see the questioning at the counter...


    Has any one unknown to you given you any programs to load?
    Do you have any SSL programs, Pirated Warze, MP3's or linux operating system?
    WHAT You have Linux with SSL... Airport security we may have a terrorist hacker at gate 12.......

  70. The Mile High Pr0n Club by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Plus you can gross out would be terrorists by showing them this website

  71. United already does this (and for less $) by ahecht · · Score: 1

    I flew on united yesterday, and they were offering data connections through their Verizon AirFone service for $5.99 for the entire flight. That's right, just six bucks for up to six hours of data connection. I was kicking myself the whole flight for now bringing my laptop carry on.

    Yes, the speed is between 4800 and 9600 bps (depending on how many people are connected), but it's better than nothing. Unfortunatly, I can't find anything on the web about this, but there were large posters in the airport terminals advertizing the new rates.

  72. My two cents as an EE by lepton+noodle · · Score: 1

    It is entirely possible for devices like an MD player to interfere with radio equipment. I once encountered a problem where a Sony CD player interfered with a ham radio receiver in the 2M band (144-148 Mhz), you could even hear the music work it's way through the demodulator of the receiver. This was probably due to harmonics from the delta-sigma DAC extending into the VHF range. Since the aircraft voice communication band is in the low VHF range as well (108-136MHz), I find it entirely plausible that an obstensibly non-transmitting device can interfere with radio communications.