Slashdot Mirror


Indian Government Moves to Let Linux In

Webi writes "The government of India has started taking precise, wide-reaching steps to usher in a Linux wave in India." India sure seems to be a highly contested arena lately. Interestingly, India's plan calls for government-sponsored support and call centers. Looks like they've really thought this through.

108 of 326 comments (clear)

  1. Sweet! by Neck_of_the_Woods · · Score: 5, Funny


    Maybe they will outsource linux support to the us!

    I better start learning my Hindi!

    --
    Neck_of_the_Woods
    #/usr/local/surf/glassy/overhead
    1. Re:Sweet! by Bowie+J.+Poag · · Score: 4, Funny



      Too late, man. Hindi is obsolete!

      Hindi++ is where it's at nowadays.

      --
      Bowie J. Poag

    2. Re:Sweet! by einer · · Score: 5, Funny

      Don't waste your time with that, Microsoft has already broken the Hindi++ interpreter and replaced it with it's own proprietary version called Hindi#.

  2. text of the article by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Informative

    Govt move on to let in Linux
    PRASENJIT BHATTACHARYA

    TIMES NEWS NETWORK[ WEDNESDAY, DECEMBER 25, 2002 12:54:49 PM ]

    NEW DELHI: The government of India has started taking precise, wide-reaching steps to usher in a Linux wave in India.

    And that cannot be good news for proprietary software vendors like Microsoft. Yesterday, the IT ministry had a meeting of around 70 people, from companies like HP, IBM, Sun and TCS, government agencies like BARC and CDAC, state governments like Kerala, West Bengal and MP to evolve a level playing field for Linux vis-a-vis proprietary software (read Microsoft).

    All the IITs too were represented at the meeting that went on for 4 hours.

    There was consensus in the meeting that Linux was a secure, robust and cost-effective system.

    As far as concrete pro-Linux acts go, government tenders may soon stop specifying Microsoft or any other vendor's name while floating software tenders, thus throwing open the way for Linux vendors to grab lucrative government contracts hitherto barred from them.

    The government is also setting up special interest groups with officials of industry and academia to find out how Linux can be deployed in e-governance, defence, education and so on.

    Since support to Linux is till a big issue, the government is also thinking in terms of setting up support and resource services, and call centres for Linux users. It is also looking at setting up pilot sites, where Linux applications can be "touched and felt". A heartening fact for Linux-philes would be the enthusiasm for Linux shown by extremely security-sensitive agencies like Bhabha Atomic Research Centre and the National Information Centre (NIC).

    Another aspect that came out in the meeting was the work on Indianisation of Linux that's happening now.

    C-DAC's agency NCST and Red Hat have, for instance, developed a Hindi version of Linux, called Indix. IIT Mumbai too is doing pioneering research in Linux.

    Yesterday's meeting of industry, academia and government representatives was chaired by IT secretary R R Shah. According to industry sources, companies like Sun and TCS were all enthusiasm for Linux, with the TCS representative claiming that the company was implementing the country's largest Linux project in Chennai. The government, however, was at pains to bring out the fact that it was not against Microsoft or proprietary software and was only looking to leverage the strengths of open source software.

    However, one official present at the meeting wisecracked, "Microsoft would have had a heart attack if it was present at the meeting. The interest in Linux at this meeting was palpable."

    One influential official told ET that many people were "violently against" computer textbooks in schools and colleges teaching Microsoft Word or Excel, instead of generic applications or technologies, like word processors. Industry sources also said that on the sidelines of the meeting, there were two views among those present about Microsoft's reported move of sharing source code with the government. While some thought it was just "posturing" by MS, others felt that it was a "genuine" attempt by the Redmond giant to reach out.

    However, sources said that it was the representative from Madhya Pradesh, who made a forceful case for Linux. He said that since MP had a paucity of resources, Linux seemed the best solution for the state. He, however, said that there was need to train people in Linux technologies. A member of the Linux user group sprang up to say that the MP government can take help of the extremely active Linux User group in Indore.

  3. English in India by Mdog · · Score: 5, Funny

    Actually, English will be just fine. Anybody in India who is well-off enough to deal with computers almost definately speaks English. Whether it's English non-Indians can understand is a different matter all together.

    1. Re:English in India by robb0995 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      I am in the process of opening a satellite office in India for my company to hire developers and back office personnel, and language doesn't really seem to be a barrier at all.

      In fact, my next trip over, I am scheduled to meet with training centers that train call center agents to speak with a midwestern american accent, and even teaches them current events!! So, this is not even socio-economic class-based, as developers earn significantly more than they do.

      You have to remember that the country was a UK colony until 1948, English is not nearly the problem I worried that it might be.

    2. Re:English in India by SpaceLifeForm · · Score: 2

      You're almost almost definitely incorrect. I mean, you're almost almost psychic if you can determine his speaking ability from his writing! And I'm not guessing. ;~)

      --
      You are being MICROattacked, from various angles, in a SOFT manner.
    3. Re:English in India by Iguanaphobic · · Score: 2

      Sort of like the "English" spoken in most of the US. Whether it's English most non-USains can understand...

      Don't forget that most TV anchors are Canadian. They actually speak English.

      --
      Fascism should more properly be called corporatism, since it is the merger of state and corporate power.
    4. Re:English in India by Daimaou · · Score: 2

      I worked in India for a little while. Just like anywhere else, there are some people who could speak English really well, some who could get by, and some who I had to communicate with using hand signals, facial expressions, and a lot of pointing at things.

    5. Re:English in India by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 5, Insightful
      I have done a great deal of work over the last year or two with people in India. In fact, it's thanks on large part to them that I'm able to support myself at the moment, since I'm currently a nonresident alien in the country where I now reside and thus not permitted to have a job as such. (Nebing an American who finds oneself in that situation is a bit ironic, I must admit, given that in the States we're always hearing about foreigners trying to enter the country to take our jobs.)

      Without boring you with the details, let me just say that many of the programming books you're buying these days are written and edited there, at least in part. (And some of the "polishing up" work gets outsourced to me.)

      Their enthusiasm for doing useful, meaningful work is genuine, as is their desire not to be lisence-taxed to death while trying to do it. They simply can't afford it. So Linux and other Open Source technologies are a natural for them.

      I also wonder if it'd have done Microsoft much good to make a pitch in any case. According to Microsoft's own "Attitudes Towards Shared Source and Open Source Research Study", as quoted in the Halloween Documents,
      Ratings for messages that were meant to be negative actually had a positive response among the respondents. For example, when read what was supposed to be a negative OSS message about OSS and proprietary software having a similar TCO, nearly half (49%) of all respondents said that having heard this message they were now MORE FAVORABLE towards OSS.
      In other words, the very things that MS keep trying to tell people are "evil" about OSS are in fact what people actually like about it! Especially those people concerned with the bottom line because they can't afford not to be.
      --
      Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
    6. Re:English in India by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      I dunno. The Simpsons is quite easy for me to understand (I'm UKian) and I'm pretty sure that's created by Americans.

    7. Re:English in India by SoftwareJanitor · · Score: 2

      Only one of the three major networks' anchors are Canadian (ABC's Peter Jennings). Dan Rather of CBS (from Texas) and Tom Brokaw (from South Dakota) of NBC are both American. 1/3 is hardly what I'd call "most". And even Peter Jennings tries to sound like he is from the midwestern US, which is considered the "weatherman" dialect in the US.

  4. So Billy Boy couldn't bully the Indians... by MamasGun · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ...good for them!

    In developing countries, Free/Open software makes tremendous sense. When your average worker doesn't make enough money in the average month to buy a license to Microsoft's latest OS, you know there's a disconnect.

    Maybe my home state (CA, the new capital of hideous debt) might take a lesson from India.

    --
    "But you've already got a DVD. It lasts forever....In the digital world, we don't need back-ups..."
    -- Jack Valenti
    1. Re:So Billy Boy couldn't bully the Indians... by drudd · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You have to remember that India is developing very rapidly as an IT power, but the rest of its economy is still struggling.

      So the labor costs in India relative to license fees are MUCH lower than in the US. So open source is removing the bulk of operating costs.

      Doug

      --
      Venn ist das nurnstuck git und Slotermeyer? Ya! Beigerhund das oder die Flipperwaldt gersput!
    2. Re:So Billy Boy couldn't bully the Indians... by cant_get_a_good_nick · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I'm not a zealot, I believe in the right tool for the job. I'm lucky enough that I understand programs and programming fairly quickly and can use a variety of toolsets. I do not assume that everyone is like me, and everyone makes the same value decisions on ease of use. free/libre, support and all that. I think that is where RMS and other zealots fail. RMS is a programmer, a pretty good one in fact, but his views are sometimes colored by that.

      I think an unbiased TCO analysis is kind of hard now. Each side has an agenda to push. Depending on what you investigate you can come up with different numbers. The only survey I can think of that I consider did a decent job on TCO is an survey that shows apache on linux is cheaper than the main alternatives. That obviously doesn't show "user" apps, just servers.

      As far as the bias goes, I think the way TCO is asked is biased as well. I rarely see people include the cost of Microsoft's essentially forced upgrades or the time and effort tracking obtaining and tracking licenses. There are also some intagibles, such as not being locked in, being able to look "under the hood" - the US government's post-9/11 intelligence gathering, MSes history of tracking have people a bit wary now. Those are real, though hard to put dollar number on, concerns.

      There are companies that offer support for OpenSource apps, they're not as big name as Linux itself, they tend to be smaller shops.

      The other thing is that the switchover cost, at least as it currently looks, is a one time cost, vs. continuous costs (MS forced upgrades) albeit that are lower. The problem is you have to at some point bite the bullet. Things like Crossover are making this easier and a gradual conversion.

      I'm not saying everything should be opensource, but things like WordProcessing make sense. It's a very mature app, fairly stable code base once you get to "modern" wordprocessing feature levels, and it's dangerous to have your important data locked in a proprietary format. If the Justice Department really wanted to make a dent in the MS Monopoly they would have forced MS to open up completely all past, present, and future Office formats. This would guarantee compatibility with competing apps, and MS would have to compete on features, not on lock-in. it would also ensure people could read and write their old Office files and not have to upgrade. It would be pretty ironic if outside apps had better support for MS's old formats than Word does.

    3. Re:So Billy Boy couldn't bully the Indians... by _Sprocket_ · · Score: 2


      What would a total cost analysis show? Would the cost of administration, customization, training, support, and finding the necessary applications cancel any benefits of not buying licenses?


      India hardly suffers from a shortage of labor. The labor charge for administration and customization will be trivial compared to any licensing. Finding necessary applications won't be much of a problem unless they have a very niche requirement - and even then, a Linux infrastructure will likely work well for most of the environment.

      And finally - training and support. You forget that India is growing their IT industry (and fighting brain-drain to some extent). Training is the entire point of the operation. Support exists in abundance with proper training (those stumped by "RTFM" forget that one either has to do some basic footwork oneself or pay for the expertise).

      Open Source solutions won't always be the answer. But it will be more and more often. It all depends on the specifics of one's needs - what is being sought. India is wise to not allow a single corporate interest to dictate their search.
    4. Re:So Billy Boy couldn't bully the Indians... by ortholattice · · Score: 2
      It would be pretty ironic if outside apps had better support for MS's old formats than Word does.

      A few years ago I had several corrupted Word '97 docs. When I opened them in Word on Win95, Word would immediately freeze or crash with an "illegal instruction" dump, or even corrupt the OS leading to the inevitable BSOD. But in the pre-Sun StarOffice the .doc's would open perfectly, with helpful red error messages showing exactly where the corruption was, and the rest of the content was easily salvaged.

      One thing that really PO'ed me at the time was that when Word '97 docs were opened with older Word versions (I forget which, but certainly the previous Mac version), there wasn't even an error message saying you had to upgrade or something. Either you'd see garbage on the screen or Word would freeze/crash. The shoddiness of such a design was just appalling. It was a painful transition until everyone was up to '97.

      One thing I never understood is why exploits to take advantage of such behavior never caught on with the script kiddies. I guess macro viruses were just too easy, so why bother.

    5. Re:So Billy Boy couldn't bully the Indians... by Felinoid · · Score: 2

      I am a zellot. I think Windows is plastic toy tools.. Windows NT is 'real working' kids tools (had a set as a kid and I could actually build stuff with them).
      But there is quite a road Linux must travle before the mass market user could use it with out hassle.

      On the TCO one problem is that version to version compatability is poor with Windows. Win 64, 32,16 and Dos are all slightly diffrent.
      As such users are forced to dump old applications and hardware for no reason other than it dosen't work with the latest version of Windows.
      If someone sereously went at it Wine could support the full api for every version of Windows.
      This would make a switch to Linux an easy way to avoid having to buy new software. But for now Linux dose not have that ability.

      --
      I don't actually exist.
  5. Gubmint sponsored call centers? by snarkasaurus · · Score: 4, Funny

    "Interestingly, India's plan calls for government-sponsored support and call centers."

    Oh joy! Another place to be put on eternity hold.

    Any word if they plan on suporting the entire world or just the users in the Indian government?

    1. Re:Gubmint sponsored call centers? by thelexx · · Score: 3, Funny

      This may actually be a really worthwhile thing. They should put meditation training in the call hold system so you can get enlightened while you wait. Or, in fact, get any enlightenment at all if their tech support is like most.

      --
      "Gold still represents the ultimate form of payment in the world." - Alan Greenspan, 1999
  6. Mono making it easier to pick Linux? by smd4985 · · Score: 2

    Not that I hope .NET gains much traction, but if it does I think the Mono project is a real godsend.

    Since .NET is mainly an API and MS seems to be supporting alternate but conforming .NET implementations, the Mono project is another reason to use Linux. If applications start using .NET in the future a government won't be at a disadvantage pushing/using Linux.

    --
    smd4985
  7. Re:Ok, And I Should Caaaree......Why? by greenrd · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Ok, And I Should Caaaree......Why?

    Maybe you should, maybe you shouldn't, but the point is it provides a positive example of how to engage the government in promoting open source - whatever country you're in. That's of interest to a lot of us, I think - not just the Indian Slashdotters. ;-)

  8. Re:Ok, And I Should Caaaree......Why? by agentZ · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Because the government of the world's largest democracy just told the world's biggest business to go soak its head.

  9. Three steps to profit by RealAlaskan · · Score: 4, Funny
    Governments should:

    1) Talk up linux.
    2) When Bill and Melinda offer money, make nice.
    3) Adopt Linux, and watch your people PROFIT.
    4) Watch their tax recipts rise.

    Whoops, that was 4 steps. Well, government projects usually go over budget.

  10. Re:fuck fuck fuck by smd4985 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You guys need to take an economics course. Globalization and outsourcing of jobs to other countries is not bad in and of itself. In fact, in general it benefits everyone in the long run. In the short term the workers who were let go are hurt, but if the proper steps are taken (i.e. new skills training) then the short term loss is minimized.

    If it wasn't for cheap foreign labor, America would never have been able to become a service economy. Basically, Americans could not have been as rich without cheap foreign labor.

    --
    smd4985
  11. Crap joke warning by oliverthered · · Score: 3, Funny


    No windows, no gates, apache inside.

    --
    thank God the internet isn't a human right.
  12. Re:Ok, And I Should Caaaree......Why? by ceejayoz · · Score: 3, Informative

    Yeah, except for the fact that the world's biggest business is Wal-Mart, and MS doesn't even rank on the top ten.

  13. India and Linux by Salubri · · Score: 2, Insightful

    There are quite a few things I'm seeing going on here that I do have to point out.

    It has been voiced that India is foolish for going with open source which "at most will be half done" as opposed to Microsoft.

    Think about this: India is a nuclear power, and they can hit major cities. Do we REALLY want a microsoft product running this? Think about it... this would bring entirely new meaning to the term blue screen of death.

    Personally I see linux right now being stuck in this trap. They don't have the marketshare because there isn't the development, and they don't have the development because there is no marketshare. One of these things has to be fixed for the other one to be fixed. India is a HUGE populous. If this becomes the OS of choice over in India, it WILL lead to more development of Linux in general of which the entire linux community will benefit.

    --
    ----- I want my LART.
    1. Re:India and Linux by Salubri · · Score: 2

      Do you think they're really looking at using MS software for critical systems... No. That part was a joke. I _AM_ a bit familiar with computers in expiremental labs enough to know this... well... at least enough to know that they don't use anything us normal people have access to.

      As far as studies that compare TCO's between Microsoft and Linux, the only one's I've seen that place Microsoft on top are either Microsoft sponsored studies or by the occasional company that bends their knee and kisses the ring of the Gates. Are there others out there? Perhaps. I admit that the studies I'm talking about are only the ones I've seen. What do I know though?

      In the computer labs I've visited, one trained unix admin can take on 200 systems, whereas MCSE's will handle about 20 - at most.

      Now lets use this information to do a little hypothetical planning. Lets say, for the sake of arguement, that we're going to implement 1000 systems and that the standard wage for the Windows admin is 1 Economic unit (just a fake term for a yearly salary for a windows admin). At the rate of 1 admin to every 20 systems, this means that there will need to be 50 admins. Each earning 1 economic unit, the total expenditure for admins is 50 economical units. Now, if they went with linux/unix, they would only need 5 admins. Now, lets even account for the fact that unix guys earn... lets say 4x the salary of an MCSE, realize if Unix admins aren't paid nearly that much it only strengthens my arguement. 5 employees earning 4 economical units each is still only 20 economical units - a savings of 30 economical units. If Unix admins aren't paid that much more than MCSE's, then you save even more in budget.

      It's not just the support over time, you also have to think about how many people would need to be hired to run things.

      But now that I've ranted about ALL of this, realize that I don't know much about the TCO market, and the examples I've used to construct my arguements are based on trends I have observed and therefore could be inaccurate.

      Frankly I disagree about Microsoft being the logical choice. With all the problems that people have with Microsoft and the control it weilds, I think the logical choice is choosing something that is stable and doesn't force you to pay out the nose every time you wish to upgrade software. But like you say... personal beliefs don't have much place in buisness decisions.

      --
      ----- I want my LART.
    2. Re:India and Linux by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 2
      Are you on crack? Would you *want* to have to handle 200 systems if they all went down at once?

      If all your servers go down at once you haven't done your job properly. Where's your UPS? Where's your backup generator? Where's your disaster recovery plan? So far the amount of unscheduled downtime on my servers in 2002 is 0 seconds. What's yours?

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
  14. but.. by sgups · · Score: 2, Insightful

    But if anything my own experience of living there tells me, nothing will come of this move for another 20 years and by that time the MS flag will be flying higher than the stars and stripes.

    --
    Democratic USA - Government of the corporations, by the Corporations, for the corporations.
  15. Bill G. is no longer in charge of M$ by SHEENmaster · · Score: 2

    He just has enough money of his own to personally buy every member of congress, the supreme court, and even the president.

    With that kind of money, you don't need to adopt the best OS around.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
  16. Source citation by MongooseCN · · Score: 2

    India sure seems to be a highly contested arena lately.

    Does anyone else find it funny that Slashdot, a site with <sarcasm> model journalistic integrity</sarcasm> I might add, always sites itself?

    1. Re:Source citation by SwedishChef · · Score: 2

      Slashdot citations are references to other news sources anyway, so why shouldn't they just give one and let us follow the links from there?

      --
      No one ever had to evacuate a city because the solar panels broke!
  17. Re:You people are absolutely intriguing by RealAlaskan · · Score: 4, Insightful
    Would my car perform any better if I had the precise engineering details about how every little part worked?

    Yes, you do, and yes, it does.

    You may not have those details to hand, but they are available to you. You may not want those details, but they are available to folks who are able to use them. That's why your fancy-schmancy modern car is significantly better than Grandpa's Model T.

    ... most would prefer to buy Microsoft (Ford, Chrysler, Mercedes, etc.) rather than hacking up a Linux (junkyard car ...

    How about Microsoft (1950's Rolls Royce clone, with a trouble-prone Chevy engine) versus Linux (modern Subaru)?

    ... I think Microsoft and other American companies getting more business means that there'll be more jobs here on the homefront. Just a thought...I'm not economic genius ...

    Right. You aren't. We can get jobs through trade with India. We don't have to sell them software to trade. Your conclusion may be obvious, but it is quite possibly wrong.

  18. India reads the writing on the wall... by CashCarSTAR · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Within 10 years Linux or one of its offshoots will be the primary OS used on desktop and server computers world-wide. India is looking towards placing themselves in a very advantageous position in this new IT world.

    Same thing as anybody with any sort of intelligence has their eye on things such as alternative sources of energy..

  19. Re:Software spending? by stevejsmith · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe they're poor because of you? Do you really think that if the United States stopped trading with everybody (specifically Iraq and Saudi Arabia, our main oil suppliers considering that Venezuala is for shit now), dropped Alaska (we bought it from Russia, you know, because of good diplomatic relationships), we would still be the super power that we are? No. We would smell and we'd bathe in the Mississippi River. Are you so dumb that you don't understand that? If all other nations did to the United State what you want to do to India and Saudi Arabia, do you think we'd be the way we are? No. No we would not. Get an education, because you've just been outsmarted by a high school freshman.

  20. Re:You people are absolutely intriguing by Lysol · · Score: 5, Insightful

    India is different! They have a lot of brain/man power over there. And they are still a very poor country. That will change tho, and when it does, would you rather them be pushing m$ or something free? It's not about performance or source code, it's completely about economics and control of ones own future and brain power.

    Besides, not every country in the world can pay ridiculous license fees for shotty software just to make a few people in some other country richer. Argh, ya know, instead of bitching about other countries, people should go there and check it out first hand. You'll see things in a completely different light and probably realize the whole high-priced, disposable 'american way' can't fly everywhere. jeeze, this is so obvious!

    As far as complaing about jobs, sorry man (really!), but remember, those of you lower on the ladder were sacraficed for those higher up. How many bosses took pay cuts or forfeited their vacation so you could stay on board? Absolutely none! So before you go complaing about those bad immigrants or bad people in other countries taking your jobs just remember, someone had to make that decision here at home. And it was your ex-boss/superstar management team.
    We won't have to worry about a terrorist attack or the like ruining our economy because we're doing it to ourselves. Give the middle guy a decent wage and get some creative management not selling their souls for the all mighty dollar and we'll go far. Of course, this is completely unrealistic today, but hey, some of us still have to keep thinking ahead..

  21. Heh.. by NanoGator · · Score: 2

    "System Shutdown Completed: Thank you, come again!"

    --
    "Derp de derp."
  22. Indian Government Moves to Let Linux In by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    "Indian Government Moves to Let Linux In"

    Wow.. never thought I'd see the day where Linux replaces an entire governing body. That should make for an interesting deomcracy. Everybody can write their own laws!

    1. Re: Indian Government Moves to Let Linux In by Dunark · · Score: 5, Insightful

      The loss of sales in India is going to be the least of Microsoft's problems. Imagine what's going to happen when all the new Linux expertise from India goes looking for jobs in other countries. Microsoft's argument about Linux being more expensive to operate is going to go down the flusher very fast.

  23. Re:You people are absolutely intriguing by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    Would my car perform any better if I had the precise engineering details about how every little part worked? Of course not, because I don't have a Ph.D in mechanical engineering and don't study chemistry.

    No, but didja ever think that *maybe* chemists out there might want to put their own ideas and improvements into practice?

    And unlike the auto world, in the computer world it's *very* easy to propogate one person's improvements around to everyone.

    Linux isn't necessary inherently better just because the source code is widely available.

    It's certainly an edge, though it doesn't make it better-regardless-of-other-factors.

    The fact that it's also free-as-in-beer is a pretty big incentive, though.

    India is no different, and I strongly advise them to buy an already working package for a fair price rather than tinkering with projects that are 20% complete and may never be more than halfway finished.

    There are plenty of commercial programs that I don't consider particularly finished, and there are plenty of open-source programs that are finished.

    Most stuff that you get when you download a Red Hat ISO is pretty solid stuff. Sure, you can get at CVS to a bunch of projects if you'd like to as well.

    Oh, and all you complaining about not having a job -- I think Microsoft and other American companies getting more business means that there'll be more jobs here on the homefront. Just a thought...I'm not economic genius, but it seems to make sense doesn't it?

    Keeping jobs in an environment where American workers are demanding obscene pay and benefits and aren't providing equivalently better performance is always going to be an issue. That's an unstable system that's going to break sooner or later. The only solution is for US workers to reduce their demands and take advantage of the benefits their government offers them. Are they drinking beer and watching football on the weekends, or studying a book from our free library system?

  24. Does this mean that Dell will support Linux? by BroadbandBradley · · Score: 2

    they already farm out thier tech-support lines to India. Perhaps MS knowledge will become scarce in India and they'll have to move the call center back to the US.

    Right on India, smart move. Here's to hoping the US government won't be the last to migrate over to common sense.

    1. Re:Does this mean that Dell will support Linux? by Radical+Rad · · Score: 2
      Right on India, smart move. Here's to hoping the US government won't be the last to migrate over to common sense.

      Oh, silly foreigners are always doing crazy stuff like this. How about that flash-in-the-pan metric system! [snicker] It'll never last. And right now my outdoor thermometer says 25 degrees and damn is it cold out there... just like it's supposed to be. ;)

  25. Re:Ok, And I Should Caaaree......Why? by Anonvmous+Coward · · Score: 2

    "Ok, And I Should Caaaree......Why?"

    Because it means all the PoS's at 7-11 will soon be running Linux.

    At least, I think that'll be the biggest effect it'll have on you. Your hotdogs will no longer be pre-made.

  26. Best Thing The Gov Has Done in 2002 by inquisitive · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In India, labour is cheap. You can hire fairly good prog/sys adm for 1/4th-1/8th the cost of a moderately good American. Linux will help the small businesses, and provide more opportunities to folks (like me) who plan to enter the SMB market with Linux/FOSS consultancy services. (OK, currently I am outside India)

    Considering the fact that US Gov/MS have a penchant for interfering, trying to strongarm anyone (including democracies), the less dependent we are on US tech, better for us.

    The biggest gains from going F/OSS should happen in the Military, Edu and SMB areas, that's my guess.

    BTW, stop trashing India folks. Yoga, decimal system, astronomy, Ayurveda (nature medicine), Meditation, Buddhism, Karate, Sanskrit etc originated in India. Do you westerners ever consider that? All that is FREE! No Patents, No Copyrights.

    1. Re:Best Thing The Gov Has Done in 2002 by inode_buddha · · Score: 2

      Thank you for saying that. As a matter of fact, I am aware of these things.

      --
      C|N>K
    2. Re:Best Thing The Gov Has Done in 2002 by KewlPC · · Score: 2

      Yoga, decimal system, astronomy

      Yoga
      Ok, fine. It was invented in India.

      Decimal system
      The numerals, at least the ones used by Western countries, are descended from Arabic numerals. The concept of zero as a number was also invented by the Arabs.

      Astronomy
      Many cultures around the world (Greeks, Romans, Arabs, and Europeans, to name a few) have contributed to astronomy. Nobody "invented" it.

      I'm not bashing India. I have nothing against India. But please, get your facts straight.

  27. India can build their own OS.......... by yogkarma · · Score: 3, Interesting

    India can build their own OS, hardware and database system and language, Only problem is Indians are not ready to think this way. They are not ready to fight to get adjusted with current situation of India. As you can see there are more number of psychiatric case in banglore after dot COM then ever. The younger generation's hero is people like sabeer bhatia who earn millions in few years, but that is not the truth any more. The hero who can show path for Indian IT future is the one who will give idea to build entire home made software and hardware solution. The confusing part is that Indians still want to work for foreign company and yet want to live and think like their parents who have experience of working in Indian companies like TATA, BIRLA and Reliance. Or in Indian Government organisation. Where competition means bloody politics, and narrow-minded approach. Indian government must think that ultimately you have to give price to LINUX also in one way or other. As most of the user group are nothing but free bug fixing hut for any software. And as far as cheap labour is the question, ha ha India is the best. Now we have answer of poor people also.

  28. Porting by jbolden · · Score: 3, Informative

    ...do you really think that Office, Explorer, Visual Studio, Visual Basic, ect ect ect HASN'T been ported to Lunix?

    Yes. The windows API hasn't been ported to Linux, GDI hasn't been ported to Linux. That is a tremendous amount of work that would all have to happen first. This topic hasn't failed to come up, and Microsoft's position has always been that it would much too expensive and their isn't any reason (i.e. the major desktop demand for Linux is to escape the rather low licensing costs so why would these same people pay for Office et al).

    1. Re:Porting by jbolden · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Mainwin for example says that it cuts porting times down from 18 months to 6 months; so it isn't just a recompile. My guess is that the numbers are similar for Wind/U. Also remember that visual studio itself is much deeper than visual studio apps would be.

      In any case I'm not a microsoft employee and haven't seen the source. My point is only that the people who have looked at said it would cost a fortune and would never pay for itself. As for Wine that's way too far behind the times.

      Finally as for India and Linux I think there is another major factor. 3rd world office workers tend to be more intellegent and better educated than their 1st world counterparts in similar positions. Which means ease of use is much less important, and ease of customization is more important.

    2. Re:Porting by CustomDesigned · · Score: 3, Insightful
      Since I'm Indian, I'll take the liberty of saying that there are cultural factors at work here as well. Indians LOVE free stuff. We'll waste gobs and gobs of time with useless junk trying to make it work as long as it's free.

      While the time may be "wasted" from a time and materials billing perspective, it is hardly wasted. Trying to make things work exercises creative problem solving, and gains a deeper understanding of how things work. The employee who expends a reasonable amount of time making junk work, even if unsuccessful, will be much better prepared for a real crunch. A wise company will encourage a balanced amount of this.

  29. Re:Software spending? by jbolden · · Score: 2

    Do you really think that if the United States stopped trading with everybody (specifically Iraq and Saudi Arabia, our main oil suppliers considering that Venezuala is for shit now), dropped Alaska (we bought it from Russia, you know, because of good diplomatic relationships), we would still be the super power that we are?

    America's greatest rise to international prominance was in the post WWI world where trade had dropped off sharply. Today as a percentage of GDP trade is still not 1/2 what is was before WWI. The fact is that US has an enermous amount of natural resources and a very diverse economy. In terms of relative power a low trade world is probably better for the US than a high trade world. America trades because in terms of absolute growth it is better.

    So actually yes we would be a super power regardless.

  30. Re:Ok, And I Should Caaaree......Why? by rseuhs · · Score: 2
    Ok, And I Should Caaaree......Why?

    Because software and hardware vendors will support Linux if they want to sell anything to the 1 billion people down there.

    Which translates to more drivers and more software for Linux - for everybody.

  31. Re:Ah, yes by (H)elix1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    US developers still have benefits over Indian ones. They're closer, easier to communicate with.

    This is a very big deal. In order to use a remote team - in this case off shore developers - the business users have to actually document what they want and get it right the first time out. Solid requirements... I've seen this type of development succeed only a handful of times, most projects produce something between what they asked for (not to be confused with what they wanted) to catastrophic failure. Come to think of it, it has been a while for requirements too. Anyhow, the short of it is most business users will rather pay US rates so they don't have to do the groundwork required to move stuff over seas. Not to say they don't give it a try once or twice first...

    One of my favorites was working with a business user who thought they needed complete creative latitude / absolute control. We went round and round about address and phone number validation. What is valid? (555) 555-1234, SOMENUMBER (alpha characters that map to digits), or extensions? A few months later the call came in on how to handle the UK customer's phone number.

  32. Re:You people are absolutely intriguing by the+eric+conspiracy · · Score: 2

    The only solution is for US workers to reduce their demands

    Won't happen. Americans will find something else to do that pays better money.

  33. Re:MS is poised to dominate the Linux market... by visualight · · Score: 2

    If I was Bill Gates I'd make up a phony coporation to release the LinuxGaming Distro with full support for DX8.1. Then after it was the most popular distro out there I'd call a press conference and let everyone know it was really me. Of course I'd lose millions on the distro and place my own monopoly in serious danger but boy would it be funny (if I was Bill).

    --
    Samsung took back my unlocked bootloader because Google wants me to rent movies. They're both evil.
  34. He may be annoying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Insightful

    I don't know.

    But he changed the world.

    I don't have to call the OS GNU/Linux to know that all this wouldn't have happened without *his* idea.

    Linus is great, probably even more competent than many. But RMS kicked the ball. Who knows how many years we would have to wait for Linux, had he not started GNU?

    Good night... Sleep well, knowing tomorrow morning no change in EULA will happen to Linux, thanks to good folks like RMS, Linus, many, many others and... the GPL!

  35. Re:fuck fuck fuck by benjamindees · · Score: 2

    It's obvious to anyone in the US that globalization has only made the extremely-rich extremely-richer and the rest of us into WalMart checkout clerks. I don't intend to get a new job in the global economy wiping the ass of the bastards who sold us out.

    --
    "I assumed blithely that there were no elves out there in the darkness"
  36. Re:Ok, And I Should Caaaree......Why? by Malcontent · · Score: 2

    "I need to eat."

    And what is causing you not to eat? Apparently you have a computer, if you are starving then maybe you can sell your computer and buy some food.

    If you are that poor there are always food stamps and welfare. There is a safety net in this country for people who are starving I urge you to take advantage of them. There is no need for anybody to starve in this country.

    --

    War is necrophilia.

  37. The really good thing by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2

    Once Linux gets a large user-base (yes, You can consider it large now, but you'd be wrong in this context, 'kay?), there will be a shitload of user complaints. Finally something will be done about many of the very serious (to a USER, not a techie) problems which Linux faces. And hopefully, our solutions will be better than those of windows.
    Remember: Options, not changes!

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  38. note to mod's by RobertTaylor · · Score: 2

    How big of a tee-pee will the Indians need for their server room?

    -1 Wrong.

    Is this another case of people in the USA not knowing there is a wider world?

  39. Re:Software spending? by jbolden · · Score: 2

    If the United States had not focused so heavily on securing cheap oil military spending would have been much lower; for example: Truman's actions with regard to Iran is what got Stalin to refuse to leave Eastern Europe and started the cold war. American society would have developed without the heavy dependence on oil. In addition the huge losses due to importing oil wouldn't have occured. The major public works projects like the interstate highway system would have been directed at other causes.

    Unquestionably were we today to not have oil it would induce a depression. But that wasn't the initial question. The initial question was about an alternate world where the US along with the rest of the world wasn't engaging in trade in any meaningful way (i.e. WWI - WWII trade policy had been maintained in the post WWII world).

    So really the question comes down to would I be driving a car using gasoline today in such a world and my guess is that I wouldn't be. Gas prices never come down after WWII and so cars never become the major form of transportation, the migration to the suberbs never occurs....

  40. Re:You people are absolutely intriguing by ninewands · · Score: 5, Interesting
    India is different! They have a lot of brain/man power over there.

    Thrue. Idia is probably the only fully-functioning democratic country between Australia and Israel and it owes it's ability to function to the existence of a fairly effective public education system and the highly entrepreneurial spirit of it's people.

    And they are still a very poor country.

    Unfortunately, this is true for two reasons.
    • First, India is, historically, a poor country because the Hindu religion emphasizes spiritual gain over material gain. This has allowed India's non-Hindu rulers over the past several centuries (first the Moguls, then the British) to exploit the "lower-classes" for their own benefit. The caste system in Indian society also contributed to this problem.
    • Second, following India's attainment of independence from Britain, the government adopted a very socialist-oriented system of central planning and control that led to massive corruption, capital flight and near-zero foreign investment.

    India has GREAT potential to become an economic powerhouse rivalling, maybe even exceeding, the US, the EU and Japan if they stay on their current path.
  41. Re:Software spending? by stevejsmith · · Score: 2

    But in our "what if" situations, we're talking about policies in the present. What if things were changed today, is what I'm asking. Well, and then there is the overlaying theme that I am a racist is a hateful bastard, but I think that we can all agree on that.

  42. Re:Software spending? by jbolden · · Score: 2

    A sudden shift away from trade (particularly oil) would induce a depression. It might be so bad that certain northern cities had to be abandoned. America hasn't abandoned a city since the 17th century that would be huge shock to thing like "investor confidence". A disaster in other words. Unquestionably war is cheaper than trying to survive an oil shock of that magnitude.

    A 25 year transition away from imported oil OTOH might not be so difficult. We have lots of uranium. Large portions of the country could make much more heavy use of solar and wind (for example mandatory solar panels on all houses and office buildings in the southern states...). Huge investments in public transit (for example elevated trains for short commutes...). Greater population density in major cities. Reinvestment in railroads to replace the trucking for most interstate trade.... It would be doable.

  43. Re:Software spending? by stevejsmith · · Score: 2

    Oh no, I understand his point quite well. I'm just trying to point out that it has no merit. I achieve that by pointing out that if he dislikes Indians for x reason then he must also dislike Jews for x reason. With that, I can disprove that Jews are whatever he says they are, therefore disproving his original point. In a mathematical proof it's called "supposition" and then when you finally prove the assumed wrong it's called a contradiction.

  44. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  45. Wow... by Salubri · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I can't believe what I'm reading today. I really cannot.

    From what I can tell this article was origionally put up on slashdot in order to show that Linux and open software were starting to gain some "marketshare" in the global scheme of things with the Indian government maneuvering to deploy the OS.

    So what do I find really as I scroll through the comments today? I see people claiming that this is bad because other countries might be using something other than Microsoft, which employs americans. I see racist comment after racist comment. In fact I've seen so much of it in this thread that I am sickened by this.

    If this is the case, you might ask why I'm responding or why I even bothered to continue reading. Maybe I'm a glutton for punishment, or maybe rather than get sickened and let things bother me it gives me the fuel to give a constructive criticism. Either way I'm compelled to speak my mind. Mod me in any direction that seems appropriate.

    First of all, I'm having a little trouble seeing how this is costing any american jobs. From everything that I'm gathering here, the Indian government is, by and large, an undeveloped market in computing. No one is losing their job because linux is being used. No market is shrinking over this. The only thing that can be said is that Microsoft is not EXPANDING it's influence into India further. Microsoft still has all the lucritive markets it had before.

    Secondly, I've seen many comments about the level of filth or inferiority of the people living over there. Perhaps people have had it too easy for a while to really see one point. In a country like the US, with a relatively strong economy and relatively low unemployment, it is much easier for a person to pull themselves up by the bootstraps. It is much easier to use programs provided by either public or private institutions to train in a field and get a job. What if that was taken away? What if you were born into an environment that wasn't as cushioned? You'd be struggling just as much as anyone there, or anywhere else where life is hard.

    Are jobs being lost in the US? Absolutely. Wal-Mart is killing off Mom-and-Pop shops. American companies are killing off other american companies all the time. American companies are even doing things like moving to other spots in the country where employment is low. I can remember the day that the factory in my hometown shut it's doors because the local union employees refused to work for less than $20.00 an hour. They went somewhere more viable for employment. In the case I gave, South Carolina... where people were more than willing to bottle beer for $8.00 an hour. Just because jobs are being lost in America doesn't mean they're being relocated overseas. It's ignorant and just plain fucking stupid to think so.

    I do agree with one of the posters I saw here... Americans really do need to learn to tighten their belts if they want to stay competetive. You can't keep on earning a salary that allows you to buy/lease a new car every year, computer upgrades every 6 months, eating out every night, and living like a king to produce a product in a global economy where people with the same skill set are starving and willing to do the same job for much less. It's the reason that a Gibson Les Paul will cost $2000 while the Epiphone Les Paul is $600.

    ~shakes head~ Okay. I'm done ranting. I'll get off my soap box now. But it's like one poster said... people should be open about thier opinions.

    --
    ----- I want my LART.
    1. Re:Wow... by RebelTycoon · · Score: 2

      Dear Salubri,

      We regret to inform you that your job has been terminated as we are opening an oversea's office.

      Have a Happy Holidays,

      (yes... its important to tighten our belts... YOU FIRST!)

    2. Re:Wow... by Illserve · · Score: 2

      You can't keep on earning a salary that allows you to buy/lease a new car every year, computer upgrades every 6 months, eating out every night, and living like a king to produce a product in a global economy where people with the same skill set are starving and willing to do the same job for much less.

      You can in a world without globalization. We've been doing it for decades. And somehow the idealistic demonstrators fail to realize that by protesting the Globalization movement, they are fighting to do just what they are most concerned about.

      Those people are throwing bricks through starbucks windows to keep people in third world countries poor, they just don't know it.

      It's damned sad is what it is. I've protested other things, but I did my homework about it first. I wish these people would focus their energy on thinking about the problem rather than railing against the system just because it's the flavor of the month.

    3. Re:Wow... by Salubri · · Score: 2

      I agree whole-heartedly.

      I think it's a common trend though. When people get angry, they get stupid. Everyone, including myself, does this. I've had to train myself to sit back, calm down, and examine all sides of the situation whenever I get pissed off.

      --
      ----- I want my LART.
    4. Re:Wow... by Tyndareos · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Those idealistic demonstrators you describe are not against globalization. They are in fact for globalization, but against the unfair globablization that most of the first world countries prefer, because they realise that real and honest globalization will have a serious impact on their economies that will have a very hard time to compete on almost any ground.

      Of course it's much easier for those being protested against to claim that the protesters are against globalization and against improvements for impoverished countries: even half-smart people who don't bother to inform themselves buy that.

  46. Re:Software spending? by jbolden · · Score: 2

    We had an accident in Pennsylvania "look for 3 mile island". Pretty much nothing happened. Nuclear power plants stopped being built because we brought done oil prices. Given a public terrified of nuclear power and cheap oil nuclear doesn't make sense. Given expensive oil it does make sense.

  47. Re:Ok, And I Should Caaaree......Why? by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

    Wrong - the entire US market for cocaine in 1993 was $31 billion - pales in comparison to Wal-Mart's 200+ billion.

  48. Re: the indian govt wants to save money... by Black+Parrot · · Score: 3, Interesting


    > How much money are they saving really? By adopting linux they are also opening thier own tech support centers. Training and hiring those people costs money. They still have to develop (costs money) or buy software (Gee jolly gosh, this costs money too). Supporting linux might actually be a more expensive proposition then sticking with microsoft. I think they did it becuase they feel it is a better operating system. Save money in not needing new hardware maybe? I dont think money was a big factor in thier decision making.

    Step back and ask yourself how much money will flow out of the country this way over the next 30 years vs how much would flow out if they didn't switch.

    What India and others are doing is commonly called "opting out".

    --
    Sheesh, evil *and* a jerk. -- Jade
  49. Re:Software spending? by jbolden · · Score: 2

    Chernobyl did major damage because they had less fall back systems. More importantly they lied about what was happening. If there hadn't been secrecy the damage would have been much less.

    As for NIBY, inevitable domain exists in every state (and certainly the federal level). A genuine national program with broad political support would simply force it to happen. Similarly for the PR; Americans aren't stupid if they see the government doing as much solar and wind as they can; and cutting out oil and yet saying we are (say) 300 reactors short on the electricty front they will believe the government. And when they say "we need 300 reactors and we are putting them in locations X1 through X300" they'll go along. What's the alternative: no heat in the winter? No transportation at all?

  50. Demanding obscene pay by msobkow · · Score: 3, Insightful

    You are correct in that most so-called programmers with less than 5 years experience think they "deserve" a six-figure salary because they used to be with some dot-bomb. You are also correct that most of them aren't productive enough to justify those rates.

    The problem is that people with the experience to justify those salaries have a hard time getting noticed and hired when 490 of the 500 resumes submitted are barely or un- qualified.

    The problem is also that businesses have no problem nickel and diming their development salaries post-dot-bomb. Hell, I just saw a posting for Oregon that was offering a whopping $12/hour for front-line Unix support. How many people with any kind of professional training (doctor, engineer, lawyer) would even dream of taking a job at such rates? Yet it's "greedy" for me to expect to make a living with a University degree and fifteen years experience to back me up?

    --
    I do not fail; I succeed at finding out what does not work.
    1. Re:Demanding obscene pay by EzInKy · · Score: 2

      How many people with any kind of professional training (doctor, engineer, lawyer) would even dream of taking a job at such rates? Yet it's "greedy" for me to expect to make a living with a University degree and fifteen years experience to back me up?

      There's no comparison at all. If a Doctor, Lawyer, or Engineer botch a job they are held legally and finacially responsible.

      --
      Time is what keeps everything from happening all at once.
  51. Pretty disappointing by rks404 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am shocked to see how quickly this post has turned into racist troll bait. It's amazing how ugly people's attitudes can turn with a downturn in the economy. So many people here are quick to blame Indians for the fact that there are so many jobs being shifted overseas - aren't the American companies and the US government that allows this also to blame? I do agree that we should be more protective of our domestic economy, but the people that are truly profiting off of cheap Indian labor are the American mega-corps like IBM, Sun and Oracle.

    This post has been eye-opening for me, as an unemployed Indian-American programmer, because I've always seen the entire Linux/Free Software/late 90's geek culture as a new kind of social phenomenon unencumbered by the baggage of the past, including racism and nationalistic xenophobia. The idea of all these foreign governments throwing their weight behind Linux means that there will be a larger userbase, more developers, and more vitality to the entire Free Software movement. But instead of greeting this with open arms, I see lots of people denigrating India and Indians. Yeah, more curry jokes and discussion about filthy, stupid Indians. Don't forget that your favorite OS was initially developed overseas by foreigners and is currently picking up lots of steam in Asia.

    1. Re:Pretty disappointing by Salubri · · Score: 3, Insightful
      ...I've always seen the entire Linux/Free Software/late 90's geek culture as a new kind of social phenomenon unencumbered by the baggage of the past, including racism and nationalistic xenophobia...
      You and I both man. I've worked crap job after crap job here in America to educate myself. I didn't turn around and blame others when I wasn't handed a cushy job with no degree just because I knew a couple programming languages and how to run linux.

      I don't even know what to really say that I haven't said in my previous post or you haven't said. However, I think I'm adding you to my friends list.

      --
      ----- I want my LART.
    2. Re:Pretty disappointing by Simon+Brooke · · Score: 2
      This post has been eye-opening for me, as an unemployed Indian-American programmer, because I've always seen the entire Linux/Free Software/late 90's geek culture as a new kind of social phenomenon unencumbered by the baggage of the past, including racism and nationalistic xenophobia.

      I think (I hope!) you're getting this impression because you're looking at it the wrong way. I am, as usual, reading at +3, and so far I've seen one off-colour joke and no racism at all. People who regularly contribute to Slashdot and thus have the karma to post at automatic +2 are not racists and are not posting hate-speach - and I honestly believe that they are more representative of the actual contributing Open Source community than all the Anonymous Cowards and trolls.

      --
      I'm old enough to remember when discussions on Slashdot were well informed.
    3. Re:Pretty disappointing by gimpboy · · Score: 2

      hey dont confuse the loud minority with the rest of us. for what it's worth, i'm about as white as it gets, and i am glad india is adopting linux. if the us follows this trend, our tax dollars can be better spent on things other than license fees.

      i also have quite a few indian friends, and i'm a big fan of the food. i'm also trying to learn hindi for fun and because i think it would be fun to work in india some day.

      just remember that the people you are seeing here dont represent all of us.

      --
      -- john
  52. Re:Ok, And I Should Caaaree......Why? by DAldredge · · Score: 2

    Sorry, you have the wrong site. Free Republic is at http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/news/browse?ao=1 . :->

  53. Re:Ah, yes by miu · · Score: 3, Insightful
    How exactly does hiring a US-based team obviate the need for harc-core requirements definition? Will the US team work for free if the customer's requirements specification was screwed up?

    Most projects with any real scope miss tons of requirements. This means that the team and customer have to negotiate date or feature slips. Much harder to do if the two cannot meet face to face.

    --

    [Set Cain on fire and steal his lute.]
  54. Hope this fructifies...... by geo_2677 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    This is good news indeed. As a linux programmer based in India, this certainly is more than a great news. All the more happy, just like many others out there, that Windows is being shown the door. Beleive it or not, the Open Source champions in India owe a lot of thanks to Bill Gates for this. If he hadn't come to India to make a publicity stunt of supporting the AIDS cause( ofcourse he is more worried about Linux than AIDS ) Linux would not have got so much attention in govt. circles and media as it does now. A few months ago any ordinary business man would know and talk only abt MS and Windows. Now he knows about Linux also. Now whenever the media talks MS it talks about Linux in the same breath. Free OS gets free publicity.

  55. Shades of Mexico? by bogie · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I'm not trying to put a damper on this, but lets not forget what happened in the past. I certainly remember hearing all sorts plans Mexico had for Linux. There were supposed to be millions of installs by now. Now its just remembered as one of Linux's higher profile failures. So while all the rah rah "let's embrace the underdog" talk is nice, get back to me linux hits >50% of the desktops.

    If India is as important to the world of software as everyone says it is, Microsoft isn't just going to walk away. They'll throw a billion or two into PR, lobbying, software give-aways, and FUD before giving up. And then they'll throw in a billion more. Remember money IS the only thing that matters(carve that into your dorm room desk). The fact that MS is competing with something that can be downloaded for free doesn't change anything.

    http://www.wired.com/news/technology/0,1282,4573 7, 00.html

    --
    If you wanna get rich, you know that payback is a bitch
  56. Re:Software spending? by norculf · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Doable, but unlikely. Americans won't walk to work or sit in a train when they can pilot their SUV in luxury and solace. They won't pay for solar cells either.

    And Bush is an oil man. He isn't going to mess with big oil.

    I also thought all the uranium was in South Africa, and that's why we let them run wild. Maybe that was another element...

  57. Re:Weird News! by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2

    That's odd, out of my dozen or so IM contacts in India, all use ICQ or Y!IM (or something that's compatible with one or the other) except one who uses MSN. And he's the only one who isn't a developer. He's employed as a manager by a UK firm that's "standardised" on MS, and isn't allowed to use anything else on the job.

    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  58. Re:thats all very well but... by m1a1 · · Score: 2

    they are focussed on the cost aspect "inexpensive beer" not the "free as in speech". A few tech savvy individuals dont represent the bulk of bored civil servants and decision makers. They just want to stretch a rupee further.

    And that is a bad thing? When I first started mucking around with linux one of the first things I thought was (and I mean this): "If I were in charge of tech for a company I could save them thousands of dollars with this." That was truly my initial reaction and it stands true. It is one of linux's finest points. I have heard all of the arguments about TCO and they don't hold up. Why? Things such as "Linux support will be more expensive" get thrown in there every time. Maybe now, but that concept doesn't scale. Once you get the whole company on linux people will learn to use it. Support will be less of an issue. Besides, if I am providing the support, I would rather that cash go to myself than MS anyways. Linux is good for me.

    As a side note, often MORE techies are needed to support windows, so it is well worth it to pay a *nix admin a bit more and sacrifice an MS junky or two.

  59. Re:Software spending? by Zontar+The+Mindless · · Score: 2
    No matter how poor Europeans have been, they knew better than to shit in their drinking/bath water. They're poor because they can't produce anything of value on their own.
    This shouldn't be dignified with a response, but it needs to be pointed out that AC obviously hasn't read his history. European (and American) history is rife with instances of plagues caused by ... guess what?

    In India (and numerous other countries), they're poor because foreigners took over their country and siphoned off their wealth for 2 or 3 hundred years.
    --
    Il n'y a pas de Planet B.
  60. Not used to american rage by m1a1 · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I see that you are a little unfamiliar with the rage that only us Americans seem to have. Simply put, we are an angry people. Some people think we just try to pass of blame onto other people to take it off of our own backs. This is sometimes true. But it would be much more accurate to say we just blame everyone for anything for the hell of it. When you get to a certain point of pissed off, you can't have enough targets. If you lose your job to someone willing to work 70 hours a week for 35 grand a year, the "hard working Indian immigrant" becomes a "daiper-head terroist" or "dot wearing misogynists", etc. It isn't that most Americans really hate Indians. Not at all. But when we get pissed we aren't afraid to say it. You will also notice more Americans are killed in violent rage by Americans every year than Indians. We just make fun of you, we kill each other.

  61. Sacrificing Level by Nishi-no-wan · · Score: 2
    - As far as complaing about jobs, sorry man (really!), but remember, those of you lower on the ladder were sacraficed for those higher up. How many bosses took pay cuts or forfeited their vacation so you could stay on board? Absolutely none!

    Actually, in Japan, it isn't unusual for the higher ups to take a pay cut/lose their bonuses for the lower people to not lose theirs in these current hard times. In good times, upper management gets a good piece of the pie, but they're willing to take less to keep everyone fed in harder times.

    Unheard of in North America, I'm sure.

  62. nitpick and free-association by MegaFur · · Score: 2

    precise, wide-reaching steps

    Alright, I'd like you to imagine a Battlemech or a Golem or an Ent--something large. Now, imagine how it walks... Could anything that big ever be described as having precise steps?

    Come one, guys "precise" and "wide-reaching steps" just don't go together.
    (I think so Brain, but where will find rubber pants our size? NARF!)

    --
    Furry cows moo and decompress.
  63. Unix popularity in India by billstewart · · Score: 2
    I haven't followed the computer development trends in India for almost a decade, but in the late 80s - early 90s, Unix was quite popular over there, with the IITs doing a lot of teaching about it and US companies opening offices in Bangalore and starting to do development there. UNIX and Open Source are much different business models, of course, but access to source, and decent operating systems that let you actually build things that work reliably, and tool-based development approaches are consistent between them, and obviously open-source environments mix better with the academic world over there than closed-source, and environments that let you do real work with modern software on older machines are a good match for third-world economies. It doesn't surprise me to see Linux taking hold.

    Of course, back then, while Microsoft was definitely one of the competitors, so was IBM's mainframe world, and to some extent other proprietary operating systems like VMS, since DEC machines were in the right price ranges.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  64. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 3, Funny

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  65. Sensationalist Headlines by donutello · · Score: 3, Informative

    The article is light on details but from reading it there were two things I gathered they were doing:

    1. When asking for bids, the requirements wouldn't specify Microsoft - rather specify the true requirements.

    2. Computer textbooks wouldn't teach Word or Excel - rather teach how to use word processors and spreadsheets.

    Both are things they should be doing regardless of Linux. It's asinine to do otherwise.

    --
    Mmmm.. Donuts
  66. I don't buy it. by 0x0d0a · · Score: 2

    That's ridiculous, and both of us know it.

    Excuse you, but Clinical Depression is not just 'the blues', or feeling a little sad because your boss yelled at you, etc etc.

    Yes, I'm aware of the differences.

    It's a real disease, and sometimes pills are one of the only, if not the only, treatments with any reasonable degree of effectiveness.

    Sure. The common cold is a real disease. Allergies (of the severity that make your nose run constantly for a season, not the kind that cuts off your airways) are as well. And neither are particularly pleasant, but people can also cope with each without throwing down Prozac or Claratin. And if they can't, then they may well have to be...depressed.

    The point of my original point is not to attack people who suffer from clinical depression in particular. It's that we're giving ourselves all sorts of perks and rewards that the competition is doing without, and that aren't really all that necessary.

  67. Re:Software spending? by jbolden · · Score: 2

    I also thought all the uranium was in South Africa, and that's why we let them run wild. Maybe that was another element...

    Actually it was tricium (spelling?) radioactive hydrogen for the H bomb. There were 3 countries that could make this stuff (technology + natural resources): the US, the USSR and South Africa. The USA's was outdated and universally everyone (pentagon included) agreed that they needed to be taken down for multi-year repair work. The USSR wasn't going to sell it to us for obvious reasons. SA wouldn't sell it to us without a lifting of all sanctions.

  68. Call Center business in India by billstewart · · Score: 2
    There was a piece on US Nationalized Public Radio the other week about the call center business in India. In the last two years, it's grown to about a $5B/year business, and is still on a steep growth curve. So it's not surprising that there are people in the government saying "Me Too! I invented the Call Center right after I helped Al Gore invent the Internet!" One of the big things that made it possible was telecom liberalization - the VSNL monopoly has been a drag on India's economic growth for years, and as they're gradually getting out of the way, people are starting to be able to get the communications tools they need to open up new business opportunities.

    Other countries have been doing call center outsourcing for a long time - the Caribbean has a lot of it, and while C&W was a monopoly in much of the area, it was much more competent than VSNL, and the area has some level of integration with the US telecom networks.

    --

    Bill Stewart
    New Fast-Compression-only CPR http://preview.tinyurl.com/dy575ks
  69. "Precise, wide-reaching steps?" by fruey · · Score: 2
    The leader of the article says so... however

    As far as concrete pro-Linux acts go, government tenders may soon stop specifying Microsoft or any other vendor's name while floating software tenders

    That's precise if you say "will soon" instead of "may soon". Otherwise it's just conjecture.

    The government is also setting up special interest groups with officials of industry and academia to find out how Linux can be deployed in e-governance, defence, education and so on.

    That's only wide-reaching if these groups actually get up and do something.

    Don't get me wrong - I think we'll see a lot of good IT out of India, and indeed there is already a lot of good stuff coming out of there. They are WAY ahead of supposedly developed neighbours yet early enough on the curve to avoid this Microsoft hold on the market. Think about it. In the US, Microsoft has dominated since DOS days, and people can't accept Linux, they think it's something new. IIRC however, Linux is now 10+ years old.

    --
    Conversion Rate Optimisation French / English consultant
  70. I get paid less than an imported worker, who cares by theolein · · Score: 2

    I'm a Sys Admin in Switzerland for a small company. I was unemployed here for almost a year before I took the overworked, underpaid job that I now have. I have since found out that a guy from Egypt (MCSE) and a guy from India (CS degree) both interviewed for the job. They were both turned down because they both expected almost double of what I am earning. Their level of IT education was higher than mine and they were both very competent I have heard. I'm envious that I don't have the education to ask for salaries like they did.

    The morals of the story:
    1.When times are hard you have to go with the times. This goes for workers of every nation, race and creed.
    2.An institution will go for the IT solution that provides the best price/performance solution.
    3.IT workers of all nations are dumb in that we don't form Unions. The exploitation of IT workers of all nations, seems to be similar to the sweat shops of the third world.

    Power to India for considering moving to Linux on a big scale. The independance gained for them is a major point given that MS (and other large US industries) are not above using the US government to strong arm nations into becoming franchises for those same industries. I only wish that some other governments, including those here in Europe *and* the US would have the same long term view, because MS is only going to get more and more mean and tricky the more they fear the Linux revolution.

  71. Time to buy stock in Red Dot Linux by Call+Me+Black+Cloud · · Score: 2

    Sorry, couldn't resist...

  72. Re:You people are absolutely intriguing by ONOIML8 · · Score: 2

    "Would my car perform any better if I had the precise engineering details about how every little part worked?

    Yes, you do, and yes, it does."

    Oh really? Could you please tell us all how to access that? My car is a 1996 and to this day the only place I can get plugs and MAP sensors for it is Ford. The major aftermarket suppliers have told me that's because Ford hasn't released the data.

    Speaking of data, the computers seem to be closed devices as well. I would love to have all of the engineering details about them and the source code. In my case, working on public safety vehicles, I could modify those (especially the body control module) to make the vehicle more safe for the operator to do their job.

    You guys need to find another industry for an example. The automotive industry is what Microsoft uses as an EXAMPLE, both in engineering and business practices.

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  73. Re:Software spending? by stevejsmith · · Score: 2

    But when one of those "niggers of Asia" was born, do you think that they had a choice? If they were born in the United States to some middle class white Protestant family, do you think they would turn out the same way? Of course not. Your development depends on your enviornment, the reason why if you're cloned and seperated at birth and then you reunite with your clone you will probably be noticably different. What choice do these people have to succeed? None. So how are you going to pass judgement on people who have never gotten the chance?

  74. Re:Software spending? by stevejsmith · · Score: 2

    No, you have to read the other posts to see what I mean by not getting oil from Venezuela, Alaska, Saudi Arabia, or Iraq. If we followed "I am a racist."'s suggestion of "fucking Saudi Arabia," we would not get there oil. He wants to voluntarily stop buying oil from them. And my reason that Alaska would be part of Russia is that if we did what he wanted, cut off all international relations, we would have never even gotten Alaska so very long ago. I'm trying to prove that if not for globalism, what he is so stroly opposed to, we wouldn't have oil, we wouldn't have Alaska, we wouldn't have America. Surely he doesn't think that most of us are Native Americans, does he?

  75. Re:Thanks! by stevejsmith · · Score: 2

    I was trying to convey the fact that the Indians, many of whom are educated but can't find work to suit their education, need it more than the Americans who end up getting the jobs. And yes, that number was arbitrary, $200 per year would be a little more like it.

  76. Where have you been? by djupedal · · Score: 2

    The USA started becoming a service based economy 5 years ago. Look at education...what have we been training our population for...nothing, but to be consumers.

    Your conclusions are all correct, just very late coming, that's all you've managed to point out.

    Stay competitive? The horse has left the barn... We're history now...you just don't know it.