Slashdot Mirror


Requiem for the Disappearing Pay Phone

StarEmperor writes "This Washington Post article describes the steady disappearance of pay phones as cell phones become more commonplace. Many pay phones, which used to generate hundreds of dollars per month in revenue, are now used so infrequently that they cost money to operate. I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?"

222 of 504 comments (clear)

  1. where can I get one? by dknight · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What if I, say, want to buy these payphones they're throwing out? I'd love to have an ACTUAL payphone in my house or something.

    1. Re:where can I get one? by vasqzr · · Score: 3, Funny


      You've never seen those start-your-own-business things with payphones?

      Put them anywhere! tons of revenue!

      Check it out!

    2. Re:where can I get one? by rickthewizkid · · Score: 5, Interesting

      They are available online, ebay, etc. The only trouble is, they have been "adjusted" to not require coins. If you were to want to make it a real pay phone, you would need the totalizer circuitry (not something the phone cos want to have in the wild ... look up the term "red box") and a ACTS phone line - convincing the telco to do that for you would be difficult....

      Just my 90-cents-for-the-first-three-minutes-worth...
      Ric kTheWizKid

    3. Re:where can I get one? by FyRE666 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I'm not sure where you are geographically, but over here in the UK the old red phoneboxes would be far too heavy to install in a house without major reinforcement for the floor. I'm guessing they were solid steel/iron, with about a million coats of paint each over the graphitti/urine ;-)

    4. Re:where can I get one? by DeadSea · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Indeed, if you search, there are quite a few pay phones on ebay. Pretty impressive.

    5. Re:where can I get one? by npietraniec · · Score: 2

      You evidently didn't read the part about people urinating on them.

    6. Re:where can I get one? by An+Ominous+Cow+Erred · · Score: 2

      The phone company will never ever give you an ACTS line. It's not something they give out. No end-user customer "owns" a ACTS-type phone.

      All customer owned payphones (COCOTs) use regular phone lines and do all their billing internally. A COCOT is relatively easy to obtain -- anyone can buy one, and it will happily ask for your quarters. :-)

    7. Re:where can I get one? by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 2

      They can if properly designed. Ma Bell spent millions on hardware and software at the Central Offices for fraud protection. They measure the exact frequency and duration of coin tone blasts, and it's pretty hard to fake it by hand. A microprocessor circuit to meter the tones precisely might do the trick...

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    8. Re:where can I get one? by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 2

      They also have a gadget inside called an "escrow hopper" which holds the coins until the end of the call, when a positive or negative 100 volt pulse is sent to trip the escrow hopper one way or the other - this tells the fone to either barf back or swallow the money.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
    9. Re:where can I get one? by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 3, Informative

      I've also heard these days that the phones turn off the handset microphone until you've paid up, so you need to do some funky tricks to get your signal in.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
  2. What will happen to 2600 mag? by Lieutenant_Dan · · Score: 4, Funny

    Without pay phones pictures the back cover of 2600 will seem sooooo boring.

    --
    Wearing pants should always be optional.
    1. Re:What will happen to 2600 mag? by i_want_you_to_throw_ · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Nothing will happen to it since almost all the pics are payphones from other countries.

  3. pay phones might get more use if by benfoldsfan · · Score: 5, Insightful

    they cost less. $.50 cents for one phone call is ridiculous

    1. Re:pay phones might get more use if by Bobartig · · Score: 2

      Amen to that. I recall in korea that the pay phone calls were 10W (I think 1100W=$1, so its like pennies per call), and the phones would "save up" the credit from one person to the next. I don't know if they were subsidized, or even if they're still there (haven't been in 10 years, and EVERYONE carries a cell phone now). But if payphones were like $0.10 for local, and $0.05/min long distance, they might actually get used

      --
      This is where I get my recommended daily allowance of "Foot in Mouth."
    2. Re:pay phones might get more use if by neema · · Score: 5, Interesting

      This should be modded up.

      That was such a stupid step to take, unless they were looking for everyone to add just one more thing to the list of the benefits of having a cell phone. Payphones always have had two advantages in my mind:

      1: They are wired, hence, no fuzz.
      2: Just one shiny thing and you could get a call through.

      Now that it's 50 cents, I find myself approaching a payphone and finding that I don't have the right amount of change on me. Who cares that it's unlimited? The three minute limit was just fine by me. I'm not exactly making leisure calls at a pay phone. The trade off is ridiculous and is bound to doom the payphones.

    3. Re:pay phones might get more use if by hitzroth · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Quote: the last two paragraphs of the article:


      For some, the pay phone has become untouchably déclassé.

      A woman at the Old Ebbitt Grill was asking strangers if she could borrow their cell phones one recent evening. She systematically worked her way through half the people seated at the bar, none of whom had cell phones to lend. Finally, she reached Hayden, who was sipping a beer. He suggested she use the pay phone he maintained in the restaurant. She haughtily replied: "I wouldn't be caught dead using a pay phone."


      Somehow, I don't see the cost as being the primary issue. If you need to make a call, $0.50 isn't that big of a deal. Hell, it's about half a candy-bar around here.

      It sounds like it's becoming a social stigmata to use the urine soaked payphones. As in: "I don't want to look like I'm not good enough/rich enough to have a cell phone."
      --
      In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
      --VonNeumann
    4. Re:pay phones might get more use if by stickyc · · Score: 4, Informative
      One thing to add - I'm not sure if this still applies (I was told this in the mid 90's), but in California, Pay Phones have 'priority' over other phones in case of emergency. This means that if there's some major catastrophy (IE - earthquake for us CA folk), the phone in your house may not get a connection, but the pay phone usually will.

      This is, of course, dependent on the connection. If you buy one from EBay and stick it in your house, you'll get the same busy signal as the rest of us while the china falls from the cupboards.
      Just something to note when the stuff hits the fan.

    5. Re:pay phones might get more use if by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      How the hell do you people get free long distance on mobile phones? Over here (UK), we have quite a bit of competition in the mobile phone sector (supposedly), yet calls to a land line are significantly expensive (several pence per minute, worse at peak rate). Yet over in America, all long distance calls are free?? Don't your companies have operating costs??

    6. Re:pay phones might get more use if by weave · · Score: 3, Interesting
      Yes, it's true, for the most part. Many plans now charge for "air time" during peak hours (0600-2100 M-F) only, weekends and evenings are unlimited (free). Long distance all around the country is no extra charge so basically on weekends I can make a call to a landline or other cell phone 3,000 miles away and talk for several hours and not be charged a single penny.

      The U.S. mobile market may be chaotic because of all of the different "standards" here (CDMA, TDMA, GSM, iDEN, PCS [aka CDMA-1900]), but the competition for customers is so fierce that the companies are doing this.

      Mind you, the peak minutes are expensive (I get 400 minutes for $40 and extra minutes are 45 cents), and incoming calls are tallied against that as well -- except during off peak time.

    7. Re:pay phones might get more use if by Gekko · · Score: 2

      Well personally I travel alot, make a fair amount of long distance calls, and make most of them at night. With almost unlimited nights and weekends, no roaming, free long distance from anywhere in the us, to anywhere in the US I could not see a reason to not get a cell phone. I could also see no reason to have a home phone anymore.

      I also discovered the added benefit of having a cell phone, telemarketers can not legally call my cell.

      I know a lot of people whom are doing this.

      --
      I mod down any one who says "I'm sure I will get modded down for this"
    8. Re:pay phones might get more use if by Jish · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I was in Manhattan on 9/11/2001 and I know that there were lines at the pay phones everywhere. My cell phone and landline were down most of the day, but I assume the people on the pay phone were getting through to their loved ones?

    9. Re:pay phones might get more use if by Guppy06 · · Score: 2

      Keep in mind the companies we're talking about. Pay phone rates aren't the only telephone rates they have monopoly control over.

    10. Re:pay phones might get more use if by raju1kabir · · Score: 2
      The businesses that operate payphones are going out of business. So, the call is 50 cents trying to keep the place from going under. It's not going to work, because too many people say "50 cents? Screw that". I know I did, but at least now I understand why it's 50 cents, so next time I use a payphone, I'll understand.

      I don't. Pricing yourself out of the market is dumb. I used to be a very frequent pay phone user (had a cell, hated it, gave it up). Now that it's 50c, though, I usually don't bother. It's not so much the money as they fact that I don't often have 2 quarters to spare. If the US had near-ubiquitous card pay phones like in the developed world, I'd happily pay the 50 cents.

      I know of some that will accept incoming calls, so if I'm running late to meet someone with caller ID, I can call and hang up and they'll call me back (my friends are used to this). But otherwise I just cadge calls from courtesy phones now. There's added fun in figuring out how to get outside dialtone on a hotel lobby phone.

      The biggest thing we're losing here, by the way, is the ability to make near-anonymous phone calls. There are still plenty of pay phones out of the reach of surveillance cameras, but it won't be that way for long.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    11. Re:pay phones might get more use if by raju1kabir · · Score: 2
      How the hell do you people get free long distance on mobile phones? Over here (UK), we have quite a bit of competition in the mobile phone sector (supposedly), yet calls to a land line are significantly expensive (several pence per minute, worse at peak rate). Yet over in America, all long distance calls are free?? Don't your companies have operating costs??

      This should suggest to you that you're being schnookered by your phone companies about how much it really costs to run a phone company. The infrastructure finance costs can be recovered from the monthly subscription fees and from the limited number of poorly-informed high-usage customers paying overage. Once the infrastructure is in place and sufficiently capacious, there's little marginal cost to the company per minute of use.

      Consider, as well, that immensely profitable US phone companies all manage to offer free local calls to residential landline customers - while BT charges more to call across the street in London during the day than it costs me to call London from 3000 miles away in Washington DC.

      Either they are lying to you or they are grossly inefficient. Either way it's a crime.

      --
      "Patriotism is your conviction that this country is superior to all other countries because you were born in it." -- GBS
    12. Re:pay phones might get more use if by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      I couldn't agree more. Although BT have cleaned up their act (slightly) now and offer the first hour of offpeak UK calls for free, the mobile phone companies show no sign of offering unmetered calls. I'm just complaining :-)

    13. Re:pay phones might get more use if by geekoid · · Score: 2

      otoh, ig you took 20%of the payphone on an area off the hook, the whole phone system shuts down. Thtas is why they lose phone service during an earthquake That and broken cables.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    14. Re:pay phones might get more use if by Cy+Guy · · Score: 2

      Finally, she reached Hayden, who was sipping a beer. He suggested she use the pay phone he maintained in the restaurant. She haughtily replied: "I wouldn't be caught dead using a pay phone.

      At Franklin's (the local brewpub) they don't have a traditional payphone, what they have instead is a cellphone for customer use. You just make your call and drop $.50 into a box. A lot of businesses used to maintain payphones for their customers, often as a losing proposition for the business since the Phone Co's charge the biz something like $200/month to have one. At first businesses tried to get around this by instead using the oversized desktop payphones some independents were offering. But with "free" phones and unlimited mobile plans now running about $60 - $70/month I think a lot more places will be doing this. At $60/month it only takes 4 calls a day to break even - plus there is a redundant phone system available in case the main POTS line phones goes down.

  4. Without public telephones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Funny

    Where will Clark Kent change into his Superman costume?!

    1. Re:Without public telephones... by dankwa · · Score: 2, Funny

      ... And HOW will the folks in Matrix get back to their ship when chased by the Agents?

    2. Re:Without public telephones... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Funny

      I can think of one instance where you didn't use your sense of humor.

    3. Re:Without public telephones... by marcsiry · · Score: 3, Informative

      That was actually a hilarious moment in the first Superman movie- Clark Kent was rushing to change into Superman for his first "public action" (saving Lois from a helicopter disaster) when he stopped and briefly glanced up and down at one of the half-booths common in NYC nowadays (and back in the 70's when the film was made).

      It obviously didn't fit his requirements, as he went on to a revolving door which he spun at super speed to blur his transformation (which seems moot, after opening his shirt in the middle of a crowded street to reveal the Superman "S.")

      Oh well, it's NYC, err, Metropolis-- no one would notice unless he was doing something abberant, like being nice or polite...

      --
      Marc Siry || interactive media professional, motorcycle enthusiast ||
  5. The environmental hazard of removing payphones is: by rickthewizkid · · Score: 5, Insightful

    ... all the spilled oil, gas, antifreeze and other automotive gook from the accidents caused by people using their cell phones while driving...

    -RickTheWizKid
    ..."Just hang up and DRIVE!"

  6. Obscure Future Rama Joke by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 5, Funny

    Maybe they could replace them with Suicide Booths :)

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    1. Re:Obscure Future Rama Joke by macx666 · · Score: 4, Funny
      Maybe they could replace them with Suicide Booths :)
      Good idea! And they can charge 50 cents for unlimited use too! Oh, wait...
    2. Re:Obscure Future Rama Joke by Alien+Being · · Score: 2

      I'm not getting into that thing. I, I'm strictly a hand operator; you know, I, I... I don't like anything with moving parts that are not my own.

  7. You wonder about the wrong thing... by Marton · · Score: 5, Interesting

    ... payphones are great to have in an emergency - and there are tens of millions of people in the US w/o a cellphone.

    The real question is: are they going to keep operating those phones that lose them money? Should payphones be thought of as something essential like public transportation, and possibly subsidized by the govt?

    1. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by AKnightCowboy · · Score: 2, Informative
      ... payphones are great to have in an emergency - and there are tens of millions of people in the US w/o a cellphone.

      If you just want the convenience and safety though there are tons of plans for pay-as-you-go. Buy some minutes up front and leave it around for an emergency. If you just need it for 911 then just get someone's old disconnected phone like the battered women's shelters do for people since they can still dial 911. Now, as I think about it, I've not used a payphone since I got a cell phone. Hell, I never have any change for the payphone anyway and it'd be easier to just borrow someone else's phone for a minute if you're in a group and give them a buck or two for the convenience. Payphones carry diseases and god knows what else on them. It'd be like putting a public urinal up to my mouth when you make a phone call. No thanks!

    2. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by vegetablespork · · Score: 2
      Buy some minutes up front and leave it around for an emergency.

      That doesn't work with any of the prepaid plans I've looked at in an effort to supply one less outgoing monthly revenue stream to the telecommunications industry.

      If you just need it for 911 then just get someone's old disconnected phone like the battered women's shelters do for people since they can still dial 911.

      This works, although the cell phone companies would rather it not be general knowledge.

      --

      Call (206) 338-5780 COLLECT for information about a genuine BA, BS, MA, MS, MBA, or Ph.D.

    3. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2, Insightful

      Tons of poor people have cell phones. (This is a symptom of the cause of their poverty.)

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    4. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by newt · · Score: 5, Interesting
      Should payphones be thought of as something essential like public transportation, and possibly subsidized by the govt?

      They are in most countries (either directly as a public service, or indirectly as a consequence of the fact that the Government usually owns the phone company).

      It's only in the US that payphones depend on the corporate whim of a for-profit company.

      - mark

      --

      -----
      I tried an internal modem, but it hurt when I walked.

    5. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by ChrisKnight · · Score: 2

      "If you just need it for 911 then just get someone's old disconnected phone like the battered women's shelters do for people since they can still dial 911."

      No longer true. I gave my old analog phone to a friend to take with him on a road trip, thinking he could dial 911 without an account. Fortunatly, before he left, he tried dialing 911. He was directed to an operator who wanted to assist him in setting up an account. He was told that they did not provide 911 service to phones without accounts. I was surprised that there wasn't a law somewhere that compelled them to provide 911 service, but apparently there isn't.

      -Chris

      --
      -- This sig is only a test. If this were a real sig it would say something witty. --
    6. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by taion · · Score: 2

      I'm surprised there isn't a law somewhere that compels you not to call 911 unless you have a good reason to.

      --

      ----------
      Floccinaucinihilipilification - the action or habit of judging something to be worthless
    7. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Dan+Crash · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Oh, please.

      Next you'll be telling me that poor people having telephones at all is a criminal mismanagement of funds. I can't imagine why poor people would waste their cash on something as frivolous as a mobile phone. Certainly not to check their messages during the day and try to get a more lucrative job. How absurd! And God forbid a mother should want her children to be able to reach her when they need her, even if she's on the bus.

      Cell phones were once exclusively for the very rich. Now they're not. Deal with it.

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
    8. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

      You're talking about lack of priorities yet your post equates her electric bill with her cable bill?

      Electric bill, fine - that's important... but cable is just another (costly!) entertainment expense.

    9. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by tswinzig · · Score: 4, Interesting

      They are in most countries (either directly as a public service, or indirectly as a consequence of the fact that the Government usually owns the phone company).

      It's only in the US that payphones depend on the corporate whim of a for-profit company.


      You make it sound like its a bad thing.

      Why should my tax money go to help someone loser make a free phone call?

      I don't have a problem with the government installing emergency phone booths that are wired to 911 for things like that, but I'll pass on footing the bill for someone else's calls... they get enough of my money as it is!

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    10. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      You can do all that with the cell phone Verizon gives you free with the service just as well as with the $200 model with internet, "bleeping" (the scourge of the earth), Java support, and small-penis-size compensator. You can also get messages on an answering machine, and for millions of years kids got along just fine without being able to call their mommies from anywhere on Earth.

      Here is an anecdote illustrating for you the "cause" I am talking about. I was eating lunch in the high school cafeteria some years ago. A kid comes up to me and asks me to let him have a few dollars. (Another "symptom" - this type of people will never ask to *BORROW* money, they always want handouts.) I asked him what he needed the money for and he said, "I'm poor! I ain't got money for lunch!" So I told him, "Get a job to earn some lunch money." He replied, "I have a job, but I spent all the money yesterday on my new jacket!" I told him he could fuck off and go hungry. (Before you say it: His old jacket was perfectly servicable, but the manufacturer had come out with a new one with an even bigger logo.)

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    11. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      Which ren faires? I'm up at the New York faire, maybe I've seen her.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    12. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      Good point, good point. I don't think this is the prevalent situation in most of the U.S. yet, though.

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    13. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Corgha · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Why should my tax money go to help someone loser make a free phone call?

      Uhh.... who said anything about free calls? They're called pay phones for a reason, you know.

      If you're OK with installing and maintaining phones that can call 911 for free, why not also let people put money in them to call other numbers while the phones would otherwise just be sitting around, doing nothing? They'd be hooked up to the phone network anyway, since a dedicated line to the 911 call center would be needlessly expensive.

      Sure, maybe those pay calls would be in some sense "subsidized phone calls", but much less so that a car ride just about anywhere is a "subsidized car ride." Somehow I doubt that the cost of subsidizing pay phones would ever come close to that of the massive pork barrel that is the federal-aid highway system (or that we'd ever invade Kazakhstan to secure our chromium supply for those cool little keypad buttons).

      That, of course, is the original poster's point -- that perhaps pay phones should be considered a part of the public infrastructure.

    14. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by JohnFluxx · · Score: 3, Interesting

      It is indeed a very interesting subject - one of which you have barely scraped the surface.

      My dad was a postman, and he used to tell me that almost all the junk mail that was delivered was delivered to the poorest estates. For it was the poorest of the council estates that were buying new TV's, new sofas etc.

      I've noticed this over and over again - lower class people mismanaging money, owning huge tv's, expensive sofas etc. The (few) middle class people I knew either didn't have a tv or had a really cheap one. (Although they did take expensive holidays etc.) Expensive cars seem to fit into both categories.

      Why does it seem that lower class people are more prone to consumerism? I don't know - perhaps a mixture of no education, depression (just don't care anymore), environment, etc.

      Btw, has anyone heard of any studies of comparision of intelligence between upper, middle, and lower class? (I'm aware of the lack of clear divides etc)

      p.s. - I'm very much in the lower (or is it 'working' class), so don't take this as arrogance.

    15. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "Not too far from the truth: the article mentions that people (women?) would sometimes urinate on pay phones. And I can rmember a movie or two where the protagonist would always pull out a hankie to handle a pay phone handset with."

      Maybe my imagination is not so vivid or something, but can anyone please explain exactly how the idea to urinate on a public phone would enter someone's mind, and why they would do it on a phone as opposed to, say bushes, or in a washroom? It just seems completely illogical.

    16. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by irc.goatse.cx+troll · · Score: 2

      "You can also get messages on an answering machine, and for millions of years kids got along just fine without being able to call their mommies from anywhere on Earth."

      For thousands of years people got along without transportation, electricity, language...

      By your logic, the world should cease to change from now on because everything in some way or another 'works'.

      --
      Pain lasts, kid. Its how you know you're alive. Sometimes I think this growing up thing is just pain management-TheMaxx
    17. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by TheOnlyCoolTim · · Score: 2

      I was using a bit of hyperbole. By millions of years, I mean "two years ago."

      Tim

      --
      Omnia vestra castrorum habetur nobis.
    18. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      Now, as I think about it, I've not used a payphone since I got a cell phone.

      I have, for this reason: the battery ran out on my mobile phone. I usually use it for stuff now rather than payphones, but they really need to sort the battery issue out. On the Nokia ones especially, it can be on 1 bar for ages and you never know when the damn thing's gonna run out or needs recharging. Payphones are needed still for emergencies when the mobile breaks.

    19. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      That's HELLA generous for this country (UK) :-) Double those figures and you've got the costs of our PAYG services!

    20. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by alienw · · Score: 2

      If it's a 911 emergency phone, do you want people yakking away on it while someone is having an emergency? Brilliant.

    21. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by tswinzig · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Uhh.... who said anything about free calls? They're called pay phones for a reason, you know.

      The original poster intimated that other countries pay for the phones.

      Setting that aside for a moment, even if the government only paid to maintain them, that is much more maintenance than an emergency phone.

      If you're OK with installing and maintaining phones that can call 911 for free, why not also let people put money in them to call other numbers while the phones would otherwise just be sitting around, doing nothing? They'd be hooked up to the phone network anyway, since a dedicated line to the 911 call center would be needlessly expensive.

      - Emergency phones don't require as much hardware. They can be a single button you press and talk into a microphone, like what appear on many campuses across America.

      - Emergency phones don't need to be stopped by every day to gather the change.

      - Emergency phones don't need to be repaired as much because they're not used as much.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    22. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Jonny+Ringo · · Score: 2

      Why should my tax money go to help someone loser make a free phone call?

      Because that loser could be you!! Life will catch you by suprise, when it really shouldn't.

    23. Re:You wonder about the wrong thing... by Corgha · · Score: 2

      get real.

      Have you ever heard of this problem on current pay phones?

      If you're actually having an emergency, and someone is standing nearby, on the phone or not, they are more likely to call 911 for you or attempt to assist you than to stand there and stare at you while you bleed to death.

  8. Recycling impact? by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?

    Ummmm. How about approximately 0? How many pay phones per person? Like 1/100 at best. Now think about all of the diapers and soda bottles and old tires and other crap that people throw out without thinking. There are things worth worrying about and then there is the noise.

    As for getting rid of pay phones, I'm fine with it. I mean, when was the last time you saw a working pay phone?

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
    1. Re:Recycling impact? by Fulcrum+of+Evil · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Perhaps a more direct metaphor is in order: You're picking up litter in a burning building.

      --
      "We returned the General to El Salvador, or maybe Guatemala, it's difficult to tell from 10,000 feet"
    2. Re:Recycling impact? by radicalsubversiv · · Score: 2

      As for getting rid of pay phones, I'm fine with it. I mean, when was the last time you saw a working pay phone?

      Last week. I even called someone on it.

    3. Re:Recycling impact? by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 2

      Insightful? Since when?

      It's called pragmatism. Look into it. I was simply pointing out that it's somewhat hypocritical to get bent out of shape about pay phones (which you will note, I said is approximately zero as in insignificant) because of all the much more insignificant crap that everyone (including you, yes you) don't bitch about because it's too damn hard to give them up. Now you will right a response about how you live in an igloo made of recycled tires and diapers and only eat food you grew from your own garden.

      Now, honestly, do you really thing that the small # of recycled pay phones is seriously worthy of any social discussion?

      --
      I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  9. This reminds me... by Jon+Abbott · · Score: 5, Funny

    When I recently opened the Back to the Future DVD trilogy and watched the second movie, there was one scene where Marty Jr. was using some kind of futuristic-looking pay phone. I laughed to myself and said, "I guess they didn't see the end of that one coming!"

  10. Pretty soon by TerryAtWork · · Score: 2

    A lot of the young kids here on /. will be saying - 'I'm old enough to remember payphones'...

    --
    It's Christmas everyday with BitTorrent.
  11. Outside line? by Andorion · · Score: 2

    Pay phones still have some use... doesn't anyone watch The Sopranos?

    -Berj

    1. Re:Outside line? by outsider007 · · Score: 5, Funny

      Pay phones still have some use... doesn't anyone watch The Sopranos?

      is it where they change into their gangster clothes?

      --
      If you mod me down the terrorists will have won
  12. Payphone Disposal by newt_sd · · Score: 5, Insightful

    How come this always gets brought up on slashdot?
    How is junking old phones any different then any other waste? Are there uranium pay phones out there? Admit it the u.s. wastes tons pay phone is a tiny tiny part of a very larger picture

    --
    ***I GOT NUTHIN***
    1. Re:Payphone Disposal by hitzroth · · Score: 4, Funny

      But.. but.. but.. telcoms equipment is sacred! Disposal must be accompanied by the appropriate rituals! /me prays to Tesla's ghost to carry the electrons and route the lost calls to their proper parties.

      --
      In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
      --VonNeumann
  13. Environment by Z0mb1eman · · Score: 5, Insightful

    >I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones

    Probably not worse than the millions of home phones that break down or are replaced by newer models. And DEFINITELY not worse than the millions of cell phones - and proprietary batteries - that are starting to be thrown out (what was the statistic I read? Kids in Japan who keep up with "fashion" replace their cell phone every 3 months, and in North America every 18 months? I know, I know, no link, no proof, etc... whatever.)

    --
    ClutterMe.com - easiest site creation on the Net. Just click and type.
    1. Re:Environment by Patik · · Score: 3, Insightful
      the millions of cell phones - and proprietary batteries - that are starting to be thrown out ... Kids in Japan who keep up with "fashion" replace their cell phone every 3 months
      How about the phones that are thrown out when someone changes plans and the new service provider forces them to buy one of their phones?
    2. Re:Environment by MulluskO · · Score: 2

      Anyone know if the companies will make any attempt to sell these thousands of phones before throwning them out? I think it would be great to clean one up, install it as a home phone. If they are to be discarded, I think they should be really inexpensive.

      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    3. Re:Environment by richie2000 · · Score: 2
      I think it would be great to clean one up, install it as a home phone.

      I sense a case mod in here somewhere. :-)

      --
      Money for nothing, pix for free
    4. Re:Environment by MulluskO · · Score: 2

      Great idea, now I need two.

      --

      Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
    5. Re:Environment by Jucius+Maximus · · Score: 2
      "How about the phones that are thrown out when someone changes plans and the new service provider forces them to buy one of their phones?"

      This is stupid. When you change phones / plans, you should get a credit for the old hardware. On telus mobility in Canada, my dad just bought a new phone to replace his really ancient one from ~1996 because the display was failing. He still got a $25 credit for it and the phone went to proper disposal and recovery of recoverable parts.

    6. Re:Environment by stephenbooth · · Score: 2

      Most places here in the UK will give you a trade in discount on your old phone when you upgrade.

      Alternatively buy a Pay-As-You-Go simm and keep it as a back up or give it to a relative who can't afford the initial purchase price but could get good use from a mobile phone. That's what I've done with my old phones. Prior to getting a mobile phone my mother couldn't see the point. Now she's addicted to texting and loves it.

      Stephen

      --
      "Don't write down to your readers, the only people less intelligent than you can't read" - Sign on Newspaper Office Wall
    7. Re:Environment by Kanasta · · Score: 2

      cellphones break down so easily. Mine, the screen's going fuzzy after exactly 2yrs. Funny, my contract was 2yrs too...

      I've only ever dropped it once and I only use it enough to need a charge every 3-4days.

  14. Too bad.. by FuzzyMan45 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    the payphone out in the Middle of Nowhere already disappeared. Here is a link to the going-away of it and why. Basically, the National Park Service and the Mojave National Preserve thought that there would be too much environmental impact if the booth remained too much longer.

    --Fuzz

    1. Re:Too bad.. by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      That is too bad, and I can understand why people are so upset. Like the article says, the fact that the number still rings seems especially cruel.

      But the last line of the article really caught my attention.

      "If I had to do this all over again, I would do it very differently," he said. "I would keep it very, very quiet."

      This I don't understand at all. Sure, the Pay Phone in the Middle of Nowhere is gone, but there are still many functional pay phones out there.

      Why not pick an arbitrary payphone on some New York street corner, and start calling it? And don't keep it quiet, either--publicize it just as much as the first one. It's bound to be interesting, and fun, even if it isn't the same as calling the original phone.

      Better yet, he could have a "pay phone of the month": select a different arbitrary pay phone each month. Imagine the people flocking to call it, and the people flocking to answer it.

      It's a simple concept, but I don't think he's even begun to explore its full potential. The original phone had a certain stark beauty to it, but it should be viewed as the beginning, not the be-all and end-all. The end will come when there are no pay phones left to call.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

  15. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by kevcol · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I only agree if the cell user is not using a headset and using a phone with special hands free dialing features. Otherwise, we might as well ban conversation between 2 or more occupants of a car.

  16. I can remember by Regul8or · · Score: 2, Funny

    the last time I used a payphone I was playing quarter tones into it trying to trick the operator into giving me a free phone call. Also stuffing the coin returns. What else are you supposed to do in high school?

  17. I wouldn't be caught dead using a payphone by teamhasnoi · · Score: 2
    I hope she remembers that right after she is mugged, brutally beaten and raped in an alley. I'm guessing she'll be glad to see one then. Oops! Where did they all go?

    I'm thinking that payphone operators are making it harder to get a call thru, and subsequently lose your 50 cents. I came across a phone that took 1.50 from me on busy signals! No other phone was to be found (this was a half mile from the U of MN)

    I was pissed. If I had been driving my big shitty van, I would've GTA'd the fucker in a heartbeat. Enjoy my illgotten buck fifty, phone bastards.

    1. Re:I wouldn't be caught dead using a payphone by Hadlock · · Score: 2

      unfortunately, i live in texas, where it is rare/unheard of to see an enclosed telephone booth, the ones here are open air for the most part. i'd much rather get the satisfaction of getting my $1.50 back, and unbolted the booth from the concrete slab it sat on and driven away with it tied to my roof. been looking for a good booth to steal to put in the apartment as of late...

      --
      moox. for a new generation.
  18. Turn them into WiFi access points by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Bell Canada has announced that they are converting some of their thousands of pay phones into 802.11 access points to extend their new WiFi service offering. WiFi-only companies like FatPort would be wise to follow suit. PayPhones are in the best possible locations for WiFi -- think AirPorts, hotel lobbies, train stations...

  19. Environmental hazard? by Milinar · · Score: 2, Insightful

    No more of a threat than everyone having to buy a new cell phone every freakin' year.

    -Milinar

  20. This is real simple actually ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 2
    ... People are using the payphones less, therefore demand has gone down so price has gone up. My cell's battery went dead the other day and I needed to make a local call, so I headed to the payphone, $0.55 to make a Local 2 minute call!!

    Think about it, that's 25 cents a minute, most cellular phone contractual plans are LOWER than this price.

    Here's the irony of the story, I didn't have any change either, so I stopped a gentleman to ask him for some change to use the phone, he said he was on his lunch break and had no problem with me using his phone.

    I think the saying "everyone has a cell phone" is wrong, but not so untrue, like the computer most people have at least one in their family, if not three or four.

    Moral of the story, I got a car charger now and don't try to see if the lithium ion battery can hold a charge for more than 4 days. Totally off topic but motorolla's new phones with a Lithium Ion battery are hella nice and last a rather long time (just not longer than 4 days).

    In closing of a long post, it's the price of the payphone that has made them less appealing, and what gets me even more is most of these phone companies who supply payphones ALSO have a division that supply celluar phones. So they really aren't "losing" money as a whole, just certain departments.

    I say more emergency solar based Cell Phones Stations on Highways, Interstates, and Rest Stops because technically Cell Phones have to be free when dialing emergency numbers, and being solar you can put them anywhere.

    I'm sure "phreakers" and 2600 will be upset though...

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
    1. Re:This is real simple actually ... by rsborg · · Score: 2
      Here's the irony of the story, I didn't have any change either, so...[snip]

      Hmmm don't you think payphone use has gone down because people can't be bothered to carry change? I sure as hell don't... and hell with pulling out my credit card and typing in 20+ more digits. In the convenience society in which we live, the payphone is altmodish.

      --
      Make sure everyone's vote counts: Verified Voting
  21. Re-use? by FyRE666 · · Score: 2

    Why not just turn them into toilets, and handy pinboards for ladies of the night to ply their wares? Oh wait...

  22. Don't trash; upgrade! by adamp3 · · Score: 4, Interesting
  23. I wonder by Alethes · · Score: 4, Insightful

    How will we make anonymous calls without a payphone?

    1. Re:I wonder by hitzroth · · Score: 2

      How will we make anonymous calls without a payphone?

      We won't. In any case, Alethes, what's so bad about not being anonymous if nobody is anonymous.
      --
      In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
      --VonNeumann
    2. Re:I wonder by K8Fan · · Score: 2
      How will we make anonymous calls without a payphone?

      Absolutely. Everyone needs anonymity once in a while...calling about a job that might be your current employer...psycho ex-girlfriends...harassing spammers at home...all sorts of things.

      Personally, I've avoided getting a cell phone and have managed just fine so far. They are expensive, especially now that no providers are offering truly unlimited minutes any more (my brother is "grandfathered" into an unlimited plan and averages 3000+ minutes a month). I'm a consultant and I'd never get a moments peace if I had a cell. I just explain that I don't have one, they can call my pager.

      --
      "How perfectly Goddamn delightful it all is, to be sure" Charles Crumb
    3. Re:I wonder by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      How will we make anonymous calls without a payphone?

      Don't worry, I'll just your cell phone when you're not looking.

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    4. Re:I wonder by OttoM · · Score: 3, Insightful
      How will we make anonymous calls without a payphone?

      1. Go to a phone shop (or supermarket, or toy store, anywhere)
      2. Buy a prepaid phone.
      3. Make your call. Do not forget to switch off sending caller ID.
      Here in the Netherlands (and the rest of Europe) a very large part (>50%) of mobile phones are prepaid. No subscription or ID required.

      If you are under 18, you cannot get a subscription, so you'll have to use a prepaid phone, or convince your parents to get a subscription for you.

  24. Don't Junk, Re-Purpose by ryanisflyboy · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Rather than throw out all those pay phones, I think it would be much more interesting to see them reused. Perhaps as 802.11 access points or something. Just replace the phone with a digital pay box with an antenna on top. Simply swipe your credit card, hook into the network, and roam around with 20 or 30 minutes of wireless access.

    1. Re:Don't Junk, Re-Purpose by pauljlucas · · Score: 2
      Perhaps as 802.11 access points or something.
      And who would use such an access point especially while being forced either to stand or sit on the sidewalk?

      Nobody needs to check e-mail that badly. This would never make any money.

      --
      If you reply, do so only to what I explicitly wrote. If I didn't write it, don't assume or infer it.
  25. limited coverage by tr0tsky · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There are still vast regions of the country that have limited cell phone coverage, especially for newer networks that provide high(er)-speed wireless data services.

    I recently switched cell phone providers from Verizon to T-Mobile so I could utilize their GPRS/GSM-based wireless internet service on my laptop (~115Kbps) using my new bluetooth-enabled phone. While CDMA coverage in the U.S. is rather extensive, the GPRS networks that AT&T and T-Mobile have deployed are still very much confined to highly-populated regions of the country.

    There I was in Westchester County, NY (about 50 miles N of Manhattan) trying to locate a client's office and imagine my frustration when my brand new GPRS-based phone was out of range. I had to stop at a supermarket and find enough change to call from a payphone - it saved my day.

    1. Re:limited coverage by John+Murray · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Lets not forget there are still vast regions of the us with NO cell phone coverage at all. If you actually look at many providers coverage maps, in much of country you will only find cell service along interstates.

      If mobile phones become even more common, it might be time for the government to step in and force cell companies to provide true national coverage with decent capacity for calls. One way to do this could be, placing requirements on building permits for new cell installations, requiring as condition of approval. The other problem is many cells are all ready overloaded with normal call volumes, hopefully additional requirements could be made to force cell providers to have extra capacity, for emergencies, etc.

    2. Re:limited coverage by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Why on earth should the government regulate this? It seems similar to suggesting that as rail transport becomes more popular, the government should force national railroad coverage. Or that the government should force the telcos to deploy true national broadband coverage.

      How about this: as cell phones become more popular, the service providers will accumulate enough revenue to put in more cells and better capacity. As cell phones become more popular, the demand for coverage in remote areas will grow, until it becomes good business to put cells out there.

      Once the demand is high enough, the providers will increase the coverage freely, without government intervention, because they know people will pay for it--enough people to make the added coverage profitable.

      And if the demand isn't there yet, but the government forces the issue anyway? Who will pay for it? We already know the consumers won't pay for it, because if they would, the phone companies would have done it on their own. We know the providers won't want to pay for it, since they know that without demand they'd only be losing money. So the government would have to pay for it--which means we'd have to pay for it. My taxes would end up paying for a cell deep in the Ozarks that nobody wants or needs or cares about. Or the government would convince the providers to pay for it after all, probably with subsidies (my taxes, again), or concessions that would grant the providers even greater power to exploit the citizenry--the citizenry that doesn't even want true national coverage yet.

      Or the government might entice cell phone providers with subsidies--and the caveat that the Office of Homeland Security have administrative access to the cellular networks. "The bad news is, you must provide true national cellular coverage. The good news is, we'll give you taxpayer money to do it, and make a profit. But we get to listen in on everybody's calls."

      This country has gotten along pretty well without true national cell coverage so far, and it can probably manage to muddle along a few more years until the market is mature enough to make such a thing plausible without government interference.

      Argh. I'm rambling on in an increasingly belligerent fashion. My point is made, so I'll stop now, before I become completely insufferable :)

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    3. Re:limited coverage by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      So the government would have to pay for it--which means we'd have to pay for it. My taxes would end up paying for a cell deep in the Ozarks that nobody wants or needs or cares about.

      Why do you think that nobody needs it? There's people living in up in them there hills. We as a society decided that every American would have water, and electricity and phone service - it probably still wouldn't be feasible to run those to some places. What's the problem with everyone in America being able to communicate from anywhere in America? Just the comfort of knowing you can communicate without worry anywhere is one great advantage.

      No longer getting mocked by Finns who can get cell coverage anywhere in Finland is another, of course.

    4. Re:limited coverage by hitzroth · · Score: 2

      Hey, do you remember reading about how rural areas in the US finally got electricity?

      Well, the big power companies said it wasn't profitable enough to run lines to rural areas. They said that the farmers and people in the rural communites wouldn't be able to afford to pay their bills, etc.

      Some people worked up the numbers and said it was, infact, not only profitable but socially and economically beneficial for rural areas to have electricity (electric appliances and equipment would lighten the work load of the people and allow one person work more land). But still the electricity companies refused, they said the risk was too great and the inital cost too high.

      So the government set up a trial area, electrified a corner of the rural US. It worked, the business was profitable, and the big energy companies wanted in on the deal.

      Now, the above is a gross oversimplification of what happened, and cell phones aren't electricity. And adding coverage is just bolstering a communications infrastructure that already exists. But, I'd suspect that cell coverage would end up being profitable if enstated -- if you give people a choice of two services, and one is cheaper and more effective, they take that one. If the enstatment of that service takes a government mandate, well, that's part of what the government is there for: to help keep businesses honest, and moving. Better than "legistlating profits", I'd say.

      As for the taxes, wouldn't you be willing to pay a little extra now to help ensure you pay a lot less later?

      As for the privacy issue... I don't have an answer except to say that if we can make records of all the calls, why not allow public access to those records. Including, perhaps especially, those of government personell?

      --
      In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
      --VonNeumann
    5. Re:limited coverage by susano_otter · · Score: 2

      Fair enough. I got a little carried away, there.

      Your counter argument is strong, and supported by facts, so I'll happily concede my purely speculative point.

      Also, I'm all in favor of less government privacy. Wasn't it David Brin who proposed last year that government snooping on private citizens was fine, so long as the citizens had equal snooping powers over the government? Or was it Bruce Sterling? Anyway, whoever said it, I like it, and should probably start voting for it.

      Thanks for clarifying the cell phone issue for me. I'll go away and contemplate things in greater detail, now :)

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    6. Re:limited coverage by susano_otter · · Score: 2
      Why do you think that nobody needs it?

      I admit I simply assumed nobody needed it. I also didn't mean the Ozarks literally, so much as symbolically; a figurative example of the kind of place I assumed wouldn't want or need cell coverage.

      I guess my response was driven largely by my belief that--unlike water, electricity, and standard phone service--cell phones are a luxury, not a necessity. I could be wrong in my beliefs, though.

      More reply here.

      --

      Any sufficiently well-organized community is indistinguishable from Government.

    7. Re:limited coverage by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      Tsk-tsk, have you forgotton our administration's pledge to "Leave no redneck behind?" (kidding) (sort of)

      From an economic standpoint, gov't intervention makes a lot of sense for market failure (private market fails to exploit opportunity), projects with high entry costs but long-term profits (airports, cell phone expansion?), and social projects that loses money but yield other benefits (universal mail delivery, public transit, gee-whiz pointless boodoogle manned space exploration :).

      Then there's Keynes to argue about...

      I'm sure someone has stated it in a more poetic way. But I do think gov't has a role, and that it should step out at the earliest opportunity.

  26. This is what _really_ drives mass adoption... by foonf · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I don't really use the telephone a whole lot. I've never seen a need for a mobile phone, and part of the argument against one went kind of like this: Well, if I'm stuck somewhere and I really need to get in touch with someone, I can always use a pay phone. And if its not important enough to spend 35 cents I really don't need to make the call anyway. I guess not eh? At some point in the future I might have to spend $(minimum cell phone cost) every month just to get the same service I would have formerly gotten from the once-ubiquitous (and free if I don't actually have to use them) public pay phones.

    The same thing happened to rail transit in most American cities about 40-50 years ago as road systems improved and more people bought automobiles.

    --

    "(Man) tries to live his own life as if he were telling a story. But you have to choose: live or tell." --Sartre
    1. Re:This is what _really_ drives mass adoption... by pyrros · · Score: 2, Informative

      I really have no idea about what charge plans are available in the USA, but here in europe you can get a GSM phone on a "pay as you go" or prepaid plan, where you don't pay a flat monthly fee, but instead buy scratch cards which give you airtime. So, you could buy a cheapass phone for less than $100 and then get a scratch card (sold practically everywhere) whenever you run out of airtime.

      There is one small catch: you have to buy a scratch card at least once a year, so you are not disconnected. However that's no big deal, as the cheapest scratch cards cost $5-7. So you are just forced to use a minimum of $5-7 a year. Most people i know use way more than that per month, so it's only an issue if you get a cellphone only for incomming calls (which are free in europe) or emergencies.

      (Prices in $ because slashdot would eat € in both POT and HTML)

    2. Re:This is what _really_ drives mass adoption... by jez9999 · · Score: 2

      because slashdot would eat &euro

      WTF are you using &euro for? There's a Euro key '' on my keyboard (ctrl-alt-4), and even if not, it's in most font sets now so just use character map!

    3. Re:This is what _really_ drives mass adoption... by schwanerhill · · Score: 2

      Prepaid phones haven't caught on here in the States like in Europe, largely because, when I last looked in May, prepaid plans couldn't be bought here for less than about US$30, and that expires after 3 months rather than a year. Pay as you go in the U.K., expensive as it is, is much cheaper than in the States. Also, whereas every little shop (at least in London) has top-up cards available, they are hard to come by in the U.S.

      However, 30 seconds of shopping around makes it seem like prepaid plans are much more reasonable now than they used to be. A $10 Cingular prepaid card gets you $0.50/min, and a $30 one gets $0.30/min, which isn't horrible.

      Also, what the provdiers don't tell you is that any mobile phone in the U.S., even a deactivated one, can make a free 911 call, as long as there's a compatible cell tower in range.

      (This is why a bit of well-placed regulation would be a good thing--American regulators have let the market determine the pricing schemes, and that means that it is impossible to get a halfway decent plan, even for occasional use, without paying $30/month and a 1-year contract, making it very difficult to change providers if you see a cheaper plan or a decent pay-as-you-go rate.)

  27. So what about emergency calls and the poor? by John+Murray · · Score: 3, Insightful

    This is bad news for all the people who can't justify paying $30+/month for a cell phone. With ubiquitous pay phones in case of emergency, knowing you could find a near by pay phone. From this article, it could soon become very hard to find a pay-phone when one is needed. This will be big problem for the lower middle class, who can't justify paying for a cell phone, but live areas, where cell toting yuppies, have caused most of the pat phones to be removed. The poor may be less effected, as, according to the article, phones in poorer areas are still profitable.

    1. Re:So what about emergency calls and the poor? by geek · · Score: 2

      Considering that 911 is a toll free call I doubt any phone companies will become altruists and put up phones that say "Homeless only" on them.

      They can still shout for help and run to nearby businesses. I doubt the impact will be large but who knows.

    2. Re:So what about emergency calls and the poor? by hitzroth · · Score: 2

      Around the local college campus we have "blue light phones".

      They're not really "phones": no reciever, button pad, etc. They're intercoms on posts topped with blue lights (hence the name). Push a button and campus police dispatch picks up. Sure, there's a potential for abuse, but it doesn't seem to happen enough to outweigh the potential benefits.

      Not too many payphones on campus these days, though. I suspect that they won't die out entirely, but rather simply become much rarer.

      How this would to apply to areas with substantial crime and vandalism rates, I don't know.

      --
      In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
      --VonNeumann
  28. "School" payphone case mods by SHEENmaster · · Score: 2

    aren't the best way to win the support of the administration.

    It isn't hard to replace the handset with one that has a sereo jack for a pda/ipod red box. I know, I know, I know: it isn't really a red box unless you solder it from scratch, but still a cool idea.

    Disclaimer: This is neither a confession nor a suggestion. I am not admitting to any wrongdoing, accompliship in wrongdoing or premeditation of wrongoing.

    --
    You can't judge a book by the way it wears its hair.
    1. Re:"School" payphone case mods by Mister+Transistor · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, it really is a genuine "Red Box". The REAL coin-tone generator circuit board in a real Ma Bell payphone is in fact in a red plastic box. That's where the term "Red Box" came from.

      --
      -- You are in a maze of little, twisty passages, all different... --
  29. Only Terrorists Use Public Telephones by jpt.d · · Score: 5, Funny


    How can the government ensure your security if you use public pay phones?

    Use your cell phone, or get one! That way your phone records are just a computer away from the people protecting your safety.

    Do not assist the Terrorists!

    --
    What we see depends on mainly what we look for. -- John Lubbock Now search for that bug slave!
  30. Pay phones were never profitable by Gus · · Score: 3, Insightful
    Most pay phones lost money like a sieve. The decline of the enclosed phone booth came about due to the high incidence of they being used as toilets; the local Bell technicians wanted nothing to do with repairing a smashed phone in a small enclosure reeking of urine.

    In general, pay phones were mandated by public safety regulations, not profit motive. Problems ranging from smashed handsets to stolen phone books to smashed window glass plagued public phones constantly.

    If pay phones were profitable, why did the Baby Bells allow anyone to start running them? It would have been a very strange business decision given their history of profiteering in the post Ma Bell era.

    --
    --Gus
    1. Re:Pay phones were never profitable by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2

      Maybe you don't recall, but the government deregulated telecommunications in the early 90's. 50,000 ripoff payphone providers were one of the many negative results.

      Also remember that until the 90's, many rural areas still hadn't upgraded to private line service, so payphones were a way to communicate without the neighbors listening in.

      Payphones were very profitable until the government decided to block incoming calls. In many poorer neighborhoods, people used the local payphone for day-to-day calling instead of paying $25/month for landline service.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
    2. Re:Pay phones were never profitable by MacAndrew · · Score: 2

      The decline of the enclosed phone booth came about due to the high incidence of they being used as toilets

      Why are we not willing to provide bathrooms for the indigent? They gotta go sometime. In some countries they have coin-op freestanding bathrooms, and provide the homeless with free tokens. There is a problem with prostitutes using the bathrooms for business transactions ... on etrick is to have the doors open after a certain time interval. I'm sure lots of people here have more experience with these contraptions that I do, but the contribution to sanitation seems obvious.

      In answer to your Q, pay phones were not particularly profitable -- maybe airports were exceptions -- and were maintained either because the property owners subsidized them (every restaurant and gas station is supposed to have a pay phone after all, though no longer) or regulatory pressure was applied to provide phones at reasonable rates for the poor. In Boston they retained a 10 basic rate until astonishingly recently.

    3. Re:Pay phones were never profitable by /dev/trash · · Score: 2

      Weird. then how come the Pay Phone just down the road from me gets calls all the time?

    4. Re:Pay phones were never profitable by Dun+Malg · · Score: 2
      how come the Pay Phone just down the road from me gets calls all the time?

      that's me, man. I've been waiting at the airport for days. Why haven't you picked me up?

      --
      If a job's not worth doing, it's not worth doing right.
    5. Re:Pay phones were never profitable by Gus · · Score: 2
      Exactly. I got my information from my boss and co-workers, most of whom spent time with the Great Telephone Expiriment in the seventies and eighties. They all dreaded calls to repair pay phones, and knew the score then.

      --
      --Gus
    6. Re:Pay phones were never profitable by Gus · · Score: 2
      How do incoming calls make a pay phone profitable? An incoming call for which the pay phone user pays nothing doesn't really seem like much of a cash cow.

      --
      --Gus
    7. Re:Pay phones were never profitable by duffbeer703 · · Score: 2

      At one time payphones were the only phones available for a very large number of people, which made them far more valuable.

      Even if a person took an incoming call -- without the payphone, that person would have communicated with their relative or friend via mail and the call never would have been made.

      Keep in mind that even 30 years ago, phone service was not a universal thing. In the rural New York town where my parents lived, only about 50% of the town outside of the main village had private lines. This is in an area about 2 1/2 hours north of NYC.

      If the phone company had to wire apartment buildings, tenaments, and rural areas with 60's and 70's technology, phone service would have been way to cost-prohibitive for anyone to purchase it.

      --
      Conformity is the jailer of freedom and enemy of growth. -JFK
  31. Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 5, Insightful
    Reasons why payphones are better than cellphones:

    • Payphones don't ring in movie theaters
    • People don't drift into your lane and cut you off because they're yakking into a payphone
    • Brain cancer isn't even a remote possibility with payphones
    • Sometimes you find a dime in a payphone's change slot
    • With a payphone you can call people collect for free
    • Payphones aren't obsoleted in a year just because they can't take stupid pictures or haven't shrunk in size by a factor of 3
    • Payphones are the safest option if you're up to no good
    • Receiving calls at payphones is convenient (or used to be before the drug dealers screwed it up for everybody)
    • No long term commitment or credit check with a payphone
    • Payphones don't ever have to come with you on vacations
    • When the payphone doesn't work, you go to another payphone instead of navigating an automated touch tone maze
    • No static with a payphone


    I could go on and on... it will be sad to see the payphone go. I swear I could strangle the jackass who actually took a call in the theater during the Two Towers last week.

    1. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by Steve+B · · Score: 2
      Reasons why payphones are better than cellphones:

      You forgot "You can't untraceably dial a spammer's 800 number from a cell phone."

      --
      /. If the government wants us to respect the law, it should set a better example.
    2. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

      You forgot "You can't untraceably dial a spammer's 800 number from a cell phone."

      A spammer who emails an 800 number shouldn't be in the business. :)

    3. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by Greyfox · · Score: 4, Funny
      I swear I could strangle the jackass who actually took a call in the theater during the Two Towers last week.

      Why didn't you? Seriously, you paid 8 or 9 bucks to enjoy the movie and you shouldn't put up with some inconsiderate fucktard yacking on his cell phone. Demand, loudly and belligerently, that they hang up (feel free to use the word "fucktard." I like it.) and if that doesn't work, pick a fight with 'em. At the very least you'll get your money's worth of enjoyment out of beating them severely (Or being beaten severely, don't back down even if they're bigger than you. Once you go down that road there's no turning back.)

      Most people don't want to get in a fight so I doubt it'd ever come to blows anyway, and the audience will think you're a hero no matter the outcome. It's up to us all to stamp out the scourge of cell phones users in the movie theater.

      And yes, I walk that walk, though since I pay my tribute to the MPAA as rarely as possible I've only ever had to demand that someone turn their phone off once (It was G or PG so I said "jackass" and not "fucktard" -- see, I'm considerate!) and didn't even have to threaten physical violence. He hung up, politely watched the movie and cleared out of the theater almost before the credits hit the screen. I hope the experience was traumatic enough for him that he will be more polite in the future.

      --

      I'm trying to teach myself to set people on fire with my mind... Is it hot in here?

    4. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2
      Why didn't you? Seriously, you paid 8 or 9 bucks to enjoy the movie and you shouldn't put up with some inconsiderate fucktard yacking on his cell phone.

      I couldn't really hear his conversation- I just saw him talking on it. The annoying thing was the stupid ring tone it made. And that makes me realize another great thing about payphones that I forgot:

      • When payphones do ring, they just ring- they don't make a mockery of the greatest music ever produced by Western civilization.


      Anyway, I think picking a fight during Gollum's "schizophrenia" scene would have made me some enemies in the theater. This happened the day of the opening in the middle of Silicon Valley, so you can imagine how completely packed the theater was.

    5. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by gilroy · · Score: 2
      Blockquoth the posters:



      You forgot "You can't untraceably dial a spammer's 800 number from a cell phone."


      A spammer who emails an 800 number shouldn't be in the business. :)


      Enough people join this trend, and the spammer soon won't be. :)
    6. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by tswinzig · · Score: 2

      Reasons why payphones are better than cell phones

      - Receiving calls at payphones is convenient


      I'm sorry, most of your list I could tolerate, but I do believe it's more convenient to answer my cell phone in my pocket than it is to walk down to a payphone.

      An alternative rebuttal might be:

      Is that a payphone in your pocket, or are you just happy to hear from me?

      --

      "And like that ... he's gone."
    7. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by silentbozo · · Score: 3, Funny

      I would have yelled "Kill the guy with the cellphone!" and let the people immediately surrounding him take care of the problem. Of course, this would have been during the midnight showing, so the fan base there would have been easier to incite to kill a cellphone wielding idiot.

    8. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

      I'm sorry, most of your list I could tolerate, but I do believe it's more convenient to answer my cell phone in my pocket than it is to walk down to a payphone.

      Actually people in my family used to do this a lot in the B.C. years (before cellphones) at places like malls and airports. It was a useful trick in a pinch. Until my grandmother (who has no cellphone) managed to get herself stranded at an airport for several hours because she didn't realize that payphones no longer take incoming calls.

    9. Re:Pay phones are nowhere near as annoying by Mike1024 · · Score: 2

      Hey,

      Reasons mobile phones are better than pay phones:

      If you're in a city you don't know, your phone is still right in your pocket; you can find it instantly, and without a long walk etc.

      Costs take care of themselves (in the UK, we can pre-pay for our calls, and with no monthly fees), so you don't have to piss around with a pocket full of change.

      If you're up to no good, you can use an unregistered* prepaid mobile phone from the comfort of your own home.

      Recieving calls on a mobile phone is easy. Particularly because where ever you are, you still have the same number.

      Pre-paid phones are availiable with no long-term commitments, or credit checks.

      You can call emergency services without leaving the site of an accident, and the dispatcher can ask you questions which you can check and stuff.

      You won't get to your mobile phone and find it's been vandalised.

      If you have a problem with your mobile, you can borrow someone else's... they're usually pretty good about it.

      Mobile phones can be digital, meaning they don't suffer from static.

      You can get mobile phone calls while you are using your wired phone line (Useful if broadband is unavailiable where you live, as is the case with me).

      If you're meeting someone, or picking them up, you can call them when you arrive, from the comfort of you car.

      You can send 'text messages' - short phone-to-phone messages - so you don't have to make a full call.

      I could go on and on... I quite like my mobile phone.

      Michael

      *you can buy the phone in a shop, and get it activated without giving an address

      --
      "Goodness me, how unlike the FBI to abuse the trust of the American public." -- The Onion
  32. Wonderful. by DwarfGoanna · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I can't stand cell phones, I don't need or want one, and I don't plan on getting one now. Maybe I have become truly die hard cynical, but this smacks of another case where I am being herded into buying something I don't need, because the public (read free or optional) alternative was taken away from me. I am so moving to Canada or Australia.

    --

    "You know why you do not see me styling wit my homies? Because I have no homies!!" -Mojo Jojo

    1. Re:Wonderful. by recursiv · · Score: 2

      You're not being herded anywhere. If you don't need a cellphone, as you say, you're all set. Having payphones available is not a right. It came into being because it made economical sense. There were enough people willing to pay for calls to make payphones feasible. They're not written into the constitution. They were just a convenience. Now there aren't enough people willing to pay for them. Why should they want to? Cell phones are more convenient, cheaper over the long run, and ladies tell me the vibrate feature really comes in handy. (I just made the last one up... ladies don't talk to me)

      Anyway, quit your whining.

      --
      I used to bulls-eye womp-rats in my pants
    2. Re:Wonderful. by op00to · · Score: 2
      Cell phones are more convenient, cheaper over the long run


      How is a Cell phone cheaper? Your standard cell phone costs perhaps $200. Then, the cheapest service is $30/month. Yes, there's pay as you go, but that's pushing 50 cents a minute in the US. If you're just recieving a call at a payphone, it costs $0.00. If you're dialing, most pay phones are 50 cents unlimited. Let's say you really need to make on the average two calls a day. Over a year, the cell phone costs $560. 365 calls with the pay phone, only $182.50. How are they cheaper over the long run? 2 years? $920 vs $365. 10 years? $5600 vs $1825. Hey, even if you take out the cost of the cell hpone, it's still not cheaper. And what's so convienent about either having to go to a store to fill up your pre-paid cell phone, or having to sign some awful contract before you even know the cell phone will work for you?
    3. Re:Wonderful. by palo0019 · · Score: 2

      First of all, it's not practical and frequently not possible to receive phone calls at a payphone. What do you do, arrange the call beforehand? And how do you do that, by calling them on the payphone?

      If it's 50c per call for a payphone, how do you figure it's $182 a year? You said 2 calls a day, you're not actually assuming one of those calls are received are you? Also, all the payphones around here are limited to 3 minutes.

      Almost all of your numbers are totally made-up. Unless you're getting some snooty picture phone shit your phone will be highly discounted with your service. I paid $60 with my pre-pay cellphone.

      So, let's assume 3 minutes a day. $365 a year with a payphone. I'm most familliar with my pre-pay, so lets do that. That's .25 per minute for the first 10 minutes of a day, .10 after (which is irrelevant in this case). I also get a $10 credit if I use more than $50 a month. At 6 minutes it'll be about $45 a month, but we'll assume I make sure I reach $50 for more important calls, which will reduce it to $40. So that's roughly $480 a year.

      Is the extra $115 worth it for not having to wander the streets for a phone? I think so. It also costs .10 to send a text message, and it's free to receive. Using that alone I could drastically cut my cost between others with cellphones. And keep in mind that pre-pay isn't usually as good for frequent users (which I'm not), a service plan could save you more money.

      And yeah I realize my numbers are just as bullshit as yours are.

  33. Slashdotted and mods... by Xipe66 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Maybe it's time for a new topic for mods to vote on "How appropriate, in the slashdot tradition, do you think this article/news item is?" Meaningless and/or uninteressting stuff are more and more frequent on the slashdot frontpage (or maybe I should change my profile to display less entries?).

    --
    Civilization is the process of setting man free from men.
  34. wtf?! by countzer0interrupt · · Score: 2, Funny

    Many pay phones, ... are now used so infrequently that they cost money to operate.


    You mean I've been putting my money into them for all this time for nothing?!

    Seriously though, perhaps if phone companies want to perpetuate the phone booth they should do more stuff like this.

    Sure, it can't be that good for profit, but it's bound to increase the popularity. But if you want to increase profit, there was a scheme a few years back where people listened to an advertisement at the start of a call to increase telco revenue. I've never seen (or heard) this done. Why not?
  35. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by TheTomcat · · Score: 2

    Hmm. I've never seen a payphone equipped automobile. Is that part of GM's On* offering?

  36. Re:land: own or right? by geek · · Score: 3, Insightful

    In high school i worked at a Mail Boxes etc on a street corner in downtown Fremont CA. My boss used to complain about the pay phone in front of the store because the kids coming home from school hung around next to it for hours everyday to the disturbance of everyone around. We talked about it once and the gist of it was that the phone companies come to small businesses like liquor stores and offer a set amount of cash over a period of time to lease the store front spot for the phone. You sign a binding contract, usually 10 years, sometimes more. You can not back out of the contract no matter how badly you want it gone.

    So no they dont own the land, it's leased. At least here in CA that seems to be the case.

  37. They shouldn't have raised the cost to $.35 by Mustang+Matt · · Score: 2

    I'm still a little bitter that I can't pop in a quarter and call when I need to.
    Honestly the only time I really ever used payphones was from high school to call mom to pick me up after sporting events.

    --
    The man who trades freedom for security does not deserve nor will he ever receive either. - Benjamin Franklin
  38. Sorry -- your living in the 80's by Codex+The+Sloth · · Score: 3, Informative

    1. Terrorists and other street criminals don't use public telephones -- mostly they don't work, it's inconvenient and there's no privacy.

    2. Criminals use stolen cell phones to make their calls and throw them away every couple of days.

    --
    I am not a number! I am a man! And don't you ... oh wait, I'm #93427. Ha ha! In your face #93428!
  39. PayPhones are good by ackthpt · · Score: 3, Interesting
    If, like me, you don't have a cell phone, payphones are a good thing.

    Payphones have all but disappeared around London, since so few calls are made on them and almost everyone has a cell phone. This trend started years ago. When I was last in London cellphones even worked down in the Tube.

    One thing disappearing payphones would mean: One more parking place available at finer gas stations and 7-11's everywhere.

    --

    A feeling of having made the same mistake before: Deja Foobar
    1. Re:PayPhones are good by stephanruby · · Score: 2
      If, like me, you don't have a cell phone, payphones are a good thing.

      Modernize. Get a cell phone. Even if you hardly use it, cell phone service in the UK is much cheaper and much more reliable than in the US and last I checked cell phones in the UK are much more reliable than those damn BT broken down pay phones.

    2. Re:PayPhones are good by Zulfiya · · Score: 2

      Payphones are a bit rarer now.

      I do have a cell phone and I've occasionally wound up letting other commuters use mine. The people who ask nicely usually offer a dollar or so to offset the cost of the call, and since I am standing right there are unlikely to be calling Zimbabwe or anything.

      I occasionally wonder if I am a pushover, or if anyone else ever actually says yes when a stranger asks to borrow their phone.

      --
      -- I'm not evil, I'm ... differently motivated!
    3. Re:PayPhones are good by walkern · · Score: 2, Informative

      Payphones in the UK are required to be operated by BT, the ex-government-owned telecomms monopoly. This is part of their legacy as a former nationalised entity. I remember reading something a while ago about how BT are stuck with the whole payphone business regardless of the cost. I for one have not noticed any fewer payphones in London, except perhaps for ones that AREN'T vandalised.

      As for cellphones working on the London Underground - they work on the underground lines that are actually above ground - but I can guarantee that they don't work in any of the tunnels! The number of times I have been bored waiting for a tube and wanted to text message someone is testament to this!

      One of the mobile networks - formerly One to One, and now part of the TMobile name - was looking into supplying a cellphone service on the underground. I'm not sure where that project went. This is a license to print money - there are millions of people every day on the underground and while they are down there they can't spend money on their phones. That said, if they start letting cellphones ring on the underground, I can't imagine the statistics for Tube passenger violence will get any better :/

  40. NO Service Plan Required for Cellular 911 Calls by Ron+Bennett · · Score: 2

    Most ANY cellular phone that's properly charged and within range of a compatible tower may be used to call 911...NO service plan of any kind is required...none!

    There are even various organizations that collect old cell phones and distribute them for emergency 911 use.

    In fact it's against the law for a carrier to knowingly block any 911 cellular call regardless of the tower(s) (assuming it's compatible with the phone being used) it's routed through nor the phone its dialed from.

    Bottom line is that absolutely NO service plan of any kind is necessary for 911 access and thus the "we need to save pay phones for 911 use" is a mute argument...now in regards to Clark Kent/Superman...not sure what he'll do now :;

    1. Re:NO Service Plan Required for Cellular 911 Calls by buss_error · · Score: 2
      "we need to save pay phones for 911 use" is a mute argument"

      Hate to nit pick, but this one really grates on my nerves. The word you want here is moot, not mute. Mute means unable to speek, moot means without significance. My wife does this and it drives me stright up the wall.

      --
      Necessity is the plea for every infringement of human freedom. It is the argument of tyrants; it is the creed of slaves.
  41. mailboxes are disappearing too by phr1 · · Score: 4, Interesting

    San Jose Mercury story: hundreds of mailboxes removed from San Francisco bay area, due to low usage, garbage thrown in mailboxes, fear of more anthrax attacks, etc. etc. I can't help worrying about all anonymous means of communication shutting down.

    1. Re:mailboxes are disappearing too by bmetzler · · Score: 2, Troll
      I can't help worrying about all anonymous means of communication shutting down.

      I can't wait until *all* anonymous means of communication is shut down. What is the usefulness of anonymous communication? I can't see any. Only a way for troublemakers to cause trouble.

      -Brent
    2. Re:mailboxes are disappearing too by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      What is the usefulness of anonymous communication? I can't see any. Only a way for troublemakers to cause trouble.

      I'm quite sure that Hitler or Stalin, or the American British circa the 1770's would have agreed with you; it would be so much easier to crack down on dissidents that way. I guess you'd like to do away with anonymous voting, too; if 'troublemakers' need to have their every word scrutinized, why should their votes escape scrutiny?

  42. Re:Superman by Lord+Bitman · · Score: 2

    That's really what was missing from that show "Lois and Clark".
    Not ONCE In a phone booth!

    I mean they went at it on the ceiling, in outer space, on clouds above the city, but not ONCE In a phone booth!

    --
    -- 'The' Lord and Master Bitman On High, Master Of All
  43. not to worry... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Many municipalities require that telcos provide payphones within the region they serve as an understood cost of having control of the local area. NYC is a good example of this; Verizon is required to provide a certain number of payphones within a certain area, etc.

    Additionally, the cost is offset greatly by the advertising revenue generated by payphones. The REAL issue isn't the telcos killing off Payphones, but putting up booths with no phones IN them for months at a time. Verizon got nailed for doing this in an NYT articlea while back.

    Either the WP post is totally off base, or other municipalities andthe baby bells that serve them are friggin' morons.

    -rt

  44. It's bad when they remove the needed phones by ashitaka · · Score: 2

    Like this one.

    --
    If you don't want to repeat the past, stop living in it.
  45. soooo sad... by the_real_tigga · · Score: 2

    Does anyone here remenber Antitrack?
    And probably even his misery resulting from old-scool (but nonetheless impressive) phone phreaking?

    as for me, I bow for you, antitrack.

    --
    my .sig is better than yours.
  46. How about trashing cellphones? by MacAndrew · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?

    How about junking hundreds of thousands or millions of cellphones. Plus the batteries each unit may go through in a lifetime. There's no way those things last as long as a nice clunky pay phone. I know we have a couple of dead ones around here somewhere, and a lot of people upgrade simply for fashion or features.

    Yes, people are looking into recycling the phones. It's difficult because the materials are so heterogeneous, and though a few like tantalum are quite valuable, the labor to break up the phones can outweigh that. A nicer idea -- hand-me-downs to less wealthy developing countries, for sale or parts. Cellular phones have a disproportionate value in countries that never got the telephone line infrastructure in the first place.

  47. But then how do I jack out of the Matrix? by Tri0de · · Score: 2

    Can't get out of the Matrix with a cell phone, it has to be a land line or Tank can't get me out of here!

    --
    "Everyone is entitled to their own opinion, but not their own facts."
  48. I Wonder Why Pay Phones Don't Make Any Money. by Effugas · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Pay phones would make more money if they, like, accepted lots of it, in large denominations, when being begged to.

    Oh, do I have a rant for y'all.

    ===

    Gather 'round the pixels, folks, and let a still green traveller relate a story from the olden days...

    End of September, actually. Toorcon -- I flew out to San Diego to join Hikari's bad ass hackfest. Was so excited that I'd actually gotten my degree three days previous (not -- but that's another story entirely) that I didn't even think to check *where* in San Diego I was going.

    Lesson #1: For f*ck's sake, know where you're going after the airport.

    Figured I'd just check the net when I got there. *laughs*

    Lesson #2: For f*ck's sake, KNOW you'll never get a net connection when you really, really need one. (Reference: "The Inverse Square Law vs. The Presence of Microsoft Powerpoint: May The Enemy Never Discover The Network Cloaking Power of Talking To People When Powerpoint Is On")

    So. Rumor has it San Diego's Airport got a new water fountain once...it's talked about in hushed whispers, the emergency budget excess of 1983 brought a quenched thirst upon every traveler since. According to legend, other plumbing amenities relating to the invention of running water shall someday visit themselves upon this fine structure.

    No friendly arrows, no Internet Cafe's -- and though the Starbucks served coffee, it came in Disass only. There wasn't even a poorly secured baggage handling network waiting to provide me with my next stop (not that I'd ever poke around an airport network; for God sakes lad, they have guns! And Latex Gloves! I plead Joey's Soverignty!)

    So what could I do? Went to call my apartment.

    On a Pay Phone.

    Lesson #3: For f*ck's sake, buy a cell phone. Seven Eleven has them. They're FREE(after many rebates you'll never recieve). There's a REASON they're so profitable -- because PAY PHONES NOW SUCK.

    Proof:

    You want proof? My previous ranting is insufficient to show that I indeed know large scale suckitude when I recognize it in my cold, not quite dead flesh?

    Got some overpriced food. Requested change in quarters -- I was off to the telephone to get fully ripped off, but there's a LOT of hotels in SD and I didn't much prefer to check each one.

    "Bzzzzzz. I'm sorry, this phone doesn't accept coins for long distance calls."

    Lesson #4: Remember how you heard that pay phones weren't making money? They mispelled "taking".

    After bitching and moaning, I remembered I could charge my card to my credit card. Yes! Maybe my legal tender, unconstitutional to refuse (but we'll ignore that) couldn't get me moving, but surely the mighty power of Visa -- it's everywhere I want to be, and I want to be in a nice bed, and in that bed...er, anyway.

    "Thank you for calling 1-800-CALL-ATT. For a credit card call, press this number or we'll sic Carrot Top on you."

    "Thank you for selecting a credit card call. If you have a Mastercard, press 1. If you have an American Express, press 2. If you have a Discover Card, press 3. If you have a Visa, get a very strange look on your face."

    "Thank you for getting a very strange look on your face. An operator will be with you shortly to further refuse payment for services."

    You have to understand. I just graduated, I've got a LONG trip ahead of me -- this is right before the Singapore trip -- of all the problems I imagined possible, not having enough to pay for a single phone call was rather disconcerting.

    I briefly considered my options for having myself placed under arrest. I hear those guys get a phone call. But then I realized their call is on a pay phone too. Oops.

    Ended up calling my mother's company on their 800 number, tail between my legs, begging for info off a single web page. You'd THINK it ends here...

    'cept the person I reach, despite the net connection on her desk, doesn't particularly know what to do with it. So she calls her husband. To access the net. For me.

    Ever browsed the web through a listener that doesn't know what she's hearing but has to translate it into something she's saying? You Will, and the company that will bring it to you...

    Anyway, no reason to rant further -- it was one heck of a trip, an absolute blast -- but indeed, no matter what country I ended up in, the pay phones were as spastic as an epiliptic monkey with a broken pacemaker.

    I did like the 90 second pay phones, that took 75 seconds to establish a call. talkfastdoesn'tevenbegintocoverit

    Needless to say, I am now vastly more knowledgable about that which is GSM.

    --Dan

    1. Re:I Wonder Why Pay Phones Don't Make Any Money. by GMFTatsujin · · Score: 2

      Yet another fine example of why the world so desperatly needs a website like GodFuckingDamnit.com.

    2. Re:I Wonder Why Pay Phones Don't Make Any Money. by YrWrstNtmr · · Score: 2

      Lesson #1: For f*ck's sake, know where you're going after the airport.
      Figured I'd just check the net when I got there. *laughs*


      Lessons learned:
      Buy a friggin' map.

  49. Sometimes, they can't be removed. by Pig+Hogger · · Score: 2

    Recently, the authorities forced Bell Canada to keep one lone payphone located in an isolated village, so to insure that someone stranded there could call for help. Doubtlessly, one will see this scenario repeat itself more and more.

  50. So much BS, so little time. by Crag · · Score: 5, Insightful
    • People were irritating in theaters before they had cell phones. There have been people talking, having big hats, having big hair, being fat, having crying children, having body odor and everything else ever since we've gathered in groups to enjoy things together.
    • People have been bad drivers since long before cell phones existed. Don't blame the phone for the driver's irresponsibility. People shave, put on lipstick, argue with their children, get drunk, you name it. Cell phones are not the problem.
    • There is no conclusive link between cellphones and brain cancer. The wall-powered microwave ovens people use everywhere have far greater capacity to do real damage to people than the battery-powered 7-days-without-a-charge cell phones. We actually know what microwaves do to flesh. We do it to food and water all the time. There hasn't been a problem with microwave ovens, much less cellphones.
    • Sometimes one finds change in the couch. One rarely finds change in one's significant other. The comparison is meaningless.
    • Emergency calls on a cell phone are always free. If it's not an emergency, why are you calling collect? Are you just cheap? Or are you making an emergency out of something that could really wait?
    • Cell phones aren't actually obsolete in a year just because etc. Some people are sheep who will buy anything with a bigger number or cuter design. I've had my phone for two years, and I would have had my previous phone for five if I hadn't given it to a friend as a present. Computers are 'obsolete in a year' just as much as cell phones, but I bet you would rather have a two-year old computer than your very own payphone. Again the comparison is meaningless.
    • Yes, payphones ARE the safest option if you're up to no good. So what?
    • What's convienient about getting calls at payphones? Standing around waiting? The lack of privacy?
    • There are cell phones which can be had with no long-term commitment or credit check. They're not cheap, but they exist.
    • Cell phones don't have to come on vacations either. If you think they do, you need better friends. I like having a cell phone wherever I go for convienience, but it's a choice I make, not an obligation.
    • Yes, when the payphone doesn't work, you walk/bus/hitchike/taxi to the next one. YAY.
    • My cellphone has excellent reception. It's better than a lot of people's home land lines. If you've had bad experiences, it's probably because you or your friends are cheap, as mentioned above.

    I could go on and on too. I swear I could strangle the jackasses who confuse the tools people use with the stupid things they do with the tools. I could also strangle the jackasses who have cellphone envy and try to mask it as some kind of superiority.

    I work hard to make sure I have the resources to live the kind of life I want to live. I want the ability to stay in touch with people I go shopping with so we don't have to agree to meet at the food court. If my girlfriend is in a car accident again, I want her to be able to reach me as soon as possible. If there's an earthquake and I'm trapped in a building, I want to be able to call for help and tell them I'm alive but bleeding and running out of air. If I'm on an airplane and hostages take over with box cutters, I want to say goodbye to my girlfriend before the plane runs into a building.

    I'm tired of anti-cellphone BS. There are no legitimate complaints against the phones themselves, and the complaints about the users have nothing to do with the phones.

    Grow up, people.

    1. Re:So much BS, so little time. by iiioxx · · Score: 5, Funny

      People were irritating in theaters before they had cell phones. There have been people talking, having big hats, having big hair, being fat, having crying children, having body odor and everything else ever since we've gathered in groups to enjoy things together.

      I agree. It's not that the cellphones themselves are bad, they are just one more tool for people who tend to be rude and inconsiderate (the same type of people who talk, wear big hats, and don't bathe). Blaming the technology for the way it is used is total bullshit.

      I often carry my cell phone in movies and restaurants, but I put the ringer on vibrate. If it rings, you have to be right next to me to even hear it buzz. I check the caller ID, and if it's someone I absolutely need to speak with I answer it, and quietly tell them to hold while I step out of the theatre. If not, I let it go to voicemail and check it after the show.

      Are there a lot of phones that don't have vibrate? Or just a lot of people who don't care about irritating the people around them? I think it's less an issue of invasive technology, and more an issue of a culture of self-obsession.

      Case in point:

      I was in a theatre this past weekend. Outside the auditorium there was a bigass sign that said "Cellphone Free Zone". During the trailers, there was an announcement to turn off your cellphone. But sure enough, halfway through the movie, a cellphone rang in the row behind me, and the woman not only answered it, but sat there and carried on a conversation. No doubt, the woman felt she was above any petty social convention, and she was too important for the "rules" to apply to her.

      At this point, I lost my patience and decided to teach her a lesson about social convention. I stood up, turned around, and announced loudly, "turn off your phone or I will whip out my dick and piss on you!" I think she thought I was kidding until I reached for my fly. Then she told the caller "gotta go" and just hung up. I said, "thank you for your cooperation," sat back down, and tried hard not to ruin the moment by laughing my ass off...

    2. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Patik · · Score: 2, Troll
      If I'm on an airplane and hostages take over with box cutters...
      In Soviet Russia, the hostages hold you!
    3. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Bartmoss · · Score: 2

      100% agree. Especially about the cinema thing - I have never in the past two years had anybody had their phone ring when I saw a movie. I have however had a bucnh of teenagers yell because they were brainless.

    4. Re:So much BS, so little time. by MillionthMonkey · · Score: 2

      There is no conclusive link between cellphones and brain cancer.

      Actually I never said there was. Maybe I didn't make that clear. All I said was that with payphones, it was obvious to everybody that this is not something to worry about at all. So we didn't even have to suffer any debate about it.

      Cell phones aren't actually obsolete in a year just because etc. Some people are sheep who will buy anything with a bigger number or cuter design.

      I've also had my phone for a long time (since 1999) and it still works fine. Although people with smaller phones make fun of it because it's as big as my fist. Most people I know personally go through one every year.

      Yes, payphones ARE the safest option if you're up to no good. So what?

      This is actually a variant of: "If you're not doing anything wrong then you have nothing to worry about". Were you asleep when they passed the PATRIOT Act? Do you know what a pen register is? Once payphones are gone, you can't make anonymous phone calls anymore. They're always traceable back to you. From a privacy perspective the disappearance of the payphone is a nontrivial issue.

      There are cell phones which can be had with no long-term commitment or credit check. They're not cheap, but they exist.

      Payphones still win in this regard. All you need is a couple quarters.

      Cell phones don't have to come on vacations either. If you think they do, you need better friends. I like having a cell phone wherever I go for convienience, but it's a choice I make, not an obligation.

      It isn't just friends. Many employers will implicitly assume that you're reachable 24/7 if they see you have a cellphone. A lot of people resent their cellphones because they don't like being imposed upon. Some people even take lack of cellphone coverage into account when passive-aggressively planning their vacations. This isn't a problem for me because I make it clear that mine is for emergencies and I don't give out the number. (In fact I tend to forget the number.)

      My cellphone has excellent reception. It's better than a lot of people's home land lines. If you've had bad experiences, it's probably because you or your friends are cheap, as mentioned above.

      Yes, I see- you've got it all figured out. Poor service is the customer's fault.

      I could go on and on too. I swear I could strangle the jackasses who confuse the tools people use with the stupid things they do with the tools. I could also strangle the jackasses who have cellphone envy and try to mask it as some kind of superiority.

      Man, what a killjoy you are! The post was facetious. People like to hate cellphones because so many varieties of bad habits tend to crystallize around them. As far as envy- I reserve that for people who have houses. Cellphones... nah, I don't envy cellphones.

      I'm tired of anti-cellphone BS. There are no legitimate complaints against the phones themselves, and the complaints about the users have nothing to do with the phones.

      Oh quit pretending the devices are perfect. Boneheaded users aside, there are legitimate complaints against the phones themselves. From the cell phone owner's own perspective there are drawbacks associated with cell phones: spotty coverage, poor service, and lack of anonymity. None of these are issues with payphones.

    5. Re:So much BS, so little time. by gad_zuki! · · Score: 2

      >I could go on and on too. I swear I could strangle the jackasses who confuse the tools people use with the stupid things they do with the tools.

      The tool isn't completely safe from criticism just because a person is using it. If the tool lends itself to certain behavior then the manfucaturer is liable also - to a certain degree. Think Microsoft's security. Think easy to swallow kid's toys.

      Why don't cell phones have functions that would fix all these little social problems? It would be trivial to install a signal that theaters and other venues that don't want to deal with ringers could send to set ALL phones in the area to vibrate.

      Or detect the doppler shift so the person can set their phone to "don't ring when I'm driving."

      Report cell phone tower to parents who give their kids cell phones in case they want to see where they're at?

      Oh course it would only be fair for the owner of the cell phone to disable these features, but the industry sure isn't helping. You can put your head in the sand and pretend this purely a social problem, but its really a technological problem mixed with a social problem.

      Simply put, the tools should be a lot better considering typical human behavior.

    6. Re:So much BS, so little time. by schwanerhill · · Score: 2

      >Are there a lot of phones that don't have vibrate?

      Yes. Including mine. I've looked into getting one, but you have to buy a vibrating battery for $35-40. Not terribly expensive, but I'd rather save the money and silence my phone in the theater. Also, for my phone, you can only get a Ni-MH vibrating batter (not Li-ion).

      Some people don't seem to realize that missing a call is not the end of the world--that's why we have caller ID logs and voicemail.

    7. Re:So much BS, so little time. by Halloween+Jack · · Score: 2
      You make some good points, but like the person that you're responding to, you go over the top in a couple of places.


      People have been bad drivers since long before cell phones existed. Don't blame the phone for the driver's irresponsibility. People shave, put on lipstick, argue with their children, get drunk, you name it. Cell phones are not the problem.



      Ah, the "guns don't kill people" argument. Before cell phones became widespread, you just didn't have the sheer number of people who felt that they had an excuse not to pay attention to their driving. I'm not talking about accidents, even; I'm just talking about people who slow the flow of traffic down because they're yakking and ignoring the line of cars building up behind them. I have yet to see someone do this because they're grooming or yelling at the kids, and drunks usually have the opposite problem. Unless their vehicle has a flashing red or blue light on top, drivers don't need to be on the horn to anyone. If the call is that important, they can pull over to the side of the road.



      My cellphone has excellent reception. It's better than a lot of people's home land lines. If you've had bad experiences, it's probably because you or your friends are cheap, as mentioned above.


      That has more to do with where you happen to be at the moment. My cell phone reception was great when I lived on the fourth floor of an apartment building with a direct line of sight to a cell tower, not so good when I moved to a basement apartment. This was with an expensive phone and a provider with excellent coverage.


      Relax. No one's going to take your cell phone away because a few people forget to switch their phone off when they go to the opera. But, if you think that certain technologies don't lend themselves to abuse, you're only fooling yourself.

      --
      I looked into the abyss, and the abyss looked into me--and we both winked.
    8. Re:So much BS, so little time. by iiioxx · · Score: 2

      OK... Does anyone believe this actually happened?

      Well I do, since I was there at the time. And my wife does, since she was there also and tried to crawl under her seat after I did it. Of course, it's only my word. I don't have videotape of the event or a police report or anything. So feel free to believe it or not. If you knew me, you wouldn't have a hard time believing it at all. I have a "history"...

      It isn't particularly clever, at any rate.

      Sorry, I didn't have a lot of time when it happened to come up with something truly creative. My thought process was something like, "you're pissing on me by using your cellphone in a movie, so I'll piss on you..."

      I'm sure you would have come up with something far more creative on a moment's notice. Or maybe you would have just sat there and taken it, because you couldn't say something to the offender anonymously.

      Why do people need to make up cockamamie stories about public heroics? The guy sat there and suffered through the phone call, later fantasized about what he wish had happened, then decided to tell people it did to make him feel better. How pathetic.

      I don't know, why do people need to anonymously refute other people's stories in order to feel good about themselves?

      I think the real issue here is that this sort of thing has happened to you, and YOU just sat there an did nothing. Later on, you wished you had said something bold or witty. Now you feel like less of a man because I actually had the balls to say something and you didn't. So in order to regain your self-esteen you have to believe that my story is a fabrication, and that everyone else is a meek little mouse just like you.

      Sorry to disappoint you.

    9. Re:So much BS, so little time. by iiioxx · · Score: 2

      I like it. The cup could whip out his straw and hold it suggestively...

    10. Re:So much BS, so little time. by mgblst · · Score: 2

      People were irritating in theaters before they had cell phones. There have been people talking, having big hats, having big hair, being fat, having crying children, having body odor and everything else ever since we've gathered in groups to enjoy things together.

      Great point... wonderful. And people killed other people before the widespread ownership of guns, but almost 12,000 deaths a year it was not. I suppose it is just a matter of degree.

    11. Re:So much BS, so little time. by mgblst · · Score: 2

      If she is sitting next to you, why don't you just grab her phone, and throw it. Seems like a much better solution, and one she is more likely to remember than some crude threat(which I thought was funny.)

    12. Re:So much BS, so little time. by iiioxx · · Score: 2

      If she is sitting next to you, why don't you just grab her phone, and throw it. Seems like a much better solution, and one she is more likely to remember than some crude threat(which I thought was funny.)

      Because once you make physical contact with a person, you enter into a whole new arena of legality. If I had reached out and grabbed her cellphone, then chucked it across the theatre, I could find myself facing a slew of criminal charges (assault, theft, and destruction of private property to name a few). Besides, why resort to violence? Public embarrassment worked just fine in that case.

  51. Phone Phun by The+Tyro · · Score: 2

    I remember some of the monkey-wrenching articles you could find back in the BBS days.

    There was one in particular I remember called "Phone Phun", written by an individual named "Mr. Death" who lived in NYC. The article gave ruthless and detailed instructions on all kinds of things to do with pay phones... ripping them off, blowing them up, etc.

    It was an amusing read, despite the incredibly antisocial behavior it espoused. Still... I sometimes wonder what cellblock "Mr Death" might be inhabiting today.

    Heh... It's a wonder any of us survive to adulthood.

    --
    Even if a man chops off your hand with a sword, you still have two nice, sharp bones to stick in his eyes.
  52. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by hitzroth · · Score: 2

    Just because a cat has four legs doesn't mean that all four-legged animals are cats.

    The environmental hazard assoicated with payphone removal is that which results from the disposal of the payphones. The prolific use of cell phones are what's causing the revenue drought for the payphone companies. Decreased revenue equalls decreased reason to keep the phones in service. Thus some of the payphones are taken out of service.

    To reiterate: People will not be obliged to use cell phones instead of the now non-existent payphones. They already are using the cell phones. That's why the companies are digging up the payphones.

    --
    In mathematics, one does not understand things, one merely gets used to them.
    --VonNeumann
  53. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by kevcol · · Score: 2

    Does that mean you wouldnt have use for these fine products? ;-)

    Based on your statement, is it fair to assume you have a sign like on a Greyhound bus that says not to talk to the driver while the vehicle is in motion? ;-) Hehehe..

    Seriously though, of course, paying attention to anything in addition to your driving when you are moving is hazardous. But you know that occasionally, you *will* have something else you are giving some attention to- talking to passenger, turning off Rush Limbaugh, scratching itchy balls, swatting an errant bee, whatever. You can't always have 100% attention to your driving no matter how much you try. I think laws trying to totally ban cell phone use in a car are way overboard. Ban CB and 2-way radios in cars then. "Must cleanse ourselves- save us from ourselves!"

  54. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by I+Am+The+Owl · · Score: 2
    Oh, fuck off. I own a cell phone and know damn well that I'd better use it while I'm not driving. All the major assholes on the road, the kind who cut you off, tailgate, or start moving just as a green light is about to go back to red, are all distracted and out there in lala land with a fucking cellphone pressed against their ear.

    People who smoke damn well better not do so in my presence, because I value my health. And people who feel compelled to chat with their significant other on their cellphones at any given time can stay the fuck off the road when I'm trying to get from point A to point B.

    --

    --sdem
  55. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by ceejayoz · · Score: 2

    Actually, there's a third type: the people like you who will loudly defend their right to use a cell phone wherever and whenever - in a theater, in their car, etc.

    Some people can multitask safely with a phone and a car. Many others can't. I, for one, get quite annoyed when someone sits in a green light, not moving, 'cause they're yakking on their phone.

  56. It is all about total cost of ownership. by AnonymousCowheard · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Let us face the facts...the Line-driven phone system is surprisingly obsolete.

    In Poland, and many other countries I don't remember, the Phone system consists of a cellular network! Many people disagree with cellular systems, out of fear of medical influences; that is reasonable. Yet ther is no other ethical wireless alternative to microwave other than what? Pick somthing that doesn't need to be ran through a medium; fiber optice need not apply, infrared could imply somthing good, wire is back to stage1. The total cost of ownership of modern phone booths on an out-dated phone system is the problem. They take too much space, too much maintenance, and are generally not reliable in all situations of elemental emergency (vehicles that smash into them, storms, vandelism,etc). What they need is a more ethical data-networked system. Future phone booths may as well be a service provided by a local internet cafe, that is the technology I think will reserect the layed-off .com people back into a profitable battle. A phone booth today gives me no reason to visit it...unless I can download the latest linux kernel in less than 100 seconds for $1.00. With such a more efficient data network, membership would be based on unlimited use, bandwidth/quality that you desire, congestion status of the network, and/or a random non-member use that is payable at the node (aka receptacle/phone).

    Total cost of ownership of computer hardware is much lower than qualified line installers running around an area creating ground loops and phucking with a phreaking system of accousticly line-driven phones. Can you imagine, maybe membership of your internet service provider could provide access to such a future communication booth. That is worth the clustered effort for such as wireless system!

    --

    But I'm sure you already Gnu that.
  57. BEEPBEEPBEEP by Cyno01 · · Score: 2

    Payfones arent quite dead yet, i have a cell fone, but i still carry around a keychain recorder with red-box tones on it. A free fone call is cheaper than my pre-payed cellular. ^_^

    --
    "Sic Semper Tyrannosaurus Rex."
  58. Why would they be junked? by ONOIML8 · · Score: 2

    I realize that it's all the rage to worry about the environment everytime someone sneezes. But......

    Why would these things be a threat. I thought the would contain all sorts of valuable metal that would be recycled. I guess my thought was that would make sense for financial reasons (recover some $$$) if not for feel good enviro whacko reasons.

    Am I missing something here?

    .

    --
    . Quit playing Monopoly with Bill. Switch to one of many non-Microsoft products today.
  59. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by ramzak2k · · Score: 2, Insightful

    i disagree. When you have the occupants sitting inside the car its easier for both of you to adjust your conversation level depending on how tight the traffic is or how much of attention level is required. It would be difficult to expect the person on the other end of the phone to have similar understanding.

    Besides that the difference between using a headset and talking to someone beside you is same as that between listening to your favourite song using a headphone and listening to it on a stereo. Which of the two do you think has a easier chance of having you preoccupied ?

    --

    Siggy Say, Siggy Do
  60. Environmental Hazzard?? by Tuxinatorium · · Score: 2

    "I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?"

    That's a truly stupid question, because all those payphones would hardly be a drop in the bucket compared to everything else in terms of the environment.

  61. Pardon me if I'm inexcusably ignorant. by MulluskO · · Score: 2
    That is true for the two pay phones at the gazebo-style bus stop at Potomac Place Shopping Center. Those still ring in $120 to $130 every several weeks, mostly because that is the route the hired help take on the way to their clients' palatial houses nearby.


    Is the hired a thinly veiled euphemism for prostitutes?

    That's a choice demographic for payphone operators, I guess.
    --

    Too busy staying alive... ~ R.A.
  62. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by lazlo · · Score: 2, Interesting

    There is another big difference between talking to a passenger and talking to someone on the phone. If I'm talking to a passenger, there is some chance that they will cause me to look at them, to make eye contact. My wife often complains that I don't look at her when I talk to her enough, but even once while driving is too many times.

    I also have often wondered about how the laws about cellphones are written such that they cover cell phones but not cb's. And for some reason it really bothers me that there is almost certainly an explicit or implicit exclusion for police.

    But, in a vain effort to swerve this post from its current tangent back towards on-topicness, the one thing that seems to bother me the most about the disappearance of payphones is that they're often very usefull in emergencies. Not everyone has a cellphone, and there are often circumstances which render them useless (bad signal reception, low battery, etc...) It's nice to have a hardline here and there where 911 can be dialed with ease, if you happen to see an accident or a fire, or a lynch mob, or perhaps if you're experiencing a heart attack or just went into labor. Granted, these are not common occurences, and the telco's certainly shouldn't be forced to maintain costly infrastructure at a loss, but at the same time that payphones are being pulled down, local and state governments are erecting emergency call boxes. Would it be all that hard to have the government agencies that are erecting the call boxes just use that money to pay the telco's to maintain their payphones? It seems like there should be a middle ground here....

    --
    Pound! Bang! Bin! Bash! is this a shell script or a Batman comic?
  63. THERMITE! by cswiii · · Score: 2

    Oh c'mon, is the Slashdot crowd so young that it doesn't know the Jolly Roger or Anarchist cookbooks? The more "well read" of us all know what thermite is said to be capable of, regarding payphones... plenty of good use, there!;)

  64. Discarded batteries harmful? by pclminion · · Score: 2

    If you work on some sort of project requiring a power source, you could use your old phone and battery as a power source. The phone becomes a very fancy charger. The cell battery itself is pretty nifty, and it's basically free since you were going to throw it out anyway.

  65. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by kevcol · · Score: 2

    Ok, you guys have some good points. I will send the subject back to brain for further tests. :-)

  66. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by zcat_NZ · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Here's my theory;

    When talking to a passenger, the passenger is actually there with you. They know when you're not paying attention because you need to focus elsewhere. When you're on a cellphone the other person will keep talking at times when a passenger would know to stop. They'll ask "are you still there?" when you're trying to concentrate on something else and don't reply to them.

    Handsfree phones don't solve this problem. After a while you learn to just ignore the phone when you need to focus elsewhere; some people never learn; some people have a few accidents in the process.

    --
    455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
  67. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Yo+Grark · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'd agree with this EXCEPT that a person talking to the driver knows when the driver has to concentrate on something coming up and instinctively SHUTS UP.

    Concentrating on Talking while driving actually distracts people from driving well. Bad drivers can often be seen doing all the talking while driving. Basic natural instinct, you cannot devote concentration power to upcoming events (getting cut off and allowing the extra space) and hold a full blown 2 way all out conversation.

    Drivers do their best thinking/working shit out because the mind is alive with activity while driving, just don't ask them to concentrate on a conversation with someone else.

    Think about it the next time you're driving :)

    Yo Grark
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering.

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
  68. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by op00to · · Score: 2

    The main reason why CB's and Ham radio users are exempt from this is mainly because they lobby a lot so their interests are reflected in the legislation. Really. I am a member of the ARRL (National Ham Radio Organization) and they have people in Washington who prevent legislation like the cell phone bans applying to them. Another reason is that most Ham users are involved in one sort of community service utilizing their radio and their vehicle, so it would be pretty detrimental to prevent that. Also, if you ban two way radios, what will the cops do?

  69. Web Auctions, Third World, Recycling by leandrod · · Score: 2
    > I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?

    None. Just auction them online, and whatever is left send to Third World countries. When even them have no use for them, junkyard and recycling. After all, what's bad about iron?

    --
    Leandro Guimarães Faria Corcete DUTRA
    DA, DBA, SysAdmin, Data Modeller
    GNU Project, Debian GNU/Lin
  70. IMO, the cause is obvious... by tlambert · · Score: 2

    IMO, the cause is obvious: most pay phones these days do not permit incoming calls.

    This is to stop drug trafficing. Looks like it's really working... ...about as well as the airport security being raised made it so the armed officers didn't need to come onto American Airlines flight 1731 out of Dallas/Forth Worth last Saturday, and yank people off the plane after it returned to the gate. Yeah, those rights we've given up have really bought us something, haven't they?

    It seems to me that the only thing it has done is make pay phones less useful to legitimate callers (for example, I needed to call someone from a pay phone recently, and talk to them for an extended period, but the inability to give them the payphone number so I could call them, give the number, and be called back, made it impossible).

    -- Terry

  71. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2

    "I own a cell phone and know damn well that I'd better use it while I'm not driving"
    Wow - okay okay, you can use your phone while not driving. Will you use it while you are driving tho?

  72. Payphones would get more use if... by psyconaut · · Score: 2

    ....they made blue boxing work again! Infact, I guarantee payphone use will dramatically rise! ;-)

    -psy

  73. Re:pay phones might get more use if-Disposable Pho by jez9999 · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Because they're the most idiotic idea ever dreampt up. Why buy a NEW phone each time you need more credit when you can keep a higher quality phone, and merely buy credit at the store?? Can you think of the waste caused by 'disposable cellphones'?

  74. Cool thing to do with them anyway ;-) by Vintermann · · Score: 2, Interesting

    What do you do with the huge adress book in your cell phone? I fill it with pay phone numbers. See, sometimes I want to dial a person. Other times I want to dial a place, and the person is not important.
    I have collected about a hundred or so I suppose. Shared them with my friends of course. We sometimes dial them to ask some stranger what the weather is like there, whether the bakery has some nice offers etc. Sometimes we play music at them.

    Responses have been entirely positive (it's not harassement, after all, if you actually take a pay phone that's ringing, you're expecting to be suprised).

    Wardriving sounds fun, and a lot more useful than this, but hey, not everyone can afford a wireless card...

    Want to try? I'll share some of my numbers with you. They're in norway. so it's expensive for most of you, but... just remeber to put 047 in front of them to get out of your own country.

    Some boxes near Bislett stadium in Oslo:
    22565586
    22607202

    Box near (a duious) pub in my hometown. Call it at midnight on a friday for an interesting chat.
    70132334

    A mall in Oslo, Byporten:
    22171821

    Airports are full of bored travelers. Here are some numbers for Gardermoen, Oslo:
    63975924
    63983701
    63982832
    63983706 ...And some more...
    63983703
    63982831 ..and some from the airport in my hometown, Vigra
    70183623
    70183622

    Karl Johan is the main street in Oslo, always a busy place:
    22834080
    22834978
    22835775
    22835777

    A subway station in Oslo, Grønland:
    22174166
    22175106
    22175563
    22175567

    The school where I'm trying to become a software engineer (phone boxes outside the toilets):
    70126928
    70128975

    OK, that's it for now. I can't guarantee no typos, or that some boxes may have been taken down. If someone could post numbers for boxes in their surroundings, I'd be grateful (preferrably in a more relevant/permanent forum than this slashdot thread)

    --
    xkcd is not in the sudoers file. This incident will be reported.
  75. Payphones are an eyesore by Moderation+abuser · · Score: 2

    US payphones, European payphones and UK payphones.

    Good riddance.

    --
    Government of the people, by corporate executives, for corporate profits.
  76. What kind of environmental hazard? by alfaiomega · · Score: 2

    "I wonder what kind of environmental hazard is posed by junking thousands of pay phones?"

    I don't know about other things in pay phones, but I've heard that quite a few kinds of birds can easily choke while eating quarters.

    --

    root@aio:~# nmap -sX -iR -p1- # Ho, ho, ho! Merry Xmas, everyone!

  77. Sux for us non cell phone people by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    I had mine turned off after wanting to be LESS accessable.. No PDA, no PAGER, nothin..

    So if i need a WORKING booth, they are hard to find..

    A lot that are still out there are in dis-repair.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:Sux for us non cell phone people by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2

      So get another cell phone. Tell the phone company to block your phone number from caller ID. Never give out your phone number and tell folks your calling from a pay phone. You could also leave it off when you are not using it to make a call.

      Bada bing

      Bada b00m

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  78. Environmental Hazards? by Maeryk · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I would imagine not nearly the environmental hazard posed by all the cell-phone people who upgrade their phones each time a new plan comes out with a free phone. Pay phones do not, that I know of, have batteries in them, and are fairly recyclable. (Aluminum, or in older cases, cast iron cases, which translate nicely to melting down). The plastics are recyclable as well.

    The fact that large companies (like phone companies or even large corporations) are now being watched closely when disposing of potentially dangerous materials (including computers) means they will probably be stripped, recycled, or waste-reclaimed in China somewhere.

    Not many of these phones would hit landfills as "phones" at any rate, unlike the thousands of Cell Phones that people tend to toss out like household garbage, complete with batteries, etc.

    Maeryk

    --
    Feminine Protection? What is that? A chartreuse flame thrower?
  79. Funny Tidbits by cascadefx · · Score: 2
    While studying Information and Communication Sciences I came across a number of interesting Telecom tidbits in one of the manuals we used for classes.

    The design specs for payphones are histerically funny to read. If I remember correctly, the coin boxes need to be able to withstand repeated blows from a Louisville Slugger baseball bat. Many that are used in "high risk" areas also have the ET function. They "phone home" when jostled too much or when they have been damaged (failing certain diagnostics) and alert the company that they are in need of service.

    My aunt was a switch technician for a while back in the early nineties and the red light district of her town generated a ton of calls for service from "customers." It seems when a payphone was having problems, it affected business and people needed it fixed pronto. They were also some of the most abused phones around. The stuff they would hear during a line test would melt your ears, supposedly.

  80. Where it will all end by FuzzyDaddy · · Score: 2

    This is the logical endpoint.

    --
    It's not wasting time, I'm educating myself.
  81. Cell phones DO impair driving performance by ChrisCampbell47 · · Score: 2
    People have been bad drivers since long before cell phones existed. Don't blame the phone for the driver's irresponsibility. People shave, put on lipstick, argue with their children, get drunk, you name it. Cell phones are not the problem.

    Actually, they are the problem, according to carefully designed scientific* studies:

    http://www.cnn.com/2001/US/08/16/cell.phone.drivin g/index.html

    I see your point, that rude, stupid people wil continue to do rude, stupid things with or without cell phones, but to say that cell phones are not a problem is simply wrong.

    * - Oh, I'm sorry, are you one of those conservatives who circumvents science when it doesn't support your personal opinions and the political process has failed you?

    To quote Jenny Holzer, "the future is stupid".

  82. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2

    Why does this class envy exist when cell phones are cheap enough for even homeless people to afford?

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  83. Money and Intelligence by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2

    Keep in mind that not all people who have money are intelligent. And by this I mean more than just a few.

    There are 5 ways to come into money/wealth.

    1. Earn it by working for it. This includes starting your own business, or inventing something that sells well. Good money management is necessary here.
    2. Inherit it. Nuff said.
    3. Marry into it. Nuff said.
    4. Win it. Either from a lottery or a court settlement.
    5. Steal it or gain it via fraud.

    If there are any other ways please let me know. In my opinion which is in no way professional I would say that the bulk of rich folks are in categories 1, 3 and 5 with intelligence being a big factor in those categories. Number 2 would come in second but requires no intelligence and number 4 would come in last requiring very little intelligence.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:Money and Intelligence by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2

      But if you weren't too smart you could lose the money a lot faster. Hmm, although this is probably a factor of being educated as much as smartness. (I wouldn't have a clue how to properly look after large amounts of money)

    2. Re:Money and Intelligence by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2

      Its not that hard. A sum of money is a sum of money, no matter the size. Put yourself on a budget and you'll be fine. Invest your money in low yield but high safety investments such as real estate, money market funds, fast food franchiszes...etc and it will grow with you.

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    3. Re:Money and Intelligence by Dan+Crash · · Score: 2

      Well, the one way of earning money that's obviously missing from your list is investing, which how most of the rich earn theirs. This is not to say many of them don't work hard, too -- but their salaries pale in comparison to their investments.

      Investing isn't limited to the rich, either. Everyone who buys a house in investing in it. Where I live, most homeowners are earning $20,000 in equity each year, the equivalent of an entry level full time salary.

      I think one of the roots of poverty is that investing isn't really understood very well by poor people. The most valuable thing you have when you graduate high school is your unblemished credit rating -- keep it sterling, and you'll have the ability to get loans down the road when a good investment (like starting your own business, or buying a house) comes your way. Tarnish your credit rating with late payments or destroy it by overborrowing on credit cards, and you'll chain yourself to poverty for years -- maybe the rest of your life. The simple act of buying an expensive sweater you know you can't afford can create an incredible disaster down the road.

      If it were up to me, I'd require some knowledge of real world investing and small business planning to graduate from high school. We'd all be a lot better off if we did.

      --
      He who refuses to do arithmetic is doomed to talk nonsense.
  84. Re:intelligence by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2

    I'd like something more than guessing when you say that there is a correlation :)

  85. How can anonymous calls be made? by sacrilicious · · Score: 2

    Without payphones, is there any way an anonymous call can be made?

    .

    --
    - First they ignore you, then they laugh at you, then ???, then profit.
  86. Re:The environmental hazard of removing payphones by Hal-9001 · · Score: 3, Informative

    Hands-free sets do not make driving while talking on a cell-phone any safer. See this paper from the New England Journal of Medicine for details. Basically, they cross-correlated traffic accident reports with cell phone logs and found that talking on a cell phone while driving quadruples the risk of getting in an accident, regardless of whether or not the phone is hands-free. This increased risk of accident is comparable to the increased risk of accident while driving drunk.

    The difference between talking on a cell phone and talking with a passenger is that the passenger is aware of the driving situation and can halt the conversation and/or call the driver's attention to the road in case of emergency.

    --
    "It take 9 months to bear a child, no matter how many women you assign to the job."
  87. Re:Big Deal! by iiioxx · · Score: 2

    Small annoyances like cell phones or crying children do not bother me.

    That depends on how small an annoyance it is. A short ringing of a phone followed by a muffled "oh, shit" from the owner as he rushes to stifle it is a small annoyance (and not worth making an issue of). The person who gets a call in a theatre, lets it ring long enough to read the caller ID, then answers it and proceeds to carry on a conversation during the movie is more than a small annoyance. They are a nuisance.

    Also, I've never once complained to a parent about a crying baby if the show was a kid's movie. If you go to see Ice Age, you'd better expect to see children there, and to accept the social effects that children create. Now, the parent who brings a baby to a 9pm show of Two Towers is just an inconsiderate piece of human shit. Especially when the baby starts howling during the battle at Helm's Deep and the parents refuse to take the baby out (because THEY don't want to miss anything). Can you tell I've been there..?

    It's much worse to have a bozo making a big deal of those things.

    I think it is because NOT ENOUGH people make a big deal about these things that rudeness and discourtesy are allowed to flourish. Our societal structure works on about 10% legislation and 90% peer pressure. You can't legislate courtesy and police rude behavior. You can only use peer pressure to correct the behavior. Often, verbal censure is enough to do that. In general, people want to be thought well of. If they suddenly realize that their behavior has caused them to be cast in an ill light, they will alter their behavior to fit into society's boundaries of polite behavior. I think there are a lot of people who simply don't realize their behavior is inappropriate, because no one has ever said anything to them.

    Like a neighbor who threatens to talk to my manager because I use a dance pad at 8pm.

    Here's a perfect example. Your neighbor is a bozo because you think YOU should be able to DDR anytime you like. Take a minute to put yourself in your neighbor's position: you work all day, come home, eat dinner, get the kids off working on their homework, sit down in your comfy chair to watch a little ESPN before you pass out from exhaustion, and your neighbor starts jumping up and down on the floor above. Don't you think your neighbor is entitled to watch ESPN in relative peace whenever they want?

    If you want to be able to DDR whenever you feel like it, simply get an apartment on the ground floor (I assume you are second story plus, because a concrete slab doesn't reverberate). You can put on headphones and DDR at 3am and no one will complain. All it takes is a little awareness of how your behavior impacts those around you, and a small amount of accomodation. If you happen to be the Lord of the Dance, well then (DUH!) don't get an apartment on the second floor! It doesn't take a rocket scientist to figure that out.

    It's no fun to live if you have to be polite and considerate all the time, in every aspect.

    I don't think that's true. I think you can be very happy and have a lot of fun while still being considerate of those around you. Unless you simply can't have fun without jumping up and screaming "Yeeehaaww!!" in the middle of a crowded restaurant because you just beat your friend at that peg game thing. Maybe your mommy never taught you this, but we have "indoor voices" and "outdoor voices"...

    If you want to be regarded by society as an adult, you have to act like an adult. Unfortunately, there are a lot of 21+ children running around in our society today.

    Sometimes needs of a few or one outweigh the needs of the many.

    That's never true. Just ask any Vulcan.

  88. Dr. WHO by ctimes2 · · Score: 2

    has been stealing them...

    --
    My cube. My friend. My solace. My prison.
  89. the article is not totally right. by abolith · · Score: 2
    My best friend runs about 25 pay phones in and around the local area and he still makes a few hundred a month off of each (somemore than others)and thats in an area that is considered "Saturated" by cell phone companies.

    --
    if you want "No More Hiroshimas" then I say "You First. No More Pearl Harbors."
  90. its not free by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    sooo i pay 30 bucks a month to have something in my car that is turned off, and doesnt get used for months on end.. ya.. im made of money.. good idea... I think ill keep looking for to occasional phonebooth.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
    1. Re:its not free by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 2

      There are pre-paid plans you know

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
  91. Re:Big Deal! by iiioxx · · Score: 2

    I think a big part of freedom in US is that we can all annoy each other ... Those who give up freedom for quite...

    Freedom taken to it's ultimate extreme is anarchy. There's an old saying that goes well in this topic:

    "Your right to swing your fist ends at my nose."

  92. Another example of why by theCat · · Score: 2

    social engineering is stupid:

    Years ago they started taking pay phones out of poor neighborhoods. Why? Because drug dealers were using them to take orders and sell drugs. Advocates for the poor said removing pay phones would not stop drug dealing and would only hurt poor folk who could not afford phones in their homes and used pay phones instead.

    Now everyone uses cell phones to buy and sell drugs. And the poor folk STILL don't have pay phones because now there is not money in maintaining them.

    Oh wait...this just in...local governments are now taking down cell towers in and around poor neighborhoods so drug dealers cannot use cell phones to take orders and sell drugs. Advocates for the poor are claiming this will only hurt poor people, who cannot afford phones in their home and instead buy prepaid throw away cell phones.

    --
    =^..^= all your rodent are belong to us
  93. Re:So much BS, so many double standards by iiioxx · · Score: 2

    I guarantee that more people than those "right next" to you are aware when your phone vibrates (say, during a meaningful quiet point in any movie), let alone when you pull it out to check the caller ID.

    No, it really is very quiet. I've been standing around having a conversation with someone before and the phone rang, and they looked surprised when I pulled it out to answer it, because they never heard it go off. Now, there was one time when I happened to be leaning against a plate glass window when it went off, and a lot of people heard that. In fact, that's a real difficult noise to explain...

    Now, the backlit LCD might be a distraction, but it's pretty dim, and sometimes a little hard to read in the dark. I can't imagine anyone except those to my immediate left or right even noticing it if I pulled it out of my jacket pocket.

    But you go further, depending on the call's "importance" (to you and the caller only) and, by your own admission, answer some calls.

    It would have to be a pretty important call from someone I was expecting a call from (ie my doctor with lab results or something). I've had a cellphone for about 8 or 9 years, and I think the total number of times I have answered the phone in a theatre was two. One was to hear whether a relative 1000 miles away made it through surgery okay, and the other was from a client who was calling to tell me whether or not I got a big contract. And my idea of "answering a call" is to pick up the phone, quietly say, "Hi. Hold on just a second, okay.." and then step out of the theatre to take the call. That is no more disturbing than quietly saying to your wife, "I'll be right back" and then stepping out to use the restroom.

    You condemn the woman for being "above any petty social convention", but then proceed act virtually identically, ignoring the "Cellphone Free Zone" sign yourself, to answer a call if you "absolutely need to speak" to that caller. Wha...? What part of "No Cellphones" did you not understand?

    Actually, I said I "often" carry my cellphone at a theatre, but I don't always do it. That time, I DID turn off my cellphone and even reminded my wife to turn off hers, BECAUSE they had actually posted a sign (and that's the first time I've ever seen a sign like that at a theatre, although I expect they'll probably become a lot more common). If they hadn't had a sign, I probably would have left it on vibrate, if I had even brought it in to the theatre in the first place.