Slashdot Mirror


X-Box Private Key Challenge Ended

powerlord writes "The Neo Project (mentioned in a recent slashdot article) recently stopped its bid to recover the X-Box private key citing legal reasons: "Due to legal reasons, we will no longer be hosting or participating in the xbox challenge." DCers.com, a site devoted to distributed computing sheds some light on Neo's sudden flip-flop with a blurb claiming that: "... many legitiment DC'ers that have been working this project since it started that have decided to quit because of the new Neo client that also tries to crack the X-Box encryption." and that they believed this might ultimately kill The Neo Project."

293 comments

  1. ms got to them by linuxrunner · · Score: 1

    Microsoft got to them first!

    --
    www.slightlycrewed.com - Because aren't we all?
    1. Re:ms got to them by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      MS got to them? Great! I hope MS keeps up the excellent work!

      I love the way that anytime an issue like this comes up, everyone and their sister show up to show their support for the "little guy" who has been opressed by the "big nasty mean guy" without having any clue what the issues at hand are or what the consequences may be.

      Xbox Live is currently the fairest online gamming system. It uses encrypted packet streams between clients and servers and ensures that no unsigned software can be run while gaming to prevent people from cheating in games. (For those not "in the know," Xbox Live has a system in place to detect traditionally modded Xboxes and will refuse to run if it detects the modding.)

      If the digital signature for the Xbox is cracked, people would be able to code game loaders which could run without the Xbox being modded. Allowing people to cheat in Xbox games, ruining the gamming experience for everyone else. As a proud Xbox owner and happy Xbox Live Gamer, I do not want this to happen!

      I challenge everyone who doesn't own an xbox and play on Live to stay out of this argument, and let those who will be affected by the outcome voice their opinions.

      T.

  2. For the lay person: by C.U.T.M. · · Score: 1, Funny

    Microsoft, again, crushes anything it wants.

    1. Re:For the lay person: by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

      True, but don't you think it was their right to do so? I'm sure cracking their key violates their acceptable use policy as well as any other license you implicitly agree to when you use the product.

      I'm not trying to be pro-MS here - this is an issue that affects all legitimate software/hardware that tries to project it's IP with software or hardware encryption.

    2. Re:For the lay person: by c_g_hills · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I'm sure cracking their key violates their acceptable use policy as well as any other license you implicitly agree to when you use the product.

      But what if you do not own an X-Box? Surely they cannot bind you to their contract if you have nothing to do with them; at least not morally. I'm not entirely sure what the laws state in America.

    3. Re:For the lay person: by jeebs · · Score: 1

      GO Microsoft! Go Microsoft! Don't be so Anal you Linux Buffs its their system leave it alone! How would you like it if you had a freshly mowed lawn and it was better then mine so I decided to come over and shit on it. Sounds like Jealousy!

  3. Legal reasons by CaseyB · · Score: 5, Funny

    It's sad that the reason it shut down is for "legal reasons" instead of "the realization that it was utterly futile".

    1. Re:Legal reasons by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Or they just realized that and just blamed, the Beast.
      They know no Linuxoid will doubt given reason :-)

    2. Re:Legal reasons by warmcat · · Score: 4, Informative
      Xboxhacker.net quotes the following 'unofficial response':

      Due to a few..."parties" pressuring us if you will, we decided to halt the project to stop any legal troubles. We have said from the beginning that if any pressure was put upon us, the project wouldn't go any further. Well, too bad. we managed to check nearly a billion key, and ranked a good 1.5 years of CPU time in only a few days. thanks to all who participated - and a special thanks to those special people who pumped out amazing packet rates for XboxHacker.net

      A billion! So they only had a bazillion gajillion to go.

    3. Re:Legal reasons by mstyne · · Score: 2

      A billion! So they only had a bazillion gajillion to go.

      Which, of course, is a hojillion.

      --
      mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    4. Re:Legal reasons by ajp · · Score: 1

      I don't think they ran afoul of any law so much as they ran afoul of a lemma.

    5. Re:Legal reasons by Decimal · · Score: 2

      A billion! So they only had a bazillion gajillion to go.

      What if the encryption was broken anonymously? A group could form and distribute software using a Freenet-style network and the page providing the files and info for the project could also be hosted on Freenet.

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    6. Re:Legal reasons by Esion+Modnar · · Score: 1

      As smart as p33ing on a high-voltage wire.

      --

      They say the first thing to go is your penis. Well, it's either that or your brain. I forget which...
    7. Re:Legal reasons by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      This won't work because: 1) You're unlikely to get that many people over a freenet project, def you won't be getting however many they got to get 1.5 years of computing time over a few days 2) As the earlier poster pointed out, even with a billion in a few days, it's still going to take centuries and centuries to try even 1/100 of the keys. If you only get the small number of people you get on freenet, it's even worse.

    8. Re:Legal reasons by BrunoC · · Score: 1

      I think "no need for modchips" is a very good reason.

    9. Re:Legal reasons by CaseyB · · Score: 2

      Ask a grownup to help you look up "futile" in a dictionary.

    10. Re:Legal reasons by BrunoC · · Score: 1

      Perhaps my concept of "futile" diff from yours. No modchips is just one reason, another "futile" reason is to prove that even 2048 bit keys are breakable provided the CPU power. Maybe they (Neoproject) just want to see how far distributed computing can go, maybe they just like prime numbers. Or maybe, just maybe, they are trying to prove that braking a 2048bit key is not futile.

  4. Perhaps they already broke it. by HaloZero · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I mean, they HAD been working for a few days. Perhaps they got the key! :-P

    "Yeah. We, um. Well. We're going to stop now. And cite an obvious legal reason, though we ignored that same reason when we first started. Because we wanted the key. But... now we don't. Or something. Look, I don't care, explain it to yourself. Just know that we've stopped, and are happy. Ok? Ok. Good. Now, onto other news..."

    --
    Informatus Technologicus
    1. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by Troed · · Score: 1

      Maybe you should read up on how long it would take to brute force a 2048 bit RSA key.

    2. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by martingunnarsson · · Score: 5, Funny

      Perhaps one of the first key checked was the right one? It's not *impossible*!

      --
      Martin
    3. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      short answer please, how long?

    4. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by 91degrees · · Score: 3, Informative

      Assuming a ludicrous number of 1 000 000 000 machines, managing to try a ludicruously high 1 000 000 000 000 numbers per second at random, it will take about 3 * 10^279 years. (I'm making some guesses, and assuming we're trying to find the prime factors of a product of two 1024 bit numbers or something like that)

      Of course, cunning techniques will possibly reduce this number quite considerably, and it's probably really nowhere near that high, but wer're still talking about such a huge amount of time that the age of the universe seems irrelevent.

    5. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I could take not much longer than a second to get the key.

    6. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by AndrewHowe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Yeah, but about as likely as winning the lottery every week of your life, while every hot female in the world beats a path to your door (and you didn't tell them about winning the lottery), hell reaches absolute zero and pigs go supersonic.
      Perhaps if you had an infinite improbability drive...

    7. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by Jace+of+Fuse! · · Score: 3, Funny

      The odds that you will win the Lottery Every Week of your Life: Improbable.
      The odds that every female in the world will beat a path to your door: Highly Improbable.
      Their odds of doing so without knowing about your money: Very Highly Improbable.
      The odds that you would have enough money if all of the above were true: Impossible.

      --

      "Everything you know is wrong. (And stupid.)"

      Moderation Totals: Wrong=2, Stupid=3, Total=5.
    8. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      I'm aware of how long it would take to go through each and every permutation of a 2048-bit RSA encryptyion key - that's not the point, though. I was suggesting, that, whatif, perhaps, they got it, in one of the very first few tries? You don't need to do them ALL. That's just... well... excessive, and useless. Why continue to work the problem if you've already got the solution? Say they got it in the first few tries (Yes, Microsoft WOULD do that? Why? Last thing you'd expect, maybe? You proved that point to us already!).

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    9. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      'The odds that you would have enough money if all of the above were true'

      I have more than enough.

    10. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by Bandman · · Score: 3, Funny

      has anyone tried all 1's??? /heh heh heh

    11. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by Greeneland · · Score: 1

      Once the PS3 comes out it ought to make quite a decent key-cruncher. see: http://www.theinquirer.net/?article=7078 perhaps the project can be revived when that happens. (once linux is running on it)

    12. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by da+cog · · Score: 1

      Yeah, I bet that what happened was that someone over there, just for the heck of it, tried entering in something like "123456789101112..." as a joke and was surprised to find that it worked. (Hey, it did for installing Windows 95!) :-)

      --
      Snarkiness is inversely proportional to wisdom because it emphasizes feeling right rather than being right.
    13. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by HaloZero · · Score: 1

      Oh my. I missed this article. *jaw drops*

      Optical links - perhaps even FireWire optical links - could be used to share computing power.

      So we get to share cell-processor units, in the range of a quarter-teraflop each, bundled in units of four (four per PS3), as far and wide as our UNIXen OS can handle? MY GOD, MAN! You could run the U.S.S. Enterprise on something like that! I wonder what the games will be like... o_o *stares off into space*

      *giggle* I like Geek toys. :-)

      --
      Informatus Technologicus
    14. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by Hanji · · Score: 1
      Assuming a ludicrous number of 1 000 000 000 machines, managing to try a ludicruously high 1 000 000 000 000 numbers per second at random, it will take about 3 * 10^279 years. (I'm making some guesses, and assuming we're trying to find the prime factors of a product of two 1024 bit numbers or something like that)
      No. That's how long it will take to try EVERY key. On average, you need half that time, and there is always a chance (however incredibly small) that you will find the key very quickly. So it would be possible for them to have found it, just unlikely.
      --
      A Minesweeper clone that doesn't suck
    15. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by mstyne · · Score: 1

      That's amazing! I've got the same combination on my luggage!

      --
      mstyne: real name, no gimmicks
    16. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by Troed · · Score: 1
      This being modded as insightful shows how clueless people on Slashdot really are.


      No it's not - but it's a lot more probable that the universe cease to exist right now, in comparison.

    17. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      #girlchat called, they want their punctuation back.

    18. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by kipple · · Score: 2

      ...if so, the key would probably be 42.

      --
      -- There are two kind of sysadmins: Paranoids and Losers. (adapted from D. Bach)
    19. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by edbarrett · · Score: 1

      I can hardly wait for the game that requires a Beowolf cluster of PS3s.

    20. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Who cares? It'll still be designed to display on a sub-800x600, 30fps, fscking TV! And don't start with the HDTV BS... 1080i is interlaced leaving 720p the best you can do -- it's a leap forward from NTSC/PAL, but still, it's not 1600x1200x32@120Hz.

    21. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Funny

      And the password would be 'sa'??

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    22. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Each key has an equally probable chance of being the right key, so finding the correct key at the beginning is no less likely than finding it at the end.

    23. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by Paradise+Pete · · Score: 1
      short answer please, how long?

      So long that a good strategy for breaking it would be to wait for computers to get faster.

    24. Re:Perhaps they already broke it. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Yeah the graphics on TV are shit they look nothing like the real world.

  5. Anyways.... by Veovis · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess the XBox commercial slogan "Life is short" applies to everything xbox related, and not just the console itself

  6. Legal reasons? by JimDabell · · Score: 5, Funny

    Anybody else automatically assume that it had ended because they found the key?

    1. Re:Legal reasons? by bluntos · · Score: 0

      it did cross my mind.. they would have want they want without added hastle

      --
      Fnord Fnord Fnord
    2. Re:Legal reasons? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 5, Interesting

      "Anybody else automatically assume that it had ended because they found the key?"

      While I'm not sure this is probable, I will agree that not posting the legal threat is highly unusual. They need to distribute a copy if only for posting on ChillingEffects.org. Also, my first call would be to the EFF. But I guess some people stick more firmly to their principles than others...

    3. Re:Legal reasons? by saider · · Score: 5, Funny

      Code monkey 1: I found the combination!

      Code monkey 2 : What's the combination?

      Code monkey 1: One, two, three, four, five.

      Code monkey 2 : One, two, three, four, five? That's the combination that an idiot has on his luggage.

      <later>

      Neo Lead Developer : Have you got the combination?

      Code monkey 1 : Yes, sir. It's 'one, two, three, four, five'.

      Lead : One, two, three, four, five? My god! That's the same combination I have on my luggage! Retract our challenge and change the combination on my luggage!

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    4. Re:Legal reasons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      While I'm not sure this is probable, I will agree that not posting the legal threat is highly unusual. They need to distribute a copy if only for posting on ChillingEffects.org [chillingeffects.org].

      Perhaps the threat was just that bad and releasing the info would be a violation of MS' trade secrets? You never know with MS and their EULA mischief.

  7. LOL by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Hahahahahah. Intellectual property disrespecting morons.

    --
    Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    1. Re:LOL by FatherOfONe · · Score: 2

      Lets see. I buy the product. I own the product. It is not even a service. So it would be hard to compare it to a Direct TV device. This would be similar to me buying a chair from a company and turning it into a couch. I am sure that any waranty that I would have would be void, but I have the right to do it. I am NOT going in to their ROM and taking all their code to create a competitor to XBOX.

      Enjoy your laugh now. I have a strong feeling that the code will be broken soon, and the customers will be laughing last...

      Granted I don't want to see anyone buy an Xbox for any reason. I don't care if Microsoft looses money on every one sold! It still helps their marketshare; so in a weird way I kinda like that it has been taken down.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    2. Re:LOL by NDPTAL85 · · Score: 1

      MS didn't use kiddy encryption. Its 2048bit encryption. Thats 2 megabits. Most people are used to 56bit encryption. You got a quantum computer handy?

      --
      Mac OS X and Windows XP working side by side to fight back the night.
    3. Re:LOL by PetiePooo · · Score: 2
      1. Its 2048bit encryption. Thats 2 megabits.
      ahem..
      *cough*.. Kilobits!! *cough*
      Excuse me.

      A point worth noting when making such comparisons is that public key cryptography requires more bits than symetric cryptography for equivalent security levels. A 1024 bit public key is considered by most scholars to be roughly equivalent to a 128 bit symetric cipher key. In a symetric cipher, every possible bit combination is a valid key. In PKI, you've got a smaller starting set, since certain components must be prime. Not all bit combinations would make a valid key.
    4. Re:LOL by craigwilkie · · Score: 1

      Its 2048bit encryption. Thats 2 megabits.

      *cough*.. Kilobits!! *cough*


      kibibits

    5. Re:LOL by FatherOfONe · · Score: 2

      Good point, but as mentioned it is only 2048BIT encryption. That is 2k not 2MB.

      Just rememeber how long it took to crack the DVD code? Wow that was done by a 15 year old...

      It won't take long.

      Also, in the news today it was found legal in the U.S. for that kid to crack the DVD code for his OWN use!

      The motion picture association had no comment...

      Please understand that I don't believe that someone should steal software, movies or songs. That is a different discussion than modifiying something you own.

      --
      The more I learn about science, the more my faith in God increases.
    6. Re:LOL by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      5 points: 1) Jon did not crack CSS. 2) It didn't take long when someone seriously worked on it but it took quite a while from when DVDs were released 3) CSS was a very very weak encryption system (since it was developed in 1995 or earlier, this isn't surprising) 4) DeCSS decrypted CSS. It did not encrypted CSS. Encrypting and decrypting are two very diff matters in a assymetric (public and private) key system 5) The only recent case I know of involving cracking DVDs was the Jon case, three further points a) Jon did no crack CSS (oops I already said that) b) Jon and his case occured in Norway (Which does not have anything close to the DCMA) NOT IN THE U.S. c) One unappealed case in the Norway has no bearing whatsoever on anything in the US

    7. Re:LOL by Babbster · · Score: 2
      Enjoy your laugh now. I have a strong feeling that the code will be broken soon, and the customers will be laughing last...

      Which customers would those be? The customers who understand - and have understood since the Atari 2600 - that a video game console is a video game console and wants or needs no other purpose? As one of these customers, I will neither laugh nor cry...I will probably say "hey, nice job" and move on with my life...and buy some video games...you know...to play on my video game console.

  8. On XBOX Emulation by Vidmaster_Steve · · Score: 1, Offtopic

    This is somewhat on-topic.

    Awhile back, it was stated that XBox game discs spun backwards, thus making emulation and even making legitimate backups as close to impossible as anyone could ever imagine.

    As for this current discussion, this makes me totally upset, because I've been wanting, for months for someone to start releasing hacks of our favorite next-gen console games.

    TONY HAWK PRO SEGWAY 2 WILL BE THE BEST ROM HACK EVER. Well, almost as good as Mega Crap...

    --
    Why is it when I hit ^R that ZSH calls me a cocksucker?
    1. Re:On XBOX Emulation by iainl · · Score: 5, Insightful

      "Awhile back, it was stated that XBox game discs spun backwards, thus making emulation and even making legitimate backups as close to impossible as anyone could ever imagine."

      This isn't, indeed cannot be the case. Grab a legitimate XBox game disc off your shelf, any one whatsoever. Stick it in your nearest DVD player. See how it plays? If its capable of streaming that animation off the disc in full 5.1 surround, then there must be at least some info on there in a normal fashion.

      --
      "I Know You Are But What Am I?"
    2. Re:On XBOX Emulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There are hundreds of pirate Xbox games in Thailand. I think you mean that Nintendo GameCube games spin backwards, there are no pirated copies of them here!

    3. Re:On XBOX Emulation by stratjakt · · Score: 3, Informative

      Neither XBOX, PS2 nor GameCube spin backwards. This is a moronic rumor that goes back to the PSX (I remember people telling me that they spun backwards). It resurfaced with dreamcast, and now with the latest gen of consoles. Mostly people say GCN spins backwards because it isn't being pirated yet. The panasonic GameCube-Q reverses directions when you put in a DVD or CD? Bah.

      It's believed because know-nothing geek wannabe's think spinning backwards would be some kind of impenetrable protection scheme - believe me, if that's all there was to it, it'd be hacked just as long as it takes to reverse polarity to the motors. GCN isn't hacked (yet) because all of it's custom circuitry is smushed into two ICs and people still havent fully deciphered what does what, like where the GPU ends and CPU begins and where the BIOS/bootblock is, etc..

      As if Nintendo, Sony, or Microsoft would needlessly spend the billions in building new production facilities for what would be an absolutely idiotic and worthless protection scheme - what piglatin is to the world of ciphers, essentially.

      I have all 3, and I can guarantee that they all do, in fact, spin in the same 'normal' direction.

      Cutitout with this spins backwards nonsense. Just becuase you read it on the 'net doesn't make it true.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    4. Re:On XBOX Emulation by archeopterix · · Score: 5, Funny
      Awhile back, it was stated that XBox game discs spun backwards, thus making emulation and even making legitimate backups as close to impossible as anyone could ever imagine.
      I don't know about that, but I've heard from a reliable source that if you play an Xbox disc backwards, you hear Satan himself speaking!
    5. Re:On XBOX Emulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      Awhile back, it was stated that XBox game discs spun backwards, thus making emulation and even making legitimate backups as close to impossible as anyone could ever imagine.

      Easy. Just mirror the discs...

    6. Re:On XBOX Emulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      an interesting place where this spinning backwards protection does work is in the new york subway system. all the screw-in incandescent lightbulbs and sockets are threaded backwards to prevent theft.

      just a random offtopic fact for ya.

    7. Re:On XBOX Emulation by TheReckoning · · Score: 1
      I don't know about that, but I've heard from a reliable source that if you play an Xbox disc backwards, you hear Satan himself speaking!

      They put Bill G's CES keynotes on each DVD? Crikey!
    8. Re:On XBOX Emulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

      I don't know about that, but I've heard from a reliable source that if you play an Xbox disc backwards, you hear Satan himself speaking!

      Developers! Developers! Developers!

    9. Re:On XBOX Emulation by IGnatius+T+Foobar · · Score: 2
      I've heard from a reliable source that if you play an Xbox disc backwards, you hear Satan himself speaking!
      No, you're thinking of Comdex. Bill Gates does the keynote speech from time to time.
      --
      Tired of FB/Google censorship? Visit UNCENSORED!
    10. Re:On XBOX Emulation by GTRacer · · Score: 2
      So-o-o-o...Does figuring that out and unscrewing them the other way count as circumvention? Will I be beaten with the DMCA if I swipe a couple'a 60-watters?

      GTRacer
      - Almost as silly as encrypting the key ON the disk!

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    11. Re:On XBOX Emulation by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      Sounds a bit ULish to me... Are America's criminals so dumb as to not try unscrewing them the other way? And is the cost of such an exercise covered by any decrease in theft?
      From what I could find on the 'net it seems that some of the bulbs are threaded backwards, but it's because they're 230V.

    12. Re:On XBOX Emulation by SScorpio · · Score: 1
      The start of an XBox disk has a small ISO9600 track that contains that movie.

      The rest of the disk is written in the weird backwards, can't read in a normal DVD drive way.

    13. Re:On XBOX Emulation by greenrom · · Score: 1
      They don't spin backwards, but the track the main filesystem is written on starts at the outside edge of the disk (normal CD/DVDs are the other way around, for those who didn't know). There is a small track that is written the normal way on xbox DVDs. You can see that track if you throw the DVD in a PC, but the other track where the game is stored can't be read because the drive reaches the end of the small track and thinks that's it. There's nothing in normal DVD drive firmware that tells it to look at the outer edge of the disk for another track.

      Of course, this doesn't mean you can't copy the games. It just means you've got to use the xbox's drive to do it since it has firmware that knows how to look for that track on the outer edge of the disk.

    14. Re:On XBOX Emulation by runderwo · · Score: 2
      Mostly people say GCN spins backwards because it isn't being pirated yet. The panasonic GameCube-Q reverses directions when you put in a DVD or CD? Bah.
      People are confused, but there is a nugget of truth floating around amidst the general cluelessness: GCN reads discs from the outside in, rather than the inside out. None of the systems spins the discs backwards, as you pointed out.
    15. Re:On XBOX Emulation by cayenne8 · · Score: 2, Funny

      But, if you spin the disc backwards, doesn't it say something satanic? "Hello there, this is a message from Bill Gates....WORSHIP ME...WORSHIP ME.....Thank you, and have a nice day...." :-)

      --
      Light travels faster than sound. This is why some people appear bright until you hear them speak.........
    16. Re:On XBOX Emulation by ewhac · · Score: 2

      ...if you play an Xbox disc backwards, you hear Satan himself speaking!

      No. If you play it backwards, you'll hear the opposite of what you'd normally expect from Microsoft. So you'll hear God speaking.

      :-),
      Schwab

    17. Re:On XBOX Emulation by zcat_NZ · · Score: 1

      I think you missed the point. Stealing them is still easy. Using them (or selling them) is a bit harder, since they have a left-handed thread and won't fit in a regular socket. Outside of the subway system these bulbs are effectively worthless.

      --
      455fe10422ca29c4933f95052b792ab2
    18. Re:On XBOX Emulation by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I think by 'backwards' they just mean the data is written from the outside of the disc towards the inside.

    19. Re:On XBOX Emulation by Decimal · · Score: 2

      I have all 3, and I can guarantee that they all do, in fact, spin in the same 'normal' direction.

      Yep. But XBox DVDs are written with track 1 on the outside so that the more important data can be read faster. Nintendo made their DVDs small, so a normal DVD+RW wouldn't fit inside the machines. Both had a thought of copy protection in the making.

      --

      Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    20. Re:On XBOX Emulation by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      If the bulbs were copy protected then it would be against the DMCA. But they're not.. You will however be arested for theft...... (which is kind of sillly given that you can't use the bulbs)

    21. Re:On XBOX Emulation by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      American criminals are apparently smarter then you to realise that it doesn't matter that you can steal the bulb if you can't use it...... Given how much crime including theft there is in the US, it probably is. the cost increase isn't likely to be much though. The cost of these special bulbs is most likely not much more, the only problem is that most likely, you can't change suppliers so easily. I suspect however that they aren't the only ones which use them. The bit on 220-240V bulbs using different threads is bullshit. Go to the UK etc....

    22. Re:On XBOX Emulation by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      Nintendo's idea is a lot smarter. It means it's impossible to make your own discs unless someone starts producing these smaller blanks. Even then, it Nintendo actually make the spiral closer together, it won't help much. However, this surely increased the price of the hadrware and disc production. Microsoft's idea is a bit harder to override altho all you really need to do is convince your X-box to read the disc for you or hack your DVD reader's firmware.... However since Microsoft wanted to use standard PC components this isn't surprising. The DreamCast also used GD-Roms of course although now it's possible to make CD-Roms which work (with less data of course). Also must have increase the hardware + disc production price. Of course, none of the methods have really done anything to the commercial pirates...

    23. Re:On XBOX Emulation by GTRacer · · Score: 2
      Damn...I was trying to make a completely weak overzealous DMCA enforcement joke and instead get schooled by you and the other guy.

      Oh well!

      GTRacer
      - Yes, I know thievery is wrong.

      --
      Defending IP by destroying access to it? That makes sense, RIAA/MPAA. Go to the corner until you can play nice!
    24. Re:On XBOX Emulation by AndrewHowe · · Score: 2

      That's retarded. If my car is nicked am I gonna be chuckling, "hehehe, it's immobilised, stupid thief can't use it" or am I gonna be pissed off that I don't have my car any more?
      "Most likely ..." you have no idea and are just guessing.
      And as for your call of "bullshit", well, they *are* 230V (DC) bulbs and they *do* have different threads. In the UK, we use 220-240V for everything, not 110-120, so why would we have two different threads? Anyway we mostly use bayonet fittings.

  9. It's offical, Microsoft reads /. by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 4, Funny

    I wish I could read slashdot.org's Apache access_log to see how many times a day Microsoft visits

    --

    Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    1. Re:It's offical, Microsoft reads /. by Kintanon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You bastard! you stole my .sig! DIEDIEDIE!
      I'm not sure which one I like better.... hrmm.
      I think I still like mine better.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    2. Re:It's offical, Microsoft reads /. by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      How log have you had it? I stated this one back in mid December.

      --

      Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    3. Re:It's offical, Microsoft reads /. by Kintanon · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Heh, about the same. It was before my christmas break. So... Dec 16th or 17th I think. Probably damn near simultaneous.

      Kintanon

      --
      Check out JoshJitsu.info for Brazilian Ji
    4. Re:It's offical, Microsoft reads /. by Znonymous+Coward · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      Great minds think alike. I just wish sig was long enough to include that goat link.

      --

      Karma: The shiznight, mostly because I am the Drizzle.

    5. Re:It's offical, Microsoft reads /. by Godwin+O'Hitler · · Score: 1

      Then how about...

      In Soviet Russia, all your Beowulf cluster of dead BSD hot grits are belong to Natalie Portman [goatse.cx]. Profit!

      -- or even --

      Goatsex warning! In Soviet Russia, all your Beowulf cluster of dead BSD hot grits are belong to Natalie Portman. Profit!

      --
      No, your children are not the special ones. Nor are your pets.
  10. Re:Neo Project by nizo · · Score: 0, Offtopic
    It's Neo Project, not New Project... How can you get it right is one part of the post and not another?

    Well you see there is this thing called proof reading...

    ;-)

  11. No information at The NEO Project by sutch · · Score: 4, Informative

    A posting by Mike Curry (who's on The NEO Development Team) states: "We will not be answering questions or commenting anymore on this subject." See XBOX Challenge - Back to 576!

    1. Re:No information at The NEO Project by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      Most likely he is sick of idiots who won't leave him alone.

  12. Neo Project by screenbert · · Score: 5, Funny

    hmmm see if anyone else can connect the dots:
    Neo Project
    Futuristic technology
    Hacking
    Crack the X-box encryption(i.e. the matrix)

    Microsoft IS the matrix....

    I'm going to hang up my controllers now.... be afraid, be very afraid.... (Cool Music here)

  13. They tried. by Penguin2212 · · Score: 0

    No prizes for guessing that would happen.

  14. what legal reasons? by ironfroggy · · Score: 2, Insightful

    Does anyone, perhaps close to the Neo Project, have any idea why the stopped trying to crack the XBox key? They state legal reasons, but I don't see any specifics. As far as I knew, this was legal. After all, isn't this what The Neo Project does all the time? Why is the key being on the XBox any different?

    1. Re:what legal reasons? by Kajakske · · Score: 1

      In the case of big companies like microsoft, it doesn't even really matter if it is legal or not.

      Case:
      It's legal, but on the edge (as I think this is)
      Microsoft sues them with the best loyers
      These projects haven't got a big firm to support them in legal battles
      The project goes down because of cinancial reasons, not because it was illegal.

    2. Re:what legal reasons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Enough of the people who were previously part of this DC project felt that it was illegal (or close enough) and thus stopped helping out. This would have the effect of (nearly) killing all their other projects. Distributed Computing doesn't work if you don't have computers to distribute to.

    3. Re:what legal reasons? by GiMP · · Score: 3, Funny

      sometimes companies use lawyers in addition to their loyers.

    4. Re:what legal reasons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Then don't call it "legal reasons." Call it "fear" or "extortion." Don't let The Enemy own the language.

    5. Re:what legal reasons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Perhaps just the threat of being drug through court my MS is deterrent enough. Microsoft doesn't have to win, they just have to be able to pay the lawyers until the other side runs out of cash. After all, what's a couple million dollars in legal fees?

    6. Re:what legal reasons? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So they can continue to sue you?

    7. Re:what legal reasons? by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      You're totally right. Even if they didn't feel it was illegal, they might have felt it was immoral or simply a waste of comp time (more worthy causes). Or perhaps they felt it wasn't worth the time because of the fact they will actually find it within a decade is nearly 0% For those anti-everything group out there, read what we say carefully. It doesn't matter jack squat whether you think it's illegal or immoral or whether you could quote the Supereme Court of the USA of the Pope saying is was legal and moral. Proving it isn't illegal or immoral is irrelevant to this. All where saying is the people who were a part of it felt it was illegal or immoral. If you have a problem with this, take it up with them not us.

  15. Life is Short by muyuubyou · · Score: 2, Flamebait

    I guess the XBox commercial slogan "Life is short" applies to everything xbox related, and not just the console itself

    "Life is Short" applies to anything Micro$haft dislike in the slightest. With the backing of the lobbyism and a rightist government, life is easy.

    Netscape, Java, freedom anyone?

    1. Re:Life is Short by Ixohoxi · · Score: 1

      The shortness they speak of indeed applies to life in the year 2003. Take them seriously.

      Listen to other advertisements as well, from ANY corporation. Hear the second meaning in doubly-spoken phrases. The public is being psychologically prepared for certain 'concepts', though they don't realize this yet.

      Life IS short. Be ready to attempt to prolong it.

      --
      What's a second? An hour? A day?
      It has much more to do with
      the Earth's rotation than with cesium.
    2. Re:Life is Short by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Which president signed the DMCA???

      Oh yea, go back to kuroshin.

    3. Re:Life is Short by GMontag451 · · Score: 1

      Given the choice between a government that merely takes away our free speech rights and a government that is liable to get us all killed in a nuclear war, I'd take the former every time.

  16. Of course they do. by Old+Ike · · Score: 0, Troll

    Microsoft employees, like everyone else, need a good laugh.

    Pretend you work for Microsoft. What better way to kick back and relax than to look at one of your chief "adversaries" as they duplicate stories, encourage at least as much FUD as you do, engage in hilarious hypocrisy ("MPAA IS BAD! Did you see LOTR? OMG WTF IT WAS GRATE!"), and think some unweildy kludgy, inconsistent OS written by cave trolls for cave trolls with mind-numbing MAN pages and HOWTOs will be used by everyone's grandma tomorrow?

    No wonder half slashdot's visitors use IE - they're all MS employees surfing from their desks as MS having a grand old laugh.

    1. Re:Of course they do. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Why was Old Ike's post modded down as a Troll? Every word of it is truth, and you can't deny that. Unless you're a mentally retarded piece of shit, which is probably the case either way.

    2. Re:Of course they do. by Omnifarious · · Score: 1

      Yes, cave trolls like you. It's kind of amusing to write trolls about trolls.

    3. Re:Of course they do. by Henry+V+.009 · · Score: 1, Troll

      And now we know that some of the Microsoft employees moderate...

      Parent shouldn't be at -1! Mod back up.

    4. Re:Of course they do. by rnd() · · Score: 2

      Mod the parent up. It's interesting. Sure, it may also be flamebait, but it's worth reading/discussing.

      Creating a consistent and unhypocritical outlook on copyright, ownership, property, etc., is going to be important to the success of Linux.

      --

      Amazing magic tricks

  17. yea... by mschoolbus · · Score: 3, Insightful

    and that they believed this might ultimately kill The Neo Project.

    So, if you remove the main purpose of the Neo Project, it may kill the project? Obviously.

    Well it was a good idea guys, time to shutdown...

  18. Most Obvious Event of The Year by Chester+K · · Score: 5, Insightful

    recently stopped its bid to recover the X-Box private key citing legal reasons

    Well duh . You don't think Microsoft (or any company, for that matter) would just sit back and let you crack a private key they use for actual business? It's one thing to crack a key in a challenge specifically presented for that purpose, but it's another thing to try to, in effect, come up with a way of forging Bill Gates' signature.

    --

    NO CARRIER
    1. Re:Most Obvious Event of The Year by interiot · · Score: 2

      Well, you may be a yungin', but I rememeber a day not too long ago where copyright protection only stood on technical merit, eg. the bad guys didn't have an advantage over the good guys. A couple years ago, this definitely was not a "well duh".

    2. Re:Most Obvious Event of The Year by warmcat · · Score: 2

      Not so fast. What law do you imagine these guys are actually transgressing?

    3. Re:Most Obvious Event of The Year by pheared · · Score: 1

      And yet, Jon Johansen is acquitted.

      Seems to me that hacking your own property should be legal.

    4. Re:Most Obvious Event of The Year by zachdms · · Score: 1

      I'm not seeing why it's bad that people have the ability to stand behind 'copyright protection'. The content providers aren't forced into it - it's their way of dealing with the system in such a fashion that they can have a livelihood. If you destory copyright protection, you're destroying many peoples' and notably corporations' incentives.

    5. Re:Most Obvious Event of The Year by Chester+K · · Score: 2

      I rememeber a day not too long ago where copyright protection only stood on technical merit,

      When it comes to signatures, forgery has always been illegal, despite the fact that writing your name on a piece of paper has no technical merit when it comes to difficulty in duplicating. The fact that they're trying to come up with the tool to forge a digital signature (and with the stated intent to use it that way) should make no difference in the eyes of the law.

      --

      NO CARRIER
    6. Re:Most Obvious Event of The Year by mph · · Score: 2
      What law do you imagine these guys are actually transgressing?
      Doesn't matter. Which party in the dispute has enough resources to make life hell for the other party until they give up?
    7. Re:Most Obvious Event of The Year by dvdeug · · Score: 2

      When it comes to signatures, forgery has always been illegal

      From wordnet:
      forgery n 1: a copy that is presented as the original [syn: imitation, counterfeit]

      2: criminal falsification by making or altering an instrument with intent to defraud

      Forgery is illegal, but this isn't forgery. There's no fraud; we just want the right to use our hardware as we will.

    8. Re:Most Obvious Event of The Year by turingcomplete · · Score: 1

      It's not the creating the ability to forge Bill Gates signature that is illegal. It would be the actual forging of Bill Gates signature in order to perpetuate fraud that would be.

      I don't see what legal reasons these people were afraid of other then a costly groundless lawsuit by a large corporation.

    9. Re:Most Obvious Event of The Year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since Neo didn't to my knowledge, even say on their website that you have to own a X-box to take part in the project, let alone try to force it in any way, your point is irrelevant

    10. Re:Most Obvious Event of The Year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Since cracking the code would allow you to violate copy protection it's could be considered the DCMA (even though it may allow other things). You may not live in the USA and nor do I but a lot of distributed computing contributers do and so does I suspect, a lot of people who work on Neo...

      Also, in US courts, there hasn't yet been enough case law to show whether or not you're allowed to do things to your own products in violation of your license agreement unless specifically allowed by law. You can argue what you think and what the founding fathers meant and Linus said and blah blah blah all you want but the fact is that in US, as in every other countries, the Government and ultimately the courts decide the laws and meanings of the laws, not you. If you do live in the US, you can influence this minutely but ultimately that's the way things are.

      More significantly though, to my best knowledge, Neo did not make any attempt to even inform let alone prevent non-Xbox owners from taking part.

    11. Re:Most Obvious Event of The Year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Also, you could argue conspirary to commit forgery or some such.

      The fake is actually that unlike in nearly everything else, there is no real no 'forgery' use for the key. The key itself doesn't have any educational uses, as some people like to quote for cracks. Cracks do so you how a protection is implemented so they arguably do have an educational use. But you don't gain any knowledge about the X-box from a key....

    12. Re:Most Obvious Event of The Year by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You're telling the machine that this content comes from or is approved by Microsft when it isn't. The signature or key or whatever you want to call it is used to encode the disc to assure a X-box that this content is Microsoft approved when it isn't.

      If you want that right (to use your hardware as you will), you're gonna need to do it without breaking Microsoft's signature. Just because it is a machine reading it doesn't mean you aren't commit forgery. Or are you going to tell me that if I forge a cheque which is machine read/tested it's not forgery because it was a machine that interpreted the cheque as being signed by someone else not me?

      What the heck does a dictionary tell you about the meaning or a word as related to the law anyway? The dictionary doesn't tell you jackshit about a law.

  19. Now what am I gonna do with my... by zoid.com · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    40881828809168530591375819139956085989380020574938 1512491823325275367\
    0039983761093737657581366182 3437132028369300928737 2136090488973662885\
    0749520857823194202487813723 5281529166119647272954 3623272112620364581\
    9171026696185476725881661520 6188703489047492973236 7903825810597884676\
    0087066526446068063036669029 6494498088117693882712 8484532375726579806\
    8929812355659309066834995984 8375737098966810233408 2736619960338101994\
    5191141043929531602040535969 8321364177283871960956 9923672820142531423\
    1154135179174732484135445198 3247750938845967420404 6551928328834053889\
    0325273138153871592525085498 7565463644 machines beowulfed in my garage?

    1. Re:Now what am I gonna do with my... by gazbo · · Score: 1

      I'd recommend sitting there most of the day imagining them.

  20. Re:Neo Project by airrage · · Score: 2

    Ah, I get it now. I kept thinking why the Neo project would stop working after producing a client they themselves created? Make sense now, I had to keep reading, and re-reading, and re-reading...

    --
    "This isn't a study in computer science, its a study in human behavior"
  21. from the topic in #theneoproject on efnet by c0nman · · Score: 3, Informative
  22. who still wants to crack this key? by ironfroggy · · Score: 5, Insightful

    I'm sure plenty of people would still like to crack this key. I propose modifying the Neo Client into a decentralized system so anyone still interested can still donate those CPU cycles.

    1. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Um, forgive me, but how to you propose to combine distributed computing with a "decentralized system"?

      Peer-to-peer result-checking?

    2. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by oliverthered · · Score: 1

      Well, you could use random block allocation and send/recieve lists of blocks from other clients now and then to reduce the amount of 'duplication?'

      --
      thank God the internet isn't a human right.
    3. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by styxlord · · Score: 1

      The only people who would still like to crack this key are the ones who don't realize how long it will take. You have to check every prime between 2 and 2^1024 (which is around 1.8e308). As has been said by many others, this is an utter waste of resources.

    4. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by k98sven · · Score: 2

      "waste of resources" is an understatement,
      we're talking about something that the combined computer power of the world cannot achive in the currently known age of the universe.

      Get it kids? We are more likely to suffer human mass-extinction due to an asteroid
      hitting the earth in the next few years than seeing this public key brute-forced.. ok?

    5. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 2

      "'[W]aste of resources' is an understatement[.]
      [W]e're talking about something that the combined computer power of the world cannot achive in the currently known age of the universe."

      Yeah! And it would take over 640k of ram! Nobody will EVER need over 640k of ram, ever!

      Be careful of hyperbole, and that 'never' word, especially when it comes to computing power. Chances are you'll eventually get a laugh-o-gram from Mr. Moore's Law Offices...

    6. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by istar · · Score: 1

      Why not turn it into a multi peer program, like SETI (www.seti.org ?) so that multiple networks and users and contribute to a central database while their own computers chip away at the encryptions?

      They would log into the central network via the program, and send the information their computer has found so far. Hell, just make the program public and let everyone work towards it.

      (which is what I think you mean by decentralizing the database, could be wrong)

      --

      "Oh shit. That wasn't supposed to happen." - OpenBSD telnet exploration turned into accidental server crash
    7. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by linux_warp · · Score: 1

      And you are saying a project like SETI is better? Tell me again the chances of finding alien radio waves?

    8. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by k98sven · · Score: 2

      Be careful of hyperbole, and that 'never' word, especially when it comes to computing power. Chances are you'll eventually get a laugh-o-gram from Mr. Moore's Law Offices...

      Ok. Please turn to chapter ten in your high-school
      math textbooks: "Exponentials"

      Um, we're talking about numbers in the range of 2^50 times the age of the universe here..

      Make all the computers in the world a billion times faster..
      One billion is slightly less than 2^30, so
      that brings us down to 2^20 times the age of the universe, a nice round number,
      a number of million times.

      Of course, if Moores law holds forever (making it more fundamental than the laws of physics)
      we might just make it with this approach just before the human race gets killed off when the sun dies out.

      With current methods, you are not going to make it.

      Perhaps a quantum computer with Shor's factoring algorithm will be able to do it some day,
      but that is a completly different technology.
      (to which Moores law cannot be applied either)

      Being smart-alecky in the face of common sense is very silly.

    9. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 2

      "Being smart-alecky in the face of common sense is very silly."

      Well, ya got me there. I like to be a smart-ass, and I like to be silly. But still, I like to counter those aspects of my personality by making valid points.

      Statatistics aside, people still win the lottery. Statistics can't say when it will happen; they just say the probability. Combine increasing computer speeds with searching the probability field at random, and there's no way to say if it won't happen tomorrow, next week, or just maybe the end of the known universe. The chances can be 1 in infinity-1, but the chance that it will happen in a small amount of time is still 1, still non-zero, age-of-the-universe irrelevant.

    10. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by Bryson · · Score: 2, Informative


      The NEO client is a piece of garbage.

      One PC using the Quadratic Sieve can out-factor all the computer
      power in the world using the NEO trial-divide method. (The
      current best factoring algorithm for large composites is the
      General Number Field Sieve.)

    11. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by Malor · · Score: 1

      Every generation of Moore's law is one bit.

      We can presently crack 40-bit DES keys without too much difficulty on a fast home computer. I know that RSA isn't as efficient, per bit, as DES is; but even worst case, we should need no more than another 2,008 generations of computer power increase to make a 2,048-bit key easily crackable.

      That's still a really, really long time (3,000 years) but WAY less than sun-dies-out. :-)

    12. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by Cramer · · Score: 2

      Who says the numbers Microsoft used are true primes? There's a pretty good chance they aren't unless they used a prime number table which isn't very likely.

      (I would assume they ran genkey -rsa and asked it for a 2048 bit key.)

    13. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by 42forty-two42 · · Score: 1

      I thought the algorithm won't work w/o using real primes.

    14. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by ironfroggy · · Score: 1

      i mentioned decentralization for two reasons:
      1) because a decentralized distributed number crunching system would be useful for several things
      2) the central server wont back out like The Neo Project did.

      And as a encryption keys get exponentially larger, dont they get exponentially less effective in relation to their size?

      As the key gets larger, it does get more and more difficult to crack, but there are also less possibilities added, yes? because as numbers rise, the occurance of primes falls.

      still, who would like to continue this little project? reply such or email me and lets start up the project. im quite serious.

    15. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by pyrrho · · Score: 1

      twill be astounding to see the first quantum computers solve these problems in seconds.

      Yes, you can see, I've bought the promises... I mean, look how far they have gotten so far... quantum computing is in the future. No doubt at that point you don't bother writing algorythms, you breed them.

      --

      -pyrrho

    16. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by Cramer · · Score: 1

      Technically, it doesn't. But in these cases, there's "near enough" primes. The key generator selects two "reasonablly prime" numbers and then tests them to make sure they don't immediately far apart.

      (And yes, I've seen the keys fail testing a few times over the years.)

    17. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by damiam · · Score: 1
      DES uses symmetrical keys, and RSA uses asymmetrical keys. The two are not in any way comparable. A 1024-bit RSA key is (IIRC) about as secure as a 128-bit symmetrical (IDEA, Blowfish, AES) key.

      However, don't assume that Moore's law will hold for three thousand years. I'd be surprised if it lasts another ten (barring quantum computers).

      --
      It's hard to be religious when certain people are never incinerated by bolts of lightning.
    18. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by toopc · · Score: 1
      And you are saying a project like SETI is better? Tell me again the chances of finding alien radio waves?

      The chances are slim, but most people probably consider finding extraterrestrial intelligence a somewhat more meaningful waste of resources than trying to crack the Xbox's encryption.

    19. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Could someone port that client to run on Earth Simulator?

    20. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Be careful when you quote people as well.... Although I would like to believe BG actually said this, I have yet to actually see any evidence he said this therefore so why should I?

      Bill Gates has said and done a lot of stupid things but without evidence and with so many diff versions (the one I heard ie it should be enough for everyone for a long time) I don't see any more reason to believe this is true then to believe say Neimann Marcus sold a recipe for $250...

    21. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For an example for why I dont trust it:

      (This comes from
      http://archive.adaic.com/docs/present/engle/ whyada /tsld003.htm)

      Within three years, Bill Gates would realize that because MS-DOS limited users to 640K of RAM of hard disk storage, it was becoming obsolete. In response to users' needs, Bill Gates developed OS/2; released in 1987, OS/2 offered 25,000 times more memory

      What's that? Are you talking about RAM or hard disk storage????

      Also there is the NT =network=new tech=whatever fits debacle (so many people claim it means this but since no one has given proof and since Microsoft denies it, we cna never know what it means)

    22. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That sounds ok at first until you realise how impossible it is to get something that actually works ok...

    23. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      Moore's law will never hold out for that long. The earlier poster seems to think that an atom is infinetly small. It's not. So there is now ay Moore's law can hold out for 3000 years. Quantum computers, if they can ever be produced may do the trick. But they ain't going to have anything to do with Moore's law

    24. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      I personally think it's a waste of time but to each his own. However, the chance of finding et intel is one thing for which you CANNOT get a reliable probability statistic while you can for the Xbox key. Perhaps more importantly, SETI has been going for a few years. I doubt anyone would give a fuck if you found out the Xbox key in say 6 years while people would probably still care if you found ET intel in 20 years...

    25. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      They def would have made it very hard to crack....

    26. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      Anyway, I think you're all missing the point. Even if someone does come up with a super quantum computer 10 years from now, who the fuck is going to care if you crack the Xbox key? More importantly, the whole DC project didn't do jack squat really if you use a quantum computer to find it.

    27. Re:who still wants to crack this key? by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      Sound very ineffiecient, very bad considering their algorythm is already very ineffiecient. Probabyl likely to take 100 times the age of the universe instead of the current 25 times the age of the universe (which is more then the effieicent algorythm time which will be 10).... BTW, I just made those number up but you get the idea

  23. Time has not yet come by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The final battle will be far in the future!

  24. Umm... by ThrasherTT · · Score: 4, Insightful

    If you didn't see this coming, you have some serious reality issues. This is the first thing that popped into my head when I saw the initial annoucement of the cracking attempt.

    --

    All Your Memory Are Belong To Java
  25. I don't work for MS... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    and I always get a good laugh from /.

  26. You guys are all fucknuckles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    that is the reason why. And fucknozzles as well! You could have gotten a mammogram, but instead you went to Xbox land and you haven't come back.

  27. Short answer to "how long?": by gazbo · · Score: 4, Funny

    "fucking"

  28. give credit where credit is due by veggiespam · · Score: 1

    paraphrased and slightly modified from the mel brooks movie 'spaceballs'.

    conversion between crewman asshole, darth helmet, and supreme evil ruler.

    1. Re:give credit where credit is due by saider · · Score: 1

      I had put in a little blurb at the bottom, but I lazily put it inside angle brackets and the HTML parser tossed it. Funny, since I remembered to use the '&lt'; and '&gt'; in the 'later' tag. I gotta get some Dew.

      Besides, I don't think anyone would interpret a scripted dialog as an original work on slashdot. I know I certianly don't.

      --


      Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    2. Re:give credit where credit is due by pclminion · · Score: 2

      I think to most people that was pretty clear :-)

  29. What? It's over? by Anand_S · · Score: 5, Funny

    Oh, man. Does this mean no more Linux on the X-Box? This news wouldn't be so devastating if there were perhaps some other device capable of running Linux.
    *cough*

  30. Summary... by grub · · Score: 1


    ..make no sense.. head hurt.. neo project killed new project ate neo. Fear the neo project.. there is no spoon..

    --
    Trolling is a art,
  31. No biggie, it's cracked anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    The key:

    408818288091685305913758191399560859893800205749 38 1512491823325275367\
    0039983761093737657581366182 3437132028369300928737 2136090488973662885\
    0749520857823194202487813723 5281529166119647272954 3623272112620364581\
    9171026696185476725881661520 6188703489047492973236 7903825810597884676\
    0087066526446068063036669029 6494498088117693882712 8484532375726579806\
    8929812355659309066834995984 8375737098966810233408 2736619960338101994\
    5191141043929531602040535969 8321364177283871960956 9923672820142531423\
    1154135179174732484135445198 3247750938845967420404 6551928328834053889\
    0325273138153871592525085498 7565463644

    Try it.

    1. Re:No biggie, it's cracked anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      So does this mean it's time for XBox signing key T-shirts!

    2. Re:No biggie, it's cracked anyway by warmcat · · Score: 2

      Dude, how can a prime number bigger than 2 be EVEN? If you can divide it by two then its not prime.

    3. Re:No biggie, it's cracked anyway by TheShadow · · Score: 3, Informative

      For those of you that know nothing about RSA. The private key is not necessarily a prime number.
      Here's how the key is generated:

      1. Generate two large random primes, p and q, of approximately equal size such that their product n = pq is of the required bit length, e.g. 1024 bits.

      2. Compute n = pq and phi = (p-1)(q-1).

      3. Choose an integer e, 1 e phi, such that gcd(e, phi) = 1.

      4. Compute the secret exponent d, 1 d phi, such that ed ß 1 (mod phi).

      5. The public key is (n, e) and the private key is (n, d). The values of p, q, and phi should also be kept secret.

      - n is known as the modulus.
      - e is known as the public exponent or encryption exponent.
      - d is known as the secret exponent or decryption exponent.

      So, factoring n into it's parts (p and q... which are prime) and the public key would give you all the information you need to determine the private key.

      --

      --
      "What do you want me to do? Whack a guy? Off a guy? Whack off a guy? Cause I'm married."
    4. Re:No biggie, it's cracked anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Amazing!

      I know a guy how has exactly this number of computers beowulfed in his garage.

    5. Re:No biggie, it's cracked anyway by DirkDaring · · Score: 1

      That's the same combination I have on my luggage!

  32. I had this idea... by nmg196 · · Score: 1

    1. Get X-Box private key.
    2. ?
    3. Profit!

    1. Re:I had this idea... by GT_Alias · · Score: 2

      Was that after discarding the "How about a Beowulf cluster of ..." idea?

    2. Re:I had this idea... by wildekat · · Score: 1

      in sovjet russia, ideas have you!

      (sorry)

  33. Typical Slashdot by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Conservatives blame Clinton
    Liberals blame Reagan
    Slashdotters blame Micrsosoft

  34. legitiment? by realmolo · · Score: 0, Troll

    It's "legitimate", you fucking tools. Maybe The DCers should look into the new Distributed Spelling Client from The English Department. There's also a cool one from The Grammar Project called They're There Their. Abbreviated T3.

  35. MS didn't NEED to do anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    Trying to crack the X-Box Private Key *feels* illegal to most users (even if it isn't...IANAL). So, many of the participants of the Neo Project probably decided that they didn't want to have anything to do with that, and stopped participating. This means that they have a lot less computing power for ALL of their projects (not just the X-Box one). So it makes sense for them to stop the X-Box Key Crack if it will bring their users (and computing power) back to the project.

    1. Re:MS didn't NEED to do anything... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Correct me if I'm wrong, but isn't this in violation of the DMCA's Anticircumvention laws?

  36. I'm not surprised. by Tiger · · Score: 1

    Two things. The first from gamasutra is a story titled "Xbox Encryption Key Under Brute-Force Hack Attack; Could Take Eons". Sounds to me like it was a noble, but ultimately futile goal.

    The second is a comment I made to friends immediately after hearing the story. The Neo Project had essentially just rubbed pig's blood and feces all over itself, and then jumped into the South Pacific and splashed its arms around. Hell, they even SAID on their webpage that at the slightest hint of objection of a legal nature, they'd drop everything.

    "So what you're saying," I can imagine a Microsoft landshark responding, "is that, if we tell you to stop... you will? Well, in that case.. Stop!" No doubt the landshark then submitted an expense cheque for several hours of "research".

    Why did TNP even bother starting? Call me suspicious, but I think it's a big publicity stunt on TNP's part. They got attention.

  37. The client by Turmio · · Score: 5, Interesting

    One thing that indicate the level of professionalism of these people is that the Neo client is written in VisualBasic (check their forums for reference, last night it was _so slow_ that I don't bother linking the thread here). VisualBasic has uses but not here I'm afraid. Yeah, why not lock out all the *nix clusters with cool admins that are the biggest contributors to distributed cracking projects by letting their clusters crack stuff when they otherwise would be idle. I guess they were developing a new portable client from the scratch with C... But still, no sympathy from me.

    1. Re:The client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Really? That's news to me...

      It's not surprising though... The X-Box community is just a bunch of kids raving and ranting... I'm sure it all seems very new and important to them. Can't really blame them, with all the publicity surrounding "Linux on X-Box" and stuff... They are reaffirmed in their mistaken beliefs every time they visit Slashdot.

      Just for the record, one more time... Guys... Hacking the X-Box is a waste of time... The X-Box is just a toy, it doesn't have the symbolic (mythical??) significance that you seem to think it has.

    2. Re:The client by Bryson · · Score: 1


      That's nothing compared to the real folly: they were trying to
      factor a 2048-bit RSA modulus by trial division.

      Even using the best algorithms known (which are super-polynomial
      but sub-exponential), that key size will be out of range for a
      number of decades. The stupid Neo approach was to find primes
      and try to divide.

      It was not a serious project. Just distributed cluelessness.

    3. Re:The client by roady · · Score: 1

      I moderated this insightfull comment as Troll by a wheelmouse accident, so I post to undo that.

    4. Re:The client by atomicdragon · · Score: 1

      I would think there are bigger problems using VB for this. I used VB once (I know, I am ashamed of it) when I was adding some pretty graphics to an even older BASIC program that did number crunching. It ran extremely slow. I am not sure if this has changed recently. But I was actually able to take the time to rewrite it in c++ and run it before the VB finished running. It would seem that such problems would knock a distributive computing back to the stone ages in terms of speed.

    5. Re:The client by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it doesn't indicate a level of prfessionalism, but your post does indicate a level of arrogance.

      this is exactly was VB should be used for: prototyping. they wrote an application, and then scrapped it to be rewritten in C.

      besides, i don't know a single admin that runs distributed cracking programs on their servers, production or otherwise. _that_ is just unprofessional.

    6. Re:The client by geekoid · · Score: 2

      Your ignorance know no bounds.

      --
      The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
    7. Re:The client by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      Considering that a number of admins were getting into trouble for SETIing and Curing etc without permission, they would have to not only be unprofessional but idiots as well

  38. Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by stratjakt · · Score: 5, Insightful

    It doesn't seem to me just as simple as 'signing' some code and burning it to a disc. I don't have the full info with me, but I've seen the dev kit and there is a completely custom layout to an xDVD, with big blocks of sectors reserved for security features. It's reminiscent of the PSX's scheme - 'bad' sectors on the disc that cant be replicated with a burner (they all automatically recalculate ECC info).

    Short of having your own pressing facility, the key would do virtually no good. So who would benefit? Asian pirates on a commercial level - they could start pressing counterfeit XBOX titles en masse, just like they did with Dreamcast. They arent going to be selling silvers of debian linux for 5$ a pop on the streets of hong kong, believe me.

    Modchips enable those who want the ability to backup their software and run homebrew applications, and I'm wholly in favor of that. If this project succeded, it'd just put mass commercial counterfeiting in the hands of bad guys, which I'm absolutely not in favor of.

    (Now, in theory, one could use a no-solder type mod (pogo pins on the lPC header), install some sort of dashboard replacement to install the new linux BIOS and run it. That'd be about it, since you cant modify the original xbox' bios in RAM, you'd never be able to run unsigned native code from a CD/DVD-R. Since you'd have to temporarily mod the console to get linux on there anyways, you might as well flash the TSOP while yer at it)

    --
    I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    1. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      As far as I understood it is not about copying XBox discs. If one was able to do a 1:1 copy then one would not need that key. It is about signing your own software so the XBox accepts and plays it.

    2. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by stratjakt · · Score: 2, Insightful

      The xbox wont even LOOK for a signature unless you put it in the disc format it expects - and you cant. The mods do more than skip the signature check, they also skip the media checks, even letting it boot from a UDF filesystem. That's my point. Signing an xbe is only the first step, now you have to put it on XBOX media.

      You could never burn a bootable xDVD, signature or no signature. The best you could do is mod the console, install linux on the HDD, then remove the mod - and whats the point of that? You still void the warranty and have to go through the mess of installation and removal.

      The only people who could create a bootable xDVD with the signature would be those with commercial production facilities.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by Sloppy · · Score: 3, Funny
      Modchips enable those who want the ability to backup their software and run homebrew applications, and I'm wholly in favor of that. If this project succeded, it'd just put mass commercial counterfeiting in the hands of bad guys
      You're just thinking of hackers and pirates, it seems. What about commercial developers?

      Maybe someone wants to develop XBox games (or any other sort of software, I guess) and not pay for Microsoft's expensive "services." If you can boot Linux on an xBox w/out any hardware mods, you can boot anything (or just use Linux as a loader or whatever) and don't have to worry about code signing anymore. So the only expenses you have are the "usual" ones: developing the software, somehow pressing the DVDs, etc. No payment to MS, no weird agreements with MS, etc. Just freedom.

      As long as hardware mods are the only way to do this, such projects can't be commercially feasible. You can't easily sell a game at S-Mart to the masses, that only runs on hardware-modified XBoxes. Most of the type of people who buy XBoxes aren't going to be willing to mess with their hardware.

      Although if this project had succeeded, neither non-Microsoft-licensed developers nor piracy would have been the big stories of the day. The big story of the day would be the earthshattering sound of thousands of other projects that depend on RSA, scrambling to replace it with something else. The XBox would just be a relatively minor and obscure mote within all the global chaos and confusion. ;-)

      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    4. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by terminal.dk · · Score: 3, Insightful

      You don't get it - do you ?

      We do not want to crack it to make pirate copies. And the asians can probably make them already if they want.

      We want it cracked so that the people who bought the hardware can run 3rd party hardware of their own choice on their own hardware.

      Would you be happy if MS said that you are not allowed to use any non-MS software on your Windows PC ? And started shipping only Windows to run on hardware protected PCs ?

    5. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by terrymr · · Score: 5, Insightful

      If you have the equipment then encryption keys and strange disc formats aren't going to stop you copying discs en masse. The only people it stops are private developers and casual copiers. Any determined pirate with enough time & hardware will find a way to exactly copy those discs. The reasoning behind the encryption & disc protection is not to stop copying but to stop people other than MS producing software for it. This has been the normal behaviour with console manufacturers for years. It has little to do with piracy and everthing to do with controlling the flow of software. The reason for this is that the boxes are sold at a massive loss - maybe $200 or more per unit and the only way to make money is to sell lots of software at inflated prices. Once again this is an example of a corporation expected the law to protect a ludicrous business model i.e. we want to sell these at a whopping great loss but make money off of selling things for it without anybody else being able to sell things for it.

    6. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by tshak · · Score: 2

      Maybe someone wants to develop XBox games (or any other sort of software, I guess) and not pay for Microsoft's expensive "services."

      The point is if you want to develop on a [insert proprietary console here], you have to pay your dues. It's illegal not to. Even if you could break the commercial countermeasures, you'd still get a [legitimate] lawsuit from MS>

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    7. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by Sloppy · · Score: 2
      The point is if you want to develop on a [insert proprietary console here], you have to pay your dues. It's illegal not to.
      Illegal, except for one little loophole: that there's no law against it.
      --
      As copyright owner of this comment, I authorize everyone to defeat any technological measure which limits access to it.
    8. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by FatAlb3rt · · Score: 1

      Once again this is an example of a corporation expected the law to protect a ludicrous business model

      //devil's advocate ON// Do you have a cell phone? Did you get it FREE when you signed up? How about your DSL modem? Same thing. Why isn't there a big move to hack cell phones or run our DSL with another provider? Ok, we don't have our own towers, blah blah blah. Just wanted to point out that M$ isn't the only company with this business model. //devil's adv OFF//

      I guess I'm mostly impartial on this issue, but it seems for the most part we like to scream freedom because it's Bill Gates that we're dealing with. Why is there such a big push to hack it? If it's a freedom thing, what's wrong with the PC you're using? If it's the challenge, beer's to you.

    9. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by terrymr · · Score: 2

      I didn't say microsoft were the only ones with this business model .... I just don't think the government should be in the business of protecting their business model against *Criminals* who might want to run their own software on an X-box.

      Your cell phone contract is usually the thing that stops you changing networks on your phone but once free of the contract there's nothing to stop you doing that.

      As for DSL - my router is mine and I don't have a contract so I suppose I could take it to another provider anytime.

    10. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by /dev/trash · · Score: 2

      I'd wager you'd be in the minority.

    11. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I should point out that the comparison to the Dreamcast isn't really valid, as these disks were not protected in this fashion - they just have an odd way of laying out the TOC.

      The 'security' with the sega/phillips GDROM was that it was a double density disk, unreadable on normal cdrom drives. Data was streamed off via the serial port, modem line ( ugh ) or Broadband adapter, the movies and audio were recompressed to bring the disk under 80min, and then burned.

      Also, I think the main participants were not faceless dealers on the streets of hong kong, but a usenet warez group called Echelon. They were truly prolific.

      -- Curious

    12. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by tshak · · Score: 2

      Sure there is, it's called copyright law. In order to make an XBox game you need to have the license to use certain copyrighted code in order to work with the system. So, unless you have a hardware modification that turns the XBox into something else (like a pseudo PC), than it is illegal. It's also illegal to sell a game which claims to A) be XBox compatible and B) have the XBox logo or any other XBox related designation without licensing them from Microsoft. The same, trivial, rules apply to Nintendo and Sony systems as well.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    13. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by Penguin2212 · · Score: 0

      I think that somewhere in the fine print of Xbox manual, it says somewhere that you're not supposed to run third party software and what not. Similar to the phone contract, I guess.

    14. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by yason · · Score: 1
      Sure there is, it's called copyright law. In order to make an XBox game you need to have the license to use certain copyrighted code in order to work with the system.

      The copyright law states nothing about having to license any code from anywhere in order to make a game for XBox. Keys are not copyrighted either. Hacking the key, writing a game using your own code and libraries and selling it is legal. No code or property of MS is illegally copied at all. Wine is free, too, and that's completely legal. Sure, MS wants you to sign a developer contract (or whatever) so that they can pull strings on you but if you don't, they can only sue you into oblivion over not-so-related issues, like over DMCA (for breaking their copy protection) and other acronyms.

    15. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This is exactly why we need to open source CD/DVD burner firmware. For some stupid reason us consumers accept that we don't get any control over the ECC generated.

      We can burn the data on a disc, but because the firmware generates ECC according to the formal color books, it will not be an 100% exact copy of the orginal.

      Till now this has prevented us from booting backups and non-licensed applications on consoles without having to modify them.

    16. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by n3k5 · · Score: 1
      So who would benefit? Asian pirates on a commercial level - they could start pressing counterfeit XBOX titles en masse, just like they did with Dreamcast.
      You mean counterfeit, as in copy of an already existing xDVD on the market? You wouldn't need any secret/private key for doing that at all. So, I'd say, this whole argument is totally idiotic.

      It's reminiscent of the PSX's scheme - 'bad' sectors on the disc that cant be replicated with a burner
      The PSX uses CD-ROMs, which, if they had misfeatures like bad sectors, couldn't be burned when the PSX was new. But new burners became available, and now there some that burn anything you want, down to the subchannels and whatsitcalled. It won't be long until the same happens for DVDs.
      --
      but what do i know, i'm just a model.
    17. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by tshak · · Score: 1

      Your argument's are laughable. You can logically argue all you want, or you can look at the reality - no company that resides in a country that respects international copyright laws has ever made any software and sold it for consoles for a reason - it's illegal. And no, you can't just "code your own libraries" because even then you need proprietary, copyrighted information. This is why a _hardware_ modification must be made in order to legally create software for the PS2 or XBox. Of course, this still doesn't make _selling_ it legal.

      --

      There is no longer anything that can be done with computers that is nontrivial and clearly legal. -- Paul Phillips
    18. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by terrymr · · Score: 2

      No really as the fine print in the X-box manual has no legal effect because it's inside the box and it's contents aren't brought to your attention before you by it.

    19. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by Penguin2212 · · Score: 0

      That's true. But I'm still gonna read the manual for my Xbox and see what kind of Bullshit Microsoft tried to put in there.

    20. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      I hate to say this, but you're a bit of an idiot aren't you? Or rather stuck in the past. PSX games including bad sectors can be replicated with most current burners and this has been true for quite a while. You still usually need a MOD chip though because PSes detect CDRs and refuse to run them. Pirates have been pressing them for years. Also Dreamcast games, although these were GD-Roms not CD-Roms. They might be pressing CD-Roms now that it's been made possible I assume. They would be selling silvers of Linux although obviously not as much as the games. However, they don't really care about mod-chip free games. They don't really need them except for the limited overseas market. Only an idiot in HK or any similar country would have a non-modded console. They are usually modded when you buy them. They can usually work out themselves how to pirate the things so that they work with modchips. Since they have a lot more available to them then someone with a burner, they don't have as many problems either. E.g. Making GD-Roms...

    21. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      Actually a lot of commerical pirates actually copied the whole GD-Rom (made actualy GD-Roms)

    22. Re:Why I *DONT* want to see the key cracked. by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      Ohoh. Another person who is stuck in 1995. MANY MODERN (and even a lot of not so modern) burners CAN BURN FULLY RAW WITHOUT REGENERATING ANYTHING. The SafeDisc 2.5 copy protection is the only recent copy protection which stumped some rather recent writers because the standard patterns confused the writers somehow enough so that they had problems. However many writers don't have this problem anymore. I REPEAT, YOU CAN BURN DATA ON THE DISC WITHOUT REGENERATING THE ECC, THE SUBCODES, ETC ETC ETC. And opensource firmware? Are you nuts? BTW, whatever you do, you cannot make a 100% exact copy of the original. You can make copies which have the exact same data content but there will still be so many differences. From the colour of the disc to the size of the spiral to the label on top to the precise position of the data on the disc (in geometric terms) to everything. Luckily, most of these differences cannot be detected easily. However, the fact that a disc is a CDR can be detected so this is a very simple copy protection in consoles. In computers, it's more difficult as it's difficult for readers to detect CDRs and more importantly, it's easy to get software to hide this. However, Sony have come up with their new SecuROM which basically uses a screwed up/unstandard spiral. This in itself isn't ingenious. Anyone can think of it. The problem is working out how to detect it with a standard reader and how to make the CDs cheaply. Sony have managed to do both fairly well apparently. The detecting it portion is somewhat problematic because it realise on seek times. This created a very serious problem. You can make a 100% copy of the data but so what? The spiral is still going to be different. And the trouble is this spiral is already in CD media you buy. You don't make your own spiral, it's already there. So basically there isn't much you can do. Sure someone could make this media but if Sony is smart, they will make the spiral different enough each time that you will need a diff media for each game and this will never happen. The only way you can overcome this is to write an image on your disc. Then an image reader on your comp will read the image. This image reader of course can store info about the spiral so the speak and interpret that when the software asks for the seek time.

  39. It was stopped because it's a crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Microsoft is legitimately trying to protect their IP with the X-Box licensing scheme. Trying to crack the protecting is a violation of the DMCA, a federal crime.

    1. Re:It was stopped because it's a crime. by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      Trying to crack the protecting is a violation of the DMCA, a federal crime.

      Which is of zero relevance to most of the world, especially the vast majority of the human population who don't happen live in the USA.

    2. Re:It was stopped because it's a crime. by antisoshal · · Score: 1

      A number is not intellectual property. Niether is a prime number. no one is is copying xbox games nor would the key alow them to. In fact, the key does not really qualify as copy protection. its merely a way to make it difficult for you to give anyone but Micro$oft money to use a pile of parts that YOU purchased with your own money. Its an obstacle. nothing more. finding the key then creating legitimate content to be used on the Xbox would not even appear on the DMCA radar. Now...if you used the key to make illegal copies of content created by microsoft you might have an argument....but just because someone CAN use something illegally does not make it illegal. Unless you want it to...in such case the computer you type on would be illegal because you COULD do something bad with it. dumbass.

    3. Re:It was stopped because it's a crime. by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      You're right but you missing the point. The developers of the program and I bet a lot of a the DC contributers do happen to live in the USA. I'm personally sick of USAers thinking they own the world or they are the world too but you shouldn't forget the important issues.

    4. Re:It was stopped because it's a crime. by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      You're a bit confused. The DCMA disallowes any activity which can be used to overcome copy protection. Many people don't agree with it but it's the law. DeCSS is illegal because of this reason. The actual program doesn't violate any intellectual property. However, the program itself can be used to overcome copy protection. Similarly, the key isn't intellectual property but you can use the key to overcome copy protection measures. Go read the law before you make dumb comments. BTW, altho I hate Microsoft, Sony etc, the end results is they choose a business model for consoles (which wasn't start by Microsoft) which involves selling the hardware below cost and makign up for it with games. While I don't agree with this model, IMHO, they should be allowed to use it if they so desire..... Idiots like you shouldn't purchase it if you don't agree with this software model.

    5. Re:It was stopped because it's a crime. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Umm... Most PC copyrights can be overcome by patching the game.

      This has been impossible to do on Xbox games because modifying the game on the disc would require a different signature on the disc. As such, getting the key could, very easily, lead to piracy.

      Thank you, come again.
      T.

  40. Do something productive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

    Guys, instead of trying to do something whose only purpose is to allow people to rip off games, why not do something noble that will help humanity. Here are some suggestions:

    1.) Seti@Home
    2.) Cure Cancer
    3.) Evolution@Home
    4.) Entropia
    5.) eOn
    6.) Climate Prediction
    7.) Particle Accelerator Design
    8.) Analytical Spectroscopy Research Group

    See a complete list here: http://www.aspenleaf.com/distributed/distrib-proje cts.html

    And no, I don't consider cracking encryption "noble". Especially when people don't seem to get the point that if it takes tens of thousands of computers months and months to crack some encryption, it is GOOD ENCRYPTION.

    1. Re:Do something productive by glesga_kiss · · Score: 2
      instead of trying to do something whose only purpose is to allow people to rip off games

      You make a very good point, and post some good links. However, you are wrong on the above, there are valid reasons to do this. Check out sourceforge for some X-Box projects, such as media players. Currently, you need to install a mod chip to make use of these. This project would have allowed people to run code of their choosing on a piece of hardware that they legally bought. Quite frankly, I can do what I want with it. (if I owned one). I can open it up, urinate on it, use it as a footstool, run my own code on it, and so on.

      However, there is a flip side to this; the most interesting project is the XBox media player. Ironically, most of the content that will be played on it is probably pirated!

    2. Re:Do something productive by Just+Brew+It! · · Score: 1

      You forgot Folding@home

    3. Re:Do something productive by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Right... ya... playing movies... that's why people want to crack the encryption.

      *COUGH*

    4. Re:Do something productive by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      Also http://genomeathome.stanford.edu/ (other then folding@home someone already mentioned) Anyway, I should add there has been some controversy of the Cure Cancer project. United Devices is a commercial company that plans to sell computing power to people who need it in the future (if they aren't already). They will run these commerical applications on the Cure Cancer clients without requesting permission or informing you (it's in the license agreement). Many people such as me have decided against it for this reason. However, I believe Intel have said they are not allowed to do so on their client so download that instead. Another thing I have issue with is the fact that there don't seem to be willing to say who get's what info. However, it appears that the university they have a partnership with will get the info and any developements will be patented by them. Of course, as with all scientific discoveries, it will also be published in a journal etc. While I'm not against Uni's being involved in commercial enterprises, I don't agree to them doing so off my personal comp's work when I have no affliation with them. And while I recognise a patent may be necessary to avoid parasitic multinational pharmaceutical companies, they have not given any indication they will be better then any of these companies, eg. in allowing poor countries access. While I don't think free drugs for the rich countries should be allowed, I am strongly against the current pratices of disallowing countries who can never afford the drugs to have any access to them. Therefore, I totally disagree with the way the info gather is being used. Of course, it is up to you to decide whether you fell this is true for you or not.

  41. Wrong! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    It was a conversation between Dark Helmet, Colonel Sanders, and President Skroob.

  42. Great ! by ConsoleDeamon · · Score: 2, Funny

    Great... Im gonna be connected to an microsoft product, I can see the blue walls whit error codes already.

  43. ah, the days of yesteryear 8) by DrSkwid · · Score: 2


    http://www.astaserials.com/?search=xbox%20privat e% 20key

    came up with a keygen !

    --
    There are places where the networks are not touching,and there are places where they are-Boeing's Lori Gunter
    1. Re:ah, the days of yesteryear 8) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A keygen that requires install of ad/spyware that adds links to porno? No, thanks. Maybe if there was a mirror.

  44. Re:The client - The irony by Atomizer · · Score: 1

    But just think of the irony if the key was cracked on a Windows machines with a VB client. Maybe using Excel VBA would've been even funnier.

  45. Great approach by Zone5 · · Score: 3

    So, translated, their philosophy was: "Hey you nasty people out there, don't challenge us in any way on this, or we'll just back down! So there!"

    Ummm... Something's wrong with their approach. Advertising the fact that you'll fold under the slightest pressure isn't the way to keep an effort going.

    Can't say as I blame them though.

    --
    "So on one hand, honey is an amazingly sophisticated and efficient food source. On the other hand it's bee backwash."
  46. Spinning backwards by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    here here

  47. You all are stupid! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't anyone at slashdot proofread what they post, and also just generally be informed about the topic at hand? It's Xbox, not X-Box!!!!! Jesus. A few months ago they were writing about Intel's Xenon processor. Look, it's Xeon!!! I'm not asking you guys to be as smart as me, but can you please try???? You're running a professional website, try to act like it.

  48. Re:I wonder... by theendlessnow · · Score: 1

    One, two, three, four, five? That's the combination that an idiot has on his luggage.

    If an ax can rip open a suitcase....

    Perhaps we're going about this problem all wrong.

  49. past precedent by zogger · · Score: 5, Interesting

    --this is an interesting case. I am reluctant to use the old cars and computers analogy, but it's appropriate here. For decades and generations car companies have come up with innovations and released a product that they own, then sell. It has shape, size, presence, features, etc all unique to that comapny, and covered by various laws of ownership and some laws on use, but still a lot of leeway. And for the same amount of time guys have decided that these products needed "souping up" and customiizing and modifying, and it's all been mostly legal. You can take a car, moidify it heavily and still drive on the public road following a set of road use laws, but you can still drive completely different if you want to on your own property or someone elses property-say a race track-in any manner you wish to. They did it for their own reasons which aren't revelant, make it go faster, make it travel on roads not envisioned as the primary road the designers were aiming for (think heavy off road mods), make it look nicer or whatever.

    Seems like more than ample past case law to make hardware modding "legal". In the cars cases it might have required the hotrodder to completely disassemble the entire car, see how every single part worked and how it was designed, then decide how they wanted to do it better or different to suit their needs. It's more than legal, it's commonplace and no one thinks twice about it, it's a huge business and millions of people do it as a hobby.

    Microsoft is seeking to become a huge exception to the past rules, as are a slew of other computer hardware and software companies. They can't have it both ways, if they actually are selling a product, then said product must be covered by a consumer warranty, and last I looked microsoft insists their products are as-is, no warranty unless they deem to do allow it at their leisure, ie, the "designed software" and "hard coded into the hardware" part. It's one or the other, if they want all the rights of a sellable consumer product, then they must accept normal useability warranties that are applied to every other "product" out there, and they most definetly DON'T accept that, so the courts should tell them (and ALL those other companies that insist on propietary excuslivity "rights" to their warez) to get stuffed until they do. As to modding the hardware itself, it's the same, either you get to OWN a piece of stuff or you don't, you can't half own something. Case precedence should have been set a long time ago, but it wasn't, now it's a big ole mess because it's become entrenched into computer-dom that they can have their cake and eat it too, something no other product has, and only one private business in the US currently enjoys (outside utilities and that gets into what is a utility), and that's major league baseball, which is goofy enough but exists.

    1. Re:past precedent by Sunda666 · · Score: 2

      You are right, of course.

      Altough, it is the market that will decide wether they will be sucessful or not. For example, say you have two choices of hardware to buy, one is the Xbox, with all the DRM crap enabled, and the other is some taiwanese clone, with no DRM or restrictions, and also a lot cheaper. What would you choose? Notice that this is already happening with DVD players, "good-brand" ones come with RPC, but "el-cheapo" taiwanese ones comes with no RPC, or sometimes with some easily-disabled RPC, just pro-forma. And they usually work (and sell) pretty well.

      I think as soon the Xbox is popular enough, some clones will start to appear, or, if computing power is enough, MAME will let us play xbox games. It's all a matter of time.

      As for this kind of crap becoming a standard for computers (Palladium), just imagine what would you choose as your computing platform: USA/M$ controlled hardware running WindowsPalladium(TM) or some ASUS board running Linux,BSD or whatever else you throw on it? Looks like an easy choice to me, but others may disagree.

      cheers

      --


      ``If a program can't rewrite its own code, what good is it?'' - Mel
    2. Re:past precedent by Old+Wolf · · Score: 2

      Well, cars are different because you can't mass-produce a clone. No Korean startup can offer even, say, a Holden Monaro. Sure, they could make something that *looks* the same but it will not have the great durability, reliability, toughness, and power and crash specifications that the real thing does.

      This is different to Xbox etc. , where some Korean startup can and will offer a version for half the price, with the annoying features (DRM etc.) disabled.

    3. Re:past precedent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      RTFA
      1. No one is saying you can't mod or try to stop YOU from modding your X-box. Provided you can find (or make) the mods you are free to do what you wish. No one is going to even think twice about arresting/suing/or caring what you do to your hardware.

      as for getting them to replace the sh*t once you break it.....

      2. If you were to put racing type Mods on a newly purchased vehicle, or take a non-off road vehicle off road, that more often than not VOIDS the warranty. I gaurantee if you put a nitrous system in a Honda, the dealer will laugh you off the block if you were to come back and say "my car broke down - a few weeks after I installed this nitrous system". Similarly if you took a sports car off-roading and cracked your chasis while doing "normal" offroading - not only do I suspect your insurance would not cover you - but Lexus sure as hell isn't going to pony up nor is the Lexus dealer!

      3. As for hacking their 2048 encrypted private key, Good Luck - and may the force be with you. If you are successful the more power to you.

      Oh and btw - Xbox is covered by both merchantability and manufacturer warranties. I don't know where you pulled this As-is bullshit from, did you buy your Xbox second hand? What kind of crack...nevermind

    4. Re:past precedent by zogger · · Score: 2

      --I did read the article and a lot of other articles on the subject. Your assumption is incorrect. I also don't own or even am considering owning an xbox, nor do I ever play video games, so there's another assumption you got wrong. I am not personally trying to crack the key, another assumption wrong. I don't use drugs, so your assumption on crack is incorrect.

      And you are also wrong on the other notions, political and legal or quasi legal pressure is being put on modchip makers, "cracking" encrypted software and reverse engineering closed source is still a serious gray area and several suits past and present exist. EULAS on software are a self written get out of jail free card non-warranty on propietary software manufacturers end (I've read those too), and really don't exist outside that industry.

      As to car modding, of course I am aware of that as pertains warranties. But no car company puts legal or political or economic pressure on the aftermarket and racing guys for doing their business, on the contrary, they gleefully snag and put to good use any advances they can find. They are more than willing to lend their trademarks and logos to them to slap on their cars at the track. Engineers are employed in the automakers stable, extremly skilled out of the box thinking and HIGH PAID engineers exist in the aftermatket and modification areas. NASCAR and NHRA innovations have added about as much to detroit's bottom line over the years as the sum total of their in house engineers. The price is right for detroit,and they aren't as plain vanilla stupid as the software houses or hollywood. They can and have learned from their mistakes in the past, but those other guys just keep making the same ones over and over again and go running to bigbrodotgov nanny.

      A lot of intelligent people in those industries, but a severe lack of common sense sometimes at the upper management levels. Must go with the mindset I guess, don't know why, but there ya go.

      You get one reply as an AC from me, so here it is.

    5. Re:past precedent by blunkett · · Score: 1

      This looks like the old IBM computer leasing practice. You never got to own one of their mainframes and therefore could do nothing with it. What happened to them.....?

    6. Re:past precedent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What happened to IBM? They became the biggest IT company on the planet and if I remember right, hold more patents than any other company.

      http://www.ibm.com/news/be/en/ibm.html

      Doesn't look like it hurt them that much.

    7. Re:past precedent by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Cars and Xboxes do compare well, but you aren't comparing them properly.

      When modifying a car, car manufacturers don't mind, though refuse to honor the warranty anymore. If you install a mod chip in your xbox, MS will cease the warranty coverage of your xbox.

      Sadly though, the software signing on the Xbox is a bit harder to compare to something on a car. Obviously half the people who were running Neo and responding here don't have Xboxes or don't use them to their full potential since everyone who does knows that Xbox Live is currently the fairest online gamming system. It uses encrypted packet streams and ensures that no unsigned software can be run while gaming to prevent people from cheating.

      If the digital signature for Xbox games is cracked, people would be able to code game loaders which would allow users to cheat. As a proud Xbox owner and happy Xbox Live Gamer, I do not want this to happen! I hope that MS continues to crush anyone who attempts to break this happy and secure online gamming system!

      T.

  50. My Neo Client is still processing packets. by D4MO · · Score: 1

    Doesn't seem shut down to me. Anyone else still running it?

    --

    Rocket science is easy. Neurosurgery, now *that's* difficult.
    1. Re:My Neo Client is still processing packets. by antisoshal · · Score: 1

      its processing just fine. their servers are ignoring your answers. their client is designed to cache results and collect them at intervals. I can only assume that not having or not USING the ability to kill the clients was a veiled attempt to allow someone else to use their source code or structure to continue work at a later date. Its pointless though in the long run. For it to work at all there needs to be better math up front.

    2. Re:My Neo Client is still processing packets. by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      If the original poster didn't know "their client is designed to cache results and collect them at intervals" i.e. that you don't need a perm connection to the internet, that poster should be shot and never allowed a computer ever again

  51. Obvious Reason by DaneelGiskard · · Score: 1

    1) Make something which threatens Microsoft in any way
    2) Let it get to their attention
    3) ...
    4) PROFIT!!!

  52. Someones already done the work: heres the URL by antisoshal · · Score: 2, Informative

    I think that the audience interested in getting cheaper Xbox games, and the audience who dabbles in high strength math and complex technology may have a decidedly lesser coincedent subset than many here assume. An MIT student has already gone to all the trouble of recovering the key and explaining how to use it. He published a REALLY complete document on how he recovered the key and how it could be used and included the fact that if the key is changed, the architecture is such that it could be recovered again. While he doesnt actually give the key (he was discouraged from doing so after discussing his paper with M$), it would seem the measures needed would cost MUCH less than 100K for someone motivated. You can find your holy grail here: http://web.mit.edu/bunnie/www/proj/anatak/AIM-2002 -008.pdf

    1. Re:Someones already done the work: heres the URL by samjam · · Score: 2

      I think you may find he recovered the symetric RC4 key for bootblock signing and not the assymetric private part used for signing applications, which is the one people really want.

      The RC4 key could be used for running new boot ROM's which in turn could run unsigned applications but it requires changes to each xBox to benefit from this.

      Sam

  53. No surprise there by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Saw that coming the nanosecond they announced it. M$ has far too much money tied up in this to allow anyone to crack it. DMCA was written to prevent this kind of action, for good or ill.

  54. Don't buy one! by RatBastard · · Score: 2
    You want to run third party applications on your XBox? Too damned bad. You shouldn't have bought one. You knew going in (or you should have) that the XBox was designed and built to do the following:
    • Play Microsoft licensed XBox game titles.
    • Play DVDs (with the DVD remote)
    • Play audio CDs.
    That's it. That's all it does (without hacking it). You want to run Linux ion it? You really should have bought a PC and saved the money you just wasted.

    XBoxes are NOT PCs (and I know it uses an Intel CPU, a nVidia GPU, an IDE HDD and DVD, that doesn't make it a PC, get over it). They come with very limited licesnses. You don't like the license, don't but the damned thing! Jebus!

    --
    Boobies never hurt anyone. - Sherry Glaser.
    1. Re:Don't buy one! by runderwo · · Score: 2
      They come with very limited licesnses. You don't like the license, don't but the damned thing!
      Uh, since when does a piece of hardware come with a binding license? I didn't sign anything when I bought it.

      Everyone likes to spout off about how MS has the right to dictate how their hardware is used, because they were so generous in bringing it to us, the consuming hordes; but nobody can show how this is legally the actual case.

    2. Re:Don't buy one! by stratjakt · · Score: 1

      >> Uh, since when does a piece of hardware come with a binding license? I didn't sign anything when I bought it.

      It's written pretty clearly on the outside of the retail box. By buying it you accept those terms.

      --
      I don't need no instructions to know how to rock!!!!
    3. Re:Don't buy one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      And what if it said 'By reading this you accept the terms' ?

      Just because it's printed on the side of the box doesn't make it legally binding in the least.

    4. Re:Don't buy one! by runderwo · · Score: 2
      It's written pretty clearly on the outside of the retail box. By buying it you accept those terms.
      I'd like to see some precedent for that. IANAL, but written contracts must be accompanied by a signature of both parties involved, in order to be binding.

      The software EULA is an anomaly, and only applies because the action of clicking the "I accept" button is somehow analogous to signing a contract. But when I pick up something off a store shelf, pay for it, and walk out of the store, no contract whatsoever has been made.

    5. Re:Don't buy one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In fact, if I recall, most EULAs are actually not legally binding because you don't get to see it before you buy the product and after you've bought it, you don't have the option to return it to the store if you don't accept it. Microsoft, who tends to print their license agreements on the outside (And if they don't they always say inside somewhere where the CD is stored if you don't accept the agreement, return this product for a refund), do have binding license agreements.

    6. Re:Don't buy one! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I totally agree. Personally, I've never known the incentive to running Linux or anything else on the Xbox. If it could be considered cheap for the price, then I might understand but since it's actually in many ways, more expensive then an equivalent PC, why the heck would anyone want to buy it to run Linux? I suppose if you only had the money to buy one thing and you really really wanted to play X-box games but who the heck wants to use Linux, or any OS on a TV screen?

  55. maybe... by psych031337 · · Score: 2

    ...the key was just something obvious along the lines of "All work and no play makes Bill a dull boy" repeated until the bit count was reached.

    Whatever, is anyone really surprised over the outcome of this? That/B would really surprise me...

    --
    +++ath0
    1. Re:maybe... by __fastcall · · Score: 1

      All work and no play makes someone's HTML skills dull... unless "That/B" is some type of new pop culture chat slang.

      --


      404 File Not Found
      The requested URL (sig) was not found.
  56. Saved Face by Euphonious+Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful
    That was a good face-saving move.

    Now, they can say they would have broken it if if wasn't so scary to try.

    Otherwise, they would have to admit it would have taken them forty-leven trillion centons just to try out the easy combinations like "haxorz begone", before moving on to the non-alphabetic "hard" ones.

  57. Statistics. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2

    Statatistics[sic] aside, people still win the lottery.

    Say we're talking about a state lottery, picking six numbers out of forty-four for the jackpot. That's about seven million possibilities, call that k. Thus, the probability of any one randomly-selected ticket being the winning one is 1/k, which we'll call p.

    The probability of at least one ticket hitting the jackpot, with n tickets sold, is 1-(1-p)^n.

    One million tickets sold: 13.2% chance of a winner.

    Five million: 50.7% chance of a winner.

    Ten million: 75.7% chance of a winner.

    Twenty million: 94.1% chance of a winner.

    These numbers are pretty plausible for a state lottery. To sum up: The chance of you winning the lottery is microscopic. The chance of someone winning the lottery is plausible, and even likely.

    (Note that if, for instance, the jackpot is above about seven and a half million dollars, and usually only a million tickets are sold at $1 each, it makes sense to buy all seven million possible combinations. (The expected return value on the investment is greater than zero.) I'm told the Mafia used to do this in New Jersey.)

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
    1. Re:Statistics. by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 1

      "Statatistics[sic] aside" /me slaps self.

    2. Re:Statistics. by AyeRoxor! · · Score: 2

      "To sum up: The chance of you winning the lottery is microscopic. The chance of someone winning the lottery is plausible, and even likely."

      Okay, so you are saying that math confirms what we've been doing all along: that one of us has a "microscopic" chance to crack it, but given enough participants, someone cracking the code is "plausible, and even likely." Sounds good.

  58. Lies, damned lies and statistics! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Why can't anyone at slashdot proofread what they post, and also just generally be informed about the topic at hand? It's Xbox, not X-Box!!!!! Jesus. A few months ago they were writing about Intel's Xenon processor. Look, it's Xeon!!! I'm not asking you guys to be as smart as me, but can you please try???? You're running a professional website, try to act like it.

    Get thee behind me Satan! This is _NOT_ a professional website.

    1. Re:Lies, damned lies and statistics! by MouseAnony · · Score: 1

      Xenon and Xeon I understand your 'anger' But X-box and Xbox? Who gives a fuck?

  59. Legal challenge? by Simon+Garlick · · Score: 2

    Or maybe someone with a clue pointed out to them that it would take greater than the lifetime of the Universe and require more disk space than currently exists?

  60. And what did I say? by mcbridematt · · Score: 0

    See your lawyer first
    There were some cries on the Xbox-Linux-devel mailing list last year saying that was illegal, and cracking the Xbox code won't do any good, since M$ can just pick up such codes and try to stop them (In most cases, If someone cracks it, M$ will start making fixed XBox's in days).
    Michael Stien has documented Possible Security attacks for the Xbox. A interesting read.

  61. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  62. Took them longer then expected by nurb432 · · Score: 2

    I would have thought that they would have been targeted by the lawyers in a matter of minutes after announcing something as blatent as this..

    This is just the beginning people, hold on to your hats.

    --
    ---- Booth was a patriot ----
  63. Simpler way? by Decimal · · Score: 2

    Can't someone just analyze an X-Box disc that already has the code on it? Or copy the first however many bits on the DVD and program new games from there?

    --

    Remember "Bring 'em on"? *sigh
    1. Re:Simpler way? by prockcore · · Score: 2

      Can't someone just analyze an X-Box disc that already has the code on it?

      I was wondering this myself. Could someone who knows more about it explain this?

      The private key is somewhere in the xbox. The public key is given to software developers by Microsoft. They sign their software with the public key, the xbox then decodes the game using the private key that's stored in the bios or whatever.

      Is that right?

      If so, how difficult is this really? You've got the cypher text (any xbox game), you've got the private key (in the bios), you've got the clear text (apply private key to cypher text)... and all we're missing is the public key?

    2. Re:Simpler way? by JohnFluxx · · Score: 2

      er no, MS have the private key and the xbox has the public key.

      In the way you are suggesting there would be no problem because anyone could sign anything with the public key.

  64. AOL by freeweed · · Score: 2

    Reminds me of a great classic AOL joke:

    "Did you hear what happens if you play an AOL CD backwards? It has satanic messages. But it's even worse if you play it fowards:

    it installs AOL"

    --
    Endless arguments over trivial contradictions in books written by ignorant savages to explain thunder in the dark.
  65. Remember, these are the by geekoid · · Score: 2

    kind of thinkers that think marking the outside rim with a black marker will make music sound better on a CD.

    no, I'm not talking about the copy protection stuff.

    --
    The Kruger Dunning explains most post on /. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dunning%E2%80%93Kruger_effect
  66. Let's be reasonable. by Penguin2212 · · Score: 0

    It would be nice to be able to run Xbox Linux without a modchip, which was to my understanding the whole scope of the project, but Microsoft would loose alot if the key was actually found. Don't take me the wrong way, I'm not trying to defend Microsoft in any way or argue the legality on either side. But, the simple truth is that the XBox Challenge was doomed from the start, given the circumstances. Moreover, if the project stayed it would take so long to actually crack the key, that by the time it would be found the Xbox would most likely be obsolete.

  67. Re:past precedent (how modding cars is different) by PhrozenF · · Score: 1

    Well...Let's see what you do when you mod a Car, and what exactly happens when you do that.

    You put Biturbos - put more air into the engine - you void your warranty

    You put Intercoolers - put cooler, compressed air into the engine - Void your warranty

    You put raised suspension - make the car ride differently than the manufacturer intended - Void your warranty

    So...no matter what mod you do...you always 'VOID YOUR WARRANTY'......and now...remember...if you choose to actually modify an engine managment system done by Ferrari to generate 200 more horses, and try selling it, and they have it patented.....they will sue your ass for the IPR of it, and they will win.

    So boy...cars aren't much different...so when you say that 'MODDING' to do something the company that made it never intended to do was legal, think again.....it never was..never will be...It is just 'ACCEPTED' in the sporty spirit of the car companies cause it does't cause them to loose any money when you do it....

    Whereas....come on...let's be fair...X-Box modders who do it for the sole purpose of using pirated shit (which, a fact, 99% of them do) do cost the game companies..and Microsft...money....

    So Microsoft isn't going to sit back and take it...they're going to go after those who want to harm their profits...

    As for running Linux on XBOX...try make a 'Public Request' to Microsoft....on the lines of the Sony PS2 Linux kit....and they might agree to help the community out with that...You never know...

    I'm sure it will help them in their 'court battle'..

  68. Hasn't the public key already been found???? by __fastcall · · Score: 1

    Somebody else posted this code as the public key:

    40881828809168530591375819139956085989380020574938 1512491823325275367\
    00399837610937376575813661823437132028369300928737 2136090488973662885\
    07495208578231942024878137235281529166119647272954 3623272112620364581\
    91710266961854767258816615206188703489047492973236 7903825810597884676\
    00870665264460680630366690296494498088117693882712 8484532375726579806\
    89298123556593090668349959848375737098966810233408 2736619960338101994\
    51911410439295316020405359698321364177283871960956 9923672820142531423\
    11541351791747324841354451983247750938845967420404 6551928328834053889\
    03252731381538715925250854987565463644


    It would seem that if this is in fact the public key, solving for the private key shouldn't require that much work... but what the hell do I know, I only had a minor in Math...

    --


    404 File Not Found
    The requested URL (sig) was not found.
  69. Not a good analogy by dragonflea · · Score: 1

    Two reasons:
    1) You don't actually OWN the software: if you read the ageement, you are LEASING the software from the company. So, it'd be like tinkering with a leased car.

    2) After you and your buddy finished making your mods to your car, you can't press a button and create thousands of identical copies for each of your friends and their friends, thereby bypassing the auto manufacturer's intended design, let alone the lost sales.

  70. ok, those are good points by zogger · · Score: 2

    --I'll give ya an Ok on that, both valid. Analogies can be flawed, it was the easiest quickest I could think of. In cars, the big companies are proud to have their corporate stickers on the modders machines. This doesn't happen with computer hardware and software very much, they throw a hissy fit and want you to "not do that" in most cases. they go way out of their way to lobby to make it illegal as much as possible. Can we agree on that as being a valid and generic point as well?

    The alternative in software is mandated by law closed source, you ain't messing with it, OR, create millions of criminals, people who want to change or alter or use in a different way software that isn't under any of the various freeware licenses. Well, we can see how effective that is.

    As to eulas in general, the ones from your favorite cast of characters, my point is still valid, a very lucrative market that is still allowed to be sold without any sort of useability warranty, and a lot of hassle if you plain don't like it or it doesn't work as the implied advertising indicates and you wish to return it. It's "possible" but they certainly make it hard to do and isn't usually. It's a bogus lawyerese gobbledegook get out of jail free card. It's fairly unique in consumer products as well, I honestly can't think of any other mass produced consumer products out there that are allowed to be sold with such absurd features in them.

    ok, here goes, YAA a yet another anology! bigfun!

    an appliance eula following closed source software eulas

    "hi, welcome to your new Acme toaster! this toaster carries no guarantee it will actually toast slices of bread. Although it looks like a toaster and has two slots in the top and we got a picture of a nice plate of hot buttered toast on the box, your bread may not fit and the toaster itself might not heat up,and it might even catch fire and torch your house down, but well, caveat emptor and stuff, but our cousin leroy seemed to hint that once in awhile he got some toast out of his. By reading this agreement and clicking here and plugging it in, you agree that you may or may not get toast out of this thing, and even if you don't, you are not allowed to open the thing up and see why not, and if you want to return it, you must jump through these various hoops and most likely you'll get told "no" most of the time. If you need assistance, you have to call this expensive phone number, hang on hold for a few hours, then get told to replug your toaster back in as you are probably not using it correctly, because no way would the toaster not work, it's your fault, that'll be 2.99$ a minute thankew
    p.s. also by clicking here and having this toaster in your kitchen, you agree that any of our representatives can come into your kitchen and look around whenever we feel like it, and maybe rearrange your cupboards or if we feel like it dump your milk on the floor. maybe in the future we might change your doorlocks as well, you'll find out when we tell you. buh bye, and hope you enjoy your new Acme toaster"

    or some such noise.

    thoroughly bogus, and please, don't tell me most eulas aren't written like that.

  71. Slashdot Stupidity by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "You're 400 pounds and you have a keychain with a rape whistle? I have half a mind to rape you on principle. HLBLBL "
    This is the least intelligent signature I have ever read. Most rapes that occur have nothing to do with sexual attraction and everything to do with the rapist trying to feel powerful over his victim. Not only does your signature show how ignorant you are but it also shows that you are a wretched asshole. Perhaps your mother will be raped someday soon and then we'll see if you still think it's a funny topic to joke around about. You're a piece of shit without any value whatsoever.

  72. Lottery Analogy. by Grendel+Drago · · Score: 2

    True, but there's where the analogy breaks down. I keep seeing conflicting reports about the size of the problem space in question, but it seems to be utterly enormous. Even if the keyspace is searched in a non-overlapping way (e.g., if no two people get the same lottery ticket), it's still orders of magnitude too vast to be cracked, even on a distributed network, even with Moore's law, even with the cleverest algorithms we have.

    Like I said, I'm vague about the problem's true size. But "enough participants" here would be more than the number of atoms in the planet...

    --grendel drago

    --
    Laws do not persuade just because they threaten. --Seneca
  73. Re:past precedent (how modding cars is different) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Let's say, I buy a quarter-pounder at McDonalds or a Double Whopper at Burger King, then I am not allowed to put some of my selfmade chilisauce on it?

  74. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    "I assure you the thought never even crossed my mind, lord."
    "Indeed? Then if I were you I'd sue my face for slander."
    -- Terry Pratchett, "The Colour of Magic"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...