Slashdot Mirror


TurboTax Activation Fiasco

kurtinatlanta writes "Though the news broke in September, no one cares about tax return preparation software until January. Apparently Intuit's activation scheme for TurboTax will only allow you to print or file your returns from the computer on which you first installed it. The phrase "one computer" in their license literally means one computer. Moving the software (i.e. disk reformat, buy new computer) requires buying it again. There are all kinds of negative reviews on amazon.com as a result. Is this problem real or overhyped?" There's a more recent story about the flap. The Intuit PR rep is quoted as saying that people can install the software on multiple computers using the same activation code, but I don't think an unworking installation really counts.

71 of 554 comments (clear)

  1. My take by Em+Emalb · · Score: 5, Insightful

    "Is this problem real or overhyped?"

    It's real. If I buy something, I damned well better be able to use it/reinstall it if my computer blows up.

    Think about it.

    --
    Sent from your iPad.
    1. Re:My take by banzai51 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      I completely agree. The more negative publicity this generates, the better. Better idea: write to your local newspaper "cyber" journalist and ask them to look into what a hassle this is.

    2. Re:My take by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 3, Insightful

      I don't know. TurboTax is only good for one tax year, so the useage lifetime for the software is as long as it takes me to actually do my taxes, which is only a couple of days, if that. Not a very big window of opportunity for total system failure , IMHO. It's not like they're keying the O/S to your hardware via the Internet or anything.

    3. Re:My take by patbob · · Score: 4, Insightful
      If I buy something, I damned well better be able to use it/reinstall it if my computer blows up.

      Mark me paranoid, but the info is my tax info. The program is as much a part of the archival data as the .tax file and the paper copies. If there's any question about how I came up with the answers on the paper form, I darn well better be able to install it on another computer so I can access the data and algorithms that went into the conclusion.

      Guess my complaint to them last September went unheeded. :-)

      --
      Welcome to the net of 1000 lies. Upgrades are scheduled soon that should bring us to the 10,000 lies mark.
    4. Re:My take by Nevermore-Spoon · · Score: 3, Informative

      I jsut bought a house this year and for mortgage approval I was required to show my last 3 years worth of tax returns which I had saved and printed on a different computer than I originally printed from. I guess I'm glad I use TaxCut instead.

      --
      I have great faith in fools; My friends call it self-confidence. Edgar Allan Poe 1809-1845
    5. Re:My take by evilpenguin · · Score: 5, Insightful

      This ability to transfer ownership of a DVD, book, CD, or VHS tape is because of the "principle of first sale." This is not a legal right, however, and only exists because it has been technologically impossible to prevent up to now, and because IP vendors were content with the revenue from the first sale.

      The technology of perfect IP control is, however, either here now (in the case of software) or on the way (in the case of DVDs, CDs, and movies). It WILL be technologically possible to prevent recording, copying, or subsequent use. If you think you should be able to transfer without copying, then you had better get a bit more politically active. Consider joining/supporting the Electronic Frontier Foundation and write your congressional deleagation in opposition to the DMCA (which is already law) and several other proposed but not-yet-passed pieces of legislation designed to control even your presently legal use of your purchases.

      Copyright infringement is, and should be illegal, but the principle of first sale, the right to archive, fair use, and the other consumer "rights" that came only from imprefect control technologies are in grave danger. If you think these should be rights of yours, by thunder, say so!

    6. Re:My take by joshki · · Score: 5, Informative
      This ability to transfer ownership of a DVD, book, CD, or VHS tape is because of the "principle of first sale." This is not a legal right, however, and only exists because it has been technologically impossible to prevent up to now, and because IP vendors were content with the revenue from the first sale.
      Sorry, wrong answer. Section 109(a) of the Copyright Act of 1976, 17 U.S.C. 109(a)

      Do some research before you start spouting about things you don't understand -- the right of first sale is codified in law, and has been affirmed by the supreme court in numerous cases. There may be debate about how it applies to some digital media by some corporations, but that doesn't change the fact that it certainly is a legal right.

      --
      I do not read or respond to AC's. If you want a discussion, log in. Otherwise, don't waste your time.
    7. Re:My take by rw2 · · Score: 5, Interesting

      Sorry Susano, but I shouldn't have to "slashdot them with complaints" to get good service.

      I should be able to shut off the ads in quickbooks.
      I shouldn't have to pay $75 for technical service that I never recieved.
      I shouldn't have to pay $149 a year for tax tables when the gross margin must be 98%.
      I shouldn't have to call and explain to them who I am to reinstall my 1999 tax software
      If I have to call them, they should be open 24/7 not just when it's convenient for them.

      Just the ads in quickbooks alone are reeediculous. I generate an invoice, intuit wants to sell me a service to check if the customer will pay. I write a check, they want to sell me checks. I quit quickbooks, they want to sell me back-up services.

      I shouldn't have to get 200K of my closest /. friends to harass them to get this stuff fixed...

      They aren't devoted to customer satisfaction, they are devoted to squeezing the absolute most they can out of their customers. I think just a few google searches will be enough to demonstrate that they have squeezed too hard and will therefore, like they have with me and many others in on this article, lose business due to an almost complete disinterest in customer satisfaction.

      Oh, and I've written them about all of these issues. Not even the courtesy of a reply. They couldn't be bothered to lift a pen, much less fix the issue. Customer service indeed.

    8. Re:My take by evilpenguin · · Score: 3, Informative

      However, read the Digital Millenium Copyright Act, which makes it a crime to circumvent a copy protection device. Where is the principle of first sale then? It is NOT present. I was never saying the law didn't mention first sale, nor that fair use isn't mentioned in the law. But there is a new law in town. See HR2281, aka The Digital Millenium Copyright Act, which amends title 17. See the section starting on page 5 of the PDF file linked (Title 17, Chapter 12 [not in the Act of 1976, is it?] section 1201 - Circumvention of Copy Protection Systems, and 1203 - Civil remedies and 1204 - Criminal Offenses and Penalties).

      The fact that the Act of 1976 codified some rights that came to exist through imperfect control does not grant those AS rights to the citizens. Read all of HR2281. It amends title 17 all over the place. I didn't just make this stuff up. Then go on and read the rest of it. Then come back and tell me you have those right enumerated in the Copyright Act of 1976.

    9. Re:My take by gilroy · · Score: 4, Insightful
      Blockquoth the poster:

      Where is the principle of first sale then? It is NOT present. I was never saying the law didn't mention first sale, nor that fair use isn't mentioned in the law.

      This of course is the evil genuis nature of the DMCA. As has been claimed, you have certain rights ... but you don't have the right to exercise those rights.


      This is my scheme for copy protection: Either a product is released "in plaintext" -- that is, with no access control mechanisms -- and the copyright holder is allowed to pursue infringers through the power of the courts. Or a piece is released with technological protections in place -- but then the producer has no right to redress under the court system.


      In other words, don't muck with First Sale or Fair Use -- or you're on your own. If your encryption/protection works, more power to you. But if some kiddie cracks your access control mechanism, then too bad... you have no right to sue.


      I don't think there's a snowball's chance in a supernova of such a law passing, but I think it would be fair.

  2. Read the submission! by Dynedain · · Score: 5, Informative

    The Intuit PR rep is quoted as saying that people can install the software on multiple computers using the same activation code - the very thing that the activation process is supposed to prevent - so he is misquoted, misinformed, or lying.

    No, you can install on another machine, you just can't print or file your return from that machine. Installation and printing are completely different things last I checked.

    --
    I'm out of my mind right now, but feel free to leave a message.....
    1. Re:Read the submission! by bellings · · Score: 3, Offtopic
      I'm really confused. You claimed that micheal wrote:
      The Intuit PR rep is quoted as saying that people can install the software on multiple computers using the same activation code - the very thing that the activation process is supposed to prevent - so he is misquoted, misinformed, or lying.
      But the in the article, micheal currently says:
      The Intuit PR rep is quoted as saying that people can install the software on multiple computers using the same activation code, but I don't think an unworking installation really counts.
      Everyone knows that changing stories without notification is a very, very bad practice, and an ethical editor like micheal would never stoop to such a low level.
      --
      Slashdot is jumping the shark. I'm just driving the boat.
    2. Re:Read the submission! by MeNeXT · · Score: 5, Insightful
      So according to you I can install MS Office on Linux, I just can't run it? Please! as far as I care, if it does not work as advertised it is not installed....

      --
      DRM? No thanks, I'll just get it somewhere else...
    3. Re:Read the submission! by The+Bungi · · Score: 4, Interesting
      Everyone knows that changing stories without notification is a very, very bad practice, and an ethical editor like micheal would never stoop to such a low level.

      Moderation rears its ugly head again, I see you got an offtopic slap.

      Anyway, think of why this happens. Especially in a story like this, Slashdot (or the OSDN keiretsu) could be fully taken to court by Intuit because of misrepresentation of facts and loss of business related to that. Don't know the exact legal term, but I'd think it's somewhat akin to slander. Never mind that it doesn't really matter - TurboTax and the whole activation thing sucks. But it's different if it's plastered all over the front page for half a million people to see.

      Ergo, the "editorial byline" is fixed with alacrity. Very convenient.

      Hmmm. What's that I see in the distance? An offtopic bitchslap on this thread? Could it be? Yes!!

    4. Re:Read the submission! by John+Harrison · · Score: 3, Interesting
      On CNN there is always a time and date that the story was last updated. /. has a history of posting updates as Update:, so the fact the /. is being inconsistent is bad.

      Of course, from this particular editor this sort of thing has come to be expected. Michael-baiting has developed as a reaction to this. It is a mark of honor of sorts to be modded down while pointed out what a terrible editor he is.

      Yes, I saw the story as it was originally posted and it did change. Of course in a situation like this where the change is because an editor shot his mouth off rather than an actual update to the story I can see why this happened. What would they post as an update? "Sorry, an editor went a little too far here, please ignore the previous sentence." That wouldn't work too well. What they need to do is be more careful in the first place. And fire someone in addition to Katz.

  3. Use TaxAct.com by Qrlx · · Score: 4, Informative

    The simple solution is to not use TurboTax. TaxAct.com has always worked for me. And it's free.

    Or, pay an actual human being to do your taxes. I've never done it but I understand they know all about the loopholes and stuff.

    1. Re:Use TaxAct.com by tibbetts · · Score: 5, Insightful

      Or, pay an actual human being to do your taxes. I've never done it but I understand they know all about the loopholes and stuff.

      Amen to that! My wife and her family haven't filled out their own tax forms for many years. I used to laugh at their willingness to throw away Good Money, but after we got married and bought a house, I decided to do a bake-off between using TurboTax myself vs. their long-time wetware tax preparer. The result? TurboTax cost me $70 ($30 fed. + $20/each for two states), took about three hours to go through (and another couple of hours or so to print and proofread) and I got a refund of $x. The tax preparer cost $120, took 40 minutes, and got us a refund of $x + $400 via legit "loopholes" (things like moving costs, higher ed credits, etc.).

      If you need to fill out only a 1040EZ form, you definitely don't need TurboTax or a preparer, but if you have dependents or itemize deductions, I highly recommend going to a live person. (And no, IANATP.)

      --
      :wq
    2. Re:Use TaxAct.com by ryanvm · · Score: 3, Funny

      (And no, IANATP.)

      I hope that last part doesn't stand for 'tax payer'. ;)

  4. One good review by SoCalChris · · Score: 5, Funny

    I bet G. Cooke from Texas would give it a positive review!

    1. Re:One good review by jonathanclark · · Score: 4, Interesting

      Why do I have the feeling that a lot of these negative comments are made by a competing company? Most of the dates are Jan 4. It would be interesting to see Amazon's IP logs for all the post. I know this wouldn't be the first case of posting fake reviews (both positive and negative). No doubt many of the comments are real, it's a legit issue - but I think it's been overhyped by competition. My guess is it's someone from TaxCut.

      Look at this review:

      ------------------
      Christopher R Chirdon from Pittsburgh, PA USA
      I was reading reviews here when I really checked into the online activation stuff. But someone was concerned if you could import your 2001 "filename.tax" file from TurboTax 2001 into TaxCut 2002 and the answer is YES! I bought TaxCut because I want to prepare on my personal computer and then take it to work to print on my laser printer, but I don't want to have to buy 2 licenses. Also, it's just SUCH a hassle. The funny thing is, I don't think taxCut uses ANY type of authentication. I put the CD in and it never asked me for a serial or anything, just a box that said "Is this a legal copy? Y/N".
      In a nutshell, if you are concerned about buying TaxCut 2002 and importing your TurboTax 2001 goo, don't be. It went right in for me, and the program seems to be every bit as good as TurboTax. It doesn't have that annoying "da dum dum, da dum da" musical intro that always bothered me either... ;)

    2. Re:One good review by cybercuzco · · Score: 3, Informative

      Actually, there are 4 reviews that give the produect a 5. Two of them are top 500 reviewers and a third is in the top 1500. All of the good reviews are within the first few days of the products release and they all sound like they could have come from the back of the box.

      --

  5. Alternative? by swordboy · · Score: 4, Interesting

    OK -

    I'm finally gonna switch because of this but my big question is, which competing product would be best to go with and why?

    TIA

    --

    Life is the leading cause of death in America.
    1. Re:Alternative? by fobbman · · Score: 5, Informative

      I've been checking out Kiplinger's Tax Cut from my local library for a few years now. Very thorough software, and it only costs me money when I return it late. ;)

    2. Re:Alternative? by argel · · Score: 3, Informative

      I used the H&R Block TaxCut the last two years. The help is not as good as TurboTax, but the price is a lot nicer.

      --

      -- Argel
    3. Re:Alternative? by Col.+Klink+(retired) · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Last year I used H&R Block's Tax Cut under VMware.

      --

      -- Don't Tase me, bro!

    4. Re:Alternative? by cafebabe · · Score: 3, Interesting

      Tax Cut is also much better than TurboTax if you are filing multiple state returns. I usually file about 3-4 state returns and Tax Cut does a good job of keeping the references correct between the Federal and state returns. I don't know if it's changed, but TurboTax didn't even allow for multiple state returns. The bad news -- Tax Cut makes you pay a premium for your 2nd and above state but I've found it to be worth it.

      --
      When violence rules the world outside / And the headlines make me want to cry / It's not the time to just keep quiet
  6. Just do it online! by HTMLSpinnr · · Score: 3, Informative

    Save the hassle and do it online. No install, can do it from anywhere you have browser access.

    --
    $ man woman *
    -bash: /usr/bin/man: Argument list too long
  7. Pencil by Borf · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Then there's always an alternate use for your hand... that's right! Doing taxes manually. On paper. Think of doing taxes as learning a braindead API for interfacing with the goverment.

    I rather like it.

    Smell of cedar and graphite. A little calculator, a big rule book. Lots of nice little numbers.

    1. Re:Pencil by cheezedawg · · Score: 4, Informative

      like receiving your return in a couple days quick

      You do realize that if you get a refund when you file your taxes, that basically means you just gave the government an interest free loan, right? The trick is to withhold as little as possible during the year so you either break even or owe a little bit on April 15 (not enough to get an underpayment penalty, of course). Then your money is YOURS throughout the whole year, and you can save it and invest it anyway you like the whole time.

      --
      "The defense of freedom requires the advance of freedom" - George W Bush
  8. TurboTax sucks anyway by Lxy · · Score: 5, Interesting

    Last year I needed to file a 1040 for the first time. Usually I just go for the 1040EZ, but I had a few items I needed to use the 1040 for. Ok, whatever.

    I was looking for a good e-file solution, so I found Turbotax online. For $10 you can file your 1040, no software to install, it's a secure java applet. Cool. I spent a good 45 minutes filling everything out, triple checking my numbers, submitted it, life was good.

    Three weeks later, I get an envelope from the IRS.

    It seems that Turbotax f#@%ed up my taxable income, and stiffed me $320 on my federal return. The IRS fixed it and sent me a check for the difference, but I was still ticked. I printed off all the info and studied it carefully. All the data I put in was right. I ran the numbers manually, and what do you know, my taxable income was lower, and when I comp[uted the tax table I found the missing $320.

    F@#% YOU, TURBOTAX.

    --

    There is no reasonable defense against an idiot with an agenda
    :wq
    1. Re:TurboTax sucks anyway by LostCluster · · Score: 5, Funny

      On the other hand... let's notice that the IRS sent that taxpayer $320 he didn't even realize he was entitled to.

  9. Possible Solution? by saider · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Here's what I do for nazi software - Run it in a VMWare virtual machine. As far as the program is concerned it is running on the same computer.

    The only trick is you need to have VMWare ($300).

    --


    Remember, You are unique...just like everyone else.
    1. Re:Possible Solution? by hedley · · Score: 3, Informative


      Not with Safecast2 you won't be. It detects VMware as a debugger. :(

      Safecast2 is a product from our perennial /. favorite Macrovision.

      Hedley

  10. TurboTax 2001 cost me $500...! by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 3, Interesting

    It was coming up with that I would need to pay in $500 federal tax. I freaked, naturally. Went to H&R Block, they did my taxes correctly, and I ended up paying in (even after you add in the H&R Block costs) less than what TurboTax said I owed in!

    Learn from me: go to a tax prep specialist and stay the hell away from do-it-yourself software solutions.

    1. Re:TurboTax 2001 cost me $500...! by fudgefactor7 · · Score: 3, Interesting

      "You are the ones the Federales will hang by the thumbs, not the Blockhead."

      Then it would be H&R Block who ends up being the defendant in a new court case. They (H&R) have a fiduciary responsibility to fill the paperwork out in a reasonably correct manner. Failure to do so not only makes them look bad but can come back to haunt them. Plus, I could malign them all over the Internet--and since it would be based on true performance (like my rant about TT 2001) they couldn't do anything about it.

  11. Damn.... by dallask · · Score: 4, Funny

    I guess this means that I cant download and rip a copy of TurboTax so that I can lie on my tax returns while burning it for family????

    Crap.

    --
    The Code Ninja is swift with his tool, precise in his delivery, and deadly accurate in his execution.
  12. What I'd like to see by salesgeek · · Score: 4, Interesting

    I don't care if it's character based, but it would be cool if the IRS did a tax application that was simply self-calculating and linked so the totals from worksheet forms carry over to the tax form.

    I don't need FinanceChick and TaxDude giving me video advice. I just need the instructions, the forms, and a way to save while I go out back and beat up on the shed, woodpile or a bear when I get to the "Your income tax due (or your refund)" line...

    $G

    --
    -- $G
    1. Re:What I'd like to see by LostCluster · · Score: 4, Informative

      The IRS has made rumblings that unless the tax software industry gets their act together, the IRS will start work on an "official" tax product that would likely be impossible to compete with.

      The state of MA has already done this, with an easy-to-use web interface (over HTTPS, of course) that puts the state edition of TurboTax to shame. MA doesn't have that complex of a tax code anyway, so there really isn't much for software to do in the first place besides data entry and transmission.

    2. Re:What I'd like to see by Just+Some+Guy · · Score: 3, Insightful
      The only problem is that the software, necessarily, will not be creative when dealing with your unique tax situation. That's what a good CPA is for: knowing things such as if you're willing to forget about claiming a deduction for that $20 donation to the EFF, then you qualify for a $137.23 tax credit under the Diggle Act of 1965. A program will cheerfully let you claim a $20 deduction at the cost of missing a greater savings elsewhere.

      Is it utterly ridiculous that our tax code is so difficult? Absolutely! However, we're pretty much stuck with it for the foreseeable future, so you may as well make the best of it.

      --
      Dewey, what part of this looks like authorities should be involved?
  13. So What? Audits, that's what. by asscroft · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I usually print and file from the same machine at which I installed anyway. This only has two impacts

    1. You can no longer get the friends and family pack, so what, it's $20.00 and is super easy way to do your taxes. How many accountants charge $20.00 for you, and your friends, and your parents. Give it up, the free ride is over.

    2. Audits from the IRS go back 7 years. If I have a new computer in 7 years I won't be able to reprint this years return. So much for the "store my tax info on CD". I'm stuck with Paper as my only record keeping. That removes one of the benefits of using a computer program in the first place.

    --
    because I have been enjoined by this Holy Office to abandon the false opinion which maintains that the Sun is the centre
    1. Re:So What? Audits, that's what. by per+unit+analyzer · · Score: 3, Informative
      Audits from the IRS go back 7 years. If I have a new computer in 7 years I won't be able to reprint this years return. So much for the "store my tax info on CD". I'm stuck with Paper as my only record keeping. That removes one of the benefits of using a computer program in the first place.

      Ummm.. You're a little bit off on this. The IRS can only go back three years and audit you. That is unless they suspect you of comitting fraud, then they can go back as far as they damn well please. You're better off keeping copies of your returns indefinitely. The Motley Fool has a nice guide on how long to keep stuff.

      Personally, I'd keep both the paper and electronic media.

      --zawada

      --
      In Soviet Russia, the Beowulf cluster imagines you!
  14. easier to read... by Eil · · Score: 3, Informative


    Here is a printable version of the article that contains less spam and is easier to read.

  15. If you're doing a 1040-EZ ... by SuperDuG · · Score: 3, Informative
    ... ack offtopic a little bit, but not really ...

    TurboTax for the Web will let you electronically file your taxes for free. The catch?? You have to file ONLY the 1040-EZ and make less than $25K, but since that's what I've filed the last 5 years, it's no real problem for me (yeah being a student!). If you want to file a 1040 or 1040A it's something like $10.00. But they will do your state and federal taxes online and submit them electronically.

    Why would this matter to /.? Well because for the last 2 years I've used it with netscape on linux with no troubles at all. So now you can do your taxes for free with linux electronically and get a refund in around 2 days.

    So don't sit there for hours and do it with the "easy to follow IRS workbook" or load windows up to use a windows only program, or go pay someone far too much money to do it for you, do them online cheaply.

    Best way to get around the registration hassle of software is to not use the software that requires you to register it.

    --
    Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
  16. go with taxcut by mlong · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I've used TurboTax I guess for the last 4 or 5 years. This year as I was getting ready to buy it I checked out amazon.com and saw all the negative reviews and decided not get it as I have 4 computers in my house. So I decided to get TaxCut. I bought it from Staples but you can get it from taxcut.com. It costs less than TurboTax and it can even import all the data from last year's TurboTax. Not only that but (at least at staples.com) there are tons of rebates on different products if you buy TurboTax ($30 off money, willpower free, home and business attorney free, mcafee free, norton personal firewall or antivirus free, checksoft express free, deduction pro free, etc.

    --
    //m
  17. Best comment on Amazon regarding the matter by Eagle7 · · Score: 5, Funny

    I love this comment:

    Quality Control?, January 4, 2003
    Reviewer: Ex-long time user from Hernando, MS United States
    I purchased TurboTax Deluxe for the fourth year in a row this year. When I went to install the program from the CD it turned out to be an AUDIO CD OF MEXICAN MUSIC! Bizarre.
    ...

    --
    _sig_ is away
  18. Re:More importantly.... by mumblestheclown · · Score: 4, Funny

    Moderation Totals: Mind-Numbingly Naive, -2

  19. Turbotax 2002 installs malware called C-Dilla by tstoneman · · Score: 3, Interesting
    Don't buy Turbotax 2002. They install malware/"Copy protection" called C-Dilla but don't tell you about it. I don't even care about the product activation stuff, it's this spyware/malware shit that they secretly installed without telling me that really pissed me off.

    Here is a link to a forum talking about C-dilla.

    Don't make the same mistake I did and delete a directory called "C:\C_DILLA". I did, and my computer froze upon startup. Apparently C-dilla is a service that requires this directory to be there otherwise it barfs on you.

    I didn't know what it was, and thought it might be related to Mozilla (Mozilla, Bugzilla, Chatzilla, etc). I deleted it, and upon reboot, my system froze during startup. After troubleshooting my frozen machine for around 1/2 an hour, the missing directory turned out to be the problem, along with these mysterious services that I didn't remember installing. I guess the service hung while looking for the directory and froze my entire system.

    I went to uninstall Turbotax and it doesn't uninstall C-dilla. I asked Intuit Live Chat support how to remove C-dilla and they told me to delete the C_DILLA directory and reboot. I told them what would happen, but they said that's what to do. After I did it, and it froze again, they said there was nothing they could to and to contact my system administrator/vendor to fix the freeze. Thanks.

    They have a 60-day return policy. USE IT. Tell all your friends and co-workers not to buy Turbotax. I was a loyal Turbotax purchaser since 1997 and I am now going to switch because I no longer trust them. Why did they install this shit on my computer without telling me, and fuck everything up?

    They have completely lost my trust, and there is nothing they can do to get it back, that's for sure.

  20. We shouldn't have to pay extra to "e-file." by timeOday · · Score: 3, Informative
    It's a scam that the govt. doesn't set up its own website for electronic filing. It would save a whole lot of tax dollars, both in printing and mailing those thick filing booklets, and probably more importantly, it costs less to process electronic filings.

    My county set up electronic renewal of vehicle licensing. It's just a simple web form, nothing fancy, and couldn't have cost much to set up. Yet it's highly effective and they encourage it because it saves them manpower and tax money, not to mention thousands of hours of people waiting in line at the DMV.

    There was a movement for this a year or two ago, but Quicken et. al. lobbied against it and offered reduced-cost filing for poor people to appease lawmakers. As a result, we are stuck paying extra to private companies to file tax returns in a way that should save everybody time and money.

  21. Software headaches bad for industry by release7 · · Score: 3, Informative
    Getting/installing/using software is becoming more and more of a headache for consumers every day. Once an average Joe loses an activiation key or has to go through the hassle trying to figure out how to use a new one, they'll just forget about using the software and come away with a bad experience. Who the hell has the time to wade through this BS just to figure out what your rights are for using the software? I just want to be able to pop the disk in my drive and have the thing run when I need it to run. Things get really maddening when you are dealing with a dozen applications, each with their own procedures and policies.

    The most frustrating is the powerless feeling it gives a user. People will come to HATE software because of the frustration and agony of not being able to control something they feel they own. This will make consumer less reluctant to throw down $100 or $200 bucks for their next software purchase. Not good. Someone needs to find a better way.

    --

    <a href="http://www.joblessjimmy.com">Work is dumb and so is Jobless Jimmy.</a>

  22. I'd call support on that one by Wee · · Score: 4, Funny
    I'd seriously call support, and have them walk me through an installation. In fact, I'd weedle my way to 2nd or 3rd tier if I could before I got to the actual inserting-the-cd bit. And I'd have to turn auto-run on too. That would be a key feature of the support session: "Ok, I inserted the CD and now there's like carnival music or something coming out of my speakers! Does TurboTax come with a soundtrack?"

    Feh. The only kind of music I want to hear when doing taxes is the Muzak in the lobby of my CPA. Try taking the TurboTax software packaging to tax court with you and see how much it helps.

    Dental work and accounting: two things you should never do by yourself, for yourself.

    -B

    --

    Ash and Hickory, straight-grained and true, make excellent bludgeons, dandy for the cudgeling of vegetarians.

  23. Re:People are dumb.... by evilpenguin · · Score: 5, Informative

    This is just dead wrong. I sniffed my network during the install. It opens an https session to a server at Intuit. About 30k of data is exchanged (being encrypted 128-bit I don't know what data). I can guarantee that if the reg key is included, they can cripple the next install. If you don't hook the machine to the internet, they don't let you pint or file. Don't make pronouncements out of ignorance.

  24. Not entirely true... by Fizzlewhiff · · Score: 3, Informative

    Moving the software (i.e. disk reformat, buy new computer) requires buying it again.

    This is not what the article said. The original installer only has to hang on to the key and activation code and they can reinstall it on a new PC. It may sound like a pain in the ass but you can just keep this info with your tax records that you have to keep anyway.

    I guess people are just pissed they can't split the cost of one copy of the program with their friends and family anymore.

    --

    'Same speed C but faster'
  25. Amended Returns by IsThisNickTaken · · Score: 4, Informative

    I have been a Turbo Tax user for the last 7 or 8 years. Several years ago I decided to change how I was handling depreciation on a rental property. I was able to reinstall my old copies of Turbo Tax and amend my tax returns. I had kept my .tax files around on my computer.

    While it is of limited use, some people do need to access/change previous tax returns. With the new product activation it sounds like I may have been screwed.

  26. Stupid question here. by Matey-O · · Score: 3, Insightful

    Why is this even an issue?

    If the IRS gets all of this information, (and it does , it's used to doublecheck your return) why do we even HAVE the other half of this industry?

    IMHO, you ought be able to log into the IRS website, it should say 'We have this and this and this in your records, you should owe X'

    At which point _you_ could add: "But I have this and this extenuating circumstance."

    The IRS would then recalculate and your income tax fileing would consist of ONLY those things that are different and unusual, with the assumption that since you didn't change any earnings info, you must agree with what the IRS has.

    If my HR dude enters my W-2 info once. And his software sends it to the IRS, why do _I_ have to rekey it each time? Why do I need to rekey the numbers AT ALL?

    --
    "Draco dormiens nunquam titillandus."
    1. Re:Stupid question here. by base3 · · Score: 3, Informative

      I attended a presentation about e-government initatives at which an IRS representative spoke about this issue. This was three years ago, but the gentleman said that the IRS had no intention of offering its own electronic filing, primarily because of industry pressure.

      --
      One CPU cycle wasted on digital restrictions management is ONE TOO MANY.
  27. This page from Intuit spells it out clearly by release7 · · Score: 4, Informative
    Copied from http://www.turbotaxsupport.com/servicesupport/defa ult.asp?platform=1&formName=&pd=&fs=&ver=&sku=&Doc ID=

    Do I need to activate TurboTax again if I reinstall the program? Whether or not you need to reactivate TurboTax (that is, purchase an additional product license) depends upon your particular situation:

    If you reinstall TurboTax to the same hard disk that it was previously activated on, you do not need to activate it again.

    If you install TurboTax on another computer, you need to activate it again only if you want to print or electronically file your tax return from that computer.

    Example: You activated TurboTax on your home computer and attempt to electronically file your tax return, but for some reason you start to experience problems with your Internet connection. The next day, you install TurboTax on your computer at work, along with a copy of your tax file. In order to electronically file your tax return from your work computer, you must activate TurboTax on your work computer. Note: If you need to reinstall an activated copy of TurboTax on another computer because of a hard disk failure, or if you are reinstalling an activated copy of TurboTax on a newly purchased computer or hard disk, please contact a live agent to obtain a second activation code.

    If you install TurboTax on another computer without activating it, you can make changes to your tax return using the EasyStep Interview, but you will not be able to print, electronically file, use the Forms Method, view tax forms, or save your tax file as a .pdf file from that computer.

    Example: After activating TurboTax, you electronically file your tax return and print copies of the return for your records. Shortly thereafter, you replace your original computer with a new one. You install TurboTax on the new computer in case you need to refer to your 2002 tax file, but you do not intend to electronically file or print your return again. In this case, you do not need to activate TurboTax on your new computer. Product Activation lets you print or electronically file tax returns from any computer that TurboTax is activated on; it does not prevent installing the program on another computer.

    --

    <a href="http://www.joblessjimmy.com">Work is dumb and so is Jobless Jimmy.</a>

  28. But if you're audited ... by Bowfinger · · Score: 5, Insightful
    I don't know. TurboTax is only good for one tax year, so the useage lifetime for the software is as long as it takes me to actually do my taxes, which is only a couple of days, if that.

    But what if you get that audit letter from the IRS in two or three years? You may want to reinstall 2002 TurboTax so you can review your records, only to find that it won't work on your most recent PC.

    What if you simply need to file an amended return later this year? What if you lost your paper copy of your return and want to print another? What if you have trouble exporting your 2002 data to 2003 TurboTax, or maybe to a competing product without such an obnoxious copy protection mechanism?

    There are lots of scenarios where you might need to use this software long after your initial filing. It's too bad Intuit is adopting the same kind of customer-hostile philosophy pioneered by our beloved MPAA & RIAA.

  29. Shouldnt that be by Unknown+Poltroon · · Score: 4, Interesting

    the irs returned 320 that they werent entitled to?
    Lets remember, its YOUR money THEY are taking.

    --
    All Troll + "offtopic" mods are meta moderated as "Unfair", because you abused the system.
  30. Spyware by The+Bungi · · Score: 4, Interesting
    Here's a nice overview of spyware. Point your non-techie friends/co-workers/family/pets to articles like this one so they "get" what spyware is and what it's not, and explain to them why they should avoid it.

    Gator for example claims millions of "satisfied customers" - in my experience they have millions of victims who don't know how the crap got into their computers in the first place and no clue as to how to remove it. But I guess that's a valid "installed base".

    As for C-Dilla, I don't think it's spyware (not in the classic definition anyway), but regardless of that TurboTax is no longer welcome on my computer, and I happen to be a 5 year satisfied user. There's absolutely no fucking way I'm going to live with a resident executable living in my system hooking processes to see if they are "protected". Intuit can smooch my bootay. I'm going with TaxCut for 2002.

    I hope the company rents a clue from this, and I hope their sales fall through the basement and they fix it for 2003. If they do, I'll buy it again.

  31. It's not just activation. It contains spyware. by Texodore · · Score: 3, Interesting

    Supposedly, TurboTax now contains C-DILLA, which is spyware. If you search around the net, such as the aforemention fatwallet forum or amazon reviews, there are reports that CD burners don't work as well as they used to. You can't just delete the C-DILLA directory - it gets recreated or will hose your system. Installing TurboTax doesn't warn you it will be installed And uninstalling TurboTax doesn't remove it.

    Yeah, the activation is annoying, and I would live with that. But I'm not getting TurboTax for this reason.

    From the article:

    Customers are also complaining about Safecast, the Macrovision security software Intuit uses to verify activation numbers. Reports have surfaced in discussion groups and some news sites classifying Safecast--also known as C-Dilla for the company that provided the technology to Macrovision--as "spyware," programs surreptitiously installed on a PC that track and report how the PC is used. Spyware programs such as Gator and Brilliant Digital have prompted growing concern among PC users.

  32. My experience says Intuit dropped the ball. by hklingon · · Score: 4, Informative

    I am a college student and part time computer consultant. We all know how that goes. The thing is, I've helped many clients upgrade their QuickBooks, Quicken and other Intuit products over the past several months. Let me relate to you only one of them:

    Client has Quickbooks 6.0. It must be about 4 years old, or so. It is cumbersome and annoying to update the Tax table/rate codes. They use it for payroll, accounts recievable, accounts payable. Though it is a family business, it is broken into several files for manage-ability. (Legally) They have several companies set up-- and some companies are seasonal. (e.g. Yard work). From what I understand, there are federal and state tax advantages, if you have several small companies that work together. Anyway, there are about 3 employees that manage the books for 15 or so company files.

    Trouble: When we upgraded from QB6.0 to QB2003, the "upgrade" did not count QB6.0 as valid. We were on hold for over 90 minutes, and finally got through to a rep, that told us we had to fax them a recipt for the QB2003 as well as a recipt for the QB6.0 from 4 years ago. (We had QB6.0 serial numbers, correspondence, etc, no good. The client had been a quicken gold support (or whatever) member for the past 4 years, up until about 6 months prior to the upgrade. They could find no trace of us in the system, and only a recipt for QB6.0 would do. They claimed they couldn't find us even though they'd mailed tax table updates a few months prior as well as a "you must upgrade to QB2002 right now because we no longer support 6.0" -- with QB2003 due out soon we decided to wait the 4 (or so) months to get the newest version. They were told QB6.0 would count for the QB2003 upgrade when they explicitly asked (at my instruction). Anyway, about 4 days later they were able to activate qb2003 with a replacement keycode, but only after faxing them both the recipts, cover of the manual and serial numbers. Did I mention we bought directly from the intuit website? As if that wasn't enough, a few days later they went to do payroll. It wouldn't let them until it went online and updated-- which it could not do because it could not verify subscription status. When done manually, after being on hold for 108 minutes, the rep said it was good for only one company file. My client would have to pay per-company. I think the "accountant edition" might side step this somehow, but it was difficult getting straight answers. We chatted with a rep on the website as well as phoned in months prior and went over the situation in detail. We ordered what they recommended. We've also discovered some features they had in QB6.0, though rudimentary, are pay-for in QB2003. It has been an extremely painful upgrade.

    Though this client only had 4 QB computers, this was probably the most painful upgrade ever. The other experiences I've had with intuit proably aren't this bad, but they're not exactly great either.

  33. Perfect opportunity for Linux ... by HealYourChurchWebSit · · Score: 3, Insightful

    If I were H&Rj, I'd get a Linux version of TaxCut out the door ASAP. Think about it. Many of us who are going to change are the same types who are/want to switch to Open Office and Linux because of similar tactics employed by Microsoft and ther XP O/S. It seem to me that there would be a very willing market that would be very difficult for TurboTax to pursue unless it drops it's own activation schems.

    --
    --- have you healed your church website?
  34. Re:don't go with H&R Block by anthony_dipierro · · Score: 3, Interesting

    That said, I know because I asked that the preparers have to go through a several week course, and pass a final test with at least 80-85% competency or they wash out of the program.

    I think my experience trumps yours here. I took the H&R Block course. There were quite a few incompetent people taking it with me. And not a single one of them failed.

    Some are also trained as Financial Advisors or Loan Advisors for Block subsidiaries, so they can sometimes point out methods of saving additional tax $ based on good investments, mortgage refinancing, etc..

    And the vast majority aren't, and are specifically informed that they "are not auditors" and therefore are not supposed to advise their clients on any tax issues. They are merely supposed to ask the proper questions (which appear on their computer screen) and type them into the computer.

    As for their offer to check past returns, you should realize that the people doing that checking essentially aren't getting paid by H&R Block to do it. See there is a minimal hourly salary, but it is drawn against a commission structure. All but the most incompetent employees earn more off commissions, so they aren't paid anything when there aren't any customers, so Block gives them some busy work during the slow hours checking other people's returns.

    Obviously if you double check a lot of returns, you're going to come up with a lot of mistakes. I've come up with thousand dollar mistakes checking H&R Block returns from previous years, so it's not like H&R Block is special there.

    Those who can do. Those who can't work for H&R Block.

    Main thing for me as a small consulting company owner is that you know you're not dealing with an Enron-esque company -- their ethics and credibility are top notch.

    Ha! H&R Block has been sued over and over again by the IRS for ripping off their customers. And that's just things that the company itself was responsible for. The employees pull even bigger scams.

  35. Unbeliveable! by Thud457 · · Score: 3, Insightful
    The fact that the average citizen needs to hire a guru or buy some fancy software every year in order to determine their responsibility to society is a TRAVESTY.

    Let the corps have their 8,000 page tax code, with their carefully lobbied for loopholes -- they can afford to hire professional accountants. And lobbiests. And lawyers.

    Simplfy the tax code for normal, flesh-and-blood, breathing, REAL PERSONS.

    --

    the preceding comment is my own and in no way reflects the opinion of the Joint Chiefs of Staff

  36. from the FAQ by stinky+wizzleteats · · Score: 3, Funny

    How does this benefit me?
    With product activation, Intuit can provide faster, more efficient support for TurboTax customers. Without technology to ensure compliance with our License Agreement, TurboTax customers who legitimately purchase the product wait longer for support because of increased contacts from users seeking support for unlicensed software.

    eh? Thousands of users calling support to deal with product activation issues are going to make it easier for me to get support?

  37. Re:Intuit's activation scheme is a VERY serious is by Amazing+Quantum+Man · · Score: 3, Informative

    Does anyone know if TaxCut has an activation scheme? I saw TaxCut Platinum on sale yesterday at Office Depot for $29.95.

    If you read the article, you'd see that it doesn't. For $29.95, I'd snag it. Accordign to the article, the Platinum edition is "single owner/multiple computer" licensed. I.e. You can install it on multiple computers you own. So grab it now.

    --
    Fascism starts when the efficiency of the government becomes more important than the rights of the people.
  38. Re:Just give me a damn Flat Tax. YES! flattax.gov by Brian+Stretch · · Score: 3, Informative

    Flattax.gov has the info. Yes, we definitely need to switch to this. It replaces the mortgage deduction with much higher personal and dependend deductions too, ending the tax discrimination against renters. That mortgage deduction artificially drives up real estate costs too (gotta maximize that deduction! Except you're paying the bank $3 to save $1 on your taxes... but real estate only appreciates in value, right? Right?). I wouldn't want to own a McMansion if this ever passes though :-).

  39. If you multiboot -- beware! by Whip · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I've been trying to post this "review" to Amazon for a couple of days, but there seems to be something wrong with their comment posting code. So here's MY experience with TurboTax 2002

    [amazon posting starts here]
    I won't reiterate many of the points made by other reviewers on amazon -- I'll just summarize the reviews as "good software, but the copy protection sucks".

    I had the copy protection suck more than most. I dual boot WindowsXP and Linux, using the "GRUB" bootloader (which is currently used now by, among others, RedHat linux), and installing TurboTax 2002 made my entire computer unbootable! The activation code writes some information to the front of the harddrive (before the first partition), which overwrote my bootloader, which was already living there! (This may happen with other bootloaders as well... I've only tested with the one).

    And fixing my system so it would boot again (by reinstalling the bootloader) produced a copy of TurboTax that a) thought it wasn't activated, and b) Thought that my productid had already been used "by another computer", so couldn't be re-activated.

    Intuit did eventually give me another product ID that worked, after I spent several hours trying to explain the problem to tech support, and rebooting time and time again as the reps had me uninstall, reinstall, install in safe mode, install while standing on my head...

    The software itself is OK (Though I still wish it could import from Quicken based on the "class" of the transactions), but I have the strong opinion that installing tax software should not render my computer unbootable!

  40. The way you "tell them" by tkrotchko · · Score: 3, Informative

    Don't buy the software.

    The guys who run Intuit aren't stupid; they know they'll achieve a certain amount of dissatisfaction from some customers and lose some business, but they're betting the increase in revenue from a curtailment in copyright violations outweighs the loss of customer satisfaction and any subsequent loss of sales.

    Buy something else, then write them a letter letting them know they lost a sale.

    Intuit is smart enough to know that they may have 90% of the market this year, but they've got to sell you again every year. Its the nature of the market for this kind of software.

    If they can't count on that annuity, they'll get the message.

    --
    You were mistaken. Which is odd, since memory shouldn't be a problem for you
  41. Fight the Power by GMontag · · Score: 3, Funny

    Sounds like you might want to join in this protest and get even with the system.

  42. Re:The US tax code could be fixed... by DmitriA · · Score: 3, Insightful

    No, that's because social security and medicare aren't really taxes - they are government-run insurance programs (that government, at gunpoint, forces you to enroll in, regardless of whether you want it or not). You pay in a premium and you get some benefits when you retire (hopefully if they don't go broke by then) and need some money to cover medical expenses.

    Now, since these programs are already going broke, reducing the premiums paid by everyone and, thus, the money paid into the system is a stupid idea - unless want you really want is to close these programs altogether and give people a choice about what they want to do (which is a good idea, but probably very unpopular among most voters - especially those seniors that vote by the truckloads)