Slashdot Mirror
Google Responds to SearchKing's Lawsuit
The Importance of writes "Back in October, SearchKing sued Google for reducing SearchKing's pagerank, as previously reported. Now, Google has filed a reply and a motion to dismiss. LawMeme has both documents as well as analysis."
This is the same as sueing the "A" group in highschool for not deeming you cool and because of that your self esteem suffered and you became a computer science major.
Ignore the "p2p is theft" trolls, they're just uninformed
Who goes to a search engine to search for other search engines anyway? That's like me training a dog to find other dogs that are trained to find dogs. I don't see how search king could possibly even claim to have a case here.
Can I start up "Slashdot King"?
II. Table of Authorities
United States Statutes and Other Authority
Hustler Magazine v. Falwell
485 U.S. 46, 53 (1988)
Sweet! Larry Flynt will set me straight. So happily did I turn on to page 10, for those playing along at home.
and it read: which is totally not what I was looking for. I even checked under the staples.
The King does have a point: when your "business" consists of shoplifting and the corner store installs a security camera, you're going to go out of business quickly enough that an injunction is your only hope.
(Use the Preview Button! Check those URLs! Don't forget the http://!)
" Google is a private company and has the right to exclude anyone they choose."
"Objection, your honor."
"On what grounds?"
"It's devastating to my case!"
(okay, the reference is a little obscure. Hint: Jim Carrey.)
Obscure? Liar!
Free Java games for your phone: Tontie, Sokoban
"the first time LawMeme has seen a legal document with a "your ad here" banner attached"
Wait a minute aren't *they* suing Google?
It should be a "Legal Attack Fund".
We should sue them for false representation!
Uh oh.. Now they're gonna sue you for taking away their right to a revenue stream! You must stop your anticompetitive behavior immediately and let them sell their public domain documents for $20.
The SearchKing website looks no differen't than those web-portals for squatted urls. But they promise such good results! So here are some query response:
Search: "Fuck You"
-1. Get Paid To Surf The Internet!
-2. Where to find music CDs, DVDs, select MP3 music tracks, free music download
-3. Never Be Sued Again!
-4. Get Paid to Surf
-5. Kudos and Compliments for You and for Those Who Bring You Happiness
-6. (see 5)
-7. How To Start A Money Brokerage Business
and I think you get the point. Perhaps a more 'relevant' search query could yield better results:
Search: Car
-1. 765469
-2. License Plates - Vanity License Plates
-3. Next Honda of New England
-4. Ramsfield.com Auto Parts
Hmm. Better results than the search for "Fuck You". But I still wanna know the logic that went into making "765469" the number one result. Oh, and another nice feature is that the linked pages come complete with a SearchKing adbar in a differen't frame.
/There are 10 types of people in this world; those who steal sigs and those don't
I had copied Exhibit A from the PDF, and didn't pay attention to the URL I got from Acrobat
http://w.qooqle.com/technolouv/index. html
Anyway, this was qooqle's (not google's) response to my request
http://paradise.qooqle.com/404.html
"Once upon a midnight dreary, while I pron surfed weak and weary.
Over many a strange and spurious pronsite of 'hot XXX galore'.
While I clicked my fav'rite bookmark, suddenly there came a warning.
And my heart was filled with mourning, mourning for my dear amour.
"'Tis not possible", I muttered, "give me back my free hardcore!"
Quoth the server,
404
OCR wins again.
Or the US?
Hmmmm, perhaps this Internet King can provide faster nudity....
If you want to know how the folks at Google feel about Scientology, try a Google search for "goatse". No, really! Look at the suggested category...
:-)
Nice hack
As a professional programmer, you ought to learn the difference between "your" and "you're".
--
SexyKellyOsborne fan #182