Slashdot Mirror


Corporate Espionage Leads To Faulty Motherboards

Champs writes "If you've gotten the feeling that they really don't make 'em like they used to, you might be right. This article at IEEE Spectrum tells the story of large batches of faulty capacitors sourced from Taiwan causing motherboards to eventually fail, with an interesting twist on the reason why these capacitors failed."

234 comments

  1. Dupe again by daghlian · · Score: 5, Funny

    This story has already been posted. This story has already been posted. This story has already been posted.

    --

    One of these days/I'm going to cut you into little pieces.

    1. Re:Dupe again by big_groo · · Score: 0, Troll

      When a duplicate story appears, why do countless morons repeatedly post and re-post to point this out? What do you want, a medal for spotting this?

    2. Re:Dupe again by azav · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Because it is quite silly that the readers do a better job than the editors at spotting the dups.

      One would assume that the editors/posters would read their web site before jumping the gun.

      And by CB Neal no doubt! For shame! For shame!

      (Zav ducks, Zav runs)

      --
      - Zav - Imagine a Beowulf cluster of insensitive clods...
    3. Re:Dupe again by walt-sjc · · Score: 1

      No, we want the editors to pay attention to what the heck they are posting! This is happening almost every day, sometimes multiple times a day. You would think embarassing the editors into action would be enough. Apparently not.

    4. Re:Dupe again by nelsonal · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      In order to make time wasting more enjoyable, the department of public sloth has established the hot grits medal for proclimation of double entrys on popular weblogs. If you happen to notice an announcment of a double entry on a popular weblog, popular defined by able to render useless pages hosted on less than a dual Xeon with T1, please let the department of public sloth know immediately. Remember kids if you read a second story about the same topic the terrorists have already won!

      --
      Degaussing scares the bad magnetism out of the monitor and fills it with good karma.
    5. Re:Dupe again by SuperDuperMan · · Score: 2, Funny

      You should ask for a refund on your subscription. That will hurt them in the pocket book.

    6. Re:Dupe again by cyberlotnet · · Score: 2, Interesting

      I think that every time a editor posts a dupe story they should be required to donate $5 to http://www.eff.org/

      If this rule was put into affect, the EFF would end up with enough money to take anyone to court, even have a head on battle with Microsoft!!

    7. Re:Dupe again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I would have gone for haiku (but then, I'm needlessly cryptic).

      site lacks editors
      another duplicate post
      trolls eat well tonight

      Actually that's more like a film noir telegram. Ah well.

    8. Re:Dupe again by Midnight+Thunder · · Score: 1

      When a duplicate story appears, why do countless morons repeatedly post and re-post to point this out? What do you want, a medal for spotting this?

      Because they don't want to be left out of the fun ;) They feel if /. editor can do it, then so can the posters.

      --
      Jumpstart the tartan drive.
    9. Re:Dupe again by cervo · · Score: 0, Troll

      Too bad slashdot can't dupe money as well as it can dupe stories!!! Otherwise it would be like money really does grow on trees, no slashdot reader would ever need to work again!!!!!

    10. Re:Dupe again by Gordonjcp · · Score: 1

      Fourth, I thought....

    11. Re:Dupe again by meowsqueak · · Score: 0, Redundant

      did the previous posts mention the IEEE article?

    12. Re:Dupe again by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      When a duplicate story appears, why do countless morons repeatedly post and re-post to point this out? What do you want, a medal for spotting this?

      And you're here reading comments about a dupe and making the obligatory "why do people post this stuff" post. I feel a recursion coming on. :)

    13. Re:Dupe again by Matthaeus · · Score: 1

      I know it's a joke, but I have to respond seriously.

      Money has value simply because not everyone has it. Sure, it'd be nice for the first couple thousand people, but after word gets out and everyone has that kind of money, it won't be worth anything anymore. Good luck trading a few lines of code for a bottle of milk.

    14. Re:Dupe again by TheJesusCandle · · Score: 0, Redundant

      I think that every time a editor posts a dupe story they should be required to donate $5 to http://www.eff.org/

      If this rule was put into affect, the EFF would end up with enough money to take anyone to court, even have a head on battle with Microsoft!! If I had a nickle for every dupe on slashdot I would be rich!!

    15. Re:Dupe again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry I missed that, can you please repeat again?

    16. Re:Dupe again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Because you're annoying?

    17. Re:Dupe again by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      There aren't that many geeks who can read slashdot so not many people will get the money. Just the geek elite!!!!!

  2. Didn't we just leave this party... by Reziac · · Score: 4, Funny

    .. like, two days ago, and last month too??

    --
    ~REZ~ #43301. Who'd fake being me anyway?
    1. Re:Didn't we just leave this party... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's a glitch in the matrix...it happens when they change things.

  3. And here I thought it was the Auto Makers... by rusty0101 · · Score: 1

    ... who were using the planned obsolecence features.

    -Rusty

    --
    You never know...
  4. No Dept? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "from the dept."

    Hmm, looks like CowboyNeal's 'creative humor' capacitor blew as well...

    1. Re:No Dept? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's not the only thing CowboyNeal blew.

  5. Repeat! by Bios_Hakr · · Score: 3, Informative
    --
    I'd rather you do it wrong, than for me to have to do it at all.
  6. Stupid Editors Lead To Duplicate /. Articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Film at 11.

    1. Re:Stupid Editors Lead To Duplicate /. Articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Film at 11 and dupe film at 12.

    2. Re:Stupid Editors Lead To Duplicate /. Articles by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Film at 11 and dupe film at 12.

      Duplicate post of insightful AC comment about industrial espionage at 12:27 -ish.

      Not a single person has mentioned any thing about industrial espionage.

      The stolen secrets are to blame here. Incorrect materials used in the process of manufacturing, too.

      You people are so damn concerend about your little REPLACABLE hardware, that you have over looked the real moral of this story.

      They're all Spies!! All of them!!!

      -handybundler

    3. Re:Stupid Editors Lead To Duplicate /. Articles by n9hmg · · Score: 1

      followed by exclusive, you-heard-it-here-first scoop at 1230.

  7. This couldn't possibly be about by cscx · · Score: 1

    Leaky electrolytic capacitors?

  8. You get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 2, Interesting

    This shows that quality comes at a cost. If you truly want to get good quality goods, don't expect to keep forcing the market to make cheaper and cheaper products.

    Why would a company steal a formula such as this? so they ddn't have to pay as much for the 'real deal' and then henceforth could sell at a cheaper price and undercut others. When this happens quality suffers.

    It has happened in many other industries and frank, I'm surprised it hasn't yet happened in something as stressed and pushed-cheaper as the motherboard and other componentry markets.

    Rampant commercialism is causing problems like this.

    1. Re:You get what you pay for by amigaluvr · · Score: 1

      I don't think you've hit that nail on the head. I think there's a lot more to it than this simple view.

      But cheapness does have part to do with it.

    2. Re:You get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You get what you pay for.

      I don't remember paying twice...

    3. Re:You get what you pay for by vadim_t · · Score: 1

      But why would they want to steal it? I'm pretty sure that chemical analysis has advanced enough so that they can just buy a few capacitors and find what they're made from.

      Could anybody explain what's the advantage of stealing a formula instead of reverse-engineering it?

    4. Re:You get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Blame the manufacturers. They didn't want to bother creating a domestic computer manufacturing industry, so now they just buy everything from fly-by-night companies that constantly shift in and out of existence.

    5. Re:You get what you pay for by chamenos · · Score: 1

      "This shows that quality comes at a cost. If you truly want to get good quality goods, don't expect to keep forcing the market to make cheaper and cheaper products."

      not exactly....its more the fault of the free-market economy and unscrupulous manufactuers. not only do consumers force manufacturers to make cheaper products, the various competitors in the market also force each other to make cheaper products through intense competition.

      furthermore, it was the choice of manufacturers to start using sub-standard components. lowing the price point should ideally be a matter of selling their products as close to their profit margin as possible, not maintaining their profits whilst lowering the price by lowering the quality of their products.

      having said that, now that the problem has come to light consumers will now choose only to purchase from manufacturers that use quality components, proving once again that the "invisible hand" of the free-market is always at work :)

    6. Re:You get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      it sounded like some japanese employee got the formula and offered it to them. so i guess they stole it because its much easier than reverse engeneering

    7. Re:You get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Rampant commercialism is causing problems like this.

      and Rampant Communisim would leave us with still using 286 computers with rumors of the 386 in the next decade comrade...

      you are a complete and utter idiot. please shut up as you bring the collective IQ of the planet down by 3 points every time you talk.

    8. Re:You get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "This shows that quality comes at a cost." ...and that's why slashdot is free.

    9. Re:You get what you pay for by kawika · · Score: 1

      There are plenty of ways to cut costs ethically. These guys tried to take an unethical shortcut and it bit them. As for quality suffering, the process of cost reduction in ANY product will sometimes take a wrong turn here or there. But if you take a look at almost any product category in 2003 and compare it to, say 1973, I think you will find that the products are higher quality at lower prices. Thank goodness for "rampant commercialism".

    10. Re:You get what you pay for by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      fly-by-night companies that constantly shift in and out of existence.

      I was into that quantum reality thing for a while too.

    11. Re:You get what you pay for by unitron · · Score: 1
      "These guys tried to take an unethical shortcut and it bit them."

      Actually, it wound up biting us, the end user. The evil capacitor companies have probably had to change their names a few times to stay in business(while the good companies whose names they "imitated" are probably wondering if they will have to change names because of the collateral damage), but enough of the boards from several different companies managed to avoid breaking down until a day or two after the warranty expired that the motherboard companies will survive, but thousands of consumers are stuck with products that are beyond economical repair.

      You can say that we have no complaint once the warranty expires but if we all knew for a fact that everything you bought would break and have to be replaced as soon as the warranty expired, if not before then, would we have made the same purchases we did? You expect everything to not cause you any replacement expense during the warranty period and most of it to survive a reasonable length of time afterwards so that you might have to buy a new VCR within a year of warranty expiration, but not a VCR, a television, a DVD player, a printer, a monitor, a scanner, a motherboard, a processor, a modem, a sound card, a stereo receiver, a cassette deck, a CD-RW, and all your other electronics gear all at once or one right after the other.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    12. Re:You get what you pay for by Tsuzuki · · Score: 1

      This shows that quality comes at a cost

      Man, for a moment there I thought you were complaining about the dupes too.

  9. Is this the whole story? by amigaluvr · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Could it be that this isn't the whole story? perhaps the blaming on motherboards failing is coming from the manufacturers

    Making improper motherboards with bad/cheaper processes, and then blaming some far-down-the-line capacitor maker who can't easily be traced. What then?

    It's not unknown for things to be the opposite of what they seem.

    I don't know who to believe any more. I would suspect however it's more than likely with cheaper and cheaper processes and manufacturing that the normal-spec caps can't handle shoddy workmanship

    Then they fail.

    Are we blaming the right people?

    1. Re:Is this the whole story? by Silent_E · · Score: 1

      I've been wondering that too. It makes me question the idea of "brand loyalty" that I grew up with (find a quality brand, and stick to it). But I'm not sure what to replace it with, other than old-fashioned critical thinking.

    2. Re:Is this the whole story? by dankow · · Score: 1

      How dare you try to start legitimate discussion in this thread!? Don't you know that it's reserved for saying, in as many clever ways possible, that this story's a dupe?

      --
      I am the hub of Jack's digital lifestyle.
    3. Re:Is this the whole story? by SirSlud · · Score: 4, Insightful

      Buddy,

      If capacitors are exploding (see the pics, they are), across multiple motherboard vendors, all of whom are desigend differently, you dont have to be a rocket scientist to recognize the trend here.

      The capacitors are exploding. Vendor-independantly. Maybe you can provide some proof that cheaper and chaper processes are leading to the same capacitors exploding in many brands of motherboards .. or actually take *gasp* some news at face value instead of dreaming there's some secret "blame it on the guys' whos capacitors are exploding" consiracy.

      Anyhow, the Mobo manufacturers were loathe to admit the capacitors were exploding. If it really *was* their shoddy workmanship causing faulty boards, they've hae JUMPED at the opportunity to blame it on some untracable capacitor. But the article makes it very clear that manufacturers are reluctant to say anything, making it clear to me that the common element in all these exploding capacitor situations is ... gasp, the capacitor! Not much of one to beleive in Occoms Razor, huh?

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    4. Re:Is this the whole story? by amigaluvr · · Score: 1

      Oh now you're being silly

      It's well known that when overclocking, voltage needs to be increased in some cases. What about that then?

      Capacitors are known to explode when they are operated out of spec. I suspect there's a big link here.

      Manufacturers selling boards that are already 'pre cooked' when it comes to overclocking. Extra voltage anyone? More heat to your capacitor anyone? more likelihood of explosion anyone?

      Any overclocker will tell you they do it for fun and know the risks of the process. That is fair, it is their fun and they know the cost.

      Slugging normal consumers with this is rediculous and just plain stinks. There should be an Enquiry

    5. Re:Is this the whole story? by oconnorcjo · · Score: 1
      Anyhow, the Mobo manufacturers were loathe to admit the capacitors were exploding

      My theory for why the companies don't want to talk about it is that it proves that buying branded products is over-rated today. It used to be that if you bought something from "good brand X", all the parts were made by the company or the company did extensive research and quality testing. But what this article is showing is that this is no longer the case. It seems MB manufacturers are putting the cheapest shit in thier product to keep cost margins down. I read that ABIT is now buying capicitors from Japan because though the Japanese are more expensive, they are more reliable. Once burned- twice shy... at least some of them are learning thier lesson. I only wish quality assurance was a philosophy instead an after thought when costomers start complaining.

      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
    6. Re:Is this the whole story? by ptbarnett · · Score: 1
      Capacitors are known to explode when they are operated out of spec. I suspect there's a big link here.

      I lost two identical ABIT motherboards to this problem, neither of which were ever overclocked.

    7. Re:Is this the whole story? by SirSlud · · Score: 0

      Good theory, except the article states nothing about these boards having been overclocked - a detail that at least the quotes from the tech repair guy would have included had it been pertinant to the problem.

      I'm just wondering why people speculate without evidence? Its like people arn't happy with a story until they added their own little insubstantiated (possible, but insubstantiated) twist. I'm all for listening, but why post a "what if" without any proof beyond that it'd be possible?

      --
      "Old man yells at systemd"
    8. Re:Is this the whole story? by amigaluvr · · Score: 1

      neither of which were ever overclocked.

      not that you know of. That is my point

    9. Re:Is this the whole story? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      thats a pretty antiqued idea i think. Sony makes speakers under thier brand, but also under the brand Sony ES. The ES speakers are supposed to be high quality...the Sony speakers from all accounts are shit.

      At any rate, most companies have shown time and again that they are NOT loyal to you. Why should you be loyal to them?

    10. Re:Is this the whole story? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Capacitors are known to explode when they are operated out of spec. I suspect there's a big link here.

      I don't overclock; first off, AMD isn't known to handle it well. Second, i'd rather just get the processor just put out of date by the current new thing.

      However, i believe i have a board with this problem; i recently upgraded board and chip, putting the old one (temporarly) out of service. While i didnt have any problems with the board, after reading the story the first time i checked the board. I found one capacitor with a dome top, and traces of a brownish substance along the slices in the top. So i probbaly have one of the defective boards, but it wasn't caused by my overclocking it.

    11. Re:Is this the whole story? by vsprintf · · Score: 1

      I'm just wondering why people speculate without evidence? Its like people arn't happy with a story until they added their own little insubstantiated (possible, but insubstantiated) twist. I'm all for listening, but why post a "what if" without any proof beyond that it'd be possible?

      Whoa. I'm having a severe reality check. I thought I was reading comments on Slashdot. :)

    12. Re:Is this the whole story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yea i'm sure people were volunteering that their board is dead...and oh yea..."i was cooking it to get that extra juice"

      why don't you fucking sit down before you say something that would be impossible....like the article mentioning "overclocking"...because even if overclocking was a part of it...that information would NEVER be obtainable.

      HOW MANY MURDERS DOES THE DEATH PENALTY PREVENT?

      we don't fucking know because people don't stand up like morons and say "hey i was really thinking of whacking my boss but i changed my mind because of the chair"

    13. Re:Is this the whole story? by Ponty · · Score: 1

      I thought half of the reason people bought AMD chips was to overclock them. Am I wrong?

    14. Re:Is this the whole story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What? Do you think the overclocking faeries might have come in the night and done it?

    15. Re:Is this the whole story? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Oh please. When you overclock, you raise voltages IN THE PROCESSOR CORE by MAYBE .1 or .2 volts. That's not going to make a capacitor explode, especially because we're talking about power supply filter capacitors, which aren't going to be run at the processor voltage anyway.

    16. Re:Is this the whole story? by klui · · Score: 1
      According to http://home.att.net/~garyheadlee/faqs.htm (linked from elsewhere within this dupe) it states:

      Does overclocking cause the capacitor to fail?

      NO, absolutely not!!! Overclocking will make the CPU core run hotter than normal, the on-board regulator controls a lot more than the CPU core and should have plenty of overhead because future CPU's may need higher current. Overclocking may cause instability and aliens from other planets may be offended by the RFI generated but it won't cause capacitor failure!

    17. Re:Is this the whole story? by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      Well...when i was told that in '98 it was true. Maybe things have changed, or maybe overclocking involved a better cooling system then simply heatsink + fan.

      What i was told exactly is that Intel allowed a buffer, where the chip could handle more heat, but AMD kept thier chips on the edge, thus overclocking was discouraged. Now, that could still be true, and more advanced cooling systems let AMDs be overclocked. i really don't know.

      I buy AMD because its cheaper and gives the same or better performance then Intel.

  10. No matter how many times I refresh.... by Yo+Grark · · Score: 5, Funny

    ARRRRRRRRGGGGGGGGGGGG I'm still getting Slashdot's History Pages.

    I'm stuck in Cache HELL!

    Can someone tell me how to get the latest stories? :P

    Yo Grark
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering American Buttering American Buttering

    --
    Canadian Bred with American Buttering
    1. Re:No matter how many times I refresh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Insightful

      I'm impressed. This is not the second, but the third time this story has been posted. People actually pay money to read this site? I'd do better flushing 5+ bucks a month down the toilet.

    2. Re:No matter how many times I refresh.... by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 2, Interesting

      Hey, if you read the story you will find that there is a new twist to it - as in why the caps failed.

      graspee

    3. Re:No matter how many times I refresh.... by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Informative
      Hey, if you read the story you will find that there is a new twist to it - as in why the caps failed.

      No, since the last time (Thursday) it referred to the same IEEE article. You're probably thinking of the time before that, in November.

    4. Re:No matter how many times I refresh.... by oconnorcjo · · Score: 2, Interesting
      I'm impressed. This is not the second, but the third time this story has been posted. People actually pay money to read this site? I'd do better flushing 5+ bucks a month down the toilet.

      I hope you don't watch the news on TV or read the newspaper because when I do, they not only often have the same story on the same page with only a slightly different angle, they keep repeating the story over and over with nothing really new. Newspapers are notorious for that but people don't seem to be bothered that they pay a dollar to do so.

      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
    5. Re:No matter how many times I refresh.... by Graspee_Leemoor · · Score: 1

      You're right- I apologize.

      graspee

    6. Re:No matter how many times I refresh.... by mcgroarty · · Score: 1
      Don't you read the Slashdot FAQ, you filthy ape!?

      CmdrTaco and Timothy are in charge of the Slashdot "Best of the Week" category!

    7. Re:No matter how many times I refresh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Do they post the exact same article in the exact same text three days in a row? Didn't think so.

    8. Re:No matter how many times I refresh.... by SageLikeFool · · Score: 1

      Triple Post: for when double posting just isn't enough.

    9. Re:No matter how many times I refresh.... by oconnorcjo · · Score: 1
      Do they post the exact same article in the exact same text three days in a row? Didn't think so.
      Jiwana Brawly (sp?) Joe Buttafuco (sp?) OJ Simpson Monica Lewinski
      maybe not the same text but the general news LOVES to beat "dead horses". Slashdot tends to have more new/unique stuff on it than most newspapers and if they slip up on an occassion with a repeat, it is not like there are not ten other NEW stories a day that they DO post. Plus they don't post very many stories that are just complete shit. This story maybe a repeat but after reading this story a couple of days ago, I checked my motherboard to see if it had any leaky capacitors... it might be a story worth repeating in that many people might have missed it (if they don't read slashdot everyday).
      --
      I miss the Karma Whores.
    10. Re:No matter how many times I refresh.... by unitron · · Score: 1
      Wasn't there an article a week or two ago with a link to a story about the incomplete stolen secret formula from someone other than the IEEE, making this the 3rd time since November?

      You know you're getting old when you remember when they were just the IEE.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

    11. Re:No matter how many times I refresh.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      You probably do flush $5/month down the toilet. Of course, that's just the money you spent on TP... :)

  11. Floppy Drives by digital-959 · · Score: 0, Troll

    Maybe a similar reason is why floppy drives and media seem to have become much less durable over the years? Or perhaps we are just used to more durable things now and floppies haven't changed? Eitherway the analysis at Digital Teenz.com makes for interesting viewing, who would have guessed that they would come to those results?

  12. I hate to be critical, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is the third time you've posted this. It was a dupe the second time you posted it. Why do you keep posting it?

    1. Re:I hate to be critical, but... by baryon351 · · Score: 1

      This is the third time you've posted this

      Quick - someone submit it again. see if we can't get to 4...

    2. Re:I hate to be critical, but... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      what a great idea, TO THE TROLL MOBILE!!!!!!!!!!

      Lameness filter encountered. Post aborted!
      Reason: Don't use so many caps. It's like YELLING.

  13. Matter Of Time by sfled · · Score: 1



    So far, the only motherboard maker to admit to the problem is ABIT Computer Corp. (Taipei), and the only major PC maker to acknowledge being affected is IBM Corp. But the problem is likely to be more widespread. Indeed, those who have repaired the damaged boards say that they have encountered crippled motherboards from Micro-Star International, ASUSTek Computer, Gigabyte Technology, and others.

    Nice of ABIT and IBM to come clean. And here I thought I was an idiot newbie for paying more and buying Intel mobo's to build my boxes. Or is it just a matter of time? Aaugh!

    --
    I'm not really a web designer, I just play one on the Internet.
    1. Re:Matter Of Time by rnturn · · Score: 1

      I saw this IEEE article a few days ago and was concerned since I have a couple of Gigabyte motherboards. Needless to say, I was pretty disappointed to find that there was absolutely no mention of this problem on Gigabyte's web site. I'd hoped that there would be some mention of it if only a ``we are looking into the reports, etc., etc.'' type of release. Guess I'll be doing a visual inspection of the systems that have those m'boards.

      --
      CUR ALLOC 20195.....5804M
    2. Re:Matter Of Time by woogieoogieboogie · · Score: 1
      I have been using MSI motherboards extensively and exclusively for many years and never have had problems. Out of close to 100 boards, I have only had one MSI 1 K7 board go bad and MSI RMA'd it no problems (with only 1 week turnaround).

      Intel boards are not more expensive. An MSI board running an 845 chipset will cost more than an intel board running the same chipset with the same features. The cheap ECS type boards are not using Intel chipsets and as a result they do not have to pay the intel tax.

      Low end Athlon chipset based (via KT333) boards from MSI offer more dollar for dollar than Intel chipset(845) based boards from either MSI or Intel and will typically perform better for most everyday tasks. I think part of it is that the VIA 4 in 1 drivers are better optimized for the via chipsets than the intel inf drivers are for intel chipsets.

      --
      ... Governments are instituted among Men, deriving their just Powers from the Consent of the Governed...
    3. Re:Matter Of Time by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Low end Athlon chipset based (via KT333) boards from MSI offer more dollar for dollar than Intel chipset(845) based boards from either MSI or Intel and will typically perform better for most everyday tasks. I think part of it is that the VIA 4 in 1 drivers are better optimized for the via chipsets than the intel inf drivers are for intel chipsets.

      Sorry, but this is straight out of the back end of a cow.
      The predominant coverage I've seen of Via's cheap nasty chipsets seems to be very negative (quick example: http://groups.google.com/groups?as_q=via%204in1%20 problem&safe=images&ie=UTF-8&oe=UTF-8&as_ugroup=mi crosoft.public.*&lr=&hl=en).
      On the other hand, I've never had instability problems with Intel chipsets. The .INF update for Intel chipsets isn't even a driver; it's just a means for Windows to recognise all the chipset devices (i.e, you'll find several .INF files in the package, but no driver binaries). If you don't install the Intel .INF updates on a Windows platform, the worst that'll happen is that things like the IDE controller don't run at full speed. On the other hand, failure to install this-weeks-latest-version-of Via's 4in1 patches means a flaky and unreliable system, or so I'm assured by people I've spoken to (or read on the NGs) who've had the misfortune to use them. Intel boards usually ARE more expensive than the competition. But then, quality costs money..

    4. Re:Matter Of Time by boskone · · Score: 1

      I've been really unhappy with gigabyte the last year or so, and their support is abysmal. I'm trying MSI now, we'll see how they do.

    5. Re:Matter Of Time by plague3106 · · Score: 1

      I've never had a stability problem with VIA chipsets either, and i've been running them for years, at least 5 to be exact. One board HAS been running for 5 years.

    6. Re:Matter Of Time by unitron · · Score: 1

      Actually I doubt if Abit rushed to admit to the problem just because they're such great guys as much as they were dragged to it kicking and screaming because the evidence was just too overwhelming.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  14. leaky caps cause slahdot dupes by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    the dupes are caused by leaking caps in the mods memory chips...
    or sumthing like that :)

  15. so confused by natefanaro · · Score: 2, Funny

    I deleted all of my temp internet files and this story still showed up! Where did I go wrong?

  16. could this have anything to do..... by Snagle · · Score: 1

    maybe if the motherboards didnt have pentiums on them...;)

    1. Re:could this have anything to do..... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Has nothing to do with it unfortunately. I HAD a Duron 800 on an EPOX 8KTA+ and it did this in spectacular fashion. 5 of them popped with lots of oozing.

    2. Re:could this have anything to do..... by kumokasumi · · Score: 1

      No, actually; I have an affected board. It's a Soyo 5SSM Socket-A Micro-ATX board.
      With a 450mHz K6-2.
      Any other partisan whining or smarmy jokes you'd like to share?

  17. So... by labratuk · · Score: 5, Funny

    ...if a duplicate post is a 'dupe', does that mean a triplicate post is 'tripe'?

    --
    Malike Bamiyi wanted my assistance.
    1. Re:So... by sean23007 · · Score: 3, Funny

      No, almost all the posts are tripe...

      --

      Lack of eloquence does not denote lack of intelligence, though they often coincide.
    2. Re:So... by CodeMunch · · Score: 1
      ...if a duplicate post is a 'dupe', does that mean a triplicate post is 'tripe'?

      No, almost all the posts are tripe...

      I wasn't aware that Statler and Waldorf read /.

  18. DUPE by man_ls · · Score: 1, Redundant

    I have never posted "dupe" before, but this is the _third_ time in recent history that I've seen this story.

    Don't you people ever check the current articles?

    Seriously...

  19. OMG! by NMerriam · · Score: 5, Funny


    hey, everyone! i don't think this is public yet, but there are some faulty capacitors going around!!!!! send this message to ten of your friends and post it everywhere or else nobody will know!!!!!!

    --
    Recursive: Adj. See Recursive.
    1. Re:OMG! by ForestGrump · · Score: 2, Funny

      no no...
      its pass it around to 10 friends within the next hour...or the caps on YOUR mobo will blow!

      -Grumpy Old Man.

      --
      Is it true that more people vote for the winner of American Idol, than vote for the president? -Ali G.
  20. This is happening again! by Anonym0us+Cow+Herd · · Score: 4, Funny

    Fool me once, shame on me. ....

    We should have learned our lesson about corporate espionage the first time. But now that history has repeated itself, within only a few days, I guess we didn't learn our lesson the first time here on Slashdot.

    How many times will we have to have faulty motherboards and other consumer electronic items before we learn our lessons abotu corporate espionage?

    Are we learning yet?

    --
    The price of freedom is eternal litigation.
    1. Re:This is happening again! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      What humorless moron modded this Informative?

  21. Imagine by Mdog · · Score: 5, Insightful

    Wouldn't it be cool if the editors of slashdot ran a professional, spellchecked site? With policies that are more than whims? I know they're just a bunch of geek morons in Michigan, but a boy can dream, can't he?

    1. Re:Imagine by proj_2501 · · Score: 4, Funny

      CowboyNeal is actually a hip-hop DJ. This is only his day job.

    2. Re:Imagine by CoolVibe · · Score: 1

      If you don't like it, go here instead. So the editors here post dupes (trips? uh..). If you don't like it, tough. There are more websites out there that do get spellchecked.

    3. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Haha, no thanks. I'd rather wade through duplicate stories than put up with the wannabe intellectualists at Kuroshin that love running their mouths. What a bunch of shitheads.

    4. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
      If you don't like it, go here [kuro5hin.org] instead.

      Ah yes... Kuro5hin... home of Osama "misunderstood freedom-fighter" bin Laden fanboys and anti-semites.

      Fun for the whole family, unless you're a jew or an American.

    5. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      A more true post has never graced this site.

    6. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Sorry, I have had enough of the American/USian debate on k5.

    7. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >If you don't like it, go here [kuro5hin.org] instead

      Ooh yeah, baby, give me those hot stories about what 16 year old Americans think about drug laws and Muslims!

    8. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Slashdot is not a monopoly - if you don't like it here, then you're free to leave to a competing site. If no such site exists, feel free to set up your own site and show how it should be done. Criticism is easy if you don't have to do the work.

    9. Re:Imagine by jelle · · Score: 1

      No that would not be cool. That would turn this into a lycos, excite, yahoo, or whatsamacallit dot com. Actually, I often do enjoy those sites too, but they are not slashdot and slashdot is not them, neither should it try to be.

      Slashdot is cool as it is. Nerd for Nerds, Stuff that Matters. Not 'prechewed and spellchecked news for [selfcensored]'

      Don't like it? Go try building a community yourself, and stop bitching here. Or write a (perl) script that detects double stories and filters them for you, then submit that to CmdrTaco for inclusion in the slashcode, with a 'preferences' setting to enable it for the whiners.

      The fact that some stories are double simply is not 'stuff that matters'.

      --
      --- Hindsight is 20/20, but walking backwards is not the answer.
    10. Re:Imagine by klui · · Score: 1

      And wouldn't it be cool if their grammar is as good as their spelling? "Its" is used properly rather than "it's"; "there" vs. "their"; ....

    11. Re:Imagine by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If this really bothers you that much, just correct the articles and resubmit them in a week.

  22. Oy! Where did the real Slashdot go? by bryanbrunton · · Score: 0, Troll

    Ok, I realize that pontificating on the less than dedicated Slashdot editors is not the most worthwhile activity, but between crap reposts like this and the daily XBox post, Slashdot just plain sucks anymore.

    The Slashdot Editors are a bunch of two faced, idiotic morons. I can't take it anymore: I'm off to finally look at the options here for filtering out XBox crap. Can you filter stories by editor? I'd prefer to never read another word written by CmdrDipshit again.

    1. Re:Oy! Where did the real Slashdot go? by SirDaShadow · · Score: 1

      Me: Computer! Activate nostalgia mode!
      Computer: Yes Master
      Computer: Going back 5 years, Sir Slashdot in 1998
      Me: Well done. What is this? Star Wars as a religion back in 1998? But....but I have only been on Slashdot since 2000 and have already seen that article shown several times!
      Computer: It's called "Temporal Amnesic Disorder", Sir
      Me:Interesting...

    2. Re:Oy! Where did the real Slashdot go? by Katz_is_a_moron · · Score: 1

      Calling Slashdot Editors idiotic morons is an insult to idiotic morons everywhere.

  23. This is a dupe by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From 2 days ago:
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=03/02/05/ 232721 8&mode=nested&tid=137

    From November:
    http://slashdot.org/article.pl?sid=02/1 1/04/175121 0&mode=thread

    Is this the first time something has been posted 3 times? Does this make this one a trupe? Or maybe a tripe?

  24. More info from the guy who changes the caps by sapgau · · Score: 5, Informative

    Gary Headlee is the guy mentioned in the article who has more information on the list of boards affected:
    Motherboard Cap Replacement

  25. Chinese et al are thieves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

    Multiple chinese natives are busted for spying in the Silicon Valley.

    Cisco is dealing with a Chinese company that flat out stole it's software.

    Software piracy is rampant in the third world.

    And yet, our corporations in their all knowingness replace american workers with foreigners who quickly secret out trade secrets.

    And yet, our corporations in their all knowingness move important operations offshore - operations with american credit information, customer information, and YOUR information.

    This is going to blow up in our faces - but it won't be the government's problem, it won't be the company's problem - it will be your problem when your identity is stolen from your very own bank records and you need to clean up the mess.

    It will be your problem when you try to get service from a company for a product you purchased (whether real or a "financial instrument.")

    Already I have heard of Indian programmers causing people trouble when they loose a contract - mailing virus's and shit to the company's email server or attempting to cause damage.

    Lets face it, there is a whole different set of morals over there - a whole different idea of what is right to do, and what is wrong to do. Are they poor because of the political and social decisions they make? Or because "America, the man, is keepin us down!" Or maybe because they have no concept of capitalism, no concept of win-win, no concept of value.

    American business is going to learn this the hardway.

    A whole bold new marketplace? No. Steal our ideas, steal our technologies, and build up products to sell at home. And they will tariff or ignore our products (aka see how they hate MS because it is not-built-there, among more valid reasons.)

    1. Re:Chinese et al are thieves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny
      That is why the smart money is going into nearshore outsourcing, "nearshore" being Canada. Canadians speak English, work harder than Americans for less money, are more law abiding and very much less violent. Canada has cities and transportation infrastructures that haven't been allowed to decay, unlike in America where cheapass taxpayers don't mind if their city turns into a jungle if it will save them $100/month. Canada also has telephone and internet services that are as good as if not better than those in the USA. Canada doesn't have greedy corporations running its health care, so it costs less and covers everybody.


      America is as obsolete as a rusted out 1976 Ford LTD; come to Canada.

    2. Re:Chinese et al are thieves by 1u3hr · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Steal our ideas, steal our technologies, and build up products to sell at home.

      Yes, that's exactly what the US did. Look a little into what US companies did in the 19th C, when its companies stole industrial processes, published books, from European countries without permission or compensation.

      Only when it had caught up and started to produce IP that it wanted to sell did it start to make and enforce such laws, and now of course uses massive pressure to force other, poor, countries into line.

      Lets face it, there is a whole different set of morals over there - a whole different idea of what is right to do, and what is wrong to do.

      As for "morality", the US is such an example of self interest in its relations with the rest of the world, that only your countrymen could keep a straight face when you mention it.

    3. Re:Chinese et al are thieves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      yeah, well ok the U.S. has it`s faults. a country is run by men some as we can guess are better than others...but when CHINA can stop killing it citizens to be sold as cheap body parts and allow freedom to worship God without fear... then you can say how great and noble china is BUT until then. if china is so great why don`t you go and stand in the forbidden city and pass out flyers about Jesus and see how long you last... WAKE UP!!!

    4. Re:Chinese et al are thieves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      you make it sound like there are "american businesses". in this world and time, there are NOT.

      global companies that have no loyalty to america besides for the temporary ties used to make a profit. you think ford, IBM, ..... are AMERICAN companies.

      they havent been for a long time.

    5. Re:Chinese et al are thieves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      eat a dick commie spy

    6. Re:Chinese et al are thieves by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Let's see you walk down the streets of Atlanta handing out Satanist literature. Let's see how long you'd last.

      You seem to equate freedom with the freedom to worship Jesus. Wake up, boy. It's far greater than that.

  26. ENOUGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 3, Insightful

    I am sick of this. Evertime there is a dupe(a mistake! sometimes people make these) there is always the obligatory barrage of "DUPE" messages and never any discussion of the issue.
    Get over it and find something constructive to do!

    1. Re:ENOUGH by chrisseaton · · Score: 1

      We've already crapping discussed it twice!!! What more is there to say!!!

    2. Re:ENOUGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Just ignore it then! Some of missed it and may like to see views on the topic. Does derision give you a rush?

    3. Re:ENOUGH by Bob9113 · · Score: 3, Funny

      I am sick of this. Evertime there is a dupe(a mistake! sometimes people make these) there is always the obligatory barrage of "DUPE" messages and never any discussion of the issue.
      Get over it and find something constructive to do!


      You mean like bitching about the dupe messages?

    4. Re:ENOUGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Nice! You are probably a coward that never do anything if we actually met.
      HEHE!

    5. Re:ENOUGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Where do you live? I live in California!! I'll tell you a town if you tell me. Lets get it on!

    6. Re:ENOUGH by chrisseaton · · Score: 1

      I live in Winchester in England, but that won't stop me from getting to you.

    7. Re:ENOUGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      This fun! I live in San Diego. Let's get some tea!

    8. Re:ENOUGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Damn. I mean't to post anonymously.

    9. Re:ENOUGH by vicviper · · Score: 1

      I am sick of this. Evertime there is a dupe(a mistake! sometimes people make these) there is always the obligatory barrage of "DUPE" messages and never any discussion of the issue.
      Get over it and find something constructive to do!

    10. Re:ENOUGH by Puu · · Score: 1

      Mod this up!

      (A dupe post about reacting to dupe articles. It's funny, laugh.)

    11. Re:ENOUGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "I think that all good, right thinking people in this country are sick and tired of being told that all good, right thinking people in this country are fed up with being told that all good, right thinking people in this country are fed up with being sick and tired. I'm certainly not, and I'm sick and tired of being told that I am."

    12. Re:ENOUGH by Politburo · · Score: 1

      The discussion of the issue is located over in the first submission.

    13. Re:ENOUGH by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I am sick of this. Evertime there is a dupe(a mistake! sometimes people make these) there is always the obligatory barrage of "DUPE" messages and never any discussion of the issue.
      Get over it and find something constructive to do!

  27. This storys been going around for at least 7 years by glrotate · · Score: 1

    That's the the first time I remember hearing about it.

  28. deja vu? by Bruha · · Score: 1

    Anywho I have a MSI KT7 Ultra MB that's buring out power supplies. I've put it in my collection of old computer crap but I'm wondering if i'm a victim. However I dont see any problems with the capacitors and just chalk it up to a bad voltage regulator on the board.

    1. Re:deja vu? by Sarcazmo · · Score: 1

      If it's burning out power supplies, you have incredibly cheap power supplies. A good power supply should never burn out due to something external happening to it power wise.

  29. HAHA! Mod Parent Up! by mekkab · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    While you only really need one post to say DUPLICATE, I like this one because of the wit content. Tripe indeed!

    --
    In the future, I would want to not be isolated from my friends in the Space Station.
  30. Just like George Costanza by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I get a second chance to use this great comment I had thought up the day after I saw this story. I'm a little torn though, should I take the time to refine it for the next time Slashdot posts this or just shoot my load? No, best to strike while the iron is hot!

    Hey, maybe they should pour some GATORADE on those sumbitches, it speeds electrolytes to the areas that need it, giving your computer the energy it needs to dominate whatever opponent stands in it's way.

    $$

  31. Well, it's finally happened... by ActiveSX · · Score: 1

    Slashdot has gone bureaucratic on us and is filing stories in trip li cate.

  32. Re:DUPE by Ballsy · · Score: 1

    I can only imagine the physical distress you're caused by having to skip over an article that you've already seen before. As it turns out, many folks have other things to do with their time than stare at (insert fav browser here) and click refresh checking out new /. stories all day.
    As for the editors, shame on them for not catching a duplicate in the many thousands of stories they sift through every day in order to provide you with some reading material at no charge to you whatsoever.
    Does the expression "you get what you pay for" mean anything to you?
    Seriously...

  33. Hi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Come visit my hometown in California!

    1. Re:Hi. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      HAHAHAHA! Sweet! Looks infected.

  34. Dupe-Reporters Harken Unto Me by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Insightful

    I and countless others are getting fed up with all the "this is a dupe" reporters out there.

    I have two questions for you. Are you paying money for slashdot? Are you submitting plenty of original articles to slashdot yourself? If the answer's no and no (and it probably is since you have all the time in the world to go looking for the old links to the reposted stories), then either shut the fsck up or go start your own forum.

    There are three kinds of intelligence. The first is those who just sort of go along ignoring everything. The second are those who criticize everything. But the third, and best, are those who create something at the risk of being criticized...like the people who run slashdot.

    That makes them smarter then you so, again, if you notice a dupe...fine...notice it and then shut the fsck up and go masturbate over some pr0n or something.

    1. Re:Dupe-Reporters Harken Unto Me by Osty · · Score: 1

      I have two questions for you. Are you paying money for slashdot?

      Supposedly some people are. See that "subscribe" link over on the left? That's how you pay money to Slashdot. Though I'd not do it, because the quality of Slashdot is not worth the money.


      Are you submitting plenty of original articles to slashdot yourself?

      I've tried to submit a number of stories to Slashdot over the years. Guess what? Every single one of them was rejected. It only takes so many rejections for a guy to give up. What good does it do me to continue to submit well-written stories on interesting articles when they continue to be rejected? None at all. So, it sounds like we have a chicken and egg problem here -- to get better stories, better stories need to be submitted, but the editors keep posting dupes, trips, and rejecting good stories, so the people submitting good stories give up and stop submitting, thus relegating Slashdot to poorly written stories and dupes ...


      There are three kinds of intelligence. The first is those who just sort of go along ignoring everything. The second are those who criticize everything. But the third, and best, are those who create something at the risk of being criticized...like the people who run slashdot.

      I think you need to qualify your third category a bit better. There are the people that create something at the risk of being criticized, and then don't give a shit when they get that criticism (or worse, get defensive, like the Slashdot editors have done in the past), and there are the people that create something at the risk of being criticized, and then take to heart any criticism they receive and use it to enhance their creation. I'd argue that the former type of "intelligence" is no better than your first two types, while the latter is what any creative person should strive toward. If you don't give a shit about criticism you receive, then your act of creation is nothing more than masturbation.

    2. Re:Dupe-Reporters Harken Unto Me by slashdot_commentator · · Score: 1

      I and countless others are getting fed up with all the "this is a dupe" reporters out there

      And haven't you noticed you are now one of those people? Not the "This story is a dupe", but the "I'm sick of you dupe complainers" (whining, redundant, cowardly jerk.)

      Are you submitting plenty of original articles to slashdot yourself?

      Actually, two days ago, I submitted a story about how bioresearchers at the University of Oxford released a distributed computing screensaver to help scan for protein agents to fight smallpox. I was quite thorough in checking the text and the working links. In hours, they rejected it. It really bummed me out. At the time, I thought they didn't like my blurb, but that the story would be important enough to pick up someone else's submission. Nope, instead, they decided to run the capacitor story yet again.

      So, the researchers could really use some CPUs, and some leech here probably could use the karma, so go submit this story again. Beats another dupe, IMO.

      if you notice a dupe...fine...notice it and then shut the fsck up and go masturbate over some pr0n or something.

      Don't you think if the editors can't seem to avoid duping stories within days (or extreme cases hours) from another, that they may need some help in having it pointed out to them?

      --
      There is no America. There is no democracy. There is only IBM and AT&T and DuPont, Dow, General Electric, and Exxon
  35. Faulty Capacitors on CowboyNeal by Limburgher · · Score: 1, Redundant

    This may have resulted in the duplicate post. Slashdot engineers are investigating. . .

    --

    You are not the customer.

  36. Those cleaver Japanese by DABANSHEE · · Score: 1

    I wonder if they intentionally sold the 'stolen' faulty capacitor formula to the Taiwanese

  37. what next? by Festering+Leper · · Score: 0

    capacitors with capton insulation?

    one spark and you've got a roman candle :)

    --
    if you want people to think you know what you are talking about, just put ".com" at the end of everything you say.com
  38. Dupe extravaganza by agdv · · Score: 1

    I think I figured out the trolls' new game:
    1)submit stories that have already been posted, so that they will be accepted and re-posted.
    2)Sit back and watch all the "dupe" posts and laugh.
    3) Profit?

    Otherwise, this is truly pathetic.

    1. Re:Dupe extravaganza by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      I think this plan needs a step 2.5

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  39. Suggestion by Trygve · · Score: 1

    So I can understand how an editor might easily overlook a duplicate story, but a triplicate -- and so closely following the last instance -- suggests a lack of effort.

    Could the editors employ some tools to help them watch for such slip-ups? Just logging the URL's previous stories have linked to, and warning if it sees them again would eliminate a number of the simple cases like this one (though there will be a number of false positives for links just pointing at a domain like cnet.com). But it's still a start, and could easily be refined to grow in accuracy over time.

    1. Re:Suggestion by nomadic · · Score: 1

      It IS lack of effort. They get paid salaries to post stories on slashdot. That's what, a minute of work, at two stories a day. Ok, 2 minutes of work per full-time workday. And that's with checking for duplication. Guess they'd rather shave some time off that oppressive two minutes of work by not checking stories.

  40. Shoddy all around by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

    Zogbi cites tests by Japanese manufacturers that indicate the capacitor's lifetimes are half or less of the 4000 hours of continuous ripple current they are rated for.

    4000 hours = 166.6 days. No wonder "Made in Taiwan" has such negative connotations.

    1. Re:Shoddy all around by SN74S181 · · Score: 1

      That's overstress testing. To accelerate wear, since it doesn't make much sense to test a batch of parts to end of life before using them.

      Not that it matters. This is the New Slashdot, where it's more important to tow the party line.

      Slag the evil [microsoft|entertainment industry|evile corporations|whatever-else-is-trendy-to-slag]!!

    2. Re:Shoddy all around by whereiswaldo · · Score: 1

      Uh huh. I guess your friends spell it out when they are joking? Kinda takes away from the friggen joke don't you think?

    3. Re:Shoddy all around by Cid+Highwind · · Score: 1

      It was a joke?

      Not all of us /.ers are electrical engineers, and I'm sure I'm not the only one here who doesn't know the difference between "4000 hours contiuous ripple current" and 6 months of what the caps on my motherboard are subjected to!

      --
      0 1 - just my two bits
  41. Looks sparse. How about an OT (clean) joke? by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Okay, what do you get when you cross a mountain climber with a flu virus?

    [Answer one level below]

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  42. Re:This storys been going around for at least 7 ye by n9hmg · · Score: 3, Funny

    AAaahh... You must be a /. editor.

  43. Answer: don't groan by MickLinux · · Score: 1

    Okay, you can't do it.

    Although a flu virus *is* a vector, a mountain climber is a scalar.

    [You have to know vector math to understand this one].

    For a bonus question for you calculus folks:
    The integral of [Cabin*dCabin] = Noah's Ark. Why?

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
  44. Pete and Repeat..... by Emugamer · · Score: 1

    Pete and repeat went up the hill...
    A paying slashdot customer took a gun and went after the editors... which do you think came down?

    DISCLAIMER I don't think that violence is the answer to anything and I do not advocate the use of force to lower oil prices save our selves from possible violence down the road or to reduce the number of duplicates on slashdot

    1. Re:Pete and Repeat..... by TheRaven64 · · Score: 1

      DISCLAIMER I don't think that violence is the answer to anything and I do not advocate the use of force to lower oil prices save our selves from possible violence down the road or to reduce the number of duplicates on slashdot
      Hmm. I agree on the first two...

      --
      I am TheRaven on Soylent News
  45. Limited life span anyway by Ralman · · Score: 1

    About a month ago, my ABIT KT7-RAID board decided to blow some caps. Nice loud popping sound and instant power cut.

    I looked around to try and replace it seeing the machine has been rock stable, and still my most used computer of the bunch. Quess what, the board is so far out of date, being only a few years old, that the CPU and memory used on it will not function in the current motherboards on the market. So a board upgrade is out of the question.
    Hence the limited life span of a computer and components.

    What to do? I checked e-Bay but the KT7-RAID boards were going for $50+ a piece. Instead I opted to get some replacement caps and try fixing the board myself. Total cost of parts ~$1.50! I got them from an electronics supplier online. The 'Shack' does not carry the correct size and ratings. I already have the soldering irons and tools to do this work from some minor case modding, so no extra layout of funds there.

    About an hour of work, since I was going slow and taking my time. One recommendation, if you try doing it yourself, that bulb solder remover from the 'Shack' is crap. Get the spring loaded one.

    Now the board is rock stable, and I just saved myself at least $48.

    Disclaimer: I am not responsible in any way if you try to do the same and screw it up!

    1. Re:Limited life span anyway by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      For $25 and an RMA number from their site, Abit repaired my KA7 in less than 6 days. It had a sudden rash of instability problems a year and a half ago and was put on the shelf. Nothing popped under power, just brown goo leaking from 14 caps around DIMM and CPU slots.

    2. Re:Limited life span anyway by nickclarke · · Score: 1

      Nice - some good honest bodging :-)

      Disclaimer: I am not responsible in any way if you try to do the same and screw it up!

      If the board's dead anyway, what does it matter if you screw it up? You'll have only wasted $1.50, as you would have still needed to buy a new mobo (and probably CPU & memory) even if you didn't try - just make sure that when you first power it up anything non-essential is not plugged in, just in case.

    3. Re:Limited life span anyway by shepd · · Score: 1

      >One recommendation, if you try doing it yourself, that bulb solder remover from the 'Shack' is crap. Get the spring loaded one.

      It's more than crap -- it's dangerous to your parts. Never use an ungrounded iron on anything that has unsocketed chips on it. Ever.

      [ Yes, I've said that before. I'm saying it again, because people I know that buy the usual $5 iron from Radio Hack usually are the same people who complain about their ICs always being faulty -- and they're not dummies, normally, either. ]

      --
      If you could be told what you can see or read, then it follows that you could be told what to say or think - BoC
  46. Joseph+Pharoah+Slashdot=repost (7yrs) by MickLinux · · Score: 4, Funny

    Okay, let's see what happened. Pharoah had a dream and couldn't remember it. So Joseph reminded him, and told him how there would be 7 years of good articles, and then 7 years without good articles in Slashdot.

    So Pharoah asked "What should we do?" And Joseph said, "Let's save up the seven years of good articles, and then repost them during the seven years of bad articles."

    Thus it was said, thus it was done, and thus we got seven years of bad articles.

    --
    Correct Horse Battery Staple: 72 bits of entropy. Enter "Correct H" into google. When it generates the phrase, that's
    1. Re:Joseph+Pharoah+Slashdot=repost (7yrs) by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      uh, I guess we're getting the 7 bad years first, right?

  47. Who are the evil motherboard makers? by trentfoley · · Score: 1
    "Other manufacturers have been less helpful. As Gary Headlee's capacitor replacement side business grew, he began receiving damaged boards built by other companies besides ABIT. But when he posted the list of other boards on his Web site, he received letters from lawyers representing two manufacturers, prompting him to pull the posting."

    Which motherboard makers threatened Mr. Headlee? And, on what grounds?

    Mr. Headlee, if you are listening, post the manufacturers here so that we can all avoid their products, thereby letting them know it is a bad thing to hide behind lawyers.

    1. Re:Who are the evil motherboard makers? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      how about evil integrators/resellers?

      http://www.lektech.com/

      they refuse to take back items that CLEARLY show the capacitor issue since

      The manufacturers of the board(s) have not stated it as a problem, thus it is a user install/usage issue {even on machines that they have built for us} and it is after the 30 day "satisfaction guarenteed"

  48. I'm sorry this happened by QDogg · · Score: 2, Insightful

    However, I'm glad that this is happening to boards that end up in the hands of tech-savvy individuals that can spot the problem. People who buy ABIT, Asus, etc... boards expect a lot from the product that they recieve and are usuially knowledgeable about the equipment that they run.

    I could only imagine if this happened to a major computer company, how it would be swept under the rug (which it may already have been). I see that IBM is named in the article, so at least they are willing to accept the failures. IBM is one of the only computer makers that I trust anymore after the way that they handled their hard drive failure issues. Yes, they tried to fix the problem by changing the uptime specs, but in the end, they got the problem worked out without too much hassle to customers (hardware zealots excluded).

    I would like to know if this problem has been documented by any users that aren't using products from the manufacturers listed in the article and their expierence with the equipment, service and support.

  49. I will Post Something Worth While... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Interesting Enough... I talked about a similar problem with our RMA guy at my company. We have about 500 machines in the field that use a motherboard by Promise. For there time(4 years ago) they are pretty decent including support for ide raid.

    Now since I talked to the RMA guy... obviously we are having issues with them. The coolest thing is that looking at the half of the returned motherboards you can actually see the breaking down of the capacitors(very cool). They kinda look like batteries when they start to leak.

    Now since Promise is no longer in business... we are pretty much left to limp along until all the hardware can be replaced...

    Related? Maybe not to the same batch of capacitors, but could actually indicate a bigger problem.

  50. Post modern posting by AndroidCat · · Score: 4, Funny
    It's a little known fact, but the world ended several years ago. In order to keep things going, They have been recycling time from the past. That's why we're getting a shuttle disaster again, Desert Storm again, Bush in the White House again.

    It's a tough job just keeping the Big Picture going, so weird effects show up in the small things. That's why television is all repeats, and why Slashdot has dups. Oh yeah, and Anonymous Coward really is this one guy.

    Have a nice day, again!

    --
    One line blog. I hear that they're called Twitters now.
    1. Re:Post modern posting by damien_kane · · Score: 1

      Oh yeah, and Anonymous Coward really is this one guy

      Hey, Anonymous Coward... Can you share your secret with the rest of us? How do you get around the 2 minute submission restriction?

    2. Re:Post modern posting by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      I just keep recycling the same two minutes over and over again. I do the same with my IN SOVIET RUSSIA posts, but I imagine you've noticed that.

  51. I know the problem by N8F8 · · Score: 1

    The editors are stuck with the same crappy search tool we users are stuck with. Sure they check for prior postings, but the search tool is broken (almost as bad as SF.net) and never returs decent results.

    --
    "God fights on the side with the best artillery." - Napoleon, Marshal of France - speaking truth to power
  52. Comment removed by account_deleted · · Score: 1

    Comment removed based on user account deletion

  53. "cowboyneal-is-too-lazy-to-make-a-dept" by indiigo · · Score: 1

    Sounds like that's not the only thing he's too lazy to do...

    --
    fslg503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-985-86 8650 3-985-fdsg8686503-985-8686503-985-8686503-9
  54. How to check before you buy by QDogg · · Score: 3, Informative

    It is easy enough to check this before you buy. Go up to the display case at your local computer parts retailer and ask to see XYZ motherboard that you are thinking of buying. Jot down all the markings on the electrolytic caps. Now go home and look up the datasheet for those caps. A good computer grade capacitor will have longevity of 2000 to 3000 hours or more at maximum ripple current and a temperature of 105 or 125C. Reputable brands are Panasonic HA or NHG, Rubycon, etc.

    Forget case mods, maybe we need to start modding our mainboards with better caps.

  55. Re:DUPE by Tony-A · · Score: 1

    When your motherboard blows up, this article is current.
    Seriously.

  56. 4000 hours rating? by frovingslosh · · Score: 1
    From the article: tests by Japanese manufacturers that indicate the capacitor's lifetimes are half or less of the 4000 hours of continuous ripple current they are rated for.

    For those who can't do the math, this is 166.66 days of normal continous operation, less than six months. If these caps are really rated for 6 months of use, then early failure is the least of our problems.

    --
    I'm an American. I love this country and the freedoms that we used to have.
  57. Finally !! by KoolDude · · Score: 5, Funny


    From the Book of /. Postings:

    And Saint Hemos displayed the posting on paper, saying, 'O Lord, bless this Thy Holy Posting that, with it, Thou mayest blow Thine readers to boredom in Thy mercy.'

    And the Lord did grin, and the people did feast upon the lambs and sloths and carp and anchovies and orangutans and breakfast cereals and fruit bats and large chu--

    Hmm... Skipping a bit...

    And the Lord spake, saying, 'First shalt thou choose random Story. Then, shalt thou post it three times. No more. No less. Three shalt be the number thou shalt post, and the number of the posting shall be three. Four times shalt thou not post, nor either post thou two times, excepting that thou then proceed to post thrice. Five is right out. Once the number three, being the third number, be reached, then, post thou thy Holy Posting towards thy readers, who, being naughty in My sight, shall comment on it.'

    Amen.


    Congratulations, /. editors have finally made it ! ;)

    --
    getSexySig(); /* returns sexy signature */
  58. In other news... by wirelessbuzzers · · Score: 1

    ... corporate espionage also leads to duped stories.

    --
    I hereby place the above post in the public domain.
  59. Department by Tokerat · · Score: 0, Redundant

    How about the"file-in-triplicate" department?

    Searching for "Capacitors" under Older Stuff yeilds these three stories as the top 3 results. Wow.
    --
    CAn'T CompreHend SARcaSm?
  60. lazyness by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    from the cowboyneal-is-too-lazy-to-make-a-dept dept.

    Seems like CowboyNeal is too lazy to read Slashdot, too.

  61. All relating back... by bob670 · · Score: 1
    to a PC market that is cycling in new products too fast for it's own good. Wintel hammers out a new CPU and chipset several times a year, motherboard makers never get up to any kind of ecnonomy of scale, and cut cost by stealing for those they should treat as partners.

    This all ties back to a desperate need for innovation and leadership in the industry. Instead of looking for a way to creat the next Y2K-type boom, look for sustainable growth via innovation. It's more than clear no one cares about clock speed, and barring gamers, people care even less about video cards (take a look at where PC games rank in sales by walking into any recently remodeled Electronic's Boutique, PC games now take up less than 1/5th of the inventory). Wintel and their parnters should stop laying of the people who innovate, stop relying on market research and actually build something new. You need only look to Apple and the success they had with iMac and iPod to see that people don't mind paying for qualit when a product satisfies their needs.

  62. Very good morning to you ... by udippel · · Score: 1

    ... Cowboy McNeal!
    Did you have a good sleep, last few days? Read your breaking news just now.
    It's a helluvolotf great story and an important lesson for us pirates. Never ever pirate! All your caps will start leaking like hell and turn brownish like - whatwoosdat?

    Eh, anyway, what we learned in school: repetition is everything. You simply cannot overdo repeating the multiplication tables.
    You simply cannot overdo repeating that *you must not pirate*. Espionage is worse. Full stop.
    Thanks, Comboy Neal for the enlightenment.
    Better: do it again, oh yeah, please, over two days, we're getting old and forgetful. The Register is a shit, they only bring their stories once and a day later: forgotten. Yeah, keep us updated. A good Alzheimer enjoys a great story by any day.

    1. Re:Very good morning to you ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      >A good Alzheimer enjoys a great story by any day.

      ROTFLMAO.

      That's really good there.

      ROTFLMAO.

      Did I say, ROTFLMAO yet? Well, that's what I'm doing, because back 50 years ago when I was working in BlahTech, we used to use these soldering irons made with wood handles to put in capacitors. But then they weren't called that, they were just called caps. You new fangled people and your new words. Speaking of new fangled words, I must say, ROTFLMAO at your really good comment there.

    2. Re:Very good morning to you ... by unitron · · Score: 1
      "But then they weren't called that, they were just called caps."

      Back then they were called condensers.

      --

      I see even classic Slashdot is now pretty much unusable on dial up anymore.

  63. Re:DUPE by Ballsy · · Score: 1

    Yes, I'm well aware of /.'s subscription service. I'm also aware that it's only $5 USD for 1000 pages. I would submit that this still falls under the aforementioned "you get what you pay for" scenario, given the relatively small percentage of duplicate articles versus original ones.

  64. Re:Humans et al are thieves by Deekoo · · Score: 1



    Sounds like he's worried that the Foreigners
    will demonstrate the same business ethics as such
    well-known American companies as Microsoft,
    Scientology, Enron, AT&T, Verisign, MCI (I think
    their US), PG&E, and suchlike.

    So how'd this troll get modded up, anyhow?

    --
    #include printf("[Yeemp: deekoo~tentacle.net]\n");
  65. Dupe and karma whores by twiztidlojik · · Score: 1

    1. Cut +5, interesting, funny, and insightful replies from last time.

    2. Paste into comments box.

    3. ??????

    4. Karma!

    --
    I will now redundantly add my name to the end of my post. You know, in case you forgot me or something.
  66. I must have missed it before by Mike_L · · Score: 1

    I must have missed it before, but I'm glad I read the article now. Perhaps this is what is wrong with my web server. It has experienced debilitating hardware problems twice now. It has an ABIT KT7E that was purchased in Sep 2001.

  67. d�ja vu by dna_(c)(tm)(r) · · Score: 2, Funny

    I've seen this comment on another story, too

  68. *cough*GATEWAY*cough* by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    um yeah
    I know for a fact that Gateway is PLAGUED with this problem...

  69. Re:so confused-Dup' answers. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Actually since the story is a duplicate, we should all simply symlink to our previous comments, and so forth and so on. The fun part comes in seeing if we get the same moderation as last.

  70. Re:Dupe indeed-Ironic moderation. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Am I the only one who sees the irony in a post pointing out that a particular story is a repeat, and that post being moderated "redundant"?

  71. Too lazy? by Alizarin+Erythrosin · · Score: 1

    Too lazy to make a department? Maybe it shoulda been "Department of Redundancy Department"

    --
    There are only 10 kinds of people in this world... those who understand binary and those who don't
  72. Infomation wants to be THREE by YellowSnow · · Score: 2, Insightful

    This story has already been posted. This story has already been posted. This story has already been posted.
    I tried to post this paragraph three times in a row but it failed the lamness filter
    Your comment violated the "postercomment" compression filter. Try less whitespace and/or less repetition. Comment aborted.

  73. Epox EP-7KXA by Genetically+Enginerd · · Score: 1

    I have two Epox Athlon 750 boards that I bought at the same time about 3 years ago. About a year ago I opened the case on one of them and found two of the capacitor tin cans on the floor of the case. I put it back together and it ran fine until I turned it off about three months ago and let it set for about a month before turning it back on. It won't even post. No beeps, no lights. Five of the caps have brown junk on the tops, along with the two without covers, and they are all lableled TAYEH 2200uf. I replaced the board,

    The other one has been running fine for the whole time. Probably time to replace it anyway...

    --
    Does the income I've derived from working with Unix belong to SCO?
  74. Just wondering... by lprechan · · Score: 1

    has anybody heard any rumours about faulty motherboards recently? i knew /. going corporate was going to be a bad thing...

  75. Dupe? This is a TRIP! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is at least the THIRD time this story has been posted.

  76. Yak, dog food! by drinkypoo · · Score: 1

    It's not much of a stretch to turn "quad" into "crap", either, if you do it phonetically.

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  77. Re:DUPE by drinkypoo · · Score: 1
    My problem with dupes is, doesn't the /. editorship actually read slashdot?

    Obviously not because if the editors did actually read the site, they would know these stories have already crossed the front page.

    I suggest a two-pronged attack to solve this problem. The first is a sloppy pattern search to see if something with a similar headline and/or story copy has already been posted. The second? Editors have to read a certain number of stories on the site or their editorship is revoked automatically until they read enough stories again (Say, 33%.)

    Of course this will never be implemented but it would probably work...

    --
    "You're right," Fisheye says. "I should have set it on 'whip' or 'chop.'"
  78. Idiots! by MicroBerto · · Score: 1
    There are so many mistakes in that whole process that it's ridiculous!

    1. Steal info from employer (but you screwed up anyway... idiot!)
    2. Sell your company's IP... idiot! When would you like to go to prison?
    3. Some company BUYS some schmuck's garbage IP... idiots!
    4. Said idiots at that idiotic company don't test the idiot's garbage plans well... idiots!
    5. Sell pathetic, untested crap to big motherboard manufacturers, guaranteeing you will lose business... idiots!
    6. Motherboard manufacturers don't test and audit these new products... idiots!
    7. More idiots try to cover up how much of idiots they are - yeah, like it won't get uncovered... idiots!

    The only people that aren't idiots right now is IBM and any big manufacturer buying these boards. They can't test every little thing... but jesus what a series of idiocy

    --
    Berto
  79. I must have paid a lot to read Slashdot by Wolfier · · Score: 1

    It's called "Read one, get one free!"

  80. Y'know... by leonbrooks · · Score: 1
    ...there has to be room for an `ears-of-corn' reference here somewhere...

    [if y'don't get it, look up the passage. And yes, archaeologists have indeed found the grain storage complex in question]

    --
    Got time? Spend some of it coding or testing
  81. Re:DUPE by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    When your motherboard blows up, you'll have a hard time reading the article.

  82. Good grief!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Don't the Slashdot editors ever communicate with each other, or bother reading Slashdot? I submitted this story on Wednesday and it was _rejected_. Then another reader submitted it on Thursday and it was posted by editor chrisd. Now it's submitted again by yet another reader and posted by Cowboy Neal.. (And I understand a similar story from a publication other than the IEEE Spectrum was posted several months ago.)

  83. Re:HAHA! Mod Sister Up! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    dude, she's hawt!!1

  84. speaking as a former Atari Games employee... by alizard · · Score: 1
    You wouldn't believe how original these games were, I was a development tech there for a while in the late 1980s. Instead of a standardized vector platform (yes, this was a good idea at the time) and a standardized raster platform with custom control interfaces for each game, each motherboard was different, and they were using lots of TTL glue chips when everyone else doing video had moved up to integrating these functions into ICs.

    Worse, they were already running short of new ideas, the new/hot game there when I left was an imported Pole Position (racing game) from Japan.

    It wasn't any surprise to me that they were losing money. It was cool to have worked for the engineer who did Missile Command.

  85. Well Well Well by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    "Indeed, those who have repaired the damaged boards say that they have encountered crippled motherboards from Micro-Star International, ASUSTek Computer, Gigabyte Technology, and others."

    Well shit, and I thought the woolly jumper I wore when I built my box killed it. Now I don't have to feel so bad about sending our broken mobos back and claiming it arrived that way! (I'm joking, I'm joking! Nobody tell Dell or the Cowboy gets it. ;)

  86. http://slashdupe.org by mousse-man · · Score: 1

    I didn't know above website existed, but after this story....

  87. READ THE PAPER by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0
  88. Leaky capacitors-Head and Shoulders above the rest by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I had one of these motherboards. Asked ABIT to fix. Looks like I'll be stuck with those darn emabrassing flakes on my capactiors, unless I want to fix it for 25 smacks.

    Your defective product is out of warranty. We will go ahead to invalidate your request. You can still apply for service for USD 25 per board by confirming this email within five (5) working days that you agree to pay for the service and the warranty extension on your new replacement will only be good for ninety (90) days. Upon receiving your confirmation and acceptance, we will reactivate your request and confirm the validation result.

    RMA Dept

    ABIT Computer USA

  89. Me too by He+Schutze+He+Scores · · Score: 1

    Heck, I don't care if this has been brought up before. I am just pissed that my ECS K7S5A died on me Dec 22, 2002, just two days after the 1-year warranty ended. Then the bastard grinches where I bought it would not honour the warranty. The six capacitors by the ATX power connector and near the CPU socket were blown, and the rectifiers had their solder turn BLUE. THe damned board had been kinda flaky ever since I bought it, but I was in a rush when I did. Never again. HSHS

    --
    He Schutze, He Scores!
  90. Sun's SunRay1 thin clients are affected as well by Markus+Kuhn · · Score: 1

    We had to replace already the Lelon capacitors mentioned in that story in more than half a dozen SunRay1 clients, which had failed exactly in the way described (details and photo).

    Nice to hear the newly emerging espionage-twist of that story ...

  91. Lamer. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    If you activate the lameness filter, it means you are lame.

  92. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    If the Tao is great, then the operating system is great. If the
    operating system is great, then the compiler is great. If the compiler
    is great, then the application is great. If the application is great, then
    the user is pleased and there is harmony in the world.
    The Tao gave birth to machine language. Machine language gave birth
    to the assembler.
    The assembler gave birth to the compiler. Now there are ten thousand
    languages.
    Each language has its purpose, however humble. Each language
    expresses the Yin and Yang of software. Each language has its place within
    the Tao.
    But do not program in COBOL if you can avoid it.
    -- Geoffrey James, "The Tao of Programming"

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...