Slashdot Mirror


Open Content Music Database Launched

An anonymous reader writes "The open source music database MusicBrainz was launched officially today. The data is partly in the public domain, partly under an open content like license. It includes artist/album/track information, with more to come. There's support for CDDB-like CD identification (actually, a lot of the current data was imported from freedb), but also identification of single tracks via audio fingerprints (TRMs). Help both in adding new content by tagging your music collection and consolidating the existing data is welcome. Also check out some technical information on the XML database at IBM developerWorks."

148 comments

  1. SCHWEEEEETTT by sickboy_macosX · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Now if only they would allow you to upload play lists, and classify your Mp3's =)

    --
    --- /* In Soviet Russia, the Mac OS X kernel panics you! */
    1. Re:SCHWEEEEETTT by EnderWiggin99 · · Score: 0, Troll

      Yes. And I could use help with my laundry too.

    2. Re:SCHWEEEEETTT by trezor · · Score: 1

      And if they were not slashdotted, they might be useful :)

      --
      Not Buzzword 2.0 compliant. Please speak english.
  2. Is CD cover art illeagle? by t0qer · · Score: 3, Interesting

    A friend of mine wanted to open up a punk CD store on the web. Being the nice friend I am I helped him import a large amount of data from the CDDB into his OScommerce store (Os commerces is an open source store package, pretty cool)

    After much alignment of tables, farting around with the data eventually we got it right but with one small detail left out....

    We didn't have cover art images...

    So frantically he tried copying the images from other sites, then he kept insisting there was a way I could easily parse the obsfucicated data from other stores (album art gif's are never the same name as the album)

    So eventually he gave up on it, but it got me to thinking, would the cover art be something unlawful for a CDDB type of entity to host?

    1. Re:Is CD cover art illeagle? by Carthag · · Score: 1, Interesting

      Technicalities aside (it's not very hard to do it at all, all it takes is a bit of perl tomfoolery - trust me ;), I believe it's illegal, since the art is copyrighted, and it's not fair use, since you're in essence redistributing it.

    2. Re:Is CD cover art illeagle? by gnurb · · Score: 5, Informative
      You can get a 300x300 pixel jpg cover art image, at amazon with their webservices

      example image

      --
      hooray! it's a sex wiki
    3. Re:Is CD cover art illeagle? by $$$$$exyGal · · Score: 2, Informative
      It's pretty easy to get all the cover art from Amazon.com, if you have the ASIN numbers.

      As far as the legality, as long as you are selling the items for Amazon.com, then you can use the images. Other than that, I doubt it ;-).

      --sex

      --
      Very popular slashdot journal for adul
    4. Re:Is CD cover art illeagle? by Duds · · Score: 2, Informative

      The RIAA has been actively threatening sites that carry high res album art. Several of them have closed.

      Whether it's actually illegal or people without time/money to fight I don't know.

    5. Re:Is CD cover art illeagle? by Infestation · · Score: 1

      it's might not be a concern of legality, but one of bandwidth. i assume lots of people use winamp to play audio cds, and winamp gets it's track listings from CDDB. while i'm not hugely knowledgable on the subject, what kind of track listing service does windows media player use, cause that download's cover's of audio cds.

    6. Re:Is CD cover art illeagle? by glesga_kiss · · Score: 1
      The RIAA has been actively threatening sites that carry high res album art.

      Yup, it's unbelievable. You'd think that these sites would be providing free promotional information about the artists and that would increase visibility and sales. If someone sees an image on a website, where is the sale that is lost? Copyright law is to protect your revenue. There isn't revenue here.

      I can see their argument about pirates using them for printing off covers, but there are a dozen other sources of getting the artwork, be it from a friend, a lending library, p2p (yes, the jpgs are there), commercial website, music database, and on, and on.

      I really get the feeling that the RIAA are very stupid. Either that or they are so smart that no one can figure out what they are up to!

    7. Re:Is CD cover art illeagle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      MS Media Player 9 (*cough* *splutter*) has a "get album details" feature that helps beef out tag details and also retrieves a small jpg of the album cover art which is used to decorate the folder in Windows Explorer.
      Hate 'em as much as you like, but it's a nifty and helpful little feature, though still needs tweaking.

    8. Re:Is CD cover art illeagle? by The_K4 · · Score: 1

      IANAL but I believe that if the store is selling CDs they are allowed to post the cover art as "a picture of the item they are selling". Just like if I owned a painting (that is clearly copyrighted) I can post photos of it on my website if I wanted to sell it and those were advertisments.

    9. Re:Is CD cover art illeagle? by jcoy42 · · Score: 1
      So eventually he gave up on it, but it got me to thinking, would the cover art be something unlawful for a CDDB type of entity to host?

      Insert usual IANAL, however, I did some work with a museum who was putting photos of their collection on-line, and this was researched.

      With artwork, usually the artist holds the copyright, and upon death, it transfers to the next of kin. This is what it boiled down to with one small exception: you can do thumbnails. Largest side cannot exceed 150 pixels.

      so 150x150 pixels should not be a problem.
      --
      Never trust an atom. They make up everything.
    10. Re:Is CD cover art illeagle? by infofreako · · Score: 1

      While the original works are certainly copyrighted and probably illegal for distribution by any means, what about the home tapers/traders who create their own artwork? Could they in essence release artwork of their own under a Creative Commons license so that others (FreeDB) could distribute this "other" artwork electronically?

      Can a tracklist of an album be protected under copyright laws as well?

      -nfo

    11. Re:Is CD cover art illeagle? by InformationOverload · · Score: 1

      The simple answer is yes, the album art is covered under similar copyright as the music for an album.

      Web sites and software applications can be authorized to use cover art if it is used expressly for the purpose of promoting a retail purchase of the album.

      Windows Media player does not use CDDB, it uses metadata from AMG. The same data can be accessed directly at Allmusic.com. Windows Media player is able to use cover art because it provides links back to AMG to purchase music (hit album details).

      Cheers.

    12. Re:Is CD cover art illeagle? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Those are both very good theories and interesting points. The Album art is copyrighted by the artist and possibly music artist. But then it's true that all you have to do is walk to a CD store to check out these works of art. I disagree that the cover art is "a picture of the item they are selling". They are selling the music and the art that you see. I'm thinking that if a band has an artist produce cover art, the artist is paid by the band/producer and then the band/producer can then use the art in whichever way they please.

      I wonder if, hypothetically, walking into a CD store with a pocket scanner of some type and scanning images of cover art with the intent of printing them up at home and putting them on your wall or something.

  3. Re:Weird by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    slashdot is the only site you can access, and you failed to get first post?

  4. What will the RIAA think?!? by trotski · · Score: 4, Insightful

    I wonder if this is with or without the support of our friends at the RIAA. I mean after all, the data being stored may violate copyright laws... a list of songs on a CD, maybe some sample lyrics, all without the approval of the goons in the RIAA.

    It's probably a non issue, then again the RIAA has a record of making big issues out of non-issues. It will be interesting to see if anything will happen.

    --

    "Entropy is the bad-guy, and he is everywhere"
    1. Re:What will the RIAA think?!? by 1in10 · · Score: 2, Informative

      I don't think you can copyright the list of songs on a cd, since that's a fact and you cant copyright facts.

    2. Re:What will the RIAA think?!? by hackstraw · · Score: 4, Funny

      AFAIK, the RIIA isn't opposed to you having information about the music that you own. They are just against you listening to the music that you own.

    3. Re:What will the RIAA think?!? by nanojath · · Score: 1
      Most of the meta-data (playlist, title, publisher, artists, etc. etc.) is not protected or protectable. Lyrics are another issue. If they are copyright protected they can't be published without permission (I know, I know, a lot of it goes on - but it would be a mistake to include it in a project like this that is striving for legitimacy).


      All of this is just more evidence of the way things are going, incidentally. Although at a very early stage, I think the trend is very promising.

      --

      It Is the Nature of Information to Transgress Artificial Boundaries

    4. Re:What will the RIAA think?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Troll?!? Off-topic I would understand, but wouldn't "funny" be more appropriate (even if it's more sad than funny)?

      YOU CAN'T MOD THE TRUTH DOWN JUST TO FEEL MORE COMFORTABLE?!?

      The rest of the world is watching very closely, and with this stuff you only fool yourselves, nobody else. If you're an US citizen, *inform* yourself what the government is doing in your name. Ignorance is no excuse... you pay taxes, so you're taking part in it. INFORM YOURSELF. DON'T BLIND YOURSELF.

    5. Re:What will the RIAA think?!? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      No, but it's an arrangement. The list of tracks is sorted in a particular order, and that MAY be copyrighted.

  5. er.... by Kalewa · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I find the idea of a program that can identify my MP3s by audio fingerprint, and will submit that information to somewhere on the Internet a little creepy...

    1. Re:er.... by Alan · · Score: 1

      Yup, my thoughts exactly. About a year ago some friends and I thought up a scheme to do mp3 fingerprinting. At the time it was simply to deal with the PITA of setting/verifying mp3 tag information. In the end we ended up not pursuing it because the theory was that someone (the RIAA) would now not have to play "my_loud_fart.mp3" to find out it was really "britney_spears-new_hot_song.mp3", but compare tags.

      This would empower the axis of evil in ways that we weren't comfortable with, so the project was put on the back-burner.

      We never had such grandious plans as musicbrainz, but all in all, I'm glad someone finally did this, if only so I don't have to deal with tagging my mp3s! :)

    2. Re:er.... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      But what's going to keep the RIAA from creating their own database?

  6. Hehe by EnderWiggin99 · · Score: 4, Funny

    Anyone else notice they're being hosted by CCCP? Seriously, they could've chosen a better moniker...

    1. Re:Hehe by StormyWeather · · Score: 3, Funny

      Dear god just when we though we had killed the "In Soviet Russia" jokes...

      IN SOVIET RUSSIA, DEAD HORSE beats YOU!

      la~~

  7. Off-topic but I'll bite... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Same here, and about half the images on /. aren't loading. I'm on ATT cable, fyi.

  8. in the news by lexcyber · · Score: 1, Funny

    http://musicbrainz.org/ had to close their site only after one day of operation. They suffered a severe dos-attack known in the computer geek underground as "slashdotting". Goverment officials are very disturbed about this and action are beeing takeing to find the source of this attacks!

    --
    - To understand recursion, we must first understand recursion -
  9. Simple explination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    All your website belong to us!

    1. Re:Simple explination by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Apparently.

      I can get Google and Slashdot.

      However, I can't check my fscking mail. I blame it all on CowboyNeal. He must've knocked out the power plug to the Internet when he was vacuuming.

  10. Incredibly well designed project by gnurb · · Score: 5, Interesting
    I stumbled upon this site earlier today completely by accident. I was trying to find an alternative to the gracenote database for use on my website, since Amazon's XML doesn't provide track listing. I did a search for "free database cd dvd" Found an article on The Register about a year old that mentioned MusicBrainz. Did a search, and baMM! discovered a great project.

    I had brought up to my friends several times, how it would be great to start something similiar. The metaratings are a great idea, providing the database openly to the public is great, and i'm falling in love with their tagging utility.

    And it's all non-profit! (and will likely get better each and every day now that it has all this slashdot traffic)

    I am this close to posting the 28 meg mysql database on my school account, but I think the coe admins would kill me!!

    --
    hooray! it's a sex wiki
    1. Re:Incredibly well designed project by Snoe · · Score: 5, Funny

      Well I WAS indexing all of my mp3s (about 20gigs of albums) using their tagger and it was working very, very well. If something is misidentified it is very easy to spot and remedy.

      Then, about 15 minutes ago I noticed the program was no longer speaking to their servers. Lo and behold, the story was put up on slashdot about 15 minutes ago. Not to sound paranoid or anything but I think this coincidence is a little creepy.

    2. Re:Incredibly well designed project by SubtleNuance · · Score: 1

      ...excuse me for not getting 'it', but how is musicbrainz different from freedb? is freedb the data-collection project while musicbrainz provides an interface like (thesameas) gracenote?

      How are they different? how are they the same?

  11. I agree by djupedal · · Score: 1

    Some AC says to tag and log and we're expected to jump and go? Isn't that how chain letters get started? ....c'mon...

  12. Illeagle=Un-american? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Funny

    Does "illeagle" mean un-American? I've always wondered. The "ill" seems to be a negative, and the "eagle" part must be refering to our national bird, the symbol of our nation.

    1. Re:Illeagle=Un-american? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      In Europe, the eagle is a symbol of nazi germany.

    2. Re:Illeagle=Un-american? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's not "your nation" anymore - not since you allowed this unlected maniac to go an a rampage. History will look down on you.

    3. Re:Illeagle=Un-american? by dotgain · · Score: 0

      No, Illeagle is missing a whitespace. Here, see: Ill eagle It is avian, not American.

  13. What I'd like to see more by nizcolas · · Score: 4, Interesting

    than open source music is a simple way of getting samples put onto vinyl. Ive seen so called "computer dj" programs and its still nothing close to cutting on real vinyl.

    Though I do like the idea of freeing up music, beats, samples etc, with out a good medium to manipulate the audio this is less of an achievement than it seems.

    The reason I say this is because Im a skrxtch dj so this problem of manipulating the audio affects me much more than someone who's mostly doing music on the computer [various forms of electronica]

    Another interesting point is that that most skrxtch records encourage reusing the samples and beats. In fact I have a copy of Tales from the Crate next to me that on the cover reads "Unauthorized Duplication is prohibited. Unauthorized flipping, mixing and juggling is recommeneded" [Thats an approximation, I couldnt find the sleeve]

    --
    If you get an error, type "OVERRIDE" or "SECURITY OVERRIDE" and then try the optimize command again.
    1. Re:What I'd like to see more by proj_2501 · · Score: 1

      If final scratch
      doesn't do what you're looking for, why not buy Vestax's "affordable" $10K dubplate cutter?

    2. Re:What I'd like to see more by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      "Unauthorized flipping, mixing and juggling is recommeneded" [Thats an approximation, I couldnt find the sleeve]"

      Close, but they probably actually spelt it "recommended".

    3. Re:What I'd like to see more by cassady_ · · Score: 1

      If you want the ultimate blend of the usability of vinyl with the freedom of computer sampling, I suggest you check out the amazing final scratch system by Stanton. Used by such world renowned DJ's as Ritchie Hawtin, you use a specially encoded piece of vinyl on your normal turntable to control MP3 or WAV samples and tracks through a laptop. It's absolutely brilliant.

    4. Re:What I'd like to see more by Forss · · Score: 1

      I assume you've seen Final scratch?

      It's really difficult to put music on vinyl retroactive because the original (pre-mastered audio) should be mastered differently for vinyl than for cd:s. Otherwise it will sound crap on the vinyl in the end. At least club music would suffer heavily from this treatment...

    5. Re:What I'd like to see more by Forss · · Score: 1

      And you know that Native Instruments will work closely with Stanton to finish a new version of Traktor which will be integrated with Final Scratch? That's going to be soooo nice...

      Btw: my new blog is about things like this...

  14. Sound of a server dying by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0, Funny

    The sound you hear is from an mp3 with the sound of a server dying.

  15. Down already by blacklite001 · · Score: 0, Redundant

    This is a great idea, I think, and I'm .. attempting.. to use it right now. But the servers seem to be clogged up and completely useless.

    Um.

  16. For the lazy people.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    how does this differ from freedb?

    1. Re:For the lazy people.. by jojopop · · Score: 3, Insightful

      Well in general nothing. One of the advantages MusicBrainz has is that uses RDF (so called "XML Database described by the original poster).

      When are people going to understand the RDF is not XML!

  17. Imagine an all-legal file sharing P2P network... by lightspawn · · Score: 4, Insightful

    A system that doesn't allow anonymous (unsigned) files to be shared... enforcing user accountability and ensuring all content is in fact freely redistributable (if not, you know who to go after, and you may be able to revoke the user's account, making all files signed by him unshareable)

    The RIAA _claim_ sharing their content hurts the bottom line, but imagine the damage caused when people learn they can find their own legal music and don't have to settle on RIAA-dictated tastes.

  18. Slashdot effect... by pouwelse · · Score: 4, Informative
    Hello,

    Google cache of MusicBrainz.org

    One of the MusicBrainz developers here.
    It seems our provider cannot handle the bandwidth requirements for the Slashdot effect. We are very sorry about that. Please come back tomorrow if you like out project.

    Our dual 1.2GHz Linux server is doing OK:

    1:39am up 178 days, 8:42, 2 users, load average: 0.04, 0.11, 0.20
    146 processes: 145 sleeping, 1 running, 0 zombie, 0 stopped
    CPU0 states: 3.0% user, 11.0% system, 0.0% nice, 85.0% idle
    CPU1 states: 3.0% user, 0.1% system, 0.0% nice, 95.0% idle
    Mem: 1551632K av, 1467548K used, 84084K free, 0K shrd, 69944K buff
    Swap: 2096472K av, 491708K used, 1604764K free 994652K cached

    PID USER PRI NI SIZE RSS SHARE STAT %CPU %MEM TIME COMMAND
    17639 pouwelse 16 0 1076 1076 828 R 11.3 0.0 0:00 top
    17267 nobody 9 0 18976 18M 12188 S 2.6 1.2 0:00 httpd
    17256 nobody 9 0 20032 19M 12000 S 1.7 1.2 0:01 httpd
    17271 nobody 9 0 20204 19M 11824 S 1.7 1.3 0:01 httpd
    17245 nobody 9 0 18584 18M 12536 S 0.8 1.1 0:01 httpd
    1 root 8 0 468 428 416 S 0.0 0.0 1:33 init
    2 root 9 0 0 0 0 SW 0.0 0.0 0:00 keventd

    Greetings,
    J.

  19. UNIX port? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Anyone working on a UNIX port of the tagger utility? The code doesn't look that bad, but's there are a couple of things that I can't figure out. What's vcl.h? Is that a windows thing? What is it for?

    1. Re:UNIX port? by mcguirez · · Score: 1

      vcl.h is part of the libraries used by Borland's C++ Builder. It contains OS specific objects and routines - not easily ported. /Gerry

      --
      When you hear hoofbeats, think horses, not zebras
  20. Can you protect a scan? by tamnir · · Score: 4, Interesting
    As far as the legality, as long as you are selling the items for Amazon.com, then you can use the images. Other than that, I doubt it ;-).


    (Insert the usual IANAL disclaimer here).

    This sounds like a reasonable assumption at first, but if you look at it more closely, on which legal basis could Amazon.com prevent you from using these images? They are not the copyright holders of the art. All they did was a simple scan/resize/save_for_web...

    Amazon could overlay a "www.amazon.com" on the scans to make the reuse more annoying, but then they could face suits from the artists...

    Now the artists could prevent you from using their art. But if you are not defaming them, I don't see why they would. I think they will rather appreciate the publicity.
    --
    I code, therefore I am.
    1. Re:Can you protect a scan? by Jondor · · Score: 2, Insightful

      While I'm not a lawer and certainly not one specialiced in american copyrights, I'm quite certain that over here (the Netherlands) there are different kinds of things that can be copyrighted among which a collection. And given that copyright laws have a tendency to converge..

      Concreet example, While i'm allowed to call everybody personal and ask them for their phonenumber and other info. Compile them in a handy index and publish it as telephone reference. I'm NOT allowed to take a shortcut and copy all this info from a phonebook.

      Amazon may not have the copyrights on the artwork for cd covers, they probably do have a right on the collection in their database and can prohibit redistribution. Given that this is america it wouldn't supprice me if they licensenced the artwork themself.

      Anyhow, in general it's my understanding that the right to use content on a public network doesn't imply the right to redistribute.

      --
      Nobody expects the spanish inquisition!
    2. Re:Can you protect a scan? by Rhubarb+Crumble · · Score: 2, Interesting
      Now the artists could prevent you from using their art. But if you are not defaming them, I don't see why they would. I think they will rather appreciate the publicity.

      The copyright holder will probably be the record label more often than not. And since owning the cover art is one of the "value-added" things that make people buy "real" CDs rather than obtaining illegal MP3s, I think they would very much object.

      Of course, you could argue that the amazon scans are sufficiently low-res and quality that a colour printout made from them wouldn't look nearly as good as the "real" cover, so this point might not apply.

    3. Re:Can you protect a scan? by radish · · Score: 1

      There's no difference between cover art and the music itself - it's a copyrighted work which is owned (usually) by the label. I run a fan site for a band over here in the UK, and I have explicit permission to host images, cover art, videos and music samples from the copyright holder. I do however have to put explicit disclaimers on the site reminding people that just because I can use them on my site, doesn't mean they can use them on their site.

      Sure, the label may well choose to allow you to post the images, like you say it's good publicity - but they could, if they wanted, force you to stop it. Just like you may think that hosting 30 second clips of the songs would be OK and good publicity, they could stop you if they wanted, it is (technically) an infringment.

      --

      ---- Den ene knappen er powerknapp, den andre er Bender voice knapp "Bite My Shiny Metal Ass"

    4. Re:Can you protect a scan? by Pornosonic · · Score: 1

      One can copyright a photograph of public domain artwork. For example, it would be illegal to scan in every photograph from your favorite Michelangelo picture book and post them on your web site.

      IANAL, but I would presume that, similarly, one cannot use Amazon's scans of cover art, except as provided by fair use.

  21. Tagger win-only ? by theefer · · Score: 2, Informative

    The MusicBrainz Tagger application allows you to automatically look up the tracks in your music collection and then write clean metadata tags (ID3 tags or Vorbis comment fields) to your files. As you tag the files in your collection that MusicBrainz didn't recognize, you submit the acoustic fingerprints (TRM ids) of your files back to the server. Submitting acoustic fingerprints will allow MusicBrainz to automatically identify these tracks in the future, so that other people using the Tagger can benefit from the work you have done.
    This sounds really nice, but it works only on Windows ! The code being GPL, I hope it will soon be ported to other free OSes.

    Or does anybody know such a tool working under Linux ?

    --
    theefer
    1. Re:Tagger win-only ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Linux makes music fun. I play mp3s using mpg123. It really is a lot of fun. Give it a try.

    2. Re:Tagger win-only ? by icepick · · Score: 1

      TuneTagger is my own first attempt at this. The MB Tagger, the windows only version, has advanced by leaps and bounds and the server interface has changed to accomdate it. I haven't had the time to catch up, maybe this weekend.

      At first I coded this in Python/GTK, but with the new server interface you don't need a web browser as much, so the rewrite will use Python/wxWindows which will run on W32/MacOSX/Linux.

      Free free to help.

      --
      You're just jealous because the voices only talk to me.
    3. Re:Tagger win-only ? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Hmm, they seem to have something for linux there:
      lftp ftp.musicbrainz.org:/pub/musicbrainz> cd rh7x
      cd ok, cwd=/pub/musicbrainz/rh7x
      lftp ftp.musicbrainz.org:/pub/musicbrainz/rh7x> ls
      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 187374 Jun 26 2002 musicbrainz-1.0.0-1.i386.rpm
      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 317277 Jun 26 2002 musicbrainz-1.0.0-1.src.rpm
      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 198629 Jun 26 2002 musicbrainz-1.0.1-1.i386.rpm
      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 409981 Jun 26 2002 musicbrainz-1.0.1-1.src.rpm
      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 198900 Jun 26 2002 musicbrainz-1.1.0-1.i386.rpm
      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 414032 Jun 26 2002 musicbrainz-1.1.0-1.src.rpm
      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 124745 Jun 26 2002 musicbrainz-devel-1.0.0-1.i386.rpm
      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 133215 Jun 26 2002 musicbrainz-devel-1.0.1-1.i386.rpm
      -rw-r--r-- 1 root root 133578 Jun 26 2002 musicbrainz-devel-1.1.0-1.i386.rpm
      lftp ftp.musicbrainz.org:/pub/musicbrainz/rh7x> get musicbrainz-1.1.0-1.src.rpm
      `musicbrainz-1.1.0-1. src.rpm' at 155384 (37%) 3.0K/s eta:86s [Receiving data]

  22. Re:get some fresh air by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    No, you've misunderstood him. He's only interested in peace for bits of Yorkshire...

  23. Re:Doomed from the start? I hope not. by Psiren · · Score: 1

    I think you have the wrong end of the stick. Musicbrainz isn't a P2P client. It's a database of information on tracks and albums, and libraries for using it.

  24. Re:Doomed from the start? I hope not. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    You are in college... but can't read? *WOW* That's something.

    You don't trade files. You upload the track listing and track fingerprints.

  25. Not that new by Lface · · Score: 2

    Musicbrainz may have been officially launced today, but the project has been around for quite some time already.

  26. questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 5, Interesting

    I looked at this project about 8 months ago and planned to use this setup for an open source media utility.

    I stopped short at that time because :

    1) the TRM (song fingerprint) technology was owned by a seperate entity and was closed/private.

    *Paranoid pondering* what if the TRM tech owners decided to charge for future use after the database was largely used and accepted. Although the database would remain open, they could charge for new fingerprints (song IDs). Not neccessarily a bad thing but we've all seen things how f'd up these situations can get.

    2) the TRM generation took place on the server. Doing a batch of fingerprints would tie up a connection for quite a while.

    My brainz a bit fuzzy on this but I think a portion of the actual audio data is uploaded and then processed on the server. I figured that generating TRMs completely client side and then uploading/matching song data to the server would do better for scalability.

    Just the same I haven't looked a the project recently and it may have since changed.

    Regardless I think its a pretty cool idea.

    1. Re:questions... by icantblvitsnotbutter · · Score: 0, Redundant

      *Paranoid pondering* what if the TRM tech owners decided to charge for future use after the database was largely used and accepted.

      This is almost exactly what happened with CDDB, which is why freedb exists. CDDB changed their protocols and you can no longer program for their service without using their own plugins (DLLs or librarys) -- which requires registering with them, and agreeing to pay a fee.

      The fee is based on usage numbers of your software, not how much you charge. That can lead to a situation where a creator of successful freeware owes them money (I don't know how WinAmp does it, perhaps they have a special agreement in light of their marquee status).

    2. Re:questions... by Agthorr · · Score: 1

      That's right. TRM is a product of relatable. Last I checked, they give away an open-source program that generates a fingerprint, and have a private database that maps the fingerprint to actual songs. Napster licensed their technology in 2001 to identify illegally shared songs, as mentioned here and here.

      Do we really want to help them build a bigger database?

    3. Re:questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Interesting

      You're wrong about the Gracenote freeware license. They don't charge freeware apps anything to use their service. Their licensing terms have been steadily decreasing in draconianness, so I think you're working on old data.

    4. Re:questions... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 1, Informative

      Gracenote now has a freeware MP3 encoding license with SDK containing the encoder software for people developing rippers. See here. If your app is freeware, you don't pay for it, and you don't incur the possible legal liabilities of using an unlicensed MP3 encoder.

    5. Re:questions... by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 0, Offtopic

      You gotta love this anticompetitive clause from their noncommercial license, though:

      "Requires that you use the Gracenote Database and Gracenote ENC Client in your Licensed Application as your sole source of data from the Internet that is based on reading TOC data of any CD, ECD or CD-ROM media with your Licensed Application"

    6. Re:questions... by icantblvitsnotbutter · · Score: 1
      I'm not sure why I'm replying to an AC post about "decreasing draconianness", but to clarify...

      If you look in their non-commercial developer licensing overview, you'll find this gem:



      • This Agreement grants developers a royalty-free license to allow a maximum of 250,000 End-Users to register with Gracenote and thereby "turn-on" the Gracenote features of their Gracenote-Enabled copies.
      • If you want to license more than 250,000 Gracenote-Enabled copies of your Licensed Applications, or if your Licensed Applications are commercial in any way (see below) you must enter into a Commercial Application License with Gracenote, and you should contact licensing@gracenote.com.



      And, funny enough, you have to first register with them to see the terms of the commercial developers' license.

      So, unless you've seen that license and know something I don't, I call bullshit and reiterate my original position: Gracenote (ex-CDDB) changed their licensing in mid-run. It's a reasonable change, but it still affects people. And it does imply a fee-bsaed relationship should your software become popular.
    7. Re:questions... by socialist+fish · · Score: 1

      I really don't know why more people haven't commented on this...

      I had similar thoughts when I had seen Musicbrainz some months before.

      I have a huge collection of MP3 from my CDs, in my home and in my computer at work and I wanted a scheme to uniquely identify each track so I could build a storage based on these IDs and then have a database which formed albums, recopilations, etc. pointing to the IDs. This wuold permit me of modifying things like track name without touching the original file. This way, I could keep syncronized copyies of the music in my computers without having to transfer the whole file just to fix a badly written name,

      I could generate random IDs. but that would prohibit me from sharing the metadata with friends who have the same albums. Musicbrainz and TRM seemed the perfect solution. But I would not rather base my work on an tagging technology which is not local (TRM has to access the relatable server), nor it is assured to be free (as you pointed in your post). To make things worse, the related data that music brainz is about to start to build (commentaries en CDs et al) would not be under the GPL or something like that, so they acn (and will) sell that data to commercial proyects and I don't like that.

      If someone know about a (free) scheme to uniquely tag music based on accoustics or something like that, please point it out, I will really appreciate that.

      martin@NOSPAM.mrfussion.com.ar

      --
      yadda yadda
  27. Re:Imagine an all-legal file sharing P2P network.. by hackstraw · · Score: 2, Informative

    The music isn't for everyone but Furthurnet already has such a service. Also, for the shorten compressed files, they can be verified by a central database found here.

  28. musicbrainz programs by wct · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I find the programs that interface with musicbrainz to be very useful. The organizational view used by Zinf is probably superior to any other I have used, including iTunes and MusicMatch jukebox. It is great that we have this large database of data that can be accessed from client programs using an open api.

    1. Re:musicbrainz programs by biostatman · · Score: 1

      A little off-topic, but check out media jukebox. I have tried out zinf and any other music player for Linux I could find and have yet to find another program that equals media jukebox in overall functionality but especially in terms of how it organizes your music (you can set up custom views of your music, such as by Genre / Artist / Album, etc...). It supports ripping and encoding to pretty much any format. It also has a great plugin system for transferring files to MP3 devices as well as having CD Burning functionality. If I had any coding skills I would love to bring something like this to Linux. I believe the next version will fully incorporate TV viewing, scheduled recording, etc... If there are any coders looking for a good program to emulate I highly suggest this one. (Std disclaimer; I don't work for j river, I just really dig their program)

      --
      For the love of $DEITY, loose != not win!!!!!
  29. FTP by mrpuffypants · · Score: 1, Funny

    well, i'd be downloading the client, but the FTP server is saying that it's 10 spots are all full right now at 5AM.

    c'mon now, this is Slashdot! Open 400,000 users on your FTP server, pay for all the bandwidth yourself, go bankrupt, then post your project on sourceforge =]

  30. Re:Imagine an all-legal file sharing P2P network.. by Zwets · · Score: 3, Funny
    "The RIAA _claim_ sharing their content hurts the bottom line, but imagine the damage caused when people learn they can find their own legal music..."

    Yeah, it's about time there were alternatives to all that overpriced commercial music.

    Let's create free, open-source versions of Britney Spears and the Backstreet Boys!

    --
    One of the lessons of history is that nothing is often a good thing to do and always a clever thing to say. - Will Duran
  31. Open Source Jukebox by locarecords.com · · Score: 4, Interesting
    I am not really sure how useful this will be. We are an Open Source music label LOCA RECORDS releasing tracks onto Vinyl (as well as old fashioned MP3) and the problem is not that of tracknames and tags etc but of distributing the music itself.

    A system is needed to be able to allow users to provide feedback (and hence publicity to new music) and most importantly somehow give the artists some money for the work they produce, afterall they need to eat too.

    --
    ---- The Open Source Record Label : : LOCARECORDS.COM
    1. Re:Open Source Jukebox by Eamon+C · · Score: 2, Interesting

      This (or something like it) will be extremely useful for building the next great P2P client. I believe that Audiogalaxy was the best service to fall to RIAA pressure. What made Audiogalaxy so great? The fact that they had a *database* of songs -- you find the track you wanted on Audiogalaxy, and then if another user who had it was online, you could start downloading it from them.

      We (P2P users) are learning that any centralized service simply won't be able to dodge the legal bullet for very long. While we have yet to design a decentralized service that doesn't suffer from scaling problems, I'm confident that eventually, somebody will -- it's really the only place to go.

      The only way a decentralized P2P network could match the ease-of-use of Audiogalaxy is for its clients to use a separate database of track information. This is exactly what MusicBrainz gives us. Music sharing will once again become as easy as browsing artists and albums, selecting a track, and downloading it from another person (or group of people) that has it.

    2. Re:Open Source Jukebox by jimsum · · Score: 1

      I wonder if a system like slashdot could work.

      I imagine a system where users are required to listen to some number of new songs when they log on. They can categorize it and rate it. Track user's preferences, then you could do some sort of "users that liked * also like *" service.

      I figure the site could give out MP3 copies. To make money, add a system to make it easy to pay the band if you like the clip. Either that, or more to my liking, pay to burn a CD.

      Don't worry about copy protection. If it is cheap and easy to pay, I expect most people will do it. Alternately, you could have some sort of free/pay split (like the adult sites), but I think the goal here is exposure. If the bands make it big, then they can go to the big labels to get rich (or is that raped?)

      I think this type of service would help music listeners that like obscure music. The record labels will come up with something to serve groups that sell 100,000 copies and more, but there really is a need for something to help the small bands. If a site like this became popular, the major labels might use it as well, for all those 30-year-old albums that take decades of searching dusty stores to buy.

      --
      -- Pot is safer than Beer
    3. Re:Open Source Jukebox by Alan · · Score: 1

      For me the even better feature of AG was the "related artist" feature. Many many times I would find a song by someone I liked and see the "other people who like this artist also like...." line and either recognize an artist I'd forgotten about, or be introduced to new artists that were in line with my musical tastes. Very cool.

      The ability to populate your download queue from anywhere on the web, so I could download to home from work, something you can't do with kazaa/gnutella/etc.

      Wish they'd come back....

  32. What we really need it to do... by rasteri · · Score: 3, Interesting

    ...is have it store a list of emotions associated with the songs, eg romantic, depressing, happy and so on. You could then build a playlist for whatever mood you were in, or mood you wanted to be in. This is FAR more effective than simply categorising music by genre (in my experience anyway).

    I think there is a windows program called Moodlogic that did this but it was closed source, expensive, and it used a proprietery database. It also used the accoustic properties of the song, so it could identify badly-named mp3s.

    1. Re:What we really need it to do... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      mod parent up! I SO wish there were a free equivalent to moodlogic...

    2. Re:What we really need it to do... by garbanzito · · Score: 1

      i have been adding mood tags (really in the comments, but structured) to my tracks for some time.. there is much room for improvement in what ID3 tags allow -- they are geared for management, not *use* of tracks.. i had hoped to migrate my "tags" (many other types, such as multiple genres, similarites to other music, bpm, containership of special sounds, etc.) into a personal database, but a universal database would be even better

    3. Re:What we really need it to do... by Espen+Skoglund · · Score: 1

      Much of what you describe here is already part of ID3v2.

    4. Re:What we really need it to do... by garbanzito · · Score: 1

      no, my description must have been too terse -- i'd examined the ID3v2 spec and as best i can tell, only BPM is already part of it (and not accessible by my preferred mp3 manager).. i find many tracks belong in multiple genres.. i see no tag that is designed to hold the kinds of animal sounds a track has, nor "reminds me of" type information

  33. Re:Imagine an all-legal file sharing P2P network.. by lfourrier · · Score: 2, Interesting

    A system that doesn't allow anonymous (unsigned) files to be shared.

    And why should you be obliged to sign your own creation, or public domain one ?
    How do you sign ? Is it free ?
    When you can sign pubdom, what prevent you to sign unfree ?

  34. OMG - I had no clue! by joel8x · · Score: 1

    I've been wanting to start something similar to this so that musicians and songwriters could collaborate on songs online and share riffs, lyrics, and chord progressions under an open license (letting people freely sample each others creative work as long as their finished product was also "open sourced"). I can't wait to look into this further! This is a great thing indeed.

    --
    Sound waves should be free!
    1. Re:OMG - I had no clue! by Consul · · Score: 1

      I've been wanting to start something similar to this so that musicians and songwriters could collaborate on songs online and share riffs, lyrics, and chord progressions under an open license (snip)

      Myself and a few of the Linux Audio Development folks have started work on what I (for the time being, anyway) call the Open Music Resource Library. I have a SourceForge page up for the dev work at http://sourceforge.net/projects/omrl and a mailing list ready to go at http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/omrl-d evel.

      The idea is to share musical "raw materials" for "open musicians", such as loops, sample sets, softsynth patches, and the like.

      --

      -----

      "You spilled my egg... I needed that egg."

  35. Hey fuck you buddy by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    are some kind of fascist? or just a wimp typing some shit into a computer?

  36. linux web server hacked by blackmerlin · · Score: 0, Offtopic

    Hey, our web server running e-smith [e-smith.org] (a modified version of redhat) has just been hacked. See http://www.hybridvision.net does anyone here know of these people, or any previous exploits?

    blackmerlin

    --
    blackmerlin
  37. lest we forget... by big.ears · · Score: 4, Informative

    ...the .mp3 wars of '00, MusicBrainz has been around a long time, and their 'trm' tech was apparently the stuff used by emusic to stick it to Napster:
    cf. slashdot and wired.

  38. Collections of Facts by cporter · · Score: 1

    Lists of songs on CDs and lists of CDs by artists, like any collection of facts, are not copyrightable information.

    song lyrics and album cover art, on the other hand, are copyright, being creative works. i don't think MusicBrainz stores either of these things.

  39. Re:Imagine an all-legal file sharing P2P network.. by bluGill · · Score: 1

    Presumably it would be free. gpg is free, so it shouldn't be hard to make a free version. The goal is that if I put a piece of music up and sign it, anyone can share it, if someone (RIAA) accuses them of sharing illegally, that person just points to me "He said I could do this legally". Since the music is signed it is easy to prove that I gave that permission, and the RIAA takes me to court. Of course since I own the copyright they have no ground to sue me.

    The difficulty is if I would make a new key, giving my name is Britney Spears, and sign some Britney Spears music, and upload it all at a public terminal. They then have no way to trace who the music is from, but it is on the network, so the RIAA gets to shut down your network just because someone used it against your policy.

  40. Tipping by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    On the bad side, some RIAA goon could try to use this for nefarious purposes. On the good side...we could use it to support tipping. The big problem with voluntary tips for unsigned artists is verifying that you're tipping the right people.

  41. What about FLAC? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    Is this service compatible with FLAC? I'm considering biting the bullet and FLACing all my CDs. It would be nice if both the FLAC files and the MP3s I rip from FLAC would be tagged using this service.

  42. For Free Music. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    I think it's more for music that artists are willing to put in the public domain. Free Music, kinda like Free Software.

  43. Re:Imagine an all-legal file sharing P2P network.. by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    GNU/Megadeth!
    GNU/Metallica!
    GNU/Anthrax!

  44. linux client? by bongoras · · Score: 1

    Please, MusicBrainz people, develop a linux version of your 'tagger' software.

    1. Re:linux client? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      If you have access to a windows computer, you could just transfer your mp3s to it, organize them, and then send them back to Linux. I use Windows for KaZaA Lite anyways, so while it would be nice to have a Linux client, it isn't needed by myself or a large percentage of their users.

    2. Re:linux client? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Knowing Rob, I am quite certain that the decision to develop the tagger for Windows first was a painful one, based on the fact that most people use Windows and are clueless about Linux. As much as most geeks hate to admit it, this is true, and the project aims to attract users, not just geek users. I would be surprised if a Linux version is not forthcoming.

    3. Re:linux client? by Grotus · · Score: 2, Informative

      Check out this post for someone who has already written one.

      --
      "From my cold, dead hands you damn, dirty apes!" - CH
  45. Is the site slow? by DesiDudette · · Score: 1

    Is the musicbrainz site slow or my network connection is bad? I have a high speed connection and its taking almost 2 minutes to get to every page!

  46. Re:Imagine an all-legal file sharing P2P network.. by Drakonian · · Score: 1

    I'd like to have a look at her source code!

    --
    Random is the New Order.
  47. Privacy issues? by no_choice · · Score: 1

    So if I use MusicBrainz to tag my music files... won't MusicBrainz then have a list of all my files aong with my IP address? What if the RIAA or some other entity demands to see the list?

  48. Help for PNP against bogus files? by icantblvitsnotbutter · · Score: 2, Interesting

    Someone mentioned that this technology helped the music industry in its lawsuit against Napster (or another service?), showing which files were being swapped. I haven't been able to quickly find that post again, so here's my thoughts in the void.

    Would technology that allows fingerprinting down to the file level, in conjunction with a user-supported (i.e. richly populated) database, actually help music file swapping? Conceivably, someone could integrate this into their service to indicate that a file was what it was called before it was transferred.

    Granted, there are other ways to fake a file than just giving the "right" name to a bogus file of the right size. But I imagine something like this (along with checks) could make it much more difficult to kill PNP by populating services with bogus files.

    A half-baked idea, but my two cents' worth anyway.

  49. Oops -- found the other post by icantblvitsnotbutter · · Score: 1

    Credit where credit's due: post #5286740 is the one that jogged my brain. Right after I made my own post, I found it lurking around the bottom of the list here along with mine.

  50. we need one for movies!! by PW2 · · Score: 2, Interesting

    I started my own intranet movie database. The problem is that populating it takes so much time, even with the helper apps I made. I really wish someone with the server resources would allow developers to work on a movie database similar to CDDB. The benefit of it would be that people would be able to import data (title, description, rating, length, actors, etc) via XML/etc to use to populate an offline database of movies they own. This personal database could be used to do custom searches on movies the person owns. Imagine having guests stop over for movie night, hand them a wireless PDA or wireless keyboard to media PC (widescreen) for movie selection; they search by a theme, "Camping" and get two results, one of which you end up pulling off your shelf to watch with them.

    1. Re:we need one for movies!! by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      It's at IMDB.com

  51. Not all it's cracked up to be by CainX · · Score: 2, Informative

    I did a quick query for the artist Tosca (aka Richard Dorfmeister of Kruder and Dorfmeister) who is big in the downtempo music scene and it only turned up one of his full albums, one remix disc, and a compilation he has a track on. AllMusicGuide has nine discs by him in their db, most with well-written (albeit characteristically glowing) reviews, and an in-depth artist bio. CDDB had them all too.

    1. Re:Not all it's cracked up to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      Dude, its new! You want Tosca in there? Run your MP3's through their program and put them in there. I never saw any claims that MusicBrainz had every Dorfmeister and his Kruder in their database, that is YOUR job. :-)

    2. Re:Not all it's cracked up to be by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

      That's when you're supposed to add to the database. YOU have control of what data is there.

  52. Re:Is CD cover art illegal? by no_opinion · · Score: 2, Informative

    Photographs are protected by copyright.

    Typically the labels only have limited rights themselves with respect to the cover art. Specifically, they usually only have the right to use the cover art when selling or promoting the album. Third parties, having no contract or license from the photographer, will not have any right to exploit the artwork. In fact, if someone uses the artwork in a way that generates money (including ad revenue), they should not be surprised if the photographer (or other album art copyright holder) goes after them and their earnings. Granted, I haven't heard of this happening before...

  53. RDF not XML?? by Proneax · · Score: 1

    How so? They are well formed xml documents, have their own xml namespace and begin with the line
    ?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?

    So while all xml is not rdf, all rdf is xml.

    1. Re:RDF not XML?? by jojopop · · Score: 1

      Nope. All RDF is not XML. XML is just one way to serialize RDF. It can be written using N3 or any other format you come up with.

  54. umm...yeah by FIT_Entry1 · · Score: 1

    220 ProFTPD 1.2.5 Server (ProFTPD Default Installation)[zim.musicbrainz.org]
    530 Sorry, the maximum number of allowed clients(10)already connected.

    They're not going to get very far at this rate..

  55. Re:Imagine an all-legal file sharing P2P network.. by La+Temperanza · · Score: 1

    Does FreeDB weed out burnt/bogus/etc CDs, unlike the CDDB? I'm thinking you could check newly signed submissions against a sufficiently large and clean database of track listings, it would make it easier to identify the majority of copyrighted music.

    --

    --
    est modus in rebus
  56. CDDB redux? by Coward+Anonymous · · Score: 1

    What is to prevent this from turning into another CDDB? What is to prevent MusicBrainz from deciding to close their DB and start charging for use after they've milked the community to build the DB?
    The DB implementation may be open source but without the information in it, the implementation is useless.

  57. crappy logo by solferino · · Score: 1

    this sounds an interesting project and i intend to read more about it

    - however, on first viewing the website, my very first impression is that they have one of the worst logos i have ever seen

    to put it bluntly,
    it looks like a pile of shit
    with 3 or 4 flies buzzing around it

    even when you work out that the picture is meant to represent a brain with musical notes hovering around it, it still looks really dumb

    now, on to read about what sounds like a valuable project

  58. that old ill eagle by solferino · · Score: 1

    just riffing off yr spelling of illegal...

    have the illegal actions of the u.s. of a. in militarily and covertly attacking and destabilising many, many nations throughout the world over the last 50 years, finally caught up with this world class bully, which is increasingly resembling an old ill eagle?

  59. Nice, but ... by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    This is nice, but what I'd really like to see is a combination of Freedb and the eyesore database, only for any album. I'd like to see, for example, who the drummer was on the song I'm listening to, and what other stuff s/he's done.

  60. It's open by Wesley+Felter · · Score: 1

    The whole point of MusicBrainz is that the data is open; some of it is public domain and some of it uses a Creative Commons license.

    You can download the entire database from their site.

  61. CDDB? by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    So this project is looking to be the next step in CDDB - carrying not only CD info but MP3 files as well?

    How about a merger with discogs.com that already have a user-maintained database, with comments et al.

  62. from LOCA website: GNU music licence by Anonymous Coward · · Score: 0

    From [LOCArecords.com] :

    "LOCA believes that the fight over Open Content and Open Media is a struggle over the freedom of expression and the freedom of speech, radically opening up the possibilities of media. To this end LOCA is attempting to release music under so-called copyleft, a license that enables music writers to develop music collaboratively and equitably and then release it into the public domain. Using either the Open Audio license (from EFF) or the LOCA Public License, a derivative of the GNU Public License (GPL), LOCA hopes to provide the control necessary to prevent further commercialisation of work that is released and to encourage others to do the same. We hope that musicians who contemplate using the work released in this manner will honour the license and release their work under a public license resulting in a radical rejection of the whole capitalist ethos of these multinational media corporations."

    This is the first I've heard of a music GNU. Is it new?

  63. Last Post! by alpg · · Score: 0

    A sense of desolation and uncertainty, of futility, of the baselessness
    of aspirations, of the vanity of endeavor, and a thirst for a life giving
    water which seems suddenly to have failed, are the signs in conciousness
    of this necessary reorganization of our lives.

    It is difficult to believe that this state of mind can be produced by the
    recognition of such facts as that unsupported stones always fall to the
    ground.
    -- J.W.N. Sullivan

    - this post brought to you by the Automated Last Post Generator...